Instant Reaction: Supreme Court Curbs Use of Race in Drawing Voting Districts

29 Apr 2026 · 11 min · 5 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode is a Bloomberg “Instant Reaction” breaking-news segment analyzing a Supreme Court ruling that curbs the use of race in drawing voting districts under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Legal analyst June Grasso says the Court has effectively gutted the Voting Rights Act over time, citing the earlier 2018 Shelby County decision (preclearance removed) and now the remaining Section 2, with Justice Elena Kagan’s dissent warning states can “systematically dilute” minority voting power without consequence.

Guests

June Grasso (Bloomberg legal analyst) and Michael McKee (Bloomberg economics/international reporter).

Key claims

states may redraw districts quickly, but timing may be constrained by filing deadlines; new maps will likely face court challenges; long-term impact is reduced ability to create minority-majority districts.

Notable examples

Louisiana likely to act; Florida already trying to redraw; California/Virginia decisions treated as politics-based gerrymandering rather than race.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Supreme Court Ruling Overview

2:16 to 4:00

Analysis of the Supreme Court ruling curbing race use in voting district drawing.

“Let's get some perspective on what all this means.”

Consequences of the Ruling

4:00 to 4:47

Discussing the potential implications of the Supreme Court decision on voting rights.

“And the court has, you know, systematically the years you hear them say, well, you know, we're so far away from the time of the Voting Rights Act.”

Gerrymandering and Its Impact

4:47 to 6:39

Exploring the gerrymandering process and how it affects minority representation.

“And you go back to the Voting Rights Act that you mentioned and how this is kind of part of the dismantling of it.”

Immediate Effects of the Ruling

6:39 to 8:12

Examining how states will react to the Supreme Court's ruling on redistricting.

“So the way to do it is to have a commission.”

Long-Term Implications of Voting Rights

8:12 to 13:00

Analyzing the long-term effects of the Supreme Court ruling on the Voting Rights Act.

“I don't think this has anything to do with that because that was a separate.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00For years, the conversation around Bitcoin was the same. Is it real? And does it belong in a portfolio? While others debated, CoinShares got to work. In 2015, they launched the world's first Bitcoin EDP, regulated, listed, and built for institutional investors. Long before the U.S. market caught up, today they manage over$6 billion in assets and have remained profitable through every market cycle, including the 2022 downturn. What sets them apart? They're not a crypto exchange chasing trading fees, not a company betting its balance sheet on Bitcoin, not a mining operation. Coinshares is an asset manager with recurring fees, a fixed cost base, and a business model you can actually model.

0:39Now listed on NASDAQ under ticker CSHR. Learn more at coinsharesipo.com.

0:56The thing about AI for business, it may not automatically fit the way your business works. At IBM, we've seen this firsthand. But by embedding AI across HR, IT, and procurement processes, we've reduced costs by millions, slashed repetitive tasks, and freed thousands of hours for strategic work. Now we're helping companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business, IBM. For many men, mental health challenges aren't recognized until they've already taken a toll. Work pressure, financial stress, changing relationships, and traditional expectations around masculinity can quietly wear men down, often without clear warning signs.

1:40In Season 3 of The Visibility Gap, Dr. Guy Winch and his guests explore how these pressures show up, how to spot them earlier, and how men can access meaningful support. Listen to the new season of The Visibility Gap, a podcast presented by Cigna Healthcare.

1:59Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts. Radio. News. This is a breaking news update from Bloomberg. Instant reaction and analysis from our 3 ,000 journalists and analysts around the world. Supreme Court ruling today curbs the use of race in drawing voting districts. Let's get some perspective on what all this means. June Grasso is our legal analyst at Bloomberg here. June, talk to us about just the background of this case and then maybe what we may know about this ruling here. So, I mean, the Voting Rights Act has been under fire for, you know, such such a long time. And the Roberts Court has been very receptive to sort of destroying.

2:46I'll use the word destroying the Voting Rights Act in 2018. I believe it was they they took one part of the act, which required preclearance. Clearance. Certain states that had a history, considered to have a history of racism, Texas, etc., certain states in the South would have to get preclearance before they redistricted, before their plans were approved. They took away that. And now this is really the other significant part of the Voting Rights Act, the remaining part of the Voting Rights Act, which was passed in 1965 to address discrimination against black votes. And I'll just read a line from what the dissenting opinion of Justice Elena Kagan, the three liberals who are in dissent, said.

3:29Under the court's new view of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, a state can, without legal consequence, systematically dilute minority citizens' voting power. Of course, the majority does not announce today's holding that way, but it's understated, even antiseptic. So, I mean, this is really consequential and it's consequential for, I think, the Republicans, you know, holding the House. If some of this if some of these states can redistrict before the midterms. I mean, I don't know if that would be possible as far as timing, but it really it really is consequential for for voting rights. And the court has, you know, systematically the years you hear them say, well, you know, we're so far away from the time of the Voting Rights Act.

4:17And there isn't I mean, I think Justice Roberts was the one who said in Shelby County, you know, we don't have that kind of discrimination anymore. So we don't. And how long can we keep doing this? How long can we keep having these rules that prioritize, you know, race in voting districts? So it's I think it's it's a stunning decision, although the court has been heading in this way for a long time. I think a lot of people hope that they wouldn't get to it at this point. But so, you know, it's really consequential. It's consequential. And you go back to the Voting Rights Act that you mentioned and how this is kind of part of the dismantling of it.

4:53What is left of the Voting Rights Act right now? You know, I don't think there's much left of it. I have to get an expert because the two biggest sections were the section that was eliminated or gutted in the Shelby County case and then this section. So I don't think there's much left of the Voting Rights Act. How are districts drawn up in the first place? I mean, that's my question. That is a great question. Gerrymandering? Have you seen some of the, like, even if you look in Louisiana, in order to keep the House speaker in a Republican district, you know, they have these odd shapes that you would never imagine, you know, different kinds of weird shapes so they can get in people that they want.

5:37It's political at this point. It's, you know, and, you know, the Democratic states do it as well. The Republican states do it as well. And it's, you know, it's just the. But my old district in New Jersey, which we've since moved from, I finally saw it on a drawn somewhere and it was unbelievably. It's just a bunch of squiggly lines everywhere. How did they figure that out? Because having lived there, like, that's not how I think of my area. My area is this town, this town, this town. You know, no, it's been cherry picked. I mean, they have people who do this for a living, you know, and they have also they have all kinds of, you know, electronic ways of doing it.

6:12But if you looked at this, I mean, the one in Louisiana looks like a sliver up the coast. But all the states. And the only thing that has happened is, but only in Democratic states, they've had maps drawn by commissions. So in that way, you get a fair map because it's drawn by a commission with maybe equal representatives. But only Democratic states have done that, and that's put them in a bad position, which is why you have some states like California redistricting in a different way, not using the commission. So the way to do it is to have a commission. But when you let Republicans or Democrats do it, they're going to do it to their own advantage.

6:54And it's so easy for them to draw maps and just eliminate certain minority populations. It's a mess, really. It's just a mess. Let me ask a really dumb question. When the Supreme Court makes a ruling like this, people jump into action right away, right? I mean, this has immediate consequences? Well, yeah. Well, I think what will happen is, yes, states will start looking at this and deciding what to do. And Louisiana certainly is going to jump into action. Yeah, because what they're going to do is, you know, the politics of it, they're going to start looking at their maps and seeing what they can do and how they can use their power as legislators to redraw the maps.

7:35I mean, I just think this is opening up a can of worms that, you know, the implications are just are just crazy, I think, as far as as what's going to happen next. Because, you know, we see that what's happening in Florida is trying to redraw its maps without even this decision. So, you know, we've come to the point where are we going to have Democratic states with all Democratic districts and Republican states with all Republican districts? It's just it's sort of mind boggling. I'm still stunned by this. Does this change any of what California voters just decided or what Virginia voters decided?

8:11No, I don't. I don't think this has anything to do with that because that was a separate. I think that California didn't the California Texas passed the Supreme Court. I think California may have passed the Supreme Court as well. They're saying that wasn't based on race. That was based on politics. And it's OK to gerrymander based on politics. So think about that. Think of it's OK to gerrymander based on politics. So, you know, Republicans and Democrats are fine. They're allowed to go in and gerrymander based on politics. Before this decision, it was just you couldn't gerrymander based on race.

8:43And now you can gerrymander basically based on race, no matter what the Supreme Court said in its majority opinion. What's left for the Supreme Court this session here? I mean, this was a big one. Yeah, the big case, the case that we're waiting for at Bloomberg is the case of the attempted firing by President Trump of Lisa Cook, the Fed Reserve governor. And the thing is that every week that it's opinion day, we expect that case to come out because it was argued so long ago and because it seemed like the justices were on board with not allowing her to be fired. But it's taking so long that you start to wonder what's happening.

9:23Is it because they were writing a lot of concurrences and dissents? You know, why is it because they're having a hard time distinguishing as they want to the Fed chair from other other board members that he's fired? So is that what's taking them long? Are they just holding it? That's what I think. I think they're just good programmers and they're holding their juiciest one for the year. They say they don't. But I don't I really don't believe that because it's it's no coincidence that all these controversial cases come down the last day of the term. So when is the last day of the term? Well, it it's a movable date.

10:00OK, it used to be the very end of June and then they would go on vacation. But it's now we've had a couple of times where it went into July because they couldn't get their stuff finished and they had so many late breaking opinions. opinions. There used to be, I mean, there's a story about a justice that used to have his car waiting outside the court the last day so they could drive him to his vacation spot. Then they all disappear and go to different locations for the summer. I want to bring in Michael McKee, covers all the economics and international aspects of our reporting for Bloomberg. Boy, we just had a Supreme Court ruling, which has obviously political ramifications for this country, maybe economics as well.

10:44What's your initial take of the Supreme Court ruling here? Well, the ruling sets the stage for states to redraw congressional districts. But the question is, do they have time to do that? In some states where they have a number of black majority districts, it's already too late because filing deadlines for primaries have already passed. The issue is how many states could still do it. One expects that Louisiana would try. But the question, the secondary question is then how far do they get with this? Because if you draw the districts, you know somebody is going to complain to the courts about it.

11:20It goes back into the court system to question whether the new maps are discriminatory in one way or another. It does have a long-term foundational impact, however, in that it dilutes minority voting power in the sense that you can't create a district that is basically guaranteed to elect a minority. And that would be a question of disenfranchisement for a lot of people. And the kind of deal that many states made that they would never admit is that we'll give you your own minority district and then we will be able to use the rest of the state for our own white majority districts and most states Republican districts.

12:01So at this point, there could be a shift in the balance of power in some states once they can get around to actually changing their congressional districts. Boy, this gets messy really quickly. that's that's the net effect of this kind of decision was this a surprise the way that supreme court ruled no it's not at all uh in fact uh legal and political analysts had been expecting this for quite some time the court has uh not liked the voting rights act for many years chief justice roberts has said that uh while it was useful at one time it cannot be permanent law because many Many of the states and many of the aspects of the Voting Rights Act have been, you'd say, cured, taken care of.

12:45People can vote. Poll taxes are gone. That sort of thing. So they've been gutting it one section at a time. This is section two, and now it is gone. So the Voting Rights Act itself is not worth much anymore. But that was expected, and that's why you have a lot of lawyers, especially on the Democratic side waiting to pounce on any new districts redrawn to see if they can make the case that they discriminate in one way or another and aren't fair.

13:18For years, the conversation around Bitcoin was the same. Is it real? And does it belong in a portfolio? While others debated, CoinShares got to work. In 2015, they launched the world's first Bitcoin EDP, regulated, listed, and built for institutional investors. Long before the U.S. market caught up. Today, they manage over$6 billion in assets and have remained profitable through every market cycle, including the 2022 downturn. What sets them apart? They're not a crypto exchange chasing trading fees, not a company betting its balance sheet on Bitcoin, not a mining operation. CoinShares is an asset manager with recurring fees, a fixed cost base, and a business model you can actually model.

13:57Now listed on NASDAQ under ticker CSHR, Learn more at coinsharesipo.com.

14:14Support for the show comes from Public. Lately, it feels like there are two types of investing platforms. Some are traditional brokerages that haven't changed much in decades, and others feel less like investing and more like a game. Public is positioned differently. It's an investing platform for people who are serious about building their wealth. On Public, you can build a portfolio of stocks, options, bonds, crypto without all the bugs or the confetti. Retirement accounts? Yep. High-yield cash? Yes, again. They even have direct indexing. Public has modern design, powerful tools, and customer support that actually helps.

14:49Go to public.com slash market and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash market. Ad paid for by Public Holdings. Brokered services by Public Investing, member FINRA SIPC. Advisory services by Public Advisors, SEC Registered Advisor. Crypto services by ZeroHash. All investing involves risk of loss. See complete disclosures at public.com slash disclosures. Being a small business owner isn't just a career, it's a calling. Chase for Business knows how much heart and effort go into building something of your own. That's why they make business growth their priority.

15:23The Chase team takes the time to understand your mission, where you are now, and where you want to go. Their broad range of solutions is designed with you in mind, so you can bring your ideas to life. From banking to payment acceptance to credit cards, you can conveniently manage all your business finances all in one place with their digital tools. Looking for tips and advice? Their online resources are always available to give you the solutions you need to help your business thrive. See how your business can get stronger and go farther with Chase for Business. Learn more at chase.com slash business.

15:57Chase for Business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. Member FDIC. Copyright 2026. JPMorgan Chase and Company. If you follow markets, you know the value of long-term thinking. You plan, you diversify, you prepare for volatility. But even the best strategies can't prevent every bad day. For more than 75 years, Cincinnati Insurance has helped individuals and businesses navigate tough moments with expertise, personal attention, and independent agents who focus on relationships, not transactions.

16:38The Cincinnati Insurance Companies. Let them make your bad day better. Find an agent at c-i-n-f-i-n dot com. Find home wherever you roam at Sinesta ES and Simply Suites, where longer stays feel comfortable, flexible, and easy. Stretch out and enjoy spacious accommodations and home-like amenities designed to help you settle in and stay productive or relaxed for however long you need. And when you're a Sinesta Travel Pass member, staying at Sinesta ES and Simply Suites means earning points toward free nights, upgrades, and more with every eligible stay. Go to Sonesta.com to book your stay and unlock the best rates with Sonesta Travel Pass.

17:17Here today, roam tomorrow. Join now at Sonesta.com. Terms and conditions apply. These days, it seems like AI agents are just about everywhere you turn, every field and every function. But without identity, you can't trust they'll serve your business instead of jeopardizing it. Fortunately, Okta helps you get identity right by securing your AI agent's identities, giving you a single layer of control, a single standard of trust. So whether an AI agent supports a single user or your entire enterprise with Okta, you'll turn risk into opportunity. Secure every agent, secure any agent. Okta secures AI.

From the publisher

The US Supreme Court limited the use of the Voting Rights Act to create predominantly Black or Hispanic election districts in a major constitutional ruling that buttresses Republican efforts to keep control of the House in this year’s midterms and beyond.
Voting 6-3 along ideological lines, the justices rejected a Louisiana congressional map that was drawn with a second majority-Black district after a lower court found an earlier map to be discriminatory.
The Supreme Court ruling undercuts what had been the most significant remaining part of the Voting Rights Act, a law passed in 1965 to address rampant discrimination against Black voters. The justices had already significantly weakened the law twice since 2013.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Bloomberg Law

All 285 episodes
Instant Reaction: Supreme Court Curbs Use of Race in Drawing Voting DistrictsBloomberg Law · 11 min
Listen in VO