Are They Really a Narcissist? Do They Really Have Borderline? Are They Truly Gaslighting You? How To Know. And What To Do When People Weaponize Therapy-Speak Against You. | Isabelle Morley

3 Nov 2025 · 1 h 8 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: 10% Happier with Dan Harris - Episode with Isabelle Morley

Episode Overview

  • Title: Are They Really a Narcissist? Do They Really Have Borderline? Are They Truly Gaslighting You? How To Know. And What To Do When People Weaponize Therapy-Speak Against You.
  • Guest: Isabelle Morley, Clinical Psychologist and EFT-Certified Couples Therapist
  • Date: [Insert Date]
  • Key Topics: Misuse of therapy terminology, distinguishing unhealthy behaviors, navigating relationships.

---

Key Takeaways

  1. Weaponization of Therapy Speak
  2. Increased accessibility to mental health terms has led to their misuse in social contexts and relationships.
  3. Commonly misused terms include:
  4. Gaslighting
  5. Narcissist
  6. Sociopath
  7. Bipolar
  8. Borderline
  9. Misuse can lead to unnecessary labeling and pathologizing of individuals.
  1. Difference Between Abuse and Bad Behavior
  2. Abuse: Involves power dynamics, manipulation, and a pattern of harmful behaviors without remorse.
  3. Bad Behavior: Occasional lapses in judgment or emotional reactions that do not constitute a pattern of abuse.
  4. Important to differentiate between the two to avoid mislabeling individuals.
  1. Understanding Gaslighting
  2. True gaslighting involves making someone question their reality or perceptions consistently.
  3. Disagreement or denial does not equate to gaslighting.
  4. Responding to accusations of gaslighting requires calm clarification rather than defensiveness.
  1. Narcissism vs. Selfishness
  2. Narcissistic Personality Disorder is clinically defined and rare.
  3. Many people exhibit selfish traits without meeting the criteria for the disorder.
  4. Mislabeling self-centered behavior as narcissism can hinder honest communication.
  1. Establishing Boundaries
  2. Boundaries are essential for healthy relationships and ensure personal safety.
  3. Individuals must communicate their boundaries clearly and enforce them consistently.
  4. Boundary violations may occur out of ignorance rather than malice; open communication is key.
  1. Misunderstanding Mental Health Terms
  2. Terms like "bipolar," "OCD," and "borderline" are often misused in casual conversation.
  3. Recognizing the severity and implications of these terms is crucial for healthy dialogue.
  4. Emotional fluctuations do not equate to clinical diagnoses.
  1. Navigating Relationships
  2. Relationships can be challenging, and individuals should focus on their own growth rather than solely on their partner's actions.
  3. Developing emotional intelligence and self-awareness can lead to healthier interactions.
  4. Consider seeking professional help when patterns of distress emerge in relationships.

---

Discussion Highlights

Cultural Shift in Mental Health Awareness

  • The podcast touches upon the positive shift in mental health openness but highlights the downside of misused terminology.
  • The need for nuanced understanding and careful language in discussing mental health is emphasized.

Importance of Communication

  • Clear dialogue is necessary for mutual understanding in relationships.
  • Miscommunication can lead to assumptions and emotional harm.

Practical Advice for Listeners

  • Encourage self-reflection and personal responsibility in relationships.
  • Seek understanding rather than blame when faced with challenging behaviors from others.

Resources Mentioned

  • Isabelle Morley's book: *They're Not Gaslighting You: Ditch the Therapy Speak and Stop Hunting for Red Flags in Every Relationship*
  • Website: [drisabellemorley.com](https://drisabellemorley.com/)
  • Dan's community and events: [danharris.com](http://www.danharris.com/)

Conclusion This episode provides valuable insights into the importance of understanding and accurately using mental health terminology in personal relationships. It encourages listeners to foster communication and self-awareness as tools for navigating complex emotional landscapes.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:04This is the 10 % Happier Podcast. podcast. I'm Dan Harris.

0:19Hello, everybody. How we doing? In many ways, it is a great thing that we are now so open about our mental health. It's also great that therapy has gotten so popular. There are, however, some downsides to this otherwise positive trend. One of them is that therapy speak, the use of clinical technical terms that therapists actually use, is now being widely misused in our culture on social media and in common parlance, and most importantly, in relationships where these terms are often being weaponized. Specifically, I'm talking about terms like gaslighting, narcissist, sociopath, bipolar, borderline boundaries, red flags, etc.

1:01So today we're going to talk about what these terms actually mean, how not to weaponize them against other people, what to do when other people weaponize them against you. And beyond all of the terminology, we're going to talk about how to navigate one of the trickiest parts of being alive, which is relating to other people. My guest is Isabel Morley. She's a clinical psychologist and a couples therapist certified in something called emotionally focused therapy, which she will explain. She's got a blog called Love Them or Leave Them. She's the co-host of a podcast called Rom-Com Rescue, and she's got a book called They're Not Gaslighting You, Ditch the Therapy Speak and Stop Hunting for Red Flags in Every Relationship.

1:42In this conversation, we talk about the difference between abuse and bad behavior, how to know if you are actually in an abusive relationship, how to correctly use the term gaslighting, what boundaries are, how to set them, and how to know if yours have actually been violated, how to spot a narcissist, the difference between having narcissistic personality disorder and just having some selfish qualities, red flags versus garden variety imperfections. the definition and weaponization of terms like bipolar and borderline, the overuse of the word triggered, basic tips for navigating relationships beyond all of the therapy speak, and much more.

2:25I just want to quickly pick up on one of the last things I said there, how to navigate all of your relationships. That really is a skill and an increasingly vital one in an era of artificial intelligence. Today's episode comes with a custom guided meditation designed to help you handle the people who drive you crazy. It comes from our Teacher of the Month, Christiana Wolf. And if you sign up at danharris.com, you can get access to it. Subscribers also get weekly live video meditation and Q &A sessions every Tuesday at 4. One other thing to say very quickly before we dive in here. If you want to meditate with me in real life, I've got a live taping of this podcast coming up on November 18th in New York City.

3:04My guest will be the hilarious and very thoughtful, soulful comedian Pete Holmes is a dedicated meditator. This will be a benefit for the New York Insight Meditation Center, and there's a link in the show notes if you want to sign up. Okay, Isabel Morley and Therapy Speak right after this.

3:25Dr. Isabel Morley, welcome to the show. Thank you. I'm excited to be here. I'm excited to have you here. So if I understand it correctly, your basic thesis and your kind of impetus for writing this book is that we are, and this is your phraseology, weaponizing therapy speak. Can you just unpack that a little bit? I think we have come into a day and age where there is so much access to mental health information, including things like disorders, that now we have taken a good thing too far And people are using these words, these terms, these diagnoses in a weaponized way, meaning that they are using them to control, to blame, to shift focus, to pathologize people in their lives, which is really not the intention of all of these words.

4:12We're going to talk a lot about the various terms that people are using and misusing and how we can properly understand them. But you just got me thinking about the fact that when I had my panic attack on TV back in 2004, like it was not a safe thing to admit that I had panic disorder, right? So the world has really changed and that's largely to the good, but there are some downsides. One of them we're going to spend a lot of time talking about, which is the weaponization of these terms. The other thing is that I think sometimes on social media, people are not just weaponizing, but also kind of, but this is another deroguer term, like trauma dumping in a way, or talking about anxiety and depression in a way that it's nice that it's normalized, but we're spending so much time dwelling in the suffering and not enough time, I think, talking about what you can do about it, giving normalization plus uplift.

5:05Agree or disagree? Absolutely agree. And I think part of it is there's this cultural shift where you want to be part of the in-group. Everybody has anxiety. Everybody is stressed about the state of the world. Everyone is depressed by the way our lives operate and how we have to function in modern society. But not everybody has depression. Not everybody has generalized anxiety. And so while the rates have gone up from the late 1900s, they are not 80 % of the population, which is certainly how it feels. But I think you feel left out if you don't identify with the funny reel about how anxious you are all the time and you can't send it to 10 friends.

5:41You're sort of missing out on the cultural zeitgeist. Yeah, I mean, I can see a little bit in some young people I know. I mean, very young people, like kids even, that there's a – people are kind of proud of their diagnosis a little bit. Proud and it becomes an identity. Yes. Becomes a whole personality of I have ADHD and that explains everything about me versus I'm a person who has a disorder that affects parts of my life sometimes. Yeah, like there's been a lot of linguistic murder happening in, I'm overstating it, but there's been some linguistic twister that's happening in medical spaces because you're not supposed to say cancer patient, you're supposed to say a person with cancer, which I get.

6:29I mean, the intention is good. I think it's not so mellifluous and it can be a little awkward at times. But a similar thing to what you're pointing at right there is, you know, I have panic disorder and have suffered from depression and I've got lots of diagnoses I could brag about if I wanted to. But I don't, that's not how I think about myself. It's just an aspect of the self. Yeah. And I've had patients come in and yes, especially young patients who are on TikTok and Instagram more so and more influenced by it who have self-diagnosed or diagnosed other people. And it truly is defining for them.

7:01It is how they see themselves. It is how they see the other people, their relationships. And if and when you take away those terms because they don't actually apply, it's very disorienting for them because this is the lens through which they have been viewing their world. And I think it destabilizes people, which is why I really want people to not become so wed to these words in the first place. Okay, so let's go through some of the, well, actually, let me ask you first. Let me ask for consent to put it in therapy speak. Yeah. Is there more you want to say on a big picture level before we dive into some of the terms that can be weaponized?

7:38I'll make the point that I think there's a difference between well-intentioned misuse of words and weaponization of words. I think a lot of us are trying to apply the words correctly and getting it wrong and are not doing so in a way to control other people or absolve ourselves of all blame. And then there's people who intentionally use these words to avoid taking responsibility to make themselves innocent in all contexts. And I think that we have to be careful to differentiate between those different paths because most of us misuse them, but not all of us weaponize them. Right. So there's a couple of use cases here for this conversation, for the listener.

8:16I'm speaking mostly the listener now. There are a couple of things you can get out of this. One is you can learn about how you may be weaponizing these terms or how they're being weaponized against you and how to deal with that. You can also learn on the lesser sin level what these terms actually mean so that you can use them correctly. And then finally, you can learn, once we learn what the terms mean, we can actually start to think about them in a more sophisticated way as they pertain to our lives and the lives of people we know. Yes, if you even need to use them at all, especially in conversation.

8:51Interesting. So we may want to think about just taking these things out of our lexicon. I think so. I mean, I'm an advocate for most of these therapy terms. We're not supposed to leave the therapy room. I have never had to tell someone I'm upholding a boundary with you. You're supposed to uphold the boundary with the person. And I think we jump to these words and think that's the end of the story. But that's not how any of this works. You don't tell a narcissist, you're a narcissist and the problem is solved. If you think they're a narcissist, then you change your behavior, your approach, the closeness of your relationship with them.

9:28You don't even have to tell them your perceived diagnosis of them. Right, right. People generally don't like to have you diagnose them, I've found. It's surprising, isn't it? People are so defensive. Okay, so that's what I was pointing at with the third use case for the listener for this conversation and for your book, which is not only going to learn how to use these terms correctly, but also once you understand them, whether you use the terms at all, and Isabel would argue maybe you shouldn't, you can really learn how to navigate things like potential narcissism on somebody else's behalf. And we can learn how to set a boundary even if we're not using the term, et cetera, et cetera.

10:09Am I stating that correctly? Yes. Okay. I'm going to go through them in the order in which you go through them in the book. So chapter three is called The Difference Between Abuse. Abuse is a word that gets thrown around a lot. The Difference Between Abuse and Bad Behavior. Say more, please. I find this to be a really tricky one because everybody is afraid to say that something isn't abuse and to have somebody be trapped in a bad abusive relationship. But there is an important but murky line between abuse and bad behavior. Abuse is when somebody is trying to gain power and control in a relationship.

10:45An abusive partner has no remorse. They don't really feel bad or apologize. They feel justified in all the terrible things they do to you. They tend to be abusive in many different ways. They don't just gaslight you. They gaslight you. They manipulate you. Maybe they physically intimidate you. They isolate you. It's usually a few things happening. And the abuse cycle, although it looks like a normal relationship cycle, is different. In the abuse cycle, there's building tension, the abuse incident, a reconciliation, and then a period of calm. That tends to happen over and over. It tends to get worse over time.

11:19A healthy relationship, you have harmony, rupture, and repair. But repair is genuine. People feel bad. They reconnect. They feel close again. They feel safe again. Reconciliation in the abuse cycle is just sort of like pulling things back together without actual authentic remorse and apology. but people can behave very badly in good relationships. When you're in a terrible fight, you might scream, you might curse, you might slam a door. That's not necessarily what we want to call abuse. Could you call the incidence abusive or abuse without calling the person an abuser? Yes. And I like to say this behavior falls under the category of abuse.

12:02We call this an abusive behavior, but without the pattern, without the recurring cycle, and if the person especially takes responsibility, acknowledges the need to change, repairs, then we wouldn't call them an abuser. So let me give you an example. I think some of my biggest relationship sins in my marriage have been around shutting down or stonewalling when she gets emotional, which she doesn't often. but in those moments where she cries or something like that which again pretty rare I in the past would like shut down I once saw a t-shirt that says I don't get angry I just get distant and and so and sometimes but I actually uh sometimes I do get or I did get straight up angry and just storm out of the room or whatever and it was all just because of my own shame but I could imagine that episode or those episodes falling into the category of a kind of emotional abuse, but that doesn't warrant labeling me as an abuser particularly.

12:59No, and this is where it becomes so difficult to talk about it because I want to argue we shouldn't even really call that abuse because that's just normal human behavior. All people during bad arguments with people that matter in our secure attachments can behave badly. So if we're looking at this in EFT terms, emotionally focused therapy, that's how I practice as a couples therapist, we would call what you did a protective response. You felt shame, overwhelmed, whatever it was, and you shut down because those feelings were too much to manage and you didn't know what else to do. And maybe the shutting down was to help things from escalating and getting worse and for you to feel a little bit better.

13:38That's not the same as you shutting down to teach your wife, you better not cry again, because I don't think that's acceptable and I am going to make sure I have power and control in this relationship. And so don't get upset with me because I'm not going to put up with it. I don't know. I mean, I don't know if that what you're describing there would have been a conscious thought on my part. But I think that version of me would have thought, yeah, it'd be convenient if she never cries again. I don't want to incentivize it. Well, fair. But humans, I find, and maybe you'll disagree, but I find them to be a very difficult species.

14:11I find us to be very complicated. I think a lot of the time we mess up and make mistakes and don't behave in the best ways that we could, especially in hard moments. I like to say that I'm as much an expert in all of this as you possibly can be. And I still do the same thing and will shut down during a bad argument because I don't have another coping resource available to me at that time. No, it's because you're an abuser. That's what it is. I'm an abuser. Finally, the truth comes out on your podcast. You can tell I didn't get enough sleep last night because I'm being punchier than usual. I apologize if I'm being more of a dumbass than I normally am.

14:48No, I completely take your point. And just on your point about, first of all, I cut you off. Do you want to finish what you were saying? Oh, I just think it's this difficulty of we're all on the spectrum of behaving well and behaving badly and that you can find a way to label everything with something pathological. But should we? I completely agree with that. I just wanted to pick up on what you said about humans being complex. One of my perhaps two glib lines is that the human curse is that we need each other, other humans, and other humans are a titanic pain in the ass. I think that's exactly right.

15:25And the closer you get to people, which is what we need, we're social animals, we need that connection, the more we tend to make it difficult to be close. Because the more we have to risk, the scarier it becomes to have somebody fully see you and know you. And the greater the loss if they were to get to know us fully and reject us. So that's when all of our protective responses tend to come out, which is why people tend to be meanest to those they're closest with. I can't remember who I was talking to the other day, but being, I guess, a semi-professional practitioner of an interviewer around issues related to psychology and the Dharma, I just find the hardest place to apply these teachings is in my marriage.

16:10Absolutely. That is the person who becomes your primary attachment figure. It's your parents when you're younger, you depend on them, they are your emotional connection to the world, and then it eventually becomes your spouse usually, which is a heavy weight to carry that they become that important. Yes. Yes. We're getting a little bit far afield here, but I'm just following my interests. We've worked with this amazing couples counselor over the years, Michael Vincent Miller, and he has this great line in a book he wrote about how we used to live in an era, and he's not nostalgic for this era, but we used to live in an era where marriage was a kind of very functional thing often arranged by the community or your parents for you.

16:53And now we have all of this freedom, which is largely good, but we then bring these outsized expectations to the altar. We want our spouse to be our best friend, an Olympic level lover, our consigliere, et cetera, et cetera. But it's too much weight to put on one relationship, which is why we need friends, why we need other sources of support. Absolutely. I know Esther Peralta talks a lot about this too, of like, this was not supposed to be the way that humans operated. We're a community species. We do better with a village. Our modern life is not really set up to have a village. So it does end up being your partner, your spouse has to bear this weight, which they can't do because they need the same thing from you.

17:35It's kind of a failing setup. I do want to continue marching through the list of terms that we use and misuse. But before I go much further, you said something about EFT, Emotionally Focused Therapy. I don't think we've ever done an episode on that. Can you just give us a primer on it? Yeah. So EFT is one of the big couples therapy orientations developed by Sue Johnson. And it really looks at attachment and how we can create and heal from insecure attachments, create a secure attachment in your relationship. It looks at what we call the negative cycle, which is essentially, I have a bad feeling, so I act a certain way because it makes me feel a little bit better.

18:15But the way that I act makes you have a bad feeling. So you act a certain way. And because you act that way, it makes my bad feeling worse. And I act more. And we typically see this, we call pursue withdraw, where I'm angry with you. So I tell you that I'm disappointed and you feel terrible. So you shut down. But because you say nothing, I think you don't care. And I get even angrier and more hurt. And it is a self-sustaining, self-escalating cycle that you can help people identify and interrupt to create, again, more vulnerability, more connection, and a secure attachment. So the way Miller talks about this, he calls it, and he invented this term before 9-11, but he calls it intimate terrorism.

18:58And the idea is that in every relationship, there's one partner who's generally really afraid of abandonment and another who's really rate of engulfment. And this can switch throughout the relationship. Intimate terrorism happens when you're weaponizing each other's anxieties. And so that sounds pretty close to the push and pull you were describing. Yeah. And when you look at all the couples therapies together, you can see a lot of the same pieces that kind of span across the different modalities of yes, like we all have painful feelings that we hide and protect by acting a certain way, treating our partner a certain way that ends up causing problems.

19:37At the end of the day, if you can figure out those feelings and share them in a more effective way and communicate in a safer, more effective way, you can avoid a lot of the conflict or a lot of the escalated conflict that you're falling into. I think Miller recently said to Bianca, you really lucked out because Dan's afraid of both engulfment and abandonment. Jackpot. but she's such a lucky girl. Okay. Anything more to say about EFT before we move on? Yeah. Okay. Chapter four, gaslighting. Man, I heard somebody use this term today and I thought of you. Are they gaslighting you or do they just disagree?

20:17Please hold forth. Gaslighting has taken on a life of its own. Gaslighting is an abuse tactic where people try to make you feel like you're absolutely crazy and out of touch with reality because you think or feel the way that you do. That is very different from disagreeing with your memory of events, thinking that you aren't justified to feel a certain way. That happens all the time. It's also not the same as lying. People lie all the time, and that's not gaslighting. And this has become my pet peeve. And this is the reason why I wrote this book is because everyone is saying, that's gaslighting.

20:58You're gaslighting me. I don't want to self-gaslight. The word has lost almost all meaning at this point. What do you do if somebody's accusing you of gaslighting? I always encourage people to take a deep breath and to not react because you're going to feed into whatever perception of you they have. I think that this is when you need to clarify what's going on, why they feel that way, like what was your behavior, what's going on for them emotionally that they are accusing you of that, and repair that incident. And later on, address the term gaslighting, the use of that term, to see if it actually is a helpful, relevant word to use in your relationship.

21:39I will say there are some people, especially abusive people, who use these terms repeatedly, and they are not safe people to be with because they will say, you're gaslighting me because you disagree with me. You're gaslighting me in this way as a way of controlling you and making you feel bad and getting you to stop voicing your opinion or disagreeing with them. And that's something that you should be on the lookout for. So abuse is a potentially weaponized term and abusive, truly abusive people tend to weaponize these terms. And I will tell you, I've had a few instances of couples who want to come work with me and one part of the couple, one spouse will call ahead and say, I just want you to know that I'm pretty sure they're a narcissist.

22:24They're abusive. I've diagnosed all of this with my therapist. You've got to be on the lookout for them because of this. And every single time when they walk into the room. It's the person who called me who is more narcissistic. It's the person who called me who is more abusive and who has weaponized all of these terms and feels very justified in doing so. And there's very little you can do to talk them out of it. Your job sounds really fun. It's a great time. It's a light day every single day. What's going on with those people who are abusive in this way? There's got to be some psychological explanation for that, which I don't want to let abusers off the hook, but we can reduce our anger a little bit by understanding it through the lens of some sort of diagnosis for them.

23:15And again, I don't want to commit the crime in reverse, but there is some way of understanding this behavior. Yeah. For the most part, they are not intending to be manipulative and pathologize and correctly their partner. Abusers are perpetual victims. The world happens to them. People don't treat them fairly. They always get the short end of the stick. They deserve better. They can't believe people don't take care of their feelings more. And when you're in that kind of victim mindset, very easy to pathologize other people's behavior towards you because that's just how you're viewing everything around you.

23:50This is maybe a question that an abuser wouldn't ask. Maybe, and I don't know. You just said that these abusers probably don't even know they're doing it. So that raises the scary question of maybe I'm doing that shit and I don't know it. How can we interrogate ourselves in this regard? If you can take personal responsibility for your part of the problem and you don't always blame the other person, that's a good place to start. Abusers never take responsibility. They feel like whatever behavior they did was justified, right? They screamed and slammed the door. They broke the plate because how could you be so cruel to them as to come home late and not tell them, right?

24:35They justify their abuse by your bad behavior and they never take responsibility for their part in it. But aren't they just protecting themselves, some sort of deep shame that would arise if they were to look at their responsibility? Sure. Yes, they're always full of shame. But the problem is that they don't ever see that. They don't have insight, typically. And if they gain insight, which I have seen, it's short-lived. Maybe they see, oh, well, yeah, I'm definitely behaving the way that my father did towards me, and it's not okay. It's scary. It's harming my relationship. I've got to change. But an hour later, they're back to their old narrative.

25:12By the time I see them next week, that insight is gone. So are these folks incurable? Some are, yeah. Yeah. So I guess maybe we should talk about boundaries now, even though that's not the order of the book. Some people, yeah, are not going to change, unfortunately. They just don't have the capacity. They don't have the willingness. Some people have different brain structures, right? Like sociopaths do not have the ability nor the desire to change their behavior and the way they operate in the world. They truly lack empathy. You can't make somebody who lacks empathy want to be kind towards people.

25:47It doesn't make sense to them. But how common is a sociopathology? Very rare. I mean, yeah, incredibly rare. And there's a spectrum of severity. So like they're really extreme sociopaths, very few, and most are in jail because they break all the laws and they hurt people and they get caught and they are in prison. Okay, so that's sociopaths. But there are people who could be abusive or I don't know if you like this word, but like toxic or malignant or something that you should avoid and set a boundary with, but they don't rise to the level of sociopaths. And I imagine those people are more common.

Read the full transcript

26:22Yes, absolutely. Yes.

26:27Coming up, Isabel talks about what boundaries are, how to set them, and how to know if yours have actually been violated, how to spot a narcissist, the difference between being a narcissist clinically and just being a little bit selfish, and much more.

26:48Okay, so let's talk about boundaries because I'm skipping ahead here, chapter 11. Did they violate your boundaries or did they just not know how you felt? That's probably not the question I mean to ask you. I'll get to that question in a second. But what is a boundary? How do we set one with a person who, as you described before, is unlikely to change? A boundary is a way to keep yourself safe and autonomous in a relationship. It is a thing that you need, that you express, and that you enforce. So it might be your boundary that if we're arguing and you start screaming, I cannot keep talking to you because it's too upsetting.

27:27I get overwhelmed. I can't stay in that conversation. I don't feel safe with you. That doesn't mean that you will never scream at me again. That means the next time you scream at me, I'm leaving the room until you're calm and then we can keep talking. there are some boundaries that i call universal boundaries you cross those boundaries it's abuse you steal from someone you physically assault them like these are not okay things to do we can all agree if that happens to you that is a boundary violation that's a red flag watch out for that but a lot of things are individual personal boundaries that i might feel okay with but you might not.

28:07And those are the things that you have to communicate. And if you don't, the other person only know they've crossed it when it's been crossed. I want to pick up on that part in a second, but let me just stick with the problematic, toxic person, whatever terminology we want to use. I can have some compassion for these folks because I think there are reasons why they've become this way. And we do need to set boundaries with them. If you're married to somebody like that, I think the answer is it's not easy, but it's somewhat clear, which is divorce. It's obviously very hard if you have a kid with them, et cetera, et cetera.

28:42But there is a remedy. Harder to do if it's your mom or if it's your boss. So what recommendations do you have for boundary setting in those contexts? You have to consider if it's a relationship that you're willing to leave because that is the ultimate boundary is leaving that relationship. If it's someone who's too important or you're dependent on, unfortunately, you're going to have to try to reinforce your boundaries repeatedly. You're going to have to pick your battles with your boundaries, which nobody likes to hear, but you may not get all of your boundaries respected with that certain relationship.

29:15And you will have to maybe shift the dynamics of that relationship. Maybe you see your mom less frequently because she cannot respect what you need. Maybe you get a new job at some point because your boss is disrespecting you. Okay. So just to reflect that back to you, if you've got a problematic person in your life who can be abusive and in the real sense, not in the weaponization of the word sense, obviously cutting them off is one hard, hard boundary, but it's sometimes that's really, really hard to do. So what I'm hearing you say is the modalities or the strategies that are available are see them less and also just get into the habit of kindly but clearly and firmly restating your boundary whenever you need to do it.

30:03Yes. And people hate this. Boundary violations do happen. Even when somebody knows it's a violation, they will continue to do it. And humans can survive that. You may not want your boss to email you at all hours. You may not want them to call you at 5 a.m. They may do it anyway, and you can survive that. And if you can't, then you can leave. But we can't control other people. Right. So you're not saying accept the unacceptable. What you're saying is, if you're unwilling to accept it, you can leave. And short of that, you can set and reset and set and reset the boundary. But like you can survive when people, as Charlie Murphy says, when people are habitual line steppers.

30:51Yeah. The issue with boundary setting is that you can't control the other person. You can control your reaction to it and you can try to sort of recondition them to behave the ways in which you would like that make you feel safe and autonomous in that relationship. But you cannot control what they will do. If you're using the word boundary to control what they do in that way. That's ironically weaponization of the word boundary. Okay, so let's go back to weaponization of the word boundary. You tried to answer this question before and I redirected you, but the question that is the chapter title is, did they violate your boundaries or did they just not know how you felt?

31:26Can you say a little bit more about that specific question? People aren't mind readers. If they don't know what you need or what makes you feel safe or happy in a relationship, they can't give it to you. And so I think a lot of us feel offended when a boundary has been crossed. But if the person didn't know it was our boundary, then maybe that's why it was crossed. People also cross boundaries repeatedly because maybe it takes a few times of hearing, that's not okay for me. I can't handle when you do that until it actually sinks in. People are just so imperfect. I feel like that's the message of this book is like, even when they're trying their best, even when they know all the right things to do and they have gone to therapy for 10 years and they have all the coping strategies at their disposal, they will still let you down, disappoint you, make mistakes sometimes, cross your boundaries, do toxic things, not because they're a terrible person, but because humans are just messy.

32:22Right. I think it's a question of degree. The way I would gauge that, and this is unscientific, is are they, quote unquote, here's a cliche, doing the work? Are they going to a therapist? Are they meditating? Whatever it is, is the trend line good with an exception and a mistake at a regular interval? Yes. But I think especially younger generations do not have that generosity. They feel like people should not be misstepping so much. If people know better, they should be doing better. If somebody's in therapy, they shouldn't be ever crossing a boundary. What's going on there? Why is that happening?

33:01Partly because there's just such a focus on all of these words. And I feel like people think that, again, if you know better, you should do better. We have very high expectations for other humans and how they should behave. And partly because we don't want to suffer in our relationships. We would like to skip the part where somebody rejects us or makes us feel terrible. And focusing on these words is a way to get out of that suffering. One of the critiques, I'm always so wary of critiquing younger generations because my generation, Gen X, has made plenty of mistakes and we do dumb shit all the time too.

33:37So I'm not saying this from a position of being overly judgmental. And often like when I think about some of the quirks or unhealthy or unadaptive behaviors of younger generations, I actually feel like the older generations should take responsibility for it because we created the world in which they grew up. So that caveat issued, one of the critiques of younger people these days is that they're addicted to comfort. They're intolerant of discomfort. And so maybe that's part of what you're describing here? Absolutely. Yes. You can skip the hard part. Nobody wants to feel the pain of, you arrived late once again.

34:16I'm not important to you. I was embarrassed. I was waiting at the party. Everybody was looking at me. Where were you? Once again, why do that part and express how you feel and feel that pain? If you can just say, what a narcissist, once again, only thinking about yourself, right? Okay. Well, so let's go to that chapter. That's chapter seven. Are they a narcissist or did they just hurt your feelings? Can you say more about that? Only at most 6 % of the population qualifies for narcissistic personality disorder at most. And that's probably the clinical population, right? The general population is maybe like 0.5%.

34:57There are not that many clinical level narcissists in the world. and if you go online or you're in my practice every spouse every ex every in-law every boss is a narcissist when we say that we're really saying they have narcissistic personality disorder which has a whole set of criteria it's lengthy what they mean is you acted in a way that hurt me or seems selfish or unempathic or you have a narcissistic trait that you're acting grandiose You think that you deserve better treatment or you're better than other people. But that does not a narcissist make. I probably told this story before on the show, so I apologize.

35:40But I once asked a shrink, do you think I'm a narcissist? And he was like, well, it's a spectrum. And you're like maybe on the... Yeah, somewhere. But we all are, or we go through narcissistic phases. Like I'm just getting at the other side of one, of like a very self-focused... Writing a book, you mean? Yes. Yeah, and talking a lot about yourself and you want everyone else to be as excited and you feel like, oh, like the world should love this thing. Every teenager, and I had a professor in grad school say, we don't diagnose teenagers with any personality disorders because they would all have one.

36:16Because it's just an emotionally and relationally fraught time. I'm almost done with my second memoir. I sometimes joke about how I put the me in memoirs. So I get it. Okay, so how do you, you said there's a lengthy set of criteria for a narcissist. How does one spot a narcissist? To be honest, it can be quite hard because at first they don't present as pathological, but there's nine criteria. They have to be present since early adulthood. And a narcissist is narcissistic across time in a pervasive way in many different contexts of their life. So I always like to say, there's no way that your spouse is a narcissist just with you.

36:58They would be that way also at work and in their close friendships and in their family dynamic. People who have these traits present that way in all their relationships across contexts. It's pervasive. It's stable. It's an inflexible way of being in the world. Can you say just a little bit more about, use the term inflexible, but what are the other things that... The criteria? Yeah. Grandiose. They think very highly of themselves. They want a lot of admiration. They think everybody else should think very highly of them. Okay, check. They want special treatment. I got that one. I got that one too.

37:30Good. But don't we all? They feel like entitled to better treatment, to praise. They lack empathy for other people. And as a result, they will exploit people if it suits them. And they tend to go through a pattern of idolizing people, especially in new relationships of like, this is the most amazing person. You're wonderful. I want to do everything for you. And then when they feel hurt by you, which they inevitably will, they devalue you and treat you terribly. Okay, so I can imagine that I probably misuse this word. And I can see your case for it being a technical term that we should avoid because it does come with these nine criteria, some of which you just listed.

38:12I think when I use it, I mean like chronically, if not terminally self-centered and selfish. Yeah, which is colloquially how we use it. And I think that if we could separate out a clinical word and our casual use of the word, great, fine. But narcissism is so much more than selfishness. because it's actually somebody with very low self-esteem trying to compensate for that by thinking that they are better than everybody else. And that's different than selfishness and being self-focused. Putting yourself above others, exploiting and manipulating others, not feeling badly if you hurt other people is a step beyond or maybe many steps beyond being selfish.

38:56I mean, that abusive part, the exploitation, subjugation, that seems like very specific beyond the way most of us are using the word. Yes, absolutely. Yes. Although when people say narcissist, I think what they're saying is, they're self-focused. They don't feel bad enough for me or what they did to me. And they hurt my feelings. So then how should we think and talk about folks who do stuff like that? Who hurt our feelings? who seem like irreparably self-involved. Again, this is back to, if you come into my office and tell me the person you're seeing is so self-involved, they don't care about you, they only talk about themselves, what do you want me to do about this?

39:45If this is the way that they are and you've tried to get through to them and they're not listening to you because they don't care, your options are to see if you can find a way to have a relationship with them given who they are that works for you or to change your relationship or to leave it. Okay, so it just sounds like you're really practical. The point is not to diagnose a narcissist because you're not qualified to do that anyway. The point is to identify the behaviors that are problematic, see if you can find a modus vivendi, a way to live with each other, and if you can't, get the fuck out of there.

40:18Basically, yes. And like the point of diagnosis is to know what you're dealing with. But at the end of the day, you want that just so you can decide what to do. It doesn't help you to know whether they officially are a narcissist or not. If they're treating you in a way that does not feel good for you, does not work for you, your options are the same whether or not we can give them this disorder. Okay. So, but just to push back for a second, sometimes it can be like if somebody has, I don't know if narcissism technically qualifies as a personality disorder, does it? Yes. Okay. So if somebody does have a personality disorder, I'll throw out some terms that I also don't understand, like borderline personality or obsessive compulsive disorder.

40:56Can't it be a source of both clarity and compassion to have a diagnosis for them? It can, yes. And I think it can also be freeing. If you see this person in the context of, oh, this is because they have borderline, that they're acting this way. It's not because of me. I didn't do the things they're accusing me of. This is their trauma, their stuff. I think that can set you free. And it gives you the options again of what you want to do about it. I'm totally for an accurate diagnosis if it helps you understand the person that you're dealing with and to sort of see through the crazy making situation you've been with them.

41:29But too many people get stuck at that stage and don't go to the next part, which is, OK, so this is what I'm dealing with. What am I going to do about it? What do you do if somebody accuses you of being a narcissist? I'm sure that never happened to you. It has happened to me. So what do you do in those circumstances? this is hard but I ask people to once again take a breath don't react I ask people to think about has somebody else said this to you for all the disorders has somebody else mentioned that maybe you have OCD does somebody else think maybe you have borderline this is the first time you're hearing it or is evidence mounting that you should take a closer look at this part of your personality you can go get an assessment if you want from a therapist and if this is inaccurate again go back to why did the person feel so hurt that they would use this term?

42:18What happened? How selfish were you that they would call you a narcissist? Heal that wound and then talk about the use of the term. All right, let's talk about another overused term. And this is a term that people weaponize on themselves, I think. But here's the way you phrase it in the chapter title. Do they have obsessive compulsive disorder or are they just particular? OCD is, yeah, weaponized in both directions. I have found other terms that fall into that category too, but for this book, this is the only one. OCD is a complex and can be a very distressing disorder where you have obsessions and accompanying compulsions that cause distress.

42:59They are time consuming and they are out of your control. Everybody thinks they have OCD because they like the dishwasher arranged a certain way, or they want to line up their shoes in a certain order, or they hate when you put a glass down and there's a ring of water on the bottom. But that's a preference. That's a need for organization and cleanliness. That's normal. That's fine. We all have our things that we care about. That's not the same thing as OCD. Okay, so what to do about that? What's the advice here? I guess the advice is, don't pathologize somebody who might be particularly particular.

43:39Yes. But some of those people might have OCD. They might, but they probably don't. If they do, they know it before you do, probably. Because not only are they asking you to do very specific things, but typically they know they have obsessive thoughts that are causing them great distress that they are trying to alleviate through their compulsive behaviors or through controlling your behavior because it's linked to their obsessive thoughts. So you said before that this is like a term that can cut both ways. People can weaponize it against you, not by accusing you of having OCD, but by saying, well, I have OCD, even though I don't have a diagnosis.

44:19And therefore, you've got to do whatever crazy thing it is I'm asking you to do. Yeah. And a lot of these terms are about asserting autonomy in your relationship, right? You have OCD. I'm not doing that. That's crazy, right? I'm not going to comply with your request. I control my own behavior. No. Or in the reverse, I have OCD. You have to do what I'm saying. I'm so clinically unwell about this, right? Do what I ask is another way of control. And so if somebody does that, what do you do? I always go back to, and eventually you've got to talk about the use of the term, but there's something else underneath those moments of demand and disconnect.

44:55Like, why is this so important to you? Can you say it in a nicer way? Can we not frame it as your OCD? But like, it is helpful for you if I do this thing. And I'm not going to always do everything you ask because I'm my own person and I may not agree with what you're asking of me. We have to find compromise and middle ground.

45:17Coming up, Isabel talks about the difference between red flags and garden variety imperfections, the overuse of the word triggered, how to know if you are in an abusive relationship, how to focus on your own personal growth, and much more.

45:37Okay, let's go through a few more of these terms. Is it a red flag or are they just imperfect? I'll tell you. And I thought this book was going to have a more critical feedback of people disagreeing and being upset with it. So far, people have been totally on board except for this chapter. People do not like this chapter. Why? I'm taking away a term that people really want to have be broad, I think. I make a case that red flag is supposed to mean danger. Serious warning, right? fire, flood, run, very serious, very big deal. Red flags are indicators somebody's going to be abusive, that they are not going to be a safe person to be in a relationship with, that you should very cautiously proceed with if you proceed at all.

46:25But nowadays, red flag means any imperfection, any bad behavior, any sign somebody might have a personality trait that's not your favorite thing, right? The ick can be a red flag. And it makes it so hard to be dating, to be in any kind of relationship, to be an employee, to be a boss, because everybody has what people now call red flags. Right. So it's like maybe we just need a different term because what red flags really means in a clinical setting is something that's, as you said before, dangerous. And so we need a term for just shit we don't like. Yes. And I think there's an overzealous approach to finding red flags as soon as possible and to spot them, the earliest warning sign.

47:15But the problem with red flags is even like the pretty acute ones are best seen in hindsight or if there are many red flags pointing in the same direction. So it's not as if your boss sends you a really rude email and you know for sure that they are going to be a terrible boss. Maybe after seven pretty terrible emails, you have a good idea that they're going to be a terrible boss. So the problem here isn't just the imprecision of the language. It's that if these are the goggles through which you're viewing all of your relationships, it just leads to a kind of hypervigilance that reduces the likelihood of success.

47:52Yes, and I think we are living in a very hypervigilant relational world where people know so much about what to look out for and what they want to avoid that they spot it right away and are quick to make conclusions, even if they're not going to be accurate conclusions about that person, and are making it very hard to have relationships because people need a fair amount of leeway to make mistakes and to annoy you and to repair. And there's just less and less room for that now. Hmm. What's going on that we have this intolerance? Does it go back to the intolerance of discomfort? Is it that we live in a world that's increasingly divided and disconnected because of social media and therefore, you know, we just don't have the reps of the hard work of being a social animal?

48:39What do you think is going on here? I think it's both of those things. I think that we do not want to feel suffering and we have an easy way out, which is we can exit relationships. And then sometimes we're encouraged to, right, do like hard endings on family relationships. That has been a thing that's sort of being pulled back now. but you know you don't like someone you go on a first date with there's a hundred thousand people on an app waiting to talk to you so why go through one more red flag why put up with one more thing if you can just hop to the next person and find somebody better but I do blame social media for a lot of it because it's easy to have little snippets of information that make it feel like we can anticipate avoid or quickly address all the human suffering we have in relationships and I partly blame therapists for this.

49:30And I say that with some caution because I think it was all well-intentioned, but therapists have helped people be too vigilant in their relationships and too quick to pathologize. And therapy has exploded in a way I don't think people would have predicted, but now it's made everyone feel like they are an expert even though they're not. So in what ways should the therapy profession perhaps reform? I think we have to be much more careful when introducing a term to a client. It sounds like your partner might have these traits or tendencies. I have had many cases of therapists recommending to people that their partner is a clinical narcissist, is a sociopath, really heavy diagnoses that they shouldn't be recommending.

50:20So I think we have to be careful when introducing a term. And I think we have to also steer people away from just the words and helping them figure out more about patterns, the feelings, what their agency in that relationship, in that context. Whereas some therapists will really stick with, well, this explains it. This person is this way. They keep doing this thing. It's not your fault. You know, they're a bad person. They're toxic. But that's disempowering at the end of the day because the person sitting in the therapy room is the one who has to make the change. Are you now like not welcomed at the APA conferences?

50:57Did your colleagues find you, are they intolerant of you? Are you a walking red flag? So far, no, people are really open to it. I'm actually doing three conferences this year all about helping clinicians address therapy speak and their practice because so many therapists don't know what to do with it, don't know how to take these terms away from people in a way that doesn't break the therapeutic rapport. All right, here's another frequently used term, bipolar. Chapter 10 is, are they bipolar or did their mood just change? I think bipolar can be weaponized in both directions too to sort of explain I'm having a really big feeling and it doesn't really make sense, but I'm allowed to have it.

51:40But most often I hear people say that person is so bipolar, they acted in such an irrational way that I cannot comprehend. it must be this underlying mood episode explaining why they left me, why they're angry with me, why they're doing something that I don't understand. So what's a better lens to understand these kinds of mood swings? First of all, there might be a reason. They may have left you because they've been unhappy with you and they didn't tell you until it was too late for you to fix it. And sometimes people do You just have big feelings that for you come out of nowhere, but for them have been building.

52:18But second of all, sometimes people just have moods or emotion states with no known triggers. They don't know why, you don't know why, and you don't have to pathologize it. And bipolar is composed of mood episodes where it's not like one day of somebody being high energy. Right? Like for bipolar one, you need to have a manic episode. Mania stands out. People get hospitalized when they're manic. So that one's pretty easy to diagnose. But again, I think people miss that an episode is different than a change in mood. Yes. Although, so a change in mood is super common and often benign. And bipolar is much, much more intense than most people understand.

53:05And yet there's something in the middle. There can be people who are arguably, and I probably fall into this category occasionally, too moody, emotionally unintelligent, just yanked around by their emotions. So obviously, we don't want to label those people bipolar, but we might want to understand what's going on and how to deal with that. Yeah, I think it's a great point because, again, links back to the person's awareness of how they are, their own emotional internal world, and how they interact and affect the world around them. And some people just have low insight. They don't know how they feel.

53:43They don't know what they need. They barely know who they are. They don't see how they affect the people around them. They don't see their patterns. And whether or not they meet criteria for a diagnosis, they're just going to be a hard person to be in any kind of relationship with. You might have to set a boundary. You might have to set many boundaries. Okay, we're not going to hit all of these in our allotted time here, but let me go to borderline, because I actually know what that term means. I'll read to you the name of the chapter just so the listener knows what it is. The chapter is, are they borderline or do they just have strong feelings?

54:17Maybe just start by defining what borderline personality disorder is. This is so interesting because borderline is hot right now. It's up there with narcissists. People call men they don't like narcissists. People call women they don't like borderlines. So, borderline personality disorder, it's typically born from serious trauma where a person develops a very unstable sense of self and has significant difficulty maintaining stable, healthy relationships because there's a constant push and pull between wanting intense closeness, almost enmeshment, and then rejecting that person and pushing them away because they're terrified of that closeness.

54:58So there is a real fluctuation in that relationship. It's often accompanied by self-harm, by suicidal ideation or attempts, by recklessness, by risk-taking behaviors. And it can be very difficult to treat because it's not usually helped by medication alone, but it takes years of therapy to address the habits and patterns and symptoms. And so people who simply have strong feelings can be misdiagnosed by a layperson as borderline? I will tell you, I have been dating recently, and I have had no less than seven men tell me or have on their profiles. My recent ex slash, for one of them, all the women I've ever been with have had borderline.

55:51So I'm really wanting to make sure that anyone I date next doesn't have it. I'm sure that date goes well. They learn a lot from me. Is it a red flag where they say that? Absolutely, yes. For me especially. It's against my whole brand, Dan. But they say that because the women have had strong feelings. They have felt very hurt by them. They have broken up in a dramatic way that didn't make sense, right? They wanted a close relationship, but then did something to indicate they didn't want to be with them. And there's no way they can understand it besides saying that they're borderline. Right. So I guess in the past they would have just said a bitch.

56:33Yeah. Right. The real underlying thing here is just our reflexive need to label people. Yes. Put them in a bucket. To make ourselves feel better. Yeah. And to reduce the complexity of this animal. Yes. Our brains do that, right? As you know, we seek simple answers. We want schema to explain what's happening in our world. We cannot give nuance to everything, or we would have no capacity to function because there's too much data to take in, it's too much work. But I argue that in our close relationships, ones that matter are ones where we could gain self-reflection, we should give those nuance. All right, let's talk about a few more terms.

57:19There's a chapter on the words toxic, triggered, and trauma bonded. These get used a lot, and I actually am realizing that I used toxic earlier. So what do these terms actually mean, and how are we misusing them? toxic I'm not even mad about at this point toxic is a life of its own my only case for toxic is that it means something bad a dynamic that is unhealthy for you or a person that is not a good person for you you can't say toxic and think that people know what it means toxic to me doesn't mean abusive doesn't mean narcissistic it could mean somebody who's just the wrong person for you because they annoy you.

57:59So instead of using it as this catch-all, I encourage people to define it a little bit before they then use it. But I don't have a huge problem with toxic in part because it has no clinical roots, really. Got it. Okay. What about triggered? I have a hard time with this chapter because language does evolve, right? Like words take on new meaning. So I know I can't control that. It's my hope book, because it's about letting go of control of other people. Triggered was intended to me For somebody who has PTSD, a trigger is a cue that brings up their PTSD symptoms. So, right, it's somebody who has been at war, who comes home, and eight months later, a car backfires on their street, and it brings up flashbacks.

58:43They have a panic attack in response. That was supposed to be what a trigger meant. People have generalized it to mean, you did a thing that made me feel a bad feeling, which is fine. That word can change and mean that, but people will trigger you. You don't get to control how people act. Being a human means being triggered, going through the world and managing your emotional reaction to that. My beef with the term is, I mean, and I probably, if somebody put all of the transcripts of this show at an AI, would see that I probably used it. But my beef with the term, notwithstanding my hypocrisy, is it just speaks to our fragility.

59:22Life is filled with triggers. You're going to die. I mean, that can be pretty triggering. Yeah. So it really, it's kind of like the term safe space. I don't love it. I'm sure its original intent was very positive. But the way people are demanding safety in a world that it's just definitionally unsafe. And so we need to be preparing people to handle life's inevitable ups and downs or triggers. Yeah. I mean, spray it. You know, if a teacher asks you for something, calls on you in class when you weren't paying attention, that could be triggering. That could make you feel anxious and embarrassed. It could make you feel all sorts of things, but you don't get to skip that experience.

1:00:00And finally, trauma bonded. This is my personal most important one because I am so frustrated by how this word has been taken over. Trauma bond is Stockholm syndrome. it's when you and an abuser or a captor develop this very counterintuitive relationship where you the survivor want to like protect and defend the abuser and captor because you feel the sense of closeness and connection with them trauma bonded as people use it now is like we went through a really hard thing together so now we're bonded because of the trauma which is just a totally different thing. I see your balance here because you don't want to be like the get off my lawn lady, you know, just like policing everybody's language.

1:00:45And so some of these, the ones we've just gone through, may like inch up toward that, whereas the other ones are like are actually causing harm to you and others when you use them. Yeah, so there's definitely a spectrum too of like severity and how much I think using these words correctly matters. I will say it hasn't stopped people from using these words with me, whether in personal relationships or professionally. What I'll get now is like, they were gaslighting. I know, I know, probably not real gaslighting, but you know what I mean, gaslighting. Like, yeah, that's fine. Look, I can't tell you how many fucking 10 % jokes I get.

1:01:22So just get used to it. So you finish with some really practical stuff. And I do want to spend a few minutes on this. Chapter 14 is called Being a Human in Relationship is Hard. So here's some advice. Let's just walk through a few of these until we run out of time. One is about how to figure out if you're actually in an abusive relationship as opposed to like just using the term willy-nilly. So what do we look for? You look for patterns. You look to see if this behavior, this abuse cycle is happening repeatedly. You look to see if you feel isolated, if you feel scared, if you're losing sense of your own reality.

1:01:54and I encourage people to talk to a therapist, to talk to friends and family, to read about abuse and how it presents and to see if it resonates. And in relationships that are not abusive but, you know, difficult, which is all relationships if you're actually participating, there's a section here in about doing the work. It's LFA therapy term, I think. Some of the things you recommend are specificity, vulnerability, and commitment. Can you talk a little bit about each of those? Yeah, instead of jumping to a label of sort of being more clear on this is the thing that you did, this is how it felt to me, and I want to work through this with you, as opposed to, oh, you're so bipolar.

1:02:38Here it is again, right? Go fix that. But in a bigger picture, I would tell people, listen, decide if this relationship is important to you, if it's worth doing the work. Because if you're with somebody who does have a disorder, it can be a lot of work and it can be a steep hill and it can be a long time. So I think you need to decide how much you want to invest in this relationship. And if it is that important, then to then go forth and do that work of trying to change and improve things. And that's the commitment. Yes, if you feel the commitment. You mentioned this just now, and it also comes up in the book.

1:03:12You know, there may be cases where you are correctly suspecting that your partner qualifies for borderline or OCD or whatever. And while you don't want to be in the business of doing armchair diagnosis or weaponizing the term, you may want to encourage people to get help. What do you recommend if that's the case? I think that there is always room to offer observations and to recommend people take a look at something. it really matters how and when you do it. If it's in the middle of a fight, it's going to be harsh and it's going to be poorly received. If it is in a quiet moment where you're able to say, I'm worried about this.

1:03:53I have noticed this pattern. It seems to be getting in your way. It seems to be affecting us. Can you go talk to somebody about it? Can you go get assessed for it? Can we look at this together? It's going to go better. And it might not. You might have somebody who is offended, who is unwilling to consider it, somebody who has no insight and won't be able to understand even what you're saying to them, in which case that decision bounces back to you of what do you want to do with that relationship with that person. One of the things you emphasize toward the end of the book here is focusing on your own growth as like a good citizen of a relationship.

1:04:30Because that's all that we have control over, you know, and you always have the opportunity to gain your own insight and to focus on your agency and your own growth, no matter what the other person does. And I think if you become so focused on the other person's problems and how they need to change, you really miss out on your chance to look in the mirror and figure out how you can change in the context of that relationship. And I found that to the extent that I've done my work, one of the benefits is something that you call for in a robust way in the book and have I've done so throughout this conversation that the more I metaphorically speaking here, look in the mirror through meditation therapy or whatever and see how fucked up I am, the more grace I'm willing to give other people.

1:05:18Yeah, I think it helps you see that we are all doing our best and some people are doing their best and it's not enough for you and that's okay. Then you can make a choice to leave. But yeah, people are imperfect. They're messy. they're struggling, but we can all support each other in that process instead of pathologize each other. Two final questions. One, is there something that you were hoping to get to that we didn't? I don't think so. Awesome. Great. And then finally, can you just remind everybody of the name of the book and anything else you've made that we should know about? So the book is called They're Not Gaslighting You.

1:05:53Ditch the therapy speak and stop looking for red flags everywhere in every relationship. Up next is a book called You Don't Have ADHD, Stop Self-Diagnosing and Reclaim Your Mental Health. That'll come out sometime next year. So that'll be a similar topic, but for self-diagnosis. And then for any therapist, they can check out my Navigating Intimacy book all about couples and sex therapy. And website that we should know about, social media? You can find me at drisabelmorley.com or on Instagram at drisabelmorley. Amazing. Great job. Thank you for doing this. Really appreciate it. Thank you. No, thank you for having me on.

1:06:27I was telling everybody before that I read 10 % Happier like the week it came out. My whole practice talked about it. I've made like every patient read it. So it's personal honor to get to meet you. Thank you. I appreciate that. I think one of the biggest growth engines for my work has been therapists. That's so interesting. We are promoters. We're a good community for that kind of thing. Yeah, I appreciate you guys. All right. Well, thanks again. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

1:06:59Thanks again to Isabel. Great to talk to her. Don't forget there's a guided meditation that comes with this episode. It's all about how to handle difficult people. It comes from our teacher of the month, Christiana Wolf. You can get it if you sign up at danharris.com. You can also, once you sign up, access our weekly live meditation and Q &A sessions. We do those every Tuesday at 4 Eastern. Also, just a quick reminder that I've got that event on the 18th of November with Pete Holmes, the comedian and meditator, that you should sign up for that. There's a link in the show notes. Finally, thank you to everybody who worked so hard to make this show.

1:07:33Our producers are Tara Anderson and Eleanor Vasili. Our recording and engineering is handled by the great folks over at Pod People. Lauren Smith is our managing producer. Marissa Schneiderman is our senior producer. DJ Kashmir is our executive producer. And Nick Thorburn of the band Islands wrote our theme. Thank you.

From the publisher

How to handle people better.

 

Isabelle Morley is a clinical psychologist and EFT-certified couples therapist (Emotionally Focused Therapy). She is a contributing author to Psychology Today, and has been featured in The New Yorker, The Boston Globe, Business Insider, Vox, and Very Well Mind, among others. Her latest book is They're Not Gaslighting You: Ditch the Therapy Speak and Stop Hunting for Red Flags in Every Relationship.

 

In this episode we talk about:

  • The difference between abuse and bad behavior
  • How to know if you're really in an abusive relationship
  • How to correctly use the term 'gaslighting'
  • What boundaries are, how to set them, and how to know if yours have actually been violated
  • How to spot a narcissist 
  • The difference between having Narcissistic Personality Disorder and just having selfish qualities
  • Red flags vs. garden-variety imperfections
  • The definition and weaponization of terms like 'bipolar' and 'borderline'
  • The overuse of the word 'triggered'
  • Basic tips for navigating relationships beyond the therapy-speak
  • And much more



Join Dan's online community here

Follow Dan on social: Instagram, TikTok

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel



Additional Resources: 

 

Tickets are now on sale for a special live taping of the 10% Happier Podcast with guest Pete Holmes! Join us on November 18th in NYC for this benefit show, with all proceeds supporting the New York Insight Meditation Center. Grab your tickets here!


Tickets are now available for an intimate live event with Dan on November 23rd as part of the Troutbeck Luminary Series. Join the conversation, participate in a guided meditation, and ask your questions during the Q&A. Click here to buy your ticket!

 

To advertise on the show, contact sales@advertisecast.com or visit https://advertising.libsyn.com/10HappierwithDanHarris

Thanks to our sponsors: 

AT&T: Staying connected matters. That's why AT&T has connectivity you can depend on, or they will proactively make it right. Visit att.com/guarantee for details.
Airbnb: Your home might be worth more than you think. Find out how much at airbnb.com/host.

More from 10% Happier with Dan Harris

All 230 episodes
Are They Really a Narcissist? Do They Really Have Borderline? Are They Truly Gaslighting You? How To Know. And What To Do When People Weaponize Therapy-Speak Against You.10% Happier with Dan Harris · 1 h 8 min
Listen in VO