Our Romance with Jane Austen

25 Dec 2025 · 46 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Critics at Large: Our Romance with Jane Austen

Podcast Overview Podcast Title: Critics at Large Description: Critics at Large is a weekly culture podcast from *The New Yorker*, hosted by Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz. The show features discussions on books, television, film, and cultural trends, weaving together classic literature and contemporary pop culture.

Episode Title: Our Romance with Jane Austen Air Date: June 12, 2025 Episode Description: This episode celebrates Jane Austen's enduring appeal, reflecting on her novels, personal favorites from the hosts, and the irony and sincerity embedded in her works.

---

Key Takeaways

  1. Austen's Legacy
  2. Jane Austen's novels were largely unrecognized during her lifetime, but they now define the period romance genre.
  3. Her writing combines romance with humor and sharp social commentary.
  1. Personal Favorites
  2. Vinson Cunningham:
  3. Favorite: *Emma*
  4. Key Points:
  5. Explores complex themes of misunderstanding and perception.
  6. Emma as a character embodies “main character syndrome,” seeing the world as a novel she writes.
  • Naomi Fry:
  • Favorite: *Persuasion*
  • Key Points:
  • Focuses on themes of loneliness and the passage of time.
  • Highlights the significance of communication in relationships, especially through Captain Wentworth's poignant letter.
  • Alexandra Schwartz:
  • Favorite: *Mansfield Park*
  • Key Points:
  • Noted for its narrative intricacies and less romantic focus.
  • Explores deep moral complexities and societal norms through the life of Fanny Price.
  1. Themes in Austen's Work
  2. Irony and Sincerity:
  3. Austen's writing is a blend of realistic situations with idealistic romantic outcomes, creating an alluring contradiction.
  4. Social Commentary:
  5. Critiques the limitations of Regency society, especially around money, class, and gender dynamics.
  6. Human Connection:
  7. Romantic relationships serve as resolutions to loneliness, showing that love is a vital answer to human isolation.
  1. Austen and the Modern Reader
  2. Modern adaptations of Austen's works resonate because they mirror contemporary societal issues, such as wealth inequality and women's autonomy.
  3. The characters' struggles often parallel those faced by modern readers, making their stories relatable today.
  1. Cultural Impact
  2. Austen's novels have inspired numerous adaptations in film and television, showcasing their versatility and timelessness.
  3. The hosts note the emotional depth in adaptations, particularly how they express longing and desire.

---

Discussion Points

A. Why Jane Austen?

  • The hosts reflect on the reasons behind Austen's lasting popularity, attributing it to her unique perspective as a woman observing the constraints of her society.
  • Austen portrayed a world of limited scope where love and personal fulfillment were often at odds with societal expectations.

B. The Mystery of Austen

  • The limited biographical information about Jane Austen adds to her intrigue, allowing readers to project their interpretations onto her characters.
  • The hosts discuss how the lack of personal letters and diaries enhances the mystery surrounding her life and work.

C. Contemporary Relevance

  • Austen's exploration of class and relationships continues to resonate in today's social climate, leading to a renewed interest in her stories.
  • The discussion includes modern parallels in female autonomy and expectations in romantic relationships.

---

Conclusion This episode of *Critics at Large* offers a deep dive into Jane Austen's work, examining her clever intertwining of romance, satire, and commentary on society. The hosts celebrate her literary contributions and their relevance, discussing personal favorites and encouraging listeners to reflect on the timeless nature of Austen's insights into human connections.

Listen to the episode for a lively exploration of Austen's world and its parallels to contemporary life.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:05Welcome to Critics at Large, a podcast from The New Yorker. I'm Alex Schwartz. I'm Nomi Fry. I'm Vincent Cunningham. Each week on this show, we make sense of what's happening in the culture right now and how we got here. How are you guys doing? Doing great. Doing well.

0:25Now, if you're anything like me, when you think of a certain kind of period romance, you know what I'm talking about. hands brushing, repressed feelings, a prolonged marriage plot, an empire waste. The name that comes to mind is Jane Austen. Now, across the six novels that she wrote in her lifetime, Austen's work gives us, yes, romances for the ages, but also, more importantly, I think, humor and biting social commentary. What are some of our favorite tropes from an Austen novel? Can we locate some of those? will they won't they the love that dare not speak its name which which in this case which in this case is just like heterosexual love until finally in like the last five pages it speaks its name amazing right yeah totally yeah um money money is huge the need for money the having of money, what you do with money, how you get your money.

1:31Can money and love meet at that perfect place on the curve that will satisfy the emotional needs and ambitions of the heroine with her material needs? Yeah. Also another thing, and Alex, I know we've discussed this off mic, as they say, smart woman surrounded by idiots. Absolutely. That's evergreen in Austin. An insufferable, pompous clergyman. Mr. Collins, Mr. Elton, we see you. And I'd say alongside the money, an attention to the properties of an estate. You got to really know, like, the estate, the home and hearth are the backdrop against which all of these things play out. Absolutely. And let us not forget miscommunication.

2:19If you could say something and get a true answer back and then make a decision based on fairly won information, we wouldn't be dealing with, first of all, the novel, and certainly not a novel by Jane Austen. Correct. It's true. Absolutely. So you, our listener, might be wondering, why Jane Austen? Why now? Well, to that I say, it's her birthday. Woo! You know, give her some flowers. This month, actually, and just about a week ago. And also, I don't know why, but the holidays just feel like a very Austen-y time. So we're taking this chance to share an episode we recorded earlier this year, all about Jane Austen and why we love her and why we've loved her for 250 years since her birth in the great year, 1775.

3:03Today, we're looking back at her work and the many, many adaptations thereof. We're going to discuss it all, the romance, the humor, and why after all this time, the works of Jane Austen still resonate. So that's today on Critics at Large. Our Romance with Jane Austen.

3:28Okay, let's start, as one must, with Austen's novels. There are six of them. Pride and Prejudice, Mansfield Park, Sense and Sensibility, Northanger Abbey, Persuasion, and Emma. Last week, thank you, listeners. Thank you, as always. We put out a poll on Instagram asking you all about your favorite Jane Austen novel. Dumb, dumb, dumb. 34 % of you, a plurality, said Pride and Prejudice was numero uno. Yeah, I'm not surprised. Yeah, yeah, yeah. That reflects my sense of things. All the way at the bottom was Northanger Abbey. 4%. Are we surprised? We're not. And I'm just going to tell you why I'm not.

4:16And I need to be honest with my fellow critics. Yes. This is the one Austen novel I haven't read. The one that got away. Well, it hasn't got away for long because, boy, am I going to get on it now. You're going to tear in. But I cannot tell a lie. So we've heard our listeners' opinions. Does anybody want to jump in and go to bat for a favorite Austen novel? Friends? Okay. I'm ready to go to bat, but I just want to say something about the bat that I'm batting with. and the balls that are coming at it. Do I have a favorite? Sort of. Does it change? It does because these novels are very precious.

4:57There are only six. I mean, there are scraps of more. There's Sanditon, which she was working on when she died. There is Lady Susan, which was her earliest mature work, which is written in letters. And these things are not really considered with the six. The six. The apocryphal gospels. Exactly. Exactly. Well, not even apocryphal. No, they're out there. They're just not. They don't count. Okay. So, favorite, even though, yeah, people love to have favorites, it makes me a little bit nervous. And because it makes me nervous, I'm cheating. Okay. And here's what I'm doing. Okay. I brought two. I brought two.

5:28Oh, okay, okay. So, the first thing I want to say is I don't want to exist in a world in which Pride and Prejudice wasn't written. Absolutely. I don't want to be part of it. I don't want to be around. I just, you know, wake me up when Pride and Prejudice is written and published. Wow. Yeah. This novel, I think the edition I have, the back of it, says something like, no novel in English has given more pleasure than Pride and Prejudice. That is so true that when I went into labor, I brought Pride and Prejudice. Not labor. Labor. Wow. However, Pride and Prejudice, while it is a wonderful, sparkling gem of a novel, I brought it in merely to say that right now, at this point in time, my favorite is Emma.

6:12Hmm. And the most recent reading I did of Emma was this past spring. It is, I think, one of these novels that is actually so complex that it can really change every time you read it and show you different aspects of itself, in part because it's based on a total misunderstanding. It's based on Emma, the main character, Emma Woodhouse's chronic, inveterate misunderstanding of the world she lives in, the people around her, her own self, her own emotions, and the emotions of others. Everything is misread. And right in the middle of this, there is an actual mystery story. This guy, Frank Churchill, shows up.

6:50He is the natural son of a family friend of Emma's, but he was raised by rich relations elsewhere. He's been talked of in the village, in the town of Highbury for years. He comes to Highbury. He's charming. He's handsome. He flirts with Emma. Emma starts to feel tempted by him, sort of. She's rich on her own, so she doesn't need to marry. This is unique among Jane Austen heroines. And the mystery is what the hell is going on with Frank Churchill and Emma? But also, what is his deal? There's someone called Jane Fairfax, a poor relation of another friend of the family's who's lounging about. She showed up at the same time as Frank.

7:24What could the deal be? So the first time you read this novel, you don't know. Every subsequent reading, of course, you have the information. And I think that this is one of these novels that gets so rich when you read it knowing what's going to happen. Because you see how Austen is creating the mystery, but you also see how Emma is misreading. The experience of reading Emma is really reading a bad novelist. Emma is writing a novel about her own life. And she sees the people in her life as characters. She has what we call, in this year 2025, main character syndrome. And like, it's not unfair. Her name is on the book.

7:59She is the main character. But this is a book about the flaws of having main character syndrome, where you feel that everyone else is existing in your story. It's a bit of an outlier in Austen's over, right? Like the heroine herself is totally an outlier. Isn't she kind of uniquely different from all other Austen heroines? You get it right in the first line. Yeah. Which is, Emma Woodhouse, handsome, clever, and rich, with a comfortable home and happy disposition, seemed to unite some of the best blessings of existence and had lived nearly 21 years in the world with very little to distress or vex her.

8:32Those things are not true. That's like the opposite of everything. Of any other Austen heroine. And handsome, clever, yes, those things are true. Rich? No. And it is the rich that is totally different. I think basically Jane Austen set herself this project. She famously said of Emma, I'm going to write a heroine who no one but myself will much like. Because those things are unsympathetic. You don't like people like that. She just like has it going on. She's running around her town. She's the queen of her little world. But I do think that one thing that goes on in Emma is you see how small that world is.

9:02And it increasingly – this is one of the novels where Austen ventriloquizes the attitudes of society the best, I think. And you feel how confining it might be. Yeah, you're – oh, great. You're the princess of Highbury. Well, like, that's not a very big or cool place to be the princess of. You know, Emma – it comes out at one point in this novel that Emma's never seen the sea. She lives in England. It's an island. But she's never seen the sea. She's not going far afield. She's provincial. Yeah. She's provincial. Exactly. Yeah. I mean, the world of Austen in general, that is one of the distinguishing characteristics of an Austen novel, is that the world of her characters is often very small, right?

9:43It's provincial. It's kind of drawn with a fine brush. They don't go that far, usually. You know, they might go to Bath. They might go to Lyme. They might go, you know, it's like there's not a lot going on. There might be a ball or two. There might be an outing. You know, there might be like a game of cards, like there might be a concert. But but other than that, it's mostly either people like staying in their own homes and having their own domestic dramas or there's a visitor. You know, there's like they go to visit in the village. Somebody from the village comes to visit. You know, it's like the dramas are very, very, very localized, which might lead me to another pretty localized book, which is my favorite, which is Austen's Persuasion.

10:34So this is Austin's final novel, published in 1817. And it is about Anne Elliot, who is gasp, 27 and unmarried. She is the daughter of a vain, stupid baronet, Sir Walter Elliot. And it's a kind of a Cinderella story. She has two sisters, one older, one younger, Elizabeth and Mary. Both of them are total duds, self-centered narcissists. And Anne Elliot is kind of shuttled between Mary's house, the younger married sister, and also a family friend, Mrs. Russell, who is described as a very wise woman, a fine lady, who made a mistake. Eight years before, eight years earlier, when Anne was in the full bloom of youth, she fell in love with Mr.

11:31Wentworth, a sailor who was below her class-wise, didn't have a fortune. They fell deeply in love with each other. And Lady Russell said, you cannot marry this man. You have to reject him. He is not worthy of you in station, in fortune. and she persuaded her, persuasion, to let go of this love affair and say, okay, I reject you. Now, Anne, the bloom of youth gone, nearly an old crone is she. Suddenly, Captain Wentworth returns to Anne's life and then begins this sort of like, will there, won't they situation, which is so familiar to us from Austin's general work. Okay. I love this book. There is a review that Virginia Woolf in 1924 wrote of a kind of edition of all of Austin's novels that came out then.

12:33And she speaks of persuasion. And I just want to quote her. So she's saying of Austin, her attitude to life itself is altered. Austen's with this book. She is seeing it for the greater part of the book through the eyes of a woman who, unhappy herself, has a special sympathy for the happiness and unhappiness of others, which until the very end she is forced to comment upon in silence. And so I think the thing that Wolf says about silence, this is a book about loneliness. because I think in almost every other Austen book, there is, you know, whether it's like Lizzie and Jane and Pride and Prejudice or like there is like a bosom friend usually or some sort of like outlet for the heroine to, even if carefully, even if, you know, of course, it's not like things are very repressed and circumscribed in all the books, I think.

13:31But I think there is usually some person who you can kind of confess your feelings to. And in this book, Anne Elliott is totally alone. In her consciousness, she is completely alone. She has only her own counsel to take. And so the idea of kind of suffering in silence is really heartbreaking in this book. Is that approach to sort of individual consciousness the reason that you like this book so much, do you think? Yeah, I mean, I think it really moved me the first time I read it. I just reread it. I finished it again last night because I hadn't read it since I was in my 20s. Just last night. So I really enjoyed it.

14:08And I was like, I just remember feeling so moved by the fact that she is so alone and has to be so watchful on her own. and finally this like tension of silence over the course of this book is finally broken when Captain Wentworth delivers a secret letter to Anne Elliot. A secret letter. I know. And it's so romantic and it's like finally, finally. The release of this built up, the tension isn't totally erotic. This like long build up. It's almost like intellectual. Yes. But these thoughts have been accruing and accruing and accruing and accruing. It's emotional. But Vincent, and I think we're going to come back to that, that is it for all of them.

14:55Sure. Like, you know, that's it. I think that the intellectual being erotic is the huge appeal of these books over time. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Yes. That's a good point. That there can be like a surplus of not just feeling but of thought and that this— And that the act of thinking is sexy and thinking together but also thinking very seriously about life and about oneself and expanding your knowledge. that is beautiful and that is attractive to someone else, but also to oneself. It makes one worthy of attraction. And then many listeners brought up this letter scene as the reason they love persuasion. And I'm going to read a little bit from Captain Wentworth's letter.

15:37I can listen no longer in silence. I must speak to you by such means as are within my reach. You pierce my soul. I am half agony, half hope. Tell me not that I am too late, that such precious feelings are gone forever. I offer myself to you again with a heart even more your own than when you almost broke it eight years and a half ago. Dare not say that man forgets sooner than woman. That his love has an earlier death. I have loved none but you. Literal chills, my friends. My God. I know. I know. No. The man has been a C for so long. He's been fighting in the Napoleonic Wars. Has he forgotten? No.

16:25No. No. Absolutely not. And just Anne's response, such a letter was not to be soon recovered from. Oh, agree.

16:40All right, Vincent. Okay. My favorite Austin book is, I think, kind of an outlier because it is, to my mind, the least plot heavy. And it is also, to my mind, the least romantic by a far cry. It is Mansfield Park, Austin's third novel. And to me, if the novel is on some level the art of narration, to me it is where it is the pinnacle of Austin's art. That the narrative strategy of this book is just, to me, incredible. And to that end, I'm going to try to like speed through the plot because to me the plot is almost not the point. A young woman at the outset of the novel, 10 years old, her name is Fanny Price, is sent to live on an estate called Mansfield Park.

17:29which is owned by her uncle by marriage, Thomas Bertram. He's the baronet of this locale. And her uncle and aunt have two daughters who are sort of perfect products of their society. They're beautiful, handsome, charming in their way, but also sort of totally horrible to her, as is basically everybody in this book, except for the son of this family, Edmund, who is kind of the friend of her heart. and soon when the cleric, Mr. Norris, the Reverend Norris dies, another group of people move into the house where he once lived with Mrs. Norris. And these are the Crawfords, Henry and Mary. And their deal is that they are kind of more worldly.

18:15And they're siblings. They're siblings. Mary is very good looking. And Henry is really funny. It's like, he's not that handsome. Everybody's always like, first time you meet him, You're not that impressed. But he has what's called comportment. He has countenance. So basically, kids— He knows how to work it. That means he has riz. He just like kind of— He's rizzed up. He's rizzed up. Every time you meet him, he just like seems cooler. And people—and he's known as sort of a playboy. And in the fullness of time, he, as a sort of game, tries to attract the scrupulously moral Fanny, who says no, says no, says no.

18:53and it's very dangerous liaisons quoted in that sense and you know not to spoil it the apex of the novel really the moral and narrative crux of the novel is her total rejection of him can I read a passage from Mansfield Park to just talk about this narrative issue I insist that you do Thomas Bertram has gone to attend to his state in Antigua and a whole paragraph is dedicated to like why nobody misses him. And whether this is a correct feeling to have. So his daughters, the Miss Bertrams, were much to be pitied on the occasion, not for their sorrow, but for their want of it. They don't miss their father.

19:36Their father was no object of love to them. He had never seemed the friend of their pleasures, and his absence was unhappily most welcome. Unhappily most welcome. So there is the real thing that they should feel, and the thing that they sort of, in the context of their moral world, do feel. And these things are at odds, but only in the life of the narrator. The narrator is like, they should feel this way. They're much to be pitied, but they don't feel this way. And the manners, the theatricality of the society is like kind of foremost, like how one should act and how much like the marriage plot, everything else that we've talked about, is really just a working through of one level of morality and a deeper level of morality.

20:21This is so interesting, Vincent. And I think you're totally right to position it as this kind of almost philosophical novel. You know, it's a novel of ideas in a sense. But there's also something very pragmatic about Austen in this novel and in others as well. when we think about the example of not loving one's own father, right? So she positions, as you say, all of these levels of like one should and one doesn't, one yearns to, one mourns the inability to, you know, all of that. But she is presenting people, daughters or relatives who don't like this father figure, and that's okay. Like she presents him as an asshole.

21:09The same thing happens in persuasion. Anne doesn't love her father. Her father certainly doesn't love her. She will act properly and she will respect him because that is kind of the structure of things and what one should do morally, I guess. But it's also presented as totally okay that she doesn't love him because he's an asshole. So there's a kind of pragmatism in Austin that is another level of that, right? It's like, yeah, there are all of these levels, moral levels. Should, should, should. Should, should, should. But there's also just life in which some people suck. And it's okay, in fact, advisable probably not to mistake them for something else.

21:55And even if it's like your own father, your own mother, whatever it is, it's okay not to love them. That's right. Which is kind of radical. Yeah. You know? Yeah.

22:09Jen Austin's works are enduring classics, but she herself is a bit of a mystery. What do we know or think we know about the woman behind the novels? Critics at Large. We'll be right back.

22:29Hi, I'm Willa Paskin, the host of Decoder Ring, Slate's podcast about cracking cultural mysteries. On Decoder Ring, we dive down rabbit holes and obsessively explore questions hiding in plain sight. Like, why has slow dancing gone out of style? And when did we all become obsessed with hydration? And where did the word mullet, you know, to describe a hairstyle, come from? That's Decoder Ring, named one of the best podcasts of 2023 by The New York Times. Listen to new episodes every two weeks and make sure to follow us so you never miss one.

23:09Okay, so listening to you guys talk about some of these novels that I love so much, it, to me, justifies why, even though we're here, like, picking favorites, it's impossible. And I don't just mean because we love them all equally. Like, no, we don't have to. We're human. That's fine. But people love these books. And I think they love them for a few different reasons. Because they're so witty. Because they're so funny. They are hilarious. Like, if you haven't read Pride and Prejudice, read it and tell me you don't laugh at the first scene when Mrs. Bennett is running around like Mama Hen, just like clucking about Netherfield Park being let it last.

23:44You know, it's just and they're very human. And then, of course, the love aspect. And I just want to say something in defense of the love aspect. Absolutely no defense is needed. No defense is needed. But I do think sometimes when people like raise their eye at the idea of Jane Austen and all these women getting married, I think what's going on is love is the answer to loneliness in these books in a very profound way. The proper love is an answer to loneliness. You know, for instance, Fanny Price, her kind of soul's friend, is the young boy, later man, who she ends up realizing she has real love for because of communication.

24:22Like, because of a real— They can talk. Yeah, they can talk, but I mean, like, communication on even a deeper level of seeing who you are through someone else and having the same effect on that person and, like, growing together. And I think even with Emma, which in some ways is the most cynical of the novels, because Emma marries exactly the guy you'd expect her to marry. She's the richest lady around. She marries the richest guy around. And like, oh, by the way, her sister's already married to his brother. But what makes you believe that this is good and beautiful, even as I do think there is very much an arch eyebrow in this novel about that match, is that there is, again, a communication between the two of them that is not possible with others.

25:01And part of the sadness of the book to me is how rigidly classed that is, that the communication is possible because only one man can really speak freely to Emma because of the class position and can really observe her faults. But that's hot, guys. And so I think the hotness of the mind is what makes Jane Austen so enduring over time and not only not frivolous, but provides this thing that people want to see in their own lives. That is my theory. Interesting. See, that to me brings into question something I think to me quite large, which I think to your point about like the whole cloth of this corpus, these six books.

25:46The big question for me is like the nature and the depth of the satire, whether we're supposed to like it or find it hot at all. Our colleague, Emily Nussbaum, introduced a concept that I think is so useful, and I think about it all the time when I'm looking at something that seems to be ironic in some sense, is the idea of the bad fan. That is like you watch Breaking Bad and you end up cheering on Walter White. You want to cook meth. And you're like— Let's cook. Exactly. Let's cook. Let's cook. And like, you know, you start to hate all the characters, like his wife, Skylar, who wants him to not cook, perhaps, you know, all this kind of thing.

26:30And how much we root for the romances that we find as they play out under these, really, like, when you think about it objectively, kind of excruciating constraints, as we say, of class, situation, et cetera, how much we are supposed to submit to the sort of the rhythm of suspense and will they or won't they and how much we're supposed to enjoy that and have that eyebrow up is, to me, a question. Because I don't, I will say I am not a rereader of Austen. I have like a admiring part of my mind about it. And like the art of the books, every time I go back to them, especially the smoothness and the quick facility of the narration and how easily she can go into different minds.

Read the full transcript

27:13I'm just like, wow, this is a master of a craft. And I wonder if the reason that I don't have that feeling is because I'm caught between those two layers of those two modes of apprehending what's going on in them. Okay. I love this. I'm so into this because I think you're putting your finger on this huge thing, which is that it's the answer of like how much is satire? How much is sincere? It changes from book to book. And I think it's also very unstable. And so much about these books does depend on the readers because like, Nomi, you were talking about Virginia Woolf. Yeah, another beloved author of mine and maybe ours before.

27:49And she said this thing about Jane Austen where she says, like, when you're basically looking for her to point the way in these books and say, like, here's what I actually believe. Wink. Fitz William Darcy is, like, actually our guy. She says she flatters and cajoles you with the promise of intimacy. And then at the last moment, there is the same blankness. Are those Jane Austen's eyes or is it a glass, a mirror, a silver spoon held up in the sun? And basically I think it's really variable. And, you know, I think the thing is, like, what people sometimes forget is that Jane Austen was and wasn't herself a member of these worlds that she's writing about.

28:27Like, Jane Austen is not rich. Jane Austen is a clergyman's daughter. He has all these kids. He has not enough money to provide for them. One of her own brothers was sent off, much like Fannie Price is sent off, to be raised by rich relations or like Frank Churchill and Emma is raised by rich relations. and adopted in fact right and changed his name so basically like frank churchill but also maintained like frank churchill a connection to the family so that jane and her sister can go and like peer in at a different way of living but they're not living that way so i think that people often think that like oh jane austen was just you know wealthy and sitting down this like lady authoress like not just people in our own time like you know people in the later 19th century criticizing her for the smallness of the world that she depicted.

29:15But to that, I say, first of all, as a woman, your world is not on the seas in that time. You're not off with the Navy gallivanting around. You are very circumscribed. By class, she's even more circumscribed. So you get Jane Austen, the person herself who doesn't have the wealth, the freedom, who also never marries. Like, she's looking at all this from a really different position. And I think irony is so key, but also sincerity. Like, basically, I think that these books are about total realism and total fantasy meeting in a way that is endlessly alluring. Absolutely. And I think also, this makes me think, Alex, that the fact that Jane Austen was essentially on the outside looking in and that meeting of kind of like, how can I shoehorn or how can I bring closer the realism of someone like myself?

30:10I'm speaking as Jane Austin right now. And the fantasy of like, wouldn't it be amazing if we all could live in a place like Pemberley? I think it's something that is for us as contemporary readers evergreen in terms of its attractiveness. And our colleague Luke Manon has a piece on Jane Austen that he wrote some years ago, I believe in 2020 in the magazine. And in it, he makes this really interesting point about the wealth distribution in Austen and how it's not totally different than the wealth distribution that we currently encounter in the United States of America. I mean, of course, this is a democracy.

30:58There is more upward mobility, but things are increasingly seem to be going in the direction of intense, intense inequality that Austin's time was, you know, a signal for. And so I think reading Austin's from the outside, looking in kind of weaving reality in a fantasy in the romantic and then and the economic realm is attractive to us because it's not totally unfamiliar and increasingly less so yeah i think you're right you know given all this though like sort of the those like true realities of the time and what we find in the books why is it i was just at a conference about a very different woman writer, Flannery O 'Connor.

31:46But I noticed a similar... Sometimes this happens where a writer occasions a sort of cult of personality, a cult of the self, and the biography becomes threaded into the way people enjoy the works. What is it about Austen that makes people fixate not only on her books but on her? What do you think? I almost think it's having so little information about her. Like, Like both in the books themselves as in that wolf quote, that wolf idea that I just read that she's kind of this eye you look through and you're not totally sure where to position yourself. But like what do we know about Jane Austen? In my head when I think of Jane Austen, I mean like if you Google her, you'll see this sort of like meager little pen drawing where she has this kind of like pursed little lips and she has some corkscrew ringlets coming down from her white bonnet.

32:41And like, that's kind of it. Because a few things, you know, one, she never published anything under her own name in her life. They were all called books by a lady. And in each subsequent book that she published, the others would be mentioned. So people knew they were the same writer and they knew the writer was a woman, but that's all they knew. And then after she died, her sister Cassandra, who was older than she was by almost three years and who is her like best, best, best friend who also never married, burned almost all of her letters. And the ones that are left are kind of by general consensus, not that revealing, not that interesting.

33:16And like, you know, but I actually think not knowing very much about her has been a huge boon in some ways for the Austen industry. Because you can just kind of endlessly wonder. Like, I recently watched the show called Miss Austen. May I introduce Cassandra Austen? Austen, are you perhaps some relation to Miss Jane Austen? She was my sister. Everything one needs to know about Jane Austen is found within the pages of her novels. You know that is most certainly not true. There's sure to be netters that will cast up all manner of treasure. My dearest Eliza. I enjoyed it very much. I think if you, critic out there, are into the Austen sphere, the Austenverse, this is a fun edition.

34:05It is four episodes. I believe it's Masterpiece, the thing that used to be called Masterpiece Theater, so you can watch it on PBS. And the Miss Austen in the title is actually Cassandra Austen, Jane's older sister. The action of the story takes place, like the present of the story is when Cassandra is herself an older woman and is trying to recover some of the letters from family friends from Jane. And she reads the letters and is taken back in time. So we get a young Jane Austen who's played by this actress who I've come to really like recently, Patsy Ferran. Well, I saw her with Paul Mezcal.

34:38She played Blanche to Paul Mezcal's Stanley in Streetcar. Oh, wow. And she looks like, they did the right thing here. She looks in the show, she looks little and awkward. She looks like someone you'd call, like, squirt, you know? She's tiny. She's tiny. A small fry? Yeah, she's a small fry. She's, like, running around. Half-finted. Exactly. Like, you cannot imagine her getting married at any point. She is there only to be an authoress, as they would have called her at the time. But I think it's like a lot of the fixation with her in the world of the Janeites, like the Austin fans. Yeah, like maybe you visit, you make a pilgrimage to the house and you, but nothing comes through there particularly.

35:16So all you can do in the end is cozy up to the words again and again. And this just this like peerless sensibility. And so you have to go back to the books to know her. We don't have the eight volumes of letters. We don't have the diaries. We don't.

35:38When we're back, why are we still so into Jane Austen? That's in a minute on Critics at Large from The New Yorker.

35:53You should tell the people who we are and what our new show is. I'm Robert Smith. This is Jacob Goldstein. And we used to host a show called Planet Money. And now we're back making this new podcast about the best ideas and people and businesses in history. And some of the worst people, horrible ideas, and destructive companies in the history of business. We struggled to come up with a name, decided to call it Business History. You know why? Why? Because it's a show about the history of business. Available everywhere. You get your podcasts.

36:31Okay, so we've been talking about the novels, the non-letters, cinders, the cremated letters, and what little we know about the woman herself. But the question I still have after all this is why? Why have these novels endured for hundreds of years? Why the movies, the books, the cosplayers, Jane Conn or whatever? The world of Jane Austen is boundless. What's up with it? I think there is just something that is incredibly evergreen in a narrative that along most of its length seems to go all wrong until in the 11th hour it goes so right. And I think that is why, you know, this is not the only way to look at it, but I think it's in a lot of ways the template for the modern romantic comedy.

37:35You know, I mean, what could it be more alike? And, you know, the adaptations, both the modernized ones and the kind of like true to the time period ones, their wealth and we keep going back again and again to the well, to the Austin well, proves that, I think. It's just one of the most perfect examples of this genre and earliest examples of this genre. And this is why I think it was so like apropos what you said about the similarities between Austin's time and our time economically and otherwise. Totally. Because even though they are so much the products of a specific time and place, they do seem very adaptable to different times and places.

38:23And in this way, so there's a moment in Mansfield Park where, you know, it's revealed that Fanny likes to read Shakespeare to her aunt. Mm-hmm. And Austen is like Shakespeare in that way, that they can be kind of modernized, that you can do modern dress Austen in the same way that you can do modern dress Shakespeare. Like some of the character portraits are very specific, but also portable to different situations and therefore adaptable. Portability. Yeah. So what are some of the adaptations that we love most when we think about Austen? Yeah, well, here's the thing. I don't think this is a conventional Austen adaptation, but I'm here to speak for the Keira Knightley Pride and Prejudice.

39:02Oh, I love that one. Okay, I'm here to speak for it. It's its 20th anniversary. It's a Joe Wright-directed movie. Keira Knightley is Lizzie Bennet. And Matthew McFadden, otherwise known as Tom, yeah, from Succession, is Darcy. And what I mean by it not being like totally conventional is that to me it's very like romantic capital R. like there's a ton of pathetic fallacy. The skies crack open as Lizzie tells Darcy that she despises him the first time he proposes. Sir, I appreciate the struggle you have been through and I am very sorry to have caused you pain. Believe me, it was unconsciously done.

39:41Is this your implying? Yes, sir. Are you laughing at me? No. Are you rejecting me? I'm sure that the feelings which you've told me have hindered your regard will help you in overcoming it. There are also, I just like, there's so many fun, wonderful aspects of this movie. But it's hot. It's hot! I want to say something, is that on YouTube, this is pretty funny. There is a 10-minute supercut from this very movie with Matthew McFadden and Keira Knightley, this Pride and Prejudice adaptation, that is Darcy yearning. Oh! It has like three million views or whatever. So it's basically like him. Yeah, just a super cut of every moment where like Lizzie comes into the room and wordlessly he's like.

40:34And I love it. And we love it. Like the thing that like sometimes what's frustrating about the Austen adaptations is they can't show the thinking that goes on with the characters in the book. But also what's satisfying about them is like they can show the yearning. We know the yearning must have been there. Right. Let's see it. With that, maybe we can turn to some of the emails. We put out a request for some input into this episode, and boy, did we get it. There's one from a Lauren, and Lauren says, Dear critics. Oh, no, I'm so sorry. Dearest critics. That is my preferred way to be addressed. Yes.

41:09I've decided that many women in 2025 are Anne Elliott for my favorite Jane Austen novel, Persuasion. Famously 27 and unmarried, Anne refuses to sacrifice her freedom without soul-piercing, half-agony, half-hope kind of love. Not money, not what her family wants, what she wants. Endless articles bombard us about how women are marrying less, having fewer children, and waiting until they're older to marry as the crisis of masculinity shapes the dating scene. But the birth rate, the world collars, women aren't doing the things we want them to do. I don't even need to say it, do I, dear critics, that with a lack of rights, no guaranteed maternity leave or affordable child care, rising costs, we all know what's going on.

41:50This country and culture simply aren't meeting our very sensible standards. Don't get me wrong. Frederick Wentworth's are out there. I was fortunate enough to marry one last fall. Review. Mazel. Mazel. Beautiful penmanship included. Oh, my God. Wow. I'm shocked by that. Wow. But only because he showed me time and time again his solidarity and friendship were up to my modern Anne Jane Austified standards. My half agony, half hope is that us Anne's never stop asking for what we deserve or settle for less. Jane says it best. Time will explain. Guys, I love this letter because first of all, it just goes against exactly what I was saying.

42:25I'm like, ah, stuff has changed so much. We have a nostalgia for the way things were that we hope certain qualities will be enduring. And here comes Lauren to say, like, of course, we are all living in or living in a situation that feels incredibly imperiled and difficult and hard to find a true partner for life in. Lauren, I'm very happy for you. Yeah. I'd love to watch the movie. I think this is another kind of data point, I think. I think this is very correct to say that part of the reason that we continue to read these novels, maybe especially as women, is, yeah, not necessarily even, I guess, not nostalgia, really, but it parallels our situation, right?

43:12Whether it's the enormous wealth gap that the Jane Austen's world was experiencing and that our world is now is in the throes of whether it's women's circumscribed in different ways, of course, but circumscribed situation and lack of resources, lack of assistance. And so we want to escape to a world where there is that chance of like, I don't want to say one in a million, but, you know, a kind of unique chance at within these circumstances, we can still find love. Yeah, this is it is a very narrow and I don't mean narrow necessarily in a bad way form of escapism that says within unfreedom, there is freedom or something like that.

44:03It's like victory from the jaws of defeat. Snatching victory from the jaws of defeat. Snatching victory from the jaws of defeat. It's like, ugh, it's like the door is closing. The door is closing. We're all going to, you know, either die or be alone or be destitute. And the last moment, something happens to shift that wish fulfillment. I think that's so true. But I also don't think that we could ever create a social system in which you can manufacture love. Oh, my God. Is that true? I think so. I think you can change. Vincent, you think so? I mean, what do you mean by manufacture? I mean, if everything was different, if these constraints weren't there, if true equality was achieved, it's not just like the satire is huge and it's important.

44:55And it's also a means of resistance. But it's not just about that. I think I'm revealing myself to be romantic. You are, but I think there is a world in which I'm going to say something horrible where men suck less. Just like kind of structurally speaking, of course, individually, I know many amazing men, present company included. I just mean that, you know, we know there is a crisis in masculinity partly because of the structural forces that we are attempting to withstand. Yeah. I think the ideal society, sure, you wouldn't manufacture necessarily our modern notion of romantic love. But love in all of its form would be easier to recognize in the ideal society because that society would be premised, in fact, on love.

45:43Like love would be the thing that says, no, you can't be that much more poor than I am. Love would be the thing that says, you know, your class of person, woman, whatever, whatever, whatever, can't be that much sort of divergent in fate from myself. And therefore, like if the society reflected those bonds of affection, we'd be able to like see it in the other more easily. It's beautiful. It's a great idea. Would that society look more like a Jane Austen love story or less like it? It would be the opposite of one. Yeah. It would be the end for all. It would be. There you go. Vincent Cunningham is running on a platform of love for all.

46:23Equal love for all. I've been doing it all my life. And I'm into it. That's today on Critics at Large. Free love. In all its forms.

46:38This, as always, has been Critics at Large. We hope you enjoyed this episode from our archive. It was produced by Danielle Hewitt with help from Michelle O 'Brien. Our senior producer is Rhiannon Corby, and Alex Barish is our consulting editor. Our executive producer is Stephen Valentino. Alexis Quadrato composed our theme music, and we had engineering help today from Vince Fairchild with Mixing by Mike Kutchman. You can find every single episode of Critics at Large at newyorker.com slash critics. And we will see you soon.

47:27Wired has always put a microscope on the people, power, and forces shaping our world. Uncanny Valley brings that same fearless reporting straight to your feed. Is Doge finally over? Will AI actually democratize American healthcare? Each week, Wired journalists from across the newsroom are going to unpack where politics, technology, and Silicon Valley collide. From conversations with tech leaders across Silicon Valley, internet fandom investigations, and government crackdowns on rigged gambling, We're taking you all over the news cycle, going straight inside the priorities, pressures, and power plays driving today's biggest decisions.

48:04Uncanny Valley tackles the questions keeping you up at night and helps make sense of the future taking shape right now. Listen to new episodes every Thursday, wherever you get your podcasts.

From the publisher

Though Jane Austen went largely unrecognized in her own lifetime—four of her six novels were published anonymously, and the other two only after her death—her name is now synonymous with the period romance. On this episode of Critics at Large, Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz choose their personal favorites from her œuvre—“Emma,” “Persuasion,” and “Mansfield Park”—and attempt to get to the heart of her appeal. Then they look at how Austen herself has been characterized by readers and critics. We know relatively little about Austen as a person, but that hasn’t stopped us from trying to understand her psyche. It’s a difficult task in part because of the double-edged quality to her writing: Austen, although renowned for her love stories, is also a keen satirist of the Regency society in which these relationships play out. “I think irony is so key, but also sincerity,” Schwartz says. “These books are about total realism and total fantasy meeting in a way that is endlessly alluring.”

This episode originally aired on June 12, 2025. 

Read, watch, and listen with the critics:

“Pride and Prejudice,” by Jane Austen
“Persuasion,” by Jane Austen
“Emma,” by Jane Austen
“Mansfield Park,” by Jane Austen
“Sense and Sensibility,” by Jane Austen
“Northanger Abbey,” by Jane Austen
“Virginia Woolf on Jane Austen” (The New Republic)
Emily Nussbaum on “Breaking Bad” and the “Bad Fan” (The New Yorker)
“How to Misread Jane Austen,” by Louis Menand (The New Yorker)
“Miss Austen” (2025—)
“Pride and Prejudice” (2005)
Scenes Through Time’s “Mr. Darcy Yearning for 10 Minutes” Supercut

See Critics at Large live at 92NY on February 19: https://www.92ny.org/event/vinson-cunningham-naomi-fry-and-alexandra-schwartz

New episodes drop every Thursday. Follow Critics at Large wherever you get your podcasts.

Critics at Large is a weekly discussion from The New Yorker which explores the latest trends in books, television, film, and more. Join us every Thursday as we make unexpected connections between classic texts and pop culture.

Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

More from Critics at Large | The New Yorker

All 59 episodes
Our Romance with Jane AustenCritics at Large | The New Yorker · 46 min
Listen in VO