The Year of the Broken Mirror

18 Dec 2025 · 50 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: Critics at Large - "The Year of the Broken Mirror"

Podcast Overview Podcast Title: Critics at Large Podcast Description: A weekly culture podcast from *The New Yorker* where staff writers Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz discuss current cultural obsessions, classic texts, and emerging trends across various art forms.

---

Episode Summary Episode Title: The Year of the Broken Mirror Episode Description: This episode examines notable releases of the year that reflect on American society's complexities, particularly in light of the second Trump administration's impact on reality. The hosts discuss various films that serve as cultural mirrors, navigate the emergence of AI as a new kind of reflection, and ponder the implications of these reflections amidst an evolving political landscape.

---

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. Cultural Reflections of Reality
  2. The year 2025 was characterized by films that confront the brokenness of reality in America:
  3. Ryan Coogler’s "Sinners": A historical drama exploring themes of race, oppression, and music in 1930s Mississippi, which employs a supernatural vampire element as a metaphor for societal issues.
  4. Ari Aster’s "Eddington": Set during the COVID-19 pandemic, this film captures societal divisions exacerbated by conspiracy theories and political strife.
  5. Paul Thomas Anderson's "One Battle After Another": Adapted from Pynchon's *Vineland*, it portrays the struggles of radicalism and its consequences in a contemporary setting.
  6. Yorgos Lanthimos's "Bugonia": A surreal narrative about conspiracy theories and the nature of truth, focusing on a conspiracy theorist's kidnapping of a corporate executive.
  1. The Concept of the "Broken Mirror"
  2. The hosts describe the "broken mirror" as a metaphor for how art reflects the fractured nature of American society and the complex interplay of fact and fiction in contemporary discourse.
  3. The year is seen not just as a reflection but as an urgent call to action, moving from introspection to civic engagement.
  1. The Role of AI in Cultural Reflection
  2. The episode discusses the pervasive role of AI in shaping perceptions of reality, presenting both opportunities and challenges for understanding truth.
  3. AI is viewed as a "broken mirror" itself, reflecting humanity in distorted ways and raising questions about authenticity and reality.
  1. Cultural and Political Landscape
  2. The discussion touches upon the influence of politics on culture, specifically referencing Trump 2.0, gaslighting, and the erasure of historical truths from cultural narratives.
  3. The hosts argue that while political pressures may distort cultural representations, they also catalyze creative resistance and innovation in the arts.
  1. Hope Amidst Disillusionment
  2. Despite the bleak outlook presented, the hosts express optimism about the resilience of art and culture as mediums for change and reflection.
  3. The episode concludes with a sentiment of hope that through cultural creation and engagement, society can navigate through challenges.

---

Notable Quotes

  • Vinson Cunningham: "This fixation on democracy on the ground... I hope describes a yearning for more action."
  • Naomi Fry: "It felt to me like a year when people were really going for it and wanted to say, this is how I see America."
  • Alexandra Schwartz: "The increasing inability to tell real from fake online... will maybe lead to people putting the phone aside more."

---

Suggested Viewing/Reading

  • Sinners (2025) - Film reviewing America's historical struggles with race and music.
  • Eddington (2025) - A narrative about the pandemic's societal effects and ideological divides.
  • One Battle After Another (2025) - An exploration of radical politics in America.
  • Bugonia (2025) - A surreal commentary on conspiracy theories and the search for truth.

---

Conclusion This episode of *Critics at Large* offers a nuanced analysis of the intersections between culture, politics, and societal realities as reflected through art. The hosts' conversations encapsulate a profound exploration of our current moment, urging listeners to engage with both the challenges and possibilities that lie ahead.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:06This is Critics at Large, a podcast from The New Yorker. I'm Vincent Cunningham. I'm Alex Schwartz. And I'm Nomi Fry. Each week on this show, we make sense of what's happening in the culture right now and how we got here. Hello, friends. It's that time of year. We're seeing year-end lists everywhere. Spotify rap has come and it's gone. What was your Spotify rap lead artist? Prokofiev for Peter and the Wolf. Oh, beautiful. I just, you know, all 10 tracks. That's where it's been at in my household. That's where it's been at. Vincent? Mine was an artist that I mentioned a lot on this podcast. Dijon, whose album Baby was my favorite album of this year.

0:51And also Justin Bieber, whose best album Swag came out this year, was also Up Bear. And then there are other things that happened. How about you? You're cooler than me. I mean, am I? And me. Mine was Handle. This is true. A classic for a reason. My listening age was 65, you guys. So all of this is to say it's a very special time of year when we try to figure out what the hell happened. For avid listeners of the pod, you guys know that this has been something of a tradition. Our first year, we did an episode on the year of the doll. That was the year Barbie came out, poor things. And last year, we decided that it was the year of the flop, if you recall.

1:35Lots of flops. Lots of disappointments. And this year, here it comes, what we settled on is the year of the broken mirror. Alex, do you want to start us off discussing a little bit how we arrived at year of the broken mirror? How did this come about? Guys, to be honest with you, I find it very hard to sum up these years. I don't know if others agree or not, but so many things go on and so many different works of art are made and seen. and absorbed and forgotten or remembered. Especially forgotten. Especially forgotten. But I do think that one thing we all started to notice was that this was a year when artists started to really confront the messed up, divided nature of reality in these United States.

2:26Just thinking about films like One Battle After Another by Paul Thomas Anderson. I want you to create a show. This is an announcement on a revolution. Eddington by Ari Aster. I'm running from there. You can't keep your own office going, but you're going to run mine. They're your streets to keep safe. Or Sinners by Ryan Coogler. There are legends of people with the gift of making music so true. It can conjure spirits from the past and the future. It felt to me like a year when people were really going for it and wanted to say, this is how I see America. So when I, the mirror idea is like we're looking at ourselves and I'm not sure we like what we see.

3:09It's not a gorgeous reflection shining back. But, you know, big swings about the state of American reality that are also very distinctive auteurist projects as these filmmakers try to tell us what they see when they look into the American mirror. Right. And we had the kind of like shifting nature of reality vis-a-vis AI. It's like, what is reality anymore? when everything can be kind of like reconstructed in the image of the real and yet be so, you know, defiantly unreal. Yeah, it's like in this effort, these big swing efforts to reflect the culture, often there were, there had to emerge these alternate figures.

3:51This is a year of vampires and twins. Yeah. Almost as a way to inspect what it means to be human now, we had to see some sort of humanoid parallel to ourselves across the expanse of that mirror and be, you know, engage in our experience with another thing that came up a lot, which is like the uncanny. Yeah. The messy, weird, unsettling nature of maybe our self-definition has to change, and that's always a kind of a startling phenomenon. Totally. Honestly, there were so many different ways that this year really started to feel like a broken mirror. And we're going to be discussing a lot of them.

4:30My question, though, is when we're going into this discussion, as we're confronted with these reflections of ourselves and art and technology and our politics, what is it that we see? So that's today on Critics at Large, the year of the broken mirror.

4:57Okay, guys, let's get down to business. We're going to get into a bunch of reasons that this felt like the year of the broken mirror. But let's start maybe with the biggest one or one of the bigger ones, okay? This through line of kind of weird, askew mirroring across some of the biggest and best films of the year. Mirroring America back to us in some really interesting and fucked up ways. Where do you guys want to start? Which of the movies that we were thinking of talking about do you want to begin with? I think we should start chronologically. I'm a bit of a traditionalist. I think it's a really good way to sort.

5:35Some norms should not be upended. Exactly. Exactly. As an editor of mine long said, you know, chronology is a very underrated way to tell a story. Yeah. So Sinners, I think, of the movies that we're really looking at in this category of big swings about American reality trying to reflect back to us something broken. but intriguing about ourselves. Sinners came out April 2025. Can you even remember that far back? I ask you. Barely. Who can? Barely. I was a young girl then. Oh, and look at us now. It was written, directed, and co-produced by Ryan Coogler. It was a real, I think we should just say, like a lot of these that we're talking about, these are real auteurist projects.

6:16Yes. Ryan Coogler basically went up against the studios and won to get to make the exact movie he wanted to make. So Sinners takes place in the Mississippi Delta in the 1930s. It's a tale of music, of race, of oppression, of vampires. Vampires. Vampires. And what really struck me about this movie was that it started in such a historically realist way. You know, all these aspects of life. It takes place among black sharecroppers in the Mississippi Delta in the 30s. and a musical teenager, Sammy Preacher Boy Moore, played by Miles Caten, maybe also, by the way, the debut of the year, the film debut of the year.

7:00He was wonderful. He was great. Goes off with a pair of twins, Smoke and Stack, played by Michael B. Jordan, and agrees to play music at a juke joint. I'm a sharecropper from Sunflower Plantation. They called me Preacher Boy, counting my daddy being the pastor. I wrote this song for him.

7:29Something I've been wanting to tell you for a long time. It might hurt you. Hope you don't lose your mind. Well, I was just a boy. And then the vampires show up. I mean, to me, this was Coogler wanting to show us something very real about America to remind us in a lot of ways, you know, this wasn't long ago. This is within the last century. Here's the origin of so much of our life, our culture, our politics as we know it now, in positive and negative ways, some of the greatest music, you know, ever made coming from this place and some of the darkest history. And then the supernatural element, I found totally fascinating and riveting.

8:10And the more I think about it, the more, yeah, the more it stuck with me yeah yeah i mean i i think it's like in retrospect actually one of my favorite movies of the year when we're talking about like big swings this is a big swing and it's a huge swing and i want to say also reek kugler because kugler is a marvel director and he's most known as you know the director of black panther and he also did uh creed and creed he's he's a very talented director and everything he's done, but those were movies that were beholden to this story that the corporation is telling, right? And with this, it's still a big movie.

8:53It's still, of course, not an independent movie by any means, but the story itself, it's kind of like his own mirroring, you know, of kind of like, let's do a big movie. Let's kind of like use the tools of the master, so to speak, to tell this different story, which is quite original, even though, again, And it relies on kind of genre tropes like horror. I really admire that sense of kind of like let's see what is possible to do within kind of like the reality that we share in which like big money making corporations expect you to do one thing. And he ended up doing another in a way that was I found weirdly radical.

9:35Like it was like it kind of like surprising to me I would say. He's such an interesting director because he is known for those bigger budget movies. But also his debut was called Fruitvale Station 2013. I still remember seeing it and sobbing at the end at the Angelica Theater in New York. It's about a young man, a true story of a young man named Oscar Grant who was killed on the train by a police officer in very short. And it's almost like Sinners wants to be a synthesis. Speaking of a mirror, right, both sides of a mirror of a tough reality, not without its joys, not without its triumphs, but a tough reality.

10:13And on the other hand, this kind of surrealist superhero thing that happens with the vampires, the bravado of the two twins, Smoke and Stack, trying to put together these pieces of the American story, both the sort of maybe a comment on American entertainment, which comes alive most vividly in this great dance scene that brings together the past and the future, making them speak to each other as if across, you know, two sides of a mirror. But also, you know, really sticking to a realist sort of historical impulse, which seems to be so alive with him. And in telling a history also give us a sort of new vision of ourselves.

10:54There is one other way I think that sinners reflects our broken marathine. It's really hard to talk about culture without also talking about politics when politics is as all-consuming and intrusive of daily reality as it is. And this was a year when so much of politics was basically telling Americans that what they know to be true about their country, about their past, never happened. Yes. The year of gaslighting. Yeah, it was definitely the year of gaslighting. Like, oh, if it wasn't great, it didn't happen. If it involved violence, it didn't happen. If it involved oppression or anything, you know, a little bit uncomfortable, it's woke.

11:36We don't like it. And so that, to me, was part of the mirror of Ryan Coogler holding up this actual mirror and, again, trying to make it very granular and authentic down to—I remember our colleague Richard Brody in his review of Sinners was really happy that the amounts of money that things cost were put so directly, you know, really kind of giving the fabric of a time. But also holding up this mirror to all of us who know that the country's past is riven with brutality and ugliness and who don't find looking away from that to be particularly comforting or elucidating. So here in this really popular and fun and dynamic setting was the mirror, the ugly part of the mirror, and also some beauties staring us back in the face.

12:22And I thought that in the spring was a great way to start this confrontation with reality through fiction. Let us move on to our next contender for Broken Mirror Movie 2025. and I think maybe we should now talk again sticking to the chronology of the year Eddington, the Ari Aster movie that came out in July 2025 so yeah, written and directed and co-produced by Aster himself and basically this is a COVID movie, right? Just to give a little bit of a praise see for those of us who haven't seen or don't remember would rather not remember because it is about a period that many of us would rather not remember.

13:08The movie takes place in May 2020. It's in a small town named Eddington in New Mexico. And the protagonist is a sheriff played by Joaquin Phoenix, whose wife is kind of depressed and along with her mother who's living at their house, they're kind of like falling in the grip of the alternative reality of kind of conspiracy theories about COVID. and so on. Then he has this nemesis, this sort of like woke, annoyingly faux-liberal contender to the mayorality of the town played by Pedro Pascal. You know,

13:51if a healthy person with a mask gets exposed to a COVID-19 person without a mask, then they got a 70 % chance It's a catch in it. But if we all wear them, then we can reduce the transmission rate to 1.5. You don't even know what you're talking about. 1.4 percent of nothing is what? And actually, Joe, this is simple. There are these sort of young, white, again, annoyingly woke youth who are kind of joining the Black Lives Matter movement. So these are all things, all the elements are, again, much like in Sinners, historically accurate or in a sense a take on things that actually happen. But then, not in a supernatural way, but in certainly off-the-rails way, the movie goes kind of bazonkers, right?

14:45And gives us a view of America that I think we can also include among the broken mirror canon. The broken mirror canon that we were just establishing. Yeah. Do you guys want to want to talk about that a little bit? Well, there's so many. It's a it's a it's complicated to wrap our arms around what goes on in that movie. Yeah. I mean, it's just like a deepening set of contradictions that end really in what seems like the total decline of a of a small but representative society. first of all the crime of the year is that this movie is not named after the actual town in which it was filmed which is called Truth or Consequences New Mexico it's a long story but the town was named after a quiz show where somebody you get asked a trivia question and if you can't answer it in a very short period of time i.e.

15:44get the truth of the situation you have to face a consequence some sort of zany thing And that is exactly what's going on in this film. It's just like a contest over the truth, which once failed by the whole society, right? Whatever divisions, ideological battles bedevil them, they can't get it together to arrive at a notion or a sort of shared truth. They all have to face a deeply divided consequence, right? And this double, this kind of dialectic between truth and its discontents is totally what the movie is about. Just something came up to me, Vincent. You said something along the lines of they can't get it together.

16:29Like the people of the town can't keep it together, can't get it together. Yeah. And it made me think, you know, Altamont, the, you know, free public Rolling Stones concert in Altamont Speedway, California, known collectively as kind of the death of the 60s, right? Like Meredith Hunter, a black concert attendee, knifed to death by the Hells Angels who were doing security, a horrible tragedy. The movie Gimme Shelter, the Maisel's movie about this event. you see Mick Jagger on stage and he keeps saying like, why can't we get it together? Can we keep it together, people? You know, like love and light.

17:14Like, can we just all unite understanding of what is kind of like the moral center that we all agree on is in a sense what I think Eddington is about. Sorry, this was a long tangent. I have nothing to do with it. But I was just thinking about, yeah, can we all keep it together? Can we all, like, agree and not even agree, not consent, just like a consensus reality, right? Yeah. No. Apparently not. You can't. And this is what we're talking about. Kind of bleak. Pretty bleak for sure.

17:52In a minute, we'll come back with something a little less bleak, just a little. That's in a minute on Critics at Large from The New Yorker.

18:24Thank you.

18:36talking now about bleak but perhaps with a touch of positive energy kind of bleak with a twist bleak with a twist paul thomas anderson's one battle after another came out not long ago September 2025. It did. Yeah, guys. Amazing. Mirroring? Wait, wait. Before we talk about the mirror, should we explain to our listeners what's this movie about? Yeah, One Battle After Another, as we said, written, directed, produced by Paul Thomas Anderson. It's based on, this is Anderson's second time sort of taking a swing, speaking of big swings, and speaking of big swings about America, his second time adapting a novel by Thomas Pynchon, this time the 1990 book Vineland.

19:29And it's about the action and then the afterlife of a band of, I don't know, what do you call them? Left wing revolutionaries? Radicals? They're radical revolutionaries. Domestic terrorists? I don't know. Yeah. Tomato, tomato. Tomato, tomato. Exactly. This company is led, at least in sort of the action of the film, by Leonardo DiCaprio, who plays a guy named Bob Ferguson, who is sort of part of this group, falls in love with a team member named Perfidia Beverly Hills, played by Tiana Taylor. They have a kid. Tiana Taylor is, I don't know, she's detained. And then, spoiler alert, she is a snitch.

20:16Everybody gets in trouble. People go into hiding. Sings like a canary. She sings. And Leo was left to raise their daughter, Charlene or Willa, depending on whether she needs to hide or not, played really amazingly by Chase Infinity. Another incredible film debut. Great debut performance. These young people keep getting more and more talented. And this group is sort of haunted or hunted by Sean Penn in an absolutely bonkers performance as Colonel Stephen Lockjaw. So there is a white supremacist group that comes up into it. There is, of course, the sort of worsening fate of Leo DiCaprio as he's forced back into revolutionary action with an absolutely burnt out brain.

21:03All right. I was part of French 75 for years, years and years. All right. They used to call me Ghetto Pat, Rocket Man, stuff like that. Only problem is I fried my brain since then, man. I have abused drugs and alcohol for the past 30 years, man. I'm a drug and alcohol lover, and I cannot remember for the life of me or the life of my only child the answer to your question, what time is it? 8.15. Now, I need this rendezvous point. You understand what I'm saying? I need it. I understand. And the question is, what time is it? There are car chases. There's a nunnery. For a moment, it's the Black Sound of Music.

21:52It's great. Get to a nunnery. Yeah. And yeah, it is another one of these big swings about a certain American persuasion, about a certain tendency. And it's many ripples through a pond. I thought it was, I mean, it has, it's so strange. I like it less and more in my mind. I like it more as a work of filmmaking. Like, the images are aging beautifully in my mind. The story is aging not so great in my mind. It's a really interesting film to keep thinking about. I want to see it again, actually. Yeah. You know, I famously did not love this movie. I mean, I loved some things about it. But I think it seemed to me to be, and I think it was because the source material of Vineland is about the 60s, sort of like 70s burnout, post-60s.

22:42Whereas like kind of putting the story in today's terms didn't seem to work. But it clearly like P.T. wanted it to work. He wanted to kind of like put a mirror in front of America as it is right now. And I was like, is this the way America is right now? You know, so for me, the brokenness, I mean, it certainly it certainly portrayed a fractured, broken reality. And some of the realities that it portrayed, which, you know, there's a lot of to do with a kind of like ice like, you know, establishment, the, you know, migrant snatching off the street, et cetera, et cetera. There's like the white supremacy thing, which actually rung like maybe most true to me in the world of the movie.

23:26It's not like it's detached from the reality right now. But I think the kind of like potential ways to engage with that reality in the world of the movie seemed to me to be completely imaginary. Yeah, I hear that. And I myself have mixed feelings about this film. I think all three of us do. I will say this, though. I think if we want to talk about what the dominant image is of 2025 or set of images are, they are ICE officers walking through the streets of the United States and abducting people in plain daylight. That's the dominant image in the United States of America in 2025. So it was interesting to me to have Paul Thomas Anderson, a director who has never been that interested in the contemporary and has usually liked to stay in the past, try to come right in with an opening, a very bravura opening of this movie at about a 30 minute sequence kind of without stop, which begins with a group of people freeing migrants from a detention center.

24:34You know, of course, the movie wasn't made, like filmed this past year when all that was going on. But seeing that image, the cinematic version of it, I just thought, OK, here we go. This is no longer, this can't be contained any longer. This is now leaking into culture with a big capital C. Yeah. Guys, moving right along to the fourth auteur, male auteur. Yes, four men. Four men taking big swings. They love to do it. The year that was. Sorry. Yorgo Slanthimos, director of Begonia. Once again. That's sicko, yeah. That came out just this October. I must admit, I didn't get a chance to see the movie yet.

25:27And you have promised me that there is a broken mirror therein.

25:37This movie is about conspiracy. It's about how conspiracy lurks and lingers everywhere. In this movie, Jesse Plemons plays a conspiracy theorist whose name is Teddy, who lives with his mentally handicapped in some way cousin, played by Aidan Delbiss. And he believes he works at a corporation that seems to have something to do with pharmaceuticals. And he believes that the CEO of this corporation, played by Emma Stone, called Michelle Fuller, who's a kind of, you know, terrifying femme boss with blood-heeled Louboutins, is actually an alien who is destroying planet Earth. So he kidnaps her. They do what anybody would do.

26:20They kidnap her. Of course. Where was her security service that day? I've often wondered this since seeing the film, but let's not nitpick. They get her, and they keep her in the bottom of their squalid home and rural somewhere or other, and try to make her confess. Can we have a dialogue, please? Don't call it a dialogue. This isn't death of a salesman. Okay, can we talk, please? Or are you just going to keep doing— We don't need to talk. Yes, okay. Because I know exactly what you're going to say. you're going to say that I'm in some kind of internet-induced, auto-hypnotic feedback loop and gatekeepers and norms and all that weak, hegemonic horse shit.

26:57But that is precisely the limp-dick rhetoric that you've been instructed to counter the human insurgency with. That's the fucking hyper-normalized dialectic by which you've convinced 7.5 billion people that they're not your captives to keep us believing in these fucking false, institutional fucking shibboleths. You mean shibboleths? That's what I said. You said... Yeah, whatever. Sorry. What goes on is a kind of hostage standoff for the ages where Emma Stone both denies everything and then agrees to everything, and the audience is kept in constant suspense about whether or not this conspiracy theory could possibly be true.

27:42and I'm going to tell you not my favorite movie of the year. I know the Lanthimos heads are all out there. They're loving it and I'm happy for them. But I'm not happy for myself because I really, this one didn't do it for me. Even though I liked all the performances in it, I felt, I got to tell you, I felt, just talking about the mirror, the broken mirror is like you're looking at, you know, an American idiot who might also be an American genius. That's the question of the movie. Are you, are you absolutely moronic to believe that aliens are controlling our planet? Or have you put all the signs together?

Read the full transcript

28:17Did you do your own research? And are you going to be proved right? And that kind of a conflict is not that intriguing to me since, like, the way that the mirror was held up to that conflict, I felt was just to make every... It was a very Lanthimos thing. Everyone comes off looking appalling, absolutely appalling. And I think Lanthimos is a filmmaker who really likes to hold himself at a remove from people and from his subjects and kind of almost, it's almost like a little kid watching like an ant farm, like, oh, will they eat each other? You know, maybe I'll put a magnifying glass on one and see what happens when it burns.

28:51So that, I felt that we are so swimming in conspiracy and in aggression and violence. This did not illuminate our situation for me, even though it was much more, it might have for other people, it's much more, you know, it's a very extreme take on what's going on. Kidnapping someone is a lot to do. Yeah. Vincent, did you disagree? Did this do it for you? I loved it because I love the work of the actor Jesse Plemons, who is just always so demented and strange and off kilter. And here he's made to stand in for the kind of someone who's become a trope in our society, just the absolutely alienated, sad and potentially violent young man.

29:42He also has a great line in the movie where I think sort of trying to understand this person, he says, you know, I've been through the whole digestive system. I started alt-right. I've been through, you know, communism, socialism, the sort of travel through ideologies that ends up in just utter, we think, out to lunchness. Yeah. And what the movie does, I thought, well, is posit all of this on top of issues of, you know, class, political economy, the environment in a way that I thought had on a much smaller scale. And even though it's visually kind of all over the place, in terms of its terrain, it's less of a huge swing than the others that we're talking about.

30:26On a very small scale with a limited number of characters, try to say something about the interiority of a certain kind of person. And yet, all that smallness and interiority has consequences for the entire human race. Yes. You won't spoil it, but this movie gives you the equivalent of a little shot of cyanide at the end. And it just says, drink up. It goes galactic. Yeah. I'm going to see this. This is really whetting my appetite for the cyanide. If you want the cyanide, go for it. That was too bitter to swallow for me at the end. Guys, we've talked about all these big releases, the big swings, the big swing of it all.

31:07Were there any other aspects that you saw around you of this Broken Mirror theme that struck you this year? To me, this is really the year that AI broke through as a daily use item for the majority of the population. Yeah. Of course, these tools have been around for a while, but this is the year when they became ubiquitous and unavoidable. When just signing on to Google means that the little Google thing is going to give you complete sentences, often totally factually inaccurate about whatever you're looking at. I do think it's the year when, I mean, we know that people increasingly are turning to AI as they would turn to other people to have conversations with, to get information from, to find emotional connection.

31:51And so we have now in our pockets everywhere this mirror of humanity. And we will see where this leads. I think it's going to be great. It's going to be great, you guys. I'm glad. Done. You know, I try not to be the Lanthimos, like handing everyone the cyanide shot. And I try to think it's all going to be okay. And there are many things that I enjoy about technology and the way it is and having access to many things at our fingertips. But I'm going to go ahead and call that a broken mirror. I'm going to go ahead and call the AI chatbots who want to flatter and cajole us to be a broken mirror of humanity.

32:32Yeah, a friend of mine I saw on Instagram posted something like some image, which it was kind of very realistic and said, I can't be spending my whole life now wondering if an image is real or not. Because this is the year when this really happened. And I'm realizing with certain things that I see, I still don't I don't bother finding out almost. So, for instance, I do think this was fake, but there was ultimately, but I definitely thought it was real when I looked at it. There was an image of Diddy in jail, like in the prison yard. I've seen this one. Yeah, so terrible. Taken of him like talking to another inmate.

33:19And I was like, OK, yeah, here's a picture of somebody, you know, paparazzi caught a picture of Diddy in the jail yard talking to another inmate. and like smiling and laughing. It was probably fake, but I have to admit I never found out and I think this is going to be the way it's going to be now, I guess, unless it's something that... I'm pretty sure it was confirmed as fake, but to your point, like how would you know? That's it. Alex, have you like experienced any of these like kind of AI... Daily and constantly. I don't know what's happening. I don't even know if you're real. I'm bewildered.

33:56What the hell is happening? I follow someone on Instagram that I'm not sure if they're a person. Oh, that's interesting. That it's an AI creation? Someone that I and several of my friends follow on both Instagram and Twitter. I've never seen them in a picture with more than two people. The Google results are very low. Interacts with my posts sometimes. And you follow them? I follow them. They follow me. Sometimes they reply to my stuff. but it's like the angle is always like, the camera's always waving in this very interesting way. The smile is always the exact, I'm like, I am wondering if it's like a test for a better AI, I'm just saying.

34:33Do you follow them? Did you follow them because they're like hot or something? Like what was the reason? Or because your friends are, oh, that was a little smile. Yeah, he was smiling. No. So it's like a bust. Like a medical researcher who also like follows a lot of writers. So it's a busty model. Good for her. Not busty, not busty. Oh. Not busty. Small naturals?

34:56It's all coming out. Sorry. Sorry. They post stuff about literature and art or whatever. Not literature and art. I'm like, yeah, she's a pretty girl, but that's not the reason. My point is, I'm like, as it goes on, I'm like, your tone is oddly consistent. Your pictures are oddly consistent. Are you a canary in some coal mine? I don't know. I don't know. Okay, off mic, we're going to all put our minds together. We'll have to. We're not going to. If it is one. I'm going to crack this. I have to say. I just want to admit this. This is my first time even talking about this. Okay, no. I think it's good admitting it to as many people as possible.

35:30It's good. Right, you know, all at once. It's good. They're very obvious AI, like, actual, like, thirst traps. I know about those ladies I've already. Right, right, right. You're over that. You're over that. But, you know, I do feel like with this whole mirror concept and the reality, unreality like the more that unreality becomes our daily environment the more that reality also commands a premium and seems to matter it's very confusing i like look at the labubus and the lfufus we did a whole episode about the labubus and woe betide anyone whose child asked them or you know i guess lover or whatever whoever's wanting labubus asked them for labubu and they show up with the lfufu you gotta you gotta count every single one of those teeth you gotta get the real thing, even though the real thing is a hideous piece of, you know, plastic and fake fur.

36:17But it's real. You got to feel that fur. You got to stroke that fuzz, you know? And I was thinking about something a friend of mine said, and I don't know if I believe this, but that the increasing inability to tell real from fake online, that thing of like, I don't know, that it's going to be increasingly like this. Does this happen? Does this not happen? Are these people actually interacting in real life is diddy like you know is it diddy in the prison yard etc will maybe and this is like the best case scenario i think lead to people putting the phone aside more i mean this is the best case scenario right i don't know if this is real but like okay yeah it's like a potential positive is people being like okay yeah i'm not getting anything from this, screw all of it.

37:09I mean, that would be the best case scenario. But screw all of it in what? I'm going to go touch grass and sit by myself now? I mean, yes, I agree. Well, not by myself. I'm going to talk to you in a podcast studio. Okay. In a podcast studio. I mean, this is just because we're here, but I could also talk to you, you know, I'll engage with my real friends. I'll engage with real people. In a controlled meatspace environment. In a controlled meatspace environment. I'll join a run club. No, I'm kidding. I'm never going to join a run club, no matter if the bots take over. That's not happening. But you know, I mean, again, this is maybe wishful thinking, but something to possibly dream about.

37:45Do we hear a resolution for 2026? Are you going to touch grass in 2026? Wow. You should. I should. Me too.

37:58In a minute, in this atmosphere of a total break from reality, do we need these cinematic reflections of ourselves more than ever? Critics at large from The New Yorker will be right back.

38:17Hey, psst. You didn't hear this from me, but Normal Gossip is back for its ninth season. Join me, Rachel Hampton, as I share the juiciest gossip from the real world with some very special guest. This season, we're bringing back some old friends, a Radiotopia buddy, and for the first time ever, a Nobel laureate. That's right. We have Malala on season nine. Normal Gossip is out on all your favorite podcast platforms.

38:54we've been talking about the shattered looking glass the the jagged shards the mirror cracked from side to side the mirror stage but broken and um i mean obviously like this was the first year of Trump 2.0, I feel like a lot happened around that that could be talked about in mirror terms or broken mirror terms, rather. I mean, the situation defies easy summary, but one of the things very much on my mind is just the total constant warping of reality that is at the point where if you resist even one little aspect of the reality warping, another one will just come in. I mean, I was talking before about how interesting it was to see sinners go back to the 1930s deep South at a time when the government itself is trying to erase history.

39:54And what I mean by that, just to get more granular, like this was the year that we heard that the Smithsonian was told to focus more on America's brightness and not about, and not, you know, get into how bad slavery was. When references to Trump's impeachments were removed from the exhibit on the presidency when various national parks had to remove signs that explained that the land that the parks exist on belonged to Native tribes who were forcibly removed. Like, OK, it's one thing to not want a land acknowledgement every time you go to the movies. It's quite another thing. I mean, and that can be discussed by reasonable people, but it's quite another thing to go to Yellowstone and just be like, nope, there's nothing here.

40:40So all these efforts that have been made to try to reflect reality accurately, there is a kind of falsification going on with the hope and the idea that the population will look into the big American mirror and see, you know, nothing but, I don't know, smiling white faces. Like, what's the idea here? Yeah. It's a nightmare. Yeah. And so that is a political thing, but it also really is a cultural thing. And it does make me wonder, you know, like one of the big pieces of news from the last week was is about this Netflix deal. We'll see which way it goes. But we now know that the administration wants to be involved.

41:20So when there's pressure coming from that level on culture, how does culture react? Like you could see a really depressing bad thing, which is that culture caves. But also it creates many, many more opportunities for what, for lack of a better word, we can call resistance. Yeah. Yeah. It becomes a lot easier to it's harder to resist when the pressures are so high, but it's also easier because even smaller things become more meaningful. You know what I mean? Yeah. Yeah. I mean, the lies are just so I mean, even talking about this, I feel like it's such a cliche, you know, like Trump lies. It's like, yeah, no shit, you know, but the level things have reached in this respect are insane.

41:59And I think the difference this time around in this new iteration of the administration is that the self-preservation instinct of corporate entities seem to have reached such a fever pitch, you know, that there's a complete kind of like agreement to appease this version, this false version of reality. You know, if we're thinking about like the inauguration and all kind of the heads of industry, you know, Zuck and Bezos, Tim Cook, all of that. And just like everybody just is like willing to kind of kiss the ring in a very public way. Like the shame about that is gone. And these are people who are presiding over the making of culture.

42:45Yeah. You know, whether it's Apple, whether it's Netflix, you know, whether it's the social media organs, you know, it's like this is it. And, you know, this kind of leads me to a question of, like, do you think the movies that we were discussing are responding to the swarping in any meaningful sense? Well, I think Eddington is a good example of this because it takes place in 2020, a moment of incredible fracture, not only politically, ideologically, sort of just in the fabric of our common reality. But it's really interesting. It's important that it's Trump 2.0, right? Most of the first Trump administration happened before the pandemic.

43:25And then we had this interregnum with Biden and here Trump comes again. And so to think about the first Trump administration and this second term is on some level to be on two sides of a great divide in our notions of what we are not only as a country but as a human community. To be alive now is to look over that gulf, to try to remember what it was really like in 2015 is to— Imagine a whole different world. And it is kind of looking into a mirror. Absolutely different. And seeing how many warps and cracks that there are. And it's only been 10 years. It's only been 10 years. Yeah. In some ways, it seems like 2025 is the year that 2020 finally ramified.

44:04It's like, this is the world that we now have. I absolutely agree. Great point. That's why I do think it's interesting to see people taking it on directly and trying, maybe failing but also trying to actually present a vision of the crisis in American culture because we're living through this crisis that just is it's lasting forever it's it's a non-ending crisis and I also think there's like I don't know what you guys think about this there's a big declineist narrative obviously with politics that you know Trump is saying we're better than ever and everything is everything is better than ever many people are saying nothing could be worse this is the worst thing ever.

44:45I've seen a lot of like lists from various tastemakers and people just kind of say, oh, this year sucked. And that has me feeling down. I don't know what to say about that, but. Well, I do want towards the end of this episode to maybe lift us up a little bit and urge us to think, what could be a potential bright point after all that we've said about the broken mirror stage of our nation and culture? Well, I kind of do think, you know, as mixed feelings as I have about one battle after another, and I know you guys share it, we're ignoring the number one hero and the best character of this whole movie, Sensei Sergio St.

45:24Carlos. It's true. It's very true. It's been played by Benicio Del Toro. Yeah, and the thing about Benicio and the thing about who's amazing in this role, as he calls himself, he's a kind of Latino Harriet Tubman, who's helping migrants find a way through the traps that have been placed for them. There is an incredible sequence, I could have watched a whole movie about this, about the safe house where he and his family are helping to hide people. And also a great confrontation with the hilarious lame-ass Bob, Leo DiCaprio's character, where Bob kind of apologizes for turning the police on to him, and the sensei says, we've been laid siege to for hundreds of years.

46:02It's not your fault. Don't get selfish. That's a mirror moment of like, wake up. Look at yourself in the mirror. This isn't all about you. I come back to that to the two ways of being in opposition. One of them is toting machine guns and setting off explosions. And the other is having the kind of quiet discipline and solidarity to carry on and continue to build the world as it should be. That's what I'm taking with me into 2026. I'm going to say the thing that I always say that for me, what is kind of like the saving grace is people still intent on making culture and making art. The fact that people still are doing that and trying to do that and the fact that people like us, I mean, this is what this podcast is about, are trying to like take these works in and reflect on them and maybe bring other people into them.

46:59For me, that's like, I mean, it's not everything, but it's something. And it makes people think that life is still worth living, maybe, even if it's not necessarily, you know, immediate political action. And I see this with my daughter. You know, I see this with, like, her excitement about discovering things, you know. And for us, we're hoary old, you know, whatever. Although, of course, we still get excited. We still, of course, discuss and live and breathe it, but we have been doing it for a long time. But for someone finding out, oh, this is a really funny, super smart TV show or, oh, can you believe this band and the music they're making, whatever it is, or it's that's what life's about.

47:48And even in the world of the broken mirror, hopefully we have these examples to at least tide us over a little bit. Yeah. And what do you think, Vincent? In many different ways, these are some of the texts that we've talked about are about the limits of a certain kind of politics. Let's call it whether institutional, partisan and the efficacy or whatever doom of people acting on their own, like sort of democracy closer to the ground. Call it revolutionary. Call it whatever you want. And it does seem that thinking about the mirror, broken or not, is a way of describing a kind of stasis, a kind of almost like narcissistic kind of figuring out.

48:37And we all have to do it. We all have to describe problems before we solve them. But, you know, the fixation on this fixation on democracy on the ground, whether it's, you know, violent or not, whether it's misguided or not mistaken or not is a maybe I hope describes a yearning for more action for like a move away from the mirror and out. this goes to your point about touching grass, like out into the streets, out into community with other people where change is potentially made. Fates are decided, you know, as opposed to the long gaze into the mirror.

49:18So this is our final episode of the year and we would be remiss not to take a moment and thank all of you. Listeners, without all of you, we'd just be three people in a room yapping, as they say. But, you know, knowing that all of you are out there tuning in each week and, you know, hearing from you, and, you know, sometimes we even meet you on the street, and that is, like, such a pleasure. It makes it all feel worthwhile. This is a community, and we love it. Listeners, we absolutely love you. Please be in touch with us. We love hearing from you, and you guys really make the show. We are wishing you the brightest end of the year.

50:03We're so lucky to have you.

50:08This has been Critics at Large. Alex Barish is our consulting editor, and Rhiannon Corby is our senior producer. Our executive producer is Stephen Valentino. Alexis Quadrato composed our theme music. And we had engineering help today from Michael Jeneau with mixing by Mike Kutchman.

50:29That's it from us for 2025. We have so many fun episodes that we're planning for you all in the new year, and we can't wait to share them with you. We hope you get some nice time off to unwind, relax, spend with your families, maybe watch some movies or read a book. We'll see you all back here in 2026.

51:03I'm Shilpa Oskakovich. And I'm Jazzy Sefcek. And we're the hosts of the Bon Appetit Bake Club podcast. Bake Club is Bon Appetit's community of confident, curious bakers. Jazzy and I love to bake. Some might even call us obsessive. and we love to talk about all the hows and whys and what didn't works that come with it. Every month we publish a recipe on bonappetit.com that introduces a baking concept we think you should know. Then you'll bake, send us any questions you have and we'll get together here on the podcast to talk about the recipe. So consider this your official invitation. Come join the BA Bake Club.

51:37New episodes on the first Tuesday of every month wherever you get your podcasts. Happy baking.

51:46From PRX.

From the publisher

Many of this year’s most talked-about releases were, in some sense, diagnostic: from Ryan Coogler’s “Sinners” to Paul Thomas Anderson’s “One Battle After Another,” films offered up assessments of the nation’s ills. On this episode of Critics at Large, Vinson Cunningham, Naomi Fry, and Alexandra Schwartz discuss these and other reflections of American life, which arrive at a time when reality itself feels more nebulous than ever. Then, the hosts consider the “broken mirror” of A.I., and how the second Trump Administration’s effort to erase unflattering chapters of U.S. history has further muddied the distinction between fact and fiction. Despite these dark developments, the art that’s emerged from this moment, much of it focussed on activists and renegades seeking change, also functions as a warning against stasis. Cunningham says, of the cultural shift: “This fixation on democracy on the ground—whether it’s violent or not, whether it’s misguided or not—I hope describes a yearning for more action. A move away from the mirror, and out into the streets.” 

Read, watch, and listen with the critics:

“Sinners” (2025)
“Fruitvale Station” (2013)
“ ‘Sinners’ Is a Virtuosic Fusion of Historical Realism and Horror,” by Richard Brody (The New Yorker)
“Eddington” (2025)
“ ‘Eddington’ and the American Berserk” (The New Yorker)
“Gimme Shelter” (1970)
“One Battle After Another” (2025)
“One Paul Thomas Anderson Film After Another” (The New Yorker)
“Bugonia” (2025)
“Art in the Age of Artificial Intelligence” (The New Yorker)
“Our Fads, Ourselves” (The New Yorker)

New episodes drop every Thursday. Follow Critics at Large wherever you get your podcasts.

Critics at Large is a weekly discussion from The New Yorker which explores the latest trends in books, television, film, and more. Join us every Thursday as we make unexpected connections between classic texts and pop culture.

Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

More from Critics at Large | The New Yorker

All 59 episodes
The Year of the Broken MirrorCritics at Large | The New Yorker · 50 min
Listen in VO