Epstein Fallout Rocks Legal As Admin Tries To Deflect From ICE

11 Feb 2026 · 37 min · 11 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer

Episode Title

Epstein Fallout Rocks Legal As Admin Tries To Deflect From ICE Episode Description This episode discusses the fallout from Jeffrey Epstein's legal connections, particularly focusing on the resignation of Paul Weiss's Brad Karp and troubling revelations from the Epstein files. The hosts also address the current state of the U.S. immigration system and a significant development in legal tech.

---

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. Epstein Files and Biglaw Implications
  2. Brad Karp's Resignation:
  3. Brad Karp, formerly the chair of Paul Weiss, resigned after being implicated in friendly correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein.
  4. Karp's communications were described as a "distraction" for the firm.
  5. Scott Barshay has taken over as the new chair, indicating a shift in leadership and strategy.
  • Noteworthy Individuals in Epstein Files:
  • A former Clifford Chance trainee was found to have drafted a disturbing sex contract with Epstein and was involved in recruiting women for him.
  • Kathy Ruemmler, General Counsel at Goldman Sachs, exchanged inappropriate jokes with Epstein, suggesting a casual relationship that raised eyebrows.
  • Alan Dershowitz was mentioned as having provided legal analysis on sex tourism laws, further entangling Paul Weiss in the Epstein saga.
  1. Immigration System Chaos
  2. A Department of Justice lawyer in Minnesota publicly expressed frustration over the government's broken immigration system, highlighting internal conflicts and overwhelming caseloads.
  3. The lawyer suggested that being held in contempt might offer her a reprieve from the chaos, illustrating the dire circumstances faced by government attorneys.
  4. The episode discussed how the Trump administration’s approach has led to systemic issues within ICE and the DOJ.
  1. Legal Tech Developments
  2. Anthropic, a key player in AI, announced the launch of its own open-source tool for legal tech, causing considerable stock declines in related companies.
  3. The hosts debated the implications of this new tool, suggesting it could disrupt the legal tech market by providing alternatives to existing solutions.
  4. The conversation touched on the need for qualified legal professionals amidst the rise of AI, emphasizing the importance of expertise in the legal field.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Biglaw's Response to Scandal:
  • The fallout from the Epstein files continues to affect major law firms, highlighting the intertwining of personal relationships and professional integrity.
  • The resignation of Karp symbolizes the potential consequences for attorneys entangled in controversy.
  • Challenges in Immigration Law:
  • The internal struggles within the DOJ reflect broader issues affecting the immigration system, necessitating urgent reforms and support for legal professionals.
  • The Future of Legal Tech:
  • Anthropic's new tool represents a significant shift in the legal tech landscape, raising concerns about the readiness of AI to handle complex legal tasks.
  • Investors' reactions to technological advancements may influence the direction of legal innovation.

---

Conclusion This episode of "Thinking Like a Lawyer" delves deeply into the implications of the Epstein files on the legal community, the chaos within the U.S. immigration system, and the evolving landscape of legal technology. The discussions highlight the intricate relationships between law, ethics, and technology in contemporary practice.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Small Talk and Weather

0:46 to 2:46

Casual conversation about the weather and personal anecdotes related to being in the Epstein files.

“So but first, we'll take a quick break to have some small talk.”

Super Bowl Performance and Legal Discourse

2:47 to 5:04

Discussion about the Super Bowl performance and its legal implications regarding streaming rights.

“anything else to say about it other than that being a literal icebreaker cold that the air how cold is it the air tastes like freezer burn did you brush your teeth well yeah yeah So I was just outside.”

Epstein Files Update: Paul Weiss Changes

5:05 to 7:10

Revelations about Brad Karp's exit from Paul Weiss and the implications of involvement in the Epstein files.

“So we kind of previewed what was going on last week.”

Disturbing Emails: Clifford Chance Case

7:11 to 10:06

Examination of troubling emails from a Clifford Chance trainee related to Epstein.

“there's at least a business case for the capitulation.”

Victimization and Responsibility

10:07 to 12:19

Debate on the complexities of victimhood in the context of the Clifford Chance trainee's story.

“The former big law associate is represented by Boy Schiller, and they say that she was a victim of Epstein's.”

Goldman Sachs and Epstein Connections

12:20 to 14:10

Discussion about Kathy Rumler's relationship with Epstein and its implications for Goldman Sachs.

“We don't know any of their interpersonal kind of face to face interactions, what those were like, any sort of phone conversations.”

Exploring Epstein's Skeevy Connections

14:10 to 23:03

Learn about the uncomfortable implications of Epstein's network and its language.

“Seemingly a joke, but, you know, deeply uncomfortable and problematic.”

Immigration Challenges Amidst Distractions

23:32 to 28:07

Discussing the internal chaos within the Justice Department affecting immigration cases.

“Well, let's transition real quick to the topic that we are all being distracted from because of the Epstein files.”

The Dilemma of Staying in Troubling Jobs

28:07 to 28:44

Explore the challenges of working in a problematic administration and the impact on those affected.

“Having people on the inside you would like to think helps, but it's a tough spot.”

Anthropic's Impact on Legal Technology

28:52 to 30:55

An overview of Anthropic's new tool and its significant effects on the legal tech market.

“One of the biggest stories of last week, and indeed, if you add together the two stories we had about it, arguably the biggest, is Anthropic.”
Show all 11 chapters

Investor Reactions and Market Sentiment

30:55 to 33:15

Discussion on how investor reactions to legal tech developments may harm innovation.

“I saw like - It was definitely a clear market reaction.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:11Elie Mystal:Hello, welcome to another edition of Thinking Like a Lawyer. I'm Joe Patrice from Above the Law. I am here with a couple of other Above the Law notable names. I have Catherine Rubino.

0:21Joe Patrice:Hey, hey.

0:22Elie Mystal:And Chris Williams here. Merry Christmas. Yeah, we are, you know, as we've already discussed, fresh from being in the Epstein files, we're here to talk to you about the big stories in the week that was in legal, which it will not surprise you will also involve said files, probably.

0:41Joe Patrice:Yeah, I said last week that I think that this is going to be an ongoing theme for the winter.

0:48Elie Mystal:So but first, we'll take a quick break to have some small talk.

0:55Joe Patrice:it's really cold before we get to talking about the weather as all interesting people do i did want to say my little bit about the uh being in the epstein files because i did listen to last week's podcast since i wasn't on it because oh right right right we couldn't schedule it yeah there was a timely timing error where i didn't pay attention to katherine being a good employee and friend so yes we're in the epstein files turns out it was because the c also which at the time i was writing so i felt like i was telling people my article got in the f-steam files and uh i was i was joking with my friends who are also broken people and they one of them had the same thought that i had i was like yo you need to put this in your dating profile and so so like there's there's there's a section where you can do like uh two truths and a lie and i was like okay one i'm a former boat builder two i don't like honey mustard three i am in the f-steam files And I didn't do it because I figured the type of people I'd attract who are okay with being in the Epstein files, I'm not into Republicans.

2:02Joe Patrice:But the thought was hilarious, and I just wanted to share that. It will be the permanent icebreaker kind of factoid about us.

2:10Elie Mystal:Yeah, maybe not for a dating profile, but I think it is going to serve us all well.

2:15Joe Patrice:Yeah. And the line of the sea also was something along the lines of the judiciary is doing so bad. The other branches are getting flack for it. So it's like for all the reasons to be in the Epstein files. I told my mom, she was like, I'm so proud of you, son. I know I am the only person that has received this message.

2:38Elie Mystal:so that's my part i just wanted to share that is perfect that's been uh our life for the last week uh but yeah no so we're in there uh it's cold i was just gonna say like i didn't really have anything else to say about it other than that being a literal icebreaker cold that the air

2:57Joe Patrice:how cold is it the air tastes like freezer burn did you brush your teeth well yeah yeah So I was just outside. I was in Manhattan over the weekend and had to go out in some of the lowest of those temperatures. And it just it tasted like burning. The air tasted like burning. That's how cold it was. It was unpleasant. Very. It was very unpleasant. Well, I wonder if that has more to do with the cold or new workings at the EPA, because, you know, I've never I've I've I've had ice on my tongue many a time. And I've never thought, hmm, burning. One thing that was hot this weekend was the Super Bowl performance.

3:42Elie Mystal:Ooh, yeah.

3:44Joe Patrice:So I was -

3:45Elie Mystal:Oh, Kid Rock and, yeah.

3:47Joe Patrice:Let's get on. Oh, no. Well, we don't refer to, we don't say Kid Rock anymore. We say the full name, Epstein Island. But there was a, I was in a privileged position because I was in a gaming chat room. I got to experience one of those times where you're around white folks and they don't know you're a minority in the room. So it was like, oh, great. This is the double consciousness thing. I'm experiencing it. And they were like, oh, my God, none of this is in English. Let's go watch Kid Rock. And in my mind, I'm like, you mean the bum did the bum, the bang, the bang, diggy, diggy, die? Like he's not speaking English either.

4:23Elie Mystal:Yeah, I saw somebody make a point like that too like i've heard it referred to as clancella uh which i can't unhear yeah uh what

4:32Joe Patrice:i think is particularly funny and kind of makes it a pseudo legal story is that the halftime show was originally supposed to stream on x but somebody did not file their compliance paperwork correctly uh and had to move it over to youtube because they couldn't they didn't have the rights to stream it yeah yeah i mean you gotta appreciate the sheer incompetence yeah It's funny how draining the swamp has just led to so much of people not being able to do their jobs. It's almost as if it was a lie from the start. Yeah.

5:04Elie Mystal:All right. Well, we have an action-packed day, so we should move on to the aforementioned Epstein Files. So we kind of previewed what was going on last week. Now we have a lot more that has happened.

5:21Joe Patrice:As predicted, Brad Karp is no longer the chair of Paul Weiss. He's still an attorney there. He will resume sort of servicing clients as per, you know, typical. But he's no longer in charge of the firm. His appearance in the Epstein files is a, quote, distraction. And he has moved from that role. Scott Barche is now the new chair. and according, I believe it was the Wall Street Journal, was the one who actually had to break the news to Karp that he was out like so much old trout. You know, apparently he was surprised by that revolution. I don't know why, because I saw those files and I was not surprised that he would eventually have to take a backseat.

6:11Joe Patrice:And the new era of Paul Weiss is upon us. And just to be clear, the backseat is still one of the highest ranked positions you can have at Paul Weiss.

6:48Joe Patrice:Sure. to Donald Trump and to sign one of those pro bono payola deals and that he was able to survive. But this this was too much, which, you know, it's not super, super surprising. There's no there's no business case for appearing in the Epstein files being like, you're amazing. I can't wait to hang out with you again more to one of the most notorious pedophiles in recent memory that there's no business case for that. there's at least a business case for the capitulation.

7:20Elie Mystal:I was going to go a different direction, which is it really does kind of show the mindset of big law that these kind of conversations, which, you know, weren't, we're not like, and we will get into people who had way worse conversations with him. We're not the worst conversations anybody had with this guy. That this is what the firm decides is a distraction, not becoming the literal symbol of capitulation and cowardice and big law. that move which everybody we obviously panned it but it broke contain it made it to the mainstream media calling out Paul Weiss for capitulating, bending a knee, like all of these these are the phrases that were used in mainstream media for it that strikes me as though that should have been the bigger obstacle to overcome but that wasn't it, it was that he'd done some friendly legal advice that technically wasn't representing, I guess.

8:19Joe Patrice:Yeah, I mean, some of the documents that are out there are definitely him commenting on the plea agreement and defense of the previous agreement when it was kind of in the media and people were trying to get that undone. So there's definitely stuff in there that that reads like legal advice, even if he wasn't sort of hired by Epstein. But yeah, and to your point, Joe, not only was that the sort of capitulation, not the thing that did it in for CARP, but Barshay is reportedly one of the stronger voices for the deal internally at Paul Weiss. He was apparently one of the big and makes sense. He's a corporate side guy.

8:59Joe Patrice:M &A is his background. And we've talked about sort of how the corporate side was much more in favor of the deals because they need to sort of make things smooth in this administration or to get there to make their nut. But whereas litigators more are of the sort that want to fight it because you fight it in court and they understand that battle. And it shows that we're willing to fight the government and we'll fight it on our behalf and on your behalf kind of thing. And those are very different mindsets. But yeah, so the new era of Paul Weiss will be led by an M &A attorney that was very much in favor of the deal with the Trump administration.

9:35Elie Mystal:OK, so who do we want to talk about next in the Epstein situation? Would we like to talk about people who had worse emails or would we like to talk about people who are also high ranking who?

9:47Joe Patrice:You know, there's a lot of them here. So we have four things here to talk about. OK, we could talk about the Clifford Chance. The worst emails. The worst emails. So there was a Clifford Chance trainee attorney in one of their European offices that had an ongoing relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. These emails are pretty disturbing. The former big law associate is represented by Boy Schiller, and they say that she was a victim of Epstein's. And certainly the initial emails talk about, you know, sort of them developing a sexual relationship while she was at Clifford Chance. Jeffrey Epstein had her write a sex contract, you know, one does as as one does.

10:34Joe Patrice:And then, you know, it gets worse from there. She eventually descends into recruiting other women for Epstein. She talks about that extensively in the emails. you know, oh, noted 24 is too old. Won't do that again. Sending videos of folks. Oh, I know you like, what do you want me to bring you back from Switzerland besides more girls? You know, deeply disturbing stuff. And Epstein also paid for her LLM at Berkeley Law. So very involved in her legal career as well. So, you know, just some deeply disturbing stuff.

11:14Elie Mystal:I will say of the sex contract, one of the email exchanges appears to be him criticizing the first draft, that it doesn't have, you know, some of the standard boilerplate language that you would expect in a contract. So Jeffrey Epstein would have been fully prepared to become a contracts professor, I guess.

11:33Joe Patrice:Well, I mean, if you read the feedback, it was typo laden, barely comprehensible. But he certainly, I'm sure, fancied himself that way. Also, who's to say that the real contract advice came for him?

11:46Elie Mystal:Maybe he forwarded to Dershowitz and then he repeated what Dershowitz said. Well, he probably would have sent it to a transactional lawyer in this instance. But I feel like everybody knows. Everybody knows contract. Yeah.

11:59Joe Patrice:My thing with this story, which I think is an important discussion to have, as important as it is uncomfortable. To what line do we think of this person as a victim and what line do we think of him as a well-compensated employee? I mean, I think that both things can be true. Right. Somebody can be a victim and then in turn victimize other people. I think that that's both true. And listen, like the documents we have are inherently an incomplete picture. We don't know any of their interpersonal kind of face to face interactions, what those were like, any sort of phone conversations. We don't know what those were like.

12:31Joe Patrice:We also don't know that these was the extent of their written communications. There's, you know, more documents that exist out there. So we don't know what the full extent of it is. We're only getting kind of snippets. But I definitely think the the line between victim and then, you know, recruiting other women to become to be part of Epstein's orbit, I think, is super problematic. But I don't think that it means she wasn't initially victimized. I think that both things can be true.

12:58Elie Mystal:So I want to jump now to Goldman Sachs. This is another instance where somebody had casual conversations with Epstein in a way where you would think probably probably ill-advised to be having these conversations. This is also one of your stories. Yeah.

13:16Joe Patrice:Kathy Rumler, the current top attorney at Goldman Sachs, had an ongoing friendly relationship with Epstein. And we've written a couple of stories about that fact. But she appears to have turned to Epstein for a lot of career advice. She was a Latham partner for a lot of years. And she at some point decided that she wanted to leave Latham or she considered other options outside of Latham. And there was a lot of communications between her and Epstein as she was going through that process. One of them included she was talking to folks from Citadel hedge funds there about whether or not she would go in house there.

13:55Joe Patrice:And when Epstein and Rumler were talking about potential negotiations between, you know, when she's getting that job, she responded to Epstein that, oh, are you going to trade one of your Russians for my comp?

14:12Elie Mystal:Yeah.

14:13Joe Patrice:Seemingly a joke, but, you know, deeply uncomfortable and problematic.

14:18Elie Mystal:Well, yeah, because to be clear, that doesn't necessarily mean that she knows anything about what he's doing right there as far as child trafficking stuff, which we know is going on. The phrase Russians doesn't imply that, but it does it does imply it does suggest a certain level of skeeviness. If you're in a position where you're talking about trading what's seemingly attractive assistance for money. And it's also one of those situations where you don't – that's a joke that I might tell somebody randomly if I didn't know that they'd previously made a non-prosegument over human trafficking stuff.

15:01Elie Mystal:Sure.

15:02Joe Patrice:This email exchange happens in 2016, and obviously in 2008, Obscene served time for state crimes related to his activities and entered into a non-prosecution agreement for federal crimes.

Read the full transcript

15:16Elie Mystal:Yeah, there are gallows humorous jokes that you could make with random friends that are they hit different if that friend has already pleaded guilty to something like that, you know, and that's really the issue. You have a relationship with somebody who has these issues in their past now and they had kind of a working relationship to this is obviously crossing more into personal conversation, whatever. But, you know, you've got to be more conscious. It's worryingly not conscious of the fact that that's, you know, sitting in there in the background. And again, doesn't necessarily mean it's illegal.

15:53Elie Mystal:It could very well not be, but it's skeevy.

15:57Joe Patrice:Yeah. And that phrase kind of your Russians is not just in the Rumler emails in the Epstein files. If you just search for that, you'll find a bunch of other folks referring to talking to Epstein about your Russians. So this was sort of a way that his inner circle talked about the fact that he paid foreign models. You know, there was, I think it was some bank after everything kind of came to light, did an investigation, a financial investigation. And there was, you know, hundreds of thousands of dollars paid to foreign models for we don't even know. Right. But the way that that was kind of referred to is something that happened a lot within these emails.

16:35Joe Patrice:On the note of skeeviness, one of the things that in my mind or like I've had suspicions, but like just see it kind of a jaw drop. There's a moment where she's like, I'm no I won't be a DEI hire. So she's she's more comfortable with getting a lift in her career from a pedophile than getting the job because she would help fluff out the firm's diversity statistics because she's a white woman, which would happen either way. like you don't like that that was you know you don't get to avoid it just yeah yeah yeah i mean i i tell all the places i work for that i'm a white man and i still show up on their diversity you know so like that that was just that was jarring to see but it's also like oh this is this is how they actually talk behind closed doors you know yeah and that's how that kind of that's how we kind of even get to the place of trading russians for compensation is you know So Epstein was like, oh, they're interested in a woman.

17:32Joe Patrice:And she's like, I'm not affirmative action hire. And he's like, no, I mean romantically. And she's like, what? You're going to trade one of your Russians for my compensation? And I was like, what? And he was like, no, I mean you. And he's like, you know.

17:44Elie Mystal:Yeah, the context is not great.

17:46Joe Patrice:Yeah.

17:47Elie Mystal:Sex trafficking is fine, but I draw the line at diversity. Classic community line. So transitioning back to Paul Weiss slightly is the last one, which is a Paul Weiss partner who is in the files for passing along some legal insights about, you know, whether or not it's OK to cross state lines to sleep with somebody who like fits their statutory laws, but not in another state, etc., which is obviously very disturbing legal advice, one would think. And that got a lot of people on social media up in arms about this, especially because this connects back to Paul Weiss yet again, a firm that's already had some issues here.

18:27Joe Patrice:But it's a weird stray, actually, that Paul Weiss is catching on this. Paul Weiss is completely catching a stray here.

18:34Elie Mystal:I believe he just graduated, was working postgrad as a research assistant. This is a just out of Harvard research assistant writing these things. And the reason they're writing them is because Alan Dershowitz does not use a computer. And so he's passing along information from his boss, Alan Dershowitz. Now, again, Dershowitz has other connections with Epstein that people, you know, was involved in that original plea deal. And people have reason to criticize that. That said, they're jumping because of some of the awful things in the Epstein files. People want to jump to this idea of, you know, this person who sent this is terrible.

19:11Elie Mystal:Dershowitz is terrible. They were advising him on how to write, you know, how to do sex tourism. There was one email about like figuring out sex tourism laws. I wanted to push back on that because I there may well be other reasons criticize these folks. But these emails aren't it. And the reason why and I understand why people are wound up because of how bad some stuff in there is. But at the time, this is all happening when Epstein's negotiating that original plea deal. He is accused of all of these things, and he is consulting with a criminal law defense lawyer about what to do. That means they're going to do research on whether or not certain things are legal or not.

19:55Elie Mystal:They're going to do research on whether or not people should receive XYZ punishment for this action or that action. And it may seem unsavory, but that does mean you're going to do that research and you're going to respond with, no, it looks like it is legal for one to do that or the other. And, you know, look, is that in some ways giving a loaded rifle to a monkey if you've got like somebody who's actually interested in doing illegal stuff and you do that research for the purposes of that? Like, yeah, like there's no way to put that toothpaste back in the tube, as I write. Like, obviously, that does mean that happens.

20:35Elie Mystal:But at the end of the day, you you do have an obligation as a defense lawyer to try to research the laws that your person is being accused of. So there's nothing there's nothing wrong with these emails. It is obviously you understand. We understand like why that's kind of unfortunate. But like as a system, we rely on defense lawyers being able to do their job. And that does mean they have to do this research. So that was my one takeaway with that, that no matter how awful things are and how much people want to feel righteous anger for some of the things that are happening in these files. There's lots of other places to place it.

21:12Elie Mystal:I don't think this is it, folks.

21:13Joe Patrice:And listen, there's lots to be angry about here.

21:15Elie Mystal:Yeah.

21:16Joe Patrice:Yeah. I was going to say, Joe, this is totally fair to say. And I'm glad you said it. But also, this is why people don't like lawyers. Yeah.

21:25Elie Mystal:I mean, it is why like criminal defense work gets vilified sometimes. And, you know, but it is part of the process. Now, like, look, we've on this show talked a lot over the years of this show about I don't have a particularly rosy view of the idea that everyone everyone deserves to have lawyers. So you can never criticize lawyers for the work they do. I think that I think there's an argument for that in criminal defense cases if you are a criminal defense lawyer. But a becoming a criminal defense lawyer is a choice. If that's not the business that you want to be in, then, you know, don't be in it.

21:59Elie Mystal:Other people are better suited to that. And in the transactional space, for instance, or civil litigation space, no, they don't have the right to you as their lawyer. Like you can say no. There's a kind of a constitutional principle in being a criminal defense lawyer. But if you decide to help out, you know, get your business tied up with a sex pest because you think you're going to make a little bit of money off of it, like that's on you. They don't there's no like higher constitutional principle that you have to do that work and collect those fees. And that's where this comes down for me. Like in this instance, at the time that this was happening, this is absolutely Alan Dershowitz working as a criminal defense lawyer.

22:40Elie Mystal:This is absolutely research that needs to be done for that purpose. I have criticized Dershowitz about a lot of things over the years. And likely will again. And likely will again. But this is absolutely not one of them. He is absolutely correct here, I think. All right. Well, let's take a break. We've gone on this for quite some time. Go take a shower quickly after so we can go on to something besides the Epstein files. Let's face it. You didn't become a lawyer to stress over summaries and analysis. You could hand it off, but you need an assistant you can trust. Co-counsel handles those important but tedious tasks that keep you from being a lawyer.

23:16Elie Mystal:And because it's trained only on expert legal content from Thomson Reuters, it's as precise as you are, which means less stress and more confidence to focus on what matters. Head to tr.com slash co-counsel to discover AI that lawyers swear by. All right. Well, let's transition real quick to the topic that we are all being distracted from because of the Epstein files. I think it's the Epstein files sort of dropped because I think this administration who had been delaying the files for a long time wanted to get some attention off of what's going on on the immigration front. So let's talk about that and not let them distract us from it.

23:54Elie Mystal:This was one story, and it's one slice of life on immigration story, I think, which is that in Minnesota, we had a government attorney in court being taken to task by the judge for the inability of the government to comply with any of the orders that they're being asked to comply or ordered to comply with. And the attorney had a moment of pure candor explaining, you don't know what we're up against. I'm telling ICE and Homeland Security to release people. I have to send three emails and call them and fight them, basically explaining that inside the government, the Justice Department lawyers, if they are being helpful, which many of them probably aren't.

24:40Elie Mystal:In this instance, this was a lawyer who was. If they are trying to be compliant with court orders, they're getting pushed back from internal to the government and explains that that's happening, explains that – and then ultimately says the caseload that they're working with was so bad they welcomed the court, throwing them in jail for contempt because at least they would get some rest.

25:07Joe Patrice:I mean, this is you're right. This is just like a real slice of slice of the times. Right. Like this is what's going on kind of on the ground. We've talked about this last week. We talked about the severe brain drain that's happening at the DOJ, which used to be a super elite job and is just not anymore. They're literally soliciting resumes on Twitter.

25:28Elie Mystal:That also happened this week.

25:29Joe Patrice:Yeah. They solicited resumes on Twitter. They're getting military lawyers to fill in the gap. They literally don't have enough people to deal with the amount of people that they're arresting. Yeah. Right. Like this is and they're under questionable conditions. There's a lot of legal like little proceedings that have to happen as a result. And they are woefully ill-equipped. And even the people who are still there, because, you know, a bunch of people have resigned in protest and will continue to do so. I'm sure even though that's all true, the people that they're left, they are just burning through them.

26:03Joe Patrice:They created these emergency jump teams at the DOJ, which said that every office had to identify one to two attorneys that would just kind of go from hotspot to hotspot as, you know, things get really crazy and they would work there for for a period of time. It sounds like, you know, a CBS TV show rather than an actual staffing strategy.

26:23Elie Mystal:You know, this all goes back to the Steve Bannon is famous, infamously came up with the Trump playbook back in the first term that they should flood the zone. They should do as much as possible at all times, and there's no way people can stop them. What I think we're starting to see here is that the problem with flooding the zone is you spread yourself out. They do not have the resources to keep up with the problems. Everybody else is doing their own thing. The government is the one who's involved in every one of these issues, and they're overburdened.

26:54Joe Patrice:And there are a lot more attorneys that are not working for the government that are working for the government, right? So there's a lot – that workload can be spread out a lot more than the government work can, particularly when it's such a bad job right now and they're not being respected internally. That's what this other part of this thing is that they are telling ICE that you have to do this, you have to do that, and they're not being respected by their other branches, other government employees. They're being saying, this is what you have to do legally, and they're saying, good luck trying to find me.

27:25Joe Patrice:And that's true. So why stay at this job?

27:29Elie Mystal:Yeah, it's real bad.

27:30Joe Patrice:I will say there is something I remember at some point I read a snippet of like an internal FBI document. And it was like it was it was a section on how to infiltrate right. How to infiltrate left wing organizations. And make them basically worse at their job. And one of the things that you do is you you get in and you don't do the little things. And over time that adds up. like yeah like make a make a make a uh write a report and forget to and forget to staple it like goofy shit like that over time it just it just puts um rust in the in the gears so as much as i want to say if you're doing this work you should quit i also want to be like if you're doing this

28:18Elie Mystal:work and you don't like what the administration is doing stay in and do your job poorly the problem The problem is the doing it poorly part means leaving people to languish who need to be let go. Fair. And that's the whole problem. Yeah, it's real rough. But no, I hear you. Having people on the inside you would like to think helps, but it's a tough spot. All right, well, we should move to our last topic because we're running a little long here. So let's take a break and be right back.

28:51Joe Patrice:Hey, Joe.

28:52Elie Mystal:Hey, what?

28:53Joe Patrice:We get to talk about legal tech now. We sure do.

28:57Elie Mystal:One of the biggest stories of last week, and indeed, if you add together the two stories we had about it, arguably the biggest, is Anthropic.

29:07Joe Patrice:It's a hell of an argument, but continue.

29:09Elie Mystal:Anthropic, the people who make Claude, and have therefore been providing technology to legal tech generally. When we talk about AI and legal tech, it's not like any of these companies are necessarily building their own large language models. The derogatory term is wrapper, as in they're just taking OpenAI. They're taking GPT. They're taking Claude. They're taking Gemini and building a wrapper around it. Now, those wrappers are important and involve work. You have to do things.

29:40Joe Patrice:Create some of the guardrails that are really the selling points for a lot of legal technology.

29:44Elie Mystal:And, of course, utilizing them with proprietary data matters, too. If you have the good data on legal that are going to make the models perform better and have a moat around it like your Lexus or Westlaw, then that matters. that said uh so they've all been using these various models and oh and i will also say that another thing that a lot of them do is have some kind of secret sauce games where they have multiple models from multiple providers and they kind of decide and fine-tune like if you if the user if the lawyer asks this question you know send this one to claude sonnet and send this one to gpt4 and like to to balance it out that said that's the legal tech market as it kind of exists right now That is the reality of what's going on out there in legal tech is everyone tries to integrate this.

30:32Elie Mystal:What happened last week was that Anthropic announced that they had built their own tool that was open source that you could use to do a bunch of the work that these other companies are building wrappers to do. What happened immediately after that is the market collapsed.

30:54Joe Patrice:Dipped at the very least.

30:56Elie Mystal:Yeah, TR went down like 15%, RelX 14. I saw like -

31:03Joe Patrice:It was definitely a clear market reaction.

31:04Elie Mystal:Legal Zoom like 20%. Like people got real hit. We, you know, our colleagues, Embry had written a story for us about how he'd been warning about this for a while, that this whole house of cards is based on the idea that these foundational models don't end up getting into legal. And, you know, here it is. It is likely, given the arms race nature of things, that the next shoe to drop is all the other ones, Google and OpenAI, that are going to try to do the same thing, putting more pressure on legal. I personally still think that legal matters. I think that people who are experts in how law works are going to do a better job.

31:46Elie Mystal:I will say –

31:47Joe Patrice:Yeah, I also think that – yeah, there's just a lot more, I think, hesitance too from the legal market, right? You have to be able to talk to lawyers to get them to use it.

31:56Elie Mystal:Well, so here's the weird part of it. It's a smart play in that we do have studies that show that inside these, especially in-house work and stuff like that, people are using these consumer-facing models more than the bespoke legal tools, which is scary as all get out. But that's a thing that's happening. And so it kind of makes sense as a logical move. But, you know, one of the things that I include in this story is after I wrote it, there was a social media post of somebody who works in-house showing a screenshot of their GC using this product. And it was trying to do all its legal research through Wikipedia.

32:35Elie Mystal:And like this is why this stuff's not ready for primetime. But people are overreacting. I actually thought that the biggest and this is a point I made on the tech show that I'm also on, in some ways, the bigger takeaway for me was the investor class is crazy. Like if they overreacted to this product, which is clearly not ready, dropping by wiping out a metric ton of value out of a bunch of legal tech companies, then I don't know as though I trust them driving the nature of innovation, right?

33:15Joe Patrice:Well, that's the entire way the system works. So yes, you're right to be scared, but that is the way it works.

33:21Elie Mystal:We're all screwed. dude we're all going to die and it's not because ai is going to kill us it's going to be the pursuit of ai is going to bankrupt us it's kind of my takeaway all right all right well we should be

33:33Joe Patrice:going that's the note we end on yeah yeah we're all gonna die that's our p2 that's our p2 moment

33:38Elie Mystal:that for those who listen to the other show that's a thing we used to do that's why we didn't win the podcast grammy or whatever it was oh well we didn't even talk about the grammys well that was another story this week, but whatever. So we should, thanks for listening. Subscribe to the show. Get more shows when they drop. We should be, you should be listening to other shows. Catherine's the host of the JBO. I'm guest on the Legal Tech Week Journalist Roundtable. We're also, there's other shows on the Legal Talk Network. You should read above the law. You should be following on social media, blah, blah.com.

34:10Elie Mystal:I'm at Joe Patrice. She's at Catherine1. Chris is at Rights for Rent. And we will chat next week.

34:16Joe Patrice:Bye.

34:16Elie Mystal:Peace. Thank you.

From the publisher

This is likely only the beginning of the reckoning.

-----

As predicted on last week's episode, Brad Karp left the top post at Paul Weiss following the disclosure of friendly correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein. But Karp wasn't the only Biglaw lawyer in the files, nor were his conversations the most troubling. A former Clifford Chance trainee drafted a sex contract with Epstein, Goldman Sachs GC Kathy Ruemmler made a joke with Epstein that normally you wouldn't make with someone who already pleaded guilty to child prostitution charges, and Alan Dershowitz managed to drag Paul Weiss into the case again when people found sex tourism legal analysis in the files from a now-Paul Weiss partner... passing along Dershowitz's thoughts.

Meanwhile in Minnesota, a DOJ lawyer called out the broken immigration system before literally asking to be held in contempt so she could get some sleep. which is what happens when an administration breaks the legal system so thoroughly that even its own lawyers can't keep up with the chaos. And legal tech took a financial jolt as Anthropic announced its entry into the legal tech space.

More from Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer

All 62 episodes
Epstein Fallout Rocks Legal As Admin Tries To Deflect From ICEAbove the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer · 37 min
Listen in VO