Big Tech Is The Enemy of Innovation

16 Aug 2024 · 43 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Summary: Better Offline - Big Tech Is The Enemy of Innovation

Episode Overview The episode "Big Tech Is The Enemy of Innovation" from the podcast Better Offline, hosted by Ed Zitron, critiques the current state of the tech industry, particularly focusing on the generative AI sector. It argues that major tech companies have become incapable of true innovation, instead opting for imitation and excessive spending without genuine progress.

Key Themes and Arguments

  1. The Collapse of the AI Bubble
  2. Current Sentiment: Zitron discusses a growing discomfort among investors regarding the massive expenditure in generative AI projects by tech giants like Microsoft and Google.
  3. Sustainability Concerns: The episode emphasizes that generative AI is fundamentally unsustainable, relying heavily on data and processes that often infringe on individuals' rights and is wasteful both financially and environmentally.
  1. Disconnection of Tech Leaders
  2. Lack of Curiosity: The episode portrays tech executives as disconnected from real-world problems and innovation. Zitron criticizes leaders like Sundar Pichai and Satya Nadella for their lack of curiosity and failure to implement meaningful change.
  3. Market Monopolization: The current tech landscape is described as a monopoly where companies follow each other’s actions rather than innovating independently, leading to a stagnation of ideas and products.
  1. Wasteful Spending and Cultural Issues
  2. Misallocation of Resources: Zitron argues that billions spent on generative AI could have been used for more beneficial societal advancements.
  3. Corporate Culture: Companies are painted as chaotic and self-serving, with internal competition among teams prioritizing profit over innovation and problem-solving.
  1. The Potential for a Backlash Against Big Tech
  2. Consumer Sentiment: The general public’s awareness of the problems with big tech products is growing. Zitron suggests that a backlash is imminent due to dissatisfaction with the quality and utility of products.
  3. Call for Accountability: He argues for accountability from the leaders of major tech companies, urging society to demand better products and innovation.
  1. Future Implications
  2. Inevitability of Change: Zitron posits that without significant changes in leadership and approach, the AI bubble will burst, leading to a reckoning for big tech.
  3. Cultural Shift Needed: The episode concludes with a call for a return to genuine innovation and curiosity within the tech industry, implying that a return to focusing on solving actual problems is essential for future success.

Key Takeaways

  • Generative AI is Critically Flawed: The technology is expensive, unsustainable, and lacks true utility for users.
  • Disconnect Between Executives and Reality: Tech leaders are depicted as out of touch with the needs of consumers and the potential for innovation.
  • A Call for Change: There is a strong advocacy for a reevaluation of how tech companies operate, with a focus on accountability and innovation.

Closing Thoughts The episode delivers a powerful critique of the current state of big tech and its impact on innovation and society. Zitron’s arguments reveal a deep frustration with the lack of progress and the prioritization of profit over genuine technological advancement. The potential for a large-scale backlash against big tech, fueled by a growing public awareness, presents a significant point of concern for these companies moving forward.

---

For more insights and to join discussions, listeners are encouraged to visit the [Better Offline subreddit](http://www.reddit.com/r/betteroffline) and connect with the community on [Discord](chat.wheresyoured.at).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This is an iHeart Podcast.

0:30Experience cloud-like comfort with high-resilience foam that's hypoallergenic and never needs fluffing. The sturdy steel frame ensures longevity, and the modular pieces can be rearranged anytime. Check out washablesofas.com and get up to 60 % off your Anabay sofa, backed by a 30-day satisfaction guarantee. If you're not absolutely in love, send it back for a full refund. No return shipping or restocking fees. Every penny back. Upgrade now at washablesofas.com. offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply parking shouldn't slow you down park whiz gives every driver a shortcut book ahead save up to 50 and skip the hassle of circling the block park smarter park faster park whiz download the park whiz app today and save every time you park in business they say you can have better cheaper or faster but you only get to pick two what if you could have all three at the same time.

1:28That's exactly what Cohere, Thomson Reuters, and Specialized Bikes have since they upgraded to the next generation of the cloud. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. OCI is the blazing fast platform for your infrastructure, database, application development, and AI needs, where you can run any workload in a high availability, consistently high performance environment, and spend less than you would with other clouds. How is it faster? OCI's block storage gives you more operations per second. Cheaper? OCI costs up to 50 % less for computing, 70 % less for storage, and 80 % less for networking. Better? In test after test, OCI customers report lower latency and higher bandwidth versus other clouds.

2:12This is the cloud built for AI and all your biggest workloads. Right now, with zero commitment, try OCI for free. Head to oracle.com slash strategic. That's oracle.com slash strategic. Wells Fargo announced a new$20 million program in 2025, teaming up with nonprofits to support small business owners. That's how Wells Fargo is helping strengthen small businesses and communities. Wells Fargo, the bank of doing. Learn more at wellsfargo.com slash say do. So I love Square. They make paying for stuff at a store really easy. I just use them at Court Street Grocers to buy a sandwich here in Brooklyn, in New York.

2:51Their stuff's reliable, easy to use, and it just works for both businesses and their customers. Square keeps up so you don't have to slow down. Get everything you need to run and grow your business without any long-term commitments. And why wait? Right now you can get up to$200 off Square hardware at square.com slash go slash better offline. That's s-q-u-a-r-e dot com slash g-o slash better offline. Run your business smarter with Square. Get started today.

3:24Hello, hi, welcome to Better Offline, I'm your host Ed Zitron.

3:39For weeks now I've been writing and speaking about what I believe to be an inevitable and possibly imminent collapse in generative AI. In the last episode, I talked about the early signs of disquiet, particularly among investors who were growing increasingly uncomfortable about the many billions being spent by Microsoft, Google, and others to support an industry that does not appear to make anyone much money and costs so much more than it makes. And I believe that this is a moment for the tech industry to atone and to learn and to change in the wake of what I think is a hundred billion dollar group psychosis.

4:12A big, nasty waste that I will now get to in agonizing detail. Generative AI was always unsustainable, and it was always dependent on reams of training data that necessitated stealing from millions of people, with its utility vague and its ubiquity overstated. The media and the markets have tolerated a technology that, while not inherently bad, was implemented in a way so nefariously and wastefully that it necessitated theft, billions of dollars in cash, and the double-digit percent increase in hyperscalers' emissions. The desperation for the tech industry to have something new has led to such ruinous success, and if this bubble collapses, it'll be a result of a shared myopia in both big tech dimwits like Satya Nadella and Sundar Pichai, and Silicon Valley power players like Reid Hoffman, Sam Altman, Brian Chesky, and of course Mark Andreessen.

5:05The people propping up this bubble no longer experience human problems, and thus I don't think they can be trusted anymore to solve them. Ultimately, this is a story of waste, ignorance, and greed, of wasted money, and of wasted opportunity, because let's face it, a fraction of the money spent by Microsoft alone chasing the generative AI bullshit machine could have been spent in many other profitable and societally useful ways. And it's a story of tech executives that are so desperate to own the future, but are so disconnected from actually building it. And this arms race is a monument to the lack of curiosity, rife in the highest ranks of the tech industry.

5:43They refuse to do the hard work, to create, to be curious, to be excited about the things they're building and the people they're serving. And so they spent billions of dollars to eliminate the risk they even might have to do any of those things ever again. They just wanted the machine to do it for them. Had Sundar Pichai looked at Microsoft's investment in OpenAI in 2019 and said, nah, no thanks, which he did put the metaverse, by the way, it's likely that none of this would have happened. But a combined hunger for growth and a lack of any natural predators means that big tech no longer knows how to make a competitive or useful product, and thus they can only see what their competitors are doing and say, uh, yeah, yeah, that's what it is, that's what we're all doing now.

6:23Before the AI hype boom, Mark Zuckerberg was once so disconnected from Meta's work on AI that he literally had no idea what breakthrough Sundar Pichai had complimented him on in a meeting they had together mere months before Meta's own obsession with AI truly began. And none of these guys seem to have any idea what's going on. And why are they having these chummy little meetings? These aren't competitors, they're co-conspirators. They're just people meeting to say, what's the latest con we're all jumping on? What's the latest market that we're all going to monopolize? I can't wait for the monopoly episode.

6:55And these companies, they're too large. They're too unwieldy. They're too disconnected. And they do too much. They lack the focus that makes a truly competitive business. And they lack any kind of cohesive culture, the kinds that are built on solving real human problems or real business problems that humans have. These are not companies built for anything other than growth. And none of them, not even Apple, have built something truly innovative and life-changing in the best part of a decade, with the exception perhaps of maybe contactless mobile payments, which are actually really cool. These companies are run by rot economists, and they have these disconnected, chaotic cultures full of these little fiefdoms where established technologists are rat-fucked by management goons when they try to make their products better instead of making them more money.

7:40And the depressing thing is that they really don't need to be that way. Seriously, there's a world where these companies just make a billion dollars a quarter, and they don't even have to fire people every time they do so. And there's one where these companies actually solve real problems too, and then they still make incredibly large amounts of money for doing so. The problem is they're greedy, they're run by greedy idiots, and they're addicted to growth and are incapable of doing anything other than following what the last guy did. And what's funny is this is very Jack Welch from the shareholder supremacy.

8:14They just see a market and like, what if we put money in that? Can we take the money from the market? That's all they can do now. Sundar Pichai is a terrible executive, but he's a really good Jack Welch clone. And by the way, if you don't know who Jack Welch is, please go back to the shareholder supremacy episode. It's important because you really need to see who fucked all this up. But, okay, so where were we? What happens next? Well, there's enough money sloshing around right now that OpenAI probably can be bankrolled a little further. And like I've mentioned in the previous episode, it'll need to be as it needs another$5 billion, if not$10 billion, to make it to the end of 2025.

8:55That very large amount of money is going to have to come from somewhere, and I think that they're going to be reduced to going to the kingdom of Saudi Arabia or SoftBank or probably taking on private debt. And that last one, I'm just really not sure is going to happen. And those suitors, they're not going to be quite as generous with their terms, and they won't give them a devil's deal like Microsoft did, which, as I previously argued across multiple newsletters and podcasts, effectively owns all of OpenAI's research and intellectual property. Sam Altman is a terrible dealmaker, by the way. While the venture capital system theoretically could afford to prop up OpenAI for another year or so, their limited partners, who are the people funding the VCs, they're probably still a little so from 2021 and 2022 when massive amounts of money went into nothing, not to mention the sudden and rapid rise in interest rates.

9:42And they'll probably balk at the amounts they're going to need. We're talking multiple, probably 10,$100 million checks or$200 million checks. OpenAI needs so much more money than the VC system is ready to give to one company. And it really will only take one person blinking to create a panic in both the public and the private markets. OpenAI may still be able to raise money, but investors have no real path to liquidity. As OpenAI most assuredly will not be able to go public, and in the process of investing, these VCs will likely find out exactly how bad things are there. While there is a chance we get one more round, kind of a dead cat bounce situation, it's honestly a little tough to imagine how it keeps going even if OpenAI raises another$10 billion.

10:27But how does the collapse happen? Well, as I said last time, there's the obvious one. OpenAI or Anthropic shuts down. But I think that them shutting down is very unlikely based on their corporate structure. OpenAI or Anthropic collapsing will be more like the character.ai deal. An attempt to hide the ugly mess where a big tech firm absorbs them in and just goes, there, now the AI division. You saw a version of this, by the way, when Sam Altman got fired from OpenAI and he was like the head of AI at Microsoft for two minutes. But if I had to guess, Anthropics' most likely home would be with Amazon, which completed its$4 billion investment into the company earlier this year and also has a profit share with them.

11:06In any case where this happens, even if the entity, Anthropica or OpenAI, keeps going without the key people in power, such as Anthropics CEO Dario Madej going in-house at Amazon or Google, again, it doesn't really matter. They will eventually die. And raising a round for a generative AI company in this market is likely going to be quite difficult, if not impossible. The narrative shifted and the people with the money to invest don't really know what they're talking about, technologically speaking. So they're investing based on how everybody else is feeling, what the vibes are in the air, what they sniff each other's arses and they say, oh fuck, is AI good or bad now?

11:42I don't really know. And when we really strip away everything, we strip away all of the lies and the marketing, and you just get down to incentives, and you think, well, they just want money, right? If that's all they want, that really is just the problem. Because fundamentally, this tech really isn't that exciting. I'm sorry, it isn't. Generative AI is not the AI from Iron Man. It is not the magical future computer. It's a generative AI. That picture of Garfield with a gun or Scooby-Doo sitting on top of a rocket, those aren't useful. That's not the future. That's just image creation. I'm sure some very insufferable freak is going to email me after this and be like, well, I've set up generative AI in all of these ways.

12:31mate i appreciate your time thank you for emailing me i'm sure you don't even sound like that the point i'm not making is that this is useless the point i'm making is it is not even in the same galaxy of usefulness that it requires to go forward to be worth all of this money and on top of that it's boring it's so goddamn boring it's so i am so bored it doesn't even do my boring business stuff. I have a PR business in my day job. I would love a dinky AI to move my shit around. It can't even do that. I want it to help me and it won't do it. And if you say, Ed, you're a stupid idiot. You're a moron.

13:09You have the brain of a bird or a dog or a dog-bird hybrid. You drool all the time because your brain cannot keep your mouth closed. All of these things are true, but it's not my job to sell generative AI to myself. It's the company's. And the idea of a super smart friend that knows everything about me is exciting. Don't get me wrong, as is the idea of automating away drudgery, all of my spreadsheets and documents, for example. But generative AI does not do these things. Putting aside any personal feelings I may have, it has not changed my life or even like slightly improved it. And I'm a guy who loves using tech and is willing to put hours, hours into finding solutions to automate or mitigate very small problems that I only really deal with occasionally.

13:52I'm not lazy, I'm efficient. At least that's what I tell my doctor. And I don't know a single person that has meaningfully changed their workflow or life as a result of generative AI, outside of being able to integrate it to speed up some part of their already existing system. I've literally never met or spoken to someone other than one guy on Twitter who has talked about using this every day in a way that truly changes things. and i should as an aside i do occasionally get someone on twitter and it's always a blue check and they always say oh yeah well it's changed the way i code it she's changed it allows me to code so much faster they then get 18 responses of someone saying i'm an engineer and this is very unstable and it really feels like generative ai is just catnip for the truly incurious i don't want to say lazy because i think everyone is kind of lazy on some level we all want things to be easier.

14:48We really do. And there is, when it comes to creativity, a degree where the problems you face making something are what makes it what it is. The struggles I've had writing and reading this script are what make me a better orator or a better writer. That process is important, but it's hard and it's annoying and you have to suck a few times. You have to write crap. You have to retake things three or four times and your poor editor Matt Ossowski sitting there going, mate, you've re-read that paragraph three times. You messed the same word up. But it's fun. This is what curiosity is. And I don't think these people have it.

15:23These people don't want to solve software problems. They want to type a thing into a computer, hit enter, and then the problem is solved, never understanding why they did it. And this isn't the same thing as calculators, by the way. I'd argue software development is art, but that's a separate thing. and ultimately this whole movement just doesn't even feel real nothing about it really felt real it's it's just a farce it costs so much money and it's still costing so much money today and the promises of artificial intelligence will not be kept through the pursuit of generative ai as generative ai is a dead-end technology that has peaked and it costs too much both financially and socially to keep it going or to justify its continued existence there's no heroic story here.

16:08There are a few people who are sincerely cheering for these companies to win. Those who, of course, don't have a tangible financial return, banking on the value of OpenAI, or they have one of the hundred different guys claiming they have an AI newsletter. And let's be honest, nobody really loves this, do they? Nobody really uses ChatGPT and has that oh shit moment you got when you first used an iPhone, when you first sent a file with Dropbox. Those little times when you really fell in love with technology again and again. and there's no magic in it. There's no whimsy. There's no joy in any of these large language models.

16:42And they're not really helping enough people to make it worthwhile. I nearly said they're not helping anybody, but there are users. There are people who actually care about this. But how much do they really care? And does any of that outweigh the costs and the environmental damage? The answer's no, by the way. And their peddlers always demand that we just give them another minute as they burn billions of dollars to get nowhere. And the general public has known the problems and limitations of generative AI for months. I constantly get emails from better offline listeners, artists, engineers, teachers, machinists, poison makers, journalists, consultants, cleaners, and copy editors all saying the same thing.

17:24This all seems like a crock of shit and the outputs are terrible because people who actually make things respect the output and the production itself, and they can see how bad this stuff is. Generative AI was also not peddled as a solution to any problem other than tech's lack of a hyper-growth market. And it's the kind of bet that only a tech industry devoid of natural selection truly builds. None of these big tech firms, and I'd argue venture capitalists, really take risks anymore because they don't want to end up looking stupid and they want to follow each other. And regular people know. They know Google is worse.

17:58They know Facebook is bordering on unusable. They know that generative AI does not do anything obviously useful at scale, and that these companies have never made more money than they're making today as they fuck the customer again and again. And I believe we're in the beginnings of a true revolt against big tech and their rotten little promises. Their luck's run out, and these formless private equity vehicles dressed up as software companies are no longer bred to create new things. We're all sitting and staring at Innovations Corp, stabbed full of holes by mckinsey veterans and slimy con artists and it's time for men like sandar peshai and satya nadella to atone because their big bet looks like a gigantic waste one so obviously rotten from the beginning that they've never been able to tell anyone that they never had a plan beyond throw money at it and eventually it will do something or we will do this as long as the other guy does it too this is a big ugly mess a monument to the excess that burned more than 200 billion dollars and allowed equally lazy and uncreative people to replace real people with shitty facsimiles that are just good enough.

19:01But do you want to be more than good enough? Do you want to excel in all things as I demand of all my listeners? Then buy one of the following products, which, as usual, will reflect my exact beliefs, wants, and needs.

19:24washablesofas.com and discover Anabay, where designer style meets budget-friendly prices, with sofas starting at$699. Anabay brings you the ultimate in furniture innovation with a modular design that allows you to rearrange your space effortlessly. Perfect for both small and large spaces, Anabay is the only machine washable sofa inside and out. Say goodbye to stains and messes with liquid and stain-resistant fabrics that make cleaning easy. Liquid simply slides right off. Designed for custom comfort, our high resilience foam lets you choose between a sink and feel or a supportive memory foam blend.

19:58Plus our pet friendly stain resistant fabrics ensure your sofa stays beautiful for years. Don't compromise quality for price. Visit washablesofas.com to upgrade your living space today with no risk returns and a 30 day money back guarantee. Get up to 60 % off plus free shipping and free returns. Shop now at washablesofas.com. Authors are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply. Parking shouldn't slow you down. ParkWiz gives every driver a shortcut. Book ahead, save up to 50 % and skip the hassle of circling the block. Park smarter, park faster. ParkWiz. Download the ParkWiz app today and save every time you park.

20:36So I've shopped with quints before they were an advertiser and after they became one. And then again, before I had to record this ad, I really like them. My green over shirt in particular looks great. I use it like a jacket. It's breathable and comfortable and hangs in my body nicely. I get a lot of compliments. I liked it so much. I got it in all the different colors, along with one of their corduroy ones, which I think I pull off. And really, that's the only person that matters. I also really love their linen shirts, too. They're comfortable, they're breathable, and they look nice. Get a lot of compliments there, too.

21:04I have a few of them. Love their rust-colored ones as well. And in general, I really like quints. The shirts fit nicely, and the rest of their clothes do, too. They ship quickly, they look good, they're high quality, and they partner directly with ethical factories and skip the middlemen. So you get top-tier fabrics and craftsmanship at half the price of similar brands. And I'm probably going to buy more from them very, very soon. Keep it classic and cool this fall with long-lasting staples from Quince. Go to quince.com slash better for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns. That's q-u-i-n-c-e dot com slash better.

21:37Free shipping and 365-day returns. Quince.com slash better. This week on a very special episode of Health Discovered, We're taking a closer look at a condition that affects hundreds of thousands of men each year, prostate cancer. I first found out about my cancer at the age of 45. Anything with cancer, you just think death sentence. In this episode, we'll explore the science behind detection, along with the practical steps men can take to protect their health. Listen to Health Discovered on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Open your free iHeart app, search Health Discovered, and start listening.

22:43banking. Truist, leaders in banking, unwavering in care. See what knowledge and care can do for you at truest.com slash unstoppable. Truist, member FDIC, leading based on top 10 commercial bank. And we're back. And now that I'm back, I want to say something to my peers in the media. It's time for a fundamental reevaluation of how we treat big tech. And it's time to question the promises of those who sought to peddle this generative nonsense. It's no longer time to ask Mark Zuckerberg about his chain. It's time to ask him how long he intends to burn tens of billions of dollars on nothing, and why the website that made him so many billions of dollars is falling apart at the seams, pumped full of content created by the big stupid bullshit machine he's helped popularize.

23:32It's no longer time to gingerly coo about Sander Pichai. Oh, he's looking at my smartphone. It's time to ask him how Gemini is going to make a profit, and what it is that it will do and press him again and again and again and again and again until he talks about why Google search is so bad now. It's no longer time to let Satya Nadella oscillate from referendums on capitalism 2020 to laying off tens of thousands of people in 2023. It's time to ask him if he's prepared to bankroll open AI to the tune of 30 billion dollars and refuse to leave the conversation without committing to a number. These men have burned hundreds of billions of dollars on a machine that boils lakes to make the most mediocre version of the past.

24:12These men are not supporting innovation. Their aggressive force is too scared to piss off the markets to actually change the world, domesticated animals that fear no natural predators and thus have no hunger for something new. They propped up generative AI because they're followers rather than leaders that have paid hundreds of millions of dollars to empower a nihilistic kind of growth capitalism that dresses up monopolies as disruption. They have propped up generative AI because building the future is hard and expensive and involves taking risks and making sure that you have a culture that doesn't expect the answer to a question in the fastest amount of time possible.

24:44Innovation isn't efficient. It's lossy. It has indeterminate timescales and requires both capital investment and space required for great people to think of actual solutions to problems that involve them, talking to and caring about the lives of real people. Fire Sachin the Deller of Microsoft. Fire Sandar Pichai of Google and work out a way to fire Mark Zuckerberg of Meta. These men are unworthy. They do not find any of this exciting or meaningful. They have no curiosity. They're private equity guys dressed up as software guys. They are con artists. They are running their products into the ground, and they're making more money than ever.

25:23Big tech has been overcome with narcissism and nihilism, and it must change its ways to not eventually face perdition. I am fucking serious. Do you think these people have a backup plan? Do you think they've burned all of this money on such a mediocre and wasteful solution because they've got other, better ideas? No, they're all out. Big tech does not have another thing. Google doesn't have any ideas. Meta is so out of ideas that they changed their name to another, worse idea, one associated with Mark Zuckerberg burning$45 billion for no reason. In fact, there's a Yahoo Finance story about the fact that all of that money that's allegedly going into the Metaverse is just organizational loss.

26:02It's a horribly run place where the management constantly changes. These goddamn people. And Amazon, they've never really been in the ideas business. They're the founder of a cloud storage cartel with Microsoft, Oracle, and Google. They work together to set the prices. Everyone wins except anyone who isn't them. And big tech is lazy because they've all agreed to compete only a little bit, never coloring too far out the lines, because doing so might expose them to an actual risk like regulation or having to hire people that built new things versus finding increasingly more annoying ways to exploit their current customers.

Read the full transcript

26:37And I really am sure that there's a societal shift coming against big tech. The natural result of years of excess and bullshit, of the loudest people in tech trying to convince people that a large language model that can generate texts and images that kind of suck is basically the same thing as an iPhone. I have no idea how quickly the shift comes, but it's coming. It's inevitable. This lack of big profitable ideas will eventually lead to some sort of reckoning or collapse in big tech. Healthy, well-run companies, they don't do things like this, let alone several different trillion dollar companies all bumbling into each other like the Three Stooges, billions of dollars of cash falling out of their pockets.

27:17It's an absolute disgrace. I will say, if the AI bubble really does pop, this is a great time to point and laugh. Regular people like yourself could see this was bullshit from the beginning. Most people find generative AI either briefly interesting or somewhat disgusting, and they're capable of seeing that stealing the entire internet so you could spend$100 billion making a shittier version of the past is kind of a stupid idea. The utility really hasn't been there from the beginning. Describing what ChatGPT is is actually kind of difficult, and any technology that's going to be worth trillions of dollars should not have the users saying, wait, what does this do exactly?

27:56And I really feel like regular people notice this. If this was as magical as it was, regular people would be lining up to use it. And while it has a lot of users, I don't know anyone who's fanatical over it other than AI fanatics. It's just very sad. But regular people aren't the only ones. And I have criticized journalists for missing this, but I want to call some people out in a good way. Economists, analysts, and journalists have been saying this isn't the future, like I said. Shira of V-Day in March 2023, mere months after ChatGPT's launch, said it wasn't magic, for example, in the Washington Post.

28:31Shira, the goat. Alex Kantrowitz and Douglas Gorman reported in August 15th, 2023 that ChatGPT isn't good enough to take jobs and it's unlikely to cause mass layoffs. The hot takes have run into reality. Little bit early, but you're correct. Paris Marks called the ChatGPT revolution another tech fantasy in July 2023, and Gary Marcus worried about generative AI being a dud in August 2023. While this is by no means an exhaustive list, it's important to note that people have been saying this, people with big platforms, and the markets chose to ignore them. As an aside, a year later, when many outlets were still tripping over themselves to say that generative AI was the future, Shura Vida of the Washington Post asked, if these chatbots are supposed to be magical, why are so many of them as dumb as rocks?

29:17It's important to call out when a national newspaper actually does the work that needs to be done to critique the powerful. Good work, Shearer. Open invite to come on the show. At this point, it seems inevitable that the bubble will burst, that the acceleration has stopped, that the funding won't be there, and that the market's taste for the billions of dollars it's going to take to make generative AI some indeterminate level of better just really isn't there. By all means, tell me I'm wrong. You certainly do on Twitter and you certainly do on email. And I'd be genuinely intrigued to see how open AI wriggles out of this jam, especially because it would mean they made a meaningful product that makes money when they don't have the chips to train GPT-5, a model that likely still wouldn't change the game enough to matter.

29:59I mean, what if they have a new architecture, I guess? But I refuse to give them credit for something they haven't done yet. And in the event that OpenAI or Anthropic is able to raise again, we'll see the cycle continue another quarter, I'm confident, at which point something crazy would need to happen to make any of this worth it. If these companies can actually raise, they'll keep the bubble inflated, but it really is borrowed time. There's enough money to fund them both maybe one more time and after that, where is the profit? Where's this going? And it's really worth considering that the narrative is bad and that there is very little that anyone can really do to change it outside of something truly incredible.

30:37These companies can play for time, hope that Sachin Adela and Sondar Pichai stand pat and say that they have great faith in the promise of AI, but I really don't think they get another series of earnings for big tech like this. In many ways, though, this is Sam Altman's greatest gambit, and so much lies on OpenAI's back as a result. This is the moment we find out if Sam Altman has really got it, whether it's worth agonizing and wringing our hands about how scary he is, or whether he's just able to hoodwink enough credulous billionaires that have their hands welded to eternal money printers. Impress me, Samuel.

31:15Wake up, Sammy, Mr. Altman. Bring me the technology. Show me what you've got. Show me your great works. Show me the works you have buried in that non-profit, for-profit monstrosity you've used to trick other visionless power brokers into giving you their entire futures for a dead-end friend best known for an absenteeism that rankled his peers and some of the startups he was supposed to nurture. Show me what you've got, Sam. Show us all. You're so smart. You allegedly can solve problems in a single phone call. Everyone talks about your big brain. What's the big play, big guy? You've got maybe six months, and that's the most generous estimate I've got.

31:56What is it? What's the plan? Wait, what's that? Search GPT? Search GPT? Sam, you're crazy. You're crazy, Mr. Altman. There's no way you can build a Google search competitor. Trust me, I know. No, really, I worked it out. I spent a few hours looking up Google's financial reports over the last decade or so, trying to figure out how much the company spends on operating costs and capital expenditures, just related to search alone. Due to the way Google structures its financials, I had to make some guesses, some more informed than others. But I reckon it costs Google about$30 billion a year to run their search product, and that's not taking into account the cost of degenerative AI-powered search summaries.

32:34All right, Sam, here we are. So that's$30 billion a year to create something that can scale to the size of Google Search. And that's just the start. You with me, man? Things do not get easier. You see, you're not just building a Google Search competitor with SearchGPT, as you also have to build the ad tech infrastructure to actually make money off of it, which you are not good at. Okay, but you've got to copy features from companies like DoubleClick, which Google acquired in 2007 for$3.1 billion and pretty much underpins the whole operation. Or maybe you have to build something like AdWords, which Google got when it acquired Applied Semantics in 2003.

33:08You will need something like both of these. And that's going to cost you in the best light, in the best day ever, about$3 billion. Or you're going to have to outsource it, which will make it worse and less profitable because outsourced companies are going to take a cut of your revenue, thus reducing your margins, which are already really bad. then you've got to hire experienced ad personnel and use that ad tech infrastructure you built you built that right to enter a market google will use their entire cartel power to kick you out of wait what was that sam wait what right right you've got to make money and ideally more of it than you spend something as i've mentioned you have some issues with like i said google search costs an absolute shit ton to run 30 billion dollars easy and that's with decades of optimization a coding language that they invented, thousands of miles of underground cables, and decades of experience in doing a thing you're just learning to do.

33:57And they have PhDs who specialize it, who've been at the company decades. You did all that? Whoa. Okay, Sam, I'm impressed. You're on a roll. You can do this. I believe in you, Mr. Altman. Now, just checking. How many ad salespeople do you have? What's that? None? You don't have any ad salespeople for your search engine? Sam, you're going to need them. Google had over 30 ,000 ad salespeople before its last round of layoffs. You're not going to make this thing profitable without ads. In fact, I don't think, Sam, you're going to make this search product profitable at all. But you know what may or may not be profitable?

34:29One of our advertisers, who will soon invade your living room, car, or other place you listen to podcasts, filling your various crevices with commerce. Behold their bounty.

34:47Tired of spills and stains on your sofa? Washable Sofas.com has your back. Featuring the Anabay Collection, the only designer sofa that's machine washable inside and out. Where designer quality meets budget-friendly prices. That's right, sofas start at just$699. Enjoy a no-risk experience with pet-friendly, stain-resistant, and changeable slipcovers made with performance fabrics. Experience cloud-like comfort with high-resilience foam that's hypoallergenic and never needs fluffing. The sturdy steel frame ensures longevity, and the modular pieces can be rearranged anytime. Check out washablesofas.com and get up to 60 % off your Anabay sofa, backed by a 30-day satisfaction guarantee.

35:31If you're not absolutely in love, send it back for a full refund. No return shipping or restocking fees. Every penny back. Upgrade now at washablesofas.com. Offers are subject to change, and certain restrictions may apply. Parking shouldn't slow you down. ParkWiz gives every driver a shortcut. Book ahead, save up to 50 % and skip the hassle of circling the block. Park smarter, park faster. ParkWiz. Download the ParkWiz app today and save every time you park. This week on a very special episode of Health Discovered, we're taking a closer look at a condition that affects hundreds of thousands of men each year, prostate cancer.

36:12I first found out about my cancer at the age of 45. Anything with cancer, you just think death sentence. In this episode, we'll explore the science behind detection, along with the practical steps men can take to protect their health. Listen to Health Discovered on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Open your free iHeart app, search Health Discovered and start listening. Hey guys, it's Erin Andrews from Calm Down with Erin and Carissa. So when the pressure's on, you remember the people who helped you get this far, whose knowledge guided you and whose care kept you grounded. For me, it was my dad, my mentor, who believed in me when I was just getting started in journalism.

36:53A real-life example that showed me when you work with someone who knows a lot and cares even more, you're unstoppable. At Truist, that's exactly how they approach banking. Truist, leaders in banking, unwavering in care. See what knowledge and care can do for you at truest.com slash unstoppable. Truist, member FDIC, leading based on top 10 commercial bank. A life that's carefree needs hair that's worry-free. Have both with Mori. Reduce shedding and thinning in as little as 12 weeks with clinically proven, all-natural Mori nourishing hair care products. Others containing sulfates, parabens, and GMOs can actually weaken your hair over time.

37:32You can look great for holiday photos. Still not sure? We get it. So right now, purchase Mori at 50 % off while it lasts. And take a quiz for a custom hair care recommendation at moerie.com. Results can vary. Mori is not a substitute for medical advice. See website for more.

37:52All right, all right, we're back and I'll dispense with the Sam Altman bit. So when I was looking up Google's financials, as I mentioned, I was able to make a few educated guesses. And I've got a hunch that Google has about a 35 % profit margin, which is pretty good. but that's with over two decades of infrastructure and a near monopoly on the search market open ai has a none of those things they don't really own their infrastructure at all as i mentioned and it's going to be relying entirely on gpt for the most part which is insanely power and compute intensive and thus costs a lot more and as i've said a billion times already gpt and other transformer based architecture is deeply unprofitable unsustainable and that's before you even get to the hallucinations the hallucinations that underpin your search engine you need to be profitable, which isn't profitable.

38:36Oh boy, this is really bad for them. Assuming the bulk of the cost associated with running Google search comes from the vast number of servers required to actually power it, it's hard to imagine how anything OpenAI does could even ever reach a profit, even if they had the monopoly Google has. Now, I'm confident that OpenAI is trying to raise capital right now on the idea that SearchGPT is able to create a meaningful competitor to the most profitable software business ever made, one that Google will likely protect with various monopolistic weapons like its treasure trove of patents. While the Department of Justice did just declare that Google had a monopoly over the search market, and I'll get to that in an upcoming episode, it will take years for things to move on that front, and nothing about this situation fixes any of OpenAI's problems.

39:22On top of that, Google spends, as I previously mentioned, billions of dollars on hardware and property, and OpenAI would likely have to build infrastructure that dwarfs even the outlays of generative AI to scale a search engine that could handle even hundreds of millions, let alone the billions of people that use Google search. It could get Microsoft to build it or lease it from the likes of Oracle, and Microsoft could probably pay for it too. But that would be another massive increase in capital expenditures at a time when the markets are waiting for the stuff to make money rather than the companies to spend more money on it.

39:54And I also should note that Microsoft recently described OpenAI as a competitor in the search business, and it's unlikely to kill Bing, which has been profitable since 2016. Let's be honest though, this is all fan fiction. OpenAI isn't competing with Google search. It would cost too much money, and the underlying technology is neither good enough nor efficient enough to actually support a search engine at scale. And even if it was, is it better? Probably not. What about ChatGPT says that it's going to be more reliable than Google search. And God, all of this is such a boring fucking farce. We're not watching startups mess around Silicon Valley experimenting in ways to fix weird problems.

40:32We're watching big tech outsource their research and development costs to one of a few hand-selected con artists that they'll drop the second that Wall Street gets pissy. Why even pretend anymore? Anthropic is propped up by Google and Amazon who invested billions of dollars in cloud credits. Microsoft props up OpenAI to the point that the NVIDIA chips crisis affected it because daddy Microsoft was buying them for OpenAI to use. And Google, Amazon and Microsoft are all making their own models to the point that Microsoft has already reported, like I said, that they see OpenAI as a competitor. It's just, it's just all so craven.

41:07Big Tech funded a cloud-dependent product that costs so much more than anything else in the market based on a spacious hype about what artificial intelligence could or could not do. They do so as a means of selling a new product, one that, while not particularly useful, also means that they can charge a lot for the cloud compute service it runs on, creating demand for a product that pays them money just for existing, allowing them to vastly expand their physical data center locations, further enforcing their monopolies over the cloud storage industry. Microsoft, Google, Meta, and Amazon created a new way to turn money into more money, investing in a tech that required you to pay them all a lot of money for cloud computing services to run on, like I said.

41:47The problem, it seems, was that none of them were willing to consider a world where this stuff never really turned into anything remarkable other than in its waste. And a lack of creativity in the tallest towers of the valley in Redmond has allowed the richest men in the industry to be conned by a snake oil machine that loses billions of billions of dollars. To be clear, there's nothing wrong on its face inherently with generative AI. It does interesting things with documents, and I fully believe there'll be some lo-fi version of generative AI that plugs around silently once the hyperscalers piss off.

42:17My problem is that it's so horribly wasteful to put all of this money into these large language models, the ones that steal everything, that require so much energy and create so little in return. Now, the reason I brought up previously the whole calculation of open AI needing$5-10 billion to survive is because I wanted to make it clear how expensive them staying in place is. That is the money they will need to continue building the thing they are doing today. They don't have anything in reserve. I'm confident about it. Maybe they can survive. Maybe they can surprise me. Maybe that can happen. But I just don't really see it happening.

42:56Greg Brockman's gone. And I mean, he was just another non-technical guy. What's going to happen? You think Mira Morati's going to come up with something? You think Sora's going to do it? No, they don't have anything. And I realize it's so strange to say this, especially if you're a member of the media listening to this. I know it's strange to accept this, but what if they're just full of shit? What if this is the best they've got? How do we deal with this? And I think we start by accepting that all of this was completely and utterly ridiculous. We live in incredible times. We're at a boiling point in the tech industry's history where these sins of excess and this total lack of vision have crippled big tech's ability to make new things.

43:37Things have been too easy, too comfortable and too frictionless for too long for people like Sundar Pichai and Satya Nadella and even people like Larry Page and Sergey Brin who are the only two people who can fire Sundar from Google. Tech needs to go back to creating interesting and cool things and having companies run by people that actually care about building them. Technology is capable of solving real problems, or at least it has been in the past, and proven time and time again how profitable it can be to do so. And I believe it can do just fine without having four or five companies that do every single thing that technology can do at the same time in the hopes that they can monopolize it.

44:13I don't think the most powerful people in tech realize how frustrated people are, how deeply affected by technology everyone is, even those who don't identify as tech nerds or enthusiasts. And I think men like Sandar Pichai and Satya Nadella are deeply unaware of how ready people are for a change, how disgusted they are by the cratering quality of the average tech product at a time when executives have never been richer. Regular consumers know that Google search sucks. They know that Facebook sucks. They know that websites are worse, that they visit certain ones and there's 18 pop-ups and your phone's really hot.

44:49They know that their iPhones are randomly trying to make them buy Apple News. and they know that there are people responsible tim cook eddie q at apple by the way welcome to come on the show but guys stop trying to sell me apple news i don't want it i don't want any of this apple shit don't make me use it unless i have to other than i message but moving on there are real targets here there are people that need to go to fix things sundar peshaya and satya nadella must go they are no longer trustworthy stewards of the future and have inspired hundreds of billions of dollars of waste in the hearts of their equally myopic competitors.

45:26These men do not care about their customers. They don't fear competition. And the government should break every single hyperscaler up. Google, Meta, Amazon, Apple, Oracle, all of them, and find ways to stop them ever growing so large in the future. Maybe we shouldn't have such large tech companies. Maybe we don't need multiple trillion dollar juggernauts that do everything in a shitty way. Maybe we don't need companies that do online advertising and also provide a platform, because that kind of monopoly leads to insane incentives like you're seeing with Google Search and Facebook. And we all deserve better.

46:04And the way to get there is to say the names of those responsible, to document their disgraceful acts, and call for accountability again and again and again and again until something actually happens and changes. And it is changing. The narrative is changing and soon it will shift more aggressively and more violently against big tech. And I think this is a great thing for the world and ultimately to take industry at large. Now, as we see the bubble, the AI bubble collapse, I must be clear, none of this is a victory lap for me. This is not actually how I wish this went. I wish this bubble had burst earlier.

46:38It would have caused less harm to the environment, to the markets, to the freelancers who lose their jobs, to the artists who email me every week. It would have wasted less money, taken less attention away from the rest of the industry, and allowed Sam Altman to accumulate less money and power. Instead, this bubble has been allowed to swell so large that it will only emphasize how bereft of ideas big tech has become, and the consequences are a growing distint against tech from the general public. And this era was ultimately the result of a lack of fear in the hearts of big tech, and a deeply held belief that their positions were permanent and their customers were trapped.

47:12My purpose in documenting this, in what feels at times like narrating the end of the world, I'm not looking to be a pundit or a talking head or a person who wants to be given credit for calling out the bubble, as none of these serve you, the customer, the listener, or history itself. What I say may be imperfect, but it exists to try and give you a clear understanding of what's happening, and yes, it's a little emotionally charged and very clear in its biases. I believe that the tech industry has lost its love and curiosity, and I find it disgusting. And the best way to fight back is to studiously explain things as they happen from my perspective at length, but with, I hope, a clarity that doesn't require a ton of technical knowledge.

47:52As things have accelerated, I've become a little more introspective about the role of my podcast, my newsletter, and my posts. I don't have a particularly profound conclusion other than that I believe that I have a brevity and clarity about the tech industry that many don't, and I also find that I'm extremely fast at writing, and I also find this all very interesting because I'm a horrible little goblin. And I don't talk for nearly two hours or write thousands of words because I desperately need the attention, which I do love. I do it for the thrill. I like covering this stuff. And because if I don't say these things out loud, the cats in my brain will eventually try and emerge.

48:26But seriously though, I do these things because I need to. This is important to me. Maybe I'm fighting back. Maybe I just like creating. I don't really know. This is me processing watching an industry I care deeply about get ransacked again and again by people who don't seem to actually care about technology The internet made me who I am connecting me and in many cases introducing me to the people I hold dearest to my heart It let me run a successful pr business despite having a learning disability Dyspraxia or as it's called in america developmental coordination disorder That makes it difficult for me to write words with a pen and thrive despite being regularly told in secondary school that I wouldn't amount to much Any of you listening, go fuck yourself.

49:05I believe that there are many, many, many people that have been allowed to live better, fuller, more meaningful lives as a result of technology. And I believe that the people who built the tools that allowed them to do so no longer control the future. And that makes me really fucking annoyed. I refuse to watch this bullshit happen in silence. And I encourage you, as I have before, to fill social media and conversations with the names of those responsible. Sachin Adela of Microsoft, Sundar Pishai of Google, Mark Zuckerberg of Meta, Andy Jassy of Amazon, Sam Altman of Associated Cons, Mira Morati, CTO of OpenAI, and Reid Hoffman, the venture capitalist who seems to always benefit over the next bullshit machine.

49:46All responsible for this echoing nihilism that's created the generative AI boom. All of these people will be fine, by the way. When this collapses, all of these people will be just fine. Multi-billionaires, they'll be just fine. but the people that won't be are the people they will lay off the people that have invested and lost money in these things the people that may even come to rely on chat gpt in some small way who won't be able to afford it when it goes tits up or gets jacked up price-wise because that's the only way to make it affordable for the company or maybe all of this just disappears and these customers are left with nothing but sometimes i understand you might feel a little doomed The doomer in you.

50:27Someone recently called me a doomer, which really pissed me off because I'm not. I'm angry. And I know some of you might be too. I won't say you're angry. That isn't fair. But based on the emails I get, some of you seem pretty pissed. And I'm not speaking for you here, but I'm angry because I know that tech can be cooler and better and more interesting. That there are real problems of poverty and climate change, of the myriad systems that don't connect very well on every laptop and phone. ways that things can be better problems that can be solved but right now they need to put tens of billions of dollars into generative ai come on man we can do better than this and while there might be little you can do to them directly i encourage you to say these names to your friends on social media prabhagar ragavan remember him from google tell people all about him too i encourage you to let anybody and everybody you know know who's responsible for this.

51:25Because ultimately, what may pop the AI bubble is a narrative. And narratives shift. And narratives are shifted by word of mouth. And they shift because of people like you, and like me, who never shut up.

51:45Thank you for listening to Better Offline. The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song is Matosowski. You can check out more of his music and audio projects at matosowski.com. M-A-T-T-O-S-O-W-S-K-I.com. You can email me at ez at betteroffline.com or visit betteroffline.com to find more podcast links and of course my newsletter. I also really recommend you go to chat.wheresyoured.at to visit the discord and go to r slash better offline to check out our reddit. Thank you so much for listening.

52:50Tired of spills and stains on your sofa? Washablesofas.com has your back. Featuring the Anabay Collection, the only designer sofa that's machine washable inside and out, where designer quality meets budget-friendly prices. That's right. Sofas start at just$699. Enjoy a no-risk experience with pet-friendly, stain-resistant, and changeable slipcovers made with performance fabrics. Experience cloud-like comfort with high-resilience foam that's hypoallergenic and never needs fluffing. The sturdy steel frame ensures longevity, and the modular pieces can be rearranged anytime. Check out washablesofas.com and get up to 60 % off your Anabay sofa, backed by a 30-day satisfaction guarantee.

53:35If you're not absolutely in love, send it back for a full refund. No return shipping or restocking fees. Every penny back. Upgrade now at washablesofas.com. Offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply. Parking shouldn't slow you down. ParkWiz gives every driver a shortcut. Book ahead, save up to 50 % and skip the hassle of circling the block. Park smarter, park faster. ParkWiz. Download the ParkWiz app today and save every time you park. Hey guys, it's Erin Andrews from Calm Down with Erin and Carissa. So when the pressure's on, you remember the people who helped you get this far.

54:13whose knowledge guided you and whose care kept you grounded. For me, it was my dad, my mentor, who believed in me when I was just getting started in journalism. A real-life example that showed me when you work with someone who knows a lot and cares even more, you're unstoppable. At Truist, that's exactly how they approach banking. Truist, leaders in banking, unwavering in care. See what knowledge and care can do for you at truest.com slash unstoppable. Truest, member FDIC, leading based on top 10 commercial bank.

55:10Lenovo, Lenovo. Unlock AI experiences with the ThinkPad X1 Carbon, powered by Intel Core Ultra processors, so you can work, create, and boost productivity all on one device. Are you a business owner or entrepreneur in need of a fast funding solution? Amerifactors provides fast capital. Call today for a free, no-obligation quote at 800-884-FUND. Startups, rapid growth stage, or struggling, even with less than perfect credit, including bankruptcies. In business for over 34 years, thousands of satisfied clients have transformed their cash flow with Amerifactors. Call Amerifactors today at 800-884-FUND.

55:49That's 800-884-3863. Or visit Amerifactors.com. This is an iHeart Podcast.

From the publisher

As the AI bubble collapses, it's time for the tech industry to repent, and to recognize that the future cannot be decided entirely by four or five trillion-dollar firms that are no longer capable of innovation, only copying other people's ideas. In this episode, Ed Zitron walks you through how the generative AI boom shows how little big tech cares about actual innovation - and how this might eventually lead to their collapse.

LINKS: http://www.tinyurl.com/betterofflinelinks 

Newsletter: wheresyoured.at 

Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/betteroffline 

Discord: chat.wheresyoured.at 

Ed's Socials:

http://www.twitter.com/edzitron 

instagram.com/edzitron 

https://bsky.app/profile/zitron.bsky.social

https://www.threads.net/@edzitron 

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Better Offline

All 276 episodes
Big Tech Is The Enemy of InnovationBetter Offline · 43 min
Listen in VO