In short
Podcast Notes: 1A Episode - What The Future Holds For FEMA In North Carolina
Overview In this episode, the 1A podcast delves into the future of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in North Carolina, particularly in the wake of Hurricane Helene's devastation. The discussion centers around significant delays in federal disaster funding, the impact of leadership changes within DHS, and broader implications for disaster response and recovery efforts in the U.S.
Key Themes and Discussions
Introduction
- Recent News Update: Brief mention of ongoing geopolitical issues, including the U.S.-Israel war and natural disasters affecting the U.S.
- Focus on Natural Disasters: Highlighted the increasing frequency and severity of weather disasters, emphasizing FEMA's crucial role.
Current State of FEMA
- Funding Delays: North Carolina has received only a small fraction of the estimated $60 billion in federal disaster relief funding, with only around $7 billion allocated.
- Local Impact: Many residents are still in temporary housing, and local governments await reimbursements for expenses incurred during recovery efforts.
Expert Panel Insights
- Brianna Sachs (Disaster Correspondent, The Washington Post)
- Discussed the slow disbursement of funds and the disconnect between state leaders and federal officials regarding funding allocation.
- Barry Scanlon (Former Senior Advisor of FEMA)
- Provided context on FEMA's historical role and the bureaucratic challenges that have exacerbated recovery efforts post-disaster.
- Gerard Albert (Western North Carolina Rural Communities Reporter)
- Offered on-the-ground perspectives about the struggles faced by local communities in recovery efforts.
Key Issues Raised
- Leadership Changes at DHS: With Kristi Noem's departure, there is speculation about how new leadership will affect FEMA's operations and funding distribution.
- Bureaucratic Challenges: The complex processes involved in FEMA funding often lead to significant delays, impacting local governments and communities.
- Mention of a "Byzantine" process and historical context of funding delays post-disaster.
- Political Influences: Discrepancies noted in federal funding allocation to different states, suggesting possible political motivations in distributing aid.
Legal and Legislative Context
- Pending Lawsuits and Funding: North Carolina's lawsuit against the Trump administration was aimed at securing infrastructure and disaster mitigation funds that were previously stalled.
- Need for Reform: Discussion of the need for legislative changes to streamline FEMA's funding and disaster response processes.
Personal Accounts and Community Impact
- Voices of Disaster Survivors: Several listeners shared their personal experiences with FEMA, highlighting frustrations with the slow recovery process and inadequate assistance.
- Economic Burdens: Emphasized that local governments are often forced to use their own funds to cover disaster recovery costs, which can strain budgets and lead to long-term financial issues.
Conclusion
- Future of FEMA: The panel speculates about the potential restructuring of FEMA under new leadership and the need for a comprehensive approach to disaster management that considers both local and federal responsibilities.
- Call for Action: There is a consensus on the urgency for reforming FEMA to ensure faster and more effective disaster response, especially as extreme weather events continue to escalate.
Key Takeaways
- The role of FEMA in disaster recovery is critical but hindered by bureaucratic inefficiencies and political factors.
- North Carolina's recovery efforts post-Hurricane Helene illustrate the severe implications of funding delays on communities.
- Future leadership choices at DHS could significantly influence FEMA's operational efficacy and funding distribution.
- A collaborative approach among state, local, and federal agencies is necessary for effective disaster management.
Final Thoughts As discussions around FEMA's future continue, it is clear that reforms are needed to enhance responsiveness and support for communities facing the realities of increasingly frequent and severe natural disasters. The voices of both experts and disaster survivors underscore the pressing need for change in how disaster recovery is managed in the U.S.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOUnderstanding the Role of FEMA
0:59 to 2:36
Discussion of FEMA's importance amidst increasing weather disasters and funding challenges.
“Hurricane Helene, a catastrophic Category 4, showing no mercy.”
Hurricane Helene Recovery Efforts
2:48 to 4:04
Detailed conversation on recovery efforts in North Carolina post-Hurricane Helene.
“Grainger knows that as an HVAC technician, you and your digital multimeter are in high demand.”
Funding Delays and Government Response
4:04 to 6:28
Exploration of funding discrepancies and delays affecting North Carolina's recovery.
“So in 2024, Hurricane Helene hit North Carolina hard, especially counties along the western part of the state.”
Historical Context of FEMA's Funding
6:28 to 8:10
Analysis of FEMA's past funding processes and improvements needed.
“And what you're talking about there is now former head of DHS, Kristi Noem's decision to have anything$100 ,000 or more approved by her office, correct?”
Leadership Changes in FEMA and DHS
8:10 to 14:06
Discussion on the implications of leadership changes within FEMA and DHS.
“And it takes about a week or 10 days to get through what we call the million-dollar queue.”
Senate Confirmation of FEMA Leadership
14:06 to 14:40
Learn about the significance of confirming a new leader for FEMA amidst ongoing challenges.
“As you mentioned, Senator Mullen today is going to be having his confirmation hearing in the Senate.”
DHS Shutdown and Its Impact on FEMA
14:40 to 15:10
Discuss the effects of the DHS shutdown on FEMA's disaster response efforts.
“Meanwhile, DHS has also been partially shut down for more than a month, And that's as congressional Democrats negotiate with the White House over changes to federal immigration enforcement policy.”
The Long Road of Disaster Recovery
15:10 to 15:40
Understand the lengthy and complex process of disaster recovery managed by FEMA.
“And I think what I want people to remember is when you have a disaster that the recovery is a 10-year plus process.”
Challenges Faced by Disaster Workers
15:40 to 16:50
Explore the unexpected challenges disaster workers faced during the DHS shutdown.
“stopped, slowed down a lot of these ongoing disaster projects.”
Funding Delays for North Carolina
16:50 to 19:30
Examine the consequences of funding delays on North Carolina communities post-disaster.
“and do not slowly roll that out, many states and communities don't have the resources, the rainy day funds, the emergency management infrastructure to just pick up and keep going.”
Show all 24 chapters
Understanding Hazard Mitigation Grants
19:30 to 20:53
Gain insights into how hazard mitigation grants function and their importance for communities.
“He announced the federal government will send the state$11 million for that hazard mitigation grant program.”
Streamlining FEMA's Bureaucracy
20:53 to 23:08
Learn about the potential reforms that could streamline FEMA's response processes.
“because the process Gerard just described, I think you used the word Byzantine to describe the bureaucracy around FEMA.”
FEMA's Role in Disaster Relief
23:08 to 23:50
Discover the traditional role of FEMA in disaster management and its current challenges.
“Well, here's how former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem described FEMA's role in disaster relief.”
Rainy Day Funds and State Budgets
23:50 to 25:36
Explore how states manage disaster costs with limited rainy day funds and budget constraints.
“other than trying to destroy it by removing staff from all the regions.”
Economic Impacts of Delayed Aid
25:36 to 27:37
Understand the broader economic implications of delayed federal disaster aid in North Carolina.
“The president approved a disaster for public assistance, but didn't include Category F, I believe, which are public utilities.”
Looking Ahead: FEMA's Future
27:37 to 28:00
Gain insights into what to expect from FEMA and its leadership during upcoming challenges.
“And as North Carolina continues to wait for the disaster funds it needs?”
FEMA Funding Challenges in New England
29:06 to 29:42
A listener shares their experience with FEMA's funding process after a disaster.
“Our small town in New England was hit by flooding twice in recent years.”
Trump's Plans for FEMA Restructuring
29:48 to 30:45
Discussion on President Trump's intention to restructure or eliminate FEMA and its implications.
“I'll also be signed an executive order to begin the process of fundamentally reforming and overhauling FEMA or maybe getting rid of FEMA.”
Impact of State Responsibility on Disaster Management
30:46 to 34:18
Exploration of the potential effects of transferring disaster management responsibilities to states.
“and they had a report that they provided the outgoing secretary that she apparently chopped up and was going to announce in December, and the White House canceled the meeting at the last minute.”
Challenges of Uncertain Federal Assistance
34:19 to 35:35
Analysis of how uncertainty in federal disaster funding affects state preparedness.
“States are facing having to absorb higher Medicaid costs, higher SNAP costs.”
FEMA Layoffs and Their Consequences
35:36 to 37:49
Veteran FEMA employees discuss the impact of job cuts on the agency's effectiveness.
“After Hurricane Helene flooded our Asheville apartment, this comes from Jenny, the fire department ordered us to evacuate.”
Public Misconceptions About FEMA's Role
37:50 to 42:01
Debate on the misconceptions surrounding FEMA's responsibilities and the need for reforms.
“But coming in with a wrecking ball and firing en masse, and we have reporting on this, that it did not seem as if the DHS was going through and saying, okay, this person's not needed.”
Challenges Faced by Disaster Victims
42:01 to 43:46
Learn about the limitations of disaster assistance programs for victims.
“Disaster victims don't really get that much.”
Future of FEMA Leadership
43:47 to 44:47
Explore the potential changes in FEMA leadership and its impact on disaster management.
“Well, Brianna, we're heading into spring, deeper into the tornado and wildfire seasons.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This message comes from Charles Schwab with their original podcast, Choiceology. Choiceology is a show about the psychology and economics behind people's decisions. Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwab.com slash podcast. Hi, it's Jen. Before we get into today's show on FEMA, a quick update on the U.S.-Israel war in Iran. On Wednesday, Israel says it killed Iran's intelligence minister, Ismail Khatib. Iran's president confirmed Khatib's assassination, saying it was, quote, cowardly. The killing follows the death of Ali Larajani, Iran's top security official. He died in an Israeli attack on Tuesday.
0:39Meanwhile, Israel is ramping up attacks in Beirut against the Tehran-backed militia group Hezbollah. We'll have more for you during the Friday News Roundup. And stay tuned to your local NPR station and NPR.org for the latest.
0:58This morning, a monster storm unleashing its fury overnight on Florida's Gulf Coast. Hurricane Helene, a catastrophic Category 4, showing no mercy. destroying property, flooding hotel lobbies, businesses, and homes. To the west now, where the Gifford Fire burning through the rugged backcountry of California's central coast is now the state's largest wildfire of the year. It reached so-called mega fire status. In fact, it's one of 38 large fires burning right now across nine states. Heavy snow pummeling parts of the Midwest. In Minnesota, this powerful storm system leading to icy roads and reduced visibility.
1:35The state slammed with more than two feet. Across Oklahoma's panhandle, an urgent rush to escape the flames as five fires have burned more than 150 ,000 acres across the region. Wildfires, flooding and hurricanes, just a few of the weather disasters we grapple with every year throughout the U.S. As extreme weather events grow more frequent and costly, the role of the Federal Emergency Management Agency is more important than ever. Kristi Noem is out at the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees FEMA. That means the agency will soon have a new leader managing disaster response and recovery in the U.S.
2:13And that's big news for states like North Carolina, where people are still recovering from Hurricane Helene. Federal funds have been slow to roll out. So what does the future of FEMA hold as the agency sorts through a backlog of billions of dollars in federal disaster relief funding? And what does it all mean for states like North Carolina that have had to bear the burden of disaster-related costs as their communities try to recover? I'm Jen White. You're listening to the 1A Podcast. We'll be back to tackle those questions and more after this short break. Stay with us.
2:47This message comes from Grainger. Grainger knows that as an HVAC technician, you and your digital multimeter are in high demand. So when a noisy office HVAC turns out to be a failing blower motor, you don't break a sweat. With Grainger's easy-to-use website and product information, you can select the product you need to keep everything humming right along. Call 1-800-GRAINGER, click grainger.com, or just stop by. Grainger, for the ones who get it done. Welcome back, and let's get right into our conversation about FEMA and how disaster response and recovery in the U.S. will be managed in the future.
3:24Joining us from Los Angeles is Brianna Sachs. She's a disaster correspondent at The Washington Post. Brianna, welcome back to the program. Thanks so much for having me back. Joining us from WAMU in Washington is Barry Scanlon. He's a former senior advisor of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. He's also the president and co-founder of DCMC Partners. That's a crisis management and public safety consulting firm that helps with recovery from crises and disasters. Barry, it's always great to have you. Thank you, Jen. And joining us from Asheville is Gerard Albert. He's the Western North Carolina rural communities reporter for Blue Ridge Public Radio.
4:01Gerard, thanks for joining us. Happy to be here. So in 2024, Hurricane Helene hit North Carolina hard, especially counties along the western part of the state. Gerard, where do recovery efforts stand a year and a half after that storm? Well, big picture wise, the storm caused$60 billion in damage. And so far, only$7 billion, give or take, have been allocated from the federal government. On a more on the ground level, there are still hundreds of people living in RVs and trailers and temporary housing, waiting on home repairs. There are still many local governments who are waiting on dozens of millions of dollars in FEMA reimbursements after clearing debris in the immediacy after the storm.
4:55So, as you say, North Carolina requested federal funds to cover around half of the estimated$60 billion in damage the storm caused. State officials say, look, we've received about 10 percent of that money. Federal officials say they've given North Carolina at least$1 billion for recovery efforts. Brianna, what's the disconnect between what state leaders are saying and what the government is saying? Yeah, we, that's a great question. The DHS has been holding up hundreds of millions of pre-approved funds for North Carolina for months now. I think we did a deep dive into this last August, and we also looked at data that showed that they had given more money to Tennessee and Florida for Hurricane Helene and Hurricane Milton than North Carolina.
5:49And so that is the overwhelming question. DHS says it's pushing out money faster than any other administration. But again, we keep seeing states like North Carolina and communities on the ground just not getting that money quickly. And it's just been a lot of frustrating back and forth from state officials, such as Governor Josh Stein having to send all these letters to Nome. And the contract, the$100 ,000 contract process has held up a lot of money over the last, I guess, like nine, 10 months now since it was instituted last summer. And what you're talking about there is now former head of DHS, Kristi Noem's decision to have anything$100 ,000 or more approved by her office, correct?
6:40Yes, the ramifications of that decision are still being seen and we probably don't know. But I have just been talking to FEMA employees across the agency for a long time and even DHS officials who have been saying that this just caused massive chaos and backlog and have prevented states such as North Carolina from getting money that, again, like FEMA moves slowly and is already bureaucratic. Craddock, this procedure, as well as others instituted by the former DHS secretary, really just caused a pretty serious holdup and slowdown of disaster release funds. Well, Barry, give us some context. Historically, what role has FEMA played in providing funding before, during, and after disasters like Hurricane Helene?
7:30Well, there's always been money for planning, training, exercises, and for mitigation works, making bridges stronger, protecting schools from the next storm. But the large amount of money, the vast majority of money, is always in disaster recovery. And FEMA's process is Byzantine, and it is long, and it needs to be improved and fixed. And there's a bill in the House that's passed the Transportation Infrastructure Committee to do that. And hopefully that will move forward and simplify some of these processes. But as has been mentioned, normally you would go to a school, document the damages, and then work with FEMA to come up with a number, and then it gets to Washington.
8:10And it takes about a week or 10 days to get through what we call the million-dollar queue. And that queue has now taken six months, nine months, 12 months, given the past secretary. And all that does is delay children from getting back into school, hospitals from fixing an emergency room, a whole host of things that you can think of in public infrastructure that impact real people's lives every day. Now, Gerard, we spoke briefly about the difficulty North Carolina has faced in securing the funds they need for relief from Hurricane Helene. Now, the federal government granted$116 million in disaster relief funding to the state for recovery and to prevent future disaster damage across the state.
8:54But that money came a month after North Carolina and more than 20 other states won their lawsuit against the Trump administration's attempt to shut down infrastructure and disaster mitigation projects around the country. Walk us through that lawsuit. Yeah, that lawsuit was filed by our Attorney General Jeff Jackson, along with dozens of other states. And this is funds that were coming before Hurricane Helene even to shore up infrastructure, water plants, sewage plants, a lot of them which did get damaged in Helene, and now that work needs to be done as well. But that money is still being held up.
9:32Just last week, Attorney General Jackson again pushed FEMA after a court ruling to actually, you know, distribute the money. Now, North Carolina isn't the only state experiencing delays in getting their disaster funds. In February, the Trump administration said it was releasing more than $5 billion and delayed disaster aids to some states, except for a handful run by Democratic governors. Those states include California, Illinois, Minnesota, and Colorado. Brianna, what did the administration say about the decision to exclude those states? Well, the administration has been saying it's not political for a while.
10:15And we had been seeing that there's been a lot of ties for their immigration policies and requests that states such as California have been pushing back on. And I've also heard internally from FEMA employees, they don't think it's a Democratic versus Republican situation. So I think there is some nuance there. I do agree that it stands out that states where I live, such as California, and I live in Los Angeles. My dad lost his home in the LA fires, and we are still waiting on a lot of money that has taken more than a year to get here. It does raise some eyebrows, but it does seem to be a little muddled as to whether it is strictly a blue versus a red situation, because last year I did cover the fact that red states were also not getting money, and the administration has been very slow to release any really public assistance or hazard mitigation grants, which are money that help states and communities build back stronger from disasters.
11:18And that kind of money hasn't really been going to any state, whether it is red or blue. Coming up, the Department of Homeland Security's partial shutdown stretches into its second month. What challenges does that pose for disaster response and relief? Stay with us.
11:39This message comes from Grainger. Grainger knows that as an HVAC technician, you and your digital multimeter are in high demand. So when a noisy office HVAC turns out to be a failing blower motor, you don't break a sweat. With Grainger's easy-to-use website and product information, you can select the product you need to keep everything humming right along. Call 1-800-GRAINGER, click grainger.com, or just stop by. Granger, for the ones who get it done. Let's get back into our conversation. Now, the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees FEMA, is undergoing big leadership changes. We'll get to that shortly.
12:17But first, Barry, there are laws that govern how FEMA typically disperses relief funding. Explain how that's supposed to work. Well, when a disaster hits and the president declares it a federal disaster area, They work to document the damages, put an estimate on them, and then provide, it's normally a 75-25 cost share, where the federal government picks up 75 % of the bill and state and locals pay the other 25%. They are not really held to any timeline. The interesting and unfortunate thing for states and localities and others, schools that go through this process is, if FEMA sends you a question, they give you a 30-day deadline to reply to their question.
12:58and they may take six or nine months to then get back to you. So the system needs to be changed. States need to be given the proper warning and when these legislations are passed, because you can't just change the rules one day. Right now, no one knows what's going to happen with the next disaster. They don't know where the funding is going to come from, if it's going to come through. And it's terribly difficult once you've managed the event to try and launch recovery when you don't know what the rules of the game are. I think for a lot of people, when they think about weather disasters that have hit the U.S., their minds go to Hurricane Katrina.
13:36Barry, what changed after that disaster that changed the rules a bit about how this department was supposed to function? Well, it put limits and minimums on the leadership and the experience of leadership that needed to be at that agency, whether it was at the regional administrator level or, most importantly, the Post-Katrina Act required that an expert emergency manager be the head of FEMA, which we have not had during this current administration. As you mentioned, Senator Mullen today is going to be having his confirmation hearing in the Senate. So a big question moving forward is not just his leadership, if he gets confirmed, but rather putting a real emergency manager in charge of FEMA so that they can work with the states and do the important work that happens when, unfortunately, disasters hit.
14:30Well, as you mentioned, President Trump has nominated Republican Senator Mark Wayne Mullen of Oklahoma to replace Kristi Noem. He faces Senate confirmation. That confirmation process is underway. Meanwhile, DHS has also been partially shut down for more than a month, And that's as congressional Democrats negotiate with the White House over changes to federal immigration enforcement policy. And DHS has restricted FEMA's disaster work during the shutdown, even though the agency's disaster relief fund is a separate pool of money that's not affected by the shutdown. But, Brianna, how is this partial shutdown of DHS hampering disaster response work and holding up relief even more?
15:08Yeah, so we were seeing this across the country. And I think what I want people to remember is when you have a disaster that the recovery is a 10-year plus process. And FEMA is involved in that process every year. And so we have disaster recovery projects, tens of thousands of them still ongoing from Texas, Florida, Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands, California. these just take a long time. So the partial shutdown, for some reason, they stymied and stopped, slowed down a lot of these ongoing disaster projects. And these disaster workers, again, are funded by a separate pool of money. And when this happened, as what usually happens with DHS when it makes a decision, it was extremely sudden.
16:02There wasn't really any process to it. Disaster workers were kind of caught like mid-travel. They couldn't fly home for funerals, for their daughters giving birth, for doctor appointments because they weren't allowed to travel. And then that changed the day after. So it just caused a lot of unnecessary per FEMA employees chaos and confusion and stilted these ongoing disaster recovery projects in states that cannot pick up the slack and just dip into resources to be like, no worries, if we can't get help from FEMA, we'll keep going. And I think that's just really the big problem we're seeing here is if you just drastically halt or stop FEMA assistance and do not slowly roll that out, many states and communities don't have the resources, the rainy day funds, the emergency management infrastructure to just pick up and keep going.
17:03Well, we got this email from Pat who says,
17:32which impacted mostly very small towns. Flood repairs in these towns often double, if not triple, the size of these towns' annual budget. Thanks for that message. Gerard, what's at stake for communities in western North Carolina the longer these critical disaster funds remain in limbo? Well, again, there's kind of two levels to it. The local government level, which are waiting on public assistance grants, which are these reimbursements that FEMA allocates to local governments who spend money in the aftermath of the storm, either clearing debris or staffing 24-7 emergency management. And those grants just have been sporadic to come.
18:15I've talked to a few people who kind of study how FEMA disperses their money, and they've called it a magic wand process. Even Senator Ted Budd, when I asked him about this process, he said that disbursement largely relied on him calling Christy Noem, who he had a relationship with, and asking her and urging her to push out the money. And then for people like the gentleman who just emailed, here in North Carolina, we have about 800 people who have applied for these buyouts through the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. And it has to go through state approval first and then federal approval. The state has approved about 600 of the 800 applicants, and they've just been waiting on the federal government to approve any of them.
19:07I think we've seen a slow trickle, maybe enough for about 12 properties throughout Western North Carolina. But these are people who are out of their homes, can't live in them because they've been flooded out, and are still paying mortgage on those homes and renting or staying in temporary housing while they are still paying a mortgage on a house they can't live in. Now, you mentioned North Carolina's Republican Senator Ted Budd. He announced the federal government will send the state$11 million for that hazard mitigation grant program. But that's a fraction of the$81 million in delayed federal aid that's now on its way to the state for Hurricane Helene recovery.
19:46Gerard, tell us a bit more about that program and what that new money specifically will go to. Well, hazard mitigation buyouts are complex, just like almost every other thing that FEMA does. But people who get flooded out of their homes and don't want to live in them anymore because it would cost too much to repair or because they're now in a flood zone and it's dangerous to live there will apply for a buyout or can apply for a buyout. And the state has to approve it. What North Carolina has done is batch a lot of approvals together, and they send those batches to the feds to approve. Once the federal government approves some of the money to come out, it's not directly sent to the state.
20:29It basically gives the state permission to spend up to that amount of money. So like you just mentioned, recently$11 million has come out for it. That means the state can start the buying out process of these homes for up to$11 million. And that just looks like a real estate transaction, which could take, you know, like we've heard, years. What has happened to your experience here, Barry? because the process Gerard just described, I think you used the word Byzantine to describe the bureaucracy around FEMA. When you think about your years working with the agency, what could help streamline some of that bureaucracy so that disaster recovery process could happen more quickly for states and communities?
21:19Well, there were terrible disasters like the Northridge earthquake, the Midwest floods, and other things that happened in the 90s when I was at FEMA. And in their defense, you know, all of the storms in 2017 and 2018 overwhelmed FEMA. And then, of course, every state became a disaster area with COVID. But we need to move with the times. You know, some of the things in the federal legislation include block grants, moving the money quicker down to the state level. A lot of the complaints about what's happened in the past are a bit of red herrings. states do run the disasters and localities do run the disasters now with financial help from the federal government, except for the most catastrophic disasters.
22:01Normally, states are running things now. So there could be block grants. There could be ways to get the money quicker. You could do more on the audit on the back end and have the responsibility be more on the states from a fiduciary reason, but things need to move quicker. I mean, the money that came out a few weeks ago, the several billion dollars, we've been told and it's been reported that there's 14 to 16 billion dollars sitting at DHS that's already been approved by FEMA staff and leadership. It's gone through this whole Byzantine process and it's ready to go. We've had rural electrics in North Carolina whose projects were approved six months ago who finally got their money two weeks ago.
22:46$700 million went to Puerto Rico on some of the energy projects we work on there. Schools in North Carolina that we work with, all of it was approved last year, and it's been sitting there waiting to be dispersed. So hopefully the other$5 to$10 billion that has been sitting at DHS can get out into the states and the communities so progress can happen and rebuilding and can move forward. Well, here's how former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem described FEMA's role in disaster relief. Emergencies and disasters are always locally executed. The state manages them, and then the federal government comes in and supports that.
23:23What we are doing here, sir, is empowering the state and the local officials to make the best decisions for their people, because they know their people, they know their community, and when they ask, then we come in and support them. So first, Barry, does that align with your experience of FEMA? Yes, that is typically and historically how FEMA has always worked. They didn't create anything new in the last 12 months other than trying to destroy it by removing staff from all the regions. One of the reasons that the mitigation projects that you've talked about have not been moving is they've decimated the staff, both at headquarters and throughout all the regions that work on these projects and would review those homes being bought out in North Carolina.
24:09And we'll talk more about those layoffs in just a few moments. Brianna, meanwhile, several states, as you mentioned, have had to dip into their rainy day funds to pay for disaster-related costs that FEMA agreed to pay but has not yet delivered. But these rainy day funds are designed to support states when they face an unexpected revenue shortfall, not necessarily pay for these costly recovery efforts. So what challenges does that present for states, not just in the short term, but in the long term as well? Sure. So most states, you know, they're required by their own state law constitution to balance their budget.
24:47And what we were hearing from communities in North Carolina last year is they were afraid that their budgets were going to be totally wrecked by not getting reimbursed from these public assistance and hazard mitigation grants. And so when a disaster hits states, especially those that are rural, and the state is required to fully take on the burden of those costs, they either have to raise revenue, which is really hard to do, or divert funds from other sources, which is also really hard to do. So likely those projects just won't happen. Those schools won't get fixed. Those hospitals won't go back online.
25:27And you have part of the community that for a long time, for generations, might just not recover. And Michigan, we were seeing this with the ice storms last year. The president approved a disaster for public assistance, but didn't include Category F, I believe, which are public utilities. So that led to electrical companies having to raise their rates on customers. And so everything just has this ripple, trickle-down effect when states do not get, and we're talking like millions of billions of dollars that they don't have in a rainy day fund. So if they have to take money from something else, like, again, it's just kind of an impossible feat for them to overcome when we keep seeing these disasters getting bigger and bigger.
26:19Well, and Gerard, what are those economic impacts here in North Carolina that lawmakers are most concerned about? Yeah, North Carolina is also the only state in the country without an approved budget yet. So we are kind of in a double whammy here when it comes to Helene recovery and what that looks like in terms of costing the state. So far, the General Assembly has kicked in about$4.4 billion in recovery aid. The governor in the next couple of weeks plans to ask for just under a billion more dollars. But the state, you know, what Brianna was talking about with states having to dip into their rainy day funds, local counties have had to do that as well.
27:05And for a lot of local governments that are rural, the storm costs them more than their annual budget. There are a few counties out here who spent more than their annual budget cleaning up after the storm and are waiting on FEMA reimbursements. The state, for their part, has kicked in and offered loans that aren't forgivable to these local governments, about$150 million. But that's just the tip of the iceberg for what these counties and local towns need. So, Gerard, just briefly in a couple of sentences, what are you watching for as the Senate goes through their confirmation hearing for Senator Mark Wayne Mullen to lead DHS?
27:47And as North Carolina continues to wait for the disaster funds it needs? Well, like the governor and every elected official here has said, that FEMA just needs to move faster, get the money out faster to local governments and to folks waiting for these buyouts. That's Gerard Albert. He's the Western North Carolina Rural Communities Reporter for Blue Ridge Public Radio. Gerard, thank you. Thank you. Brianna Sachs with The Washington Post is staying with us, as is Barry Scanlon. He's a former senior advisor of FEMA and co-founder of the crisis management and public safety consulting firm DCMC Partners.
Read the full transcript
28:21Still to come, President Trump promised to shut down FEMA. What would it mean for states to bear the brunt of disaster response and recovery in the long term? That's just ahead.
28:34This message comes from Grainger. Grainger knows that if you're the purchasing manager at a manufacturing plant, the only thing more important than having the right safety gear is having it there when you need it. That's why you can count on Grainger for auto reordering. helping ensure your team members always have cut-resistant gloves on hand, and each shift can run safely and efficiently. Call 1-800-GRAINGER, click grainger.com, or just stop by. Grainger, for the ones who get it done. Let's get back to the future of FEMA. Susan emails, Our small town in New England was hit by flooding twice in recent years.
29:10Our fire station was near the river and was declared a loss by the state due to erosion of the riverbank. FEMA agreed to cover costs of demolition, construction, and assistance building a new station away from the river. But in the course of the process, the original FEMA staffers were transferred, and the new staffers denied all funding. It has taken years of volunteer work to resubmit to FEMA and get the promised funding back. If it wasn't for a few key volunteers, we would have lost the funding for good. We are grateful for the FEMA help, but it has been a massive headache. But last year, President Trump said he intended to phase out FEMA after hurricane season.
29:48I'll also be signed an executive order to begin the process of fundamentally reforming and overhauling FEMA or maybe getting rid of FEMA. I think, frankly, FEMA is not good. I think we're going to recommend that FEMA go away. Trump says states and local governments would assume financial responsibility for disaster management once the agency is shuttered. A full elimination of FEMA requires congressional approval, but the agency could be significantly restructured by the administration without involving Congress. Barry, help us understand how and why the Trump administration is trying to shift more responsibility for disaster recovery and response to states.
30:27How and why? I don't know I could speak for them. A year ago when he did the executive order creating the FEMA Review Council, former governors, former emergency managers, some current both Texas and Florida provided their state directors of emergency management as experts, and they had meetings around the country with different people who've been affected and different governments affected by disasters, and they had a report that they provided the outgoing secretary that she apparently chopped up and was going to announce in December, and the White House canceled the meeting at the last minute.
31:02So everyone who works in this, both in the government and in the private sector, who works on these issues, we're waiting to see what that council and that report is going to come out from the White House. There's a lot of different things that you could do. You could, like the disaster that was mentioned in Vermont. Unfortunately, because of all the regulations and rules that FEMA has created or Congress has created, often the cost of a disaster is 35 % federal administration, which is obviously way too high. That's just money that is not needed to fix and help some of these disaster damages.
31:39You could change the cost share. Instead of the 75-25, it could be 60-40, and the states have to pay more. There's a lot of things that you could do to put more responsibility down on the state and local governments. You can't just flip a switch and do it overnight because those rainy day funds that we've discussed have to be built up. There's a lot of issues. There needs to be an off-ramp if you're going to change fundamentally how this works. You mentioned changing the cost share between the federal government and states. We got this email from Brett who says, President Trump wants to make disaster response more state-driven.
32:15I would think that making states more fiscally responsible for disaster response would have a bigger negative impact on red states than blue states. Has this been studied? And, Brianna, I'd love to hear your thoughts about that first, but also more broadly about how well all states are positioned to respond to weather disasters, especially if they're facing compounding weather disasters. So perhaps there is a hurricane and then there is a flood because we've seen these weather disasters happening more intensely but also more closely together. Definitely. And it is a complicated issue because I think many people in the emergency management world agree that states, there should be less process and recovery should happen faster.
33:06And block grants seem like a solid solution. And you also need oversight of those. So I think it's a long runway here. And again, the report was supposed to lay out some nitty gritty of the future of FEMA, and we're all still waiting for that. But the truth is, even the best states such as Texas, Florida, California, and even Louisiana, who are experts at disasters, still need federal help. So you think of all the other states that don't have, A, the lived experience and flooding is now becoming the most common disaster and they just don't have that emergency management infrastructure. And if FEMA dwindles and shrinks back quickly and not over a rolled out period of time, I think we're just going to see a lot of prolonged devastation across the country and specifically in red states because there is all this research that those are the states that are getting hit harder and they are seeing compounding disasters with heat and then flood and ice storms.
34:17Well, and Barry, what does this uncertainty around the reliability of federal disaster assistance mean for states as they try to plan and budget for the future? States are facing having to absorb higher Medicaid costs, higher SNAP costs. And so it's not just disaster relief and recovery. They may have to absorb other costs as well that their budgets just aren't prepared to take. Well, what happens is it just grinds recovery to a halt. because if states don't know what they can count on, it's impossible for them to allocate the right amount of funds. But right now what's happening, because of this slowdown of the last year over a year, if you're a contractor, you're not going to wait around for a locality to hire you to help them rebuild the school if you're never going to get your bills paid.
35:11So what we've seen throughout the Southeast, we see it in Puerto Rico, is the people who would work on doing reconstruction have moved on to other things, right? So the whole system sort of grounds to a halt because if you don't know that your partner FEMA is going to be there to do their role, it really just stops the process. We're hearing from so many of you, many of you here in North Carolina. After Hurricane Helene flooded our Asheville apartment, this comes from Jenny, the fire department ordered us to evacuate. What began as a temporary displacement stretched into months and eventually a permanent relocation.
35:53The trauma of losing our home was only intensified by the stress of dealing with FEMA. We were met with a slow, outdated system that felt out of touch with the reality on the ground. At one point, we were even asked to fax documents, despite having no power, no internet, and no way to access 21st century technology. In the end, the aid we received didn't come close to meeting our family's needs. Well, I want to put this in the context of what's also happening right now, the federal government. As a part of an effort to cut federal spending, Doge slashed FEMA's workforce in a series of layoffs last year.
36:28The agency has lost more than 2 ,000 permanent employees since the start of Trump's second term. And some of those firings are facing legal challenges. But Brianna, how are layoffs also complicating the agency's work? Yeah, and I actually asked some FEMA employees what they want people to know in their own words. So I'm just going to read some responses from veteran FEMA employees. Here's what I want people to know. If you think that FEMA was slow before, it's slower now because we have lost so many people and are stretched thinner than the agency has been in the last 25 years. And then here's another.
37:07the administration has also pushed out people who have so much institutional knowledge that now the people left to lead have little experience and this was another the lack of the loss of institutional knowledge is what many FEMA employees brought up and that that they're afraid that mistakes might be made or there's just going to be this vacuum in in leadership and that has again, a harmful effect on communities where the process, as we've covered, is already bureaucratic and Byzantine and slow and needs to be reformed. So I think most people agree that FEMA could move faster. It could be more nimble.
37:48It could be better. But coming in with a wrecking ball and firing en masse, and we have reporting on this, that it did not seem as if the DHS was going through and saying, okay, this person's not needed. We have duplicates of this person because we got documents from officials saying they sent in justifications as to why, you know, this group of people should stay and this group of people should stay. And all those people were fired and they were just fired really quickly. So it did seem as if the administration was just taking kind of a wrecking ball to staffing and not really understanding the ramifications of that.
38:25And now the agency, you know, part of these employees is left really picking up the pieces in a much thinner and more precarious place than it has been over since the last 25 years. Well, Barry, this leads us back to this question of leadership of DHS, which oversees FEMA. As we said, Senator Mark Wayne Mullen of Oklahoma, he is President Trump's nominee to head DHS. What do we know about how much experience he has around disaster recovery and relief? I haven't seen that he has that much. Oklahoma clearly for years, for 20 years, actually had the most disaster declarations because of so many tornadoes and ice storms and other things that happened over the years.
39:10So I don't know that he has any, but it's not just having that experience at the DHS level. You know, one issue, You talk about changes to FEMA. There were many of us that when DHS was created, we tried to keep FEMA out of it and keep it independent and answering directly to the president. And that unfortunately didn't happen. And that's part of this new act as well, that people, and I believe it, believe that FEMA would function better reporting directly to the president and not getting lost in the bureaucracy of DHS. But most important, you know, as Brianna just said, And it's really the experience throughout the whole ranks.
39:49All of the state emergency management directors gathered in Washington for their annual meeting last week, and I participated in it. And one of the biggest things that all of them said to a person is, thank goodness 2025 was not a busy disaster year. Because there's no one on the other end of the phone line to call. All of the people that used to run the hardest hit areas of the United States, and everyone gets hit now. But the people with the most experience at headquarters and throughout the FEMA regions, most of them are gone. And the numbers that, Brianna, and you have mentioned about FEMA losing and having cut 20 % of its staff over the last year, well, it was understaffed before all those cuts happened.
40:33So this is something that is now a decade long of them trying to catch up from just the overwhelming disasters that have happened over the last decade. We're still hearing from you. Chris emails, I lived through Hurricane Helene and Milton. Because I live in the flood zone, evacuation was mandatory. I had no car. I was living on a social security check in a high-rise apartment for people aged 55 and older. I maxed out my credit cards paying for motels, replacing ruined food, a flooded rug, spoiled cat food, and on Lyft rides with zero help from FEMA. It took me two years to pay off the credit card debt.
41:07I had to put off a surgery for my cat in 2024 because of the credit card debt from the hurricanes. There was absolutely zero help for victims of these natural disasters. And Logan in Ohio emails this, I understand the need for disaster recovery. However, I'm unclear as to why folks expect FEMA to financially provide for their personal losses, such as homes. Doesn't homeowners insurance take care of these scenarios? FEMA should focus on public areas of needs, such as roadways and utilities. And I'd love to hear your perspective on that, Barry, and just quickly note that when we're talking about these weather disasters, not everyone who loses their home is a homeowner.
41:46There are lots of renters who also have to navigate recovery. But what's your response to this thought that maybe this isn't FEMA's role at all? Well, it's been a misconception the whole time I've ever worked in this that I'll tell you, once you visit disasters and work on disasters, you don't have to be to too many to find out that Disaster victims don't really get that much. The programs aren't designed that way. They're designed to try and help people be safe, sound, and secure is the phrase. So there's not piles of cash going out to individuals. And part of what these reforms are talking about is also to make it simpler for disaster survivors.
42:28They're not having to call HUD, NSBA, and FEMA. Try and have it be a one-stop shop so people don't deal with bureaucracy on a personal level. So it's really not that much that helps disaster victims. They're really much left to their own devices, frankly. And is there a place, do you think, for state and local governments to take on more responsibility in managing disasters? as perhaps an incentive to try to keep recovery costs low or to maybe focus more on mitigation efforts? Well, they could pay for some of the individual assistance, and they already do. Again, there is a cost share. So this misconception, this red herring that somehow this is a whole new idea that states are going to manage disasters, Governor Stein and North Carolina have to manage the disaster.
43:21FEMA is just, in many respects, except for the most catastrophic disasters is a reimbursement agency. It's a bank. So there is some guidance and there is some oversight, but disasters are run by the states. So it's really something that they need to be the steady partner that they have always been. And if they need to be improved, that should happen. But it's really a bit of a misconception that somehow states have to take on more responsibility. They've been doing it already. Well, Brianna, we're heading into spring, deeper into the tornado and wildfire seasons. What are you watching for, especially as we wait to see if the Senate will confirm Mark Wayne Mullen to head of DHS?
44:12I think I'm watching for what the future of FEMA in terms of leadership is going to look like. Like, are they going to put in an administrator who has emergency and management experience as they are required to by law? Or are they going to continue to let Karen Evans lead? Are they going to rescind this$100 ,000 memo? Fire season's already here. The Plains and Nebraska, they were having massive blazes already. So I think it's going to be a really active fire season and just hoping that the agency can pull out of this just in time for that. Well, that's Brianna Sachs. She's a disaster correspondent at The Washington Post.
44:52Also with us today, Barry Scanlon. He's a former senior advisor of the Federal Emergency Management Agency and co-founder of the crisis management and public safety consulting firm DCMC Partners. Thanks to you both. Today's producer was Lauren Hamilton with help from Haley Blassingame. We're broadcasting today's program from WFDD in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, as part of the station's 80th anniversary. And special thanks to the WFDD staff who've helped make this happen, including George Newman, Lori McCroskey, and Tom Dolan-Mair. This program comes to you from WAMU, part of American University in Washington, distributed by NPR.
45:29I'm Jen White. Thanks for listening, and we'll talk more soon. This is 1A.
45:51This message comes from NPR sponsor Charles Schwab with its original podcast on investing. Each week, hosts Lizanne Saunders, Schwab's chief investment strategist, and Kathy Jones, Schwab's chief fixed income strategist, along with their guests, analyze economic developments and bring context to conversations around stocks, fixed income, the economy, and more. Download the latest episode and subscribe at schwab.com slash oninvesting or wherever you get your podcasts. This message comes from MidiHealth, introducing AgeWell, longevity care designed by women for Women can feel overlooked by the healthcare industry, especially when it comes to aging.
46:35MidiHealth offers personalized services conveniently accessible through telehealth visits and covered by major insurance providers. Your health is worth it. Book your virtual visit today at joinmidi.com. That's joinmidi.com. These days, it feels like the news changes every hour. Well, NPR has a podcast that does that too. NPR News Now brings you a fresh five-minute episode every hour of the day with the latest, most important headlines in episodes that are clear, fact-based, and easy to digest. Listen to NPR News Now on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.
From the publisher
With Kristi Noem out at the Department of Homeland Security, all eyes are on FEMA to roll out millions of dollars in stalled federal funding for disaster responses. That’s especially true in North Carolina, where the western part of the state is still grappling with the effects of Hurricane Helene.
We sit down with a panel of experts to find out what the future holds for FEMA in the Tar Heel state.
Find more of our programs online. Listen to 1A sponsor-free by signing up for 1A+ at plus.npr.org/the1a.
To manage podcast ad preferences, review the links below:
See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.
Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices
NPR Privacy Policy




