5/7/26: Billionaire Says Tax The Rich Is A Slur, Epstein Alleged Final Note, Glenn Greenwald On ADL & Animal Abuse

7 May 2026 · 52 min · 21 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode criticizes (1) predatory “FlexLoan” payday-style lending in Tennessee by Advance America, (2) billionaire Stephen Roth calling “tax the rich” a slur and comparing it to “from the river to the sea,” (3) court-released claims about Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged suicide note and Howard Lutnick’s Epstein testimony, (4) ADL’s 2025 anti-Semitism incident audit and alleged weaponization of hate-speech law against Israel critics, and (5) a federal “Save Our Bacon Act” bill opposing state animal-welfare limits for pigs.

Guest backgrounds

Glenn Greenwald is an independent journalist and publisher of the Glenn Greenwald Substack.

Key claims

FlexLoans charge about 279.5% APR, enable wage garnishment, and have led to 110,000+ lawsuits since 2015; Roth’s rhetoric equates “tax the rich” with racial slurs; the Epstein note may be fake/unsupported; Lutnick lied or changed claims; ADL definitions allegedly conflate anti-Israel protest with anti-Semitism; animal-cruelty laws are driven by corporate profit.

Notable examples

Advance sued 1 in 50 Tennessee residents; Epstein note described as “no fun, not worth it” (all caps); Lutnick said he’d never see Epstein again in 2005 but allegedly visited in 2012; ADL examples include “Zionist F off” and arrest of a student over a Netanyahu “bonbons” joke; pig gestation crates and the Smithfield pig-rescue FBI hunt.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Economic Implications of Rising Credit Card Debt

1:06 to 2:45

Discussion on the White House advisor's statement about credit card spending and its implications for the economy.

“talking about how credit card spending is up, and that's actually good for the economy.”

Predatory Lending in Tennessee

2:45 to 4:48

Examination of a Tennessee lender's predatory practices, including high-interest loans and lawsuits.

“So we're going to spend some time on it.”

Consequences of Flex Loans on Borrowers

4:48 to 8:18

The devastating impact of Flex loans on individuals, highlighted by a specific case study.

“The Trump administration's effort to dismantle CFPB are even currently being reviewed by the courts.”

Billionaire's Controversial Comments on Taxing the Rich

8:18 to 10:40

Discussion on a billionaire's comparison of 'tax the rich' to racial slurs, and the implications of wealth disparity.

“And it's, like you said, also it's just a sign of how desperate people are.”

Wealth Disparity and Its Societal Implications

10:40 to 14:00

Exploration of wealth inequality and the need for a social contract to address growing disparities in society.

“I'm purely speculating based on my own memory.”

Wealth Inequality and Social Contracts

14:00 to 15:47

Discussing potential solutions for wealth inequality and the societal implications.

“And yet, they cling to these riches with the desperation where, look, maybe the wealth tax wouldn't solve everything.”

Epstein's Perspective on Wealth

15:47 to 16:14

Exploring the mindset of elites and their justification for wealth and privilege.

“I mean, one thing we learned from the Epstein files is they just don't see other non-elites as like fully human the way that they are.”

Analysis of Epstein's Alleged Suicide Note

16:39 to 20:26

Examining the authenticity and implications of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged suicide note.

“And I'm going to give you like the punctuation and stuff as well, just because I think it's significant in terms of analyzing whether or not this is a real product.”

Howard Lutnick's Testimony and Controversies

20:26 to 25:39

Discussing Howard Lutnick's testimony regarding his relationship with Epstein.

“not as many of his personal communications that were in there.”

ADL Report on Anti-Semitic Incidents

26:18 to 28:00

Breaking down the ADL's findings on anti-Semitic incidents and their definitions.

“So, guys, we have a new annual report from the ADL on alleged anti-Semitic incidents.”
Show all 21 chapters

Analysis of Anti-Semitism in Protests

28:00 to 29:30

Discussion on the classification of anti-Israel protests and their portrayal as anti-Semitic.

“Screaming Free Palestine at elderly people walking into a synagogue is anti-Semitic.”

Incidents of Alleged Anti-Semitism

29:30 to 31:00

Review of specific incidents categorized as anti-Semitic and the context surrounding them.

“Yeah, we can pull E5 up, guys, and we can go through.”

Critique of ADL's Reporting

31:00 to 32:30

Discussion on the credibility of the ADL's claims about anti-Semitism and the political context.

“Did it really happen in the way that they're presenting it?”

Free Speech Concerns Related to Israel Criticism

32:30 to 34:20

Exploration of how laws are limiting free speech regarding criticism of Israel.

“the only one that they can really think about is to equate protest against Israel or even opposition to Israel with anti-Semitism.”

Weaponization of Anti-Semitism Claims

34:20 to 37:00

Examination of how anti-Semitism is used as a tool to suppress criticism of Israel.

“In this case, a joke, but in often cases, protests against the government of Israel.”

Investigating Protests Against Land Sales

37:00 to 39:40

Discussion of a New York protest and the implications of government investigations.

“You know, it's a human impulse to want to be free in terms of how what you can think and what you can say.”

Media Coverage of Protests Against Israel

39:40 to 42:04

Critique of media narratives surrounding protests and their portrayal in the news.

“And in this case, Glenn, these protesters were clearly going and protesting against this advertisement of land available in the West Bank.”

Media Bias and Coverage of Palestinian Issues

42:04 to 42:54

Learn about the media's role in framing narratives around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

“In order to, oh, look at these mean protesters.”

Legislation on Animal Cruelty in Farming

42:55 to 47:28

Discover the implications of a new bill on animal welfare and farming practices.

“And Glenn, you can explain this certainly better than I can, but California, among other states, had passed some legislation saying, listen, what we do to these animals is horrific enough.”

Activism in Animal Rescue and Welfare

47:29 to 50:56

Understand the success stories of animal rescue efforts and activist strategies.

“And there have been now bipartisan efforts and genuine bipartisan movements to curb the worst of animal cruelty.”

Corporate Influence on Animal Welfare Legislation

50:57 to 53:36

Explore the relationship between corporate interests and animal welfare regulations.

“This fits with generally, I think if you were to ask RFK Jr.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human. Owning a home is full of surprises. Some wonderful, some not so much. And when something breaks, it can feel like the whole day unravels. That's why HomeServe exists. For as little as$4.99 a month, you'll always have someone to call. A trusted professional ready to help. Bringing peace of mind to 4.5 million homeowners nationwide. For plans starting at just$4.99 a month, go to homeserve.com. That's homeserve.com. Not available everywhere. Most plans range between$4.99 to$11.99 a month your first year. Terms apply on covered repairs. Hey guys, Sagar and Crystal here.

0:36Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election, and we are so excited about what that means for the future of this show. This is the only place where you can find honest perspectives from the left and the right that simply does not exist anywhere else. So if that is something that's important to you, please go to breakingpoints.com, become a member today, and you'll get access to our full shows, unedited, ad-free, and all put together for you every morning in your inbox. We need your help to build the future of independent news media, and we hope to see you at BreakingPoints.com.

1:06Turning now to debt, a shocking new statement from the White House economic advisor, Kevin Hassett, talking about how credit card spending is up, and that's actually good for the economy. Let's take a listen. The head of one of the big five banks in my office yesterday going through the credit card data, and just as Secretary Besant said, credit card spending is through the roof. They're spending more on gasoline, but they're spending more on everything else, too. Wow, really good. It's just great news to hear that so many people are spending more on their credit cards. That's usually a really good sign for the U.S.

1:36economy. How do you even think about that? How could you possibly think that that is a good indicator of where things are? When your circle of friends and peers is credit card issuers, like executives at Visa or whatever, then you think a little differently about these things. If people are using their credit card and they're paying off their balance, then great. But what is it? It's like 70-something percent of people carry a balance, and the amount of balance has actually gone up even more under the Trump administration, and especially during the last six-month period. So, yeah, I would say that's actually a really bad thing, actually.

2:08We should probably cut credit cards off, but that's a whole other conversation. Remember when Trump was going to cap the interest rate for that? Yeah, I do. We covered it. I mean, we gave it to some serious talk. In fact, somebody scolded me. I don't even remember. They're like, why have you done more coverage on this credit card thing? And I was like, well, do you think it's real? And they're like, no. I'm like, well, then that's why. Okay. I mean, we covered it whenever it came out seriously. It died in Congress. And then, oops, turns out that it's never actually going to happen. Or maybe it will someday.

2:33But in the immediate term, it's not. I do want, we were trying to pair this because this is a story that we're both really passionate about. And it really makes me sick that this can even exist in the United States. So we're going to spend some time on it. Let's put it up here on the screen. So ProPublica, phenomenal job here. This lender said its loans would help Tennesseans. It has now sued more than 110 ,000 of them. So let's take some time, shall we? Is that across Tennessee, there is a company called Advance. What they have decided to do is they have sued over 110 ,000 people since 2015, more than any other payday lender, making it one of the largest plaintiffs of any Tennessee-based company collecting debt.

3:17In Hanson's Appalachian County, this is somebody who they profile, where nearly half of households make less than$50 ,000, the company has filed one case for every 32 residents over that period of time. Now, they began filing thousands of these lawsuits after Tennessee lawmakers approved something called FlexLoan, a product which was pioneered by Advance in Tennessee. The loan's$4 ,000 cap is nine times higher than the limit for most payday loans. The company charges the equivalent of a 279.5 % annual interest rate. Let me repeat that. A 279.5 % annual interest rate. Before it became legal, payday lenders could only lend$425, and a borrower could never be required to pay back more than$500.

4:06Since then, those protections have been eliminated, and now thousands of borrowers are defaulting. Flex loans only stop growing when they are completely played off, when a flex lender declares the loan is in default or when it sues the borrower. If the loans do end up in court, the law allows lenders to recoup attorney fees, which cannot be done with payday loans, a practice that can add up to a third of the loan amount. Court judgments against customers are often thousands of dollars, some exceeding$10 ,000. 40 % of all cases end up in wage garnishment. The consequences of flex loans were predicted in the Tennessee legislature 10 years ago.

4:47The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau wanted to regulate the product created by the agency. The Trump administration's effort to dismantle CFPB are even currently being reviewed by the courts. Advance has argued this product would help consumers by offering them loans that are technically cheaper than a payday loan. It downplayed concerns by consumer advocates that these high-interest loans targeted and trapped low-income borrowers in debt that they could never pay off. And when you just keep reading, I could go on forever about this particular company, but you have 279.5 % annual interest rate up to what is a$4 ,000 limit.

5:21Now, this payday loan, often the most predatory type of loan that is out there. I thought that we recognized all this like 10 years ago. We effectively passed all these regulations across the country. And I was like, oh, we're good. Little did I know that in the state of Tennessee that you have a product which is somehow worse. Now, I don't know what's worse is that so many thousands of people are actually using them, which I guess shows how desperate things are. But it validates my entire view on these types of things. We're like, no, actually, we just don't allow this shit here in the U.S. We do not allow people to lend out at 280%.

5:52There's a word for it, you know, usury, actually. And we decided that as a society, we weren't going to entrap desperate people in these types of circumstances, which will only bury them even more. But what's really gross is how many millions of dollars that these people make, you know, in the future. Oh, they're getting filthy rich. Because you're dead. You're dead. Garnishing your wages. You can get a court judgment against you and your property. And you'll be digging yourself out of this for years when, I don't know, maybe you had a drug problem. You were in a desperate state. You didn't think fully about the consequences.

6:24is the next thing you know, you're paying for it 15 years later. One of the women in here that they talked to, she took in her grandkids and the added cost of their school supplies, food, whatever they needed, just was too much for her to bear. And so she was at risk of losing her home. And so that's why she went to advance and she was paying her loan off, but she didn't realize the way that it would continue to accrue. And they would let you borrow more on your principal. and she was doing that and got in this loop. And there's so many crazy things in this article. I mean, the whole thing is so heartbreaking and so disgusting.

7:01The level of exploitation here, the level of predation, and also the level of corruption because this company was started in Tennessee and they bought off all the legislators there. Big donors also to Trump. Very happy, I'm sure, with Trump effectively eliminating the CFPB. So any sort of limits that would have come from the federal level, that is all gone as well. And there was one guy in the Tennessee legislature, one, who voted against the legislation that made all of this legal. And what he honed in on, he was a lawyer, had some experience in the area. He recognized that this ability for them to recoup the attorney's fees meant that it would give them a huge incentive to basically take everyone to court and put them through the ringer.

7:46And you're talking about poor people who don't understand this system, don't have money to hire a lawyer. So they're trying to navigate this incredibly complex bureaucracy, have no idea what they're doing. They are never going to succeed or almost never going to succeed. And so this was the stat that really floored me in here. Advance, this company, has brought one lawsuit for every 50 Tennessee residents since 2015. One out of every 50 residents has been sued by this company. And yet Tennessee still allows this to occur. It's just so disgusting. They've won$200 million since 2015. And it's, like you said, also it's just a sign of how desperate people are.

8:29You know, how many people are in the position where it's like, I got, you know, I'm not going to be able to pay my mortgage. I'm going to get kicked out of my apartment. Like I'm, you know, right on the edge here and in need of these sorts of incredibly predatory loan product. So really disgusting. At the same time, we've got any efforts to maybe fight back against this incredibly rigged system are now being deemed by a billionaire as effectively like a racial slur to ask for the rich to be taxed more. So maybe people weren't in such dire circumstances and you had a more equitable distribution where it wasn't the gilded age 2.0.

9:04Put C3 up on the screen. This is so crazy. So this is the guy who's the head of this of Warnado real estate empire. His name is Stephen Roth. And he was asked about the whole like Zoran Mamdani, tax the rich, going after Ken Griffin, et cetera. And what he said in response to this is so crazy. And I quote, I must say, I consider the phrase tax the rich, quote, tax the rich when spit out with anger and contempt by politicians, both here and across the country, to be just as hateful as some disgusting racial slurs. And even the phrase, from the river to the sea, Mr. Roth said, referring to the pro-Palestinian phrase that some Jews believe amount to a call for ethnic cleansing.

9:52So you know how apparently Mr. Roth must feel about that phrase. He says, tax the riches even as bad, Zagar is calling for Palestinian liberation. But to claim that that's like a racial slur, That's like saying the N-word, tax the rich, literally a call for a policy proposal at a time when billionaires, I don't know what his effective tax rate is, but in general, billionaires' effective tax rates are lower than the tax rates of probably like many of the people who are getting screwed over by advanced lows, certainly by middle class people or small business owners or whatever. And to change that, he considers to be an epithet.

10:28He considers that to be beyond the pale, just total, total insanity here. Yeah, look, I mean, these guys do themselves no favors. They go on TV and they literally cry about, Elizabeth, who was that guy? What was his name, the billionaire? Oh. Cooperman? Leon. I want to say that's his name. If not, maybe I didn't. I apologize, Mr. Cooperman and your legal team. I'm purely speculating based on my own memory. I'm pretty sure that was who it was. I'm fairly certain in terms of my recall. But yeah, I mean, it's like you're true. You nailed it. All right, good. So I remember that when they would do that.

11:01And I was like, you know, from a purely self-interested perspective, wouldn't you want to just lay low? Like whenever you're paying nothing and you're filthy rich, how old is this guy, Stephen Roth? It's like, dude, just lay low. Like why even try to pick this fight? But because these guys really believe that they're like the kings of the city, that Vornado Real Estate Trust or whatever are these people who should be worshipped. And, you know, if you're in New York, I think the one thing that we all know is that people just love landlords in New York City. They're just the most beloved class that everybody's had a great relationship with is the landlords.

11:40Yes. And the real estate developers in general, too. And the real estate developers and the landlords are just the most beloved class of figures who we really want to hear sympathetic notes from. I mean, here's the thing, too, is like, when are you going to realize? We talked about this before. Roe calls the wealth tax in California an anti-revolution tax. When are any of these guys going to realize you've got to do a little something or else you're going to have a big problem? This type of wealth disparity, which is only set to spiral wildly with AI, this is not going to be good for you over the long – if there isn't some way to mitigate it, to make people feel like they're bought into this society and have some stake in what's going on.

12:23I mean, it's no surprise you have acts of political violence, including acts of violence against, you know, CEOs. And the country looks and I was like, I kind of get it. I mean, that's should be such a warning sign and a wake up call of where we are and how disgusted people are and how desperate they are. And yet to even call generally for tax the rich, he considers to be just beyond the pale, unacceptable. He thinks he said something in there, too, about how, like, you know, these are the best of the best and we should be thanking them or something like that. It's like, oh my God, buddy. Like, that is crazy.

12:56You're a real estate developer at a time when like the vast majority of people are like, I'm never gonna be able to afford a home. Vast majority of people are like, I'll never be able to. I think he's comfortable, but it's still the point. It's just like, because I'm pretty sure like those buildings are all the, I think they're like in like Times Square and all that. If I recall, it's been a long time. I don't know, I feel like they do apartments too, but I don't know. I could be wrong. But just generally, like, don't you guys have any dignity, you know, whenever it comes to being like this. Self-awareness.

13:21Self-awareness and dignity. You know, Ted Turner just died, the guy who created CNN. And they don't make it like him anymore. I think he was like 87. Yeah, he created CNN. He was filthy rich. He was a playboy, you know, Jane Fonda and all that. He was a landowner. He was also a big environmentalist. And also in the last 20 years, you didn't really hear much about him. You know, he didn't use his vast media empire in his aging time to protect his wealth. He kind of just made his money and just went off. He was one of the largest landowners in the U.S. And I was like, you know, a lot more rich people should be like Ted Turner.

13:56Like why is it so hard, right, in your waning days to be like, okay, my time of relevance is coming to an end and I should enjoy time with my family, whatever, and just kind of not – you know, you had your heyday, your working time, and it's over. And yet, they cling to these riches with the desperation where, look, maybe the wealth tax wouldn't solve everything. Because as long as you don't use it for the right purposes, then I don't know. But my point is just like, we've got to figure out something. We need some sort of a social contract. I don't know if it includes a wealth tax. Maybe it would include more of a financial tax, like more of going after our hedge fund industry.

14:36There's all kinds of tax loopholes alone would raise hundreds of billions of dollars. Like you don't even have to do that. I guess there would technically be a wealth tax. So there's all these different solutions. But to Ro's point, I haven't looked fully at the California thing. But the anti-revolution one is just empirically correct. Like we have a complete – it's not just about inequality just in terms of wealth. I think it's really about inequality whenever it comes to the opportunity that people have to start off from a baseline. The American dream is built on the idea your kids will have a better future than you.

15:10That is just not the case for the last 25 years, period, end of story. So that has to be solved. Some of it starts with housing, but a lot of it starts with a lot of other different things. And yeah, so Tax to the Rich is a one way in which it's being channeled. But it's also being channeled in a lot of very different ways in people's – the way that they feel about our society, the news, AI, social media, the level of control. that they feel data centers, you know, it's like a physical manifestation of all that. So yeah, I don't know. I'll never understand these people, but that's why I'm not one of them.

15:44It's a sickness. It's literally a sickness. Yeah, and I mean, this will be transition as to our Epstein block here. I mean, one thing we learned from the Epstein files is they just don't see other non-elites as like fully human the way that they are. And so that's, you know, that's how they justify this immense wealth, this immense privilege, this immense power is they deserve it. And that also comes out in his comments here. It never happens at a good time. The pipe bursts at midnight. The heater quits on the coldest night. Suddenly, you're overwhelmed. That's when HomeServe is here. For$4.99 a month, you're never alone.

16:19Just call their 24-7 hotline and the local pro is on the way. Trusted by millions, HomeServe delivers peace of mind when you need it most. For plans starting at just$4.99 a month, go to homeserve.com. That's homeserve.com. Not available everywhere. Most plans range between$4.99 to$1 ,199 a month your first year. Terms apply on covered repairs. Let's get to this Epstein suicide note, alleged suicide note, which was released by the court. Let's go and put D1 up on the screen. This is from The New York Times. OK, so here's the note on the right. You can see the handwriting there. And I'm going to give you like the punctuation and stuff as well, just because I think it's significant in terms of analyzing whether or not this is a real product.

17:01They investigated me for months. Found nothing, all caps. The note begins, adding that the result was charges going back many years. It is a treat to be able to choose one's time to say goodbye. What you want me to do, dash dash, M dash there. Bust out crying. The note reads, no fun, all caps. Not worth it, all caps. So the backstory here is that this note was according to Epstein's former cellmate, who was a former cop who killed four people, was convicted of killing four people. He maintains his innocence. In any case, he was put for some reason in the same cell with Jeffrey Epstein. Seems kind of crazy to start with.

17:40In any case, that's what happened. And he says that he found this note tucked into a graphic novel that was Jeffrey Epstein's. It was written on like yellow paper, he said, and he opened the book to read and he found it there. It has been sort of caught up in court proceedings. What's this guy's name? Tartaglioni? Yes. Yes. It's been caught up in his court proceedings and was sealed because of his own proceedings. There was now this motion to, hey, let's release this thing because it's subject to public interest. And so it was released. Tartaglione and his lawyers claim that they verified that this is truly from Jeffrey Epstein.

18:18But we don't know how. We've been given no evidence of that. So that's what we told the Times that he found the note in a graphic novel. I would actually love to know which graphic novel. After Mr. Epstein was taken out of the cell after the apparent suicide attempt, I opened the book to read it, and there it was. It was written on a piece of yellow paper ripped from a legal pad. The medical examiner, remember, then ruled his death a suicide. Also, this was not the actual alleged suicide. This was an attempted suicide that they claim happened. And Tartelloni is, I think he's the former cop. Yeah, he's the former cop who was awaiting trial at the time for quadruple homicide.

18:58Just to be clear. I will do the most boneheaded thing of all time. I asked AI Claude, does this fit with Epstein's writing style? Okay, all right. All right, so with that caveat that this is the lowest tier commentary you can offer, and I apologize. He said, this is what Claude says. What I can say, the note style, fragmented, dramatic, heavy use of caps and exclamation points is unusual for a suicide note. It reads more like someone venting frustration. than someone in a final and a reflective state of mind. In terms of Epstein's writing style, what they say is that because it's mostly legal documents and correspondence with associates, not just casual personal prose, it is hard to establish a clear stylistic fingerprint.

19:44So there you go in terms of what Claude thinks of how it fits with the alleged suicide note. I mean, if I'm being honest, it just seems kind of fake. This is my own personal opinion and speculation. It seems fake to me. It just doesn't fit with a lot of his. I've read thousands of his emails between the Epstein files and those hacked emails that Ryan and I had access to. I feel like I'm pretty familiar with his writing style. The M-Dash thing in particular is weird. That said, people write very differently by hand necessarily than they would type. And Claude makes a good point that he's corresponding mostly with his teams of lawyers and other people, not as many of his personal communications that were in there.

20:29So I don't know for sure. It does feel like the grandiosity of himself, definitely, but the level of humor and other things alleged within it. Bust out crying? I don't know. I could be wrong. I'm not sure I'm buying it now, personally. That's just my opinion. Yeah, me neither. I mean, and we also should just say, like, Tartaglione has a bit of an incentive here because, and he even said at some point, like, you know, in case they thought that it was me that did this to him. And so that also should be taken into account that the person that allegedly found it would have a reason for reducing such a note to get any sort of suspicion that he did something here, you know, off the table.

21:13So there you go. Okay. All right. We also had some interesting developments with regard to Mr. Howard Lutnick, a little bit of upset from both Republicans and Democrats. Let's actually put D5 up on the screen first. So Lutnick testified behind closed doors about his relationship with Epstein, what he knew, blah, blah, blah. And so this is kind of fascinating. James Comer, who was a Republican, actually admitted that Lenin had not been 100 percent truthful about being on Epstein's island ahead of this interview with the oversight panel on Wednesday. So this was for a closed door transcribed interview as part of the oversight panel's investigation into Epstein.

21:55After the fact, a number of the Democrats who were part of that interview were extremely frustrated and disgusted with Lutnik and said outright that they thought he was lying during that interview that they had with him. Let's go and take a listen to what Ro Khanna had to say. This is D2. Well, now we know why that interview was not videotaped. If Donald Trump had seen the video transcript, he would have fired Howard Lutnig. It was really embarrassing. He was asked very straightforward questions about whether he regretted misleading the American people. I mean, he said that he would never see Epstein again in 2005.

22:42And everyone knows that he took his wife and kids to see Epstein in 2012. And yet it was just contortions and lies and no acknowledgement that he misled the American public. And then he's raised even more serious concerns about the investigation. He originally had said that Epstein engaged in blackmail and recorded videotapes. Now he's saying, well, he was wrong. He was just speculating and Epstein actually didn't engage in blackmailing. This raises the question of what the cover up is. Did someone tell him to say that? I've not heard that he is that Epstein never engaged in blackmail. Why is Howard Lutnick changing his testimony, changing his story?

23:27He's lost all credibility. And really, it's a shame that the American people don't get to see what he did there. And you'll recall, of course, Letnick famously gave that interview where he told this elaborate story about my wife and I from the very first moment that we met Jeffrey Epstein, we were disgusted and we said we would never have anything to do with him. And then lo and behold, the emails come out and they had gone to the island and maintain a relationship, etc. So Roe was pointing out that he still is trying to avoid grappling with the fact that he just, you know, clearly outright lied in that original telling of his disgust and how they vowed they would never have anything to do with Jeffrey Epstein.

24:03James Walkinshaw also had some pretty strong comments after the fact. This is the congressman who represents Fairfax County, replaced Jerry Connolly after Jerry Connolly died. Let's go ahead and take a listen to that. I hope today that we would have heard some or more so contrition from Secretary Ludmick for flat out lying to the American people. Instead, what we've heard thus far is hours of testimony where he's attempting to redefine the meaning of the word I. He claims that when he said, I would never be in a room again with Jeffrey Epstein, he meant only him and Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein was so gross to him, so disgusting, that he wasn't willing to be in a room with him, but he was perfectly okay with his wife and family being in a room with Epstein.

24:56He's lying. And today's transcribed interview is part of the ongoing cover up because the American people deserve to see the video of what's taking place in there. They deserve to see the sweat on the secretary's brow as he struggles to answer basic questions about his lies to the American people. So anyway, Sager, they were apparently none too impressed with what Mr. Lutnick had to say behind closed doors. Shocking. Yeah, really shocking. Right. In terms of Lutnick. No, I mean, Comer even said it straight up. He's like, yeah, he didn't tell the truth. Well, he wasn't 100 % truthful. He was not 100 % truthful.

Read the full transcript

25:31What percent truthful was he, Dean Comer? It's like, remember when Andrew Schultz interviewed Trump and Trump was like, I'm mostly truthful? Andrew was like, what do you mean mostly? Anyway. All right. What do we have standing by? Glenn Greenwald? Yeah. Let's get to it. Owning a home is full of surprises. Some wonderful, some not so much. And when something breaks, it can feel like the whole day unravels. That's why HomeServe exists. For as little as$4.99 a month, you'll always have someone to call. A trusted professional ready to help, bringing peace of mind to 4.5 million homeowners nationwide.

26:05For plans starting at just$4.99 a month, go to homeserve.com. That's homeserve.com. Not available everywhere. Most plans range between$4.99 to$11.99 a month your first year. Terms apply on covered repairs. So, guys, we have a new annual report from the ADL on alleged anti-Semitic incidents. We can put E4 up on the screen. This is their audit of anti-Semitic incidents in 2025. According to them, the number has gone down since 2024, still remains elevated, and they say the number of violent incidents has increased. Joining us now to break down the import of this report is Glenn Greenwald, independent journalist and publisher of the Glenn Greenwald Substack, which, of course, we recommend you guys all subscribe to.

26:49Great to see you, Glenn. Good to see you. Great to be with you guys. Yeah, of course. So let me kick us off with this segment with Jake Tapper and Jonathan Greenblatt explaining this report and how they defined, quote-unquote, anti-Semitic incidents in this report. And then we also have our own little slideshow we can pull up of the nature of some of these alleged incidents. This is E9, guys. Let's go ahead and take a listen. How did you define an anti-Semitic act? I mean, if somebody criticizes the government of Israel, is that anti-Semitism? What was the way that you defined it? Well, the ADL has been tracking anti-Semitic incidents in a systematic way, Jake, for 46 years.

27:28We have a very rigorous methodology. An anti-Semitic incident is defined by an act like harassment, vandalism, or violence directed at an individual or an institution because of its Jewish identity or connection to the Jewish people. So pro-Palestinian activism is not anti-Semitic. Criticizing the state of Israel is not necessarily anti-Semitic. But wishing violence against all Zionists or Israelis or Jews, that's anti-Semitism. saying Free Palestine marching down the street is not anti-Semitic. Screaming Free Palestine at elderly people walking into a synagogue is anti-Semitic. So, you know, to a certain degree, time, place and manner really is important here.

28:16But let me note, ADL looks at this and we found in 2025 that more than half of the anti-Israel demonstrations were an anti-Semitic at all. And we didn't count them. In fact, we don't count most of the things that are reported to us, only if we can ascertain with certainty that there was a motive, again, to marginalize, intimidate, or threaten people because of their faith. Your reaction, Glenn? All you have to do is look at the data set that the ADL produced as part of this report to see that everything Jonathan Greenblatt just said is basically, at best, deceitful, if not outright lying. There are all sorts of incidents where, as part of anti-Israel protests, meaning protests against what they've done in Gaza or what they're doing in Lebanon or what they do more broadly with the treatment of Arabs and Palestinians in the West Bank, where if you say free Palestine, if you say from the river to the sea, if you say globalize the Intifada, that automatically goes into the category of anti-Semitic incidents no matter where you're saying it, how you're saying it, at whom you're directing it, you can just go through the data set.

29:28I think, I hope you guys have some of these. Yeah, we can pull E5 up, guys, and we can go through. I'll read off a few of these to give you guys a sense of some of the nature of the incidents here. So a Jewish public figure received anti-Semitic harassment from a user on X who accused them of being involved with the assassination of Charlie Kirk and being a foreign agent. That was one alleged incident here. An Israeli flag was moved from a locker and a, I like this, potentially anti-Semitic flag was placed across from it at Syracuse University. Let's go to the next one here that we have. At an anti-Israel rally organized by groups including Pal Auda, Indivisible, and the Party for Socialism and Liberation, protesters displayed messages including Zionist F off.

30:09Let's see the next one. An individual wearing a Palestinian flag harassed people participating in a pro-Israel march saying, free America from the chains of Israel, hell, free America, and you are propaganda. I'm not sure what is the problem with that one. Students for Justice in Palestine at Brooklyn College posted a message on Instagram attacking Hillel, writing, Hillel is not a student group, as it claims, but an active participant in genocide. The post also targeted two Jewish students by name who had served and volunteered with the IDF. So those are some of the types of incidents. As you can see, there are many incidences that were reported here, some under harassment, some under vandalism, and some under overt violence.

30:50Some of them are genuinely, you know, things that are terrible, like assaults and things of that nature. Although I also have to say, because the ADL has so beclowned themselves and undermined their credibility, you have to look at those and be like, well, did this really happen? Did it really happen in the way that they're presenting it? Right. Even the assaults, which generally are what people think about when you hear about hate crimes, like anti-Semitic hate crimes, racist hate crimes. I think, you know, if you look at the bar graph, you will see the drastic number of these kinds of incidents where people are expressing political views, not aimed at Jews, aimed at the IDF, aimed at Israel, aimed at Israel defenders, aimed at the ideology of Zionism, which is not the same as Jews.

31:32There are huge numbers of Jews, huge numbers of them, who don't believe in Zionism, don't believe in the apartheid state of Israel, don't believe in the moral justice of committing genocide in Gaza or stealing land from Syria and Lebanon and the rest. So it's all done with a conflation. Now, of course, you can find some genuinely anti-Semitic incidents. And under the assaults category, even if you were to credit the ADL, which would be very foolish to do in light of what we know about them, but even if you were to credit all the assaults that they counted as actual anti-Semitic assaults, it numbers in like the low hundreds, like 160 or 200 or something like that, which, you know, I'm not saying should be dismissed, but is far from the sort of epidemic they're trying to depict.

32:14And I think the context here is so critical, which is that there is a very well documented and rather still rapidly accelerating collapse of support for Israel in the United States and throughout, more broadly, the democratic world. and the solution that they've embraced, the only one that they can really think about is to equate protest against Israel or even opposition to Israel with anti-Semitism. We saw that in the encampments on college, which were all deemed basically intrinsically anti-Semitic, even though they were filled with Jews and led by Jews and all kinds of Muslims who only had a problem with Israel's destruction of Gaza.

32:52And then also the kind of more, the broader institutional imperative, these kinds of groups, If they're a group aimed at injustice acts, they have an inherent interest, an institutional interest in depicting acts as grave of a problem as possible. And that's what really is going on here. Yeah. And one case, what drives me crazy is, you know, it's one thing to label something anti-Semitic, but it's another to use the instrument of the law against them. Can we put E7 up here on the screen? This was a case, Glenn, I'm sure you're familiar with, where this Florida International University student, Gabriela Saldana, was arrested for wanting Israel's Netanyahu, what they say, to drop bombs on the school event.

33:30What it really was is a joke in a WhatsApp group of 215 students where she said, Netanyahu, if you can hear me, drop some bonbons for us Capstone students in Ocean Bank Convocation Center. In bond court, they said she also wrote, there's going to be a bomb in the Ocean Bank Center. It was going to be Jonathan's fault. In reference to another student in the chat, she appeared before a judge and was literally not only arrested, but we learned from her, according to her, she made contact with our team, that the charges have gone ahead and been filed or continue to be in the court case against her.

34:04Now, we're going to have a GoFundMe link down in the description, but this is beyond the ADL's weaponization of the term anti-Semitism, to extend it further. This is the state of Florida or many other jurisdictions across the United States using these types of incidents to weaponize the law against our own citizens. In this case, a joke, but in often cases, protests against the government of Israel. Yeah, look, I'm somebody who obviously has advocated or not obviously, but I have advocated for free speech and a pretty aggressive and robust one might even say absolutist version of free speech for decades versus a lawyer and now as a journalist.

34:40And there have been many threats unrelated to Israel or ADL, the ADL-type groups, over the years. But at the moment, far and away, the greatest threat to free speech, both in the United States and more broadly in the democratic world, are laws that are being passed designed to ban or limit or punish or even outright criminalize all kinds of criticisms about Israel by conflating those with anti-Semitism and then kind of pushing them into the hate speech laws that have been promulgated all throughout the democratic world. And this, thankfully, we have the First Amendment in the United States, which makes it more difficult.

35:17But the very first agenda item, seemingly, of the Trump administration was to figure out ways to weaponize the law, to punish Israel critics as anti-Semites, imposing broadened hate speech codes on our college campuses. And then you have all these state governors, often red state governors, but not always, who have been promulgating all sorts of laws designed to punish and limit how much you can criticize Israel in the United States. It is a grave problem from a free speech perspective. And the way in which the ADL is manipulating this report is exactly the underlying framework for how it's done.

35:52I would just quickly add, you know, this was sort of the excesses of the woke movement and the fallout of BLM and Me Too, that even a lot of its original supporters felt uncomfortable with how far it went. And the American right was apoplectic. And I thought they had legitimate grievances. And now basically the primary tactic of at least the pro-Israel faction of MAGA and the American right is to go around screaming bigotry and anti-Semite and racist and everybody who disagrees with them, and then going further and using these institutional and even legal mechanisms to punish and stifle it. It's remarkable to watch.

36:27They have no self-awareness. Well, and I think they're probably, I mean, if you really want to fuel anti-Semitism, how about we pass a bunch of suppressive authoritarian style laws and institute a government-wide crackdown on any criticism of Israel while simultaneously insisting that Israel is inextricably linked with the Jewish people and that every Jew is aligned with Israel and that attacks on Israel and attacks on all Jewish people. Like that is a surefire way to increase anti-Semitism. So I think Jonathan Greenblatt and his ilk have done more to stoke actual genuine anti-Semitism than virtually anyone else in this country.

37:05I could not agree more. You know, it's a human impulse to want to be free in terms of how what you can think and what you can say. And it's been documented over many centuries. Obviously, some cultures deprioritize it, others. But all of us have that instinct. And it's an especially American ethos. Like, I think we all just instinctively have this kind of backlash or anger effect when we're told we can't say certain things or certain topics are off limits. I do think there was backlash from the kind of excesses and free speech suppression in the name of racism or, you know, homophobia and transphobia and misogyny and the like.

37:41And I think we're seeing that now. But, you know, the irony, Crystal, is that under these new hate speech laws that the Trump administration forced our leading universities to accept this IHRA expanded definition of anti-Semitism. One of the new definitions of anti-Semitism is you can't conflate Israel and Jewish people. So if Israel does something, you can't say, oh, look, the Jews are committing genocide. That is actually anti-Semitic to attribute to all Jews with the state of Israel, the government of Israel do. And yet they do this all the time. This is the whole foundation for what they're doing is to say, if you criticize Israel, it means you're criticizing, quote unquote, the Jews.

38:20They're the ones constantly conflating it because that's a prerequisite for being able to characterize Israel criticism and anti-Israel activism as anti-Semitism. so they punish it when it's done by their adversaries or their enemies, and then they turn around and embrace exactly that formulation when it's in their interest to do so. It's so crazy. We're watching this to the government level. Can we put E2 up there on the screen? So there's this recent incident in New York City where the Assistant Attorney General, Harmeet Dillon, has now announced that the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice is going to investigate this protest that happened at a synagogue in New York City.

38:58Now, if I put it that way, it may sound bad. But when we dig a little bit further into what exactly was going on, can we put E3 up there on the screen? This was at a synagogue in New York City, the Park East Synagogue, where a person who was able to go to the event saw that there were properties that were being advertised, not necessarily for sale in that jurisdiction, but for being advertised to invite American Jews to make Aliyah to Israel where properties, in some cases, available in the West Bank were being sold or being told them that they could go and they could go and live there. A very, very different event than the way it was initially sold is just a protest against a synagogue.

39:43And in this case, Glenn, these protesters were clearly going and protesting against this advertisement of land available in the West Bank. And now the Civil Rights Division is saying protesting that, which even the New York Times and others who, when they cover this, are usually acknowledged as illegal. That's how they refer to the West Bank properties. The civil rights division of our government is going after protesters for sales of that type of land and property in the West Bank currently in Palestinian land. I mean, this is the lie at the heart of everything that this whole campaign of deceit is rest on is to pretend that people who are protesting Israel or people who are protesting stealing of land in the name of Zionism are somehow targeting Jews for being Jews.

40:33Again, this was the lie at the heart of the smear campaign against the student protesters, that these people were supposedly harassing Jewish students, not letting Jews pass, when in reality these camps were full of Jews, of Jewish organizers, of Jewish leaders who were leading in many cases and certainly participating in these anti-Israel protests. They weren't targeting Jews. They were targeting the ideology that says America should pay for and finance and arm the genocide in Gaza. I know you guys interviewed them. I interviewed tons of students on my show. At supposedly the most anti-Semitic encampment, which is at Columbia, they had Shabbat dinner every Friday night because there were so many Jews.

41:12They had, you know, dinners for every kind of religion, including Shabbat dinner every Friday night. And this is the same thing. Nobody remotely honest thinks that that protest was about targeting a synagogue because it's a synagogue. As you say, they were protesting what the U.S. government for decades under both parties has said is a direct threat to national security, which is Israel annexing more and more of the West Bank, which prevents a two state solution, which destroys America's ability to operate safely and in its interest in the region. And now as an American citizen, you can't go and protest the seizure of land, the stealing of land, the selling of land, simply because you happen to put it in a synagogue, which is exactly why they put it there, so that it looks as though they're protesting a synagogue, rather than protesting this policy of theft.

42:03Yeah, which is so disgusting, the strategy there to use a synagogue as sort of like a shield, you know. A human shield. A building shield, I guess. A religious shield. Yeah, exactly. In order to, oh, look at these mean protesters. They just hate Judaism. It's like, no, they hate that you're selling illegal stolen land. How about that? But that gets left out of almost all of the coverage or it's buried. Sagar was looking at the New York Times article and the way that, you know, in the headline in the subhead, they don't mention anything about West Bank, illegal land sales. You have to read in before they even mention it.

42:34And then they use this, you know, sort of bullshit, wishy-washy language. Oh, in most places around the world, they consider this to be illegal. So, I mean, the way that the liberal media has helped to, you know, create enough runway for this genocide against Palestinians to occur is a whole separate topic altogether. other. I want to turn to these stories, two different stories, but let's start with the bill that passed the House that's made it into the farm bill, which enforces, requires federal government mandated cruelty against pigs in particular, and could put F2 up on the screen. And Glenn, you can explain this certainly better than I can, but California, among other states, had passed some legislation saying, listen, what we do to these animals is horrific enough.

43:21at least we can require that they're in a cage large enough where they can turn around. This bill that's already passed through the House and now heads to the Senate says, no, we're not going to allow states to carve on even this level of humanity towards these highly intelligent animals. So can you give us a little bit of the background here and what this bill would actually mandate? Yeah, I read an article in 2017 for The Intercept where there was this case where animal activists went into Smithfield farms where they have tens of thousands of pigs held in the most nauseating conditions you can possibly imagine.

43:57And they rescued two little piglets who are basically on the verge of death, obviously not stealing from Smithfield in a monetary way. These pigs had no monetary value. They were going to die. But symbolically to kind of personalize the pigs and to show what their conditions were. And the FBI went on a nationwide hunt in order to find these two piglets. They went into refuge, refuges and shelters, and they like clip parts of the pig's ears to do a DNA test to try and find these two piglets and then prosecute the activists because they're working at the behest of this gigantic factory farm industry that's led by Smithfield Farms, which is owned in large part by by the Chinese.

44:36But even before that, it's a complete bastardization of farming values. They, as you were, you were showed a picture of what's called a gestation crate where the female pigs are put into this tiny crate where they cannot turn around. There's no space for them to turn around. And they live like that their whole life. They're impregnated. They have babies. The babies are taken away from them. After the minimal amount of time, they often step on them. They don't see them. They go insane. They actually start biting through the metal cages and losing all their teeth because I have a small farm with a bunch of farm animals.

45:07and pigs are as intelligent as dogs, as sentient, and probably more emotionally complex. And what they are above all else is extremely social animals. It's just like if you put a human being in prolonged isolation of solitary confinement, they're going to go crazy because you've deprived them of what they need as human beings, which is interaction with others. Same with these pigs, but it's done on a massive scale. And so a lot of states, and it's happened in Europe and elsewhere around the world, has said, no, we're not saying we're going to be vegan. We're not going to stop eating meat, but there's a level of sadism and cruelty and torture that we won't tolerate.

45:42And these states, democratically elected, it was a referendum in California, others as well. The Biden administration challenged it, tried to get the Supreme Court to overturn these animal rights, these animal abuse laws in California and elsewhere. The Supreme Court upheld it. And so now the industry is using their control over the Congress and the Senate with their money to basically ban what voters enacted, saying we don't want in our state to consume products that are a byproduct of the most sickening torture you could possibly imagine. And is really all of this, Glenn, just at the behest of corporate profit?

46:15Is that the entire drive behind it? Because it doesn't even seem fathomable, you know, that you could be against something like this, unless I guess it's what, X more sense in order to moderately care for these animals. Is that really the drive behind this entire thing? yeah yes i mean you know farming for so long has been based on organic and natural values you have free-range chickens and farm and cows and uh and and and pigs this is total industrialization of the process that disregards what the bible and religions teach is the inherent value of god created animal life the most majestic one of the most majestic things we have on the planet it's designed to take it and completely objectify it solely for corporate profits that's the only reason why they don't give pigs a little bit more space before they're slaughtered so that they can at least turn around and have like a minimally decent life on their way to the slaughterhouse it is all about corporate profits and then they have these lobbyists and unfortunately there's no countervailing lobby that is for say animal welfare the interesting thing is that this has become genuinely bipartisan i think like dogs are kind of the gateway into understanding the cruelty to our animals.

47:29And there have been now bipartisan efforts and genuine bipartisan movements to curb the worst of animal cruelty. It might run into problems in the Senate, but, you know, I've watched Congress long enough to know that you never place your bets against industry lobbyists. They always seem to get their way. Yeah. And they frame it as they call it the Save Our Bacon Act. And so they go after, you know, Americans love a bacon. Oh, bacon's going to be too expensive if we don't, you know, torture these pigs a little bit more. And so I know that's the way I remember when California was looking to pass this legislation, that was the way that they framed it, the sort of fear mongering tactics that they used, using, you know, I mean, frankly, using the like exploitation desperation of the American people and their sensitivity to prices against them in, you know, on behalf of this large industry.

48:16I also wanted to get your reaction to So we can put F4 up on the screen to the rescue of this 1 ,500 roughly beagles. I mean, these images are just like, how can you not be moved by these adorable little dogs being, you know, getting to go outside and run around after being subjected to horrific conditions and being used for tests. Glenn, give us a little bit of the backstory here, if you could, about the way activists were able to, at great cost to themselves, were able to secure the significant victory. Yeah, you know, it's such a feel-good story, but it also has so many lessons for how activism can actually succeed.

48:56I think sometimes we get jaded. I even just said like, hey, I wouldn't put my money against, you know, industry groups in Congress. But this is actually a success story, but it's so long in the making. The first time I wrote about Ridgeland Farm was 2017 or 18. And the only reason I knew was because there were these activists kind of working, on the fringes about an issue that hadn't gotten much attention. And if you looked at what happened with Ridgeland Farms, they breed dogs into the world, purposely beagles, because it's a very docile, loving, trusting breed of dogs. That's purposely what they want in their labs.

49:28And they sell them for these absolutely sadistic, gratuitous experiments to research facilities or corporations that are funded by the U.S. government. And while they're bred, they're kept in these metal cages, these just completely overcrowded metal cages. They never see the light of day. These dogs that just got released, it's the first time they went outside. It's the first time they were actually on ground. They had spent their whole lives in metal cages. And these activists, you know, there's Wayne Sung, who's with the DXA, the Direct Action Everywhere group that does civil disobedience. They're the ones who rescued those pigs that I mentioned before, they have been working to get Ridgeland Farms closed.

50:09And what finally enabled them to do it was that there's been these bipartisan groups like White Coats Waste that have said, hey, conservatives, you don't want your government money funding hideous animal experimentation that have said to the left, you love animals, you want to protect animals. And it kind of became this bipartisan movement because they weren't picky or ideologically pure about who their allies would be. They just wanted to shut this facility. And finally, it's getting shut. But it's saving thousands of these beagles who would have been destined for the most horrific animal experimentation.

50:40And they breed them into the world just for experimentation. And then they kill them after. So that's their whole lives. Ridgeland is finally being shut down. But it's still a massive industry of dog experimentation that this kind of symbolizes how to do successful activism both in this area and I think more broadly. Yeah. And, you know, just to make it bigger than animal welfare, because that's a key component of this, This fits with generally, I think if you were to ask RFK Jr. of two years ago, maybe three years ago, he would have been vehemently opposed to things like this. It fits also with some of the betrayals from the Trump administration on the Maha movement of glyphosate and of the prioritization of corporate profit, let's say here in terms of pigs and animal welfare.

51:21But generally, one of the more inspiring parts, you know, you would think originally of Maha was like, OK, let's actually take our environment seriously. What we put into our body is not just good for us, but also in terms of regenerative agriculture. Like many of these things have just not come to pass, not only not come to pass, but have been outright rejected by this administration, Glenn. And I know I'm just curious, you know, what you what you make of that. But at the same time, I do think there's more heightened awareness because of the work that you've done, activists and others on these things.

51:51I'm just curious how you're thinking about it. I mean, if you enter these facilities, which I have done, you'll obviously be shocked by the animal cruelty, but it's also physically repulsive. Like the smell, the conditions of these animals that then are fed into people's bodies. They use massive amounts of antibiotics just to kind of mass treat these animals to prevent them from dying before they can sell them. And this mass use of antibiotics has a very high risk of creating antibiotic-resistant infections that can be a gigantic threat to the human species. They dump this waste, this disgusting, repulsive, these conditions go into poor neighborhoods where they just dump enormous amounts of waste without any real studies of what the impact is.

52:32There's all kinds of psychological effects on the workers who are required to just slaughter and devalue human life. They come out with all kinds of trauma, all kinds of psychological issues. It's a multi-level sickness that this industry is producing. But of course, the problem again is, you know, our Congress operates based solely on money. And they are a very well-funded group. If I could just quickly tell you like just one short antidote, which is in places like Montana and Idaho, which typically have a kind of libertarian free market ideology, like you can do what you want, the government shouldn't tell you.

53:08They just passed bills that ban lab-grown meat, which was the alternative for people who still want to eat meat but don't want to consume animal products. And in other words, people who want to buy alternatives to factory farm meat are now banned from doing so because these industries are so powerful that they got the legislatures and the governors to ban their competitors. Even though these are free market states of consumer choice and the like, that's the level of power that we're talking about. Incredible stuff. Glenn, thank you so much. Thanks for breaking down all of these issues for us. We really appreciate it.

53:40It's great to see you. Happy to be with you guys. Thanks. Talk to you soon. Thank you guys so much for watching. We appreciate it. Friday show for everybody tomorrow. See you then. This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human.

From the publisher

Krystal and Saagar discuss a billionaire says tax the rich is a slur, Epstein alleged final note, Glenn Greenwald on ADL & animal abuse.

 

Glenn Greenwald: https://greenwald.substack.com/

Gabriela's GoFundMe: https://www.gofundme.com/f/support-gabriela-saldanas-legal-representation 

 

To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show AD FREE, uncut and 1 hour early visit: www.breakingpoints.com   

Merch Store: https://shop.breakingpoints.com/   

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar

All 553 episodes
5/7/26: Billionaire Says Tax The Rich Is A Slur, Epstein Alleged Final Note, Glenn Greenwald On ADL & Animal AbuseBreaking Points with Krystal and Saagar · 52 min
Listen in VO