Trump vs Comey (and the city of Portland)

29 Sep 2025 · 34 min · 17 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode argues that Donald Trump’s second-term approach is “disruptive/chaotic/aggressive,” focusing on (1) his decision to deploy National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, to protect “war ravaged Portland” and ICE facilities from “Antifa and other domestic terrorists,” and (2) the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey for alleged lying to Congress about FBI leaks tied to the Russia investigation. It claims the Portland deployment is legally questionable (governor consent issues), based on thin evidence, and politically motivated to pressure Democratic areas and potentially affect midterm turnout. It also frames Comey’s indictment as retribution and as part of a perceived weakening of DOJ independence.

Guests

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau, host) and Anthony (BBC Washington, co-host). No external guests are interviewed.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Introducing the Episode

0:44 to 1:11

Hosts introduce the episode's focus on Trump and Comey.

“And to think, that's just a small taste of what Schwab offers.”

Introducing the Episode

1:14 to 2:05

Hosts introduce the episode's focus on Trump and Comey.

“If you're going to try and sum up everything that's happened since 20th of January, everything about Donald Trump's second term in just one word, what would it be?”

Trump's Actions Since January

2:05 to 2:49

Discussion on Trump's disruptive behavior since taking office.

“When Donald Trump calls, they say, yes, sir.”

National Guard in Portland

2:49 to 3:47

Exploration of Trump's decision to send National Guard troops to Portland.

“But it's a big deal also, isn't it, that troops are being sent to Portland, National Guard troops.”

Context of Protests in Portland

3:47 to 5:30

Analysis of the historical protests in Portland and Trump's motivations.

“Well, I think he's looking for an excuse, isn't he?”

Political Implications

5:30 to 7:35

Discussion on the political ramifications of deploying troops.

“I mean, there were really big protests there against globalism and the World Trade Organization and things like that.”

Mayor Wilson's Response

7:35 to 10:28

Review of Mayor Wilson's criticism of Trump's troop deployment.

“And I think you're seeing that from actually some Democratic politicians, the senators, the two Democratic senators who represent Oregon saying, stay calm, don't do anything to instigate this.”

Media Influence on Trump

10:28 to 12:18

Examining how media shapes Trump's perceptions and actions.

“is not what's happening in Portland today, although it's often made to look like that.”

Understanding Antifa

12:18 to 14:00

Clarification on what Antifa represents and its political implications.

“But, you know, that was not on my list, Portland.”

The Role of Soros and Antifa in Political Discourse

14:00 to 15:32

Explore how George Soros and Antifa are framed in political narratives.

“And so the names you hear kicked up are, say, George Soros and Open Society, which is his organization that supports in their definition open government and freedom of information and things like that.”
Show all 17 chapters

National Guard Deployments: A Complex Legal Landscape

15:33 to 18:16

Understand the complexities surrounding National Guard deployments in the US.

“And that actually on Friday at the same time that James Comey, which we'll talk about, was indicted.”

Consequences of National Guard Deployments

18:17 to 19:17

Discussion on the implications of National Guard presence in cities.

“By the way, I love the fact that she recorded this on a bus.”

Trump's Indictment of James Comey: A Backstory

19:18 to 24:12

Delve into the historical context of Trump's animosity towards Comey.

“Run us through the relevant bits of James Comey's CV and why Donald Trump hates him so much.”

Comey's Response to Indictment: A Call to Action

24:13 to 25:58

Listen to Comey's reflections on standing up against tyranny.

“The indictment is around testament that Comey gave to Congress in 2020 about leaks that the FBI had to media outlets about the Russia investigation and whether Comey authorized those leaks or not.”

The Chilling Effect of Prosecution on Political Discourse

25:59 to 28:00

Examine the potential chilling effects of prosecutions on political figures.

“confidence in the federal judicial system, and I'm innocent.”

Trump's Perception of Prosecution and Retaliation

28:00 to 33:16

Explore Trump's claims of selective prosecution and the implications for justice.

“And so Trump's saying, I was selectively prosecuted because of who I was.”

Political Environment and Historical Comparisons

33:16 to 33:50

Discuss the evolving political climate and its historical parallels with Nixon.

“that Richard Nixon was corrupt and he was abusing power and he needed to be forced from office.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.

0:30No bouncing between tabs. And best of all, no spreadsheets. Stop managing software and start managing your business with one unified system. Try for free today at odoo.com. That's O-D-O-O dot com. Self-directed investing. Trading. Full-service wealth management. Automated investing. Financial planning. Thematic investing. Retirement planning. Phew. And to think, that's just a small taste of what Schwab offers. Because Schwab knows that when it comes to your finances, choice matters. No matter your goals, investing style, life stage or experience, Schwab has everything you need, all in one place, so you can invest your way.

1:11Visit schwab.com to learn more. Here's a question for you, Anthony. If you're going to try and sum up everything that's happened since 20th of January, everything about Donald Trump's second term in just one word, what would it be?

1:26Anthony Zurcher:One word. Let's see. Disruptive, chaotic, aggressive, destabilizing. Take your pick. OK, four one words. I think we could add revenge or retribution to that, especially after the events we've seen over the last couple of days where we've got one of his big enemies, as he describes him, James Comey, former head of the FBI, being indicted and he sent National Guard forces to the city of Portland, which he complains about a great deal as well. It feels like he's taking on and fighting back against previous adversaries. Welcome to AmeriCast. AmeriCast. AmeriCast from BBC News. When Donald Trump calls, they say, yes, sir.

2:09Right away, sir. Happy to lick your boot, sir. We are the sickest country in the world.

2:15Anthony Zurcher:Oh, dear. Are you worried that billionaires are going to go hungry? Of course the president supports peaceful protests. What a stupid question. Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?

2:31Hello, it's Sarah here in the BBC's Washington Bureau.

2:34Anthony Zurcher:And it's Anthony right next to you, Sarah, here in Washington. Now, James Comey, we will get to later, because I think a lot of people have been saying over the weekend that this is one of the most frightening things they've seen Donald Trump do since he was returned to office. So we need to give that plenty of attention. But it's a big deal also, isn't it, that troops are being sent to Portland, National Guard troops. We know what it's like having them on the streets of Washington. So we've seen that for the last few weeks. But sending them to Portland, Oregon is really important, isn't it, Anthony?

3:02Anthony Zurcher:Right. And he announced this in a Truth Social post on Saturday. And it kind of came out of nowhere because we had been talking about Chicago. Trump had said he was going to send National Guard to Memphis, Tennessee. New Orleans, Louisiana had been batted around a bit. Portland was not one that was on the radar. But this is the way Donald Trump described it in his Truth Social post. He said, at the request of Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, I am directing Secretary of War Pete Hegseth to provide all necessary troops to protect war ravaged Portland and any of our ICE facilities under siege from attack by Antifa and other domestic terrorists.

3:39Anthony Zurcher:I am also authorizing full force if necessary. All right, unpack that for us. War ravaged Portland. Why? Why Portland in particular? Well, I think he's looking for an excuse, isn't he? to send National Guard troops to blue states, to Democrat-leaning states, where he can, and there's a whole slew of reasons for that, that we can get into the general purpose of doing this. But he can't, can he? Unless the governor invites them in, the legality is that he's not allowed to send his troops there, and he fell foul of the law in California when L.A. took a case after he'd sent the National Guard there, of course.

4:16Do you think, when he says it's the ICE facilities, so the immigration facilities that are under attack. This is him looking for another justification so that he can use his presidential power to send National Guard troops anywhere he wants, regardless of what the governor says.

4:31Anthony Zurcher:Yeah, I think that's definitely part of it. As you mentioned, California was the first California Governor Gavin Newsom filed a suit trying to block it. A lower court judge put that on hold, put the deployment of National Guard on hold, but then the appellate court put that lower court hold on hold. So we've seen the governor of Oregon now, a Democrat, very quickly file suit, hoping for the same sort of result to get this suspended. And the White House came out with a sheet of what they said was evidence for this. They listed a couple of times that immigration officials have been assaulted in their views.

5:07Anthony Zurcher:No details on this, but assaulted or threatened or doxxed, revealed who they are. They had some local neighbors who were complaining about the noise and then just kind of a couple incidents about how disruptive this was. So it seems, in my opinion, kind of thin gruel for deploying soldiers on the streets of Portland. But I think you have to view it in the larger context that Portland, Oregon, liberal city, has been a hotbed of protests going back decades. I mean, there were really big protests there against globalism and the World Trade Organization and things like that. Of course, with the Black Lives Matter movement in 2020, we saw big demonstrations there and some damaged federal property at the time.

5:52Anthony Zurcher:And Trump was interested in deploying National Guard at that time. And there was pushback within his own administration. I think he regretted not being able to do it. Not a lot of pushback in this administration, is there, against anything Donald Trump wants to do? Yeah, I think there was kind of a hair trigger on his part. Well, there's problems in Portland, Bangla, send our National Guard troops. But it does risk escalating things, doesn't it? Well, I was seeing pictures on social media all weekend, which are obviously trying to make a political point, but of people sending pictures of sort of terribly moderate cues at farmers markets to buy artisanal bread or pickles or something like that and say, you know, this is what war-ravaged Portland looks like, sending a picture of a sort of liberal's dream scene, beautiful weather, organic foods, you name it, happy dogs walking in the park.

6:40What is it like that? I've never actually been. I've always wanted to go.

6:42Anthony Zurcher:I grew up. I spent a year in Oregon. My family lived there, Corvallis, which is a little south of Portland. But I would get up. Portland's a big city. And even in the 80s and 90s, it was always kind of the alternative, quirky, weird town. It has only gotten quirkier and weirder and become more of kind of a liberal bastion. I think if you see the videos on the streets now, it does not look war torn by any definition of that. I mean, there are protests outside the ICE facility, and that is kind of the gathering point for all of these protests. And there is a very active, engaged liberal activist group in Portland that will get out there and demonstrate for these kind of things.

7:23Anthony Zurcher:And we have seen that turn into sometimes disruptive, sometimes violent protests. that hasn't I don't think been the case at this ICE facility but by Trump deploying these it well he can either one things kind of stay the same stay calm which is you know probably fine with Trump but then he gets another opportunity to set the precedent of deploying National Guard or two this becomes a flashpoint and then there are bigger protests and this becomes something where there are clashes between federal troops and and protesters and that gives Trump the the ability to say, see, I told you we need to send more National Guard in.

8:01Anthony Zurcher:And I think you're seeing that from actually some Democratic politicians, the senators, the two Democratic senators who represent Oregon saying, stay calm, don't do anything to instigate this. We're going to fight this in the political rooms. We don't want to take it to the street. And there is a fear among quite a lot of Democrats that not only is this about Donald Trump wanting to be seen to crack down on law and order and do it in this particular way where he, with his presidential power, can send troops into cities instead of leaving it to the mayor or the governor to deal with that he personally wants to take the reins of law and order.

8:36But there are people, I noticed JB Pritzker, for instance, the Illinois governor saying this over the weekend, that they think there's a wider agenda leading all the way up to the midterms and that Donald Trump actively wants in cities that are more likely to vote Democrat, a really heavy presence of National Guard troops out on the streets during the elections in the hope that that might suppress Democratic turnout. Is that fanciful? I mean, are they being a bit paranoid about that?

9:02Anthony Zurcher:Probably a little of both. I mean, there's very real concerns about what's going to happen in the midterm elections because these, as we've talked about in the past, these midterm elections are so pivotal. It could determine whether Democrats take back one or both chambers of Congress. And if they do that, then they're going to be able to, one, stop Donald Trump's legislative agenda dead in its tracks, but also begin investigating to have this kind of supervising ability to be able to hold committee hearings and issue subpoenas and do all the kind of things that will really bedevil Trump for the last two years of his term.

9:36Anthony Zurcher:I think we heard from Keith Wilson, who is the mayor of Portland, talking about his own views of why they're doing this and his own views of whether this is justified. Just another one of these Democratic politicians who has been given a platform to be able to respond. Let's hear what he had to say. President Trump has directed all necessary troops to Portland, Oregon. The number of necessary troops is zero in Portland and any other American city. And let me repeat that. This is an American city. We do not need any intervention. This is not a military target. The president will not find lawlessness or violence here.

10:19I've been so deeply disappointed to see the footage from a half decade ago, recycled and then recycled again. The footage that Mayor Wilson is referring to there, that has been going round and round on social media in the last few days, is not what's happening in Portland today, although it's often made to look like that. It's footage from back in 2020 after George Floyd was killed, and that incited lots and lots of protests, and it's been recirculating now. Donald Trump may or may not have believed that it was current when he saw it. Certainly, obviously, he didn't do any checking about it because it looked like a perfect reason to send the National Guard there because he was furious back in 2020 about it all as well, wasn't he?

11:01Anthony Zurcher:Yeah, exactly. Exactly. And as I mentioned, he he wanted to send National Guard troops in in 2020 and he wasn't able to. So in a way, it's not surprising that he very quickly when Portland kind of became a focus of Fox News and these protests and all the stuff that was airing on. And some of the clips, as you mentioned, they were they're not even what's going on there right now. They were happening five years ago. And so they're all kind of mixed together and showing up on Fox News. And it's creating this kind of a belief on the right that Portland is in crisis. And it's kind of interesting, actually.

11:35Anthony Zurcher:Trump himself earlier this month was talking about Portland and seeing these videos and not sure whether they're real or not, or not sure whether they're current or not. I mean, here's what he said on the 5th about Portland and what he was seeing on, I guess, Fox News and conservative outlets. I will say this. I watched today. I didn't know that was continuing to go on. But Portland is unbelievable what's going on in Portland. The the destruction of the city. Well, I'm going to look at it now because I've I didn't know that was still going on. This has been going on for years. So we'll we'll be able to stop that very easily.

12:18We'll be able to stop. But, you know, that was not on my list, Portland. But when I watched television last night, this has been going on. You wouldn't be standing if you were the mayor. Can you imagine what they're doing? They're walking in throwing smoke bombs into the store. These are paid terrorists, OK? Paid terrorists. That's interesting. It's also interesting, I think, how influenced he is by what he sees on television far more than, you know, whatever senior advisers have been giving him briefings in the Oval Office. He turns on the TV for 10 minutes and that changes policy. But anyway, that's by the by.

12:49The paid terrorist is really interesting because he rails all the time, doesn't he, about Antifa, another what he calls domestic terrorists. I think he's even actually officially declared Antifa to be a domestic terrorist organization, hasn't he? You hear it mentioned all the time, usually by right-wingers who are saying whatever terrible thing has happened can be blamed on violent Antifa members. What is it? I mean, it's not something you can't really be a card-carrying member of Antifa, can you?

13:16Anthony Zurcher:There's a line going around that Antifa is neither domestic nor an organization by any kind of a definition. I think it actually started over in Europe as anti-fascist protests. But it is it's more kind of an outlook on on how to resist what many view is the right wing dictatorial authoritarian trends in governments around the world. And so this is their anti movement, anti-fascist movement, which is what Antifa comes from. And when you see and hear right wing politicians and Donald Trump in particular talking about Antifa, they're not talking about going after directly after Antifa because there is no president of Antifa.

13:55Anthony Zurcher:There's no board of Antifa. What he wants to target are the left wing groups that he says are funneling money to support these kind of demonstrations that then turn violent. And so the names you hear kicked up are, say, George Soros and Open Society, which is his organization that supports in their definition open government and freedom of information and things like that. But the Republicans and Trump accuse George Soros and other left wing billionaires of funding these organizations, funding these protests, making signs that they can carry. And that is what I think they're going to be getting at when it comes to like what actual steps they can take.

14:35And conservative politicians often sound obsessed with Antifa, as though all of the nation's ills can be blamed on them. And they say that the January 6th riot, for instance, was provoked by Antifa, people being there, all sorts of things that have gone wrong all across the country. It's all Antifa's fault. Are we looking at something else going on here in Donald Trump's mind, where if he can take these left-wing organisations and really demonise them as domestic terror groups, And here he is setting the National Guard against them, essentially. So making it look kind of warlike. He has to do that in order to create a pretext to try to investigate or prosecute any of the left wing billionaires who fund left wing protest groups.

15:16If he can say, basically, look at the domestic terrorists that the likes of Antifa are, that gives them the justification to go after someone like George Soros for funding them, because it's not illegal to fund just, you know, some kind of left wing group that's simply putting out pamphlets, is it?

15:32Anthony Zurcher:No. And that actually on Friday at the same time that James Comey, which we'll talk about, was indicted. Donald Trump signed an order directing his government to investigate the funding, the left wing funding of domestic terrorist groups. And I think a lot of people read that as being a means to lay the groundwork for prosecution, whether racketeering or other kind of prosecutorial tools that are used to to go after organized crime, use them and direct them at left wing organizations. Because if you can cut off the funding to get out the vote, the organizing drives that left wing organizations do, the kind of things that help to win elections and and rally support, create grassroots.

16:12Anthony Zurcher:I mean, that's going to give your side a leg up because the right is certainly organizing and they have a lot of money and they're spending a lot of time trying to get their grassroots built up, particularly in the wake of Charlie Kirk's assassination. nation. If they can undercut the Democrats at the same time, the left at the same time, then I think they view that as a plus. Now, we've had a voice note from Yvonne in London asking us about what happens with these National Guard deployments. Let's have a listen. Hi, Mary Kast. This is Yvonne from London, indeed recording on a London bus. So excuse the background noise.

16:46My question concerns the deployment of the National Guard, the federal troops to various US cities. We hear about them turning up. Do they leave? Are they still there? What's happening after the deployment? What are sort of the longer medium term consequences? Many thanks. Bye. Thank you, Yvonne. And we're quite well placed to answer that, Anthony and I, because we are here in Washington, DC, which of course had a national troop deployment itself. Now, how long do they stay there, she was asking. And that kind of all depends on the law, doesn't it? And this rather complicated business about whether the president even has the power to send the troops in.

17:25And that's different in Washington, D.C. than it is in other states.

17:29Anthony Zurcher:Right. Washington, D.C. is a federal city. So the president, by law, can take over the National Guard and deploy it for whatever reason he wants, whatever he wants. California and Oregon and Illinois, those are trickier because the law seems to indicate that it's the state governor who is one who deploys the National Guard and has to be consulted and has to approve. What we saw in California and Los Angeles during these anti-ice protests was that Trump sent in the National Guard and actual Marines, active duty soldiers, without the governor's permission or consent. And that's why this has all been kind of tied up in lawsuits.

18:06Anthony Zurcher:And so we kind of have to see how those lawsuits play out for how long those soldiers can stay deployed, how long they could be deployed in Oregon if they start showing up there soon. By the way, I love the fact that she recorded this on a bus. This is such an important question that she couldn't wait. She had to get it recorded and sent to us. So I hope we gave you a good answer, Yvonne. Now, we don't know where she was going, but there's a phrase in English English about seeking the view of the man on the top of the Clapham omnibus, a way to get to the kind of grassroots sense of, you know, the ultimate vox pop.

18:39So let's hope that she was on her way to or from Clapham as she asked us that. So I started this episode, Anthony, talking about revenge and retribution, things that Donald Trump promised us during the campaign he would do. So we can't claim that this is a surprise that he suddenly pulled this out of nowhere. But I think it reached a new point in the last few days with the indictment of James Comey, because this is the first time somebody's actually been officially indicted, charged with criminal offences that's been on his list. He's done other things like take away Secret Service protection for people.

19:14We'll probably get into all of that kind of thing. But this is this is the biggest with James Comey. Run us through the relevant bits of James Comey's CV and why Donald Trump hates him so much.

19:26Anthony Zurcher:It's a blast from the past. I mean, we used to talk about James Comey every day in 2016 and 2017 when he was the director of the FBI and a kind of a central figure, You're not only in investigations of Donald Trump and Russia meddling in the 2016 election, but also investigations of Democrat Hillary Clinton and her use of a private email server. Can you remember that? That seems like ancient history now. But he was appointed FBI director by Democrat Barack Obama in 2013, although Comey is a Republican. FBI directors are supposed to serve terms that stretch out over presidential terms. So they're supposed to be somewhat separate and protected from partisan passions.

20:06Anthony Zurcher:What happened, though, was when Donald Trump was elected, in part because Comey reopened the investigation to Hillary Clinton about a week before Election Day. And that kind of changed the dynamics of that election. But we'll put that aside. But this is something I remember really clearly. Just over a week before the election, he came out and said, you know, he was whatever it was. He was carrying on his investigation into her emails. And it couldn't have come at a worse time for her campaign. And she and a lot of Democrats blame him personally for losing. So you would think Donald Trump would be delighted with the man that handed him the election.

Read the full transcript

20:39Anthony Zurcher:You would think. But shortly after that, Comey had a meeting with Donald Trump, said that they had this dossier, this investigation that they were doing into Russian meddling in the 2016 election and possible ties between Trump's own campaign and the Russian government. And he said one of this dossier had incriminating evidence or alleged, you know, that talked about the potential for maybe incriminating evidence that the Russians had on Trump. That set off Trump pushing back against Comey in the early months of Trump's presidency, 2017. There was more and more talk about what Russia did to meddle in the election.

21:19Anthony Zurcher:And Trump ended up firing Comey, saying he could trust him, that he wanted to replace him with someone else. That set off the independent counsel investigation, the Robert Mueller investigation into all of this allegations of Russian meddling in the 2016 election. I mean, we're going back a lot here, but that investigation ended up saying that, yes, the Russians did meddle in the 2016 election, but there were no conclusive evidence that there was any kind of coordination between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. But so that's what Trump always calls the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax.

21:56That's the shorthand for it.

21:57Anthony Zurcher:Yeah, that's the shorthand for it. But to just kind of step back about what Donald Trump thinks of James Comey, he blames him for setting off all of that and years worth of political distractions and investigations into Trump during this first term and that it was Comey who was responsible. Comey was one because he had an axe to grind against against Trump. And the FBI was riddled with, in his view, people who did not support Trump and wanted to undermine his presidency. He never let that go. And though even though Comey has not held any kind of public office since he was fired by Donald Trump in 2017, he's kind of faded from public view.

22:36Anthony Zurcher:Clearly, Trump still blames him and others in Trump's circles blame Comey as being part of the deep state that was conspiring against Trump. And just a week ago, Saturday, Trump posted on Truth Social a complaint that his Justice Department wasn't prosecuting these people. And he named Chuck Comey in particular, along with Letitia James, the attorney general of New York, and Adam Schiff, a senator from California who was key in that Russia investigation when he was a member of the House of Representatives. And lo and behold, two days later, we have, you know, talk about, well, Trump replaced the...

23:11Yeah, this is absolutely astonishing, isn't it? So there he is, he's shouting essentially on social media at the Attorney General, Pan Bondi, saying, get this done, why are these people not in court? And then within two or three days, the US Attorney's resigned, the one that Trump wanted to get rid of. He has appointed one of his own personal lawyers who has no experience as a prosecutor whatsoever to that job, And then within 48 hours, she's come up with an indictment, which is what up until then the Justice Department had been saying there just wasn't enough evidence for. You know, they couldn't prosecute him.

23:45They couldn't put together a case at a reasonable chance of getting a conviction. So they couldn't take him to court. Then this woman, Lindsay Halligan, steps in and suddenly she comes up with an indictment. But it's kind of weird anyway, isn't it? Because anybody who's poured over the indictment doesn't even really, really know exactly what it is that Comey's been charged with. I mean, it comes over the larger heading of lying to Congress. Right. Exactly what it was he said and exactly why they think they can prove that's a lie seems a little bit vague.

24:12Anthony Zurcher:Yeah. The indictment is around testament that Comey gave to Congress in 2020 about leaks that the FBI had to media outlets about the Russia investigation and whether Comey authorized those leaks or not. And Comey denied it kind of in a circuitous way, saying he stood by his earlier testimony, I think, in that congressional testimony, which is one of the reasons why prosecutors may have been kind of reluctant to push this, because it clearly is not clear cut what he testified and whether he was lying about what he knew. And there's conflicting statements from him and Andrew McCabe, who was his deputy, who was one who actually leaked the information to the media.

24:54It's really difficult to prove whether people are lying themselves anyway. You've got to prove intent as well as the fact that the statement was incorrect.

25:01Anthony Zurcher:And obviously he's a pretty bright guy and he has legal training and he was the head of the FBI. I'm sure he was very careful in that testimony. But let's listen to Comey himself, who put out a video statement, a video response on Instagram on Thursday after that indictment came out saying what he thought of this indictment. My family and I have known for years that there are costs to standing up to Donald Trump. but we couldn't imagine ourselves living any other way. We will not live on our knees, and you shouldn't either. Somebody that I love dearly recently said that fear is the tool of a tyrant, and she's right.

25:41But I'm not afraid, and I hope you're not either. I hope instead you are engaged, you are paying attention, and you will vote like your beloved country depends upon it. which it does. My heart is broken for the Department of Justice, but I have great confidence in the federal judicial system, and I'm innocent. So let's have a trial and keep the faith. Some really interesting things in that statement, including saying, fear is the tool of a tyrant. James Comey says, I'm not afraid. Well, I think a lot of other people, if they thought they might end up in his position probably would be and with perfectly good cause because he says he's got confidence that he's innocent and that therefore he won't be convicted.

26:29But it seems to me that the Trump administration isn't necessarily absolutely set on getting him convicted and sent to prison because the process can be the punishment. This is going to take years. I mean, it already has. He will have to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars, at least on legal representation. I don't know if he is doing any kind of work at the moment, but if he is, this will probably almost certainly take over. It will have repercussions through his personal life as well. We've talked to, you remember Miles Taylor, friend of the pod who's been on here, just going through a lower level version of this.

27:02And he's told us just how incredibly disruptive it's been for him and his family. This will have a chilling effect, won't it, on all sorts of people who might be thinking, I, you know, I ought to stand up for democracy and the American Constitution, look at what's happening to James Comey and think, well, maybe not me.

27:18Anthony Zurcher:And John Bolton, Donald Trump's former national security advisor who had his home and office raided, looking for classified documents. There now is a pattern of harassment and in this case, prosecution of people who had been critical of Donald Trump over the past four to eight years. So I think it does risk having a chilling effect. Of course, if you talk to Republicans and Donald Trump, they will say, well, that's exactly what happened in the four years after Trump left office, that Donald Trump was indicted four times, including convicted once on charges, which, we've talked about in the past, the hush money payments to the porn star were pretty an unusual application of federal law.

28:01Anthony Zurcher:And so Trump's saying, I was selectively prosecuted because of who I was. So turnabout is fair play. These people are being, they won't admit it, But these, you know, clearly James Comey is being prosecuted in part because he was sharply critical of Donald Trump and has been ever since. I mean, he is out of public office, but he still has been pretty critical of Donald Trump. Remember that that picture on the beach of 8647, which the Republicans said meant, you know, kill Donald Trump. But I mean, that's it. But it was something where they said, well, he's he's making threats. And I guess the Secret Service actually investigated him.

28:37Anthony Zurcher:So he hasn't been entirely silent is what I'm saying. And so now this is the chance for Republicans and for the Trump administration, the Justice Department, which clearly now the firewall between the Justice Department and the president is gone. They're doing their taking actions on at the behest of the president. Like they are now using the same in their view, the same sorts of tools that were used to go after Donald Trump or Steve Bannon or other folks in the in the administration who were prosecuted for lying to Congress. Oh, yes. Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro went to prison for refusing to testify to Congress.

29:14So, I mean, yeah, you could say the boot's on the other foot now. But for all that the Trump team complained vociferously about the Justice Department being weaponized and the witch hunt against them, they seem perfectly happy to do the same thing themselves without fearing charges of hypocrisy.

29:32Anthony Zurcher:Right. And we should we should draw distinctions, too, between what happened to Trump and others and what's happening now. You know, the prosecutions in New York and the indictment in Atlanta against Trump, those were independent of the Justice Department of the White House. And even the two federal indictments that Trump faced for handling classified documents and for attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Those were the results of an independent counsel that was set up, a special prosecutor that was set up to investigate. And Biden wasn't there posting on social media, wasn't making public comments saying that, you know, Trump should be indicted soon.

30:06Anthony Zurcher:Let's get him. And he's totally guilty. Guilty as hell. You know, the sorts of things that Donald Trump is saying about Comey and about Letitia James and about Adam Schiff and these other folks that he is he is targeting. So there are there are key differences to what happened the past four years and what are what's happening now. It just feels like the pretense, any kind of a veneer of independence has been stripped away. This is a Justice Department, as I said, that is operating at the behest of this president. And this perceived firewall that has been set up between now and the days of Nixon is gone.

30:46Yeah. And Donald Trump doesn't deny that this is probably just the start. He was asked on Friday, now that James Comey has been indicted, who's the next person on your list? Mr. President, I'm James Comey. Now that James Comey has been indicted, who is the next person on your list in this retribution? It's not a list, but I think there'll be others. I mean, they're corrupt. These were corrupt, radical-left Democrats. Because Comey essentially was worse than a Democrat. I would say the Democrats are better than Comey. but no there'll be others look it was that's my opinion uh they weaponized the justice department like nobody in history what they've done is terrible and so i would i hope there frankly i hope there are others because you can't let this happen to a country often what he wants to prosecute them for is entirely different from what he is angry with them about though, isn't it?

31:46So Adam Schiff, a Democratic congressman, the Trump administration say that there's some evidence of mortgage fraud, him saying somewhere wasn't his principal residence or was when he was applying for a mortgage. I mean, it's not his mortgages he cares about with Adam Schiff, is it?

32:04Anthony Zurcher:Right. It's the fact that he was chair of the House Intelligence Committee that was investigating and ultimately impeached Donald Trump for pressuring Vladimir Zelensky to try to find evidence of malfeasance on Joe Biden's part in Ukraine. I mean, again, trip down memory lane for all of this. But Donald Trump remembers clearly. And Donald Trump is pursuing punishment for people who crossed him in the past. And we opened this episode talking about retribution and revenge as a description for Trump's presidency. And he said, as you point out, he said last year or the year before on the campaign trail that I will be your retribution.

32:44Anthony Zurcher:And sometimes he said, well, you know, retribution was winning would be retribution success, success of the country will be retribution. But there were other times where he specifically said, I'm not ruling out revenge. And sometimes revenge is justified. And and sometimes, you know, what did the Democrats did to him is deserving of payback, essentially. And, you know, I think back to the years of Richard Nixon and the Watergate scandal, when the Watergate tapes revealed that Richard Nixon was plotting to use the FBI to investigate his enemies. And that was one of the key aha moments where everyone came to the conclusion that Richard Nixon was corrupt and he was abusing power and he needed to be forced from office.

33:24Anthony Zurcher:And he ultimately resigned in the under the threat of being impeached. Well, here we have Donald Trump coming right out and saying it a week and a half ago on his truth social post. These are the people you should prosecute. Why aren't they prosecuting them? They're they're guilty as hell. It just shows how different this political environment is and how much the rules have changed now versus in 1972, 73, 74. Okay, well, that should be the last from us. For now, Benjamin Netanyahu is about to arrive at the White House. So I'm going to run off and see if I can get into a press conference and try and ask him and Donald Trump a question there.

34:00Anthony Zurcher:Excellent. I'm starting to wrap my head around the fact that the government could shut down at midnight tomorrow night. So there's a lot of politics around that, which I'm sure we will delve into later this week. Yeah. Oh, and that and that big meeting at the Pentagon, the mystery meeting where every senior person in the military has all been called to come and go to this meeting with Pete Hegseth. And we don't know what it's about. He's going to lecture them on personal fitness and grooming, I think. It should be fun to watch. So plenty to talk about the next time we're back with another AmeriCast.

34:30Bye, y 'all.

34:35from BBC News. Well, look, thanks for listening all the way to the end of today's AmeriCast. You are now officially an AmeriCaster. It is, of course, a ride, a wild ride, navigating the US news, particularly in the era of Trump. You have made it. If you have a comment, a question about the things we've talked about, or anything at all, actually, get in touch with us. The email is americasterbbc.co.uk. The WhatsApp is 03301239480. We answer your questions every single week actually on the podcast. So keep them coming. You can join the online community as well on Discord. The link is in the podcast description on your app.

35:15We will be back with another podcast very soon. So until then, see you later. Bye.

35:45I'm Amy Scott, host of How We Survive, a podcast about the messy business of climate solutions. To a lot of people, geoengineering might seem like a dangerous, outlandish way to play God. But some are embracing this sci-fi-inspired approach. as a solution to the climate crisis. Listen to How We Survive on your favorite podcast app.

From the publisher

It started with a Truth Social post from the president, calling for a handful of his critics to be prosecuted, one of those targeted was the former FBI director James Comey. Less than a week later, he has been indicted and charged with perjury over testimony he gave to Congress five years ago about the FBI's investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election. Prosecutors allege he lied about whether he authorised the leak of classified information to members of the media.

Sarah and Anthony discuss the rocky relationship between Trump and Comey, concerns about whether Trump is weaponsing the justice department to target his political rivals, and who could be next?

And Trump has set his next target for the National Guard to deply to - Portland, Oregon. He says the city is ‘war-ravaged’ and that ICE Facilities are ‘under siege from attack by Antifa, and other domestic terrorists’. What is the reality on the ground? How have Democratic lawmakers in Oregon pushed back? And what precedent could it set if federal troops do march onto the streets?

HOSTS: • Sarah Smith, North America Editor • Anthony Zurcher, North America Correspondent

GET IN TOUCH: • Join our online community: https://discord.gg/qSrxqNcmRB • Send us a message or voice note via WhatsApp to +44 330 123 9480 • Email Americast@bbc.co.uk • Or use #Americast

This episode was made by Rufus Gray and Alix Pickles. The technical producer was Ricardo McCarthy. The series producer is Purvee Pattni. The senior news editor is Sam Bonham.

If you want to be notified every time we publish a new episode, please subscribe to us on BBC Sounds by hitting the subscribe button on the app.

You can now listen to Americast on a smart speaker. If you want to listen, just say "Ask BBC Sounds to play Americast”. It works on most smart speakers.

US Election Unspun: Sign up for Anthony’s BBC newsletter: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-68093155

Americast is part of the BBC News Podcasts family of podcasts. The team that makes Americast also makes lots of other podcasts, including Newscast and Ukrainecast. If you enjoy Americast (and if you're reading this then you hopefully do), then we think that you will enjoy some of our other pods too. See links below.

Newscast: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/series/p05299nl Ukrainecast: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/p0bqztzm Radical: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/p0gg4k6r The Global Story: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/w13xtvsd

More from Americast

All 207 episodes
Trump vs Comey (and the city of Portland)Americast · 34 min
Listen in VO