In short
Better Offline Podcast: Episode Summary
Episode Title
How To Argue With An AI Booster, Part Three
Episode Overview In the third and final installment of the "How to Argue with an AI Booster" series, host Ed Zitron critiques the arguments made by proponents of generative AI, emphasizing the disconnect between hype and reality. He dives into misconceptions about AI technologies, the misleading narratives perpetuated by media, and the true economic implications of generative AI.
---
Key Themes and Discussions
- Misunderstanding AI's Value Proposition
- Generative AI vs. Amazon Web Services (AWS):
- Zitron argues that comparing generative AI to AWS is flawed, as AWS arose from a clear market need and achieved profitability relatively quickly, whereas generative AI lacks a proven demand and continues to burn capital without clear returns.
- Media Misrepresentation
- Hype vs. Reality:
- Zitron critiques the tech media for amplifying the hype surrounding AI without adequately assessing the capabilities and limitations of the technology.
- He accuses journalists of failing to hold AI companies accountable for vague claims about the capabilities of products like ChatGPT.
- Economic Implications of AI
- Revenues and User Metrics:
- Zitron challenges the legitimacy of reported user statistics (e.g., ChatGPT’s supposed 700 million weekly users), arguing that numbers can be misleading without context on user engagement and retention.
- He suggests that high-profile revenue announcements often mask deeper issues in profitability and real-world value.
- The Illusion of Popularity as Proof of Utility
- Popularity vs. Practical Utility:
- Despite claims of ChatGPT's popularity and high subscription numbers, Zitron argues that these metrics don't necessarily translate to significant utility or transformative impact in businesses.
- Skepticism of AI Claims
- The Burden of Proof:
- Zitron urges listeners to question broad claims made by AI boosters, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence and specific examples that demonstrate genuine utility and effectiveness in real-world applications.
---
Key Takeaways
- Critical Engagement:
- Listeners are encouraged to critically assess AI claims, asking probing questions about profitability, utility, and the actual capabilities of AI technologies.
- Questioning Metrics:
- Simply citing user numbers or revenues as proof of success is insufficient; a deeper understanding of metrics and their implications is necessary.
- The Role of Media:
- The media plays a significant role in shaping public perception of AI, and there is a responsibility to accurately convey the potential and limits of these technologies.
- Call for Better Arguments:
- Zitron stresses the need for AI advocates to present stronger, more substantiated arguments rather than relying on popularity and vague claims.
---
Conclusion In this episode, Ed Zitron delivers a compelling argument against the overly optimistic narratives surrounding generative AI, advocating for a more nuanced understanding of its capabilities and limitations. He calls for a shift in how both the media and the public engage with AI technologies, pushing for accountability and evidence-based discussions.
---
Additional Resources
- [Latest Premium Newsletter: Why Everybody Is Losing Money On Generative AI](https://www.wheresyoured.at/why-everybody-is-losing-money-on-ai/)
- [Better Offline Merchandise](https://cottonbureau.com/people/better-offline) - Use code FREE99 for free shipping on orders over $99.
- [Join the Discussion](https://www.reddit.com/r/BetterOffline/) on Reddit or [Discord](https://discord.com/invite/QUUQUP9szv).
For further insights, visit [Better Offline's official website](https://betteroffline.com) and follow Ed Zitron on [Twitter](https://twitter.com/edzitron) and [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/edzitron).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This is an iHeart Podcast.
0:30Thomson Reuters and specialized bikes have since they upgraded to the next generation of the cloud. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. OCI is the blazing fast platform for your infrastructure, database, application development, and AI needs, where you can run any workload in a high availability, consistently high performance environment, and spend less than you would with other clouds. How is it faster? OCI's block storage gives you more operations per second. Cheaper? Better? OCI costs up to 50 % less for computing, 70 % less for storage, and 80 % less for networking. Better? In test after test, OCI customers report lower latency and higher bandwidth versus other clouds.
1:12This is the cloud built for AI and all your biggest workloads. Right now, with zero commitment, try OCI for free. Head to oracle.com slash strategic. That's oracle.com slash strategic. So I love Square. They make paying for stuff at a store really easy. I just use them at Court Street Grocers to buy a sandwich here in Brooklyn, New York. Their stuff's reliable, easy to use, and it just works for both businesses and their customers. Square keeps up so you don't have to slow down. Get everything you need to run and grow your business without any long-term commitments. And why wait? Right now, you can get up to$200 off Square hardware at square.com slash go slash better offline.
1:50That's S-Q-U-A-R-E dot com slash G-O slash better offline. Run your business smarter with Square. Get started today. Hey, it's Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. Now, I was looking for fun ways to tell you that Mint's offer of unlimited premium wireless for$15 a month is back. So I thought it would be fun if we made$15 bills. But it turns out that's very illegal. So there goes my big idea for the commercial. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. A front payment of$45 for a three-month plan equivalent to$15 per month required. New customer offer for first three months only. Speed slow after 35 gigabytes if network's busy.
2:27Taxes and fees extra. See MintMobile.com Call Zone Media Hello, I'm Ed Zitron, and this is Better Offline.
2:45Better Offline We've finally reached the end of our three-part How to Argue with an AI Booster series. These big strong men are standing outside of the Better Offline studio, suspended 200 feet above the Las Vegas Strip with tears in their eyes. And they're saying, Sir, Sir, it's the most beautiful podcast I've ever heard. Please stop recording it. Everyone else will feel insufficient when they hear it. No, no, I have to continue. I'm afraid my listeners need me. But okay, seriously, folks, if there's anything I want you to take home so far is that the arguments that these people, these AI sycophants make, They crumble under the slightest bit of scrutiny.
3:24And yet these arguments work because they either exploit the lack of knowledge of those of us who don't understand the rotten economics of AI, or because they force the opposite party to surrender their reason and to exit the planes of reality. To which I say, fuck that, absolutely not. This is a hill I'm prepared to die on, and I'll hope that you'll all be standing with me side by side. Now in the first episode we shook away the claims that it's the early days for AI and we just need to give it more time. Then I took the idea that generative AI is like Uber or fiber optic networking, two industries that both burned a lot of money at the start, but are otherwise nothing like generative AI.
3:58And now it's time to deal with the dregs of the arguments. These are the worst of the worst booster quips. Here we go. Ultra booster quip. I thought about recording that with a bunch of reverb, but it didn't really work out for me, but I wanted to do it once. But anyway, their argument is, ahem, AI is just like Amazon Web Services, a massive investment that took a while to go profitable, and everybody hated Amazon for it. Now, I actually covered this in-depth in the Hater's Guide to the AI Bubble, but the long and short of it is that Amazon Web Services is a platform, a necessity with an obvious choice, and has burned about 10 % of what Amazon and all of them have burned chasing generative AI, and had also proven demand before building it.
4:37Also, Amazon Web Services was break-even within three years, and OpenAI was founded in fucking 2015, and even if you start from November 2022, by Amazon Web Services standards should be break even by now. But now I'll quote myself. Amazon Web... No, wait. Sorry, that's for boosters. Amazon Web Services was created out of necessity. Amazon's infrastructure needs were so great that it effectively had to build both the software and hardware necessary to deliver a store that sold theoretically everything to theoretically everywhere. Handling both the traffic from customers, delivering the software that runs Amazon.com quickly and reliably, and, well, making sure things were stable.
5:15It didn't need to come up with a reason for people to run web applications. They were already doing so themselves, but in ways that cost a lot more, were inflexible, and required specialist server skills. Amazon Web Services took something that people already did, and what there was already a proven demand for, and made it better and scaled it. Eventually, Google and Microsoft would join the fray. I editorialized a bit there, but I can do that with my own work. Now, a common booster kit, by the way, is for them to say, well, this AI company, they've got high annualized revenues. And as I've discussed in the past, this metric is basically month times 12.
5:49And while it's a fine measure for normal high gross margin businesses like software as a service companies, it isn't for AI. It doesn't account for churn, which is when people leave. It also is a number intentionally used to make a company sound more successful. So you can say$200 million annualized revenue instead of$16.6 million a month. And you're also meant to, but you heard, they said 200 million annualized, but you heard 200 million. Your mind did. That was a bad blanket reference, but I'll continue. They want you to think 200 million. They want you to think that's what they'll make. More often than not, if they mention an annualized number, that number will not be how much they make that year.
6:28Also, if they're using this number, it's likely not consistent. Now, if they bring this up, you should just say to them, hey, how much profit is the company making? And also, how much are they burning? At this point, they will, I think, mace you. I mean, with the spray or an actual mace. AI boosters are strange. Now, they'll also say, well, this AI company's in growth mode, and they'll pull the profit lever when it's time. And the answer to that is always going to be. Why have none of them done this? Not one. Not one of them. Now a booster will burst through your door and go, AI, AGI, AGI, what?
7:03And then there's that will bullshit again. It's always about the will with these fuckers. We do not know how thinking works in humans and thus cannot extrapolate it to a machine. And at the very least, human beings have the ability to re-evaluate things and learn, a thing that LLMs cannot do and will never do. We do not know how to get to AGI. Sam Altman said in June that OpenAI was now confident they knew how to build AGI as they have traditionally understood it. Then in August, Altman said that AGI was not a super useful term and that the point of all this is it doesn't really matter and it's just this continuing exponential of model capability that we'll rely on for more and more things.
7:42I'm really tired of people quoting this guy. He doesn't make any fucking sense. Read anything he says out loud, and it's just really just total bullshit. Even Meta's chief AI scientist, the Anne LeCun, says it isn't possible with Transformer-based models to make AGI. We don't know if AGI is possible, and anyone claiming they do is lying. Anyone who's talking about AGI is talking about fan fiction again. Ask them how they feel about Banjo and Kazooie. Do you think they made love? Actually, if next time someone brings up AGI to you, seriously bring up Banjo and Kazooie and their romantic involvement.
8:19I actually, I think that that's the only response you should give now. Stop humoring them. It is fan fiction. But putting Banjo and Kazooie aside, there's also a really stupid booster thing they do, which is, I'm hearing from people deep within the AI industry that there's some sort of ultra powerful models they're not talking about. And this, by the way, is hogwash. Nothing different than your buddy's friend's uncle who works at Nintendo that says Mario is coming to the PlayStation. innovation. Ilya Sutskeva and Mira Mirati raised billions of dollars for companies with no product, let alone a product roadmap, and they did so because they saw an opportunity for a grift and to throw a bunch of money at compute for no reason.
8:57Anyone who has secret shit is not talking about it because it doesn't exist. Also, if someone from deep within the industry has told somebody big things are coming, they're doing so to con them or make them think that they have privileged information. Ask for specifics, and if they say, I couldn't possibly tell you, then they're full of shit. They're full of crap. They're full of doo-doo. And if they get vague, get specific. Oh, it's going to be able to automate other things. What things? How? How does it automate them? Oh, I don't know. Then you don't know shit about fuck. Now talking about not knowing shit about fuck is another booster quip.
9:31ChatGPT is so popular. 700 million people use it weekly. It's one of the most popular websites on the internet. Its popularity proves its utility. Look at all the paying customers. Now that paying customers part we'll get to in a second, but this argument is poised as a comeback to my suggestion that AI is not particularly useful. A proof point that this movement is not inherently wasteful or that there are in fact use cases for ChatGPT that are lasting, meaningful, or important. I fundamentally disagree. In fact, I believe ChatGPT and LLMs in general have been marketed based on lies of inference, which I realize is ironic.
10:05I know. It's pretty clever. I had a whole blog written called The Lie of Inference that kind of became this. It wasn't very good, though. This is. This is good. Don't say it's bad. I also have grander concerns and suspicions about what OpenAI considers a user and how it counts revenue. Let me give you an example. They claim to have 5 million business customers, yet 500 ,000 of those are from a$15 million year-long deal with Cal State University, which works out to around$2.50 a user a month. OpenAI has also started doing$1 a month trials of its$30 a month team subscription, and one has to wonder how many of those subscribers are counted in the total and indeed for how long.
10:46I do not know the scale of these offers, nor how long OpenAI has been offering them. A Redditor posted about this$1 for a month deal a few months ago, saying that OpenAI was offering five seats at once, so one buck for a month per seat. How many people cancel after that. Who knows? Maybe they just hope they don't. In fact, I found a few people talking about these deals and even one adding that they were offered an annual$10 a month chat GPT plus subscription. That's like, not like$10 a month for just one month. That's for 12 months. With one person saying a few weeks ago that they'd seen people offered that same deal for canceling their subscription.
11:22And actually I got the same thing when I tried to cancel. Yes, I pay for chat GPT. I need to actually use the fucking thing to criticize it. When I tried to cancel, it was like, hey, do you want three months for$10 a piece? And I was like, sure, just to prove my point. Suspicious. But there is a greater problem at play, by the way, and it goes beyond pricing. And it's that ChatGPT and OpenAI has been marketed based on lies. So ChatGPT has 700 million weekly active users. OpenAI has yet to provide a definition. Yes, I've asked them, which means that an active user could be defined as somebody who has gone to ChatGPT once in the space of a week.
11:54This term is extremely flimsy and doesn't really tell us much. Yes, it's a lot of people, but how active are they? SimilarWeb says that in July 2025, ChatGPT.com had 1.287 billion total visits, making it very popular. What do these facts actually mean though? As I said previously, ChatGPT has had probably the most sustained PR campaign for anything outside of a presidency or a pop star. Every single article about AI mentions OpenAI or ChatGPT. Every single feature launch, no matter how small gets a slew of coverage. Every single time you hear AI, you're made to think of ChatGPT by a tech media that's never stopped to think about their role in the hype or their responsibility to their readers.
12:35And as the hype has grown, the publicity compounds, because the natural thing for a journalist to do when everybody is talking about something is to talk about it more. ChatGPT's immediate popularity may have been viral, but the media took the ball and ran with it, and then proceeded to tell people it did stuff it did not. People were pressured to try this service then under false pretenses something that continues to happen to this day and i'm going to give you a really fucking grisly example when i discovered this when i went and looked at this it filled me full of rage it's disgraceful what happened on march 15th 2023 kevin roos of the new york times would say that open ai's gpt4 was exciting and scary and that it was exacerbating in his words the dizzy and vertiginous feeling i've been getting whenever I think about AI lately, wondering if he was experiencing future shock, then described how it was an indeterminate level of better, and then said something that immediately sounded ridiculous.
13:29In one test conducted by an AI safety research group that hooked GPT-4 up to a number of other systems, GPT-4 was able to hire a human task rabbit worker to do a simple online task career, solving a capture test, without alerting the person to the fact it was a robot. The AI even lied to the robot about why it needed the capture done, concocting a story about a vision impairment. Now, this doesn't sound even remotely real now, but this was two years ago. So I went and looked up the paper, and pretty much everything that Roos described was illustrative, i.e. it doesn't really seem whether it happened.
14:05Now, he's referring to the safety card, which every model has that lists all the measures used to train it and such. And this safety card led to the perpetration of one of the earliest falsehoods and most eagerly parroted lies about this fucking industry. And that was that chat GPT and generative AI is capable of agentic actions. Outlet after outlet and some people who should definitely have known better, led by Kevin Roos, eagerly interpreted an entire series of events that took place that doesn't remotely make sense. Starting with the fact that I don't think you can hire a cast grab it to solve a capture.
14:38Or at the very least, without a contrived situation where you create an empty task and ask them to complete it, why not use Mechanical Turk or Fiverr? There are people right now offering that service. There were actual real things. But you know me, I'm a curious little critter. So I went further and followed the citation from the safety card to the study. And this is by METR and the research page. It turns out that what actually happened was METR had a researcher copy and paste the generated responses from the model, and otherwise handled the entire interaction with the task grabber. And based on the plurality of task grabber contractors, it appears to have taken multiple times.
15:16On top of that, it appears that OpenAI and Meta, that's METR, sorry, were prompting the model on what to say, which kind of defeats the point. Like, we don't actually know what they prompted it to do. And when you look, it even says it does like chain of thought reasoning, which didn't really exist back then. And if it did, it was extremely like chain of thought is reasoning. And that came out end of 2024. This whole thing is absolutely insane. It's absurd that anyone wrote about it is real. What happened, just to be really blunt, is that they, if they even opened a task rabbit, it's really not obvious whether they actually did this.
15:51They had to go to the model and say, okay, I'm opening a task rabbit window. and now the person has said this and now this is it just doesn't sound real at all but even if it did it's very obvious that they were telling the model what to say and then copy pasting the response and it took them multiple tries it took me five whole minutes to find this article partly because it was cited on the gpt4 system card i then then read it within that time then wrote this part of the script it didn't require any technical knowledge other than the ability to read it is transparently blatantly obvious that GPT-4 did not hire a TaskRabbit or indeed make any of these actions.
16:28It was prompted to, and they did not show the prompts they used, likely because they had to use so many of them, if they even did it. Anyone falling for this is a mark, and OpenAI should have gone out of their way to correct people. Instead, they sat back and let people publish outright misinformation.
16:51So I've shopped with quints before they were an advertiser and after they became one, and then again before I had to record this ad, I really like them. My green over shirt in particular looks great, I use it like a jacket, it's breathable and comfortable and hangs on my body nicely, I get a lot of compliments, and I liked it so much I got it in all the different colours, along with one of their corduroy ones, which I think I pull off, and really that's the only person that matters. I also really love their linen shirts too. They're comfortable, they're breathable, and they look nice. Get a lot of compliments there too.
17:18I have a few of them. Love their rust-colored ones as well. And in general, I really like Quince. The shirts fit nicely and the rest of their clothes do too. They ship quickly, they look good, they're high quality, and they partner directly with Ethical Factories and Skip the Middlemen. So you get top-tier fabrics and craftsmanship at half the price of similar brands. And I'm probably going to buy more from them very, very soon. Keep it classic and cool this fall. With long-lasting staples from Quince. Go to quince.com slash better for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. That's Q-U-I-N-C-E dot com slash better.
17:52Free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.com slash better. Parking shouldn't slow you down. ParkWiz gives every driver a shortcut. Book ahead, save up to 50 % and skip the hassle of circling the block. Park smarter, park faster. ParkWiz. Download the ParkWiz app today and save every time you park.
18:39things from businesses using them and as a customer never upset to see them in a store square keeps up so you don't have to slow down get everything you need to run and grow your business without any long-term commitments and why wait right now you can get up to 200 off square hardware at square.com slash go slash better offline that's s q u a r e dot com slash g o slash better Start offline. Run your business smart with Square. Get started today.
19:36Bring the boo! Ex-boo.
19:43Roos, along with his co-host Casey Newton, would go on to describe this example at length on a podcast that week, describing an entire narrative where the human actually gets suspicious and GPT-4 reasons out loud that it should not reveal that it is a robot. It's not a reasoning model. At which point, the task rabbit solves the capture. During this conversation, Newton gasps and says, Oh my God, twice. And when he asks Roos, how does this model understand that in order to succeed at its task, it has to deceive the human? Roos responds, we don't know. That is the unsatisfying answer. And Newton laughs and states, we need to pull the plug.
20:17I mean, again, what? Disgraceful, embarrassing, reprehensible. All that and more on the Hard Fork podcast, published weekly. You can cut that. That adds to free, fellas. Credulousness aside, the GPT-4 marketing campaign was incredibly effective, creating an aura that allowed OpenAI to take advantage of the vagueness of its offering as people, including members of the media, willfully filled in the blanks for them. Altman has really never had to work to sell his product. Think about it. Have you ever heard OpenAI tell you what ChatGPT can do, or go to great lengths to describe its actual abilities?
20:53Even on OpenAI's own page for ChatGPT, the text is extremely vague. You scroll down, you're told that ChatGPT can write, brainstorm, edit, and explore ideas with you It can generate and debug code, automate repetitive tasks Not clear what the tasks are And help you learn new APIs Question mark With ChatGPT you can learn something new, dive into a hobby, answer complex questions, and analyze data and create charts What repetitive tasks? Who knows? How am I learning? Unclear It's got thinking built in What that means is also unclear unexplained and thus allows a user to incorrectly believe that chat GPT has a brain and thinks.
21:29To be clear, I know what reasoning means, but this website does not attempt to explain what thinking means. You can also offload complex tasks from start to finish with an agent, which can, according to OpenAI, think and act, proactively choosing from a toolbox of agentic skills to complete tasks for you using its own computer. This is an egregious lie, employing the kind of weasel wording that would be used to torture IR baboon for an eternity. Precise in its vagueness, OpenAI's copy is honed to make reporters willing to simply write down whatever they see and interpret it in the most positive light.
22:00And thus the lie of inference began. What ChatGPT meant was muddied from the beginning, and thus ChatGPT's actual outcomes have never been fully defined. What ChatGPT could do became a kind of folklore, a non-specific form of automation that could write code and generate copy and images that can analyze data, all things that are true but one can infer much greater meaning and use from. One can infer that automation means the automation of anything related to text, or that write code means write the entirety of a computer program. OpenAI's GPT agent is not, by any extension of the word, and I quote, already a powerful tool for handling complex tasks, but it has not, in any meaningful sense, committed to any actual outcomes.
22:40As a result, potential users, subject to a 24-7 marketing campaign have been pushed towards a website that can theoretically do anything or nothing and have otherwise been left to their own devices. The endless gaslighting, societal pressure, media pressure and pressure from their bosses has pushed hundreds of millions of people to try a product that even its creators can't really describe or don't feel compelled to. And if I was wrong, we'd have real use cases by now and better metrics than weekly active users. As I've said in the past, OpenAI is deliberately using these weekly active users so that it doesn't have to publish their monthly active users, which I believe would be much higher.
23:14Now, why wouldn't it do this? Well, OpenAI, as I've mentioned, has 20 million paying ChatGPT subscribers and 5 million business customers, with no explanation of what the difference might be, really other than it involves Teams and Edu, but not Pro. Anyway, this is already a mediocre 3.5 % conversion rate. Yeah, it's monthly active users, which are likely 800 or 900 million, but these are guesses, would make that rate lower than 3%, which is pretty terrible considering everyone says this shit is the future. I'm also tired of having people claim that search or brainstorm or companions are a lasting, meaningful business model.
Read the full transcript
23:49I'm really tired of it. I'm tired of being told this again and again and again. That's not what chat GPT is going to actually survive on. Breathe. Okay, let's move on. Here's another boost to grip though. OpenAI is making tons of money. That's proof they're a successful company and you are wrong somehow. So OpenAI announced that it has hit its first$1 billion month on August 20th, 2025. On CNBC, in fact. Weirdly enough, by the way, that quote was not in the TV interview. But anyway, this also brings it exactly in line with my estimated$5.26 billion in revenue that I believe it has made at the end of July.
24:23Did that in a premium newsletter? Please pay me. However, remember what the MIT study that I mentioned said. Enterprise adoption is high, but transformation is low. There are tons of companies throwing money at AI, but they are not seeing actual returns. OpenAI's growth as the single most prominent company in AI, and if we're honest, one of the most prominent in software writ large, makes sense, but at some point will slow, because the actual returns to businesses are not there. If there were, we'd have one article where we could point at a chat GPT integration that helped scale a company, save a bunch of money, make a bunch of money, written in plain English, and not in the gobbledygook of profit improvement.
25:03Also, OpenAI is projected to make 12.5 % $1.7 billion in 2025. How exactly will it do that? Is it really making$1.5 billion a month by the end of the year? Even if it does, is the idea that it keeps burning$10 billion or more a year, every year into a 10? What actual revenue potential does OpenAI have long-term? Its products are about as good as everybody else's, cost about the same, and do the same things. ChatGPT is basically the same product as Claude or Grok, maybe less MechaHitler, or any number of different LLMs. The only real advantages that OpenAI has are infrastructure and brand recognition.
25:41These models have clearly hit a wall in trading, hitting diminishing returns, meaning that the infrastructural advantage is that they can continue providing its service at scale, nothing more. It isn't making its business cheaper other than the fact it mostly hasn't had to pay for it other than the site in Abilene, Texas where it's promised Oracle $30 billion a year in 2025. I'm sorry I don't buy it. I don't buy that this company will continue growing forever and its stinky conversion rate isn't going to change anytime soon when open ai opens stargate abilene it will turn profitable how i hear this one a good amount how how how how how how how's it gonna happen nobody ever answers no one ever answers actually how this company will become profitable it's fucking insane to me nobody ever answers the question efficiencies efficiencies they're gonna be efficient they're gonna be efficient if you're going to say chat GPT-5, I wrote a huge scoop and then did an episode about why it's not more efficient.
26:37In fact, it's less efficient. And I'm sure one of you is going to argue, well, you know, they could do their custom silicon. They have a$10 billion deal with Broadcom. How are they fucking paying for that? Also, you realize that, well, actually, no, just, you know, no, you're right. They're going to get the chip from Broadcom because you know what they always say about the first generation of tech, right? It always works and it's always great and it has no problems. that's what i always that's that's what i happen with pretty much every first time they make anything in tech anyway let's move on you'll hear boosters also be like well my brother's friends dog uses chat gpt and they love it well i heard this happen or my mate has it in this or i heard this person or i use it in this one before we go any further just to be clear though is when you hear a booster bring up ai and they'll say something make sure they're talking about generative ai are they actually talking about generative ai is this a large language model thing.
27:30It's very, very, very common for people to conflate AI with generative AI. There are many different kinds of AI. Make sure that the AI booster, whatever they're claiming, whatever they're telling you, is actually about large language models. There are all sorts of other kinds of machine learning that people love to bring up. LLMs have nothing to do with folding at home, autonomous cars, or most disease research. But okay, let's do a speed run. Using AI led researchers to discover 44 % more materials. No, it didn't. MIT has now withdrawn in this paper citing concerns about its integrity. I've linked it in the show notes.
28:03There's a huge rundown. Here's another quote. AI is so profoundly powerful it's causing young people to have trouble finding a job. While young people have been having trouble finding jobs, there's no proof that AI is the reason. Every piece of coverage you're reading is citing an Oxford economics report that amidst a bunch of numbers says, and I quote, there are signs that entry-level positions are being displaced by artificial intelligence at higher rates. A statement that it does not back up other than claiming that the high adoption rate by information companies along the sheer employment declines in some roles since 2022 suggested some displacement effect from ai and digging deeper the largest displacement seems to be entry-level jobs normally filled by recent graduates there's otherwise new data anyone making this point is grasping at straws i go into this in more detail in a newsletter called sincerity wins the war which i've linked to but it's one of the worst reported stories in tech And now I'm actually going to ad-lib for a second because I forgot while writing this script, there was also this thing that came out of Stanford that said there's been a 13 % drop in jobs affected by AI.
29:05And this was used as proof that AI was taking them. Now, curious little critter that I am, I went and read that. What it actually did was find a bunch of jobs that they think are related to AI and being affected by AI. They saw they were going down. They went, oh, it's AI that did that. They fart around with various statistics, but that's the long and short of it. I'll give you an example of one of the jobs, accountancy. Now, any accountants listening, big up to my accountant listeners. There's been a hiring crisis in accountancy for years. People are not becoming CPAs. The reason there are less of them is that less people are becoming them.
29:37It's nothing to do with AI. Imagine if anyone put half as much effort into writing up these stories as I did writing up one of these booster quips. But here's another one. The AI is replacing young coders, and it is not. In fact, Amazon's cloud chief just said that replacing junior employees with AI is one of the dumbest things he's ever heard. There is no actual real evidence that this is the case. Every single story you have read is anecdotal. Anyone peddling this has an agenda or is not reading. Every CEO mentioning this specifically avoids saying the words that AI is replacing people because AI can't replace people.
30:13I will add an aside, there are people's jobs that have been replaced by ai translators transcribers brian over at blood is in the machine but in the machine even sorry brian he's doing a great job on covering this there are people that have lost jobs these people are losing it because their bosses are fucking stupid because their bosses are just taking the shittiest possible version of their work and slopping it up that's not happening at the knowledge worker scale nor is it happening at the CODA scale. Everyone telling you that has an agenda. But boosters will also claim that AI is doing science for search somehow, or will do it.
30:48And it won't. I've included a write-up about why foundation models can't do this. Someone's going to read it and say, but there's this bit where it says it isn't a defeat of LLMs. And the reason he says this is because, I shit you not, that LLMs aren't incapable of doing scientific research. He says they're insufficient, which is the same thing. They're insufficient. Anyway, he claims they're also not dead weight for science, then spends hundreds of words meandering around that thing to kiss up to AI boosters for some reason, I assume, because they've terrified him by being really annoying. And these people need to go outside and touch grass.
31:26Now, a lot of people think they're going to tell me that they use AI all the time, and that will change my mind. I cannot express how irrelevant it is that you have a use case. Every use case I hear is one of the following. I use it for brainstorming, to which I say, who cares? Not a business model. It's commoditized. I use it like search. Who cares? It's not even good at search. It's fine. It's not even better than the low bar set by Google search. The results it gives aren't great, and the links are deliberately made smaller, which gets in the way of me clicking them so I can actually look at the content.
31:55If you're using ChatGPT for search, you may not actually care about the content of the things you're looking at. If I'm wrong, great. You now have a functional search engine. Congrats, your fucking lations. Well, I use it for a search, and if you use it for research, you do not respect actual research. You want a quick answer. It's that simple. These reports are slop. I've read many, many, many AI reports and they're not good. Sorry. Well, I use it for coding. I know someone who used it for coding and I'll get to that in a minute. But all of this would be fine and dandy if people weren't talking about this stuff as if it was changing society.
32:27None of these use cases come close to explaining why I should be impressed by generative AI. It also doesn't matter if you yourself have a kind of useful thing that AI did for you once. We are so past the point when any of that matters. AI is being sold as a transformational technology, and I am yet to see it transform anything. I am yet to hear one use case that truly impresses me, or even one thing that feels possible that wasn't possible before. This isn't even me being a cynic. I'm ready to be impressed. I just haven't been impressed in three fucking years, and it's getting boring. Also, tell me with a straight face that any of this shit is worth the infrastructure.
33:01Remember, AI boosters are arguing that this stuff is powerful. None of these use cases are powerful sounding. But sir, oh, you're back, great. Sir, vibe coding is changing the world, allowing people who can't code to make software. Now, this is one of the most brain dead takes about AI and coding. And it's that vibe coding is allowing anyone to build software. And you'll never guess what Kevin Roos covered this. he legit did this article. While writing the script, I hadn't even noticed he'd legit. Anyway, while technically true in that one can just type build me a website into one of many coding environments, this does not mean said website is functional, secure, or useful.
33:40Let's make this really clear. AI cannot just handle coding. Go into the show notes and read this piece I've linked from Colton Bogey. I have actually interviewed him now. He's going to be coming out in the next few weeks, the episode. The interview is fucking brilliant. And then the other I've linked to by Nick Suresh. If you contact me about AI and coding without reading these, I will send them to you and nothing else will crush you like a car in a garbage dump into a cube. One or the other I will choose at the time. Also show me a vibe coded company, please. Not a company where somebody who can code has quickly spun up some features, a fully functional, secure, and useful app that has made money and made by somebody who cannot read or write code.
34:21You won't be able to because it is impossible. Vibe coding is a marketing term based on lies peddled by people who either have a lack of knowledge or morals. And are AI coding environments making people faster? I don't think so. In fact, a recent study suggested that they actually make software engineers 19 % slower. The reason that nobody is vibe coding an entire company is because software development is not just put a bunch of code in a pile and hit go. And oftentimes when you add something, it breaks something else. This is all well and good if you actually understand code. It's another thing entirely when you're using cursor or clawed code like a kid at an arcade machine, turning the wheel repeatedly without having a coin in there and pretending that you're playing it when the demo's going on.
34:59Vibecoders are also awful for the already negative margins of most AI coding environments, as every single thing they ask the model to do is imprecise, burning tokens in pursuit of a goal they themselves don't really understand. Vibecoding doesn't work, it will not work, and pretending otherwise is at best ignorance, and at worst supporting a campaign built on lies.
35:28Parking shouldn't slow you down. ParkWiz gives every driver a shortcut. Book ahead, save up to 50 % and skip the hassle of circling the block. Park smarter, park faster. ParkWiz. Download the ParkWiz app today and save every time you park. So today's show is brought to you with support from Square, who I really love. They offer quick payment processing, really easy to use terminals. Everything spins up really quickly. Every store I use them in, I don't really think about the experience, which is exactly what I want from any kind of tech. The loyalty programs work really easily. They're over at Court Street Grocers, S &P, Van Leeuwen Ice Cream.
36:03They're just a very easy to use and straightforward piece of tech. I can't recommend them enough. I've heard great things from businesses using them. And as a customer, never upset to see them in a store. Square keeps up so you don't have to slow down. Get everything you need to run and grow your business without any long-term commitments. And why wait? Right now, you can get up to$200 off Square hardware at square.com slash go slash better offline. That's S-Q-U-A-R-E dot com slash G-O slash better offline. Run your business smarter with Square. Get started today. Stop settling for weak sound.
36:43It's time to level up your game and bring the boom. Hit the town with the ultra-durable LG XBoom portable speaker and enjoy vibrant sound wherever you go. Elevate your listening experience to new heights, because let's be real, your music deserves it. The future of sound is now with LG XBoom. And for a limited time, save 25 % at LG.com with code FALL25. Bring the boom. XBoom. There's a lot going on in Hollywood. How are you supposed to stay on top of it all? Variety has the solution. Take 20 minutes out of your day and listen to the new Daily Variety podcast for breaking entertainment news and expert perspectives.
37:25Where do you see the business actually heading? Featuring the iconic journalist of Variety and hosted by co-editor-in-chief Cynthia Littleton. The only constant in Hollywood is change. Open your free iHeartRadio app, search Daily Variety, and listen now.
37:45And this is all built up to one final point. I'm no longer accepting half-baked arguments. If you're an AI booster, please come up with better arguments. And if you truly believe in this stuff, you should have a firmer grasp on why you do so. It's been three years, and the best some of you have is it's really popular. Uber also burned money. Your arguments are based on what you wish were true rather than what's actually true. And it's deeply embarrassing. Then again, there are many well-intentioned people who aren't necessarily AI boosters who repeat these arguments, regardless of how thinly framed they are.
38:16In part because we live in a high information, low processing society where people tend to put great faith in people who are confident in what they say and sound smart adjacent. I also think the media is failing on a very basic level to realize that their fear of missing out or seeming stupid is being used against them. If you don't understand something, it's likely because the people you're reading or hearing it from don't either. If a company makes a promise and you don't understand how they'll deliver on it, it's their job to explain how and your job to suggest it isn't plausible in clear and defined language.
38:46This has gone beyond simple objectivity into the realm of an outright failure of journalism. I have never seen more misinformation about the capabilities of a product in my entire career, and it's largely peddled by reporters who either don't know or have no interest in knowing what's actually possible, in part because all their peers are doing the same thing and saying the same nonsense. As things begin to collapse, and they sure look like they're collapsing, but I'm not making any wild claims about the bubble bursting quite yet. It will look increasingly more deranged to bluntly publish everything that these companies say.
39:18Never have I seen an act of outright contempt more egregious than Sam Altman saying that GPT-5 was actually bad and that GPT-6 will be even better. Members of the media, Sam Altman does not respect you. He is not your friend. Clammy Sam Altman is not secretly confiding in you. Clammy will think you are stupid and easily manipulated and will print anything he says, largely in part because many members of the media will print exactly what he says whenever he says it. And to be clear, if you wrote about GPT-6 and made fun of it, that's great. But let's close by discussing the very nature of AI skepticism and the so-called void between those who hate AI and those who love AI from the perspective of one of the most prominent people in the skeptic camp.
39:59Critics and skeptics are not given the benefit of grace, patience, or in many cases, hospitality when it comes to their position. While they may receive interviews and opportunities to give their side, it's always framed as the work of a firebrand, an outlier, or somebody with dangerous ideas that they must eternally justify. Skeptics are demonized, their points under constant scrutiny, their allegiances and intentions constantly interrogated for some sort of moral or intellectual weakness. Skeptic and critic are words said with a sneer of trepidation, that the listener should be suspicious that this person isn't agreeing that AI is the most powerful special thing ever.
40:36To not immediately fall in love with something that everybody is talking about is to be framed as a hater, to have oneself introduced with the words, not everyone agrees, or on 40 % of your appearances. By comparison, AI boosters are the first to get TV appearances and offers to be on panels. Their coverage featured prominently on TechMeme, selling slop-like books called Shit Like the Future of Intelligence, Masters of the Brain, featuring 18 interviews with different CEOs that all say the same thing. They don't have to justify their love. They simply have to remember all the right terms, chirping out test time compute, and the cost of inference is going down enough times to summon Wario Amadei to give them an hour-long interview where he says the models, they are, in years, going to be the most powerful schoolteacher ever built.
41:18And by the way, yeah, I did sell a book, because my shit fucking bangs, my shit rocks. I'm not, I'm, I'm not going to be too smug, but like, I put a lot of effort into this and I research it very well. Others should try harder. I have consistent, deeply sourced arguments that I've built over the course of years. I didn't become a hater because I'm a contrarian. I became a hater because the shit that these fucking oafs have done to the computer pisses me off. I did The Man That Destroyed Google Search because I wanted to know why Google Search sucked. I wrote Sam Altman Free because at the time I didn't understand why everybody was so fucking enamored with this clammy sociopath.
41:52Everything I do comes from a genuine curiosity and an overwhelming frustration with the state of technology. I started writing the newsletter that led to this podcast with 300 subscribers and 60 views and have written it as an exploration of subjects that grows as I write. I do not have it in me to pretend to be anything other than what I am. And if that's strange to you, well, I'm a strange man, but at least I'm an honest one. I do have a chip on my shoulder in that I really do not like it when people try to make other people feel stupid, especially when they do so as a means of making money for themselves or making someone else look good.
42:23I write this stuff out because I have an intellectual interest. I like writing, and by writing I'm able to learn and process my complex feelings around technology, and talking it out actually feels good. It's an intellectual exercise that I really enjoy. I happen to do so in a manner that hundreds of thousands of people enjoy every month, and I'm not specifying where those people go, and if you think that I've grown this by being a hater, you are doing yourself the disservice of underestimating me, which I will use to my advantage by writing deeper, more meaningful, and more insightful things than you, and then I'll say them with lots of curse words on this podcast.
42:55I've watched these pigs ruin the computer again and again and make billions doing so, and all of this is happening while the media celebrates the destruction of things like Google, Facebook, and the fucking environment in pursuit of eternal growth. I can't manufacture my disgust, nor is it hard to, nor can I manufacture whatever it is inside me that makes it impossible to keep quiet about these things. I don't know if I take this too seriously, whether I don't take it seriously enough because I keep saying fuck and shit, but I'm honored that I'm able to do so and I really appreciate everyone who listens, reads, or engages with me in any way.
43:27I really do love you all for listening. I know that this was a long three-parter. I've enjoyed recording it. I've done lots of retakes. Matt Asowski, love you, man. Sorry for all of this. I'll catch you next episode.
43:47Thank you for listening to Better Offline. The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song is Matt Ossowski. You can check out more of his music and audio projects at mattosowski.com. M-A-T-T-O-S-O-W-S-K-I dot com. You can email me at ez at betteroffline.com or visit betteroffline.com to find more podcast links and of course my newsletter. I also really recommend you go to chat.wheresyoured.at to visit the Discord and go to r slash betteroffline to check out our Reddit. Thank you so much for listening. Better Offline is a production of Cool Zone Media. For more from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
44:53Parking shouldn't slow you down. ParkWiz gives every driver a shortcut. Book ahead, save up to 50%, and skip the hassle of circling the block. Park smarter, park faster. ParkWiz. Download the ParkWiz app today and save every time you park. Stop settling for weak sound. It's time to level up your game and bring the boom. Hit the town with the ultra-durable LG XBoom portable speaker and enjoy vibrant sound wherever you go. Elevate your listening experience to new heights because let's be real, your music deserves it. The future of sound is now with LG XBoom. And for a limited time, save 25 % at LG.com with code FALL25.
45:34Bring the boom. XBoom. There's a lot going on in Hollywood. How are you supposed to stay on top of it all? Variety has the solution. Take 20 minutes out of your day and listen to the new Daily Variety podcast for breaking entertainment news and expert perspectives. Where do you see the business actually heading? Featuring the iconic journalist of Variety and hosted by co-editor-in-chief Cynthia Littleton. The only constant in Hollywood is change. Open your free iHeartRadio app, search Daily Variety, and listen now. Ugh, come on, why is this taking so long? This thing is ancient. Still using yesterday's tech?
46:14Upgrade to the ThinkPad X1 Carbon. Ultra-light, ultra-powerful, and built for serious productivity. With Intel Core Ultra processors, blazing speed, and AI-powered performance, it keeps up with your business, not the other way around. Whoa, this thing moves. Stop hitting snooze on new tech. Win the tech search at Lenovo.com. Lenovo, Lenovo. Unlock AI experiences with the ThinkPad X1 Carbon, powered by Intel Core Ultra processors, so you can work, create, and boost productivity all on one device. This is an iHeart Podcast.
From the publisher
In the final part of this week's three-part Better Offline Guide To Arguing With AI Boosters, Ed Zitron walks you through why generative AI is nothing like Amazon Web Services, how the media misled the public about ChatGPT, and why ChatGPT’s popularity does not mean it’s a mass-market product.
Latest Premium Newsletter: Why Everybody Is Losing Money On Generative AI: https://www.wheresyoured.at/why-everybody-is-losing-money-on-ai/
YOU CAN NOW BUY BETTER OFFLINE MERCH! Go to https://cottonbureau.com/people/better-offline and use code FREE99 for free shipping on orders of $99 or more.
BUY A LIMITED EDITION BETTER OFFLINE CHALLENGE COIN! https://cottonbureau.com/p/XSH74N/challenge-coin/better-offline-challenge-coin#/29269226/gold-metal-1.75in
---
LINKS: https://www.tinyurl.com/betterofflinelinks
Newsletter: https://www.wheresyoured.at/
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/BetterOffline/
Discord: chat.wheresyoured.at
Ed's Socials:
https://www.instagram.com/edzitron
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

