Sen. Ed Markey wants media companies to fight for the First Amendment

11 Dec 2025 · 58 min · 24 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Senator Ed Markey argues the Trump administration is using selective, allegedly unconstitutional enforcement to pressure media and speech, comparing it to Orwell’s 1984. He focuses on FCC Chairman Brendan Carr’s threats to broadcasters, the uneven enforcement of a Supreme Court–upheld TikTok divestiture law, and the need for strong First Amendment and AI safeguards.

Guest backgrounds

Ed Markey is a Massachusetts U.S. Senator. Nealai Patel is editor-in-chief of The Verge and host of Decoder.

Key claims

  1. First Amendment rights are “preeminent,” and media firms “bend a knee” instead of litigating.
  2. Carr uses FCC authority aggressively against broadcasters while ignoring harms from social media.
  3. Congress passed the TikTok divestiture law for national security/transparency, but Trump allegedly won’t enforce it and is pursuing a deal without public details.
  4. Republicans and tech/AI interests seek preemption of state AI/privacy protections for profit, risking discrimination without guardrails.

Notable examples

  • Threats to ABC/Jimmy Kimmel and pressure on CBS/60 Minutes; “punish him or the FCC will punish you.”
  • Wilma Hale (Trump challenge) and other firms allegedly won when they fought rather than capitulated.
  • TikTok: 170 million users; proposed Oracle/algorithm-splitting scenario; Markey says he received no answers from the administration.
  • Gaza-related speech and the case of Romesa Ozturk (Tufts graduate student detained after Gaza op-ed).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Senator Markey on Free Speech and Democracy

2:15 to 4:28

Senator Markey discusses the threats to democracy and the First Amendment.

“Senator Markey did not mince words with his answer.”

Multitasking in Politics

4:28 to 6:02

Senator Markey reflects on balancing personal interests and political duties.

“Senator Ed Markey, you're a senator from the state of Massachusetts.”

The Threat of Authoritarianism

6:02 to 8:57

Discussion on the implications of Trump's actions on free speech and media.

“So I guess we all have to multitask in a world of social media distraction.”

Media's Response to Government Pressure

8:57 to 12:09

Exploration of how media companies are responding to governmental pressures.

“Obviously, there are specific areas where Trump and the Trump administration's use of power is succeeding and failing.”

The Complicated Case of TikTok

12:09 to 14:00

Senator Markey shares insights on TikTok's future amidst political maneuvers.

“They pay Donald Trump whatever tribute that he is looking for.”

National Security Concerns Around TikTok

14:00 to 22:46

Discussion around the national security concerns related to TikTok and the opaque nature of potential deals.

“And at the same time, how do we protect our national security?”

First Amendment and Media Companies

27:20 to 28:00

Exploration of the relationship between government actions and media companies in the context of First Amendment rights.

“Before the break, we were talking about all the chaos around the TikTok ban, which in turn led me to ask about an even bigger issue in the United States right now.”

The Role of the FCC in Media Regulation

28:00 to 29:19

Explore how the FCC under Brendan Carr is reshaping media content regulation.

“The Supreme Court was asked to rule on it.”

First Amendment and Humor in Media

29:20 to 31:09

Discuss the implications of First Amendment rights on humor and political criticism in media.

“The next day, the president of the United States and his FCC commissioner would say, we've got to just shut down NBC.”

Historical Context of FCC Regulations

31:10 to 33:19

Understand the historical evolution of FCC regulations and its implications for the media landscape.

“That is the protection of our democracy.”
Show all 24 chapters

Mental Health Crisis and Media Responsibility

33:20 to 34:27

Examine the connection between social media and the mental health crisis among youth.

“One in four teenage girls contemplated suicide in 2023 in our country.”

Big Tech and Media’s Regulatory Challenges

34:28 to 36:16

Analyze the challenges media companies face against the power of big tech in regulations.

“And by the way, you only need three things to be in politics.”

Power Dynamics in Media and Politics

36:17 to 37:39

Investigate how power and money influence media and political interactions.

“And Trump is putting pressure on them because they absolutely cannot fight.”

AI Regulation and Civil Rights

37:40 to 41:54

Delve into the urgent need for AI regulation and its implications for civil rights.

“They're saying we'll pay the fine or we'll accept the chilling effect that you're now creating in terms of our ability to program entertainment or news for the American people.”

AI and Civil Rights Protections

42:09 to 43:16

Discussion on the importance of civil rights protections in AI technology.

“about the need for us to have a movement of all of those civil rights protections which have been out in the physical world be moved over to AI.”

Congressional Oversight and Censorship

43:16 to 44:39

Senator Markey discusses bipartisan efforts regarding media censorship and oversight.

“One of the functions here is congressional oversight, which I would say has been at a low point throughout the Trump administration so far.”

Political Dynamics in Congress

48:38 to 53:00

Senator Markey reflects on the evolving political dynamics surrounding AI legislation.

“I'm talking with Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey.”

Challenges for Democratic Leadership

53:00 to 56:00

Discussion on the current state of Democratic leadership and their ability to fight against powerful interests.

“They're now under a year away from having those subpoenas be sent their way.”

Perception of Political Leadership

56:00 to 56:15

Discussing audience perceptions of political leaders and parties.

“Those are some adorable photos of the two of them together.”

Age and Ideas in Politics

56:15 to 56:46

Senator Markey talks about age versus the vigor of ideas in political leadership.

“You have a primary opponent, Seth Moulton, who's 47.”

Legislative Challenges in a Changing Landscape

56:46 to 57:00

Markey shares his experiences with introducing legislation in a difficult environment.

“It's not easy to get co-sponsors, by the way.”

The Fight Against Powerful Forces

57:00 to 57:55

A discussion on the need for both young and old to confront society's powerful influences.

“And I think that's what the public is getting very, very concerned about.”

Democratic Party's Future and Responsibilities

57:55 to 59:58

Markey discusses the Democratic Party's need to take a stand on various critical issues.

“you'll be responsible for not finding the cure for cancer.”

Preparing for Future Elections

59:58 to 1:02:26

Analyzing the upcoming political challenges and strategies for the Democratic Party.

“And we have to align ourselves with the No Kings movement.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Zootopia 2 has come home to Disney+. Let's go! Get ready for a new case. We're the greatest partners of all time! New friends. Gary Death Snake. And your last name? Death Snake. Dream Team. And new habitats. Zootopia has a secret reptile population. You can watch the record-breaking phenomenon at home. Zootopia 2, now available on Disney Plus Rated PG. And right now you can get Disney Plus and Hulu for just$4.99 a month for three months with a special limited time offer ends March 24th. After three months, plan auto-renews and$12.99 a month terms apply.

0:30Nilay Patel:Chronic migraine is 15 or more headache days a month, each lasting four hours or more. Botox, onabotulinum toxin A, prevents headaches in adults with chronic migraine before they start. It's not for those with 14 or fewer headache days a month. It prevents, on average, 8 to 9 headache days a month versus 6 to 7 for placebo. Prescription Botox is injected by your doctor. Effects of Botox may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. Alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness can be signs of a life-threatening condition.

1:00Nilay Patel:Patients with these conditions before injection are at highest risk. Side effects may include allergic reactions, neck and injection site pain, fatigue, and headache. Allergic reactions can include rash, welts, asthma symptoms, and dizziness. Don't receive Botox if there's a skin infection. Tell your doctor your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, including ALS Lou Gehrig's disease, myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton syndrome, and medications, including botulinum toxins, as these may increase the risk of serious side effects. Why wait? Ask your doctor, visit BotoxChronicMigraine.com, or call 1-800-44-BOTOX to learn more.

1:30Ever feel like your brain just won't click? Onnit AlphaBrain is a daily supplement engineered to support memory, focus, and mental speed. Made with science-backed ingredients, Onnit AlphaBrain helps you lock in, tune out distractions, and stay sharp. See what your brain can really do. Visit Onnit.com and shop AlphaBrain to unlock your next level. That's O-N-N-I-T dot com.

1:58Nilay Patel:Hello and welcome to Decoder. I'm Nealai Patel, editor-in-chief of The Verge, and Decoder is my show about big ideas and other problems. Today I'm talking with Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts. Well, you'll hear me start with the only question I think anyone should be asking of any politician in federal government. What the hell is going on here? Senator Markey did not mince words with his answer. You'll hear him compare the Trump administration to the fascist dystopia in Orwell's 1984 and say that democracy itself is on the line. And one of the places that Senator Markey and I agree that democracy seems most on the line is when it comes to the First Amendment and the increasing pressure the Trump administration has put on free speech in America.

2:37Nilay Patel:If you've been listening to this show or The Vergecast this year, you know that I've been particularly focused on FCC Chairman Brendan Carr and the pressure that he is putting on free speech. Carr talks like a mobster when it comes to threatening broadcasters with fines and overbearing merger conditions if he doesn't like the speech they promote. And many media companies, like CBS parent company Paramount, go along with it to get what they want. Senator Markey has a lot to say about all this, especially ahead of Chairman Carr's upcoming appearance in front of Congress on December 17th. But there's more going on in the world of free speech.

3:11Nilay Patel:I also have a lot of questions about the supposed TikTok ban, which no one seems to know anything about, even though the House and Senate actually passed a law that would force ByteDance, TikTok's parent company, to either sell some assets or stop operating in the United States entirely. That law was held to be constitutional by the Supreme Court, even though it has profound free speech implications for all of TikTok's users. But despite being the original proponent of a TikTok ban during his first term, President Trump has now promised a deal with ByteDance that would keep TikTok operating in some way.

3:42Nilay Patel:So instead of enforcing the law, his administration simply hasn't. And having an administration flat-out ignore laws it doesn't like for political reasons is a pretty big problem. Now, Senator Markey actually voted against banning TikTok, and I wanted to know if he's heard anything about the status of the app, or the status of a deal. And if anything he's learned since that vote has changed his mind about the potential national security issues that were the argument for a ban. Of course, Senator Markey and I also talked about the bigger picture, especially as we head into an election year. His answers about how to push back against authoritarianism were pretty forceful, although I pushed him pretty hard on whether the rest of the Democratic Party, especially its current leadership, is as interested in fighting back as he is.

4:24Nilay Patel:Senator Markey doesn't hold back on the show. He doesn't hold back with me. I think you're really going to like this episode. Okay, Senator Ed Markey, here we go.

4:44Nilay Patel:Senator Ed Markey, you're a senator from the state of Massachusetts. Welcome back to Decoder. It's great to be with you again. It's been four or five years now, but I loved it the last time, and I've actually been looking forward to it. Yeah, I'm excited to talk to you. I have to reveal something to you. The last time we spoke, the last time I interviewed you, in the background, I was furiously refreshing a window to buy Taylor Swift tickets. And I was like, I can't. I'm interviewing. I have to sound smart, but my niece and nephew want these tickets. I got the tickets, and I think the interview went well, but I've always wanted to let you know that.

5:17And I will say that it was a brief interlude in the middle of a political race that I was in against Congressman Joe Kennedy to win the Democratic primary for the Senate seat in 2020. So I'll be honest about that, too. I actually it was like it was almost like a pallet cleaner for me because otherwise I'm back into the nitty gritty of a campaign. So I loved it the last time, too. You were thinking about Taylor Swift at the same time. And I have to admit, while I would have liked to have thought of only the questions that you were asking me about technology and its role in modern American life, I was also thinking about my campaign at the same time.

6:02So I guess we all have to multitask in a world of social media distraction. and I've learned how to at least minimally cope with it.

6:14Nilay Patel:Sadly, we have only distractions to talk about once again here on Decoder. There's a lot to talk to you about. I want to talk about Brennan Carr and the FCC. I've covered the FCC very deeply over the years, as you know. I want to talk about AI regulation, which seems to be coming up in a lot of different ways lately. I want to talk about the TikTok ban. But first I want to ask a question that I've been asking basically every politician who comes on Decoder that I think really sums up what I've been hearing from our audience, which is simply, Senator, what the hell is going on? Donald Trump is channeling big brother from George Orwell's 1984.

6:48He wants to control. He wants thoughtful police to be in charge of who we are as a country. And he has weaponized the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Trade Commission to enforce his goal to have thought control over the American people. He's turned the Federal Communications Commission into the Federal Censorship Commission and installed Brendan Carr as the chairman. And it's all towards the goal of ensuring that no one is ever able to criticize effectively Donald Trump, big brother. And there is a backlash to that overwhelmingly as people learn about what he is doing in weaponizing his administration.

7:46But it's not going to stop. It's who he is. He admires Putin. He admires authoritarian leaders in countries around the rest of the world. He just doesn't understand why he can't do the same thing that they do in their countries. And all we can really do is fight them every single day. Democracy is on the line. The First Amendment is the beating heartbeat of democracy, of freedom in our nation. And as he seeks to inject himself into the business of the media in all of its forms, it's really just meant to give him absolute authority to become King Donald. And that's why we saw the No Kings movement be created and put five, six, seven million people out on the streets of America a few weeks before the election.

8:41It's why we saw the election result in the first week in November across this country repudiating this political philosophy. But we're not done. We're in a battle and we just have to do it every single day because he's not going to stop. Therefore, we cannot stop.

8:57Nilay Patel:I want to ask you about that. I want to ask about specifics. Obviously, there are specific areas where Trump and the Trump administration's use of power is succeeding and failing. There are just the general nature of Americans not liking to be told what to do seems to be pushing back. There's a structure of the American government itself and whether that is holding fast in the face of an authoritarian leader. The thing that strikes me, though, is it turns out there's a lot of latent power in the executive in the United States. and Trump and the people of his administration are just trying to use that power as aggressively as possible in a way that maybe is new but relies on that power existing.

9:36Nilay Patel:I think Brendan Carr is actually a great example of this, right? His thesis of the FCC is look at all this authority we have that we don't use. Look at my interpretation of news distortion to go and punish broadcasters who have licenses. Look at the authority that I might give up in terms of making telecom providers do cybersecurity measures. There's a lot of authority there. And at least what Trump and his administration have figured out is we should try to use it in a way that other administrations have not tried to use it. Do you think the presence of that authority itself is a problem or is it just the judgment of Trump in using that authority?

10:12It's, yeah, the judgment of Trump using it. But it's also, from my perspective, It's the judgment of CBS or other networks or other social media companies to just roll over and not contest what the government is trying to do. They have First Amendment rights. First Amendment rights are preeminent. And unfortunately, what we're seeing in 2025, increasingly, are companies, media companies, who are willing to bend a knee, willing to pay the fine, willing to accept the actually illegal use of power by the Federal Communications Commission or by the White House. and rather than contest it, instead just try to put it behind them.

11:09And I think it's pretty clear that in each of these instances, they had a very high probability of winning in court in terms of the exercise of their First Amendment rights. In the same way that Wilma Hale, the law firm in Massachusetts who contested Donald Trump, won in court. Law firms from New York City, like Paul Weiss and others, they instead bent a knee. But there's no question that if they had taken the same kind of strong defense of their First Amendment rights, their due process rights, as did Wilma Hale, the law firm in Boston, they would have won. I would say the same thing for all of these media companies.

11:53They would win ultimately because the First Amendment is what is at the heart of the protection of our democracy. And because these companies are so wealthy or so afraid, they don't exercise the right. And instead, they just pay the piper. They pay Donald Trump whatever tribute that he is looking for. But ultimately, it's a disservice to our country, especially given the role which those companies play in providing the ability for the voices of the American people to be heard.

12:27Nilay Patel:So let me complicate this a little bit. I want to come back to the relative strength of the media industry, its appetite for fighting Trump, its ability to pay the bill for fighting Trump compared to the tech industry, which certainly has the money to pay to fight. There's some structural stuff I want to dive into with media versus tech there. But let me complicate this by asking about TikTok. You talk about the voices of the American people and the first one being preeminent. I think a lot of young people, particularly in our audience, saw TikTok as being the channel for their voice, as being where they actually got their news.

12:57Nilay Patel:We just ran a story on The Verge about young people overwhelmingly preferring news influencers on TikTok to traditional media like The New York Times. I have a lot of thoughts about that, but the data is clear. The sentiment is clear. They preferred TikTok. The Congress of the United States passed a law banning TikTok or at least forcing a sale to TikTok. That went to the Supreme Court. It was upheld as an appropriate use of power to perhaps silence the speech of Americans on certain platforms. Trump stated it. We don't know. He basically told the Department of Justice not to enforce the law. What is going on with TikTok right now?

13:29Nilay Patel:Do you know? Because it feels like a lot of this is wrapped up in, hey, we have this power and we're choosing not to use it. And we have this power that isn't traditionally used this way and we're using it as aggressively as possible. Trump is seeking to cut a deal with Oracle and others in order to resolve the issue. What I've done is, you know, I'm introducing legislation just to say very clearly, where is the transparency? What are the protections that have been built in in order to protect against a compromise of the information of American citizens? And at the same time, how do we protect our national security?

14:12The details are going to be very important in this deal that Trump wants to cut with Oracle. There's actually a deadline in another couple of weeks, the middle of December, in terms of the expiration of the negotiating period. He could extend it again. Of course, he's in complete violation of the law to begin with. He doesn't seem to be bound by that. And the Republicans are not in any way holding him accountable. under that law. Our goal has to be to keep TikTok alive, to make sure that it continues to exist, but to also deal with these national security and transparency issues. And until and unless Trump reveals what are the details of the deal, then it's no different than the deal that he says he's going to be able to cut with Ukraine and Russia, and he's very close to a big deal.

15:10And yet it never happens. It's a it's a it's a ever disappearing almost oasis in the long distance. So that's that's where we are right now. We don't have the details. We don't know. It is possible that we could resolve this in a way that deals with the issues that revolve around it. And that's what I want. But at the same time, the American people have to know the details in order to ensure that our interests are being protected as well.

15:40Nilay Patel:We are aware of that deadline in mid-December. Last month, Lauren Feiner, our reporter, went and asked about a dozen lawmakers what's going on. Basically, no one answered. I think we got a statement from Senator Cantwell saying this is a problem, but no answers. Have you heard any answers? Have you heard from the Trump administration about what the deal could look like or if there's even any progress? No, I have written to the Trump administration. I've asked them for the answers. I have not received any answers from them. So it's still impossible to evaluate the overall quality of the deal, which Trump says that he's cut, with the Chinese.

16:15And unless and until all of the details are made public, no one else is going to be able to do that kind of evaluation either.

16:24Nilay Patel:One of the proposals that we've heard floated is that Oracle will take over the data, but the algorithm will get split up and everyone will have to download a new app. TikTok, as we know it, will be shut down. There'll be some new Oracle version of TikTok, Larry Ellison talk, and then that will be what we have. Would that be acceptable to you? Well, I haven't seen it. I don't know what the details are. I don't know what the safeguards are. I don't know what kind of transparency it will have. I have no idea what the national security implications of it are. So only at the point at which you can actually see the contract, which has been agreed to, would it be possible to do an evaluation.

17:03So otherwise, we're just playing fantasy baseball. You know, we're talking about, you know, any kind of, you know, potential, you know, construct that may or may not ever happen. And the only thing we can really deal with is the actual deal that's put on the table for the consideration by the American people and the United States Congress.

17:23Nilay Patel:The reason the United States Congress felt comfortable passing a bill that would force the sale of TikTok, effectively banning the app in some way, and the United States Supreme Court felt comfortable saying that law was constitutional, was the national security concerns that you're talking about, right? That the Chinese government controlled an algorithm that would shape what people would see, that they would collect a massive amount of data on the American people. That was not transparent. It could not be controlled. and having that in American hands or at least allied hands would be safer. That hasn't changed, right?

17:49Nilay Patel:I mean, this is why the law was passed. This is why the Supreme Court upheld the law. The Chinese government and ByteDance still have an awful lot of control over the algorithms. Why has that not been a concern for your Republican colleagues? Is it just wiped away or is it just TikTok is too popular to deal with? Well, Congress is hiding. They're afraid of Donald Trump. They pass a law when Joe Biden is president. But once Donald Trump takes over, they're afraid of him. So, again, I voted no on that ban, by the way. So to the extent to which I have been trying to police this issue effectively, it is to get the information which the Congress should have.

18:32And unfortunately, that's not what the Republican chairman and the House and Senate are doing. and it comes to me to be writing these letters, to be demanding the answers. But we will not know if the national security of our country is threatened unless and until we actually see the details. And Trump is not sharing that with anyone except for his business buddies, who he's trying to make happy and even more super wealthy than they already are. But beyond that, the rest of us are still operating in the dark.

19:05Nilay Patel:I want to zoom out and connect this to the selective enforcement of power at the FCC and other agencies because it does all feel like a piece to me. But I just want to ask one more question here. Our young audience is convinced that the reason TikTok got banned was because lawmakers saw how young people were talking about the war in Gaza and how pro-Palestinian they were and anti-Israel's actions in Gaza, which rise to war crimes in some cases, it appears. and that the United States government decided to shut that avenue of discussion down. And that they see that very clearly. Looking back on it, that seems to be what drove a lot of the conversation inside of Congress, even though that was never really revealed to us, that the Chinese government was somehow fomenting anti-Israel sentiment with their algorithm, so we got to ban this app.

19:50Nilay Patel:Have you seen anything else besides that that would lead to a ban? Because that is very much what our audience believes. Again, I absolutely strongly believe in the robust debate over Gaza. In fact, there was a young woman, Romesa Ozturk, who was a graduate student at Tufts University who was whisked off the streets of Tufts University back in the spring and then moved to a prison 100 miles outside of Baton Rouge. and I had to go down and visit her in order to put a spotlight on her. She was a Fulbright scholar working on her PhD thesis, which was going to be the positive uses of social media for children.

20:33Clearly a real danger to our country. She had co-authored with five other people an op-ed in the Tufts undergraduate newspaper on Gaza. And that was the crime that she was being charged with. And she was actually never charged with the crime legally. And because of the spotlight I helped to put upon her, they had to release her. But that just reemphasizes what you're saying about this whole subject of Gaza and how there has been an effort to try to suppress the kind of discussion which we need about what was occurring in Gaza. on behalf of Netanyahu and ministers Smatrich and Ben-Gavir throughout the entirety of this war.

21:27So we have to defend free speech in order to ensure that we have, not just on TikTok, but everywhere, the ability to have our voices be heard.

21:42Nilay Patel:Do you think that the public perception of Gaza, the public opinion has shifted so much that that's why there isn't more pressure to make TikTok divest itself and be sold? That's the dynamic that I'm really asking about. Has public opinion moved so far that fighting that fight on that grounds is no longer politically viable? So we're just not going to enforce the law. I'll be honest, Neelai. It's very hard for me to get inside the internal workings of the cerebral mechanism of MAGA right-wing Republican senators. OK, that's uncharted territory for me. So understanding the totality of all of their thinking and motivations is just impossible for me to dissect beyond the fact that we need free speech.

22:24And the only answer to any attacks on free speech is more free speech so that the American people can have the information they need in order to make decisions on important public policy issues. So I don't know the answer to that. I wouldn't rule it out as a motivation then and now. But to be honest with you, I just don't know.

22:46Nilay Patel:We have to take a quick break. We'll be back in just a minute.

Read the full transcript

23:15Nilay Patel:Thank you. into another full-time job. Posting a job isn't always the hard part. It's finding, connecting with, and screening the right candidates. Hiring Pro streamlines the entire process from drafting your job to shortlisting candidates and conducting AI-powered interviews for initial screenings. Conversational interface lets you describe what you need in plain language. No recruiter jargon needed. Nearly 60 % of hirers find a candidate to interview within a week. With Hiring Pro, you spend less time searching and more time connecting with the right talent. Hire right the first time. Post your first job and get$100 off towards your job post at linkedin.com slash partner.

24:00Nilay Patel:That's linkedin.com slash partner. Terms and conditions apply. Support for this show comes from Framer. If updates to your site are feeling harder than they should, Framer is the shortcut you've been looking for. Framer is a website builder that can transform your dot-com from a formality into a tool for growth. They've helped thousands of businesses from early-stage startups to Fortune 500s build better websites faster. Framer is an enterprise-grade, no-code website builder used by teams at companies like Perplexity and Miro to move faster. With real-time collaboration, a robust CMS, and everything you need for great SEO and advanced analytics that include integrated A-B testing, your designers and marketers are empowered to build and maximize your dot-com from day one.

24:51Nilay Patel:Learn how you can get more out of your dot-com from a Framer specialist or get started building for free today at framer.com slash decoder for 30 % off a Framer Pro annual plan. That's framer.com slash decoder for 30 % off. Framer.com slash decoder. Rules and restrictions may apply. Support for today's show comes from SelectQuote. Life insurance isn't exactly the most fun thing to think about, but getting it right can be simple when you find a policy through SelectQuote. For over 40 years, SelectQuote has been one of the most trusted brokers in insurance, helping more than 2 million Americans secure over$700 billion in coverage.

25:34Nilay Patel:You don't have to sort through dozens of confusing options on your own. Instead, one of their licensed agents will find the right policy at the right price for you. Comparing plans from trusted, top-rated insurance companies to find a policy that fits your health, your lifestyle, and your budget. Life insurance is never cheaper than it is today. You can get the right life insurance for you for less and save more than 50 % at selectquote.com slash decoder. Save more than 50 % on term life insurance at selectquote.com slash decoder to get started. That's selectquote.com slash decoder. Support for the show comes from ShipStation.

26:20Nilay Patel:If you're a fast-growing business, one of the fastest ways to lose momentum is getting bogged down in shipping. If you're constantly jumping between disconnected apps just to get orders at the door, you might want to check out ShipStation. ShipStation is an all-in-one platform that brings together order management, rate shopping, and powerful analytics in a single dashboard. It helps you find competitive shipping rates and can even honor discounts you already have with other carriers. ShipStation says that by sharing tracking details, you can cut customer service inquiries by 12%. For 60 days with full access to all features.

27:00Nilay Patel:No credit card needed. Just go to ShipStation.com and use code DECODER for 60 days for free. 60 days gives you plenty of time to see exactly how much time and money you're saving on every shipment. That's ShipStation.com, code DECODER. ShipStation.com, code DECODER.

27:28Nilay Patel:Welcome back. I'm talking with Senator Ed Markey. Before the break, we were talking about all the chaos around the TikTok ban, which in turn led me to ask about an even bigger issue in the United States right now. The tendency of the Trump administration, especially FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, to attack media companies in a way that is not at all compatible with the First Amendment. The reason I started there and the reason I said I think I'm going to complicate this to begin with is because the theme for me really is selective and perhaps unconstitutional enforcement of the law. And so here you have a very clear law.

27:59Nilay Patel:The outcome was obvious. The goal was obvious. The Supreme Court was asked to rule on it. And it is being unenforced maybe for political reasons, maybe because we can't get a deal on – maybe because of public opinion on Gaza. On the other hand, you have Brendan Carr, who is taking a bunch of laws that have not been enforced for decades, who is reasserting the authority of the FCC over content in a way that even previous Republican chairs of the FCC walked away from and saying, I have all this authority. I'm going to use it to make sure the speech is correct. How are you interacting with the FCC?

28:31Nilay Patel:How is Congress overseeing the FCC? Is there a sense that his actions are appropriate or need oversight? Right. Obviously, whether it be TikTok, that's 170 million American users, 7 million small businesses. They have a right to be able to think that the government would be able to find a solution so that our national security concerns could be dealt with. And then over on the broadcast area, you have Brendan Carr, who, you know, honestly threatened ABC, threatened Jimmy Kimmel with almost a Godfather Part One offer they can't refuse. Either you punish him or the FCC will punish you, ABC. So they responded to that.

29:19Now, I'm thinking back to when I was a boy that if Johnny Carson ever told a joke about a president, it would have been unimaginable. The next day, the president of the United States and his FCC commissioner would say, we've got to just shut down NBC. We've got to shut down Johnny Carson and The Tonight Show. They can't be allowed to do it. So this is a hypersensitive president who believes that he is all powerful and he has an FCC commissioner who is now suffering from invasion of the body snatchers. He's no longer the Brendan Carr of the previous era, which was kind of a good conservative Republican lawyer.

30:01He is now willing to do the bidding of Donald Trump in any way that he wants if Donald Trump is offended. So, unfortunately, that is a condition that we are going to have to live with. We see CBS bent the knee in terms of its 60 Minutes programming. NBC was threatened by the president saying that jokes by Seth Meyers should be illegal. And you have kind of in the background, you have a FCC chairman who's nodding his head the whole way. You know, very, very concerned about your local TV stations whose licenses might be put in jeopardy if you allow that kind of programming to be on TV anymore. So there is a very serious, powerful threat to the economic well-being of these companies that they're weighing compared to their First Amendment rights of free speech.

30:59Which telling jokes on television about a president is not illegal and can never be illegal. Any more than telling jokes about senators can be made to be illegal. That's all part of what they constructed into the First Amendment. That is the protection of our democracy. When I first started covering the FCC 15 years ago, I spent a lot of time with Michael Powell, who was a conservative FCC chairman.

31:23Nilay Patel:And what he had been trying to do is unwind the excesses of what you might call the Janet Jackson era of the FCC, right? Justin Timberlake pulls down Janet Jackson's shirt at the Super Bowl. The whole government goes crazy. We're going to censor CBS and Viacom. Quite a lot happened in that time. And that case ran for a long time. And what Chairman Powell, I think his former Chairman Powell, when I was talking about it, his point was this is ridiculous, right? The future of media is not on broadcast airwaves or TV stations. The future of media is on the internet. These broadcast companies are just part of the mix with internet content that Americans are getting.

32:00Nilay Patel:And we should deregulate them to let them compete more fairly and even let them get bigger so they can go after the scale of Google and Facebook, which he saw as rising. I would say he was broadly correct. Right? The idea that the delivery mechanism of the media should change how the government regulates it is as alien to a young American today as any other idea from the past. That because this is coming over the broadcast airwaves, the government gets to say what it is versus this is coming over my internet pipes and the government has no say. Brendan seems to be totally reversing that and saying if this is the broadcast airwaves, I have a lot of control over it.

32:36Nilay Patel:And if it's on the internet, I shouldn't have any. That seems untenable, right? Because Americans are largely on the internet. Do you see him trying to regulate the internet as well? Because that's actually the prize. Well, he doesn't want to regulate the internet to protect against the harms which he says are emanating from broadcast TV. So to the extent to which the Republican Party, Brendan Carr, Donald Trump, shed their crocodile tears. about the impact that broadcast television could have upon American society. When it comes to Meta, Google, all those people who were sitting right behind Donald Trump on Inauguration Day, we've got a crisis in our country.

33:26One in four teenage girls contemplated suicide in 2023 in our country. One in eight teenage girls actually attempted suicide in our country in 2023. One in five LGBTQ youth attempted suicide in 2023. And the Surgeon General of the United States has pointed an accusatory finger towards social media, not as the exclusive, but one of the principal culprits in this crisis that we have in our country. If the Republican Party, if the White House, if Brendan Carr really cared about this issue, we'd be hearing them speak out on it. It's a crisis. We have a mental health crisis amongst teenagers and children in our country right now that goes unaddressed by this administration, by the Federal Communications Commission, because of that information, which is being targeted towards young people in our nation.

34:21But at the same time, hypocritically, he's very concerned about jokes about the president. in the president's eggshell psyche that he cannot bear to have anyone ever criticize him at any time. Grow up, Mr. President. Grow up, Brendan Carr. And by the way, you only need three things to be in politics. Backbone, backbone, and backbone. Take on big tech. Take on where the real problem is. Take on where we have a culture that is undermining the mental health of children, of undermining democracy, undermining the very well-being of our whole nation. That they're afraid to do because of the cash and carry nature of this administration, where the more money you contribute, the more money you pour into the coffers of Donald Trump, his campaigns, his presidential library, is the more likely you escape any scrutiny, notwithstanding the magnitude of the danger which you're posing to our society.

35:21And meanwhile, relatively benign comments made on traditional television is attacked as though it's like a dagger to the heart of our democracy when it's nothing more than more jokes and more critical analysis of public policy, which is being broadcast by the traditional sources.

35:41Nilay Patel:This brings me to the structural question that I was thinking about earlier. The big tech companies, they have the resources. They're getting ahead of the regulation or the potential for regulation by building the ballroom today, right? By buying the crypto on the side today. They're the ones who are most able to fight. I think in your estimation, they're also the ones where they most definitely need to be regulated, right? You see a mental health crisis. There needs to be some regulation of these platforms to address that crisis. That has some connection to the First Amendment in some meaningful way.

36:13Nilay Patel:And they will fight that fight. And they will spend the resources to fight that fight. And thus far, they have escaped almost all regulation in this country. And the other idea of the media companies who are as weak as they have ever been, who do not have the resources, who are lacking trust from the American consumer in real ways, who do not have the distribution, who depend on the platform's distribution. And Trump is putting pressure on them because they absolutely cannot fight. I don't know how you fix that structural problem, right? If you want to go after one of the big media companies, the idea that they have unlimited money to fight the fight all the way up and survive along the way, that's a little shakier than if you want to go fight a Google or a Meta or an Apple or whoever else who do have unlimited resources to just wait you out, to just spin you in litigation until you go away.

36:58Nilay Patel:How do you resolve that structural discrepancy? Well, I don't think there's too much of a difference to be honest with you. It's clear they allow themselves to be extorted. The big tech companies, you know, they walk in with presents for Trump into the Oval Office. You know, they pay whatever they are asked to pay and tribute. But they simultaneously then take down, you know, the safeguards that were built in. In an earlier period before Trump, in order to ensure that there is some, you know, protections that are built into these online social media sites. They just give. They're folded. And what's happening on the traditional broadcast side looks very similar.

37:44They are responding in the same way. They're saying we'll pay the fine or we'll accept the chilling effect that you're now creating in terms of our ability to program entertainment or news for the American people. And that chilling effect is impossible to fully quantify, but we know it's real. We know both the broadcasters and the social media companies are now very afraid of what the consequences could be from an out-of-control Justice Department and an out-of-control Federal Communications Commission that can easily be weaponized by the White House. So I think in terms of the impact on the American people and their ability to receive information unfettered, it's now the same in both sectors.

38:32And it's a systematic attack that has been made, unfortunately, successfully by the Trump administration. There are some notable exceptions, I will say. But in general, he's having the intended effect be put into place across the entire media spectrum.

38:52Nilay Patel:One of the weirder aspects of this FCC, Brendan Carr in particular, you mentioned earlier that he used to be a fairly traditional conservative lawyer. And now he's fire-breathing MAGA. He's cutting against some of his own positions from the past. Some of the positions from the first Trump administration that his predecessor, Ajit Pai, used to take, like disclaiming all authority over state-level net neutrality rules. They got rid of net neutrality by saying we actually have no authority over broadband. And now I've seen floated Chairman Carr say, well, we should have authority to preempt state AI regulations because that's part of broadband.

39:28Nilay Patel:which makes no sense in the context of, well, you disclaimed all your authority. How can you possibly now have the authority to narrowly preempt AI regulations? Has this been presented to you in any way that makes coherent sense? Or is this just more, let's see how much power we can acquire and use? Yeah, I think that's all you have to understand. What you're saying is that it's all about power. It's the power of whoever can pay the most to the White House. The AI industry wants state preemption. The AI industry wants preemption of state privacy laws, California, New York, other places. And this administration is, without question, not interested in the public policy consequences of those kinds of repeals, but they instead are interested in what kind of monetary benefit can flow to the Republican Party at the highest levels because of the capacity of these companies to pay.

40:31So there's a reason for us to really be concerned right now. We have an industry, this social media industry, that right now is unwilling to stand up to the president in any meaningful way. And simultaneously, the most extreme elements amongst that social media industry is coming to Washington and asking for an override of all state legislation across the board on everything that could, in fact, deal with protection against AI and the environment. AI and its impact on workers, AI and its impact on civil rights, AI and its impact on children. All of it is now subject to a real threat from the Trump administration, from the most extreme elements in the Trump administration, and from the most extreme elements in the AI industry.

41:32We're at a real juncture right now where the power is now concentrated so fully in the hands of those who have great wealth that there is a real danger that we could have an AI revolution be unleashed without the safeguards that we know have to be put in place. Yesterday, I did a press conference introducing my AI Civil Rights Act with the civil rights leaders of the United States, Black Caucus members from the House of Representatives, Cory Booker and others, talking about the need for us to have a movement of all of those civil rights protections which have been out in the physical world be moved over to AI.

42:19Otherwise, we're going to see discrimination in housing, in education, in applications for financing, for mortgages, all across the board. And we have to act right now. In earlier areas of the introduction of new technologies, the federal government, state and local governments, they moved in. When the automobile was deployed, public policymakers said, you've got to have brakes. You've got to have airbags. You've got to have seatbelts. You've got to have rear-view mirrors. You've got to have some guardrails. You've got to have some safety. We like the idea of an automobile. We just don't like the idea of the law of unintended consequences being unleashed to the max.

43:05That's what's happening with AI right now. We know what the safeguards have to look like. We know what protections have to be built in. It would not inhibit our ability to compete against the Chinese.

43:16Nilay Patel:One of the functions here is congressional oversight, which I would say has been at a low point throughout the Trump administration so far. But Brian Kari is coming to testify in front of Congress on December 17th. What's your goal there? Do you think you can meaningfully get him to change his behavior or are you just trying to figure out what he's doing? Well, I was heartened that Senator Cruz was very critical of the Kimmel controversy. So I'm hoping that it's bipartisan. I'm hoping that people are willing to stand up and to ensure that the Federal Communications Commission knows that there is bipartisan concern about this censorship that Carr is seeking to impose upon the media.

43:59At the same time, I brought out two resolutions onto the Senate floor, one on the Kimmel situation, a resolution condemning it, and a Republican senator got up and objected. Then when the Seth Meyers situation unfolded, I brought out a resolution onto the Senate floor, debated it. Then the Republican got up to just object to it even being considered. So while I appreciate the fact that Senator Cruz stepped up, I'm still awaiting any evidence to convict other Republicans of being guilty of actually standing up for the First Amendment, standing up to fight for the rights of comedians and news gatherers to be able to present the information as they see a fit and not after having received a permission slip from the White House or the FCC.

44:51Nilay Patel:We have to take another short break. We'll be right back.

45:02Nilay Patel:Support for the show comes from Anthropic, the team behind Claude. If you've spent any time lately trying to get an AI to do something useful, not just sound impressive, but generally help you think through a hard problem or task, you may have heard the name Claude. Claude is made by Anthropic, and they've got a few things going on right now that are worth paying attention to. First, Cloud Code. It's a command line tool for developers that understands your entire code base, run tests, iterates on solutions, and then handles complex tasks end to end. Developers have been using it for everything, not just coding.

45:38Nilay Patel:And that's exactly what led them to build something called Cowork, which takes the same agentic power and brings it to everyone else. No terminal required. You point it at your files, set a task, and Cloud works through it autonomously. in the background while you focus on other things. Less back and forth, more deep, sustained work getting done. Anthropic is committed to keeping that conversation ad-free. That means no sponsored suggestions, no third-party influence on what it tells you. Claude's only job is to help you keep thinking. Try Claude for free at claude.ai slash decoder and see why problem solvers choose Claude as their thinking partner.

46:24Nilay Patel:Support for the show comes from Shopify. Starting a new business, it could be a lonely endeavor, especially in the beginning. And when you're starting out, it's more important than ever to make sure you have the right tools at hand. Shopify is the commerce platform that millions of businesses around the world rely on to sell their products online. If you're asking yourself, what if people haven't heard about my brand? Shopify helps you find your customers with easy to run email and social media campaigns. And if you get stuck, Shopify is always around to share advice with their award-winning 24-7 customer support.

46:58Nilay Patel:Best yet, Shopify is your commerce expert with world-class expertise and everything from managing inventory to international shipping to processing returns and beyond. It's time to turn those what-ifs into with Shopify today. You can sign up for your$1 per month trial and start selling today at shopify.com slash decoder. Go to shopify.com slash decoder. That's shopify.com slash decoder.

47:34Nilay Patel:Spring starts at the Home Depot and we are bringing the heat to your backyard this season. Fire up the flavor with our wide variety of grills for under$300. Like the next grill four burner gas grill that's perfect for hosting your spring cookout. Then set the scene and turn your outdoor space into the go-to spot the patio sets for every budget. Bring it this season with grills that deliver flavor and patios that set the vibe from the Home Depot. Start your spring with low prices guaranteed at the Home Depot. Exclusions apply to HomeDepot.com slash price match for details. It's not just something you made.

48:06it's the privilege that you get to work with your hands. It's building something that serves a purpose. Proof that you have the grit to keep going. At Timberland, we understand you take your craft seriously. And we do too. Which is why our products are built to the highest quality. We put in the work so you can perfect yours. With purpose in every detail and crafted with intention. Timberland. Built on craft. Visit Timberland.com to shop.

48:38Nilay Patel:Welcome back. I'm talking with Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey. I wanted to ask him how he perceives the apparent split in the Trump coalition between the hardcore tech bros on one side and the America First MAGA caucus on the other.

48:52Nilay Patel:I know you said it's hard for you to read the minds of MAGA members of Congress. But at least from where I sit, there's a pretty notable split between what you might call the tech part of Trump's coalition and the MAGA part, the populist part of Trump's coalition. And the idea that the tech companies and the AI companies should run unfettered over public policy is running directly into the more populist impulses of the Trump coalition, the MAGA part of the coalition. Are you experiencing that split in the Congress? Certainly we've seen Marjorie Taylor Greene is going to retire from Congress. There's something happening there where it seems like the tech bros are not as ascendant or is not as unchecked as they might have been early on in the Trump administration.

49:35Well, you're right. Hell was freezing over back in July when there had been an insertion of an AI moratorium into the one big, beautiful bill coming over from the House that the Republicans really didn't know about it at the rank and file level. But when it came over to the Senate, it was Marjorie Taylor Greene and Ed Markey. Yeah, hell's freezing over. Pigs are flying. We're agreeing that that language should not be allowed to pass in the Senate as well. And it was taken out. So there is some recombinant political DNA that is now being created. And it's, I think, kind of heartening at a certain level that some Republicans at some level are willing now to stand up to the tech bros and to say, no, we need some safeguards.

50:29We need some protections. To the extent to which Marsha Blackburn is doing it, Marjorie Taylor Greene is doing it. We actually then had a vote on the Senate floor at like two in the morning on that provision, and it passed 99 to 1 on the Senate floor to delete that moratorium on a ban on AI at the state level in terms of new legislation. Right now, they're trying to insert that into the defense bill. Yep. And my own belief is that, go ahead, test us. I think we can put together a coalition here to really raise such a stink about the Sank or Sank defense bill, that if you try to include a ban on any, you know, AI legislation at the state level, that you just might run into a bipartisan coalition that no one has seen on a defense bill in the history of our country.

51:18Nilay Patel:The architect of that bill we've heard is David Sachs, who is the White House crypto and AI czar. There's a lot of conversation about his investments, about his potential conflicts of interest, just about what kind of character he is inside the Trump administration. The distinction I've been drawing is there's sort of the formal policymaking process, right? There's the front door. There's the FCC and there's Congress and there's bills and committees. And then there's the Trump world, the backdoor, right, where things happen and don't happen. Things are announced on true social and maybe they're real and maybe they're not.

51:51Nilay Patel:And that's the David Sachs world. Have you interacted with David Sachs? Have you seen how that side of the House is operating? And how much is it influencing what Congress is actually doing? No, I have not met David Sachs. I would have a 50 percent chance of picking him out of a lineup of two people. So I have absolutely no idea who he is and what he does in the White House. Except to the extent to which that eye-opening expose in the New York Times last week laid out what he is doing that enriches himself, enriches Trump's allies, is almost indifferent to what the impact might be upon a policy that serves the American people rather than the enriching of a small number of well-connected Americans and overseas allies.

52:43So that needs a lot more attention. We're limited in terms of our ability to actually subpoena people as Democrats. The Republicans control the House and Senate, although I would say the election in the first week of November is highly predictive that that will not be the case in one more year and they should start to get ready in the Republican Party to have a blizzard of subpoenas be sent their way. They're now under a year away from having those subpoenas be sent their way. But yeah, it's frightening what is going on. And at the bottom line, I just see self-enrichment as the core of what the agenda is.

53:21Nilay Patel:I'm really just trying to draw the connection. The reason that preemption of state AI laws keeps coming back up again is because of whatever is happening in Trump world, right? Like that group of people has this idea that there should not be state-level AI laws. And then it keeps showing up in the Congress and you might have to keep voting it down. Can you make that connection more clear for your colleagues, for the American people? because it is strange that there are shadowy back rooms full of special advisors to the president who might have conflicts of interest getting bills on the floor of the Congress in this way over and over again, even after they've been voted down.

53:56Well, I think that happens on every bill. We can't quite see what Stephen Miller does every day. Well, he's on X.

54:05Nilay Patel:You can see he's just being racist on X. What I'm saying, just in terms of what conversations preceded whatever call that is then made by Steve Miller up to the leadership of the House and Senate Republicans, we don't know everything that is going on. But Sacks fits into that profile as well as several other people who work in the White House right now. And it's all part of this kind of very, you know, very clandestine, cozy coterie of people who are very close to the president, who slosh between public policy and private self-aggrandizement, who do the bidding of the president, who understands what the agenda is for Trump's children and for the children of others who are inside of the Trump administration.

54:56in terms of their ability to become fabulously wealthy. And I think everyone understands it. There's an old saying that it's hard to understand something when you're paid not to understand it. That's where we are right now with the Republican leadership. They're paid not to understand it. They can see it on a daily basis. And the revolt has to come from the rank and file. The revolt comes from Marjorie Taylor Greene. It comes from Marsha Blackburn inside of their own party. And my own belief is that they're on very dangerous terrain right now with this AI revolution. Very, very dangerous terrain.

55:33They don't understand the public revolt which is building against a small coterie of super wealthy people in conjunction with the Trump administration making decisions for 340 million people. They're going to pay a big political price down the line.

55:48Nilay Patel:Let me ask about that revolt more generally and specifically about the Democrats. You brought up midterms. Obviously, there was the election just recently. The Verge is based in New York. We're inundated with Sir Ron Vandami every day. He's obviously a phenomenon in the party, appears to be a phenomenon with Donald Trump himself. Those are some adorable photos of the two of them together. You know, our audience perceives both parties as being out of touch, as being beholden to billionaires or outside interests in some way. You're obviously, you've been in the Senate for a long time. You're turning 80 next July.

56:15Nilay Patel:You have a primary opponent, Seth Moulton, who's 47. Does the current Democratic leadership have the fight it needs? Are they also paid to not see it? Because I hear from our audience that what they want is younger, more energetic people who are going to take the fight to Trump more directly in maybe a way that Chuck Schumer has it. Well, first of all, it's not your age. It's the age of your ideas. So I'm still the youngest guy in the room. I've introduced the legislation, AI and workers, AI and the environment, AI and social media, AI and civil rights. So I've introduced the legislation. It's not easy to get co-sponsors, by the way.

56:50People don't really want to sign up, young or old, okay? Just so you understand, it has nothing to do with age. It has to do with, as I said earlier, backbone, backbone, backbone. Are you willing to take on the most powerful, wealthy people in the history of the world? That's what it's all about. And I think that's what the public is getting very, very concerned about. It's that they see a government unable to muster the courage to take on these powerful forces that are basically reshaping our society. our society. And so that's been at the heart of my entire career, building in the safeguards from the E-rate to make sure that every kid gets the education they need paid for by the media companies, paid for by the communications companies, the safeguards for children online.

57:36That's my 1998 law, which I'm trying to update up to age 17 and under for families. It has nothing to do, though, with what the age is of people who are willing to step up and fight. A lot of young people actually, they're kind of enthralled by the AI industry. They kind of buy into this whole idea that, oh, if there's any regulation at all, you'll be responsible for not finding the cure for cancer. And so they want to be part of this generation. And so what we need is young and old willing to stand up to them. That's what it's all about.

58:12Nilay Patel:Let me take age out of it. the thing people are really seeking is vigor and values, right? You mentioned that there's probably some sort of tsunami coming for Republican leadership as the rank and file splits, as MAGA splits from the tech bros. Do you think there's one coming for Democratic leadership? Do you think the current Democratic leadership can lead this fight? Well, we're fighting on healthcare. We're fighting on these tech issues. We're fighting on environmental, educational issues. We just saw a big return on that on Election Day in November of 2025. That exceeded the expectations of all of the experts out there observing what was going on.

58:5313 and 15 point victories in Virginia and in New Jersey. And there's now polling out there at 12, 13 points that people are more likely to vote for a Democrat for the House and for the Senate next year. And so that is what I think is going to frighten the Republican Party, because that translates into a 60-seat victory for the Democrats next year, 60-seat victory. So our message is working, but Democrats just have to stand up. They have to fight to make sure that AI is controlled in a way that is compatible with our American political and moral traditions. We have to stand up to ICE. We have to make sure that we're not allowing for masked agents to be sweeping people up off the streets the way they did with Romesa Ozturk and thousands of others across our country on an ongoing basis.

59:57We have to show that as a Democratic Party that we understand that we're in a that Donald Trump is a walking, talking constitutional crisis every day that he's in the Oval Office. And we have to align ourselves with the No Kings movement. We have to align ourselves with Indivisible. We have to align ourselves with 5051 and all the other organizations which are out there who are standing up and saying, no, we're going to fight for democracy. We're 250 years in. And those I'll tell you what people want to hear. Those minute men and minute women, they got knocked down. But they got back up and they fought and they won against King George.

1:00:36The abolitionist movement, they got knocked down. They got back up. They fought. They won. The suffragette movement, they got knocked down. They were not knocked out. They got up. They fought. They won. The civil rights movement, Martin Luther King Jr., that whole movement, they were knocked down. They were not knocked out. They got up. They fought. They won. That's where we are right now. We were knocked down. But we're not knocked out. And that's what the No Kings movement is all about. That's what the Democratic Party has to be all about. It has to be about that movement.

1:01:04Nilay Patel:Let me just push you on this a little bit. Do you think Chuck Schumer and Akeem Jeffries are as aligned with that messaging and with the No Kings movement and the aggressive fight against this administration as you are right now, the way you're talking to me? Well, it's what won the election. That's not what I asked. I asked if the leaders of Congress, the Democratic leaders of Congress are aligned with what you're saying. Well, I'll tell you what. I think a year from today, we're going to see that we've won the House overwhelmingly and we very well may win the United States Senate. And let's at that point then be making our judgments about what this movement is and what the message has been that is now winning out there.

1:01:43The Republicans have a big problem in the next four weeks because 22 million Americans are about to lose their health care or see a 50 to 75 percent increase in their health care premiums. So they're about to have nitro meat glycerin policy. And the Democrats are aligned 100 percent on that issue to ensure that the Republicans are made accountable for the pain they're about to inflict upon the American people. So that's our job. We have to we have to stay organized. We have to stay focused. And if we do it, I think that the American people next year will resoundingly throw out the Republicans and then in the House and Senate give us the subpoena power we need to ultimately have to almost buy a paper mill for all of the subpoenas we're going to be sending over, not just to the Trump administration, but to all of those people out there who have been enriching themselves at the expense of the American people.

1:02:35Nilay Patel:Yeah. Senator Markey, this has been a great conversation. You've got to come back faster than five years next time. I look forward to the oversight you intend to conduct. Love you. Thank you. I'd like to thank Senator Marky for taking time to join Decoder, and thank you for listening. I hope you enjoyed it. Now is the best possible time to drop us a line. We're about to record our end of year special with your questions and comments, so get them in while you can. You can email us at decoder at theverge.com. We really do read all the emails. Or you can hit me up directly on Threads or Blue Sky.

1:03:02Nilay Patel:We're also on YouTube. You can watch full episodes at DecoderPod. We also have a TikTok and an Instagram. They're at DecoderPod as well. A lot of fun. If you like Decoder, please share it with your friends and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Decoder is a production of Verge and part of the Vox Media Podcast Network. The show is produced by Kate Cox and Nick Statt. It's edited by Ursa Wright. Our editorial director is Kevin McShane. The Decoder music is by Breakmaster Cylinder. We'll see you next time.

From the publisher

Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey and I agree it seems like democracy is on the line right now, especially around the First Amendment and the increasing pressure the Trump administration — especially FCC chair Brendan Carr — is putting on free speech. I also had a lot of questions for Sen. Markey about the supposed TikTok ban, which no one seems to know anything about, and all the other problems we’re facing in 2025.

Links: 

Even the lawmakers behind the TikTok ban have no idea what’s going on | The Verge

Carr’s FCC is an anti-consumer, rights-trampling harassment machine | The Verge

The FCC is a weapon in Trump’s war on free speech | Decoder

Here’s the Trump EO that would ban state AI laws | The Verge

Silicon Valley is rallying behind a guy who sucks | The Verge

Silicon Valley’s man in the White House is benefiting himself and his friends | The New York Times

Subscribe to The Verge to access the ad-free version of Decoder!

Credits:

Decoder is a production of The Verge and part of the Vox Media Podcast Network.

Decoder is produced by Kate Cox and Nick Statt and edited by Ursa Wright. Our editorial director is Kevin McShane. 

The Decoder music is by Breakmaster Cylinder.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Decoder with Nilay Patel

All 152 episodes
Sen. Ed Markey wants media companies to fight for the First AmendmentDecoder with Nilay Patel · 58 min
Listen in VO