Trial Over Tupac Shakur's Murder, 30 Years Later

18 Aug 2026 · 36 min · 15 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

A Bloomberg Law episode analyzing (1) the 30-years-later criminal trial of Dwayne Keefe D. Davis for Tupac Shakur’s 1996 drive-by murder, and (2) later legal news on ICE warrantless arrests, DACA/advanced parole, and employer hiring-bias rules for foreign workers.

Guests

Nima Rahmani, former federal prosecutor; president/co-founder of West Coast Trial Lawyers. Leon Fresco, partner at Holland & Knight; former head of DOJ Office of Immigration Litigation.

Key claims

Prosecutors say Davis planned retaliation, got the gun, and arranged the shooters; strongest evidence is Davis’s own repeated admissions to police/FBI and a 2019 memoir. Defense argues Davis’s statements are lies for street cred/book sales and that there’s no proof he was in Las Vegas; also highlights immunity litigation and alleged investigative failures. Rahmani says the prosecution likely needs independent corroboration (e.g., placing Davis in the vehicle/Las Vegas) because physical evidence and living percipient witnesses are lacking.

Notable examples

Suge Knight’s prison statements; Davis’s alleged “ringside” lie about the Mike Tyson fight; 2008 immunity dispute reaching the Nevada Supreme Court; ICE “flight risk” individualized determinations; DACA advanced-parole travel potentially triggering 3/10-year bars; DOJ warning employers about sham recruitment for employment-based green cards.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

The Context of Tupac's Murder

0:03 to 1:08

An overview of Tupac's death and the current trial against Dwayne Davis.

“As a listener of this podcast, you're looking for ways to help teams move faster, make sharper decisions, and turn scattered context into work they can use.”

The Context of Tupac's Murder

1:59 to 4:23

An overview of Tupac's death and the current trial against Dwayne Davis.

“Tupac is gunned down in a drive-by shooting from a white Catalani in an act of revenge.”

Challenges in the Prosecution's Case

4:23 to 9:21

Discussing the difficulties faced in prosecuting a 30-year-old case.

“Nima, start with the challenges of trying this 30-year-old case where most of the people who were involved are no longer alive.”

Defense Arguments and Strategies

9:21 to 12:20

Exploring the defense's strategies and claims in the trial.

“And of course, under the rules of hearsay and the confrontation clause of the constitution, an accused has the right to cross-examine his accuser.”

Perceptions of Law Enforcement

12:20 to 13:17

Examining the impact of public perception of law enforcement on the trial.

“Attorney's Office charges this arsonist.”

Perceptions of Law Enforcement

15:29 to 15:56

Examining the impact of public perception of law enforcement on the trial.

“from world-renowned chefs like Daniel Bouloud and Marcus Samuelson, nightlife venues like the new Jean Batiste Jazz Club, and the Caribbean's most luxurious casino.”

Tupac Shakur Murder Trial Overview

16:08 to 24:56

An overview of the trial regarding Tupac's murder 30 years later.

“Davis is accused of Shakur's murder in a drive-by shooting in 1996.”

Expectations from the Trial

24:57 to 25:21

Discussion on the implications and expectations of the trial.

“Excited to see what the coming days and weeks show in terms of a testimony.”

ChatGPT for Business Introduction

25:24 to 26:06

Introduction to ChatGPT for Business and its benefits.

“It's always great to get your insights, Neema.”

ChatGPT for Business Introduction

27:34 to 27:58

Introduction to ChatGPT for Business and its benefits.

“and the Caribbean's most luxurious casino.”
Show all 15 chapters

Preliminary Injunctions and ICE Policies

28:05 to 33:40

Learn about recent legal challenges to ICE's warrantless arrest practices and the implications of a tentative ruling in California.

“A federal judge in Los Angeles signaled she's likely to issue a preliminary injunction ordering ICE to stop making warrantless arrests unless agents first determine that a person is a flight risk.”

DACA and Advanced Parole Challenges

33:40 to 37:45

Discover the complexities and new rulings affecting DACA recipients and their ability to obtain immigration benefits after international travel.

“I mean, what normally happens when a DACA recipient decides to travel internationally?”

Hiring Foreign Workers and Legal Implications

37:45 to 42:07

Understand the legal challenges employers face when hiring foreign workers and the potential discrimination claims arising from current regulations.

“Can all DACA recipients get green cards?”

The Need for Immigration Reform

42:07 to 42:49

Learn about the flawed immigration system and the need for reform to create a merit-based process.

“And so the incentive structure is horrible.”

The Need for Immigration Reform

43:22 to 44:26

Learn about the flawed immigration system and the need for reform to create a merit-based process.

“and turn scattered contexts into work they can use, ChatGPT for Business can help.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Today's episode is brought to you by ChatGPT for Business. As a listener of this podcast, you're looking for ways to help teams move faster, make sharper decisions, and turn scattered context into work they can use. ChatGPT for Business can help. ChatGPT for Business gives teams a shared workspace with admin controls, permissions, and access to work and codecs in ChatGPT. This means your business can move from question to answer and code to rollout quicker. Join over 10 million business and enterprise users worldwide already using ChatGPT for work. Download the ChatGPT desktop app or contact sales to learn more.

0:37When you're running a business, the best days are the ones where priorities stay on track. For midsize and large companies, risk can affect multiple parts of the organization at once, from property and liability to cyber and regulatory challenges. At that level, managing risk becomes an ongoing discipline. At the Hartford, the focus is on helping businesses manage risk before it turns into something more disruptive. And when losses do happen, that work is paired with insurance coverage shaped by years of underwriting, risk engineering, and claims experience. Learn more at thehartford.com slash risk mitigation.

1:12Policies provided by Hartford Fire Insurance Company and its property and casualty affiliates, Hartford, Connecticut. it. Discover a spectacular island destination with crystal blue seas, endless sunshine, and the cool Bahamian breeze. Baja Mar, located in Nassau, Bahamas, offers your choice of three luxury hotels, over 45 fine dining and nightlife venues, Jean Batiste's all-new jazz club, the Caribbean's most luxurious casino, and one-of-a-kind experiences for the entire family, like our 15-acre tropical water park, wildlife sanctuary, world-class golf course, and so much more. Visit Bahamar.com today.

1:50This is Bloomberg Law with June Grosso from Bloomberg Radio.

1:59Tupac is gunned down in a drive-by shooting from a white Catalani in an act of revenge. Tupac Shakur is a cultural icon, considered one of the most influential and versatile rappers of all times, despite dying at the age of 25 in a drive-by shooting in Las Vegas in 1996. His murder was considered one of the biggest unsolved cases of our time, and now, three decades later, Dwayne Keefe D. Davis is on trial for orchestrating Shakur's murder. Here's how prosecutor Benu Palau described it. Dwayne Davis did not pull the trigger. But what he did do was plan the retaliation for the beating of his nephew.

2:50You will learn that Dwayne Davis got the gun. You will learn that he got into a white Cadillac. You will learn that the opportunity presented itself for retribution, Dwayne Davis made sure that the shooters were armed and ready to execute their way. The strongest evidence in the prosecution's case appears to be Davis's own words. For years, the former gang leader actually boasted about his involvement in shooting Shakur, laying out the details in multiple interviews with police and the FBI, than on the pages of a memoir in 2019 and in media interviews. But in an unusual posture, the defense attorney, Michael Senfit, told the jurors his client was not to be believed.

3:44Just look at the actual facts. What facts do you have to support any of what QPD said out of any of these interviews or in the book? But Suge Knight, who was in the car with Shakur when he was shot, thinks Davis will have a hard time convincing a jury, as he told ABC News in an interview from prison. Everything he said and talked about, he already told on himself. So what are you going to do? He raised all the recordings of the interviews he did. The 63-year-old Davis faces life in prison if he's convicted of the murder. My guest is former federal prosecutor Nima Rahmani, president and co-founder of West Coast Trial Lawyers.

4:27Nima, start with the challenges of trying this 30-year-old case where most of the people who were involved are no longer alive. It's very difficult to prosecute a case 30 years later, especially because everyone who was in Kifi D's vehicle is dead, many of them for gang-related reasons. Really, the only percipient witness that we know so far is Suge Knight, who of course was driving Tupac's vehicle. But I think it's unlikely that he's going to testify in this case and identify either the shooter or even put Davis in the vehicle. The other issue is Tupac himself, the testimony that came out on the first day of trial was that he refused to snitch and identify the shooter, saying that he would take care of it himself.

5:15Of course, he succumbed to his injuries at the hospital and was unable to do so. Does it seem like the best evidence the prosecution has is Kifi D's own words? Because he bragged about being involved in the killing many times over the years and wrote a memoir to that effect. I've never covered a case like this that's based almost entirely on the defense's own words. The opening statements were surreal. You have the prosecution calling Davis a criminal mastermind, the shot caller of this gang. And then you have the defense, on the other hand, trying to undermine their client's own credibility. They said he was full of crap.

6:01They said this was all BS. They essentially were arguing that he's a fool who was bragging to make himself seem more important, gain street cred in the gang culture, and to sell books. I've never seen anything like it. And at this point, the defense is claiming that there's no evidence that Davis was even in Las Vegas that night. This was a really important point. So Davis has said that he wasn't even in Vegas in interviews he's done from jail with local media outlets in Vegas. But during opening statements, the defense said that Davis lied about being ringside or close to it in the Mike Tyson fight.

6:43He wasn't even there. He wasn't at the fight. He wasn't in the city, which would be absolutely devastating to the prosecution's case if that's true. They need witnesses to at least put him in Vegas and Clark County. Otherwise, they're going to have significant problems. He did many interviews over the years with the FBI, with Las Vegas police, with L.A. police, where he again boasted about his involvement in this shooting. I mean, back to, I think, 1998, he talked to the FBI first. So, I mean, is the jury going to be asking? So if he talked to them all these times, why wasn't anything done? Why did it take until 2023 to indict him?

7:31That's one of the best arguments the defense has. They're arguing that even LAPD, even the FBI, they didn't believe Davis. That's why they didn't charge him. And you're right, we're talking about going back to, I think 1997 was his first interview with LAPD after Biggie Smalls was killed outside the Peterson Auto Museum in Los Angeles. Of course, there's the infamous 2008 interview with the federal task force that became the issue of much litigation. He was given immunity. The prosecution argued that it was just use immunity. It didn't bind other jurisdictions, including Nevada. This was litigated all the way to the Nevada Supreme Court, where the defense argued that it was transactional immunity.

8:18He couldn't be prosecuted at all. Ultimately, the judge agreed with the prosecution that one jurisdiction cannot contractually bind another. and I think that 2008 interview as well as the 2019 memoir I think those are the most damning pieces of evidence for Davis in the defense. What do you think about the defense saying oh he was bragging in an interviews Davis has said you know he was trying to make some money off this? It's certainly possible the prosecution is going to need to corroborate these admissions or confessions with some independent evidence. It's going to be very hard when you have the defendant now arguing that he was trying to sell books and seem more important.

9:02Ultimately, I think at a minimum, they've got to put him in the vehicle. And the question is, do they have the witnesses to do so? Their witnesses are going to testify about this white Cadillac that pulled up next to a BMW. But the challenge, like you said, is all the percipient witnesses to the shooting, they're all dead. They can't testify. And of course, under the rules of hearsay and the confrontation clause of the constitution, an accused has the right to cross-examine his accuser. Also, they don't have the gun. They don't have the car. I don't know if they have any physical evidence at all.

9:39That's the concern here. Normally in a murder case, you're going to have ballistics, you're going to have DNA, you're going to have fingerprints. We don't have any of that cell side evidence so you're relying on these admissions so obviously there's a potential motive i think we're going to hear a lot of testimony about the beef between these gangs one other interesting wrinkle is that that may be helpful for the defense is that davis previously said that sean diddy combs offered him a million dollars to kill tupac now of course combs is denying that. But if that particular, and Holmes isn't going to come anywhere near this trial, like should Knight, he has his own legal problems.

10:21But if that statement is also untrue, it sort of leads to the conclusion that this is all just a complete fabrication by someone that had nothing to do with it. That's why that independent corroborating evidence is going to be critical for the state. So basically, you just can't believe anything that Davis says. Well, that's the point. The more elaborate the lies and McCombs part being one of them, the better it is for the defense. Again, it's really bizarre that they're just trying to undermine their own client's credibility. I've never seen anything like this in any case I've ever covered. So the more lies there are and the bigger those lies, the better it is for the defense.

11:06The defense attorney is also pointing to missing documents in the original investigation. Detectives work as being biased, sloppy and incompetent and even some corruption there. I mean, that's an argument that we've heard many, many times before. What's the challenge when you have these types of cases? Because I live and work in Los Angeles, and I was here in the 90s. And obviously, this is not a Los Angeles case, but there is a perception or there was that LAPD was corrupt during that time. Rampart, Rodney King, the failure to ever arrest anyone for the Tupac or Biggie murders. There are a lot of people who believe that law enforcement were complicit.

11:54It was bad boy. So the challenge is when you have a 30-year-old case, I'm not saying everyone is of age to remember when Tupac was killed, but some of these jurors have very strong preconceived notions as to who was responsible for Tupac's death. That becomes a challenge. And there are other cases as well where this has been an issue. I think a recent example, not a murder case, but the fire case here in Los Angeles where I live, Jonathan Renner-Kinnick, he was charged for arson. But that was after many, many months when people believe that the LA Fire Department, the LA Department of Water and Power, Mayor Karen Bass, Mother Nature, they're all responsible for the devastating Malibu and Palisades fire.

12:40than the U.S. Attorney's Office charges this arsonist. And ultimately, the jury hung 10-2 in favor of acquittal. And one of the jurors that spoke out and said, no, this wasn't his fault. He's being scapegoated. So I think the defense has an argument here that it was law enforcement that failed to do their job. And by the way, this is when the defense lawyers argue in almost every case, right? A poor, sloppy investigation. And the fact that it took 30 years to bring any criminal charges against one of, or actually who I believe is the greatest rapper of all time being murdered, does play into that argument, June.

13:17Stay with me. Coming up next on the Bloomberg Law Show, I'll continue this conversation with former federal prosecutor Nima Rahmani. What's the likelihood that the defendant might take the stand? This is Bloomberg. Quick one before you jump back in. You're listening for ways to help teams move faster, make sharper decisions, and turn scattered context into work they can use. ChatGPT for Business can help. ChatGPT for Business gives teams a shared workspace with admin controls, permissions, and access to work and codecs in ChatGPT. This means your business can move from question to answer and code to rollout quicker.

13:53Join over 10 million business and enterprise users worldwide already using ChatGPT for Work. Download the ChatGPT desktop app or contact sales to learn more. Innovation is what gets your business to market. And Wasabi is designed to give every business a shot at competition. How? Break free from skyrocketing storage costs and unpredictable egress fees from old and top-heavy legacy providers. You know, the big guys. Wasabi is the world's hottest cloud storage company and the go-to provider for professional and collegiate sports teams and leagues around the world. And here's why. Innovation. From Wasabi's AI-enabled intelligent media storage Wasabi Air to the industry's only cloud storage service with triple protection against cyber criminals, data deletion, and ransomware, the world's top companies trust Wasabi.

14:46Remember, Wasabi is up to 80 % less than market competition and doesn't charge a cent for businesses to access their own data. Wasabi, another championship story. Check them out for free at Wasabi.com. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage, proud partner of iHeart Podcast Network.

15:29from world-renowned chefs like Daniel Bouloud and Marcus Samuelson, nightlife venues like the new Jean Batiste Jazz Club, and the Caribbean's most luxurious casino. At Baja Mar, you'll find every pleasure under the sun and one-of-a-kind experiences for the entire family, like Baja Bay, our 15-acre lush tropical water park, interactive wildlife experiences, including our daily flamingo parade, world-class golf, tennis, spa, and so much more. Visit Bahamar.com today and discover a vacation destination where memories are made for a lifetime. Bahamar. Life spectacular. Fans of the late rapper Tupac Shakur stood outside the Las Vegas courthouse as a trial 30 years in the making started in a courtroom where Dwayne Keefe D.

16:20Davis is accused of Shakur's murder in a drive-by shooting in 1996. Some fans, like Derek Lee Stanton Jr., say they're prepared to stick it out as long as the trial lasts. It's more important than ever right now to even be having this conversation be brought up, for everybody to be focusing on this and to even want to find some justice for Tupac's report. I've been talking to former federal prosecutor Nima Rahmani, president of West Coast Trial Lawyers. Tupac remains a cultural icon. He's considered by many, and I guess you, to be one of the most influential and versatile rappers of all time. Fans of Tupac are standing outside the courthouse.

17:05How does that play, if at all, into the way the jury considers the case? I think it helps the prosecution because to the extent that you have a beloved victim, jurors are going to want to hold someone, anyone responsible. Obviously, you have cases where, and again, I don't condone any type of violence, but if you're looking at a very different type of case, would be Luigi Mangione because health insurance is so unpopular. That's a challenge for the prosecution in that case and certainly a benefit to the defense now. I don't, of course, condone violence for any reason. But when your victim is very well liked, I think that's an advantage for the prosecution because the jurors are going to want to hold someone responsible.

17:52The trial is expected to last between four to six weeks, and prosecutors are expected to call 35 to 45 witnesses. We've discussed how no one who was in the car, except allegedly for the defendant, is still alive. Suge Knight, who's serving time in prison for another crime, has said he doesn't want to testify. So besides retired police officers and detectives and perhaps some people who were at the hotel or the fight, who else do you think is on the prosecution's witness list? I think they're not going to be your witnesses in the traditional sense in that they didn't actually perceive the murder.

18:33I think we're going to see a lot of people talk about this feud, you know, this history, obviously the fight at the MGM. Basically setting the stage and really telling a story of why Davis would be motivated to shoot and kill or orchestrate the murder of Tupac Shakur. So I expect there to be a lot of witnesses telling that story. But as far as percipient witnesses, you're right, June. I don't think there are many, if any at all. Do you think it'll end up being, does the jury believe what Davis said before and through the years, or do they believe what he's saying now and he's been saying only since he was arrested?

19:15I think it's a fascinating case because it's really based on what Davis has said. Now, if you're the prosecution, I think you get there in a couple ways. One, you have to show that Davis's story has been consistent over the years, over the past almost 30 years now. If the story is consistent, that's helpful. There's inconsistencies because when people lie, they can obviously often change their stories over time, especially after many years. The second is that corroboration I talked about. I mean, they need something. They're just hanging their hat on the confessions alone. I think that's challenging, especially because, like the defense argued, no one else has filed charges, notwithstanding these confessions.

20:01The defense plans to call just a handful of witnesses. The defense attorney hasn't said whether the defendant will take the stand in his own defense. If he testifies, are the jurors supposed to believe him now, supposed to believe him before? I think if I'm the defense, I do not under any circumstances put Davis on the stand. Here's someone that is going to be completely destroyed on cross-examination. Maybe you want him to be destroyed because you want him to just look so incompetent. You want him to be a bumbling fool. So maybe it would be a mad genius move. but it's very very risky for this type of defendant he's obviously opened his mouth many many times when he should not have even when he was in jail he was talking to reporters right it's really unheard of unless there's a specific pr or other reason while there's a pending criminal case for a defendant to talk to reporters i mean it certainly happens we've seen it i believe with Scott Peterson and others who have a certain narcissism to them.

21:09But it is risky. And if I were the defense here, I would kind of stick with what I got, which is really reasonable doubt, because the prosecution is at a disadvantage because so much time has passed and most of the witnesses are dead. A jury of 16 people, six men and 10 women was seated. So four are alternates. Potential jurors were questioned about their knowledge of gangs, guns, hip-hop music, and memories of the 1990s music scene. Among the jurors, you have a self-help guru who once had a shoplifting habit, a motorcycle-riding retired gemologist who says she'd never heard of Tupac but doesn't have a problem with gang culture, and a mailman who used to listen to Tupac's music back in the 90s.

21:56So you appear to have a very diverse jury there. I say this respectfully. I am licensed in Nevada. We have an office in Las Vegas. But Vegas can have some interesting folks that travel through there. So I'm not surprised there's a diverse cast of characters. Look, I always say it's 12 men and women who can't get out of jury duty, right? So I'm not surprised you have all types on that panel. Here he's charged with murder with a deadly weapon, with the intent to promote further or assist a criminal gang. Do you think the jurors will have any problem with the fact that the prosecution says that the defendant himself didn't pull the trigger?

22:38I don't think so. I think the jury instructions are pretty clear. It's well established that you can be convicted as a co-conspirator. You can be convicted as an accomplice. The classic law school example is, you know, there's a murder and you're driving the getaway car. You don't have to pull the trigger to be guilty of murder under those circumstances as an accomplice. And in this particular case, at least the prosecution is alleging that Davis got the gun, and they're pretty specific as to who he got it from. He passed it to someone in the backseat only because he was to the right of Tupac's car in the front passenger seat.

23:16And his story is that had he been on the other side and had a clear shot, he would have taken it himself. So that's pretty damaging for the defense. He passed the firearm to someone in the back who didn't or was unable to take the shot and the other backseat passenger did. So under those circumstances, that's murder under the law, if the jurors believe that story. That story, you know, as you're reciting it, does have a lot of details that make it seem credible, I have to say, you know, for a jury, because it's not just I gave someone the gun and they know it's I wasn't on the right side or I would have shot him and then I came to someone in the front.

23:57And also he talks about Tupac actually waving to fans or whatever. He said if they wouldn't have known that he was in the car if he hadn't done that. So I mean, there are some details. Yeah, I mean, yeah, there are very specific details. And what's sort of fascinating is Tupac's car was apparently pulled over about 10 minutes before he was shot because he had no plates. So obviously an important part of the story. But yeah, like you said, if the story is precise, if it's consistent, if it's corroborated, I think the prosecution can get there. But if it's just a general story about a hip hop feud, it's gonna be hard to get 12 out of 12.

24:39This trial was 30 years in the making. We'll have to see if it lives up to the expectations that many people have for it. I am just really excited to be covering this one. Hopefully the jury gets it right. But really, the fact that there have been no charges in two of these cold cases for decades, it's really a head scratcher and really plays into the perception, right or wrong, that law enforcement is corrupt and that they either don't take these cases seriously at best or we're complicit somehow at worst. So I'm glad the case is moving forward. Excited to see what the coming days and weeks show in terms of a testimony.

25:24It's always great to get your insights, Neema. That's Neema Rahmani, president and co-founder of West Coast Trial Lawyers. Quick one before you jump back in. You're listening for ways to help teams move faster, make sharper decisions, and turn scattered context into work they can use. ChatGPT for Business can help. ChatGPT for Business gives teams a shared workspace with admin controls, permissions, and access to work and codecs in ChatGPT. This means your business can move from question to answer and code to rollout quicker. Join over 10 million business and enterprise users worldwide already using ChatGPT for Work.

26:01Download the ChatGPT desktop app or contact sales to learn more. Innovation is what gets your business to market. And Wasabi is designed to give every business a shot at competition. How? Break free from skyrocketing storage costs and unpredictable egress fees from old and top-heavy legacy providers. You know, the big guys. Wasabi is the world's hottest cloud storage company and the go-to provider for professional and collegiate sports teams and leagues around the world. And here's why. Innovation. From Wasabi's AI-enabled intelligent media storage Wasabi Air to the industry's only cloud storage service with triple protection against cyber criminals, data deletion, and ransomware, the world's top companies trust Wasabi.

26:48Remember, Wasabi is up to 80 % less than market competition and doesn't charge a cent for businesses to access their own data. Wasabi, another championship story. Check them out for free at wasabi.com. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage. Proud partner of iHeart Podcast Network.

27:33Bolloud and Marcus Samuelson, nightlife venues like the new John Batiste Jazz Club, and the Caribbean's most luxurious casino. At Baja Mar, you'll find every pleasure under the sun and one-of-a-kind experiences for the entire family, like Baja Bay, our 15-acre lush tropical water park, interactive wildlife experiences, including our daily flamingo parade, world-class golf, tennis, spa, and so much more. Visit Bahamar.com today and discover a vacation destination where memories are made for a lifetime. Bahamar. Life spectacular. A federal judge in Los Angeles signaled she's likely to issue a preliminary injunction ordering ICE to stop making warrantless arrests unless agents first determine that a person is a flight risk.

28:23That would force ICE agents to fundamentally change the way they've been conducting the sweeps at the heart of President Trump's massive deportation campaign. Joining me is an expert in immigration law, Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland & Knight. He was the head of the Justice Department's Office of Immigration Litigation during the Obama administration. Leon, is this the same case that went up to the Supreme Court at one point? So this case has had a lot of iteration. So it started in June of 2025 with the sort of go to the Home Depot and start grabbing people. We want to get to 3000 arrests a day.

Read the full transcript

29:04And there was a TRO and a preliminary injunction back then that had to do with racial profiling and said, you need to have a warrant in order to arrest people if you were doing these roving ICE operations. You couldn't just do that. You had to have a list of people that you knew were in undocumented status and you had to pick them up. And that was for all of Los Angeles County. And what happened was this is where the Kavanaugh stops was created. That ended up going all the way to the Supreme Court. And Justice Kavanaugh said, no, no, no, you can have warrantless arrests here because you can see certain things about people that are common toward the fact pattern of being undocumented, where they are being apprehended.

29:49Are they speaking a different language? Blah, blah, blah. And so that ended up being disbanded. And so these folks came back with a new legal theory. And the new legal theory was, well, wait a second. Maybe this isn't based on racial profiling. Maybe the problem is that these arrests that are happening are not just warrantless, But they're warrantless and they're also being done without taking into account whether these individuals are actually flight risks or dangerous. because the idea was you should only be arresting, again, people on a list that you know are undocumented. You shouldn't be pulling people over on the street and just arresting them unless you thought that the problem was that if you didn't arrest them right at that minute, then you would never be able to find them ever again.

30:42And so their view, the plaintiffs, was that ICE was sort of papering over this work using form language, and they actually said they were using some inappropriate racist language also. And so they had all of these accusations. Leon, this is a tentative ruling. Explain why it's tentative. In California, I never knew this until I worked at the Department of Justice because I'm from Florida and I lived in D.C. But in California, they have this weird thing where when you show up to court for an oral argument, they give you the decision before you even have the oral argument, which is very odd and disconcerting.

31:17Disconcerting. And so that's what had happened here is the judge gave them the preliminary injunction. It's called the tentative ruling. And then you have to argue why the tentative ruling shouldn't go into effect, which I've always found like, well, once the judge spent 50 hours doing work to put in a 50 page order, why would they ever go back on their tentative ruling? I mean, that's cognitive dissonance at its, you know, 100 percent level there. But nevertheless, when I was at the DOJ, I was able to argue a case out from under a tentative ruling, but it's very, very hard to do. And most people think this judge will not go away from her tentative ruling and will issue the preliminary injunction that then says that you actually have to have individualized language that says this is why this person is a flight risk or dangerous.

32:10And if you don't do that, then you need a warrant in advance in order to arrest them. And then we're going to have to, again, work our way up to the Supreme Court to see if that's really the standard here. So four federal judges in Oregon, Colorado, D.C., and Sacramento have issued these preliminary injunctions against the warrantless arrest by ICE agents. But has it reached an appellate court yet? I mean, so it reached the Supreme Court on the issue of racial profiling, but not on the issue of making an individualized determination about flight risk. And so that's where it's going to need to get to an appellate court and then ultimately to the Supreme Court.

32:49Most of these are in the Ninth Circuit. So the Ninth Circuit will eventually deal with this one way or the other on the issue of what kind of determination ICE has to make. I find it hard to believe that ICE ultimately will have their hands tied by the Supreme Court to the extent that they're not allowed to make arrests. But we'll have to wait and see. I just don't see it. I think they will be allowed to make arrests. The way the Supreme Court usually deals with these things is they say, look, if there's an unconstitutional arrest as applied to a specific person, come back to us and argue about that.

33:23But we're not in advance going to just tie ICE's hands for no reason. So they love this idea of as applied constitutional challenges and say, come back to us later if there's a problem with the way this is being implemented. Let's turn to another topic. The Justice Department administrative panel has ruled that DACA recipients and others who travel internationally with advanced parole could be disqualified from immigration benefits, including permanent residency. I mean, what normally happens when a DACA recipient decides to travel internationally? I'll try to keep this as simple as possible, but it's actually a very huge order that affects millions of people.

34:07So that's why I thought it was important to talk about it today. Here's what happens. In 1996, as part of something called the Illegal Immigrant Reform and Responsibility Act, it was President Clinton and then the Republican Congress that came together and they agreed on this. They said that illegal immigration had gotten out of control to such an extent that we needed to do something about it. And they created something called the three year, 10 year bar. What it says is if you are in America in an undocumented status for longer than 180 days, if you leave, you're banned for three years from coming in.

34:42And if you are here for longer than 365 days in undocumented status, then that ban is 10 years. So if you leave, you can't come back in for 10 years. It's a categorical ban. And so what's the problem? So the problem is this. Sometimes people will overstay their visas and eventually meet someone and get married, you know, like in the movie The Proposal with Ryan Reynolds. and send them all, of course. Exactly. And so in those situations, people can then apply for green cards. Or DACA is another example where the people who had DACA, they didn't have a legal status. Now they have one. Now they can apply for a green card.

35:29Okay, so what happens next? What happens next is during the year or two years, it takes like between a year or two years, that you're waiting for your green card, you are trapped inside of the United States. You're not allowed to travel abroad unless you get permission from the government. And that piece of permission is called advanced parole. If you leave without that permission, you're abandoning your application and they never let you back in. You're totally in big trouble. So you have to have that piece of permission. So the question is, when the government gives you this advanced parole permission to travel, did it say to you, oh, we know that if you had left, you would have been subject to the three and 10 year bar.

36:12But we're saying, no, no, no, don't worry about it. You can come back in. And that's what the government did say for the last 15 years. But what the Trump administration has just done is said, no, no, no, no. If you leave the country, even if we gave you one of these permission slips to leave the country, guess what? You're never coming back in. You're subject to that 10-year ban and you're never going to be allowed back in. Now, they didn't do it retroactively, which is good. They did it prospectively. So at least they gave people now a warning. But the point is, many people would use these paroles in order to be able to actually qualify for a green card.

36:54That's what the DACA people did. Because what happens is, if you entered illegally into the United States, then you can't get a green card, not overstay your visa. It doesn't matter who you marry. You could marry Trump. You still can't get a green card. But when you got one of these paroles, that fixed that. But now they're saying, no, no, no, no. If you leave, even if you have a parole that you used to think would fix that, it doesn't fix that. So now the immigration lawyers are scrambling, telling all of their clients who possess these advanced parole documents that if they're in one of these cases where they're currently in a marriage that they're trying to use to excuse an overstay, don't leave because you're never going to be able to come back in the country.

37:38And so a lot of people, at least up front, are going to get snagged by this during the transition period. And it's going to be quite a mess. I have a DACA question. Can all DACA recipients get green cards? Well, so here's what happened. What the DACA does... There's never an easy answer to any of my questions. Yes. Well, no, no. The answer is maybe, and I'll explain. So here's what happens. What the DACA does is it gives you a status, because a lot of these DACA kids crossed illegally, so they had no way of getting a green card. But what the DACA does is it gives you a kind of a quasi-status, and at least under the Biden administration, When you had this quasi status, then what would happen was they would give you an advance parole.

38:25And so you could travel and come back. And when you came back, that parole fixed the fact that you came illegally the first time. So now you've entered legally and now you could marry a U.S. citizen and get a green card or you could get an employee. But now that's all gone. They say even if the Biden administration gave you such a permission, good luck trying to use it. if you leave and you use it, we're not letting you back in the country. There's potentially 50 ,000 people who could be snagged in under this if they're not careful. Something else from the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice has put employers on notice that can face discrimination claims for favoring foreign workers over U.S.

39:07workers, even if they're technically complying with Labor Department regulations. So explain what does an employer have to go through if they want to hire a foreign worker? Yeah, there's different processes, but the process that this one is referring to is the process by which you hire a foreign worker for a green card, for what's called an employment-based green card for lawful permanent residents. The main process there is a process where you have to do recruiting to show that an American worker was not available. The statute itself has things that it says that you have to do. So, for instance, it says you have to put two ads on a Sunday paper and then you have to pick between a radio ad or an Internet posting or whatever.

39:52It gives you like a menu of 10 things and you have to pick four of them. And so here's the problem. Even though you're technically compliant when you do a search for a U.S. worker using the four criteria, they give you 10 and you can pick any four you want. And what the Department of Justice is now saying is, yeah, that's fine and dandy. But if you're not using the actual means that you use when you actually want to find a worker, then we're going to say this is a sham process. So not only do you have to use, you know, four out of 10 things in our menu, but if you do something normally to find workers, you're going to have to do that same normal thing here because this shouldn't be a process about not finding someone.

40:36You should be trying to do everything you normally do to find someone. And only if you can't find someone, then do you hire the foreign worker. So there were 13 settlements reached in the past 18 months involving this alleged hiring bias. And OpenAI reached a settlement with the Justice Department of$3.2 million. Did that number come out of thin air or did it relate to the number of violations? violations per person but at the end of the day that these these settlements are because people don't want to litigate these issues and so the question is is some company ultimately going to want to litigate this and say why can't i use four out of the ten that you told me to use why do i have to use the same ones that i use for my other employees if these were the ones you wanted me to use do that or otherwise say i have to use the same ones that i use for my normal employees but you know, this is the problem.

41:31Now, the reason all of this is crazy is because what happens is these foreign workers are already in the company. They're usually working on a temporary visa, on an H-1B. And what you're trying to do is you're trying to reward them for good work by applying for their green card. The employers want to do the right thing and give that employee a green card. But in order to do that, they have to show there's not an American to get that job. So technically, from the employer standpoint, the way they're incentivized to do this is to try to not find an American worker so that they can give this employee a green card.

42:07And so the incentive structure is horrible. It's a terrible situation. And so this is one of the key areas where immigration reform is needed so that at the end of the day, the people who get green cards are people with skills and talents and abilities that are important to the marketplace. Not this system where you have this perverse incentives, where the only way someone can get a green card is for an employer to have to go through a kabuki theater of trying to show there's not an American worker there. That system has sort of had its day, and we really do need to move to a new system now. I think the term kabuki theater would apply to many of the immigration cases we've discussed, Leon.

42:48Thanks for joining me, as always. That's Leon Fresco of Holland and Knight. And that's it for this edition of the Bloomberg Law Show. Remember, you can always get the latest legal news on our Bloomberg Law podcast. You can find them on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and at www.bloomberg.com slash podcast slash law. And remember to tune into the Bloomberg Law Show every weeknight at 10 p.m. Wall Street time. I'm June Grosso, and you're listening to Bloomberg.

43:21Before you sign off, you tuned in for ways to help teams move faster, make sharper decisions, and turn scattered contexts into work they can use, ChatGPT for Business can help. ChatGPT for Business gives teams a shared workspace with admin controls, permissions, and access to work and codecs in ChatGPT. This means your business can move from question to answer and code to rollout quicker. Join over 10 million business and enterprise users worldwide already using ChatGPT for Work. Download the ChatGPT desktop app or contact sales to learn more. When you're running a business, The best days are the ones where priorities stay on track.

44:00For midsize and large companies, risk can affect multiple parts of the organization at once, from property and liability to cyber and regulatory challenges. At that level, managing risk becomes an ongoing discipline. At the Hartford, the focus is on helping businesses manage risk before it turns into something more disruptive. And when losses do happen, that work is paired with insurance coverage shaped by years of underwriting, risk engineering, and claims experience. Learn more at thehartford.com slash risk mitigation. Policies provided by Hartford Fire Insurance Company and its property and casualty affiliates, Hartford, Connecticut.

44:37M &M's popped caramel do sound different. Oh no, people are going to be obsessed. What do you mean? People hate the sound of chewing. Maybe they won't like the crunch. Maybe we're saved. Wait a minute. Yellow. Huh? Have you been eating them this whole time? Mmm, so tasty. Hands off us. M &M's popped caramel. It's more fun together.

From the publisher

Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani, president of West Coast Trial Lawyers, discusses the trial of Duane “Keffe D” Davis, who is charged with orchestrating the 1996 drive-by shooting of the legendary rapper, Tupac Shakur. Then immigration attorney Leon Fresco, a partner at Holland & Knight, discusses the ramping up of enforcement for employers favoring foreign workers over US workers. June Grasso hosts.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Bloomberg Law

All 284 episodes
Trial Over Tupac Shakur's Murder, 30 Years LaterBloomberg Law · 36 min
Listen in VO