9/19/25: Trump CHEERS Kimmel Shutdown, Late Night RESPONDS

19 Sep 2025 · 1 h 6 min · 27 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode dissects Trump’s reaction to Jimmy Kimmel’s indefinite suspension from ABC/Disney, arguing it reflects government “jawboning” and a broader effort to chill criticism of Trump across late-night and other media. It also discusses related Trump comments about TV networks, FCC power, and late-night comedians’ responses (including Stephen Colbert).

Guest backgrounds

The episode is hosted by multiple commentators (Tarika Foster-Brasby, Cheryl Swoops, Crystal, Ryan, Emily, Griffin, and others). It references prior work at Nextar (Crystal and Ryan) and includes comedy-focused analysis from Griffin.

Key claims

  1. Trump frames Kimmel’s removal as “free speech” or “lack of talent,” but hosts argue it’s punishment for criticizing Trump.
  2. FCC chair Brendan Carr’s pressure on ABC is treated as an explicit threat tied to licensing and broader media leverage.
  3. Executives reportedly acted to appease the administration, not because the joke was beyond bounds.
  4. The FCC’s “public interest” and “news exemption” powers are portrayed as tools for political coercion and consolidation.

Notable examples

  • Trump’s “ballroom” joke and his “you’re not allowed to criticize me” framing.
  • Colbert’s “If You Give a Mouse a Kimmel” bit and “we are all Jimmy Kimmel” monologue.
  • Discussion of Nextar’s local-TV consolidation and political-ad revenue.
  • Mentions of other speech crackdowns and “Twitter files” comparisons.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Late Night Show Reactions to Kimmel

0:00 to 1:01

Discussing the reactions to Jimmy Kimmel's suspension and Trump's comments.

“If modern life feels a little loud, you're not alone.”

Late Night Show Reactions to Kimmel

2:55 to 4:05

Discussing the reactions to Jimmy Kimmel's suspension and Trump's comments.

“I didn't know if you were talking to the audience rhetorically or to us, Crystal.”

The Intersection of Media and Politics

4:05 to 6:46

Analyzing the implications of Kimmel's suspension amid political pressures.

“And he's still sort of like hanging around in the area at a Dairy Queen.”

Government Influence on Media Outlets

6:46 to 14:00

Debating the role of government in media decisions and implications for free speech.

“This is not in the public interest that you are making up intelligence, whatever.”

Kimmel's Suspension: A Reaction to Trump

14:00 to 15:10

Discussion on Kimmel's mild joke and the pressure from the Trump administration.

“But it was not like that crazy or wild or insensitive, like insanely out of bounds thing to say.”

Analyzing Kimmel's Comedy Choices

15:10 to 19:35

Exploration of Kimmel's comedy style and the implications of governmental influence.

“Griffin, we should get you in on this because comedy is your space.”

The Challenges of Late Night Satire

19:35 to 22:20

Debate on how late-night shows are affected by political pressures and audience reception.

“Some of this is, anyway, that is, we don't have to get into the market of late night shows, just to say that I think the networks take these opportunities very eagerly to be like, hey, look, we're working with you.”

Trump's Critique on TV Networks

25:59 to 28:00

Examination of Trump's statements about media criticism and its implications.

“We've got new comments here from Trump on the Air Force One about sort of his larger plans or thoughts on TV networks in general.”

Analyzing Trump's Critique of Late Night Hosts

28:00 to 29:16

Discussion on Trump's criticism of late night shows and the implications for free speech.

“But I do want to focus in on what he said there, which he specifically said they hit Trump every night.”

The Role of the FCC and News Exemptions

29:16 to 31:05

Exploring how the FCC's news exemptions might be used politically against broadcasters.

“You better be careful because you step over wherever that invisible line is.”
Show all 27 chapters

Stephen Colbert's Response to Trump

31:05 to 33:02

Reviewing Stephen Colbert's comments on Trump's actions and censorship.

“Because what Trump said there where he was like, you have to it's not allowed to just bash Trump night after night.”

Evaluating Late Night Reactions to Censorship

33:02 to 35:48

Discussion on the late night hosts' reactions and the lack of a call to action.

“Yesterday, after threats from Trump's FCC chair, ABC yanked Kimmel off the air indefinitely.”

Comparing Previous and Current Administration's Threats

35:48 to 40:09

Comparing the historical context of free speech threats from Trump and Biden administrations.

“And these are really influential, powerful, wealthy people at this point.”

Democratic Actions and Free Speech Concerns

40:09 to 42:00

Examining the Democratic response to political speech suppression and related free speech issues.

“Even though I wasn't on their side there, like, I think it is fair to say this administration, what they're doing now is genuinely different than what anything we saw under the Biden administration.”

Hypocrisy in Media and Government

42:00 to 45:44

Exploration of the hypocrisy in media and government actions regarding free speech.

“The Equality Act, which almost every Democrat supports, would have serious ramifications for free speech because of the way that it reads gender identity into sex.”

The Threats to Democratic Institutions

45:44 to 51:49

Discussion on the erosion of democratic institutions and the implications of media consolidation.

“It's going to use the tools and the power of government to censor speech, taking cancel culture to the next level.”

Reflections on Cultural and Political Trends

51:49 to 56:00

Analysis of cultural shifts and political trends impacting society and the media landscape.

“It hasn't been the universities, wasn't the law firms.”

Intro to Skyline Drive

56:00 to 56:14

Discussion about listening to the Skyline Drive podcast for various insights.

“Listen to Skyline Drive, How to Live Forever on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.”

Questions About Life and Health

56:14 to 57:08

Exploration of personal health questions and seeking answers.

“Juliana, your phone is hot to the touch.”

The York County Shooting Incident

58:14 to 1:00:01

Discussion on a tragic shooting incident involving police in Pennsylvania.

“Five cops were ambushed, three killed, two others wounded.”

Media Response to Violence

1:00:01 to 1:01:21

Analysis of media coverage and potential biases surrounding violent events.

“But what I would say, Ryan, is if the shooter were trans and just murdered three cops, everyone in the fucking country would know about it and it would be wall to wall coverage.”

Podcast Reactions to Current Events

1:01:21 to 1:02:27

Discussion on how various podcasters respond to political and cultural events.

“And we were also searching for people that were meeting the moment.”

Analysis of Tim Dillon's Commentary

1:02:27 to 1:05:20

Examination of Tim Dillon's views on political correctness and free speech.

“He also announced that, I couldn't even tell if he was joking, that he'd been fired from the Saudi Arabia.”

Starbucks and Political Commentary

1:05:20 to 1:07:29

Discussion on Starbucks' policy and implications for political expression.

“He's talking about Portnoy, and he says typical member of the tribe.”

Reflections on Political Reactions

1:07:29 to 1:10:01

Discussion about the emotional responses of individuals in the media to recent events.

“And he fired him saying that you're not allowed to do politics.”

Emotional Reactions and Political Implications

1:10:01 to 1:12:20

The hosts discuss the emotional impact of recent events and the political responsibilities of public figures.

“And it's just so anyway, just a word to say, I think some of it will go away.”

Transition to the Second Half of the Show

1:12:20 to 1:13:42

The hosts outline upcoming topics for discussion in the second half of the episode.

“Well, on that note, folks, we are going to get into a lot of other fun stuff here in the second half.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed Human. If modern life feels a little loud, you're not alone. At Miraval Resorts, mindfulness has never been about perfection or performance. For more than 30 years, it's been about presence and about slowing down enough to listen. At Miraval Berkshires in Lenox, Massachusetts, each season brings its own rhythm. rolling green hills, quiet forests, and a sense of stillness that feels like a sanctuary. Here, well-being takes many forms, meditation, yoga, hiking, equine experiences, and time set aside simply to be present. These aren't just experiences for the moment.

0:46They're simple, intentional practices, tools you can carry with you long after you leave. Because wellness doesn't live in one place. It lives in how you show up again and again. Miraval Resorts. Wellness for real life. Learn more at miravalresorts.com. Hey, everybody. I'm Tarika Foster-Brasby. What's up, y 'all? I'm your girl, Cheryl Swoops. When you tune in to a new episode of our podcast, Levels to This, you're definitely going to get some spicy WNBA analysis. but we're more than just hoops and the real conversation is what we actually bring. It's been really, really cool seeing kind of these women just really step into their power off the court and understand that they aren't basketball, right?

1:35And they're not asking for permission. Listen to Levels to This with Shroes Hoops and Tarika Foster-Brasby on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Mange Shatikular and I'm back with a new season of my podcast, Skyline Drive. This time I talk to scientists, biopunks, curmudgeons, blues owners, super seniors, and Goa's top cryotherapy lab to try to understand this obsession with living forever and what it means for all of us. And I get into a bit of trouble along the way. I'd say probably start bone smashing. That doesn't work. Make it look more defined. They say it works.

2:12I don't know. Listen to Skyline Drive, how to live forever on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey guys, Sagar and Crystal here. Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election, and we are so excited about what that means for the future of this show. This is the only place where you can find honest perspectives from the left and the right that simply does not exist anywhere else. So if that is something that's important to you, please go to breakingpoints.com, become a member today, and you'll get access to our full shows, unedited, ad-free, and all put together for you every morning in your inbox.

2:45We need your help to build the future of independent news media, and we hope to see you at breakingpoints.com.

2:55Hey, everybody. Happy Friday. Happy Friday. I didn't know if you were talking to the audience rhetorically or to us, Crystal. It could be either. Both. All of the above. You know, welcoming people in. Yes. I got us in trouble last Friday, so I'm going to try to be more demure this week. We're tightening it up. We've got makeup on. We're hair, makeup ready. That's right. Yes. That was the real bummer. Yeah, we're going to calm down and how we objectify our nation's assassins. Our nation's assassins. And Ryan combed his hair. I did. He found a calm. Looking good. Looking good, guys. There was a bunch of reaction last night on the late night shows to the firing of or indefinite suspension of Jimmy Kimmel.

3:41I guess it's not clear that he's canceled for good. So wanted to get into some of that. We got some new Trump comments. We've got updates with regard to Israel, Netanyahu directly denying that he had anything to do with Charlie Kirk's death. And some new information brought to light by Candace Owens, a new picture that she released that is allegedly of Tyler Robinson hours after the killing occurred. And he's still sort of like hanging around in the area at a Dairy Queen. I don't know. We'll probably get to that in the premium section. Yeah, really interesting. Obviously, really interesting story.

4:15Yeah, for sure. It shows him wearing like a combination of the outfits that he'd worn previously in the photos that we've seen. And it's just, you know, I mean, whether or not the photo is real or not, I think, is a question in and of itself. Some people speculate it could be AI. We don't have a timestamp, all of those sorts of things. But anyway, we'll bring you all of the latest with regard to that investigation. Yep. Another fast food killer, apparently, just like Luigi with the McDonald's. So let's start with Trump's comments here about Jimmy Kimmel. Why don't we? Your vice president, Vance, said that free speech is under attack in the UK.

4:55Do you agree with him, Prime Minister? We saw dismissal of a very well-known chat show host in America last night, Mr. Kimmel. Is free speech more under attack in Britain or America? Well, Jimmy Kimmel was right because he had bad ratings more than anything else. And he said a horrible thing about a great gentleman known as Charlie Kirk. And Jimmy Kimmel is not a talented person. He had very bad ratings and they should have fired him a long time ago. So, you know, you can call that free speech or not. He was fired for lack of talent. Lack of talent. What are we making of this? Yeah, we haven't gotten you guys take at least on the air with regard to the the indefinite suspension of Kimmel.

5:36So, Emily, what did you make of all of these developments before I get to the president's specific comments there? You know, I probably am in the position of like disagreeing with I'll probably be the one like odd man out throughout this conversation, because I think with Kimmel, the timing is is obviously an appearance of conflict of interest and an appearance of conflict of interest is a conflict of interest. But also my position is that the FCC either should not exist or this particular power of the FCC certainly should not exist. I actually asked Brendan Carr about that a couple of months ago about whether the law itself actually needed to be changed.

6:17And he said at the time, actually, that's probably a conversation that needs to be entertained, whether the FCC should have any jurisdiction to determine what, quote, public interest is. Because as long as that exists, if you're a Trump Republican and you see the FCC with this power and you see corporate media going against you for so long or going against it being like fairly obviously biased in one direction for so long, then the tool gets more and more tempting to use. And the last thing on that point that I'll say is I would not have a problem with the Democratic FCC commissioner if you see NBC News or wherever lying our way into another Iraq war saying we could do this the easy way or the hard way.

7:02This is not in the public interest that you are making up intelligence, whatever. I would never support them yanking a broadcast license. I don't think the jawboning is that like significant. I do think that the merger question is absolutely significant. The Nextar merger question is absolutely significant. But my basic point on this is that I think the corporations are opportunistically taking these dust-ups as their opportunities. Opportunities. The market was catching up with Kimmel. The market was catching up with Colbert. He wasn't turning Colbert wasn't turning a profit. I'd be shocked if Kimmel wasn't losing a decent amount of money.

7:45And when these things come up, it becomes an opportunity for the networks to be like, we're doing you a favor, Trump. Look what we're doing here. So that's that's kind of my take overall. But I'm sure we'll have other disagreements. What do you think, Ryan? I disagree on basically all of that. I don't think we have any way of knowing whether or not Colbert or any of these people are profitable. You see this claim made that they're profitable or unprofitable. The way the broadcast networks work is not that they make a certain amount of candy and it costs this much to make the candy and then they sell the candy for a higher price and then they have a margin there.

8:26It's like, it's not like there's so much more to that. And they're part of a giant brand and which involves their connection to their bigger conglomerates and the cable revenue that they get and the broadcast revenue through the ads that they get. And if they have even just 500 ,000 people who are huge fans of Kimmel, that can actually make it worth it to have the Kimmel. So like there's this, we're too quick to say that this, that, that actually these are business decisions they wanted to make, but they were afraid to make, which that, that I don't understand either. Like companies are usually fine to fire, you know, to make business decisions that they think are in their own interest.

9:06They don't need the government to push them. But I think the bigger disagreement is on the problem with the jawboning. I think jawboning by the government, especially when it is directly connected to an explicit threat. Brennan Carr of the FCC told ABC, you need to take action against Jimmy Kimmel or else. That is an explicit threat of government action unless they take action. In Missouri versus, you know, the Biden or whatever the case was, where you didn't even have any threat. What you had was members of the government, both the Trump administration's DHS and then Biden administration's DHS, going to the platforms and flagging.

9:56I don't think I don't like this post here about the vaccine. I don't like this about the lab. and the platforms are actually like, for the most part, they're like, all right, we're taking that down. The reason it was a problem is not because the government said, take this down or else. The fact that they're the government means that they come with awesome power, enormous power that has to be kept in check. So the or else is implicit. The or else is just implied. It's much worse when you straight up say or else. Like that's just gangster stuff. But the awesome power of the federal government needs to be checked by the Constitution.

10:42And that's why the FBI cannot even walk in the door and tell you anything about your monologue. Or else you understand that to be an implicit threat. Big fat beefy Italian guy comes in. It's like when Taibbi got a knock from the IRS on his door after the Twitter files. Right, yeah. Hey, just knocking on the door here. Just want to make sure that all your paperwork is in order. Like, they didn't even have to say, back off of the Twitter files or else you will get audited. That would be horrifying if they said, back off the Twitter files or else you will get audited. How is this any different? Also, the entire center left thought that the framing of the Twitter files was misinformation.

11:33It was poorly constructed. It was cherry picked. So should the FCC or the IRS or the FBI have said, you know what? We didn't like the framing of the way the Twitter files came out. We thought this was wrong. So now you're going to suffer. You're going to get punished. It's the exact same thing because the conservative argument is that what Kimmel said was misinformation and therefore the threats are justified. In fact, if you look at exactly what he said, he said MAGA folks are desperately trying to find ways to make it so that this is not one of their guys. Now, to me, it turned out it was not one of their guys.

12:16He said this on Monday night. It was the case that everybody from every direction was trying to make the case that this was not one of their guys. That's just what they were doing. So then come in and say, you have to take action against this guy or else. And then the or else is the dual murders. There's murders at the Disney level that are needed. And then Nextar wants to merge. Nextar is the biggest, which bought Rising. um next star is the biggest owner of local television networks which is trying to buy even more local television networks which we have said for decades is consolidation that we don't want to see so they need the law changed basically they need they need an fcc rule changed so that they can buy more local television channels and which are so lucrative why because of super pack and political ads.

13:11That's the main revenue source. That's the only reason local television channels are so lucrative. And Nextar, as we know, because Emily and I worked for them for like five minutes, they're a Trump-aligned... Freelance. Yeah, we met their leadership. They're Trump-aligned. And so then they operated on the same team. And helped effectuate this entire thing. And they also, by the way, Brendan Carr and his comments, I mean, directly name checked like, hey, these, you know, cable affiliate owners, they need to be looking into this. So he says that and threatens ABC. Next thing, next star says, OK, no problem.

13:55We're going to we're going to preempt Kimmel. And then, and according to the Rolling Stone reporting, the executives who'd been meeting and who'd been like, you know, shitting themselves over this, they did not think what Kimmel said was over the line, nor do I mean, I think what Kimmel said ended up being obviously incorrect. But it was not like that crazy or wild or insensitive, like insanely out of bounds thing to say. In any case, the executives didn't have a real problem with what he said, but they explicitly felt that the pressure from the Trump administration was the reason why they had to act.

14:30And then on top of all of that, if you had any doubt in mind, then you have Brennan Carr go out and say, hey, maybe the view should be next. You have Trump come out and say effectively, like, you know, you shouldn't be allowed to criticize me or else your license should be revoked. So if there was any doubt whatsoever about the reasoning for the decision making of the ABC and Disney executive team, it should all be put to bed by the chain of events, their own internal deliberations, and then the government basically going out and bragging about the power that they wield and their ability to coerce news executives to do whatever the hell they want.

15:10Griffin, we should get you in on this because comedy is your space. But one thing to that point, I don't I wonder how because the Wall Street Journal was reporting after it happened that Kimmel, they expect Kimmel to be back in a couple of days. And I actually am curious if he will be back by like Monday. I don't know. I agree with one thing Crystal said on the nature of the like the one liner by Kimmel standards was relatively mild. He said he said some during covid. He said some crazy stuff like he's he's he's been out there. And my thing with Kimmel, I don't know what you guys think. It's sort of like my thing with Colbert is a big like Griffin.

15:54We've talked about this like strangers with candy era Colbert fan. It just feels like a lot of it feels lazy. But anyway, that's beside the point. And one other point, I think what people were really upset about and then Griffin, who's if you're in comedy, that means you're an outlaw at this point because comedy is illegal once again. And so there were there was two pieces of the joke. The first part is not even a joke. It's like Mag is trying to out there trying to score political points on this and say that it's not their guy. I don't even actually see how that's funny. It's just a comment. But the joke was the next one, which is like, let's see how Trump is responding.

16:30And then Trump gets asked, you know, sir, like, how are you holding up personally after the loss of your friend? And Trump responds. Great. We're building this. I don't know if we have it handy, but like, you know, we're building this ballroom. Everybody said we couldn't build the ballroom. It's going to be absolutely fantastic. It's going to be the greatest ballroom in the history of ballrooms. And, you know, it goes on and on and on about the ballroom. That's it. And so that was his joke. He's like, look at this guy. What a cretin. Like, that was the joke. I think that's what Trump was actually offended about.

17:05But Trump should have not acted like a cretin if he didn't want Jimmy Kimmel to portray him as one. Well, and Trump made it pretty plain that that's what he was upset about since he then went on to say, you're not allowed to criticize me. Yeah. Right. Yeah. I mean, yeah. Go Griffin. If we're to analyze this from a comedy perspective, then Kimmel is guilty and should be fired. But we shouldn't analyze it from a comedy perspective because that's not that's not right. I did have a few questions for Emily. I am curious about this idea that the FCC should be eliminated or what have you. I'm curious about that and what that would mean if it's gone.

17:43But also to the point about money to slightly steel man Emily's case about views. I did read last night that Jimmy Kimmel was averaging in the key demo around 129 ,000 views, which is about one YouTube clip from us. This clip today will probably do more. is that real he's averaging that in the demo and that's actually down 50 from what it was a couple months ago so there seems to be uh like a steady decline there but like if this were just purely if next star were to try to make this look like purely a financial decision like oh we're just bleeding money on this show why wouldn't they just make an announcement being like hey we're gonna slowly fold this show down at the end of the year as opposed to this super knee-jerk reaction from the administration.

18:33And like, why would I sorry? Yeah. Disney. Like, why? Why wouldn't they do similar what they did with Colbert? Right. Where they're like slow rolling it out. But this knee jerk reaction to it seems to be like implicitly a direction from the from the government. Well, I think because they're trying to please like I think they're being opportunistic. My my honest opinion is that I think they're trying to like exactly what you say. Trump operates like like a Roy Cohn-trained mafioso. So I think they take these sort of dust-ups as opportunities to be like, look, we're giving you a little here. Like, we're cooperating.

19:07We love Trump, maybe is what they're saying behind the scenes. I don't know if you guys caught Sherry Redstone obviously coming out and saying that this is business. There were a bunch of anonymous sources who went to Puck and then I think the New York Post during the Colbert dust-up that said it was losing around$40 million last year. I don't know. I mean, like when you have a few anonymous sources, it's hard to obviously verify that number without the network going on the record. Those are catastrophically bad numbers for Kimball. Some of this is, anyway, that is, we don't have to get into the market of late night shows, just to say that I think the networks take these opportunities very eagerly to be like, hey, look, we're working with you.

19:49Yeah, I'll grant you the show's dud and probably is losing money, but it's just hard to disentangle it from the entire network. Well, and I just looked it up. So the numbers I'm seeing, Kimmel was averaging 220 ,000 viewers in the demo, which is still not great. It's a little better than 100 and whatever. A couple months ago. A couple months ago he was. It was what I read. Okay. Well, and he was ahead of Colbert and Fallon in terms of his numbers. So, you know, in terms if you look at the genre, he was actually the person who was performing the best. That makes sense. Yeah. I mean, I just listen.

20:29I obviously agree with Ryan. The business thing may be true that it's losing money, but that is not the reason he was suspended right now. Because, in fact, I think by doing it in this way, they have put themselves in a much worse position because people are very upset that they made this decision and they have the possibility of strikes from talent. And, you know, obviously, this is a giant conglomerate. There's all sorts of ways that talent and producers and actors and whatever can speak out and be upset. It's created this whole national cultural moment. Like, I don't think as a business this would have been the way that they would have wanted to go.

21:07Instead, they could have done what, for example, like MSNBC did at the beginning of the Trump administration when they look around and see the writing on the wall and they basically offer up Joy Reid as tribute. They're like, OK, but you don't even have to say anything. We're going to get rid of this lady and we're going to sell off MSNBC. Are we good now? That in that way, there isn't that direct like you're directly threatened and under duress. You intentionally like cave and capitulate in a way that is undeniable and blatantly obvious. And also the reason why these shows, these late night shows like in general, big picture suck is because they are sycophantic to the Democratic Party.

21:46And now the Republicans are asking for them to be sycophantic to the Republican Party. and like to a certain extent comedy is supposed to be illegal it's supposed to feel illegal it's supposed to feel like oh you're not allowed to say that but the comedian is saying that and that's why it sucks right now when they just you know jerk off the democratic party and it's going to suck when they jerk off the republican party and so it's like the the fundamental like identity and core of comedy is going to continue sucking if it's about making comedy feel legal like your things that you're allowed to say, which is the antithesis of the form.

22:20Get rid of the FCC, baby. Yeah. That's kind of an interesting comment, though, Griffin, because what Trump is doing accidentally is making them like edgy and subversive. Yes, exactly. He's bringing it back. You can't do. You're just like standard thing is now illegal. So making it so because we all watch. I mean, I watched a bunch of the monologues from last night, which were not like particularly spectacular. But now they have this looming interest and, you know, increased interest and scrutiny and edge to them simply because of what the Trump administration has, you know, has done here. I'm Manga Shatikular and I'm back with a new season of the podcast Skyline Drive.

23:02This time I'm diving into a rabbit hole of peptides, organoids, blood boys, blue zones, and brain replacement to try to understand what this longevity obsession is all about and what it really means to live forever for all of us. I learned about some rad science. I can make a brain for you and then we can test what draw is the best. for your brain, as opposed to his brain. Here are some hard truths. I would expect Indians to age faster, but I did not expect it to be almost a four to five year acceleration. And get myself into a world of trouble. I'd say probably start bone smashing. That doesn't work.

23:45Make it look more defined. They say it works. I don't know. Listen to Skyline Drive, How to Live Forever on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Bill, why is my eye twitching? Does this mean I'm in perimenopause? Maybe I have adult ADHD. I need to look this up. Where's my phone? Juliana, your phone is hot to the touch. I think it's asking you for a break. You know what? Maybe I should just ask ChatGPT. Or maybe we can ask an actual human. Yes, like a couple sex therapist. Whoa, that escalated quickly, but okay. Because I have questions. We have questions. And I bet everyone has questions.

24:23Like, is it normal to sleep in separate bedrooms? We do that. How about this one? Is bribing your kids bad parenting or just negotiating? Oh, and I still do need to know, why was my poop green that one time? Hypothetically, right? Okay, well, instead of letting the internet guess, we've got actual people answering these exact questions. And laughing with us has got to be better than spending three hours down a rabbit hole online. Listen to Bill and Juliana. The podcast. on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your podcasts.

24:57Hey guys, Paul Verzi here and I want to talk to you about Paul's best podcast Will Ferrell's Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio I sit down each week with a special guest and we discuss the absolute best of things Pete Davidson It's that and then there's everything else He would just shout one line and it would murder Marie! Lunch! Let's talk about the best moments that we had on the road I would love a cocktail Dude, Joe could get last row middle seat on a Southwest Airlines flight. Joe, how was your flight? It was great. The guy on Penn State, he went on the field, and the player thought Joe was his former coach.

25:32And he hugged him. And he hugged him, and Joe just went with it. And the guy goes, what are you doing here, coach? And Joe just goes, man. And you walk in, and it is bananas. I mean, it's a feast for the eyes. And I was like, it's not my thing either, but we're here. When in Rome. Top athletes, chefs, musicians, everybody. Listen to Paul's best podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. We've got new comments here from Trump on the Air Force One about sort of his larger plans or thoughts on TV networks in general. Let's take a listen from him on Air Force One for a second.

26:08That's something that should be talking about for licensing, too. When you have a network and you have evening shows and all they do is hit Trump. That's all they do. If you go back, I guess they haven't had a conservative for years or something. But when you go back and take a look, all they do is they're licensed. They're not allowed to do that. They're an arm of the Democrat Party. Thank you, everybody. Thank you. Fly safely. You know why I say that? Because I'm on the flight. Otherwise, I wouldn't care. He's on the flight or otherwise he wouldn't care. That would be a good joke, except we know he's on the flight because he's standing right there.

Read the full transcript

26:52And so he stepped on his own punchline with his own presence. Otherwise, that's pretty funny. He also keeps saying from his first post to just that he's absolutely convinced that Kimmel has been fired. And that is not what any of the reporting suggests right now. And it wasn't what any of the reporting suggests when he fired off his true social at 1.30 in the morning UK time. So I don't know if he knows something or if he's trying to manifest. Maybe they should just not just bring him back and not announce it. And you know what I would never notice. He might not ever know. And what might solve the entire problem is if they give Trump Kimmel's late night spot and then Trump isn't president anymore.

27:36Everybody wins. He would love that job. Yeah. But can he do a five minute monologue or is it just the whole show? Oh, just going to be his monologue. I see. Like, could he contain himself? Although, you know, sometimes, you know, if he was not president, I would watch that. I would make that. Remember that time on the campaign trail? He like they just like stood in silence and swayed to Ave Maria or something like that. That was great. That was great stuff. That was amazing. Some real surrealist content. I don't know what you call that. But I do want to focus in on what he said there, which he specifically said they hit Trump every night.

28:12That's not allowed. It's like literally in America, you are allowed to criticize the president of the United States. That's like kind of the whole deal here. Like that's a big part of what we're all about. And as I said before, makes it plain not only that the real problem he had wasn't, you know, something he said about Charlie Kirk's killer. It was about the criticism of him, which is why he had previously said, hey, Jimmy Kimmel's next, had been calling for his ouster. And also why you've now got, you know, Brendan. And he said, who did he say is next, Jimmy Fallon or Stephen Colbert? And Seth Meyer.

28:48And Seth Meyer. And then you have Brendan Carr coming after The View and, you know, putting them in the spotlight. And The View, notably, and this is like pretty shameful, they didn't talk about this topic yesterday on their show at all. So and that's the point. The point isn't just to get a scalp in terms of Jimmy Kimmel. The point is to send the message out to everyone that you better watch it. You better be careful because you step over wherever that invisible line is. You get a little bit of a, you know, online conservative backlash going. And that's it. Your companies, your corporate executives, they're not going to have your back.

29:28They are not going to have your back. You are on your own. And that message, whether or not Kimmel comes back at some point or doesn't come back, whatever, that message has been sent. And the fact that The View said nothing about this yesterday, I think, shows you the chill that has already been instilled, at least in many journalists, personalities, comedians across the board. Speaking of Canadians across the board, we'll go for it, Emily, while I pull this clip up. I do have a Colbert clip I want to pull up next. I was going to say, if I were Democrats right now, I would immediately be looking at ways to defang the FCC and force Republicans to defend the power of the FCC because the FCC gives what's called news exemptions.

30:13Howard Stern, for example, got his quote news exemption. So this is like it goes back years and years and it's been used in ways that we've become accustomed to because like many things before we had this crazy moment 10 plus years ago, I guess now in the U.S., we didn't think about the tools or we hadn't thought about the tools in this way for like 20, 30 years. And now Republicans, having watched the media, especially with Trump, but like saying going back over the last whatever 30 years, the way that conservatives were covered, are saying, well, hey, there's this public interest tool in the FCC's toolkit and that's there.

30:58So while all of these levers are being pulled, why not take a look at the public interest part of it? Why not say why not take away the quote news exemption from some of these these broadcasters and make it so that they do have to do equal time? Because what Trump said there where he was like, you have to it's not allowed to just bash Trump night after night. if they have their news exemption, maybe the FCC takes that away and then says, actually, it's not allowed. You have to do equal time and all of that, which as a business model doesn't really even make sense anymore. So if I were Democrats, I would make Republicans start defending the New Deal FCC because that would get – I honestly think there's a pretty good case for abolishing the FCC, the way that we license broadcast airwaves and all of that.

31:46But anyway, beside the point. gutfeld needs equal time get me on there that doesn't count because it's cable but like the broadcast networks gotcha gotcha yeah which most people i don't think distinguish a difference between like the average person just views this as just like a freedom of speech thing without the intricacies like oh that's that's broadcast this is cable like you know the problem there is that this isn't really on the up and up it's not as if they have a genuine concern about public interest and they're going to use the remedies existing around the public interest rule. What they're saying is, we don't like what you said and we're going to connect it to this other thing, this merger that your parent company wants.

32:28And we're going to use the threat of blocking this merger, not because we think it's anti-competitive, not because we don't like the merger on the merits, but as power to get you to do what we want. So looking at the rules implies that this is being done on the up and up through the rulebook. And it's not. It's just being done with raw power. So many people are saying, well, what are Jimmy Kimmel's colleagues going to say? What is Jon Stewart? What is Jon Oliver going to say? So we've got a clip here from Stephen Colbert that we'd like to play here. See if it met the moment. I'm your host, Stephen Colbert.

33:09But tonight, we are all Jimmy Kimmel.

33:17I still have a show though, right? Okay, good. Yesterday, after threats from Trump's FCC chair, ABC yanked Kimmel off the air indefinitely. That is blatant censorship. And it always starts small. You know, remember like in week one of his presidency, Gulf of America. Call it Gulf of America. Sure, seems harmless. But with an autocrat, you cannot give an inch. And if ABC thinks, if ABC thinks this is going to satisfy the regime, they are woefully naive. And clearly, they've never read the children's book, If You Give a Mouse a Kimmel. and and and to jimmy and to jimmy just let me say i stand with you and your staff 100 and also you couldn't let me enjoy this for like one week all right if you give a mouse a kimmel ryan loved that one that's good stuff i was like oh there's hard there's the key demo folks there's the key demo gen x and i'm sorry i think i am in the demo now i need to start watching these late night shows So did you guys watch these late night reactions?

34:29Do we find that this met the moment? Because I was struck by these feeling very similar to other just Trump takedowns in terms of tone and energy. What did you guys make of it? So I think what they were lacking, I mean, on the one hand, I'm sympathetic because it's hard to make comedy about something that, you know, like to have a topic and be like, I'm going to make a joke about this. And yet their mandate on the show, obviously, is not just to do political commentary, but to make it funny. And it's a difficult thing to be able to nail. Sympathetic there. It's certainly not something I could pull off.

35:02I think what they were all lacking is some sort of a call to action. It's like, okay, you don't like it. And you're saying, oh, this won't affect my performance. Maybe it will. Maybe it won't. I mean, I don't even think like as an individual human being, you're not even really fully equipped to assess your own ability to withstand that pressure because you don't know the way things are subtly influencing you. if that makes sense, which is why we've worked hard to insulate ourselves from different pressures that we can anticipate. But there was no like, OK, that's why we need to boycott. That's why we're going on strike.

35:36That's why Democrats need to break up these giant conglomerates. Maybe it's too much to put that on them. But I think people are looking at them for some sort of leadership since this is their industry. And these are really influential, powerful, wealthy people at this point. And there was none of that. It's just sort of like, you know, Republicans are hypocrites. OK, we can see that. You know, we're not happy about what happened with Kimmel. That's obvious. And I think the other thing that's always difficult with Trump is because we've had this is far from the first threat to the First Amendment from this administration, even literally in this week.

36:16So when you've talked about these things before, it also becomes difficult to separate from previous concerns from this moment and to really sort of like put a pin in what makes this particular action different, more extraordinary, more troubling, darker, more sinister than previous things that we've thought about and talked about with Trump. Yeah, Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert are really awful free speech martyrs for the left in these cases because they're at heart corporate Dems who have coasted on really lazy comedy and started driving some of these formats into the ground unnecessarily so.

36:56And it's hard to – I think it's hard for people to rally around these guys because they're company men. I agree, Emily, because also it's like liberals have a lot of times turned a blind eye to other freedom of speech issues over the last two years. I mean, like, have they covered the crackdowns from both Biden and Trump on Palestine protest freedom of speech? Like, I see so many people in L.A. Have Colbert and Kimmel talked about that? That's a really good point. I mean, Stuart has. Yeah, Stuart has for sure. But I don't know. I am a little struck by like a lot of liberals that I see online coming out for the first time about freedom of speech after two years of disastrous freedom of speech.

37:36But it's like all when it's like a multimillionaire, like white host of a late night show. That's when it matters. Obviously, he's a more famous person. It's going to make a bigger impact. But yeah, if you haven't been talking about freedom of speech in a lot of other areas, and let's say a lot of these were front page news stories, you like to miss Mahmoud Khalil. That's a front page story. Like, that's not like, oh, sorry, I didn't turn to the third page to see that. Let me defend not, you know, Colbert and these people who I haven't watched. I genuinely don't know. I don't suspect that they said anything about that, but I don't actually know for sure.

38:10But let me defend the libs a little bit here, which is to say, number one, Democrats overwhelmingly, you know, oppose what's happening in Gaza, have opposed the crackdown on, you know, on speech on campus. Like that movement comes from the left. And, you know, it's most more leftist, but also left liberal. So there's that. The other thing I would say is, again, like I was and Ryan was at odds with a lot of liberals in terms of their, you know, ignoring an acceptance and pushing actively cancel culture and trampling on speech and censorship and all of that. Right. So I wasn't on the same page with them there.

38:51However, I will say both in terms of the substance and in terms of the state mechanisms, this is different. Right. Like with the Twitter file stuff, what the Biden administration was messaging to, you know, these social media companies about was covid misinformation that they felt like genuinely was going to cause people to lose their lives. Right. So now we all felt like, OK, first of all, a lot of these accounts are tiny accounts like it's not going to make that big of a difference. You guys have been wrong about a bunch of stuff with covid. We don't want a ministry of truth just by sending these messages and having these meetings.

39:27You're exerting extraordinary pressure. But I don't want to pretend like the COVID misinformation and this like lame comment from Jimmy Kimmel are remotely the same because they're not. Right. So the content is different. And then as Ryan was laying out before, the government action is different as well. So here you have an explicit threat, and it comes in the context of a Trump administration that has used every opportunity, real and imagined crises, to crush dissent, crack down, grab power, and has truly, I mean, it truly is an authoritarian threat to the country and to democracy. So I even as I, again, was not on the same page as liberals, you can go back and look at my support of the Harper's letter and coverage of the Twitter files and all that.

40:17You guys took a lot of heat. You guys took a lot of heat. Yeah. Even though I wasn't on their side there, like, I think it is fair to say this administration, what they're doing now is genuinely different than what anything we saw under the Biden administration. I don't think it even came close. And that's before we even talk about like scrubbing people's social media and, you know, for whether or not they can have a visa and deporting them without due process. And, you know, the massive crackdown over speech on Palestine, et cetera. So that's what I would say in defense of the libs. Um, it's the I think you always have to take what Trump is saying, even if he doesn't mean it.

40:59Literally, you have to take it seriously, because when you have the president of the United States threatening broadcast licenses and even if it's just, quote, jawboning, I think you do have to take it seriously, especially when it comes with threats from the FCC and when you see compliance. So I actually think the way that Trump talks about broadcast licenses is insane. And when they have a track record of weaponizing the government to punish universities, law firms, immigrants, students, anyone that they don't like. When he's coming out and issuing a statement saying, hey, we're going to make Antifa, which is like an ideology, a terrorist organization, and threatening people who are just pro-Palestine with providing material support to terrorism.

41:45That's the record of this administration. So it's not an idle threat. We all know that they have weaponized the entire federal government in every way that they can think of in order to coerce and crush dissent and consolidate power. So that is a very different landscape than what we've dealt with before. The other thing I was going to say is I do think some moves from Dems and the Biden administration, and this doesn't have to become a tit-for-tat thing, I do think things like the Global Engagement Center, which it's hypocritical for Marco Rubio to shut it down and act like he's a champion of free speech, obviously, given what's happened with visas and other students.

42:22But in that case, the State Department was funding blacklists of conservative media outlets and not even just conservative media outlets, but like literally unheard, found its way onto a global disinformation index that was funded by the State Department. The Equality Act, which almost every Democrat supports, would have serious ramifications for free speech because of the way that it reads gender identity into sex. And the same thing was true of the way the Obama administrations and the Biden administrations wielded Title IX. So it's some of that stuff, I think, was was enormously significant in ways that it's frustrating because the Colbert, you know, who's now a free speech martyr and Kimmel is a free speech martyr.

43:06don't give a damn about, they don't care. And some of the people who are supporting them don't care and never did. The media barely covered the Global Engagement Center story, like it wasn't really anything. And there are other examples that we could point to, too. I actually agree. I don't think the COVID one is apples to apples. I think it's apples to oranges. But I do think there are other ones where we saw both the Obama and Biden administrations weaponizing their power to go after journalists and, you know, or not just journalists, but to go after speech. Actually, Ryan, the James Risen case from the Obama administration and the James Rosen case from the Obama administration are examples of that, too.

43:42But in those cases, most of the media was pretty defensive of Risen, if I'm remembering correctly. Yeah, and Risen started late Bush and then went into Obama. And so it was this bipartisan attempt to get – he was a New York Times reporter who had exposed some of the NSA spying reporting that was then later confirmed by Edward Snowden's leaks. and they were threatening to put him in prison in order to get him to reveal his sources. And eventually Obama backed off because he was the kind of person that elites could pressure and say, you're a constitutional scholar, bro. Like you're a law professor.

44:23Like, what are you doing? All right, fine. And so he never ended up going to prison. But, you know, Crystal and I both warned, throughout the teens and early 20s that what the left was doing might be constitutional because it's private stuff. You're bullying. The mob is bullying some company to fire a person or get rid of them. But that it was still eroding of the First Amendment. That the First Amendment has a letter and it has a spirit. And while it might not have been violating the letter of it, it was violating the spirit of it. And amendments that are on the books, but that aren't respected by the cultural spirit, aren't worth what they're written on.

45:11Look at the Fourth Amendment. No illegal search and seizure. Well, how's that working out for us? It's still written there. But because spiritually we kind of abandon it, then nobody follows it anymore. And so that's why people like Glenn and Crystal and I were all saying, no, you've got to draw the line here and protect it in spirit, not just in letter. Because you're not always going to be in power. And in a lot of cases, like Trump was president at the time. And when you fully lose power, look, you know, it's going to ratchet further. The most hopeful thing I've seen, which is probably too hopeful, is that the right is going to have its outrageous spasm of cancel culture.

45:54It's going to use the tools and the power of government to censor speech, taking cancel culture to the next level. but it's going to fall apart because the american people when they vote in elections a lot of the political science says they're not really actually moved by what the media and and what commercials say like that's just that's a that's a fraction of of how people vote what they vote on is the underlying material conditions of their lives which are rapidly deteriorating under Trump. So his effort to like do a Turkey Erdogan or Hungarian like consolidation of the media to hold on to power may not work because we're so federalized and because people vote based on how they, you know, and Democratic Party is the oldest political party in world history.

46:48So people know they're, they don't know what it stands for, but they know it exists. And so if they're not happy with the conditions that they're living in, they know that they can vote for this other party. What is that party going to do? God only knows. They're not telling us. Right. But at least they're not the party in power. So that could still happen. And then at that point, maybe both the left and the right are like, okay, we were wrong. Let's do an amnesty and a truce on this cancel culture stuff. No. Okay. No. Well, let me just say. Like, well, and we all pretend like cancel culture started with like, you know, liberals in the like Hillary Clinton era.

47:27And that's just not true. Like, think back to the post 2001. Yeah. I mean, and yeah, go back to McCarthy. Even the early 90s, like all the little like moral panics about rap lyrics and stuff like that. It was John Adams throwing French aligned people. Oh, so true. In the prison. John Adams was the worst. Original sin. Original sin on First Amendment there. It actually started with Jesus. Yep. There you go. Original podcaster. But I mean, so I like I have to tell you guys, I feel I don't feel scared or angry. I actually just feel depressed because I like let's play this out a little bit. OK, and let's keep in mind you guys, Ryan and Emily, you guys covered this week.

48:11also this consolidation of media institutions in the hands of Trump aligned figures and Zionists, the Ellisons, you know, they're so you're going to have CBS, potentially CNN, HBO, you know, Twitter's already owned by Elon, TikTok coming under that umbrella, too. So, yeah, I've got a breakdown of you of these crystal for you while you're talking. OK, if you want to throw that up on the screen. And so you talk about Orban. I mean, this is Orban. This is like a speed run of Orbanism, which from my study took longer to consolidate than, you know, this has in the second Trump administration. And then what do you do with the remaining mainstream, you know, establishment institutions?

48:50You do what you did with Jimmy Kimmel. You send out the message. Listen, you better not cross me or else there are going to be consequences. And the corporate executives, you know, as a leftist, I never expected the capitalists to fight back against fascism, but they certainly aren't rising to the occasion. There's no doubt about that. And so that message goes on, too. You're going to hurt feelings. Don't hurt feelings with the F word. So that goes out, you know, that goes out, too, to everybody who works there. Like, they're not going to they don't have my back. Nobody has solidarity with me.

49:21I am just out here on my own. And do I personally have any ability to stand up to the entirety of the United States government? Of course not. And neither does independent, quote unquote, independent media either. Like if Disney can be crushed like a bug, what do you think we are? Right. So you have I mean, you have so you that's the media landscape. OK. And then, OK, we have elections, right? We have midterms. We already know Trump is trying to like jerry rig the maps to make it as favorable as possible. cast out on mail-in ballots. They're monkeying around with the voter rolls, like all this stuff that they're going to try to do.

49:58Not to mention we've got National Guard already in the streets in multiple cities. Are they going to be there intimidating voters on Election Day? I don't think it's a crazy thing to suggest. Then let's say that Democrats overcome that. It's too big to rig. They win a majority in the House. They do well in the Senate, whatever. You think this man is going to accept those election results? Of course he's not. Of course he's not. We already know his playbook. He's already projecting what he's going to do when he's casting doubt on elections and mail-in ballots and saying, you know, I wish we had the recourse of the ballot box, but, you know, the ballot box in many cases is rigged and it's not sufficient.

50:35He's going to go out and say, no, these election results are not legitimate. Democrats did not win these seats. They're incapable of winning these seats. And his base will believe him. So at that point, You have a media ecosystem that is completely compromised, that's terrified to tell the truth about the nature of the elections. You've got, you know, roughly half of at least of the voting public that is going along with, you know, his view that this is all rigged and a sham. Like, where are we then? Because the whole thing, to Ryan's point about like, you know, it's all written down on paper, but it's as good as the paper it's written on if we don't all sort of like buy into the spirit of the project.

51:12The whole thing falls apart if you don't have most of the population sort of routinely just like accepting, OK, these results are more or less correct and we're going to move forward with what we get. So that's where we're headed. And this media consolidation piece is an important part of it because they need to be scared to tell the truth going, you know, when and if that happens about what actually occurred. And so that's why I'm feeling very depressed, because I don't see what institution exists or what power structure exists that is capable of like rolling back or resisting any of this. It's certainly not the corporations.

51:49It hasn't been the universities, wasn't the law firms. You know, it's it. Labor has already long been defenestrated long ago. They're irrelevant to the conversation, which is sad and pathetic. The court system, like Trump has realized that, number one, there's this loophole in liberal democracy where if you just do a bunch of shit, it takes a while for the courts to catch up. And number two, the Supreme Court's giving him everything he wants anyway when it gets there. So I don't know, guys. That's where we are. It's pretty ugly. And they're already on Fox News being like, oh, well, the First Amendment.

52:22I don't know if Charlie really would have believed in that now. I think Trump said that. And then someone else on Fox News was like, I don't I don't know if we really I don't know if we can deal with the First Amendment anymore. I'm not sure if that's as important as these other things we're dealing with. literally what every lib said during the biden administration that sent conservatives through the roof not every lib of course but it was like all of the disinformation libs who were complaining about the the first amendment scope being too broad in the way that i mean it is like it she said the thing that was sending uh all of the right onto their moral high horse um and again like in a good way, right?

53:02Like we should all be against the government saying, well, maybe that whole First Amendment thing is a little outdated. So yeah, I mean, I... Yeah, Emily, I'm curious for your take on Crystal's scenario, because it seems pretty dystopian, but also fairly realistic. The only thing I would say could change that arc would be a financial crisis, which we do seem like I think that's a matter more of of when rather than if that could that basically just flips the table. But outside of that, where do you see holes in the kind of arc that she sketched out there? I don't. I mean, I don't. I think, you know, for me, it was also depressing when the Hunter Biden like laptop case broke And I saw the way the media had treated the like Russia collusion thing for years.

54:01And of course, I like I remember not being able to DM that story after the Politico broke that 51 former intelligence people coming out and saying it had all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation. I remember not being able to send it over a DM in private conversations. So that was like I felt really similarly then. then. And I think probably the most important reservation that people should have about Trump, even if you're conservative, even if you are ideologically MAGA, but you're not like full Curtis Yarvin and want just like a monarchy or an American CEO instead of a president. The biggest reservation people should still have is fake claims of fraud in elections, because in elections, because that is the hallmark of banana republicanism.

54:53And we've seen there's precedent for it. So I don't think like I actually think a lot of conservatives, if you laid out what Crystal just said, would be like, oh, ha ha. But no, I think it's completely serious because, again, we have precedent for it. So I've got nothing in response to that. I'm Mungish Hatikular, and I'm back with a new season of the podcast Skyline Drive. This time I'm diving into a rabbit hole of peptides, organoids, blood boys, blue zones, and brain replacement to try to understand what this longevity obsession is all about and what it really means to live forever for all of us.

55:32I learned about some rad science. I can make a brain for you and then we can test what draw is the best for your brain as opposed to his brain. Here are some hard truths. I would expect Indians to age faster, but I did not expect it to be almost a four to five year acceleration. And get myself into a world of trouble. I'd say probably start bone smashing. That doesn't work. Make it look more defined. They say it works. I don't know. Listen to Skyline Drive, How to Live Forever on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Bill, why is my eye twitching? Does this mean I'm in perimenopause?

56:16Maybe I have adult ADHD. I need to look this up. Where's my phone? Juliana, your phone is hot to the touch. I think it's asking you for a break. You know what? Maybe I should just ask ChatGPT. Or maybe we can ask an actual human. Yes, like a couple sex therapist. Whoa, that escalated quickly, but okay. Because I have questions. We have questions. And I bet everyone has questions. Like, is it normal to sleep in separate bedrooms? We do that. How about this one? Is bribing your kids bad parenting? or just negotiating? Oh, and I still do need to know, why was my poop green that one time? Hypothetically, right?

56:51Okay, well, instead of letting the internet guess, we've got actual people answering these exact questions. And laughing with us has got to be better than spending three hours down a rabbit hole online. Listen to Bill and Juliana. The podcast. On the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your podcasts.

57:12Hey guys, Paul Verzi here, and I want to talk to you about Paul's best podcast. Will Ferrell's Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio. I sit down each week with a special guest and we discuss the absolute best of things. Pete Davidson. It's that and then there's everything else. He would just shout one line and it would murder. Marie! Lunch! Bill Burr. Let's talk about the best moments that we had on the road. I would love a cocktail. Dude, Joe could get last row middle seat on a Southwest Airlines flight. Joe, how was your flight? It was great. The guy on Penn State moving on the field. And the player thought Joe was his former coach.

57:47And he hugged him. And he hugged him. And Joe just went with it. And the guy goes, what are you doing here, coach? And Joe just goes, man. And you walk in, and it is bananas. I mean, it's a feast for the eyes. And I was like, it's not my thing either. But we're here. When in Rome. Top athletes, chefs, musicians, everybody. Listen to Paul's Best Podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Let me ask you guys something, too, about this York County shooting of, you know, there was an ambush. In Pennsylvania? In Pennsylvania. The cops. Five cops were ambushed, three killed, two others wounded.

58:28And I'm curious if you think that the climate that we're in explains some of the lack of attention that the media is paying to this. uh the guys matthew ruth was the is the killer he was he was he was killed or he took his own life it's there's there's very little information about about this he was stalking his uh his girlfriend his ex-girlfriend she called the police um they suspected an ambush um and still got ambushed um from a cornfield um and and he's he's a registered libertarian i believe white guy like it's what people call demographically inconvenient but even given all those facts the killing of the shooting of five police officers and the killing of three usually makes national news even if the shooter is demographically inconvenient yet there's barely been a blip i I wonder if the political climate the media is under right now is influencing decisions by broadcasters to say, you know what, let's not touch this.

59:42This looks like trouble. I mean, the innocent explanation would be there's just so much else going on, you know, with Charlie Kirk just being assassinated and that being the investigation of that being ongoing and the Kimmel censorship and all of those things. Right. And to presidents in the UK, like all these things that are going on that it just couldn't quite break through. But what I would say, Ryan, is if the shooter were trans and just murdered three cops, everyone in the fucking country would know about it and it would be wall to wall coverage. So I think there's no doubt that the demographic inconvenience of the shooter is a big part of the reason why networks decide, you know, there's a lot of other stories to cover.

1:00:28We're just not going to touch this. We're just going to put this one on the back burner and we're not going to particularly touch it. Now, I will say that's nothing new, of course. You know, how many stories do we have of like adorable little white girls who get murdered and kidnapped or horrible things and they become national names and stories? And same thing happens to an adorable little black girl and nobody ever knows her name. Like this is not a new thing in terms of American media presentation. But I think you are correctly touching on the particular political valence that could be influencing the lack of coverage, lack of details, the lack of curiosity around this one.

1:01:04Because when I saw this break, I was like, wow, what the hell is going on here? And I'm still in the place of, wow, what the hell is going on here? Because there hasn't been much, if any, significant journalistic inquiry into what exactly unfolded and what the circumstances were. So Ryan was asking, Ryan was, Ryan was searching for hope earlier in this episode. And we were also searching for people that were meeting the moment. And a lot of people have been saying, oh, what about all these center right, right wing podcasters who made free speech and cancel culture, a core part of their message, a core part of why they voted for Trump, why they supported Trump and the vibe shift.

1:01:48and a lot of people on the left were saying, oh, these guys are going to duck their heads, not meet the moment. So let's see what that side of podcasting has been saying first here. I've got a few different ones. This one here is from Tim Dillon. This is an Instagram story. For those just listening, it says on his Instagram story, SEC Commissioner threatening to revoke broadcasting licenses has chilling effect on free speech. AG threatening to go after hate speech is a bad sign. When someone has a weapon, Everyone will use it. I continue to unconditionally support Israel and all of its actions now and forever.

1:02:25It's nice to cover your bases there. He also announced that, I couldn't even tell if he was joking, that he'd been fired from the Saudi Arabia. From the Riyadh. Yeah. The comedy circuit? So I actually think that might be true. But he's keeping the down payment. Yeah. Because I looked at their website for the comedy festival. He's off. And I don't see him there anymore. So I think that might have actually been true because he did his whole monologue where which I covered and did a monologue about where he was like, you know, they're paying me enough to look away. But then he said in the monologue, if someone's being beaten next to me, I'm going to look away.

1:03:01If there's slave labor, I'm going to look away. So we sort of named the things that Saudi Arabia is doing. So I I I can't I couldn't totally. But I think he may I think he may have been canceled from the company. The funniest thing to do is take the down payment and get fired. Getting fired is the funniest thing you can do always as a comedian. And that's why Tim has been unafraid to kind of like poke all sides, including like his friends. Like, I mean, he's ripped RFK. He rips Barry all the time. He used to get invited to dinners there. So he also he also joked, I'll be taking the down payment and donating it to a foundation that supports.

1:03:35He's like, I'm just kidding. I'm going to buy a car. Yeah. another exactly see you in Montecito um but this one I thought was even uh more interesting this comes from a barstool sports podcast um now the CEO uh Dave Portnoy seemed to support the decision was kind of gaslighting people and saying it's not really a big deal it's all about a business decision but here's one of the podcasts under his arm and what they had to say no right now in 2025 at 10.06 on September 18th. The extreme right are the biggest group of pussies that has ever existed in America. A bunch of, because people with green hair at Starbucks, because once in a while a fucking guy swam against girls.

1:04:20You fucking pussies have broken in half. Led a duo in consequence culture Portnoy, who is just waving his arms at the right to like him again after the thing last week where he said it was Trump's fault privately and publicly that Charlie Kirk died. Now he's like, I gotta get them back. I gotta get them back. I gotta get them back. Typical, I will say, fits the tribe profile. So there's that, and you know, is he getting, wait, is that, is he just getting antisemitic at the very end there? Yeah, the tribe profile? Is that he still on Barstool? All right, let's, we'll look into this. We're gonna look into this.

1:05:01I thought he got into a big fight with Portnoy. He had me until the end there, yeah. Talk about not sticking the landing. Yeah. Is Portnoy Jewish? Yes, he's Jewish. Yes, Portnoy is. Yes, he's Jewish, yeah. Yeah, so he just wraps it up with some blatant anti-Semitism. Yeah, wraps it up with like... But he's talking about Portnoy, wasn't he? He's talking about Portnoy, and he says typical member of the tribe. He's just basically saying like typical Jew. So, yeah. Yeah. All right. He has me until then. We lost that one. Tim distuck the landing far better by hailing Israel. So we're showing the right way and the wrong way of doing this.

1:05:39We've smoked out the true anti-Semite on Breaking Points, and we all know it's now Griffin. Griffin. Okay. This is the free half of the show. This is the half the Fox News producers watch, Emily. This is not okay. They watch the whole thing. They absolutely watch the whole thing. They share one premium sub. I'm a defender. I'm a defender of Jewish people all around the world. We need to check the IPs of their login, see how many people logged in. They did name drop Starbucks, though. And I had to throw this up here. There's an update here from Starbucks. Update, Starbucks employees must write Charlie Kirk's name.

1:06:18No matter what your name is. Yes, exactly. In response to some conversations on social media, Starbucks shared the following, there are no restrictions on customers using Charlie Kirk's name on their order, and we are following up with our team, which I just think is such a great example. It's like, this is the world that they're envisioning, like that they need a safe space at Starbucks so that they're what? It's so live coded. The trans barista can write Charlie Kirk on it. Like, I don't know. I do. I want to say, go ahead, Crystal. I just, I, when, before Starbucks made this decision or whatever, I felt really bad for these baristas who are trying to navigate like this corporate policy against writing anything political on the cups and these customers coming in and berating them and recording them and putting them on blast the world.

1:07:03I felt very bad for the baristas. Right, how is that not political? Yeah, I mean, how do you navigate that, right? Your boss is telling you to do one thing and then you've got this customer who wants to make a social media moment of it and then Libs of TikTok is going to send it out to the world and make it out like you're some evil pro-murder lefty or whatever. So I, yeah, the whole thing was, I don't know. And Portnoy fired some intern from Barstool because he posted condolences to Charlie Kirk on like the Barstool, Texas account or something. And he fired him saying that you're not allowed to do politics.

1:07:46Wait, what? Yeah. You see this? Yeah, I didn't see that either. I didn't see that. That seems weird. um and portnoy said i i always hated this kid he knows you're not supposed to do politics on the account it's not about what he said it's these are these are accounts it's not his personal account she's not supposed to do politics he had the kid had posted like basically thoughts and prayers for charlie kirk uh from the texas barstool account um so but they have a very strict rule no politics from the account so to crystal's point if you're a barista and they say no politics on the cup and somebody asked you to do put a political gesture on the cup you say no then you get filmed and now you're on libs of tiktok and so yeah starbucks kind of put them in a bad situation i agree with you there yeah i mean i also just do want to say because i i genuinely think this is important that when something happens to somebody who's in the media space um i think this probably also explains why dean withers for example had such a visceral reaction after but really though griffin like after it happened did you see withers video for those don't know dean withers is like dean withers is a very young zoomer liberal tiktok debater and he was i mean it was by the way here's this oh there it is okay scumbag wow yeah he was not But anyway, what I was going to say is, for me, like as someone who did not know Charlie Kirk nearly as well as a lot of people who are in the media who were very, very close with him, like in right wing media who are like very, very, very close with him were.

1:09:32this is just all i'm trying to say here is not defending any like censoriousness or whatever but just to say that i have been trying to extend a lot of grace to people and hopefully people have extended some grace to me because that was like a collective trauma for people on the right who are really close to charlie kirk and are now the ones that find themselves in positions to be like in the public space discussing it so i hope that some of this dies down i don't think all of it will die down but i did just want to say that like if something god forbid happened to like someone on the left i do think we would also be seeing some of this like deep visceral um anger that's like feels really raw and again i'm not saying that's gonna go away i don't think it is but i do just want to say like i just knowing some of these guys what this did to them psychologically was incredibly hard and i can't imagine again i wasn't like a close personal friend of charlie but a lot of people that I am close friends with were.

1:10:34And it's just so anyway, just a word to say, I think some of it will go away. I don't think all of it will go away. And it's been crazy. I think that's a fair point. I don't extend that point to the president of the United States, though. And that's who it's fair, you know, because because he showed that he had no emotional reaction that he doesn't care. Yeah, I mean, yeah, he was. How are you doing? I'm doing great. I'm doing great. My renovation is going fantastic. You know, so, you know, and I don't know how capable he is of human emotions on the best of days, but whatever. I mean, and so that's that's like it's one thing.

1:11:10OK, a cultural phenomenon, random influencers. You know, I still think you're a person with a platform. You still have responsibility. Certainly, I don't think grace would be applied in the other direction. Not that that should dictate what you do, whatever. But that's one thing. But the president Johnson is a good example. Yeah. President United States is using this as a chance to crack down. Right. In any number of ways on media figures, media outlets, he doesn't like on left wing groups. You've got Stephen Miller, who is like basically the real president of the United States, who is out overtly like we are going to use this aggressively to go after all of our political enemies.

1:11:48And they will. I mean, that's I believe them when they when they say that and they are already taking steps in that direction. So, you know, my my my grace that I can extend to individuals who who directly knew Charlie and are impacted by this on a personal level does not extend to the president of the United States, who was supposed to represent all of us and is probably the worst person I could possibly imagine to be the president at a moment such as this. that's yeah absolutely and i also before we go to the premium one other point um that i think i think the audience correctly sussed out that that that the trauma that um emily is talking about having hit you know people close to him but also people in the broad kind of ecosystem also does you know bleed out into people on the progressive side too like you and i think that just you know psychically psychologically people like me and crystal and hassan and um anybody who's kind of like a public figure you know saw themselves in that and i and i then i and i think the audience is right to you kind of be to be wary of the of that fact like understand that we're that our analysis flows out of out of that bias um and so that um that i but i don't think there's you'd have to be just a stone cold, not human person for it to be any different.

1:13:15And that's not who we are either. Yeah, that's a good point. Well, on that note, folks, we are going to get into a lot of other fun stuff here in the second half. We're going to be analyzing, breaking down the Candace Owens new released photo of the shooter, Tyler Robinson, alleged shooter. And we're going going to be getting to a few other stories. If you want to see all that and ask us questions in the AMA, you can sign up at breakingpoints.com to support us and our independent journalism. We don't read ads. We don't take money from anybody. It's all you guys. And we'll see you there on the second half.

1:14:08Whether you're starting college for the first time, finishing the degree you began years ago, or ready to take the next step with a graduate program, NLU means business. At National Lewis University, our business programs are designed to fit your goals, your schedule, and your future with flexible options, expert faculty, and career-focused learning. Join us at an upcoming open house and discover where a business degree can take you. NLU means business. Visit nl.edu to learn more and register today. Hey, everybody. I'm Tarika Foster-Brasby. What's up, y 'all? I'm your girl, Cheryl Swoops. When you tune in to a new episode of our podcast, Levels to This, you're definitely going to get some spicy WNBA analysis.

1:14:55But we're more than just hoops. And the real conversation is what we actually bring. It's been really, really cool seeing kind of these women just really step into their power off the court and understand that they are basketball, right? And they're not asking for permission. Listen to Levels to This with Cheryl Swoops and Tarika Foster-Brasby on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Mange Shatikular and I'm back with a new season of my podcast, Skyline Drive. This time I talk to scientists, biopunks, curmudgeons, blues owners, super seniors, and Goa's top cryotherapy lab to try to understand this obsession with living forever and what it means for all of us.

1:15:39And I get into a bit of trouble along the way. I'd say probably start bone smashing. That doesn't work. Make it look more defined. They say it works. I don't know. Listen to Skyline Drive, How to Live Forever on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human.

From the publisher

The BP team looks at Trump doubling down on the silencing of TV Show criticism after the successful pressure to take Jimmy Kimmel off the air for Charlie Kirk comments, then we look at the reactions from the "anti cancel culture" podcasts.


Krystal: https://x.com/krystalball

Ryan: https://x.com/ryangrim

Emily: https://x.com/emilyjashinsky

Griffin: https://x.com/griffinpdavis

 

To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show AD FREE, uncut and 1 hour early visit: www.breakingpoints.com

Merch Store: https://shop.breakingpoints.com/

 

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar

All 553 episodes
9/19/25: Trump CHEERS Kimmel Shutdown, Late Night RESPONDSBreaking Points with Krystal and Saagar · 1 h 6 min
Listen in VO