Can Denmark convince Trump not to “conquer” Greenland?

15 Jan 2026 · 32 min · 13 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Two US-focused stories: (1) Jerome Powell’s public clash with Donald Trump over a DOJ criminal investigation tied to Federal Reserve building renovations; (2) Denmark and Greenland’s meeting in Washington with Marco Rubio (and J.D. Vance joining) about Trump’s push to take control of Greenland.

Guests/backgrounds

Hosts Sarah (BBC Bureau Washington), Anthony (BBC Washington, D.C.), and Justin (AmeriCast HQ London). No external guests are interviewed; the episode is commentary by the hosts.

Key claims

Powell says DOJ subpoenas threaten a criminal indictment over his Senate testimony, but he frames it as political retaliation because the Fed won’t lower interest rates to Trump’s preference. Denmark says Greenland security can be handled under the 1951 Defense of Greenland agreement and NATO, rejecting any ideas that violate Denmark’s territorial integrity and Greenlanders’ self-determination.

Notable examples

Powell’s Sunday video statement; Fed renovation cost dispute (estimates rising to about $3.1B); Trump’s “Golden Dome” missile-defense rhetoric; Denmark’s rebuttal to “dog sleds” and plans for more military capabilities; Germany/Greenland troop increases.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Intro to Greenland Talks

0:00 to 0:37

Discussion on the ongoing talks regarding Greenland's future and political implications.

“This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.”

Intro to Greenland Talks

2:21 to 3:38

Discussion on the ongoing talks regarding Greenland's future and political implications.

“Hello, it's Sarah here in the BBC's Bureau in Washington.”

Jerome Powell's Controversy

3:38 to 6:20

The implications of Jerome Powell's public confrontation with Trump and the investigation.

“or at least you two can, Sarah and Anthony, later on, though I may have to go to bed because I tend to do that quite early for other reasons that we won't go into now.”

Federal Reserve Building Costs

6:20 to 9:32

Analysis of the rising costs of the Federal Reserve building renovations and Trump's criticisms.

“I have served at the Federal Reserve under four administrations, Republicans and Democrats alike.”

Political Dynamics of the Fed

9:32 to 14:00

Exploration of the political relationship between Trump and Powell, and its economic implications.

“that has been necessary because it is a 90-year-old building.”

Presidential Influence on the Federal Reserve

14:00 to 14:51

Explore the complexities of presidential influence over the Federal Reserve and its implications.

“In that case, actually, ironically enough, is going to be argued before the Supreme Court just next week about how much influence a president has on the makeup of the Federal Reserve, which is supposed to be independent.”

Populism and Monetary Policy

14:51 to 16:49

Discuss the tension between populism and traditional economic governance in the U.S.

“People around the Fed say he's looking burnt out and tired and he'll probably just retire from the whole thing.”

Global Economic Repercussions of U.S. Policy

16:49 to 19:27

Learn how U.S. monetary policy impacts global economies and central banking practices.

“Yeah, you know, it was interesting after Powell made the statement on Sunday night, a bunch of former Federal Reserve governors came out with a statement.”

Market Reactions and Trump’s Economic Strategies

19:27 to 22:10

Examine how the stock market reacts to Trump’s economic policies and the Federal Reserve's decisions.

“because they know you're going to do everything possible in the Fed.”

Republican Dynamics and Trump's Influence

22:10 to 25:18

Analyzes the shifting dynamics within the Republican party regarding Trump's influence over the Federal Reserve.

“And as Anthony, as you say, the Supreme Court is about to, I mean, it's a different case, isn't it?”
Show all 13 chapters

Trump's Vision for Greenland

26:21 to 27:18

Delve into Trump's motivations and statements regarding Greenland's strategic importance.

“And just before this meeting, if they were nervous at all, these foreign ministers, they woke up to see that he had posted on social media, the United States needs Greenland for the purpose of national security.”

Denmark's Response to U.S. Claims

27:18 to 28:03

Understand Denmark's perspective and firm stance on Greenland's territorial integrity.

“The president has made his view clear and we have a different position.”

Dissecting the Greenland Debate

28:03 to 32:13

Explores the complexities and disagreements surrounding Trump's interest in Greenland.

“That does not sound like they really agreed on anything, does it, Anthony?”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.

0:30business needs in one place, saving you time, headaches, and serious money. Stop paying for missing pieces. Go to odoo.com. That's O-D-O-O.com to learn more. Self-directed investing, trading, full-service wealth management, automated investing, financial planning, thematic investing, retirement planning. Phew. And to think, that's just a small taste of what Schwab offers. because Schwab knows that when it comes to your finances, choice matters. No matter your goals, investing style, life stage or experience, Schwab has everything you need, all in one place, so you can invest your way. Visit schwab.com to learn more.

1:14Hello, we've got two very big stories playing out today. First off, important talks about the future of Greenland. the foreign ministers of Denmark and Greenland have come here to Washington DC for some talks at the White House. How did they go? We therefore still have a fundamental disagreement, but we also agreed to disagree. There was another extraordinary moment this week, another disagreement, when the world's top central banker, the chairman of the US Federal Reserve, made a video statement basically calling out Donald Trump. Public service sometimes requires standing firm in the face of threats.

1:49I will continue to do the job the Senate confirmed me to do, with integrity and a commitment to serving the American people. That was Jerome Powell there, breaking the news that a criminal investigation has been launched into him by the Trump administration, and basically saying he thinks that this is entirely politically motivated because he hasn't done what President Trump wants him to and lower interest rates. Therefore, Trump is using the Justice Department against him. Now, that is a very big deal, and we will explain exactly why. Welcome to AmeriCast.

2:51Hello, it's Sarah here in the BBC's Bureau in Washington. And it's Anthony, right next to Sarah here in Washington, D.C. And it's Justin in the worldwide headquarters of AmeriCast in London, England. And we should say before we start, it's late, at least it's late for me. It's after half of six in the evening, which, you know, I mean, it's fine for you guys because it's still the middle of the day. But for me, it's not. But there is a reason why we're doing it slightly late because there is an awful lot to get to. and some of it has yet to happen or is happening as we're on. So we're doing the right thing.

3:22Before we get into Jerome Powell and Donald Trump, we should say that one of the other things we need to keep an eye on is this meeting between J.D. Vance, Marco Rubio and the foreign ministers from Denmark and Greenland at the White House. And we know what that's all about. Very interesting to see what comes out of it and what the tone was like. So hopefully we can get to that. or at least you two can, Sarah and Anthony, later on, though I may have to go to bed because I tend to do that quite early for other reasons that we won't go into now. But OK, Sarah, take us away when it comes to Jerome Powell.

3:55What has actually happened to him this week? Well, this was a fairly astonishing intervention from the chairman of the Federal Reserve, who's normally a rather reserve kind of chap. I mean, that's the sort of person in that role who is very buttoned up and serious and doesn't tend to make splashy news. But on Sunday night, he recorded a video in which he revealed that he was under investigation by the Department of Justice and that he thought that this was an entirely political move based on the fact that he has clashed with Donald Trump, who wants him to lower interest rates faster than he has been doing.

4:31They've had some very public arguments about that. And he set all of this out absolutely foursquare, accusing the president of political interference in this investigation. And I mean, I was pretty surprised by seeing him do that. Anthony, were you? Yeah, I mean, he is, as you mentioned, normally a restrained kind of guy, doesn't get involved in politics. And here he was putting politics directly on the table. All of this investigation is over renovations that have been happening to the Federal Reserve building and testimony that Jerome Powell gave before Congress about those renovations. But let's listen to Jerome Powell in that statement he had released on Sunday night in full.

5:10On Friday, the Department of Justice served the Federal Reserve with grand jury subpoenas, threatening a criminal indictment related to my testimony before the Senate Banking Committee last June. That testimony concerned, in part, a multi-year project to renovate historic Federal Reserve office buildings. I have deep respect for the rule of law and for accountability in our democracy. No one, certainly not the chair of the Federal Reserve, is above the law. But this unprecedented action should be seen in the broader context of the administration's threats and ongoing pressure. This new threat is not about my testimony last June or about the renovation of the Federal Reserve buildings.

5:51It is not about Congress's oversight role. The Fed, through testimony and other public disclosures, made every effort to keep Congress informed about the renovation project. Those are pretexts. The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the President. This is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions, or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation.

6:26I have served at the Federal Reserve under four administrations, Republicans and Democrats alike. In every case, I have carried out my duties without political fear or favour, focused solely on our mandate of price stability and maximum employment. Public service sometimes requires standing firm in the face of threats. I will continue to do the job the Senate confirmed me to do with integrity and a commitment to serving the American people. Thank you. My reaction to that, Sarah, is wow, because you don't often hear in those terms, with that degree of bluntness, Jerome Powell say anything about anything that isn't specifically monetary policy.

7:07The fact that he is taking the president on and doing so so nakedly, so openly now, this is a new world. Yeah. Yeah. But he said, didn't he? Public service sometimes requires standing firm in the face of threats. And that's obviously what he has decided to do in this particular case and to call it out publicly. You don't get to be the chair of the Federal Reserve without understanding that every single word, every single pause, every single comma you say matters. You get to the point where you get very good at choosing your sentences carefully because it can move markets. It can shift tectonic plates in the global economy.

7:44So here he was with a conscious decision to go straight at Donald Trump, really the first time he's ever done that publicly, knowing what that would amount to, a declaration of war or a line in the sand that this has to stop. And actually, he has been getting a lot of applause from the left and the right for being somebody who is prepared to stand up to Donald Trump, even in the face of a potential criminal investigation. And there's been a lot of commentary I've seen. You probably have as well, Anthony. People say, if only everybody had the courage to call Donald Trump out when he's using the justice system in this way or when he's trying to bully people into doing something.

8:22So, yeah, a lot of respect going towards Jerome Powell for that, at the very least. Right. I got to remember what these threats are. Donald Trump has said Jerome Powell has been too late to reduce interest rates. He called him Jerome Too Late Powell. He says he's incompetent. But the latest attacks that Donald Trump has been launching are on that building on Constitution Avenue, the headquarters of the Federal Reserve. You can see it. It's not too far from the White House. It's been surrounded by cranes for the past few years. And he says that the cost overruns have have been essentially corruption and mismanagement on the part of Powell.

8:59The building was built in the 1930s. It hasn't been renovated significantly since then. So it needed a lot of work. The original estimates for the renovation were two point five billion dollars. Trump says now it's going to cost maybe upwards of three point one billion dollars to finish the project. There have been accusations that it's full of luxury items. Powell has denied that. He says these cost overruns are because of increased costs of these renovations, just inflation and building costs, but also things like remediating asbestos and other cleanup that has been necessary because it is a 90-year-old building.

9:38That is the focus of this latest investigation. But clearly, from Powell, the way he's characterizing it, that is not what this is about. Yeah, and Donald Trump has been trying to get at him over these building costs for quite a while. I remember a few months ago, President Trump went all the way down to the Fed building to do a tour of the renovations, which is not a normal thing for a president to do, to leave the White House to do something like that. And they ended up bickering about the costs, actually, in front of the TV cameras. So we're taking a look, and it looks like it's about 3.1 billion.

10:08It went up a little bit, or a lot. So the 2.7 is now 3.1. I'm not aware of that. Yeah, it just came out. Yeah, I haven't heard that from anybody at the Fed. Yeah, it just came out.

10:25I know it's at about 3.1 as well. 3.1, 3.2. This came from us? Yes. I don't know who did his name. You're including the Martin renovation. You just added... It's higher capital. You just added in a third building is what that is. That's a third building. It's a building that's being built. No, it was built five years ago. We finished Martin five years ago. Part of the overall work. So we're going to take a look. We're going to see what's happening. Gloriously uncomfortable. And you can hear people feeding Donald Trump the information in the background there. Look, the big picture here is that when Donald Trump discovers who nominated Powell for this role, He's going to be very angry, isn't he?

11:14Because it was one Donald Trump. Yeah, exact some retribution, I would assume. Exact some retribution, exactly. So back in 2017, he gets nominated by Donald Trump. But the relationship, to put it mildly, has soured. How normal is this? Well, the first bit and the second bit, very normal, actually. So presidents do nominate the chair of the Federal Reserve. The second bit is that they fall out. They always fall out or often fall out. George W. Bush certainly fell out with whoever was in charge of the Fed when I was in D.C. doing your job, Sarah. And it was something that people talked about and I think Bush actually wrote about later on.

11:56But crucially, crucially, crucially, because of the centralness of this relationship and the importance for the American economy and potentially for the global economy, which something we'll get to in a bit, they don't fall out publicly. And what they certainly don't do is enter into these threats of criminal proceedings, etc., etc. But the bottom line is Donald Trump has decided, as presidents sometimes do, I want to run the economy hot. So he's got his fiscal policy, his taxing and spending. He's got tax cuts happening and not enough spending cuts to match them. So heat there. But also he wants similar heat with monetary policy.

12:38wants the Fed to lower interest rates, even though the Fed thinks that it would be unwise to lower them too much at the moment. Why? Because it creates inflation. It creates, crucially, inflation further down the road. But this is the point, isn't it, guys? In the immediate short term, i.e. the months going up to November, oh, I wonder what's happening in November. People will feel good. Yeah, you'd reduce interest rates. People feel like they have more money in their pocket, And that would suit Donald Trump very well at the moment, because he is looking at voters complaining about prices and about the affordability issue that there is here.

13:16He continues to say that affordability is a word that was made up by Democrats. But that doesn't stop the problem that voters are concerned about prices and dropping interest rates would make them feel a little bit better. That's the way the system was set up. It was set up to be insulated from the short term political motivations of people who are governors on the Federal Reserve are supposed to be thinking in the long term. They're supposed to be cooling some of the political impulses of presidents and members of Congress. They serve longer terms, terms that overlap different administrations.

13:49And they're not supposed to be able to be fired by a president without cause. We've seen Donald Trump already try to fire Lisa Cook, who is one of the members of the Federal Reserve, a governor alleging that she engaged in some sort of a mortgage mortgage fraud, although that hasn't been proven yet. In that case, actually, ironically enough, is going to be argued before the Supreme Court just next week about how much influence a president has on the makeup of the Federal Reserve, which is supposed to be independent. So all of this is kind of coming together all at once. And the stakes are high because it is the health of the U.S.

14:25economy and the economic system that the Americans have right now that is at stake. There's a delicious irony to this, Justin. Jerome Powell's term actually runs out in May. Donald Trump will be shot of him really quite soon, except he can stay on as one of the governors, so not the chairman anymore, but one of the governors, therefore with an important decision-making role, for another couple of years after that. A lot of people thought he wasn't going to bother. People around the Fed say he's looking burnt out and tired and he'll probably just retire from the whole thing. But if anything is going to make him determined to stay on, it's going to be this row that he's having with Donald Trump.

15:03Plus, not only are Democrats angry about this, you've got some Republicans in Congress deeply, deeply concerned about this, including one, Tom Tillis, who actually chairs the committee that will approve the new Fed chairman whom Donald Trump will get to nominate. He says they're not going to approve that unless this threat against Jerome Powell is taken away. So Donald Trump might end up with Powell on the board for another couple of years and possibly not even being able to replace him as the chairman precisely because he's gone after him quite so hard. It's really interesting. It goes to the heart of what populism is in a way, doesn't it?

15:40And the way that Trump wants to govern, because there is a, I sort of dimly remember this from undergraduate economics. There is an argument about whether or not you are giving away too much democratic power when you allow central bankers to set interest rates, given how important monetary policy is to everything we do. But the counter argument is exactly the one you've just been talking about, both of you, that an economy that is well run and stable and provides long term goods for everyone is an economy where there is a separation between the political and the technical when it comes to monetary policy.

16:18And it's interesting that Donald Trump is moving in the direction of directly challenging that and saying, no, it should be me because I am elected by the people and the people ought to have a say in all of this. And you do wonder the extent to which there are other people around the world, other strong men or potential strong men, perhaps some strong women as well, who are thinking, who are looking at the Fed and what happens with Jerome Powell and whether Trump is successful and indeed whether he's successful with his successor in persuading him to put or her to put interest rates down further than they should be, whether that actually does have a kind of domino effect across the world.

17:00Yeah, you know, it was interesting after Powell made the statement on Sunday night, a bunch of former Federal Reserve governors came out with a statement. And one of the things they said was this is kind of developing country, Tim Pot dictatorship type of behavior that, you know, one of the things that global economists try to prevent is having leaders of countries take over the monetary policy of their nations to try to goose the economy. And what they end up doing is having this incredibly high inflation, whether it's in South America or African nations or elsewhere. This is a pattern that is not one that the United States should follow, not a path that it should go down.

17:41But, you know, if the United States does this, then then is that is it going to be in a position to tell all of these other countries that know what you're doing is a bad economic idea? I mean, we're leading by example one way or the other. Yeah, in this sense, shockwaves around the world. You had central bankers from across Europe all the way to Korea saying this is a terrible thing. You had former chairs of the Fed, all sorts of economists and Wall Street people coming out and saying they were deeply, deeply worried about this. Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, actually went on the record saying he was concerned about this.

18:14He's normally pretty careful about what he says in the political arena. So, I mean, it's had repercussions already. It was really interesting what happened to the stock market, because, of course, that's the one thing that might affect Donald Trump's thinking. It fell quite precipitously on Monday morning and the dollar weakened and all sorts of things like that. By the end of the day, Monday, though, things are running so hot in the economy here. It was actually up at an all time high, the SNP. Yeah. And isn't that Trump's point, actually? And he made this point. In fact, we should listen to it.

18:46He made exactly this point to business people quite recently. he was talking directly about Jerome Powell and he was talking to the Detroit Economic Club so he was on his visit to Michigan and he makes that point about the impact that low interest rates could have on the economy and on actual businesses and actual people. Today, if you announce great numbers they raise interest rates to try and kill it so you can never really have the kind of rally you should have. What happens and what we want we're going to have a lot of great months, a lot of great quarters. I want the market to go up. You announce unbelievable numbers and the market goes down because they know you're going to do everything possible in the Fed.

19:31We have a real stiff in the Fed, but that's for another day. If I had the help of the Fed, it would be easier. But that jerk will be gone soon. That jerk will be gone soon. That's interesting from a president who said on Sunday that he knew nothing about this investigation. into Powell, and it had nothing to do with him whatsoever. Right. I mean, he was pretty explicit. But, you know, we've heard Donald Trump talk about prosecuting his political adversaries before. I mean, he was explicit with James Comey and Letitia James, the attorney general of New York, and then indictments came out just a few days later.

20:07He hasn't said anything like that about Jerome Powell, but I think most people think that that is what he's thinking. Certainly a lot of the Republicans who have come out and condemned what Donald Trump did, imply that that was what, that Trump was the one behind this. That is, this didn't just come out of nowhere. But we do see a lot of this hysteria, could I call it? Concern over something Donald Trump does with the economy, whether it's tariffs now or interest rates or the spending bill and the stock market drops. And then, Sarah, as you mentioned, it goes back up again. And nothing seems to be able to put a lasting dent in the economy, at least so far, whether that's because people realize their worst fears are being realized.

20:57They think Donald Trump is more bluster after a day or two to kind of mull over it. But for one reason or another, the economy keeps chugging along. Now, the business cycle being what it is, the economy will eventually have a downturn. But predictions of its demise have been greatly exaggerated over the course of the last year. But isn't that why, actually, the financial community, both inside the US and actually worldwide, have taken this relatively calmly? When you think of the stakes, I mean, this is a huge, huge deal. You know, it's alongside, I don't know, snatching Maduro or all the other kind of big kinetic things that Donald Trump has done or ordered.

21:39this if he if he goes ahead with it and if there is a full criminal prosecution is a massive deal because of the impact that it that it has but actually business people in the united states financiers inside the united states at wall street but also really crucially the bond markets around the world the people who lend america money and would be very worried about rampant inflation in the future. I don't think they think that your television judge, Sarah, is really going to get anywhere with this. Isn't that right? And as Anthony, as you say, the Supreme Court is about to, I mean, it's a different case, isn't it?

22:15But if the Supreme Court decides that the president can't get rid of someone unless they've got very good reason to do it, that presumably bolsters Jerome Powell's standing. And it's funny, one of the things the Supreme Court has said in past cases where it's been looking over Donald Trump's decision to fire supposedly independent heads of agencies, is that the Federal Reserve is different. It's somehow unique. And so a lot of people who are going to be watching the court here are expecting the court to come out and say, you have to have more evidence in order to remove a Fed governor than just you don't like the person's politics, or you have some sort of unconfirmed allegations of impropriety, which is what we have in the case of Lisa Cook.

23:02So it's not to the point, I guess we can say, where the people who really do hold the levers of power in the economy, the global economy, are too worried about Trump. They catch their breath every so often. They express surprise. The monocles pop out of their eyes every now and then. But as far as really being down on all of this and worrying about worst case scenarios, they don't seem to be buying into that. Do we think Jerome Powell carries on this fight now? And you were suggesting he's going to stick around anyway, even when he's not chair. Has Donald Trump picked an enemy who could actually be quite an awkward one?

23:43Yeah, if he sticks around, I mean, that's one vote that is going to be for keeping interest rates more based upon the economic conditions as has been traditionally observed. If the economy continues to click along, they're not going to cut them nearly as much as Donald Trump wants. Trump will still have the chance to name Powell's replacement as Fed chair, which is an incredibly influential position. One of the names I've heard floated is Kevin Hassett, who is at the White House all the time. He's an economic advisor of Donald Trump's. He certainly seems in favor of being more aggressive with cutting interest rates.

24:20But that'll be an interesting fight if people like Tom Tillis dig in their heels and other Republicans who would be normally his allies in the Senate don't want to confirm who he picks because they're worried that Trump is exerting too much influence over the Federal Reserve. It could set up another kind of a head to head battle between Trump and Republicans in the legislature just a few months before the midterm elections, when a lot of these senators are going to be running for a reelection or much more concerned about what voters think than what Donald Trump thinks, maybe for the first time so far since Trump came back to the White House.

25:00One who's not running for election, of course, is the said Tom Tillis, which is why he's suddenly so empowered. Suddenly you see him standing up to Donald Trump. Now he knows he doesn't need to get reelected.

Read the full transcript

25:16OK, let's talk about Greenland. There's a lot of news recently about Donald Trump's desire to take over Greenland. But there's a big event here in Washington today because the foreign ministers of Greenland and Denmark came to the White House to have a meeting with Marco Rubio. And then at the last minute, Vice President J.D. Vance insisted on joining the meeting as well. I don't know how happy they would have been about that. And this is a meeting they've been wanting to get for ages, isn't it? Because this is absolutely crucial for them. Yeah, this is serious. This is something that Denmark is taking seriously.

25:47This is something that America's NATO allies are taking seriously because Donald Trump has not stopped talking about annexing, buying, somehow taking control of Greenland since he came back to the White House a year ago. Yeah, and blow my own trumpet once more and say, I asked him just last week in the White House about this, why it was so important that he felt to own it rather than just be able to use the military base that they've got there or increase his military presence in Greenland. And he said, you don't defend something if you just have a lease on it the same way you do if you own it.

26:18So he's very determined about, he wants to take control of Greenland. And just before this meeting, if they were nervous at all, these foreign ministers, they woke up to see that he had posted on social media, the United States needs Greenland for the purpose of national security. It's vital for the golden dome that we're building. NATO should be leading the way for us to get it. If we don't, Russia or China will, and that's not going to happen. And then he went on at great length to explain why it would be absolutely unacceptable for anything less than the United States taking full control of Greenland.

26:51So, I mean, that was setting the stakes pretty high before the foreign ministers of both Greenland and Denmark walked into the White House. Right. Let's listen to the foreign minister of Denmark, Lars Loga Rasmussen, talk about the meeting. We had what I will describe as a frank but also constructive discussion. The discussions focus on how to ensure the long-term security in Greenland. And here our perspectives continue to differ, I must say. The president has made his view clear and we have a different position. We, the Kingdom of Denmark, continue to believe that also the long-term security of Greenland can be ensured inside the current framework.

27:35The 1951 Agreement on the Defense of Greenland as well as the NATO Treaty. For us, ideas that would not respect territorial integrity of the Kingdom of Denmark and the right of self-determination of the Greenlandic people are, of course, totally unacceptable. And we therefore still have a fundamental disagreement, but we also agree to disagree. Fundamental disagreement and a frank but constructive conversation. That does not sound like they really agreed on anything, does it, Anthony? It doesn't. And as he spells out there, they don't want to cede Greenland. They want to respect the territorial integrity of their kingdom.

28:20And if that's their starting point, and Donald Trump's coming into this saying, we want Greenland, we're going to do anything we have to do in order to get Greenland, it's essential, then you're not going to find grounds to compromise. And I think it's interesting because NATO, the Europeans, Denmark have been taking Donald Trump's concerns at face value. Oh, you know, there's worries about Russia and China. Oh, there's not enough done to ensure that Greenland with its, you know, tens of thousands of people is secure. We're going to increase the amount of military presence there. Germany, I think, announced they're sending a dozen troops.

29:00Greenland is sending more troops there. The reality is that's not going to satisfy Donald Trump. And so all of these steps and all of these negotiations seem to are never going to resolve the fundamental disagreement here. And I don't think unless Donald Trump backs off, it's going to go away. Because they're talking past each other, I suppose. Because also in that press conference, Logo Rasmussen pointed out that there is an existing agreement. He was referring to this 1951 treaty that means that America can install pretty much as much military equipment and people as it wants there. It's got very, very wide access.

29:36And Donald Trump was talking in his social media post about the Golden Dome that he wants to put in, which is a Star Wars kind of missile defence system. And he thinks that he would need to station some defensive missiles on Greenland. Well, he could do that under this existing agreement, but it wouldn't involve him owning it. And yeah, as you say, that does seem to be what he's got his heart set on, to increase the territorial landmass of the United States. But also, of course, there is a conversation we had, isn't there, about the critical minerals that could be extracted from Greenland, especially once the ice starts to melt.

30:07And they said they're open to American investment and mineral development. But I think you get at the real point here, and that is changing the color of Greenland on a map. It still seems inconceivable to talk about military action to seize Greenland, which is essentially NATO territory. it seems extremely unlikely that any financial offer would be enough to allow him to buy it, which we think is his preferred option. Marco Rudio has indicated he'd rather buy it than invade it. They all seem so far-fetched. It's difficult to imagine where we go from here, but he doesn't look like he's giving up.

30:40Hey, talk about a military option. As I mentioned, Germany's moving troops there. There may be other Danish troops there. That's almost like a tripwire, right? This is what you do when you're dealing with an adversary. You put troops on the front lines. That way, if there's some sort of a military incursion, it escalates quickly because you have to shoot someone to get it. You can't just land troops on the frozen tundra of Greenland and begin to occupy it. There would be a conflict. And we should be clear, Anthony, that you're absolutely right. The Danes are sending more troops to Greenland. The Germans have agreed to do so.

31:13The UK are talking about sending troops there as well, not to defend against an American incursion, but rather in order to show to Donald Trump that they and NATO are taking the security of Greenland very, very seriously. And he doesn't need to come and take it over because actually, look what they're doing. They're doing everything that he could want. But Donald Trump has been very dismissive of those efforts up until now. He said that all Denmark's done up until this point is add one more dog sled. And in fact, just today, the Danish foreign minister hit back at that comment. The Kingdom of Denmark has already stepped up our own contribution by committing additional fund for military capabilities.

31:54Not dog slates, but ships, drones, fighter jets, etc. And we are definitely ready to do more. Ready to do more. And they are promising to do more. Not enough, however, in Donald Trump's mind, I'm sure. Well, we'll be talking about this again, I'm sure, Anthony, many, many times. All right, well, you have a good one. We'll be back soon. Bye. Bye, y 'all.

32:22Thank you for listening to another episode. It is you, the AmeriCaster, that makes AmeriCast the community that it now is. If you like what you've heard, please do subscribe to this podcast on BBC Sounds or wherever you get your podcasts. We always want to hear your feedback as well. We look at every single bit of correspondence that we get. So you can send us an email, americast at pbc.co.uk. The WhatsApp is 44 330 123 9480. And you can get involved in the AmeriCast Discord server. The link to that is in the description. Till next time. Bye bye.

33:40We'll be right back. Come on! Get a load of this guy. Catch up on a dog. Yeah, we've got thoughts. Too loud? In Chicago, you're gonna hear it. Because nothing here gets built without conversation. Nothing moves without connection. So, if you think you know AT &T, it might be time to rethink that. Because their network has improved, like, a lot. So Chicago can keep speaking its mind with AT &T Wireless and AT &T Fiber. Chicago won't stop talking. Our improved network backs it up. AT &T. Connecting changes everything. AT &T Fibre. Limited availability in select areas.

34:40Join millions saving billions on hidden fees. Be smart. Get wise. Download the WISE app today. T's and C's apply.

From the publisher

There are two big stories on today’s episode. What happened when foreign ministers from Denmark and Greenland met with Vice President JD Vance and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the White House? We discuss their “frank” talks and “fundamental disagreements”.

Plus, the world’s top central banker Jerome Powell has hit back at the US president in an unprecedented video statement on social media. It follows the Trump administration opening a criminal investigation against Jerome Powell, chair of the U.S. Federal Reserve. Over the past year the president has insulted Powell publicly, criticising his decisions not to cut interest rates, as well as calling the Fed chair "Mr Too Late", a “major loser” and a "numbskull".

Justin, Sarah and Anthony explain why it matters and the impact this very public spat could have on the US and global economy.

HOSTS: • Justin Webb, Radio 4 presenter • Sarah Smith, North America Editor • Anthony Zurcher, North America Correspondent

GET IN TOUCH: • Join our online community: https://discord.gg/qSrxqNcmRB • Send us a message or voice note via WhatsApp to +44 330 123 9480 • Email Americast@bbc.co.uk • Or use #Americast

This episode was made by Purvee Pattni, George Dabby, Alix Pickles, and Grace Reeve. The technical producer was Philip Bull. The series producer is Purvee Pattni. The senior news editor is Sam Bonham.

If you want to be notified every time we publish a new episode, please subscribe to us on BBC Sounds by hitting the subscribe button on the app.

You can now listen to Americast on a smart speaker. If you want to listen, just say "Ask BBC Sounds to play Americast”. It works on most smart speakers.

US Election Unspun: Sign up for Anthony’s BBC newsletter: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-68093155

Americast is part of the BBC News Podcasts family of podcasts. The team that makes Americast also makes lots of other podcasts, including Newscast and Ukrainecast. If you enjoy Americast (and if you're reading this then you hopefully do), then we think that you will enjoy some of our other pods too. See links below.

Newscast: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/series/p05299nl Ukrainecast: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/p0bqztzm Radical: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/p0gg4k6r The Global Story: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/w13xtvsd

More from Americast

All 207 episodes
Can Denmark convince Trump not to “conquer” Greenland?Americast · 32 min
Listen in VO