In short
Podcast Episode Notes: Better Offline - The Department of Justice V Google Ads: Part 2
Episode Overview
- Title: The Department of Justice V Google Ads: Part 2
- Host: Ed Zitron
- Guest: Jason Kint, CEO of DCN
- Context: Second part of coverage on the Department of Justice's antitrust case against Google, focusing on their practices in internet advertising technologies.
Key Themes
- Antitrust Case Overview
- The DOJ's case against Google alleges monopolistic practices through serial acquisitions and auction manipulation in ad tech.
- The trial is ongoing, with Jason Kint providing firsthand insights as he attends in-person.
- Structure of the Ad Market
- Three Key Markets Identified:
- Sell Side: Google’s publisher ad server (DFP) holds a 91% market share.
- Ad Exchange: Google’s AdX facilitates ad bidding and has significant market control.
- Buy Side: Google’s ad demand network claims an 80% market share.
- Google's Alleged Manipulation Tactics
- Last Look Advantage: Google gets to see winning bids and can undercut them, effectively bidding twice in auctions.
- Dynamic Revenue Sharing: Google can adjust its revenue share percentage to win bids, creating an unfair advantage and obscuring actual publisher earnings.
- Witness Testimonies
- Testimonies included former high-ranking executives from Google and major ad tech companies, providing insights into Google's market dominance and practices.
- A significant witness from News Corp described feeling "held hostage" by Google's practices, underscoring the co-dependent relationship between publishers and Google.
- Judicial and Market Reactions
- The judge appears to grasp the complexities of the case well and is scrutinizing Google’s internal practices, including their handling of evidence and employee communications.
- The legal arguments hinge on whether Google's actions constitute monopolistic behavior and harm to competitors and advertisers.
Critical Discussions
- Monopoly Power: The episode emphasizes how Google’s control over multiple aspects of digital advertising creates barriers for competition, thus raising significant legal and ethical questions.
- Impact on Advertisers: The podcast hints at the need for further testimony to clearly demonstrate how Google's practices can lead to inflated ad costs for advertisers and limit their market choices.
Conclusion
- The trial continues with a significant focus on the presentation of evidence and testimonies that could potentially sway the court's understanding of Google's role in the advertising ecosystem.
- Upcoming weeks will feature more developments, including Google's defense strategies and implications for the broader advertising market.
Additional Resources
- For more information, visit [usvgoogleads.com](https://usvgoogleads.com/) and check out Jason Kint's updates on [Twitter](https://x.com/jason_kint).
Host & Guest Socials
- Ed Zitron: [Twitter](https://twitter.com/edzitron), [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/edzitron)
- Jason Kint: [Twitter](https://x.com/jason_kint)
---
Feel free to delve deeper into the intricacies of this case and join the ongoing discussions in related forums like [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/BetterOffline/) and [Discord](https://discord.com/invite/QUUQUP9szv).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This is an iHeart Podcast.
0:30Thomson Reuters and specialized bikes have since they upgraded to the next generation of the cloud. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. OCI is the blazing fast platform for your infrastructure, database, application development, and AI needs, where you can run any workload in a high availability, consistently high performance environment, and spend less than you would with other clouds. How is it faster? OCI's block storage gives you more operations per second. Cheaper? Better? OCI costs up to 50 % less for computing, 70 % less for storage, and 80 % less for networking. Better? In test after test, OCI customers report lower latency and higher bandwidth versus other clouds.
1:12This is the cloud built for AI and all your biggest workloads. Right now, with zero commitment, try OCI for free. Head to oracle.com slash strategic. That's oracle.com slash strategic. So I love Square. They make paying for stuff at a store really easy. I just use them at Court Street Grocers to buy a sandwich here in Brooklyn, New York. Their stuff's reliable, easy to use, and it just works for both businesses and their customers. Square keeps up so you don't have to slow down. Get everything you need to run and grow your business without any long-term commitments. And why wait? Right now you can get up to$200 off Square hardware at square.com slash go slash better offline.
1:50That's S-Q-U-A-R-E dot com slash G-O slash better offline. Run your business smarter with Square. Get started today. This week on a very special episode of Health Discovered, we're taking a closer look at a condition that affects hundreds of thousands of men each year, prostate cancer. I first found out about my cancer on my birthday at the age of 45. Found out my cancer has spread to my pelvic bone. And from there, life just changed. About one in eight men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during their lifetime, and the risk increases with age. Anything with cancer, you just think death sentence.
2:34And the only thing I could think about was, who's going to take care of my family? You have to go out there and build your support system. You got to build your team. In this episode, we'll explore the science behind detection, along with the practical steps men can take to protect their health. Listen to Health Discovered on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Open your free iHeart app, search Health Discovered, and start listening.
3:03Ah, come on. Why is this taking so long? This thing is ancient. Still using yesterday's tech? Upgrade to the ThinkPad X1 Carbon. Ultralight, ultra-powerful, and built for serious productivity. With Intel Core Ultra processors, blazing speed, and AI-powered performance. It keeps up with your business, not the other way around. Whoa, this thing moves. Stop hitting snooze on new tech. Win the tech search at Lenovo.com. Lenovo, Lenovo. Unlock AI experiences with the ThinkPad X1 Carbon, powered by Intel Core Ultra processors, so you can work, create, and boost productivity all on one device.
3:44Call Zone Media. Hello and welcome to Better Offline. I'm your host, Ed Zitron.
4:01I am joined by Jason Kint, once again, the CEO of DCN, who'll be telling us more about the first week of the Department of Justice versus Google Ads. Jason, thank you so much for joining. Thanks for having me back, Ed. Thrilled to be here. So what's been happening since we last spoke? How'd the first week go? It's a blur. I mean, it's an impressive operation. I think we talked about how this district is known as the Rocket Docket, and that's how they got from filing a complaint to actual trial in like a year and a half. So it has that reputation, and we saw it in action this week. I mean, every day we start at 9 a.m.
4:38sharp, like clockwork until 6 p.m., with three or four senior executives testifying every day. And who's testified so far? Three or four ex-Google employees we've heard from. We've had CEOs of all the major ad tech companies. Andrew Casale from Index Exchange, CEO of Magnite, and Rubicon. Actually, it's now called Magnite. And then who else do we hear from? We heard two different publishers, executives. So we've kind of gone down the list. We've had one expert witness, a computer science professor from Carnegie Mellon. And so is this currently the Department of Justice's case? Like it's them laying out their case?
5:24Yeah, this is what they call their case in chief. And it'll take probably about, I think, two weeks. And then Google will have a chance to defend itself. So what's the thrust of their argument other than they have a monopoly? Well, it's that there are three different markets at work here that they have a monopoly in. So, you know, some of the back and forth is still Google trying to break that apart and blur into one single kind of two sided market, they call it. But but the Justice Department is their complaint is, again, that there's three markets. There's the sell side, there's the ad exchange, and then there's the buy side.
6:00Google in their opening statement has already tried to make that into one market that's a two-sided market, trying to lean into a prior Supreme Court decision that involved American Express. I don't think they'll have much success there. but um once you get past proving that there's three markets there and that they've got monopoly power in them then it's also a tying argument that they've used one of the one of those to build up and maintain market power through through bad conduct to um to do that so so do me a favor break me down those three parts then and then we can get into the degree sure um so the the publisher side, the sell side, Google has the product that a lot of people still know as DFP, which came from their double click acquisition.
6:51So that's the publisher ad server. And according to the Just Department's opening statement, they've got like 91 % of the market share for the publisher side. And a publisher in this case is like a website? It'd be like a website. That shows Google ads on it. Exactly. And so that's the server that's, it's kind of the sort, I guess what you call the source of truth, we've always called it, but it's the ad server that says, hey, I've got this ad. And then it takes care of deciding who wins it and then ultimately rendering and serving the ad. And then actually dealing with all the accounting and inventory projections, etc.
7:32So that's what's the sell side of this auction market, this real-time auction market. And then to go to the other side, you've got on the buy side, Google has their ad demand that they have through their ad network that they also have. I think the Just Department's arguing they have like 80-some percent of that market. That's really important because a lot of the arguments are that you couldn't use other products and still have access to that Google demand. And so they use that advertising demand of advertisers that want to spend money in order to ensure that everyone else stays on their supply chain.
8:15And then in the middle is the ad exchange, which Google's called Ad X. And that's the exchange that acts as the ability to take in bids of the ad inventory and then clear them. So it's the place where Google sells ads on Google to Google? No, it's the ad X would be the what would take the sell side. So the publisher ad server. So all the different websites are out there across the web. It would take their inventory and say, hey, I've got this ad impression. I'm requesting somebody to bid on it. And then Google could handle the bid because of its demand. But other parties could come in, too, and bid.
9:02And it would decide the highest bid. So how are they using this as a monopolist then? Where is the other than being on every single transaction? Are they are they doing anything else to basically intervene and drive up price? Well, I mean, a couple of the main themes that are going on throughout the entire week is that that adx, which is the exchange, Google takes 20 % of the revenue, and they've never had to come off of that price. And so the CEOs of Index Exchange and these other exchanges that are out there were testifying, and they charged like half of what Google charges, sometimes even as low as 5%.
9:46Andrew Casale, the CEO of Index Exchange, said they actually went down to zero, and they weren't able to take away business from Google. So Google is able to keep that 20 % and extract monopoly rents according to one of their own internal... Forgive my ignorance here, but how do they... Is it that there's a bunch of ad inventory that Google only has access to? It's the opposite of it. It's actually that you can only have access to the demand, the ad spend that Google has, if you're using AdX. So that ad demand won't travel through any other exchange. And why is that? Is it just because it's a decision by Google?
10:33And so, yeah, so they've made the decision to only allow their demand to go through ad X. So what's stopping people from building their own ad X? There's other exchanges out there that try to compete with, with ad X, but they're not able to because they can't get access to all the ad demand and that spend. And it's that critical. And everybody wants to stay on AdX. And Google has then advantages, which we can go through, because of the way that AdX operates. So what are those advantages? I think the biggest one that was part of the opening statements is what's now last look, they call it. There was something called first look, which was really before the auctions really opened up with header bidding.
11:22and first looks kind of just this it's to simplify it's basically if you put in if a publisher said hey i've got this ad unit and i'm willing to sell it to anybody and the floor the lowest price i'll sell it for is five dollars then google always had the chance to say i'll take it before it even goes into the auction they could say they had first look and they could just say i'll take it for five dollars and a penny basically before they even put it in the auction And over time, that transitioned into something called Last Look, so that when auctions started to open up, because of their privileged position that Google had, they had something called Last Look, where after all the auction took place, they could then look at the winning bid and decide if they wanted to beat it by another penny.
12:12Oh, so they can literally just rig the dice pretty much as they want? I mean, that's the reading in the room. And it's interesting because I think one of the biggest questions always going into this trial was, it was originally going to be a jury. Now it's this Judge Brinkema. Can you explain these live high-speed trading auctions of ad tech to the average American? And they're doing a really good job of explaining it. I think the judge gets it. The people in the room get it. And, you know, I think Last Look was one of the better examples where the Justice Department in their opening statement described it as kind of like a classic silent auction where every party writes down their bid on the slip of paper.
12:59It's in a sealed envelope and you only get to bid once. And then at the end of the auction, Google gets to peek into the envelope, see what the highest bid is and say, you know, I'll pay a penny higher for that. So Google gets to bid twice where everyone else gets to bid once. Essentially. That's essentially what happens, right? And so they get to pick up wherever they think there's additional value because of the quality of the impression. And this is in the tool that lets publishers sell ad space, right? Yeah, that's basically what's called an SSP. It's the supply side platform that takes their inventory and puts it out for auctions.
13:57So I've shopped with quints before they were an advertiser and after they became one, and then again before I had to record this ad, I really like them. My green over shirt in particular looks great. I use it like a jacket. It's breathable and comfortable and hangs on my body nicely. I get a lot of compliments. I liked it so much. I got it in all the different colors, along with one of their corduroy ones, which I think I pull off. And really, that's the only person that matters. I also really love their linen shirts, too. They're comfortable, they're breathable, and they look nice. Get a lot of compliments there, too.
14:24I have a few of them. Love their rust colored ones as well. And in general, I really like quints. The shirts fit nicely and the rest of their clothes do, too. They ship quickly. They look good. They're high quality. And they partner directly with ethical factories and skip the middlemen. So you get top tier fabrics and craftsmanship at half the price of similar brands. I'm probably going to buy more from them very, very soon. Keep it classic and cool this fall. With long-lasting staples from Quince, go to quince.com slash better for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns. That's q-u-i-n-c-e dot com slash better.
14:58Free shipping and 365-day returns. Quince.com slash better. This week on a very special episode of Health Discovered, we're taking a closer look at a condition that affects hundreds of thousands of men each year, prostate cancer. I first found out about my cancer on my birthday at the age of 45. Found out my cancer has spread to my pelvic bone. And from there, life just changed. About one in eight men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during their lifetime, and the risk increases with age. Anything with cancer, you just think death sentence. And the only thing I could think about was, who's going to take care of my family?
15:42You have to go out there and build your support system. You got to build your team. In this episode, we'll explore the science behind detection, along with the practical steps men can take to protect their health. Listen to Health Discovered on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Open your free iHeart app, search Health Discovered, and start listening.
16:08Are you a business owner or entrepreneur in need of a fast funding solution? Amerifactors provides fast capital. Call today for a free no obligation quote at 800-884-FUND. Startups, rapid growth stage or struggling, even with less than perfect credit, including bankruptcies. In business for over 34 years, thousands of satisfied clients have transformed their cash flow with Amerifactors. Call Amerifactors today at 800-884-FUND. That's 800-884-3863. Or visit amerifactors.com. Hey, it's Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. Now, I was looking for fun ways to tell you that Mint's offer of unlimited premium wireless for$15 a month is back.
16:47So I thought it would be fun if we made$15 bills. But it turns out that's very illegal. So there goes my big idea for the commercial. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. A front payment of$45 for a three-month plan equivalent to$15 per month required. New customer offer for first three months only. Speed slow after 35 gigabytes of networks busy. Taxes and fees extra. See MintMobile.com. So as you're finding from my litany of very simple questions, this stuff is pretty complex. Is the judge getting it? I think she is, yeah. I mean, they're coming up with, I think, simple ways to explain it.
17:24She seems sharp as a tack, and she's fair as can be. I mean, she runs a courtroom like I've never seen. But the technical aspects of it, I think they're going as deep as they really need to. And, you know, they had an expert witness in Carnegie Mellon, computer science professor, Dr. Ravi. And he did a really good job of with some visuals of explaining the kind of the three or four kind of most important ways in which they were, quote unquote, rigging or allegedly rigging the auctions. And he kind of walked through each of those. And it was easy to follow. And what was his testimony exactly? What did he get into?
18:06Well, he walked through that last look and why that was so important as an example that we just talked about. He talked through something called dynamic revenue sharing, which is a pretty big advantage that Google just gave itself in AdEx also, So where, you know, the way he testified was that Google recognized, and there's tons of emails that they put up that back this up. So it's not, or maybe past the stage of having to say their allegations because there was evidence going up on screens. But what they did was, you know, Google takes 20%, as I mentioned, of the transactions that go through AdEx.
18:49And so the other 80 % goes to the publisher. So in simple terms, if it's a dollar, if it's a dollar transaction, Google is going to take 20 cents. The publisher is going to take 80 cents. And what they did was they said, you know what, if we've got this last look and we know that somebody else is going to win this ad at 81 cents because we're only going to get 80 cents across to the publisher. Why don't we take our revenue share down off 20 percent to 15 percent? And so then we'll win. Oh, God. and 85 cents will go through and we'll win the bid. And so in Google's own words, in their own email, they described it as just another way to exploit the fact that they have last look.
19:31So we've got this last look. Why don't we come off of our 20 % share if it allows us to win the impression? And so that's a way to, you know, it didn't actually drive that much more revenue through, but what it did was it gave them a lot more volume and activity um a lot more of the bids were won through their exchange rather than the other competitive exchanges that were out there if that makes sense it does so you talk about them needing addicts to continue like forgive me if i understood this but the demand that they have that's really their secret source the demand that they can source why isn't why can't anyone else get that kind of demand what is it that's stopping them well it That's where this is interesting because it kind of starts with the search trial that they just won last month.
20:20And so that remember the other case over in D.C. was that Google has monopoly power over search text advertising, too. And so they've got this platform in which advertisers are going in to buy ads in which they've got monopoly power. And so trying to convince a lot of smaller business advertisers out there, small market advertisers, to go through another platform is in itself difficult. There's friction there. And so everybody spends money on Google already. And so they already come in with that massive advantage. And is it more expensive to use other platforms? Is it more burdensome to set up with them?
21:03You know, we haven't really got into the quality of the buy side platforms. They seem to be described as relatively comparable. So it's more a matter of having one central interface in which you're buying. So but it's clearly that money is going to be coming through from the Google site no matter what. That's going to go to Google's platforms, going to go to the wider web. And so they just walk in with a massive advantage on the demand side. And so the real challenge is that that's, or the issue is that demand should be able to go to other exchanges, not just to Google's. And that's where I think Google's trying to set up its defense is that they shouldn't have to connect their demand to other platforms.
21:44There's no issue with, well, we'll get to the legal piece of it, but go ahead. Yeah, even though that seems a perfectly reasonable thing to say for anything like this. Right. So is this suggesting that all Google properties run through AdX? Like you can't buy advertising on Google ads without going through AdX? Can't buy. No. So I'm sorry to, yeah, I wish I had my visual as we're talking. But you can't, if the advertising demand on the buy side on Google, that has to go through AdEx in order to go to other publishers. And so, yeah, I think that's the same thing you were saying. And that demand is coming from advertisers, as in people who want to advertise on different platforms.
22:36That's right. But then it goes through adx and then Google basically gets to monkey with it at the beginning and the end of it. It's just it feels fairly, fairly crooked. That's the feeling when you're sitting in the room. It very much does. And there's a lot of emails from Google employees where you can tell they feel like this might be a little crooked, you know. So there was a thing, The Verge quoted a particular witness from News Corp that seemed quite interesting, who said she felt like they were being held hostage by Google. Yeah, she was really solid with Stephanie Laser. She no longer is with News Corp.
23:19She's actually at Amazon now, which is interesting. But she gave really clear evidence and testimony. And, you know, she was explaining how there was really no choice to use any platform but DFP as their ad server. And therefore, with it, it comes with all these other obligations. And, you know, the one thing that Google did that she seemed to really not like was there is a point that was important in time where Google said to publishers, you can no longer have floors, price floors on individual exchanges. So what does that mean? Essentially, if you're a publisher, if you're a website and you're saying, I have this ad that's available and I will allow five different exchanges to put forward their highest bid for it.
24:15And when you say ad available, you mean like space on a website to advertise? Like a banner on their homepage. Yeah. So a banner on their homepage, and they're making it available to, let's say, five different exchanges. One of those is ADX, but then let's say also Pubmatic and Rubicon and Exchange, these various SSPs we call them. And for a while, you could actually set a price floor, essentially the lowest price you were willing to sell that banner on the homepage. And you could set it individually based on the exchange. So what publishers were often doing was they were putting a higher price for Google, for AdX, for a number of reasons.
24:55And some of those reasons included wanting to diversify. So not all the revenue and spend was coming from Google because that could create risk, as we see. They also wanted to manage the quality of the ads because sometimes the ads weren't as high quality coming through AdX. So by having a higher price point, it kind of weeded out some of the garbage. And so there were a number of reasons. And at this moment in time, Google said, you know what, you now need to have a universal price floor across everyone. And that basically gave AdEx the same, you know, the same advantage. It made sure it had the same price floor as everyone else.
25:30But how do they maintain a price floor across other platforms? Like, did they just say, if you violate this, you're off of our ad platform? Well, it all, it's because again, DFP, the ad server, is also Google. So it's the final source of truth. Yeah. So they own the place where ads are negotiated, the place where ads come from, and then the server that puts the ads on places. Bingo. That's really, that's good. That seems like. It's a good business if you can keep it, right? Yeah, but that might be a problem for them.
26:12Parking shouldn't slow you down. ParkWiz gives every driver a shortcut. Book ahead, save up to 50 % and skip the hassle of circling the block. Park smarter, park faster. ParkWiz. Download the ParkWiz app today and save every time you park. This week on a very special episode of Health Discovered, we're taking a closer look at a condition that affects hundreds of thousands of men each year, prostate cancer. I first found out about my cancer on my birthday at the age of 45. I found out my cancer has spread to my pelvic bone, and from there, life just changed. About one in eight men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during their lifetime, and the risk increases with age.
27:00Anything with cancer, you just think death sentence. And the only thing I could think about was, who's going to take care of my family? You have to go out there and build your support system. You got to build your team. In this episode, we'll explore the science behind detection, along with the practical steps men can take to protect their health. Listen to Health Discovered on America's number one podcast network, iHeart. Open your free iHeart app, search Health Discovered, and start listening. Are you a business owner or entrepreneur in need of a fast funding solution? Amerifactors provides fast capital.
Read the full transcript
27:38Call today for a free no obligation quote at 800-884-FUND. Startups, rapid growth stage or struggling, even with less than perfect credit, including bankruptcies. In business for over 34 years, thousands of satisfied clients have transformed their cash flow with Amerifactors. Call Amerifactors today at 800-884-FUND. That's 800-884-3863. Or visit amerifactors.com. This is Jacob Goldstein from What's Your Problem? Business software is expensive. And when you buy software from lots of different companies, it's not only expensive, it gets confusing, slow to use, hard to integrate. Odoo solves that because all Odoo software is connected on a single affordable platform.
28:21Save money without missing out on the features you need. Odoo has no hidden costs and no limit on features or data. Odoo has over 60 apps available for any needs your business might have, all at no additional charge. Everything from websites to sales to inventory to accounting, all linked and talking to each other. Check out Odoo at O-D-O-O dot com. That's O-D-O-O dot com. This is Buzz Knight from Taking a Walk. Lexus believes in the importance of standards. One of my standards? I never want to be late. I always want to show up on time. For Lexus, the standard is simple. Experience amazing. Their benchmarks aren't stats or specs.
29:06They're feelings, exhilaration, joy. That sense your car was designed just for you. Machines built to make you feel more human. Because a car that doesn't make you feel something is a car that stops short of amazing. Experience amazing at your Lexus dealer. So, were there any other really cool publisher witnesses, interesting people? So, on the publisher side for listeners, just saying that's the people putting ads up. Sorry, they're the ones providing ad inventory. Yeah, we heard from Gannett. He was actually the first witness. Gannett, the big newspaper company, their head of their ad operations group, was the very first witness on Monday.
29:55You know, he really set up some of the basic foundation of the case. So I think it was enough really from the publisher's side. Now we're actually deeper in the weeds of the conduct issues and some of these like the revenue sharing we're going through and some of these other games that they played. I think the most, actually the most interesting one, if I can digress for a second, the dynamic revenue sharing where they would come off the 20 % and drop down, they actually came out with dynamic revenue sharing too, where they seemed to realize that it was hurting their margins coming down off 20 % in order to win the transaction.
30:35So they decided they would also go higher than 20 % when they had a high enough bid already, and that would allow them to recoup that margin. And so they essentially described it as a bank in which they could, as the expert would have said, he described it as imposing a debt on the publishers, where basically Google would say, you know what, we're going to go offer, take less than 20 % revenue share in order to win an ad, but then we're going to go ahead and hold a little debt for you, publisher, and we're going to take that money back later on and pay ourselves back. Wait, so when they came up, so when they reduced their car to win a bid, they would then take the remainder of the cut that they'd lost and then charge the people they were meant to give money.
31:19So the place where the ad was going? Yes. But later on. So maybe one ad goes through at a 15 % revenue share that they came down off 20 % in order to win that transaction. And then maybe the next time an ad went through on that site, they would take 24 % or whatever it is in order to pay themselves back. How did, how the, pardon my French, how the fuck is that? Like what the, that's insane. Well, that's what we're going to find out, right? I mean, imposing a debt on publishers. I wrote that down in my notebook as soon as he said it, because I was thinking, yeah, that's what that is. And so if the publisher didn't know that that debt was being imposed on them, or if it was unclear or they were being misled, which seems to be the case often, then, you know, that's significant harm to the publishers.
32:05It's, it's, we're talking billions of dollars. if it's a matter of 20 % versus 18%, you know, coming down off that number. So are there any other harms they've discussed, other ways that Google's actions have harmed others? Well, I mean, certainly there's been harm to the other ad exchanges, the other ad tech companies too, that haven't been able to compete because of that monopoly power. We haven't really seen from the buy side yet in terms of, you know, how it affects the advertisers. We had two different ad agency executives testify. And, you know, it was good. It was solid. It was kind of foundational.
32:41But I want to really see the Just Department connect the dots still on how this harmed advertisers, because it's fairly clear that Google is going to, as its defense, say, you know what? We made a market that, yes, we dominate the buy side, the sell side, and we control the auctions and we do all these funny business games, but we do it to be more efficient. and our advertisers are all happy. And so what's the harm? I mean, that's clearly where they're going. And so I think those dots need to be connected a bit. It feels like they can't really say that that's the case though, because the way this harms advertisers is this must raise prices or at least manipulate them to benefit Google.
33:24Yeah, I mean, there's both that and then what we don't know too. And I think there'll be one or two economists that will probably have testify next week. and I think that's the part that they'll also land in. Has anyone from Google kind of like said anything? Have they managed to get anyone to flip on the Google side? There was only one of the ex-employees. I think all the ex-employees were somewhat damaging, but only one of them that was, I think, really sympathetic and the case. And he just seemed to have no love for the, he called it the machine. he would describe like where he knew things were not right they were not doing the right thing as a company and his colleagues would agree and then they would propose a change and then it would get denied, it would come back from the machine and the people on the other side he said that would overrule what they wanted to do, he never figured out who was on the other side He said he kind of commented on it.
34:29I never really knew where that decision was coming from, but it would come back as a no. And so that was the closest we saw. And this is Izal Lipkiewicz. It was. Oh, yeah. Good call. Yes. Oh, yeah. That's what I'm here for. It's really funny because all of this has been going on decades. That's what really astonishes me. This isn't even subtle, what's going on. I haven't really dug too deeply, and I know I will, into the discovery. And actually, have they been providing a bunch of internal... So you said there's a bunch of emails. Has there been a lot of them? There's been a lot of new documents.
35:05Yeah, a lot of emails. And I'd say about 20 or 30 are going up on the Just Department site per day. And I think I mentioned on our opening session, but usvgoogleads.com has all the exhibits, and they're all searchable, et cetera. They're doing a great job managing that. But, you know, there's a lot of material. And the other thing that is happening, because we talked about it on the first show, is they're really landing, the dust bar is really landing that there is evidence that we're not seeing. And so they've asked a number of the ex-Google employees about having their chats automatically deleted after 24 hours and why they didn't honor the litigation hold.
35:45And the judge leaned in several times on that where she asked questions of the witness and said, when did you get this litigation hold? Why didn't you preserve your chats? What did you understand? And so I think that's also going to hang over them the rest of the trial. And has that been a consistent theme? Because I did see a message with friend of the show Prabhagar Raghavan saying, responding to someone and saying, oh, wait, this chat's on the record, which is so bad. That's really bad. That's really bad. Wow. Yeah, it's a consistent theme, and I wouldn't take it lightly if I were Google. And because, you know, she already said that she was going to affect the credibility of every witness.
36:28And so you've got Izar, we mentioned a guy named Chris LaSala who ran their publisher operations globally, testified this morning, Brad Bender a couple of days ago. These are former employees. And so, you know, even though they weren't, I think, really damaging as witnesses, I think the judge also knows she didn't, we're not seeing everything probably. So, and she has to make that inference. And then on top of that, I think the first witness every day next week is also a Google employee. I mean, Monday at 9 a.m. will be Neil Mohan, who was the CEO of DoubleClick when they sold it to Google. He brought the deal in and he continued to run it for quite some time.
37:09And now he's the CEO of YouTube. So I think that'll be a really important witness. He's probably one of the guys on the other side that, you know, the machine. Go ahead. So right now, the Department of Justice is making their case. How long left do we have of that before Google gets to make theirs? I would have to imagine at least another week to a week and a half. And then Google will have another week or so probably for their defense. And we'll get to closing arguments by the first week of October. Very cool. And do you think that the Department of Justice is making their case convincingly? I think they are.
37:49Yeah. I mean, Google's strategy in the beginning seemed to be confusion. It was both to try to confuse the market. That's not three markets. They've tried to argue that the display ads are the same as TikTok ads and Facebook ads, and they've lost that. and the opening statement that they did which I think it got some reporting on this it was Karen Dunn who's their lead defense attorney from Paul Weiss she did the opening statement for half an hour and she just really tried to sandwich in just I mean she ran out of time and had to cut on the fly just a lot of technical terms and a lot of jargon from the industry I think to try to confused the judge up front um she got some press because interesting enough she ran out of the room as soon as she finished at whatever was 10 a.m on monday she ran out of the room to go because she was also the lead um advisor and coach for um for kamala harris for the debate and so she literally she opened up on monday and she's leading the defense and then she also is was helping to prep Kamala.
38:55So busy woman. Yeah. So, I mean, kind of exciting, but also it doesn't feel like Google is particularly well prepared for this. I guess we'll see more in their defense, but it doesn't seem like their plan is anything other than let's confuse as much as humanely possible. Yeah. I mean, I think, I think that is my read on it too. I think it's a good read on it, even though they had four years, I think because the state AGs filed back in 2020. So they've had time to work through their defense on this. But I think ultimately, it's going to come down to a legal issue. They're trying to make the case about something that's called refusal to deal, which there's some Supreme Court precedent on that they shouldn't have to provide APIs or do deals with their rivals.
39:45But with the monopoly power that they have, I don't think that that's really the that's not the case it's a it's a tying case where they're saying you can't have our advertising demand unless you use these other products where we also have monopoly power and that's i think that'll be enough for the just department to win also kind of feels like the an argument that you could win much better if it didn't seem like you were deleting all this stuff that's exactly right there's a lot of smoke in the room for sure so yeah well well jason thank Thank you so much for joining us again for this. Where can people find you?
40:18You can find me on Twitter. It's probably easiest. Jason underscore Kint, K-I-N-T. And I always look for feedback. Okay. And also go to usvgoogleads.com. And if any of this was slightly confusing, they have an incredible trial resources, Bear, with a glossary of terms with Ad Tech Explainers. I know, listeners, this is a lot. It's a lot for me, and I'm steeped in this crap all the time. but the people running usv google who was actually running that jason do you know it's a coalition but there's a group called check my ads that's taking lead on it and i appreciate the other mention of it because they're just doing a phenomenal job they really are and also genuinely a lot of people i would argue this is undercovered in the tech industry just because this is the biggest thing happening in tech it is and there's literally like you know 300 billion dollars of advertising spend that goes through Google.
41:11So it's what pays for all this journalism. I also should mention, because it's different than the search trial, that the National Press, New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, they were all there on the first day. The wire services were all there. The DC groups like MLEX and Capital Forum were there, but also the industry advertising trade press, Adweek, Digiday, Business Insider, Marketing Brew, and ad exchanger were all there. There must have been 30 reporters there. Many of them were there the whole week. And there were 10 cameras I counted outside of the courthouse. And so there actually was a lot of attention on it, which is wonderful.
41:46Which is great. And I think everyone, please go and check out USV Google Ads. Go check out Jason. And you can check out my various stuff that you'll hear in a recorded clip after this. Thank you for listening. Thanks, Ed.
42:04Thank you for listening to Better Offline. The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song is Matt Ossowski. You can check out more of his music and audio projects at mattosowski.com. M-A-T-T-O-S-O-W-S-K-I.com. You can email me at ez at betteroffline.com or visit betteroffline.com to find more podcast links and, of course, my newsletter. I also really recommend you go to chat.wheresyoured.at to visit the Discord and go to r slash betteroffline to check out our Reddit. Thank you so much for listening. Better Offline is a production of Cool Zone Media. For more from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
43:09Parking shouldn't slow you down. ParkWiz gives every driver a shortcut. Book ahead, save up to 50 % and skip the hassle of circling the block. Park smarter, park faster. ParkWiz. Download the ParkWiz app today and save every time you park. Are you a business owner or entrepreneur in need of a fast funding solution? Amerifactors provides fast capital. Call today for a free no obligation quote at 800-884-FUND. Startups, rapid growth stage or struggling, even with less than perfect credit, including bankruptcies. In business for over 34 years, thousands of satisfied clients have transformed their cash flow with Amerifactors.
43:46Call Amerifactors today at 800-884-FUND. That's 800-884-3863. or visit amerifactors.com. In the heat of battle, your squad relies on you. Don't let them down. Unlock elite gaming tech at Lenovo.com. Dominate every match with next-level speed, seamless streaming, and performance that won't quit. And push your gameplay beyond limits with Intel Core Ultra processors. That's the power of Lenovo with Intel inside. Maximize your edge by shopping at Lenovo.com during their back-to-school sale. That's Lenovo.com. Lenovo. Lenovo. This is Doug Gottlieb for the Doug Gottlieb Show. The Toyota Tundra and Tacoma are designed to outlast and outlive, backed by Toyota's legendary reputation for reliability.
44:33Get into Tundra with available iForce Max hybrid engine, delivering exceptional torque and towing capacity. Or check out a Tacoma with available off-road features like crawl control. It can take you beyond the trails. Toyota trucks are built to last year after year, mile after mile. So don't wait. Get yours today. Visit buyatoyota.com for deals and more. Toyota, let's go places. Chances are you've been to the doctor recently and you probably handed over your insurance, your ID, and even your social security number. Your doctor is just one of many places that has your personal info. And if any of them accidentally expose your details, you could be at risk for identity theft.
45:14LifeLock monitors millions of data points a second. If you become a victim, they'll fix it, guaranteed, or your money back. Save up to 40 % your first year. Call 1-800-LIFELOCK and use promo code IHEART or go to lifelock.com slash IHEART for 40 % off. Terms apply. This is an IHEART podcast.
From the publisher
Ed Zitron is once again joined by Jason Kint, CEO of DCN, for the second episode of Better Offline's coverage of the Department of Justice's second antitrust case against Google, one that alleges that "through Serial Acquisitions and Anticompetitive Auction Manipulation, Google Subverted Competition in Internet Advertising Technologies." This is the second episode of our ongoing coverage of the trial, which Jason will be attending in-person in Washington DC. For more information, visit https://usvgoogleads.com/ and follow Jason at https://x.com/jason_kint
LINKS: https://www.tinyurl.com/betterofflinelinks
Newsletter: https://www.wheresyoured.at/
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/BetterOffline/
Discord: chat.wheresyoured.at
Ed's Socials:
https://www.instagram.com/edzitron
https://bsky.app/profile/zitron.bsky.social
https://www.threads.net/@edzitron
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

