In short
Q&A episode covering (1) retirement planning for Mike (retire in ~12 years) and (2) whether to spend $60,000 on a wedding in New Zealand, plus (3) a Luxembourg listener’s question about behaviorally vs mathematically better investing.
Guests / questioners
- Mike (Kansas City, age 51): professor in graduate healthcare education; spouse (43) in a military unarmed branch; planning retirement at 63/55 with daughter age 8.
- Abby (repeat caller): planning a destination wedding in New Zealand costing ~$60,000; cash-flowing it; household income ~$400,000; investments ~$800,000.
- Leia (Luxembourg, anonymous; named by hosts): 28 and husband 30; considering a tax-deductible private pension contract (ETF mutual funds via insurer) vs self-directed ETFs; contract duration 10 years.
Key claims / notable examples
- Wedding: money should fund your priorities; “plan for the future, don’t live in it.” Average U.S. wedding cited as ~$35k (2026); spending more isn’t automatically better—experience quality matters (example: $25k zipline wedding for 10 seconds).
- Retirement: main risk is sequence-of-returns overlap with daughter’s college years; also check TRICARE isn’t free and review pension survivor-benefit assumptions.
- Luxembourg: behavior beats math—self-directing could tempt higher-volatility individual stocks; example referenced of prior episode behavior risk.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOWedding Spending Discussion
0:00 to 2:14
Exploring personal wedding expenses and insights on spending.
“Joe, how much did you spend on your wedding?”
Mike's Retirement Question
3:05 to 6:30
Mike seeks advice on retirement planning and financial strategy.
“I trained in economic reporting at Columbia every other episode-ish.”
Analyzing Mike's Financial Situation
6:30 to 14:01
Detailed discussion on Mike's financial strategy and retirement readiness.
“The first thing I would say is congratulations on all of the incredible planning that you've done.”
Understanding TRICARE and Pension Plans
14:01 to 17:26
Learn about the costs associated with TRICARE and the implications of survivor benefit plans on pensions.
“TRICARE is fantastic, but TRICARE is not free.”
Portfolio Management for Couples
17:27 to 21:06
Explore strategies for managing joint portfolios to maximize investment benefits.
“If you plan on it, where you're going to go through our money and his money first, and then her money later on because she's younger.”
Retirement Readiness and Financial Planning
21:07 to 23:20
Discuss the importance of financial milestones and the impact of inflation on retirement plans.
“readiness for retirement, I mean, you're planning on a$2 million portfolio in addition to also having this pension.”
Navigating Financial Challenges and Opportunities
23:21 to 28:00
Learn about leveraging contributions and returns in financial planning and the significance of tax-advantaged accounts.
“And by the way, I think it's prudent that you said 7%.”
Analyzing Financial Plans for Education
28:00 to 29:12
Discussion on financial planning and the benefits of 529 plans for education funding.
“there's up to an annual limit of$5 ,000, but it's an opportunity for your daughter to be able to grow massively tax advantaged money, like just massively, massively tax advantaged money.”
Analyzing Financial Plans for Education
29:13 to 30:25
Discussion on financial planning and the benefits of 529 plans for education funding.
“We're going to take a moment to hear from the sponsors who make this show possible.”
A Bride's Dilemma: Wedding Spending
31:06 to 32:50
A caller asks about spending $60,000 on a wedding and its implications.
“And before you can toast your spindrifts in support of my nuptials, I was wondering, do you guys have a rule of thumb or advice on how much to spend on a wedding?”
Show all 21 chapters
The True Value of Money in Wedding Planning
32:51 to 36:20
Discussion on the balance between spending on a wedding and the importance of experiences.
“That is so beautiful to have been part of going to grad school and getting your first job and now your wedding.”
Creating Memorable Weddings Without Overspending
36:21 to 41:42
Advice on how to make a wedding memorable while being mindful of budget and expectations.
“He said, all right, calculate the differential and then ask yourself, what would you otherwise spend that differential on?”
Travel vs. Investment: A Personal Story
41:43 to 42:01
Personal anecdotes about traveling vs. investing money for future returns.
“This is before remote work became popular.”
Navigating Financial Decisions: Present vs. Future
42:01 to 47:32
Learn about the balance between enjoying the present and planning for the future in personal finance.
“I remember getting an email from this guy.”
Investing Choices: Private Pension vs. ETFs
48:51 to 56:00
Explore the pros and cons of maintaining a private pension versus self-directed ETF investments.
“Pros trust the Home Depot for heavy duty storage solutions for any job site or garage.”
Understanding Emotional and Behavioral Finance
56:00 to 1:03:25
Explore the impact of emotions and habits on financial decision-making.
“know, focus on the fees and then wreck themselves because they're very smart at the fees and they're not smart at what am I going to actually do if I don't pay the fee?”
The Trade-off Between Fees and Human Nature
1:03:25 to 1:08:21
Discuss the balance between financial fees and understanding human behavior in investments.
“If you leave Luxembourg for any reason, the average person changes jobs every what?”
Community Engagement and Resources
1:10:01 to 1:10:20
Learn about the community resources available for financial education.
“Yo, LOL about the fourth thing they said.”
Meet the Hosts and Next Steps
1:10:50 to 1:11:06
Get to know the hosts and look forward to future episodes.
“That's affordanything.com slash F-I-I-R-E.”
Upcoming Webinar Announcement
1:11:07 to 1:11:58
Find out about an informative webinar on tax strategies.
“Our esteemed audio editor, Steve, the guy who produces this sound effect.”
Reflections on Time and Assets
1:11:59 to 1:12:27
Explore thoughts on time management and asset estimation.
“We overestimate assets and we underestimate time, which is this precious asset, non-renewable asset that we, we don't think enough about, I think in this community.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Joe, how much did you spend on your wedding? Oh, no. You were not expecting that question. It's like, wait, what?
0:09Paula Pant:I have blocked it out. It is a nightmare. Personally, I did not spend a lot of money. My father-in-law spent the money, did not share with me how much money that he spent. He and my mother-in-law, I guess, spent together. I remember there was consternation about how much is being spent around every corner. Listen to that passive voice. There was consternation. There was consternation. Consternation was had. Right. As if we hadn't created it. Somehow there was consternation. I don't know who created that. But we did get lucky. I mean, Cheryl's uncle had a beautiful place that we could get into for free.
0:52Paula Pant:I was required by my father-in-law. If I wanted entertainment, I was going to pay for it. And if I wanted limos, like for the wedding party, like I was paying for that too. So for me, it was the cost of a DJ who I knew and liked and the cost of a limo. So not much. But you were a DJ. You were a DJ at the time, weren't you? And that was cool. I hired my favorite competitor. I had one big competitor that I hated. They got all kinds of gigs because they had great advertising, but they sucked. They were horrible. And then I had this other guy who was phenomenal, just a fantastic DJ. and I was so excited to have my favorite competitor DJ my wedding.
1:29That's amazing. That's amazing. And that's a great spend because you know that scene. You know the industry.
1:37Paula Pant:You know the players. Yeah, our wedding was a blast. We were, Cheryl and I were middle school coaches. So we had a dinner with our family. And then when it was time to cut the cake and to party, we had our teams come join us. So my wedding reception was flooded with seventh and eighth graders. Oh. Oh. It was so awesome. It was so awesome. Oh, amazing. You were track and field coaches, yeah? We were track and field coaches. Nice, nice. Well, we are going to answer a question today in the middle of the episode. Oh, this isn't just about me and my wedding? I have the slides ready to go? After, that'll be the after show.
2:13Okay. But in the middle of the episode, we're going to answer a question from someone who, who she's having a wedding in New Zealand and wants to spend$60 ,000. Is that a good deal? Yay, nay, pros, cons. We're going to discuss that. That's mid-show. Before that, we're going to talk to Mike. He wants to retire in 12 years. And after that, we're going to talk to a listener living in Luxembourg who has a question about what is behaviorally right versus what is mathematically right. All of that is coming up right now. What do you think, Joe?
2:49Paula Pant:Wow. Okay. We stretched out. Buckle up. We're ready to go. Welcome to the Afford Anything podcast, the show that knows you can afford anything, not everything. This show covers five pillars, financial psychology, increasing your income, investing, real estate, and entrepreneurship. Acronym, double I FIRE. I'm your host, Paula Pant. I trained in economic reporting at Columbia every other episode-ish. I answer questions from you. And I do so with my buddy, the former financial planner, Joe Salcihai. What's up, Joe? I had a horrible morning this morning, Paula. What happened? Well, I found out my toaster wasn't waterproof and I was so shocked.
3:30With that, we go to our first question, which comes from Mike.
3:36Paula Pant:Hi, Paula and Joe. This is Mike in Kansas City. I'm 51 years old, professor in graduate healthcare education. I also do some contract patient care and coaching consulting on the side, so pretty reliable income. My spouse is 43 years old. She's in the service in one of the unarmed branches, so also reliable source of income. For a variety of reasons, we were a little bit late to the game of becoming parents, but we now have an eight-year-old daughter, so we've got a little bit higher cash flow needs, I think, than most people our age based on the age of our daughter. As it relates to our accounts, I want to give you the numbers of what we have currently, and I've combined both of our accounts into one, and I'll tell you kind of my thinking for that and ask Paula's opinion if I'm approaching that thinking correctly.
4:21Paula Pant:Roth IRA, between the two of us, we have$300K. Pre-tax between IRA, 403B, and TSP, we have$300K. $70K in taxable brokerage. $40K in high-yield savings. It was higher, but life happened. We are aggressively replenishing that. $20K in a 529, we're adding a little bit to that, but really not prioritizing it. A couple other key factors. Spouse is eligible for military pension. Technically, she can retire in five years, but if she stays in longer, pension goes up. So I'm estimating her pension will be$80 ,000 a year when she retires. We also get health insurance covered via TRICARE. I'm estimating that we'll need about$120 ,000 per year initially in retirement because I'm including budgeting to assist with college expenses.
5:08Paula Pant:My question then, am I approaching the overall retirement planning correctly? can I plan for both of us to retire in about 12 years? That puts me at 63, my wife at 55. And in doing so, it makes it easier for me to look at all of our retirement accounts as one lump portfolio or one joint portfolio. Most of the Roth money is mine, about 90 % of the Roth is mine. So we'd have access to that by the time she hits 55. And her retiring at age 55 would give us access to her TSP. So again, am I looking at this correctly that we can, if we retire together in 12 years, that this is all one portfolio? If that's correct, I've calculated a retirement portfolio of about 2 million, assuming a 7 % rate of return and conservatively investing 2 ,200 per month.
6:02Paula Pant:Then my question, kind of a Joe question, because he always talks about, well, every plan has an Achilles heel, what could be the Achilles heel in this plan? So if I'm looking at annual expenses of$120 ,000, this plan has us at$160 ,000 a year, ADK pension, ADK withdrawals, and health insurance is covered. So I'm wondering, what am I missing here potentially? Thanks so much. Learned a lot from both of you and appreciate any input that you have. Mike, thank you for the question. The first thing I would say is congratulations on all of the incredible planning that you've done. It's clear from your question that you've done a great job thinking through this, lining up everything, getting all of your ducks in a row.
6:44Kudos to you, big congratulations to you for doing all of that. Joe, I'm just going to dive right in. Joe and I did not discuss our answers in advance, so I'm curious, Joe, to hear what you're going to say. But I'll dive right in with the first things that I noticed right away. Number one, you've done a great job of diversifying the tax triangle and so I think big thumbs up in terms of tax diversification of having different buckets of different tax treatments I think you've done a great job there I noticed there is not a lot of money in the 529 account I'm curious as to why your daughter is eight years old she's going to need the money starting in 10 years and then running between 10 to 14 years from now given that she'll need it starting in 10 years and through to year 14, that means that her sophomore going into junior year is right at that moment, 12 years from now, when you want to retire.
7:35That's when sequence of returns matters most. You know, in the two years prior to retirement, you know, it's your retirement date plus minus two years is the window of time when she's going to college, assuming, I guess that's an assumption that I'm making, but assuming you, that she wants to and that you want her to go to a four-year college and to begin that at the age of 18. Assuming that, that means that her college experience is going to be your retirement date plus minus two years, which is when sequence of returns makes the biggest impact. And so that is the number one thing that I would be protecting for.
8:12You did mention that you are a college professor. There is a possibility that she has some type of a discount if she enrolls at the same university that you teach at. You didn't say that in your question, so I don't want to make that assumption. But I'll also just kind of put that asterisk here because I guess my question back to you is, does she have some type of a benefit if she were to go to the university that you teach at? If so, is that the reason that you're not putting more money in the 529 plan. And if that is the reason, how certain do you want to be that she will go there? Do you want her to have the opportunity to go somewhere else if that is a better fit?
8:57Those are my questions back to you. And again, I would not, it sounded like from the structure of your question that you're thinking about retirement drawdowns in the context of using a portion of those early drawdowns to pay for her college. But again, given sequence of returns, I would probably not commingle retirement drawdown planning with the college bucket. I would, from a planning perspective, keep them separate.
9:23Paula Pant:I'm a little worried about sequence of returns risk. I'll get into that because, as you know, Paula, I think sequence of returns is the second domino. I think he's far enough away from the jagged edge of a safe withdrawal rate that I'm not as worried about that. But those first two years I am for the very same reason, which is that his expenses could balloon because of the fact that he has this at the same line. And this is the importance. When people would come into my office and they would tell me a list of different goals to draw them out on a timeline. Like when you put them out on a timeline together, Paula, you nailed it.
9:59Paula Pant:A lot of people would come to my office. They wouldn't realize, oh my goodness, she's going to be a junior in college the same year I want to retire. You can already see that that's going to change cash flow. There's also a cool part to this though, which is, you know, a lot of studies now on retirement though, talk about if you can at all tiptoe into retirement and a lot of people don't get the chance to, but if you do get the chance to tiptoe into retirement, that's, that's actually better. And so those first couple of years where your daughter is still in college and you're training you're spending for the rest of your life as you transition, having that transition in the middle of it, I think might actually be a good thing.
10:40Paula Pant:It might be a decent thing to help you cope with this new lifestyle that you have because you're automatically, the big thing people have a problem doing is replacing the things in their life that they were doing with other things. And now like friends of mine with kids in college right now, they're, you know, you want to leave your child alone. You don't want to be helicopter mom or helicopter dad, but once a quarter, they're off to the university to go visit Junior and see how she's doing and take her and her friends out. And they're corresponding, they're sending care packages. They have this thing.
11:17And then she's flying home for Thanksgiving and Christmas. Right.
11:21Paula Pant:So there is this little bit of help with one of the biggest problems in retirement, which is what is my purpose once I've done working? Oh, I thought you were going to take that into a different direction. I thought it was going to be what does my spending look like during that four-year window when my daughter is in college? Because there's going to be all of that. In addition to the college fees and the things that are planned, there's going to be all of that additional travel. No, 100%. Yeah. The cool thing there is that you will train your spending to be a little more frugal because of the fact that you have money going out.
11:55Paula Pant:So as a guy who had twins go to college at the same time, you will have money going out the door. And as we talked through this, it just occurred to me if as a university professor, if she were to go to the university that you teach at, and if there is a discount associated with that, does that persist even if you were to retire? Is that contingent upon employment? You know, like what are the conditions that the university would set if that is even a factor at all? I say this because my dad was a professor at the University of Cincinnati and he very much hoped that I would go to the University of Cincinnati, which I did not, because, you know, it would have been a lot cheaper if I had, but I very much did not want to go there.
12:39It's a great school. Yeah, it's a great school. But the idea of living at home and commuting to college with my dad every day was like, yeah, you know, I think.
12:50Paula Pant:Time for the next thing. Yeah, exactly. That was me too. Part of the experience of going to the Citadel was just being halfway across America, you know, and not that I don't love my family, love my family, but I just needed to learn how to be independent. Right. Exactly. Yeah. The reason Mike, that we're having this discussion and I don't want to put words in your mouth, Paula, but because you started here, I think you kind of felt like I do. He said, we're not really prioritizing that or some, something to that phrase. When he said five 29 plan, we're not really prioritizing that or we're put, we're not putting a lot of money into that.
13:22Paula Pant:And I immediately, the flag went up in my head too. Like, why? This is a big hurdle that you're going to have that's coming up at the same time as retirement. What about his idea of thinking of all assets as one portfolio? I like that given that they are going to be retiring at the same time, you know, or given that that is the plan. I like viewing everything as one cohesive portfolio and planning from that framework. There are a couple of things that he said, though, that I would want to put a flag in. He said, health insurance is covered by TRICARE, and that's awesome. TRICARE is fantastic, but TRICARE is not free.
14:04So TRICARE does have fees and cost shares associated with it. And when you're 65, you're going to be paying Medicare Part B premiums. So you will need to set aside some money for healthcare costs. Like it's, TRICARE is wonderful, but your health related costs are not going to be zero. I would make sure that you do that planning. The other piece of it though, is the$80 ,000 pension. What is the deal with the survivor benefit plan? If they elect the survivor benefit plan, then the surviving spouse gets a bigger payout. If they don't, then if she dies first, then the plan vanishes. And so that's something that I would be cognizant of planning around, like with regard to that pension, what is the first to die slash survivor benefit set up?
15:03Paula Pant:Well, that's important to know for another, at first I'm like, why is she talking about him dying? But then I realized that what you're talking about is the pension estimate that he's thinking might not be actually what they receive. Well, well, that's not where I was going with that. I was just going with if she dies first and they don't elect into the survivor benefit plan, then he doesn't get the pension. Right. But the amount that you have on the pension estimate, you want to carefully look at what that assumption is. That's where I thought you were going, which is now where I'm going. Yeah.
15:34And if they do elect for the survivor benefit, how is that going to impact the payout?
15:39Paula Pant:Right. Because he's thinking that his plan's based on$160 ,000 a year, and maybe it's not. Maybe the pension's going to be less money. I like looking at it as one portfolio for a host of reasons, Paula. The first of which is whenever I saw people's 401k plans, some had areas that were really good and other areas stunk. And what What happened was invariably when people would come to see me, they would have these two perfectly allocated pies. So hers is completely allocated with, let's say, large companies, small companies, international companies, maybe some bonds, whatever it is, right? Just kind of a traditional allocation.
16:22Paula Pant:And then his would be large companies, small companies, international bonds. But the bonds funds in his stink and the international fund in hers stinks. So instead, what we would do is a couple of things. First of all, since it's our money, it's both of you, it's both of your money. If she's got a great bond fund and he doesn't, then over contribute to and be overexposed to bonds in her portfolio and don't put any in his. And now you get the benefit of the good bond fund in hers and you can just eliminate the bad bond fund in his. And likewise with the international, if he's got great international, she doesn't have good international.
17:03Paula Pant:Now he looks loaded up. So if anybody went and looked at his statement, they go, are you crazy? Look at how much international you have. Well, then you can answer, well, this is my entire portfolio of international because it's the best international fund we have at either of our workplaces. So I like it for that reason. But I also like it because going back to the timeline, Paula, if you begin lining up money to when you're going to spend it, their age difference is going to play a piece of this. his money could be the more conservative end of the buckets because they'll be the first money that you go to which means we shouldn't see anything remotely conservative in hers because of the fact that we have now we have to pay attention to your risk tolerance as i say that but assuming that you have a moderate talents for risk your most aggressive money should be in hers because that has the longest time to grow.
17:56Paula Pant:If you plan on it, where you're going to go through our money and his money first, and then her money later on because she's younger. Would you be thinking about asset location based on the name that the account is on? Or would you be thinking about asset location based on tax treatment of the account? Because I would, in the hierarchy waterfall, I would be prioritizing tax treatment first unless you're specifically earmarking a particular account to be tapped prior to when she turns 59 and a half. When you get close to the time that you're going to spend the money, most of asset location stuff will tell you not to put your most conservative stuff in the place where you should put it that it's easiest to get because you're going to cost yourself more in taxes.
18:46Paula Pant:Yet it's far easier to get at the money in a brokerage account than it is to pull it out of one of these retirement funds. Now, if you're going to live on a fixed income, it's fairly easy. We would set something up where you're taking money every month out of your IRA, right? Just the IRA sends off a check, withholds taxes, boom. So you could do it that way, I suppose, if you're comfortable with getting a check that's closer to a pension or getting a distribution that's much more like a pension. The problem with that approach, Paula, is that we would have people that would set those up because asset location matters.
19:20Paula Pant:They would then have this automatic withdrawal and then they go through a period where they just don't spend any money. And so they end up costing themselves a bunch of money in taxes by pulling the money out of the retirement account to quote spend and then they don't spend it. So I don't know. I'm not as excited about that part of asset allocation as I am. You know, when I think about this, so I think number one, the brokerage account, right? Most flexible. So that will probably be your most conservative money. But then I look at his Roth and her Roth, and I look at his 401k and her 401k, and I think I'm going to want a Roth to smooth over tax brackets while we're taking his money out.
20:01Paula Pant:And then I'm going to want Roth money to smooth over tax brackets when we're taking her money out. So I kind of look at her Roth as the way we smooth over her money, which I think of as the longest term money. His is the medium money with his Roth and her pre-tax. Then the brokerage account, probably most conservative because it's easiest to tap. But I think like anything, as you can see, we're developing questions. How do you live? How do you take money on a monthly basis? Are you somebody that's going to be much better. We're going to cover this again later on in the show with another person where it's your behavior that really matters, right?
20:40That's going to be our final question. Yeah.
20:42Paula Pant:You like that? Foreshadowing people. That's what it's called. Spoiler alert. Yes. This is the way all the pros do it right here. Coming up later on this podcast, we will be talking about. So I think for the most part, you still get great tax treatment on those assets. And I think we get better asset allocation because we're focused more on when we're spending the money. when that dollar is going to be spent. Yeah. I will say overall, zooming out in terms of your readiness for retirement, I mean, you're planning on a$2 million portfolio in addition to also having this pension. So I'd say you are easily more than ready given, particularly given the security of the pension.
21:23And even if you opt for the survivor's benefit and the pension is not 80 per se, the portfolio is already strong enough that like you've got the portfolio, you've got the pension, you know, the only thing that worries me is the major thing that worries me is sequence of returns risk around your daughter going to college. Beyond that, I think it's very strong.
21:46Paula Pant:I love talking about the Achilles heel. Joe's like, I disagree. Well, I don't completely disagree, but he did ask the question, like, what's the Achilles heel. And so I think the Achilles heel is two things. Number one is I love the fact that he said our lifestyle is going to be$120 ,000 initially. Because my first thought is even during the 16 years that I was in the trenches with people, their financial plan, we saw their spending go up just to keep up with costs. So inflation is a bear. So I don't know if Mike, Like if you did this using professional software, because inflation is surprisingly robust, even if it's a 3 % or 4 % number, and your expenses take more of a bite out of your retirement than you would expect.
22:36Paula Pant:So that's number one is you referenced inflation. So I think the answer is going to be yes, I'm going to be fine. And by the way, I do think you're going to be fine. So I should have probably led with that. But instead of doom and gloom, might have led with that. But I want to do that. I wouldn't just take Paula and Joe's word for it. And then the second thing is, you know, what's the second Achilles heel? 7%. I mean, 7%, it doesn't matter how low your rate of return is. We've had years where we've had negative 20 before. It has been a long time since 2008. We could have another black swan event on our doorstep any day.
Read the full transcript
23:16Paula Pant:And we're kind of lucky that we haven't for this long. So 7%, no matter what you do. And by the way, I think it's prudent that you said 7%. I would have done 7%, but it still is an Achilles heel. So here's what we would always do in our financial planning meetings. I would build milestones between here and that 2 million number. Where do I need to be every year to get there? And let's say, Paula, you're my client and And we come in and right now you're at 750 ,000-ish, let's say. And we get together and it's a year from now and you need to now be at 805 ,000. And we add up all your stuff and you're at 815 ,000.
24:02Paula Pant:Well, now we know we can do a few things. Number one is you could save less money today, which is really cool. Number two is you might be able to project an earlier retirement if you want it. number three is you could save the same amount but save it for other things let's say you like to travel you want to travel more today you're not prioritizing the 529 and you realize listening to what paula said at the beginning of this that you should now you divert some money toward another goal or you can just keep the status quo and keep building ahead knowing that you now have flexibility for what happens in future years when seven percent doesn't have you have a lot of options.
24:39Paula Pant:It's the same if you get behind. So if you have to have 810 and you're only at 780, well, now your options are, should I save more money? Do I ask for a raise? And then how do I come up with that money? Do we need to spend less money? Do we cancel stuff? Do we go ahead and realize that we have a deficit now? Do I retire later? Do I now retire later? My daughter didn't want to go to my university where I work, but now she's going to. I don't know what the options are. But again, you've got a lot of options. And the options are better, Paula, when you're looking at it 10 years before that you're not on the timeline than if you wait until two years before.
25:22Paula Pant:So I love these milestones along the way. And I think that you're still far enough away that having that 7 % number, I would just make sure that you're on it. And if you're not on it, what I like is, is that every time you look at whether you're ahead or behind, you then are in the driver's seat versus without that timeline. Here's what people want to talk about when they came into my office. What's going on with these politicians? There's a new thing about social security. What happens about interest rates? All this crap that's out of your hands. And I would go, okay, let's talk about that later.
25:58Paula Pant:You need to be at 810 ,000. Where are you? And immediately my client would go, oh, I'm at, let's see, I'm at 785. Oh, so do you think you should save more? You can control that, right? And then we start talking about how to do it. And all of a sudden, you put away all this crap that you can't do anything about and you focus on you and the goal. So essentially, Joe, what you're saying is that you've got two levers. One lever is your returns, the other lever are your contributions. And so 7 % is a great assumption, but check in with it, make sure that you're hitting minimum seven. And if you're not, then you have to pull the other lever.
26:32Yeah.
26:32Paula Pant:You got a course correct. Right. On the topic, Joe, of what's going on in the news, there is another piece, Mike, that I want you to pay attention to. And it is in addition to the 529 plan, there's also something called the 530A plan. 530A is also, depending on what side of the political aisle you fall on. 50 % of the population refers to it as a Trump account, and the other 50 % of the population refers to it as the Invest America account. If you're in the financial planning industry, you would call it the 530A account. So that's simply how I will refer to it. But your daughter is eligible for that.
27:13Anybody with a social security number who will be under 18 at the end of this calendar year, it is eligible for, you can open a 530A account for that person. So I would strongly encourage you to open and contribute to a 530A account. Now, your daughter is not eligible for the government contribution of 1 ,000, which is why a lot of people erroneously believe that this account is only for babies. That's actually not the case. The$1 ,000 is only for babies, but if you're a minor under the age of 18, you can have a 530A account. And the tax treatment on this is absolutely incredible. So I would, in addition to the 529, open that account for your daughter, contribute to it, your family, friends, your workplace, anybody else may contribute to it as well.
28:10there's up to an annual limit of$5 ,000, but it's an opportunity for your daughter to be able to grow massively tax advantaged money, like just massively, massively tax advantaged money.
28:24Paula Pant:I love the attention that you've given this, Mike, and the things that you've thought of, the fact that you think that you can exist on 160 ,000, as we've talked about before, Paula, I believe strongly that staying away from that jagged edge of the safe withdrawal rate is just a good idea for being happy because then you don't have to worry about whether your withdrawal rate remains safe as much. So I find that great. I think the questions he's asking are the right questions. Do I think about it? Is our money or separate funds? I like all the planning he's doing. Good stuff. What about the 529 plan like you do?
29:00Paula Pant:But there's got to be a reason for it. We just don't know. Yeah. Yeah. Well, thank you, Mike. Thank you for the question. And please call us back with an update. Call us and let us know how this plan progresses. We're going to take a moment to hear from the sponsors who make this show possible. When we return, we're going to hear from someone who is planning a wedding in New Zealand, wants to spend$60 ,000 on it, and is wondering, is that smart? Is that a financially savvy thing to do? That's up next. In business, there's no room for guesswork. Every shipment matters. Every deadline counts. When you're trying to keep operations running smoothly, the last thing you need is uncertainty.
29:44That's why reliability is at the core of USPS Ground Advantage. From the moment your package is first scanned in, it moves through a secure nationwide network, aiding in a timely and accurate delivery. You get near real-time tracking so you can keep up with your shipments. And with affordable, upfront pricing, there are no hidden fees or surprise surcharges to throw off your cost sheets. It all adds up to predictable deliveries you can depend on. Because knowing your logistics are handled lets you focus on everything else. Your customers, your team, and the future you're building. Visit usps.com slash groundadvantage to start shipping with confidence.
30:31USPS Ground Advantage. We mean business.
31:01Paula Pant:fandoms that matter most. Learn more at Accenture.com slash Spotify.
31:40welcome back our next question comes from abby
31:46Paula Pant:hey paul and joe my name's abby i'm a repeat caller i called you when i first went to graduate school to ask about investing for that and then i also called you after i got my first job and now I'm calling you to ask about my wedding. And before you can toast your spindrifts in support of my nuptials, I was wondering, do you guys have a rule of thumb or advice on how much to spend on a wedding? Perhaps a rule based on percentage of net worth or of income. My husband and I are tentatively planning to have our wedding in New Zealand, which will be at an all-in cost of around $60 ,000, which we can cash flow.
32:23Paula Pant:We have investments together in the range of$800 ,000, and we have an income of$400 ,000. It feels very much against the FI mindset to spend this much on a wedding, but I worked hard and picked up a lot of overtime to pay for it. However, I know if we invested that money, it could be worth$ % &$ % & in 40 years. Can't wait to hear your advice. Thank you so much. Abby, first of all, I love that I've been there through so many milestones and moments in your life. That is so beautiful to have been part of going to grad school and getting your first job and now your wedding. Now our Abby's getting married.
33:04Google ran this ad once. It was just an ad for Google. I don't know why they run this. Everybody knows what a Google search is, but they were basically just running an ad for the Google search bar. They ran that ad by showing this set of like search queries that was like, study abroad in Paris. And then it was like, how do I ask a girl out in French? First date ideas.
33:28Paula Pant:Oh, the whole timeline. You know where this is going. You see the whole progression. Visas to France. Oh, that's wonderful. Wedding rings, you know. And then the final one was like how to assemble a crib, right so it was like a this very very cute ad it showed how you use google searches across these milestones of your life and i got vibes from that when when abby called and talked about that's so cool yeah that's great i love this question and before we answer it though i do want to talk about something that abby the same thing that you thought always frustrates me about the quote fire movement is when people see the five lifestyle is rice and beans.
34:13Paula Pant:And there is an element of that. And it is my least favorite part of it. I think we have to dispel this myth that cheapening our existence is a better life. Whoever started that piece of the five movement needs to be shown the door. You need to take them and kick them out of the club because cheapening your life does not make it better. It doesn't. Less expensive can be better. We can even talk about that because that's going to be part of my answer, but cheaper is not better. Oh my goodness. Stop, stop, stop. But, but Abby, that's not you. That's, that's my trigger with people who think that fire means I, I do less than what I could.
34:57Yeah. Abby, so honestly, when you said, you know, I know that that money, if invested at 7 % for 40 years, would end up being a**. And the reason that I want to bleep that out is because it doesn't matter how much that money is going to be. What are you going to do with that? What's it for? However, the point, the whole point of money is not to amass more zeros in a bank account or in a portfolio, in a brokerage statement, right? The point is to have dry powder, to have a set of tools that you can use in order to construct the life that you want, to build the memories that you want, to do the things that matter most to you.
35:47Money is a physical manifestation of your values and your priorities. And so if this wedding is a priority to you, which it sounds very much like it is, then I don't care what that money would be 40 years from now because there's nothing that you would otherwise spend on 40 years from now that would be worth more than what that is worth to you today. Let me use another example. I was talking to Joe, a mutual friend of both of ours, and we were discussing this question you often hear in the personal finance community of, should you live in an expensive city like New York or San Francisco, or should you live in Texarkana, Texas.
36:38Yes. And he made an excellent point. He said, all right, calculate the differential and then ask yourself, what would you otherwise spend that differential on? If you would otherwise spend that differential on something extremely important, like, you know, if this is a, your kids can eat three meals a day versus your kids can only eat two meals a day type of a scenario, then obviously your answer is quite clear. You go to a lower cost of living place. But if you look at that differential and there's nothing in particular that you would necessarily spend it on, you're kind of like, I guess I could get a nicer pair of jeans.
37:24I don't know. I could buy a few extra sweaters. I could order DoorDash a little bit more often. Like, what the heck are you going to do with that money? My TV would be marginally bigger than it otherwise is. If you don't have anything that is a bigger priority, then why wouldn't you spend it on this thing that's going to be really influential? And so anyway, in that example, it's where do you live? But in your example, it's, do you make this memory that you will have for the rest of your life or not? All right.
37:57Paula Pant:Can I have a slightly different take? Yeah, go for it, Joe. So the average amount of money that people spend, I went and looked it up, Abby, when you called, just because I didn't know. I haven't kept up in a place that many of us have heard of called the Knot keeps a running index of what the average wedding is in America. It's$35 ,000 in 2026. So$65 ,000 wedding should be a very nice wedding. Now, the thing that we referenced earlier in the show is that for 10 years, I was in the wedding industry. Oh, that's right. As a DJ. I did weddings. I did fraternity parties. Like I did everything. I did all kinds of events.
38:38Paula Pant:But I saw some really expensive weddings. I was a piece of some really expensive weddings that were not awesome. And I saw some really inexpensive weddings that were super awesome. So what I wouldn't do is make the mistake of equating more money with a better experience because they can be two different things. And the thing is, I'm sitting in a spot right now and my daughter won't mind this. My daughter just got engaged. So we're about to have a wedding in our family. And we've been talking about this a lot and not really about the budget as much as what makes a beautiful wedding. what do you want it to look like?
39:24Paula Pant:And I think that's where you start. I think you start with, how is this a beautiful thing? Because if you're going to spend$60 ,000 on it, I would want it to be phenomenal. And I'll give you an example, a different example. I saw a TikTok video last week, Paula, where a guy paid$25 ,000 so that he could zipline into his own wedding and be unhooked from the zipline. And he said it was worth every penny. He must be a zipline enthusiast. Well, and I'm glad you made that point because from where I sit, it looked like throwing money away. Like seriously, throwing$25 ,000 away for 10 seconds for me.
40:02Paula Pant:But again, that's me versus him. And there is a difference and it is your day. All the years I was a financial planner, I've never heard anybody say, I wish I would have spent more money on my wedding. What I have heard people say is, I wish I would have had a more beautiful day. I wish I would have had more fun that day. I wish I would have had more. And what I saw were brides that had spent a lot of money being pushed around by the help that they hired to make sure that it ran. And they were so into, because they'd spent so much money, they were so into it being the perfect day for everybody else that they forgot that it was supposed to be their perfect day.
40:39Paula Pant:Spend time making it your perfect day, not making it everybody else's perfect day. I don't have a dog in the fight about 60 ,000 bucks. I don't. I have a huge dog in the fight when it comes to that$60 ,000 and having it work for you, if you're going to do that. I don't know. It's as much about more money or less money as it is about, um, you know, talking to people that have been there, getting different professional opinions about how do I make sure that this is a great day for me and a great day for my guests. Yeah. I guess start with the wedding that you want and then don't let money be the friction that causes you to shortchange the vision.
41:20Paula Pant:Yeah. And I also wouldn't have guilt around it. You know, the, to your point again, Paula, just to reiterate this, there's definitely some guilt around if I, if I invested this money, it would be who cares. Right. Who cares? Who cares? You know, somebody emailed me, This was many, many years ago, back when I used to write online frequently about world travel. I don't do that as much anymore. I mean, I still travel a lot. I just don't write about it. This is before remote work became popular. So at the time, the zeitgeist was what was called location independence. And I remember getting an email from, this is back when I used to check my email.
42:00Paula Pant:Oh, that was a long time ago. Yeah. I remember getting an email from this guy. You guys don't know how funny that is, by the way. I really don't. It's been like six years since I checked my email. You have no idea how funny that is. You checked email? Once upon a – in my youth, Joe, in my youth. And so he was like, I really want to – I think he was at a transition point, one of those natural transition points in life, like middle zone after undergrad, but before grad school, that band of time when you've got a lot of flexibility and what you do ultimately isn't really going to matter that much anyway.
42:39And he was like, I really want to travel. Like I've been reading all of these essays online and I love the idea of just going to Thailand or going to wherever. He was like, but I just keep running the numbers and thinking about how well, if I invested that money instead, it would be worth whatever by the time I'm 65. And this is the shadow side of the personal finance space. You know, we have to simultaneously talk to both audiences. We have to talk to the people who are neglecting the 65-year-old version of themselves. But we simultaneously also have to talk to people who are, who have taken the concept of quote-unquote delayed gratification too far.
43:26and are now simply deferring their life. There's an expression that I love, which is plan for the future, don't live in it. And if you overly are living in the future, then you neglect to live in the present. And that only leads to regret because you have certain windows of opportunity in any present moment that will not be there a decade from now.
43:53Paula Pant:We do underestimate time. We overestimate assets and we underestimate time, which is this precious asset, non-renewable asset that we don't think enough about, I think, in this community. I do want to reiterate this another way, Paulo, which is I just had a wonderful discussion with another friend of both years of mine. I got him, Jesse Mecham, who runs YNAB, which is great budgeting software. And Jesse and I were having this chat and he has learned through experience as he's gotten older. And I love how over time we learn these lessons, right? Where he was very militant about budgets early on.
44:30Paula Pant:And now he's graduated to what matters most is what the money's for. And he said something very poignant, which was some of the multi, multi, multi millionaires that he interfaces with are very unhappy, are incredibly unhappy people. And he said, because even though they have millions and millions and millions of dollars, they don't know what that money is for. They don't know what it's for. And so you could extrapolate this money, Abby, and have it go to a beeped out number. That's a pretty big number, right? You could have it get to that number, but what's it for? Here we know what$60 ,000 is for.
45:10Paula Pant:We know what it's going to do. And I would suggest, you know, through my experience in financial planning is Jesse's right on. Once you've assigned a home to that money, then the money becomes fuel and it becomes fun. But until then, it's just a pile of assets and it doesn't help you with what I think most of us are trying to solve for, which is happiness. Yeah. So solve for happiness. That's the takeaway. We're not solving for zeros on a brokerage statement. We're solving for happiness. Yeah. Now I will say this, if you had come here, Abby, and told us you want a$60 ,000 wedding, but your future meals for next week are uncertain, which is what we see far more often, our answer would have been hella different.
46:02Paula Pant:Incredibly different. This is all predicated on the fact that it's not affecting your future, that your future is fine. Exactly. Exactly. Yes. Yeah. So enjoy the wedding. Send photos. Send photos. You're going to have to open up your email to get the invite, Paula. All right. I will concede to check email if you send photos. Wow. You heard it here first. Hot take of the show, Afforders. I will check one email and it will be that one. I'll ask Rima to ping me. She'll be like, Abby sent her wedding photos. and then that will be the one email I open. You know, I would like to say that there's a nice chat going on YouTube.
46:44Paula Pant:If you want to hang out with us, we make this on YouTube. We have a lot of fun doing it. But a guy named some dude hanging out with us says, my wedding cost about$1 ,800 in Vegas before they closed the chapel in the Excalibur. Parents bought us a helicopter ride over the city at night. Fun and cheap. Lots of family made it. You know, it's in the eye of the beholder, Paula. It's in the eye of the beholder. For some people, they'd hear... In New Zealand, are you kidding me? Then the whole family can't make it. Inexpensive thing in Vegas, then the family can make it. Other people hear Vegas wedding, I'm out.
47:16Paula Pant:I'd rather have the destination. So it begins with you and the fact that it is this moment for you and the fact that you can afford it, whatever it might be. Beautiful. Well, thank you, Abby, for the question. And send photos. We are going to take one final break to hear from the sponsors who make this possible. And when we return, we're going to hear from a listener in Luxembourg who has a question about what behaviorally makes the most sense versus what mathematically makes the most sense. That's up next. Hey, Chicago. Class it up with Crocs. You know back to school is coming in fast. So why wait to find your new fave footwear?
48:00Paula Pant:Step into a local Crocs store and step into your new look. Try it. Style it. Make it yours. Because the right pair doesn't just show up, it shows off. First day fits, handled. Walk out ready for whatever's next. Visit your nearest Crock store today. When you need to build up your team to handle the growing chaos at work, use Indeed Sponsored Jobs. It gives your job post the boost it needs to be seen and helps reach people with the right skills, certifications, and more. Spend less time searching and more time actually interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Listeners of this show will get a$75 sponsored job credit at Indeed.com slash podcast.
48:43That's Indeed.com slash podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Need a hiring hero? This is a job for Indeed sponsored jobs.
48:51Paula Pant:Pros trust the Home Depot for heavy duty storage solutions for any job site or garage. Right now, get up to 15 % off select storage and organization. impact and water-resistant totes and shelving built to hold up to 2 ,500 pounds. Storage systems have space for all your tools and protect them in the garage, on the job site, and everywhere in between. Save time and maximize efficiency with adjustable shelving customized to your business's needs. Shop and save on pro-grade storage at The Home Depot. How pros get more done.
49:28welcome back our final question today comes from what did you know we're international we are international because the final question comes from luxembourg how about that
49:41Paula Pant:hi paula and joe thank you very much for this incredible podcast and all you do for the community. I really love the podcast and I've learned so much so far. I've tried to apply some advice on investments even here in Europe. My partner and I are both immigrants that live in Luxembourg. I'm 28 and my husband is 30 and we've been working in Luxembourg for three years now. Here in Luxembourg, there's an option to have an additional private pension minus the state pension, which is directly deducted from our salaries. The private pension option allows us to invest in mutual funds with insurance companies and the amount contributed per year is tax deductible from our tax return.
50:21Paula Pant:My partner and I contribute a total of 534 euros per month. Out of these, 11 euros are deducted as charges and also there is a 0.1 % fee for assets under management per month, making a total amount of 1.2 % per year. But the major benefit of this plan is that our tax liability reduces by about 1 ,500 euros per annum and the potential return on investment. The average return from the two mutual funds we are invested in from 2020 to 2024 is about 9 % and 10%, and we do have a 50-50 split in each fund. But the issue is that the contract is for a duration of 10 years. Cancelling the contract before the 10-year period expires requires all tax benefits received to be paid back to the tax authorities and there are some penalties attached.
51:14But since we just started the plan last year, the refund and penalty will not
51:19Paula Pant:be significant if we cancel now. My husband really wants us to keep the plan regardless of the fees since it's a contract and it forces us to invest always no matter the circumstances and we treat it as part of our monthly bills. But I'm thinking we can automate our investments in ETF directly and save up on the fees and also in Luxembourg if we keep the investments for more than six months we are not required to pay any capital gains tax too. We both have good investment habits because we have been able to save up to six months in emergency funds and we invested more than 30 ,000 euros in ETFs and across four individual stocks in three years.
51:59Paula Pant:So I believe all things being equal, we will be able to directly invest by ourselves. But I'm more concerned that instead of us continuing to invest in ETFs, we will be tempted to play around by investing in more individual companies, which can have a negative impact on our future goals. My question is, does it make sense to continue with the private pension contract or invest directly by ourselves in ETFs? Thank you so much for answering all our questions. this is a great question paula but we can't answer it yet because we have to give her a name she's anonymous i did some homework yes i did a little bit of homework i looked up famous people from luxembourg and there is a phenomenal chef named leah linster from luxembourg has had the gold michelin star has had a michelin star which is amazing since 1987 wow every year and to hang on to a Michelin star every year since 1987, because every year you have to get it again, is tough.
53:02Paula Pant:She's also the only woman ever to win gold at the, I'm going to pronounce this horribly, Bacouste Ore. She's the only woman to ever win gold there. And I think that she's cooking up a great question here. Oh, I see what she did there. So I think we should call her Leia. Leia, beautiful name. Leia, the thing that struck me at the end of your question. So, okay. Yes, the fee is high. 1.12 % is a high fee. But fundamentally, this is a question about behavior versus mathematics. And the thing that struck me was that you said that if you were to self-direct your investments, you might be tempted to invest in individual stocks.
53:46And that has higher risk, higher volatility, to use the technical term, higher standard deviation, meaning it zigzags a lot more. I think this is very much a question about knowing yourself, because if investing directly in ETFs yourself leads to one month saying, you know what, I don't want to go to an ETF. I'd like to take a flyer on an individual company. Then that ends up hurting you more than it helps. And to give an example of this, And I think I mentioned this on a previous episode within the last week or two. I have a friend. I think I said this either in the last episode or two episodes ago.
54:28You said you had a friend? I know. Yes, exactly. You opened your email and you have a friend? I know. Headlines. It's just somebody alerted the media.
54:40Paula Pant:Who was all invested, didn't have much investments, but had individual stocks. Yeah. And he's 48 years old. He has almost zero safe retirement. retirement and I tried to get him to go into index funds. And then I followed up with him a week later to see how it went. And he had bought into the SpaceX IPO. Oh my. And it was because he just couldn't resist the lure of individual stocks. And so I think there is a know yourself element because, Leah, if you end up buying into individual companies in a way that is outside of your plan, then that outcome is much worse. And actually, I want to make a statement here for the broader audience.
55:26It's one thing to have a plan that you're going to put 95 % of your assets into ETFs or index funds and then 5 % into individual companies. That's a plan, right? It's a different thing entirely to have a plan to put money into ETFs. And then at the last minute, be like, just kidding and put it into individual companies and stuff. So that's the differentiation. Yeah.
55:49Paula Pant:It's so annoying. I can't stand it when you go first and we agree so much. I wrote down mixed signals and I put knowing yourself versus knowing the fees. A lot of people know, focus on the fees and then wreck themselves because they're very smart at the fees and they're not smart at what am I going to actually do if I don't pay the fee? She says she's worried that if they don't switch, they're not in the best stuff. And he wants to stay because it's reliable and they built the habit, right? He recognizes, hey, we built the habit and we're going to keep doing this. And sometimes being locked in is some cool friction, right?
56:26Paula Pant:It actually is good. Locked in is not always bad because you keep doing the right thing. Then she says, well, we have good habits, but then turns around and says, but I'm worried that we might not keep the good habit. So I don't know. But what I do know is that just knowing how much knowing yourself matters more than the fees. And in this community, we worry so much about the fees. And yet I have seen people that have paid high fees to possibly the wrong person go far further than they would have had they've been left alone far further with the wrong person, the wrong fees. Could they have gone faster, better, more optimized?
57:07Paula Pant:A hundred percent, they could have done even better. But the fact that they did anything at all versus doing nothing, just won them the day, won them the day. So are fees important? Yeah, fees are important, but doing the... So So I would say this, Leah, that if you do remove yourself from the program, my question is, is what friction are you going to put between you and your money to make sure you keep doing the thing? And there's some great ideas. If you read James Clear's Atomic Habits, like the way people build these habits, you attach it to other things. You attach it to, you give yourself some good carrots to reach these goals at a time before you know it.
57:54Paula Pant:It's part of what you do every day. Yeah. So there's some cool ways to do it, but I don't know. Well, I would say even before habits. So the waterfall of priority is first automation and then habits. Sure. Because habits are our only behavioral things that you have to do for things that cannot be automated. Like brushing your teeth cannot be automated. So you have to - I get the feeling she's going to automate the money into a brokerage account easily. Like I get this feeling from her. She didn't say it, but when she goes, we have a good savings habit, we can do that. She'll set that up automatically because she knows that it's going to happen.
58:28Right.
58:29Paula Pant:I think her worry is once it's in that brokerage account, she takes it out of the index. Yeah. Yeah. The ETF. Yeah. Yeah. And that's the thing that struck me as well, because it's quite simple to automate money going into an ETF. But I think the question is the behavioral component of, will you then be tempted to touch it? I sometimes refer to that as un-automating the system. People sometimes set up these great automations and then un-automate their own systems. I've seen people really wreck their plan because they didn't have these checks and balances. The good news is I don't even remember these people's name.
59:09Paula Pant:Early in my career though, there was a couple and one thing that happened, And so the firm that I worked for and the timeframe that I worked, I started off in the age when there were very few fee-only planners. And I ended at a time when there was a collection of everything and I could charge people just a fee for advice and all nothing. I could do fees plus assets. I could do commissions. I could do all kinds of different things. But anyway, early in my career, it was all commissions where I was. So we were handed accounts when people would leave. They were these accounts. People wouldn't return calls to the current advisor, whatever.
59:46Paula Pant:And you could only serve so many people. So these advisors would unassign the account and then they'd hand them to new people. So I get these people's account. Well, for some reason, they answered the phone. And they had this growth fund, Paula, that they had had for many, many, many years. And they had forgotten about it. And the only reason why they answered my call was because I happened to say, you know, there's a lot of money in this fund. And the woman goes exactly how much money is in this fund? And I said, there's$90 ,000 in this fund. And she goes, well, way back in like 1983 or something, we put, you know, some ridiculous number, like four or 5 ,000 bucks in it.
1:00:27Paula Pant:And there's$90 ,000 here. Are you kidding me? And I go, yeah. She goes, that's amazing. So we get together, we do a full financial plan. They don't need the money. They have done really well without it. And now we put it to, to get an earlier retirement for them. They began calling me every other month because Paula, there were all of a sudden emergencies that came up. There were reasons why we had to touch it. They drained that$90 ,000 within three years. It was gone. It was 100 % gone. And it was just because they knew they had the money because we did the entire financial plan. I got to see their financial thing and they're like, yeah, nothing's going to happen again.
1:01:10Paula Pant:There's going to be nothing that comes up a couple of months later. Oh my goodness. You'll never believe it came up. You know why it came up? It came up because you knew you had this money and you couldn't keep your hand out of the cookie jar. Maybe not. Or maybe they were the most unlucky people ever and just became unlucky the second they knew they had$90 ,000 that they didn't know they had. Could be one or the other. I don't know. So I don't want to assume. However, you can hear my dripping sarcasm. Nice people, super nice people. But I think our brain does that. I think our brain goes, ooh, this money's available.
1:01:41Paula Pant:And when it's in the plan, the Luxembourg plan, it's not available. Right. There's a magic to having it not be unavailable. I don't know, Leah. I don't want to tell you what to do, but I think you guys have to really have it out about whether you are going to touch it or not. If you're not going to touch it, then move it. Well, I guess the way to conceptualize it then is to think of the fee as your quote-unquote insurance that guarantees that you don't mess with it. Yeah. That is like the payment that you make to secure that it's kept safe from natural human impulse. Yeah. A big part of money management, I think, is admitting that human nature is flawed and fallible and imperfect.
1:02:37Designing a financial plan that recognizes that to be human is to be imperfect and that recognizes that and sets up the safeguards accordingly. right? And if you have to pay a small fee that is like the I'm imperfect fee, right?
1:02:58Paula Pant:I love that name. Yeah. Yeah. Then I think if that fee leads to the outcome that you want, then it is well worth it. There are a few things that we don't know about this plan that I think we should bring up. And that is, and I'm only going to bring this up because this is the way that it is in the United States. If you decide to leave Luxembourg, I only say that because Luxembourg is a tiny country, right? If you leave Luxembourg for any reason, the average person changes jobs every what? 4.2 years, I think is still the number. So if you leave Luxembourg for whatever reason, what happens to that money?
1:03:36Paula Pant:Does it have to stay in Luxembourg? Is it easy to move? How does all that stuff work? I just want to know these. It almost goes back to Mike's question. Every plan has an Achilles heel. if you stay in it, like we just told you what we think the upside is staying in it. And that is the fee is the insurance. But besides that, what are the downsides to staying in it? Like if you build this up, like if you build up a 401k, you know, you're going to be paying a lot of tax later on. What are the issues with staying in this plan? And I don't, I don't know how this plan works. I don't know what the deal is with it.
1:04:11Paula Pant:So I think you want to look that up though. Hmm. Well, Leah, thank you for the question. And I love the discussion because this is the root of a lot of financial planning. It's, do you do the thing that on paper seems quote unquote, like more ideal, or do you do the thing that, that recognizes your own nature? Let me, can I just give one more example actually, as I'm thinking about this? It's so funny, Paul, because I just thought of an example too. So one other example, and I think a lot of people who are listening to this might be able to relate to this, the age old question of, do you keep your mortgage or do you pay off your mortgage?
1:04:53Particularly for anybody who has a mortgage with an interest rate that's less than 5%, right? So if you locked in an interest rate that was a three point something percent that you locked in in like 2019 or 2020, money. Do you keep the mortgage? Do you pay off the mortgage? And of course, mathematically, if you've got a 3.5 % mortgage interest rate, it makes sense to hold onto that mortgage, right? It makes sense to not pay it off and to put that money into investments. And so, Joe, we were just talking about this recently on your show. I made the decision, the mathematically unsound decision to pay off a, actually not just one, but multiple low interest mortgages.
1:05:39But I did that largely because I understand myself, I understand my own behavior and my own nature. And based on the other types of risk in my life, the inherent risk of being an entrepreneur, the inherent risk of running a company, as well as just based on like behaviorally, do I just want to deal with the added cash flow management or not? I made the decision to just simplify my life and reduce the amount of risk that I was exposed to by just paying off the mortgages, right? Does that mathematically make sense? No. Would I have a greater net worth if I had put that money in the year 2020 into index funds?
1:06:24Absolutely. I would have a much greater net worth today. Do I regret it? Nope, not at all. If I could invent a time machine and go back, I would have made exactly the same decision. Zero regrets.
1:06:37Paula Pant:And that's why you didn't invent the time machine because it would have been a waste of time. Exactly. Like why? Otherwise she would have invented the time machine. You know, it's funny just to take this fee idea to the extreme, the fee versus behavior. This is the thing that I saw a fair amount when I was a financial planner and talking to our friend OG about this. He still sees this from time to time, which is the person that goes, you know, I can't stand my company. I hate working for my company. I'm not giving those people, we'll say the word people, but change it. I'm not going to give those people any of my money, so I'm not putting any money in the 401k.
1:07:16Paula Pant:I'll show them. And then they end up Paula doing nothing to show the man that I'm not giving you anything. And OG has talked about what we were talking about this just a couple of weeks ago. He's like, you know, the owner of that company is not sitting around going, ah, I wish Joe would be putting money in the 401k because I'm not eating. It's going to be horrible. Like you're not hurting them at all. A, they don't run the 401k. They off it to somebody else, right? It's a benefit so they can do some cool tax things on their end. But yeah, you're just hurting yourself by not putting money into the plan.
1:08:00Paula Pant:And that's extreme. That's, Leah, not at all what you're talking about. But it just struck me that sometimes when people are like, I'm not paying those fees. You're like, the only person you're hurting is you. Hmm. Well, so Leah, thank you for the question. Best of luck with everything ahead. With Luxembourg. You kidding me? It looks beautiful. Every time I've seen, I've never been through Luxembourg, but Leah, it looks like you live in a gorgeous country. Absolutely. I'd love to visit someday. Joe, where can people find you if they'd like to know more? You know, what's interesting is there was a wild show that everybody's talking about on a different podcast.
1:08:41Paula Pant:I know that most people are talking about Afford Anything. And if they're not, they're talking about Stacking Benjamins. But there's a little show called Diary of a CEO. And they had on this gentleman who used to work for OpenAI, the company that makes ChatGPT. And his job was to do forecasting for them. And he quit. And they offered him$3 million to shut his mouth about what happened to OpenAI. And he said, no, Paula. so that he could say the things that he thinks. So what he says about AI and where he thinks it's headed isn't good. So we had a roundtable discussion where we asked you, what do you think of what happened on Diary of a CEO?
1:09:22Paula Pant:We asked OG. We asked our friend Jesse Kramer. And I love your opinions. You're not AI experts, but you guys have talked about money discussions. And let's say that this does come true. Let's say it doesn't come true. What do you do anyway? How do you frame this? How do you look at it? How do you live with the fear that this might happen? Like you guys answer a lot of great questions in that episode. So thank you. Yeah. So go find our, you don't even have to hear the diary of a CEO episode. We play the open. I really like Paula, your take, Jesse's and OG's take. It was a really interesting textured conversation.
1:09:58Yeah. So it was, it was a reaction episode. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Roundtable reacts.
1:10:06Paula Pant:Yo, LOL about the fourth thing they said. Yeah. So that is on the Stacking Benjamins podcast, which you can find on your favorite podcast player. Thank you to all of you for being afforders. Thank you for being part of this community. We have a free fill outable workbook on the five pillars, financial psychology, increasing your income, investing, real estate, entrepreneurship. So if you want to, it's like a interactive fill in the blank. You can work through each of the five pillars and work through each of the five concepts. And it helps you put some thinking and some structure around your relationship with Double I Fire.
1:10:47You can download that. It's totally free at affordanything.com slash F-I-I-R-E. That's affordanything.com slash F-I-I-R-E. Thank you so much for being part of this community. I'm Paula Pan. I'm Joe Salciai. And we will meet you in the next episode. Oh, there's one thing we didn't say, which I promised Steve we would say. Steve. Steve. Hi, Steve. Steve has a webinar. Oh, yeah. Our esteemed audio editor, Steve, the guy who produces this sound effect.
1:11:26Steve is hosting a webinar on Tuesday, August 4th. It's at 3 p.m. Eastern, 12 p.m. Pacific. He's co-hosting it with Sean Mullaney, an advice-only financial planner, on how to legally avoid an expensive tax surprise. If you want to talk about the subsidy cliff, check out his webinar with Sean Mullaney on Tuesday, August 4th. We will have a link in the description and in the show notes on how you can register. Bam. You did it.
1:11:59Paula Pant:Thanks, everybody. Yeah, thank you. We do underestimate time. We overestimate assets and we underestimate time, which is this precious asset, non-renewable asset that we, we don't think enough about, I think in this community. The other thing that I would like to think about is, is the fact that I can't remember what I was going to say. This is a good YouTube moment right here. I'm still stuck on the fact that you don't answer your email. I love it.
From the publisher
#736: A bride wants to spend $60,000 on her wedding — money that could grow to $800,000 in 40 years if she invested it instead. This week, three very different listener questions all boil down to the same fight: what the math says versus what actually makes you happy.
👉 Figure out your own money mindset — free FiiRE Playbook: https://affordanything.com/fiire
This week, Paula and Joe tackle three listener questions: a professor trying to retire in 12 years while his daughter starts college, a bride wondering if $60,000 is too much to spend on love, and a couple in Luxembourg deciding whether a 1.2% fee is worth paying to keep themselves from touching their own money.
In this episode, we discuss:
How to know if you can retire in 12 years while your kid starts college
A little-known tax-advantaged account almost nobody realizes their child can use
Why a 7% return assumption isn't a "set it and forget it" number
Whether a $60,000 wedding is a smart use of money — or a mistake
How to decide if a big purchase is worth it before you spend the money
Why paying a fee to a financial company might actually be doing you a favor
How to tell a resilient money habit from a fragile one
This episode is for anyone caught between what the math says and what they actually want — whether that's a wedding, a retirement date, or a fee you're tempted to cut. If you've ever done the "mathematically wrong" thing on purpose, you'll feel understood by the end of this one.
⏱️ TIMESTAMPS
Note: Timestamps may vary slightly depending on dynamic ad placements.
(05:26) Can this couple retire together in 12 years?
(08:22) Why his college savings look thinner than expected
(30:37) The two retirement levers you can actually pull(
30:54) A little-known tax-free account for kids
(34:41) Is a $60,000 wedding a smart money move?
(38:31) The math behind what that wedding money could grow into
(44:57) The $25,000 zipline entrance he saw at a wedding
(52:14) What every big purchase question really comes down to
(55:11) Pay the fee, or invest it yourself?
(1:08:28) Why a small fee might be worth paying
🔗 RESOURCES MENTIONED
👉 Figure out your own money mindset — free FiiRE Playbook: https://affordanything.com/fiire
👉 Register for Steve Stewart and Sean Mullaney's free webinar on ACA subsidies and the Subsidy Cliff: https://SteveStewart.me/webinar
👉 Hear Paula, OG, and Jesse Cramer react to the Diary of a CEO episode on AI's future, on the Stacking Benjamins podcast: https://youtu.be/wppwRxGtFD4
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
