CMA CGM and FedEx Supply Chain: The Deal Behind the Deal

0:01Hi, I'm Kelly Barner and this is the Art of Supply Podcast. Every business story has a supply chain angle, and those stories deserve to be told. This show digs deep into news headlines and interviews thought leaders, executives, and newsmakers to capture their perspective in their own words. With no agenda to lead us in any particular direction, we'll offer you objective coverage of geopolitics, innovation, and competition. Facts will always take precedence over hype. The rest is up to you. On July 1st, FedEx announced that they have agreed to sell their FedEx supply chain subsidiary to CMA's CGM Group for$1.4 billion, subject, of course, to the standard regulatory approvals.

0:57Now, FedEx supply chain is the company's 3PL unit, So that includes warehousing, distribution, and fulfillment. Nearly 10 ,000 FedEx supply chain team members will join Siva Logistics. That's a prior acquisition that's already owned and operated by CMA, CGM. Now, depending on the source you read, which is interesting, FedEx supply chain has either 130 warehouses or 150 warehouses. So for the sake of simplicity, I'll say 150 as we go through this episode, but take that with a grain of salt. Now combined, those distribution centers cover 40 million square feet and they offer CMA CGM a two-day reach to 96 % of the U.S.

1:44population. This deal will nearly triple SEVA Logistics' size, expanding their North American footprint to a combined workforce of 20 ,000 across more than 240 locations. And despite the required regulatory approval, this acquisition is expected to close in the current year. Now, what interests me most about this deal is last FedEx's decision to sell off their 3PL unit. And we just saw them spin off FedEx Freight, so they're clearly in a selling mood. But it's more the partnership elements between the FedEx parent and CMA CGM that are embedded in it. And so in this episode of Art of Supply, here's what we're going to cover.

2:29The deal itself and what it signals about the larger market. The multi-year ocean and air cargo agreements worth an estimated$3.5 billion over 10 years that are wrapped into this deal. And whether the air cargo capacity CMA CGM is building out is competition for FedEx or something else entirely. Now, before moving on, it's worth backing up 10 years because this business has been here before. FedEx supply chain was originally a standalone business called Genco. FedEx acquired it in 2015 for$1.4 billion. And if that number sounds oddly familiar to you, you get bonus points. FedEx bought Genco for$1.4 billion, and 10 years later, they are selling it for the exact same price.

3:25Now, quick sideline here. I don't necessarily have anything to support this, but after a decade of ownership, same price tag in, same price tag out, it seems like it's worth asking whether that's a wash for FedEx or sort of an admission that the 3PL unit never grew into the price or profitability that they were hoping to get. Now going forward, former FedEx executive Patrick Mobile will lead Siva Logistics, which brings his experience in North America and with FedEx operations, as well as experience working with a French logistics company. And that's helpful because CMA, CGM, is headquartered in Marseille, France.

4:07They are the fifth largest 3PL provider in the world by gross revenue. Now, if FedEx has been on a selling spree, the MACGM has been on a buying spree. They've done this over the last 10 years as they have transformed themselves from being a pure ocean carrier and port terminal operator into a full end-to-end logistics provider. And owning FedEx supply chain will only make them more competitive worldwide. Now, even though we're talking about some really big numbers, this was probably an easy spinoff decision for FedEx. As a company, we know they've been streamlining to focus on, quote, providing unique expertise for high value verticals, including healthcare, automotive, aerospace, and data centers.

4:58Even at$1.4 billion, FedEx supply chain is a small part of the overall company, and it makes up less than 2 % of consolidated annual revenue. Now, as we saw with FedEx Freight, senior management at FedEx seems to have concluded that the supply chain unit will never deliver the returns that they're aiming for with the core FedEx Express business. In their coverage, Bruno Digital put it this way, quote, FedEx is not simply selling an asset. It is trading a warehousing unit for a deeper transportation relationship with one of the world's largest container lines, which is a smarter reallocation than a straight divestiture.

5:42Now, on the flip side, ocean shipping revenue for FedEx has been exposed to root disruption risk, including the virtual closure of the Strait of Hormuz during the Iran conflict. This is a reason that the partnership side of this deal matters just as much as the sale of the 3PL unit. To that point, this isn't just a sale. It's a divestiture and a commercial handshake on something that's going to be ongoing. In a non-exclusive agreement that's part of this whole deal, CMA's CGM will be a preferred ocean carrier for the remaining FedEx business, with select air cargo capacity agreements between the two companies also becoming part of the deal.

6:27Now, this is where it gets tricky. Just to slow down for a minute so this is hopefully clear. There are so many FedExes in this story. So FedEx, the parent company, will continue to have an ocean and air freight relationship with CMA CGM, even after selling FedEx Freight to them, which will soon no longer be called FedEx Freight, and that will help make this a lot more clear. Those ocean and air freight agreements are expected to begin in a phased way between this year and 2028. Now, Reuters reported a source close to the matter that put the combined revenue potential of the ocean and air freight agreements at about$3.5 billion over 10 years.

7:10And that's the detail that keeps this from being a plain old divestiture. CMA's CGM isn't just buying a warehousing unit as useful as that is. They're locking in a decade-long commercial relationship with one of the biggest shippers on earth, a company about twice their size from a revenue perspective. Here's what this means from an overall market perspective. According to MarketScale, quote, a carrier that previously competed primarily on ocean freight is now assembling a ground-level warehousing network large enough to influence contract negotiations and North American distribution. And CMA CGM has been clear about this.

7:54Their motive, in their own words, is to reinforce more than 25 years of investment in the U.S. supply chain. And they want to reduce their dependence on volatile container shipping rates now that they will hold a major U.S. warehousing operation. In Chairman and CEO Rodolfo Sade's own words, quote, we are aiming to be number two in the sector by the end of 2027 in terms of transport capacity. CMA CGM has made a broader U.S. commitment as well. They plan to invest$20 billion in the United States over a four-year period. Now, in 2025, CMA CGM generated 68 % of its about$55 billion revenue from its shipping line, with the logistics division delivering$18 billion.

8:45But this isn't just a CMA CGM story. It taps into a broader industry trend of ocean carriers that are going vertical. They're increasingly investing in warehousing, distribution, air cargo fulfillment, and inland transportation, rather than just limiting themselves to the port-to-port piece of a journey. Now, geopolitical uncertainty certainly has a role in this. It has increased the demand for providers capable of delivering integrated transportation, warehousing, and supply chain management together. As AMB Logistics wrote in their coverage, quote, that creates a more competitive environment for traditional freight brokers.

9:29Customers are increasingly asking for more than a rate. They want visibility, flexibility, rooting strategy, carrier management, warehouse coordination, exception control, and freight decisions that support the full business. Now, it would also be interesting just to see this as a global ocean freight diversification strategy. But if you remember, this is exactly the logic behind Amazon making their logistics capabilities available to the whole market, such a formidable challenge. All shippers, regardless of location, freight type, industry, want more visibility. They want more consolidated services, and it makes sense given the level of complexity and risk that they're facing.

10:18Even asset-based logistics providers are trying to become more than the facilities and equipment that they provide. They're trying to move into offering systems, orchestration, planning, and automation. Now, what this means for retailers may cut both ways. On the one hand, it may reduce their cost and shrink timelines by consolidating more of the end-to-end journey under one provider. At the same time, it's going to narrow the number of logistics options available to them as the market consolidates among less players. Now, when you take the acquisition of FedEx supply chain and also the ongoing ocean and air freight deal, it seems like a pretty good idea, maybe even a win-win for both companies.

11:05But not everybody is completely sold. Ari Rosa is a senior analyst of equity research at Citi, and he thinks FedEx could have gotten more for FedEx supply chain if they had just waited a bit longer on the deal. As he said, quote, my sense, if I'm totally honest, is that FedEx probably, if they had sat on that business for a little bit longer, waited for the economy to pick up some steam, waited for clarity of what comparable businesses might be valued at, it's possible that FedEx could have gotten more money for that business. At the same time, how long are you going to wait when only 2 % is at stake?

11:45Now, the acquisition plus the partnership made me start wondering crazy things like, could CMA, CGM ever come back and buy more of FedEx? Let's say if they wanted the rest of their air cargo capacity. Now, the fast answer here is no. And that's not based on cash or stakeholder interests, but the law. Under U.S. federal law, and the United States isn't alone in this. Foreign ownership may comprise up to 25 % of the voting stock of U.S. airlines, and boards of directors may include up to 33 % non-U.S. citizens. But a U.S. citizen entity has to hold at least 75 % of the total voting interest. There are real-world precedents for what a foreign cargo player's stake and U.S.

12:38air capacity actually looks like. And there have been proposals to change this, none of which have been successful. So here's an example. Polar Air Cargo is 51 % owned by Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, that's a U.S. company, and 49 % old, but with only 25 % voting interest by DHL Express, a subsidiary of Germany's Deutsche Post. So DHL doesn't own that FedEx-style capacity outright in polar air cargo. They have a passive, capped, non-controlling stake in a US-controlled joint venture. That's the model. It's not a takeover. Now, the existing FedEx supply chain deal, buying the non-aviation logistics assets outright, then locking in that partnership for ocean and air capacity is getting close to the ceiling of what CMA, CGM is legally allowed to have.

13:35It's not a stepping stone towards buying more FedEx. The current airline ownership rules make that a pretty much non-starter. The natural follow-up question is whether CMA, CGM is quietly building their own air network instead. They do have their own air carrier. That's CMA, CGM Air Cargo, creatively named, which currently operates eight freighter aircraft with eight more set to join the fleet next year. But that is a fraction of FedEx Express's fleet, which runs in the 100. CMA CGM did recently acquire Crystal Aero Solutions, their formerly external aircraft maintenance partner, just to strengthen their airhouse maintenance capacity and support the airline's continued growth.

14:23But because they are a foreign-controlled carrier, they can't fly domestic U.S. legs themselves. It's the same structural reality that's driving the FedEx ownership limit conversation. And interestingly, there's a mirror image example of this same situation on FedEx's side. FedEx signed a strategic memorandum of understanding with China Southern Air Logistics in June of 2026. This is centered on Guangzhou, where FedEx operates its largest Asia-Pacific hub and is expanding its facilities. Now, FedEx can integrate operations with China Southern by purchasing blocks of capacity, much in the same way global integrators like DHL Express have used blocks-based agreements with carriers on key routes.

15:11But FedEx can't own firm in China. So both companies, FedEx and CMA CGM, are solving the same problem. They have home bases and they're trying to expand globally in accordance with the rules. So they're filling network gaps without crossing those legally established ownership lines. And they're doing it through partnership rather than acquisition. Now that ends up being sort of the through line for this whole story. There's the deal, there's the ownership law, and there's the air cargo build out. They're all versions of ways of dealing with the same constraints. And what keeps pulling me back into this story isn't the$1.4 billion.

15:55It's not the decision to spin off FedEx supply chain. It's how much of modern logistic strategy is happening in the space between what a company is allowed to own and what it actually needs to compete on the global stage. And that's where expectations are today, as well as what they're likely to expand to moving forward. FedEx and CMA CGM just spent about a year negotiating exactly where that line is going to sit for them. That's the deal behind the deal. And it's worth watching as more of these vertical plays are probably going to show up across the industries. And in some cases, like this one, they will be sitting conveniently behind other deals.

16:46Art of Supply is part of the Art of Procurement family of brands. To ensure you never miss new content, I invite you to sign up for our newsletter at artofsupply.com. If this episode of the Art of Supply podcast made you think, please spread the word. You can support the show by giving us a thumbs up, a star rating, or a review wherever you find your podcast audio. Join me next week for another deep dive into the art of supply.