In short
Oscar season as a lens on Hollywood’s business direction, including studio bets, Oscar campaigning, prediction markets, and the Academy’s move to YouTube; plus the Ellisons’ Paramount/Warner acquisitions and what that could mean for production, news, and costs.
Guests
Matt Belloni, chief correspondent at Business Insider and Hollywood reporter/author (Puck’s Matt Belloni), longtime Oscars and industry chronicler.
Key claims
Warner’s “auteur” strategy is validated by awards success (especially Sinners and One Battle After Another), even if some films won’t recoup theatrically. Oppo research scandals are “overblown” this year; late voting makes most Twitter controversies unlikely to swing results. Prediction markets (e.g., Calshi) may influence media coverage and reflect Best Actor odds (Belloni expects Timothée Chalamet). The Oscars moving to YouTube is framed as a money-driven licensing shift, not a guaranteed audience-growth fix.
Notable examples
Ryan Coogler’s vampire film deal; Warner’s $15M awards campaign; Carla Sofía Gascón backlash last year; Timothée Chalamet “ballet/opera” controversy; Michael B. Jordan SAG win; YouTube connected-TV viewing; Ellison debt math ($80B) and proposed $6B cost cuts; potential rightward shift at CNN/CBS; Gulf money discussions for Paramount/Warner.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOOscars 2023: The Anticipation
2:15 to 3:56
Discussing the upcoming Oscars, seating arrangements, and industry shifts.
“Last time we had this conversation, it was just after last year's Oscars.”
Warner Brothers' Oscar Strategy
3:56 to 7:36
Analyzing Warner Brothers' nominations and their strategic direction in filmmaking.
“lost them tens of millions of dollars and they still ran a$15 million awards campaign for the movie.”
Oppo Research in Oscar Campaigns
7:36 to 10:02
Exploring the tactics of Oscar campaigns, including oppo research and past controversies.
“to be fair, they're not saying that they're saying that Warners is going to be able to be autonomous and they want them to make these kinds of movies and they have expertise.”
Betting on Oscars: Prediction Markets
10:02 to 13:08
Discussing the impact of betting markets on Oscar predictions and media coverage.
“And in the last couple of days, there is a non-story about Timothee Chalamet suggesting that ballet and opera aren't important.”
Engagement Through Gambling
13:08 to 14:00
Examining how gambling and fantasy sports affect audience investment in events.
“but if you were to bet, I might put some money on Timmy to win Best Actor because he was the favorite for most of the season, and it's only this late surge that has caused Michael B.”
The Impact of Betting on Sports Engagement
14:00 to 15:10
Explore how fantasy betting influences sports viewership and engagement.
“how many more people are invested in football because of their fantasy team or their betting?”
Oscars' Future: From TV to Internet
15:10 to 16:50
Discuss the potential shift of the Oscars to a YouTube platform and its implications.
“television show and how the audience is steadily declining and what does that tell us about the state of media and monoculture and will the you know will this ever return will the oscars ever get more important.”
Challenges of Transitioning the Oscars
16:50 to 19:10
Examine the challenges the Oscars face with audience transition to digital platforms.
“I think they're making a sacrifice here, doing it so soon.”
The Oscars and Entertainment Format
19:10 to 20:30
Analyze the need for the Oscars to adapt their format for modern audiences.
“And she has some ideas, but like, it's just the fundamental problem with the Oscars has always been and will continue to be until the Academy changes it.”
The Oscars and Netflix: A Missed Opportunity
22:45 to 24:10
Discuss why Netflix didn't acquire the Oscars and implications for the industry.
“But is it possible to talk about politics without talking about Donald Trump?”
Show all 15 chapters
The Ellisons' Acquisition Strategy
24:10 to 27:40
Explore the Ellisons' strategy in acquiring Warner Brothers and the implications.
“And they're kind of stand-ins for you're mad about the way technology has changed and audiences have changed.”
The Future of News under Ellison's Leadership
27:40 to 28:00
Analyze how the Ellisons' leadership may shift the news landscape.
“And whether he's doing this to appease Donald Trump or because he genuinely thinks that's a good idea for a business reason or ideologically doesn't matter, that's where it's going to go.”
Understanding the Ellison Deal and Its Implications
28:00 to 32:44
Explore the motivations behind the Ellison deal and its potential impact on Warner Brothers Discovery.
“he thinks that the world needs more conservative news.”
The Controversy Over Gulf Investment in Hollywood
32:50 to 37:58
Delve into the implications of Gulf investments in Hollywood and industry reactions.
“dollars in gulf money and again not from companies in the gulf but gulf countries saudi arabia uae Cotter were supposed to kick in$24 billion when this deal was being discussed late last year.”
The Future of Hollywood Amidst Change
37:58 to 40:14
Discuss the transitional phase in Hollywood and the opportunities emerging for creators.
“We had Janice Min, your former colleague slash competitor, on a few weeks ago.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01Peter Kafka:Oh, hey. Sorry, love to chat, but I'm busy shopping all the rollbacks and more at Walmart. Grab a what? Cancel that. I gotta grab these big savings on the Walmart app online and in-store like right now. See who? Nope, unavail. The only thing I want to see are the prices just lowered on Tech Home and all my must-haves. Wait, you want to shop Walmart with me? Alrighty, I think I can fit you in. recommendations can be great maybe someone recommended this podcast and here you are but home projects are a little different if the podcast isn't your thing you might lose a few minutes from your day but if you hire your cousin's neighbor to mount your tv you might end up with a lopsided screen and wall damage i know a guy isn't a good strategy for your home that's why thumbtack works so well.
0:54Peter Kafka:It matches you with top-rated local pros with photos, reviews, and credentials all in one convenient place. For your next home project, try Thumbtack. Hire the right pro today.
1:11Peter Kafka:Xfinity tech support? How can I help? I can't get Jurassic Park back online without... Oh, you just need Xfinity. Plug in your gateway and you're good. All set. Luckily, Xfinity has reliable, self-healing Wi-Fi that keeps you safe from threats. Wow. You can even boost speeds to your most important devices.
1:30Matt Belloni:Get reliable Wi-Fi at one price for five years.
1:34Peter Kafka:Guaranteed. Xfinity. Imagine that. Watch Jurassic Park with Xfinity. Restrictions apply. Select plans only.
1:45Peter Kafka:From the Vox Media Podcast Network, this is Channels with Peter Kafka. That is me. I'm also chief correspondent at Business Insider. It is Oscar season. If you weren't paying attention to that, because maybe you're paying attention to other things happening in the world. The actual awards are Sunday, March 15th. That means it's time to talk to Puck's Matt Bellany, the excellent chronicler of all things Hollywood. I want to talk about the awards, but really, this is a chance to talk about the movie business and where it's going at what seems like a crucial moment. Welcome back, Matt. Thanks for having me.
2:16Peter Kafka:Thanks for coming. Last time we had this conversation, it was just after last year's Oscars. You said you had good but not great seats. Basically, your star had slipped since you were editing The Hollywood Reporter. Are you going this year? And if so, have your seats improved?
2:31Matt Belloni:I am going, and it is unclear whether my seats have improved. They do not assign tickets until the night before the Oscars. So they will just pop up in my digital wallet where I'm sitting. I don't think, I'm not anticipating much of an improvement this year. I didn't do anything to warrant getting better seats.
2:52Peter Kafka:I don't know. I feel like I read a profile of you in the Times and some other glossy stuff. Someone had a picture, someone saw a profile of you looking pensive at Sundance. I think you're moving up.
3:02Matt Belloni:Yeah, I guess stars on the studio do not get preference for Oscar tickets.
3:07Peter Kafka:No, I don't know. I think if you're in the studio, which you literally were, then you should get better seats.
3:13Matt Belloni:You know what? from your mouth to whoever the Academy decides. It's not embarrassing. Let me be clear. The mezzanine is not embarrassing, but I hopefully someday will return to the orchestra seats.
3:27Peter Kafka:Okay, besides Matt Bellany's quest for better seats, what are the storylines you care about the most with this year's awards?
3:33Matt Belloni:I mean, the hilarious thing about the Oscars this year is that the leading studio with 30 nominations was just gobbled up by another studio. the fourth richest man in the world. I mean, Warner Brothers, this is almost like a swan song for Warners. This is the best it's ever going to get for this studio. Now, put aside the fact that one battle after another lost them tens of millions of dollars and they still ran a$15 million awards campaign for the movie. Sinners did very well for them and is really a validation in their minds of the strategy that has been put in place at Warners to bet hundreds of millions of dollars on auteur filmmakers to make original movies, people in Hollywood love that.
4:21Matt Belloni:And if Sinners wins, it's because, in part, people want to thank Warner Brothers for betting on this filmmaker, Ryan Coogler, and saying, yes, we will make your$100 million vampire movie and give it a full release. And yes, it will make$350 million worldwide. So I still think one battle after another is going to win, but that's also a validation. I mean, that movie costs, they say 130. I've heard as much as 150 and it grossed about two something worldwide. Not going to make money, but the filmmaker community loves the fact that Warners did this.
4:56Peter Kafka:There were a lot of stories about both sinners and one battle after another as they were in production and coming out with lots of people sort of concern trolling. Oh, it's too much money and it's not known IP and what is Warners doing giving Ryan Coogler this deal? What are they doing spending all? And now it's flipped and now they're being heralded for making movies that are not superhero movies.
5:18Matt Belloni:I mean, when the movies work, at least creatively they worked. One battle did not work financially for all the reasons that people said it wouldn't work. It was just too expensive for what it was. And PTA, Paul Thomas Anderson had never directed a movie that grossed more than 75 million worldwide. And the fact that this movie got over 200, I guess, is a win. You have Leonardo DiCaprio in it, and that's a big draw worldwide. But it's not going to make money. But I think when you win Best Picture, it kind of doesn't matter because the value of that movie in the Warner's library will always be strong.
5:53Peter Kafka:So assuming that one of either Sinners or one battle after another wins and the odds right now are on one battle after another, does that tell us anything about the state of Hollywood in 2026 other than Warner Brothers made a bunch of critically successful and in some cases commercially successful movies in the last year?
6:13Matt Belloni:Well, it says something about where we're going in the sense that we don't know whether David Ellison and his Paramount team is even going to allow the kind of bets that Warner Brothers made to get those two movies into production and contention. Like if you look at the past history of Skydance movies, the movies that David Ellison made at his company, I highlighted this last night in my newsletter because people at Warner Brothers are joking about it. It's a lot of garbage. It is stuff that, you know, Apple throwaway movies like Ghosted and The Family Plan. And, you know, he made Gemini Man and Life and all these movies that kind of came and went.
7:00Matt Belloni:And then he attached himself to the Paramount franchises. Paramount and Tom Cruise. Yeah. And Tom Cruise, Mission Impossible, Top Gun. He did Reacher and Jack Ryan on TV. He's done okay on the franchise front, although arguably the Terminator movies he made were not good and not successful. but that is his focus. And it's, it's going to be interesting to see if he will even allow the kind of filmmaking at the budgets that were employed on those movies to even happen.
7:31Peter Kafka:So it could be a last guess for that kind of filmmaking, or at least for Warner brothers, making that kind of filmmaking.
7:37Matt Belloni:to be fair, they're not saying that they're saying that Warners is going to be able to be autonomous and they want them to make these kinds of movies and they have expertise. but I think there's going to be a lot more control over Warner Brothers from the Paramount side than there would have been at say Netflix if Netflix had bought Warner Brothers and they were talking about keeping it as a fully autonomous theatrical studio.
7:59Peter Kafka:So we'll come back to David Ellison and his father Larry Ellison in a few minutes. Back to the Oscars for a second. You used to hear stories about oppo research. My producer Charlotte was bringing this up where and I guess the Harvey Weinstein sort of pioneered this at Miramax.
8:15Matt Belloni:And now all of his acolytes are running the campaigns
8:18Peter Kafka:these days, people who came up under Harvey. To improve the odds of you run an Oscar campaign in part to promote your movie and also to tear down somebody else's. Was that happening this year around? I feel like I didn't hear any of that. And the only thing I can think of was there was a California Post story going after the Safdie brothers and some ugliness there that It seems like they don't get along. It was not really even about the movie.
8:42Matt Belloni:It was just that they don't get along, but they don't get along.
8:44Peter Kafka:And one of the safeties had behaved extra badly, supposedly on a set. Or he allowed some people to behave badly.
8:52Matt Belloni:You know what? The oppo research thing, I think it's a little overblown because they, the campaigns don't want to go there. But when they see an opportunity like last year with the Carla Sophia Gascon controversy where the star of Amelia Perez, which was already, it was, you know, it got the most nominations. People forget that last year, Amelia Perez, but it was already kind of weakened in the sense that there was backlash online to some of the gender stuff in the movie. There was a kind of a lot of people just thought the movie sucked. Yes. And it's very different to show that movie in a film festival environment where it's a lot of tours who want to believe in the artistic merit of it.
9:33Matt Belloni:And then it drops on Netflix and people are like, uh, what? What is this penis vagina song? Like, what are we doing here? So it was weak. And then Carla Sofia Gascon went on this resurfaced Twitter scandal. Bad tweets. Bad tweets. And we've seen it before. And people pounced. And all of a sudden, the other campaigns were highlighting what she had said. They saw an opportunity to take that movie down. And it worked. We didn't see that this year, though.
10:03Peter Kafka:Didn't see it this year. And in the last couple of days, there is a non-story about Timothee Chalamet suggesting that ballet and opera aren't important. But that won't. First of all, I don't believe there's a big ballet and opera contingent in the Academy, but also the award voting is closed. Right.
10:20Matt Belloni:So that's when this scandal, which is a giant nothing burger. I mean, literally, it's it's one of those that is only made for Twitter and the outlets that love to get traffic off of Twitter. the the allegation is that he's going to offend the artistic community but this broke at the very end of voting likely people had either voted or already made up their mind and plus even if these scandals make their way into the academy it takes a while for them to to permeate because most academy voters are not very online they are working actors directors writers etc and it just I don't, if, if Timmy loses, it won't be because of that.
10:58Matt Belloni:It will be because there was a last minute surge for sinners. It won the SAG award. Michael B. Jordan won the SAG award and it will be because he splits the Leo vote and Michael B. Jordan surges. But I still don't think that's gonna happen. I think Timmy's going to win.
11:14Peter Kafka:And, and this is the first year of the Oscars where prediction markets are fully mainstream, or at least the idea of them is fully mainstream. Have you tried it? I've gone on CalShe because it's legal and easy and you can download the app from the Apple App Store and connect it to your Apple Pay in two clicks and be betting and your third click. The thing I always point out is Polymarket, that's not the case. That's not legal in the U.S. So to use it, you need a VPN. You need to pay in crypto.
11:42Matt Belloni:I am not a gambler. Normally, I don't do this stuff. But I've been experimenting on CalShe this season, mostly just to kind of see how it works. And I won like a hundred bucks on Kate Hudson getting nominated.
11:55Peter Kafka:I won$3 on John Cornyn, probably winning the Republican primary. How do you think that affects the race either? I mean, does it there's a couple of things I can imagine. It might literally affect the way the race pans out, depending on, I mean, if people have a sense of how the betting is working. I also assume it affects sort of the the media that covers the race. does that, if Calci has odds and I can just go to Calci and see what the odds are for one battle after another, does that pull from variety in Hollywood Porter or even puck coverage of who's winning the race?
12:28Matt Belloni:A little bit. I mean, these awards prognosticators claim to have the inside track and be able to reflect things that the prediction markets would not. It'll be interesting to see how those prognosticators do against the prediction markets. But we've seen right now, Now, for instance, Michael B. Jordan is the favorite to win Best Actor. And Timothee Chalamet has dropped down. I believe he's at like 30 % or something like that now. And I think that is because a lot of people are seeing this stuff online and not realizing how little it's impacting the voting. So Timmy's a pretty good bet right now.
13:08Matt Belloni:And this is not betting advice. but if you were to bet, I might put some money on Timmy to win Best Actor because he was the favorite for most of the season, and it's only this late surge that has caused Michael B. Jordan to go ahead. So I do think it'll be interesting to see who ends up being a better prognosticator, the so-called experts or the math and the markets.
13:31Peter Kafka:The people who promote gambling, whether it's sports gambling or prediction markets, one of the standard raps is, in favor of it is when you can bet on it, it adds stakes. It generates more attention. People are more invested in the game or the awards because they have money riding on it or someone else does. Do you believe that? I do. And I know people at the academy that believe it.
13:52Matt Belloni:They secretly kind of like this stuff. They like the people because they've seen what it does to sports. I mean, how many more people are invested in football because of their fantasy team or their betting? It's an entirely new avenue to get people invested.
14:08Peter Kafka:Yeah, it's unclear to me still whether people are more involved in sports because of betting and fantasy betting, but we can table that for now. You don't think so? I don't know. It certainly works for me. I'll tune into a game if I have someone on my fantasy team playing. No, and there's a contingent of that, right? And I just don't know if the audience has grown. Like, if that was happening, you'd think the audience would grow for these things? And I think they're basically flat to down for most sports.
Read the full transcript
14:32Matt Belloni:Yeah, I guess NFL is the big one. I think the NFL betting has permeated society in a way that everybody at least knows somebody who does it. So I think the Oscars would love if that became a thing. Now, they're not going all the way like the Golden Globes did, where the Golden Globes showed the polymarket odds on the screen, which was like the tackiest thing you could ever do for an artistic merit competition. competition but the globes are tacky and cash grabbing but the oscars have not done yet they
15:03Peter Kafka:do not have a prediction market partner give give them time so that leads me to this conversation which is normally uh when i cover the oscars it's about the television it's often about the television show and how the audience is steadily declining and what does that tell us about the state of media and monoculture and will the you know will this ever return will the oscars ever get more important. And it looks like the Academy has basically said, we've had a nice run. We're taking our ball and we're moving to the internet. So you no longer have these discussions about our declining rating. So in a couple of years, YouTube, this show is going to be a YouTube show.
15:38Peter Kafka:What does that tell us about where things are going?
15:41Matt Belloni:It tells us two things. First and foremost, the Academy needs money. YouTube was stepping up to maintain the license fee that the Academy has become accustomed to. The Academy is like a very well taken care of spouse, male or female, in a very nice bunker or mansion where all of a sudden they were potentially looking at a divorce from ABC that was paying$100 million a year for the show and offering much less. So they can either switch up the lifestyle to which they become accustomed, or they can find a new suitor. And the Oscars are so worth it to YouTube as a branding moment and to get everybody talking about how this pinnacle of Hollywood excellence is moving to the internet and moving to the home of Cat Videos and Mr.
16:34Matt Belloni:Beast. And this will be the narrative everywhere. Now, will the audience actually grow? The Academy hopes that not only will the audience get younger, it will grow worldwide because it is so accessible and everybody can watch anywhere they want. I'm not convinced of that. I think they're making a sacrifice here, doing it so soon. Eventually, yes. But in 2029, are a lot of people going to recognize and realize that you've got to download the YouTube app, put it on your TV or phone, and watch it there, or go to a website? I don't know that the older audience for the Oscars is going to do that.
17:12Peter Kafka:Yeah, I mean, YouTube says well over half their viewing now is on connected TVs. They're already there. They're the biggest platform
17:19Matt Belloni:on connected TV. But what we saw with Amazon Prime Video when the NFL moved Thursday Night Football there was that the audience for that first year after being on Fox went down. Right. And now it's back. They've figured it out. And now it's back. But that's three, four years later. So that first couple years, I think there is a contingent
17:39Peter Kafka:of people that just won't find it. And this premise that if we make it accessible around the world and we put it on YouTube and YouTube's got a very young audience, that will make the Oscars relevant again. This fixes our relevancy problem. I find that hard to believe, but also YouTube is a giant fucking platform. Maybe there's some truth to it. Maybe, but here's the thing,
18:01Matt Belloni:is that the Oscars are pretty accessible worldwide. They air in most countries. It's just the problem is a 5 p.m. or 4 p.m. show on the West Coast is the middle of the night in Europe. And you wake up in Europe and you see who won and a lot of the value of watching. It's not like the Grammys where there are performances that you kind of want to see, even if you already know the winners. The Oscars is all about the winners and the speeches.
18:27Peter Kafka:The winners, and it's also about who wore what, right? Clips. And what were interesting things and clips and that already you don't need to watch live. And the idea of seeing famous people on TV was a big deal up until the last 10 years when you can see famous people nonstop on the internet. You can't escape famous people.
18:46Matt Belloni:And the Academy is trying to rectify that. They have Amelia de Moldenburg as their ambassador doing interviews. She's a big YouTube star. They have ambassadors from various creators and stuff that they now allow into the show to try to boost their profile online. I actually do an interview with Amelia on The Town this week where we talk about how to make the Oscars younger. And she has some ideas, but like, it's just the fundamental problem with the Oscars has always been and will continue to be until the Academy changes it. They give out 24 awards, 23 or 24 awards. And until they do what the Grammys did, which was recognized, this is a television show.
19:28Matt Belloni:People want to be entertained. They don't want to see who wins the best sound award. That's going to be a problem.
19:35Peter Kafka:So maybe someone in Hollywood who knows how to make a television show could work on that with them at some point.
19:40Matt Belloni:You'd think so, but that's not the way it works. The Academy has a board of governors with 54 governors that represent the different branches, and they tried it a few years ago. They tried to take some of the awards off camera and put them on a pre-show, and everyone was up in arms, and then they didn't actually get any benefit in making the show shorter because everyone else— Right, they lost both ways. Yeah, they just went, and they still gave them out on the air. They need to do a culling. They need to say, these are the 10 awards people care about. everything else will be at a pre-show or the commercials.
20:11Peter Kafka:And that's the way it is. And the messaging from YouTube after they won this deal was, by the way, we're not going to YouTube up this show. It is going to be the show you're used to seeing on ABC. We're just going to move it over to YouTube. I understand why they both say that and probably believe that's the case, but that can't work long-term.
20:29Matt Belloni:Well, the Academy produces the show. The Academy selects the producer in consultation with the broadcast partner, but ultimately that person works for the Academy. So there's the problem.
20:41Peter Kafka:We'll be right back with Matt Bellany, but first a word from a sponsor.
20:48Peter Kafka:Whoa. Okay. This one says you get a free phone if you switch. Hey, this one also says you get a free phone if you switch. Yeah, they all do one. Wait, wait, wait, wait. The T-Mobile one says families saved over$3 ,700 versus the other big guys in the past five years. and their experience plans have Netflix included, plus a year of Dash Pass by DoorDash.
21:11Matt Belloni:Hang on, let me see that. And a five-year price guarantee? Oh yeah, we're switching.
21:16Peter Kafka:That's what I'm talking about. Do we clap now or?
21:19Matt Belloni:I'm thinking high five.
21:21Peter Kafka:At T-Mobile, get savings that keep stacking up. That's value you can feel every day. Switch now at T-Mobile. Savings based on Harris X billing snapshots from Q3 2021 to Q4 2025, among accounts with three plus voice lines compared to AT &T and Verizon, excluding discounts, credits, and optional charges. See harrisx.com slash T-Mobile. Price guarantee on talk, text, and data. Exclusions like taxes and fees apply. See T-Mobile.com.
21:49Matt Belloni:Hi, I'm Brene Brown. And I'm Adam Grant. And we're here to invite you to the Curiosity Shop. A podcast that's a place for listening, wondering, thinking, feeling, and questioning. It's gonna be fun. We rarely agree. But we almost never disagree, and we're always learning. That's true. You can subscribe to the Curiosity Shop on YouTube or follow in your favorite podcast app to automatically receive new episodes every Thursday. For the last 10 years, everything in American politics has basically revolved around one man. And as a political journalist who came of age during Donald Trump's rise in 2016, I've had a front row seat.
22:28Matt Belloni:I am officially running for president of the United States. It's going to be only America first. America first.
22:40Peter Kafka:Thousands of supporters of President Trump stormed the U.S.
22:43Matt Belloni:Capitol building. But is it possible to talk about politics without talking about Donald Trump? That's the question I'm going to ask in our new show from Vox.
22:53Peter Kafka:The idea of like a post-Trump or not exactly Trump-focused show can exist because he's not really driving any agenda items. It really does feel like so reactive.
23:01Matt Belloni:You know, I think this Iran thing is also going to cause a big split in the GOP. So far it doesn't among like people who say they're MAGA voters are still with Trump. But like for the first time, you see on a major issue open opposition from the start of this war. I'm Estet Herndon. And welcome to America Actually.
23:23Peter Kafka:And we're back. You and I spent time last year talking about the notion that Netflix might buy the awards. Why didn't they? Why is it YouTube instead? They both, the argument you made for YouTube buying this, that would work for Netflix as well, right? It would.
23:39Matt Belloni:And they were interested. But first of all, Netflix already has the SAG Awards, which were renamed the Actor Awards. Not as cool. There's also a political thing within Hollywood. Netflix is already controversial within the film industry because they do not put their movies in movie theaters and give them wide releases generally. So there's a lot of people that believe that's the reason why Netflix has not won Best Picture, despite campaigning heavily for a decade now.
24:11Peter Kafka:And they're kind of stand-ins for you're mad about the way technology has changed and audiences have changed. And Netflix is the avatar of changing Hollywood. would if you're angry at it, vote against Netflix.
24:22Matt Belloni:And they've done a lot to try to fix that. I mean, Ted Sarandos is on all the boards of the Academy and he does the fundraisers and they put their awards movies in theaters. And if you want to see a Netflix movie that's up for awards, you can go to a screening most nights in LA in some movie theater, but it doesn't change the fact that people have substituted Netflix for the digital boogeyman. And if Netflix started airing the Oscars. I think that might have been a bridge too far for many Academy members.
24:56Peter Kafka:So gets us right into the thing that Netflix is also not doing, which is buying Warner Brothers. The Ellisons are going to buy that. Instead, we spent the last couple of years watching David Ellison buy Paramount and now Warner's. We're going to spend the next couple of years watching him combine those two companies. It'll be an ugly process. There was optimism at one point, I feel like last fall or people preferred the idea of David Ellison buying Warner Brothers again because they didn't want Netflix to buy it. It feels like once Netflix got it and then lost it, that that narrative is flipped.
25:28Peter Kafka:What's what's the thing people are most correctly scared about when they think about the Ellisons buying first Paramount and now Warner Brothers?
25:36Matt Belloni:I think that the thing people are scared about is simply the math. If you look at the contours of this deal, they are taking on$80 billion of debt to buy this company. And when you just went through what happened with Warner Brothers Discovery, which also took on tens of millions of dollars to combine those companies, they spent three years cutting costs. Right.
26:03Peter Kafka:And to cut down the debt, cut down the debt, cut down the debt. That was the main, that was the goal.
26:06Matt Belloni:That was the 100 % North Star, so much so that they changed the compensation structure for David Zaslav, the CEO, so that he would 100 % focus his time on cutting the debt. And to his credit, he did so. But he did so at the cost of a lot of spending that people in Hollywood are used to. And when you're combining these two storied studios, the Ellisons are already talking about$6 billion in cost cuts. That's a lot of people. Now they say that there are a lot of things. Jerry Cardinal came on my show and talked about how it's not primarily going to be employees.
26:42Peter Kafka:It's going to be better tech and we're going to save money with an Oracle cloud deal.
26:46Matt Belloni:Yes. Nobody believes that. They think that it's going to be painful. And I think they're probably right. You know, it depends what you consider to be painful. Is 20 % reduction of employees painful? You know, that's thousands of employees. This is a company combined that has more than 50 ,000, 60 ,000 employees. So that's a lot of people. So that's the first thing. And then I do think that the freak out over the tenor of CNN and CBS News and the kind of positioning of those networks, I think people are right to recognize that Ellison has a very different view of the news than the previous ownership.
27:32Matt Belloni:He is going to move those two entities rightward. He calls it towards the center, but it's going to be more like Fox News.
27:41Peter Kafka:And whether he's doing this to appease Donald Trump or because he genuinely thinks that's a good idea for a business reason or ideologically doesn't matter, that's where it's going to go.
27:50Matt Belloni:Yeah. And knowing him a little bit and knowing Ellison, I don't think he's a particularly ideological person. He's not doing this in order to create some kind of Fox News competitor because he thinks that the world needs more conservative news. I think he's looking at the market and he's saying there's one news network and cable that kicks everyone's ass. And why are they doing that? Why are they kicking everyone's ass? Because it's the one place that a center-right country can congregate around a news product that they feel reflects their sensibilities. So why not compete on that playing ground, then compete with the 10 other outlets that are espousing a left-center view?
28:33Peter Kafka:Yeah, I guess I would point him to all the other networks that are trying to compete with Fox News, that that market already exists, but... You mean like News Nation and OAN and, yeah.
28:43Matt Belloni:Yeah, there's something about Fox and the populist nature and the vibrant screen and all the things that Roger Ailes invented that does resonate. But I see why he's doing this. I also think his father is a role here, like plays a role. His father is a conservative guy, has a relationship with Trump. And the political stuff, they recognized very early that they had an in here. They've got two and a half years to be in the good graces of the government. They're going to do everything they can
29:12Peter Kafka:to exploit that relationship. Do you think there's anyone in Warner Brothers Discovery who is happy that the Ellisons got this deal? You heard a lot that, you know, it seemed like if Netflix bought them that they would more or less leave Warner Brothers Studio alone. They basically said they were going to leave HBO alone. Those guys seemed like they were pretty psyched for that. Is there any, is there anyone in that, you know, Warner Brothers Discovery is a big company. Is there anyone there? It's like, oh, I would love to work with the Ellisons or that's a better option for me.
29:41Matt Belloni:Well, first of all, the shareholders of Warner Brothers Discovery, which does include a lot of senior level employees. They got more money for their shares than they ever thought they were going to get when the stock was trading at$7 less than six months ago. But I think that for people who believe in theatrical and theatrical distribution, I think that Ellison is at least saying the right things. Now, nobody in town believes he's going to get to 30 movies a year for both studios. He's saying that Paramount and Warner Brothers will both release 15 movies a year in theaters, which would be more than both of them released last year, a lot more.
30:22Matt Belloni:But if he's committed to the theatrical experience and he doesn't do what Disney did when they bought Fox, which was just kind of neuter and downsize the Fox studio into just a label that produces a few movies a year, then that could be good. and much more so than potentially what Netflix was going to do. Now, Netflix was also saying they're going to maintain the theatrical windows. But after a couple of years, I could have absolutely seen Ted Sarandos say, you know what? We tried it. Not our model. We're going to go back to producing all of our movies for Netflix with a few big superhero movies in theaters.
31:02Peter Kafka:And I think we'll spend a couple of years speculating about, you know, is Casey Bloys from HBO going to stay? And where else would he go? and we'll see how all that pans out.
31:10Matt Belloni:I mean, they're saying the right things and I'm told that David did call Casey and a number of the top executives and say hello and tell them that they're great, which is, I guess, the first step there. But it doesn't change the dynamic because if you look at what Cindy Holland is doing at Paramount right now. Former Netflix. She's the head of streaming. Former Netflix. Former Netflix head and she's the head of streaming at Paramount. She's greenlighting a lot of shows that arguably could be considered HBO-style shows. She's, you know, this Jeremy Strong 9-11 show where he plays a firefighter.
31:43Matt Belloni:There's a number of other things. She's got the Duffer brothers. Like, I think that there's going to be conflict there, not just in who Casey reports to. He could report to David Ellison as is in his contract. But what do these platforms mean? What do they go after? Is Ellison going to take the Max part out of HBO Max? and just have them focus on the prestige of the prestige? Or is he going to let them do shows like The Pit or The Penguin or, you know, Welcome to Dairy or these more populist-style IP-driven HBO shows that they've been doing over the past year, couple years now, to try to broaden out the HBO Max brand?
32:29Matt Belloni:That's an interesting question.
32:31Peter Kafka:We'll be right back, but first a word from a sponsor.
32:44Peter Kafka:and we're back as you know one thing i am obsessed with and also obsessed with the fact that fewer people are obsessed with this is where the money is coming from and are we going to see 24 billion dollars in gulf money and again not from companies in the gulf but gulf countries saudi arabia uae Cotter were supposed to kick in$24 billion when this deal was being discussed late last year. Now, Paramount won't talk about that, at least on the record at the moment.
33:15Matt Belloni:Well, they're not. Jerry Cardinal basically says we're going to syndicate this money, meaning we're going to bring in investors, but they won't say who. And guess why? They're still trying to get this deal approved. And last thing they want is an entire street full of Democratic senators with pitchforks going after their Saudi money, even though they've already said that they're likely going to have Saudi and Qatar and Abu Dhabi money. Right.
33:40Peter Kafka:That's that's why. So my two theories were one, they just don't want to talk about it and they'll wait as long as they can. But again, you interview Jerry Cardinal and he basically said it's great to have Gulf money. If we were to have Gulf money, the positive things that are happening in the Middle East right now. It's from these sovereigns, which is a wild quote to say. And the other theory is maybe these deals actually aren't done. And maybe the fact that there is a war in the Middle East right now may make Saudis or somebody else more reticent to put money in. I'm kind of assuming that the Saudis wanted to put$10 billion into this last fall that they still want to put$10 billion.
34:17Peter Kafka:It's not very much money for them.
34:18Matt Belloni:There's been some reporting that might change. And there's also been some reporting that Tencent in China might be back in as well. I think what's probably going on with Jerry is they want to keep their options open. And even though they may have these handshake commitments from these groups, they want to potentially bring in others. I mean, some of the analysts, one of the analysts, Peter Zupino, suggested they bring in more equity investors to bring down that debt. And maybe there are others out there they can recruit now that they have more time to come into this deal.
34:51Peter Kafka:So assuming this deal goes through, it doesn't really seem to be any practical way to stop it, as far as I can tell. Maybe you think differently.
34:58Matt Belloni:The states are talking a big game, but we'll see what they do.
35:00Peter Kafka:Yeah. I mean, it seems unlikely, but you never know. You certainly don't want to prognosticate too much. And so Elizabeth Warren, people like that, people like me, will say, hey, it's pretty wild to have Saudi Arabia putting$10 billion into this company that controls CNN, et cetera. Will anyone else care? Will Hollywood care that there is golf money?
35:23Matt Belloni:You know what? I don't think so. I think that when push comes to shove, people want their projects made. And they worked with Rupert Murdoch for many years at Fox. And he was very smart. He kept it separate. Fox News was in New York. Separate leadership team. The studio was the studio. and they worked with the kind of creators that very much did not like Fox News. And I think that that will be the prevailing wisdom. Unless it becomes something that people, that stars get asked about on the red carpet or becomes embarrassing for them. Maybe it could be a deciding factor if a hot project is going to one of two buyers and one is the Ellisons, the other is someone who's not involved in this stuff.
36:14Matt Belloni:Maybe it could decide. but I don't think, first of all, there's only a certain number of buyers in Hollywood. So you've got to, you know, work with everyone if you can. And it just, people want to see their projects
36:26Peter Kafka:made. I was talking to someone who's probably going to get Saudi money and they were sort of practicing their like explanation for why they need it. And it comes down to, I want the money, but they've got a whole rap about, did they make a mistake? It was like what we saw last summer with the comedy festival. Did they make a, you know, they're, they're modernizing. They're not the country you think? And did they make a mistake when the head of Saudi Arabia had Jamal Khashoggi dismembered? Yes. Was that a big mistake? Sure. But, you know, we got to move on. And I think you'll hear versions of that.
36:55Peter Kafka:Yeah, I've heard that argument.
36:55Matt Belloni:And listen, I get it. I get it. Again, there's only a few entities that are willing to support these kinds of projects, and most of them have something that's wrong with them, whether it's a human rights thing. I mean, Hollywood was enamored with China for many years because the market was opening up and the movies would do well there. And they have their human rights issues as well. Disney does business with them, has a theme park there. The world is a complicated place. I understand that. This one irks a lot of journalists because of the nature of the mistakes, as you put it. But Jerry Cardinal doesn't have any problem with it.
37:35Matt Belloni:The money men don't have any problem with it.
37:37Peter Kafka:Mm hmm. Yeah. And their point is and his point specifically is not only do we not have a problem with the government doesn't have a problem with it. The Trump administration is is actively encouraging investment in Saudi Arabia brought all those CEOs there had the prints at the White House literally rolled out the red carpet form. So that's complaining about it is a pre 2024 thing. It sounds like his argument is. Last question for you. We had Janice Min, your former colleague slash competitor, on a few weeks ago. And I was asking her for a sort of vibe check from Hollywood. And she said it's really grim.
38:12Peter Kafka:She said, you know, Detroit-like vibes going on here between consolidation, production leaving town, a threat of AI, threat of tech in general. Want to make an optimist case for Hollywood? Anything, any green shoots that you see as the Hollywood is cooked meme overdone?
38:31Matt Belloni:I think this is a period of transition and it's going to be an extremely painful period of transition, but there are opportunities and you see them everywhere. What's going on in the creator space right now is pretty exciting. And the opportunities for people to build their own brands and creators to have not just a springboard to getting traditional deals or, you know, you, you're Markiplier and you have a following on YouTube and you use your own money from YouTube to make a movie and your fans show up and it opens to$20 million. That's an incredible success story that would never have been possible even 10 years ago in Hollywood.
39:10Peter Kafka:I mean, YouTube has been around for 20 years. We've been waiting for someone to come out of YouTube or MySpace before that and make that leap to movies and it hasn't happened. It's really interesting that it took that long. And I don't
39:24Matt Belloni:know whether that means it's going to be incredibly rare or we'll see more of it. The business is becoming more sophisticated. I mean, everyone's like, Oh, everyone in Hollywood is downsizing. That's true. But there's this entire diaspora of creator and podcast and video and micro dramas and all of these other things that have popped up around Hollywood. And the Borg of Hollywood is sort of assimilating them. The agencies now all cater to this area of the business. The studios are becoming interested. The money is finding them. So it's just a different, the definition of Hollywood is expanding.
40:02Matt Belloni:And while we're seeing the decline of the traditional studios, I think overall, once this transition period is over, you are going to see a robust entertainment industry.
40:14Peter Kafka:you did an excellent job of answering the optimism questions spoken like someone who was a successful creator himself and does newsletters and audio podcasts and then we're still doing audio only here but you're doing you moved into video so maybe maybe the future looks bright for you as well man the world needs to hang in my face you'll get better seats next year if not this year matt from puck from the town thank you for joining thank you very much thanks again to matt felony I should have him on more than once a year. I'm going to try to fix that in 2026. Thanks to Charlotte Silver, who produces and edits the show.
40:48Peter Kafka:Thanks to our advertisers who bring it to you for free. Thanks to you guys for listening. See you next week.
From the publisher
Oscar season is supposed to be Hollywood’s lap. It is also, increasingly, a reminder of how shaky things are in Hollywood right now. And this one comes as one of the town’s most prominent players is about to be swallowed by a new mogul, backed by tech money.
Here to unpack all of it is Puck’s Matt Belloni, who explains why we may never see an Oscars like this again; how the show will — or won’t — change when it migrates to YouTube in a couple years; how the movie business thinks about the upcoming Paramount/WBD deal; and some 100% not guaranteed betting advice for Sunday night’s show.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
