The News Roundup For October 31, 2025

1 Nov 2025 · 1 h 27 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: 1A - The News Roundup For October 31, 2025

Episode Overview This episode of *1A* features a roundtable discussion on significant political and social developments in the United States. The ongoing government shutdown, implications for SNAP benefits, immigration policy changes, and international relations are key topics of discussion.

Key Themes

  1. Government Shutdown
  2. Duration: The shutdown has persisted for over a month.
  3. Consequences:
  4. SNAP Benefits: 42 million Americans face a cutoff in food assistance, marking the first time in history this program would go unfunded due to a shutdown.
  5. Impact on Federal Services: Federal workers face cutbacks, delays in air travel, and disruptions in educational programs like Head Start.
  6. Political Dynamics:
  7. Republicans are contemplating ending the Senate filibuster to reopen the government.
  8. Polling indicates that Republicans are experiencing greater blame for the shutdown.
  1. Legal and Judicial Developments
  2. Supreme Court Case: The Court is examining the legality of President Trump's National Guard deployments, particularly in Chicago.
  3. Prosecutors on Leave: Two federal prosecutors faced repercussions for their handling of a January 6-related case, reflecting tensions within the Justice Department regarding political matters.
  1. International Relations
  2. Trump and Xi Jinping Meeting: Amidst trade disputes, President Trump met with Chinese President Xi, with discussions resulting in reduced tariffs but limited fundamental resolution of trade tensions.
  3. Middle East Tensions: Despite Israeli strikes in Gaza leading to numerous casualties, the Trump administration maintains that a ceasefire with Hamas is still in effect.
  1. Economic Developments
  2. Federal Reserve Actions: The Fed lowered interest rates to stimulate the economy amid rising unemployment and inflation fears.
  3. Impact of Layoffs: Significant layoffs in the tech sector and major companies like Amazon and UPS are raising concerns over economic stability.
  1. Immigration Policy Changes
  2. ICE Leadership Shakeup: Trump administration officials are replacing ICE leaders with Border Patrol agents to increase the aggressiveness of immigration enforcement actions.

Panelist Contributions

  • Amanda Becker (Washington Correspondent for the 19th):
  • Discussed the implications of the government shutdown on SNAP and Head Start, highlighting real-life impacts.
  • Wendy Benjaminson (Washington Senior Editor for Bloomberg News):
  • Provided insight into political maneuvering on Capitol Hill amid the shutdown and its implications for upcoming elections.
  • Arthur Delaney (Senior Reporter for HuffPost):
  • Analyzed the effects of the shutdown on air travel and the broader economy.

Listener Engagement

  • Listeners expressed concerns about the effects of the shutdown on everyday life, prompting discussions about possible solutions and political responsibilities.

Concluding Thoughts The episode paints a picture of a nation grappling with significant political and economic challenges. The panel's insights suggest a growing urgency for resolution in both domestic policy and international relations as the implications of the government shutdown continue to unfold.

---

This structured overview captures the essence of the discussed topics and highlights the importance of ongoing political developments in the U.S. and abroad.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Hey, it's Todd, your host for this edition of the News Roundup. Just a quick heads up before we start the show. The news is constantly changing, and things might have changed by the time you hear this episode. Stay up to date with the news by listening to your local NPR member station and by visiting NPR.org for all the latest. Thanks for listening. Enjoy the show.

0:28You're listening to the 1A Podcast. I'm Todd Zwilich, and this is the News Roundup. 42 million, that might be the number of the week. That's about how many people in America rely on supplemental nutrition assistance to get enough to eat. Those benefits, also called SNAP, are set to expire tomorrow because of the government shutdown. This has now dragged on for more than four weeks, and it's gone well beyond talking points. Real people and real services are getting hurt from federal workers making cutbacks to stay afloat without pay to thousands of flights delayed and critical programs that support early education and food getting cut off.

1:10We'll uncover it all, plus other big news of the week, including a rate cut from the Fed, a court battle over National Guard deployment, and a shakeup of the Trump administration's immigration roundups because Trump officials think ICE isn't aggressive enough. Our panel is here, Wendy Benjaminson, Washington Senior Editor for Bloomberg News. Hi, Wendy. Hi, thanks for having me. Great to have you again as well. Arthur Delaney is here at the table with me, Senior Reporter for HuffPost. Hi, Artie. Hi. And Amanda Becker, Washington Correspondent for the 19th. Hi, Amanda. Hello. Happy Halloween. Happy Halloween to you, too.

1:46All right. In the meantime, let's start with those SNAP benefits and this deadline bearing down on millions of Americans who rely on supplemental benefits to get enough to eat, as I mentioned. Amanda, remind us of what happens November 1st if there's no deal on the shutdown. So if there is no deal today, by midnight, Friday, SNAP benefits will not be sent from the Agriculture Department to the states that then load them onto the debit cards of recipients. So as you said in the intro, we're talking about 42 million Americans that rely on this nutrition assistance. And this would be the first time in the history of the program, which started in its current form in the 1960s, that it went unfunded.

2:32And that includes during other government shutdowns. That includes the longest shutdown in U.S. history in 2018 and 2019, that December and January during Trump's first administration. The USDA found a workaround then to fund SNAP despite the ongoing shutdown. The USDA has said it will not disperse any of its contingency funds right now. And so if people have cards that are loaded at the beginning of the month, because this happens on a rolling basis, depending on how the states handle it. But if your card is set to be loaded on November 1st or November 4th or those first few days of the month, your card will not be loaded.

3:11Now, I should, you know, let everyone know that if you have remaining funds on your card right now, say that your card is funded towards the end of the month. So it was just funded a few days ago. They will not disappear, those funds. You'll still have them to use. We're talking about the disbursement of new funds going forward as of Saturday. Sounds like you have a hungry cat there as well, Amanda. You might want to. Sorry about that. You know, they're acting up because of Halloween. Yeah, sure. Well, all cats arch their backs around Halloween. Arthur, back on the serious issue, though, of SNAP benefits.

3:40There is a lawsuit. We're waiting for a ruling, I think, from a judge in Boston. How are states dealing with sort of the wait and see here on whether funds are going to flow? Democratic states filed this lawsuit saying, hey, USDA, you got money there. You use it, which is some scholars who follow this say is correct. And some states are saying they can tap their own money to cover some of the costs. But this program is really too big. It's not on the scale of a state budget. It's typically billions of dollars in each state over the course of the year. So that won't be a solution. And things are getting real now with the shutdown because of this.

4:20Well, Democrats in the Senate this week pushed for a new bill to fund food aid benefits, part of the jockeying over the government shutdown. That bill failed in the Senate. Here's the reaction from Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota. This bill is a cynical attempt to provide political cover for Democrats, to allow them to carry on their government shutdown even longer. And we're not going to let them pick winners and losers. It's time to fund everybody. Wendy, there's been some rumblings from Capitol Hill, the Democrats. Some Democrats are saying they'd like to find an off ramp from this whole thing now.

4:57Are there signs that senators want this shutdown now to end? Squint and look real hard. You can start to see some cracks. Yes, you can start to see some cracks there. There are meetings between leadership and rank and file. They are not leader on leader meetings. But, for example, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer met with MAGA Representative Katie Britt. Thune has said there are no meetings on the table, but we know there are some meetings, you know, going on. Yes, everyone wants an off-ramp for this. And you can hear the tension in Thune's voice in that clip that you have. Although he sent the Senate home for the weekend, so nothing will happen until, you know, at least Monday, but it won't happen on Monday.

5:43The pressure on both sides is incredible right now, but polling is showing that the Republicans are taking the harder hit. And one poll is showing that independent voters are blaming the Republicans for this by a two to one margin. So it is in Thune and Trump's interest, if they don't want to be hammered in the midterms, to try to find that off ramp and then take credit for it. Yeah. OK, the polling numbers are important. That's the crass politics of a shutdown. Amanda, you've also been looking at the potential impact to Head Start programs and to child care in federal workplaces during the shutdown.

6:22Again, real impacts on real people who rely on these benefits. What have you heard? Yeah, so Head Start is also funded on a rolling basis. Depending on the program in the state, they're funded on the first of a month. So, you know, every first of the month, certain Head Start programs are funded. Luckily, for the month of September, there were relatively few Head Start programs impacted. And sorry, that would have been going into October, so October 1st. But starting November 1st, there's 134 programs across 41 states in Puerto Rico that collectively serve 65 ,000 children that will not be receiving their Head Start funding.

7:04So those programs will either have to scramble and come up with other funds from the state or other sources. You know, we're seeing state governors step in on SNAP. They might have to start stepping in on Head Start as well to keep those programs open if they can. But that's going to be a really real impact in people's lives. I'm also hearing reports of a lot of federal buildings have child care and day care and early learning centers in them. Some of those have not been accessible. And already earlier this year, one of the cuts made by Doge early in the administration was to shut the office at GSA in charge of those child care facilities.

7:42And many of them will be closing permanently at the end of the year. So, you know, this is all coming to a head at a time when people are already trying to figure out how to put food on the table. And now they're also trying to figure out child care. Child care, children's cognitive development, getting enough to eat for millions of Americans. How about getting around and getting around the country? Just last night, the FAA put out an alert that there were no air traffic controllers available in Orlando. There was a ground stop at the Orlando airport, average of 2.7 hours of flight delays Thursday night.

8:18also delays this week, major delays, staffing shortages at LAX, O 'Hare, Newark Liberty, some of the nation's largest airport. What's going on with flight delays and being able to move around the country from the biggest outlets here, Arthur? So there are always flight delays because of weather and staffing shortages because the FAA has been way below by, I think, several thousand people on the number of air traffic controllers they want. But Sean Duffy, the secretary of the transportation department, has said this week that on recent days, whereas usually you'd have 5 % of the delays caused by a staffing shortage, now it's as many as 24%.

8:59So it's clear that the shutdown is affecting that and people aren't going to stand for it. And when the shutdown is going on, you're going to be extra upset about any delay to your flight. It's just going to be infuriating, even if it's not. I mean, it was fury over flight delays, if I recall, that helped bring the last government shutdown in Donald Trump's first term to a close. That's right. And that resulted from only, I think, about fewer than a dozen air traffic controllers calling in sick on a given day. This week, senators were trying to get out of town on Thursday, and they couldn't because their flights had been delayed.

9:33So they're stuck at the Capitol lamenting that to reporters. Their own flights. Well, it's hard to remember a little bit unless you cast your mind back. But This entire shutdown fight started when Democrats demanded and Republicans refused to negotiate on relief from steep increases in health insurance premium subsidies under the Affordable Care Act. And now, right on cue, Wendy, prices for next year's ACA health care plans were released publicly this week. What did we learn? We learned people are going to get stuck with a big honking bill. Some of those increases put people's premiums at$1 ,000 a month or more.

10:13Some are less. But if you're only making slightly over the poverty level,$1 ,000 a month is impossible. And so that means that people will have to either give up or pray that the Senate can come to some sort of agreement on this to extend the subsidies, which is all Democrats have been asking for. And Republicans are saying, trust us, we'll talk about this after you open the government. And, you know, Democrats aren't willing to take their word for it, which is a sign of how, you know, messed up everything is right now. But yes, I mean, ACA premiums and people, it's open enrollment starting tomorrow, and people will get notices that they are, that their premiums are going up to as much as$1 ,000 a month.

11:03Well, the president is also aware of it. Arthur, I noticed late last night that Donald Trump went on Truth Social lamenting what he calls the disaster of the Affordable Care Act, rising premiums. But his message with lots of exclamation points was, do something, Democrats. He's been out of the country, so maybe he didn't remember that the government shut down for this exact reason because Democrats wanted that taken care of in the funding bill and Republicans said no. Or that Democrats don't control any branch of government where they could do something about it, even if they wanted to at the moment.

11:37Well, that's the government shutdown, food benefits and health care benefits. We have a lot more on the shutdown effects across America, immigration and more. Stay with us.

11:52We've been talking about the effects of the government shutdown on real people, their real economy, on Head Start for Children and Americans, 40 million Americans, getting enough food to eat. One listener writes that DoorDash and some other places are offering discounts during the government shutdown. Unclear about how much a difference that can make. I've noticed that restaurants and other services around the Washington, D.C. area where there are a lot of federal workers are also offering free meal deals, free lunches if you're a furloughed federal worker and you show your federal ID. So there are cases around here, Arthur, of people kicking in.

12:28There's also dedicated for federal workers food bank distribution. So there's a lot of nice efforts to help. Nice efforts. It's hard to wrap your head around the idea of the need for food banks. for federal workers who work for our federal government to keep it going, but that's where we're at. Ridiculous. All right. Well, we have talked about the most basic parts of the economy, those food costs, those healthcare costs that are going up. Open enrollment starts tomorrow, as Wendy said, what they mean for real people. Let's go macro now on the economy. On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve cut interest rates again for the second time this year, hitting the lowest benchmark borrowing rate in three years.

13:07At today's meeting, the committee decided to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by a quarter percentage point to three and three quarters to four percent. That was the Fed chair, Jerome Powell, at a press conference this week. The Fed also announced that it was done with the reduction of its asset purchases. That's called quantitative tightening. They're done with that. So, Wendy, why is the Fed lowering interest rates again now? Well, I think their reasoning was that inflation had cooled, the job market had soured enough that they felt that they should lower borrowing costs for businesses and for people buying houses and things like that.

13:50So basically, when the Fed lowers the interest rates, they lower the borrowing costs for businesses so they can either hire more people or at least not lay off people like the dramatic layoffs we saw this week. People who want to buy a house can get a mortgage that isn't 6 % interest. You know, that will kill them going on. And, you know, it's always been sort of and then, of course, businesses can expand. So there's a trickle out effect on suppliers and things like that. It's just good for the economy, for lower interest rates, and that's why Donald Trump is constantly pushing for them. But it also means it can trigger inflation.

14:27And just this morning, Dallas Fed Chair Lori Logan said that unless inflation comes down more, she will not vote for another rate cut in December. So she's done with rate cuts. There's also concern, Wendy, about the quality of data that Fed governors, that economists, any of us can rely on. Now, in a government shutdown, key employment data and other economic data isn't being produced. Right. And it's not like the Fed sits around and looks into a crystal ball and says, OK, let's have interest rates. These are data-driven decisions. And just for example, today we would have had the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index, which is a fancy name for the Fed's key yardstick for inflation.

15:13How much is inflation going and how is that affecting spending by people in the United States? And they have no idea. That data didn't come out because of the shutdown. There's no information on the actual jobless rates from the government. There is a private company that does it, but, you know, that may or may not be accurate. Consumer confidence, the way businesses are feeling. All of these are the ingredients that the Fed uses to set interest rates, and they don't have them. Nick emails us to say the two parties in Congress must come together to end this shutdown. Too many people are suffering, and I think we have made that case, Nick.

15:50Thanks for that comment. Amanda, meanwhile, Nick raises an important point. The shutdown has to end, but this is about a lot more than public sector employment. Private sector employment, the U.S. economy lost 32 ,000 private sector jobs just last month. In August, nearly 2 million Americans faced long-term unemployment for 27 weeks or more. That's when we had data from the Labor Department. What do we know about what's contributing to higher unemployment rates and fewer jobs in the private sector? Yeah, I mean, shutdowns are bad for the economy. And when it's a short shutdown, the economy bounces back.

16:27But the longer it goes on, the longer the lasting effects it can have. You know, one thing that's contributing to higher unemployment right now is that we have, you know, tens of thousands of federal workers who aren't working and not receiving paychecks because they've been furloughed. We also have the tech sector doing layoffs related to AI in many cases and the rise of AI. Most recently, Amazon announced, I think, 14 ,000 jobs being cut. They didn't contribute that only to AI, but, you know, that's a substantial number of jobs right there. So these are all things that are coming together at the time of the shutdown when we have a lot of federal workers at home and not getting paid.

17:04And, you know, this could end up having lasting effects on the economy the longer it goes on. Arthur, Amanda notes that 14 ,000 corporate employees laid off from Amazon, a business related closely to Amazon, UPS. They're the ones who bring the packages to your door. UPS lays off 48 ,000 workers just this week. That's gigantic. How are these numbers reverberating on Capitol Hill and other places that you cover? I don't think they are particularly. Usually layoffs of this size are not necessarily an indicator of a broader trend. For example, a recession. You don't say there's a recession because there's a bunch of double-digit thousands of layoffs like this.

17:43In the tech sector, an Amazon executive actually said this isn't about our money situation or even AI. It's just culture. And they do copy each other. And these executives are paid in part on stock price. And they improve their own compensation if investors are pleased by what they see as a cost-cutting effort. So I don't know what to make of it. And it's one of the reasons that it's tough not having real data. Nobody in the private sector does research on what's happening in the economy on the scale that the federal government does. And provides it, again, to Fed governors, economists, journalists like us, anybody who wants to get a handle on the macro trends in the economy.

18:23Those data are just not there. We're going to continue to cover the story of the shutdown and the economy, especially its effects on regular Americans like you all across the country. Meanwhile, another story that's important all across America, the legal battles still raging over the Trump administration's deployment of National Guard troops in U.S. cities. Let's start in Illinois. On Wednesday, the Supreme Court requested more information in the case, considering whether President Trump has the legal authority to send National Guard troops into the Chicago area. And top Democrats in Illinois and Chicago have sued over that deployment.

19:02The court is giving both sides until November 17th to respond, meaning that case won't be resolved at least for several more weeks. Amanda, what kind of information is the court requesting from the administration and from Illinois officials as it starts to consider National Guard deployments in Chicago and the Chicagoland area. It seems to be focused on the definition of what regular forces are. So federal law allows a president to send the National Guard in without the permission of state officials or governors when there's a rebellion or some danger, when the president and it is, quote, unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.

19:44So what they've asked in these briefs that are due on November 17th, they can't be more than 15 pages. I plan on reading them. I'm sure a lot of people will. They've asked the parties to weigh in on whether this term regular forces would include the regular forces of the U.S. military, whether that would include ICE, and kind of how these things and these definitions relate to this federal statute. And so that's what we'll see them weighing in on in the next couple of weeks. Well, that's Chicago. Then, of course, there's Oregon, where local officials also sued the administration over the use of National Guard troops.

20:17Now, on Tuesday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided that it's going to rehear the case over the administration's use of the Oregon National Guard in Portland over the objection of the governor there in Oregon. That's a reversal of a ruling from a three-judged panel just last week. So, Wendy, why did the court reverse that narrower ruling and why is it going to hear the case in the full court now? Right. So what happens at the circuit court level, Todd, as you know, is that it's often a three-judge panel of the larger panel of judges and then it can go to the full panel. So a three-judge panel ruled two to one that Trump was likely lawfully exercising power.

21:01And the dissenting judge angrily demanded, I mean, the ruling certainly sounded angry, demanded a full court hearing. So that's where we are now. But in the meantime, while they're waiting for the full court to hear this and rule, they have reinstalled the temporary restraining order, keeping not only the Oregon National Guard, but any National Guard from deploying to Portland. So that is. And meanwhile, the original U.S. District Federal Judge, Karen Immigert, who initially stopped the deployment of the troops to Oregon, is going to hold a full trial on her question. So it is certainly delaying the deployment and may stop it entirely.

21:51Wendy, just briefly, also in that trial that you mentioned with Judge Immigert in Portland, the Justice Department acknowledged, revealed this week in court that they deployed the National Guard to Portland despite the judge's order. They contravened the judge's order and briefly deployed the National Guard to Portland. What impact did that have on the case? Well, it's certainly going to irritate the judge, not to mention the Oregon officials. This is just part of this administration's ability to not only push the envelope to its extreme, you know, seam-breaking point, but sometimes just to ignore it.

22:26You know, and that seems to be what's going on here. Arthur? I think what's fascinating about this is in the Chicago case, the appeals court, they said it was really clear that there was no rebellion, which I think is obviously true to anybody, even if you're looking at the most inflammatory footage of what's going on. In other words, the justification for National Guard troops that there's a rebellion going. There's not only no rebellion, no series of riots, not even obstruction of federal immigration authorities trying to do their job. As the appeals court said, the agents are able to come and go from the facility where there's been a protest for 19 years.

23:03And the Supreme Court won't look at that. They have to say we're more farsighted in considering not what you mere mortals see, but future precedent for presidential power. Well, meanwhile, this week, what seemed like a strange move from the Pentagon, orders from top military officials for the National Guard and their detachments in all 50 states and U.S. territories to form, quote, quick reaction forces. These are to be used for missions like riot control. That's according to a Pentagon memo that was reviewed by The Guardian. Now, Arthur, the memo directs a total of 23 ,500 troops to be trained nationwide.

23:43for quick reaction forces. What else do we know about this direction? Well, this is not Pete Hegseth's idea. President Donald Trump told them to do this a couple months ago, and so they're doing it. And it was issued near the outset of the National Guard deployment in Washington, D.C. in response to an imaginary crime emergency. And it just shows that this thing with troops being sent into cities against the will of cities is not going to stop. Ostensibly, it's so that they can quell riots, but they're already deploying troops all over the place with no riots to quell. So it's really concerning to people who respect the idea that you're not supposed to use the military for law enforcement in the United States, which was one of our founding values.

24:28Something that's talked about in the Declaration of Independence, a grievance against George III. Yeah. Well, we talked about one part of the Trump administration's effort to militarize the streets in U.S. cities. Now let's get to the latest on the Trump administration's crackdown on immigration in neighborhoods and on streets all across America. There was a major shakeup at ICE this week. They're one of the agencies on the front lines of the Trump administration's immigration roundups. Now, several directors of regional ICE offices are being replaced with officials from Border Patrol. Amanda, why this change?

25:05What does it mean? So first of all, it indicates that the administration is not happy with the job that ICE leaders have been doing. They want to see more arrests. They want to see, you know, a bigger presence. ICE tends to do, you know, they'll go in a raid, a targeted raid, looking for someone. And they might sweep up some other people in the process. Border Patrol uses a little bit more aggressive tactics. tactics. You know, we've seen them rappelling into apartment buildings from helicopters, jumping out of rental trucks at, you know, hardware stores. And so this is more what they would like to see, kind of larger sweeps that are more aggressive, that lead to more arrests and bringing more people in.

Read the full transcript

25:44Now, this is all part of the Department of Homeland Security. This week, an investigation of DHS and its propaganda about immigration and crime crackdowns on social media. Now that the border is secure, the battle for the soul of our nation turns inward as federal agents work day and night to arrest, detain, and deport vicious criminals from our nation's capital. That was DHS Deputy Assistant Secretary Micah Bach. Now, a Washington Post analysis found misleading footage and descriptions in multiple posts, including in that one that you just heard about arrests being made in Washington, D.C., while showing footage in other areas of the country.

26:24Wendy, what else did we learn from this investigation? Well, first of all, kudos to our colleagues at the Washington Post. And this is terrifying on a number of levels, not only that this administration just flat out lies to us, but also this notion of what is news and what isn't. So this showed ice raids. They would say this was happening in Portland and it would show this violent scene of protesters and doing things. And in fact, it was in Nantucket or it was in Chicago or it was in some other city or it was years ago. And so the danger is that, you know, you don't, these videos are getting more views than accurate news reports.

27:04Wendy, I also want to point out that this isn't the only thing going on with the people who run DHS's social media accounts. And if you're not well-versed in the nuances of propaganda. This one was easy to miss. In July, on July 23rd, in fact, DHS posted an image depicting a white figure, clothed in white, heading west with pioneers. The post included exactly 14 words, which experts noticed as code for a white supremacist neo-Nazi creed. It also included the words heritage and homeland, both capitalized. That's common online code for HH, which stands for Heil Hitler. That's your government advertising for ICE recruits with 14 words and HH.

27:46And it's real. We'll be back with more of the roundup in just a moment. Stay with us.

27:57Let's get back to the conversation now with this message that we got from Richard, who says, I suggest that the Democrats would look pretty good now from a public support standpoint. If They gave into Republican demands for a temporary budget extension to avoid the chaos that seems to be brewing. And then the Republicans refused to go forward with budgeting for such things as health care snap and other benefits that the Democrats were fighting for. Think of how Republicans would be perceived under that scenario. And we got this from Kathleen in Pittsburgh about the shutdown. Couldn't they step in and offer low or no interest loans to those people who are affected?

28:33They'll get the money eventually. My Chase Bank website does have a link saying, are you affected by the shutdown? And we got this from Anne in the Adirondacks who says, while 47 has been globetrotting, regular Americans are suffering. This has to stop. Get out and vote on Tuesday while we still can. It's so hard to hold on to hope. Well, thanks for those messages. Thanks for your message there, Anne, in the Adirondacks. Well, let's talk about some big elections taking place. Well, right now, it's not just about the midterms next November. Elections happening in America on Tuesday, and they can be bellwethers.

29:10New Jersey, Virginia, the race for mayor in New York City making big national news. So let's start with New Jersey, Arthur, where Hispanic voters make up over a fifth of the voting population. The president's agenda expected to have a big influence on the governor's race in New Jersey. What are the key issues? What's that race looking like? Well, one big thing that both candidates are talking about a lot is actually utility bills because energy costs are going up. This is widely attributed to the rise of AI and data centers, which guzzle electricity. And so Mikey Sherrill, the Democrat, is for clean energy like all Democrats are.

29:49And Jack Cattarelli, the Republican, is like Donald Trump saying that's a green news scam. We've got to use oil and gas. And so that's a clear battle line. But I think the biggest thing could actually be Trump. And this could be a mini-referendum on where we are in national politics because that's – in addition to your utility bills, that's a major signal in local politics as well, increasingly a bigger signal in local politics. New Jersey is a blue state historically, but the polls in that race have been very close. It is close. And, you know, I wondered near the outset of the shutdown when the Trump administration said they would shut down this bridge tunnel project to New York, if that would have a major impact.

30:34And seemingly not. Chattarelli is doing perhaps better in the polls than many may have expected. So he's still well behind, you know, not within the margin of error. But it's an important race to watch. And I think it could be a bellwether for where things are headed in next year's midterms. That's New Jersey. Then there's Virginia, which one way or the other is about to have its first woman governor in the running for governor, current Republican Lieutenant Governor Winsome Earl Sears. And on the other side, Democrat three-term congressional Democrat Abigail Spanberger. Amanda Becker, where does this race stand just a few days out here from Election Day?

31:12A few days out, Spanberger, the Democrat, is pulling far ahead. this has, of the two governor's races, New Jersey and Virginia, this one does have a potential to be a blowout. That doesn't mean that it will be. But if the polls that, as it stands now, come to fruition on Tuesday, I mean, in some polls, she's about 10 points ahead. You know, Virginia, especially the area around Washington, D.C., has a lot of federal workers. They've been hit very hard, both by doge cuts earlier this year and the shutdown. About 22 ,000 people lost their jobs in Virginia after Doge axed kind of a lot of the federal agencies in D.C.

31:50and their workforces. And so Spanberger has really been focusing on policy more than personality and making the case that Trump's policies and this administration's policies just aren't working for the state of Virginia and the workers there in particular. And, you know, we see Earl Sears remain really kind of closely aligned with the Trump agenda. So this is one way or another an embrace or a repudiation of the Trump administration in this governor's race in Virginia right outside. But when some Earl Sears is aligned with the Trump agenda, she does not have the Trump endorsement, right? Correct.

32:26Why? You know, I don't know. Trump's endorsements and non-endorsements are all over the place, and he chose not to weigh in on this one. Well, federal workers, their jobs and their prospects are a big deal in this race, Wendy. Another big deal is redistricting and the redistricting wars that we've been talking about on the show for the last several many months. Texas, of course, redistricting to get Republican advantage. And then other states reacting, red and blue states, in this arms race for gerrymandered House seats. What happens in Virginia if Abigail Spanberger, the Democrat, becomes governor after next week?

33:05Well, if she does, and I just want to very quickly add that one of the things that's interesting nationally about Spanberger is she is focusing on policy. She is not running a Trump is bad campaign. So that will be very interesting to see if Democrats can come out of the wilderness with that. But what will happen is that Democrats in Virginia will attempt to redistrict, not as dramatically perhaps as California, but will try to redistrict the state. Right now, it is a very purple state. As Amanda mentioned, you have the Washington suburbs in the northern part, which is one of the most, if not the most populous area of the state.

33:42That is blue as blue can be. As you get down into rural Virginia and down toward Norfolk, where there's that large military presence, it gets a little more red. But it is far fewer people. And so they will be able to gerrymander around the University of Virginia area and things like that to maybe add a couple of Democratic seats. Greta emails to say that we're making a mistake by referring to these races as bellwethers. She calls it typical wishful thinking. So about voter preferences for 2026, we'll let that comment stand. Then there's New York City. There's New Jersey. There's Virginia. Then there's the city of New York.

34:19It never sleeps, and it's also having a high-profile race for mayor. Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo running as an independent. And the Republican candidate, Curtis Sliwa, the founder of the Guardian Angels, If you remember the 80s, they're both running well behind Democratic Socialist and State Assemblyman Zoran Mamdani. Let our words ring out so loud tonight that Andrew Cuomo can hear them in his$8 ,000 a month apartment. New York is not for sale. That's from Sunday when Mamdani drew a crowd of about 13 ,000 people to a rally in Queens. Bernie Sanders of Vermont was there. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York was there as well.

35:05What does it signify that Mamdani has run such a successful campaign, especially online, aligned with progressives over pretty much all establishment figures, Amanda, from the incumbent mayor to the former governor to a familiar face for New Yorkers, at least, and Curtis Sliwa? I mean, he's sort of outrun them all with this really, you have to say, well-oiled online campaign especially. Yeah, I mean, some of his campaign videos are frankly some of the best I've ever seen. And I've covered politics for 15 or 20 years now. And so Mandami is running, you know, the energy is behind him. He is double digits ahead of the people, you know, the other people in the race right now.

35:48He is particularly focused on a kind of expanding the electorate, bringing in people who might not have participated otherwise or in the past. He has a lot of energy from young people. And so, you know, this race, I know, you know, we just heard that not not to consider these races bellwethers, but I do think they indicate energy in the party and what type of candidates are resonating with voters. And that could be different in different places. And in New York, it's kind of the progressive left wing of the Democratic Party right now. Meanwhile, Arthur, Momdani has run an impressive campaign, especially online.

36:23The videos are, I think, objectively that they're compelling. He's 27. Running New York technocratically is the hardest job probably in American politics. Maybe there's one harder, but actually running the city is going to be a completely different set of skills if he's elected mayor. It's going to be a big challenge for him. The conventional wisdom about that is that the mayor of New York is not as well-liked on the way out as on the way in. You're battered by that job. But right now, Mom Donnie has been the most important name on Capitol Hill during the shutdown. Every morning, House Speaker Mike Johnson has said, this is the head, the new leader of the Democratic Party.

37:07So we'll see if that continues. You know how they like to settle on a Pelosi or an AOC, and he's the new one of those. And it's been jarring to see. He's the new foil, in other words. for. He's the new foil, but he's exactly the kind of like fun, energetic young person who can do videos on the internet that I thought Democrats had been wanting for all this time. And there's this furious effort to portray him as an anti-Israel, anti-Semite by Republicans. One skill that Momdani does have that Democrats have been hungry for, politics aside, well, it's still politics, but it's messaging really, the ability to break through, the ability to get noticed, the ability to get shared.

37:45In some ways, that's separate from the actual details of the content, but he does break through, and that has a lot of Democrats. Even if they think his politics are too left, that has a lot of Democrats taking notice. Well, let's turn just for a moment to the justice system in the time that we have left. This week, the Trump Justice Department put two federal prosecutors on leave after they filed a sentencing memo referring to January 6th attackers at the Capitol as a mob of rioters. Prosecutors referred to them as a mob. They got sidelined. The defendant in this case was a pardoned January 6th writer himself convicted for later gun charges separate from January 6th.

38:25Then hours after those prosecutors were sidelined for this memo, the Justice Department withdrew that sentencing memo and filed a new memo that scrubbed all references to January 6th at all. Amanda, how do we understand why prosecutors were put on leave and what the DOJ did with this memo in this case? I think this is widely seen as just the latest act of retribution from Trump trying to shape the Justice Department in his image to deploy it against political enemies. I mean, the man in this case, this is someone who turned up armed at former President Obama's house, which, you know, I think anytime someone shows up armed at a former U.S.

39:10president's house, that's generally viewed as a credible threat. And so this is him trying to reshape the Justice Department, which we've seen on a number of fronts, you know, over the first months of this administration. Also, the effort to erase January 6th from the public memory and the public consciousness has reached courtrooms across America. I should say, either I Mayor Wendy said that Mom Donnie is 27 a moment ago. He's 34. I think I said that. He's actually a little bit older. He's 34. He made a video about turning 34, so got his age wrong. I do want to point out another important story from Illinois this week, a verdict there in Illinois.

39:44Former Sheriff's Deputy Sean Grayson was found guilty of second-degree murder in the death of Sonia Massey. She was an unarmed black woman who called 911 to report a prowler. Family friend Teresa Haley spoke at a press briefing after the verdict. We can't call the police and feel safe in our own homes. That's what Sonia did. She called for help, you all. Yes. And she was murdered in her own home. Say her name. Sonia Bassett. Say her name. Sonia Bassett. Say her name. Amanda Becker, what does this verdict tell us about how police-involved shootings are being handled now, both by courts and by communities?

40:26I think, you know, there's been a push for more accountability, and I think we're finally starting to see it happen. The former sheriff's jeopardy who was convicted faces up to 20 years in prison. This case drew condemnation widespread from all across the community and the state overall, including the governor, the White House at the time, which obviously was the previous White House. It led to policy changes in Illinois in terms of police and police training. And so I think that this is just, you know, one recent example of a demand for increased accountability and it actually happening. All right.

41:02Well, before we leave the show today, I want to do a quick lightning round, a couple of quick issues. These are some important stories that we don't want to necessarily fly under the radar before we go. We want to make sure we get to them before a meeting overseas with the president of China this week. Arthur, President Trump said the United States will resume testing nuclear weapons. That hasn't been done since 1992. He said we'll do that. Don't know if we will because can't always go on Trump's word, but it would be really escalatory. They say it's not really necessary for maintaining the integrity of our weapons.

41:34So watch to see if that actually happens. Meanwhile, President Trump had previously teased the idea of running for a third term, trolling both Democrats and Republicans. Steve Bannon's been doing it, too. There is no legal basis for him to run for a third term, but that doesn't stop him. And this week, the president appears, maybe, to have settled the question. Here he is on Air Force One. If you read it, it's pretty clear. I'm not allowed to run. It's too bad. It's too bad, she says, Wendy. Yeah. And my personal suspicion on this is that all of this was him trolling for fun, trolling for affirmation, which is something from his fans, which is something this president, you know, seems, well, says he needs a lot of.

42:15But I think even he knows this is flat out unconstitutional. The Constitution says you can only run and stand up for election twice. He's he's win election twice. He has done that. That's it. Another important part of this, by the way, not for Democrats, not for the general public, but for Republicans. Donald Trump after the midterms is about to be what's called a lame duck. And if Republicans believe he might run for a third term, maybe he can stave off that weakness that's built into the American system and the Constitution that forms lame ducks. Well, thanks so much to our guides today as we rounded up the week's news.

42:50Wendy Benjaminson of Bloomberg, Arthur Delaney of Hot Post, and Amanda Becker of the 19th News. Thank you all for joining us. We'll be back with more of the conversation in just a moment. Stay with us.

43:06it's the international hour of the news roundup president donald trump wraps up a week-long multi-stop tour in asia there were warm welcomes dancing even a golden crown gifted for the president as well as trade deals and tariff tweaks but most important was the grand finale a high-stakes meeting with president xi of china in busan south korea we're joined now by bloomberg Washington correspondent, Tyler Kendall. She's been traveling with the president this week in Asia and is on the line from Seoul. Tyler, thanks for being here. Yeah. Hey, Todd, thanks for having me. And I know it's the middle of the night in Seoul.

43:41We really appreciate you joining us here at the top of the hour. Now, President Trump and Xi's meeting, well, this was their first sit down in more than six years. And of course, there's been months of tariff threats, retaliations, increasingly heated rhetoric, trade restrictions on both sides. What came out of this meeting? What were the big deliverables? And are we now in a denouement of the trade war between the U.S. and China? Right, exactly. So this is, of course, a welcome truce at this point. We are expecting there to be this reprieve, this easing in the tensions for at least the next year, according to officials on both sides, but it doesn't really address some of the more core issues, the fundamental things that really contributed to the standoff between the U.S.

44:31and China in the first place. I'm thinking about national security, trade imbalances, both countries lobbying for dominance when it comes to the tech sector. And that's why our analysts at Bloomberg Economics say that this calm may really only be about buying time for both sides to strengthen and their own economic position ahead of what's expected to be a long road ahead of competition between these two countries. That's fascinating, sort of a short-term papering over of differences that'll get us to the next year, not a fundamental deal that's going to cool things off. Right, exactly. Though we will see some immediate impacts, right?

45:09China is going to see this immediate reduction in its tariff rate as President Trump says that he is cutting that 20 percent levy in place over fentanyl by half in response to what he says are China's pledges to curb those so-called precursor chemicals that are used to make the drug. And, you know, that's going to be a pretty big boon for the Chinese export market, particularly ahead of the busy holiday season as they're trying to export more to the U.S. Just for, you know, quick context here, Chinese exports to the U.S. are down 17 percent this year. So this is coming at a very welcome time for these exporters.

45:46And then in terms of other tangibles from this deal, it really feels like a pullback in the recent escalation from the past few weeks. The fentanyl tariff, that is different because that tariff has been in place for months. So that is really significant. But a lot of what we saw are really new threats that were on the table and are now being taken off. China will suspend those recently unveiled export curbs on critical and rare earth minerals for at least a year, though they're certainly still in the pipeline. The threat is still there. And Beijing will also resume the purchases of U.S. soybeans.

46:19That, of course, is so significant, particularly for American farmers, which haven't seen those imports at all this harvest season. And then on the U.S. side, we saw the White House also take off some threats off of the table. Well, you know, they're set to halt those plans to impose fees on Chinese ships that are docked at American ports. That's a key concession that we know Beijing really wanted to see. And they're also going to pause this rule that would have expanded restrictions on Chinese blacklisted firms. That also was considered to be a major concession that Beijing really wanted. Now, Todd, I will also quickly add there were things that we were watching that we thought might make it into this framework, but ultimately didn't.

46:59That included that President Trump said that the leaders, they did not speak about NVIDIA's Blackwell chips. That was a significant development leading. High tech AI chips of the future that there's a lot of concern if China has access to them. Exactly. That was unlikely a sigh of relief for defense hawks in Washington who were kind of caught in a tricky position after President Trump said that he was potentially going to discuss this with Chinese President Xi Jinping. But after that meeting, he said that the leaders did not speak about these advanced semiconductor chips. We know that there have been concerns in the nation's capital about lending that technology over national security concerns.

47:40He also said that they didn't even talk about the potential of a downgraded version of that process. Or that's something that a few months ago President Trump had floated could be on the table. But for now, it doesn't look like that. That was an option at this point in time. Well, Taylor, let me ask you about some of these details that you mentioned, because there's a lot of analysis here back home in the States concluding that really that China got the better of Trump here for this deal, that agreeing to buy soybeans and lift export curbs on rare earth metals, as you mentioned, simply returns to the status quo ante in exchange for major U.S.

48:15concessions. That's a lot of the analysis here. What's the best analysis that you have and what are economists saying about the, I dare say, I don't really want to say who got the better of whom, but who got the upper hand out of this thing? Well, so it's a little difficult. If we put into context, you know, both economies have been watching this very closely. This is going to be a welcome reprieve for markets that have been sort of royaled by an up and down in the trade relationship, if you will. The analysis that you're pointing to that we are hearing from experts really goes back to this idea that China has such a grip on the global market when it comes to critical and rare earth minerals.

48:55And that is a huge leverage point for China. They account for 70 percent of global supply in rare earths, 90 percent of global processing. So it's just an enormous amount. And the idea that they had these newly unveiled export curbs on critical and rare earth minerals. Now, we should say there are other export curbs that are already in place, but these were new ones. They would have had a really big global impact. The fact that they were threatened and now only delayed a year while the U.S. also had to put up its own significant concessions, including that it's going to roll back this idea it was expanding its entity list.

49:34it's sort of equating that these critical and rare earth minerals can be used as a bargaining chip. And that's sort of why you're hearing this argument that perhaps that leads more into China's leverage more so than the United States. Well, Tyler, we're going to let you go, but we've been talking about China. I do want to talk briefly just for a minute about Japan because the president trumpeted major Japanese investments in the hundreds of billions of dollars in the United States during this trip. Companies like Toyota, though, turned around and said they never agreed to the types of investments that President Trump was advertising.

50:11How much of that agreement with Japan is reality versus hype? So at this point, we got this initial list from Japan on this$550 billion investment fund pledge. And that is really critical to Japan securing those lower, more preferential tariff rates at 15%. Importantly, that also extends to autos. A really critical part for that rate to be lowered, though, has to do with Japan investing. And we saw President Trump at this reception in Tokyo with business leaders, a lot of Japanese business leaders, but also American CEOs there too. Tim Cook sitting next to the Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, for example.

50:51But the projects that have been proposed haven't necessarily been finalized yet. So that's something to watch out for here because really the U.S. government and the Japanese government need to put pen to paper and work together on these investment deals to get them approved and over the finish line. So there's still a lot of negotiations ongoing, but this Japanese deal is very significant. And Todd, it comes hand in hand with some other deals that were inked. You know, they signed one with Japan on critical minerals, on ship building. I was in Tokyo and every front page newspaper of all the local Japanese papers was really touting this shipbuilding cooperation agreement.

51:31Because, again, this goes to the fact that the U.S. is really trying to bolster its leverage ahead of that critical meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping in these sectors that are critical for competition. That's Tyler Kendall, who traveled with the president this week in Asia, reporting for Bloomberg. She's a Bloomberg, Washington correspondent, joining us from Seoul. Tyler, safe travels back. Thank you so much. Thank you. All right, let's bring it back here to the United States and to Washington, D.C., and to our panel. You've heard them all before here on The Roundup. Amy McKinnon is here, U.S.-Europe foreign affairs correspondent at the Financial Times, dressed for Halloween as a train engineer around the table.

52:10Hi, Amy. It's good to be back. Happy Halloween. Jack Detch is here, defense reporter at Politico, who at this moment is wearing a Phantom of the Opera mask around the table. Happy Halloween, Jack. A retro art deco mask, I suppose. Not branded, non-branded retro art deco. Rishi Iyengar, otherwise known as Iron Man, sitting across from me, staff writer at Foreign Policy. Hello, Iron Man. Hi. Got to stick with the Marvel Cinematic Universe. So thanks for having me. At all times. Well, the president did return from his trip to Asia, boasting of millions of dollars in trade deals that we just heard from Tyler there and wins for the economy.

52:46So many meetings great for our country with literally hundreds of billions, trillions of dollars have come into our country over the last four days represented by this meeting. But trillions of dollars where Toyota is going to build plants,$10 billion worth of plants. And, you know, I could go over so many different companies coming in. They're pouring money into the United States. So beyond even this meeting, this was an unbelievable trip. And I hope you're glad you were part of it. There's the president selling it as he does. Now, Amy McKinnon, Toyota says that$10 billion, Toyota says that's not true.

53:21I don't know if trillions is true. I think it's not. That number's not true. But more broadly, do these deals truly reflect the president's America First agendas as a win for him? Certainly as a core part of his agenda. I mean, every president in the world likes investment in their country. But, you know, Toyota's remarks, that's really a pattern that we've seen in the Trump administration. He has touted, I think, upwards of$17 trillion in investment. But when you actually look at the detail of some of these, there are very vague promises. And when you kind of look at the track record of the first Trump administration, a lot of the deals and investments that were announced then either never came to fruition or were a lot less than initially billed.

53:59So there is a lot that remains to be seen here. We can't finish talking about this trip without talking about the adulation and the gifts that the president got. A gold crown from South Korea, a gold leaf wrapped golf ball, a gold-embroidered cap, golden foods. Jack, foreign leaders have figured out what the president likes. Shinzo Abe's putter, too, on that list. Trump has always decked himself out in gold, the best way to stay in his good graces. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Every week here on The Roundup, of course, we check in on Hamas, Gaza, and Israel and the war there. Now, this week, Palestinians in Gaza experienced the deadliest 24 hours since the start of the U.S.-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Hamas went into effect almost three weeks ago.

54:44Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered what he called powerful strikes in Gaza after Israel said Hamas shot at Israeli soldiers in the south of the territory. Now, those strikes killed more than 100 people, including 46 children, according to local health officials in Gaza. On Wednesday, the Israeli military said it was returning to the ceasefire, but remained ready to attack again if necessary. President Donald Trump voiced support for Israel's actions while traveling in Asia this week and said nothing would jeopardize the ceasefire. You have to understand Hamas is a very small part of peace in the Middle East, and they have to behave.

55:25They're on the rough side, but they said they would be good, And if they're good, they're going to be happy. And if they're not good, they're going to be terminated. Their lives will be terminated. Well, Israel and Hamas have each accused each other of violating the ceasefire at this stage. Rishi, what risks does this round of strikes, these alleged violations, this very shaky, tenuous and violent ceasefire pose for the longer term process here? It's been 21 days since this ceasefire was agreed. And there have been a lot. This has been, as you pointed out, the deadliest attacks since then by Israel.

56:10But this is much longer. This conflict has been going on for this current conflict has been going on for over two years. And right now, as we heard from President Trump's comments just then, there is the United States, but also a big coalition of countries, Qatar, a lot of Western countries, very invested in making sure this ceasefire sticks. So even these violations, it is still a very fragile truce between these two parties. But there is a big investment. So there was a concerted effort to quickly get back to the ceasefire and treat these back and forth. What is Netanyahu trying to show? I think it's easy to understand the strikes and the tit for tat.

56:58I mean, this is Israel and Hamas after all. But going big, going powerful, as he said, to use a Trumpian word, killing 100 people. Netanyahu made a decision here not to strike eight people, but to strike 100. I think Netanyahu, this is clearly still such an emotional issue for Israel, for Netanyahu, for the Israeli public. where there's still negotiations over the return of some of the hostage bodies that Hamas captured during the October 7th attack a few years ago. And so it seems like an effort to show that any, they're accusing Hamas. Of course, Hamas has denied that they violated the ceasefire.

57:40But any attack on Israel will be met with extreme force. Now, Rishi mentions that local leaders, local Middle Eastern leaders in the neighborhood, are heavily invested in the success of this peace deal. That includes Qatar, whose prime minister, and that country is one of the guarantors of this peace deal, spoke about the violation of the ceasefire and blamed Hamas. What matters to us is how we make sure that we safeguard the agreement. We make sure that this event or this occasion doesn't make this agreement collapse. and making sure that we are back on track. And us and the U.S. and Egypt and Turkey, all of us, we were focused on that direction only.

58:24So, Jack, the prime minister also went on to say something that's true, which is that Hamas has not yet committed to unconditional disarmament. And that, after the return of hostages for Netanyahu, was like the entire reason for continuing this war for so long. Those two things, return of hostages, disarmed Hamas that no longer plays a role in Gaza. So how does this acknowledgement from the prime minister of Qatar complicate the deal and inform us about how it goes forward? Well, it's saying out loud what we already knew quietly, right, which is Hamas's agreement to this deal was always sort of a yes, but.

59:00Yes, we agree to the deal, but no, we're not going to disband and disarm, which was, of course, Israel and Netanyahu's core demand here. They don't want any Hamas and certainly not an armed Hamas. It's not something he's ever been willing to negotiate away. So it's not going to move the needle in getting Israeli troops out, in getting this down the road. But perhaps both sides feel they can play the clock a little bit, right? Trump's not applying consistent pressure. He's off in Asia. He's dealing with Ukraine. He's dealing with other foreign policy issues. And the Europeans, after the U.N., have not followed up with a major diplomatic salvo to get this conflict to an end.

59:36Amy, it sounds like, and this is me interpreting, when President Trump makes statements like we just heard him make, you're going to pay for it with your lives, your lives will end. And these armed elements of Hamas don't believe him. I mean, as soon as the deal was agreed to, we saw a real kind of show of force from Hamas. After, you know, two years of war, two years of being just pounded and bombarded by Israel, there was all these shows of force by Hamas kind of coming out on the streets, these very gruesome accusations of revenge killings, of them trying to kind of assert authority and crack down.

1:00:09So really kind of flying in the face of saying, you know, we're still here. and showing no intention of either backing down or disarming, as is one of the terms of the deal. Now, for some residents of Gaza City, these renewed strikes that we've been talking about have made them lose hope that there is a deal to be had. Here they are speaking to Al Jazeera. Where are the international guarantees that were promised? Where are the mediating countries that helped broker the ceasefire and pledged to ensure its continuation? Now, after the truce and the new wave of bombings on Gaza, people who had just begun to feel some sense of safety, peace and reassurance, who believe the war was finally over, are once again living in fear, especially the children and women.

1:00:54Now, this week, Hamas handed over apparent remains of two more hostages to Israel. Now, under the deal, Hamas agreed to return the 20 living and remaining bodies of hostages it was holding within 72 hours. All the living Israeli hostages were released back on October 13th in exchange, as we talked about at the time, for 250 Palestinian prisoners and more than 1 ,700 detainees from Gaza. But then, Amy, something strange this week. Israel and the Red Cross accused Hamas of staging the recovery of the body of one of the hostages this week. There was a video released by the New York Times of men appearing to bury, dig up, and rebury a body or body parts wrapped in a white shroud several times while Red Cross personnel at times stood next to a pit.

1:01:45It was a very strange scene that was recorded and published by the New York Times. How is all of this complicating the ceasefire? And what are we looking at here? I mean, it's the latest gruesome turn and an extraordinarily gruesome conflict on all sides. I mean, much of the deal now hinges on the return of the remains of the remaining hostages. There's 11 people, deceased people who remain in Gaza, and that Israel wants back. Hamas said pretty openly at the point that the deal was concluded, that they could return some of those remains immediately. Others, they weren't quite sure where they were.

1:02:24Some are buried by rubble and the years of war. Right, exactly. Some are harder to... Do we have any... It's a very strange scene that was recorded and published by the Times. Again, the digging up of a body, reburying it, moving it, burying it again, bringing in a backhoe. It was just very odd. Do we have any sense of sort of what this is? I mean, it could be an attempt to say that they are, you know, pretending to look for these bodies. It could also just be an attempt to kind of draw out the agony of hostage families, which is something we saw earlier when remains were returned, where they were paraded in coffins in front of crowds in Gaza, and in a very gruesome manner, not behind closed doors, as was the initial intent.

1:03:10Well, meanwhile, in Israel, protests in the streets in Jerusalem, hundreds of thousands of ultra-Orthodox Israelis converged on Jerusalem. This was on Thursday. They were there to protest mandatory reporting for military service. Now, in Israel, military service is compulsory for almost everybody, Jewish males and females, at 18 years old. But a recent Supreme Court ruling just last year said that there was no legal basis for allowing the most religious people to be exempt from military service. And in the absence of new legislation, the army has to begin drafting these ultra-Orthodox Jewish men.

1:03:50This is a first in Israel, hence the protest. Rishi, how is this very large protest likely to deepen divisions within Israel right now? Absolutely. It was, as you said, a huge protest, hundreds of thousands of people of the roughly 1.3 million ultra-Orthodox Jews in Israel that make up about 13 % of the population. And they oppose enlistment because they believe studying full-time in religious seminaries is the most important duty. Now, that's become an issue and a source of deep division during this war that we've seen because Israel's military forces have been stretched. There have been many reserve soldiers have served sort of hundreds of days and multiple tours of duty.

1:04:42And the Israeli military has said that they need more soldiers. And secular people want the religious people to join up and if not fight, be in green like everybody else. Absolutely. And it's also important because of Netanyahu, you mentioned his kind of almost the Trumpian language that he uses, and he has shown a similar ability to President Trump to really bounce back from otherwise career-ending sort of political setbacks over the course of this conflict and beyond. But his coalition that he's ruling right now is held together with the help of two of these ultra-Orthodox political parties.

1:05:25And there isn't an election scheduled until next November. But given the protests we're seeing, given the deep divisions, there is the prospect that he might have to hold early elections. And that creates a lot more uncertainty for him. We will continue to follow the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, the developments there, the prospects of Benjamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu, and the prospects of Hamas, who has yet to disarm as they are called to do if this peace deal is to advance beyond stage one. We'll continue to follow that story here on 1A. One story that we've been following concerning South Africa and policy here in the United States, on Thursday, the Trump administration announced that it will restrict the number of refugees that it admits to the country to just 7 ,500 people, and those people will be mostly white South Africans.

1:06:18No reason was given, but it's a dramatic drop from last year's ceiling of refugees set under the Biden administration of 125 ,000. So new restrictions, just 7 ,500 refugees to America, almost exclusively white South Africans. Well, let's get to some news out of Latin America. This week, the U.S. military struck another boat that it claims was carrying drugs and drug traffickers. The strike was somewhere in the eastern Pacific. We don't know exactly where it killed four people, according to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. The U.S. military has acknowledged striking 14 alleged drug smuggling boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific since the beginning of September, killing at least 61 people that we know about.

1:07:02The Trump administration has offered little to no evidence to justify these attacks. But on Wednesday, officials offered a briefing on Capitol Hill to Republican lawmakers only. Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat of Virginia, he's the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee. He was really angry and had this to say about being left out of that briefing. When you politicize decision making about putting our service members in harm's way, you make them less safe. Now, on Thursday, the administration did hold a second briefing, and at that one, select Democratic lawmakers were allowed to attend.

1:07:41Jack Detch, what do we know about the kind of information that was shared in these briefings? What did lawmakers learn about the legal justification for these attacks and how the U.S. government is deciding who to kill and who not to kill on the high seas? The Trump administration has been saying that the U.S. is in an armed conflict with drug traffickers, almost akin to the armed conflict we were in with ISIS a few years ago, which sounds pretty cut and dry. But they don't have an authorization for the use of military force, a post 9-11 authority to do this. So they can call these people narco-terrorists, but they're using the constitutional Article 2 authority for military operations.

1:08:18I know that's a mouthful, but this means essentially they're capped at 60 days for their ability under the Constitution to launch these strikes. We're at day 59. We're expecting a war powers vote next week from the Democrats. So it's not clear these arguments that are going to specifically GOP lawmakers are going to hold up. And there was a fascinating anecdote from the bipartisan House briefing. DePence Department officials said they don't know precisely who they've killed in these strikes, and they can take these strikes without knowing the identity of these people. Wait a second. The tweets from the Defense Department identify, oh, we say that the boats were carrying drug smugglers, drug traffickers, narco-terrorist drug traffickers.

1:08:57But you just told me that the Pentagon says they don't know their identities. How can both of those things be true? What we're hearing from lawmakers, Rep. Sarah Jacobs of California, who came out of one of those briefings, said that Defense Department officials are telling them they do not need to positively identify people on these vessels and prove this connection in order to take these strikes. So, of course, this is something that the Defense Department hasn't said publicly, but this is what we're hearing from lawmakers who have been in these briefings. The U.N. human rights chief says just within the last several hours that these strikes are unacceptable and must stop.

1:09:30That's the message from the U.N. We got this email from one of from our listener Randall in Silver Spring, Maryland, who says we've heard the justification that these are drug smugglers that pose a clear and present danger to the United States. But there's been no proof provided. And those explanations seem absurd on their face. So why is the U.S. sinking these boats? Is it to set the precedent for unprovoked military action? Could this be the precursor that gets the media and citizens accustomed to unexplained military strikes? Is it to distract the news cycle from the shutdown? All of these.

1:10:02Amy, Randall has lots of theories, but the theory of militarization of the Caribbean and Venezuela is something that's more than just idle conjecture, I think. Absolutely. I mean, the Trump administration has made it very clear that it wants to focus on the Western Hemisphere and its defense posture, and this is part of that. I mean, as Jack alluded to, I mean, the power to declare war lies with Congress and the Constitution. The latitude that the president does have is when it's an immediate pressing national security threat. He does have the authority to conduct some limited strikes. But in that briefing that Jack referenced in the House Armed Services Committee, the DoD lawyers were absent from that hearing, so they were not there to present the administration's legal justification of the grounds, which they think they have the authority to carry out these strikes, which is frustrating lawmakers deeply.

1:10:52In other words, the people who can explain what's changed. We're not there. Two months ago, drug dealers on the high seas were people who you apprehended, arrested, and tried. Now they're people who you kill, even if you can't say who they even are. There's some news from Sudan that we want to make sure you're updated on as we keep an eye on tragic developments there. This week, paramilitary rapid support forces seized control of the entire Darfur region, ousting the rival Sudanese army from its last stronghold there. Video footage released this week showed trenches filled with dead bodies and paramilitary fighters executing civilians as they begged for their lives.

1:11:31The two-year battle for control of Sudan, it's killed over 40 ,000 people and created the world's worst humanitarian crisis with more than 14 million people displaced. The capture of the provincial capital of North Darfur by powerful Arab-led forces raises fears that Africa's third largest nation might split again nearly 15 years after the oil-rich South Sudan gained independence following years of civil war there. We were talking about American military strikes of what the government calls drug dealers and narco-terrorists on the high seas in the Caribbean and in the eastern Pacific. Pacific.

1:12:14And before we went to a break, Rishi, Amy was talking about sort of the connection of these strikes with another thing going on in the Caribbean, which is an American military buildup in Puerto Rico and in other places. A U.S. warship docked in Trinidad and Tobago for four days this week, engaged in military exercises before leaving the area. What can you tell us about this military flex that we're seeing in this region? Why is the U.S. fleet gathering around the southern part of the Caribbean here. It's all part of, as Amy pointed out, this effort to really put pressure on what the Trump administration calls narco-terrorists.

1:12:54Now, this U.S. ship that docked the SS gravely has further made that controversial between Trinidad and Tobago, where the U.S. ship docked, and Venezuela, which canceled an energy agreement. The Venezuelan government canceled an energy agreement with Trinidad and Tobago over this. But it does seem like Trinidad and Tobago, the government there, has kind of brushed that off and said that these are routine military exercises. So they're trying to downplay it and avoid inflaming for the tensions. But that comes as reports from the Wall Street Journal and the Miami Herald today that the U.S. government, citing U.S.

1:13:38officials, may be preparing for actual airstrikes on Venezuela on sites that they say are used for drug trafficking into the United States. So that would prove to be a major escalation, but possibly what the Trump administration legally or illegally sees as a logical next step for this military buildup that they've been doing. Ground strikes in Venezuela on alleged drug sites. What are we to make of this pretext? The focus of the Trump administration rhetorically has been fentanyl. It is the drug that is killing thousands of Americans and addicting thousands more. You can see the images every time you log on of what fentanyl looks like.

1:14:21Venezuela is not a major producer of fentanyl. Venezuela is not in the fentanyl game. That's very well established. How do we reconcile these two things? It's part of we saw that in a sort of unusual move, President Trump confirmed a few weeks ago that he had authorized CIA covert action in Venezuela. And out of all the places across Latin America, across the region, beyond the U.S. southern border, we've seen a big focus on drugs coming in. But there's been a particular emphasis from the Trump administration on Venezuela. And they've long had issues with Nicolas Maduro, the leader there. And so there is some speculation that they could be kind of laying the groundwork to take down the Maduro regime.

1:15:14And there's a lot of telegraphing. They, of course, have not said that overtly and won't say that. But it seems to be almost a pretext in some ways that the targeting of these drug groups is a way to target Venezuela. Pretextual designation of drug sites in Venezuela, killing of at least 61 people on boats that the military says are drug boats, providing no proof or evidence to the public or to members of Congress. Jack Rishi just mentioned reporting this week CIA actions on the ground, but the AP reported this week that U.S. law enforcement, an agent, secretly tried to recruit Nicolás Maduro's pilot to join a plot to capture the Venezuelan leader.

1:15:58What do we know? Yeah, this was 16 months of trying to pitch Bittner Villegas to help divert Maduro's plane to a place where United States authorities could make the arrest. They said they'd make him a very rich man. So, I mean, this extended over multiple administrations. There was an operation that tried to get this going. Villegas ultimately didn't buy into this, but this just references kind of what we're seeing right now, a stepped-up covert campaign that Trump has even referenced publicly, which is a huge step away from usually how covert operations are conducted, but it just shows the seriousness of the way that this has been stepped up, the way that the pretext is being developed, and the level of planning, of course, the journal reporting today that it seems like the U.S.

1:16:44now mapping out military targets within Venezuela that they could strike? Well, the Trump administration is advertising its pretexts and its coming strategy in Venezuela. Down in the southern part of the continent, the Trump administration is also advertising its strong support for Javier Malay and his government, pledging up to$40 billion in bailout funds if Malay's party won recent elections. Amy McKinnon, Malay's party won Unrecent elections. Did Donald Trump help? Whether or not it tipped the scales, I couldn't say, but they certainly did. The U.S. did weigh in to offer to prop up and stabilize the Argentine currency ahead of the elections, which I have to think would have tipped the balance in his favor.

1:17:29More news from around the Caribbean as we exit the region in just a moment. Hurricane Melissa hit Jamaica as a Category 5 storm, winds reaching 185 miles an hour, accompanied by torrential rains. Melissa also impacted Cuba, Haiti, and the Bahamas. Here's Brandon Miller, meteorologist at CNN, who joined us on Wednesday. You know, this storm really maxed out the scale, you know, 185 miles per hour. We've never seen a storm make landfall stronger than that. We've only seen one in the Atlantic ever climb slightly above that. Category 5 storm, and we watched the devastation, covered it for you here on 1A just this past week as that storm passed over and devastated the island of Jamaica.

1:18:13We'll continue to cover and follow that story as well. All right, we'll exit our hemisphere, the Caribbean, South America, Venezuela, and Argentina for the moment, because of course it's the roundup, and that means we have to talk Ukraine, where there's news that Russia conducted two tests of new tech that can be used in a nuclear attack. President Vladimir Putin announced the first on Sunday, saying the country tested a missile that can carry a nuclear warhead and travel a lot further than conventional ICBMs because it's also powered by nuclear material. Then on Wednesday, Putin announced a second test.

1:18:49Russia had tested a nuclear-powered undersea drone called Poseidon, and it can travel about 100 knots, 115 miles an hour underwater and trigger a devastating tsunami if it's equipped with a nuke and it's detonated near a coastal city. These are two of Russia's six nuclear weapons projects under development. Jack, what else do we know about these weapons and Russia's development of them and the timing of Putin's announcements? So Russia has four novel nuclear systems they've been working on. One's a hypersonic glide vehicle called Avangard Kinzhal, which we've seen them launch in Ukraine. The Circon hypersonic anti-ship cruise missile and the two that you mentioned, the Burevestnik.

1:19:31Of course, I'll lean on our Russian speaker, Amy, to get the pronunciation right. Close. And the Poseidon, I'll take close. So this is kind of leading to these tensions between the two powers, between the Kremlin and the United States. because as we saw Trump launch the argument that there could be more nuclear tests from the United States, it's driving this feeling within Washington that the Russians are sort of cheating the United States on arms control. They're ripping us off. They're sort of pushing their weapons tests and their nuclear development programs past where the United States is, and it's leading us to a place where we're probably going to abandon some limits of arms control.

1:20:10In response to this, just as he headed into the meeting with President Xi earlier this week, Rishi, Donald Trump went on True Social, said the United States would resume nuclear testing. What would it mean? And there hasn't been a nuclear test in this country since 1992. What would it mean practically, financially, strategically for the United States to actually start detonating nukes and nuclear tests again? There's a lot of the Trump's nuclear claim is kind of unclear in many ways. the Trump administration or Trump has not confirmed whether it's just testing nuclear-capable weapons like we just heard Russia has done.

1:20:53They haven't made clear whether it's kind of a much more broader scale nuclear testing. And you've seen a lot of local communities in the U.S., in Nevada, for example, Nevada, Nevada, which faced the effects the last time the U.S. did this several decades ago, come out in opposition. So there's more questions than answers and a lot of unanswered questions around this. That's Rishi Iyengar of Foreign Policy. Jack Dech of Politico is here and Amy McKinnon from the Financial Times. I'm Todd Zwillick. You're listening to 1A. Amy McKinnon, you are the resident Russian speaker around the table. As Jack made clear, your take on the timing of Russia's tests and the American, or at least the presidential response that nuclear testing would resume, your take on the timing of that and how much of it is real?

1:21:49So the timing of these Russian nuclear tests comes after there was this kind of interesting flip-flop flurry of diplomatic activity between the U.S. and Russia earlier this month, where Trump announced that he was going to meet Putin in Budapest after their phone call, which Trump said was positive. And then five days later said that the summit was off. And then very quickly, Trump imposed sanctions on Russia's two largest oil companies. So clearly, Trump is getting frustrated with Russia. People close to the president will tell you that that is genuine, that that's not for show. And this is Putin trying to get attention.

1:22:25I mean, the Russians are often quite quick to reach for the nuclear file if they do want to kind of get American attention and do some saber rattling. You mentioned those sanctions, American sanctions against two large Russian oil concerns, Rosneft and Luke oil. These sanctions have a chance of moving the needle in Ukraine. U.S. analysts have now said, and these reports have come out, basically giving voice to what everybody in Europe seems to have known all along, which is that Putin is not interested, has no incentive for a ceasefire or an end to the war. Trump reached for the big ticket item.

1:23:02There were sanctions that he could have reached for that are smaller or more incremental, but going after Rosneft and Lukoil was certainly a big action. When you speak to people who are really versed in the details of this, it's going to fall down to enforcement. China is the biggest purchaser of Russian oil now. India is number two. Is the Trump administration going to speak to Beijing and New Delhi and get them to roll up their purchase of Russian oil? New Delhi seems to be interested in that. China, I mean, it didn't even come up, Trump said in his conversation with Xi this week. So it's all going to matter down the road when it comes to enforcement of these sanctions.

1:23:42All right, one final bit of news from Europe as we round out the hour here and get to your reporter's notebook, which we'll do in just a second. More arrests this week in France as police narrow in on suspects tied to that Louvre heist that captivated the world. The total number of arrests are now seven. Prosecutors say about 100 investigators are working seven days a week with roughly 150 forensic samples analyzed so far. About 189 items have been sealed as evidence, and key details have snapped into focus, including the fact that thieves knew the direction that outdoor cameras were pointing when they got that cherry picker outside the second floor of the Louvre in Paris.

1:24:20Still no sign of those Napoleonic jewels valued at more than$100 million. We have just a second before we have to wrap up the hour. In a sentence or two, if you like, tell me what stories you're looking at for next week. Amy McKinnon, the Halloween happy railroad engineer. Go ahead. It all depends on what Trump posts on Truth Social, to be very frank. My life revolves around that a lot these days. A little bit reactive. Jack Detch, Phantom of the Opera this Halloween. What's next for you? The U.S. lifted sanctions on the Bosnian-Serbian leader Milorad Dodic this week. That's a major move that sort of potentially frees him and frees his hand in a place that a lot of European officials are worried could be a separatist region or could provide some breakaway tensions there.

1:25:08Would that make the Russians happy, lifting sanctions on him? The Russians, of course, are very close with the Serbians and by extension close with Dodic. Yeah. Rishi Iyengar, Iron Man this Halloween, what's next for you? I'm surprised Amy didn't say this, but as our resident Russia watcher, but Hungarian President Viktor Orban is coming to D.C. next week. We'll be keeping an eye on that and also the Supreme Court hearing on whether Trump's sweeping tariffs are legal or not. Pay attention to the B-roll from news events all across Washington. If you see an engineer or a Phantom of the Opera or Iron Man himself from the Marvel Comic Universe, you'll know that it's either Amy McKinnon of the Financial Times, Jack Detch of Politico, or Rishi Iyengar from Foreign Policy.

1:25:51Thanks, guys, for being here, and happy Halloween. Mike Kidd is our sound designer and engineer. Chris Castano is our digital editor. Maya Garg is our senior managing producer. Alexandra Botee is our senior supervising producer. Eileen Humphries is the editor and producer of 1A On Demand. And Barb Anguiano produces our podcast. Special thanks to Matthew Simonson and Zoe Kazanzidis for their help every week. This program comes to you from WAMU, part of American University in Washington. It's distributed by NPR. I'm Todd Zwilich. This is 1A.

1:26:27Thank you.

From the publisher
The government shutdown has gone on for longer than one month.

Now, Republicans are considering ending the Senate filibuster to reopen the government.

The Supreme Court requested more information as it heard arguments about whether President Donald Trump is within his rights to deploy the National Guard to Chicago.

Two prosecutors who went after January 6 rioters were put on leave this week for filing a sentencing memo in the case of a man who showed up armed outside of the Obama residence.

Amidst a brutal trade dispute, President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping sat down for a face-to-face meeting in South Korea.

Despite recent Israeli strikes killing more than 100 people in Gaza, the Trump Administration says the ceasefire with Hamas is still on.

Following a snub by President Trump and a successful nuclear weapons test, intelligence officials say Russian President Vladimir Putin is showing no signs of seeking a compromise to end the war Ukraine.

Find more of our programs online. Listen to 1A sponsor-free by signing up for 1A+ at plus.npr.org/the1a. 

Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

NPR Privacy Policy

More from 1A

All 320 episodes
The News Roundup For October 31, 20251A · 1 h 27 min
Listen in VO