6/29/26: DSA Colorado Takeover, Europe Heat Wave, Newsom Tax Scam

26:07In Europe, the number with air conditioning is very low. Across the continent, it's something like 20 percent. And if you look at where the continent is situated, I mean, they're very high up in terms of where they are in the globe. And so they are just simply not supposed to experience this type of extreme heat. But now with the climate crisis, this is increasingly going to become the new norm. We can put E3 up on the screen. This gives you a sense of how much things have changed. So this is global temperature variations over the last 2022 years. You can see where the steam engine was invented.

26:46And then we start to climb into these extraordinary temperature variations. That is where we are now. Let's put E4 up on the screen. This has some of the numbers about the heat wave that is, they say, blasting Europe right now. the extreme heat would have been virtually impossible 50 years ago, according to researchers. Millions of people, they write, are sweltering under Europe's worst heat wave ever recorded. Because of temperature increases driven by climate change, Europeans are suffering from temperatures that would have been impossible 50 years ago. The phenomenon melting longstanding temperature records is due to a heat dome parked over Europe with clear skies and strong sunshine, intensifying the effect for large swaths of the continent.

27:27Temperature records have been broken in France, the U.K., and Spain, with red alerts issued in Germany, Belgium, Italy, Switzerland, and the Netherlands. A study published Friday by World Weather Attribution found the heat wave is the most severe ever recorded in the region. It has been driven by climate change with rising temperatures outstripping the rate of global warming. They also, Emily, they dig more into this study in this article. And what they do is they compared the temperatures that were seen this week with those that were measured in two other heat waves, 1976 and 2003. In 76, they said that's where it would have been virtually impossible to achieve this level of temperature.

28:08In 2003, during the first heat wave of the century, which I actually remember fairly well, temperatures would have been 10 times less likely than today, while nighttime temperatures would have been more than 100 times less likely. And that nighttime temperature piece is actually really important because people who are struggling in the heat during the day, usually at nighttime, okay, you're going to get some rest, but your body's going to be able to recover. But when you have these tropical temperatures that continue at night, that means your body is never going to get any sort of rest and recovery from the heat.

28:38So that's part of what makes this so extraordinary. And of course, as the climate crisis proceeds, you're going to increasingly have not Europe, but other parts of the globe that are virtually uninhabitable, where you just, you know, it becomes impractical, not practical for human beings to be able to live and persist in those conditions. So this is a bit of a wake-up call, and we can expect a lot more extreme weather going forward this year in particular because we are entering into a La Nina cycle. I told you I read a lot yesterday and listened to a lot of information about what that is. But in any case, the TLDR is going to lead to more extreme heat events in particular and very likely more extreme events in general.

29:18And we don't know yet, But it is looking possible, if not likely, that this will be what is termed a super La Nina, which means that the, you know, the impact of it is even more extraordinary than usual. So very likely we hit yet another global temperature record this year with more, you know, excess deaths and more fallout from the extreme climate.

29:41Emily Jashinsky:The World Cup is seriously going to be endangered by what happens in the United States this week. Like the knockout rounds are going to be on the line for sure. The predicted temperatures where some of these games are going to be played are looking like they're going to be just absolutely brutal. And here in Washington, D.C., there will be. We were earlier in the show covering how the crowds aren't looking huge so far for Trump's Great American State Fair celebrations on the National Mall. But every year there are thousands of people on the National Mall for the Fourth of July fireworks. works.

30:14Emily Jashinsky:And again, hopefully it'll be by the time they push it back to like 1030 p.m. Hopefully it'll be a bit cooler. But this is coming home this week in a way that I mean, people need to be really, really safe. Obviously, we have air conditioning here in a much on a much higher level than many people across Europe. But it's going to be really dangerous this week. Yeah. Apparently, there's like a cultural debate over air conditioning in France in particular, because they're they are sensitive to not wanting to fuel the climate crisis and they feel that this is, I mean, it shouldn't be necessary in most of Europe, but increasingly it is necessary just for human safety and survival.

30:51And the other thing here is obviously the impacts are not just not to downplay, but not just in terms of human well-being, you know, in the immediate heat wave. But we have farmers right now in the U.S. who have been, had their livelihood destroyed by a drought, which, you know, was really atypical and very likely also driven by climate crisis. And then you had on top of that, of course, the tariffs, and then you had the Iran war. And it's just been one thing after another for them. One thing that you can certainly expect in a La Nina cycle is more drought. And then you have crop failures, then you have food prices increasing.

31:30And obviously, we know the reverberations that that can have on, you know, on consumers here, but in poorer places in the world on just their ability to live, obtain what they need to be able to survive. And so those are some of the impacts we're looking at, too.

31:44Emily Jashinsky:It's going to be I mean, we can put this from Boise. You flagged this crystal. This is E5. This is so crazy. This is nuts. Yeah. I had to double check because I was like, this has to be AI. You see someone driving in water and chunks of ice. It looks like the Titanic. Right. And so what happened here is they had this massive, massive storm. And then they had something like eight inches of hail, insane hail storm. And so you had flooded streets with the like crusted ice from the hail on top, really apocalyptic looking stuff. And, you know, with any one weather event, it's very difficult to say it takes scientists like doing the research.

32:25Okay. Is this the climate crisis or is this something that may have happened in the past? But I think most people just in their own lives, if they're adults at this point have experienced It's like, you know, things are just not they don't quite go the way they used to. You know, I have I live in the town that I grew up in. So I remember very well the climate in the 80s and what it was like and how many snows we got and all of that sort of stuff. And there is zero doubt that it is not the same as it was just within my lifetime. And so I think that's made it very difficult for people who want to deny that this is going on to persist in those delusions.

32:58So they've had to adopt different tactics. I'm actually going to talk about this a little bit in my monologue to try to forestall any significant action that would curtail fossil fuel consumption. But we have to hand it to Comrade Trump. He's done a pretty good job with the destruction of fossil fuel consumption with this whole Iran war straight before moves closure. The acquisition of Chinese solar panels is literally through the roof, like insane spike in adoption of renewable technology. I think there should be. People can't afford gas. Right. They're just staying at home. Yeah. And I think there has been a wake-up call in terms of national security that even if you are a net energy producer, as we are, that does not mean really anything when it comes to this is a global market.

33:43And so if there's a problem with it, guess what? The prices are going to go up for us, too. The only actual protection from that is renewable energy. So China has, you know, they still have a lot of fossil fuel productions. I'm not trying to whitewash that. But they have invested a lot in being the leader in renewable tech. And those investments are really bearing fruit at this point and have made it feasible now so it doesn't have to be doom and gloom. The technology is available. The solar panel tech has gotten much, much, much, much better than it used to be. So, you know, it's not pie in the sky to imagine the sort of mass adoption that could begin to bend this curve.

34:18Emily Jashinsky:You know, it's one of those things where I think the climate movement is maturing, like on the politics of it, because at the same time, as we're looking at all of this, it was also, I think, the 20th anniversary of an inconvenient truth. Have you seen any of this content circulating about some of the the Gorian predictions that just didn't come to pass? No, this must be a right wing Twitter. Yeah, it's definitely right wing Twitter. But yeah, I mean, there's a I think obviously an adoption of a more persuasive technique than we saw 20 years ago. I had so many high school teachers play that movie.

34:52Emily Jashinsky:That's I'm making myself sound like a baby. But yeah, like we had to watch it three times in public high school. Like it was a hell of a time. 2007 support that support. I'm ready. Yeah. Welcome to ninth grade biology. Here's Al Gore. We'll let him take it from here. He did, though, raise the public awareness about the import, you know, even if I trust you that some of the predictions didn't come to pass. I think he made a lot of people. Unfortunately, I think he made a lot of people skeptical just because so many things were ended up becoming like, you know, that was a problem for the climate movement.

35:30Emily Jashinsky:I think it was significant. Some of the hysteria was a significant problem for the climate movement because people could then look and say, huh, and not take it as seriously. But to your point, I mean, also, everybody has seen some of the undeniable stuff around them, too. Yeah. But I do think the climate movement has had a more like there's there. I think the bigger problem of the climate movement is the entrenched oil and gas interests that buy off our elections is probably a bigger issue for them or the the people who are raising the alarms. The degree to which people like lives with air conditioning.

36:00Emily Jashinsky:As population grows in places like Africa and China and India, that's going to be the next big frontier for the climate movement. Yeah, for sure. And that's why the technological development genuinely makes it much more hopeful and possible to do what needs to be done to avoid these sorts of horrific situations like what our European brothers and sisters are experiencing right now. Renewables are better for the planet, and they get you the hell off the grid. So it's a goal that conservatives should support. Win, win, win, win, win. All for it. Come on, let's go. Yep. True energy independence is renewable energy.

36:33Has never been tried. Okay, no. All right, Crystal, you have a monologue. You've been feeling monologue-y. I might be a little rusty, guys. It's been a while, but I'm excited to tell you about Gavin Newsom, who has now realized that he's got a populist problem and doesn't want to be labeled as he should be. the candidate of the billionaire, protecting the billionaire class. So last week after the DSA wins, he suddenly had a big announcement. I will bring you all of the details now. When it comes to advancing your education, you have more options than you think. At Rasmussen University, we find ways to remove barriers, not build them, like a new laptop if you're eligible and enroll in select online or on-campus programs.

37:17That means flexible and engaging online courses and resources, tuition savings options if you qualify, exceptional student support, and much more. Online nationally or check out their 20 campuses across six states. Start when you're ready and get the support you need. Visit rasmussen.edu. I turned off news altogether. I hate to say it, but I don't trust much of anything. It's the rage bait. It feels like it's trying to divide people. If we got clear facts, maybe we can calm down a little. NBC News brings you clear reporting. Let's meet at the facts. Let's move forward from there. NBC News, reporting for America.

38:04Unlock the savings at Boost Mobile and save up to$600 a year. I've been scouting these big carriers for a minute now, and I've seen them pull the same play a thousand times. They promise you the world, then hit you with a price hike right when the game gets tight. But Boost Mobile, their$25 a month unlimited wireless plan is the most consistent player on the floor. No contracts, no price hikes. Unlock the savings today at BoostMobile.com slash unlock. Based on average annual single line payment of AT &T, Verizon, and T-Mobile customers compared to 12 months on the Boost Mobile unlimited wireless plan as of January 2026.

38:33For full offer details, visit BoostMobile.com. After watching DSA candidates win shocking upset victories last week, California Governor Gavin Newsom has belatedly found religion on a billionaire tax. It's time for a national billionaire's tax and a new social contract. Think about this, just 10 % of people, 10 % of people in this country own two-thirds of the wealth. A 30-year-old, for the first time in American history, is not doing better than his or her parents. That's a five-alarm fire. American wages have stood still, and the costs across the spectrum, cost of living, have skyrocketed. The system is fundamentally broken.

39:15The federal tax code, the corporate tax code, and the inheritance tax code seem to be written for a different set of Americans. It's time for an economic reset, a true minimum tax. A true minimum tax on billionaires that ensures the people at the very top pay at least the tax rate their own workers pay. We also should end this tax-free lifestyle loan. And this is the gimmick that allows the ultra-wealthy to borrow against their stock portfolios while reporting no taxable income. We also have to rewrite those inheritance rules so that the largest intergenerational wealth transfer in human history, estimated by, well, be$124 trillion that will be changing hands, doesn't lock in a permanent American aristocracy of inherited wealth.

40:03Time as well to return to the pre-2017 corporate tax rates. and time to close those offshore loopholes once and for all. And as AI reshapes the country, every American should own a piece of the future it builds through a national public equity fund. So it all sounds pretty solid, right? You got some federal taxes, you got some loophole closing, hiking the inheritance tax, some solid rhetoric around the democracy debilitating impacts of wealth inequality. Has Gavin Newsom truly seen the light? reformed his pro-oligarch ways. After all, this is the same guy who knifed Medicare for all in the state in spite of its overwhelming popularity and the fact that he himself had run on the program.

40:46The guy who cowered before the Israel lobby, running away from some initial tepid comments he made about Israel being an apartheid state. The guy who is right now today the foremost opponent of California's own wealth tax proposal. More on that in just a moment. What do we think of these proposals of Newsom and also of his sincerity on the matter. Well, friends, there is good reason for a lot of skepticism. The biggest red flag is what Ro Khanna pointed out on our show last week. If you really wanted to tax these guys, Gavin Newsom, you could just back the ballot initiative that exists right now in your own state.

41:21And if you want to tax these guys nationally, as Newsom claims that he does, you could embrace Senator Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren's existing wealth tax proposal. I've reported a 5 % tax on 250 billionaires in California. So 3 million Californians don't lose health insurance. He then is opposed to it, is leading the charge against it. These 250 billionaires are important donors and political contributors. And he says, well, I'm for a national billionaire's tax, but he doesn't want to do what Bernie is talking about, or I, 5 % tax on billionaires. He doesn't even want to do what Warren is talking about, 3 % tax.

42:00He wants to just say, OK, they can't borrow against assets and should be taxed on that, which is exactly what the tech billionaires are proposing. I mean, and would raise a fracture of the revenue. So at some point, you've got to be choose. Are we going to be against the oligarchs or for the oligarchs? We can be against them, which is what Bernie and I and Warren are. And then some of them may come along in the new social contract. But what we can't do is pander to them. So what is actually going on here? It looks like Gavin Newsom is adopting a classic political tactic. He can read a poll. He sees the populist rage seething out there among the commoners.

42:38He knows his presidential ambitions will be cooked if he becomes the guy that opposes taxing billionaires. But he does still have that donor base to please, which is the force that is responsible for his current political position. So what he is doing is rhetorically embracing the populist position, billionaire taxes, while pushing a policy that is less threatening to the oligarchs, both because it is more modest and also because it is less likely to actually happen. The California wealth tax may only be 5%, but it is an imminent threat and could open Pandora's box as other states potentially follow suit.

43:13So he can't support that. Better to support something that is both impossible and kind of lame. After all, state-level action is the best we can actually hope for at the moment, with the White House currently occupied by the Epstein-class president. So nothing Newsom proposes at the federal level really poses much of a threat to the oligarchs at all. None of it is going to happen anytime soon. He is hoping that he can find this Goldilocks zone of appeasing the pitchfork wielders while also signaling to his rich buddies that they can trust him to avoid anything actually meaningful. The approach reminds me very much of a 2021 video that was released by a group called Unearthed.

43:50In it, an activist tricked an ExxonMobil lobbyist into thinking that he was in a job interview, so he would spill the beans on all of their climate denial strategies. That lobbyist revealed that once public opinion shifted too hard in favor of climate action, Exxon couldn't do just their old climate denial junk science approach any longer. Instead, they opted to pretend like they cared so much about the issue, while simultaneously offering an intentionally unpopular and unworkable solution. In this instance, for them, it was a carbon tax. According to Unearthed, quote, during the undercover meeting, which took place via Zoom in May, lobbyist Keith McCoy suggested that Exxon's public support for a carbon tax as its principal climate policy is a, quote, advocacy tool and great talking point that will never actually happen.

44:35Quote, nobody is going to propose a tax on all Americans. And the cynical side of me says, yeah, we kind of know that. But it gives us a talking point that we can say, well, what is ExxonMobil for? We're for a carbon tax. That's what McCoy said. This, in a nutshell, is what Newsom is doing with his federal tax plans. But what are the tax proposals themselves? Gabriel Zuckman, one of the world's preeminent experts on wealth inequality, is less than impressed. Quote, you claim today that you support a national billionaire tax, he said to Gaffin Newsom. But when one reads your text, one quickly realizes you don't.

45:08You talk about closing loopholes as if this was equivalent to taxing billionaire wealth. It is not. For example, taxing loans used against assets, as you propose, is not a bad idea, but it would only generate a tiny fraction of the$4.4 trillion that a 5 % annual wealth tax on billionaires would generate nationally. That's because loans are just very small relative to billionaires' wealth. So your proposal in practice would do almost nothing to curb the explosion of the wealth and power of America's oligarchs. And that is the entire point. Newsom's proposals close some unspecified loopholes. They tax loans.

45:47They tax income. But they carefully avoid doing the one thing that actually needs to be done, taxing wealth. This is the whole ballgame because the wealth of billionaires and now trillionaires is incomprehensibly larger than the annual salaries that they take. Elon Musk, for example, he takes zero dollar income salary from Tesla. Their wealth is also vastly larger than the loans that they take out against their assets to fund their expenses, as Zuckman points out. There is no answer for the billionaire and trillionaire crisis other than some form of wealth tax. Levying one in California would be a great start, given that it is one of the largest economies in the world, and because it often serves as a lab for democracy, passing successful policies onto other states in the country.

46:34As for Newsom's complaint that it could cause the wealthy to flee the state, he should frankly be ashamed for repeating the reactionary talking points of the billionaires themselves, boosting exactly the propaganda frame they use to avoid ever facing significant taxation of any kind. By the way, there is just not a lot of evidence that anything like this is happening at scale. In fact, in New York City, we heard all kinds of billionaire meltdowns about how they'd all leave the city for good if Zoran Mondani was elected, and this has not shown up in the data at all. In fact, sales of multi-million dollar homes surged after his election.

47:08So it seems like they're figuring out how to brave the communist storm there. As for California, there's been a similar billionaire meltdown over the even prospect of this wealth tax passing in the state, with warnings that California would lose its status as the innovation capital of the world. Looks like they're doing okay so far, though. Per Zuckman, again, venture capital funding has gone through the roof in California as investors rush to fill the coffers of anyone with the words artificial intelligence in their pitch deck. Good news, guys. The billionaires are going to be OK. As for the rest of us, well, there's a bit more cause for concern.

47:43As their wealth skyrockets at an accelerating pace, they buy up all the assets they can find, sending prices through the roof, putting goals like, I don't know, homeownership increasingly out of reach for ordinary people. They're also executing a hostile takeover of democracy, which is all but complete. What else can you take from Elon Musk spending a quarter of a billion dollars to elect Donald Trump, who then promptly handed over the keys of the entire government to this one trillionaire, the richest man on the planet? But if you think the billionaire class only plays one side of the political aisle, you are sorely mistaken.

48:20They will happily buy off Democratic politicians, too, the type who can say just enough to appease the populist mood, have a shot at the White House, but who will reliably come through for billionaire interest when it really counts. And I think they may have found their perfect candidate. And Emily, there's a lot of very interesting politics at play here because it is not lost on me that this sudden interest in taxing wealth comes right on the heels of the DSA victories in New New York City. Newsom has been very late to the party on all sorts of like he does not have his finger on the pulse of what's going on.

48:56His initial reaction after Donald Trump was elected, it was like, let me have Steve Bannon and Charlie Kirk on my show, not to debate them, but to just be like, let me let's be buddies and let me hear you out. He quickly reversed course when he realized that people hated that and he positioned himself as this like anti-Trump resistance warrior. He is now very belatedly realizing that this conception of him, this justified conception of him as just like a tool of donors and billionaires is going to be an issue for him. And this is his solution. This sort of like basket of, you know, of lame proposals and studiously avoiding the well tax and trying to position like you're a real warrior here.

49:31That is his response.

49:32Emily Jashinsky:So in a Democratic primary in 2028, his baggage is very real because so much of it is going to be focused on the anti oligarchy tone that you hear people like John Ossoff sounding, which is interestingly enough that you're seeing it from somebody like John Ossoff. But Gavin Newsom right now is under federal investigation from the Trump administration. It is absolutely lawfare. It is targeted. All of that is true. His wife has been running a genuine grift where she's getting all of these corporate donations into her nonprofit companies from the companies that Newsom regulates as governor, PG &E, Comcast, AT &T.

50:10Emily Jashinsky:They're all donating, of course, Newsom's French laundry scandal was because he was dining with a guy who was wrapped up in the PG &E case after the Paradise fire. Newsom has been horrible. He's the definition of a crony capitalist. And so as he then tries to sell, and ABC 10 did a great investigative series on Newsom and PG &E, and people obviously were killed in the camp. Horrible, horrible, horrible situations, shameless management of PG &E from Gavin Newsom. And he then has to go out there and try to make this almost Trumpian argument about Kushner and the Trump sons and Trump himself, which he's tried to do.

50:53Emily Jashinsky:But it reminds me of Trump in 2016 coming out against Hillary Clinton, being like, I know the system, so I alone can fix it. Newsom's not going to do that. He's not going to admit that he has a problem. And for whatever reason, it worked back in 2016 for Trump. But in the primary, that is not going to work for Gavin Newsom because he is going to be hammered over and over again over his relationships with these massive corporations. And good luck, because that's a real problem, especially if you're not going to get on board with Roe's plan, which pretty much I think every Democratic candidate is going to be pressured to get on board with.

51:26Yeah. Something like that. Roe immediately jumped in to do a press conference. And look, I mean, kudos to him because it's not comfortable going against, like, he is the most powerful Democrat in the state of California. He is the Democratic governor. And he jumps out to, you know, immediately call him out and say, look, this is hypocritical. Like, if you support a well tax, then we have one right here that's actually actionable versus this other stuff that you're peddling, which is not a well tax and also is not workable. Yeah, he's not going to do it. And that part is actually really important because I mentioned that he ran one of his governor's campaigns on I'm going to be the guy that does single payer health care and partly got elected because we were like, great, we support that.

52:07And then maneuvered, it looks like, behind the scenes to make sure that even though it had, you know, majority support in the California House and Senate, that it just never came up. So he was able to thwart it from behind the scenes. And, you know, he takes money from various interests, corporate interests in the state. That is his base of support. And he recognizes that he needs to sort of cover the fact that that's his base of support. He thought it would be enough to do the, you know, the very aggressive anti-Trump, which I support, by the way. But especially when California cities were being like invaded by National Guard and it was the flashpoint and whatever.

52:45That really raised his steam in the eyes of Democratic voters. But I think you're right. Personally, I believe when push comes to shove and people really dig in on where are you on oligarchy and maybe more important, where are you on Israel? It's going to be a problem for him. Huge. And you've already seen him stumble multiple times on this. Again, he knows it's kind of an issue. He's not really sure what to do about it. And there is no squaring the circle of like where the bulk of the donors are on that issue versus where the Democratic base is. So what we're seeing in these primaries is there are some real vulnerabilities there, even though he continues to be pretty high in terms of when you poll Democratic primary voters on who they would like to see.

53:23Emily Jashinsky:He's the like he sees his lane. All right. So you watch American Psycho, you think of Patrick Bateman, you're like, yeah, that guy would vote for Trump. Right. Gavin Newsom's like, oh, I am the anti-Trump Patrick Bateman. This is my lane. I am going to be the creepy, slimy elite who's actually anti-Trump. And what's going to work about that is it's going to make my trolling of Trump even more successful. Like, I'm going to get under Trump's skin. I'm going to be the guy that undoes his legacy, but with, like, the perfectly gelled hair and the nicest suit that you can imagine. And it's going to be the ultimate troll.

54:01Emily Jashinsky:I don't think anybody is going to want that. I mean, maybe some small percentage of a Democratic base is going to be like, yes, this guy is Trumpian and can get it done and actually set us back on the right course because he's so, I don't know, part of the establishment and he's going to be able to manipulate. Yeah, exactly. Again, will that work with some people? Maybe. It's not enough to win a primary, at least as of the way he's executing it right now, because it comes across as like playing into, he looks like he would be friends with Jared Kushner, right? And nobody believes that he actually literally married to Kimberly Gilmore.

54:36Emily Jashinsky:He was literally married to Kimberly Gilmore. And nobody actually believes that he's against the system, right? Like nobody believes he's an enemy of the system that he's mad about. He just doesn't like these particular people in the system. Yeah. And even that is like, I don't know that he really hears that. You know what I mean? Like in terms of his politics, he needs to aggressively push against them. But yeah, no, No, I mean, the point I think that people need to really take in is the AI tech oligarchs right now, they got their man in the White House. They're getting basically everything they want, right?

55:09All the regulations rolled back. Trump was ready to sign some executive order, which would have lightly regulated them. David Sachs swoops in. Nope, that thing is killed. Not happening. There are some interesting developments we'll probably cover tomorrow that are happening in AI right now. But in any case, that doesn't mean that they aren't also looking for avenues in the Democratic Party. And so you're going to see candidates like Newsom and others who may sound some good notes about, oh, I'm concerned about this, I'm concerned about that. But you dig one level deeper and maybe the tech oligarchs aren't getting 100 percent of what they want, but they're probably getting like 90 percent of what they want, 95 percent of what they want.

55:45Just with a kinder, gentler frame put around it of we're less crazy than the Republicans. And that really is the role that he serves for them. So I want people to be very aware of that as they watch him try to position himself for 2028.

55:59Emily Jashinsky:Crystal's on the beat. There you go. Not going to give it up. All right, guys. Thank you so much for joining us today. And again, very excited about this newsletter. First edition comes out today. Look at this adorable graphic they made of me and Sagar. Stay ahead of this headlines. Go subscribe. Breakingpoints.com. Premium subscribers. You will get this automatically along with the entire show uncut as usual. But, guys, you can go and subscribe for free, and you will get most of what is in the newsletter. Anyway, you know, the top blocks and what we're focused on for the day, a little bit of, you know, information, a little bit of quotes from the show, some links to the source materials that we use.

56:40So, like I said before, go ahead and subscribe. Also, give us your feedback, what you think of the product and whether you find it useful, ways we could update it to make it even more useful and interesting to you.

56:50Emily Jashinsky:We're going to get to work on it right now. We absolutely are. And Sagar is being lazy as hell this week. So I'll be back tomorrow. Yep. More Hoshio tomorrow. Love that gardening. We'll see you then.

57:17When it comes to advancing your education, you have more options than you think. At Rasmussen University, we find ways to remove barriers, not build them. Like a new laptop if you're eligible and enroll in select online or on-campus programs. That means flexible and engaging online courses and resources, tuition savings options if you qualify, exceptional student support, and much more. Online nationally or check out their 20 campuses across six states. Start when you're ready and get the support you need. Visit rasmussen.edu. Hi, it's Karen in Georgia from My Favorite Murder. We cruised around L.A.

57:50in the Hyundai Ioniq 5 and dove into the fascinating life of actress and inventor Hedy Lamarr. Want the full story? Take a listen. She starts dating Howard Hughes. And in fact, she helps him design a faster plane. So she finds the fastest bird and the fastest fish and sketches out a drawing of what the two would look like as a plane. And that becomes the plane that we know today. And he calls her a genius. Check out our new episode spotlighting groundbreaking innovators like Hedy Lamarr and Billie Jean King. Presented by the Hyundai Ioniq 5. Goodbye. Running a business shouldn't feel like surviving a software group project.

58:27One app for accounting, another for inventory, another for sales. And somehow, none of them talk to each other. That's where Odoo comes in. An all-in-one business management software that brings every part of your business together. From sales and accounting to inventory and marketing. All in one powerful platform. No messy integrations, no bouncing between tabs. And best of all, no spreadsheets. Stop managing software and start managing your business with one unified system. Try for free today at odoo.com slash iHeartRadio. That's odoo.com slash iHeartRadio. This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human.