4/6/26: Iran Total Control On Hormuz, Energy Rationing, US Casualty Coverup, Iran Worried About US Nukes

25:21And that is really like, and by a significant margin. And that really is kind of like the swing group of the present day. Okay. People who hate both parties, which one can they tolerate more than the other? Now voters in that group, which hold a negative view of both parties, favor Democrats by 31 points. 31 points. Now, let me give a caveat here, which is that you have a lot of Democratic voters who are like, vote blue no matter who, they will always vote for a Democrat, they self-identify as Democrats, et cetera, who now have an unfavorable view of the Democratic Party. They would be classified as double haters, even though they always are Democratic partisans.

26:04So I think that is important to keep in mind when you look at this polling. But, you know, the political landscape is somewhat of a constraint or certainly a factor in the way this war will unfold as well. Part of what's going on internally in the White House, apparently Susie Wiles is not happy. There's a sense of like, OK, we got to wrap this thing up. Trump is bored with it and he understands it's a distraction from the midterms. The problem is, I don't know how he gets out of this thing without, you know, just an utterly humiliating defeat. I mean, that would be if he walks away now, That's what we'll be looking at.

26:35And so he's backed himself into a corner where even if the poll numbers continue to decline as precipitously as they have been, it's not clear that there's anything he can really do about that situation. Yeah. Look, he doesn't have much of a way out. D4, let's put that up there on the screen. This is another significant one. But remember, a lot of people who vote for Trump, one of the big things that always has been his strength has been, hey, the people who vote and or love him, they love him forever. However, what they're seeing is that the Trump voter regret is now clearly registering. So in April 2025, 74 % of Trump voters scorned any of those options and said they were very confident in their vote.

27:16Today, that number is only 62%. The 38 % of Trump voters who chose a less resolute option was double the 19 % of Kamala voters who did the same. And then of the 38%, 21 % said they were still confident but still had some concerns. So the amount of regret for a vote, I mean, what? That's almost 40 % of the people who voted for you are saying that they— I'm not really crazy about what's going on. That's a lot. I mean, last time I checked, and actually checks, it maintains in the data. If MAGA is 100 % in, but independents, centrists, or moderate Republicans are out, that's literally the Trump coalition.

27:52That's the entire thing. Now, young voters have swung dramatically away from a lot of the Republicans, especially for Trump. I also love the whole podcast thing. They're like, oh, the podcast, they don't matter anymore. They're not MAGA. I'm like, well, they seem to matter a lot in the election. So which one is it? So if Theo Vaughn and Joe Rogan and Tim Dillon, like the entire brosphere is like not only anti-Trump, but like very anti-Trump. Now, at this point, at least some of them. Well, what does that mean, I think, for the vibe or any of that? It's like the Silicon Valley people who are still pro-Trump.

28:26They're like, you know, Japanese guys who refuse to surrender at this point. They're like the only ones still planting the flag. I can't think. I mean, they're even OG MAGA people who have been in the movement since 2015 who are like, all right, you know, I'm not I'm done with this per se, but pointing out a lot of the problems. So when you think about those things, like it's a big problem. There's an irony for those Silicon Valley guys who thought they were going to get their, you know, heart's desire in terms of unleashed AI under Trump, which was part. That wasn't the only thing, but that was a big part of what was going on there, especially after Trump wins and you have them all, Mark Zuckerberg and Sam Allen and all these people like come in and kiss the ring, etc.

29:05And the Iran war could destroy their industry. I mean, Trump did all the deregulation and the pumping it up and all of that. So he did all of that stuff. But because of the reckless disregard for literally anything and a decision to sort of throw us into World War III here with no plan for it to last beyond literally two days, Iran is – they're threatening one of the largest data centers in the world right now. I mean, they're threatening these tech companies directly. The energy prices are going to take a huge toll on them. We've already talked about this, you know, somewhat. But there is an irony there to the fact that they got behind Trump and he may be the one that actually destroys that industry.

29:44And, you know, that may be another silver lining ultimately of this war. I don't I mean, here's the thing. We could say it in the big picture. You know, as I do in the interim, what's going to happen? Millions lose their jobs, bankruptcy, high interest rates, stagflation. People I was just looking at the CPI. People are expecting now four or five percent energy inflation just on the year. From the inputs into our, I mean, that's a disaster. You know, like, that erases the margin for the average, what's the average restaurant run on a margin? Like 6%, right? So think about that. There's a lot of small businesses that run on that.

30:18If you have enough of that inflation, it'll either get passed on, really huge demand destruction, and a lot of people will lose their jobs. You know, suicide goes up. It's not going to be good. Let's go ahead and turn to some of the ways that they're working to keep accurate information from you all and from the world and from us and everybody else. And this is really quite extraordinary. So let's put this up on the screen. This is from Planet Labs. And we've talked a little bit about this before, but this is an expanded level of censorship here being done willfully by Planet Labs at the request of the United States government.

30:55So this is from Al Jazeera. They say U.S. satellite firm Planet Labs announces blackout on war on Iran images. The company says the move is being made amid the U.S.-Israel war on Iran, and it comes after a direct request from the U.S. government. So previously, there had been a hold on satellite data from the region, with the idea being that maybe two weeks later, we'll post the information. So you're not getting real-time looks from this private satellite company of what the damage is in the region and damage specifically to, like, U.S. bases throughout the region. We still have very little information.

31:31We know that many of our service members have been pulled off of some 13 bases in the region and are being put up in civilian hotels, which, by the way, in and of itself could constitute a war crime because you're then putting civilians—you're using civilians as human shields. In any case, that's our only indication of how much damage there is. You'll get a few photos out, a little bit of glimpse here, a little bit of glimpse there. But this private satellite company has just completely bent to the desires of the Trump administration here to hide how much damage there is. I would pair this with there is a report from The Intercept about the way that they are delaying and underplaying reports of casualties and even service members deaths to try to, you know, to try to create a misimpression of how the war is going and downplay the damage.

32:17Now, I'm not going to say these things are really new in war. I think there's typically an effort to downplay the level of death, the level of injuries, the level of damage, etc. You know, Trump is very big and Heggs had the very big on this whole victory narrative and they're obliterated, etc., etc. But for a private company to just go ahead and sort of collapse like this and agree to the whims of the U.S. federal government's brief at that. Well, first of all, yes, screw them. It's also, don't forget this. You know, they have contracts, right? Like they have contracts with all these news organizations.

32:45I have covered a war since 2014, and I have used open source satellite imagery for every single conflict we have ever been in, ever been in. This is from Afghanistan to these OSINT satellite images. And by the way, we were able to get them a couple of days after the incident. This now is cutting off everything from like what? March – it was like March 9th, dating back to March 9th that they are withholding all imagery. And that was some of the initial imagery that we had of U.S. bases. The American public has an absolute right to know, especially with this government and the regime that we've seen put in place over the extreme restrictions in the Gulf.

33:29I talked earlier about how people who are entering Oman are being told to sign these documents where they're not allowed to record. They're able to report, but they have to do some writing. in the UAE. You have citizens who can get arrested, or you have foreigners who can get arrested for publishing videos of missile strikes. I know that this is in place for much of the Gulf. There's really only one or two journalists who have even been gone to the Straits of Hormuz, not saying that they don't have the ability to do so, but more so that the governments are not letting them. You've only had two journalists, Western journalists, who were able to go to Iran.

34:08One of them, remember, the guy who we interviewed? Oh, that guy got bombed by Israel. Let's not forget that. So the censorship regime now is dramatic in place. And actually, you have Chinese and Russian satellite because, yeah, turns out, oh, nobody owns like geostationary orbit, okay? So you've got a bunch of Chinese and Russian satellite companies. They're publishing everything. Or they're not publishing open source. They're sending it straight over to the Islamic Republic. And you can see how these Chinese and Russian satellites, look, what, you think they don't want revenge, especially the Russians?

34:43After all of these Ukrainian attacks that we have done on them, that we backstop, that we've given them all of this intelligence, they are salivating at this ability to try and destroy as much U.S. military aircraft as possible to create this huge energy crisis in Europe. I mean, I follow a bunch of accounts that are directly from the Kremlin. They're doing backflips over them. They're like, oh, this is the end of the European Union. Screw you. Oh, it's not so fun whenever it happens to you. Same in China. I mean, they're just sitting there, you know, seeing the meme, do nothing win from Xi Jinping, literally doing nothing, just sharing satellite imagery.

35:20And by the way, they're doing a export ban on all of their oil. They seem to be doing okay. But the general tack of the CCP so far has been, let's sit here. We'll take some temporary hit on the oil market, but we are bleeding the West dry and we are destroying the ability of their Navy. All we have to do is support Iran a little bit. A few of these hit pinprick strikes and we can create significant chaos and damage in the US. Why wouldn't you do it? Well, you add that to the AI misinformation. People were sharing, including politicians, Greg Abbott, shared this fake AI image of the supposed airman who was shot down and rescued and whatever.

36:00This thing was spread widely. It's just completely fabricated. And if any of you guys have gone on Twitter and tried to figure out what the hell is going on, it's a near impossibility. There's all kinds of fake strikes or repurposed video from this or that. It's very hard to sort through what is going on. You've got a whole bunch of authoritarian governments, including Israels, that are involved here that are only showing the world the pieces that they want to show, you know, maybe strategically leaking something or showing something in order to evince some sympathy from the world. But otherwise, lots of damage is being undersold.

36:34And let me go back to that intercept report I mentioned, because I think this is highly significant. So at the intercept, they say there's a casualty coverup. The Pentagon is hiding U.S. losses under Trump in the Middle East. According to their reporting, this is from last week, almost 750 U.S. troops have been wounded or killed in the Middle East since October 2023. That's an analysis from the intercept, but the Pentagon will not acknowledge it. CENTCOM, which oversees military operations in the Middle East, appears to be engaged in what a defense official called a casualty cover-up, offering the intercept lowball and outdated figures failing to provide clarifications on military deaths and injuries.

37:11At least 15 troops, they say, were wounded Friday in an Iranian attack on a Saudi airbase that hosts American troops. That's according to two government officials who spoke with the intercept. Hundreds of U.S. personnel have been killed or injured in the region since the U.S. launched a war on Iran just over a month ago. They go on to detail the way that CENTCOM has sent outdated statements on casualty numbers. They result in undercounts, including a statement sent Monday from spokesperson Captain Tim Hawkins, noting that since the start of Operation Epic Fury, approximately 303 U.S. service members have been wounded.

37:43That comment was three days old and excluded at least 15 wounded in the Friday attack on Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia. Command did not reply to repeated requests for updated figures. They also would not provide a count of troops who have died in the region since the start of the war. An intercept analysis puts the number at no less than 15. So they're cooking the books here. They're underselling the amount of deaths. They're underselling the amount of injuries in a systematic fashion, using outdated numbers and trying to deceive the news media. And so the intercept was able to catch them in some of this deception.

38:17Yeah, not a surprise literally at all, right? And so you could see pretty obviously. But also, we all knew this was the case. Let's go through a few other examples. Do you remember the Saudi embassy, the U.S. embassy in Riyadh when it got hit? And we were told, just a fire. Don't worry about it. Turns out the fire raged for hours, destroyed a significant part of the embassy. We learned about it three weeks later. Same with the bases. We've sustained minor damage. Now we're being told they're basically uninhabitable. And a lot of the troops there had to relocate to some of these hotels. This was the case for some of the radars that were hit.

38:54We were told it's no big deal. That's when the satellite imagery came out immediately after. We're like, oh my God, this entire battery is completely gone. And so basically at every turn, you should remember there's more damage than we know about. And the really big stuff like the tankers and remember some of those aircraft that we've lost that are on the ground, that stuff has to come out because it's so sensational. But lower level things about, oh, we're not living in the base anymore. Oh, actually the embassy was on fire but actually burned a lot more. I would not be shocked. If energy infrastructure has been hit, I would say, five times harder.

39:29I mean, what? Are you really going to disclose the amount of damage that has taken place in your oil refinery? Probably not. You don't want to show how weak actually you are or how close to breaking. So I really think everyone should just remember the immense amount of censorship. And then, look, Iran too. They release all kinds of stuff. They release something about some guy's skull that was in a U.S. military. And you're like, maybe. I mean, look, it's I mean, is it possible that an American was killed and we're not told about it? I find it very hard to believe. Oh, I find it very easy to believe.

40:02See, because I've asked around about this. KIA is just a whole other. Well, I mean, according to the intercept report, there's at least two that we haven't been told about. And so what they can do is I don't think they can delay it forever. But can they, you know, can they delay it? Absolutely. And these people will lie about things even that they know will ultimately come out. They just have zero shame. So, no, that's not hard for me to imagine at all. I'm not saying the Iranian report is true. I'm just saying that that is not difficult for me to imagine whatsoever. And the other piece that is unaccounted for is we have, I don't know how many, contractors throughout the region as well.

40:34That's true. And we haven't gotten any insight into injuries among contractors, casualties among contractors. And they're, you know, in many cases basically doing the same job as the U.S. military. So in any case, very, very incomplete picture of what the reality is for Israel, for our Gulf allies, for the U.S. inside of Iran. Very limited pictures of what's actually going on here. That's right. All right. Let's get to Trita Parsi. Crystal is going to step out because she's got a train to catch. That's right. I'm going to New York. By the way, if anyone is in Brooklyn tonight, I'm going to be doing this Jacobin event that I'm excited about.

41:12There you go. See you guys there. All right. Let's get to Trita. I'm Lori Siegel, and on Mostly Human, I go beyond the headlines with the people building our future. This week, an interview with one of the most influential figures in Silicon Valley, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. I think society is going to decide that creators of AI products bear a tremendous amount of responsibility to products we put out in the world. From power to parenthood. Kids, teenagers, I think they will need a lot of guardrails around AI. This is such a powerful and such a new thing. From addiction to acceleration. The world we live in is a competitive world, and I don't think that's going to stop, even if you did a lot of redistribution.

41:49You know, we have a deep desire to excel and be competitive and gain status and be useful to others. And it's a multiplayer game. What does the man who has extraordinary influence over our lives have to say about the weight of that responsibility? Find out on Mostly Human. My highest order bit is to not destroy the world of AI. Listen to Mostly Human on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

42:19In 2023, former Bachelor star Clayton Eckerd found himself at the center of a paternity scandal. The family court hearings that followed revealed glaring inconsistencies in her story. This began a years-long court battle to prove the truth. You doctored this particular test twice in so-and-so, correct? I doctored the test once. It took an army of internet detectives to crack the case. I wanted people to be able to see what their tax dollars were being used for. Sunlight's the greatest disinfectant. They would uncover a disturbing pattern. Two more men who'd been through the same thing. Greg Gillespie and Michael Marangini.

42:56My mind was blown. I'm Stephanie Young. This is Love Trap. Laura, Scottsdale Police. As the season continues, Laura Owens finally faces consequences. Ladies and gentlemen, breaking news at Maricopa County as Laura Owens has been indicted on fraud charges. This isn't over until justice is served in Arizona. Listen to Love Trapped podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. Why hasn't a woman formally participated in a Formula One race weekend in over a decade? Think about how many skills they have to develop at such a young age. What can we learn from all of the new F1 romance novels suddenly popping up every year?

43:41He still smelled of podium champagne and expensive friction. And how did a 2023 event called Wagageddon change the paddock forever? That day is just seared into my memory. I'm culture writer and F1 expert Lily Herman, and these are just a few of the questions I'm tackling on No Grip, a Formula One culture podcast that dives into the underexplored pockets of the sport. In each episode, a different guest and I will go deeper into the wacky mishaps, scandals, and sagas, both on the track and far away from it, that have made F1 a delightful, decadent dumpster fire for more than 75 years. Listen to No Grip on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

44:27Joining us now is our great friend Dr. Trita Parsi of the Quincy Institute, great friend of the show. Good to see you, sir. Thanks for joining us. Good to be with you. Okay, let's go ahead and start off with a tremendous allegation here where the president telling Trey Yinks of Fox News that actually the United States did send arms to some Kurdish militant groups and that somehow that didn't end up failing as some sort of mission. Let's take a listen and we'll get your reaction. Now, the president also provided new details on what happened earlier this year as the Iranian regime took to the streets and slaughtered what the president tells me is 45000 civilians in their own country.

45:04After that took place, President Trump told me the United States sent guns to the Iranian protesters. He tells me we sent them a lot of guns. We sent them through the Kurds. And the president says he thinks the Kurds kept them. He went on to say we sent guns to the protesters, a lot of them. Pretty extraordinary allegation there, sir. Maybe either talking about the previous protests from before the war or after the war, arming the Kurds. But how should we receive and analyze this news in the context of the war that we're currently in? Well, if you go back and look at the coverage of these protests at the time and my own interviews with you guys, it was very clear that there was something very different about these protests in terms of the violence, And not only that was used overwhelmingly, of course, by the Iranian government and the very large number of deaths, not the 40 ,000 that Trump is referencing, but certainly around 7 ,000.

46:02But also because there was so much violence from some elements within the protest movement, which was very unusual. So you saw targeting of mosques, of fire stations, of banks, etc., as well as the killing of at least 200 or so of the government's forces. This is not what we had seen in Iran before. And at the time, a lot of us was trying to understand how is it that this came about this way, that we have this very significant change in trends. And at the time, of course, Mike Pompeo, former head of CIA, was tweeting how the Mossad was on the ground, hinting at the US arming these various elements.

46:42And now, of course, Trump coming with not an allegation, but probably a revelation that this actually was exactly what was happening, that there was elements inside of Iran that were being armed by the United States and Israel were conducting some of this violence. Now, the timeline that he's presenting here seems to be a bit off. He's essentially saying that the armaments came to these protesters after the Iranian government killed so many of them. And this is around January 8th and 9th. But I think he may have actually misspoken there because there were clear evidence that something was happening before then.

47:19And that really what this was is that you had two different things happening at the same time. A very large, highly peaceful protest against the government calling for it to be completely replaced. And then another element that operated under the shadow of these larger protests that was using violence on a scale that we had not seen before. And a lot of the protesters that were out there had no idea about this. They were not involved in any violence. They were not going out there protesting violently to overthrow the government. Nevertheless, once the government started clamping down, they killed both peaceful protesters as well as people from these armed elements, what appears to be without much discrimination.

48:02Very important, yeah, that we make that distinction. But to say openly from the president, yeah, we sent them a lot of weapons actually probably bolsters a lot of the case that the regime itself was making for why it had to have such a large crackdown in the first place. So at the same time, though, we have to get your reaction here for how the Iranians are going to respond from Trump's insane Easter message. Let's put it up there, guys, on the screen. Tuesday will be power plant day, bridge day all wrapped in one. There will be nothing like it. Open the fucking straight, you crazy bastards, or you'll be living in hell.

48:34Just watch. Praise be to Allah, President Donald J. Trump. Tell us a little bit about, sir, about the way that this is going to be internalized in Iran by the regime as they consider all these last-minute ceasefire proposals and things that are flying around this morning. I think there will be two primary takeaways on the Iranian side. The first one is that Trump is losing it, that he's acting in increased desperation. He's speaking from a position of anger and frustration rather than through measured and thought through threats that he actually can act on. He's issued a lot of threats that he has not acted on precisely because he cannot act on them without causing massive escalation that would backfire on the U.S.

49:18itself. Yeah. And so when— Go ahead. Sorry, go ahead. Right. Secondly, when looking at this, I think the Iranians are probably starting to think that Trump may actually go towards the nuclear option. But his desperation has now led to a scenario in which he may very well consider options like that. And I have spoken to former US officials who are very concerned that this is the direction that Trump is going in. The use of language such as total surrender, et cetera, that echoes the Second World War language vis-a-vis the Japanese, for instance, are things that are making people worry that this may actually be a consideration.

50:00Mindful of the fact that none of Trump's threats or actions so far have brought the Iranians an inch closer toward the type of surrender and capitulation that Trump still seems to be looking for. I don't think it's forthcoming. And as a result, people are starting to fear that actually there may be a use of a nuclear weapon. Yeah. I mean, I'm terrified about it as well. I made a joke earlier in the show. The thing about the madman theory is you're not supposed to actually be mad. You're just supposed to be pretending to be mad. But that's actually kind of the core question. At this point, every ounce of pressure the U.S.

50:34has put for a ceasefire has been rejected. Obviously, that leads the U.S. logic of let's up it because this time they might break. We do have this statement from the Speaker of the Parliament. We can put it up here on the screen. He says, your reckless moves are dragging the United States into a living hell for every single family member in our whole region is going to burn because you insist on following Netanyahu's commands. So they remain defiant. But sir, if we do go past the deadline, if the attack does happen, what will the likely response by Iran then be? Will we see the same horizontal escalation across the region?

51:10Will we see, you know, what possibly do they have left in their arsenal to make things even worse and escalate this into total war? We don't know what they have left in their arsenal in terms of how many missiles they have left, if they have more advanced missiles that they haven't used. I think we should admit, though, that they have surprised the United States several times by using missile technology, et cetera, that, you know, frankly, we didn't believe that they had. So I think one has to be very humble in recognizing that perhaps they have several other cards up their sleeves that could really surprise us.

51:42I think also what we saw over the weekend with what appears to have been a rescue attempt against an American pilot that was shot down in Iranian airspace, but also that there seems to be other things going on that may suggest that there also was perhaps an effort to launch some form of a smaller land invasion in order to grab the Iranian HU, but that it failed. All of these things are coming together here. And I think what we're seeing is that as a result, the Iranians may very well do exactly what they have threatened to do, but have not done yet, which is to go after the oil infrastructure, the energy infrastructure in the region, as well as desalination plants, et cetera, in the GCC states, as well as in Israel.

52:28And those states are actually more sensitive when it comes to this than Iran is. And if the Iranians go after the oil installations and the oil infrastructure, I think we have to recognize that's a very different scenario we would end up in. Right now, the oil prices are high because of a bottleneck in the Persian Gulf. The oil tankers are not coming through unless they pay the Iranians a transit fee. We are not having an oil problem because infrastructure has been destroyed and production has come down. But if you add that to the scenario, which means that not only do we have a bottleneck, but we also have a production problem, that's when you will likely see oil prices go up between 150, perhaps 200.

53:08Not only is it going to increase because of that immediate shortage, but because if all infrastructure is taken out, then you also have long-term shortages because they're going to take years to be able to rebuild all of that. Right now, in the absence of that destruction, oil prices can actually go down to more normal levels within weeks if this conflict is resolved. But if the oil infrastructure is destroyed, it's going to take years to do so, even if the conflict is resolved. That's a major escalatory card that the Iranians have. They've been using it as a counter threat to prevent the United States from going after Iran's oil infrastructure and other civilian infrastructure.

53:46Last question for you then. What about the Houthis? They've remained largely out of the conflict so far in the Red Sea. They did fire several missiles at Israel today, but they have not fully tried to close the Red Sea. I saw some reports that it's possible that they've been paid off by Saudi Arabia or, you know, bribed effectively to stay out of the conflict. How seriously do you take those reports? Do you think they're just holding back? Because their, you know, strategy so far in the conflict has been – has either not made sense or they just seem to be waiting. What do you think? I think it's more that they're waiting.

54:18What we have seen is that what they have done, when they have done something, it appears to have been very closely coordinated, not only with Iran, but also with Hezbollah and Lebanon. Meaning that the attacks are coming in a very coordinated and timed fashion in order to make the Israelis put them in as a disadvantageous position as possible. All of that, to me, suggests that they're demonstrating their capability as a deterrence. But if the U.S. escalates massively after these threats, then I think it is quite likely that the Houthis will enter the war fully. And that will, again, further the horizontal escalation from what we've seen so far.

54:56Yeah. Well, sir, thank you, as always, for joining us and for all of the insight you're able to give us. We appreciate it very much, and we'll see you later. Thank you. Appreciate it. Thank you guys so much for watching. We appreciate it. Ryan and I will be out tomorrow. Bro Show. We'll see you then.

55:27I'm Laurie Siegel, and this is Mostly Human, a tech podcast through a human lens. This week, an interview with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. I think society is going to decide that creators of AI products bear a tremendous amount of responsibility to the products we put out in the world. An in-depth conversation with the man who's shaping our future. My highest order bit is to not destroy the world of AI. Listen to Mostly Human on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

55:58In 2023, Bachelor star Clayton Eckerd was accused of fathering twins. But the pregnancy appeared to be a hoax. You doctored this particular test twice, Ms. Owens, correct? I doctored the test once. It took an army of internet detectives to uncover a disturbing pattern. Two more men who'd been through the same thing. Greg Gillespie and Michael Mancini. My mind was blown. I'm Stephanie Young. This is Love Trapped. Laura, Scottsdale Police. As the season continues, Laura Owens finally faces consequences. Listen to the Love Trapped podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

56:37Ready for a different take on Formula One? look no further than No Grip, a new podcast tackling the culture of motor racing's most coveted series. Join me, Lily Herman, as we dive into the underexplored pockets of F1, including the story of the woman who last participated in a Formula One race weekend, the recent uptick in F1 romance novels, and plenty of mishap scandals and sagas that have made Formula One a delightful, decadent dumpster fire for more than 75 years. Listen to No Grip on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human.