Brooke Rollins, Secretary of Agriculture | All-In DC

4 May 2025 · 50 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg

Episode Title

Brooke Rollins, Secretary of Agriculture | All-In DC

Description In this episode, David Friedberg interviews Brooke Rollins, the Secretary of Agriculture, covering her background, the structure of the USDA, current agricultural challenges in the U.S., and the impact of programs like SNAP on the agriculture budget. They discuss reforms needed within the USDA, the state of farming, and the future of American agriculture.

---

Key Themes and Discussions

Introduction to Brooke Rollins

  • Background: Rollins shares her upbringing on a small farm in Texas and her history of involvement in agriculture and public policy.
  • Role in Government: Discusses her previous positions in Trump's first administration and the transition into her current role as Secretary of Agriculture.

USDA Overview

  • Agency Size and Structure:
  • Established under Abraham Lincoln
  • Over 100,000 employees and a budget exceeding $200 billion
  • Handles various programs including SNAP, crop insurance, and rural development loans.

Agricultural Challenges

  • Trump Administration's Impact: Rollins reflects on Trump's first 100 days and outlines necessary reforms within the USDA.
  • SNAP Program Issues:
  • Contributes to obesity and health issues in the U.S.
  • $123 billion spent annually, highlighting the 15 billion dollars directed towards sugary drinks.
  • Farmers' Sentiment:
  • Farmers feeling the pressure from international competition and labor shortages.
  • Need for more farmers to sell products profitably without heavy reliance on government subsidies.

Policies and Reforms

  • Need for Realignment: Rollins indicates that the USDA needs a restructuring to focus on supporting farmers and ranchers effectively.
  • Health Concerns: The health challenges associated with SNAP and other programs are major concerns, emphasizing the need for nutritional reform.
  • Labor Issues: Challenges in finding labor for agricultural work, particularly in states like California.

Future of Farming

  • Market Expansion: Importance of opening new international markets for American agricultural products.
  • Addressing Labor Shortages: Recognizing the need for immigration reform to support labor availability in agriculture.

Innovation in Agriculture

  • Support for Innovation: Discussion about the role of emerging technologies in agriculture, advocating for an open market while ensuring safety and consumer choice.
  • Concerns about Regulations: The need to balance innovation with regulatory measures to protect traditional farming practices.

Conclusion Rollins concludes by expressing optimism about the future of American agriculture, focusing on the necessity of reforming government programs to support farmers and enhance food security.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Brooke Rollins' Vision: To realign the USDA to better serve farmers and enhance food security while navigating the complexities of bureaucratic systems.
  • Importance of Agriculture: Highlighting agriculture as a national security issue, emphasizing self-sufficiency in food production.
  • Future Directions: Commitment to innovation and exploring new markets while addressing the labor and health challenges facing farmers today.

---

Follow Secretary Rollins

  • [Brooke Rollins on X](https://x.com/BrookeLRollins)
  • [Secretary Rollins on X](https://x.com/SecRollins)

Follow the Hosts

  • [Chamath Palihapitiya](https://x.com/chamath)
  • [Jason Calacanis](https://x.com/Jason)
  • [David Sacks](https://x.com/DavidSacks)
  • [David Friedberg](https://x.com/friedberg)

Social Media Links

  • [All-In Pod on X](https://x.com/theallinpod)
  • [All-In Pod on Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/theallinpod)
  • [All-In Pod on TikTok](https://www.tiktok.com/@theallinpod)
  • [All-In Pod on LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/allinpod)

Intro Music and Video Credits

  • [Intro Music Credit](https://rb.gy/tppkzl)
  • [Intro Video Credit](https://x.com/TheZachEffect)

---

This summary outlines the core discussions and insights from the episode featuring Secretary Brooke Rollins, emphasizing her perspectives on agriculture policy and the challenges and opportunities facing the USDA and American farmers today.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Secretary Rollins, thank you for joining me here. Can you call me Brooke? Brooke. I didn't... I mean, I'm wearing a tie. There's a degree of formality. You just came from a cabinet today. I did. Food security is national security. America's the largest -ag exporter in the world. These farmers don't want all these checks. No one wants to hand up. Exactly. No one wants to hand up. $15 billion a year is spent on soda. Taxpayer dollars. These spend on sugary drinks and junk food. that's making our kids sick. Absolutely not. Does that mean we shut them down? Does that mean no? Of course not. Part of that was having 300 executive orders drafted.

0:38We did it all very quietly. No one really knew what was happening. We're not here for the people to serve us like some monarchy. We're here to serve the people. I'm here in Washington, D .C. at the U .S. Department of Agriculture to interview the 33rd Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins. We just had an amazing conversation talking about Brooks background, the work she's doing at the USDA, the impact DOJ is having food stamps, the sentiment of the American farmer, tariff and trade, and everything in between really amazing conversation. Thank you to Secretary Rollins for allowing me here today.

1:13I hope you'll enjoy the conversation. I'm doing all of you. All right, besties. I think that was another epic discussion. People won the areas. I can hear and talk for hours. Absolutely. We cross your questions. We are giving people ground truth data to under a neuronic. What you gonna say? That was fun. I'm doing all the year. Congrats on your first 100 days. For 100 days yesterday was the 100th day of President Trump. I'm 70 days. Right. But I'm President Trump yesterday, but today we celebrated together at the Cabinet meeting. And we're about to go back over to the White House right after we finished to do more celebrating.

1:48Great. Well, we appreciate it. The USDA is an incredible agency. It was founded under Abraham Lincoln. I think I believe was established under Lincoln. When I think I was talking to your staff, I think 60 % of American workforce within agriculture at the time. That's right. And it's a really critical agency for American prosperity. It has been really important for food security and for the interests of America around the world. It's a trade partner, the largest Ag exporter in the world. The agency is incredible in terms of a scale. 29 sub agencies, over 100 ,000 employees, 40 ,500 locations and an over $200 billion annual budget.

2:26So really an incredible department to oversee. But before we get into the USDA and talk a little bit about some of the work you're doing and have been doing, maybe we can talk a little bit about your background. Did you grow up on a farm? How did you get into agriculture? So yes, I grew up in a really small town in Texas. We were not farmers or ranchers per se in Texas. I grew up on a small farm. We raised animals, we bailed hay, but my family, my mom's side of the family, my grandmother, they had a big row crop farm in Minnesota. So I spent every summer on that farm corn, wheat, soy, pretty much everything you could consider and think of.

3:06So that was my row crop, which has actually been very, very helpful because coming from Texas and being more of a cattle razor and being in cattlemore, which is what I'm in in Texas, it's really great to have sort of both sides of the house and and I'm very appreciative to that. But yes, grew up in a very small town. We didn't have much. I was raised by a single mom, but we did have the land. And on that land, we raised our animals. Again, we built our hay. I barrel raised every Friday night. I grew up in 4 -H and FFA went to Texas A &M on an agriculture scholarship, studied soil science and meats and and feeds and feeding and really dove way into agriculture.

3:43After knowing I would go to law school, I really had a heart for understanding policy and the people, but thought I would really stay in ag for the rest of my life. Obviously, sometimes the path diverts and changes, but even over the 20 years since I last worked 100 % in agriculture, which was for Rick Perry when he was first governor, then quickly moved into all the policy. But I've always stayed very much in touch and involved in AG and always really worked in AG policy, but it's part of a much broader portfolio until this job. But no, listen, the USDA is the People's Department. That was what President Lincoln's vision was.

4:26The American founding had four key agencies, of course, the Attorney General Justice, State and Defense, which was the Department of War at the time, but defense. And that was really the beginning of our country, were those four. Interior was added a couple decades later, and then agriculture. That was sort of the cadence of building a new government and creating some sort of self -governing structure that you want the power to remain with the people. But certainly, as America moved from a frontier republic into, as we know, the world's greatest economic superpower, certainly you needed some kind of governing structure.

5:03And so Abraham Lincoln in the 1860s believes sincerely that the majority of Americans then were rural, they were agriculture related, and that they needed representation here in Washington. So the People's Department was formed, and this building was built in the early 1900s, 1920s, and here we are today. Now through the years, as you mentioned, it has grown and grown and grown. I do believe it became a bit of a catch -all in some ways. you know, we run the food stamp program, the SNAP program, the supplemental nutrition program. We run the forests, of course, the forest services under forestry is under USDA, so that's tens of thousands of firefighters as an example.

5:46And of course, all of the farming and agriculture related from rural development loans to farm loans to crop insurance. And then, and then, of course, moving all of the economic relief, et cetera, that sometimes is often needed. I am I'm still getting my arms around, you know, two months in, exactly everything that we're working on here. But in President Trump's greatest vision and in his bold leadership, one of my top priorities is how we realign the USDA around its original purpose, which was serving the people and especially the farmers and ranchers, so really looking forward to continuing that work.

6:20But you were in the first Trump administration. I was in the first Trump administration. I think I was the only ag major in the building. And now I was doing a lot of different hats. I was working with Jared Kushner in the Office of American Innovation and then was doing all the strategies. So kind of the big picture, you know, for the president and the policy, especially on the domestic side, eventually ran the domestic policy team, eventually towards the end. Took on Kelly and Conway's team and some other portfolios. So really over the course of those three years in Trump one. How did you end up in Trump one?

6:53Well, that is a really crazy long story. I, for my entire policy, my heart is in public policy. I have just, I first thought I may end up at seminary and be a pastor, a youth pastor, and that was really where I was felt very cold after college, but then realized that if I lean into public policy, and I didn't know what that meant, I didn't even know what tank was, but that I could perhaps change more and help more people going that route than if I just worked at a church. And so I really kind of got excited about that idea and I was a big firm litigator for a couple of years after law school, did a courtship, a federal courtship, for a judge in Dallas in the Northern District, and then got a call from Rick Perry, also another big Tom Texas Aggie, Ag Major from an Ag background in rural town, and he just become governor.

7:54And in Texas, George W. Bush had just become president, the whole hanging Chad. You know, I think the election integrity issues are new to today. They are not new to today. This goes way back. But Rick Perry became governor. He was lieutenant governor. And he called me and I was sitting, um, billing my every six minutes, the billble hour for this big law firm in Dallas. Love the firm. Didn't love the work. And he said, why don't you come join my new team down here in Austin. I was 28 years old. I'd only been out of law school for a couple of years. And he made me his deputy general counsel, sort of shocking to everybody.

8:27But I'd known him. I met him when I was 15 as a future farmer of America. He believed in me. And so that was really how the pivot, as I was trying to figure out what was next, I really leaned into public policy. And I found in the governor's office, it was a great experience. I only did it for two years, but the very beginning of his administration, Rick Perry's, that you could make such a difference. But what I realized was that there was no one at that moment in Texas governance that was lobbying for freedom and for liberty and for God and for family. That all of those people that would come see me every day wanted something, even in Texas, looking for a specific law or wanting a little bit more taxpayer money.

9:11and I wasn't even 30 yet. So I was sort of nude all of it, but I was put in a pretty highly responsible area. And it was so instructive to me. So anyway, long story short, I ended up planning to sort of step away from any sort of official work. And my husband and I were ready to start a family. And I was gonna do that for 20 years. And then perhaps think about re -entering the workforce force again having no idea what that even meant. But I got a call from Wendy Graham, who was the Senator Phil Graham's wife, chair of this organization I had never heard of, called the Texas Public Policy Foundation.

9:51And only had a couple of employees based in San Antonio. I was the governor's policy director at the time. I went from being deputy general counsel to taking on all the policy for Rick Perry. And she said, would you like to come do this? I have any kids at the time. Well, you know, I could do it for a year or two and I didn't even know what a think tank was, but I did know that based on my experience in Rick Perry's office, I'm not an academic, I'm an ag major from Texas A &M, but that if there were significant efforts to build a policy apparatus, I couldn't have articulated this 20 years ago, but I can now into what my instinct was.

10:26If there were a significant policy apparatus or apparatus, I guess, that were strategic and intentional, and that didn't have clients that weren't paid to advocate for certain things. We only advocated for what was right, that it could change everything in Texas, everything. It's just been the policy director. I had no one telling me what the right thing to do was. I just had the industry in lobby in my ear. And so I thought, yeah, let me go do this Texas public policy thing for a year or two, and that'll be fun. And then I'll really step away once my kids start coming, hopefully. And I looked up 15 years later with four kids, Luke, Jake, Anna, and Lily.

11:09I was doing the flexible work before it was a thing. My board at TPP, I was wonderful. Went from two employees to about 120, became, I believe, the most effective public policy organization in the country. Move Texas because I had been in the sausage making. So I knew, wasn't, again, one in academic, which at the time most think tanks will run by. But I understood innately how to stop bad things and how to move good things. And that was really the bottom line and out of hire really, really good people. So I got a call from Jared Kushner, whom I had never met. I had been on the president candidate Donald Trump's economic team.

11:46I got a call when he was running its Hillary Clinton. Would you help us just build out our economic tax plan, deregulation plan, et cetera? And I said, of course, but I run a nonpartisan thing tank. And I'm always happy to help because obviously I think we thought Donald Trump was going to be more conservative than Hillary, but no one really knew riding been a Democrat. Very early, not very long ago. And I said, but yes, if anyone calls in helps, I want them to understand the Texas model, what we did and cutting taxes and deregulating and the job growth had happened. and how it helped poor people the most, going back to my original idea of going to seminary.

12:23And so he won. I was on that economic team. I was not interested in coming to DC or the White House. I told the team that, they said, what would you like to do? You were on the team when a lot of people weren't. And I said, no, no, I'm gonna stay in Texas and help. Then I got a call from my now very good friend, but then at the time didn't know him, Jared Kushner, who said, whatever you're doing, this is about six months into term, year one of term one. What is that thing you all are doing in Texas? Criminal justice reform, deregulation, tax cuts, I mean, whatever, all of the great things you've done, that sort of, can you come just talk to me about how you did it?

13:00And so I flew up to DC and flew up again and flew up again and I started saying, we really need you in the White House. We want you to build something very similar to what you built in Texas. is a relentless super strategic, very intentional policy apparatus that could move things. And I said no, and then I said no again, and then I said no again. And then my family and I finally said yes. And so that's how I ended up in the last one. And that transition into this term, obviously you've kept in touch with the president. Well, it's much bigger and more interesting story than that I think. So the final year of term one, I took it upon myself.

13:41I sort of anointed myself as the person that would ensure that when President Trump won the second term on November 3rd of 2020, that we would be ready, unlike we were not in the first term. And so I spent the year with Larry Cudlow who ran the National Economic Council, Scott Robert O 'Brien who ran National Security Council, and I was domestic policy at that point, and really drove an effort to put together an agenda in the teams that would be ready for that second term. And so when that didn't happen and you know everyone else was discouraged, no one would hire Trump people. It was a very dark time January 6th happened.

14:23And in November of 2020, I realized that what I had been blessed to build in Texas, what the Trump first White House asked me to help do within the West Wing, that that's what I needed to do on the national scale. Never, never thinking for a second. At that moment, the President Trump was going to run again. But the whole idea that we had just had four incredible years, that we had a team of people in the cabinet, Trump won, senior staff, Trump won, that finally not only knew how to talk about conservative issues, but knew how to govern from a free market, America first perspective, and that couldn't be lost.

15:04If we lost that team, if we lost that thinking, if we lost that know -how and know if we'd ever get it back, and the Democrats are really good, the left is really good at government. We, our side, is really good at raising families and building business. And so this happens every time that we're put into government. We have a team of people that have the best intentions, but we lose years because we don't know how to run a bureaucracy, how to deconstruct it, and how to reconstruct it. And so what I always - In the timeframe. Yes, exactly, because that's it. It's the timeframe. So we launched the America First Policy Institute and quietly in early February of 21, publicly in April almost exactly four years ago today in April of 21.

15:50I had nine former Trump cabinet members from Trump won 50 former White House senior staff. Many were volunteers at the beginning. Eventually I could raise enough money to get everyone on payroll. But when the president won in November, AFPI and then our sister C4, we launched America First Works. It was a $90 million operation in just a couple of years. And I think fundamentally transform the landscape. Part of it, part of it, not all. Part of it was getting ready for a second America first term, whether that was Donald Trump or whomever, and part of that was having 300 executive orders drafted, having 196 agency plans ready.

16:25And we did it all very quietly. No, we didn't talk about it in the press. No one really knew what was happening. So that then translated to seven of our team are now on the cabinet. Dozens and dozens and dozens are in the White House. And along with our other partners that in those dark days of early 21, you know, from Stephen Miller, that there are just so many of us that were kind of, you know, in solidarity in those early days, not knowing that we would be back, but if given the opportunity, we would answer the call again. So now you're in the cabinet. You're running the Department of Agriculture.

17:01It's been in 70 -some odd days, 100 days for the president. How have the first 100 days gone? What have been kind of the highlights for you in starting this term out. You never says, are you exhausted? And it's a seven day a week, 20 hours a day. And for me, there are days where I'm tired of, and I think I got here to DC. I was in doing tours all day yesterday with Secretary Kennedy. The day before I was in Ohio, I think that's right, yes. Two days before that, I was in North Dakota. Then I'm back here. It's literally a 5 a .m. to midnight, seven days a week effort. But it's just such a gift. I mean, who gets to do this?

17:39And at an inflection point in our country's history, this is, I feel like this is 1776 all over again. And I think about never ever to compare myself to, you know, the founding fathers. But those guys were farmers and teachers and businessmen before they declared independence from the greatest power the world had ever known. And that was great Britain and the king. And so in many ways, I feel like our cabinet and this president has got's hand in that that's what we're called for as well. So while certainly we're working very hard and the 100 days has been extremely fast paced, I think that's why you see the joy in the work is because we're ready for it.

18:20Some of the secretaries in the cabinet have talked about the need to deconstruct, tear down, rebuild, or in some cases completely dismantle the department that they're overseeing. What's your kind of mandate with agriculture? Is there a reform needed in agriculture like others have declared for their departments? Does it need to be rebuilt from the ground up? Does it need to be refought or does agriculture work well and in the best interest of America? What's your general kind of take and your general mandate on the Department of Acts? Yeah, well, and I think when you say, you know, it's agriculture work well.

18:56I think you mean USDA. So the fact that we have an agency with a hundred plus thousand employees the largest budget item is food stamps that the SNAP program there are so many different divisions and contract. I mean we are just getting started. We've already canceled almost six billion dollars a hundred thousand two hundred thousand dollars at a time. That's a significant amount of contracts that we're canceling. We are reducing enforcing and force to make sure that we are as efficient as effective and as flexible as possible. There is no doubt that USDA absolutely needs a realignment, a reconstruction, and a significant reorganization.

19:36So, that's what we are working through right now. The idea that USDA should be, you know, we've got other programs and those are important like food stamps, although they need significant reform. But this agency should be about farmers and ranchers all day, every day, and our ag producers. And how do we talking about the industry now and industry that every year we lose more family farms? Every year, things get outsourced to other countries, including China and Brazil. Every year, it gets harder and harder for most of our farmers to make a living where they can support their family, pass their fourth, fifth, and sixth generation farmer range onto the next, their sons or daughters, it's getting harder and harder.

20:21It's also getting harder and harder for new Americans, men or women to get into the business of farming. It's almost impossible. There's not enough opportunity for capital to inject, to buy a new tractor, to buy the land, to figure out how to become part of this great historical legacy profession in American history. So we've got a lot of things A here at the department, we need to really, really be refocused on and we are. But also there's some massive policy questions that we've got to think through. And then the kind of the final big priority is these farmers don't want all these checks. I mean, they take them.

20:59It's the way they stay in the black and the way they keep farming. It's a national security issue because we lose more farms. We buy more food from overseas. That's not good for the country for a lot of reasons. but at the same time, they would like to be able to sell their product at a profit and not have to worry about the government at the end of the day. So these are all big policy questions that hopefully we expand markets, the president's realigning the entire world economy right now, putting America first. All of those things combined, I believe, will lead us into a new era of prosperity where we can hopefully solve for most of them.

21:32I think they're all really good targets, obviously tactically challenging, but can we start with snap real quick, I just want, because it's 70 % of your budget. It is. $123 billion a year. So just to create some context, 13 % of Americans are on the food stamp, the snap program, at $123 billion a year, that's roughly, call it, 2 % of America's federal budget is going towards the food stamp program. And one key kind of policy point that's come up lately is that roughly 10 % or 15 billion dollars a year is spent on soda and 75 % of the population on snap are clinically obese. Yes. And there's a real health concern about the snap program continuing to fuel our health crisis in America.

22:24What have you and in partnership with Senator, sorry, with Secretary Kennedy talked about with regards to addressing the health challenges that arise from the way the snap program operates today? Yeah, that's been a pretty big priority of ours. And within the first hour of being sworn in on February 13th, 50 letters went out to all 50 governors in the country. And in those letters, we talked about SNAP and innovation and send me your waivers because the way the program works, it moves through the states. And so, and I love that anyway. Like, why would the federal government be telling everyone what to do?

22:58We want in the founders best vision of the 10th Amendment to allow the states to build those programs. But within that was why are taxpayer dollars, why are taxpayer dollars billions of taxpayer dollars being spent on sugary drinks and junk food to go into our supplemental nutrition program for our food, food and secure populations, you know, our lower income populations. When, to your point, the backside is an obesity and chronic disease epidemic unlike any developed country in the history of the world has ever seen. 74 % of our adolescents, our teenagers, would not pass the military readiness test of our United States military right now today.

23:4775%. So again, talk about national security, talk about all of the things. This is a massive, massive challenge facing America. And in the first administration, and health care was under my portfolio and domestic policy, as conservatives, we've long talked about how do we make America healthy again, but very much from a numbers perspective, right? The cost to the health care system at the back end of this. It's not just the taxpayers funding it at the front end with the junk food and the sugary drinks and the diabetes. I mean, just it's really stunning what's happened just in the last couple of decades.

24:24but then on the back and the cost to our healthcare system and treating those chronic diseases, it's going to bankrupt our country. It's almost bankrupting all the state right now through Medicaid. So how do we solve for that and you know, inner bobby Kennedy? And bobby and I don't agree on everything, but we do agree on most things. And the opportunity, I was just with him yesterday, touring some farms and talking about nutrition and agriculture all day, the opportunity for the agriculture, lead, and the health lead to work daily hand in hand to solve this together. You can't solve this through government regulation.

25:01You just can't, but you solve it through nutrition, through empowering your farmers, through getting good food into these programs versus the ultra processed, et cetera. So we've already used these points. And he couldn't be more right. And listen, it's a, again, talk about realigning the world economy with the president's vision of tariffs. It's also realigning how we look at food, how we as a federal government to your point on SNAP and other food programs. We have 13 nutrition programs. Listen to this number. This is going to astound you. In America today, through USDA, this is not all the other agencies.

25:37This is just here at USDA. We spend $370 million a day on nutrition programs. So not just SNAP, but food banks and all of the other ones. That's just USDA. That is a stunning number. We've got to do better. And so that's a big part of it. So Secretary Kennedy and I are on this. We are so aligned. We've got the dietary guidelines. What come from doing right now? What shows up in DC as you guys try and make this move? Because there's a lot of money to, that's just to paint the picture, about a quarter of a percent of federal spending is going towards buying soda. Yeah. Okay. So I'm assuming that there's some interests that show up that are like we don't want that to go away.

Read the full transcript

26:20Is there any anecdote you can paint for how DC works and how the political machine typically works? Yeah. That you can help folks here and understand what is what happens as you guys try and make these sorts of reforms? Who shows up and what are they trying to? Well, I will I will talk about it. I will also say that those that represent those industries They are good people who are raising their families. And I do believe their talking point is freedom. I should someone at the bottom of the socioeconomic level latter not be able to buy the same things you and I could buy. Of course my answer is, well, we're not using taxpayer dollars.

26:58That's a big difference. And we're not paying for it on the back end. But I understand where they would potentially be coming from. But the amount of money that is at stake is reflected in the amount of lobbyists that are out and about and certainly very much a part of the Washington DC establishment. But it goes directly to why as difficult and as challenging as these policy issues are for all of us in President Trump's cabinet, reflecting today on the 100th day celebration, It's also so different because none of us are of Washington. That was true in the first term and that's why I felt so freed.

27:43I could just do what was right. He just said, go do what's right. But in the first term, we didn't really know yet how to do it, what we were doing and who was on our side. That four -year pause in between term one and term two, it was the greatest gift. I mean, not only could we plan, but we also fully understood understood who is in it to save the country, what it was that we needed to do to get this done. And for me, this is so black and white. And I've told everyone this, I don't need to listen and have 57 meetings with lobbyists representing the industry. This is black and white. Taxpayer dollars be spent on sugary drinks and junk food that's making our kids sick.

28:27Absolutely not. Does that mean we shut them down? Does that mean no? Of course not. But it just means we realign and we spend the dollars where they need to be spent we reform and hopefully we make America healthy again. I think this is one of the most important points about this administration is without having all the political insiders in the administration. There's no political leverage that can be applied and you can have a true objective first principal point of view on policy which seems to not have been the case for a very long time in the United States. going back to the point about the founding fathers and that era of America, these were folks who ran farms, who ran businesses, they came and provided their time as civil servants for a period and then they left and went back to private service.

29:11That's right. And that government did not have the sort of political careermanship that I think allows lobbying and lobbyists to have the leverage that they have in government today. That's exactly right. On both sides. This is, I'm not, I'm not asking as far as it's, it's not a party thing. It's not, it's just, it is an entire industry that has been built around. This is the problem when the government gets too big. Right, I mean, this is that, this is world history, Greece, Rome, Spain, France, Great Britain, every great world power has buckled under the weight of a government that hands out the largest, right, that everyone's got their hand in the pot and they buckle and that's how they lose their place in the world.

29:57And that is what? Listen, I sincerely believe that without Donald Trump, coming down that escalator, and I'll listen, there were 17 guys and one girl, I think running that, you know, in 15 when he did that. I was not the smart one that said, oh, there's the game changer. That's him. I was like, oh, I love that person, and I've known him forever and right. They're going to be so great. It's going to be Donald Trump. But at that moment in American history, without that human being who is literally willing to swing for the kid vences every single day, a hundred times a day for the American people who owes no lobbyist, not one thing.

30:34We were all hired with the idea that we owe not industry, not lobbyist, one thing, now we need to listen to their concerns, but every day, all day, we're called to do what's right. And I don't know that that's ever happened, at least in my lifetime, in governance, in federal governance. So I want to talk about the irony of running the USDA with your policy background. This is an an organization that administers programs like SNAP, the federal crop insurance program, the direct payments program to farmers, commodity price support, where the federal government, the USDA, buying commodities to keep prices high, and coming from a free market background, coming from a maximizing liberties background, small government background, wasteful government spending needs to be eliminated background.

31:18How do you reconcile the irony of running this department? Yeah. And how do you think about where you want to take this department with that background over time? Yeah, it's great. This is you, the first person to really dig down on this that I've talked to since I took the job. And it's an extremely insightful and thoughtful question that you raised because that's 100 % true. my entire background is how to get government out of people's lives and how to get government quote handouts out of the private sector and how do we downsize significantly everything that the government stands for and how do we let the markets work.

31:57I think two things. First, I have become an absolute avid believer in President Trump's vision on putting America first for years, you know, I was well that the cheaper goods from China are good for everybody. And they allow those at the bottom of the economic ladder to have a better quality of life. And this is the market at work now that I've seen it in the first term, but especially as the agriculture secretary realizing how poorly our products are treated on the world stage, the tariff, it's just, it's stunning to me that we let this go on for so long, the way Argentina treats our beef, the way China treats the way Brazil treats our core, I mean the way the UK treats our pork.

32:42And that's just in my world. I haven't even really studied the automakers and others. There is no doubt that that realignment has to happen for America to continue to thrive and lead on the world stage for another 250 years. That's the first thing. So, so really realigning my thinking after a deep study and deep thought in his approach of America first, not free markets for the sake of free markets, but fair markets for the sake of America. Get parity first. Right. With the goal of free markets eventually. The second thing I will say and more on the USDA side is food security is national security.

33:20We have already lost tens of thousands of family farms in the last decade. If we continue on that trajectory, America will not be able to feed ourself. In the minute you become unable to feed yourself is the minute you lose all power on the world stage. The minute you have to rely on China or Brazil or Argentina to feed your people, you're done. And what has happened over the last number of years is China's been buying up a lot of our farmland in America. A lot of our major meat packers, etc, are now owned by foreign ownership. And you know, it's not all, I'm not going to cast dispersions on everybody.

34:00But at the end of the day, we have to make sure that our agriculture industry is here in this country that we are feeding ourselves and that we're lying on ourselves. And so all of the programs that you just outlined are part of that effort. We lose our farmers and our ranchers. We lose America. Not just the diligence and the hard work and the discipline and what that righteous, I believe the most righteous of all professions means, the beginning of our country was fought by farmers. but also we lose it from a national security perspective. And when that happens, we lose everything. Let's talk about farming and the farmer today.

34:37There's two million Americans that work directly in agriculture across, I believe, 1 .8 million legal farms in the United States. China historically has bought $36 billion a year of American agricultural product. America is the largest ag exporter in the world. So our farmers are deeply dependent on trade. That's right. And in California today, farmers have declared there's a 20 % labor shortage. Meanwhile, there's a massive effort to address illegal immigration in the United States. And I want to just hear like, what's your view on the ground? You visited, I think you said 15 states, since you've been in office.

35:18Hundreds of farmers. What's the state of mind of the American farmer today? What are they feeling? What are they worried about? What are you hearing? The first three things on that, the first is that they are almost to a farmer. They are so supportive of President Trump, even understanding that this current, again, trade renegotiations, it hurts, and they're not going to be able to survive that long, but they know that the president has their back. So that's been really encouraging to me. Now, I have made a huge effort to get out into the country to meet the farmers, to continue to shake hands and say, we're with you, but in the long run, this is going to be so good for our agriculture industry, this renegotiation, these opening up markets.

36:06Under Joe Biden, we lost $50 billion in trade. We went from a zero -dollar trade deficit with Trump 1 to a $50 billion trade deficit with Biden. And that's $50 billion almost directly out of our farmer's pockets. So the short term, but that the president is with them. But secondly, to your point, there are tremendous headwinds, whether it is the trade re -negotiations, whether it is row crops, especially being in the thinnest margins they've ever had in their lifetimes. And then we export so many of those row crops. That's almost a double whammy. the president's vision of a, you know, basically a disruptive restructure of the American economy includes the shipbuilding.

36:47And so, for again, a lot of the exporters that need that extra fee on top of that is just one more. And again, that James and Greer and the team has been great. They've been solving for that and ensuring that AG is at the table and that every day and every decision they're making, they're doing that. But I think ultimately, and this has been a big part of what I've been talking to the farmers about, is ensuring that we're opening up those new markets, and whether it's India, or Japan, or South Korea, or Brazil, or Peru, or the UK, I am going to all of those countries in the next few months. This is just me on behalf of agriculture.

37:24This is our trade crew, our commerce secretary. I mean, it's just me, but I feel so bullish on the idea that if we are, we're on Trump time, we deploy Trump time, which is going as fast as you can, as hard as you can for as long as you can, around the world. We're going to open up so many new markets for our farmers. And then we saw for the labor issue, which you brought up, which is a really big issue. Now I think sometimes the Californians tend to inflate that because they, yeah, I know, They think a little bit differently. I hear it in Florida too. Yeah, well, and there's no doubt, are there?

38:01I'll give you one statistic from a large strawberry farmer. I work in strawberry as well as other crops. But the farmer mentioned that he did an analysis. He thinks that since pre -COVID days, the total labor cost in the strawberry industry is grown from 700 million a year to 2 billion a year. Wow. And that's really hurt margins. And so it's really hard to net a profit, particularly in specialty crops. not road crops, everything's automated, but specialty crops where you're dependent on labor doing work in the field, harvesting product to be able to keep up with the lack of labor and that of weight, there's been a lot of an exodus of immigrants out of that might qualify under the visa program.

38:42So maybe I don't know if you're active or spending or the the program that I can come up with. I'll put a little note across the T on what you just said And that is I'm a Texan and our South Texas, the citrus farmers down there think about in Mexico for some of them half a mile away They can see it right across the border now through the wall. They can see it and and it's two dollars an hour Those farmers are paying two dollars an hour over there You come across on our side and with everything that we're required to do and pay and it's 20 to 23 dollars an hour How do you compete? You're you're growing the same crops You can't.

39:19And so that's what we really have to focus on are dairy farmers. You know, the visa programs don't work for them. It's not a seasonal deal. Those cows have to be milked 365 days a year. They can't find people to milk the cows. So the president, not in today's cabinet meeting, but in the last one a couple of weeks ago, brought this up himself. And he said, and he and I talked about it in the first term. We've talked about it since then. He understands that there is a massive labor challenge for our farmers and our ranchers, especially our farmers in this country, but our ranchers as well. And he himself said, you know, that those who are not here legally, they need to go back, they need to self -deport, but that we will ensure that there's some sort of program in place that will help make sure that our farmers on this side have the labor that they need.

40:07Now, the details of that are being worked out. I can't really talk much about it, but the fact that the president himself is focused on that should give our farmers some, some a lot of encouragement that help, help literally, figuratively and metaphorically, is on the way. Got it. I think that's a key thing for farmers to hear. They, you know, from what I hear from folks in the industry, it's something that they want to make sure is acknowledged and addressed. Yeah. It's agriculture such an interesting market. There's such an alignment with some of these conservative values that you and this administration espouse.

40:41But then there's such an important role that government actually plays. That's exactly right. That is, at this point, you couldn't, you know, I love Elon and love Doge and they've been such a good partner in helping us get rid of the $500 ,000 grant to study transgender menstruation cycles in men. And you know, what the mice are going to do with under a blah, blah, blah, the craziness, he's been wonderful. But agriculture in many ways is different. You can't come in here and gut the crop insurance program. You will lose thousands of farmers and guess who swoops in and picks up their land in their operation?

41:20The Chinese. You just can't do it. Now, my goal and my fervent prayer is that in four years from now, we will have moved. We will have opened up the markets. We'll have reached this new era of prosperity for our farmers and our ranchers. And in so doing, this should be the goal of every government program that we're able to roll a lot of that back and out and that we don't need it as much. So the budget can come down over time. Exactly. Yes. That's the goal of the same with the food stamps. I mean, talk about 80 % of the USDA budget is food stamps. Our goal needs to be moving people into a life of work filled with dignity, where they don't need those programs anymore.

41:57Versus the last administration trying to get as many people into those programs as possible, our goal is to move them off of programs because they have a good well -paying job and they don't need that anymore. No one wants to hand out. Exactly. No one wants to hand out. I think that's what a lot of people don't understand. So, effectuating on that is really important. Yeah, and I guess maybe you can share a little bit of the anecdotes. What's it been like with the Doge representative that have been come to the Department of Ag? Are they embedded? Are they long -term? Do you believe that Doge plays as an, forget a long?

42:28Yeah. But as a department or whatever it is, ad hoc department, does it play a long -term role in continuously improving and identifying opportunities for cost savings? 1000 % and it's like all my dreams have come true. You know, I'll never forget when the president came down the escalator in 2015 and he was talking about for every one new regulation, we're gonna get rid of two. And I thought, are you kidding me for the first time? Are we making deregulation fun and sexy? Like I've been talking about this in Texas and it no one want to talk about it, right? Even Republicans like, oh, you know, we can never get rid of once governments there we just have to make it better.

43:06And Donald Trump, 10 years ago, started talking about it, made it a thing. The first year of Trump won for every one new regulation, 22 win. The next year was 17, the next year, 13, I think. And then by the end, because it got a little bit harder to find them. But still, it went two to one. Our average was like 10 to one in the first Trump administration. Well, then you add on Elon Musk and his team of geniuses who normally would never even think about being in government, not that they wouldn't want to, but they wouldn't even begin to know how you combine that with this idea that we're returning power to the people, we're downsizing government.

43:42We are not in charge. We're not here for the people to serve us like some monarchy. We're here to serve the people. And that's a fundamental shift in the way we're thinking in the federal government and then to add Elon on. So it actually right after our cabinet meeting, maybe right before a couple of hours ago, I guess the news reports were saying, oh, he's headed back to do his business. I pulled him aside and I said, I hope this isn't true. this country needs you and your team forever. And to see now the states begin to add their own doges, this is how we save America. This is how we protect the country.

44:14Hopefully that actually comes to the institution. It becomes institutional. Exactly. And hopefully we make it so powerful and get the people so involved that even the Democrats can't roll it back, that this is the long -term plan for the country. For your department, there's a big farm bill negotiation that comes up. I've been in DC a couple of times for farm bills. if I'll give an anecdote, go in, I have a conversation with someone on a committee or in an office, and they're like, well, we can get this thing, but we gotta go give the other guys this thing. And it clearly becomes this bill that today, I think is rated at a trillion five over whatever the budgeting period is.

44:51It's one of the largest bills we pass, and the SNAP program is in it, so it serves the house of representatives interests, and then all the farm programs are in it, so it serves the Senate interests, because the Senate is heavily influenced by rural states, by agriculture. And so it's become this behemoth bill. It is. And how do you view, are you going to play a role in, and how do you view this kind of horse trading that needs to go on to ultimately reduce government inefficiency, spending on things that don't necessarily make sense, as we get into this Farm Bill negotiation in the next couple of months?

45:24Well, I am encouraged that the Biden team couldn't get it done. I mean, they worked and it's important. I know a lot of people are hating it and they should because it does become a Christmas tree of sorts. But the reference prices, which is what our farmers are paid on have not been changed since the last farm bill, which was at the beginning of Trump one. So Debbie Stabenow, who's now gone, was the lead Democrat and the Senate, the Senate was leading. Of course, Joe Biden wasn't, that team was sort of MIA. We've got a different team on the ground now. And one of the very first conversations I had with Amy Klobuchar, who took Debbie Stabenow's place as the lead Democrat.

46:01Of course, now we're running the Senate's a little bit different is how do we get this done? But realizing that the SNAP program, which is what the Democrats are always trying to put more money into, that grew 40 % under the Joe Biden term, 40%. The program that was already this gigantic, you know, huge amounts of waste and fraud and abuse, it's now even more and they did that on purpose, right? They knew it would be hard for us to roll that back. I'm underscoring your point that this is not going to be easy. that the farmer part of the farm bill is 15 % 1 .5%. The food stamp part of the farm bill is 85%.

46:37So I have been thinking about this already having conversations and strategy sessions on both sides of the aisle, frankly. We've got to get this done for our farmers and even a Senator Klobuchar's credit and other Senate Democrats on the Ag Committee. They care as much about the farmer in their states as I believe most of the Republicans do. It's a ag is the number one industry in almost every state. And so trying to find that middle ground, but ensuring that we're bringing real reform to the SNAP program, but that we're most importantly supporting our farmers and our ranchers will continue to be the driver.

47:11As in all things, I think Donald Trump is the game changer here, and I think he's going to help us get this done. So I want to talk about one last point before we wrap, which is on innovation, generally speaking in food. There's been a large amount and how it relates to protecting farmers' interests. There's been a lot of investment in cellular agriculture using cells to make milk or eggs or cheese or fish or chicken using biotechnologies. And DeSantis went on stage with a couple of ranchers from Florida and they passed a law banning the sale or production of cellular agriculture, cellular products in the state.

47:52and there are two other states that have passed laws, others that are considering it, now there's a conversation about some folks at the house, also doing it. And the general statement, well, there's already a regulatory framework for making sure it's safe for consumers, making sure it's healthy, et cetera. Some people might not like it, but I go back to my free market principles. Why not let consumers choose as long as it's safe, as long as it's appropriately regulated, shouldn't it be made available rather than protecting the interests? Otherwise, you end up looking like Europe. Europe and Europe has stifled innovation in agriculture for decades.

48:23And as a result, they have fallen way behind America. And it's an opportunity for America to sustain its innovative advantage. Have you spent any time on this topic and you have a point of view? Well, let me say this. I have not dug into this yet the amount that I need to. But having said that, I do believe that the innovation and the drive for better should never be stifled. And I sincerely believe that there is hopefully room for everyone, especially as this emerging market is happening. And I also believe that at the end of the day, the American consumer, when most of them, when having to decide between real American beef and something that's not, that they're going to choose the real American beef.

49:10So I at least, in my nominal knowledge at this point without digging in, I just believe so strong in our ranchers and our farmers and what they produce and what it means to the average American family, I'm the mom of four, and how I feed my family. But I don't think we ever want to get in the way of stifling innovation, especially as it relates to something that could eventually be such a game changer. Well, Brooke, I really appreciate all the time you've given us. Given me today, it's really great to spend this hour with you and congrats on the role, congrats on the progress and I really look forward to seeing the work you're going to be doing over the years ahead.

49:47Thank you. It's an honor to do it. Thank you.

From the publisher

(0:00) David Friedberg welcomes Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins!

(1:32) How she ended up in Trump's two administrations, history of the USDA

(16:56) Trump's first 100 days, what needs to be reformed in the USDA

(21:31) SNAP's massive impact on USDA budget: soda, obesity, health challenges; how being DC outsiders helps the Trump Administration

(30:48) How she reconciles running a department with a lot of government intervention after coming from a free market background

(34:33) State of US farming in 2025, labor costs, opening up new markets, and more

(42:11) Working with DOGE, Farm Bill negotiation, stance on agricultural innovation

Follow Secretary Rollins:

https://x.com/SecRollins

https://x.com/BrookeLRollins

Follow the besties:

https://x.com/chamath

https://x.com/Jason

https://x.com/DavidSacks

https://x.com/friedberg

Follow on X:

https://x.com/theallinpod

Follow on Instagram:

https://www.instagram.com/theallinpod

Follow on TikTok:

https://www.tiktok.com/@theallinpod

Follow on LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/company/allinpod

Intro Music Credit:

https://rb.gy/tppkzl

https://x.com/yung_spielburg

Intro Video Credit:

https://x.com/TheZachEffect

More from All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg

All 296 episodes
Brooke Rollins, Secretary of AgricultureAll-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg · 50 min
Listen in VO