In short
Better Offline Podcast Summary
Episode Title
Empires of AI With Karen Hao
Episode Overview In this episode of *Better Offline*, host Ed Zitron engages in a deep discussion with Karen Hao, author of *Empire of AI*. They explore the implications of artificial intelligence, specifically focusing on OpenAI and the broader arms race in AI development. The conversation highlights the parallels between historical colonialism and the current AI landscape.
Key Topics Discussed
- Colonialism and AI
- Comparison: Karen Hao draws parallels between historical empires and modern AI companies, suggesting that today's tech giants exploit resources and labor similarly to colonial powers.
- Exploitation: The tech industry claims to bring progress and modernity, yet often serves the interests of elite tech figures at the cost of societal well-being.
- Data Ownership: Companies are seen as taking ownership of data that does not belong to them, reflecting a new kind of colonialism.
- OpenAI's Evolution
- Initial Enthusiasm: Early excitement surrounding OpenAI's mission was met with skepticism as the organization demonstrated increasing secrecy and lack of transparency.
- Research vs. Product: There was a significant shift from research focus to product releases in OpenAI's development, indicating a potential misalignment of goals.
- Organizational Structure: Early disorganization within OpenAI led to confusion about its mission, with internal disagreements complicating the company's direction.
- Personal Insights on AI Leaders
- Sam Altman: Altman is portrayed as a charismatic and persuasive leader whose true beliefs remain unclear even to those close to him.
- Dario Amadei: Amadei is described as a true believer in AGI, but his scientific background sometimes clashes with the business realities of leading a tech company.
- Jack Clark: Clark's evolution from a critical journalist to a figure within the AI community reflects the normalization of certain ideologies in tech.
- Ideological Beliefs and Culture
- Echo Chambers: Many within the AI field become entrenched in a singular worldview, believing in the inevitability of AGI due to their constant immersion in a supportive environment.
- Existential Stakes: There is a pervasive anxiety among AI leaders regarding the implications of their work, often described as existential threats to humanity.
Key Takeaways
- The narrative around AI often mirrors historical frameworks of power and exploitation, necessitating a critical perspective on technological advancements.
- OpenAI's trajectory showcases the complexities and contradictions within the tech industry, particularly regarding transparency and corporate motives.
- Personalities within the AI realm, including Sam Altman and Dario Amadei, are influenced by an ideological commitment to progress, even as they navigate the challenges of leadership and ethics.
Final Thoughts Karen Hao emphasizes the need for a critical examination of the tech industry's claims and motivations, urging listeners to recognize the broader societal implications of AI development. The episode serves as a cautionary tale about the potential for modern empires built on technology to replicate the mistakes of historical colonialism.
For more insights from Karen Hao, visit her [website](https://karendhao.com).
---
*This episode of Better Offline was recorded and produced by Cool Zone Media. For more episodes and updates, visit [Better Offline](https://betteroffline.com).*
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This is an iHeart Podcast.
0:30Thomson Reuters and specialized bikes have since they upgraded to the next generation of the cloud. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. OCI is the blazing fast platform for your infrastructure, database, application development, and AI needs, where you can run any workload in a high availability, consistently high performance environment, and spend less than you would with other clouds. How is it faster? OCI's block storage gives you more operations per second. Cheaper? OCI costs up to 50 % less for computing, 70 % less for storage, and 80 % less for networking. Better? In test after test, OCI customers report lower latency and higher bandwidth versus other clouds.
1:12This is the cloud built for AI and all your biggest workloads. Right now, with zero commitment, try OCI for free. Head to oracle.com slash strategic. That's oracle.com slash strategic. Wells Fargo has awarded$138 million in grants to nonprofits, supporting military and veterans with housing, small business, career transition, and more over the last 10 years. It's one of the many ways Wells Fargo seeks broad impact in communities. Wells Fargo, the bank of doing. Learn more at wellsfargo.com slash say do. Support includes contributions from Wells Fargo and Company and the Wells Fargo Foundation.
1:52This week on a very special episode of Health Discovered, we're taking a closer look at a condition that affects hundreds of thousands of men each year, prostate cancer. I first found out about my cancer at the age of 45. Anything with cancer, you just think death sentence. In this episode, we'll explore the science behind detection along with the practical steps men can take to protect their health. Listen to Health Discovered on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Open your free iHeart app, search Health Discovered, and start listening. CallZone Media Hello and welcome to Better Offline.
2:34I'm your host, Ed Zitron.
2:44Better Offline. As ever, remember, you can buy better offline merchandise. Link is in the episode notes. Today, I'm joined by Karen Howe, the author of the upcoming book Empire of AI, which tells the story of open AI and the arms race surrounding large language models. Karen, thank you for joining me. Thank you so much for having me, Ed. So you describe the progress of these models and these companies as a kind of colonialism. Can you get into that for me? Yeah. So if you think about the way that empires of old operated during the very long history of European colonialism, they were essentially taking resources that were not their own, exploiting massive amounts of labor, as in not paying them or paying them extremely small amounts of money.
3:28and they were doing this all under a civilizing mission, this idea that they were bringing modernity and progress to all of humanity when in fact what was actually happening was they were just fortifying themselves and the empire and the people at the top of the empire and everyone else that kind of lived in the world had to live in the thrash of what the people at the top decided based on their whims for what was part of their self-serving agenda. And that's essentially what we're seeing with Empires of AI today where they are taking data that is not their own, they're laying claim to it. They're taking land, they're taking energy, they're taking water.
4:05They are exploiting massive amounts of labor, both labor that goes into the inputs for developing these AI models, but also exploiting labor in the sense that they are ultimately creating labor-automating technologies that is eroding away people's labor rights as we speak. And they're doing it under this civilizing mission of they are doing it for the benefit of all of humanity. And what I say in the book is empires of AI, they're not as overtly violent as empires of old. And so maybe that can become confusing and people think, oh, well, it can't be that bad. But the thing is, we've had 150 years of social and moral progress.
4:43And so empires of modern day are going to look different in the way that empires of old operated. And when you look just at the actual parallels, there are just so many extraordinary parallels between the kind of basis of empire building back then and now that I think it is fundamentally the only frame that I have found to really help understand and grapple with the sheer scope and scale and the actual, like, what is actually happening here within the AI industry. One theme from the book I also noticed was that despite all of the backs and forths between all the people, very rarely product came out, though.
5:26Like, it was interesting. There seemed to be all of these conversations about research and all of these things they were saying, but it usually just ended with, like, some sort of release and then kind of just moved on. Yeah. It almost makes me wonder what they're working on half the time. yeah you know it's I think it's a product of two different things um that that you notice that in the book one is that I finished writing the book before a lot of the most recent product releases came out um right that's just the nature of writing things on the time scale of books is yeah it's not fun yeah as it it I froze the manuscript in like the early days of January right before DeepSeek, right before Stargate, right before a string of other releases.
6:16So that's one is that through most of OpenAI's history, it was really more focused on research conversations. And it's only been in the last year or so that it's really dramatically shifted much more to talking about product. But the second reason is that I personally, that is my expertise. I came up in AI reporting covering the research. And so I wanted to focus on that in the book and really unpack it, especially because there's not as much reporting on the research these days. And I wanted to kind of track that history and the internal conversations that happen when people say that they're developing so-called AGI.
6:58And you talk about in 2019 in the book that your rose-colored glasses got knocked off by a story. What was it that really made you start being suspicious of these companies? Yeah, so I, in 2019 was when I started covering OpenAI and I embedded within the company for three days in August of 2019 to profile what had then become a newly minted, capped profit nested in a non-profit. it. And I think the thing that really started tipping me off was, it was actually really small things initially. The first thing was, they publicly professed to be this bastion of transparency, and they were going to share all of their research to the world.
7:42And they had accumulated a significant amount of goodwill on the basis of this idea. And they were raising, not literally fundraising, But they had amassed a lot of capital on the basis of this idea. And when I started embedding within the company, I realized that they were incredibly secretive. Like they were not, they wouldn't allow me to see anything or talk to anyone beyond very strictly sanctioned conversations. And even in those conversations, I would notice that researchers were giving side eye to the communications officer every other sentence because they were worried about stepping into a lane that was considered proprietary.
8:21And I was like, wait a minute, why are there things that are proprietary and why are people being secretive if all this is supposed to ultimately be shared with the public? But the other thing was, when I was talking with executives, like the very first interview that I had was with Greg Brockman and Ilya Satskever, the CTO and chief scientist. And I just asked them very basic questions like, why do you think we should spend this much money on AGI and not on something else? And can you articulate for me, what does AGI look like? What would you even want AGI to do? And can you articulate for me, you know, part of their origin story as a company was they want to build AGI, good AGI first before the bad people build bad AGI.
9:08So I was like, well, what would bad AGI look like as well? Or like, what are the harms that are coming out of some of this rapid AI progress? And they weren't able to answer any of those questions. And that was when I thought, hold on a second. I thought that this was a nonprofit meant to counter some of the ills of Silicon Valley. One of the ills being that most companies end up being thrown boatloads of cash without clear articulated ideas about what they're going to do with that cash. And here I am in this meeting room trying to just ask the most basic questions, like the most boilerplate stuff that there should be some kind of answer to.
9:54And they can't even answer that. So it seems like it is actually very much just an animal of Silicon Valley. This is not actually something different from what we're seeing with the rest of the tech industry. It felt as well, there was a comment, and forgive me for forgetting it exactly where, where it was like, our secrets could be written on a grain of rice or something like that. Yeah. And I have to admit, as I read it, I got this weird feeling like, does anyone actually have any IP? because when you actually look at the conversations they're having, and you are likely privy to more here, it felt like they wouldn't talk about what they were doing at all and not...
10:32I say this is run a PR firm, written a lot about the Valley. It feels like they'd say more, but no one wanted to say anything. Not even secret. It's like nobody really knew. And you even described some of the managerial stuff in there like no one really knew what was going on anyway. It just feels like a remarkably disorganized company considering the scale. Yeah, so I think early on at OpenAI, it was completely disorganized in the sense that they had no idea. They decide, okay, we're going to build this AGI thing. But then they were like, what does that even mean? We have no idea. And there weren't real managers at the company either because they had just gathered up a bunch of researchers from academia.
11:15And they didn't really have much of a sense of how to organize themselves other than a traditional academic lab where there's a professor and grad students. And I mean, academia, you know, has its function, but that ultimately wasn't the right structure for trying to move a group of people towards a similar goal. And over time, opening eye did start cleaning itself up a little bit. It did start restructuring itself. it started focusing more on GPT models because they hit on that in around 2018, 2019. But similarly, there's still just because there's no clarity about its mission and ultimately what it is trying to build, you end up with just a lot of rifts within the organization over this very fundamental question.
12:08People fundamentally disagree about what OpenAI is. They disagree about what AGI is. They disagree about what it means to ensure that something should benefit all of humanity. And I think because there was all this confusion or there were all these different interpretations ultimately of these like basic tenets of the organization, I think people also just, they wouldn't quite clearly articulate to one another what they were doing. It wasn't necessarily that they were trying to be secretive to one another. It was more just that they weren't really on the same page. And this eventually became sort of less and less true in the sense that as Sam Altman installed himself as CEO and started really exerting a particular type of path for AI progress, then they started having, you know, research documents that explicitly articulated, we are a scaling lab, like we are going after scale to do what we want to do.
13:10How long did it take them to put those documents together, though? What year about? I think their first research roadmap was in 2017. So it was one and a half years into the company. Not so bad. Into the nonprofit, yeah. Yeah. So I will admit there is another colonial thing that stood out. Well, two, specifically. One, it definitely feels that there are a lot of unintelligent cousin types who were put in there because their mate was there throughout the company. but two it's this kind of religious view around AGI this kind of nebulous justification for just about everything I was disappointed I understand why you mentioned him like did Yudowsky was in there I think the less wrong people this is a personal belief just no need to mention them again for anyone I think that Yudowsky anyone who writes a 600 ,000 word Harry Potter book should be put in prison including J.K.
14:02Rowling but it feels like there really is this belief system that's push throughout this industry, which mirrors colonialism, mirrors the very Judeo-Christian push of the British and many other colonial entities. Yeah, absolutely. So one of the things that I was most surprised by when reporting the book is I had seen all the divisions around boomers and doomers, people saying, hey, I can bring us to utopia, or people saying, hey, I can kill us all. I really did think initially that it was just rhetoric and that it was just a tool for accruing more power. And the thing that surprised me most was how many people I met that genuinely, deeply believed in both, especially the Doomer ideology.
14:47Like I was interviewing people whose voices were quivering because they were talking about their anxiety around the potential end of the world. And that was a very sincere reaction. And I think that is part, you're exactly right that it is a huge parallel with empire building in the past, is that empires need to have an ideology that convinces themselves why they are ultimately doing something that is for the benefit of the world. So in the past, when they had this civilizing mission, we're bringing this to the world, it also wasn't rhetoric. It was also a deeply seated religious and spiritual and scientific belief that they were doing something that was better off for everyone.
15:32I mean, the origins of the BBC in England were religious indoctrination on some level. It kind of, it's, I admit I'm surprised to hear the quivering voices stuff, I think, because I think that, again, this is personal opinion, Yudowsky, I think, is full of, I think a lot of those less wrong guys are full of shit. I think they're doing it for the, not for the bit, but it's the same kind of, I don't know, horse trading shit that people do around anything. It's like, we don't have anything to believe in, so let's all agree on this. But it's interesting to hear that people are, I don't know how to put this, actually believing this crap, even though it doesn't feel like there's any real evidence, you know?
16:15Yeah, well, I think the analogy that I started using is I really feel like open AI is Dune, where, you know, in Dune, there is a mythology that is created by a certain group of people with full understanding that they're creating a mythology, right? Right. But then as they start to embody and act out this mythology, not only do many, many people who didn't know that it was originally created come to believe it, also the people who created it come to believe it themselves. And I think this is essentially exactly what is happening within AI with the ideologies is that maybe there was at some point someone who was more aware that there was some kind of rhetorical trick that they were playing around really propagating this kind of belief.
17:08But it is not, we're not at that point anymore. Like, there are lots and lots of people who genuinely believe these things. And I think it's self-perpetuating because when you believe it, you look for signs of it. And you research things that would suggest more evidence for your belief. And so they're kind of continuing to reinforce their beliefs. And the more these AI models have progressed, the stronger these beliefs have become, because whether you believe AI will bring utopia or dystopia, there is an abundance of evidence that you can point to now to reinforce your own. Yeah, exactly, to reinforce your own starting point.
17:50And so it's sort of like a microcosm of society today where the average person no longer encounters information that can change their minds. It just continues to entrench whatever they already believed before. Do you believe Sam Altman believes this shite? Do you think he believes in AGA? Is he part of it? It's really interesting because I think the... No matter who I interviewed and no matter how long they worked with Sam Altman or how closely they worked with Sam Altman, not a single person was able to fully articulate what his beliefs are. And I think that is very much by design. That's beautiful.
18:35That's. Yeah. And it wasn't, and they would explicitly say this too. They would call out, I'm not actually sure what he believes. and this was the most consistent thing that people said about him.
19:04Every time you park. This week on a very special episode of Health Discovered, we're taking a closer look at a condition that affects hundreds of thousands of men each year, prostate cancer. I first found out about my cancer at the age of 45. Anything with cancer, you just think death sentence. In this episode, we'll explore the science behind detection, along with the practical steps men can take to protect their health. Listen to Health Discovered on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Open your free iHeart app, search Health Discovered, and start listening.
20:10no impact to your credit score quote at 800-884-FUND. That's 800-884-3863. Or visit amerifactors.com. Hey, it's Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. Now, I was looking for fun ways to tell you that Mint's offer of unlimited premium wireless for$15 a month is back. So I thought it would be fun if we made$15 bills. But it turns out that's very illegal. So there goes my big idea for the commercial. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. A upfront payment of$45 for three month plan equivalent to$15 per month required. New customer offer for first three months only. Speed slow after 35 gigabytes of networks busy.
20:48Taxes and fees extra. See mintmobile.com.
20:53I really noticed as well, if you read your book and you really look, you actually can't get much of an idea of who Sam Altman is at all. And in fact, you can't work out why he's brilliant at all. And I've read a lot of stuff about Sam Altman. The long and short of it I can understand is that he's got good psychology and he's really charming. Everyone talks about the psychology and the charming and it's just really, it is so, he's such a bizarre man. Like everything about him is so, like the way that people talk about him is so strange. Yeah, so this is what I sort of concluded about why he's been able to pull off what he does.
21:33He is a once-in-a-generation talent when it comes to storytelling. And he has a loose relationship with the truth. Yes, I've noticed that. Which is a really powerful combination. And so when he's talking to someone, he shines most when he's talking to small groups of people in one-on-one meetings. And what he says is more tightly correlated with what that person needs to hear rather than what he believes, which is part of the reason why people say ultimately, like, they don't really know what he believes because he doesn't really indicate it. and so I think that is what makes him incredibly persuasive and and he is really good at understanding people and what they need and what they want and you know he's well resourced so he's able to then deliver to them what they need and want and what I realized is with that kind of talent you would inherently be incredibly polarizing as a figure because if the person agrees with you, you're the best asset in the world for what they want to achieve.
22:44You're incredibly persuasive. You're able to get the resources. You can do exactly what that person can do for you exactly what you want them to do. But if you disagree with this person, that person becomes the greatest threat ever because they are so persuasive, you have fear that they're going to be able to carry out exactly what you don't want them to carry out. And so that kind of boils down to why he's just such an enigmatic and extremely polarizing person, as it really depends on whether or not someone agrees or disagrees with him. He also doesn't seem that smart. I don't know. He seems quite good at talking to people.
23:23But when I hear him talk, he doesn't seem that eloquent. And it makes me wonder if perhaps Sam Altman is a symptom of a greater problem that so much of our power structure and money is based on someone making a decision based on the last intelligent person or intelligent seeming person they talk to. Yeah, I think our society is also just, we still have such a, we have, we worship people that are wealthy. Yeah. Yeah. And so even if he's not saying something that is convincing you in real time, he has all of the kind of indicators that this person has been remarkably successful and you should listen to what he says because then that will make you successful too.
24:07Right. Right. And so I think that is part of the kind of mythos around him is that if you can join up with him, it will greatly enrich you. And, you know, like there's a lot of evidence to suggest that, too, that like there have been plenty of people that have allied themselves with Sam Ullman and that have become much richer for it. And so whether or not people are joining up with him because they necessarily 100 % agree with his ideology or his actions or anything like that, or if it's more because ultimately they get to benefit from that alliance, I think is, yeah. It almost feels like it's people connecting with other people to see how far they can get far more than AI.
24:53Because one of the other things I really noticed when you were telling the story of the firing of Sam Orton getting fired in November 2023, as much as people wanted to pretend, they kept bringing up the tender. And to explain for the listeners, the tender was that OpenAI had plans to let people sell their stock. It really felt like that was more the primary concern than any loyalty to Altman. It was, I wouldn't say it was the primary concern, but I mean, yeah, it really depended on who I was speaking to. Yeah, it's hard to tell exactly, just to be clear. Yeah, exactly. Like every employee sort of had a different calculus that ultimately led them to revolt against the board and want Altman back.
25:36And there were different calculuses among Microsoft and investors. But one of the key things that I think is necessary to understand just why there is so much seeming loyalty around Altman in general is he is very, very good at establishing relationships with money involved where he is the linchpin to the other person accessing that money. And so the tender offer is a perfect example of this in that employees, ultimately, they realized that Altman is just – he's really good at fundraising. And whether or not an employee believes in the AGI thing, they all agree that OpenAI ultimately needs an enormous amount of capital.
26:16And also many of them are doing it in part because they can then guarantee their own financial future. And so with Altman gone, it became increasingly clear that OpenAI wouldn't survive. And so that's not something that a lot of employees wanted. it became clear that even if OpenAI did survive, they would be a lot more shortchanged in terms of the amount of capital that they would be able to get because he would no longer be their champion for that. And also the tender offer could potentially go away and they would not be personally enriched as well. And, you know, many of them, the thing to also understand is like, it's very expensive to live in the Bay Area.
26:58And so for the worker, for the employees in the moment losing the tender offer wasn't like oh no i'm i'm gonna lose like my retirement it was also this sense of like i'm literally gonna lose my financial security right now like i already tried to i already bought um you know a house based on the fact yeah i feel like you mentioned that yeah yeah there was someone who put money yeah who put plenty of money down and that the the tender offer dissolving was a real financial stress it was a threat to their financial existence in i imagine so but i'm just the way it was framed in public was that this was some big loyalty thing where everyone was like i love open ai and sam altman and that just didn't feel like it was what was happening that people seemed angry at ilia but they just seemed angry because something changed rather than like yeah yeah i mean i think i think there were certainly people within the company that did feel loyalty to altman and and and that was one of their primary motivating things but by and large when i was interviewing um lots of employees for understanding like what ultimately led them to rally around sam there was actually uh more practical concerns than just personal loyalty that was driving the thing, whether it was financial or whether it was just, I really believe in AGI and I don't want OpenAI to go away because it'll scrap all of the work that we've done.
28:34And of course, you know, of course the narrative would, I mean, OpenAI themselves have been pushing again and again and again, this idea that all of the employees or whatever, more than 90 % of the employees ended up signing the petition. And they cite this number as just a show of solidarity and loyalty to Altman. But then, of course, if you look at the track record after the Boyd crisis, how many people have subsequently left the company once things have sort of stabilized and there isn't a crisis situation that is i think much more revealing of whether how much loyalty people have to him so tell me about jack clark so jack clark is the what is he he's one of the co-founders at anthropic now yeah i without putting you on the spot kind of feels like jack clark has got off a little easy with everyone not even saying you you're one of the few people jack clark worked at the register which is an extremely critical it publication and now he's out in conferences saying that AI agents will control everything.
Read the full transcript
29:39He just feels like one of the weirdest characters in this whole story. Yeah. Yeah, it's interesting. Like when I went to profile OpenAI in 2019, I actually, the first person I reached out to was Jack because I had spoken to him before and he had until then, until recently been playing communications for, had for OpenAI and then he had shifted into a policy role. And I remember when I... when I was at the company, I was like, hey, Jack, like, do you think you can actually give me more access to seeing the things that I like? Stuff that I'd like to say. Yeah, like, I was literally asking, so they wouldn't let me go beyond the first floor.
30:21There were three floors, second and third floor. I'm so sorry. There's computers there. It's not like they have an AI machine. Come on. Yeah. And I was like, hey, like, can I just literally just go up to the second floor? Can you like take me up and just like let me walk on and he looked at me with this like like deep deep side eye of like no karen like you absolutely cannot and i was like hey you're a former journalist you know how this works like uh you know that jack row in 2014 for the register was shock and aws the fall of amazon's deflationary cloud just as jeff bezos did to books and cds Amazon's rivals are now doing it.
31:00He used to write these very grouchy, LREG-style pictures. It's just so weird. Yeah, I mean, I think this is the... But it gets back to that thing you were saying about the doctrine. Yeah, so because I started covering this company in 2019, I talked with people then that I then talked to for the book, and I was able to sort of have this unique opportunity to track how people's individual beliefs evolve when they are seeped in this world. And there were people that I was talking to back then that were like, I don't really believe in this AGI thing, that by the time I was talking to them for the book, were like AGI all the way, like that this is a genuine, true belief.
31:45And I think there's a lot of reasons for this transformation. Like one is that you are only talking to people who believe this. So you're just constantly in this environment where you're not talking to people who are challenging or testing that belief and instead just like continuously being reinforced in this echo chamber. But I think there's another thing that I kind of came to realize while reporting on the book is like people who really, really believe that AGI is possible, that we will actually be able to replicate human intelligence. It's not a belief about what AI is capable of. It is a belief about what human intelligence is.
32:29And a lot of people in the AI world today have this belief that human intelligence or everything in the world is inherently computable. And all you have to do is just amass more data and more compute and eventually you will get to that thing. You will be able to replicate that thing. And when you are in this kind of environment where you have people constantly arguing to you that this is why AGI is possible because everything's computable, and then you see the rapid clip of your models being able to do more and more functions that other people outside in society previously would have suggested were not possible, it's sort of this self-reinforcing belief machine.
33:11Like it just manufactures more and more evidence. You said every sign kind of gives you. Yeah, exactly. And so I think, and one of the things that I also have just has a general realization, not just with OpenAI, but in general, when I'm covering tech companies, I kind of have a policy for myself to do a little bit of a detox after I spend a lot of time talking with them. because it is like when you're talking with all these people that exist in this world, you do adopt their worldview and you do adopt their talking points and you do see things through their eyes. And usually I then have to like let myself just be in the actual world for a little bit and remind myself of what the average person thinks and what the average person values and remind myself that there are problems beyond the Silicon Valley's borders that just look fundamentally different from what they conceive the world to be.
34:12And so I did that with the opening eye profile. I did that with, I profiled Facebook years ago, and I did that with Facebook. I did that with the book where I would interview lots of people in these big batches and kind of really do my best to try and occupy their shoes for a couple weeks a month. And then I would spend my time explicitly not interviewing open AI people, just interviewing other people that were out in the world to just like reset my brain chemistry a little bit. Because it really does feel that way. It really does feel like you kind of get absorbed into this singular worldview.
34:50And then you have to kind of remind yourself of the greater reality.
35:24We'll see you next time. I first found out about my cancer at the age of 45. Anything with cancer, you just think death sentence. In this episode, we'll explore the science behind detection, along with the practical steps men can take to protect their health. Listen to Health Discovered on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Open your free iHeart app, search Health Discovered, and start listening. Are you a business owner or entrepreneur in need of a fast funding solution? Amerifactors provides fast capital. Call today for a free, no obligation quote at 800-884-FUND. Startups, rapid growth stage or struggling, even with less than perfect credit, including bankruptcies.
36:12In business for over 34 years, thousands of satisfied clients have transformed their cash flow with Amerifactors. Call Amerifactors today at 800-884-FUND. That's 800-884-3863. or visit amerifactors.com. This is Mario Lopez with one with Mario Lopez Daily Podcast. Toyota is moving toward a more sustainable future by giving you the freedom to choose from a full lineup of hybrids, plug-in hybrids, regular gas, and 100 % electric vehicles. So, pick from stylish cars like the Camry, Corolla, and Prius, as well as efficient and spacious SUVs like the RAV4 and Grand Highlander, all backed by Toyota's reputation for reliability.
36:51In fact, for 2025, Toyota is the best resale value brand for the fifth year in a row, according to Kelly Blue Books, KBB.com. So a smart buy today can mean higher trade-in values tomorrow. With Toyota, you got more choices and less compromise. Visit buyatoyota.com for a great deal on an efficient Toyota today. Vehicle's projected resale value is specific to the 2025 model year. For more info, visit Kelly Blue Books, KBB.com, Toyota. Let's go places.
37:24i'm gonna ask this question without getting you in too much trouble do you think that's what happened with kevin roose i mean it's really i know i don't want to put you in a situation we have to talk ill of someone but that interview was bizarre in hard fork i so i've been i think really lucky in that i've covered the tech industry almost always not living in SF. I agree. That's a great thing. And, and, you know, like I've been able to figure that out in my career and that was an explicit decision. Like I did not want to live in SF anymore. Like I had lived in SF. I wanted to get out. Um, and I think this is a really, it's, it's, it's a really hard balance for any journalist is you need to decide whether you're close to your subject and immersed in their world and therefore might be co-opted by, their world or whether you exist outside of that world and therefore you don't have as much access you don't get to go to the parties where you hear tips all the time and and that's 100 % just like it's been a tension in my career as well as like I constantly feel like I'm missing things because I'm not an SF but the thing that I think I have gained from not being an SF is just a continued connection to non-SF world, you know?
38:47Like, I, um, I noticed when I spend too much time with SF people that I start, my vocabulary changes, like, how I talk about things changes, because, because people in SF talk about things in a very particular way, you know, like, they are talking about like optimization hacking and like they have a particular utilitarian maximization mindset around how they do things and why. And I have to then kind of step away from that and reset my language even when then I sit down to write a story that's for the greater public. And so, yeah, so I think this is something that's just challenging in general is like, And it's really hard to not get too close to your sources and to not start adopting everything that they say as your own, especially if you are literally living with them.
39:51Yes, in some cases, right? Could be anyone. but it does feel like there is a kind of almost word contagion or thought contagion with this stuff with AGI that it pickles certain people they hear about the idea of the autonomous computer and it drives them mad and everything to your point they they start chasing it even though there's not really any evidence that we can do it yeah I mean I mean like when I first started covering ai i also was so enthralled by the premise like when i when i so before i covered ai um i didn't like the when i first started covering it at mit technology review uh i did not realize before then that ai was actually trying to recreate human intelligence i thought it was just you know i mean it is marketing it is a marketing term but even then this sounds like it might be a definition that people would argue over.
40:51Right, right, right. But I mean, like in the original, like when AI was coined as a term in 1956, like John McCarthy, he did explicitly coin the term both to attract funders, so as a marketing term, and because he was trying to describe what he wanted the field to do, which was to recreate human intelligence. And that is just, it's such a evocative thing. like to think, wait a minute, could we actually do that? And what would that mean? And there's so much philosophical, it's just a philosophical mind field. Like, and if you are someone that loves philosophizing, you can just sit there for like days and days and days and think, holy crap, like what would that be?
41:37What would that look like? How could we do that? Thousands of words of New York Times columns. And so I really got, I got pulled into just the kind of sheer, enigma of that and also the power of that of oh wow if we could do this like if you know if if imagine being in the shoes of someone who's actually doing the AI research and thinking to yourself I might be contributing to the recreation of my own intelligence or of our collective intelligence like that's intoxicating you know it feels like philosophy marketing though because I just look at this stuff and I hear about this stuff and I always think okay but what are you doing today?
42:24And then I look at what they're doing today and I say that doesn't seem anything like that. And I actually don't think that there's anything harmful in discussing AGI. What pisses me off is how many people don't seem to be discussing AGI. They discuss the ramifications on the edges because something that Casey Kagawa, our friend of the show, has brought up a number of times with me is like no one seems to be discussing personage. like if we make a conscious computer do we give it a social security number that's actually really funny because i think there are too many people discussing personage i i don't see them in the well perhaps they're not doing it in the media because agi gets brought up as this vague term and then they go huh what do you think yeah this could be good could be bad millions trillions i don't fucking know and it's just it's so bizarre because i look at i've been covering i personally with AI really only started looking at it hard in 2023 which is my own fault and I've looked and perhaps that has also colored my belief system because I kept looking for the thing like the stuff the thing that everyone was freaking out about and you look and it's like we've extrapolated from large language models that AGI will come out but actually that kind of leads me to another question you sam ortman's a confusing person what about mar uh dario amaday dario amaday what do you think does he believe in agi you think you think he's a true believer i do think dario is a true believer yeah and i do think that he's a true doomer as well like he genuinely is has a lot of anxiety around uh the agi creating the end of the world um whether or not and also what does it mean to be a true believer?
44:06Does he believe the bollocks he's saying? Because he claims that AGI will be here by 2027 or quicker. Yeah. So that then is when he's just wearing his CEO hat and he needs to say something. When you say wearing the CEO hat, can you be a bit more specific? I think Dario is an interesting case in that he originally, he has a different background than Sam. You know, Sam is a VC that, or an investor that then became the CEO of an AI company and his skill is storytelling, right? That's what all investors do. Dario was, he was a scientist. He studied, I think, computational neuroscience. And he had a kind of deep fascination with this idea of how do you figure out how the brain works and how do you replicate?
44:52Like it was, he didn't initially call himself an AI researcher in, I think, the early days of his academic career, but he was essentially studying a lot of the things that hardcore AI researchers study, the brain, computer science, all of these things. And so I think he has this fascination. And I don't know this for sure, but I would guess that he is of the category of people that I described that believes that everything is fundamentally computable in the world and human intelligence computable. And so he does really believe that if he can figure it out, like AGI will happen. But then he has to run a company and a company can't just do science.
45:36And actually one of the things that people mentioned to me about their criticisms of Dario when he initially ran Anthropic was that he didn't care about the business at all. Like he seemed to have no interest in anything other than the science and there were people within the company that were like this is not going to work as a company if you cannot literally do business if you if you cannot raise money and so yeah i think what happened um i i i didn't actually report this out but my guess is what happened is dario then had to shift to not just being a scientist but also being a businessman and he had to learn how to storytell.
46:17And is he, uh, and, and I think honestly, he tries to match, you know, Sam Altman is a really successful storyteller and, and able to accrue a lot of capital. I think Dario tries to match the stories that Altman tells, um, in order to try and accrue the same amount of capital and, and try to take capital away maybe because ultimately their personal arch nemeses and anthropic and open ai are uh competitors why do they hate each other so much is it just because sam altman doesn't like that wario walked off i don't know that sam i i i can't figure out whether sam genuinely ever hates anyone but people certainly hate him um and dario hates him for sure in dario hate him i think it goes back to this idea of do you agree or do you disagree with sam about something fundamental and therefore do you perceive him as the greatest asset ever or the greatest threat ever and from in dario's case he fundamentally disagreed with sam about um certain key decisions around safety ai safety the Doomer brand of AI safety, where Daria was the one that decided to blow up the amount of computer chips that were being used to train a single model.
47:43So he did that from GPT-2 to GPT-3. They went from a couple dozen chips to 10 ,000 chips all at once to train GPT-3. And Dario wanted to do this because he wanted to create an internal lead in order to then have some time to do research on this model that would emerge from 10 ,000 chips. And Altman does this thing where he will convince, he will ally with people. So he was like, oh, 10 ,000 chips, that's a brilliant idea. We should totally do that. But then once it was done, he sort of shifted to, okay, now we should release it. Or now we should give it to Microsoft because we have this deal with Microsoft.
48:23We need to make them happy. We need to give them some kind of really exciting thing deliverable to justify the first$1 billion they gave us so that they can then give us more money. More billions. And so it was actually, it was like the two, it was both Altman and Amadei together that I would credit as being responsible for dramatically accelerating the AI race. Because Amadei was the one that decided we need to blow it up to 10 ,000 chips. And then Altman was the one that persuaded him, yes, you should do it because I agree with you. And then kind of flipped to, okay, now we need to get this out in the world as quickly as possible.
49:00And Amadei, I think, feels like his intelligence, like Altman, as a politically savvy person, was able to use his intelligence against him to achieve exactly the opposite of what he ultimately wanted, which was to slow things down rather than accelerate it. This sounds like colonial Britain. It's just white guys getting angry at each other over tiny grievances from years ago. Here's a weird question. Well, first of all, do any of them seem happy in any way? Do any of them seem to enjoy anything? I ask this seriously. I genuinely do. They seem miserable. That is the consistent theme from all of Jack Clark included.
49:50they all seem pissed off scared paranoid weird it's like they're being driven mad by this yeah yeah yeah i think that is an entirely accurate description i i think you cannot be not driven mad um in this world where you have convinced yourself that the stakes are the future of humanity you know like how do you not how do you not buckle under that pressure i mean skill issue I think I'd be fine. Give me$1 billion. But it does make me think that right now, as Bloomberg came out with a headline just as we were recording this, that Stargate, SoftBank's Stargate is hitting snags over tariff fears. They can't seem to raise the money.
50:37I wonder if we're going to see new levels of paranoia, anxiety with all of these people as the AI trade starts to collapse a bit. Yeah, this has been an interesting theme that I've picked up on with the way that Altman operates is when he starts sounding incredibly optimistic in public about the future of OpenAI, the future of AGI, the future of all these things, it means that something is going wrong. Like it's become the opposite signal because he will roll out the most grandiose language when he needs to cover up something that is really stressing him out. and so we're seeing you know like this happening again more recently where I mean in the beginning of the year he had this post where he was like we are no longer just building AGI we are now on our path to building super intelligence like he was sort of like upping the ante saying okay yeah continue to hold on continue to stay with the program because we are about to super charge turbocharged this like 10 times more.
51:55And it was like at the time when OpenAI was starting to really feel weak because it had just lost a string of executives, including some of its most important ones, Ilya Saskover and Mira Morati. And it was under just massive amounts of scrutiny and it wasn't making the clip of research progress that it needed to kind of solve what it itself defined as the key challenges to reaching AGI. And so, yeah, so I think the more that it sort of becomes clear that people are no longer really buying into this AI future that they've painted, the stronger they're going to paint it, the more they're going to roll out this rhetoric.
52:38You mentioned this because there was a tweet from April 15th where he said the OpenAI team is executing just ridiculously well at so many things right now. The coming months and years should be amazing. So I'm going to guess things were bad. Yeah, yeah. Cool. I now know how to read Sam's tweets. Yeah, this was like a thing that I just consistently, consistently, every time I was reporting on things that were going really bad, sure enough, Altman would roll out some kind of like really crazy, some really crazy, yeah, statement out in public. So that was actually, that tweet's actually a perfect example because he says things will be awesome in the coming months and years.
53:16it's always like hold on stick with me yeah stick with me things might look a little bit weird now but oh boy like just you wait for what I'm seeing inside that like you need to just have patience for you know it's always that kind of May 7th pictures great to see progress on the first Stargate in Abilene with our partners at Oracle today will be the biggest AI training facility in the world the scale speed and skill of the people building this is awesome and then this story comes out a week later bloody hell this tells so final question how do you feel what do you think this fiji simo forgive me if i messed up the name there what do you think about her becoming ceo of applications and sam altman doing something else yeah so i i haven't actually i haven't actually done reporting on this myself but my sense of what happening what's happening is altman's not a good manager he's not actually like he's a he's a fundraising ceo he's not someone that can run the company.
54:17And I think probably what happened is that after Mira Marati left, she was the one that was actually doing the day-to-day operations and the running of the show. After she left, he then made a big show of, I'm going to be much more close to the work now. I'm going to do the day-to-day running. And probably his time is up in doing that because in my book, I talk a lot about how like he's not good at that like he is he will he's not good at making decisions he's very conflict averse so what he does is he'll just say he'll agree with every single team even when they're disagreeing with one another and it causes chaos and it causes rifts where you don't the person at the top is not able to make a decision and say we are all going to go this way now and some of you are going to be unhappy like he he does not do that and so it just leads to a lot of tumult, chaos.
55:12Part of the reason why OpenAI has had so many product releases and features and things like that, I think is actually also a product of this in that he doesn't want to tell any team, like all of these product releases and features are different teams working on these things. And he doesn't want to tell any team, like, we're going to have this person release first and have their moment in the sun. And then we're going to like work a little bit more. And then you get your moment in the sun, you know, a year later. He's like, everyone gets their moment in the sun like we're gonna do releases we're gonna do like 12 days of shipmas we're we're gonna just release that was insane features in 12 days so everyone's days of shipmas for the listeners that don't remember that was when they claimed they were going to release 12 new 12 new products 12 new products over the 12 and it wasn't 12 new it was like four new products and like some of them were like an api for an api it's just so strange it feels like while you're also describing an empire you're also describing this kind of very petty underpin it really does mirror british colonialism right which you've got a guy who doesn't want to rule who wants the power of a ruler and all the assets but someone else ideally in another country should take responsibility yeah truly awful i mean this is the paradox of empire is like it it feels inevitable because it feels so strong and it also feels so weak when you start to look at it under the surface it's it was a really great book and I really appreciate your time where can people find you I am on LinkedIn and Blue Sky these days and also on my website KarenDHow.com and yeah reach out I have a contact form there and I try to respond to as many people as possible wonderful thank you so much for joining us I'm of course Ed Zitron you'll now get a thing I recorded over a year ago that people still complain about about where you can find stuff.
57:07Thank you for listening.
57:16Thank you for listening to Better Offline. The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song is Matt Ossowski. You can check out more of his music and audio projects at matosowski.com M-A-T-T-O-S-O-W-S-K-I dot com You can email me at ez at betteroffline.com or visit betteroffline.com to find more podcast links and of course my newsletter. I also really recommend you go to chat.wheresyoured.at to visit the discord and go to r slash betteroffline to check out our reddit. Thank you so much for listening. Better Offline is a production of Cool Zone Media. For more from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com.
57:56Or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
58:23We'll see you next time.
58:31Park smarter, park faster. ParkWiz. Download the ParkWiz app today and save every time you park. This is Rob Parker from The Odd Couple with Rob Parker and Kelvin Washington. The Toyota Tundra and Tacoma are designed to outlast and outlive. Backed by Toyota's legendary reputation for reliability. So get in the Tundra with the available iForce Max Hybrid Engine. delivering exceptional torque and towing capacity. Or check out a Tacoma with available off-road features like crawl control. It can take you beyond the trails. Toyota trucks are built to last year after year, mile after mile. So don't wait.
59:16Get yours today. Visit buyatoyota.com for deals and more. Toyota, let's go places. Stop settling for weak sound. It's time to level up your game and bring the boom. Hit the town with the ultra-durable LG XBoom portable speaker and enjoy vibrant sound wherever you go. Elevate your listening experience to new heights, because let's be real, your music deserves it. The future of sound is now with LG XBoom. And for a limited time, save 25 % at LG.com with code FALL25. Bring the boom. XBoom. There's a lot going on in Hollywood. How are you supposed to stay on top of it all? Variety has the solution.
1:00:01Take 20 minutes out of your day and listen to the new Daily Variety podcast for breaking entertainment news and expert perspectives. Where do you see the business actually heading? Featuring the iconic journalists of Variety and hosted by co-editor-in-chief Cynthia Littleton. The only constant in Hollywood is change. Open your free iHeartRadio app, search Daily Variety and listen now. This is an iHeart podcast. V
From the publisher
Ed Zitron is joined by Karen Hao, author of the book Empire of AI, to talk about the confusing world of OpenAI and the associated mind-poison of artificial general intelligence.
Book link: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/743569/empire-of-ai-by-karen-hao/
(all the buy links are available there)
Karen’s website: https://karendhao.com/
Twitter: https://x.com/_karenhao
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/karendhao/
BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/karenhao.bsky.social
YOU CAN NOW BUY BETTER OFFLINE MERCH! go to https://cottonbureau.com/people/better-offline use free99 for free shipping on orders of $99 or more.
You can also order a limited-edition Better Offline hat until 5/22/25! https://cottonbureau.com/p/CAGDW8/hat/better-offline-hat#/28510205/hat-unisex-dad-hat-black-100percent-cotton-adjustable
Newsletter: wheresyoured.at
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/betteroffline
Discord chat.wheresyoured.at
Ed's Socials - http://www.twitter.com/edzitron
instagram.com/edzitron
https://bsky.app/profile/edzitron.com
https://www.threads.net/@edzitron
email me ez@betteroffline.com
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

