How long will traces of our civilisation last?

29 Aug 2025 · 34 min · 14 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Whether traces of a long-lived technological civilization (past or future) would survive on Earth, and what evidence humans will leave.

Guests/backgrounds

Adam Frank, astrophysicist at the University of Rochester (works on finding life elsewhere); Gavin Schmidt, head of NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (climate science); Prof. Sarah Gabbett and Prof. Jan Zelishevich, paleontologists/geologists at the University of Leicester; plus fossil curator Paul Davis (Lime Regis Jurassic Coast).

Key claims

The “Silurian Hypothesis” argues brief technological eras won’t fossilize into detectable remains. Fossilization is rare (<0.1% of species). Humans will be detectable via altered strata, chemical isotope shifts, durable materials (plastic), and synthetic/industrial byproducts (fly ash, nuclear waste). Another civilization would likely be detectable if it manipulated the environment.

Notable examples

Ozymandias “Nothing beside remains”; Grand Canyon rock strata; Jurassic Coast ammonites/ichthyosaurs/plesiosaurs; deep-ocean burial for fossilization; fly ash spherical carbonaceous particles; concrete with fly ash; graphite lasting billions of years; dinosaur-killing meteorite as a “big blip” analogy.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Exploring Fossil Hunting

1:12 to 3:43

Paul Davis shares insights on fossil hunting and its challenges.

“Hello and welcome to CrowdScience from the BBC World Service.”

Listener Inquiry on Civilizations

3:43 to 6:06

Discussion of listener Steve's questions about the traces of civilizations.

“He's not a paleontologist, but an astrophysicist.”

The Silurian Hypothesis Explained

6:06 to 7:51

Introduction to the Silurian Hypothesis and its implications for past civilizations.

“Producer Sam is searching for actual fossils.”

The Role of Fossils and Strata

7:51 to 10:07

Exploring how fossil formation and geological strata relate to evidence of past life.

“We probably will have changed the rock strata.”

Fossilization Process Insights

10:07 to 12:29

Description of the fossilization process and its implications for future discoveries.

“So there'll be loads of species that exist that we don't even know about and never will know about.”

Searching for Fossils at Lime Regis

12:29 to 14:00

Sam shares his experience and techniques for finding fossils on the Jurassic Coast.

“And it was just also a coincidence that the sorts of rocks that preserved here were absolutely perfect for preserving fossils.”

Fossil Hunting Hopes

14:00 to 14:40

The speaker shares their optimism about finding fossils on a beach.

“And I always say what you want to do is look with your eyes and your fingers.”

Traces of Technological Civilizations

14:40 to 17:04

Discussion on the potential for evidence of ancient technological species.

“It seems that we can't rely on fossilised remains to tell us everything about ancient species.”

Human Impact on Earth

20:38 to 23:38

Exploring how humans alter the environment and its implications for future paleontology.

“about how long it's going to last, is nuclear waste.”

Preservation of Human Artifacts

23:38 to 28:00

Examining how human-made materials like plastic might last in the geological record.

“Speaking of, let's check back in with producer Sam.”
Show all 14 chapters

Plastic vs. Dinosaur Fossils

28:00 to 29:48

Explore the longevity of plastic and children's drawings compared to dinosaur fossils.

“Do you think there's a chance that in the future our plastic stuff with dinosaurs on it might actually outlast fossils from dinosaurs?”

Scientific Debate and Evidence

29:48 to 31:36

Discuss how new scientific research can challenge existing theories and build consensus.

“were technologically advanced because we have combined elements and materials in just such imaginative ways and we've made lots and lots of new materials.”

Imagining a Future Without Humans

31:36 to 32:40

Learn how thinking about a world without humans can impact our view on climate change.

“When that idea came out, people were like, that's crazy.”

Exploring Fossils and Technological Traces

32:40 to 34:57

Join a discovery of fossils while discussing the absence of previous technological civilizations.

“But first, let's get an update from producer Sam on the beach in Lyme Regis.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK. Pop quiz. What's in your kid's lunchbox? At Whole Foods Market, they've already done the studying. Over 300 food ingredients are banned from their shelves. No hydronated fats in the peanut butter and no high fructose corn syrup in the cookies. And for sandwiches, there are no synthetic nitrates or nitrites in any of their deli meat. So you can pack lunchboxes with peace of mind. Get back to school ready at Whole Foods Market. We face the greatest challenges of our time. Challenges that test our limits. There is a place where we can find answers.

0:43Where journeys break new ground and connections unlock opportunities. Where innovation can spark real change and our actions can push our world forward. Singapore, where business events can create lasting impact.

1:07And I haven't found any one at all yet. Nothing.

1:12Caroline Steel:Hello and welcome to CrowdScience from the BBC World Service. And if we now look down here, actually geologically, all of these olivey green rocks are pieces of a material called pyrite, or fool's gold to give it its common name. But it's here mixed in with bolts and screws and hinges and undescribed bits of rusty metal. I'm Caroline Steele, and you're listening to fossil hunter Paul Davis, showing producer Sam the tricks of the trade. So actually, strangely enough, these patches with the rusty metal and the fool's gold are one of the best places to look for fossils. All right, I'm determined now to find something in here.

1:52Yeah, so this is the tree. And so what you do is you just look through and you're looking for that shape of ammonite. There is no guarantee, of course. This is called fossil hunting, not fossil finding.

2:05Caroline Steel:We're hunting for traces of species which once roamed our planet. thanks to listener Steve, who has two big questions for us. It all started with my daughter, who's just been taking a big set of exams, and one of her exams required her to study the famous poem Ozymandias. And in it, there's this passage, My name is Ozymandias, King of kings. Look at my works, ye mighty in despair. Nothing beside remains. Round the decay of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare, the lone and level sands stretch far away. And it reminded me of this unsettled feeling I've had for years and years, knowing that everything on Earth's surface disappears over geological time, and in quite a short period of geological time too.

2:55And that was a really, an easy feeling for me. And that's what prompted my questions.

3:00Caroline Steel:So what is your question for crowd science? If an intelligent animal had built a civilisation on Earth that lasted, say, for 50 ,000 years, which is way more than humans have ever managed, and they'd done that at some arbitrary point in the past, 372 million years ago, would we even know? Would there be any traces left today besides fossils? And the related question is, if we look forward 20 million years, 780 million years in the future, will there be anything left of us, of our civilization? That is, it's giving me a slightly unsettled feeling. it sort of both makes me feel like gosh what's the point in anything because yeah we're going to be completely untraceable in the future and then also gives me sort of a sense of urgency at the same time which is a stressful combination it's sort of like we're a matchstick burning in the face of the sun we're not nothing but we are so close to nothing compared to the whole of reality that it's really impossible to get your head around.

4:10Will any bit of our buildings be left? Will any of our artefacts last?

4:16Caroline Steel:Thanks for getting in touch, Steve. I think I know the place to start. He's not a paleontologist, but an astrophysicist. Steve's two questions, one which looks back and one which looks forward, are in fact the same question. How will the Earth's surface change over timescales that long, such that you'd be able to find evidence of something that happened in the distant past. This is Adam Frank from the University of Rochester in the US. He normally spends his days trying to figure out how to find life on other planets. But sometimes that leads him right back to Earth. I was interested in the idea that climate change may be a common thing that happens to any technological civilization.

5:05That basically, if you're harvesting a lot of energy from your planet, you should expect to trigger some version of climate change. And so I went to meet with Gavin Schmidt, who's the head of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies. And I went into his office and I said, I'm thinking about climate change on alien planets, because of course we know that there's been no other civilization on Earth. And he stopped at me and said, how do you know that? And my jaw just dropped down to the floor, because I thought I had the weirdest question ever. And now he had out-weirded me. And the thing was, it wasn't that Gavin thought there was a previous technological civilization on Earth.

5:43He was just doing the thing that is the most beautiful part of science. He was just asking a question and asking, how would you know the answer?

5:53Caroline Steel:Adam and Gavin landed at a very similar question to our listener Steve's. If there had been previous advanced life on planet Earth, how would we know? In this episode of CrowdScience, we're on the hunt for clues. Producer Sam is searching for actual fossils. They're cool-looking rocks, but I don't think those are any fossils. While we explore what evidence an ancient civilisation might have left behind, and what traces we might leave for the archaeologists of the far future. But Adam and Gavin are already one step ahead of us. Their curiosity led to something called the Silurian Hypothesis.

6:38Caroline Steel:Named after an ancient lizard-like species from the BBC science fiction show Doctor Who, the Silurian Hypothesis proposes that if there was a technologically advanced civilisation hundreds of millions of years ago, we wouldn't be able to find traces of it. Everybody always thinks like, oh, fossils. Well, of course stuff will be fossilized. But the problem with fossils is that most things are not fossilized. It's only a tiny fraction of Earth's life that has ever become fossilized, especially if your civilization only lasts a brief time geologically. So imagine that you have a 10 ,000 year long civilization, which is a blink of the eye for geology.

7:22that's too short to really create a lot of fossils. So in general, the whole argument comes down to it's unlikely that anything from a technological civilization could survive that kind of duration of time.

7:36Caroline Steel:OK, so we definitely need to have a look at fossils. How likely is it that we would find fossils from a previous technological species if one had existed? And in the future, will we humans leave enough for archaeologists to find? Going forwards, what will we leave? We probably will have changed the rock strata. So if you go to the Grand Canyon, you'll see layer after layer of rock going down. And that's a record going back hundreds of millions of years. And the material, the actual chemical composition of those layers is actually telling you what physical processes were happening at the time. So clearly, we already see this, that the rising of the temperatures because of human-made climate change, changes in the ocean levels, all of these things are going to change what gets deposited in the rock.

8:27And that you would be able to see probably hundreds of millions of years from now. You'd see that there was a difference in the oxygen isotopes, the carbon isotopes, due to the fact that the Earth's climate system had changed due to human activity.

8:42Caroline Steel:It's interesting because in some ways it's such a sort of important and fundamental question, but then also at the same time, how on earth do we work it out? Because, you know, we're only alive for 80 years if we're lucky and we're trying to predict how long the traces of our civilization will last and we just can't do those experiments. We can't do the experiment in the sense of running, we can't watch what's going to happen to our civilization. But the beautiful thing about science, there's ways of answering the question. You can look at what we call proxies. We can look at other things and how they erode over time.

9:19Look at the geological history.

9:21Caroline Steel:I'm sure you're very busy, but I don't suppose you have time to do all that work and let us know. Yeah, hopefully, that's probably not work I'm going to do, but because my main job is to look for life in the universe on other planets. But hopefully someone else picks up on it. Okay, adding strata or layers of rock to the list of things we need to investigate alongside fossils. Luckily, I'm joined by producer Sam, who we heard digging for fossils at the start of the show. Sam, Adam said it's really hard to become a fossil, which surprises me. Yeah, unfortunately, your chances of becoming a fossil are extremely low, actually.

9:59Caroline Steel:It's estimated that it's as low as less than one-tenth of one percent of all species that have ever lived become fossils. So there'll be loads of species that exist that we don't even know about and never will know about. Yeah, your chances of becoming a fossil are pretty low. And then, of course, on top of that, you have even lower chances of being found by someone. So that all sort of backs up what Adam said, right? Even if a previous technological society did exist, maybe we would never find it. Yeah, but I mean, there are still fossils, so it's not completely impossible. And there are a couple of spots around the world where there's actually lots and lots of fossils.

10:39Caroline Steel:I got to go to one of them in the UK recently, Lime Regis on the Jurassic Coast. And I went to the beach there with geology curator Paul Davis from the local museum, who gave me the lowdown on fossils and how they're made. So fossils go through a process of a change from a living creature to, in essence, stone. And that can be a chemical change of the shell, or in some cases, they don't even change the chemistry of the shell. We still have the original shell of the animal, or it can be a bone, and the bone can slowly change. It's called a process of per-mineralization, where the chemistry of the bones or the shells are slowly changed through millions of years of water and chemicals and minerals flowing through the sediments and rocks that they're embedded in.

11:33Caroline Steel:So let's say I would like to be a fossil for the future. Are there any things I can do to optimize my chances? Well, you're doing not too bad for a start. You've got hard parts, you've got bones, you've got teeth. Your best chance is to be buried at sea. Make sure that you get laid down somewhere in a nice sedimentary basin where it's laying down very fine-grained sediments and it's deep enough water so the bottom waters of where you're being laid down aren't very rich in oxygen. but the chances of humans becoming fossils will be patchy, as is most life throughout geological time. We as paleontologists are trying to recreate past lives with tiny little snapshots on windows of life.

12:23Caroline Steel:OK, so remind me to get buried in the deep ocean, which hopefully I have a while to organise. Sam, if it's easiest to become a fossil at the bottom of the sea, not to question your methods but why are you looking on a beach good point i did ask paul why this spot is so fossil rich lime regis and the jurassic coast in particular are incredibly good for finding fossils because most of the rocks here were laid down at the bottom of an ocean and the seas that were there in the jurassic were teeming with marine life from small little things like ammonites up to fish to the more famous marine reptiles called ichthyosaurs and plesiosaurs and of course the more life the more chance those will get preserved as fossils and the reason we find such a lot here it's a happy accident of geography and the geology we're here on a eroding coastline which means that fossils are constantly being washed out of these rocks onto the beach for people to find.

13:27And it was just also a coincidence that the sorts of rocks that preserved here were absolutely perfect for preserving fossils.

13:36Caroline Steel:So Sam, talk me through what you're actually doing. How were you looking for these fossils? I'm sort of picturing that there are so many that you just sort of spot them, walk over to them and pick them up. Well, not quite. It wasn't that easy. We did have to really look. But Paul did give me a couple of really helpful tips. You are looking for small, regular and symmetrical. They tend to be various shades of greys and browns. And I always say what you want to do is look with your eyes and your fingers. You do not need to hammer for everything that you see in front of you. OK, I have my fingers crossed for a fossil.

14:16Caroline Steel:At this point, did you think you stood much of a chance? Yeah, I actually did. because when I was coming into town on the bus, I noticed that on every shop door and even on the lamppost there, they had images of ammonites, these iconic spiral shells. And I just felt like with all of this imagery, there must be loads and loads of them on the beach. Okay, well, we'll check back in with you later to see if you had any luck. It seems that we can't rely on fossilised remains to tell us everything about ancient species. So maybe there could have been a former technological civilization in Earth's distant past.

14:53Caroline Steel:That's what we're looking in. Pop quiz. What's in your kid's lunchbox? At Whole Foods Market, they've already done the studying. Over 300 food ingredients are banned from their shelves. No hydronated fats in the peanut butter and no high fructose corn syrup in the cookies. And for sandwiches, there are no synthetic nitrates or nitrites in any of their deli meat. so you can pack lunch boxes with peace of mind. Get back to school ready at Whole Foods Market. Apple Vacations, where your story starts. The Summer Savings Event is here at Apple Vacations. It's the perfect time to bring everyone together for the getaway you've been dreaming about.

15:32Book between July 24th and August 27th and enjoy up to 55 % instant savings. From relaxing beach days to unforgettable moments with the people who matter most, your next vacation starts here. Travel through July 31st, 2027. and start your vacation today at applevacations.com or through your travel advisor.

15:48Caroline Steel:Apple Vacations, where your story starts. To next.

15:59Caroline Steel:You're listening to CrowdScience from the BBC World Service, the show that searches for traces of answers to your science questions. I'm Caroline Steele, and in this episode, we're answering two questions from listener Steve. Far in the future, will there be anything left of us humans? How long will our remains remain? And could there have been another technological species on Earth before humans? In all honesty, as a paleontologist and a geologist, I just don't think that's possible. I think it's a lovely idea, but I think we will leave a trace. Here are two scientists who wrote a book called Discarded, how technofossils will be our ultimate legacy.

16:42Caroline Steel:as a sort of answer to the Silurian hypothesis. I am Professor Sarah Gabbett from the University of Leicester and I am a paleontologist. I'm Jan Zelishevich. I'm a geologist and paleontologist and emeritus professor at the University of Leicester. They don't necessarily think it would be fossilised bodies that would give away ancient advanced species, but instead fossilised traces of their technology. Geologists and paleontologists look through the strata of the entire Earth's history from four and a half billion years ago, minutely. And we can say with great assurity, actually, that no traces of some technological civilization have been found previously.

17:29That's either with the record of stuff, you know, so materials or objects, But also we can look at the chemical signals through time and we can tell from those as well that there's never been a time like there is today.

17:47Caroline Steel:But it just it feels like humans have been alive for such a small fraction of the Earth's history, right? Like could there not have been another sort of blip ages ago that sort of been lost to huge geological time? There might have been intelligent dinosaurs or super philosophical ammonites, but not manipulative ones, not ones that made lots of things and changed the earth in the way that we did. Because had they done so, they would have left a big mark in the geological record, and we'd have found it. Of things that have left a mark in the geological record and were just a blip, we have the example of the big meteorite that killed off the dinosaurs.

18:32That was a very short blip, but it had a very big effect, and we found that, in this case, we are the meteorite.

18:38Caroline Steel:We might not be a giant ball of rock colliding with Earth and wiping out species, but we are interfering with them in other surprising ways. All of the animals and plants that we've either made extinct or transported around the Earth to reshape Earth's biology, We've altered the path of biological evolution. Therefore, we've altered the pattern of the fossil record. And that's going to show up first. And using that as a guide, our far future explorers are going to wonder what happened. Why did that happen? And they're going to hone in on the layer where all this began. And that's the layer of us.

19:21Caroline Steel:We humans have had a huge impact on other animals. If we're not transporting them from one corner of the earth to another, we're picking winners and losers. These days, only 4 % of mammals are wild mammals. The other 96 % are either us or the animals that we farm to eat. So we've completely changed the diversity of life. Look at chickens. We kill 75 billion chickens every single year. So that goes to show that we're making lots and lots of this strange animal. And chickens are two thirds of the biomass of bird life on Earth. Two thirds of it is chickens. Wow. So future paleontologists are going to be like, why are there all these birds and why do they all look the same?

20:19Caroline Steel:And why are they dying on mass? Yeah, exactly. Another thing future paleontologists might notice is how we're creating deadly waste that we have to bury deep underground. Yeah, nuclear waste, it's a good example actually of kind of one of the only things that we've really thought about deeply, about how long it's going to last, is nuclear waste. And, you know, we're still kicking that ball down the park, really. And then there are the other methods humans use to generate energy. Things like giant coal mines, massive dams and also less direct traces. One signal that we have already left behind from the burning of huge amounts of coal and oil and gas is fly ash.

21:03That's gone up into the atmosphere as smoke and as pollution. What are called spherical carbonaceous particles. They're very tiny bits of unburnt carbon. They're really, really robust. They're indigestible and they will simply stay there as a layer within strata. Far future paleontologists will be able to find those little bits of fossil carbon-rich fly ash in much the same way that we now routinely find fossil spores and pollen in strata. You take a bit of the rock, you dissolve it up, look at the remains under a microscope and hey presto, there will be these quite unique bits of fly ash. There's nothing quite like it in the geological record.

21:46Caroline Steel:So the chemical traces in rocks will give us a way to future paleontologists. But what about more concrete clues? So let's say, for instance, if you have a city like Venice or New Orleans or Shanghai, if you're sinking, eventually it's going to begin to be covered by layers of sand and mud. And so those crumbling buildings, they're going to be in pretty poor shape. So it's going to be a rubble layer. But beneath that, let's say the underground car parks and sewage systems and all of that, they're going to be much better preserved simply because they'll have a layer of soil and sediment and mud and sand on top of them and they will become strata.

Read the full transcript

22:32Caroline Steel:I quite like the idea of a paleontologist in the future stumbling across an underground car park. It seems so sort of unromantic, but maybe quite symbolic of humans. Is there any chance that some future paleontologist will see concrete and just think that's a new rock type? Or has it obviously been meddled with? If they see just a lump of concrete, they'll say that's a kind of rock. It's a bit weird. For instance, one of the ways we make concrete now is by adding fly ash. That kind of concrete with fly ash in it under the microscope looks absolutely bizarre with these spherical fly ash particles everywhere.

23:11and they'll see that microscopically. They will tell that concrete apart as something really different. And of course, if they see shapes, fossilised shapes, concrete bricks, the edges of concrete buildings, paving slabs, then they'll see that is something quite different from a natural stratum.

23:30Caroline Steel:So rather than our fossilised human remains, future palaeontologists might be more likely to stumble across our materials. Speaking of, let's check back in with producer Sam. I don't think these are ancient fossils. No, no. So when we're taking people to look for fossils, what we have to say is avoid the rectangular red rocks, which tend to be bricks. So these are bricks that are washed out of the Old Town Dump, which was placed on the top of the cliffs back in the early 1800s, was active right and through until about the 1970s. So the town and its surrounding areas would have had all their town rubbish dumped here on the top of the cliff.

24:15And unfortunately, things that are on the top of the cliff quite often mean that they end up on the bottom of the cliff. So if you look here on the beach, you can see some very large slabs of concrete with twisted reinforced metal going through them. And about 20 metres away, there's another big patch.

24:35Caroline Steel:Yeah, that's quite a lot of concrete there. Yeah, that's quite a lot of concrete. Okay, so Sam, no luck finding a fossil yet, but sounds like there was lots of lovely concrete. Yeah, concrete, old rusty boilers, lots of glass. So lots of things getting in the way of my fossil hunting, but I was very determined, so I kept looking. Okay, sounds frustrating. We're going to come back to you at the end of the show.

25:01Caroline Steel:I think it's fair to say that we would find traces of previous technological species through clues that they've manipulated the environment, like making new materials, burning fossil fuels or interfering with other species. And we humans are likely to be detectable far in the future because of the impact we've left on planet Earth. But just how far? Here's paleontologist Sarah again. Plastic is going to last an awful long time. And how would plastics fossilise? Like, would you just sort of chip away at a rock and then a ballpoint pen falls out? Exactly that, I think. The thing about plastic is it's incredibly durable.

25:46So there's not much that can break it down that's environmentally relevant. And in that way, plastic can actually probably last not just thousands of years, but potentially millions of years just as plastic.

26:00Caroline Steel:So how do you go about testing how long our things will last? It's really difficult. So we can do experiments in the lab and I do quite a lot of this. So I take plastic and I basically assault it with, you know, either high temperatures or high pressures or sometimes, you know, really strong UV light. And I can make it break down doing that. but I have to put extra temperature, extra UV light. So none of the conditions are like what they are in the environment. So I'm really artificially accelerating the breakdown of that plastic. So those experiments are kind of useful, but they're not really telling us how long these things are going to last.

26:44And that's why we look to the fossil record for analogues. So, for example, fossil leaves. we have fossil leaves stretching back hundreds of millions of years. Paper is made of cellulose, which is the same stuff as leaves. And so we use that as an analogue to say, OK, paper in the right environment could probably last hundreds of millions of years.

27:09Caroline Steel:If you had to put a number on how many millions or billions of years in the future these traces will be around for, what would your best guess be? for how long do you think paleontologists would be able to look back and see that we existed? My guess would be until the end of the planet, honestly. Really? Yeah, because, for example, our planet's, you know, four and a half billion years old. We have rocks that are four billion years old that have graphite in. So, you know, graphite in the form of a pencil could last four billion years. OK, so our limit isn't sort of our stuff decomposing or, I don't know, getting pushed down into the centre of the earth.

27:57Caroline Steel:It's the fact that the sun's going to blow up and sort of melt the earth. Do you think there's a chance that in the future our plastic stuff with dinosaurs on it might actually outlast fossils from dinosaurs? um potentially yeah i mean dinosaur fossils are you know very old hundreds of millions of years old but these are biological materials so the bone of dinosaurs if it's been re-mineralized it can probably last hundreds and hundreds of millions of years i'm not sure about billions of years because we don't really have a test case for that but the plastic dinosaurs that kids play with, you know, if it ends out buried in sediments at the bottom of the ocean, could well last longer than an actual dinosaur bone.

28:50Another thought on that is one of the pictures in the book I use is a picture made by my little nephew, Teddy, and he's drawn a dinosaur in crayon and pencil. And as I explained earlier, that probably can last hundreds of millions of years too. So perhaps Teddy's drawing of a dinosaur. And it's very cute because out of its mouth comes roar. Maybe that will last longer than dinosaurs. Who knows?

29:17Caroline Steel:And future paleontologists will be like, what were these creatures? They lived alongside and where are the traces of them? That's what I thought. His picture has also got, it's got a big dinosaur with all sorts of spikes coming out of its back and so on. And then it's got a picture of him and his mum and dad and his sister and a house. So it is going to be quite confusing. It's going to be so confusing. I wish I could be a fly on the wall at future paleontologists trying to work out what on earth was going on. I think that they will tell that we were technologically advanced because we have combined elements and materials in just such imaginative ways and we've made lots and lots of new materials.

30:04I mean of minerals on the planet that occur naturally there's about something like 5 ,200 and we have made artificially, synthetically 300 ,000 new minerals.

30:22Caroline Steel:There's no doubt that we humans are leaving a huge mark on our planet which will be traceable long into the future. And you might have noticed that contradicts astrophysicist Adam's idea that if a technological society existed on Earth before us humans, we wouldn't be able to find traces of it. I asked Adam what he makes of Jan and Sarah's work. So let me say that their recent work is, I think, very interesting and it may show that the work I did with Gavin was wrong. And that's what's great about science, right? Is it teaches you how to change your mind. They picked up the question that Gavin and I asked and have a different answer.

31:02And so they are raising issues. They are using evidence. They are using the scientific logic and the data they have, which we didn't perhaps look at in our first paper, to say like, no, no, no, look, we would expect there to be fossils. And then what happens is somebody else will pick up on their work, either affirming it and showing new evidence for it or pushing back on it. And once you get to like 20, 30, 40 papers, then you have a consensus. You're like, OK, we've really, really looked at this. And now we know. For example, consider plate tectonics, the idea of continental drift, right? When that idea came out, people were like, that's crazy.

31:41You can't know that. And now we are 100 % certain that there is continental drift.

31:47Caroline Steel:Do you think sort of imagining this future without humans is useful? I feel like it could maybe change how we think about things like climate change, almost having accountability, thinking of a future world in which future civilizations will look back on what we've done and the choices that we've made. Absolutely. I think it's actually vital for us to make it through this period of technological immaturity to be able to think about the long term history of the Earth and an Earth without us. because the problem is climate change. These are planetary scale changes that will have consequences for centuries, for millennia, for tens of millennia.

32:33And we are not very good at thinking along lines of anything longer than a few decades.

32:40Caroline Steel:It's nearly time to wrap up the show. But first, let's get an update from producer Sam on the beach in Lyme Regis. All right, here's the first one I found. And I don't know that it's a fossil, but there's some like scratchy marks on the side. Oh, no, no, no, no. They're not scratchy marks. Those are actually the imprints of the ribs that would have been on the ammonite. So ammonites weren't just perfectly smooth shells. They had ridges along them. So these little ribs that you see that go around ragily like the spokes on a bicycle wheel, these are the ribs of an ammonite. So you have found a bit of an ammonite.

33:16Caroline Steel:Okay, great. this just seems like an interesting That's a white knobbly bobbly rock Okay this last one I'm feeling most hopeful about I think it's an outline of an ammonite Yeah you've already told me what it is and you're actually spot on. You can see that, that's an ammonite imprint, you can see the lovely spiral nature of it, it's really distinctive. Once you've spotted the pattern of an ammonite and been shown them even like on my t-shirt then once you start to see them in the rocks and in the small pieces, they're really distinctive. And you're right. Excellent. Thank you so much. Congrats, Sam.

33:54Caroline Steel:Can you show me what you found? Absolutely. Okay, so here is the ammonite imprint that I found. Oh, cute. Oh, I'm so jealous. So I have one more little fossil that I want to show you. Oh, yeah? So part of it's rock and then there's some browner bits here with like little sparkly bits in them. Yeah, sort of glittery looking. So this is actually fossilized poo. Who's poo? Probably some sort of marine species, like maybe a type of shark or an ichthyosaur or something. But the sparkly bits in there, those are most likely from fish scales eaten by whatever had lunch that day. That's really beautiful.

34:43Caroline Steel:So yeah, we had some luck. Okay, so lots of success, but no traces of a previous technological civilisation per chance? Didn't find any previous technological civilisations, nope. I did find many traces of our civilisation though, which we definitely need to report back to listener Steve. Because Steve, you wanted to know if there might have been another technological species on Earth before us humans. I think we can say with relative certainty that there wasn't. There might have been very intelligent iguanas or super smart octopuses, but as soon as species start manipulating their environment, they leave traces.

35:26Caroline Steel:Like us humans, we've covered the earth in plastic, concrete and other mysterious fossils which will last until the end of our planet. Which gives me some comfort, because for some reason I feel invested in us humans being detectable. even though I don't think will be looked on kindly by future paleontologists. Now over to Steve for the credits. That's it for this edition of CrowdScience. Today's question was from me, Steve, in London in the UK. If you have a question that's been haunting you for eons that you'd like the CrowdScience team to dig into, email crowdscience at bbc.co.uk. This episode was produced by Sam Baker and presented by Caroline Steele.

36:10Thanks for listening. Bye for now.

36:41120 children killed at a school. Experts say the evidence indicates it was American forces that hit the school, but the U.S. government has not admitted responsibility. I'm Asma Khaled, and I host the Global Story podcast on the BBC. The BBC has now visited the site of the school and spoken to Iranians about what they saw.

37:00Caroline Steel:For more, listen to the Global Story on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcasts.

From the publisher

What will remain of us hundreds of millions of years from now? And how can we be so certain that we are the first technologically advanced species on Earth?

These unsettling questions have been haunting listener Steve. If fossils can be lost to deep time through erosion and subduction into the Earth’s mantle, how would anyone — or anything — ever know that we had been here? And if an earlier species had built a civilization that rose and fell, would we even be able to find traces of it?

To investigate, CrowdScience presenter Caroline Steel speaks to the scientists trying to answer these questions, while producer Sam Baker goes fossil hunting on the Jurassic Coast in the UK.

Caroline speaks with astrophysicist Adam Frank at the University of Rochester in the US, who along with NASA scientist Gavin Schmidt developed the Silurian hypothesis – the idea that if an advanced species had existed deep in Earth’s past, they might have vanished without leaving a trace.

But palaeontologists Jan Zalasiewicz and Sarah Gabbott from the University of Leicester in the UK argue that humans are already leaving an indelible mark in the form the chemical and material fingerprints we’re pressing into Earth’s crust. They contend that the ‘technofossils’ we are producing will last a very long time indeed.

Along the way, Caroline and producer Sam discover just how rare fossils really are, how even the tiniest particles of pollution will give us away to far-future explorers, and why car parks might be our ultimate legacy. What they find is at once unsettling and oddly comforting: humanity could be fleeting, but our impact probably won’t be.

Could we really have missed evidence of an ancient civilization? And what strange clues will we leave behind for whoever, or whatever, comes next? We explore Earth’s geological memory to find out.

Presenter: Caroline Steel Producer: Sam Baker Editor: Ben Motley

(Photo: Old phone embedded in concrete layer with defocused landscape background Credit: Petra Richli Via Getty Images)

More from CrowdScience

All 66 episodes
How long will traces of our civilisation last?CrowdScience · 34 min
Listen in VO