In short
Critics at Large Podcast Episode Notes
Episode Title
Does “Hamlet” Need a Backstory?
Podcast Overview
- Podcast Title: Critics at Large
- Podcast Description: A weekly culture podcast from The New Yorker featuring discussions on current cultural obsessions, classic texts, and emerging trends in books, television, film, and more.
Episode Summary In this episode, hosts Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz explore Shakespeare's enduring play, "Hamlet," and its continual relevance through various adaptations, particularly the new film "Hamnet" directed by Chloé Zhao. They discuss the complexities of the play and its characters, how it resonates through changing societal contexts, and the significance of grief and masculinity in both the original text and its adaptations.
---
Key Discussions
The Enduring Appeal of "Hamlet"
- Cultural Relevance: "Hamlet" has remained popular since its inception over 400 years ago, continuously attracting audiences with its themes of grief, betrayal, and the human condition.
- Generational Resonance: Each generation interprets "Hamlet" through its cultural lens, dealing with phenomena like grief and political disillusionment.
Adaptations Discussed
- Hamnet (2025)
- Directed by Chloé Zhao, this film portrays Shakespeare's writing of “Hamlet” as a response to the death of his son, Hamnet.
- Emphasizes themes of grief and the process of moving through profound loss.
- The film's narrative style is described as subdued and pastoral, focusing on the natural world and emotional landscapes.
- Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
- Tom Stoppard's absurdist play shifts focus from Hamlet to his minor characters, exploring themes of existentialism and absurdity.
- Almereyda's Hamlet (2000)
- Presents Hamlet as a contemporary film student, emphasizing the play's themes in a modern context.
- The adaptation critiques traditional interpretations and offers a fresh take on the character's struggles.
Themes and Analysis
- Grief's Role in Creativity: The hosts discuss how "Hamnet" frames grief as a catalyst for artistic expression, paralleling Shakespeare's own experiences.
- Crisis of Masculinity: A significant topic is whether "Hamlet" reflects a crisis of masculinity relevant today, exploring societal expectations of men and the struggles associated with them.
- Art as Therapy: The discussion touches on the idea that art can serve as a therapeutic outlet, especially in handling grief and identity.
Key Quotes
- "I think it endures because every generation has its version of the incomprehensible." – Vinson Cunningham
- "The telling is another one of the things maybe."
Personal Impressions
- Diverse Reactions: The hosts share varied opinions about "Hamnet," highlighting a spectrum from enjoyment to criticism.
- Alex Schwartz expresses disappointment, feeling that the film fell short in its emotional impact.
- Naomi Fry finds it beautiful and moving, praising its visual storytelling.
- Vinson Cunningham appreciates the film's pastoral elements and its thematic depth.
---
Conclusion The episode concludes with a reflection on "Hamlet's" continued significance and the flexibility of its interpretation, affirming that it speaks to universal human experiences that transcend time and culture. The hosts invite listeners to consider their own relationship with the text and its adaptations, fostering a deeper appreciation of Shakespeare's work in the modern context.
---
Further Reading/Watching
- Hamnet (2025)
- Hamlet by William Shakespeare
- Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead (1990)
- Kenneth Branagh’s Hamlet (1996)
- Michael Almereyda’s Hamlet (2000)
Follow-Up Listeners are encouraged to engage with the themes explored in this episode through their own readings and interpretations of "Hamlet" and its adaptations. New episodes of Critics at Large drop every Thursday.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:28Can anyone do the speech? And by opposing in them to die to sleep. Go, Vincent. Perchance to dream? Not yet. No more.
0:41This is Critics at Large, a podcast from The New Yorker. I'm Alex Schwartz. I'm Nomi Fry. I'm Vincent Cunningham. Each week on this show, we make sense of what's happening in the culture right now and how we got here. How you guys doing? Turkey Day, how was it? It was good. It was really nice, actually. It was nice. I saw my family. I ate. There's still stuffing in my fridge. Yeah. Which for me is a mark of success. I thought you were going to say there's still stuffing in my belly. I'm stuffed like a Christmas goose. Like a prized turkey. Yeah. I did have a lot of stuffing. It was my favorite food on Thanksgiving by far.
1:18Anyway, that done, it's December. And that means we're officially in Oscar movie season. So, you know, just get ready for some real cinema on this podcast. So recently, the three of us saw Hamlet, which I'm sure will feature in a lot of these Oscar races. It's a fictionalized story about the writing of, of course, Hamlet, the beloved Shakespeare play. Directed by Chloe Zhao, the movie stars Paul Meskel as William Shakespeare and Jesse Buckley as his wife, Anya's. He's got more inside of him than any man I've ever met. Who are you looking for? William Shakespeare. I have no talent awaiting. But women and my family see things.
2:06What do you see? It's a really interesting, complicated movie, I think. On the one hand, there's this really loose biographical element about Shakespeare's perhaps most famous play. But on the other hand, it's a story about intense grief and, I guess, how to move through it. Of course, we're going to hear everything about how you guys thought about it in the course of the show. But first impressions? Do you want to know my first impressions? First impressions. Okay, I have a sense what else is going to say. A couple words, yeah. Hated it. Hated it. Oh, God, I can't wait to talk about this. Okay.
2:42Know me. So, shockingly, did not hate it. Good. I'm making progress. I was sure I was going to hate it, but enjoyed it and thought it had a bunch of things going for it. Cool. We got the whole gamut because over here, loved it. Wow. So today we're going to talk about Hamlet and about Hamlet, of course, the play itself. Hamlet has never not been popular, right? It's been in production almost constantly since it was written over 400 years ago. And in that time, it's undergone all manner of revisions, updates, adaptations, reimaginings. Hamlet, to me, is all about how the common difficulties of life, grief, betrayal, loneliness, indecision, strike each of us with a unique and particular pain.
3:33It's also about how all of this lands specifically on a troubled young man. In 2025, we hear a lot about the plight of young men, economic, interpersonal, on and on. their propensity to shoot people, all that stuff. And I want to know, what is Hamlet's hold on us now? And does this contemporary narrative about men have anything to do with it? So that's today on Critics at Large. Who is Hamlet today?
4:06All right. All right. Let's start with Hamlet. The film came out in select theaters during Thanksgiving week. It's going into wide release later this month. I saw it in the great big cavernous Theater 3 at BAM, which I love. It's directed by Chloe Zhao, adapted from a novel of the same name by Maggie O 'Farrell, who was sort of the co-screenwriter with Chloe Zhao. Can somebody lay out the premise before we jump upon it? I can try. Please. Okay, so we're seeing William Will Shakespeare behind the scenes as a man rather than a playwright. And he meets a girl, a woman, who is said to be the daughter of a witch, kind of like a wild girl, a girl of the woods.
5:01They live on the edge of a forest and the movie opens, you know, with this vista, this beautiful vista where she's kind of like she's seen from above kind of curled up in the roots of an old oak tree or something. I don't know if it's oak actually, but, you know. And Shakespeare, whose name isn't mentioned for almost the entirety of the movie, we're meant to know, of course, that it is Shakespeare. But he's just kind of like a hot guy with like facial hair who sort of skulks around. is very taken with this woman, Agnes, and they kind of have this almost wordless courtship. Agnes, wait!
5:48I know who you are. Who am I? Well, I don't know you, but I've heard... I'm the daughter of a forest witch. Yes, people say that, but that's why I don't... I am my mother's daughter. I've learned many things from her.
6:05What are you looking at? You. Why?
6:12They make love and she... They do. They do. They make love on a table that is laden with fruits. With significantly apples. With apples. And she gets pregnant. They get married. She has first a girl and then a little bit later gets pregnant again and has twins. Meanwhile, it suddenly emerges that Will, Shakespeare, is Shakespeare. That is, it emerges suddenly about mid-movie that he's a writer and that he is kind of stagnating in the countryside and must go to London. Anya stays home with the kids. But then the plague comes. What ends up happening is that one of the twins, named Hamnet, dies. And then grief comes, horrible grief.
7:11And Agnes sort of, you know, almost loses her mind from this grief. Towards the end of the movie, we, for the first time, are in London with Shakespeare, who, it emerges, has written a play. The play is Hamlet. And the implication is that he was deeply affected by the death of Hamnet, his son, and in response to it has written this play about Prince Hamlet in Denmark, the play that we know as Hamlet. I will say that what I liked about this movie and surprised me is there's no volubility in it right it's it's it's quite wordless there's a long stretches of silence and a lot of focus on nature and kind of the the lived environment that these characters are in and this is before again it is revealed that Shakespeare is Shakespeare I really enjoyed that I thought it was beautiful I and And as I get older, I'm kind of like, I find myself more in touch with a pastoral.
8:19I'm like, oh, I'm like enjoying these wooded scenes of like whatever mushrooms being dug from the earth. I was like, this is like some Scandinavian movie from the 80s. Like, I really like this, you know. This is all before the whole like Hamlet, Hamnet, playwriting thing happened. And later, I liked it less. Although I didn't hate it, but I also didn't think it totally worked. Okay, now I'll shut up. Alex, I mean, I know we know what you thought. We know what you thought, but we're eager to hear. And I bet I'll also agree with you. No, here's what I want to say to start. If you love this movie, I'm really glad you love this movie.
9:04And I don't mean to say that in a condescending way. I wanted to love this movie. It sounds like such an asshole thing to say, right? Yeah, I'm sorry. Maybe I just made it all worse. I'm happy for you. I rub salt in the mood. No, I understand there's this, Hamnet is sweeping the nation. All I hear is not a dry eye is to be seen. I did cry like a baby. Good, you know, and that's great. I wish I had cried. I wish I had had— Your heart is made of stone, Alex. Well, no, but I wish I had felt. I wish I had had these feelings that's been moved by this grief. And instead, I have quibbles and I have bigger problems with the movie Hamnet.
9:44So I have read the novel Hamnet, on which the movie is based, Maggie O 'Farrell's novel. The stuff you love, Nomi, is stuff I really didn't like in this movie. To me, this movie felt romanticcy adjacent. We have the strong, noble heroine who is, of course, iconoclastic. God forbid she's an ordinary woman. No, she has to be singular. She's got to be someone who modern women look at and think, if I had lived in 1595, I wouldn't have been an ordinary housefrau. I would have been her. I would have been Agnes, barefoot, wandering into the forest with my kestrel above me because I'm cool and free. I would have had my hair down.
10:24Once my mother died in front of me in childbirth, I too would have renounced the church because I'm a free thinker. Can I just say something? Yes, of course. I think we found my romanticcy. We found your romanticcy. This is it. Yes. This is it. We found it. I think we found at least that aspect of it. You know how I was like romanticizing it. The hot Latin tutor with a single earring arrives to teach Latin. And by the way, the movie doesn't make this totally clear, but both in life, in the real, we know very, very little about Shakespeare's life and the life of Anne Hathaway, his wife. But one thing we do know is that he was 18 when they got married.
10:54She was 26 and she was pregnant. So something had gone down. Vincent, defend this movie. Well, here's the thing. And Nomi's point about the pastoral, I think, first of all, I deeply relate to about sort of as life goes on being more attracted to sort of nature as an object of observation and study. I guess I've always had that part of me, but I do feel that it has grown. In this movie, though, I think it is important. And I don't think it's just about the affect of the character being sort of she's a woodsy woman against the people of or, you know, she's a witchy person against the church and et cetera.
11:34But I think much more importantly, the work with landscape is so good. I think there are so many beautiful images of, you know, the huge tree and this little cave under the root system and bodies being very small against the sort of grandeur of the landscape. There's a scene where a childbirth scene, actually. There's a big storm and the river water is seeping into the room where Amias is giving birth. And she can sort of she connects this to, you know, Williams on his way somewhere. He's on a boat. Like the panic of that. All of that to me makes the first half of the movie very clearly like about nature.
12:15About all of our frailty, our sort of how subject we are to forces outside of ourselves, how much we are out of control, etc., etc. There's a moment where Annis' mother-in-law, William's mother, has an almost direct-to-camera monologue. It's the only real monologue in the movie. And she's saying, like, you have to know that things can go wrong. It's in the middle of the sort of plague scene. And she's like, you can't take it for granted that your child lives and breathes and the heart is beating in their chest. I think she says you have to always keep your guard up. Yeah, it's basically that. Like, it can go away any moment.
12:53And therefore, and it's like a disquisition on maybe the connection between love and nature. That we are not in control over those items which we love. and therefore, you know, we have to sort of surrender. The second half of the film, which, you know, there's a huge shot of the globe, all of its sort of, first of all, its exterior, and then inside all of its ropes and pulleys and the background sort of scene painting, which is a painting of a forest, not unlike the real forest, the real forest that we've been looking at sort of cinematically. It's really a two-act system, this movie. Nature on the one hand, artifice on the other, and how our lives as people who are human animals but also making things, people that are attracted to art creators and people who receive creations, deal with artifice mostly to negotiate our relationships to nature.
13:52So that all I found really intellectually stimulating. Yes, I did cry in the middle of the movie. And I also just thought the performances were incredible. Yeah. Jesse Buckley was amazing. Paul Mezcal is just like fucking batting a thousand in the thing. There's one moment when it doesn't work. When he's like looking over the Thames and like says the to be or not to be speech. I was like, Jesus fucking Christ, stop. Thank you. So that was like flawed. That moment, it did not work. But he could have just stood there looking at us with his eyes. And I'm like, God, they're both to me just out of control in this movie.
14:29Jesse Buckley is very good. You know, this movie, I think we should raise the issue here that one critique of this movie that's going around is that Hamnet is that it pulls at the heartstrings. The movie, I think what that critique is supposed to mean is that it really delves into the particulars of the way that this child dies. You see a very horrible death of a kid. It's not glossed over. It's you're with Agnes as she screams in the room as her son dies. and it's a little bit like the critique that art is manipulative. I've also seen this movie called Manipulative. Well, art, it's supposed to manipulate.
15:09So that's okay, but what I, but I mean, guys, it didn't get me, this movie didn't get me at all. Like the grief parts of it didn't, I felt, yes, I felt that much like Hamlet, you know, that Chloe Zhao would like to play upon me as upon a pipe, you know, which is what Hamlet says to Rosencrantz. She tried to play you like a fiddle. She tried to play upon me, and I did not feel played upon. And I think a big part of why is that I could not connect. Because I love Hamlet, the much bigger issue I have with all of this, with Hamlet as a book and also as a film, is that I don't find it illuminates anything about Hamlet the play.
15:51In fact, I don't understand it as a reading of Hamlet, period. The raison d 'etre for this whole thing is to say this is the origin of this work of art. This work of art came around so that as a way for Shakespeare to deal with his own feelings of grief and sorrow and also to address, literally address his wife, who communication completely cracks between them after the death of their son and it's repaired. It's a very modern, like, therapeutic process. It's art therapy. Hamlet is art therapy is what this movie says. And, of course, what can be presented on stage in the film is very, very little of the play because it makes no sense with the actual play Hamlet.
16:30Like, I'm watching this thinking, oh, I wonder what Agnes, who's standing in the theater, thinks about Hamlet's absolute hatred for his mother and his fury at his mother. I'm wondering about that. I'm wondering what she thinks about the character of Ophelia, who in turn is set up and betrayed by Hamlet and driven mad and driven to death by what Hamlet does. And so the complexity and the intensity and all the many hundreds of meanings that are in the play Hamlet boil down to this. It just breaks the illusion to me. And I don't understand what is concretely being said. Anyway, go ahead. Charge at me.
17:05No, I just don't. No, no, no. I just don't. Maybe the movie purports to do that, but I don't think the movie is trying to explain Hamlet at all. I think it's trying to show. So it's almost like Hamlet, and maybe, and I could see this as a critique of the movie. And I like what you said about like, if you are going to invoke Hamlet, all of a sudden all of Hamlet comes to someone who has read the play. That is like, I think that's a really good critique. But to me, what is good about the movie is that Hamlet is almost just like capital A artwork in this movie. It's a kind of theorem about the place of art in our otherwise unartful lives.
17:46like if it were trying to be a one-to-one, here's Hamlet, here's this autobiographical thing, I wouldn't like it either. But I just like didn't read it that way at all. Well, I'm happy for you because it's pretty hard when a text precedes a movie saying that Hamlet and Hamlet are the same name and the whole thing is hammered on your head as hard as possible that this is why Hamlet came to be to ignore it.
18:11Didn't the scenery totally remind you of the background home screen for macOS Sequoia. We're all looking at it, baby. Minimize your browser windows and you'll be in Hamlet. Oh, that's so funny. That tree is so much more gnarly than that. It looks like, that looks like the scenery in the play. Nothing wrong with that.
18:36In a minute, it's our favorite Hamlets on Critics at Large from The New Yorker.
18:52I'm Rebecca Ford, Senior Awards Correspondent at Vanity Fair and co-host of Little Gold Men. Oscar season is upon us. Little Gold Men takes you behind the scenes of the race for the biggest prize in Hollywood. There's a hundred wrestlers in the room, but only one can be Oscar nominated. Whether you're a movie lover or an industry buff, Little Gold Men from Vanity Fair has everything you need to know about this year's Oscar race. Follow and listen to Little Gold Men wherever you get your podcasts.
19:32Do you guys remember the first Hamlet that you ever saw? or the first time you read it, whatever, and did that, like, make a deep impression on you? I love this question because I was going to say, for me, it wasn't seeing, it was reading. Same deal. Absolutely, reading. And not only do I remember it, I have my first original copy of Hamlet that I read in high school. I have my little Alex Schwartz, you know, grade 12 thing in there with the Roman numeral for 12 and all of my notes. Just to give you a sense of how advanced my thinking about this was. So when Hamlet first appears, The king, the new king Claudius, who is, of course, brother to Hamlet's father, Old King Hamlet, has married Gertrude, Hamlet's mother, two months after, nary two months after Hamlet's father was buried.
20:19The body not yet warm. Cold. The body not yet cold. Yep. The king says, but now my cousin Hamlet and my son. And Hamlet says, a little more than kin and less than kind. And I just wrote, brilliant. Which you were right about. Brilliant. Got to just hand it to that Shakespeare. He can do it. No, yeah. To me, Hamlet was hugely important. I did also encounter it in school. Reading Hamlet was the way I learned a lot else. So, you know, I was taught iambic pentameter and how to scan poetry via Hamlet. Like the study of literary devices, alliteration, anaphora, the beginning of a line in the same way over and over.
21:07And so, yeah, it couldn't be more formative. How about you, Nomi? I never studied it. I mean, I remember the Kenneth Branagh adaptation from the mid-90s, from 1996, I believe. To be or not to be, that is the question. Whether it is nobler in the mind to suffer the same. I remember it in the context more of Kenneth Branagh than of Hamlet. That's fair. You know, that period where he was like he was doing Shakespeare and everybody was like he is the second coming of, you know, whatever, like the genius of Kenneth Branagh, you know, his his coupled them with Emma Thompson before they separated. That is my context for Hamlet because I'm an idiot.
21:56And it's like four hours long. And it's I remember I'm sorry. I'm such a Philistine. Like I remember Nod being extremely – I remember like dragging my feet through it because I was like this is important. You know what I'm saying. Of course I know what you're saying. And I think to insult yourself as a Philistine is just – it's wrongheaded. Wow. I think it's Kenneth Branagh who's to blame. It might be Kenneth Branagh. Let's just blame him. And so I am looking forward to our discussion today because we each brought a little bit of Hamlet to the table, right? Little versions. We each have our little thing that we're going to talk about, right?
22:36Yeah. I will happily start the sort of show and tell portion. Yes, please do. Because I'm looking forward to what you're going to share with us. I will just say that I watched the trailer for it. I've never watched it. And I was like, God, I have to watch it. You do. This is Hamlet, or as it is sometimes known, Hamlet 2000. My father. I see my father. The king, your father. In my mind's eye. Directed and adapted by the filmmaker Michael Almereda. It stars Ethan Hawke as Hamlet, who is a film student who's back from college because of the death of his father, who was the CEO of the Denmark Corporation.
23:25Played by Sam Shepard. Sam Shepard is the ghost. His first time appearing to Hamlet is through a CCTV camera. Kyle McLaughlin is Uncle Claudius, which I love. Kyle McLaughlin is like the most sinister looking. We've talked about him on our David Lynch episode. He's the perfect guy to be Uncle Claudius. Diane Venora as Gertrude. Liev Schreiber as Laertes. Very good. Julia Stiles, beautiful as Ophelia. and it's got so much going on. First of all, the choice of Hamlet as a film student corresponds a little bit to what I was saying about Chloe Zhao, which is that it really takes seriously cinema as medium and Hamlet is always looking at screens, whether it is the information from the ghost, the way he finds out certain key plot points is all through this sort of like mechanisms of surveillance.
24:17So it's very contemporary in this way. his to be or not to be occurs in a blockbuster video. He's walking down the aisles, and the funniest thing is that every single one of the little genre markers says action on it. Here's the rub. For in the sleep of death, what dreams may come when we have shuffled off this mortal coil must give us pause. And he's just going through the aisles, sort of, sometimes it's in voiceover, sometimes he's sort of muttering to himself. For who would bear the whips and scorns of time? He's wearing a little snow cap with flaps over the ears. It's one of those Guatemalan hats.
24:56Yeah. Woolen Guatemalan, like, ear flaps. Big ear flaps with the strings coming down from each flap. And he just has that wounded, angry indecision. He's a perfect Hamlet. And Almereta, at every step, is kind of choreographing these wonderful set pieces, whether it's in a fancy Manhattan apartment or sort of walking down a glass hallway. Everything is just so downbeat, evocative. It is easily, easily. And I really like Hamlet. It is easily my favorite Hamlet. Michael Almereta, you will always be famous to me. I saw it. I just haven't seen it in many, many years. But I remember being very into it.
25:38There's a scene in the Guggenheim. Yeah. Yeah. Do you have a favorite? I do. Well, so I was wondering which version of Hamlet I should rewatch. And then Tom Stoppard died. My husband said, why don't you watch Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead? It's some version of Hamlet. The, you know, play written by Stoppard and first staged in 1966. But then, of course, was made by Stoppard as well, directed by Stoppard as a movie in 1990. Now, the Stoppard play, which I've never seen it staged, but I rewatched the movie, is a classic postmodern gambit, right? It's kind of switching the focus, kind of like turning the dial on Hamlet to these side characters, right?
26:31Rosencrantz and Guilderstrom are the friends of Hamlet who are used by King Claudius to help conspire against Hamlet and take him off to England to be killed. Minor characters. And so it's turning the dial on them from minor to major. And it's also turning the dial from tragedy to comedy. and I remember watching this movie when it came out again the 90s being like oh this is this is smart you know this is like I want to be smart this is like oh it's post-modernism it's like they're it's quoting the play but it's actually about you know it's kind of like shifting the stakes of it etc etc and then I like was like okay I guess I'll watch it it'll probably be annoying and I was like okay I love this beautiful there's nothing better than that yes first of all Tim Roth We love to love, as we say frequently.
Read the full transcript
27:25And Gary Oldman, so good in this movie, so charming, so funny. There is a scene where they talk about death, and they're like, okay, what does it mean to be dead, basically? Do you ever think of yourself as actually dead, lying in a box with a lid on it? Nope. Nor do I, really. Silly to be depressed by it. I mean, one thinks of it like being alive in a box. One keeps forgetting to take into account the fact that one is dead, which should make all the difference. Shouldn't it? It really, this is a stupid thing to say, but it really makes you think about the stakes of Hamlet. And the stakes of what it means to be alive by kind of like shifting the perspective of it, right?
28:19because... Why is that a stupid thing to say? No, it's like... Let's go big or go home. No, but it's like... That's what it's all about on the pod. It really makes you think about life and death. Okay, Nomi. I just think that it's like, it's nice to think of like the minor as major. Mm-hmm. Alex, I know you kind of wanted to talk about some stage adaptations. Yeah. I mean, Hamlet is the most theatrical play ever written. It is a play that is obsessed with theater, that has theater at its very heart and center. The play that Hamlet stages, The Mousetrap, To Catch the Conscience of the King. Hamlet is constantly talking about acting.
28:59This is a play that is meant to be performed and indeed has been since it came out. You know, I would have loved to see 55-year-old Sarah Bernhardt performing this thing in the 19th century. In pantaloons. Exactly. What a scandal. all. That is exciting just to think about. But we do have some little gifties from the past on YouTube. Here we have Richard Burton, who some people believe to have been the greatest Hamlet on stage. I mean, you know, let's just say in the 20th century. And this was a very famous production of Hamlet that was on Broadway in 1964. It was the longest running Hamlet in Broadway History, and it was directed by the eminent Sir John Gilgud.
29:45So here's Richard Burton doing To Be or Not To Be. To be or not to be, that is the question, whether it is nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of troubles and by opposing any. To die, to sleep, no more. And by a sleep to say we end the heartache and the thousand natural shocks. So I really recommend checking this out on YouTube. There are many more clips. It's very beautiful and it also is exciting. This is a hot-blooded Hamlet and I like that. One of the challenges I think, yes Nomi, go for it. I should note, by the way, since this is an auditory medium rather than a visual medium that Richard Burton is wearing a black V-neck sweater with nothing on underneath.
30:44Tell him, Nomi. Much like Michael Douglas in Basic Instinct. It's a sound I haven't heard since Delta Burke on Designing Women. I swear to God, that's such a good one. It's a V-necked Richard Burton giving it his all. you know the thing that is there's so many things that are brilliant about Hamlet but one of the things that's brilliant about it that's really I would imagine a challenge for an actor is that you have to convey thought as it moves and that you know of course Shakespeare is externalizing thought in this completely world shaking amazing brilliant way where Hamlet is deliberating and considering from the moment he knows and understands from his father's ghost that he's supposed to kill his uncle and take revenge.
31:32He's deliberating how to do it, what to do, if the ghost is real, if it's just a phantasm meant to trick him. And then, of course, he's contemplating a different kind of action, whether or not to go on living. And to be or not to be, the most famous words in the English language have to seem fresh and original. So I'm always interested when I see productions of Hamlet in how an actor makes that thought move. So, there was a recent production of Hamlet I saw that really got me in that way, that I really enjoyed. It's the director, Robert Icke, the English director, who's in his 30s. And he mounted a production of Hamlet in England with Andrew Scott.
32:14So, Andrew Scott was 40 when he played this role. He is magnetic in his intensity. To be.
32:28or not to be? That is the question. Whether tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of troubles and by opposing, end them. And then what happened was the pandemic, our pandemic of 2020. And when the production came back and when it transferred to the United States, Ike made a decision to cast a much younger Hamlet, the actor Alex Lawther, who's a really young guy. He seems young. He's in his early 20s. And he has this wiry, fidgety quality that reminds you that Hamlet is a college student. So was he just like literally fidgety or like, I mean?
33:33Yeah, he had a kind of kinetic quality, you know, and he's dealing with the death of his dad at this extremely tender age. And one huge problem for me with Hamlet, always, always, always, not a problem in a bad way, in a good way, is the Ophelia character and his treatment of Ophelia. Why does this young woman get sacrificed for the sake of this greater scheme that doesn't involve her at all? Does it have to do with Hamlet's deep anger and distrust with women? Is Hamlet intending for this to happen? Did he love Ophelia? What is going on? And in the Alex Lothar version, there's sex on stage, you know?
34:12Like there's some fire there. There's a real sense of attraction there. And there's also, it just reminded me of how messed up stuff is when you're in your early 20s. It's messed up. You can burn really hot and then go really cold even if your dad doesn't die in this crazy, terrible way. And what I liked about the Lawther production was just seeing a very young man wrestle with these questions and feeling him again to be human.
34:40When we're back, is this 400-year-old play more relevant now than ever? That's in a minute on Critics at Large, from the New Yorker.
35:03Hi, I'm David Remnick, editor of The New Yorker. At this year's Academy Awards, Timothee Chalamet and Tiana Taylor aren't the only major nominees. The New Yorker will be there, too, with two nominated short films, which you can watch at newyorker.com slash video. Two People Exchanging Saliva was executive produced by Julianne Moore and Isabelle Huppert, and it's set in a dystopian Paris where kissing is illegal. Our animated short film retirement plan follows a man as he dreams about all the things he's going to do when he's done working. You can enjoy both of those films and our full library of acclaimed short films at newyorker.com slash video.
35:57Among the many responses to Hamnet that have appeared, and there have been truly many, kind of all around the gamut, there was an op-ed in the New York Times. The upshot of it was, in the course of calling it like a Hamlet for the TikTok generation, it says, every generation gets the Shakespeare it deserves. This op-ed is by Drew Lichtenberg. I wonder whether that thing, just about this generational analysis of Hamlet, does that speak to you? And does it have anything to do with why we're so captivated by this, again, very old story? Well, tell me if I'm wrong, Vincent, because I also read this op-ed.
36:39And my sense of it was that, you know, of course, the implication that every generation gets a Shakespeare deserves is that the current generation does not deserve a very good Shakespeare. Deserves a bad one. Yeah. There's the image that accompanies this op-ed is Shakespeare being rained upon by a kind of crown of rain clouds. Poor Shakespeare. Poor Shakespeare. And the writer, Drew Lichtenberg, is annoyed, I think it's fair to say, that Paul Meskel, as he says, grunts wordlessly, mopes, sad-eyed, and sighs with inexpressible longing. That he's kind of this inarticulate, which is a surprising choice, gloomy, beefcake-y guy, and he's not into it, and he's not into the biographical reading.
37:24He calls it mumblecore Shakespeare. I saw this movie with my friend John Pilsen. He's a great photographer. He's also like one of the best people to watch a movie with. And he brought me he brought to my recollection the essay by T.S. Eliot. It's called Hamlet and his problems. Oh, God. And it's Eliot saying, you know, Hamlet's actually a failed artwork. And I won't recapitulate his arguments, most of which I disagree with. But it is a really good—the beginning is really interesting because he's saying it's been kept alive, this play, and it has an inflated reputation because in the person of Hamlet, certain kinds of creatively-minded critics are always writing themselves into it.
38:07You know, that no matter who's reading it, they're reading themselves into it, and therefore it becomes better in their minds than it really is on the, quote unquote, the page. I disagree with the sort of end diagnosis of the play, but I think that's like, it's not just critics who do this. All of us do this, and that's actually why the play is good. The interpretation is part of the greatness of the play. So why is it that Hamlet is still relevant today? I think it is about ambivalence and ambiguity. Like, I don't think there is one way to read it. And I think that's why it's productive for reinterpretation.
38:50Yeah, no, that's why I think it endures is because every generation has its version of the incomprehensible. Like every, it's not just that death is always eluding us and ruining our consciousnesses and all this. But it's not just death. It's politics. It's society. Every body has to deal with their own version of this does not make sense and yet it is. One thing I've been wanting to ask you about is whether Hamlet is itself about a sort of crisis of masculinity. And it just so happens that we are in 2025 in the middle of another crisis of masculinity on a totally societal scale. Does Hamlet speak to that for you, at least today?
39:37Oh, as directly as if it had been written into our times. Right. Like, which I think is kind of crazy. Hamlet is talking to Horatio. We're in Act 1. We're very, very early in the play. He's talking to Horatio, and Horatio is about to tell him that he saw the ghost of his father. And Horatio says, I saw him once. He was a goodly king. And Hamlet says, he was a man. Take him for all in all. I shall not look upon his like again. He was a man. This question of what is a man? What makes a man? What makes, it's said in the play, like it's, he was a king. No, what's better than a king is to be a man.
40:16And all we hear about these days, I feel, we hear about other things too, but a great deal of what we hear about is no one knowing what a man should be. And here is Hamlet, who does know what a man should be. It's my dad, but he's gone, and now he doesn't know how to embody that for himself. That is why I see Hamlet in our times. I don't know if this strikes you guys as like totally off the mark or too cute and neat. No, I mean, I think I think obviously like any any kind of it's not like a one to one. You're not saying this, you know, Shakespeare was talking about the manosphere like 400 years ago or whatever.
40:54I'm kind of saying that. But yes, but I do think there are resonances, you know, the idea of not measuring up. Right. The idea of we used to have a sense back in the whatever are the good old days, whether it's like when daddy was alive or when, you know, the make America great again of it all. Right. Of like we knew what men were. Men were men. Women were women. You know, we weren't walking around bemoaning, you know, being fail sons, essentially. Right. And I think, too, that the question of what is a man, that is an issue that we find endlessly fascinating and endlessly important because men, not just men, women, too, but the question of, like, man making the world and whether that ability to make the world is slipping or ascendant or whatever it may be.
42:00is a determining question in how the world looks. And so being given a text that we can look at to think of the variety of ways it can go, that question can go, is still more important than ever. Yeah. Yeah, there is that, like, generational thing of, that's how I've always read the, you know, shall not see his like again. Like, there is an era of manhood that has passed. And, like, you know, we talk about these statistics, female students outnumbering male students at colleges and universities by like three to two these days. Men are more likely to live with their parents, et cetera. Men die by suicide by increasing, increasing amounts.
42:47I will just say anecdotally, men don't even know how to dress anymore. You know, it's a mess out there. Just look at Richard Burton in his v-neck for inspiration. Yeah, that's right. And and there is this dialectic, you know, when you talk about the grimaced things, even, you know, political assassination. There is this sense where it's like. in the absence of any positive guidance about how to be a man, the imperative is just to act. You just got to do stuff. You know, Laertes is more of a man of action than Hamlet, and Hamlet's thinking and moping is sort of feminized in the text of the play.
43:26Claudius tells Hamlet that his grief is an unmanly grief, right? That you got to move on and you have to act. And we see all of this sort of the today's conversations about violence seems so much to be about sort of misplaced action in the absence of positive ways to be in the absence of you know establishing a household or being able to find a first job there are just these spasms of violence which we think of as like maybe uniquely american but we can also think about in this as a kind of lacking a ladder to quote-unquote manhood, all one can do is kind of act out. Yeah, in that sense, I think Hamnet is a very liberal movie.
44:07Like, it's an answer to kind of the misplaced action. It's the idea of let us heal, you know? Feel sad and pick up your pen. Yeah, pick up your pen and come to terms. Embrace your grief, right? Embrace your grief instead of kind of like just striking out willy-nilly at all directions. You know, just act without thinking. Think, write, reflect, and feel better. And this is everything I hate about the movie. Right. This is not a value judgment. I'm just saying. I just want it in case anyone forgot. This is what it's saying, you know. Instead, it's like a new man vibe, right? It's not like, let's go back to toughing it out.
44:56Yeah, I guess I would say, you know, I find it comforting that this kind of nostalgist take on a man's place is at least as old as 1601, which is our, I think, our first known date of the performance of Hamlet. The deep misogyny in Hamlet 2, which is something that is, it's fascinating to contend with. Just the anger, the anger, the anger, and to let the anger play out and express itself and come to this resolution as it does, this very, very bloody resolution where no one can survive this situation. Right. I do think it's, I really don't want to be like, the story of Hamlet is the story of moving from darkness to light, you know, but there is something that happens in Hamlet that I do think is relevant to this.
45:45There is an absolute movement of the character and a transformation of the character that happens over the course of the five acts. And so you begin with a young man who's in turmoil and chaos. And by the end of the play, a transformation has taken place that allows Hamlet to achieve what I think we would call in modern terms a real sense of self. and a sense of cosmic order, that he is a part of the world that he had felt was turned upside down. And there was a moment in the final act of the play, in Act 5, Scene 1, Laertes arrives, there's about to be a big conflict. Hamlet has killed Polonius, Laertes' father, Laertes' sister, Ophelia, has drowned herself out of grief for Hamlet.
46:31And Hamlet identifies himself, and he says, this is I, Hamlet the Dane. And I think if you're just seeing this play, you're like, yeah, we know. Like, got it by now. Thank you. But what he's really saying is, I know who I am. My father was Hamlet the Dane. He was king of Denmark. I am Hamlet the Dane. I am taking my rightful place. I am coming to bear accountability. And I think very consequently, when the play ends, these two men kill each other's enemies and then forgive each other. There is a sense of completion of not letting these cycles continue. That is really something. And that is, like, talk about Weeper.
47:10Yeah. And it's sort of maybe it's meta, too. It's like he also asks Horatio to tell us that even a cautionary tale, that communication, that art making itself is a guide through life. I know we like, you know, most of us feel a certain way about the didactic, but Hamlet seems to see his own life at the end of it as a kind of guide to others. Yeah, he says. In this harsh world, draw thy breath in pain to tell my story. And so the telling is another one of the, is the thing maybe. Yeah. Your telling is the thing.
47:54This has been Critics at Large. Alex Barish is our consulting editor and Rhiannon Corby is our senior producer. Our executive producer is Stephen Valentino. Alexis Quadrato composed our theme music and we had engineering help today from James Yost with mixing by Mike Kutchman. You can find every episode of Critics at Large at newyorker.com slash critics. We'll see you next week.
48:29You should tell the people who we are and what our new show is. I'm Robert Smith. This is Jacob Goldstein. And we used to host a show called Planet Money. And now we're back making this new podcast about the best ideas and people and businesses in history. And some of the worst people, horrible ideas and destructive companies in the history of business. We struggled to come up with a name, decided to call it Business History. You know why? Why? Because it's a show about the history of business. Available everywhere you get your podcasts.
From the publisher
Since it was penned more than four hundred years ago, Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” has been in production nearly continuously, and has been adapted in many ways. On this episode of Critics at Large, Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz consider why this story of a brooding young prince has continued to speak to audiences throughout the centuries. They discuss the new film “Hamnet,” directed by Chloé Zhao, which recasts the writing of “Hamlet” as Shakespeare’s response to the death of his child; Tom Stoppard’s absurdist play “Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead”; Michael Almereyda’s 2000 “Hamlet,” which presents the protagonist as a melancholy film student home from college; and other adaptations. What accounts for this story’s hold over audiences, centuries after it was written? “I think it endures because every generation has its version of the incomprehensible,” Cunningham says. “It’s not just death—it’s politics, it’s society. Everybody has to deal with their own version of ‘This does not make sense and yet it is.’ ”
Read, watch, and listen with the critics:
“Hamnet” (2025)
“Hamnet,” by Maggie O’Farrell
“Hamlet,” by William Shakespeare
Kenneth Branagh’s “Hamlet” (1996)
Michael Almereyda’s “Hamlet” (2000)
“Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead” (1990)
John Gielgud’s “Hamlet” (1964)
Robert Icke’s “Hamlet” (2017, 2022)
“Every Generation Gets the Shakespeare It Deserves” by Drew Lichtenberg (The New York Times)
“Hamlet and His Problems" by T. S. Eliot
New episodes drop every Thursday. Follow Critics at Large wherever you get your podcasts.
Critics at Large is a weekly discussion from The New Yorker which explores the latest trends in books, television, film, and more. Join us every Thursday as we make unexpected connections between classic texts and pop culture.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
