Anthropic vs. The Pentagon, Bloodbath at Block, The Citrini Selloff

27 Feb 2026 · 1 h 5 min · 29 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Big Technology Podcast Episode Notes

Episode Title

Anthropic vs. The Pentagon, Bloodbath at Block, The Citrini Selloff

Host

Alex Kantrowitz

Guest

Ranjan Roy from Margins

---

Episode Overview In this episode, Alex and Ranjan discuss several major tech news stories, focusing on the confrontation between Anthropic and the Pentagon, significant layoffs at Block, and the implications of Citrini's recent research that induced market panic.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Anthropic and the Pentagon Showdown
  2. Background: Anthropic faced pressure from the Pentagon to allow its AI technology (Claude) to be used for both autonomous weaponry and domestic surveillance.
  3. Claude's Involvement in Military Operations:
  4. Claude was reportedly used in the capture of Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro during a U.S. military operation.
  5. The partnership with Palantir for data usage raised questions about Anthropic's responsibility and awareness of how its technology is utilized.
  • Cultural Clash:
  • The discussion highlighted a culture clash between tech companies and military operations, questioning the ethical implications of using AI in warfare.
  • Alex and Ranjan debated if AI should be allowed for autonomous warfare, with Ranjan leaning towards skepticism.
  • Anthropic's Positioning:
  • Dario Amode, CEO of Anthropic, publicly stated that the company cannot agree to the Pentagon’s demands due to ethical concerns over mass surveillance and autonomous weapons.
  • The response was seen as a strong marketing position that emphasizes Anthropic's values against military use of AI.
  1. Funding and OpenAI
  2. OpenAI's $110 Billion Fundraising Round:
  3. The episode covered OpenAI's significant fundraising success backed by major investors like Amazon and NVIDIA.
  4. Discussion centered around the complexities of the funding, with Ranjan questioning the reality behind such large numbers.
  • OpenAI's Competitive Landscape:
  • The growth of OpenAI in the AI landscape was contrasted with competitors like Anthropic.
  • Ranjan noted a shift in usage patterns, with consumers increasingly gravitating towards AI tools that enhance productivity.
  1. Block's Layoffs
  2. Mass Layoffs at Block:
  3. Block announced it would cut nearly half of its workforce, leading to discussions about corporate responsibility and the impact on employees.
  4. Dorsey's comments on AI being a reason for layoffs were critiqued as a potential cop-out for broader corporate issues.
  • Impact on Company Culture:
  • Concerns were raised about deteriorating morale among remaining employees and the implications of AI being mandated for internal communications.
  1. The Citrini Selloff
  2. Research Paper Impact:
  3. The episode examined the fallout from the Citrini research paper, which highlighted potential negative consequences of AI on job markets and economic stability.
  4. Ranjan and Alex discussed how speculative fears drove market reactions, showcasing how external narratives can influence stock valuations.
  • General Commentary on AI and Economy:
  • The conversation highlighted the dual narrative around AI: one that fears economic displacement versus another that sees potential for growth and innovation.
  • Alex argued against the pessimistic view, positing that AI could create new opportunities rather than simply displace existing jobs.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Cultural and Ethical Challenges: The clash between tech companies and military needs underscores significant ethical challenges in AI deployment.
  • Market Reactions: The influence of speculative narratives on stock valuations reflects the deep-seated anxieties in the tech market right now.
  • Innovation vs. Displacement: The debate about AI ultimately revolves around its potential to create new economic opportunities versus the risks of job loss and economic downturn.

---

Closing Thoughts The episode provides an insightful look at the intersections of technology, ethics, and the economy. The discussions encourage listeners to think critically about the implications of AI in both military and corporate contexts, while also considering the broader impacts on society and the economy.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Anthropic and the Pentagon: A Complex Relationship

0:59 to 2:01

Discussing the tensions between Anthropic and the Pentagon regarding AI use.

“Welcome to Big Technology Podcast Friday edition, where we break down the news in our traditional cool-headed and nuanced format.”

AI's Role in Military Operations

2:01 to 4:13

Exploring the involvement of AI in military operations and the implications.

“So this is sort of, let me just take, and of course, Anthropic is Friday, but Anthropic has already said no to that on Thursday.”

Cultural Clash: Tech vs. Military

4:13 to 6:39

Examining the cultural differences between tech leaders and military officials.

“But, I mean, the capabilities are embedded in Anthropik's model.”

Hypothetical Scenarios in Warfare

6:39 to 9:46

Debating the ethical considerations of using AI in autonomous warfare.

“It's the kind of situation where the technological might and speed could be critical to detection and counter-strike.”

Anthropic's Ethical Stance on Warfare

9:46 to 14:02

Dario Amode's position on the ethical implications of AI in the military context.

“To me, one of the most fascinating parts is we all use Claude.”

Anthropic's Ethical Stance on AI and Warfare

14:02 to 14:51

Learn about Anthropic's refusal to comply with Pentagon requests regarding AI use.

“Now, again, to our knowledge, these two exceptions, Dario writes, have not been a barrier to accelerating the adoption and the use of our models within our armed forces to date.”

The Marketing Angle of AI Ethics

14:51 to 16:48

Explore how Anthropic's positioning as an ethical AI company plays into their marketing strategy.

“Because there are some consequences that could happen and we'll talk about them.”

Concerns Around Autonomous Weapons

16:48 to 19:16

Discussion on the implications and risks of autonomous weapons in warfare and AI.

“There has to be like at least this idea being pushed that they can be controlled.”

The Role of Tech Companies in AI Regulation

19:16 to 22:26

Debate about the responsibility of tech companies in regulating their AI technologies.

“Waymo as basically RoboCop coming to life.”

Potential Consequences for Anthropic

22:26 to 24:14

Discussion on how Pentagon policies could affect Anthropic's operations.

“Actually, so where do you fall on model companies like regulating, I guess, I don't know if that's the correct word, but use cases.”
Show all 29 chapters

Funding News: OpenAI's Record-Setting Round

24:14 to 26:13

Details on OpenAI's recent $110 billion funding round and its implications.

“It's like, can you imagine the Pentagon on the line with like Boeing and being like, how much Claude do you use?”

Complexities of OpenAI's Funding

26:13 to 28:00

Analyze the intricacies and stipulations surrounding OpenAI's massive funding round.

“OpenAI announces$110 billion funding round with backing from Amazon, NVIDIA, and SoftBank.”

Exploring OpenAI's Recent Funding Round

28:00 to 29:10

Discussion surrounding OpenAI's funding and its implications for the industry.

“And and again, we have our benchmark here on the podcast.”

The Shift in OpenAI's Business Strategy

29:10 to 30:20

Analysis of OpenAI's business model and revenue strategies in light of recent funding.

“So it's going to get 50 from Amazon, but it's going to put back either 100 or 138.”

Competitiveness of OpenAI and Alternatives

30:20 to 31:30

Debate on OpenAI's competitive position and user preferences in AI tools.

“But like one thing that was also interesting to me as well was there wasn't a lot of talk around like where this money gets invested into.”

Anthropic's Strategic Shift to Coding API

31:30 to 32:50

Exploring Anthropic's pivot towards coding APIs and its impact on the market.

“I'm just going to say like, it is crazy to me.”

Understanding Market Dynamics in AI Coding

32:50 to 34:50

Insights on the rapid shifts in the AI coding market and competitive landscape.

“They were giving up the consumer product basically, and it worked brilliantly for them.”

The Reality of Annualized Recurring Revenue (ARR)

34:50 to 36:10

Discussion on the misconceptions surrounding ARR in rapidly changing markets.

“And just how quickly people can switch, how the moat was never really there.”

Future of AI Applications and Company Survival

36:10 to 37:30

Exploring the sustainability of AI companies amid fierce competition.

“Like certainly companies are putting releases out there about ARR and you have to like, you know, kind of shake your head a little bit about, you know, is that really the number or not?”

Debate on AI's Capabilities and Responsibility

37:30 to 39:50

A discussion on the ethical implications of AI making decisions vs. human oversight.

“Well, I would argue that they're not like, I mean, clearly they're ascendant right now, but I would still argue that OpenAI is the leader.”

Closing Thoughts and Upcoming Topics

39:50 to 41:37

Wrap-up of the discussion with a preview of future topics related to tech layoffs and market analysis.

“But I also think there's a long way to go.”

Block's Layoffs and AI Justifications

42:00 to 43:38

Discussion on Block's recent layoffs and the role of AI in corporate decision-making.

“And by the way, this is coming for others as well.”

Generative AI's Impact on Management

43:38 to 45:36

Exploration of how generative AI could change management practices within companies.

“It feels like a cop-out versus, listen, like a lot of big tech, we're a little bloated, we overhired, we're just trying to right-size the business a little bit.”

The Broader Context of Workforce Changes

45:36 to 49:09

Examining the implications of workforce changes and generative AI on the tech sector.

“Is that kind of where this technology is heading?”

Public Perception of Tech Layoffs

49:09 to 52:10

Discussion on how the public perceives layoffs in the tech industry and empathy levels.

“I know a lot of people at a lot of tech companies that get a lot of money for not a lot of work.”

Cascading Crises and the Citrini Letter

52:10 to 56:00

Analysis of the Citrini letter's claims about economic impacts of AI and automation.

“We're going to talk about it in a moment.”

Navigating Economic Concerns in Subscription Services

56:00 to 58:24

Explore the implications of subscription services on the economy and individual finances.

“It was like, and it is, it raises these kinds of questions I thought were like trying to assign kind of like value to the idea.”

AI's Role in Economic Growth vs. Job Displacement

58:24 to 1:02:06

Discussion on how AI might transform the economy without causing massive job losses.

“I think we're agreeing with each other a little too much.”

Market Reactions and Stock Market Stability

1:02:06 to 1:03:07

Analyzing how irrational fears affect stock market stability and reactions.

“And they scare people and the fear translates into clicks.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Big Technology Podcast:Anthropic showdown with the Pentagon reaches an endpoint. We dig into what it means. Block is laying off half the company as Jack Dorsey tells everyone AI might be coming for their jobs too. OpenAI finally raises its$110 billion fundraising rounds and we have yet another AI science fiction sell-off. That's coming up on a Big Technology Podcast Friday edition right after this. Michael Lewis here. My best-selling book The Big Short tells the story of the build-up and burst of the U.S. housing market back in 2008. A decade ago, The Big Short was made into an Academy Award-winning movie. And now I'm bringing it to you for the first time as an audiobook narrated by yours truly.

0:42Big Technology Podcast:The Big Short's story, what it means to bet against the market, and who really pays for an unchecked financial system, is as relevant today as it's ever been. Get The Big Short now at pushkin.fm slash audiobook or wherever audiobooks are sold. Welcome to Big Technology Podcast Friday edition, where we break down the news in our traditional cool-headed and nuanced format. We have a great show for you today. We're going to break down everything that's happening between Anthropic and the Pentagon and discuss what it means for the company and maybe the future of war and defense. We'll also talk about the big layoffs at Block.

1:18Big Technology Podcast:Half the company seems like it's on the way out the door. We'll talk about OpenAI finally raising the$110 billion round. That round might grow even larger. And of course, the Citrini sell-off. We're joined as always by Ranjan Roy of Margins, who's back from Europe and ready to podcast. Let's podcast, Ranjan.

1:37Ranjan Roy:AI science fiction driven sell-off is catnip for me. So I have to come back for that.

1:44Big Technology Podcast:We love it. And it's been such a big week of AI news that that's the fourth most important story. Wait, was Citrini this?

1:51Ranjan Roy:When did it get published again? It was like... That was this week. My God.

1:55Big Technology Podcast:My God. Every week is a month, it feels like. All right, let's get into the big story. This is one I've been really looking forward to speaking with you about. We haven't talked about it on the show yet, but today is Friday, and that means it is the deadline between the Pentagon and Anthropic, the deadline for Anthropic to accede to the Pentagon's requests that Anthropic both give it the option to use its technology for autonomous weapons and conduct domestic surveillance. So this is sort of, let me just take, and of course, Anthropic is Friday, but Anthropic has already said no to that on Thursday.

2:32Big Technology Podcast:And we're going to get into what the repercussions are. But I think it might be helpful to actually talk through what's happening between Anthropic and the Pentagon and maybe give some context here.

2:44Ranjan Roy:Walk me through it. Walk us all through it.

2:46Big Technology Podcast:So you may recall that the United States captured the leader of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro, In a raid that the United States didn't lose any military servicemen and actually seemed like it pulled off in a remarkable way. Now, it turns out that Anthropics technology might have been involved there. This is from the Wall Street Journals a little while ago. Anthropics artificial intelligence tool, Claude, was used in the U.S. military operation to capture former Venezuelan president, Nicolas Maduro. The deployment of Claude occurred through Anthropik's partnership with data company Palantir, whose tools are commonly used by the Defense Department and federal law enforcement.

3:29Big Technology Podcast:Following the raid, an employee at Anthropik asked a counterpoint at Palantir how Claude was used in the operation. So, you know, it did seem like this was just Anthropik, you know, kind of leaking this news that it was working with Palantir to help capture Maduro. It's great marketing if you want to show the capabilities of your tool. But in fact, Anthropic really didn't have much idea of what was going on within Palantir as far as its technology being used for the raid. And it even had to ask a Palantir employee about it. And that's where these conversations of like a tech company going to the Defense Department or the Department of War now and saying, how's my technology being used?

4:08Big Technology Podcast:This is how it all began.

4:11Ranjan Roy:Yeah, I think especially in terms of how it was being used. again the employee uh saying it was palantir layered on top of clod and that basically clod has been helpful for synthesizing satellite imagery in different aspects of the intel picture the thing that just kind of jumps out to me here is like yeah how what kind of responsibility should anthropic have in here and this might surprise you a bit but i'm not going to say i'm like full Department of War Hegseth on this one. But, I mean, the capabilities are embedded in Anthropik's model. And, like, what kind of control they actually have over how it's getting used.

4:53Ranjan Roy:It's computer vision in the end, in this case. And it's kind of like doing the analysis in the sites on top of it. So, I don't know. I've been having a tough time trying to figure out where I land on this. Where are you landing on this?

5:07Big Technology Podcast:Well, first of all, this is sort of, I'm telling the story here to discuss, to basically set up this idea that I'm not really sure if there's a there there between Anthropic and the Pentagon. That's what I, okay, okay. I think there might be a lot of posturing and positioning. And now there might be an argument that these hypotheticals matter, and we'll get into that. But this initially started on something so minor. It was, and by the way, this is from Dave Lawler, who's an Axios editor, who responded to my tweet about what did Anthropic do with Venezuela. We don't know. And they didn't know either.

5:41Big Technology Podcast:And so what he said is, yeah, it might have, in the past, Claude has been helpful for synthesizing satellite imagery and different aspects of the intel picture. We don't know that the technology was being used either for mass domestic surveillance or autonomous weapons in Venezuela. This whole thing began simply with Anthropic inquiring how his technology was being used by the Pentagon. That's when Dario Amode, the CEO of Anthropic, makes his way down to D.C. And again, I don't think this was a disagreement that happened based off of real-world pictures because The Washington Post and Semaphore have both reported on what happened with the discussion next.

6:24Big Technology Podcast:So this is from The Washington Post. A defense official said the Pentagon's technology chief whittled the debate down to a life-and-death nuclear scenario at a meeting last month. If an intercontinental ballistic missile was launched at the United States, could the military use Anthropics-Clawed AI system to help shoot it down? It's the kind of situation where the technological might and speed could be critical to detection and counter-strike. Anthropic chief Dario Amode's answer rankled the Pentagon, according to the official who characterized the CEO's reply as, you could call us and we'd work it out.

6:59Big Technology Podcast:So basically the Pentagon's version of events is, you know, maybe these conversations began around this Palantir thing. They start having these conversations together about how anthropics technology can be used. And somebody from the Pentagon presents this like nuclear scenario to Dario, basically saying we might need your technology to be used quickly. And Dario gives the most Dario answer ever. Yeah, call us and we'll let you know, right? You could totally see him saying this. Now, this is from the Post. An Anthropic spokesperson denied Amode gave that response, calling the account patently false and saying the company has agreed to allow Claude to be used for missile defense.

7:40So here's my read.

7:43Big Technology Podcast:I don't think the Pentagon went to Anthropic and said, We need your technology for autonomous weapon use and mass surveillance of America. I simply think that the disagreements about hypotheticals became so out of control where there was a culture clash. I mean, think about the culture clash here. It's Dario Amode, CEO of Anthropic. We know how he acts. And Emil Michael, who's on the other end. By the way, both of them have been on the show. I like, I mean, I've enjoyed speaking with both of these people. uh and emil has basically said um that uh you know who's emil is the undersecretary of war for research and engineering at the sec at the department of war he says that dario wants nothing more than to try personally to personally control the u.s military and is okay putting our nation's safety at risk i'll just turn it to you this is kind of how i look at it it's simply conflicting culture it's not a specific disagreement over technology that will be used in the moment okay

8:40Ranjan Roy:Sorry, I didn't even realize this is Emil Michael of Uber fame, right? Correct. Like the mid-2010s, kind of like very aggressive, brash personality that kind of like the face of tech spreading at all costs, screw the taxi unions, all that. Okay. That's Emil. Yeah.

9:00Big Technology Podcast:He happens to be a very interesting guy. I've enjoyed speaking with him, but sorry, go ahead.

9:05Ranjan Roy:No, no, no. So I do agree. And it's rare that when the topic of like autonomous weapons killing civilians, I would say there is not a there there. And it's just kind of like, as you said, culture clash. I agree. That's really what it feels like. I think the other thing I keep thinking about as I'm reading through all of the stories coming out on this one is it's so rare in the past when you would hear about some kind of like, you know, like nebulous defense department technology, war games, whatever else. As an individual, you would have no real concept of what that might look like. To me, one of the most fascinating parts is we all use Claude.

9:51Ranjan Roy:We all like understand how AI works. So like actually like thinking through, I don't know. I kept thinking like, what's the query? What's the analysis? It's like, Claude, how do I capture Maduro? Here's like 10 documents. Give me a strategy. Like, I don't know. I keep trying to think through like, what does it actually look like? I don't know. Right. Yeah.

10:14Big Technology Podcast:I mean, my belief here, and we don't know exactly, my belief here is that Palantir did the heavy lifting on Maduro. And then maybe someone was using natural language to synthesize some information there. I mean, the jokes have been amazing on X, right? It's like you tell Claude Claude, you know, Claude Codes, capture Maduro, make no mistakes. And it just goes out and does it. Like we're not at that point yet. And we even joked last week with Aaron Levy that like the fact that people were like, yeah, Claude has been used for warfare and, you know, was responsible for the capture of Maduro. And everyone's like, yeah, of course they are.

10:46Big Technology Podcast:Not asking any questions has kind of been like a testament back to the company's capabilities. But I think its involvement in this specific operation has been blown completely out of proportion. Just speculation reading between the lines here. But the other side of the argument is that, well, these hypotheticals do matter. And you want to have a defense contractor because Anthropic working with the Department of War is a defense contractor that will basically be ready to do what you need them to do when you need them to do it. And this is from Sam Parnell, the Pentagon's chief spokesperson. He said, the department had no interest in conducting mass domestic surveillance or deploying autonomous weapons, but wanted to use AI for all lawful purposes.

11:36Big Technology Podcast:This is a simple common sense request, he says, that will prevent Anthropic from jeopardizing critical military operations and potentially putting our warfighters at risk. Again, this just kind of goes back to like, you know, this is obviously not anything in theater right now. However, yeah, the question stands. Do you want to even make the Pentagon think that you might say, you know, in a moment of war, we're not ready to go that far? I don't know what's your perspective.

12:04Ranjan Roy:I'm going to present to you a hypothetical here. Alex, if you are the CEO of a massive AI research lab that has some powerful foundation models, do you allow your technology to be used for autonomous warfare? Because, yeah, do you? I don't think so.

12:25Big Technology Podcast:I don't think so. But I'll tell you what. I'll tell you what I will do. I'm going to preface this by saying I think that Dario has real values and Anthropic has real values. And they've mostly stuck with them. And I give them credit for doing that. However, if I have this moment where the Pentagon is, let's just say this. I have this moment where the Pentagon is saying we want to use it for all, your technology for all lawful purposes. And I say, oh, all right, just don't use it for autonomous warfare or mass surveillance. And they're like, just sign the all lawful degree here. We don't want any caveats.

13:00Big Technology Podcast:It'll just make it easier for us. I might be tempted to blow that out of proportion. I might be tempted to, let's say, release a blog post and say, no freaking way. I'll never work with the Pentagon on these things. Lo and behold, Thursday night, statement from Dario Amode on our discussions with the Department of War. Dario said, and this is, I love the way that Dario writes. I think he's a great communicator. He says, I believe deeply in the existential importance of using AI to defend the United States and other democracies and to defeat our autocratic adversaries. Anthropica has therefore worked proactively to deploy our models to the Department of War and Intelligence community.

13:40Big Technology Podcast:We were the first frontier AI company to deploy our models in the U.S. government's classified networks, the first to deploy them at the national laboratories and the first to provide custom models for national security customers. He says, in a narrow set of use cases, we believe AI can undermine rather than defend democratic values. One is mass domestic surveillance. The other is fully autonomous weapons. Now, again, to our knowledge, these two exceptions, Dario writes, have not been a barrier to accelerating the adoption and the use of our models within our armed forces to date. Regardless, he says, we are not going to change our position.

14:17Big Technology Podcast:We cannot in good conscience accede to the Pentagon's requests. I don't want to reduce this to public positioning, but I'm going to just for this sake of argument. It's almost as if even if the Pentagon's request was reasonable, they didn't need them to agree necessarily to these demands. And Anthropic just ran with it. And now they're going to position themselves as, you know, again, once again, hammer home that branding, the ethical company, the company that works for you, the company that has values. The company is not growth at all costs. And, you know, who knows? Because there are some consequences that could happen and we'll talk about them.

15:00Big Technology Podcast:But I don't think it could have been a better situation for Anthropic than the one that they were just handed.

15:04Ranjan Roy:I think we've been hanging out too much because my affliction of looking at everything through a marketing and communications lens seems to be rubbing off. Because I'll admit, as this is all happening, that's the first thought that's going through my head. And I'm like, oh, my God, this is gold from a standpoint of anthropic. We're the good guys. Do you not support mass surveillance? Do you not support fully autonomous weapons potentially killing civilians? But but it OK, let's separate those two out. Mass surveillance, bad, fully autonomous weapons. I don't if that's the direction that warfare is going, I feel like that's just going to be part of whatever China or other countries are developing anyway.

15:53Ranjan Roy:So it's just going to be kind of as awful as it may sound. It's going to kind of be standardized unless there's some kind of like global agreement to actually ban autonomous weapons. But again, as someone who works in agentic AI, the more fascinating part of this to me is like having autonomous agents in anything, the assumption is that they can be controlled. And this is where I think this is actually kind of weird for Anthropic to be pushing this hard to say, if you are actually kind of like at least hinting or implying that there is this world where they're not being controlled, and then even in my day-to-day enterprise AI workflows with autonomous agents, can I actually rely on them?

16:40Ranjan Roy:Like this whole promise of autonomous work being done and agents running around doing all different types of work, it does tie to the autonomous weapons thing. There has to be like at least this idea being pushed that they can be controlled. And it's weird to me that Dario is kind of saying, actually, they can't.

17:00Big Technology Podcast:I'm sorry like isn't there a difference between Claude Code running a command and you know bugging out on your website and then having to go out and fix it when you're like this isn't working to like potentially conducting a military operation where people are going to get killed

17:14Ranjan Roy:but it's the same underlying kind of process it's the same underlying technology that's what I mean that like yes the scale and the gravity of it all is kind of terrifying but it's the same way with anything autonomous drive self-driving cars like at a certain point do we all accept that autonomy is good and predictable and will work or do we say there is this level of like uncertainty that does lie around it that it can it can go haywire and kill the wrong people or or i guess actually is the argument that not that it will go haywire and go kill a bunch of random people or is it are they implying that the department of war it's still weird for me to say that uh actually will use it for nefarious purposes and that's the risk what do you think's implied in there

18:07Big Technology Podcast:again like my perspective here and i understand why am why anthropic would not want to sign this away to the pentagon to like have like full use and whatever it because if it's a company comes in with values it has its values but again like i don't know if there's a concrete worry here so what I'm trying to say. I think it's mostly just like, you know, blanket no, this is against our values and let's go. And even Emil Michael was on, I think he was on Fox Business or Fox News saying that like we're in the middle of this discussion and this blog post comes out, you know, again, like I do think, and again, I don't want to feel too cynical about this, but I do think that this is, you know, sort of a PR opportunity.

18:45Big Technology Podcast:But back to your point, I mean, like, you know, I would trust, think about this, I would trust a Waymo, I would get into Waymo. I would trust it to drive me. I know it's probably good on like 99.7 % of rides or whatever. Much better than humans. But I don't want Waymo to be the police. Like I'm not giving Waymo a gun and saying, if you see a crime, go arrest somebody. Like I don't trust it to that extent. That's the difference I'm trying to make.

Read the full transcript

19:15Ranjan Roy:Okay. No, no. Okay. I'll give you that. Waymo as basically RoboCop coming to life. Get in the car. Anti-RoboCop here. Yeah, okay, I can see that. But going back to the PR standpoint, it is. I was trying to be level-headed and take this kind of genuinely seriously, but this is just like, and I mean, I have to imagine we'll get into open AI. And I mean, Sam Altman even came out and said that the company would potentially be working with the Pentagon. I think it's -

19:50Big Technology Podcast:Same restrictions, by the way, with OpenAI. And Sam is like, well, we're just going to hope that we can defuse. We'd like to try to help deescalate things.

19:58Ranjan Roy:Yeah.

19:59Big Technology Podcast:That's just OpenAI being like, OpenAI agreeing with my statement that this is not a real disagreement yet. And so therefore, let's go ahead.

20:08Ranjan Roy:Where's Sundar going to fall on this? That's what I want to know.

20:11Big Technology Podcast:He's going to sit back and he's going to be like, we're printing. We don't have to be involved in this. This is great.

20:16Ranjan Roy:Well, you got to have a monopolistic ad business, just printing cash and making Gemini better. Don't have to worry about autonomous weapons.

20:24Big Technology Podcast:I mean, you can't pay for marketing like this. And I'm sorry if this comes off too cynical, but this is an Axios. This is from a defense official. The only reason we're still talking to these people is we need them and we need them now. The problem for these guys is they are that good. You can't pay for that type of marketing.

20:42Ranjan Roy:That's why it is. But it is interesting how, okay, again, not trying to be too cynical here again, like Claude catches Maduro, great headline, great marketing, kind of just not exciting. Which is not what happened. But that's the narrative in the meme. But then, yeah, Dario realizing this is a great opportunity for us both to be the ethical AI company to kind of, I mean, it's a pretty good positioning nowadays if you're like setting yourself up for that conflict to have the headsets of the world kind of like coming at you on Twitter that actually can help your case. So, yeah, I do think, yeah, again, I never would have thought on the subject of autonomous warfare, I would say it's a meh story.

21:38Ranjan Roy:But I agree on this one. And they just raise their giant round. They don't need this marketing. They already have enough, but good for Don.

21:48Big Technology Podcast:If you think they don't need the marketing, I think you're underestimating the level of competition right now. Every bit of marketing helps.

21:55Ranjan Roy:Yeah.

21:55Big Technology Podcast:I mean, think about it. It almost follows the same line as the Super Bowl ad, right? Like, Claude won't ever do ads. Claude won't, you know, kill you in your sleep.

22:06Ranjan Roy:That should have been the Super Bowl ad.

22:08Big Technology Podcast:I think I just run this fan fiction of this episode. But I think that, like, ultimately, like, there is still, I think part, I don't want to say it's entirely cynical marketing. I think part of Dario really does believe that this is not the uses that Claude should be used for. And I think on the Pentagon side, you can totally see their side as well, where they're like, we don't want to be in a mission critical moment and have Dario say, you're not ready to do this.

22:35Ranjan Roy:Actually, so where do you fall on model companies like regulating, I guess, I don't know if that's the correct word, but use cases. Again, companionship, AI erotica, we've debated in the past. And open AI has one view of it versus others. Like, do you think as this evolves, and I mean, it almost kind of comes down back to the great content moderation debates of Facebook and others. Like, do they have the responsibility to do that moderation? Because I do kind of think they do, but this is just going to get messier and messier and more and more complex.

23:17Big Technology Podcast:Yeah, I think they do. I mean, I think that if you're a private company, you have at least the right, if not the responsibility, to try to make sure your product is used in ways that you think are beneficial to society. I don't see what the problem is there.

23:31Ranjan Roy:That's so idealistic and optimistic.

23:33Big Technology Podcast:Well, allow me to take this moment to maybe not be as cynical as I've been in our first few minutes of this show and say, yeah, I think that is important.

23:42Ranjan Roy:Tech companies have some responsibility to society writ large.

23:47Big Technology Podcast:that's the i mean i know it's controversial to say that's that's a hot take but i can see people just hitting play on something else right now but uh but that's where i'm i'm gonna stand there i'll die on that hill but it's not this is not without potential consequences for anthropics let's talk about it uh in preparing for they might the pentagon might now label anthropic a supply chain risk and pentagon officials from the journal have reached out to defense contractors, including Lockheed Martin and Boeing in recent days, to gauge how much they use Claude. I love that scene, by the way. It's like, can you imagine the Pentagon on the line with like Boeing and being like, how much Claude do you use?

24:26Big Technology Podcast:Because we might ban it for this hypothetical reason. Now, are we not going to be able to make planes anymore? It's just crazy that we've, ChatGPT came out three years ago and we're at this stage already. Critical infrastructure right now.

24:37Ranjan Roy:Yeah. Yeah, I think, I mean, that's the politics element. I guess that is kind of like that part is almost more terrifying to me in the actual near term of, again, like if that level of kind of like tit for tat Twitter fighting can actually lead to like that, you know, some kind of like the supply chain risk application actually kind of like derailing a private business. That I don't like.

25:11Big Technology Podcast:They might also invoke the Defense Production Act, which would require Anthropic to supply its technology to the Pentagon the way the Pentagon wants, which would be unprecedented. Again, I mean, the tweets coming through the timeline this week, and I know Twitter is not real life, but a lot of people in the AI world, a lot of buyers are paying attention to this. Here's from another Twitter user. Best proof Anthropic has that it has the best internal models. The Pentagon would rather invoke the Defense Production Act than use someone else's AI.

25:41Ranjan Roy:Do you think they get rate limited?

25:45Big Technology Podcast:Maybe that's what actually started.

25:48Ranjan Roy:Actually, they were like about to capture. Actually, this might be too dark, but I was going to say that's why we didn't invade Iran yet. They're getting rate limited on Claude.

26:00Big Technology Podcast:I don't know, Roger. I'm not going to go there. I'm going to take that one back. I don't know. Maybe by the time we publish this podcast.

26:08Ranjan Roy:Anyways, let's move on to lighter news like funding rounds.

26:12Big Technology Podcast:All right. OpenAI announces$110 billion funding round with backing from Amazon, NVIDIA, and SoftBank. So finally here, the round we've been talking about, man, that was quite a transition with the round we've been talking about, has arrived. It is bigger than expected. Remember, it started out at$50 billion. Amazon, and then it went to$100 billion. Now it's$110. And this is from CNBC. Other investors are expected to join as the round progresses. So it's not even over. We just have these big commitments from these three big companies. $50 billion from Amazon. I mean, that's wild. Speaking of Dario, I wonder how he's feeling now that one of his biggest partners in Amazon is making a deal like this with OpenAI.

26:56Big Technology Podcast:We won't spend too much time on it. But Ranjan, your takeaway from the size of the round, who's in and any other things. I love how we're going to glaze over the biggest funding round of all time.

27:07Ranjan Roy:Only in February 2026 could a$110 billion round in a private market actually be like, let's not spend too much time on it. But I think I want to call out it being, and I'm very glad that OpenAI is making, again, this funding round the most OpenAI-ish thing possible because$110 billion is the headline. It is impossible to tell what the actual round is because, again, from the information, Amazon's decision to invest up to$50 billion in OpenAI could hang on whether OpenAI goes public or reaches a loosely defined milestone known as artificial general intelligence. That was my favorite part because we might after we lost that benchmark with Microsoft and OpenAI, but now it's back.

27:55Ranjan Roy:And this idea of like declaring AGI actually potentially unlocking tens of billions of dollars, it's back again. And and again, we have our benchmark here on the podcast. Waymo's operating in New York City officially will mean AGI is here. But I think, I don't know, did you, like the complexity of the funding, do you call this, do you genuinely call this$110 billion round? There's so many stipulations here.

28:21Big Technology Podcast:No, it's not. It's not, certainly not that. I think it's a very important point that you're calling out here. I mean, remember when OpenAI and NVIDIA said that they were going to do$100 billion together and it was another one of these, well, it's$10 billion now and in time. Turns out that$100 billion was actually$30 billion, which is what NVIDIA will be investing. Although Jensen Wanga said we hope they invite us to come back, but certainly an intent to invest$100 is very different from an actual action to invest$30. To me, the interesting thing here is what happens as a result of these major deals.

28:58Big Technology Podcast:So this is from CNBC. OpenAI said it's expanding its existing$38 billion agreement with Amazon Web Services by$100 billion over the next year, eight years. So it's going to get 50 from Amazon, but it's going to put back either 100 or 138.

29:19Ranjan Roy:That's why I'm so happy about this announcement. It's got everything. It's got kind of like nebulous benchmarks and tranches. It's got circular funding and financing. It's a classic Sam funding round. Again, as you said, potentially putting in 50, potentially over eight years, getting that$38 billion up to$100 billion. It's perfect open AI funding.

29:47Big Technology Podcast:That's right. Yeah. I mean, Sam was on CNBC earlier today and basically said, look, this is only going to work if the revenue goes up and answering the circular funding thing. And I think he's right. And it's only going to work if the revenue goes up. And that's basically it.

30:05Ranjan Roy:That's good business right there.

30:07Big Technology Podcast:Good business. But also like, yeah, of course, if the exponential continues, then we'll continue to get the money and it all makes sense. And if it doesn't, you won't get the money.

30:17Ranjan Roy:Yeah, I think, I mean, I definitely want to get into kind of like where you see OpenAI's business at this exact moment. But like one thing that was also interesting to me as well was there wasn't a lot of talk around like where this money gets invested into. Like in the old days of a year or two ago, I feel any of these big funding rounds would really kind of center around getting to that next generation model, building data centers. It was still a bit, I don't know, did you see anything? Like it still wasn't, there wasn't a big kind of flagship push around what this money actually is going to mean to both OpenAI and the ecosystem at large.

31:03Big Technology Podcast:Yeah, it has to be infrastructure. right and just the support for inference especially when you're working with partners like amazon and nvidia i think that's not an accident and open ai basically told us what the game is right they're like if we are able to build more infrastructure and serve more demand we're going to make more money and we'll keep building until that proves to be untrue so to me that's this is that's just um one step here along the way on that front well but where do you view

31:30Ranjan Roy:open AI competitively right now. I'm curious. I'm just going to say like, it is crazy to me. My chat GPT usage has declined dramatically between Gemini actually for like day-to-day, just basic stuff. I'm using a lot more like it just, again, and we've talked about switching costs and moat actually. And I know like the idea of memory, which everyone has been talking about for a long time is supposed to kind of start to build that moat. But it's still such a reminder to me of how brittle a lot of these kind of like foundations are that might seem again, what is it? 900 million users now?

32:08Big Technology Podcast:Yeah, they just said today, 900 million. Yeah, 900 million. So they're definitely on track for a billion by mid to late March. Yeah, exactly.

32:16Ranjan Roy:And again, ChatGPT is the like Google kind of like trademark brand name, whatever of like ai for the average person it's like a verb but still like i actually was looking this up the other day because i was curious back us on this show a year ago there were headlines anthropic was screwed like usage was going down on the consumer side and again massive credit to them they had such a clear bet and we we outlined this very early that like they were going all in on coding API. They were giving up the consumer product basically, and it worked brilliantly for them. But again, 12 months ago, 14 months ago, the narrative was very strongly, Anthropic is in a bad position.

33:05Ranjan Roy:It's kind of where perplexity is now. Open AI is just dominating. Gemini is on the rise. Two years ago, Gemini and Google are dead. It keeps reminding me just how quickly things can shift in this market right now.

33:20Big Technology Podcast:Yeah, it changes fast. I mean, obviously, like when people think about generative AI, they think about ChatGPT. That's what you hang your hat on right now if you're open AI. Some of the other bets, Sora, you know, haven't worked exactly according to plan. We still don't have the device. But I think that basically you have this two-pronged strategy. You're growing ChatGPT from the ground up. It's the leading consumer product. And you use that to leverage and move into enterprise. And yeah, they're making their move into coding. And it's very interesting now what's happening in the coding market, wouldn't you say?

33:56Big Technology Podcast:Because you have Cloud Code, which I've been in like crazy. I'm hitting my limits every couple hours just in Cloud Code. It's amazing. And there's some other players like Cursor that are starting to go up and down as the two big boys get involved. So what's happening with Cursor, Anjan? Okay.

34:16Ranjan Roy:So I wanted to highlight this story. There was one tweet from a Kyle Russell around how the company was removing 90 seats and basically over Slack, people were like, hey, can you unsub me from Cursor? Yeah, I'm not using it anymore too. And I think, again, this momentum, the speed and inflection with which people can shift or this idea of moat, it's just so fascinating to me because, again, a year ago, Cursor was synonymous with autonomous coding or CodeGen and any kind of AI-driven coding. And just how quickly people can switch, how the moat was never really there. And so I think it raises two questions.

35:02Ranjan Roy:Like one, does everything kind of like only condense to the foundation model labs? And my argument that it's the product, not the model is completely wrong. And if that happens, I will say that. But I think, like, to me, that was one side. The other, that the cursor story, and I mean, we don't know definitively, like, where things are internally for them from a revenue perspective. But, like, I hope that this starts to raise every claim around ARR or, like, annualized recurring revenue. That starts to go away. Because anyone who knows, it's like taking one month of data and extrapolating it times 12 when you have a good month.

35:47Ranjan Roy:I mean, there's like I've seen people joking, but maybe it's the case you have one week or one day in times by 365 and call it ARR. I think like in the market, actually trying to understand stickiness over time is going to become much, much more of like a valued thing right now.

36:06Big Technology Podcast:Yeah, I think that's great. I mean, I think that there's definitely been some title inflation when it comes to ARR, right? Like certainly companies are putting releases out there about ARR and you have to like, you know, kind of shake your head a little bit about, you know, is that really the number or not? But I think going back to your previous point, I think that's the most important point is that when it comes to AI applications, because of generative AI's general purpose nature, you always have to worry about one of the big companies gobbling up what you're doing. And certainly that's what's happened with Cursor, I think, is that Cloud Code, right, which was initially like, you know, seen as a frenemy or maybe just a different version of Cursor for different use cases.

36:53Big Technology Podcast:And it's not like not being an IDE, maybe. It's fully competitive now. And people are just working within code and they're working within codex. And so that's what's happening is the big models are just gobbling up smaller competition.

37:06Ranjan Roy:So question, 12 months from now, is Anthropics still the king of the hill or have things shifted again dramatically? Because if we're looking, there's some kind of directionally similar things. I mean, OpenAI is growing and raising more money, but still kind of who owns the narrative and conversation and kind of like the next wave of innovation? Do you think it's still Anthropics six months from now, 12 months from now?

37:34Big Technology Podcast:On coding? Yes.

37:36Ranjan Roy:Everything else I don't know.

37:38Big Technology Podcast:Well, I would argue that they're not like, I mean, clearly they're ascendant right now, but I would still argue that OpenAI is the leader. But I think coding is going to be very interesting because that is the use case right now. That's clearly economically valuable and exploding. In fact, I think some of the numbers on Anthropic paid subscribers are quite impressive. Actually, I have them in my inbox. You want me to read them? Read them to me. All right, let's see. So, let's see. Free users on Claude are up more than 60 % since January, fastest growth in Claude's history. Daily signups have tripled since November.

38:18Big Technology Podcast:Every single day... Okay, I'm sorry. I'm just making sure that this is on the record. Every single day this week has consecutively broken the record for Claude's largest ever day of signups, and paid subscribers have more than doubled since October. people are staying and upgrading because they value claude's most advanced capabilities and consistently say it sharpens their own thinking so it's more than a super bowl bump they're saying it's adoption from months before the ad campaign so they're doing really well i think that the the coding fight is going to narrow but a year from now i think they're still going to be uh in the lead and i still think that will be the biggest use case for these models as the vibe

38:59Ranjan Roy:coding stuff continues what do you think well i'll differ again as as my the company work for writer autonomous knowledge work is where we play claude co-work is in there manis is kind of one of the only other competitors really i'm still standing by my prediction that that's going to be the big trend of the year it's self-interested in talk my book but really and i gotta say i was it's been interesting to me because like how claude code has been the entry point for most people because like our company, we only work with enterprises. So it's not a consumer product. So just not as many people feeling it.

39:34Ranjan Roy:But I just say like, I think you get it now, right? Like in Claude Code, it gives you that feeling of like what I've been trying to say since October of like actual autonomous agentic work, like agents out there doing stuff for you that actually works with many steps. And you feel it now, right? I heard you talking about that.

39:54Big Technology Podcast:I feel it, yes. But I also think there's a long way to go. Although it's done a great job building some internal tools for me, I have to say.

40:00Ranjan Roy:Okay. You're pro-agentic now. You're coming around.

40:04Big Technology Podcast:I'm feeling the agentic. I'm feeling it. But I'm not, I'm not, I don't haven't fully drank the Kool-Aid like you have. Okay. We have to, go ahead.

40:13Ranjan Roy:I was going to say, what I've actually come away with is it's the word agent and agentic was so just beaten down and kind of like mischaracterized for all of 2025. 25 that's why everyone's just has a hard time saying the word agentic whereas in reality all this what's happening is it's act this is actually agentic that this is what we were promised but we just heard it for so long and it wasn't working or none of it made sense that that's why people

40:41Big Technology Podcast:people are uncomfortable saying it no here's a i think this is a good uh distinction of where we sit you are happy to you believe that ai will this agentic stuff will eventually be good enough to take the shots and i'm like do not take the shots let us if we're gonna have to shoot let a

40:59Ranjan Roy:human do it okay that's maybe that is that's the breakdown yeah okay i think you're far too trusting

41:08Big Technology Podcast:of it but anyway we'll go go down that rabbit hole another day or you can respond if you want

41:14Ranjan Roy:no i think that that's that's a reasonable characterization that's gonna i like i like uh our regular standing debate around is it the product or the model probably is a little more tasteful than should AI take the shot or humans take the shot.

41:32Big Technology Podcast:But these are both real questions.

41:34Ranjan Roy:These are both real questions. Yeah. Yeah.

41:36Big Technology Podcast:All right. I'm going to take a break and come back. We're going to come back after this and we're going to talk about Jack Dorsey laying off 4 ,000 at block. And then we're going to talk about the Citrini research paper in the time we have left that caused this sell-off in the market. We'll be back right after this.

42:20Big Technology Podcast:Now, try it out for free.

42:50Big Technology Podcast:proactive. And by the way, this is coming for others as well. What do you think about that, Ranjan?

42:56Ranjan Roy:This one killed me, I got to say.

43:03Ranjan Roy:I have two kind of minds here. One is, and again, as we've been discussing today, everything is comms and marketing in my mind. And it really just feels like, again, blocks, revenue growth has been slowing, profitability. 2025 was not, it wasn't a bad year, but it's certainly like they were a company that saw incredible growth during COVID and it's been slowing. So like the stock's down 75%. It's overall, business is not great. So to say it's AI kind of bothers me. It feels like a cop-out versus, listen, like a lot of big tech, we're a little bloated, we overhired, we're just trying to right-size the business a little bit.

43:54Ranjan Roy:To me, that's what this is. And again, I'm saying that as someone who genuinely believes workforces are going to get transformed and there's going to be some problems and like dislocation in the industry. I felt this one was just kind of Jack being like AI when he has to lay off a bunch of people. Right.

44:15Big Technology Podcast:And I think we should give the context here, right? So Block is profitable. It's a profitable company making these moves. And still it's up 14 % today after the news. So here's what I'll say about it. This is not the first time that Block has been doing layoffs this year. Block did layoffs earlier in February. This is from Wired. After hundreds of workers were laid off in early February from Jack Dorsey's Block, some of the people remaining at the company say the internal culture has devolved to a point where performance anxiety is running rampant, using generative AI is required, and overall morale is rapidly deteriorating.

44:56Big Technology Podcast:Listen to this. Black employees are currently expected to send an update email to Dorsey every week, who then uses generative AI to summarize the thousands of messages. I don't know if this is the most effective use of the technology and I hate to make the argument here, but is Jack onto something? And are we going to see more of this? Because the idea that a CEO could get a weekly email from all their employees, thousands of employees, throw them into a generative AI engine, get a feel of what's going on in the company, that his reports can do the same with their legions of employees and become more effective through that.

45:43Is that kind of where this technology is heading?

45:47Ranjan Roy:I mean, it was interesting when I read that. On one hand, to me, that actually would be the wrong process because if you're asking everyone to give you essentially sell themselves and the work they're doing on a weekly basis and using that as your foundation for understanding the state of your company, it's going to be biased positive.

46:17Ranjan Roy:it and Jack's just sitting there thinking everything's great. So I think, but it's funny that to me that you took that as a negative. Cause again, like it is kind of, you don't think it's cool at all. The idea that now you can kind of manage in different ways that like you can act at scale that never would have thought possible before, like really getting a view that's semi true or at least versus having like a bunch of people spend a month doing a report that you're going to have like an all hands meeting or a board meeting where they update you that you can actually

46:52Big Technology Podcast:have more real-time feedback like that you don't like i don't think i'm criticizing that uh oh you're not let me tell you this i i think instinctively i you know i'm on the side of workers here i think it kind of it's kind of gross that ceo is instead of talking with them having AI summarize them, summarize their notes and making them write these notes. I mean, just think about how much work you have to write and that gets fed in. You're probably writing with AI. You're probably almost certainly using it.

47:20Ranjan Roy:Your agent is talking to Jack's agent is what's happening here.

47:23Big Technology Podcast:But ultimately, you know, I think I have to get past that. I actually think that if I was running a company of that size, I would do this. I really think it is a great way to stay on top of a company, actually. I don't think it makes the company 50 % more efficient. And it's like natural to get these quotes that I read from SFGate from employees who just don't like the mandating of AI and also aren't happy that half the company is leaving. But maybe the truth lies somewhere in the middle. and I think we should really focus on the warning, so to speak, that Jack gave to everybody else saying that, you know, I just think we're early and I'm going to be honest about it and I expect many others to do the same thing.

48:09Big Technology Podcast:Because I got this note from somebody who's worked with Jack in the past. This block news is going to cascade hard. Jack just put the question to every CEO in tech and maybe beyond of whether they are carrying dead weight that could be shed. if a few more tech companies pull moves of this magnitude, and we know they will, then the odds of it crossing over increase tremendously. I would say it sounds right. And probably we're going to have many tech companies, CEOs saying, and by the way, they know that Jack can run a bloated company. I mean, look at what happened with Twitter, but saying, you know, maybe we don't have to do 50, but can we do 20?

48:44Big Technology Podcast:It's a little bit scary.

48:46Ranjan Roy:I think it's scary, but when the hiring at these companies was up by 100 % or 200 % in a condensed amount of time based off of extrapolated revenue and growth numbers from COVID, we weren't all complaining. I think I'm almost cynical isn't quite the right word, but I don't know. I know a lot of people at a lot of tech companies that get a lot of money for not a lot of work. It's become the case increasingly more so over the last five years, seven years. The Googles and the Facebooks for a while, I would say. But like there is like it's one sector of the economy that became the most valuable sector of the economy for a 15 year period or whatever it is, 10 year period.

49:37Ranjan Roy:and it became bloated. And now, like, to me, AI, what it's doing, it's just kind of like the value of work and software and technology that we had assigned to it over the last decade is not the same. And that's happened to many, many other industries over time and it causes disruption. But to me, that's almost like natural business cycle rather than, again, I'm like not too doomer about it. and maybe that's short-sighted, but it's not that different than other shifts that have happened over time.

50:14Big Technology Podcast:Yeah, I guess you could condense two 75 % effort email jobs today into one email job if you have generative AI. But I also think, as we have this conversation, I don't think either of us are going to discount the fact that there's real people in these jobs and this really sucks. uh and you know especially now we're like in a no hire no fire time period that for every person that gets laid off at a place like block it's just like it's a disaster in each one of those

50:46Ranjan Roy:cases and i don't want to leave that out no no i that's that's the problem about all this it's like i don't want to shortchange i mean getting laid off sucks and like yeah it is just it's it's it's sad, but it's also like, does Metallica and Benson Boone need to play Dreamforce? And is that like the sign of a healthy industry or an industry that might be getting a bit soft? I ask you. Benson Boone and just one of them, Metallica or Benson Boone, but - Look, as long as we keep Metallica, right?

51:22Big Technology Podcast:We got to keep Metallica. I don't know.

51:23Ranjan Roy:I'd rather, that always kind of saddens me that they went, that they're playing a dream force. Benson Boone, put him up there. Not Metallica.

51:33Big Technology Podcast:This is going to be embarrassing. I don't even know who Benson Boone is. He's the guy who,

51:36Ranjan Roy:he did the flip at the Grammys now? No?

51:41Big Technology Podcast:No idea who that is.

51:42Ranjan Roy:All right.

51:43Big Technology Podcast:So maybe you cut him. Maybe you keep him and you cut Metallica and then keep your employees. That would be my preference, maybe. I think I'm going to create an agent for you

51:52Ranjan Roy:to keep up better with pop culture, Alex.

51:55Big Technology Podcast:Well, I would like that. I would have to filter that agent's emails. Just too much. But by the way, so here's where this becomes a real problem. Is if every company, I don't know, I actually don't think Jack is right. We're going to talk about it in a moment. But even with these AI tools, the software engineering employment numbers are going up fairly quickly, which is fascinating. but if jack is right in the case that he is um that could be rough i mean if you think about every company coming out and doing i mean we've seen amazon do these big layoffs right like every company comes out and does a 20 layoff that is uh that's tough that's tough if you're a tech worker but the amount of money everyone in tech has made relative to every other industry

52:46Ranjan Roy:over the last 10 to 15 years like i think that that's going to be actually one of the more interesting things politically, how this all plays out, I think, is that it's targeting, this is causing a disruption in a sector that got a lot bigger, but is still a small percentage of the overall kind of like employment in the economy. So do you think people will be as strongly reacting or up in arms around this, or it's going to kind of be like, and again, as someone who works in tech, I'm saying this, that like, it's just, it's harder for me to be like that saddened by it, given just how these companies have been able to operate for a long time.

53:30Big Technology Podcast:I mean, if you're asking me whether there's going to be an outpouring of national sympathy for tech workers, I don't believe so. I mean, this is, remember, this is a country where many people celebrated the Palisades fire when they saw that there were people in a different socioeconomic status than them that lost their houses. So I don't really feel like we're a nation of empathy right now, at least. We should be, but we're not. All right. Speaking of cascading crises, let's end with this. I'm sure you saw this Citrini letter talked about the 2028 global intelligence crises. I'll try to summarize it as best as I can.

54:04Big Technology Podcast:Basically, this research firm who may or may not have shorts, I don't know 100%, but it's been speculated that they do and some of the companies that have tanked because of this letter, basically looked at what happened if generative AI works. They write, it should have been clear all along that a single GPU in North Dakota generating the output previously attributed to 10 ,000 white collar workers in midtown Manhattan is more economic pandemic than economic panacea. So basically they say, look what's going to happen. There's going to be a human intelligent displacement spiral where people will automate jobs way.

54:39Big Technology Podcast:Maybe this is kind of where that Jack memo can actually end up in the bad scenario, right? Because then you have people with their mortgages. They can't pay them. Stocks go down. And then, you know, there's so much of our economy, so many large parts of our economy that are based off of wanting to avoid annoyance, not wanting to cancel certain things and not disputing certain fees. The agent goes out and cancels these things and takes down those fees. And then all of a sudden, consumer spending is down, growth is down, and private equity that depends on all this starts to go up in flames. And even these apps, you can build your own delivery apps, for instance.

55:23Big Technology Podcast:And then all these displaced white, so those businesses go away and all these displaced white collar workers end up taking blue collar jobs and there's just no jobs left in the economy. I think I boiled it down. That's kind of the argument. I think you can tell by the tone of my voice. I'm not, I'm not convinced that they're right here. What was your reaction?

55:43Ranjan Roy:So my reaction to the actual content of the piece, and then there's my reaction to like, actually kind of like it causing a stock market sell-off are two different things. I think, I don't know, it was a good piece of, it was like an interesting piece of writing. It was like, and it is, it raises these kinds of questions I thought were like trying to assign kind of like value to the idea. Like if we're locked into subscriptions, we forget about, But imagine if I tell you, imagine you have an agent that is actually able to track your Netflix, Disney +, Hulu, all of your utilization of those services.

56:25Ranjan Roy:And then the ones you're not using, it goes and cancels them for you. That sounds pretty good, right?

56:31Big Technology Podcast:Oh, I would love that. Yeah, exactly. But the argument is that that will cause cascading economic problems.

56:37Ranjan Roy:But this is where if that is the foundation of the U.S. economy, that's the more terrifying part to me than the actual unwinding of it, if that's the case. So I think that part of it is, I don't know, it was interesting, just like the kind of questions it raised. There's a lot of like, I saw arguments over like it using DoorDash as an example. And I actually do agree with the idea that that was like, and as not the biggest fan of DoorDash is readers of margins will know, I do think they're going to be the hardest to displace out of any, given it's a marketplace, there's like physical labor elements of it.

57:20So I thought that part, like there's definitely weaknesses in it. To me, the idea of some kind of like cascading potential downward spiral here, I do think, I don't know, it presented a pretty like interesting,

57:40Ranjan Roy:consistent narrative that actually told a good story. So I see why it had the impact it did. But I don't know. My hot take on this one is I think it raised actually a more interesting issue is that, again, the state of the current stock market, the valuations of a lot of companies have gone in the same direction for a very long time. And I think it is more unmasking just general unease and worries about valuations as opposed to it's like AI is going to destroy society. And people, again, it's an excuse to just kind of knee-jerk sell things that you're sitting there on paper have just been marked up insanely over the last number of years.

58:23Ranjan Roy:But you just you don't feel it's actually valued that valuable. That's kind of how I am reading it.

58:30Big Technology Podcast:I like that take. I like that take a lot. I think we're agreeing with each other a little too much. Yeah, I know. That feels spot on to me. And, you know, it is this, I was asked about a version of this on CNBC this week, and I had to cite the something big is happening paper. I think this is kind of what it is. There is this belief that something big is happening. It is, in a way. The question is what the magnitude is. And there's this instinctive race to go and say, you know, it's going to take our jobs and destroy our economy. The one issue that I had with that paper, and this is sort of my core issue, is it just wasn't imaginative at all.

59:08Big Technology Podcast:It didn't think that somebody who's displaced has like any dreams of their own that they might go build now that these tools exist. Right. And that it sort of felt the economy is stagnant. I really believe that like if these tools work the way that you think that they're going to work, then, you know, they're just not going to cause vast economic displacement. displacement. This is the line that I really hated. In every way, AI was exceeding expectations and the market was AI. The only problem was the economy was not. I just think that if the AI exceeds all expectations, then the economy is going to become AI and enable people to grow much more than they have previously.

59:53Big Technology Podcast:And so the economy will be AI and the economy will grow. That's just my perspective.

59:58Ranjan Roy:Yeah. Do you know what? I saw this stat around the number of professional photographers where there was worry that once first digital cameras and then phone cameras came out that it would destroy all the entire industry. I mean, I guess this is Jevin's paradox in action, whereas like actually the like increase in access to taking photos created massive new demand in industries around photography. And like it was actually this nice little encapsulation I felt around like what can happen. Like suddenly now everyone needs professional quality photos or in the past you wouldn't have cared as much.

1:00:38Ranjan Roy:And because you could take photos on your phone, it created social media. And like, like the, there is whatever that means for society. That's another question. But like there, there's that argument that it was like a really nice, simple picture of in the last 20 years of our, our lifetime, seeing something that could have been pure doom actually turning into something like in a positive, unexpected way.

1:01:05Big Technology Podcast:That's it. I mean, if you think that everything is static and that people don't want to do new things or grow or they're satisfied with whatever they're doing, then you believe the Cetrini paper. If you don't, if you believe that there's growth and the economy changes and people find new things to do, then you don't believe it. And in fact, this is from Citadel, which wrote a rebuttal. The number of software developer jobs being posted on Indeed is far outpacing the total number of job posting in terms of overall. in terms of percentage growth. So that says everything you need to know. If AI is able to code much better than so many people now, why are software engineering jobs outpacing the rest?

1:01:46Big Technology Podcast:It's just that when you have these tools and you're able to be more productive, you're able to do the things that you couldn't do previously. And so you want to do them. And you don't shrink into a corncob and say, I'm done because of these things. And that's why these papers like this, the Citrini paper annoy me because they just don't have any imaginative thought and they're not realistic about the way the world works. And they scare people and the fear translates into clicks. And God, I guess I'm being very harsh on them right now, but I'll keep with it. It just seems to me to be the worst way to do things.

1:02:22Ranjan Roy:And I think the other worst way to do things is the idea that the stock market is so brittle right now that an AI sci-fi imaginative paper can cause a sell-off is still get a handle, everybody. Come on. Come on, stock market. It's okay. Just take a breather here.

1:02:44Big Technology Podcast:I mean, if anyone shouldn't be freaking out, it's the stock market. We know that the market reacts so coolly to any bit of stuff. Relax, God damn it. Just not a sub stack. Not a sub stack. Not a freaking sub stack. Like obviously Substack was out and being like, we move the market. It's like, is this the way you want to move the market? Yeah, yeah. I don't think so. All right. Let's pack it up and go home and we'll cool off and come back next week and hopefully the world will still be standing. Does that sound like a good plan?

1:03:15Ranjan Roy:I think, I hope so. I'll see you next week.

1:03:18Big Technology Podcast:All right, see you next week. Thank you everyone for listening and we'll see you next time on Big Technology Podcast. Amazon bietet allen frischgebackenen Eltern in den Logistikzentren extra Familienboni. So wie Anton, der gerade seine neugeborene Tochter im Arm hält. Ihr Glucksen ist für ihn das schönste Geräusch der Welt. Das heißt, vielleicht ist das Geräusch das schönste von allen. Niklas hier von e-commerce.de. Wir bauen eigene Marken über Amazon, Kaufland, eigenen Onlineshop und Co. auf mit ganz normalen Menschen. und das funktioniert gerade besser als in den letzten Jahren wegen neuen AI-Automatisierung.

1:03:58Big Technology Podcast:Und dafür launchen wir eine komplette Workshop, eine komplette Training-Session for free am 8.3. um 10 Uhr. Sei dabei www.e-commerce.de

From the publisher

Ranjan Roy from Margins is back for our weekly discussion of the latest tech news. We cover: 1) The origins of Anthropic's stare-down with the Pentagon 2) Claude's use in the operation to capture Venezuela president Nicolas Maduro 3) Was Claude really being used for autonomous warfare or mass surveillance, and did the military seek it out? 4) Maybe this is just a culture clash 5) Anthropic's marketing win 6) Should AI be used for autonomous warfare? 7) OpenAI raises $110 billion 8) Is that money real? 9) Block to cut nearly half its staff 10) Can AI be helpful in managing large companies? 11) Another science fiction story leads to a market panic.

---

Enjoying Big Technology Podcast? Please rate us five stars ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ in your podcast app of choice.

Want a discount for Big Technology on Substack + Discord? Here’s 25% off for the first year: https://www.bigtechnology.com/subscribe?coupon=0843016b
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Big Technology Podcast

All 399 episodes
Anthropic vs. The Pentagon, Bloodbath at Block, The Citrini SelloffBig Technology Podcast · 1 h 5 min
Listen in VO