In short
Breaking Points: Episode Summary (12/23/25)
Episode Title
Ryan CONFRONTS Emily On College Campus CANCELLATION
Podcast Description Breaking Points is a fearless anti-establishment multi-week podcast hosted by Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti that holds the powerful to account.
Key Guests
- Emily Jashinsky: Journalist and co-host on Breaking Points.
- Ryan: Interviewer for this episode focusing on Emily's political views and experiences.
---
Episode Overview
In this holiday edition of Breaking Points, Ryan interviews Emily Jashinsky, focusing on her experiences during her time at George Washington University (GW) regarding political activism, college controversies, and her journey in media and journalism.
Key Topics Discussed
- Emily's Background and College Experience
- Emily was the president of the Young Americans for Freedom (YAF) chapter at GW.
- She gained attention for opposing a mandate for sensitivity training on preferred pronouns, igniting controversy on campus.
- Controversy Over Sensitivity Training
- Discussion on the backlash Emily faced, including being labeled a "hate group" for opposing mandatory sensitivity training.
- Emily reflects on her experience with the backlash, noting how it affected her perspective on political activism and media.
- Cultural and Political Awakening
- Emily shares her story of growing up in a culturally conservative environment, her early political awakenings, and the shift towards more populist views.
- She recounts her experiences working for the Young America's Foundation and the impact it had on her career trajectory.
- Reflections on Media and Journalism
- A discussion on the evolution of media, audience engagement, and the challenges of presenting honest news without succumbing to ideological biases.
- Emily talks about her work with Christina Hoff Sommers and her insights into feminist critiques.
- The Role of Algorithms and Audience Expectations
- Analysis of how algorithms are reshaping media consumption and public discourse, emphasizing the need for diverse viewpoints in discussions.
- The hosts reflect on the demand for shows that present balanced perspectives rather than polarized narratives.
Key Takeaways
- The conversation highlights the challenges faced by individuals who express dissenting opinions on college campuses, particularly concerning cultural and political issues.
- Emily's journey illustrates the complexities of navigating one's political identity amid societal pressures and media scrutiny.
- The episode underscores the importance of fostering a space for dialogue that transcends partisan divides, encouraging open conversations and understanding.
Conclusion
Ryan and Emily engage in a thoughtful discussion about the state of contemporary media, the importance of honest dialogue, and the evolution of political discourse, showcasing a commitment to bridging divides in the current media landscape.
---
Additional Information
- To support Breaking Points: Listeners are encouraged to become premium members for ad-free access to the show.
- Merch Store: Visit the Breaking Points merch store for various items.
---
This structured summary provides an insightful overview of the episode's discussions, key themes, and the journey of Emily Jashinsky, emphasizing the nuances of political discourse in contemporary media.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed Human Black history lives in our stories our culture and the conversations we still have in today I didn't know This Black History Month the podcast I didn't know maybe you didn't either digs into the moments perspectives and experiences that don't always make the textbook Let me tell you about Garrett Morgan Bruh had to pretend he didn't even exist just to sell his own invention Listen to I didn't know maybe you didn't either from the Black Effect Podcast Network on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or simply wherever you get your podcasts.
0:411969, Malcolm and Martin are gone. America is in crisis. And at Morehouse College, the students make their move. These students, including a young Samuel L. Jackson, locked up the members of the Board of Trustees, including Martin Luther King Sr. It's the true story of protest and rebellion in black American history that you'll never forget. I'm Hans Charles. I'm Menelik Lumumba. Listen to The A-Building on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. What if mind control is real? If you could control the behavior of anybody around you, what kind of life would you have?
1:15Can you hypnotically persuade someone to buy a car? When you look at your car, you're going to become overwhelmed with such good feelings. Can you hypnotize someone into sleeping with you? I gave her some suggestions to be sexually aroused. Can you get someone to join your cult? NLP was used on me to access my subconscious. Mind Games, a new podcast exploring NLP, aka neurolinguistic programming. Is it a self-help miracle, a shady hypnosis scam, or both? Listen to Mind Games on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey guys, Sagar and Crystal here. Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election, and we are so excited about what that means for the future of this show.
1:59This is the only place where you can find honest perspectives from the left and the right that simply does not exist anywhere else. So if that is something that's important to you, please go to BreakingPoints.com, become a member today, and you'll get access to our full shows, unedited, ad-free, and all put together for you every morning in your inbox. We need your help to build the future of independent news media, and we hope to see you at BreakingPoints.com. All right, this is a special holiday edition of Breaking Points. We're coming to you from the past. We have no idea what is going on in the world in which you are currently living.
2:35We are recording this way back in the middle to early month of December, year of our Lord, 2025. Hope everything is going well for you. Today, we're going to be joined by journalist Emily Jashinsky. Emily, thank you for joining us. To be clear, this is part one of a series we're doing where Ryan is going to interview me, and then I'm going to turn it back over to Ryan, and we're going to interview Ryan. Ryan appears to have Googled me in preparation for this, and I did not do him the same courtesy because I've probably Googled you before. I don't know. I'm sure when we first started hosting, I'm sure I was like, isn't that the guy who beat up Jesse Waters?
3:20actually right around the time that i was fighting with jesse waters um is when you were fighting with uh the big lgbtq lobby um which is what we're going to get into first and then i do want to um you know hear about more of like what what got you into this world but i think this is actually a good place to start so we do have an actual element um that i googled there's a whole bunch but I just grabbed one from Raw Story. So the headline here, and this is the year 2015. Love the photo that adorns this. This headline's so funny. If you're only listening to this, you need to go find the video because there is a picture of two women making out.
4:02Next to the headline, college group hosting Rick Santorum demands, quote, sensitivity training to teach gays, quote, respect. And so this came from a GW Hatchet article while Emily was at George Washington University and was the head, is that right, of Young Americans Found? Y-A-F, right? Yeah. This is the Buckley organization, right? William Buckley created this youth organization, Young Americans Future or something like that? Yeah, it's confusing. I can get a note if you want. Yeah, so, yeah, that's what I want to do. And so then GW mandated that they were going to do, like, you know, DEI stuff, like sensitivity trading, particularly, I think this one, correct me if I'm wrong, particularly around trans issues.
5:01Yes, pronouns. pronouns and you were quoted as saying forget it um we don't we don't want to do this and interesting in in the raw story article um they have the college republican throwing you under the bus oh of course that's what always happens so the head of the college republican says look it's just a little just a little train a little sensitivity training that's how it used to be don't be so sensitive that's how it used to be um all right so i've been vindicated so you're a so that so when'd you graduate high school so 2011 so 2011 so you start GW senior year um so this is your senior year of college yeah um so what is what is this buckley group and then we're going to get into the controversy because it became like a little national thing you came like a punching bag for the kind of uh left-wing raw story huff post i wonder if huff post did anything on you.
5:56If I remember correctly, I think HuffPost did. But, you know, it was it's actually very interesting. And I think telling story, it's a little thing, but like the desktop kind of here, it brings in a lot of different. I don't know. It does bring in a lot of different trends that started to pop up, especially after 2015. But basically, in college, I was the president of the YAF chapter. That's Young America's Foundation, which had just merged in 2012 with Young Americans for Freedom, which is the Buckley Group that was created with the Sharon Statement in 1960 at the Buckley Estate. And Ronald Reagan kind of comes out of Young Americans for Freedom circles.
6:36He was not a young American, of course, but that was part of the Reagan revolution. Guys like Roger Stone affiliated with Gaff and all of that. But when I got to college, you know that was the the conservative group on campus that I got involved with and this is a the the LGBT sensitivity training story is a funny one because it was I don't know like a snow day if I'm remembering correctly and I got a call from the student newspaper uh the hatchet and And that's a job incoming. Yeah. And they asked, does GW YAF oppose this bill that the Student Association passed like last night that mandates sensitivity training?
7:24And it was such a trap because I hadn't given any thought to the question of the Student Association sensitivity training bill. And I think actually what they asked is if we would be requesting a religious exemption to the thing. And I think the quote that I have in the hatchet is like, well, I'm sure we would be because it doesn't sound very tolerant of other people's religious beliefs because the sensitivity training was going to for student leaders of student groups. It wasn't a huge deal, but it did mandate that you go to preferred pronoun sensitivity training. We have the receipts right here.
8:00You said mandated training is not really being very tolerant of all religious beliefs. The way that people who are deeply Christian behave is for a reason. And if you're training them to change that behavior, there's obviously a problem with that. So they were going to have every student. Just if you were the leader of a student group. So if you're the head of a YAF chapter or even, you know, the Muslim student group, like you all would have had to do it. Right. Let me see if I can find the Republican one. He said, regardless of this is Alex Pollack. What's he up to now? He's the head of the college Republicans at GW.
8:35He's got to be like lobbyist or something by now. I think he works in publishing. Wow. Flamed out. I have to double check. You know, it's like college Democrats and college Republicans, like college Democrats, less so now it's they're more activisty. College Republicans, certainly to this day. Like those are those are people who are just gunning for internships on the Hill and trying to figure out a way to run for Congress. Right. And YAF gets, and by the way, in disclosure, I'm actually on the board of directors at YAF because that was my first job out of college. I was the spokesperson there and, you know, owe a lot to them because as a nonprofit group, you know, I got a lot of like experience.
9:21You know, went to conferences and they were the group that paid for Rick Santorum to come to our campus. And it was a very, very, very interesting experience having Rick Santorum come. But it was the reason that that groups like YAF are different from college Republicans is because there's that sort of populist element to it. And that's the forgotten part of the Reagan revolution is the forgotten part of Buckleyism. So it was a revolution against the establishment Republican Party of the time against Gerald Ford. That's what it was against. And so that's what I've always liked about like YAF as a conservative student group.
10:00So anyway, yes, they were trying to mandate sensitivity training. I was like, hmm. So Alex Pollack said, quote, regardless, this is the college Republicans head, regardless of your views on LGBT people, LGBT people exist. He said it should be mandatory from a sensitivity perspective, which is not definitely not the Republican position anymore. Elephant in the Zoom. And so, so how did this, so how did, how did that experience of becoming a momentary kind of national figure in the sense that you're, it's got to, you know, it's not as if like you were a household name or anything, but like if you were a college senior and all of a sudden your name is in like national publications with people hating on you.
10:49Yeah. what was that like and how did that shape your, who you are now? Is this origin story stuff or were you, this was just like you were on the same trajectory either way? No, this is absolutely origin story stuff. I had a job already lined up for when I was graduating at a Republican consulting firm that was going to be doing like oppo research. And I ended up working at YAF instead because after this happened, they were like, whoa, things on campus are, are actually even crazier than we had quite realized, come work for us and do some PR stuff. So that was my first job. And I took it because I was very interested in media.
11:29I always wanted to be a writer. And this job would let me write columns and do that sort of thing. But it was horrible. Truly, it was horrible. They wanted me to go on Fox News. I said no. And of course, after that, I ended up doing a decent amount of Fox News until about five years ago when we started hosting together tapered off. But, um, it was, it was truly horrible. I had people yell at me from across the street. I went on spring break, um, students are like a student. Yeah. Um, I went on with my friends, by the way, I have many, um, gay friends at GW who were like, Whoa, what the hell you're the allied and pride group on campus.
12:12Uh, I would have to go look this up, but they put out a statement if I remember correctly, that said we had committed an act of violence against the transgender community. Yeah, I think they called you a hate group or something. They called us a hate group. They tried to get us pushed off campus, literally tried to get us pushed off campus. I think people were agitating for us to get suspended. And this is, again, not because we said anything other than we think that mandatory sensitivity training on preferred pronouns is not tolerant. That's the statement. So, yeah, they tried to push off campus for that.
12:42And it was very like proto woke, I guess you would say. But it was horrible. It was genuinely horrible. And a lot of people i'm sure there are a lot of people on the right who would love that but for me i i hated it and i don't have like literal ptsd from it but thinking about it feels still really still raw i still i still feel kind of panicky yeah because it was an early experience with a pylon and i've never been comfortable you know when you when you're a journalist even when you do a show like this um you know it's every once in a while something you say gets clipped or what And it's horrible every time.
13:15I hate it. Yeah. The headline. Here's another headline. Conservative club labeled, quote, cancer, quote, hate group. Yes. For requesting to opt out of LGBT training. Come on. Interestingly, I just noticed that the original Hatchet article has a list of corrections that is almost as long as the article itself. Oh, it doesn't actually? Yeah. Oh, that's awesome. Um, and one of them, and I wonder if this played into the pylon, um, it says, uh, the hatchet incorrectly reported that the sensitivity trainings would include information about sexual assault. The focus of the trainings would be LGBT issues.
13:53We regret these errors. Um, and so it may, it may have initially been reported that you also wanted to opt out of, uh, sensitivity trainings around sexual assault, which would, but I mean, clearly it was originally reported that way. Like, that's why they had to correct it. That would be even more egregious, probably to the public say like, how, how dare you? How could you not? So I wonder if that like played a role in the pile on. What really started it was the Allied and Pride at GW statement. And that started going viral on our campus circles. Like Facebook was big back then. And I think they, yeah, they put out the statement on Facebook.
14:31And when that happened, it was just everything from their national media picked up on it. So like raw story, whoever else picked up on it. And it became a just a total nightmare. We got like hauled into a meeting with the Student Association. It was its origin story stuff just for the fact that this was, you know, I would say that the point of this being mandatory and then having like a pretty, I think, reasonable request to not have to go to a mandatory like reprogramming training. I feel like that was kind of reasonable. Then you have the college Republicans throwing us under the bus and you have the Ida and Pride group freaking out.
15:13And this is about like three months before Bruce Jenner became Caitlyn Jenner. And it's just all of the stuff was happening in the spring of 2015. That was pretty interesting because Trump was literally about to come down the golden escalator like a few months later. Right. Right. Yes, this is this is definitely in this is definitely an interesting time. I could imagine some people coming out of this. With it with more of a more of an axe to grind, like you have a. You know, you're you're pretty firm in your culturally conservative politics, but I haven't noticed you. with any kind of hardcore like vendetta um and and probably much more tolerant rhetoric than a lot of people who have your same politics it's um how did that come about i would say yeah it's kind of for me it's the opposite because one of the things that one of the reasons that it came to dc is i grew up like in the woods in wisconsin not a super rural area uh kind of the exurbs of Milwaukee, but, um, you know, my, my, my family definitely was like in the woods.
16:24Um, and my dad, could you see your neighbor or like, what was your situation? No. Yeah. No. Um, you can shoot on our property, all that good stuff. Um, and we, hopefully that means your neighbors were really far away. Yes. Uh, well, it's also just that even they have a lot of woods, so they have a bunch of property um and anyway so all that is to say the you can see him now because all the trees are down but anyway going on uh going forward uh i grew up like why are the trees down what happened it was a it's a the cycle of the forest they're old and also my dad has just been like deforesting uh taking him down for various well because they're dead and yeah anyway also good excuse to use the chainsaw, but, uh, grew up like hunting, fishing.
17:13My mom is from a very rural area. My dad's from very blue collar background, um, and going to church every Sunday. Um, and it was just like, one of the reasons I came here is that I was so frustrated by what I was seeing on TV and in movies, just the way that culture talked down to people. I always felt like I just wanted to prove the point to elites that these are decent people. I just am so annoyed by this assumption that you are bad if you come from a culturally conservative background. For whatever reason, that has just always really, really, really gotten under my skin. And that's why I came here.
17:53And so I hate feeling misunderstood. It just drives me insane. And so I like having conversations. And that's where I think I don't have an ax to grind. I just genuinely have a point to prove. And I like having those conversations. I want people to see that I might disagree and really disagree on difficult stuff, but I don't hate anyone. It's really the opposite. And that's just frustrating. Were your parents conservative? When did you get a political awakening? So my mom definitely is conservative. of my dad votes for both parties. He's a, um, he worked for the state. He was an engineer for the state of Wisconsin.
18:36Uh, his whole career is retired now, but, um, he was a public employee union. Um, and so went through the, the kind of Scott Walker era. I wish funny cause Scott Walker is president of the half now. Uh, but you know, they would, yeah, my mom was an HR for years, um, at some, some big corporations like Johnson controls. And they would argue about, uh, Walker and unions. She was in HR and had to deal with a lot of that. So a little bit of both. My dad's Catholic. My mom's Lutheran. So it was a little bit of both. But for me, it was just kind of this cultural, wasn't always like hardcore conservative.
19:15And I don't think I'm, you know, I'm not like MAGA or Republican now. I just am kind of a limited government, cultural conservative type person. Right. I pulled up another 2013 article. This is another Hatchet article? Another Hatchet article. I'll read from this one. It says, Sophomore Emily Jashinsky said she grew up in a strict Lutheran household and is also morally opposed to same-sex marriage. But after honing her political views as a libertarian, and she'll be doing, well, we did the reason debate already, she does not think the government should be taking a stance on the issue at all. She will not head to the Supreme Court this week where there was going to be a protest around marriage equality ruling.
20:03Republicans do not need to get caught up in social issues, she said. Jashinsky, a member of the Young America's Foundation, said she is inspired by new voices in the Republican Party that are more libertarian like father and son Ron and Rand Paul. She called them the future of the GOP. Amazing. That seems so I can. Hopeful future. I can guarantee that was like a six-month phase in toying with libertarianism. But the limited government that you still espouse is – so this was hardcore libertarianism. You were like – No, I mean, yeah, kind of. It was becoming that. I mean, the – Sophomore year, that's around when people try on libertarianism.
20:41Yeah, that's exactly right. Yeah, and it was definitely short-lived. But the reason that I was attracted to libertarians is because I've always been a populist. And at the time, Ron and Rand Paul were populists. The Tea Party movement was populist. And so the thing that I was wrong about, and Charlie Kirk was wrong about this at the time, too, I think I just came around a little earlier, was that the Republican Party did need to get caught up in social issues, not in the way that a lot of people wanted it to get caught up in social issues. And Rick Santorum is an interesting figure in this respect, too.
21:12On the one hand, was talking about Charles Murray's coming apart and cultural elitism. Then, on the other hand, was talking about a pretty unappealing worldview that Americans were moving away from that wouldn't fit on a populist platform. So anyway, yeah, that was short-lived. I don't think I've ever really considered myself a libertarian. I still really like Rand Paul because I think he is a populist. I like Ron Paul because I think he's a populist. But at the same time, you know, I am kind of a economic populist in a way that they aren't like I believe in industrial policy and protectionism and all that fun stuff.
21:51So, yeah. So Ron Paul ran in 2008 for president when you would have been what year you're graduating? Eleven? Yeah, I was in high school. So was that kind of the first campaign you paid serious attention to or? Yeah, yeah, because in 2004 it was 12. Or I'm sorry, it was 11. Yeah, so that was definitely the first major one. Did he do better in 2012? I'm trying to remember. So he runs in 2008. 2012 he comes out. This is post-tea party. Kind of mid-tea party. Did he almost win Iowa or win Iowa? He did incredibly well. He was shocking the Republican establishment. Yeah. And the people who got behind him in 2012 I think ironically you could say many of them became Trump supporters like Ron Paul was the like yeah I know some of them he was the avatar for challenging the Republican establishment yeah exactly yes and so it feels like people were more interested in challenging the Republican establishment than whenever that person was saying yeah so that's why you're like okay if it's going to be Ron Paul, then I'm going to learn about libertarianism.
23:06It's going to be Trump. I'm going to do this other thing. Yeah. And after 2012, Ron and Rand were treated as the future of the Republican Party by the media. There was that Time Magazine cover that was like the libertarian moment, if I'm remembering correctly. And it was all the rage and like young conservative circles, like nobody wanted to be connected to the Santorums and young Republican circles, because there was this sense pre-Trump that the culture war was dragging everybody down. And to the extent that the pronoun sensitivity training thing is origin story and lore, it's that for me, that is an early point where I reversed that 2013 Hatchet quote, where I was like, oh no, actually the culture war is where, this is like the big tent.
23:54The culture war is the big tent. And I'd always been more interested in the culture war than most people who were like in college Republican circles. Um, but that's, you know, to me, I was like, this is getting so wild that kids are being chased off a campus for saying like they're being called a hate group for saying they didn't want to do a mandatory pronoun training. Like it was getting a little crazy. Things are getting weird. And so then how long were you at YAF after college? Almost two years, almost two years. Um, and my college job, I was, I'm probably the longest American Enterprise Institute intern ever because I worked for, uh, not in foreign policy, although I would be like standing in the lunch line behind Paul Wolfowitz, uh, wild.
24:37Architect of the Iraq war. Yeah. Yeah. Wild stuff. But I worked for Christina Hoff Summers, who is, um, like she was very favorable to Bernie in 2016, but was at AEI writing about feminism. Um, she wrote that book from in 1994 Who Stole Feminism? And she wrote The War Against Boys. And my job was to fact check the original War Against Boys, the footnotes, and make sure the research hadn't changed. And in fact, what I found often is that some of these trends had gotten worse about young men in schools and all of them. When did The War Against Boys come out? The original one was 2000. 2000. Yeah.
25:13Yeah, the re-release was 2013, I think. How did Christina Hoff Summers shape your politics, working with her? Yeah, I mean, I just wrote in the Washington Post this month about my experience working for her. She's amazing. She's brilliant. And it was, for me, more of like an awakening along these same lines that I had, I felt it in my gut, but I didn't have the language or the research or the experience to kind of back it up, which is this is a person who's eminently reasonable, brilliant, and had leftist critiques of the feminist movement when she was, her courses were cross-listed in the women's studies department at Clark University, I think it was in Massachusetts in the early 90s.
25:55And she had leftist critiques of the feminist movement, got kicked out of the women's studies conferences and everything when she wrote Who Stole Feminism and ended up at AEI making, I think, a lot of the same leftist critiques, feminist critiques of the feminist movement in ways that aren't easily categorized as necessarily leftist or reactionary. But she was so misunderstood and that i think i haven't even thought about that until now but like that i think really resonates with me is that this these elite distortions of well-intentioned people who are just trying to engage in conversation who did steal feminism like what was the feminist and and for what purpose like what's her what's i haven't read that what's her that's where she uh that's where she goes through some of the statistics that the feminist movement has often relied on that aren't great.
26:48So for example, overstating the wage gap, overstating the prevalence of domestic abuse and violence, and in ways that further victimize women. It's like the learned helplessness, but applied to women in the feminist movement. But also, she was very early in saying that erasing sex distinctions was going to hurt women's spaces. It was going to undermine Title IX. It was going to create serious problems. She was very early on Gamergate, which is funny. I think I've told the story before of like ending up at a Gamergate meetup while I was a Christina intern at a bar on U Street here in D.C. that got like a bunch of bomb threats called in.
27:29And it was all of these Gamergate people. Milo was there who came from around the country. And what was Gamergate for people who like if you're under 30, that probably doesn't exist to you. Yeah, that's true. um it's seen as like trump lore as 2014 woke lore yeah 2014 it's seen it's sort of seen as like proto woke um it was a bunch of men getting mad about the feminization or the feministization of video games uh and some of them channeling that in really awful ways and some of them channeling it in ways that was just like stop encroaching on our spaces like we have to let some stuff be for guys um and some of the feminization feministization of the video games was like proto woke um but anyway yeah i was at that gamer game meetup and it was like uh i say this respectfully steve bannon cites that as his origin story he like saw the energy around gamer gate right so there's a lot of angry young men here we could we could channel this into a publication and a presidential campaign yes and a political movement yeah and some of that went to uh some of that energy went to trump some of it went honestly to things like charlottesville And some of it went to, you know, just Jordan Peterson and early Jordan Peterson, like some really good stuff.
28:46So, yeah, but I was like I say this respectfully, like in a party of like sweaty basement dwellers who had traveled. It was the worst smelling party I've ever been to who had traveled from around the country and were so nervous and they didn't have a lot of money. And they put everything into getting to this meetup. And it was like the highlight of their year. And it was in a way, you know, there's some of them who are clearly fringy and off. But in a way, it was like also some of them were well-intentioned and it was very kind of touching. I don't know. Any of them talk to you or were they all afraid of you?
Read the full transcript
29:16They were afraid of the women, that is for sure. But yeah, they were they were really excited. And then they were really excited when the leftists called them bomb threats and they had to evacuate three times because it made them feel. Oh, they would go out in the street like they're renegades. Right, exactly. Right. They're a real threat. It made them feel kind of alive. Yeah. Yeah. Which, and so you being at the Gamergate basement party goes to a question I've seen a lot of people ask. I've wondered about like the, how do you square you in the public space? You work harder than almost anybody that I know.
29:54Like the day that we're taping this, you're up early in the morning to do breaking points. you're then recording some episodes for the holidays um you'll then have maybe four hours to go do other work the Sirius XM show at two Sirius XM show at two then you're going to do the reason debate it you have to be there at 5 30 and then you're doing your after party show on Megyn Kelly's network at like 10 which will go till when like midnight 11 11 30 right so that's it's a long day it's a fun day i don't want to say that like like it be the way i always think about it i love how you say it beats working yeah you always say it's not real work it gives me perspective because it's fun but it's a lot that's a lot it's a lot 6 a.m to like 11 12 p.m we can acknowledge that that's like a long day even if it's fun stuff yeah it's a long day um on the other hand the from the cultural political perspective it's like well women shouldn't, you know, shouldn't be working.
30:55Or I don't even know exactly where, obviously you wouldn't ban them from working. But like, how do you square that? That's a good point. No, that's gone back to like, people have asked, you know, Phyllis Schlafly that for years. And actually another one of my former experiences was we brought Phyllis Schlafly to campus. I went to a Bertucci's and sat next to Phyllis Schlafly when I was like 20 years old. And, you know, she was 89 at the time. And I just remember still working, still working, escorting her down this narrow hallway at GW. And the protesters, 89 years old, were like shouting her face and calling her like the most awful things.
31:35And again, I actually do understand where some of that comes from directed to Phyllis Schlafly, because there's a lot of, you know, there's a lot of angst from like the sexual revolution and LGBT stuff, feminist stuff that then comes out. and actually probably Israel stuff too that comes out when you have a kind of somebody like Phyllis Schlafly as an avatar for that movie. Anyway, yeah, watching the like hatred and betrayal was quite an experience. I don't, I'm not one of those people that, you know, has ever thought that women should not work. My mom worked, you know, probably 70 hours a week.
32:13Like she was flying to like, you know, for a lot of my childhood, she was flying to like China and Germany because she worked for, you know, auto manufacturing company. No, no, no, no. She wishes. She wishes. But no, she was in human resources, which would be a horrible CIA cover or maybe a great CIA cover. Maybe. I don't know. No, but I've never thought that. But I think we have Mary Harrington has this really interesting point about how the separation between home and work is actually industrial. It's post-industrial. It's only something that we think about. This idea that women should stay home and that home isn't work is like very much.
32:53And Mary comes at this from like a Marxist perspective that like men and women shared the work of the home until industrial society came along. So I think some of these are like artificial distinctions. I think if you look at surveys, it's true that most women want to work part time with their kids and be home for part of the time with their kids. That is the plurality of what women want to do. So I think women should should be treated that way and shouldn't be talked down to for choosing to work part time or stay home with their kids. But I don't really buy into the artificial distinctions between that.
33:29That is an interesting point because the whole like women should be at home is a post-World War II. Like in the 19th century, like, yeah, everybody was working at home, especially because energy production was such a significant part of home life. Yeah. like going out and like basically getting coal or chopping wood um and making sure that you had like enough to heat the house occupied like like men men had to do that and were doing it on top of whatever their job was otherwise the house is cold and that gave them an out then too they're like that they're you know if they're shirking other duties because they're not shirking anything because they're like like literally they got to be out there chopping wood yeah exactly um an enormous amount because it burns so fast yeah um and interest it so energy production being taken care of now by just the house has freed men up um and so men have filled that time with uh not as many as gamer gate and like right now now it's now it's back to being wildly unbalanced back at home.
34:45It's a good Christmas book recommendation, Feminism Against Progress by Mary Harrington. She goes into some of this. What's her take? Just what I like. It's actually very fascinating. At the time, I don't know if she would still define herself this way, but at the time, it's a very Marxist critique of the feminist movement. It's really interesting. That's interesting because, yeah, it's like, I guess a lot of it, they grew up in the 40s. Yeah. And 50s. Yeah. And it's right. That was their perspective rather than a long historical one. Yeah. It becomes like a corporate academic feminism. Um, so then how do you wind up with the Federalist?
35:19I was at the Washington Examiner working for, uh, someone, you know, Tim Carney on the commentary desk for a couple of years, a job opened, uh, on the commentary desk at the Examiner. I jumped at it right away. Cause I really wanted to do writing. And I told you after that, when I started working for them, that's what I ultimately wanted to do. So I jumped at that. But Tim was insistent and rightfully so that if you're a 24 year old and you have an opinion writing job, you're actually going to be doing reporting. So like you can you can do your blogs, but you need to bring new information to the table.
35:49And so that's where I hate reporting. I always say there are a couple types of journalists. There's the journalists who get into the job because they love reporting and talking to people and they hate writing. There's the journalists who get into the job because they love writing and hate reporting. there's the rare person who likes both and is good at both but I'm the type of person that I'm in it because I love writing I don't like reporting but Tim forced me to do it and uh that was incredible um so the Federalist plucked me from there to sort of do that but um with more at the time uh like considered um elegant kind of cultural writing every day so my job was to write one piece on culture a day.
36:32It was like the dream job, which because the Federalist is very small, quickly turned into a lot of other things. I was doing a lot of editing, read the submissions every day, which was fascinating. The Federalist submissions from like 2018 to 2024 were very, very interesting. Not bad. Yeah. So, and the Federalist model was publishing non-professional writers from around the country, which I think any leftist publication is a, that is a model that they should take because we were publishing. Most of our staff was in the rest of the country. You know, our politics editor was in Texas, executive editor in Indiana.
37:09Like everyone was elsewhere, but most of our writers were non-professional writers, either just like people with normal jobs, like small town lawyers, stay at home moms, that type of thing. So that was very, very interesting to see the difference between like the DC hive mind and the submissions every day. So now you went to college with two interesting people, Graham Plattner yeah I think so yeah Sagar and Jetty yes did you did you know him in college and is that how you first started doing like how did you first start doing rising appearances so actually before then doing the show Sagar and I definitely met each other without knowing it in college is my theory because uh he was in a frat that I would uh occasionally like be at the parties I had a friend of a friend who was like in that frat um you partied with Sagar yeah probably he was a year getting high in this he was not getting high upstairs but soccer used to be a much better time uh much better dive he used to be a much better hang um yeah so soccer's a year ahead of me at gw platner was just going through gw very slowly on the gi bill we found out recently that we overlapped with him um i don't think either of us knew him but um soccer had a really similar circle of friends uh to me and so when we met at an event that he was covering it was he was covering a yaf event we like met in person and you were at yaf at the time yeah uh this was right it was like the week of the 2016 election and uh we met in person we were like oh yeah we have all these friends in common and then our friend circles like became totally intertwined uh because one person started like my best friend started dating one of his best friends and there you go there you go and so then he starts asking to do like weekly were you doing weekly rising things you know it's it's funny it's even funnier than that Sagar um was really interested in starting to do like on-camera stuff when he was at the Daily Caller and I at the time was doing a decent bit of on-camera stuff at Fox and so we were talking about like what that's like if it's worth it all that sort of thing and so when he was at the Caller uh we were kind of strategizing on those types of things and then he would come and like i think you too would be on the panel on rising when he got that job yeah i think we had like maybe you had this too i think it was like tuesday i'll be you'll be on like tuesdays yeah and whatever you want to talk about yeah tuesdays something like that um yeah so then so you help sager with the whole fox thing i don't know if you'll admit it but yeah we got it well we'll interview sager we were at the piece on uh Connecticut Avenue.
39:44Yeah, we had a little conversation about that. And I was also on the Daily College softball team, so I was hanging out with all those guys. The team any good? Oh, hell yeah. That year we beat the State Department in the championship. Wow. It was awesome. Hillary's State, well, not Hillary's, but Obama's State Department. I played on the House Ways and Means Committee team for several years. What? That's a crazy story. We had like four or five HuffPost people. And then Ways and Means. This is so inappropriate. We literally were going to bat for them. So then Sagar and Crystal leave. They go do Breaking Points.
40:26Yeah. And you come in for a couple weeks and do Rising and then end up doing it for a very long time. How did that fit into your, how you had seen your career going? I guess then we got to wrap up pretty soon. Yeah, people probably... Kick us out of here. I know I've said this before. People probably know this. Like, on-camera stuff is not my favorite. I don't love it. I'm happy to do, like, radio stuff, but I really hate doing on-camera stuff. And so one of the reasons I didn't want... I didn't jump at the chance. Among many other reasons, Sagar and Crystal kind of filled us in on what was going on at the Hill.
40:59So there were a lot of reasons. I think both of us were skeptical. It was great money, though. At the time, it was great money. And so I just like, you know, was also kind of trying to help them out and was like trying at the time I was trying to do less on camera stuff, to be honest, because Fox had, again, tapered off for various reasons. but it started to become really fun and I think you and I both experienced the obvious reaction that audiences had to Crystal and Sager which was awesome like just it was so cool it's cool to see how that's blossomed but yeah that's I didn't really and around that time reading has like been steadily declining and like audiences are moving here so if you want to share the news that was so cool kind of go where they are here we are well yeah and i don't know i mean i don't i don't know that i would want to co-host anyone else i mean there's obviously also kristin sager they're great um but yeah that'd be no fun but i just mean if like we had initially been paired up together um yeah i don't think i don't know if i would be here um because i feel like that was really crucial yeah it's it's that's the limiting factor in it and i think in these shows actually is that it's i think that's right there's an there's an audience for much more of this type of news right than is produced yep but people can't produce it because they can't get along and they can't right um or they don't and not or but and they don't know what they're talking about so it's it's hard to find people who like like know what they're talking about and also like the other person they don't uh agree with them on on everything right it was really hard i mean i mean the fact that we got through peak woke that kristal and soccer and all of us got through peak woke and like you make t-shirts yeah we should we survived to the cancel culture wave.
43:07I actually think it is an amazing achievement. And the last thing I'll say is just... It's going to be downhill from here. It's going to be downhill. And also, yeah, I mean, we certainly have disagreed on Israel stuff and probably definitely still do. But that has been an interesting journey for me too. But the last thing I'll say is I think algorithms are reprogramming our brains, especially in media. And this is just also audience directed. you guys have probably see just the amount of people that react to ryan and me and crystal and saga with total sometimes extreme like you can't talk to that person you can't talk to this person people will probably be surprised at how much that we get constantly like this is disqualifying you should never talk to this person again how can you host a show with this person how can you host a show with this person given what this person that this person is friends with thanks like it's just crazy um and so i think one of the reasons there's a demand for this type of show that doesn't get done is because the algorithms are like reprogramming so many people to give in to those pressures and uh to fight or to dig in their heels and not continue to learn from each other and whatever so that's one thing i think we do well yeah and i think if you push past those people like we're winning yeah i think that's true because there are more people who are like no no, actually you should talk to each other.
44:30Yeah. And I want to hear, like, a lot of people will watch both Fox and CNN. It's like, why are we making people do that? Yeah, exactly. Just give it to them. Just give it to them right here. And it also creates more honest news because it fights audience capture. Yeah. Like, you know, if you just have one perspective, then you build an audience that wants to hear that perspective. And if you want to change direction or you or you if you have a position that differs from what they think, which you have to because times change. Right. We move on like we get new information. Totally. You can't or you lose your audience.
45:13Whereas our audience. Very much expects to hear things they don't agree with. Yeah, that's so true. And I hope people see that we like learn from each other. I think journalists should have more questions than answers, you know, and that's where I get a lot of times people being like, well, what do you actually think about this? It's like because we're used to having people in media who have a rock solid opinion on every single thing because that's how you were taught. I mean, I always talk about how when I did media training before I went on Fox the first time, I answered I don't know to a question in the training.
45:48And the woman was like, just don't ever say that. Don't ever say that again. Yeah, right. And now it's like a lot of times I'm just asking questions because you don't have to have a prefab ideological conclusion for every question that comes up. And shows that are in the habit of giving you that are bad. I think people are getting sick of them. Well, Emily Jasinski, co-host of Breaking Points. Co-host of the Emily Jasinski late night hour on the Megyn Kelly show. still ongoing writer at unheard yeah columnist uh and Ryan and host of the show right I'm Ryan biggest fan I said I swear other than maybe Alizan there you go um so thanks so much for joining me thanks for having me Ryan hope everybody's having a wonderful holiday now it's my turn to turn the camera on Ryan
46:52Black history lives in our stories, our culture, and the conversations we still have in today. This Black History Month, the podcast I Didn't Know, Maybe You Didn't Either, digs into the moments, perspectives, and experiences that don't always make the textbook. Let me tell you about Garrett Morgan. Bruh had to pretend he didn't even exist just to sell his own invention. Listen to I Didn't Know. Maybe you didn't either. From the Black Effect Podcast Network, on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or simply wherever you get your podcasts. I didn't know.
47:301969. Malcolm and Martin are gone. America is in crisis. And at Morehouse College, the students make their move. These students, including a young Samuel L. Jackson, locked up the members of the Board of Trustees, including Martin Luther King Sr. It's the true story of protest and rebellion in black American history that you'll never forget. I'm Hans Charles. I'm Menelik Lumumba. Listen to The A-Building on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. What if mind control is real? If you could control the behavior of anybody around you, what kind of life would you have?
48:04Can you hypnotically persuade someone to buy a car? When you look at your car, you're going to become overwhelmed with such good feelings. Can you hypnotize someone into sleeping with you? I gave her some suggestions to be sexually aroused. Can you get someone to join your cult? NLP was used on me to access my subconscious. Mind Games, a new podcast exploring NLP, a.k.a. neurolinguistic programming. Is it a self-help miracle, a shady hypnosis scam, or both? Listen to Mind Games on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human.
From the publisher
Ryan interviews Emily on her political views and life story!
To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show AD FREE, uncut and 1 hour early visit: www.breakingpoints.com
Merch Store: https://shop.breakingpoints.com/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
