In short
Episode topic: Democrats’ high-stakes Senate gamble in Maine: whether nominating Graham Plattner (an oyster fisherman with no political experience) will let them beat long-serving Republican Sen. Susan Collins, amid escalating allegations and questions about candidate vetting; plus a subplot on California’s slow vote counting and Steve Hilton’s California run.
Guest backgrounds
The episode is hosted by Anthony (BBC Washington) and Justin (BBC). It also cites interviews/voices from supporters and strategists, including Amanda Littman (recruits novice candidates), Daniel Moraf and Liane Fan (paid for vetting), and Morris Katz (strategist for Zoran Mamdani).
Key claims
Plattner’s “redemption” pitch may mirror Trump-style politics (“in spite of” flaws). Democrats may have missed major red flags in vetting. Collins is portrayed as serving Trump/corporate interests, but independents may still back her.
Notable examples
Wall Street Journal texts to a woman via a dating app; New York Times ex-girlfriend accounts of intimidation; controversy over a Nazi “Totenkopf” tattoo; Plattner’s YMCA victory speech and teleprompter; Democrats’ strategy calls with Bernie Sanders/Schumer/Warren; Moraf/Fan vetting missing the tattoo and Reddit posts; California jungle primary results for Steve Hilton vs Xavier Becerra.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOMaine's Political Landscape
0:45 to 2:12
Exploring the significance of Maine in the upcoming midterms and candidate Graham Plattner.
“Hello, it's Anthony, and you're about to hear AmeriCast.”
Graham Plattner's Background
2:12 to 4:20
Discussion of Graham Plattner's background and the controversies surrounding him.
“Oh, I think when I hear that sound, it reminds me of money.”
Media Scrutiny of Plattner
4:20 to 9:46
Analyzing recent media reports revealing serious allegations against Plattner.
“It's got a lot of sea and then Canada, pretty much.”
Plattner's Redemption Arc
9:46 to 12:06
Plattner's response to the allegations and his vision for change.
“So Plattner's response is that, well, he had this tattoo and he wore it.”
Comparisons to Trump's Supporters
12:06 to 14:01
Drawing parallels between Plattner's supporters and Trump's base regarding their reasons for support.
“night and he looked a little different actually during that speech he was He's wearing business slacks like suit pants and a white collared shirt.”
The Power of Redemption in Politics
14:01 to 14:39
Discussion on the belief in personal change and redemption in politics.
“If we can change politics in this country, then you have to believe that we can, that a person can change too.”
Recruiting Political Candidates
14:39 to 15:51
Insights from Amanda Littman on recruiting novice political candidates.
“And she says, you know, a lot of the people that she brings in, they have skeletons in their closet.”
Challenges Against Susan Collins
15:51 to 17:00
Exploration of the challenges Democratic candidates face against Senator Collins.
“But she is grudgingly saying this is the candidate the Democrats have picked.”
Voter Sentiments and Concerns
17:00 to 18:14
Voter perspectives on Graham Plattner and concerns about his candidacy.
“She voted to convict Donald Trump after he was impeached in 2021.”
Controversies Surrounding Plattner
18:14 to 21:08
Discussion on the controversies and challenges Graham Plattner faces.
“Everybody wants him to lose because he isn't the established Democrat.”
Show all 19 chapters
Democratic Vetting Process
21:08 to 23:15
The vetting process for Democratic candidates and the challenges involved.
“And there were people I talked to, some who did not want to be quoted on the record, who said they were Mills supporters, the governor.”
The Role of Candidate Backgrounds
23:15 to 27:42
Discussion on the importance of candidates' backgrounds and past actions.
“But, you know, we've heard that before from different politicians and it doesn't always work out that way.”
Implications of Candidate Selection
27:42 to 28:00
Exploration of the broader implications of candidate selection for the Democrats.
“You know, that is, maybe they should find a different oppo research firm.”
Democrats' Candidate Selection Strategy
28:00 to 29:21
Learn about the Democrats' risky strategy of selecting non-traditional candidates.
“It sounds like they didn't think the Reddit post would be a big deal.”
The Case for Non-Politician Candidates
29:21 to 30:59
Explore the argument for electing individuals without traditional political backgrounds.
“Yeah, it's a high risk and in theory, high reward.”
Reaching Angry Young Men
31:00 to 31:34
Discover the strategy to bring angry young men back to the Democratic Party.
“And the idea that we should dismiss them or that that's disqualifying, I think, is, you know, that doesn't quite make sense of the way we talk about who we want to be as a party and how we want to expand our coalition.”
California's Political Landscape
31:34 to 33:09
Understand the dynamics of California's political scene and the upcoming elections.
“He, in his speech last night, said that he was broken, that he came back broken from Afghanistan and Iraq.”
Election Counting Controversies in California
33:10 to 35:52
Examine the complications and controversies surrounding election counting in California.
“And at one stage, and we talked about this, didn't we?”
Trump's Claims and Voter Confidence
35:52 to 39:43
Analyze Trump's claims about election fraud and the impact on voter confidence.
“And so it takes a while in a state with tens of millions of people, it takes a while to just get through it.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.
0:17The United States is about to mark its 250th anniversary. And so on the Global Story podcast from the BBC, we're telling surprising tales of American influence on the world stage and in ordinary people's lives all across the globe. We have this ability to export our story and a lot of people have bought it. I feel like the American dream is alive, but not well. From the BBC, it's the United States at 250. Listen on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcasts. Hello, it's Anthony, and you're about to hear AmeriCast. And we're delighted to have you with us. And if you enjoy what you hear, please do consider subscribing to the podcast.
0:58That way, you'll never miss an episode. Now, on with today. Have the Democrats messed up or have they just played a master stroke? The state of Maine in the northeast of America, the far northeast bordering Canada, is at the centre of a fierce debate within the party, the consequences of which are potentially seismic. Democrats looking to win back control of the Senate in this November's midterms need to win Maine. But can they do it with the candidate they have picked? Graham Plattner, an oyster fisherman from Maine. no political experience, multiple allegations about his conduct and his behaviour, particularly towards women in his past.
1:38He says he's changed. I've made mistakes in my life, mistakes that I regret, that I live with, and that I continue to learn from. And I'm still far from perfect. But every day I wake up and I try to be a little bit better and a little bit kinder than I was the day before. Everyone agrees he's not a typical candidate for the Democrats, and Graham Plattner is going to be running against the Republicans' longest-serving female senator. So will the Democrats' massive gamble pay off, or have they potentially messed up their chances of taking back the Senate? Welcome to AmeriCast. AmeriCast. AmeriCast from BBC News.
2:19You hear that sound? Oh, I think when I hear that sound, it reminds me of money. We didn't start this war, but under President Trump, we are finishing it. This is a big cover-up, and this administration is engaged in it. This guy has Trump derangement syndrome. I have four words for you. Turn the volume up!
2:43Hello, it's Anthony, and I'm here in the BBC Bureau in Washington, D.C., but that's not where I started my day. I woke up at the crack of dawn this morning in Bangor, Maine. And it's just in the worldwide headquarters of AmeriCast in London, England. And the time in Britain is just 10 past three or so in the afternoon on Wednesday. And Anthony, what a trip and what a time to go there because, oh, my goodness, you've witnessed history in the making and something that let's be blunt about it. This could be enormously influential what you've just seen and experienced when it comes to November and the Democrats chances.
3:19Yeah, we've talked about this race before. Of course, it's the Graham Plattner race to become the Senate Democratic nominee to take on Susan Collins, the incumbent who has served in the Senate for 30 years now. This is the high stakes race in the upcoming midterms. This is a state that could decide which party controls the Senate after November's midterm elections. And that's because this is the one state that Kamala Harris won in 2024 that a Republican senator is up for reelection. In fact, a Republican hasn't won for president statewide, won the state of Maine since 1988. So this has been a state that has been on Democrats' target for quite some time.
4:03And Susan Collins keeps defying gravity, but they think that this is the year. And if they can get Maine to flip, then it'll make it much easier to find the three other states, Republican states, they need to flip to take back control of the Senate. And just set the Maine scene, because you've got a fantastic time of year, haven't you? And I mean, it's not all politics, is it, to put it mildly, which is kind of quite important, actually, for what we're going to be talking about. But it's just such an amazing place. It's mostly my memory of it. It's got a lot of sea and then Canada, pretty much.
4:32And it's hardly attached to the rest of the United States. The northeastern tip of the United States. And it's very rural and it's bigger, I think, than a lot of people imagine geographically, but still very small as far as the population goes. 1.4 million people, I think, spread out over the state. A lot of them are around Portland and the western portions of the state that are essentially suburbs of Boston. I flew into Portland on Sunday night. It's an artsy kind of town, a really cool, hip place. They have a lot of breweries, good little lobster roll places if you're a lobster fan and live music and things.
5:09And then you drive out east, which is just where the state stretches on, and you get out about a three-hour drive from Portland. That's where I was last night in Blue Hill, Maine, which is Graham Plattner's birthplace. It's a tiny little town on the coast. And I think Plattner picked that as the site of his election night watch party. It's a big YMCA gymnasium there because he wanted to emphasize the fact that he comes from rural Maine. In fact, that's what he says time and time again. He's a product of Maine, a product of rural Maine. And these are the people that he wants to give a voice to, not just the blue haired hipsters in Portland.
5:53Yeah. And it seemed like such a good idea. and they seem to be absolutely to have fixed on something, the Democrats, that not only they were so proud of in Maine, but they were saying, actually, this is a way to do it right around in other places as well because we found someone who isn't a politician, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. And as you say, he's oyster farmer. He's done, what, four tours of duty, hasn't he, as a Marine and as a soldier as well in Afghanistan and Iraq. Rough, tough guy, et cetera, et cetera. but um beset with allegations about his past conduct and i want to sort of divide it up because there's loads of stuff that was already known he's got this tattoo this nazi tattoo which he then had covered up didn't he and he got when he was a uh in in the forces he's also got all sorts of social media posts in the past that in a sense everyone kind of accepted didn't they and And on both sides, they had it out and he was still very much the guy and he very much was always going to win the primary.
6:59But it's fair to say, isn't it, Anthony, that in recent days, things have got worse for him and worse potentially for the Democrats. Yeah, just in the last week and a half or so, there's been a one-two punch from major media outlets. Punch one was a Wall Street Journal report where we heard revelations that Plattner had been sending text messages after he married Amy, his wife, to a woman over a dating app. And the wife actually found out about these and she told the campaign about it. And the campaign, a campaign advisor who has since had a falling out with Plattner, took those stories to the Wall Street Journal and they published them.
7:37So it was more recent, certainly, than some of these Reddit posts we've talked about and certainly more recent than the Nazi tattoos. So it re-aired some of these concerns about Plattner and his personal behavior. That was the Wall Street Journal. That was punch number one. Punch number two came from The New York Times. And that was the New York Times went back and talked to a bunch of Plattner's ex-girlfriends in the 2000 teens and thereabouts, including one who is now a Republican operative. But it was a girlfriend of his at the time in Washington, D.C., that said that he was sometimes threatening towards her, that he sometimes grabbed her by the shoulders, that he one time pulled her out of the car by her wrist enough that it bruised her.
8:21She felt intimidated and threatened. Other of his exes said that he was sometimes a little problematic, sometimes a little sketchy, and not always the best boyfriend and someone who has had a problem with alcohol and could be verbally intimidating. So that was what came out, and that put him on MS Now, the liberal network here in the U.S., trying to explain away all of this and saying that that's not who he is now and that he has changed. And there's another allegation, isn't there, in the New York Times, that this tattoo that he had, the so-called Nazi tattoo, that he has said, oh, I didn't know what it was when I first had it, et cetera, et cetera.
9:04And when I found out, when I was told, I covered it up. Actually, he's got a girlfriend now who's saying that he did know because he used to refer to it as my Totenkopf, which is the name of the tattoo, the symbol. And that, I mean, in a way, alongside the other allegations, but in a sense, more seriously, it does suggest that he was properly dishonest then about this tattoo. And in a way that is actually causing him some difficulty now with people saying not only that he's got a past, but that he's properly tried to cover it up. Right. And the girlfriend shared messages that she sent other people talking about the tattoo and saying he had a Nazi tattoo, which corroborated at least the fact that she knew it was a Nazi tattoo well before Plattner admitted or said that he found out about it.
9:56So Plattner's response is that, well, he had this tattoo and he wore it. The reason it became revealed is he took off his shirt at a friend's Jewish wedding or a family Jewish wedding, and he never would have been cavorting about with a Nazi symbol on his chest if he knew that. But yeah, it undercuts his believability on this. And your honesty and your reputation when you're trying to knock down these kind of stories is the best defense. And if that gets undercut, then you could be in real trouble. Well, let's hear what he says about all of this now, because he's hit back in the past and he's defended himself and defended himself, it should be said, pretty successfully because he's got this far.
10:38But he did his victory speech, didn't he? Redemption is not just some simple or easy destination. It's a journey. I've made mistakes in my life, mistakes that I regret, that I live with and that I continue to learn from. and I'm still far from perfect. But every day I wake up and I try to be a little bit better and a little bit kinder than I was the day before. And if you give me the chance, I will be a senator for the people who cannot afford to buy a senator. Now the national pundits, the political establishment, they keep looking for that one story, that one headline, that one moment in my life that they can define the campaign by but in trying so hard to understand me they failed to understand that this is not about me at all now the truth is Susan Collins doesn't serve us she serves Donald Trump she serves the Epstein class she serves her corporate donors and the corrupt political system that has rigged the economy against us she does not serve us and so we will defeat Susan Collins
11:59so Justin that was Platner's victory speech at that YMCA that I attended last night and he looked a little different actually during that speech he was He's wearing business slacks like suit pants and a white collared shirt. He did have his sleeves rolled up so you could still see the tattoos. And he was also reading off a teleprompter. But I think listening to that, it sounded like a pretty well-delivered speech. And it hit the notes that he wanted to. This, you know, it's not about me, it's about us thing. Who does that remind you of? A recent unconventional politician who was dogged by scandals and managed to shake them off.
12:36Yeah. Yeah, I mean, there's a wider reason, isn't there, why Democrats, some Democrats, and we'll talk a bit about the split that there is in a second, but why some Democrats, including people like Bernie Sanders, left-wing senator, very much a fan of Plattner, and absolutely saying he's sticking by him, and just making the point that he's not a perfect guy, but he's going for the billionaire class, exactly the point that Plattner just made. And that put me in mind of supporters of Donald Trump, because you and I have both met them all around the state, haven't we, Anthony? And people say to you, yeah, he's and they quite often use quite rude words about him, don't they?
13:15But he's going to do what we want to do. And, you know, back in 2016, it was about people who wanted to reduce abortion rights, wasn't it? And thought he's not a perfect vessel for us, but we're going to go for him anyway. And in the other elections as well, people have found reasons to vote for Donald Trump in spite of who he is. And I think that there is certainly a view, isn't there, among many Democrats that for Plattner, it's going to be the same. It will be in spite of who he is or who he was. Right. And you could hear early in that clip we played what he's trying to do there, which is to try to paint a redemption arc that he had problems that he came back from.
13:53Which it has to be said, Donald Trump's never done. Yeah, I've never done. So I mean, he's trying a slightly different twist on this, I suppose. But you know, this redemption arc and that he has changed. He's a changed man. He's trying to be better. If we can change politics in this country, then you have to believe that we can, that a person can change too. And he actually, we didn't hear in the clip, but he attributed the force for that change. The person who has helped him realize that change was Amy, his wife we brought up on stage and had kissed, must have five or six times on stage at various different times.
14:25I also believe that people can change.
14:33And the reason I believe that is because I have lived it. And the reason that I have lived it is because of my wife.
14:56I talked to someone, someone, Amanda Littman, who her job is to recruit novice political candidates for office, people who may not think about politics, people who haven't run for office before and to run for local, state, federal elections. And she says, you know, a lot of the people that she brings in, they have skeletons in their closet. They're not perfect. They never thought they were going to run for office, so they may have made mistakes in their lives. And she said that the thing that was most important was for them to be honest about it, for them to paint this kind of redemption arc. They learned from their lessons.
15:30They're a new person now. And the thing that is most dangerous is if after you do that and more stuff comes out, Then it starts feeling like you're just making excuses that this is not an authentic kind of acknowledgement of your past, but something you're throwing out there to get the media off your scent. And she wasn't thrilled with Plattner. She thought there should have been more choices running for Senate besides Plattner and Janet Mills, the governor. But she is grudgingly saying this is the candidate the Democrats have picked. And she feels like she has to support him ultimately to beat Susan Collins.
16:05There's another problem, though, running against Susan Collins, isn't there? So he said in that clip we were just listening to, the truth is Susan Collins doesn't serve us. She serves Donald Trump. Well, not only Donald Trump would say that, would he? And the record shows that she doesn't always serve Donald Trump and quite often doesn't. I mean, genuinely doesn't. And she's known for anything in the U.S. And she is quite a well-known senator, isn't she? It's because she's independent minded. So they're trying to portray her as a sort of Trump tool and suggest that independent-minded voters should vote for Plattner.
16:44But it just seems to me that there is a potential issue that they have that Susan Collins simply does seem like the moderate. And independent-minded voters in Maine who have voted for her again and again and again and again might go the same way in November. Yeah, that's going to be the challenge with trying to unseat her. She voted to convict Donald Trump after he was impeached in 2021. And interestingly enough, the Trump people haven't come after her for it the way they came after, say, Bill Cassidy, the Louisiana Republican senator who just got voted out of office in that state's primary because Trump backed someone to knock him out.
17:22I think that's an acknowledgement of the tenuous situation that Collins finds herself in in Maine. So when you weren't eating oysters or basking in the sun, did you have a moment to talk to anyone, any real people, as we used to say on the BBC? I don't think we do anymore, quite rightly. But did you give us a sense, a flavor of what people are saying about all these things we've just been talking about? I got out and talked to a bunch of main voters, first at a Platner town hall event on Sunday night. That's where I spoke with Kevin, the first person you'll listen to. And then I went to a polling place in Portland and started grabbing voters who were coming out.
18:00And these were all Plattner supporters, but you can hear in these various clips some of the trepidation, some of the concern they have. And I will add, I do my own audio here. I'm not an audio technician, so I apologize for the quality of some of these. I'm a writer. I do the best I can. Everybody wants him to lose because he isn't the established Democrat. He isn't 75 years old. He didn't grow up in politics. He hasn't been groomed right from... Some of these guys go in there at 23 and stay until they're 88. He is not that person. And the stuff in the news recently, that doesn't really... Yes, it concerns me.
18:41But what concerns me more is Susan Hollins going back to Washington. Hi, my name is Julia. I'm a nurse at Main Medical Center and I voted for Graham Plattner to... the Haubar fight for universal healthcare. I mean, we've definitely seen some more, like, under-the-nose issues coming from Plattner, like, rising up, but I still think that it really is, like, there is no one else at this point. Yeah, and the issues that you see in this stuff about his personal life, does that affect you or concern you at all going into November? I think it's unfortunate because I believe that her, out that his wife came out with a statement saying that like we're working through this privately.
19:26I do not want like more public pieces about this so I'm glad that they are working through that. My name is Fiona Coleman. I'm 24. I'm from Portland, Maine. I voted for Graham Plattner. I saw him speak multiple times and I really appreciated his commitment to the working class as well as as well as immigrants and people of color in Maine. Have any of the reports that come out recently in major media that concerned you at all, the things about his past girlfriends or anything like that? Yes, definitely. And I've had to think about that a lot and had discussions with family. I don't want anyone to think that I'm okay with any of the things that he's been accused of.
20:14I'm just very anti Susan Collins and I will take anybody that isn't her. So, again, absolutely not OK with anything that he's been accused of. It's really striking listening to that, Anthony. I mean, that is what Trump people said again and again. I'm not OK with the things that he did. I don't like the way he's treated women, et cetera, et cetera. But, you know, we're electing a president, et cetera, et cetera. And there is a kind of there are some Democrats, aren't there, who are worried about the hypocrisy potentially or the accusation of hypocrisy here, that people are very, very upset about Donald Trump and the things that he has said and done in the past and facing now.
20:58It's not the same stuff. And you could argue convincingly, I think it's not the same level of stuff. But nonetheless, it's stuff and it's a double standard potentially. Yeah. And there were people I talked to, some who did not want to be quoted on the record, who said they were Mills supporters, the governor. They did not like Plattner. They were very worried that he was not going to be able to beat Collins and also worried about what it says about Democrats that they would, like you say, still support someone who cuts against a lot of the things they say are reprehensible in personal behavior and in politics.
21:36So I also talked to a woman named Maureen who was an independent, and she said she knew Susan Collins. She had met Susan Collins before, that she generally supports her. But what she said was she didn't know enough about Plattner to make up her mind yet, and that she's going to have to do some research. She barely pronounced his name right. And I think that shows what's going to happen over the next month and two. It's going to be a real battle by the Republicans, by Susan Collins, by all these groups that are going to be pouring negative ads into Maine to try to define Plattner before he is able to define himself and to paint this redemption story and to try to explain all of these other things that have come out.
22:18And if he can do that, then he has a chance. If he is just swept away in a sea of money and people make up their minds that this guy is someone they don't want to send to replace Susan Collins in the Senate, then he's going to be in real trouble. Or if something else comes out. Yeah, yeah. I mean, that was the thing. Plattner was here last week, here in D.C. last week, and he spoke with Bernie Sanders and Chuck Schumer and Elizabeth Warren, kind of a high-level strategy session with the top senators, Democratic senators here. And one of the things, according to reports, they all asked him was, is this it?
22:54Is there anything else that's going to come out? Are there any allegations of domestic violence? And he assured them no, that this is it. There's nothing, that he's going to be attacked and people are going to pick through things he said, but that there's nothing that could be a fatal blow to his campaign. So I think there are a lot of Democrats here in Washington that are going OK and they're crossing their fingers and they're hoping for the best. But, you know, we've heard that before from different politicians and it doesn't always work out that way. It's fascinating, isn't it, how someone is picked as well, because, I mean, obviously there was some degree of vetting, but we'll listen in a second to the people who who were sort of in charge of the vetting.
23:42And it's an extraordinary interview, actually, that they gave to the Wall Street Journal. But just before we get to that, Anthony, because it's not clear in my mind, do you have to be, well, what do you have to be in order to run as a Democrat in a state primary? Or does it vary from state to state? If I want to put myself forward, what do I have to convince people apart from that I've got the money to do it? Well, you know, typically you have to convince the party officials. You don't have to get them to sign off on it, but getting their support, getting the party's support, building relationships, whether it's a local race or a statewide race, that is the key.
24:23Oftentimes, the national party, which has committees like the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the Senate Leadership Committee, they will go out and actively recruit people. They think this is someone, an ex-veteran, for instance, or someone who has won locally and has a following or someone who kind of fits their idea of what a winning candidate could look like. They go off and encourage them to run. I mean, that's what the Senate leadership did with Janet Mills, the governor of Maine, in this race. They twisted her arm, told her to run. I don't think she really wanted to, but they said, you know, we're going to clear the field for you.
24:55Everyone except this Plattner guy. And you should be able to get the nomination and a walk. That's the way it often works. The way it has worked more now and what some people within the progressive left of the Democratic Party and in the Tea Party on the right as well are trying to do is bypass those institutions, those kind of centers of power and find their own candidates, convince them to run, help fund them through a national donation network and social media and elevate their status and then get them to try to win a seat. even if the party doesn't have their back in the initial days. Well, let's listen to these two people who apparently got him to run.
25:38So they're not from Maine themselves. Daniel Moraf and his fiance, Liane Fan, were impressed, they said, of a video of Graham Plattner rallying against a proposed Norwegian salmon farm in Maine. Big local issue. Apparently he did it very well. He argued it would devastate the local economy, etc. So last July, they drove to his house unannounced, they said, to convince him to run. So this is the Wall Street Journal's interview with them or a clip of the Wall Street Journal's interview with them about the kind of vetting process that they then went through for Graham Plattner. How did you go about vetting him?
Read the full transcript
26:18And why did you? We paid a nice firm a whole chunk of money and got some stuff back, some of what you've seen on the news we got back, other stuff we didn't. Did the vetting process turn up the tattoo that became so controversial? No. The Reddit post, did that turn up in the vetting process?
26:48the firm sent us a thing and it had some of the yeah but it didn't have all of them and what did you think about that how did you how did you think your way through the fact that he had posted these things on social media i said none of this will or should stop him from becoming a U.S. senator. And what was your thinking there? I think if what the voters wanted were people who were grown in vats and had never done or said anything that they might regret their entire lives, we'd have a very different country. Part of our thesis here is that people do not want their candidates grown in vats. They want people who are real human beings, and they want people who do not look and sound like the background people who've been leading this country off a cliff for the last century.
27:40And that was Graham. Convincing, Anthony? You know, that is, maybe they should find a different oppo research firm. Clearly, they missed some stuff. I mean, all campaigns do this. They dig up the dirt on their own candidate in order to find out what could come up, and then they can prepare themselves. And clearly, they missed some things here. And they dismissed some things. It sounds like they didn't think the Reddit post would be a big deal. And maybe he's right. Maybe there won't be a big deal in the same way that stuff in Trump's past ended up not being a big deal. But you could see they were also trying to bypass the establishment and find someone who they agreed with that they could put up.
28:20But yeah, it sounds like there are some holes in their operation. Yeah. Well, some holes in the operation and some silences in that interview that I thought thought spoke pretty eloquently themselves there is a wider thing here isn't there i mean number one name as we've said name is massively important if if the democrats lose in november that's it they're almost certainly not going to take the senate and that's a big blow given that in recent months they've been pretty hopeful that they could but number two this business of candidate selection is a really big deal isn't it nationwide because it's this is a in a sense this is an experiment isn't it, Anthony, to see whether you could really go for it and go for non-politicians and go for exciting, interesting local people and just throw the rulebook away and get rid of all the Washington bigwigs of the elderly people who run the party, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, and really kind of recreate it from the grassroots up in an exciting way, which is what those two were effectively talking about.
29:22Yeah, it's a high risk and in theory, high reward. I mean, if Plattner wins, they're going to have an early 40-year-old progressive politician, kind of the mold of Bernie Sanders, who's going to be there for quite some time and is a very, as we heard in his speech, a very effective advocate for these type of positions, for a wealth tax, for universal health care, for free college education. He would be a prominent voice in the Senate if he wins, but it is a gamble because, as you say, this is such a key race for Democrats. They have to win this. And, you know, maybe the theory is that they've been advancing traditional politicians now against Susan Collins every six years.
30:00Maybe a non-traditional is the way to go. I guess that is going to be the test, as you say. Yeah. So another interview along those lines from the Wall Street Journal. They interviewed Morris Katz, a political strategist who led the media on Zoran Mamdani's New York mayoral campaign. So that very, very, very successful campaign came from absolutely nowhere, of course, to win. And he is working with Plattner and he says this. If you believe that the only people who should be able to run for office are people who have planned it their entire lives, then that is one kind of vetting standard. If you believe that we should have people who never before thought they'd run for office, but who want to step up for their communities, who want to serve, whether they be a harbormaster or an iron worker, they're going to have said, like anyone else, they will have said things that they will have regretted, broader for our politics, I think it's incoherent to believe that, you know, how many think pieces have been written about how do we win back angry young men and we have someone who was one of them and who made it out the other side, who's uniquely equipped to bring them back into our fold.
31:03And the idea that we should dismiss them or that that's disqualifying, I think, is, you know, that doesn't quite make sense of the way we talk about who we want to be as a party and how we want to expand our coalition. That really interested me, Anthony, that line about the men and the angry young men because of course men particularly young men particularly angry young men have been going for donald trump haven't they been going to the republican side of the ledger and young women increasingly going for the democrats and we've we did a whole episode recently about about the plight of men and particularly young men in the u.s that they need them back in the democratic party and and they think potentially that having a damaged candidate as he would accept himself a damaged candidate, but nonetheless, as Morris Katz was saying, someone who's come out the other side, that that's the way they could do it.
31:54Right. He, in his speech last night, said that he was broken, that he came back broken from Afghanistan and Iraq. And he said that it was Maine and the people of Maine who put him back together again, who healed him. We ought to talk a little bit about California as well, if only because it is just strange to anyone who's British. It is so strange that Steve Hilton, who we know as being someone who worked very closely with David Cameron, who was a conservative. Yes, he was conservative prime minister, but kind of touchy feely conservative back in the day, believed very much in, you know, climate change as an important issue and all the rest of it.
32:38Hugging hoodies was his was his big thing. And actually, Steve Hilton was on that side of the party as well when he was when he was here. But my goodness, he's reinvented himself for you, hasn't he? Yeah. And not just for his taste in tacos, as we've talked about in the past. But he's going to be on the on the general election ballot running against Xavier Becerra, the Democrat, former cabinet secretary for for Biden. So he made the cut. He made the top two in the California jungle primaries, they call it. So now he's going to have a chance to make the case to the California population writ large that he is an alternative to the Democrats who have controlled California state politics for, gosh, going all the way back to Arnold Schwarzenegger in the early 2000s.
33:23It's been a while. So they had this jungle primary. And at one stage, and we talked about this, didn't we? The Democrats were actually worried that because of the nature of the primaries, everyone stands and just the top two go through, that potentially they could not be in the top two. So at least they got Becerra through. So they got their candidate. Although I think, as we were also saying, he's not the most amazingly light everyone on fire kind of. Milk toast. Milk toast is the word that you used famously. Yeah. So they've got milquetoast on the Democratic side. For Steve Hilton, he's got this Trump endorsement that may have helped him, I suppose, get this far.
34:02So get Republicans out to vote for him in the primary. But I wonder if that does for him. Basically, I suppose what I'm saying is could Steve Hilton be Arnold Schwarzenegger Mark II? Unlikely. It's still an uphill climb in California. There are a lot of Republicans in California, but there are a lot more Democrats. I mean, it's a 60-40 Democratic state by most accounts. So he is going to have to find some kind of way of convincing Democrats and independents, but even some Democrats, to cross the aisle and vote for him. And he may have to do that in a way that separates him from Donald Trump. And I'm not sure he's capable of doing that because Donald Trump is very unpopular in California.
34:50So it's a narrow path, particularly this November, when it seems like if there are political winds, they're blowing against the Republicans and not at their back. And the other subplot is this business of, I mean, we're able to say now that Hilton and Becerra have gone through, but it's, I mean, light years since they actually held the election, isn't it? It's absolutely crazy that we're only able to say it now. And Donald Trump, hasn't he, has seized on that. I mean, that in itself is one reason why they shouldn't have done this. But my goodness, it takes them. What is it with counting in Californians?
35:25You know, I mean, it's the way the system is set up. If you mail a ballot and it's postmarked on election day, then it can be counted. And a lot of people vote by mail in California. And then there is a system in place to verify all of these ballots. So there's a lengthy process to making sure that the ballots are legal, that this is the only ballot this. This voter has been cast. Each ballot has a barcode. It's tracked like a FedEx package. So it has a unique identity. And so it takes a while in a state with tens of millions of people, it takes a while to just get through it. Now, you could just not have mail-in voting.
36:04A lot of states don't have that kind of system. Florida has early voting, but it doesn't really have mail voting the same way where you can do things on election day and turn around quickly. But if you're going to make the rule that if you pop a pop a ballot into the post on the election day, then you do have to wait a while for all of these things to trickle through the system. But as you say, it does open it up to allegations of mischief, particularly when Republicans tend to vote on election day and a lot more Democrats vote by mail. Right. So you see all the votes mounting up and you think, oh, goodness, or you could at least pretend to think, oh, goodness, the Republicans are going to win this.
36:42And then they count all the others and they haven't. And then Donald Trump can say this. The election was totally rigged. It was a rigged election, just like they're rigging the election right now, it looks like in California. Can you imagine? It's four days and they still aren't even close to telling you who won. You know why? Because they're rigging the election. That's why. You're going to be waiting weeks to get these votes. It's corrupt. Somebody said it's incompetent. I said, no, just the opposite. It's unbelievably competent if you happen to be a Democrat politician, because with their policies, the only way they can get elected is to cheat.
37:21Yeah, I suppose we should say there is absolutely no evidence at all that there was treating in the California election, but there is plenty of evidence that it is oddly slow. And we've actually had a question which I would have put to you, Anthony, from Jeremy, who asks, has Donald Trump not already dismissed the results of the midterms as electoral fraud? That's why he's really not that bothered, because he won't accept the results. What does the team think? Well, we're the team today, or you're the team when it comes to this. I mean, it's an interesting point, isn't it, that actually he is just going to say what we've just heard him say about all the results in November.
37:53Yeah. The next election where Donald Trump doesn't say that there was fraud and that he got more votes, Republicans got more votes than were actually counted, will be the first. He does this all the time. He did this when he lost Iowa. That was a Republican caucus. It wasn't even Democrats casting ballots there. So this is his thing. He does not like to acknowledge any kind of defeat, particularly at the ballot box. So I think we can rest assured that if Democrats do well in November, that he is going to dismiss this. The question, I think, is will he try to do anything to stop, say, legislators from California, Congress people from California from being seated or to challenge the results in closely contextual elections elsewhere?
38:40And I think that is a big concern among Democrats because people may have shrugged what Donald Trump was saying after the 2020 presidential election, that he wasn't really going to do anything. He was just kind of letting off steam. And then January 6th happened. So that is kind of worst case scenario. And I think that is the back of a lot of people, a lot of Democrats' minds. Interesting that Steve Hilton actually says there isn't evidence of vote ringing in California, which won't have pleased his backer, Donald Trump. But still, he's gone with that. Yeah, I mean, Californians have faith in their electoral system.
39:15They know how the system works. They see how the ballots come and they know how to mail them. So it is more puzzling from a distance. And I can understand people say, you know, why is it taking weeks for them to declare a victory here? I mean, that is confusing. But if you drill down into why, if you look at the systems and the processes that California uses, yeah, it's slow, but it is not rife with fraud the way Donald Trump alleges. OK, if you are a very slow counter or indeed, if you're not, get in touch with us. the WhatsApp 443301239480 americast at bbc.co.uk the hashtag americast discord the link is in the description you can watch us on YouTube of course you can subscribe to us wherever you get your podcasts you just search for americast from Anthony and me for now that's it bye bye see you all later bye y 'all
40:27When you hear the phrase made in China, what do you think? I'm Tristan Redman. And I'm Asma Khalid. And together we host the Global Story podcast from the BBC. And today on our show, we look at the origins and evolution of made in China, because it actually wasn't inevitable. What we're talking about is the world's largest communist nation is at the beating heart of the capitalist system. For more, listen to The Global Story on bbc.com or wherever you get your podcasts.
41:13to look at the lives and fortunes of some of the world's richest people. And asking you to decide if they're good, bad or just another billionaire. Good, bad, billionaire from the BBC World Service. Listen now or search for Good, Bad, Billionaire wherever you get your BBC podcasts.
From the publisher
There are new allegations against Graham Platner, the confirmed Democratic senate candidate in Maine. The small north eastern state which borders Canada is at the centre of a fierce debate within the Democratic party. Have they picked the right candidate for a profoundly important election in Maine, which will be integral to Democrats’ chances of winning back control of the US Senate?
Graham Platner, the Democrat’s new candidate, is facing multiple allegations and scandals around his conduct and behaviour, particularly around women. He says he’s been unfairly targeted, and that everyone has behaviours in their past which they regret. But will that be enough to convince voters? In this episode, Anthony Zurcher - who is just back from reporting in Maine - joins Justin to give us his take after hearing from voters and Graham Platner himself.
Also, we hear from insiders on exactly how Platner was selected and vetted before he became a Democrat candidate. He’ll be facing incumbent Susan Collins, the longest serving female Republican in the senate, who is also a longstanding Trump critic.
Plus, with accusations from the US president about election fraud in California - where ballots are still being counted for the governor race to replace Democrat Gavin Newsom - we look at the preliminary results. It looks like British-born Republican Steve Hilton has been chosen to stand against Democrat Xavier Baccera in November. Why is it taking so long to count ballots and come up with a result? And, we discuss whether Trump’s claims about election fraud part of a bigger playbook for November’s midterm elections.
HOSTS: • Justin Webb, Radio 4 presenter • Anthony Zurcher, North America Correspondent
GET IN TOUCH: • Join our online community: https://discord.gg/qSrxqNcmRB • Send us a message or voice note via WhatsApp to +44 330 123 9480 • Email Americast@bbc.co.uk • Or use #Americast
This episode was made by Tom Gillett, Alix Pickles and Ellie House. The technical producer was Jonny Baker. The series producer is Purvee Pattni. The senior news editor is Sam Bonham.
If you want to be notified every time we publish a new episode, please subscribe to us on BBC Sounds by hitting the subscribe button on the app.
You can now listen to Americast on a smart speaker. If you want to listen, just say "Ask BBC Sounds to play Americast”. It works on most smart speakers.
US Election Unspun: Sign up for Anthony’s BBC newsletter: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-68093155
Americast is part of the BBC News Podcasts family of podcasts. The team that makes Americast also makes lots of other podcasts, including Newscast. If you enjoy Americast (and if you're reading this then you hopefully do), then we think that you will enjoy some of our other pods too. See links below.
Newscast: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/series/p05299nl Top Comment: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001mssm Radical: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/p0gg4k6r The Global Story: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/w13xtvsd
