In short
A breakdown of a controversial NDAA provision (Section 224) that, the guest argues, permanently entwines U.S. and Israeli defense technology and makes it hard to unwind; discussion of modern warfare lessons from Lebanon/Ukraine/Iran and U.S. munitions depletion; then a political scandal segment about Maine Democratic nominee Graham Plattner; and finally Cenk Uygur’s UK ban.
Guests/backgrounds
Brandon Weikert, new Substack author; former campaign aide/press reporting is cited for Plattner; Graham Plattner is the subject (Democratic nominee for Maine Senate); Cenk Uygur, founder of TYT, plus Hassan Piker (also banned).
Key claims
Section 224 creates a dedicated Pentagon executive agent to identify Israeli-origin technologies for U.S. procurement and co-production, effectively fusing innovation bases; rivals use denial tech (drones/missiles) to stymie U.S. power projection; U.S. munitions timelines are constrained by supply-chain bottlenecks; Trump’s “ceasefire” is framed as temporary market-calming, not a real deal; Plattner’s sexting-text revelations are portrayed as gossip and a breach of trust; UK banned Uygur for statements about Israeli influence over Western governments.
Notable examples
Beaufort Castle debate in Lebanon; IDF chief-of-staff warnings about breaking in southern Lebanon; Jonathan Pollard; Haaretz on Beaufort; CSIS-style munitions replacement timelines (e.g., Tomahawk return to inventory late 2029–early 2031); Wall Street Journal/New York Times Plattner text claims; UK Times of London rationale; Guardian claim about Israeli lobby contributions.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VODiscussion on U.S.-Israel Military Legislation
1:07 to 2:00
Brandon Weikert discusses controversial legislation linking U.S. and Israeli military operations.
“Joining us now is our great friend Brandon Weikert.”
Implications of Military Integration
2:00 to 4:33
The potential consequences of deeper U.S.-Israeli military integration are explored.
“And actually, it might actually be better for restraining Israel if our officers had more control in some ways over the IDF.”
The Significance of Military Sites
4:33 to 6:00
Discussion on the military significance of historical sites and their symbolic value.
“And, you know, this also, this is sort of quietly being admitted now, but it's an implied admission by our DC elites, both parties, that the U.S.”
Analysis of Modern Warfare Trends
6:00 to 8:13
The hosts analyze recent military engagements and their implications for future conflicts.
“Brandon, you wanna break some of this down?”
Challenges in Military Supply Chains
8:13 to 10:26
Brandon discusses the challenges the U.S. military faces regarding supply chains and munitions.
“Brandon, talk a little bit about what both Ukraine war and Iran's successful ability to repel our attacks and do tremendous damage to our bases across the region.”
Iran's Strategic Position and U.S. Responses
10:26 to 14:00
The ongoing U.S.-Iran conflict and the implications of strategic positioning are examined.
“And, you know, actually, let's have you address this.”
Analyzing Trump's Ceasefire Strategy
14:00 to 15:22
The discussion revolves around the implications of Trump's ceasefire claims and the potential outcomes post-agreement.
“So I think what Trump is doing is he's trying to calm the markets, claiming he's got a ceasefire.”
Graham Plattner's Controversial Senate Campaign
18:29 to 21:38
Discussion on Graham Plattner's scandal involving sexually explicit texts and its implications on his campaign.
“This is courtesy of a disgruntled former campaign aide.”
Amy Gertner's Response to Scandal
21:38 to 23:36
Analyzing Amy Gertner's public statements regarding her husband's scandal and its context.
“like health care and education and child care.”
Political Implications of Personal Scandals
23:36 to 28:04
Exploration of how personal scandals affect political candidates and public perception.
“It's one of the best books ever written about the war.”
Show all 17 chapters
The Political Impact of Personal Scandals
28:04 to 38:25
Explore how personal scandals influence political careers and voter perception.
“I mean the idea that this is going to be some scandal in me, it's so ridiculous.”
Graham's Response to Media Allegations
38:26 to 42:00
Listen to Graham's defense against the media's portrayal of his personal life.
“And if anything, we'll have a Trump like effect of making people feel like they're out to get him, especially because his wife doesn't even care.”
Analyzing Campaign Responses
42:00 to 43:20
Discussion on the implications of a political campaign's transparency and response strategy.
“So I'm not sure exactly what he means by that.”
Cenk's Experience with British Ban
46:11 to 48:22
Cenk shares his experience of being banned from the UK and the implications of that ban.
“Yeah, so I went to the airport yesterday.”
Criticism of Israeli Influence
48:23 to 55:02
Discussion on the implications of Israeli influence on U.S. politics and the controversial nature of this topic.
“that I said that Israel controls the American Congress because they've given the most in this last election cycle.”
Broader Context of Political Criticism
55:03 to 56:00
Exploration of how political criticism varies across different governments and its acceptance in discourse.
“no, Jake, you are allowed to say it about big pharma and defense contractors and oil companies, you're just not allowed to say it about the Israeli lobby.”
Banning of Cenk Uygur: A Discussion on Free Speech
56:00 to 1:00:26
The hosts and Cenk Uygur discuss the implications of his ban from the UK and the surrounding controversy.
“Well, and I know Hassan had pointed out that one of the previous speeches he gave at Oxford was on the topic exactly of how important it is to separate out Israel from the Jewish people.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human.
0:30you get your podcast. Just listen. We don't care where you hear it. Hey guys, Sagar and Crystal here.
0:35Jeffrey Sachs:Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election and we are so excited about what that means for the future of this show. This is the only place where you can find honest perspectives from the left and the right that simply does not exist anywhere else. So if that is something that's important to you, please go to breakingpoints.com, become a member today and you'll get access to our full shows, unedited, ad-free, and all put together for you every morning in your inbox. We need your help to build the future of independent news media, and we hope to see you at breakingpoints.com.
1:07Joining us now is our great friend Brandon Weikert. He is the new author of Weikert on Substack, where there will be a link down in the description. And Brandon, for our purposes, dissected a new highly controversial piece of legislation, which was snuck into a congressional bill. Let's go and put this up here on the screen from Brandon. Congress is quietly making Israel a permanent pillar of U.S. military modernization. You write, Brandon, buried deep within the NDAA is a provision that serves far more attention. On its face, Section 224, the United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative appears to be a routine measure designed to improve military cooperation between these two longstanding allies.
1:51In reality, it may represent something much larger. Indeed, it is unprecedented. Break it down for us, Brandon. This is getting quite a lot of attention. Yeah. So the social media claim is that, well, the U.S. and Israel militaries are merging. It's not quite accurate. And actually, it might actually be better for restraining Israel if our officers had more control in some ways over the IDF. But ultimately, the real issue here, and in many ways, it's bigger than if we were just merging command structures. This is a fusing of the U.S. and Israeli defense and technology innovation bases. And once those things are together, and I kind of track it in my article, once those things become one, you can't disentangle those two things, which I think is the point.
2:40But because, you know, Crystal, and I mean, you know this from Europe, the Democrats have been really at the forefront of sort of becoming skeptical of Israel. And then, of course, the Republicans are now the young people on the right are kind of following that suit. But ultimately, the Israelis know that in the long run, they cannot rely on foreign aid as it is currently structured coming to them because the next generation is rising in both parties and both sides are skeptical of Israel. So the Israelis have to be afraid that they're going to get cut off. If they do it this way, though, this is a backdoor way for Israel to ensure not only it continues to receive aid through this section, but also it allows them to basically have access to our entire tech base.
3:26Wow.
3:26Jeffrey Sachs:So let me read a little bit of your piece here. You say Section 224 goes well beyond traditional forms of cooperation that we already have with Israel. You say the legislation directs the Secretary of Defense to appoint a dedicated executive agent to synchronize bilateral defense technology efforts. That official will be tasked with identifying Israeli origin technologies that could be incorporated into U.S. programs of record, facilitating their transition from research projects into actual procurement pipelines and promoting industrial partnerships and co-production arrangements between American and Israeli firms.
4:00Jeffrey Sachs:In other words, Congress is not merely encouraging cooperation. It is directing the Pentagon to actively search for Israeli technologies that could become part of the future U.S. military. And you paint a portrait of this integration making it very difficult if you had a future president who had a different view of the U.S.-Israel relationship to unwind this relationship and also make it very difficult for a future Congress that may have other ideas to step back from what we are doing with regard to Israel. without hurting our own national security. That's 100 % correct. And, you know, this also, this is sort of quietly being admitted now, but it's an implied admission by our DC elites, both parties, that the U.S.
4:45defense industrial base, despite possibly getting$1.5 trillion next year, can't produce advanced technology reliably on its own. So now it's having to pivot and go to other countries and say, hey, we need your stuff. So that's also sort of a subtext here, which is another significant crisis. But the whole thing here with Israel is, yes, they are a partner, but they have their own agenda, as all countries do. Why do we keep enmeshing ourselves with other countries that do not share our exact values or strategic outlook at the level that we currently are? This is a tighter relationship if the bill passes as it's written.
5:28This will become a tighter relationship than even the special relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom. It will be closer than the U.S. and NATO's relationship. And we saw with Jonathan Pollard in the 80s, you know, the Israelis will deploy spies or use spies to steal our stuff and then sell it to the highest bidder for their own purposes, throwing us under the bus. Imagine what they're going to be able to do with access to our most advanced quantum computing, biotech, et cetera, research. Yeah, and let's go start actually with D1, guys. I'll read from some of this. So this is a field report from Lebanon.
6:06There is a growing debate over the military significance of Beaufort Castle, which observers are saying after 15 months of war, Israeli forces reached a symbolic historical site less than four kilometers from the border rather than capturing a key resistant stronghold, they contend the castle's value is primarily media and psychological, not operational. Brandon, you wanna break some of this down? A castle which literally dates back to, what is it, the first, I'm gonna get my crusades mixed up. It's one of the crusades. I think it's the first crusade. I might be wrong though. Castle goes to the first crusade, clearly of significance to say, we basically are the conquering heroes, the party.
6:46And it's a message to the world about this messianic enterprise that they're on. Yeah, that's exactly right. And, you know, whenever armies start engaging in symbolic ideological sort of, you know, sideshows, which is what this is, at the expense of tactical and strategic gains, it doesn't usually end well for the invading army. And so this does look to me like the Israelis are saying, we're not going anywhere. In fact, we're going to expand our footprint. And in fact, they're moving beyond the Latani River at great cost to themselves. You had the IDF chief of staff twice now come out in the last four weeks saying, if we keep going at this operational tempo, the IDF will be broken in southern Lebanon because they can't sustain the logistics chain.
7:34They can't keep losing. I mean, Merkava main battle tanks, upwards of 60 to 70, have been destroyed because they keep sending these things down the gut. And the Hezbollah just keeps popping them off. like the Ukrainians did in the beginning of the Ukraine war against those Russian tanks. So you see the IDF making really, really silly mistakes that you saw in World War II, that you're seeing silly mistakes now that are repeating what's happening in Ukraine. This is not, A, going to end well for them, but B, it certainly means the Israelis are expanding their footprint. We're tethered to that now.
8:12And the question is, are we going to go further and now enmesh our technology base with whatever the heck they're planning to do in Israel?
8:22Jeffrey Sachs:Yeah. Brandon, talk a little bit about what both Ukraine war and Iran's successful ability to repel our attacks and do tremendous damage to our bases across the region. And now Hezbollah using these fiber optic drones has really been able to exact a lot of damage on Israel. I mean, there is an article right now in Haaretz that says manufactured nostalgia for Lebanon's Beaufort masks, a strategic failure. I mean, they are taking a lot of blows there and have not been able to achieve what they wanted to achieve. Putting all these things together, what does this tell you about the reality of modern warfare?
8:58It shows us that our strategic rivals in Iran, Russia, China, and I'm just using that term kind of, you know, academically, our strategic rivals, because I know there's some argument about whether. But the point is, technically, our strategic rivals have leapfrogged the U.S. military and the militaries of our allies with these denial technologies. They figured out the way you stop American and allied power projection in their parts of the world is with lots and lots of cheap drones, missiles, and even sometimes hypersonic weapons, which is a technology we have not yet fully developed or have defenses against.
9:40And as you brought up the Ukraine and Iran wars together, and this has sort of been the drum I've been banging for the last week, in my opinion, if you look at the southern end of Ukraine, where the Russians are, and you look at the northern end of Iran, there is only a 621-mile gap between those two fronts. So if things continue, as I suspect they will, I do not believe there will be any deals in either war. If things continue, you could see the ultimate coming together of those two conflicts in a true world war. And that's what I've been tracking, and that's what I'm afraid of. And frankly, our rivals have figured out how to stymie the American war machine.
10:21$1.5 trillion. What's it getting us? One strategic defeat after another. It is crazy, Brandon. And, you know, actually, let's have you address this. So I recently, it was the CSIS chart, but I'll describe it to you, Brandon. And I was ridiculed for saying this. I said it will take five years to replace 39 days of munitions used in the Iran war. It was called a liar, an American decliner, apparently. All I did was post a chart. Ryan McBeth went after you. I saw that. He went after me too, apparently. Okay, so let's get into it then. So all I did was post a chart, which said estimated return to pre-war inventory.
10:53That's it. where it says for Tomahawk, late 2030, early 2031. For that, mid to late 2029. You just referenced our timeline, an industrial base for$1.5 trillion. Why does it make it so vulnerable to the studying of the Iran conflict and of Ukraine whenever we have timelines like that? Or are the timelines fake, as he's saying? No, I don't think the timelines are fake. I know that's what the Hawks are saying. About a month ago, I was at an undisclosed military facility in Georgia. They had me on a panel with three hawks versus me. They spent the entire time strafing me. But ultimately, they couldn't answer the basic fact.
11:31If there's this secret supply somewhere, why haven't we seen it yet? And of course, the answer is there's no secret supply. And actually, my newest article on my sub stack, I actually took part of what you were saying and I expanded on it because Ryan McBeth also went after me, apparently. The bottom line here is this is math. Okay, math is like gravity. You can only resist it for so long. And the bottom line is, it may take 30 days to assemble a single Tomahawk cruise missile, but this isn't like an Ikea piece of furniture. This is a highly complex system. If you have bottlenecks in the underlying supply chain, the rocket motor, the rocket fuel, the rare earth minerals that China has control over, that 30-day timeline to assemble is extended for however long the bottleneck lasts.
12:20And so I actually said, Sagar, I think, I think your timeline is too optimistic. This might be more than six years to seven years, especially if current operational tempo remains the same or increases the defense industrial base in 14 key weapon systems, precision guided munitions like the Tomahawk, but also these air defense interceptors, those 14 munitions, they can't keep up with. They're depleting faster than they can replace. And at some point, we're going to have to switch munitions. And I think actually that is informing Trump's ceasefire right now is that he's trying to buy time for a little bit more of these systems to be built.
12:58I don't believe this is a real ceasefire.
13:00Jeffrey Sachs:Can you talk a little bit more about that? Because you did mention earlier, you don't think that we are likely to see a deal. Yeah, well, there's no stasis in the argument between Iran and the United States. I mean, the fundamental issue is there's no way Iran is giving up control over the Strait of Hormuz, not without them getting those transit fees and service fees, which is similar to what Turkey does, by the way, in the Turkish Straits. But that's another issue. There's no way. And then also these this nuclear, the nuclear dust, you know, the blessed dust. The bottom line with that is the Iranians have just proven even by just threatening to have nuclear weapons, they can break the back and the will of the U.S.
13:44and Israeli joint forces. We fought them for, you know, four months almost now to a standstill. And the Iranian regime is still the Iranian regime. And we are the ones seeking immediate relief to all of their pressure. They're not going to stop because they don't have to stop. So I think what Trump is doing is he's trying to calm the markets, claiming he's got a ceasefire. But even if he gets the ceasefire, Crystal, that's only a 60 day memorandum of understanding. What happens on day 61? Because we are told that the president is insisting on day 61, they're going to meet with the Iranians and finally hash out the nuclear issue.
14:22Why would the Iranians give up the nuclear dust? They wouldn't. It's too much of an advantage for them. Second of all, in this proposed deal, the 60-day moratorium, the Iranians have up to 30 days to let up control of the Strait of Hormuz for the remainder of that temporary deal. What makes anybody think that the Iranians are just going to slow down their control until maybe day 30? So we're going to go another 30 days of Iranian blockade. of the Strait of Hormuz. This is not boding well. And so there's no incentive. And frankly, Trump cannot obviously negotiate for two reasons. He's going to look weak.
15:02He'll look like he lost. And the Israeli factor, Netanyahu can't afford to have the war end. So we are just in a pause until some greater positioning can be had. And then I fear the war will begin or we'll just be in a permanent frozen conflict, which again, Strait of Hormuz remains closed. The economy collapses in either event. What a disaster. Everybody go subscribe to Brandon's sub stack as you just saw. Excellent analysis and deep.
15:28Jeffrey Sachs:And if I could just say as well, Brandon is on the right. He's taken a lot of professional risk to tell the truth about this war. So please guys consider going and supporting his sub stack. Yeah, he does great work and he also really deserves and earns your support as well. Genuine personal sacrifice, which is rare for somebody who actually just wants to say what he thinks. So we support you 100%. We hope everybody else will as well. See you later, man. Thank you. See ya. Number one hits. Millions of records sold. Awards. Sold out tours. You think the Jonas Brothers are satisfied? Nope. It's podcast time.
16:02We get to ask other people questions because we're sick and tired of being asked questions. Hey Jonas is available now and their first guest is a big one. Paul Rudd. You know, Steve Carell is a great singer. Can you tell you not to audition at The Office or something? I told him. Whoa. We were filming Anchorman. Clearly I was the idiot. Thank God he He didn't listen to me, right? Listen to Hey Jonas on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Why is everyone obsessed with romance right now? Like everyone. Your coworker who quote unquote doesn't read is reading romance.
16:35Your mom, book talk, the entire internet. I'm Sanjana Basker. I'm Tyler McCall. And this is Radio 831, a romance podcast. the books, the tropes, the adaptations, the drama, the discourse, and what all of it says about how we actually love, yearn, and obsess. We're going to Wuthering Heights, which, for the record, is not a romance novel. And yet it has haunted the romance genre for 200 years. We're getting into dark romance, age gaps, certain Russian hockey players, and sentient objects in love, which is a thing. That's the kind of conversation we're having every episode. Listen to the Radio 831 podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
17:26What would you eat if you had to start over? Real simple, poor man's, poor woman's food. Black beans, chicken, rice, plantains. That's poor people's food, man. But being Nigerian, that's, come on, a go-to. On the podcast Eating While Broke, I sit down with celebrities, entrepreneurs, and creators as they revisit the meals they once relied on and the moments that shaped their journey. Named Best Food Podcast at the 2026 iHeart Podcast Awards, this show is all about real conversations on money, growth, and what it really takes to make it. It was times where me and Lex were like definitely getting into it because we're not making any money.
18:05Like I need to start making money. Like why are we doing this? But I don't know. I think we just always knew that we had something really good and eventually people were going to catch on. And so we just thugged it out. The full season is available to binge right now. Listen to Eating While Broke from the Black Effect Podcast Network on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.
18:29Jeffrey Sachs:Graham Plattner, who is the presumptive Democratic nominee for Senate in the state of Maine, a key Senate race this time around, is facing new revelations that have caught the attention of many who can put this up on the screen. This is courtesy of a disgruntled former campaign aide. Wall Street Journal had this scoop. Graham Plattner's wife flagged sexually explicit text to his Senate campaign. I'll read you a little bit of this to get the story here. Days after Graham Plattner announced his main Senate bid, his wife informed the campaign about a potential political problem she had previously discovered on the oyster farmer's phone.
19:04Jeffrey Sachs:Sexually explicit text was several women, according to people familiar with the matter. Amy Gertner, who married Plattner in 2023, told the campaign about messages she had found early in their marriage. When she informed the campaign about this was in the spring of 2025. In late August, as some aides were conducting opposition research on their own candidate, Gertner disclosed the text to a campaign aide to make sure they did not pose a risk to her husband's nascent campaign. The campaign had been preparing for a major rally with Bernie Sanders. Aides ultimately decided the text were a private matter that was being handled by the couple in marriage counseling, a campaign official said.
19:40Jeffrey Sachs:The rally proceeded as planned, with thousands in attendance. So again, the TLDR here is that Graham Plattner's wife had previously, years ago, earlier in their marriage, discovered these sexually explicit texts between Graham and several women. They have worked through it in marriage counseling. She has actually put on a statement that I'll show you shortly. And so when you're going through these campaign processes, typically you as a candidate will do your own opposition research on yourself. So you'll actually hire a firm to dig into your background and find whatever it is that an opposing campaign is likely to find.
20:16Jeffrey Sachs:So it sounds like in the process of this, Amy Gertner, Graham's wife, decided to disclose this to an aide and say, hey, do you think this is going to be a problem? And then now this aide who long ago left the campaign and is working for another candidate and for a consulting firm, I think, who is very much not a Graham Plattner fan, decided to go to the press with this disclosure that the candidate and his wife thought was happening in privacy. Let me go ahead and play a little bit of Amy Gertner as the first one between the two of them. Graham has now spoken to the press as well, but to put out a statement about her reaction to these revelations and what she sees very much, and I think rightly so, as a breach of trust.
21:00Jeffrey Sachs:Let's go ahead and take a look at that. If anybody knows me and Graham personally, you know that we got married in 2023. We live in Sullivan. We've got two dogs. And we love each other deeply. So it makes me really angry, disappointed, and I find it really shameful that there's a group of media outlets and people who are willing to spread gossip. instead of talking about real issues that Graham is running on, like health care and education and child care. I knew the man that I married had been through an immense amount of violent, active combat. And he's been in therapy for years. I just, I admire the fuck out of him.
22:06so when there are news articles about our marriage it's just extra shitty can I say that
22:12Jeffrey Sachs:online yes yes so I think it's disgusting that this aide brought these texts the existence of these texts to the press I don't see how it's anybody's business when she has forgiven him and they've worked through this in marriage counseling and it's sort of crazy to me that of all the revelations about Graham Plattner, this seems to be the one that is, you know, generating the most heat and most attention. But I think it's because at this point, you know, he is the Democratic nominee de facto. Janet Mills has dropped out of the race and his positioning is really anathema to a lot of the Democratic establishment.
22:48Jeffrey Sachs:So I'll get your reaction and we can show how some of the centrist dens are already out like, yeah, maybe low key, we'd rather have Susan Collins, which is crazy to me. I mean, it is an immense breach in terms of the campaign woman who leaked these text messages, or at least leaked the existence of these text messages. Zooming out a little bit, I mean, in terms of public people, unfortunately, we now live in a world where your entire personal life is under scrutiny. If a media outlet had found this, it would have been fair game. But the fact that they were egged on by a campaign operative is pretty crazy.
Read the full transcript
23:17Yeah, and I'm sure people would expect me to be on some soapbox here. But honestly, I mean, this is entirely fitting with everything that we know about Graham Plattner. who is as typical of a Marine who served in Iraq as humanly possible. If you've ever watched this series, Generation Kill, or read the book, I highly recommend the book. It's one of the best books ever written about the war. Grubbiner is basically a character in either that book and or that series. So if you haven't seen it, I highly recommend it. Especially fitting with his, a lot of it is Reddit-tier gossip, and where he was boasting about jerking off in a port-a-potty.
23:56Literally, out of something like in Generation Kill. I don't know that he was boasting about it.
24:01Jeffrey Sachs:Or just stating the realities of serving abroad. What life was like for him while he was posted abroad. I was laughing while watching, because I was like, dude, this is like Generation Kill. I was like, it's like a time shot out of the 2003 book that it was set in. But yeah, zooming out, here's the deal, right? With Graham, it's between him and his wife. And so did I think what he did was bad? Yeah, I think it's horrible. However, she's chosen to forgive him and to stay with him. I believe that they're currently trying for a baby. And ultimately, look, I'm pro-marriage. I'm also pro-babies. And so, you know, the marriages are difficult.
24:33I don't condone this behavior. I think it's bad. But the fact that she wants to stick with him, yeah, I think I wouldn't say great or not. It's value neutral, and that's up to her. That's up to him. In terms of the discourse, I am fascinated by this because am I living in some Pollyannish world where we thought that our politicians were like the most upstanding moral citizens. Donald Trump is president of the United States. And then if we were to take a look at some of Plattner's colleagues, why don't anybody Google Ruben Gallego divorce or Chris Murphy, one of the people we're about to talk about here who himself recently got some interesting circumstances or Ken Patton.
25:14In fairness to Chris Murphy,
25:16Jeffrey Sachs:he is taking Graham's side. Right, no, I know he is. So he's not being a hypocrite at least on this. I'm giving a survey of the people who are in the United States Senate. Ken Paxton, a literal serial adulterer embroiled in a financial corruption scandal involving his mistress as the Republican nominee for Senate down in Texas. Some of my favorite presidents, it's repulsive. FDR died at a home with his mistress, okay? JFK, Google, JFK, 19-year-old girl, White House. It's horrific. the LBJ literally orgies on Air Force One. I'm not saying this is some sort of titillating thing. I'm just giving you an example of like, yeah, I mean, sometimes it's just about who the leader is and what they're gonna do for you.
26:00And sometimes you gotta stake a step back and say, all right, now the bigger question I think comes down to judgment. Did he show bad judgment? Yes. Now that said, do the people who presume and present as some public upstanding moral citizen and then it secretly are also having like insane turmoil in their current life and then perpetuating policies, which you don't like. Is that better? I mean, that's a question for all Americans to decide.
26:26Jeffrey Sachs:But this is such an important point, Sagar, that you're hitting on here. Like, OK, this is a scandal. But Susan Collins backing the Iraq war and now being in the Senate long enough to also back the Iran war and sending young men and women off to die, including Graham Plattner's you know, comrades who he served with, you know, that's not a scandal. That's not a problem in judgment. I mean, the way we view morality, or at least the way that sort of the Beltway media views morality to me is really upside down in terms of what you would want in a public servant. Now, you could decide whether this is the type of person that you would want to like, you know, be married to.
27:08Jeffrey Sachs:Amy Gertner knows the full picture and said, yes, I do. I love this man. We're going to work through it. We're going to go through marriage counseling. That is a different question. But, you know, as another example, Chuck Schumer decided to attend this Israel Day parade with freaking Bezalel Smotrich, who is the most grotesque war criminal you can possibly imagine. Is that a scandal? Is that, you know, titillating media outlets and leading news coverage on CNN, et cetera? No, of course not. So, look, I'm curious what you think the political fallout will be. I have a feeling voters in Maine are going to shrug this off like they've shrugged off all of the other things that were supposed to be disqualifying for Graham Plattner.
27:46Jeffrey Sachs:I do think he has a bit of a not to compare him and Trump, because I don't think, you know, the landscape is is exactly the same. But I do think he has a bit of a Trumpian quality where he can push through, quote unquote, scandals in a way that other politicians can't get away with. And because he has so effectively communicated the message and the position of the Democratic base and really not just to the Democratic base but to the broader public that people want to hear about checking oligarchic power, that that is compelling enough for people to be like, yeah, let's just overlook this messy personal stuff.
28:24Look, I'm putting my analyst hat on. I mean the idea that this is going to be some scandal in me, it's so ridiculous. Like I'm sorry. Ryan made a great point. There are only a few hundred thousand people who vote in Maine. You could actually conceivably meet most of the politically engaged people in that state. And Graham knows many of them. It's a small state. Like, this is not Texas. This is not California, where the media culture matters more than anything, because that's the only way that you're going to be able to meet somebody, right? Or social media, or any of these. This is actually, like, some of the last vestiges of literally, like, barnstorming every county or whatever.
29:01Sorry, Maine. I'm not that familiar with your structure. But I think - I think they're counties. I think so, too. I never know with some of these places, parishes, whatever. So with Maine, it's a small, a tiny state. It has a very, very small number of people who are actually politically engaged. As far as I know, literally, it has only one major city. So it doesn't seem that hard to actually go around and meet people, to hold events. And ultimately, America is telling us a very clear message. from Paxton to Plattner to Trump, your personal life and your upstanding moral character does not matter.
29:36What matters is what are you going to do for me? And I think, by the way, I don't think that's necessarily a good thing, but I do think it is reflective of an establishment culture where we had people who were presentable, you know, presentably outward facing, quote, upstanding moral people who got us into, I mean, look, W, all right? W is a good example. W, as far as I know, he didn't cheat on his wife. He was a recovering cocaine addict and a drunk. He found God and he was touched and all that. He was a disaster. I think he's a good guy. I really do, like in terms of his own personal character.
30:09But as you just said about Iraq, I mean, that didn't translate to good judgment. That didn't translate to being a good president. It was a complete fucking disaster. That's part of the reason why Trump became president. Yes, and immoral, of course. But I'm saying like what we often took - Personal morality. Personal, I'm trying to think, of other people who presented that way, where these politicians that a lot of people fetish... Jimmy Carter, perfect. Oh my God, perfect, right? Jimmy Carter. He was, yeah, the saint, Habitat for Humanity. He was a disaster, an absolute disaster. I made this case actually before Trump, but let me make, I'll give you the counter to this.
30:49Before Trump, Lex Friedman, you can go and look it up. We had a long exchange about whether the personal character of a president matters. And I said, no. I said, no, it doesn't. And I said, there's so much history whenever we go back. And look, I just talked about JFK. I talked about LBJ. I talked about FDR. I talked about Grant, who himself was a fool, fell for a number of different financial scams, literally. Almost died penniless. And that's part of the reason I had to write his memoir. A lot of these people display bad judgment in deep and horrible ways of their personal life, where if I knew people personally, I would judge the hell out of them.
31:22However, they ended up doing great things. But I made that case about Trump. Now, I could also say that Trump's venality and his obsession with himself, I think, has been a disaster. But that's an important point.
31:33Jeffrey Sachs:It's not the womanizing. Yeah, right. I don't care about that. It's that venality. It's the narcissism. It's the self-dealing. And it's the corrupt behavior that has been there throughout his entire – I mean he is a con artist. That is what he, at his core, is great at doing. He's great at creating an illusion and selling that illusion. That is the character failing that I think has been, you know, really devastating and does actually matter in terms of the, you know, the way that Trump has conducted himself in office. Yeah, I take your point. And part of what was the devil's bargain? The devil's bargain was, yeah, we know he's a narcissistic, self-dealing casino con man.
32:15We think it's different than I just laid out all of Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney seems like a good guy. Built his wife an elevator when she had MS. He's got a giant family port. Mitt Romney's family life is exactly what I want my family life to look like, as opposed to somebody like Donald Trump. All right. If I'm ever, you know, cheating on my way, bragging about my sexual ex-voice in New York Post, please put a bullet in my head. Right. So that's that's I would much rather look like Romney. But would I want to live under a country like Romney? No, actually. And so, look, I mean, you're not wrong.
32:48But I will say, you know, with Plattner, in terms of his record, we don't know. A lot of it is promises. He's a lot like John Fetterman in terms of his upstart nature. He's never held public office. He certainly has. Fetterman actually had held public office. Yeah, that's fair. I don't know. Actually, no, good point.
33:04Jeffrey Sachs:Fetterman had more of that. He hasn't had a stroke, though, which I do genuinely think is the reason why Fetterman has become a different person. It's possible. But I'm just saying, we don't know. The red flag with Fetterman was his position on Israel, which he basically just allowed. Was it to Israel at that time? I don't remember. Ryan did the reporting on this. Fetterman just basically went to, I think it was DMFI and was like, tell me what you want my Israel position to be and I will adopt it. And that way you won't spend against me. So that and the whole like chasing down some, you know, unarmed black dude that he you know, that whole thing.
33:38Jeffrey Sachs:There were some red flags there. But I another point, Sagar, that I think is is worth considering just as we're making the Trump comparison is, you know, when Trump first came on the scene, the fact that the Republican establishment, which was hated, was so aggressively against him was a signal to a lot of voters, Republicans and otherwise. that, oh, he like they judged him by his enemies. You know, the fact the media hated him, the Republican establishment hated him, the liberal establishment hated him. They're like, oh, there must be something there. And I think that there's a bit of that with Graham right now with the Democratic Party, because I'd have to dig into the numbers.
34:16Jeffrey Sachs:But the more that came out about his Reddit, whatever, and his tattoo, et cetera, the more he searched in the polls. And so I think there we have a Democratic base, certainly, that is disenchanted with Democratic leadership. So when they saw like, oh, Chuck Schumer does not want this guy. That means I do want this guy. And I think that one of the biggest risks for him going into the general election was the Democratic brand is such trash. You know, the minute you have Chuck Schumer coming to campaign for you or whatever, voters may go, oh, I don't know if this is really what we're going for. So in a weird way, I think the fact that he continues to generate these cycles of upset against him, I think it could have a similar effect as, you know, what happened with Trump.
34:58Jeffrey Sachs:where people looked at the fact that the media and liberal establishment, Republican establishment all hated him so much and said, oh, this guy, this guy is over the target. Because I've even seen some, you know, some sort of anti-Israel conservatives who have been defending him and effectively saying like, oh, we all know why he's being attacked so aggressively. Yes, it's true. Because of his position on Israel and also his position on oligarchy, which are both anathema to the, you know, established order. Who can deny that this is, it's so obvious. It's just all about Israel. If you hate the guy because he's against Israel, then just say it.
35:36Don't invent all this bullshit. Not when Trump, the three-time philanderer, is president and you guys worship the ground. He walks on, shut the fuck up. Like, this is the stuff that just drives me absolutely crazy. And I'm telling you this again, as somebody, I would love to live in a more moral world. I would love to live in a place where cheating on your wife is like a gigantic scam. It should be, okay? hey, you should be humiliated for it, which, you know, I guess he has. His wife has forgiven him. That's her business. But beyond that, it's like, that's not how the country is feeling right now.
36:06Like, message after message after message. If you can stand up for what I want, then we don't care how you generally conduct yourself in your personal life. And you're absolutely right to compare it to Trump. Remember, the grabbing by the pussy tape was supposed to literally be a campaign ender. A lot of people thought that. Nobody could survive it. It hardened Trump's support. It hardened it. When, who was that woman in New Hampshire? I'm totally blanking on it. Ayotte, Kelly Ayotte, the senator? Yeah, yeah. Right? She's like, oh, we gotta denounce him. Paul Ryan, he wins. He not only wins, but then we do all these, remember all those soul-searching interviews in the New York Times?
36:41They're like, we went to a diner in Ohio and they say the tape doesn't bother them. Yeah, no shit, right? You know, in retrospect, because for them, we tried Romney, we tried W, we tried McCain. He was a war hero. All of this, loss, loss, loss, loss. Trump was the only one. He stood up on immigration. He stood up on trade. Those are the two things that we care about. We need to stand up against the left. That's how Plattner is, right? D plus 14 in terms of Maine on the generic ballot. Need I say more? This is all bullshit. Now, actually, Matt Iglesias wrote a piece about this. I read it, you know, a glimpse into the centrist's mind.
37:19And he's like, you know, he's like, Plattner, even though he's a Democratic nominee, presumptive, is just obsessed with going to war with the party's establishment. And I was like, yeah, dude, that's the point. Like, that's the whole point of his candidacy. And also, at this point, Plattner's gotta be thinking a little bit about how do I wanna govern? Like, how do I actually want to be a United States senator? And it's very obvious, not just in terms of the voters who obviously desire something like this, but he wants to do something very different than how the currently people in office are. And that is simply the age we live in from Republican to Democrat.
38:00There's why Paxton, by the way, I think Paxton would have won even if Cornyn had been endorsed by Trump. Texas GOP fed up with John Cornyn. Establishment, been here forever. You know, oh, he doesn't even know what he's doing. Like we live in a very anti-establishmentarian age. And Plattner is just another example of that, the latest iteration of somebody to come out. So, no, I don't think it will hurt him whatsoever in terms of his polling. And if anything, we'll have a Trump like effect of making people feel like they're out to get him, especially because his wife doesn't even care. Like if his wife cared and they were getting a divorce, that's kind of different.
38:36But come on, like, what are we doing?
38:38Jeffrey Sachs:Yeah, they're they're like you said, they're actively having trying to have a baby right now and struggling with fertility is something that many, many couples struggle with. We should probably I don't really feel like playing Cory Booker or Michael LaRosa, but suffice it to say that you've got them and Neera Tanden and others who centrist Democrats are supposed to be vote blue no matter who, who all of a sudden are like, oh, I don't know about Graham Platt. Or it's like, dude, you know, do you mean what you say about Donald Trump and about the problems that he has created and the threat that he represents to the country and the world?
39:07Jeffrey Sachs:If you do, then there's no problem here. And of course, the it's the obvious parallels to Zoran Mamdani, who is as squeaky clean as you could possibly get. And still you had Chuck Schumer refusing to endorse him and other, you know, Kirsten Gillibrand coming out and calling him a jihadist. You know, there's it's not an accident that the candidates who are critical of Israel in a way that goes against the Democratic establishment are the ones that suddenly they get reservations about, oh, I don't know if I can get behind this particular person. So anyway, you've had a lot of that with Graham. But I do want to play his response to make sure we get that on the record.
39:47Jeffrey Sachs:He actually claims and I want to listen to his wording here carefully. He claims that some of what is reflected in The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times articles is not exactly accurate, but he doesn't really elaborate on what that means. It appears that he and Amy have both accepted that these text messages are a real thing that that happened. But in any case, let's go ahead and play six so we can hear Graham's response. Graham, we heard Amy's video, saw Amy's video last night about this situation, the story in The Times and The Journal. What would your statement be at this point? It's no surprise to me that the establishment media outlets are just going to run gossip instead of wanting to talk about the things that actually matter in this race, which are the material realities that the Mainers are working with.
40:31These people are going to try to make this race about anything but what it's supposed to be about, which is policy. They never want to talk about policy. Amy and I have a very loving and very happy marriage. They would very much like to try to rip that apart. all right, we're going to come after us in every awful way that they possibly can. And we're just going to keep talking about the fact that the hospitals are closing, the fact that child care facilities are closing, the fact that teachers and nurses aren't paid enough, and the fact that everybody down here continues to work harder and longer and get less.
41:03But, of course, the powers that be do not want us to talk about that. And so they're going to just do gossip instead. But the stories are true, right, about the texts? No. No, this is the amazing part. The Wall Street Journal and the New York Times ran stories without any evidence besides the gossip from a former staffer. I'm sorry. That's frankly journalistic malpractice. We pushed back on it. They won it. They did it anyways. I know that you have a question.
41:32Jeffrey Sachs:So are you confirming that the messages did not exist? What's that? The messages, they did not. I'm confirming that what Genevieve McDonald said in the New York Times is not true. So you never met with her about uncomfortable, for lack of a better word, sexting messages as the campaign was going? We talked about things in Amy and I's marriage that we've gone through over the years. We talked about that because that's our marriage. And we discussed it with the campaign. What Genevieve McDonald claims isn't true. So I'm not sure exactly what he means by that. And I think it's a bit of a mistake to open up this door because now you just raise more questions about like, OK, well, what do you mean?
42:10Jeffrey Sachs:Well, what part is not true? and it just continues the story. His campaign came out. Take your lumps, you know, and say like the initial messaging of like, this is not what people care about. True. Right. And then, you know, this is our, this is a private matter in our merits that we've worked through and we're moving forward. Opening up this line of inquiry of like, okay, well, what part of it is true? Well, what part of it is not true? Well, what about the this and the that? I, you know, I don't think that that was a smart move on his part. It was ridiculous. He was like, oh, his campaign came out and was like, well, the part about Genevieve McDonald, that part wasn't true.
42:48We're not saying that. It's like, dude, just cut your losses, man. Yeah. Pull a Trump. Locker room talk. Whatever. Get over it. In fact, you should turn it on the journalist. Be like, are you a pervert? Do you enjoy reading my sexual messages? Which one was your favorite? That's what I'm serious. I wouldn't be in this position. But that's what I would do. If I were a comms director, I'd be like, oh, you're a sick, disgusting pervert. Like looking at pictures of me shirtless and be like, are you gay? That's what I would do. But, you know, nobody wants to take advice from me. Free advice for the Plattner campaign.
43:19All right. Cenk Uygur, standing by. Let's get to him. Number one hits, millions of records sold, awards, sold out tours. You think the Jonas Brothers are satisfied? Nope. It's podcast time. We get to ask other people questions because we're sick and tired of being asked questions. Hey Jonas is available now and their first guest is a big one, Paul Rudd. You know, Steve Carell is a great singer. Can he tell you not to audition at The Office or something? I told him. Whoa. We were filming Anchorman. Clearly I was the idiot. Thank God he didn't listen to me, right? Listen to Hey Jonas on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
43:56Why is everyone obsessed with romance right now? Like everyone. Your coworker who quote unquote doesn't read is reading romance. Your mom, book talk, the entire internet. I'm Sanjana Basker. I'm Tyler McCall. And this is Radio 831, a romance podcast. The books, the tropes, the adaptations, the drama, the discourse. And what all of it says about how we actually love, yearn, and obsess. We're going to Wuthering Heights. which for the record is not a romance novel and yet it has haunted the romance genre for 200 years. We're getting into dark romance, age gaps, certain Russian hockey players and sentient objects in love, which is a thing.
44:43That's the kind of conversation we're having every episode. Listen to the Radio 831 podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.
44:56What would you eat if you had to start over? Real simple, poor man's, poor woman's food. Black beans, chicken, rice, plantains. Yeah. That's poor people's food, man. But being Nigerian, that's, come on, a go-to. On the podcast Eating While Broke, I sit down with celebrities, entrepreneurs, and creators as they revisit the meals they once relied on and the moments that shaped their journey. named Best Food Podcast at the 2026 iHeart Podcast Awards. This show is all about real conversations on money, growth, and what it really takes to make it. It was times where me and Lexa like definitely get into it because we're not making any money.
45:35Like I need to start making money. Like why are we doing this? But I don't know. I think we just always knew that we had something really good and eventually people were going to catch on. And so we just thugged it out. The full season is available to binge right now. Listen to Eating While Broke from the Black Effect Podcast Network on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
45:59Jeffrey Sachs:So we have a very special guest this morning, founder of TYT, Cenk Uygur, who has a little personal story that he would like to share with our audience because it certainly has relevance to, I think, all of us. Cenk, great to see you as always. Good to see you, man. Good to see you guys. Yeah, so tell us what's been going on. Yeah, so I went to the airport yesterday. I'm going to London. I'm going to speak or was going to speak at South by Southwest London and then in Oxford a couple of times, one speech by myself. And then one speech with my nephew, Hassan Piker, was going to be a kind of an interesting moment.
46:32My sister was coming. It's a good moment for her. Right. And and I get to the airport and they tell me that I've been rejected by the British government and they won't let me board the plane. And I honestly had no idea what they were talking about in the beginning. I'm like, what do you what do you mean? No, I already have a visa. and they're like sorry their british government says you're not alone not allowed in the country and only 20 minutes later did i see the article from times of london explaining why although we all knew didn't we i mean at first i thought it was like a bureaucratic snafu then when i realized it was an active decision we all knew that israel had made it and then of course uh ironically they said well you say that western governments control israel israel controls the western governments too much.
47:17So since Israel controls us, you're now banned.
47:20Jeffrey Sachs:On behalf of Israel, we are going to ban you for saying that Israel has so much influence on our governments. And I mean, it's crazy because, well, do you know anything specific about what you said that they found to be so objectionable? You and, by the way, Hassan, also banned from the country, going to speak also at South by Southwest and with you at Oxford. Do you have any specifics about what it is that the two of you have said that's just so unconscionable that you can't even be allowed on British soil? Yeah, I mean, that's, first of all, let's note that I think we're the only family that has been banned from Britain, had two family members banned from Britain.
47:57So I guess that makes us the most dangerous family in British history. I don't know. This is so hilarious and absurd. But at the same time, look, when I got that news at the airport, I felt like a little bit of my freedom had been taken away, my freedom of movement, and it didn't feel good. And and we can't have our open societies not be open anymore. And so this is outrageous. So they said, Crystal, that according to the Times of London, because they've never talked to me directly, that I said that Israel controls the American Congress because they've given the most in this last election cycle.
48:36The Israeli lobby has. And they said that's incorrect. That's actually correct. That is a factual statement. So they literally banned me for saying something that is true. So theoretically, almost every news person should be banned. Although to be fair, as most of them are mainstream media, and so they don't state that fact. They hide that fact. But yeah, and by the way, where do I get it from? From a British publication, The Guardian said that 94 % of Congress has gotten campaign contributions from the Israeli lobby. That is a stunning number. They're also the number one lifetime donor to Donald Trump, Joe Biden, Hakeem Jeffries, Chuck Schumer, Mike Johnson.
49:11So to say that the Israeli lobby does not have influence or massive influence or really control when they win every single vote in Congress would be to be counterfactual. So it doesn't get any more absurd than being banned for saying things that are empirically true. Here's the other thing. Why do they care? If you say something about Israel controlling you of Congress, you didn't say. I mean, maybe you said parliament, although it might be true too now. In this particular case, to ban, you know, you're a United States citizen. I don't even check about visa when I go to the UK, okay? It's visa upon arrival, so-called special.
49:47You know, last time I went, you didn't even need to talk to anybody. Just scan your passport, and you can walk in to the city of London. And so you get there to the airport. You find out you're being banned. You have no communication. But let's take it a step further. I believe our vice president criticized European governments for heavily censoring their own citizens. I agree with that criticism. Has anybody from the State Department reached out on your behalf to make sure you're going to facilitate your entry into the UK? No, not yet. So I'll tell you the one guy who has done something is, you're not going to be shocked, Ro Khanna.
50:21He's already on it and he's reached out to the British ambassador and asking for an answer. and I am curious about it because there there is no logical answer here for why I've been banned I mean they try to pretend that it's anti-semitism but I've never said anything anti-semitic so they're like well I guess your criticism of Israel is by definition anti-semitic but if that's true then you're literally going to have to ban billions of people from Great Britain because that's who is critical of Israel. Over 61 % of this country is critical of Israel. So what level of absurdity are we going to?
50:59And to your point, Sagar, you know, there's this phrase thrown around, special ally. You know, they say it about Israel and sometimes they say it about the UK. And so I know, and you're right. I never said anything about the British parliament. I never said anything about the British government. So they're not banning me for criticizing the British government, although I do now. So congrats. Yeah. And I made factual statements about the American government. That's why I got banned. But wait a minute. So apparently Israel is such a special ally of Britain that they'll even ban Americans. Like we are an inferior ally to Israel, apparently, because American citizens will get banned if they so much as criticize the most special ally of all for apparently almost all Western governments.
51:47So how is this not absurd, guys? I mean, look, one more thing about that. Israel's population is almost identical to the population of Papua New Guinea. Right. So if anyone was being banned for criticizing Papua New Guinea, it would be obviously irrational, like the most ludicrous thing you've ever heard. And they say, nope, nope. When you do it about Israel, it makes sense. It doesn't. It's not normal. It's super weird. And it gives the game away. It's the mask off moment.
52:21Jeffrey Sachs:Yeah. Well, and I followed your coverage long enough to know that, you know, there are a lot of countries that you've been critical of. I'm sure you've been critical of Russia, Saudi Arabia. No one says, oh, you're critical of Saudi Arabia. So you're anti-Muslim or you're Islamophobic. Nobody says, oh, you're critical of Russia. So you're anti-Christian. No one says, oh, can't come to my country because you said something mean about a different nation. And with Israel, look, we've listened to the Secretary of State Marco Rubio say, hey, you know, part of the reason we're in this war here is because we knew Israel was going to attack Iran and we couldn't or wouldn't stop them.
52:57Jeffrey Sachs:So that's why we're in the war. We heard Donald Trump say something very similar, that we were in this war with Iran because of Israel and others in the Gulf who wanted us to be in this war. So you are just echoing the words that are literally coming from the leaders of this country. Yeah, that's exactly right. It would be hilarious, though, if they banned Donald Trump. They're saying that, you know, that Israel, you said Israel controls you. So we are now banning you from coming to the UK. And guys, there's another component of this that's important. So you can look at it in a lot of different ways.
53:36You can say, look, and you're absolutely right. I've said very harsh things about the government of Russia, the government of Saudi Arabia, the government of UAE, the government of Turkey. So you don't get banned for any of these. And then they say, no, no, no, Israel doesn't have special privileges. Again, counterfactual, empirically incorrect. And in fact, when you add that extra lie on top, it makes us think, why are you lying straight to our face when we have eyes and ears? But beyond that, not only do I not say anything against Jewish people, on the show I actively say, I've said hundreds of times, this is not about Jewish Americans or Jews anywhere in the world.
54:16Governments do terrible things. If the Turkish government does something bad, it doesn't mean I did it as a Turkish American. It doesn't mean a Turkish citizen did it. And by the way, there are huge lobbies in this country that also control our government. Big Pharma controls drug policies. Big oil controls oil and energy policies. And it would be absurd to say that they don't. We can't negotiate drug prices. That's how thoroughly the drug companies control our government. And that's because we legalize bribery in America. So these are super important facts about the American government. And if you say you're not allowed to say the most important facts about the American government, otherwise we won't allow you into Britain.
54:56Well, what you're saying is that Great Britain is no longer a free country, period, right? And then if you say, no, no, Jake, you are allowed to say it about big pharma and defense contractors and oil companies, you're just not allowed to say it about the Israeli lobby. Again, you're giving the game away. You're saying they're the most important lobby and they have special and extra privileges that no one else on planet earth gets. And then one final thing about that, guys, if I tell everybody to not hate anybody who's Jewish in fact I say I love Jewish people I have Jewish family I have Jewish endless Jewish friends because I grew up in areas that were heavily Jewish and so I grew up with those guys my whole life my co-founders are Jewish on the Young Turks etc and if they say well that's the equivalent of a guy saying that Hitler is cool and you should hate Jews, well, then you've made – you've taken the power away from actual bigotry and anti-Semitism and fighting it.
55:54It's almost like a Jesse Smollett situation where they're screaming anti-Semitism when none exists and thereby cheapening the word and the concept and ironically doing damage to that cause. That's such an important point.
56:08Jeffrey Sachs:Well, and I know Hassan had pointed out that one of the previous speeches he gave at Oxford was on the topic exactly of how important it is to separate out Israel from the Jewish people. I mean, this is something that you both underscore and focus on all the time. I'm curious, you know, I had seen previously that there was I didn't follow it closely, but that there was some MP in particular who like was, you know, really gunning for Hassan specifically over some of his more controversial, I guess. statements. I mean, is that where this came from, do you think? And then, you know, they, once they realize like, oh, we're going to ban Hassan, they're like, oh, well, we've got, you know, his uncle, we're going to ban him too.
56:49Jeffrey Sachs:Where, what do you think is the train of, you know, how this all came together to result in banning both of you? And do you think that that would extend to like, you know, anyone who holds similar opinions, who's expressed similar things, either as influencers or online, et cetera. Yeah. So look, who it applies to is going to be fascinating. Professor Larry Lessig from Harvard is a good friend of mine. He helped me out a little bit yesterday and today. And what we found out is that these bans are almost never reversed. Am I really going to be banned from the United Kingdom for the rest of my life?
57:29Am I really an enemy of the crown? I mean, this is I keep saying this is absurd because I've this is as insane as it gets. So where is it coming from? Probably from the Israeli lobby. I mean, who else would have come from the Australian government, British citizens? Did they vote on this? My guess is I would win in a landslide if you actually ask the British citizens if my speech should be banned. My guess is that my speech is probably nearly identical to the majority of the British citizens in terms of what my opinions are. Are they going to start banning their own citizens? If you're a UK citizen and you leave the country, are they going to let you back in if you've criticized Israel?
58:11So is it that I'm a media figure? But what if you said something in social media? Does that count? or is it just any opinion you had that you stated to anyone will get you banned from britain if it's opposed to kazakhstan no i'm sorry israel of course i mean again fill in any other country and it's preposterous and then they say no if you tell us it's preposterous when it comes to israel we'll call you doubly anti-semitic no it's it's it's just insane and and look it's not shared by any of our citizens. The American citizens don't agree. British, Western, worldwide, no one agrees. The only people who want special privileges for Israel are government officials and, honestly, mainstream media.
58:57Yeah. I'll tell you, I'm very rarely shocked. When I heard that you guys were banned, I was stunned. This is the Anglosphere, our cousins. I mean, you don't even think when you get on a flight to the UK. I would think more getting on a flight to Saudi Arabia than I would on a flight to UK. And yet it's the flight to the UK which got you banned.
59:20Jeffrey Sachs:Yeah. Absolutely unbelievable. Yeah. How about that? Those Western values that were supposed to be, you know, that's the reason we're allied with Israel, right? We've got to defend Western values. And meanwhile, you know, they often cause us to trample on what those supposed Western values are. And of course, with their genocide, ethnic cleansing, constant bombing of other countries don't represent. certainly what I would want Western values to be. Now, maybe they do reveal the true Western values. That's a different conversation for another day. But Cenk, so great to have your insights and your first-person perspective on this.
59:52Jeffrey Sachs:We really appreciate you taking the time to join us. I know it's early in California, so extra thank you for that. We really appreciate it, Cenk. It's such an important thing. I think every American should hear about this. I really do. Thank you. I really appreciate you guys. And Crystal, that last point is so powerful. They say, oh, we're helping you with Western civilization. But first, you've got to get rid of your freedom of speech, your freedoms altogether and only represent us. No, that's not Western civilization at all. That's the exact opposite. And can you imagine being banned from the United Kingdom because you opposed the genocide?
1:00:26I mean, wow, how the world has changed. Sick. We'll see you later, man. Thank you. Thank you, guys. Thank you guys so much for watching. We appreciate it. Bro Show tomorrow. Don't miss that. Chris will be back on Thursday.
1:00:57We'll see you next time.
1:01:10Carell is a great singer. Can he tell you not to audition for The Office or something? I told him. Whoa. We were filming Anchorman. Clearly, I was the idiot. Thank God he didn't listen to me, right? Listen to Hey Jonas on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human.
From the publisher
Krystal and Saagar discuss Congress tries to intertwine US and Israeli militaries, Graham Platner cheating scandal, Cenk banned from UK.
Jeffrey Sachs: https://www.jeffsachs.org/
Brandon Weichert: https://x.com/WeTheBrandon?s=20
Cenk Uygur: https://www.youtube.com/theyoungturks
To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show AD FREE, uncut and 1 hour early visit: www.breakingpoints.com
Merch Store: https://shop.breakingpoints.com/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
