In short
Discussion of political news and media controversies, focusing on (1) NYT coverage of Zoran Mamdani’s college application race selections, (2) immigration enforcement backlash illustrated by “Alligator Alcatraz” detention ideas and Home Depot-style raids, and (3) Gaza ceasefire/aid negotiations ahead of Trump meeting Netanyahu, including claims about aid distribution violence.
Guests/backgrounds
No formal guest list in the transcript. Hosts are Sagar and Crystal (Breaking Points). Other figures discussed: Steve Bannon (commentary clip), Curtis Sliwa (Republican nominee), Tim Dillon and Joe Rogan (podcast clips), and Jeremy Scahill (co-founder of The Drop Site News) interviewed about Netanyahu/Trump/Gaza.
Key claims
- NYT allegedly used hacked Columbia application info from a “race and IQ” Substack/X figure to attack Mamdani; hosts argue Mamdani followed the application system and that NYT sourcing standards are inconsistent.
- Immigration raids target non-criminals (e.g., construction workers/day laborers/students) and are framed as “humane” via alligator-themed detention; hosts argue this reflects Stephen Miller’s ideology and mass detention expansion.
- Gaza ceasefire talks hinge on Hamas demands for stronger language preventing renewed assaults and unrestricted aid flow without Israeli-controlled “Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.”
Notable examples
- Mamdani reportedly checked “Asian” and “Black/African-American” on a 2009–2010 Columbia application; NYT story framed as scandal; Eric Adams cited the same boxes.
- “Alligator Alcatraz” concept; Home Depot day-laborer raids; ICE actions against Palestinian student activism.
- Gaza: Trump’s ceasefire proposal; Hamas objections about aid distribution and troop withdrawal; Jeremy Scahill describes aid-trap allegations and ongoing violence around aid points.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOZoran Mamdani and Steve Bannon's Perspective
0:00 to 0:29
Analysis of Zoran Mamdani's political campaign and its implications.
“Want to know you're on the best path to the right car?”
Zoran Mamdani and Steve Bannon's Perspective
2:08 to 6:27
Analysis of Zoran Mamdani's political campaign and its implications.
“Let's talk here about Zoran Mamdani and the New York Times because this is an interesting story.”
The New York Times Controversy
6:27 to 13:19
A discussion on the New York Times' reporting of Mamdani's identity.
“And I think what Bannon is recognizing and again, like I've seen an interesting discourse on the right about Mom Donnie since he won.”
Curtis Sliwa's Reactions and Political Pressure
13:19 to 14:00
Exploring Curtis Sliwa's stance on Zoran Mamdani amidst political tensions.
“I think it exposes sort of the absurdities of the critical theory that Mamdani and his father actually wax poetic about and believe really deeply in.”
New York Times Critique of Zohran Mamdani
14:00 to 19:10
Discussion on the New York Times' critical approach towards Zohran Mamdani's candidacy and identity.
“But the New York Times doesn't believe what I believe.”
New York Times Critique of Zohran Mamdani
20:17 to 20:50
Discussion on the New York Times' critical approach towards Zohran Mamdani's candidacy and identity.
“We know kids don't hold back, and I wouldn't want them to.”
Tim Dillon's Take on Immigration Policies
20:51 to 28:00
Analysis of Tim Dillon's humorous take on Trump's immigration policies and the concept of 'Alligator Alcatraz'.
“His aggressive approach to immigration is not one of them.”
Immigration Policy and Public Perception
28:00 to 40:42
Discussion on the impact of immigration policies and public sentiment during the Trump administration.
“federal law enforcement agency, as I said before, larger than the military budget of places like Brazil and Israel.”
Trump and Netanyahu Meeting Analysis
41:51 to 42:05
Jeremy Scahill discusses the implications of Trump's meeting with Netanyahu.
“So to analyze this and the possibility of any sort of a ceasefire deal and what's going on in Iran and all sorts of other things, we're lucky to be joined by Jeremy Scahill, of course, co-founder of DropSite News.”
Ceasefire Proposals and Negotiations
42:05 to 45:15
Explore the implications of Trump's ceasefire proposal and Hamas's demands.
“So let me just start with that question.”
Show all 15 chapters
Hamas's Language Demands
45:15 to 48:21
Understanding the significance of the language Hamas seeks in agreements.
“sort of comes to the table and says, you got to have the stronger language, we'll agree to the stronger language, but wink, wink, that's a stronger language.”
Gaza Humanitarian Foundation Controversy
48:21 to 51:16
Discussion on the activities and claims about the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.
“Gaza Humanitarian Foundation that has been running these aid traps and, you know, corresponding massacres.”
Media Portrayal and Palestinian Reactions
51:16 to 55:52
Analyzing the media's portrayal of a new Palestinian peace offer and its implications.
“First of all, we have to understand this not as an independent entity, but as an agent of the Israeli state.”
The U.S.-Israel-Iran Relationship
56:00 to 59:28
Explore the complex dynamics of U.S. support for Israel's actions against Iran.
“I haven't had a chance to watch it, but I'm seeing some of the clips floating around.”
The U.S.-Israel-Iran Relationship
1:00:06 to 1:00:32
Explore the complex dynamics of U.S. support for Israel's actions against Iran.
“What it sounds like when you road trip to the iHeartRadio Music Festival in the all new Hyundai Palisade Hybrid.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Jeremy Scahill:This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human. Want to know you're on the best path to the right car? At CarMax, the price you see is the price you pay. No negotiating, no last-minute surprises. Every car is CarMax certified and backed by a 10-day money-back guarantee, so you can buy with confidence. Want to shop from home? Go for it. You can come in when you're ready, take it for a spin, and buy however works for you. No pressure, no haggling, just the right car. Your way. Visit CarMax.com for details. Want to drive? CarMax. We know kids don't hold back, and I wouldn't want them to. Get in there, make a mess, slide for home, bring on the stains.
0:40I've got OxyClean Versatile Stain Remover. It works on over 100 stains, and it's America's number one stain fighter additive brand. It's color-safe and chlorine-free, so I use it on whites, colors, and dark fabrics. And OxyClean isn't just for laundry. Mix it with water for use all around the house, kitchens, bathrooms, and even floors. When my kids go all in, I say go for it, because I've got OxiClean to get the stains out. It's not clean unless it's OxiClean. For curb appeal that lasts, shop Labor Day Extra Big Deals at Lowe's. For a limited time, get 50 % off all Holland pavers. Plus, save$110 on the Ego Power Plus 56-volt 2.5-amp-hour blower-trimmer combo kit.
1:22Now just$249. Labor Day deals are on now at Lowe's. In-store and online. Valid through 9-7. While supplies last, selection varies by location. Holland Papers offer excludes Alaska and Hawaii. Hey guys, Sagar and Crystal here.
1:36Jeremy Scahill:Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election, and we are so excited about what that means for the future of this show. This is the only place where you can find honest perspectives from the left and the right that simply does not exist anywhere else. So if that is something that's important to you, please go to breakingpoints.com, become a member today, and you'll get access to our full shows, unedited, ad-free, and all put together for you every morning in your inbox. We need your help to build the future of independent news media, and we hope to see you at breakingpoints.com.
2:08Jeremy Scahill:Let's talk here about Zoran Mamdani and the New York Times because this is an interesting story. So before we jump into the New York Times piece, we have to get a little bit of Steve Bannon's take on Zoran. So much Bannon in today's show. So much Bannon. And by the way, I do want to just say like Bannon has taken a lot of L's. So I don't want to overstate his importance, but I just I always think it's interesting to hear his thoughts because he does have a better grasp, I think, of the political moment than many others. Let me just say anecdotally, someone who was recently on War Room told me like after they went on War Room immediately, they had, I think, like within a couple of minutes, 100 plus new followers on X.
2:50And so Bannon has like it's still true that your average ex-user is exceptional from the average American because not most people are on Twitter and most people aren't watching. Most people are not watching Steve Bannon. But he does actually have a really, I think, strong tether to the MAGA base itself. I think the like hardcore MAGA, Bannon still sets the tone for them. That is not a majority of the American public, but it's a small group that he does have a lot of sway with and listens to him every day.
3:21Jeremy Scahill:Yeah. But I mean, usually what he uses his sway for is, yeah, he'll protest in advance about, let's say, Medicaid cuts or about the tax cuts for the rich. Trump decides. Or about Elon, and then once Trump decides and does whatever, then Bannon's role becomes explaining to the MAGA base why actually this is fine. Trust him. And why you have to trust the plan, and why, oh, well, he must have attacked Iran because he had more intelligence than we did, and we just have to trust this guy. So that is actually the role that he serves. Nevertheless, his analysis of Zoran Pandani was a lot more interesting and intelligent than the people who were claiming that he's going to, like, implement Sharia law in Manhattan.
3:57Jeremy Scahill:Let's go ahead and take a listen to a little bit of what he had to say. That's one of the most sophisticated races. And he focused on affordability and he addressed their issues. Now his response, he took the the the the the anger of the moment of populism and got engaged with people. Cuomo ran a traditional thing. This kid ran a very sophisticated campaign, a very sophisticated campaign on the grassroots. And we can put the next piece up on the screen. I mean, he talked also about how the messaging was intelligent. He said that Mamdani's diagnosis of New York's affordability crisis sounds quite similar to Bannon's description of America as the two seem to agree on 70 percent.
4:36Jeremy Scahill:Bannon says 50 percent, but that's still a lot. Politics today is all about authenticity. Mamdani's campaign was today's equivalent of Barack Obama's. He's walking down grocery aisles chatting on TikTok. He accepted every interview request, relied on grassroots organizing.
4:58Jeremy Scahill:I wish that were true. Mamdani blew it up. I wish that were true. Do you share the conservative view that an unabashed socialist in support of the Palestinian cause is a gift to Trump? Bannon shakes his head. You shed more tears for answered prayers than unanswered prayers, he replies. Mamdani can bring people out. Populism is the future of politics. So he sees him as basically like and I do think that I don't want to understate actually the significance of Mamdani's victory because being able to run as an unabashed anti-Zionist in New York City and win is an earthquake. And you have a huge schism in the Democratic between the Democratic base and Democratic elites.
5:41Jeremy Scahill:I do not think that most people vote on Gaza, but I do think that Gaza is becoming a litmus test issue for the Democratic base, which says to people, does this person have a shred of integrity? Are they willing to stand up against, you know, political forces or, you know, well-organized, well-funded forces and actually fight for something? And it is the sort of schism between the base and the elite of the party that, you know, it's the sort of thing that Trump actually exploited in his 2016 victory. And I think there is going to be a real reckoning with that in 2028, not to mention, of course, the economic pieces that everyone is like, you know, melting down about the grocery stores and the rent freeze, etc.
6:26Jeremy Scahill:and the overt embrace of like, yes, I'm a democratic socialist and that's just who I am and I'm not running away from it whatsoever. No, I think that's right. And I think what Bannon is recognizing and again, like I've seen an interesting discourse on the right about Mom Donnie since he won. Because you notice there Bannon was talking to Marjorie Taylor Greene. Right. Who posted the initial hilarious meme of the Statue of Liberty and what, like a full burqa? Yes. Yeah. And there've been there was this like initial reflex to just be completely grossed out, icked out by Mamdani that people like Bannon started to, I think, change a bit.
7:13And you've seen it's not like it's the whole right is embracing Mom Donnie, but you've seen this interesting strain. And I think it's probably in part due to new media, this interesting strain of people being like, whoa, look at what he did with young voters and millennials in New York City. Shocking. Like we have this information right in front of us. That's like a pretty clear sign that he was he was speaking to something. And it's just not only a smart observation by Bannon, but I don't think it's an easy one to make right now. He can make it because he's sort of seen as like a godfather-like figure, but not an easy point to make at all.
7:54Jeremy Scahill:All right. Let's talk about The New York Times. So they published this big scoop that they apparently raced to the presses because they wanted to beat Chris Rufo. Yes. Who is also chasing down the same story. Let's put this up on the screen. they reveal exclusively that Mamdani identified as both Asian and African-American on his college application to Columbia. Specifically, they says he doesn't consider himself black, but he said the application did not allow for the complexity of his background. They included the specific, you know, form and how he checked the box showing these are the questions Columbia opposed to applicants about race and ethnicity during the 2009-2010 application cycle when he applied and he indicated he was both Black or African American and Asian.
8:44Jeremy Scahill:Okay, now, a little quick refresher on his background here. He was born in Uganda. He was, and his family had been in Uganda for generations. There were a bunch of Indian laborers who were brought over by the British in the early 1800s to do basically, like, you know, slave labor in Uganda or indentured Observatory in Uganda. And it became this thriving diaspora community that ends up being actually quite successful within Uganda. And so his family is part of that history. Obviously, he's also South Asian being, you know, ethnically from the Indian subcontinent. So he marks these two boxes and they are acting like this is sort of a giant scandal.
9:29Jeremy Scahill:There were three reporters put on it. One of them was a health reporter, by the way, at a time when people are like losing Medicaid and hospitals or rural hospitals are under attack. And this is what they're focused on. In addition, you may ask yourself, well, how did they how did they come upon this information? Emily, where did they where did they get this from? And we can put C3 up on this on the screen. They got it from this guy who posts as a crime. He runs a sub stack. He's also very prominent on X. Your French is beautiful, Crystal. Thank you very much. Merci. He focuses a lot, Emily, on race and IQ.
10:07Jeremy Scahill:Quote unquote academic who focuses a lot on race and IQ prominently featured post there seeks to defend the argument that average national IQs vary by up to 40 points with countries in Europe, North America, East Asia at the high end, countries in the global south at the low end and several African countries purportedly having average national IQs at a level that experts associate with mental impairment. So basically, he's your sort of average Twitter racist that got a hold of these hacked documents from Colombia. Now, listen, I am not against news organizations using hacked material, even if it comes from a sketchy source.
10:41Jeremy Scahill:But you know who has been against that in the past? That would be the New York Times who refused to report on, for example, the Iranian hacks of Trump campaign documents, including the J.D. Vance dossier and refused to publish it, in part, apparently, because of the source of those hacks. In addition, when they first put out this report, they really glossed over who this guy was. They called him like an academic who's opposed to affirmative action, when in reality he's just like a brazen racist that, you know, posts like your average Twitter racist posts ultimately. I didn't go back and look at his feed.
11:19Is it bad? It's exactly what you expect. Yeah. So it's also I mean, this whole story is we tease this at the beginning of the show's so many layers to peel back. The first of which is like, I don't I think it's pretty clear that Mom Donnie was playing by the rules that we as a society set for college applications for a very long time. Correct. Now, I don't know. I mean, if we're if you're if you're going to do and say all of these different identities are important and material to whether or not you belong academically at Columbia, I would probably disagree with a system like that. at the same time, that is the system that existed.
12:05What's actually somewhat remarkable, Crystal, is that with all of that, he didn't get into Colombia, apparently. You couldn't come up with a bigger parody of affirmative action system on paper than the Zora Mamdani application being like... Well, the Asian part might have killed him. That's right. Maybe he should have left that off. So this is really a story about him being...
12:24Jeremy Scahill:But then if you just claim you're black, then that... I mean, I think it's what he said, And I think it's reasonable. And I also think it's reasonable to say, like, you know, he was putting what he thought would be beneficial for him on a college application, as one does. But I think when he was like, these boxes don't really fit my identity. And I think that's fair. His identity is complex. He talks about it a lot. It's something his, you know, his dad is a professor of these sorts of things. And they clearly thought deeply about it. So I also don't think it was casually done. He sees himself as like he is from Uganda.
12:59Jeremy Scahill:His family is from Uganda for multiple generations. But he also. He's what E.D. Amin. Right. Yeah. But he, you know, also is, you know, has this Indian ethnic heritage. So to check both those boxes, like, I'm not really sure how else he should have filled out that form. I completely agree. And I think it's the problem. I mean, so from my position on this, and I bet it would have been Rufo's position on this. I think it exposes sort of the absurdities of the critical theory that Mamdani and his father actually wax poetic about and believe really deeply in. At the same time, he has a much stronger claim to both of these heritages than somebody like, and I'm going to use this as a proxy and I know it's cringy, but Elizabeth Warren, who many such cases, like she's an example of something that's happened for decades in college admissions.
13:42And I just think it all like exposes the absurdity of this and how immaterial and silly that it can be to insist that by checking off these boxes, you know a significant amount about the person based on it. And you can make a determination as to whether they belong at your school. I mean, I think it's all just absurd. But the New York Times doesn't believe what I believe. So it's like an incredibly funny. It's just an incredibly funny anecdote or not even an anecdote, like an experiment in them having to. It's because it's the Ramamdani. The New York Times has decided that they're going to apply a very critical lens.
14:17Jeremy Scahill:You might say they're waging a jihad against him in the language of Kirsten Gillibrand. Let me I want to jump to Curtis Lee here, who is the Republican nominee for, you know, in this race. And by the way, there's so much billionaire pressure on him. Bill Ackman is going to bat to try to get Sliwa out of this race so that Eric Adams or Andrew Cuomo, I guess. Who did he get behind Adams or Cuomo? I forgot. Anyway, one of them can consolidate and ride to victory over Zoran Mamdani. In any case, Liwa gets asked about this on Fox News, and I'm sure Fox News was expecting him to attack Zoran over this, and he chose not to do that.
14:55Jeremy Scahill:So let's go ahead and take a listen to C7. I do know he is a practicing Muslim, and I've advised our colleagues, which there are many on our side of this issue, because we know Zoran will destroy this city. Do not attack his religion. Leave the religion alone. If you don't want to see him elected, there are a million Muslims in New York City who can vote, many of them with conservative values, many of them who voted for Donald Trump for president. So you can criticize that background, the center of his campaign. Right. You can criticize him as being a communist, socialist, anti-Semite, Czech. But leave the religion alone.
15:31Now, he would consider himself Southeast Asian, although he's of Indian heritage, his mother and father. He grew up in Uganda. So I guess you could sort of put it in the blender. I don't have a problem with how he self-identified.
15:46Jeremy Scahill:Put it in a blender, Emily. That is, to me, also such a New York response. You know? And, I mean, you say a lot of things about Curtis Lewa, who I used to be on a bunch of Fox panels with, I told you. So I've, like, met him a few times in real life. But he is a New Yorker. And so he's looking at this. He's like, don't attack him because he's Muslim and because of his identity. Like, you want to go after him, you know, talk about his policies and whatever. But yeah, he's from Uganda. He's Muslim. He's Indian. He's all those things. Put him in the blender. However, he self-identifies. Whatever. Who cares?
16:13Jeremy Scahill:How is this really the issue? Producer Mack went viral for posting that video and saying Sliwa just outwoke to the New York Times. True. So funny. I mean, it is a point in favor of the like race is a social construct. Well, it's a point in favor of that, absolutely. And I have always taken that as being a point in favor of not using it as such a material of such material importance in certain processes like affirmative action, for example. But we don't necessarily have to have that debate. It's just funny. No, I mean, I don't actually disagree with you on that. Let's go and put let's see. I think The New York Times response is C5 because they clearly their common section was furious with them.
16:53Jeremy Scahill:They took a lot of heat over this because I mean, think about this. They used hack documents from a quote unquote race realist to to rush out this piece. They were apparently rushed it out because they were trying to beat Chris Rufo to the punch. Like, what are you doing? In any case, this is one of the reporters, Patrick Healy, talking about why they did. And this is so funny. He says sometimes sources have their own motives or obtain information using means we wouldn't like Trump's taxes, WikiLeaks or Edward Snowden. It's important to share what we can about sourcing. We always independently assess newsworthiness.
17:26Jeremy Scahill:Okay, you are comparing this to WikiLeaks' exposure of war crimes or Edward Snowden's exposure of mass surveillance. That's what Zoran's Columbia application race selection. You're comparing that to WikiLeaks. And again, just to reiterate, it would be great if the New York Times had a consistent standard here. They do not. They do not. So what is the standard ultimately? Because apparently sometimes it matters whether it's hacked and who it comes from. And sometimes when they just want to go after a particular candidate, then it doesn't matter and they're happy to use hacked documents from wherever they come.
18:05I mean, from my perspective, I can't help but enjoy this because it's a story of such little consequence that I have to laugh my way through the entire thing.
18:15Jeremy Scahill:They are embarrassing. They're absolutely embarrassing. They're a mess. Last piece I'll put up here. We've got Eric Adams, you know, grabbing onto this. And a lot of people commented, too. This is C8, guys. You can put up on the screen. A lot of people were noting that in the primary, Cuomo was like a Cuomo aligned super pack to be specific here. was like darkening Zoran's skin and like ramping up his beard to make him look like scarier. And now in the wake of this story, they're trying to like lighten his skin and make him look more like, oh, he's just, you know, basically a white guy. And so Eric Adams says Zoran Mamdani identified as Asian, African-American.
19:00Jeremy Scahill:He's got the picture there of him checking Asian and African-American. So whatever. Yeah. There you go. It's like how you just have to enjoy it. You just have to enjoy it. Incredible. All right, let's go ahead and get to Tim Dillon and Joe Rogan. Hey, it's Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. Now, I was looking for fun ways to tell you that Mint's offer of unlimited premium wireless for$15 a month is back. So I thought it would be fun if we made$15 bills. But it turns out that's very illegal. So there goes my big idea for the commercial. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch.
19:43What it sounds like when you road trip to the iHeartRadio Music Festival in the all-new Hyundai Palisade Hybrid.
19:51Jeremy Scahill:Wow, this is really nice inside. The Palisade Hybrid has more luxury than ever. Whoa, this sound system is awesome. Turn it up. More tech than ever. Sweet, you got the available built-in dash cam? and more range than ever because the Palisade Hybrid gets up to 600-plus miles of range on a full tank. So do we ever have to stop for gas? Visit HyundaiUSA.com or call 562-314-4603 for more details. We know kids don't hold back, and I wouldn't want them to. Get in there, make a mess, slide for home, bring on the stains. I've got OxyClean Versatile Stain Remover. It works on over 100 stains, and it's America's number one stain fighter additive brand.
20:30It's color safe and chlorine free. So I use it on whites, colors and dark fabrics. And OxyClean isn't just for laundry. Mix it with water for use all around the house, kitchens, bathrooms and even floors. When my kids go all in, I say go for it because I've got OxyClean to get the stains out. It's not clean unless it's OxyClean.
20:49Jeremy Scahill:So we have continued to see some concerns raised from the sort of bro podcast sphere that had been pro-Trump leading up to his election and specifically over the issue of immigration, which, to be honest with you, is a little bit of a surprise to me because there are lots of things in Trump 2.0 that I think it's reasonable to have been surprised by. His aggressive approach to immigration is not one of them. They were literally holding up mass deportation now signs at the RNC. Nevertheless, it's good to see that there are concerns being raised here, you know, with people who maybe will be influential among a large sort of more independent base.
21:26Jeremy Scahill:Let's go ahead and start with Tim Dillon and some of what he had to say. You're collecting people that are law abiding, that have been in the country a very long time, that have committed no crime. You're picking people up in church parking lots at high school graduations. It's inhumane. And I think a lot of people feel that way. But in fairness to the Trump team They did think of this And say What if
21:59We put them all In a prison Surrounded by alligators Would that make it feel more humane Like I think Trump and his people were like Sure People find these raids to be a bit abrupt and, you know, soulless, unkind. But if we then took the people we swept up and put them in a prison built in an alligator swamp, would that make people feel better? It's a great way, I think, to show that it's not just a heartless, policy, it's a policy that we've put a lot of thought into.
22:51Jeremy Scahill:So there you go. Tim Dillon's take on alligator Alcatraz. Like, oh, your policy that was already dreadfully unpopular of snatching up like innocent people who've been paying their taxes, been here for years and years from a Home Depot. This will make it better. I'm sure that will mess that we're serious about this. And he goes on a whole thing, too, about how, you know, there are many other types of deadly animals throughout the U.S. Like, why not put them inside of, like, a shark, literal shark tank down in the ocean with the sharks swimming around? Maybe we could get some, like, grizzly bears involved.
Read the full transcript
23:23Jeremy Scahill:So in any case, it's interesting to me, Emily, that, I mean, first of all, it's interesting to me that anyone was surprised by this direction from the Trump administration, given that you've got Stephen Miller running the show. And running the show and even more like I think he has completely taken over this portfolio in a way even beyond what was the case in the 2016 Trump. But given the first administration, given the rhetoric on the campaign trail and, you know, given the like explicit promises that were made that this was going to be a focus. I know Trump claimed that, oh, well, this will just be focused on.
23:58Jeremy Scahill:He didn't say just be focused on criminals, but he made it seem like the focus of the policy would be on a mass criminal illegal alien population. They said first over and over again. That's what we would do first. Definitely not the case. But also they projected, they made it seem like, you know, the vast majority of undocumented immigrants were in fact criminals, which is just not reality. So I think that's where, you know, they're running up against the difference between the projection of the Trump campaign and the way this was portrayed. And then the actual reality of seeing moms, dads, neighbors, people who have lived in this country and caused no problem, committed no crimes, done all the right things, even people who were actually following the process and trying to apply for asylum and showing up for their hearings and all of those things.
24:53Jeremy Scahill:This is the same thing that happened really in the first Trump administration as well, where mass immigration has never been more popular than it was during the first Trump administration. Which is why then you had every 2020 Democrat running on a very pro-immigration and a very relaxed border policy. And Biden particularly talked tough about border security and all of that. But they were telegraphing. The signaling over and over again was that this would be a much more lenient and welcoming administration. And so, yeah, I mean, we should roll this Rogan clip as well because it echoes Tim Dillon.
25:30I mean, to your point, Crystal, this is one of those political, I don't want to say conundrums, but it is kind of a conundrum for the GOP, which the Republican base is very different from the rest of the country. The Trump base, I should say, actually, is very different from the rest of the country on the question of mass deportation. So it polls very differently depending on what you're looking at. When you get it, and you've pointed this out a lot, when you get into the specifics of what, quote unquote, mass deportation looks like, people are less supportive than when you just use the phrase mass deportation.
26:03But this is really, really important to the Republican base. People like Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller believe that you never have the same country again if there isn't a process of mass deportations over the course of the Trump administration. And their definition of mass deportation is really undoing the entire Biden era, which will involve basically if you wanted to take eight million, if you wanted to deport the eight million estimated people who came in at least during the Biden administration. First of all, that's not all illegal immigration. A lot of it was legalized by the Biden administration, which created the asylum process and will not create it, but expanded the asylum process and made it really easy.
26:43They did not detain people and let them into the interior of the country while their asylum hearings waited because there were so many people. And so to undo that, you're talking about tens of thousands of deportations a week. If you wanted to do it in a year, it would be like 20 ,000 deportations a day at least. So it's not going to – I think they always knew it wouldn't be what the public looked like. It wouldn't be congruent with the public's expectation when you hear mass deportations. and you see that juxtaposed with constant rhetoric about criminality and all of that, it's going to look different in practice.
27:16Jeremy Scahill:And they want to go further than just rolling back what happened during the Biden administration. I mean, you have a memo from the DOJ talking about let's prioritize denaturalizing U.S. citizens. I mean, that goes far beyond. You genuinely, I mean, Stephen Miller is a genuine ideologue who wants a white ethnostate. And anyone who doesn't fit his category of what an American should be, he thinks should be fair game. to get out of the country. And so that is, you know, the project that they're embarking on. And as aggressive as the raids have been so far, you now also have the one big beautiful bill that floods ICE with resources, where they're supposed to have 10 ,000 ICE agents, largest federal law enforcement agency, as I said before, larger than the military budget of places like Brazil and Israel.
28:07Jeremy Scahill:Just a huge influx of resources, not to mention an extraordinary flooding of money to private prison contractors who will be setting up these mass detention centers. So in any case, you've already got the Tim Dillons and the Joe Rogans of the world somewhat uncomfortable with what's going on. Let's go ahead and roll what Joe Rogan had to say about this D2. We were told there would be no, well, there's two things that are insane. One is the targeting of migrant workers, not cartel members, not gang members, not drug dealers, just construction workers showing up in construction sites, raiding them, gardeners.
28:52Yeah. Like, really? Or Palestinian students on college campuses. or not like there's a turkey did you see this video of this uh turkish students at tufts university that wrote an essay and then uh there's a video of like ice agents like is that the woman yeah yeah yeah what was her essay about it was just critical of israel right yeah i mean and that's enough to get you kicked out of the country there's a there's a long history of of of anti-colonial activism in u.s colleges you know that led to to you know south africa changing and all of that. And I think this is a continuation of that.
29:30Jeremy Scahill:And Emily, it seems to me like there have been a few things that have really touched a nerve for people in the Trump 2.0 era with regard to the immigration policy. Number one is the, what they were talking about there, the kidnapping of Ramesa Ozturk, which happened on camera. You have these masked ICE agents. I think they were ICE agents. I don't even know what federal agency they came from, who came multiple of them, grabbed her off the street. And then lo and behold, we learn. What did she do? She wrote an op-ed for the student newspaper calling for the university to divest from Israel, like the most basic First Amendment protected call to activism, you know, and she, I think the visual.
30:11Jeremy Scahill:And not anti-American at all. No, no. And I think the visual of seeing her snatched off the street for that, I think that was really searing for people. Totally agree. I I think Kilmar Abrago Garcia and what happened there, he really became, you know, as you had him and hundreds of others, swept up no due process. And the Trump administration admits that this was they shouldn't have done this, that this was a wrongful deportation. And yet they're so committed to keeping him in this horrific slave labor camp dungeon in El Salvador. You know, I think that you can see in the poll numbers that the favorability of Trump on immigration really begins to decline there.
30:51Jeremy Scahill:And then the other thing that really touched a nerve for some reason was these Home Depot raids. And you have a moment with, you know, reportedly Stephen Miller goes to ICE and yells at them and says, why are you focusing on the criminals? I want to see you go to the 7-Elevens. I want to see you. He name checks at Home Depot specifically. And then you see an escalation in the tactics. That's what also leads to the anti-ice protests in places like L.A. But something about picking up the Home Depot day laborers really struck guys like Joe Rogan, guys like Tim Dillon, because I think it feels so familiar.
31:26Jeremy Scahill:These are not like, you know, the scary theoretical gang members who are out there terrorizing community. It's like, you know, Rogan has probably been to that L.A. Home Depot where that raid happened. He may have used some of those day laborers for some project around his house or something like. It just feels so suburban and so familiar that it's impossible to caricature these guys as some nasty menace to society in the way that the Stephen Millers and the Trumps of the world want to. Well, I was going to say, and this is another example of where that gulf is significant, because Rogan and Tim Dillon are wealthy independents.
32:00You talk to the kind of red meat Trump base, they are going to be all for Home Depot raids in the Stephen Miller. and Donald Trump is not quite on board with the Home Depot raids, by the way, because he's clearly been curing from the hospitality industry, construction industry, and is himself not sold on what we saw from, it was like Vallejo, where you had workers running through the fields when ICE was trying to make arrests. And that gulf is, I mean, it's not going anywhere because you have Stephen Miller making this his single priority. This is Bannon's, like, if Bannon is ranking his priorities, this is probably the literal top one because they actually believe that this is like the Jenga block that once it's pulled, everything crumbles.
33:01They really see it that way. And because of that, Donald Trump can say we're going to be lenient with hospitality workers and agricultural workers as much as he wants. But if they're going to be funding a bunch more detention centers like Alligator Alcatraz hasn't taken any money from FEMA so far, which is interesting because DeSantis did it on his own. Now ICE has all of this money and is going to be building more detention facilities. And most of those migrants who came in during the course of the Biden administration, if they are, quote, unquote, criminal, it's because they crossed the border twice, for example.
33:37Like they got deported and then recrossed or they didn't go to an asylum or whatever it is. Like that's what hasn't been followed. And for the average American, they're not going to like seeing those people rounded up and put in detention camps, let alone like shoddy ones that were constructed in a week. But the Trump base both demands it and loves it. And that's a huge political problem.
34:00Jeremy Scahill:Well, here's what I would say. Yes, the Trump base, they are not going to complain. They're going to delight in the, you know, alligator Alcatraz and the Home Depot raids and the, you know, whatever Trump does, they're going to be on board with. But whatever Trump does, they're going to be on board with. So if he wanted to moderate this policy at this point, he could. And I don't think he'd face any significant backlash from the base. There's no indication that there has ever been any significant backlash from the base over any Trump policy. You know, so I don't see him as they are beholden to him.
34:35Jeremy Scahill:He's not beholden to them at this point. And maybe there was a different point where that was the case. But I mean, the same as like I could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue. It's true. It's true. His base is with him. They will justify anything. We talked about the Epstein thing, even though there's been all this online, oh, my God, the Epstein and Trump's going to reveal it and blah, blah, blah. Him turning on a dime and being like, ah, no client list, nothing to see here. They're going to find a way to justify it. So I don't think he's really held hostage by the base. I think he has. I think. Well, he's held hostage to the extent that Stephen Miller is very powerful in the administration and Stephen Miller wants to do it.
35:09Jeremy Scahill:That's the point is I think he has outsourced this to Stephen Miller and Stephen Miller. and other things as well, by the way. And Stephen Miller's running it, and he's not really concerning himself too much with the details. And, you know, feels like, okay, I ran on mass deportation, and, you know, the only time he cares is when, yeah, some rich business owner calls him and is like, my farm workers are getting rounded up or I don't have my seasonal hospitality workers or whatever. And he'll express some concern. But then, you know, days later he'll go back on it and Stephen Miller's still doing his thing.
35:42Yeah, I think Stephen Miller is obsessed with the details of the policy, but not at all concerned about the politics of it because they see this, at least most of them, see this as a one-term administration. No, he is a true ideologue. Yeah, they see this as the second term. Trump doesn't have to run again and that this is their last chance to walk a lot of this back, walk what happened back during the Biden administration. And just as we were talking, Crystal, Tom Homan did a gaggle at the White House. And he said that deporting 3 ,000 people a day is, quote, not enough and said, for those that say 3 ,000 a day is too much, we have to arrest 7 ,000 every single day for the remainder of this administration just to catch the ones Biden released into the nation.
36:25And as we were just saying, I'm sure that math actually adds up because it was a really significant wave of immigration, the most significant since Ellis Island, as David Leonard had written for The New York Times not too long ago. So, yeah, I think those numbers add up. But the only people that really, really is going to relish seeing that is the slice of the country, this hardcore, diehard MAGA. And the rest of the country, it's not as though they're just going to be like whatever. However, they are going to be revolted by it and is going to be a huge shot in the arm for the Democratic Party and the left as they try to mobilize an opposition to Trump 2.0.
37:00But Stephen Miller understands that that's a risk that they, from his perspective, have to take for like to have the policy outcome that he and Tom Homan want. Yeah. The political risks, they believe, are well worth taking.
37:13Jeremy Scahill:Well, and Stephen Miller was going to be an anti-immigrant zealot, regardless of what happened during the Biden administration, how many immigrants came in, because he thinks it should be a white ethnostate. And he believes in that. He does. He believes. I mean, even Trump, I think, has acknowledged that Stephen Miller only wants white people here. Like, that is his policy. And you increasingly have people like Charlie Kirk who are out now admitting, like, we need to have zero immigration from the, what do you call it, the third world. which again is just like we don't want brown people here. So the mask is kind of off for some of these guys.
37:44Jeremy Scahill:And he is in control. It is ultimately his policy and he is running it. In terms of the political fallout, the last point I'll make on this is it's not just horror at what is being done to other people. It's also that when you have any federal law enforcement agency with this large of a budget, who are doing things like snatching people off the street because they wrote an op-ed, and who are saying they're going to prioritize denaturalizing American citizens, you very quickly realize that this thing does not stay confined, even among the immigrant population, even among the naturalized citizen population.
38:26Jeremy Scahill:You are constructing a mass surveillance state, a mass police state. And that will have reverberating impacts for everyone. We already have seen American citizens who got picked up and detained for hours and hours because they, you know, had the wrong, were in the wrong place and had the wrong, wrong level of melanin in their skin and look like they might be an immigrant. And even if they had their papers, they weren't believed or they weren't listened to and were detained. But this, the increase in the ICE budget means those things are going to be happening more and more regularly. Palantir wants to build their big database of absolutely everyone.
39:04Jeremy Scahill:I mean, this is a mass operation that if the Stephen Millers of the world get their way, like I said, it's not just going to be about the way it impacts immigrants, although that part is important as we, you know, are all human beings and deserve some level of human rights and dignity. It's also going to impact everyone in this country. So I think, we're kind of on the cusp of seeing that. And I think the best hope is just that there's a tremendous level of incompetence and they're not actually able to marshal the level of resources, the flooding of resources that they're being given. I mean, that's a pretty decent bet.
39:41Jeremy Scahill:That is a strong possibility of that. We've never seen a deportation effort on the scale in modern history. I mean, 7 ,000 a day per Tom Homan's point. Yes, they have a lot of money, But they also only have, what, three and a half years at this point to do it. It won't be popular with the public. So it's an uphill climb for them to be sure. That much we know. All right. Let's go ahead and get to Jeremy Scahill on Trump's meeting with Netanyahu this week. What it sounds like when you road trip to the iHeartRadio Music Festival in the all-new Hyundai Palisade Hybrid. Wow, this is really nice inside.
40:24The Palisade Hybrid has more luxury than ever.
40:27Jeremy Scahill:Whoa, this sound system is awesome. Turn it up. More tech than ever. Sweet. You got the available built-in dash cam? And more range than ever because the Palisade Hybrid gets up to 600-plus miles of range on a full tank. So do we ever have to stop for gas? Visit HyundaiUSA.com or call 562-314-4603 for more details. We know kids don't hold back. And I wouldn't want them to. Get in there. Make a mess. slide for home. Bring on the stains. I've got OxyClean Versatile Stain Remover. It works on over 100 stains and it's America's number one stain fighter additive brand. It's color safe and chlorine free.
41:04So I use it on whites, colors, and dark fabrics. And OxyClean isn't just for laundry. Mix it with water for use all around the house, kitchens, bathrooms, and even floors. When my kids go all in, I say go for it because I've got OxyClean to get the stains out. It's not clean unless it's OxyClean. Do you hear that? That sound, right? That means that summer's officially here. It means that grown adults just sprint into the street for a frozen dessert shaped like a cartoon. But this summer, Mint Mobile has a better treat. Every plan, including unlimited, is$15 a month. And unlike ice cream, it won't drip down your wrist or look nothing like the picture.
41:37Does anyone have any cash? Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch.
41:41Jeremy Scahill:Upfront payment of$45 for three months,$90 for six months, or$180 for 12-month plan required. $15 per month equivalent. Taxes and fees extra. New customer offer for initial plan term only greater than 50 gigabytes may slow when network is busy. See terms. So as we mentioned a couple of times earlier, Benjamin Netanyahu is in town this week in D.C. to meet with Trump once again. So to analyze this and the possibility of any sort of a ceasefire deal and what's going on in Iran and all sorts of other things, we're lucky to be joined by Jeremy Scahill, of course, co-founder of DropSite News. Great to see you again, Jeremy.
42:10Thanks for having me back.
42:11Jeremy Scahill:So let me just start with that question. What do you think is the consequence? What sort of things are going to be discussed at this meeting with Netanyahu and Trump? Well, you know, of course, Donald Trump has said this is the final proposal for a Gaza ceasefire. And what we've seen over the past week or so is a process where the Israelis have essentially been negotiating with themselves within Netanyahu's power structure on what positions they want to stake out. The proposal that Trump put forward was drafted in consultation with the Israelis, with primarily Ron Dermer, who is Netanyahu's lead official dealing with these negotiations.
42:47And Hamas, for its side, didn't do much in terms of revising the document, but they did zero in on three key things that they wanted changed. And basically, one of them is they want a bit stronger language from Donald Trump confirming that he will continue to force Israel to hold its fire beyond an initial 60-day period so that a permanent ceasefire can be declared. Israel has pushed back very hard on that. They want to be able to resume the military assault on Gaza after two months if Netanyahu decides that's what he wants to do. The second is that they wanted to have a reversion to the original ceasefire agreements map positions for Israeli forces to withdraw from Gaza.
43:29Netanyahu has been saying that he wants to stay in the south of Gaza, that they want to create a zone along the Egypt border and try to force all of the Palestinians, two million plus Palestinians, into this small sliver of the Gaza Strip. And then presumably they think that they would then fight a guerrilla war against Hamas fighters in the rest of the Gaza Strip. And then the final term that Hamas wanted changed had to do, and this is the one that I'm told this morning by Hamas officials, is most central right now in the negotiations. Hamas wants unrestricted aid to flow into Gaza, and they don't want this deadly aid scheme, cynically known as the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, to be in any way involved with the distribution of aid.
44:13So you have a delegation right now that Netanyahu grudgingly sent to Doha, Qatar. And I was told by a Hamas official this morning, there's been absolutely zero progress in those talks. Another Palestinian close to the negotiations said that if Netanyahu insists on Israel controlling the aid, that it could be a deal breaker. But all parties involved, including Hamas, know that it's irrelevant what's happening right now in Doha. All that matters is what happens between Netanyahu and Trump. If Trump decides he wants a deal, he's the only person in the world that can force Netanyahu to accept terms that he doesn't want to accept.
44:49Yeah, as it's always been. Yeah. And you broke this down in your drop site report, which folks just saw up on the screen and can read and go into great depth and detail on Jeremy. So could you also flesh out for us what some of that stronger language might look like? Because I think when I hear that, at least, I think stronger language. But what is like, does the stronger language still leave wiggle room for Netanyahu? And would that be part of something that Trump sort of comes to the table and says, you got to have the stronger language, we'll agree to the stronger language, but wink, wink, that's a stronger language.
45:24It's language at the end of the day. So can you tell us a little bit more about what Hamas is looking for when it comes to the language? I mean, this is a really important question. I think it bears repeating that Israel has constantly violated ceasefire agreements, including the agreement that Donald Trump and Joe Biden pushed through. That original January agreement wouldn't have happened without Donald Trump and Steve Witkoff. And Israel killed more than 160 Palestinians during the ceasefire. Then it unilaterally abandoned it and resumed the military assault on Gaza on March 18th. And so as the discussions have happened, Emily, over the past couple of months since that ceasefire was blown up, Hamas has been pushing U.S.
46:05mediators. And there have been some direct talks between the United States and Hamas, something that Joe Biden wouldn't do, Trump has done. And during those talks, the Palestinians have said, you know, we hear what Donald Trump says, that he wants to end this war and he wants it to be definitively ended. But we need to have Israel bound to that agreement. And so, you know, it may seem like it's splitting hairs, but what Hamas wants is for very clear language that states that the United States, Egypt and Qatar, Egypt and Qatar are the regional mediators dealing with this ceasefire negotiation process, that they want them to guarantee that while Hamas and Israel negotiate a final resolution to the Gaza war, that the terms of the 60-day initial truce are going to apply, meaning Israel will not put a blockade on aid, and meaning that Israel is not going to violate the ceasefire.
46:55Hamas knows that Israel will likely violate any agreement that it signs. So they're sort of struggling to find what is the best that we can get in this situation. And they believe that by having Trump publicly state that he is going to keep Israel in check because he wants a permanent end to the war. Now, we can talk about Trump's agenda and what he wants to see happen as a result of it. But there are indications that Trump actually does want this resolved. He also likely wants to expand the so-called Abraham Accords. He may want to make a deal with the decrepit, corrupt, unpopular leader of the Palestinian authority.
47:29Whatever happens next, Hamas understands that it really only matters what Donald Trump wants and is willing to do right now. So that's why you see what appear to be kind of minor language changes actually meaning something to Hamas. And look, if you put the two versions next to each other, there is a big difference because they took out hedge language. They took out vague phrases like if necessary. They removed just Egypt and Qatar being the guarantors of that and reinserted the United States. It's possible that Trump is going to grant some concessions on this. The bigger issue really is going to be where do Israeli troops withdraw to if a ceasefire is signed?
48:06Because Netanyahu is saying they're going to remain there no matter what. And then this other issue of the aid, I mean, it's an unspeakable situation right now in Gaza. And I'm told that that is actually the main issue that is being debated and discussed right now.
48:18Jeremy Scahill:So let's actually skip forward to talk more about that aid situation, the quote-unquote Gaza Humanitarian Foundation that has been running these aid traps and, you know, corresponding massacres. There's an interview recently with the head of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Now, this is the guy who replaced the original guy who stepped away after saying, well, I don't think that this is a good idea anymore. This is E3, guys. Let's go ahead and play a little bit of this interview and then I want to get Jeremy's reaction on the other side. We have spoken to doctors, British doctors, Western doctors, eyewitnesses on the scene who tell us that almost every day they are coming under fire from Israeli forces trying to get to the aid point just before and as they leave.
49:04They are being fired on. What are you doing to ensure their safety? I don't think anybody knows entirely what's happened in the Gaza Strip. From our point of view, based upon our experience on the ground, we don't see the evidence of this degree of mass casualties directly related to people seeking aid. Because you have absolutely zero way of verifying who's taken that aid. While we can't verify that every individual pack of flour, for instance, isn't somehow ending up in some place that it wasn't intended, what we can absolutely verify is that there is no mass diversion issue. Based on what? Because you're not verifying the people who collect the food.
49:56There is no system. Their names are not anywhere. There's no ID. And also, we have filmed your food being sold at astronomical prices on the black market. I just have a question for you, Debra. Do you have anything positive to say whatsoever about what we're doing? We've made a decision. And the decision is that it's worth operating in a war zone with all the complexity and all the risk, as deadly as it is, because Gazans deserve food. And that is laudable. So my challenge to you is take us in. Let me come and see it for myself and report the good and the bad. Because if there is nothing to hide, and this process is exactly how you're explaining and you're saying it's a good process, then let us film it.
50:45Be transparent. That's not a decision I can make alone. I mean, there are lots of different aspects to that, including the diversion of resources solely dedicated to the people of Gaza. I would like to see from a few people in the press a little less cynicism.
51:03Jeremy Scahill:A little less cynicism from us, Jeremy. So that was Reverend Johnny Moore, who is an evangelical leader and is now the new head of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, saying there are no mass casualty events, but also you can't come and see and verify for yourself. Yeah, I mean, a couple of things. First of all, we have to understand this not as an independent entity, but as an agent of the Israeli state. That's how Netanyahu and other Israeli officials have spoken about it. And mainstream major news organizations, including NPR, the BBC, The Washington Post, have recently done exposés where American mercenaries who went to Gaza as part of this AIDS scam actually describe the lethal actions of their own operatives.
51:48We have Palestinians that have filmed the aftermath of these shootings. We have doctors, including international doctors in Gaza, that have described the sorts of wounds and fatal wounds that they have treated in the aftermath of people desperately trying to go and get what is actually a pittance of aid. While this clip sort of went viral and it was sort of portrayed as a gotcha moment, the journalist actually engaged in what I think is a bit of journalistic malpractice. She started questioning him about Hamas diverting the aid. Senior U.S. officials, including the head humanitarian officer from the Biden era, have said that there's no evidence of any significant theft of aid by Hamas.
52:25But just this morning and over the past few days, Yasser Abu Shabab, who is the head of an Israeli and Palestinian authority-backed militia in Gaza, has openly said in Hebrew-language media interviews that his forces have stolen aid to then distribute it to people that they want to give it to. So, you know, yes, there were really important things that came out of that interview, but also the journalist wasted so much time in her questioning based on an entirely false premise. The reality is, and I don't think anyone can dispute this, Israel has used food as a weapon of war. And the Israeli cabinet over the weekend voted to intensify the use of food as a weapon of war.
53:06and they're rejecting putting in charge a neutral, independent body that had a very effective system for distributing aid and it was not being stolen by Hamas. That's just the fact. So, Jeremy, I have to get your take on this Wall Street Journal piece from Elliot Kaufman that published over the last couple of days. This is E2. We can put it up on the screen. I mean, just fascinating for a lot of reasons, especially from somebody who follows this, even just as a student of the media coverage, like yourself, Jeremy. So, a new Palestinian offer for peace with Israel. Hebron Sheik's proposed to leave the Palestinian Authority and join the Abraham Accords.
53:44The reaction to this peace from people in the region, Jeremy, was really fascinating. Could you tell us, first of all, what you make of the journal dropping the story a couple of days before Netanyahu's visit, and basically some of the reaction that has poured out since it was published. I mean, throughout the history of Israel's occupation, you've always had small clusters of Palestinians that have sort of appeared to be more pro-Israeli or maybe for their own reasons want to try to cut a deal. I mean, the reality is this is a tiny fraction of the Palestinian population that is making this offer.
54:21And it's not even clear that they speak for the entire community of Hebron. You know, often when these stories come up that appear to be presenting an alternative to established Palestinian political figures or movements that are about Palestinian liberation, they get an enormous amount of attention in the West. The reality is that this is basically a non-story on the ground in Palestine. People are concerned about the genocide in Gaza, and they're concerned about the largest forced displacement campaign in the occupied West Bank since 1967. Fifteen members of Netanyahu's party, the Likud party, over the weekend wrote a letter to Netanyahu saying, now is the time to seize, to formally annex the entire territory of the occupied West Bank.
55:09So, you know, these kinds of stories, you know, may be appealing to an op-ed writer in the Wall Street Journal or sort of fun for coffee talk among people that delude themselves into believing that somehow you can co-opt the Palestinian liberation struggle. But at the end of the day, the vast majority of Palestinians in poll after poll support the idea that they need an independent homeland, that it needs to be a unified one that connects both Gaza, the occupied West Bank and Jerusalem. So, you know, I think that we have to look at this through the lens of who's really promoting this story because it really we're talking about a teeny tiny fraction of the Palestinian population that is advocating for this solution.
55:49Jeremy Scahill:Lastly, Jeremy, just to circle back to the meeting today with Trump and Netanyahu, they'll obviously also be discussing Iran. Tucker Carlson just dropped his interview with the president of Iran. I haven't had a chance to watch it, but I'm seeing some of the clips floating around. Apparently, he got asked about the supposed Iranian sleeper cells in the U.S. He denies that and says this is just being used basically to scare Americans. He also apparently revealed, claimed that Israel had tried to assassinate him, which I don't think would be a big surprise to anyone. In any case, what is your understanding of what Israel's interest is with regard to Iran, what they would like to do, and what we would like to, what they would like us to do on their behalf, and what the, what Trump himself's orientation towards Iran is at this point?
56:36Well, I mean, I think it's pretty clear that Netanyahu wants full-scale regime change in Iran. And to his credit, even though there was a lot of speculation that Trump was going to go forward and actually assassinate the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei and bankroll and arm Israel as it actually enacted regime change in Iran, it doesn't seem to be, as of now, the direction that the United States wants to go in. But I think it's very likely that we will again see bombing of Iran, whether it's only Israel or Israel in the United States, remains to be seen. But Iran, time and again, has defied people's declarations that the end of the government is just on the horizon.
57:20And it really speaks to the bankrupt nature of the political media in the United States that it's left to Tucker Carlson to do interviews, not just with the president of Iran, but with other figures that the United States has designated as official enemies. Anytime you get to hear the perspective of the people on the other side of American missiles, it helps to inform a society that purports to be democratic. So, you know, we should have more hearing from people that live on the other side of American missiles. And at the end of the day, whether you're a conservative or a liberal or you're a political radical of some sort, more information means a better ability to make decisions.
58:01And I think there is a fundamental question that shouldn't only belong to the MAGA movement, and that is what is fundamentally in the U.S. interest. I would argue that none of these wars are in the U.S. interest. And I know that there's a minority section of Trump world that also, for their own reasons, believe that same thing. We can't continue this bankrupt neocon view of the world that the United States can be a hammer in search of nails. And we certainly shouldn't be doing Israel's agenda because what Netanyahu wants, and clearly he has a lot of support for this in Israel, is to continue setting that region on fire.
58:36What may seem to be tactical victories right now in the short term could well produce a generation of people that seek to oppose the United States and Israel that are far more radical than any of the forces that we now see in the region. It's born of an idea called blowback. And I think that, you know, Netanyahu can try to do his victory dance being, you know, the only leader that's been invited three times to see Trump. But Americans should really be asking. And I see increasingly conservatives asking this question. Major media figures in the conservative ecosystem are asking these questions.
59:11And I think it's important. Why is the United States doing the bidding of this rogue regime in Israel? That's a serious question that should be on the table right now for all Americans.
59:22Jeremy Scahill:Jeremy Scahill, well said as always, and great to see you, sir. Thank you so much for your reporting. Thank you both. All right, guys, that does it for us here today. I will be back for Breaking Points tomorrow, and then we'll have actually Sagar in for Emily on Wednesday and whatever. We're switching it. Yeah, absolutely. We'll just keep you guys guessing out there. Thank you guys again so much for your support. We're going to go ahead and do that AMA Live now for premium subscribers. If you are not a premium subscriber, you can become one at breakingpoints.com. In any case, hope you guys have a great day and I will see you back here tomorrow.
1:00:06What it sounds like when you road trip to the iHeartRadio Music Festival in the all new Hyundai Palisade Hybrid.
1:00:12Jeremy Scahill:Wow, this is really nice inside. The Palisade Hybrid has more luxury than ever. Whoa, this sound system is awesome. Turn it up. More tech than ever. Sweet. You got the available built-in dash cam? And more range than ever because the Palisade Hybrid gets up to 600-plus miles of range on a full tank. So do we ever have to stop for gas? Visit HyundaiUSA.com or call 562-314-4603 for more details. We know kids don't hold back. And I wouldn't want them to. Get in there. Make a mess. Slide for home. Bring on the stains. I've got OxyClean Versatile Stain Remover. It works on over 100 stains, and it's America's number one stain fighter additive brand.
1:00:52It's color-safe and chlorine-free, so I use it on whites, colors, and dark fabrics. And OxyClean isn't just for laundry. Mix it with water for use all around the house, kitchens, bathrooms, and even floors. When my kids go all in, I say go for it, because I've got OxyClean to get the stains out. It's not clean unless it's OxyClean. Some people use ChatGPT to answer questions. Others use it to get real work done. With ChatGPT Work, you bring the goal, plus real inputs like briefs, notes, files, feedback, data, and project plans. It can help turn them into an analysis, tracker, deck outline, prototype, or workflow you can review and keep shaping.
1:01:28You stay in control, giving direction and choosing the final output. Put ChatGPT to work on your most ambitious ideas and projects. Get started at ChatGPT.com by selecting Work Mode. Available on Plus and Pro plans.
1:01:40Jeremy Scahill:This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human. Thank you.
From the publisher
Krystal and Emily discuss NYT smears Zohran, Rogan shocked by Alligator Alcatraz, Gaza aid group head confronted on daily massacres.
Jeremy Scahill: https://x.com/jeremyscahill
To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show AD FREE, uncut and 1 hour early visit: www.breakingpoints.com
Merch Store: https://shop.breakingpoints.com/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
