The Juror

5 May 2023 · 35 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Criminal Podcast Episode Summary: The Juror

Podcast Overview Title: Criminal Description: A show about individuals who have done wrong, been wronged, or found themselves in complicated situations. Hosted by Phoebe Judge, recognized as a Best Podcast of 2023 by *The New York Times*. Part of the Vox Media Podcast Network.

Episode Details Title: The Juror Description: This episode recounts the experience of Sven Berger, who served on the jury for a murder trial in 2008 and struggled with the implications of the verdict he helped deliver. The story was originally reported by Maurice Chammah for The Marshall Project and features insights from the podcast *Heavyweight*, hosted by Jonathan Goldstein.

---

Key Themes and Discussions

Jury Duty and Its Consequences

  • Sven's Background:
  • Served as a juror at age 27.
  • Had expectations shaped by watching courtroom dramas like *Law & Order*.
  • His ambivalence towards the death penalty influenced his selection.
  • The Case:
  • Involved the murder of Jonas Cherry, a mini-golf course manager, allegedly by Paul David Story and an accomplice.
  • The trial was straightforward regarding guilt; the focus was on sentencing (death penalty vs. life imprisonment).

The Verdict

  • Group Dynamics:
  • Sven felt pressured to conform to the majority opinion favoring the death penalty.
  • Despite his personal misgivings about Story's threat level and remorse, he remained silent, fearing a hung jury and its repercussions.
  • Immediate Regret:
  • Sven experienced profound regret following the sentencing, feeling guilty for contributing to a death sentence.
  • His struggle with the decision led to increased drinking and personal turmoil, including a divorce.

Long-term Impact

  • Confronting Guilt:
  • Sven's life was overshadowed by guilt and shame, particularly regarding his role in Story's sentencing.
  • Over eight years, he avoided discussing the trial, attempting to escape through alcohol.
  • Revelation:
  • In 2016, Sven learned he had misunderstood jury instructions, which could have prevented the death sentence if he had cast a dissenting vote.
  • This revelation deepened his regret, leading him to reach out to the media.

Connection with Victim's Mother

  • Marilyn Cherry:
  • Mother of the victim, Jonas Cherry, and her emotional journey post-trial.
  • Expressed feelings of loss and isolation from friends and family who could not comprehend her son's situation.
  • Forgiveness:
  • Marilyn reached out to Sven after reading his article, expressing forgiveness, which surprised and overwhelmed him.
  • Their eventual meeting served as a crucial moment where they could confront their shared pain.

A New Path Forward

  • Meeting Outcomes:
  • During their meeting, Marilyn reassured Sven that he did what he thought was right at the time.
  • Sven learned that his actions influenced efforts to change jury instructions to better inform jurors about dissenting votes in death penalty cases.

Ongoing Developments

  • Legal Changes:
  • The episode discusses ongoing legal efforts to change how jury instructions are presented in capital cases in Texas.
  • Despite the complexity and emotional toll, there remains hope for reform and understanding.

Key Takeaways

  • Juror's Responsibility: The emotional burden jurors face can extend far beyond the courtroom, affecting their lives in profound ways.
  • Impact of Guilt: Guilt can lead to isolation and substance abuse, underscoring the need for jurors to process their experiences.
  • Forgiveness: The act of forgiveness can be transformative, offering healing both for those wrongly sentenced and those who delivered the sentence.
  • Systemic Change: Awareness of juror misconceptions can lead to legal reforms that may prevent wrongful sentences in the future.

---

Conclusion This episode of *Criminal* highlights the complex emotional and moral landscape that jurors navigate during capital trials. It underscores the lasting impacts of decisions made in moments of pressure and the potential for personal growth and understanding through forgiveness and dialogue. The story of Sven and Marilyn serves as a powerful reminder of the human element behind the judicial process.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Support for this show comes from Snapdragon Snapdragon Snapdragon. charge of your day with a PC that can keep up with you. With PCs powered by Snapdragon X Elite processors, you get up to 22 hours of battery life so you can be productive on your terms. Whether that's during coffee shop marathons, airport layovers, or wherever life takes you, it's the performance you deserve for your busy life. Break free from power outlets with a PC powered by Snapdragon X Elite. Learn more at snapdragon.com slash laptops. Battery life varies significantly based on device, settings, usage, and other factors.

0:41Amazon has everything for everyone on your list. Like your sister, who refuses to accept that she does not have a face for bangs. Get her a lovely hat. Amazon has a huge selection of fashionable gifts, and with holiday deals, you can save big on hats, home decor, even the hottest toys. Grab some barrettes while you're at it. For that, oh, so awkward, sweep your hair to the side until your bangs grow out stage.

1:12In 2008, a man in Texas named Sven Berger got a summons for jury duty. He was working as a software developer and had recently gotten married. He and his wife had just bought a house, and he says he liked to come home from work and watch Law & Order on TV. He'd seen so much Law & Order, he thought he knew what to expect from a trial. During jury selection, he was asked how he felt about the death penalty. He said that he wasn't strongly for or against it, and was picked to be on the jury. Sven talked about what happened next on one of our favorite podcasts, Heavyweight. a show in which the host, Jonathan Goldstein, explores the moments from people's lives that they still have regrets about.

2:03Today, we're sharing that episode with you. Here's Jonathan Goldstein. The case was the state of Texas versus Paul David Story. Story was a 22-year-old accused of the murder of Jonas Cherry, the manager of a mini-golf course in Hearst, Texas. Story and an accomplice forced Cherry into the back office, made him unlock the safe, and put the money, a few hundred dollars, in a bag. And then, they shot him multiple times. Story's trial lasted two weeks and would have felt familiar to anyone who watches TV courtroom dramas. There were lawyers with thick binders full of ballistics reports and medical examinations.

2:45Character witnesses were called, and disturbing photographs of the victim's body were shown. The only thing missing was any suspense about the verdict. There was no doubt that he was guilty of murder and robbery. And so really, as a jury, all we had to worry about was sentencing. The jury had to decide between life imprisonment or the death penalty. It seemed the victim's family knew what they wanted. It should go without saying, the prosecutor announced to Sven and the other jurors, that all of Jonas' family and everyone who loved him believe the death penalty is appropriate. The prosecutor asked the jurors to sentence Paul Story to death.

3:25The instructions stated that for the death penalty to be imposed, the jurors must judge three things to be true. That Paul Story was guilty, that there were no mitigating circumstances like, say, mental illness or provocation, and lastly, that Story posed a future threat to his community. That was the one I had issue with. I seriously doubted that he would be a continuing threat to the prison community. And what was it about Paul's story that made you feel like you just didn't see him as a continued threat? A couple of things. The young man Sven saw in the courtroom appeared confused, in over his head, and remorseful.

4:12This was his first offense, and some of the evidence suggested that it was Story's accomplice who'd been the mastermind behind the horrible crime, as well as the one who'd fired first. Sven was certain that Paul Story should be punished, but he didn't think he should be put to death. But in the jury chambers, there was a very different feel. Everyone else was in favor of the death penalty, and so faced with, you know, almost a dozen other people who already felt strongly, I didn't think I could convince anyone of what I was thinking. I'll be honest, I was scared. At 27, Sven was the youngest juror by about 10 years, and he was the kind of guy who avoided speaking up at all costs.

5:05At home, if his neighbor parked in his space, he let it go. At the office, if his boss told him to do something, even if he disagreed, he did it without question. In other words, even though he'd been looking forward to being a juror, when he found himself in the jury room, Sven wasn't exactly Henry Fonda in 12 Angry Men. The way he understood it, the jurors had to reach a unanimous decision, and the idea of swaying 11 strangers over to his way of thinking seemed impossible. He was also afraid that if he opposed the group, It would result in a hung jury and a mistrial. They'd have to start the whole process over again with a new jury.

5:44Everyone would be mad at him. So Sven said nothing. An hour and a half later, Paul Story was sentenced to death by lethal injection. It was hard to look at him during the sentencing. We sat waiting for the judge to ask us, you know, what's the sentencing? And everyone was really tense. And the woman next to me, another juror, began crying. She was trying to hide it, you know. And I gave her my handkerchief, and she just wept. Then the foreman announced the verdict, and I think his mother cried out. They had an exit for us to go through after we collected our things. and we were out of that courtroom fast.

6:41It felt like a mistake right away. Sven went over to his parents' house where he had dinner and drank scotch with his dad. He told his family about the trial and then he went home where he had more to drink before bed. And then that was that. Then it was over. And I went on with my life. Or at least he tried to. But what do you do with these feelings? I was just stuck. I felt massive amounts of regret. I felt guilty, you know, sending someone to death row. When you think about the people a capital murder trial affects, you think of the victims, their loved ones, the accused and their families, and what they're going through.

7:30You don't usually think about what it does to the jurors. But for Sven, the trial wasn't something he could put behind him at the crack of a gavel. In the days and weeks after the verdict, he read every article about the case he could find. But the more he read, the more shame he felt. So eventually, he just stopped. I realized it wasn't really healthy. At the time, Sven was a regular drinker. And it only got worse after the trial. It got a lot worse after the trial. He was drinking more, beginning as soon as he got home from work, and spending more days hungover. His wife didn't understand what was going on.

8:05It may have contributed to my divorce, which was the following year. A year after the trial and Sven's life had changed, the new house with the hammock and the flagpole was sold, and Sven moved out of Texas.

8:28We'll be right back.

9:02We'll be right back. That center stage front camera is amazing for group selfies, right? Mrs. Claus? I'm Mrs. Claus's much younger sister. And at T-Mobile, there's no trade-in needed when you switch, so you can keep your old phone. Or give it as a gift. And the best part? You can make the switch to T-Mobile from your phone in just 15 minutes. Nice. My side of the tree is slipping. Get back! The holidays are better at T-Mobile. Switch in just 15 minutes and get iPhone 17 on us with no trade-in needed. With 24 monthly bill credits for well-qualified customers plus tax and$35 device connection charge.

9:33Credits end and balance due if you pay off for earlier canceled. Finance agreement, 256 gigs,$830. Eligible port in a new line,$100 plus a month plan with auto pay, plus taxes and fees required. Check out in 15 minutes or less per line. Visit T-Mobile.com. Support for the show comes from Estee Lauder. This holiday season, make sure all eyes are on you with Estee Lauder's iconic Double Wear Foundation. It's 24-hour color true wear and oil control. Make it the perfect fit to be your next go-to foundation. It's lightweight and buildable with medium to full coverage and a natural matte finish. It stays in place all day.

10:05No touch-ups needed. Find your perfect match with over 55 shades that flatter all skin tones. Shop Estee Lauder Double Wear Foundation on estelauder.com.

10:18Sven settled in Olympia, Washington to start his life over. He found an apartment for himself and his cat Niku, but he couldn't shake his memories of the trial. When a friend bought a secondhand silver Nissan, Sven couldn't stop thinking about how that was the same car the victim, Jonas Cherry, had driven. When addressing co-workers, the name Jonas would accidentally slip from Sven's lips. And Paul Story, who still was on death row, was never far from Sven's mind. He tried to escape through alcohol, but it didn't free him from his shame. Sometimes, after a night out drinking, he'd return to a Facebook page Paul Story's mother had made for Paul.

10:56One mother had already lost her son, And now, because Sven had been too afraid to speak up, another mother was going to as well. I'm not trying to excuse his crime. It was terrible. But to send a guy to death for any reason at all, that just, the presence in your mind, the sort of recurring thoughts about it, can that go away? For all the bad rap it gets, shame offers a certain safety. It provides a comfortable hole to hide in, away from the judgment of others. But it can also lead to isolation and inertia. And for eight years, eight years in which Paul Story sat on death row awaiting an execution date, Sven barely talked about the trial with anybody.

11:45But then, in 2016, the year after Paul Story's federal appeal had been denied, a reporter writing a series of articles about the judicial system approached Sven about his experience as a juror. Sven was tired of being all alone with his regrets. And so, for the first time, he opened up about his feelings. I felt guilty, he told the reporter, and sad, and a little helpless. I don't think I made the right call. Sven had hoped that talking about the trial might help, and it did, up until the article was published. That was when Sven received an uncomfortable phone call from a lawyer who'd read the article.

12:24Sven was at work. Fearing his co-workers might overhear, he took the call outside, behind his office building. It was there that he learned that, eight years earlier, he'd misunderstood a key part of the jury instructions. I thought incorrectly, essentially. I believed I would have to convince everyone to choose life imprisonment when, in fact, all I had to do was decline the death penalty, and that's all it would have taken. Preventing the death sentence only required one dissenting vote, a vote Sven could have cast. So there would have been no mistrial, no hung jury, and instead of the death penalty, Paul Story would have gotten life in prison without parole.

13:16That would have been nice to know. I could have changed. I could have let him live.

13:30After the article was published, something else happened, something Sven never expected or wanted. Paul Story's mother, Marilyn, got in touch. She reached out with an email filled with sentiments of forgiveness. She had forgiven me. And if I wanted to, I could, you know, reach out and talk with her. And knowing that there was that forgiveness, it felt so weird. Like, it wasn't something I could completely understand. For Sven, it didn't make sense. Why would Marilyn want to speak with him? How could she, of all people, forgive him for something he couldn't forgive himself? I didn't know how to deal with, I still kind of don't know how to deal with that.

14:16And I couldn't, I couldn't, I couldn't match her message. How do you mean? Well, I wasn't sure how to reply with something as powerful as that. It just floored me. I didn't know what to say. Sven was never able to write Marilyn back. I did begin a reply, but I didn't have the courage to finish or send it. It's just, you know, there's so much pain in there and I feel like I really wrecked things up.

15:01A few months after Sven received Marilyn's email, an execution date was set. The state would put Paul Story to death on April 12th of 2017. But then something unexpected happened. Glenn and Judith Cherry, the parents of the victim, came forward. It seems that at the trial, the prosecution had lied. The Cherries, in spite of their son's murder, are and always have been against capital punishment. In a video they released publicly, Judith Cherry presents a statement which reads, in part, we do not want Paul Story's family, especially his mother, to witness the purposeful execution of their son. They are innocent of his deeds.

15:43Based on this testimony, with only five days to spare, Paul Story's execution was postponed. When news of the stay of execution reached Sven, it felt like a second chance, an opening, to finally respond to Marilyn's email. But he didn't. It's now been over two years. He's remarried, doesn't drink anymore, but he still hasn't contacted Marilyn. And so at this point, like, what do you want?

16:13I need to apologize for not doing what I should have done to begin with, for not following my gut, for not trying.

16:28Shame leads to inertia. And as even the most casual reader of the fundamentals of physics will tell you, an inert object will remain inert until it is acted upon by an external force. In other words, it takes a little nudge. And who better to supply a little nudge than a little nudge? And so, I write Marilyn a letter. I know this is a really sensitive and deeply personal issue, it reads, and I hope I'm not being too forward. I ask Marilyn if she remembers a juror by the name of Sven Berger. About a week later, I receive a note back via email. Thank you so much for your letter, Marilyn writes. I have no ill will toward Mr.

17:08Berger. I have offered him my email address as well as my phone number with no reply. She also forwards me her original email to Sven, the one she sent two years ago, the one he can't stop thinking about. When I read it, I'm expecting a grand gesture of forgiveness. But Marilyn never mentions forgiveness, never even uses the word. Instead, it's just six short sentences in which Marilyn thanks Sven for the article and says she shared it with her son. Her tone's breezy. She ends with, Have a great day! I understand that Sven, consumed by guilt, would read so much into so little. What I don't understand is why Marilyn sent him the email in the first place.

18:02We'll be right back.

18:15Fox Creative. This is Advertiser Content, brought to you by Nature Sunshine New Marine Glow Collagen. Blue light is everywhere. We wake up, we look at our phones, we're watching TV. We don't realize how much blue light in itself can affect our skin. My name is Dr. Brianna Olamiju. I am a dermatologist based in New York City. We know that blue light causes free radical breakdown, and free radicals create oxidative stress on the cells. And so when the cells are stressed out, the collagen is breaking down more easily, and that's when the aging process can be accelerated prematurely. Screens in blue light aren't going anywhere.

19:02That's why Nature's Sunshine New Marine Glow combines the age-defying properties of marine collagen with skin-supporting vitamins and antioxidants and powerful blue light-busting lutein. What we know about lutein is that it is a natural blue light filter. Lutein and antioxidants are like a power couple. Combined, they can prevent premature aging and collagen breakdown. Experience more radiant skin and proven eye protection with Nature Sunshine New Marine Glow, the only collagen product clinically proven to support eye and skin health and defend against blue light. Try Nature Sunshine New Marine Glow now at naturesunshine.com.

19:43Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start? Thumbtack knows homes, so you don't have to. Don't know the difference between matte paint finish in satin, or what that clunking sound from your dryer is? With Thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro. You just have to hire one. You can hire top-rated pros, see price estimates, and read reviews all on the app. Download today. I know you jokingly mentioned breakfast. Oh, I was joking. I have a couple little things if you get peckish at all, some croissant, some of this stuff, I don't know, some cookies. No, I'm fine.

20:24Yeah, okay. Marilyn lives in Fort Worth, Texas. The two of us meet in a hotel suite downtown, where I can't stop offering her food that she can't stop refusing. Do you want to have a coffee or a tea? Uh, no. Marilyn is tall and stately, with smiling eyes. She's in slacks, boots, and a cropped blazer, all in black. She sits on the end of the couch, next to an empty armchair, and she tries to give me a sense of what her life was like before the trial. I was always the life of the party. I mean, I was a jostor. Oh, make sure you have Marilyn there because she's going to keep the party going. I was always kind of the one that everybody went to.

21:00People knew you can call me in the middle of the night. You know, if you need somebody to come pick you up, you know, call Marilyn. She'll get up, she'll go do it. Since the trial, Marilyn doesn't feel like the same person. But after 10 years, her friends and family wanted to go back to being the same old Marilyn she always was. So it went through a transition of my family not understanding because it's like, okay, you know, well, why aren't you cheery and happy like you used to? And you got to go on with your life. But this is Marilyn's life. Every day she's reckoning with the horror of her son's crime and worrying endlessly about his safety in prison.

21:37The thing that's hardest, though, is the way the people closest to her now look upon her son. She says that everyone's passed judgment on Paul, written him off as worthless and unredeemable. And they blame him for her pain. And I even had a family member where Paul is the cause of all of this. And that was very hurtful. It's like they wanted everything to be okay. But that's my child. And I love him. And I'm not going to ever stop fighting for him. Fighting for him meant working with her son's lawyers to change his sentence to life in prison. Paul's appeals were exhausting. It took up all of her time and energy, which affected the hospitality job she worked at for over 30 years.

22:22It became extremely hard for me to concentrate at work. And I feel like it cost me my job. After losing her job, Marilyn then lost her house. She was forced to move in with her younger son. So it's kind of like, you know, at my age, where I thought that I'd be getting ready to retire, I'm starting over. So that's a hard thing.

22:52Ten years after the trial, and everyone, her friends, her family, have all moved on. So when Marilyn read Sven's article, she saw in him someone like her, someone who'd never gotten past that final day of the trial. When they actually gave the sentence, the death penalty, I thought I had died. I thought I had literally died. It didn't even register because I'm just like, what just happened? What have they done? You know, my whole time there, I was just look at the jurors to try to read, okay, what are they thinking? What are they doing? I wanted them to know if I could only tell them what kind of person he is.

23:39and I want people to know, you know, everybody's, they assume that if you're involved in a heinous crime like that, that you're a monster, but he wasn't a monster.

23:51I think that might be him. Okay, so he's going to come up. Marilyn and I have been talking for about an hour and a half when the front desk phones. I think they probably... Now, how do you pronounce his name? Sven. Is it Ben? Sven, S-V-E-N. Sven, yeah. Sven, yeah. Sven. I hope I get that before he gets it. But before we get a chance to practice our Svens, Sven is at the door. Hi, Sven. I'm Jonathan. It's very nice to meet you. Nice to meet you in person. Marilyn is here. Hi. Now, how do you pronounce your name? Sven. Sven. Sven lingers in the door of the hotel room. Here, sit down. Sure. Have a seat over there.

24:33He's bespectacled, neatly dressed in a collared shirt and sweater. he looks around and clears his throat. I'm a little nervous, so... The last time Marilyn and Sven had been in the same room was 10 years ago, at the trial. Marilyn was seated behind the bar. Sven sat in the jury box. But today, he sits down in the empty armchair beside her. He can't quite bring himself to look at her. As he tells Marilyn what it was like to receive her email, he gazes down at his lap. It was very surprising. And I read it and I reread it. And I even began several letters that never went anywhere. I didn't know what to say.

Read the full transcript

25:15What do you say about that? I don't want to write a letter that's trying to make me feel better. Do you know what I mean? From the moment the vote was cast, I had regret. I thought, I'm doing the wrong thing. And although it was great hearing that, you know, you forgave me, I couldn't forgive myself exactly. And I can't even imagine how you must feel. Okay. First of all, I want to say, I don't want you to feel shame because, you know, my son was involved in a crime. He made a wrong choice. And I don't ever want you to feel that you did anything wrong. You did what you felt you had to do at the time.

26:05But you came back. And for you to come out and for you to say, hey, I made a mistake. You right your wrong. I can tell by Sven's face that he isn't convinced. He doesn't feel like he's right at anything. This is because for years, Sven has been avoiding all traces of the case. No Googling, no newspapers. He never even read the article he'd been interviewed for. So he doesn't know what Marilyn knows, which is the chain of events that his article set in motion.

26:44The jury instructions for Paul Story's case were written in dense legalese, and nowhere in their nine pages did they state that a single dissenting vote can prevent the death penalty. In fact, courts in Texas are prohibited from telling jurors that. In theory, that's to encourage them to arrive at a consensus. But what it means is, Sven's confusion wasn't his fault. For years, legal advocates had wanted to bring a bill before the legislature that would clarify the instructions. But they needed someone who could say, I would have done things differently if I had understood. Marilyn explains to Sven that with him and the things he'd said in the article, They'd finally found that person.

27:25There are senators in the state of Texas who have introduced the bill based on you to change the way the instructions are given to a death penalty jury. Sven, slumped in his chair, straightens up. Really? Yeah, yeah. You have no idea what sort of impact you had. I don't know anything about that. You were very instrumental. This is... I'm shocked. While his eyes have tended to dart around the room, looking at me or down at his hands, right now, Sven is looking directly at Marilyn. She tells him that had he in fact voted against the death penalty at her son's trial, these attempts at reform might never have happened.

28:09I'm a firm believer that things happen for a reason, because this is not just about my son. It's about other mother's sons that are on death row as well. So if this can help any other case, you know, outside of Paul's, then we've served our purpose. You came forward. So I look at you as my hero. Sven physically shrinks from the word hero. It's as though she's placed a large, awkward crown atop his head. Wow. That's not the way I'd consider myself or my actions in any way. I don't feel that special, but I appreciate all your words. To me, you are. So, you know, it means a lot. That's a lot to process.

28:58I had no idea. You didn't know any of this? No. Oh, the articles. There's a really good one in the Texas Tribune. It's one of the ones. I actually printed it out for you, but I waste Coca-Cola on it. So I didn't want to give you an article that was, but you should look it up. Oh, this blows my mind. I need to send you some articles in because it's definitely movement. It's definitely movement. Wow.

29:33Sorry, I'm a little at a loss for words.

29:40Yeah, walking in here, I didn't know what to expect. And I was a little nervous. I do feel, even just now, a little bit of weight taken off my shoulders.

29:56This helps. This helps so much. Oh, this helps so much.

30:07After all these years, Sven is finally able to accept Marilyn's forgiveness, even if he still isn't ready to forgive himself. It chews me up today that I didn't express a dissenting opinion. I should have spoken up at least. I mean, I didn't think he would be a danger to the prison community. I didn't see a hardened criminal there. I got the impression of sort of a kid who was in a situation he didn't know how to handle. I saw someone who made a terrible mistake. And someone I did not believe would do it again. As Sven speaks, Marilyn's eyes well up. You know, I kept looking at the jurors, and I was like, you know, it has to be somebody on there that feels and that can see through all of this that the prosecutor is presenting and everything to know that my son is not a monster.

31:02No, no, never. I never saw Paul as a monster. After the crime, Marilyn's family never saw her son the same way again. From that moment on, he was nothing more than a murderer. And on the final day of the trial, 12 jurors confirmed that judgment. Her hope had been that maybe someone had seen something else. It wasn't a hope for someone to recognize in her son anything special or good. She just wanted them to see him as something other than a monster. I didn't see that throughout the trial. I never saw that once. Paul's story is still on death row, and Sven still can't reverse the sentence. But in speaking aloud the words that Marilyn's been repeating to herself, for so long.

31:45Sven's made her feel less alone. You have...

31:53Some of the hurt that I have carried on my heart for the last 12 years, you just lifted it. You have no earthly idea what that meant to me. It's... It meant a lot. And for you to say that, it is...

32:15It's, um, it really eases my heart.

32:29After years of worry over what to say to Marilyn, Sven's finally found the right words. I'm sorry I never wrote back. That's okay. I totally understood. I, uh... That's a lot.

32:44Since Sven and Marilyn's meeting, a judge made an official recommendation that based on Glenn and Judith Cherry's testimony, Paul Story's sentence be changed to life in prison without parole. Though the Court of Criminal Appeals still has to make a final ruling, Story's lawyers are hopeful. And so is Marilyn. As for Sven, after finally responding to Marilyn, he decided to send a letter of apology to Paul Story. I couldn't find the strength to speak up in the jury room, he wrote, and that is a mistake I will carry forever. Sven is yet to hear anything back.

33:36That's Jonathan Goldstein, host of the podcast Heavyweight. After this episode first aired in 2018, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the recommendation from the trial court judge, keeping Paul Story on death row. The Supreme Court declined to hear the case, but Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the prosecutors in Paul Story's trial quote, misled the jury. But then, in a move that Paul Story's defense attorneys called unprecedented, the district attorney in the same county where Paul Story had been prosecuted years earlier asked the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals to reconsider its decision.

34:24The district attorney wrote in a motion, quote, Story should, at the very least, be granted a new punishment trial. Justice demands it. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has not yet responded to her motion.

34:44Heavyweight recently wrapped up the seventh season of their show. You can listen to all of their episodes on Spotify. Next week on Criminal, more about the experience of serving on a jury and the ways that some court systems are trying to change that experience.

35:05Heavyweight is hosted and produced by Jonathan Goldstein, along with Stevie Lane, Kalila Holt, and Mohini Medgaukur. This episode was edited by Jorge Just, with additional editing by Alex Bloomberg. Special thanks to Emily Condon, Peter Bresnan, Emmanuel Berry, Caitlin Kenney, John Michael Tuttle Gates, Amanda Marzullo, Mike Weyer, Emily Fallis, Brian Reed, Sean Cole, Diane Wu, Christopher Swatala Ira Glass and the rest of the team at This American Life. Maurice Chema originally reported on Sven's story for The Marshall Project. We're including a link to his article in our show notes. Bobby Lord mixed the episode with music by Christine Fellows, John K.

35:51Sampson, Michael Hurst, Blue Dot Sessions, and Bobby Lord. Additional music credits can be found at gimletmedia.com slash heavyweight. Criminal is recorded in the studios of North Carolina Public Radio WUNC. We're part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. Discover more great shows at podcast.voxmedia.com. I'm Phoebe Judge. This is Criminal.

36:30Right now is the AI gold rush. And that means everybody who builds an app, a platform, a piece of software, a gizmo that somebody, anything, everybody is trying to put AI everywhere. And for two weeks in a series on the Vergecast, we are talking through what that looks like. We're talking to developers about what they're building and how they're building it and whether AI actually does make sense everywhere or is just going to ruin everything in the process. That's the AI miniseries on the Vergecast wherever you get podcasts. This series is presented by MongoDB.

37:092025 was a wild year for the tech industry. AI seemed like it took over everyone's brains. It was the only thing anyone wanted to talk about. NVIDIA became the most valuable company in the world. We had some huge new video games. The Switch 2 launched. A lot of people got it. There was just a lot going on. And on The Verge Cast, we are talking about the best, the worst, the most important, the biggest heel turns, all the stuff that happened in 2025. And making maybe a few predictions about what's going to happen next year. All that and more on The Verge Cast, wherever you get podcasts. This series is presented by JIRA by Atlassian.

From the publisher

In 2008, Sven Berger was chosen to serve on the jury for a murder trial. He says the sentence that he and his fellow jurors handed down “felt like a mistake right away.”
Sven talked about what happened next on the podcast Heavyweight, and today, we’re sharing that episode with you. Maurice Chammah originally reported on Sven’s story for The Marshall Project.
Say hello on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram. Sign up for our occasional newsletter, The Accomplice. Follow the show and review us on Apple Podcasts: iTunes.com/CriminalShow.
Listen back through our archives at youtube.com/criminalpodcast. 
We also make This is Love and Phoebe Reads a Mystery.
Artwork by Julienne Alexander. Check out our online shop. 
Episode transcripts are posted on our website.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Criminal

All 173 episodes
The JurorCriminal · 35 min
Listen in VO