In short
The AMC satire The Audacity (premieres April 12) about Silicon Valley as a backdrop for how tech money and status shape real people, not how software works. It follows Duncan Park, a “wannabe titan” trying to sell his stalled company to “Cupertino” to inflate his stock price, plus an upstairs/downstairs cast including a high-status psychiatrist and other workers affected by tech’s fallout.
Guest backgrounds
Jonathan Glatzer is the writer behind Succession and Better Call Saul. Hosts are Stephanie Wu (Eater editor-in-chief) and Peter Kafka (Business Insider Chief Correspondent).
Key claims
Glatzer says the show isn’t “tech wall-to-wall,” but about people making tech and living with its effects. He argues AI isn’t the problem—profit-driven creators and power are. He cites zeitgeist elements: an “AI therapy bot,” Veterans Affairs layoffs, and a wildfire mirroring his own experience.
Notable examples
iPhone “yonder pouches” at school; a chief ethicist monologue (“tech changed the world, but so did the bubonic plague”); the psychiatrist’s insider-trading-like logic; data-collection via school tablets; and a therapy bot that doesn’t fail as expected.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOIntroducing The Audacity
0:44 to 2:08
Discussion about the new show The Audacity and its unique approach.
“I'm also Chief Correspondent at Business Insider.”
Character and Setting Insights
2:08 to 3:37
Exploration of the show's characters and their connections to tech culture.
“This is me talking to the Audacity's Jonathan Glatzer.”
Researching Silicon Valley
3:37 to 5:50
Glatzer shares his experience and insights while researching Silicon Valley.
“Was this always going to be a show that was set in Silicon Valley, or did you come to that later once you had the idea?”
Satire and Reality in The Audacity
5:50 to 7:55
Glatzer discusses the show's satire of Silicon Valley and real-world parallels.
“So, he very much wants to be, and that desperation fuels him.”
Critique of Tech Culture
7:55 to 12:35
A deep dive into the show's critique of technology and its societal impact.
“I think it's about as quick as you can go, honestly.”
Wealth and Social Divides
12:35 to 14:00
Discussion on the portrayal of wealth and social dynamics in Silicon Valley.
“You can tell yourself you could live without an iPhone, and it would be very, very difficult for you to get through your day without an iPhone.”
Wealth Disparities and the Mirror of 'Succession'
14:00 to 17:09
Explore the stark contrasts in wealth depicted in 'Succession' and the societal implications.
“The amount of monies that we're talking about are just so astronomical.”
The Psychologist's Perspective on Wealth Creation
17:10 to 18:59
Discuss the ethical dilemmas faced by a psychologist catering to billionaires and her views on wealth.
“And some of the other episodes, she doesn't ever say this, at least in the episodes I've seen, but in her mind it's justified.”
The Role of AI in Therapy and Society
19:14 to 21:46
Examining the potential benefits and ethical concerns surrounding AI in therapy.
“When you sort of talked about why you weren't trying to write to the moment.”
The Future of AI and Its Societal Impact
21:46 to 24:46
Discussing the implications of AI advancements on society and how they can affect our lives.
“The bot's going to tell him to do something to self-harm or it's going to fail in some obvious way.”
Show all 16 chapters
Making Prestige TV in a Changing Landscape
24:46 to 28:00
Insights on producing shows like 'Succession' in the current television industry.
“I think that we have to remember why that's happening.”
Filming in Silicon Valley
28:00 to 29:13
Learn about the experiences and challenges of filming in Silicon Valley.
“Now, they're asking the federal government for help.”
AI in Production
30:54 to 33:11
Explore the role of AI in content creation and its acceptance by writers.
“Do you use AI in any part of the production, whether it's ideating, writing, production?”
Data Privacy and AI Concerns
33:11 to 36:40
Discuss issues of data privacy and the implications of AI in society.
“I mean, the WGA or Writers' Union, they are working very hard to try not to allow AI to be a writer, but they've also done some end runs as well.”
Impact of Data on Elections
36:40 to 38:32
Understand how data collection influences political elections and behaviors.
“Private data is an evergreen topic as concerns tech.”
Creative Process and Audience Feedback
38:32 to 41:01
Insights into the creative process of writing a series and handling feedback.
“as you keep building these data centers, making the processing power more and more powerful for future elections, I think that it doesn't augur well.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Peter Kafka:If you're tired of endless scrolling to figure out where to eat, same. I'm Stephanie Wu, editor-in-chief of Eater. We've just launched the new-ish and way better Eater app. It has all the restaurants we love, gives you personalized picks wherever you are, and serves up smarter search results just for you. You can find my list of the best places for martinis and fries in New York City. And save your favorite spots, share lists, follow editors, and book right in the app. Download the Eater app at EaterApp.com. It's free for iOS users.
0:40Peter Kafka:From the Vox Media Podcast Network, this is Channels. Peter Kafka, that is me. I'm also Chief Correspondent at Business Insider. And today we are talking about Silicon Valley and TV and how you make a TV show about Silicon Valley. even if you think the show really isn't about Silicon Valley. That show is called The Audacity. It premieres this Sunday on AMC. It comes to us from Jonathan Glatzer, who has written a lot of great TV shows, most notably Succession and Better Call Saul. I've seen three episodes of The Audacity. I'd describe it as a middle ground between Succession and HBO's Silicon Valley.
1:18Peter Kafka:Sometimes it's a pretty broad farce, poking at the weirdness of our tech overlords. Sometimes it's a pretty nuanced look at the people who live near and with those tech overlords and how they get by. And as you'll hear in our discussion, Jonathan Glatzer says he's not interested in tech per se, but the people who make the tech and the people who deal with tech's effects. But it is still a show where one character is trying to sell his stalled out company to a big company called Cupertino, or at least convince other people that Cupertino wants to buy it so he can juice his stock price. It's also a show where kids have to put their iPhones into yonder pouches before they can enter school, which is a super duper real thing.
1:59Peter Kafka:You do not have to be in Silicon Valley to see. And as it turns out, once you get Jonathan Glatzer talking about tech, he does have a bunch of opinions about tech. So let's get to it. This is me talking to the Audacity's Jonathan Glatzer. Jonathan Glatzer, you have made many excellent shows. Some of my favorites, Better Call Saul, Succession. You are now out with your first show. you have made yourself. It's called The Audacity. You can start seeing it on AMC starting Sunday, April 12th. Did I get the date right? Correct. I got the date right. Thanks for coming. Yeah, thank you for having me. Why make a show about technology in 2026?
2:36Peter Kafka:I don't know.
2:40Well, it's not about technology. It's about the people who happen to be making technology. Silicon Valley is the backdrop, and it's a big backdrop. And we do a lot with it. Backdrop is not to dismiss it by any means. It fuels the show and fuels the story. But in front of that backdrop are the characters in the foreground. And they are a crazy group of people that's quite diverse. The lead character, played wonderfully by Billy Magnuson, is a tech guy. But the second lead is a psychiatrist. And, you know, there's her family and her kid and the school that the kid goes to. And there's a couple of guys that come in from D.C.
3:30working for Veterans Affairs. And so, it's a much broader swath than tech. And that was by design. I did not want to do tech wall-to-wall.
3:43Peter Kafka:Was this always going to be a show that was set in Silicon Valley, or did you come to that later once you had the idea? It was always said in Silicon Valley, the head of AMC Networks, Dan McDermott, wonderful man, he grew up there. And so he'd been looking for some time to do something that was in the tech world or Silicon Valley space. And I admitted to him that I am by no means an expert in tech, but it seems like a really fascinating culture to try to capture. And so, that's really from the start. So, you were told, we've got an opportunity to make a show in tech. Do you have anything? Or what can we place in Silicon Valley?
4:29Yeah. It came from that. Nothing was born beforehand, before that ask. So, it all sort of happened when I went up there for a couple of weeks, just kind of researched the place and get to know it. And it's a weird place, man. It's got a lot of...
4:47Peter Kafka:It is weird. It's weird how normal everyone there thinks it is. Whenever I parachute in, visit friends, family, go do for work, I'm like, wait, what is that? Like, oh, that's this thing that we all do, and they don't think of it as weird. No, I know. And you could say that, I guess, about any culture or society or whatever, they have their rituals and things that are not fully understood by outsiders. But it is much more of a monoculture than you would think it would be. And it thinks of itself as sort of on the bleeding edge of where things are. It likes the idea that it is separate from, they especially hate the East Coast, their old world.
5:27Peter Kafka:So, we are the frontier. They revel in that. Unless I'm missing it, you are not naming names in this. There's a company called Cupertino. You call it Cupertino, not Apple. There's other made-up names. How much time do you want people to spend thinking, oh, I wonder if that guy is supposed to be Steve Wozniak or Steve Jobs? I think they won't be able to... Certainly, Duncan Park is the main guy. He's a wannabe titan. He's a couple rungs down the ladder. He's not even a billionaire, right? So, he very much wants to be, and that desperation fuels him. And that's a very Silicon Valley story. And probably, you know, he's aspirational in that regard.
6:13Peter Kafka:He only sold his company for nine figures instead of the billions. Well, he was offered billions for his first company and stuck by it because, as one of the characters says, you thought it was a movement. It was just a startup. So, he holds on to it thinking that the movement would last, but it does not. And he ends up selling it for a couple hundred million at the end of the day, which is - A failure for them. A failure. Other shows that have satirized either Silicon Valley or just other real-world places, and you've worked on Succession, where there's real characters or very identifiable real people.
6:49Peter Kafka:This one, it seems like you're going out of your way to say it. I'm not saying this character is this person or this thing is that. I'm definitely not. And Succession didn't either, by the way. And we did base it... Obviously, the Murdochs informed a lot of that, but so did a number of others. I had Marissa Mar on this show talking about all the work she did, making that a real thing. She was a huge force behind the show, really, genuinely. I would love to read whatever Bible she created, because she talked about how she created them. The backstory for all this, all the mechanisms. I guess what I'm getting at is this seems like it's in a world that's inflected by reality, but there's broad humor and broad jokes.
7:35Peter Kafka:It's doing a bunch of different things. but one thing it doesn't seem like it's trying to do is to tell you, this is how Silicon Valley and specific kinds of tech work today. Definitely not the tech and how it works. Part of it is when you make a television show, you're writing it at least a year before it comes out. In our case, about a year and a half. I think it's about as quick as you can go, honestly. There's so much heavy lifting to do. So, when we try to anticipate what tech might come up with, it's a fool's game, and you'll just never keep up. However, we did land on a bunch of things that became very quickly either at the center of news stories or whatever.
8:26Like, you know, the AI therapy bot was not really a thing a year and a half ago, which is an astonishing fact in and of itself that, of course, it's something that everybody knows what I'm talking about when I say AI therapy bot. Those stories started to come out maybe about two, three months after I wrote the pilot. But there's a number of things. Even the VA guys that are coming in, when I wrote the pilot and sort of started to carve out the story for the VA, played by Rob Corddry, the Trump administration wasn't in yet. Doge hadn't happened yet. And the VA was one of the main targeted... hundreds of thousands of layoffs happened at Veterans Affairs, making the task of helping the vets who served our country that much harder.
9:17And it was already hobbling along as it was. So, all of that became very weirdly zeitgeisty. And more than that, there's a wildfire that burns down the main character's house in episode three, which I wrote just a few days before my house burnt down in a wildfire. In the California fires last year. Yeah, yeah, in Altadena. So, you got to be careful. I don't know. It started to get weird.
9:50Peter Kafka:You don't want to summon up reality. No. Did you have... I've gone through three episodes. In the third episode, one of the characters has a monologue where she has sort of an overriding... She's high up in the tech world, but then she says, here's my criticism of the tech world. You don't know whether to take her seriously or not. Did you have notions of your critique of tech before you went into this? Did those change while you were writing it? No, they've gotten only stronger. This year and a half period, we've all seen this exponential growth of obviously AI, but also the marriage politically between Silicon Valley and DC that is, I suppose, mutually beneficial.
10:40Certainly... At the moment. At the moment. Yeah. Yeah, we'll see. Yeah. But yes, the monologue that you're talking about, she was the chief ethicist at this Cupertino company. And she says, what have we actually changed? What has tech actually done? We set out to lower barriers to information. We tried to increase tolerance between people. We talked about helping climate change. We talked about providing a better education situation for our kids. And thing after thing after thing, they failed miserably across the board. She says, tech changed the world, but so did the bubonic plague. And it is, I suppose, something that when you break it down, when you really, I mean, I think it helps to be of a certain age, to have lived many years prior to all of this, and to look back at those years and wonder, was I living in a cave?
11:49Was I incapable of communicating with friends and peers? And was information being blocked from my -
11:59Peter Kafka:How did I survive before tech made my life possible? Right. And I think that that is this brainwashing that has taken place, whether deliberately or not, where we have come to feel like all matter, all quotidian life is dependent on an app or tech in some fashion. But it turns out you could, in theory, manage without it. Not only manage without it, I do believe, from my own point of view, that we are not better off with it. But now it's here. You can tell yourself you could live without an iPhone, and it would be very, very difficult for you to get through your day without an iPhone. I am Ned Ludd and Don Quixote and all of those guys rolled up into one who is writing a TV show about tech.
12:51And I use tech to some extent myself. obviously I mean how can I not
12:56Peter Kafka:I'll come back to tech but I want to talk about money and how people live because I think you can watch this show and have zero interest in tech and still be very interested in it because it's showing you how people live and how status works and how money works and like you said at the beginning you've got you've got the big swinging dick CEOs but you also have their psychiatrist and therapist who doesn't even own her own home Right. She has to rent. That's right. Whose kid goes to the fancy school but doesn't pay full freight. That's right. Scholarship, the school informs her. Yeah. When they're having a fight.
13:31Peter Kafka:And so, all these sort of upstairs, downstairs things that, again, you see some of in shows like Succession that you also see in Friends and Neighbors. But, I mean, I think that's what's almost more interesting to me than any of the tech stuff is how do these people live in a world where some people have enormous amounts of money, some people are only well off. Right. Yeah. I think it is also... you don't want to talk about tech, but Silicon Valley also has this dividing line because the wealth that has accumulated there happens so quickly. The amount of monies that we're talking about are just so astronomical.
14:14It really is. One of the most fascinating apps that I came across was this thing that showed a graph of how much Elon Musk is worth. It shows that a pixel or a little group of pixels is what the average household is like. Have you seen this before? No, but I can imagine. You swipe and you swipe and you swipe and you swipe and you swipe endlessly until you reach each of these pixels. Then each of those screens is about a billion dollars. So I guess you're swiping for some time to reach his level of wealth. And it is just – it's boggling that when you graphically see the difference between what an average family makes and what he has.
15:07And I guess that the show is holding up a mirror in a lot of ways and just kind of asking, is this what we want?
15:16Peter Kafka:But some of it that resonated with me wasn't about, look how much money this billionaire has. It's, look what... The struggle. But also, there's stuff there that, again, if you are familiar with upper middle class people, you've seen, like, we have a team of people to help strategize getting your daughter into college. And here's how we're going to do donations. And here's the SAT prep guy. And I don't think 1300 gets you to Duke, by the way, but we can discuss that offline. Or maybe you know better than I do. You got a 17-year-old. Maybe it does get you into Duke. But it's a lot of travails of people that you generally aren't sympathetic for, and maybe you're more sympathetic towards them just because they're in contrast to billionaires.
15:59Yeah, I think that's fair. I think the psychiatrist is somebody who's a psychologist, technically, PhD. She has a very high-profile clientele of a lot of billionaires who come to her, and she's sort of a popular therapist in the area, her and her husband. So it's high status, but she's still a service provider. That's right. She's still getting an hourly wage from these people who, in many occasions, and completely believe this, she has helped them make more money. She has helped many people who work underneath that individual make more money or keep their jobs or keep the company aloft. And she realized through the process of helping these other people that she's got a very keen mind for this sort of thing.
16:49She's got a good brain for finance. and the injustice of getting an hourly wage when she has probably created billions of dollars of wealth for others, the injustice of that really eats at her.
17:08Peter Kafka:And there's a logic to it. She essentially engages insider trading. We find that out in the first episode. And some of the other episodes, she doesn't ever say this, at least in the episodes I've seen, but in her mind it's justified. I have created this value. I should partake in the value. We'll be right back with Jonathan Glatzer. But first, a word from a sponsor.
17:30Peter Kafka:Chat, I think it's time to book that trip to Walt Disney World Resort. You know, you work so hard. I think it's time to give yourself a little TLC. Like, when's the last time you had fun? We could hop on a light cycle. Eat food from all over the world at Epcot. We could even build those lightsabers you've always wanted. Like, let's make plans for real this summer. Find your moment at Walt Disney World Resort.
18:01Peter Kafka:Are you stuck staring at your W-2? Are tax refund worries holding you back? You probably have FOMO, the fear of messing up. The fix? Using TurboTax on Intuit Credit Karma. They find every credit and deduction to help you get every refund dollar you deserve or your money back. It's time to overcome your fear of messing up and get your taxes done right. Start filing today in the Credit Karma app. Introducing Home Care Plus, a new subscription service from Lowe's that helps make life easier by giving members a hand with home maintenance. Let Lowe's tackle the tasks you keep meaning to do, like electric dryer vent cleaning, replacing hard-to-reach light bulbs, and more.
18:45Peter Kafka:Subscribe to Home Care Plus for just$99 a year and consider your to-do list done. Members get more at Lowe's. Available in select zip codes only. Cancel anytime. Non-refundable fee. Product purchase required. Terms and service restrictions apply. Details at lowes.com slash terms. Subject to change.
19:03Peter Kafka:And we're back. I was expecting, just because we're in an AI moment, I just spent an hour reading the Ronan Farrow, Sam Altman profile in The New Yorker, and just the world I live in, AI, AI, AI, AI. It is not foregrounded in your show. No. When you sort of talked about why you weren't trying to write to the moment. That's right, yeah. In the third episode where it comes up, they really spend some time talking about it. Yeah. And surprisingly, I thought, you were surprisingly empathetic to the idea that AI can be helpful. That therapy chatbot, at least in the episode I've seen, provides real connection and therapy to someone who needs it.
19:39Well, for me, the problem isn't AI. The problem is the people who are promoting and making AI, putting it into your phones, putting it into your refrigerator, putting it into everything. They're the problem. We are the problem. Human beings are the problem. The technology in and of itself is neither good nor evil.
20:03Peter Kafka:I sort of expected you to go, oh, here are all the problems with AI. And maybe, again, I'll keep watching. Maybe that guy's going to be terribly misled by his therapy bot. But you really, it seemed like you took a real beat to go, no, this stuff really could at least temporarily help someone. I think that what I say about AI is a lot of what I say about Silicon Valley, which is it's admittedly and it's all said with a wink that we're going to make the world a better place while we make enormous profits that King Midas would be jealous of. But I think that what starts to get me very worried, the idea of curing cancer with AI, or climate change for that matter, with AI, is very alluring.
20:53I'd like to see evidence of that before I invite it into my pocket, into my phone, into my child's education, into what they're building for, what they're spending. You'd like to opt in. I'd like to opt in, but I'd also like to see them earn that trust.
21:11Peter Kafka:It's like your choice based on their decisions. It's not just opting in, though. It's just the idea that it should, at this juncture, with all that is unknown, by not just the consumers, but by the creators themselves, they don't know what they have. That's not a call to me for insinuation into every fucking thing that we touch, that we interact with. That is not a call for... I mean, it's just you look at... When the guy from the VA starts playing with the bot or starts interacting with the bot, I thought, I know where this is going to go. The bot's going to tell him to do something to self-harm or it's going to fail in some obvious way.
21:54Peter Kafka:And it does not. It seems to give him pleasure, and I found that surprising. You expect a show like this that is a jaundiced eye towards tech and towards the travails of rich people to go, ah, see, here's another fail. Well, I think that when you watch, say, Frankenstein, there is sympathy for the monster. It is not the monster's fault. It is Frankenstein's. It's the Doctor's. That's genuinely... And there's nothing... As you said, I mean, it is here. It is here. The technology is here. If there's any shaping or shaving that can be done with that reality, it remains with the people who are in control of this.
22:37There are not very many of them. When they understand the profit potential of this technology, and they still... Even Even the most ambitious and gung-ho AI proponents, when they come on and they say, well, yeah, there'll probably be some bumps along the way, you better fucking believe that those bumps are going to be potholes that would swallow your whole fucking car. There is nothing more frightening to me than when you hear the spin of any individual who controls that wealth and that much power and that much tech that is in all of our lives saying, yeah, there might be a bump.
23:20Peter Kafka:There's another document for you out this morning. It's from OpenAI. It's a public policy pitch where they're like, there could be some risk here and some downside. We should think about restructuring our government and social safety nets. And maybe they believe it, maybe they don't. When you start talking about that sort of stuff, some people are cynical and they say, well, they're actually hyping the impact of what they're doing and won't be that transformative. but they need to say it will be to justify all the fundraising. Other folks say, yeah, they're really underplaying it, and this is a real problem, and we're fundamentally not suited to deal with it.
Read the full transcript
23:52And there was also an article this past weekend about the natural gas turbines that are completely polluting Loudoun County in Virginia. I think there's another area down in Mississippi that's being completely...
24:05Peter Kafka:It's been very hard to find a pro-data center constituency in this country. Well, that's the essence of what AI is. That is the cost of AI, and it is big. And it is happening at a time when the government has abandoned the idea of helping us with climate change. Climate change itself is just like, you don't even hear about it anymore. It's yesterday's news, but it's tomorrow's fucking reality. It's today. Yeah, it's tomorrow, though. Let's keep the can down the road and let someone else deal with it. That's where we're at. Every time there's a polar vortex or a wildfire in California that burns down 9 ,000 homes, I think that we have to remember why that's happening.
24:49Why has the weather gotten so weird? We have a recency bias as human beings. It's built into us. It is one of the most dangerous things that we have. It is probably the greatest challenge of our species to get past the... I mean, we won't, but the whole idea of history repeating itself, the whole idea of not learning the lessons of the past, of not heeding the warning signs, et cetera, it's do or die for us on that.
25:23Peter Kafka:It's hard for me to pivot in my next question about peak TV, but I'm going to try it anyway. Go for it. This is a show that I think a few years ago we would have called Prestige TV. Definitely, we saw a lot of shows like this in the peak TV era. You made a bunch of them. You worked on a bunch of them. Again, I mentioned Succession and Better Call Saul and Bloodline on Netflix. And those were all made while there was a ton of money moving around Hollywood to make this sort of stuff. That has come to a halt. Things are retrenching. What is it like to make a show like this in 2026, 2025? How is it different to make a show like this in today's business environment as opposed to five years ago?
26:07What it's like is that it's a blessing. You do not take it for granted that you have this platform that has shrunk. AMC is the only channel on the dial at this point that is independently owned. that's not either owned by a tech company or Disney or now whatever they're going to call Paramount, etc. So, you know, I don't think any of those companies would have had, frankly, the balls to do something that really was a satire about the most powerful industry on the planet right now, the biggest moneymaker on the planet right now. And while I will again say this is about the people there, it's about the effect of this bubble of Silicon Valley living inside this bubble on these people, these human beings.
27:06Peter Kafka:Were there resources that you would have had, do you think you would have had five years ago that are less available now just because everyone's got a more realistic sense of what it's going to cost to make something and what you're going to get back on that? The numbers are the numbers. Succession had more time and money to... Flew all over the world. Yep. It was fun. You guys substitute Vancouver for Silicon Valley. We do, yeah. Do you think if this was a different show... Same show in a different time, this would have been filmed in Los Altos? Probably not, actually. I think the Canadian or the tax credit chase started many years ago.
27:42Peter Kafka:So, that is not a budget crunch thing that is new. That is not new. It heralded an age of flight from Los Angeles in terms of production, something that every governor of California says that they're going to reverse. Now, they're asking the federal government for help. So, let's see how that goes. Well, that'll go great. But were there parts of Silicon Valley's topography or any landmarks you said, well, I got to have this? And we shot for a week in Silicon Valley. We shot in Palo Alto. And so, you know, the opening shot is of the old satellite dish on Stanford campus. And a lot of, you know, man, did we pack that weekend.
28:29Drone shots, car shots, driving.
28:31Peter Kafka:You do a pretty good job. I kept thinking, oh, they did a nice job. This seems like Silicon Valley. And then they must have filmed it here. and then I wrote it was Vancouver. I'm like, well, they're obviously got some shots of the actual stuff. We did. And, you know, you see Woodside where, like, the famous Bucks is and the general story that's up there. Yeah, I mean, you know, we drive around the Meta campus and the Google campus and couldn't get near the Apple campus, but that's by design. By them, not by us. But yeah, there's Vancouver actually worked out quite well. I mean, it's also the Pacific Northwest.
29:10So there's some there's some similarities there.
29:13Peter Kafka:We'll be right back. But first, a word from a sponsor. For the last 10 years, everything in American politics has basically revolved around one man. And as a political journalist who came of age during Donald Trump's rise in 2016, I've had a front row seat. I am officially running for president of the United States. It's going to be only America first. America first. Thousands of supporters of President Trump stormed the U.S. Capitol building. But is it possible to talk about politics without talking about Donald Trump? That's the question I'm going to ask in our new show from Vox. The idea of like a post-Trump or not exactly Trump-focused show can exist because he's not really driving any agenda items.
30:01Peter Kafka:It really does feel like so reactive. You know, I think this Iran thing is also going to cause a big split in the GOP. So far it doesn't among like people who say they're MAGA voters are still with Trump. But like for the first time, you see on a major issue open opposition from the start of this war. I'm Estet Herndon. And welcome to America Actually.
30:23Hi, I'm Brene Brown. And I'm Adam Grant. And we're here to invite you to the Curiosity Shop. A podcast that's a place for listening, wondering, thinking, feeling, and questioning. It's going to be fun. We rarely agree. But we almost never disagree. And we're always learning. That's true.
30:40Peter Kafka:You can subscribe to the Curiosity Shop on YouTube or follow in your favorite podcast app to automatically receive new episodes every Thursday.
30:54Peter Kafka:And we're back. Do you use AI in any part of the production, whether it's ideating, writing, production? Well, I will sometimes look up terms of art in tech to try to get that right. We have consultants as well, though. So, usually I'll turn to a human. But if it's two in the morning and I'm writing, I know where to go.
31:24But for better or worse, I don't think that AI is the right tool for writing this show or beyond help for research.
31:34Peter Kafka:Would you look at a scan to someone that said, yeah, yeah, I do it for research and all that stuff. And also, I kick ideas around and I got to this better. I always had a block here and I bounced different ideas. I went with this one and chat GPT, help me figure that out." You're feeling a shift already in the conversation. I think that there was a kind of adamantine, public-facing thing for writers to say, no, never, ever, never. And now what you hear is, they're all lying. Everyone's playing with it. They won't admit to it, but they're playing with it. I would imagine it could be helpful for some shows that are more like a procedural, where there's a pattern.
32:15You know, I mean, there are shows that have been on the air for 20 years. That's a lot of data to feed into AI. Make me a new SVU. I will admit that there are times, again, that two in the morning moment, when it's like, wouldn't it be great if I can snap my fingers and this thing could just be written? But it's not going to be written in a way that I would ever find serves these characters as they need to be served.
32:45I hope it never gets to that point where it's...
32:48Peter Kafka:I mean, where do you think it goes? Do you think there's going to be a certain kind of audience that says, the same way I want to go to a farm-to-table restaurant, and I know that they knew where the pig was slaughtered, and I want John Glatzer's original work, and I'm going to seek that out, and I understand there's other stuff that is mass-produced and uses AI, and I distinguish that? I mean, the WGA or Writers' Union, they are working very hard to try not to allow AI to be a writer, but they've also done some end runs as well. I think that you can use AI, but you have to pay a writer, which I think is, frankly, a little bullshitty.
33:30It might have been just the best that they were able to get from the studios and the negotiations. But I do think that it is a slippery slope. But I also think that, by and large, it's not cool. AI is not cool. I mean, you feel the backlash happening.
33:50Peter Kafka:My 15-year-old is sitting outside. I told him, I used ChatGPT to help kick around ideas for this. What? Yeah. What are you talking about, dude? My 17-year-old is the exact same. And, you know, these are kids who have grown up. Now, he'll fully use it to cheat on his next term paper, too. Okay. Yeah. Okay. But thinks that it's a terrible idea. I never took a Latin test where I did not have a cheat sheet in my hand, so I can't exactly complain. But yeah, I think that we really do have to ask. For me, my sense, I consider time to be a wonderful commodity that we undervalue all the time and rushing to the finish line or whatever it is that we're rushing to is an attribute that is valued far more than careful consideration.
34:43As I was saying before about slow down with AI and why don't you cure a cancer first before you recommend my whatever. Whatever it is. It's everywhere. You can name anything and it would apply. But I do think that the way that we interact with tech, there's a storyline in the second season now.
35:07Peter Kafka:You've been renewed for second season. Even before this one has started airing, you're writing it literally right now. Mm-hmm. Where one of the kids at the private school, they're given a new computer tablet to do their homework on. and it's the learning LMS, learning model system, maybe. And this is something my son got fairly early on. Kids now are getting them in kindergarten public schools, too. And what we just need to stop and remember is everything is going through, whether it's Google Classroom or what have you, everything, all that data is contributing to a profile that is associated with that student.
35:52every behavior assessment is in there. You're hoovering up all your data. No wonder they give these computers for free to schools. It's like the British system. They decide who's going to work in the coal mines and who's going to be a doctor. That's happening.
36:13Peter Kafka:Privacy and who controls the data, big theme. Yes. And this was, I think, a big deal a few years ago in the U.S. That was a big concern. I think we've moved to AI now, and are the robots going to kill us or just make us unemployed? But it seems to be the animating thing for you, at least in the first season, that you are concerned about who has access to the data, how do we give it to them, what do we get in return? Private data is an evergreen topic as concerns tech. So, that's probably more than any reason why I chose that and not AI, because AI is evolving so quickly. Private data has been the profit center of Silicon Valley companies, other than the hardware that we buy mostly through one or two companies, smaller Chinese companies, perhaps.
37:07But basically, the collection of data, the advertising that comes out of that, how they sell it to political organizations, how they sell it to insurance companies, all of that, that is, in fact, the profit center of Silicon Valley. us, what we do when we touch our phone, how long we linger on a photo or an article or an ad, how we shop, how we eat, how we masturbate, all of it is gathered and they are watching. They really are. Now, it's anonymized with your IP address.
37:49Peter Kafka:And they also oversell what they can do, right? That's part of the Cambridge Analytica story, is everyone wanted to... They had said, oh, we have all this information. We were able to figure out how people are going to vote, and we can manipulate that. That turned out not to be true. People wanted it to be true. They wanted a reason to blame tech. I think that Facebook's influence on the election had... Even if it just had a... Oh, I'm not saying there's no effect, right? That's the reason they're giant advertising businesses, because they are good at getting people to behave a certain way. Any effect in a democratic election is too much.
38:25And if Cambridge Analytica was the harbinger of how much it can be affected as we go forward, as you keep building these data centers, making the processing power more and more powerful for future elections, I think that it doesn't augur well.
38:43Peter Kafka:You're writing a second season now. You're going to go do that after you finish talking to me in a minute. But are you going to gauge people's reactions and feedback to season one as you're writing season two? Is that going to get into your head one way or the other? I'm going to bravely say no. Don't read the comments. I don't read the comments. You might still read the comments. It is tempting. It is really, really tempting to read reviews and things like that. I don't think it's particularly helpful. at the end of the day I have a season of television to write my fealty is to these characters and to the production and to the network but it is to make the best show possible with these themes and these people and so that's a big fucking job as it is if you start hearing what Lasagna Come 25 is saying about you on the comment section.
39:46I think it starts to get sticky. Is that lasagna cunt? I did not say cunt. I said cum. Okay. Because cunt is not a word that one can use. No, that's why I was surprised.
39:55Peter Kafka:But I think we'll see what my editor thinks of that. Should we leave it on that? Should we leave this conversation? On lasagna cum? Yeah. I don't think we should. Okay. How about this? You can watch season one on AMC and you can stream it. AMC Plus. Yes. which anybody who's listening, still listening, has hopefully got some interest in this thing. I would say probably a better experience watching it without commercials, and AMC Plus is a bargain. Okay. I watched a screener of it with no commercials, but had my name emblazoned across, so that is less than ideal. So, AMC Plus is the way to go. Your name will not be emblazoned on other people's stuff.
40:33Peter Kafka:Go watch The Audacity. It's in season one now. Season two will be out. In about a year. In about a year. Jonathan Glatzer, great to meet you. Thank you, Peter. Appreciate it. Thanks again to Jonathan Glatzer for coming in in studio to talk about the show. Thanks to Charlotte Silver producing and editing the show. Thanks to our advertisers for bringing it to you guys. Thanks to you guys for listening. We'll see you next week, maybe a day or two later than we normally come out, but it'll be worth your time. See you soon.
From the publisher
Jonathan Glatzer has written for shows like Succession and Better Call Saul. Now he’s got his own: The Audacity, a new AMC drama set in Silicon Valley.So why make a Silicon Valley show right now — and what, exactly, is he trying to say about tech?
Glatzer tells me he wasn’t interested in making a wall-to-wall “tech show,” or in doing spot-the-billionaire satire. Instead, he says, he wanted to focus on the people living inside that world: the strivers, service providers, almost-rich neighbors, therapists, and families orbiting vast amounts of money and power.
We talk about why privacy and data collection still worry him more than AI hype; why he thinks tech has failed to deliver on many of its biggest promises; and why he’s more interested in the human consequences of Silicon Valley than in explaining how the industry works.
Plus: what it means to make a prestige-style TV drama in a post-Peak TV market, why AMC was willing to take a swing on this one, and how you fake Silicon Valley by shooting in Vancouver.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
