Who is Ethan Hsieh? | Teaching, Play & What TIAMAT is For

8 May 2026 · 1 h 13 min · 37 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Ethan Hsieh discusses the relationship between theory and practice in Tiamat’s “theory into practice, practice into theory” series, focusing on how “teaching” differs from “facilitation,” how theory legitimates and can be corrected by practice, and what Tiamat (and its training program SPIRE) is “for” within an ecology of practices.

Guests and backgrounds

Ethan Hsieh is described as a “cheap architect” of Tiamat and a leader in voice work and training containers. Taylor Barrett and Ethan Say are co-hosts/friends who frame questions and connect the discussion to concepts like Sophia vs. phronesis, leadership vs. teaching, and practice-as-research.

Key claims

Teaching involves explicit pedagogy with two questions: knowing/doing (skills/capacity) and being/becoming (normative impact over time). Facilitation is more in-the-moment and practice-serving, with less longitudinal responsibility. Theory must be phenomenologically adequate; practice can challenge theory (practice-as-research). Both can become “too precious,” creating vicious cycles. There is no panacea practice or modality; containers must define “what’s ours to do” vs. when to refer out.

Notable examples

A singing/voice-training story (“sing to the end of the room”; “your voice is not real”) is reinterpreted via performance theory as tuning to distal attention. He also cites noticing students’ emotional/affective responses to voice vibration and argues that these emergent effects should be studied rather than dismissed. He mentions “dissociation” and warns against shifting into therapy mode inside training contexts. SPIRE stands for service, pilgrimage, inquiry, ritual, and enlightenment (process, not attainment).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Exploring Theory and Practice

0:45 to 2:20

The hosts discuss the relationship between theory and practice in education.

“And today we are going to focus upon Ethan.”

Ethan's Perspective on Teaching

2:20 to 4:35

Ethan shares insights on the distinctions between teaching and facilitating.

“At least insofar as Tiamat is concerned as a pedagogical program that teaching orientation is actually quite like explicit.”

The Knowing-Doing and Being-Becoming Questions

4:35 to 6:35

Ethan discusses the critical questions that underpin effective teaching.

“So there is a way in which you are gaining a kind of skill, capacity, and you have to know that in order to repeat it over time.”

Facilitating vs. Teaching: Responsibilities

6:35 to 8:30

The conversation delves into the responsibilities of teachers versus facilitators.

“whereas the facilitator is expecting to have people continually return?”

Distinctions in Educational Contexts

8:30 to 11:30

Discussion on how different educational contexts require different approaches.

“I feel like there's something in here around sort of the distinguishing markers of the different types of containers or sort of events, workshops, that sort of thing.”

Dynamic Adaptation in Teaching

11:30 to 13:25

Ethan emphasizes the need for adaptability in teaching methods.

“Whereas phronesis is being, you know, contextually sensitive, focusing in on what needs to happen here now, fitting to this situation, making sure that people are sort of belonging to it as tightly as possible.”

Theory and Practice Interconnectedness

13:25 to 14:00

The hosts conclude with reflections on the interconnectedness of theory and practice.

“So what I try to point that is also that as somebody who is having to kind of juggle both poles, there is a necessity for actually being self-corrective on this all the time.”

Dynamic Teaching and Learning

14:00 to 15:10

Explore the challenges and dynamics of teaching and leadership in practice.

“or abilities or backgrounds or things that they're coming in with?”

The Role of Theory in Teaching

15:10 to 17:20

Understand the importance of theory in teaching and its relationship to practice.

“So that's like, I'm hearing John's in the desire and I'm like, can I do that?”

Legitimacy of Theory in Practice

17:20 to 20:40

Discuss how theory legitimizes teaching practices and the implications of this.

“I want you to get familiar, drop the novelty of it, feel your way around it.”
Show all 37 chapters

Mutual Correction Between Theory and Practice

20:40 to 24:30

Examine how theory and practice correct and inform each other in education.

“So that is definitely how theory works for me.”

Emotional Impact of Voice Work

24:30 to 28:00

Learn about the emotional dimensions of voice work in teaching and practice.

“It's not proportional to bonafide good descriptions of what's happening in practice.”

Emergent Understanding in Practice

28:00 to 28:50

Exploring the relationship between theory and practice in the context of intervention.

“of this particular kind of intervention?”

Balancing Theory and Practice

28:50 to 29:50

Discussing the potential pitfalls when theory and practice are not well aligned.

“Here I'm doing Aristotle deficit and excess, which is, I mean, I encounter this a lot.”

Designing Ecological Practices

29:50 to 31:09

The importance of having a diverse ecology of practices to cater to individual needs.

“So one is we can hold theory and practice too tightly.”

Navigating Theory Complexity

31:09 to 32:28

Understanding the complexities of creating a cohesive theoretical framework across practices.

“really not important for dialectic and dialogos to really address the issue of belonging.”

Socratic Approach to Learning

32:28 to 34:16

Emphasizing the importance of keeping questions open in pedagogical practice.

“that you could, but we're not in that business, eh?”

Integrating Diverse Perspectives

34:16 to 36:00

Examining the interplay between various psychological theories and practices.

“It's like, oh, no, who am I ultimately following?”

Propositional Knowledge and Participation

36:00 to 37:04

How propositional knowledge should lead to deeper participation and understanding.

Defining Our Role in Practice

37:04 to 39:28

Discussion on the ethical considerations of what practices we are qualified to offer.

“There's also the question of, there's the container, the training, or the workshop that we set up.”

Establishing Clear Boundaries

39:28 to 41:24

Clarifying the boundaries between different types of healing practices and their ethical implications.

“So I've also been in containers called school where like in school you have somebody sort of like, you know, breaking down and losing it, right?”

Philosophy vs. Other Practices

41:24 to 42:06

Exploring how philosophy differentiates itself from other forms of support and advice.

“I mean, this is a question we're often asked, and I think we have come upon it.”

Exploring the Role of Philosophy and Psychology

42:06 to 43:51

Discusses the distinctions between philosophy, psychology, and their applications in various fields.

“Like we're not in like so what is I mean, I think that we've said why and we we need to be clear about what's ours to do.”

Ethan's Vision for TIAMAT

43:51 to 45:26

Ethan discusses the purpose of TIAMAT and its role in developing self-knowledge.

“So, I mean, we might not answer this question, but thank you.”

Understanding SPIRE in Context

45:26 to 47:39

Ethan explains the SPIRE model within TIAMAT and its significance for personal development.

“like our crossroads and connections piece, very expressly, right?”

The Importance of Relational Connections

47:39 to 50:26

Delving into the relational nature of humans and the importance of connections.

“so to my mind I think that's what that strikes me as what TMX is to do I'm not here to give anybody an answer to what their life means.”

Navigating Personal Realizations

50:26 to 53:38

Explores the personal realizations around safety and relational understanding.

“Even if you are being deceived, it's a real deception.”

Finding Safety Through Connection

53:38 to 55:44

Ethan reflects on his motivations for creating a safe space for experiences.

“It feels like we're getting, we're starting to touch on something.”

The World as Open for Play

55:44 to 56:00

Concludes with a meditation on the uncontrollable nature of reality and play.

“So here it's related to an experience of a place for all experiences.”

Exploring the Essence of Play

56:00 to 56:51

Discover how embracing play can influence our experiences and perspectives.

“Perhaps you let me know how it is for you, but I'm still sort of trying to get at that part of through allowing a space for all experiences to have a place.”

The Connection Between Joy and Goodness

56:51 to 58:24

Understand the relationship between joy and leading a fulfilling life.

“Is something about, like, because you were saying, you know, helping people live a good life.”

Navigating Complexity Through Play

58:24 to 1:01:11

Learn how serious play aids in understanding complex realities.

“So I want to try and see if I can through line this.”

The Ritual Importance of Play

1:01:11 to 1:02:48

Explore the deeper significance of play in human experience.

“I think that's a good place to be right now.”

The Impact of Authentic Relating

1:02:48 to 1:04:55

Reflect on how authentic relating can transform personal experiences.

“that what I think we found is across time, across history is the fully play way, the way to play most fully is with every faculty of your being.”

The Nature of Suffering and Connection

1:04:55 to 1:10:01

Delve into the complexities of suffering and the importance of connection.

“So there's always that frustration of like, this is for everyone.”

Understanding Relationships: The Value of Being Present

1:10:01 to 1:11:11

Explore the importance of being present in relationships and allowing for deeper connections.

“And next time I see you, there'll be more to know.”

Transition to Practice: Preparation for Engagement

1:11:12 to 1:11:52

Prepare for a practical session and the importance of participation in shared learning.

“Well, I think ending on joy is a good place to end because we do want to move to practice.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:18Welcome, everyone. Sorry for the delay. This time it wasn't the technology. It was regular old. They had a marathon in Toronto and I couldn't get to the studio. So we're starting a bit late. I apologize for that. I'm here with two very good friends, Taylor Barrett and Ethan Say. This is our third in our series on theory into practice, practice into theory, and the relationship between those. I went first, and Taylor and Ethan midwifed me last time Taylor spoke, and then myself and Ethan midwifed him. And today we are going to focus upon Ethan. And we've covered a lot of ground. I won't try and review it all because it's very rich and very deep.

1:04What has been very powerful is both the deep continuity between what we're saying and also the interesting variations, which means it's a very much a living thing. And so I'm going to turn it over and maybe we can start with Ethan. given the two previous discussions, how are you coming into this? What is landing for you as the doorway into our third and final discussion on this?

1:38Yeah, good question. I think, so the overall kind of theme has been theory into practice, practice to theory, the relationship in between. And I think there's an important distinction there in the way that I sometimes have to see my role wear double hats, which is being a facilitator in the sense of affording a particular kind of experience and to make easy for folks what that experience might be. But then on the other hand, there's also a role that I wear and find myself like leaning into and adopting quite strongly, which is that of being a teacher. And I think they're not the same thing. Facilitating experience and teaching are two very very different things.

2:21At least insofar as Tiamat is concerned as a pedagogical program that teaching orientation is actually quite like explicit. Yes of course there is an experience of transformation but it changes the role that I have to stand in and that means the way that I hold theory and practice perhaps is also necessarily changed. And that's kind of like where is most amorphous. Yeah. So is there a mapping between these two? I don't know if I'm hearing that or not, where the theory is more about teaching and the practice is more about facilitation. You gave us two pairs and I'm not clear what the relationship is between those two pairs.

3:10Yeah. So this is what's like, um, still very nascent for me, which is in the interest of teaching something. And this is part of a paper that I'm writing, which, uh, oh, I just got news that it will definitely be published. Um, coming up as just like the editor say, send it to me when you're ready. Um, wow. Lucky you. That's great. Congratulations.

3:35so it is that thing of like i grew i grew up kind of running and being a part of workshops and workshops insofar as my understanding of them is hey come in you have an experience you're not expected to necessarily take anything away aside from the experience of that particular workshop um and so there is an act there is a way in which you you were i'm invited to come into an kind of open state, right, and experience something that is novel. But, you know, as I grew older, the explicit teaching became much more of a dominant kind of experience. And that's the one which I want to pass on to folks, which is anytime that we say we're teaching somebody something, we presuppose two things, which I call the knowing doing question and the being becoming question.

4:27The knowing doing question is there is something here, there is an intervention which you know what it is and you can consciously enact it. So there is a way in which you are gaining a kind of skill, capacity, and you have to know that in order to repeat it over time. Then there is the being becoming question, which is that whatever is being learned has a normative value. We have to know what it is doing to the person, how they are, how it's changing the way they participate in the world and has longitudinal ramifications across their life. So when these two are in play, then it's like, ah, okay, now as a pedagogue, I can make decisions around what it is I'm offering to folks and then how important it is, like why it's necessary, why there's a why there's an ought tied to that and that applies to both theory and practice what frameworks am i offering what practices are in place what are the constraints that we're setting up such that these two questions are answered um and ultimately what happens is that as a teacher the i think taylor you pointed at this last week which is you know when someone comes in and learns something the idea is that they can leave that they eventually transcend the teacher right that a participant transcends my workshop transcends my work and they can do something on their own accord they are not bound or dependent on me to provide a particular kind of experience for them all the time that they've internalized the capacity to a very strong degree So that's kind of the way that I think both theory and practice are held.

6:21They are bound to these two questions, knowing and doing and being and becoming. These two things. I understand that was helpful, but I still don't understand the difference then. Is the difference between teaching and facilitation that the teacher expects the student to not return, whereas the facilitator is expecting to have people continually return? I'm trying to get what's the, you said you wear these two hats. And when I ask you, which is fair, you keep saying the two hats involve these different questions and they both involve theory in practice. I'm trying to figure out like what, what is the distinguishing difference between being a teacher for you and being a facilitator?

7:02Is it your expectation of the relative autonomy of the student from what you're offering? So the teacher is expecting, I may never see you again, whereas the facilitator is expecting, I may see you again because I'm here to regularly help conduce or afford something. I don't know if that's what you mean. I'm just throwing that out as an example of what I'm looking for. I mean, I think that's a good question because it's still... I think it hinges for me on responsibility. There's a particular responsibility that a teacher has, a kind of responsibility, and a facilitator might not hold as tightly.

7:42At least I don't in those two different contexts. As a teacher, I'm tracking historically where the student has been, where they're going to go, and I have to hold that longitudinal piece, whereas with a facilitator is much more like i'm more i'm more in the moment so to speak i'm more in that instance so i don't have to necessarily hold that um that historical piece as uh uh as that important in a way so although they both have elements it sounds like you're saying the teacher emphasizes development, foregrounds it, and the facilitator is emphasizing experience and is foregrounding that. Is it something like that?

8:32Yeah. Yeah. I feel like there's something in here around sort of the distinguishing markers of the different types of containers or sort of events, workshops, that sort of thing. Because when I hear you talk about this, Ethan, to me, I'm like, oh yeah, you're talking about training. That's like a training container. And when I think of certain things like drop-in or practice workshops, the leader in that container is maybe just the facilitator because you're just focused on the practice. But if you have a training context, then it's like, well, there's a progression, there's a pedagogical progression I want you to go through.

9:12Whereas a drop-in sort of practice or workshop, it's either substantially more contained or not even really, I mean, I wonder if this fits for you, it's not really even quite into like a teacher position because I can see myself when I'm in a training container as I could say more like, yeah, what I'm doing here is teaching. And then when I'm running a different type of container, then I wouldn't even consider that I'm teaching, even though there's a lot of implicit teaching that's happening and a lot of implicit learning, but it's like the intention or the focus is a little bit different for me.

9:43is that map for you or is there a distinction yeah that yeah that maps for me that maps for me um as a teacher i find myself in a you know in a position of just like maybe it's a bit more forgiving actually which is really odd because i would imagine it to be the opposite um as a teacher i find myself more forgiving of like um participants making mistakes having room for for failure because that's necessary and I know that like ah cool like I can try that and I can continue with that whereas I think as a facilitator that sense of I might not actually see you again like there's a kind of longing in there for me of like it's like but oh I want to I want to be with you on this journey I want to continue with it in some way it sounds like to me that like in the practice well I mean I guess I'm sort of I'm leading you to this but we'll see if it fits it's In the practice container, you're serving the practice.

10:41So in that case of somebody not being there or whatever, you make corrections. You're more rigorous. I don't know. This is how we do the practice. No, this is how we do the practice. Whereas in the longer sort of arc of somebody's journey through, you know, a number of workshops or a training course, it's sort of like, I see you. I see where you're at. I see where you're headed, you know, and it becomes sort of these slight course corrections for the individual while they're using, as I've been saying lately, practice as a vehicle. Yeah. Yeah. Very nice. So this sounds like a species of the genus of Sophia and Phonesis, right?

11:20Where Sophia is concerned with trying to help people discover cross-contextual, long-term, deeper invariant principles that take longer to, I don't know what to accommodate to. Whereas phronesis is being, you know, contextually sensitive, focusing in on what needs to happen here now, fitting to this situation, making sure that people are sort of belonging to it as tightly as possible. and the idea is that almost all virtues and virtuosity this is aristotle's claim they're both names for wisdom involve a relationship between those two so a very wise person is somebody who has a grasp of these broad principles and then can disclose them in a way that makes them salient and relevant in this situation and somebody who's contextually sensitive is also somebody who has a background awareness that this context is not everything there is or everything that there can be does that does that land yeah yeah the sophia phronesis piece is is very front of mind for me and i think that's where like the theory and the practice tends to be tested for me because sometimes i i'm very very prone to this but i can get attached to a particular way of doing something and then say you or somebody else who's brilliant will come and tell me very powerful evidence of why it needs to shift and why that shift is necessary and I can feel like an attachment to a particular theory or a particular practice and go actually I've been doing this for a while and I know this is the case and it's always difficult to like have to rejig that in a way that's in dialogue with whatever is coming out, whatever is new and updating.

13:25So what I try to point that is also that as somebody who is having to kind of juggle both poles, there is a necessity for actually being self-corrective on this all the time. Like the kind of thing of like, there's no panacea practice. It doesn't always work. It needs to be reiterated and reject and living according to what is presenting itself. And that even goes down to like with individuals in the room, how do we make adaptations and modifications to accommodate folks who have different constitutions or abilities or backgrounds or things that they're coming in with? And I find that incredibly dynamic.

14:06It's very vitalizing for me, but it's also incredibly terrifying. Yeah, I mean, that seems to tighten the correspondence then because phronesis is adaptive fit and Sophia is adaptive transfer. And so now I heard Taylor propose to you that facilitation is for the really is for the sake of the practice in that it's prioritizing making sure the practice is being done correctly. but it seems like we have drifted to the idea that when we're moving to teaching we're more interested in theory if what we mean by theory is that which affords us transferring across many different contexts that's what theory means it means to be able to see deeply right to move between context pilgrimage theoria to go from one context to another um i'm just i'm just trying to bring it back to theory and practice yeah right like what yeah Is that what you meant?

15:15So that's like, I'm hearing John's in the desire and I'm like, can I do that? Or is this going to be a slight, not to change it, but a slight offer? Do what you need to do. Yeah, yeah. So what I get the senses or what we're sort of circling around or starting to hear around is still sort of this distinction of like the different types of hats each of us might wear when we're, you know, quote unquote, front of the room. And when I hear you talk about teaching and all the things that you just said, I'm like, oh, I just call that leadership. But I don't have like a particular identity as a teacher.

15:54I'm aware that the various features of what a teacher does exist and those are things I do. But for whatever reason, I don't say like I'm a teacher. even though other people may very well say that of me. So I sort of, so I frame it more in that sort of leadership area because I, you know, because my idea of leadership is, is that I'm taking responsibility for the whole of what's going on rather than, you know, and I may have a series of facilitators who are just taking responsibility for that particular group and that particular practice and trying to make sure that it's easy and helping cohere and redirect people within the practice.

16:30But I'm the one on the outside taking a look and tracking, you know, various development, oh, we should split people into these groups so that they have a better chance of sort of the transfer across all the different exercises, practices, the pedagogical arc that we offer within the container. So I think that's sort of how I'm looking at that. And then because that tends to be the role in which I would bring theory in, I wouldn't bring it in as a facilitator of a practice. If we come in and do a DID, other than like setting it up about what the practice is for, which is like a five-minute spiel, I wouldn't go deep into it.

17:09We wouldn't start reading the dialogues and things like that. Because to me, that's like part of a greater sort of intention rather than here's this particular practice. Here's the mechanics of the practice. I want you to get familiar, drop the novelty of it, feel your way around it. But then to go past that, then it's like, well, actually, now I have to start like teaching you and maybe correcting you and offering you feedback about, you know, where you might be getting stuck, you know, to get into, you know, more of an embodied practice expression within the practice, that sort of thing. so i'm just checking to see if that sort of lines up with what we're sort of talking about it and maybe you have a distinction between the difference between a leader and a teacher as well or maybe it's just happens to be our preferred uh choice of words i mean i think that the teacher i think the teacher leads a process and and that has to that is um in that sense if it's folded in um But where the theory and the practice kind of meet is like, I think the teacher has to do an extra kind of job of actually understanding what the relationship is between these two things as they pertain to students, right?

18:29So, and then also having the developmental kind of understanding of what that would do moving forward. So, you know, Uncle Ithar would tell a story. So when I was still training as an actor, my old teacher, 12 years ago now, something like that, you know, she would do this kind of like emergent improvised singing from a like psychophysical tradition. And then she will always say this thing of like, oh, you know, sing, but sing to the end of the room. Like sing just like, you know, and then the thing that she would say is like, your voice is not real. That's not your real voice. Like your real voice will get there.

19:10Now, that has a lot of philosophical detriment to it. And to me, I find that unjustifiable. But when I look at the theory of say elite performance now, particularly with singers, basically I can look at that and go, okay, what she was doing is she's tuning it to distal attention. And then if you do that imaginatively, you can have that. You can basically achieve that same effect. You can get that same experience and the same learning still occurs, but without having to tell somebody that their voice is not real or not true. So to my mind, there's a way in which if I'm a teacher, I don't just have to be aware of the material in which I'm teaching, but the impact of that on a particular person is just as much a part of that, which I think lands with like how I've heard you talk about leadership as well.

20:00So in that sense, I think they gel. um yeah i'm hearing something different i'm hearing you introduce and i think that has to do with the normativity then theory has uh theory has a legitimation it legitimates or it justifies uh because what you what you objected to was basically the falsity of a particular claim that was being used in the practice um and um so that sounds like that sounds like an important an important point. I don't know quite how it fits in what we're doing, but right now we're just going with what's coming up. So that is definitely how theory works for me. And by the way, we're using theory here, I hope, in the philosophical and scientific sense.

20:50We don't mean the way it's meant. So in everyday discourse, people use theory as just a guess. Well, that's your theory. That's not what a theory is. A theory is a well-argued, well-evidenced claim that's plausible and probable, right? We should take it seriously. So like the way the atomic theory or quantum theory, that theory of evolution, that's what we're talking about here. And so for me as a teacher, that is what ultimately legitimates and justifies what I'm saying. And so if the theory changes, like what I'm claiming as why you might be doing this or how you can do this will therefore necessarily change if I want to be responsible to reality.

21:39So I just want to feed that back because up until now, we've been sort of talking about, I don't know what to call it, the engineering aspect of this. Like, am I oriented this way across contexts or I'm oriented this way? Am I leading people through a progression or am I landing them in a situation? And all of that's relevant. I'm not dismissing those dimensions. It sounds to me, though, like another dimension has been added that what theory seems to be doing is legitimating a practice. But I wonder then if practice has a similar or some kind of analogous role for theory. So what we can say is theory has the capacity through legitimation to challenge practice.

22:23You both were nodded when I say, oh, the why and the how might change if we really sincerely believe the theoretical backing has changed. Is there a corresponding going the other way where things in practice can challenge theory and say this theory is not quite right because of X, right? And, you know, that strikes me as a really interesting question. okay so i mean you're you're describing the headline of what practice as research is yes at its core right is that you know we we get in the room we do stuff and then we realize oh this thing is happening like and this thing keeps happening quite like reliably and somehow when we take a look at that we go hmm let's go through the theory this doesn't seem to be um accounted for, right?

23:21And then that becomes an aspect of it which we find knowledge gaps in the actual doing of something that, you know, perhaps was emergent or no one ever had their eye on. But once we start to engage in something, it's like, oh, this keeps reliably happening. And then it gives us something that we can stand on by which we can, you know, innovate perhaps on the theory itself or at least innovate more practices that move in that particular direction. And there's something to be found there, which I think is very right. Yeah. Okay. So that's really important because we've got sort of, we've got, you know, theory is true, but we also have to ask, is the theory true to the phenomenology being disclosed to the practice, which is something like, yeah, your theory might be giving you a good explanation of causation, but it's phenomenologically inadequate.

24:16It's not accounting for this. This is showing up. This is happening. You need to go back and revise your theory because your theory might be true. It might be pointing to things that are the case, but it's not true to the phenomenology. It's not phenomenologically adequate. It's not proportional to bonafide good descriptions of what's happening in practice. It's partial. It's partial. It's partial. It's partial. Like everything. But I want to see how it's partial because there's ways in which theories are partial that aren't about phenomenological inadequacy. A theory can be impartial in a lot of other ways.

24:54But this seems to be a really interesting one. Yeah, it's a partiality, but it's specifically – and, of course, it's because we have multiple senses of realness. One is the coherence of my propositions and their correspondence to experimental data, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. And then there's this other one that is, oh, no, no, no, right? Something is present and I'm participating in it and it's fitting me to reality in a really powerful way. And so I hadn't thought about this before. I'm getting excited about this. I'll try to calm down. But this idea that what we're talking about with theory and practice is we're actually talking about different normativities because of different kinds of knowing and how they are playing off against each other and mutually correcting each other.

25:41The theory can say you're making causal claims or historical claims that, sorry, don't land. The practice can say you're leaving out, you're not accounting for this real phenomenon that needs to be addressed in a powerful way. Yeah. Yeah. And I think there's also, you're pointing at a pattern whereby theory and practice are mutually correcting. Exactly. They're incredibly tightly coupled. And I think what I'm also, you know, in a fairly contrarian way, kind of like pointing at also that there are ways in which if we don't steward that proportion well and like hold the theory too tightly, then it railroads the practice to move a particular outcome forward, right?

26:31And it doesn't correct. And then similarly, we hold tightly to particular kind of practice, including the orientation we get into it. then the theory doesn't have a way of self-correcting and then it becomes this vicious cycle in the other direction. Right. Yeah. So we can be too precious about our theory and we can be too precious about our practice in some ways. Yes. That's good. That's good. That's good. And I wrestle with this all the time with just doing the voice work, like some of the voice work that I do in Tiamat. I notice consistently in all of the classes that people get very emotionally impacted by like the visceral feeling or just vibration happening inside their body, right?

27:16And it's like, oh, and then there's almost this kind of deep reflective presence that occurs where it's like, oh, how come I've never heard my voice in this way? I never felt this way before. I never thought about my breath in this way, right? Because they've been taught, you know, a particular way of singing or speaking, right? Which has to do with, you know, put your voice down a little bit lower and people will really understand you. Speak at half the speed you think you should be speaking to, you know. So there's a particular framework that they might have picked up on which this sort of pops open.

27:54And then when I went back and I looked at it, it's like, well, does anybody look at the emotionally sort of like affective dimension of this particular kind of intervention? and it's like, no. It gets sort of marked or written off as like, oh, there's just something that occurs and this is how you deal with it. And I'm like, wait, wait, wait, it's not a problem. It's something that's occurring that is emergent and we can pay attention to it in a new way that helps us understand the depth of what it is that we're actually doing when it comes to introducing this practice to people, for example. That's good.

28:32Good. So I'm finding this very fruitful because I think we're really exploring the normativity now. So we can be disproportionate in the relationship between theory and practice if we're too precious about our theory and too precious about our practice. But it strikes me there's also other ways we can be disproportionate. Here I'm doing Aristotle deficit and excess, which is, I mean, I encounter this a lot. I encountered it yesterday at a lecture I was giving where people, well, something comes up in practice and then they think that legitimates them undermining a very good theory and claiming an alternative science, pseudoscience.

29:19Let's call it that, right? Because that happens. It happens a lot, right?

29:28And there's the same way, too, where you could have a theoretical innovation of some kind, and you're trying to change the practice, but it's making things worse in some fashion. It's debilitating the practice. It's choking it. So one is we can hold theory and practice too tightly. And the other is we don't defend theory or practice enough from the, do you know what I'm trying to say? Because it's like, wait, I get that you had this really wonderful experience, but I don't think you should leap to conclusions about the ultimate nature of reality from it. And the other is, yeah, I know that quantum mechanics are true, but I just don't see how it's, I'm trying to give obvious examples.

30:26I just don't see how it's really showing up in this practice in an important or relevant way. Right. But I feel like, so, you know, the sense that I'm getting is we're starting to push onto a potential sort of third role or whatever that we tend to hold. And that's the one around, you know, a design or pedagogical design, which is different than sort of teaching in the room. right so it becomes that question of what's the practices to do what's the theories to do so we can we can bring the theory right into practice we can notice something different in the normativity then the question is is this a uh the function of the practice or does this mean that there this is why we do an ecology of practices and not just one bloody type of practices so that we can get it into dialogue somewhere else it's like well it's actually really not important for dialectic and dialogos to really address the issue of belonging.

31:18So here's this other container or set up a practice such that you can go in there, you can feel your belonging such that you're not trying to get that need met in this practice. This is the same thing about, we say about relationships, it's too much to look for one other human being to meet the needs of another one, all of the needs. I think it's the same issue with the practice, which is why we say there isn't a panacea practice, no practice that can meet everybody where they're at and what their needs are for their particular intention or path of unfolding. So that's excellent. So we've got this relationship of theory and practice constraining and correcting each other, but we also have this broader, I think that's the right adjective, but change it if you think it's something, this broader realization of where is it fitted and functioning within the ecology and that determines that constrains the degree to which the theory and practice can correct and constrain each other did i get it yeah yeah that's really good taylor that's really good that really lands for me yeah and then what we don't want to do is to say okay you know this is we're going to invent a new theory that homes all of these practices within a closed system that you could, but we're not in that business, eh?

32:41I know people who are, and it's kind of terrifying. Because actually, I think ultimately what happens is that there is a breakdown of dialogue across different domains or other groups of people who might be doing practices. Yeah, and it's that. And also when you try to create those overarching theories, you then realize that what you really need is interdisciplinary. And then you're just to a higher order ecology of practices. If you want, like, because the same reasons why there's no panacea practice is the same reason why there isn't a panacea discipline that can explain everything. And so from I mean, that's what that that has what has happened to me.

Read the full transcript

33:29Right. So I'm doing this ecology, you know, synoptic integration in cognitive science and trying to – that's why there is no final theory. There can't be because the relation – it's a very – you're creating this very complex, dynamical, interdisciplinary system that's trying to track this very complex, dynamical, interpractice, right, system. Yeah, I mean, I have a great temptation to come up with the overall theory because I love theory. But it's been like. No, that's where that's where for me, that's when I go. I settle in and Plato and through Plato, Socrates takes priority over Aristotle for me.

34:16That's when it happens for me. It's like, oh, no, who am I ultimately following? I'm following Socrates, not Aristotle.

34:25And it lands for me that effectively what we're doing because of that orientation is we're keeping the question open such that we are always sort of open to the iteration. We're not stuck in the closed loop such that we're, again, the practice into, sorry, the practices research turns around and helps us go back up to the, okay, well, what about the introduction to practice? No, actually that part's fine. Bring it up into the design level of it of like, actually, this is misplaced or we need something between here and here, which is probably why I've really been enjoying the design part of practice with you gentlemen, as well as others, because it's sort of been that next sort of edge or challenge from the facilitation of practice, the teaching of a particular practice, but now it's like an actual pedagogical design for ecology of practices to try to afford a particular outcome unfolding is I keep coming back to that word.

35:20And it occurs to me that that's probably quite evidence of why TMX is constantly evolving. There's a lot that sort of stays and persists, but then there's always the stepping back and looking at and saying, okay, so what do we move here? What do we move there? Actually, no, we've designed this other practice and we feel like that it's actually working really well and it does the job of two other practices. So how do we make that shift to make it? Yeah, exactly. oh yeah even now just on the theory side of it i'm having i am giving myself aneurysms trying to you know sort of like understand the relationship between tma and predictive processing now that's like that's really quite at like the forefront of the of the world is a guy oh oh hey hang on wait what what is this because i used to work on like a you know sort of more um cbt kind of i used to look at cbt a lot i used to look at psychodynamics a lot right and i still do i'm still you know very much a union and then it's like now I'm bringing a different lens right it's like wow this is hard this is hard but it's also a lot of fun and it's giving like a new a new way right to offer something forward uh which is you know just nerdily exciting for me but it's also that the understanding that I at least I hold this position that all propositional knowledge needs to afford more participation right if the propositional knowledge just keeps you there at the ceiling go okay i got it right then it's like hang on what are you doing what's that there's more there's more that is in vibe there's more that can be found um and so i try and like trying to sort of bring those things together requires almost a rejigging of like certain pieces go well hang on how i have to ask questions that i've never asked before right about the theory and then you know sometimes that that needs to be challenged uh it always needs to be challenged but sometimes it gets named somewhere that, talk about independent convergence that someone else has found how dissociation works in certain practices like oh, oh that thing, ah, and then it illuminates something which I wouldn't have otherwise kept my eye on so so something about there's something in your response that has me wonder about in some ways Yeah, I feel like, oh no, hang on, I don't want to paint Ethan into a corner or put him on the spot about this, but I am quite curious what you would say about it.

37:48There's also the question of, there's the container, the training, or the workshop that we set up. And yes, there could be things that's happening within the container that feed back up into an iteration or redesign or will change the way we introduce a practice, that sort of thing. So keeping it as a living organism, ever evolving, bringing in new knowledge, stuff like that to keep it as sharp as possible. But then there's also the question of what are the containers ours really never to do? So I think it was by you bringing up dissociation, right? Like, of course, trauma is always in the room and we treat that as, you know, as a consideration.

38:21But it's also like the question of, well, what are the actual, like, what is ours to do? And then when do we sort of outsource it and say, well, actually, you know, mental health professional or, you know, trauma work or things like that. So for me, it's just bringing up that question. It's sort of like, yeah, how do we define what's ours to do when we're sort of in practice and offering? Because we can offer things, we can say they're not therapy, they can have a therapeutic effect, which tends to be that thing that's a little bit challenging to try to explain to people, because then they have it and then they sort of drop into a therapeutic mode with people sometimes, which of course we want to dissuade because that's, to me, that's not ours to do.

39:04So I just sort of handing that to you about like there's what's ours to do but then there's also the support of other types of modalities, other types of support systems that also help alleviate blocks, contractions such that they can come back in return and actually really flourish within the containers that were offered rather than again there isn't a panacea practice there also isn't a panacea modality perhaps or ecology of practices. Well I think you're pointing exactly at why the the what we're articulating with like theory informing practice and correcting and practice and correcting theory is so important because that allows us to be able to name this is the context for what we're doing for x amount of time right and so given that the both the theory right in the sense of having an understanding of what's happening and where the bug needs to stop as well as you know a historical experience of what the practice can do is is meant to do is the practices to do right holds the other book and then we can go well okay if this is happening now we can you know say okay you know we can make this recommendation um you know go call this number right or take a moment sit down it gives us certain affordances which we otherwise um say wouldn't necessarily have.

40:24So I've also been in containers called school where like in school you have somebody sort of like, you know, breaking down and losing it, right? Or going through something really difficult. But then the containers way of dealing with that is now you have to do this different thing, right? Which is within what they would then articulate as the practice. The goalpost seems to shift to be able to hold something which frankly is kind of, to my mind, not necessarily ethically, it's we made. So I'm always a little bit cautious about that and when the context is set up such that we know okay what is ours to do here, what's the practices to do here and can we stand by that decision, right?

41:16Then I think that helps to address a lot of the ethical concern.

41:24Yeah, not to pin you into a box, but...

41:31It's more of a rectangle on my screen. Oh, yeah, yeah. It's a rectangle. I mean, this is a question we're often asked, and I think we have come upon it. And maybe we should at least address it, which is, yeah, okay, what is ours to do? How is it different from coaching, from psychotherapy, from common sense advice, right? And you see, just to put us in good company, you see Plato wrestling with this. How is philosophy different from poetry and how is it different from the doctor and how is it different from the lawyer and the statesman? Like we're not in like so what is I mean, I think that we've said why and we we need to be clear about what's ours to do.

42:24And you then articulated how that comes to bear. But we haven't really said what we think the what is. What is ours to do with our ecology of practices or better? What is it to do for the ecology of practices that we teach and facilitate? What is it trying to do? What's it offering for people? And there's two dimensions whenever you say something like that. In psychology, we distinguish between the pathological and the positive. The pathological is you're in some way falling below what Freud called normal unhappiness. and we want to address that, right? And then positive is, oh, no, no, no. But there's ways in which you probably want to excel beyond the normal average, normal unhappiness, and come to fullness of being, flourishing, deep senses of fulfillment, things like that.

43:24And no matter where we go, we'll find that we're bumping into people that are already there. If we go into the pathological, we're bumping into the doctor and the psychotherapist. And if we go into the excellence, we're bumping into one kind of coach. And if we say, no, but this this deep, then we're bumping into religion. Right. And while we're trying to fix the world, well, then we're bumping into politics. Right. So, I mean, we might not answer this question, but thank you. Well, no, Ethan, I was trying to give you what Taylor gave you, which is I don't want to box you in, right, or rectangle you in.

44:11But at the same time, I do think we – I mean, I think – I feel we've been led to here with good reason, and we should try and be clear. because there's a sense in which what we've been talking about in theory and practice actually occurs in all these domains where they're trying to balance good theory and good practice, you know, religion, psychotherapy, right, coaching, et cetera. So what is it we're doing?

44:42I noticed I want to try to tee it up so it's maybe a little bit easier for Ethan. um please do that even then feel free to shoot it down because maybe you actually have a through line across all the things but to me it occurs to me it's contextual to sort of the the intention of whatever the container is um so i'm wondering for you you know sort of being the cheap architect of tiamat what's tiamat's to do that's that's fair that's good i i think giving a specific case allows us to rub up against something better. Yes, that's good. Yeah, okay. So there's two kind of like paths to this question.

45:18I think sort of like lead to the same place, right? Which is, you know, depending on the context of the container, if it's like, say, a connection container, like our crossroads and connections piece, very expressly, right? But there, you know, it's offering a particular experience such that you can meet like-minded folks who are interested in the cultivation of a good life. And I think that's fine. That's exactly the context for that. And then when there is, at least in the domains which I tend to operate, which is much more of a training domain, then really it's kind of, it's inter-categorical in the way we were talking about it just now, that I cannot necessarily pin it down to one thing, but it's multiple aspects to the right degree, to the right proportion.

46:08so it's um well okay so if i give a if i give a more straight answer first right like what i'm trying to do with tms to really help people develop the necessary self-knowledge so a psychoeducation that can afford a good life that's that's the the kind of headline piece the caveat to that is um it's doing that without becoming a religion it's just it's just affording to my mind what i want to see folks be able to do is that like they come to tmf and religiosity that sense of bindedness a connectedness with self other world right to borrow heidegger is higher probability becomes more foregrounded for them.

46:58And to me, that's the win. It doesn't make TMA a religion. It just tees you up. Similarly with things like psychoeducation. So I named the psychoeducation piece and why the theory on that front is important. It's like, well, if you have an understanding of the way in which you're an epistemic creature, your knowing is being, you know and you're built or the beautiful thing that Mark said which is you are built to know the world by being in it and in that is that sense of knowing how that works how that occurs okay go live your life go enjoy your life so to my mind I think that's what that strikes me as what TMX is to do I'm not here to give anybody an answer to what their life means.

47:51I'm trying to afford them the principles and the processes by which they can discover that for themselves. Hence, that teaching piece of you should be able to go out into the world and live your life well. And then what about at the level of Spire? Because I'm imagining it's a little different. I mean, that's still included, I think. But I get the sense you're sort of transcending that as well in that context. Yeah. Yeah. Spire is like for me it's just a most rewarding piece. But yes. Maybe tell everybody what the acronym stands for. Yeah. First of all, what does SPIRE stand for? Good. So for those of you who are not familiar, SPIRE is within Tiamat, the facilitator training program.

48:35And then SPIRE stands for service, pilgrimage, inquiry, ritual, and enlightenment. And there's a caveat with enlightenment, which is understanding it as the process rather than the attainment of a state or the achievement of a state. So in that sense, I think Spire is really for folks who can already feel the call that being of service to other people's development is actually deeply meaningful. And I think those are, to a certain extent, that's everybody. You know, anybody who's had kids or, you know, relationships that are meaningful to them. But it's one thing to experience the meaning of that and the significance of that.

49:22It's another thing to be, to intentionally cultivate the capacities to enrich those relationships, not just for yourself, but also for other people.

49:35So I'm hearing sort of enriching religio and relationship and their inter-defining sort of ideas. So that speaks that we sort of have a presupposition, which I'll say I do, that we think human beings are ultimately deeply relational in nature, within and without in between. And what we're trying to do in some sense is wake people up to their relational nature so that they can enhance and improve it and come to a greater sense of fullness of being or something like that. Is that landing for you? Well, this is where I feel very strongly about it, which is that we are already connected and relational like relations are primordial so we are already connected into everything else we might forget it we might think that's not the case but i think that's the fundamental presupposition so when someone says like um uh oh i'm not real and mind you i grew up for 30 years you know with people telling me that what you're doing is not real you're not real I kind of push back and I go, no, it's all real.

50:57All of it is real. Even if you are being deceived, it's a real deception. And there's something to me which I feel very strongly about with that. And it's not a, I don't mean that in like a childhood naivety, like just take everything from your fashion. That's not what I mean. I'm not saying throw away rigor. What I am saying is that there's a recognition of relationality in his primordial form. So I'm not teaching anybody anything new, but is that question of can we maybe get out of the way a little bit? You know, talk about disastrous dichotomies, for example.

51:40I feel a bit emotional about this.

51:56I think I've just met a lot of people and I've been guilty of being one of these people myself. Or taking on a particular worldview where the viewing of oneself as an instrument that moves itself through the world and does things and this is a kind of it's a depersonization derealization thing like living in that place is actually quite terrifying um

52:36and one of the one of the best oh one of the one of the most difficult but also most rewarding worldview shifts that I've had to make is to actually like recognize and directly realize that oh all of my experience actually has a place everyone else's experience has a place too that we share that. Even though I might not want to, I might feel a certain way about it. We're still sharing that.

53:17So what I'm... And I think maybe you've already said it, but I get the sort of sense that what you're touching into is more of your deeper why, about why you do what you do, which would, of course, inform what you create and bring and deliver into the world.

53:36I see you nodding. So I think I'm sort of, yeah, I could feel it even before you had named the emotionals like, oh, hang on a second. It feels like we're getting, we're starting to touch on something. Apologize for the word right now, given what you just said, but we're starting to touch on something right now. Not to say that the other stuff was, but I could just sort of feel like more of the really real, like something like the thing that's, that is always true, but it was yet to be disclosed.

54:07And I'm wondering, do you have that sense, that elevator pitch of the thing that you're trying to do? I think I said something in that previous one about how important it is for me, at least on leadership-oriented containers, that I'm wanting people to get really clear about why it is that they do what they do, because if they're not clear about it, it has them. And when you're in a position of power and a one-up thing and you don't actually understand something else is motivating you, that's the potential where you can do harm. So the thing that I tend to get to for me about why I do this, and it's a little bit harder for me to fully touch into the place more because I just now know it as true.

54:56Whereas before it was a little bit more novel for me. It was like, oh yeah, I could feel the tenderness. But for me, it was, I just want to feel safer in the world. I'm doing what I'm doing so that I can feel safer in the world, so that I can feel safer with my daughter in the world. And I think one of the things that actually helps me feel safer about it is going back to my whole thing about control and controlling for the future is like, at least I'm doing something about it. And that at least you know, alleviates sort of that idea of mind to do. If I want something, then I should be doing something to turn around and do it.

55:31And it sort of alleviates that a bit for me. So I'm wondering sort of for you, how might you, you know, articulate that or condense that? What is that thing? So here it's related to an experience of a place for all experiences. experiences. But I'm wondering, and I can sense the personal impact for you of having that realization or I guess this is the difference between not being awake and waking up. Perhaps you let me know how it is for you, but I'm still sort of trying to get at that part of through allowing a space for all experiences to have a place. Where does that land you? what does that do for you?

56:32I think I've actually said this like multiple times in multiple different ways and it just so happens that the way that is coming out for me today is that remember that the world is open for play. It's an old thing that, it's an old documentary of Robin Williams when he was still around. but in that sense that the world is open for play simultaneously feel for me saying that like the world is not one way the reality is uncontrollable fundamentally

57:06um but there's a way to navigate it which can open up all of it all of it

57:18And that also goes like personally, like the internal sort of like landscape, the inner world, inner life, we always talk about this and I think it's also accessible through play, which is not an invitation to be flippant. it's not an invitation to not um to be to to throw it away as meaningless and not consider it too much right and just toss it over your shoulder and move on no but it's it's an invitation to keep like exploring but that's one or just one i want to check one thing john so is it But is it, so what I'm hearing in that is almost like you want to see more joy. Is something about, like, because you were saying, you know, helping people live a good life.

58:17And I'm thinking in that for you, joy must equal good. Yeah. Yeah. So I want to try and see if I can through line this. So first of all, I want to just note that you took the notion of phenomenological adequacy really deeply there. Like you're saying, like there's like you're saying all my experiences have to have a place. And I get the sense that that's just not welly nilly. There's a sense of properly proportioned placing. Right. There's a logos there, of course. Of course, there's a terrain of intelligibility to it, right? Totally. So that says to me that you're talking about something like what you're doing with play.

59:10Play is inherently developmental. It's exploratory, but it's also transformative, especially if it's serious play. And then what that serious play seems to be doing is like Plato's anamnesis. We seem to be, you said it was always true, but we have forgotten it. It's not like learning about Saturn, right? It's about a fundamental recovery of our relationality. And then what I hear you saying is you're trying to recover your relationality so people can properly proportion their experiences. such that they can better, right, couple to the complexity of the world, right? Because joy is not pleasure.

59:58Joy is I'm really in touch with something really real. So, I mean, this is a species of an evolutionary model of organisms complexify in order to keep a continuity of being coupled to a complex reality. So as reality changes, they can re-adapt to stay fitted to it. Is that? Yeah. Yeah. Because to me, that is very different. That's very different from what therapy is offering people. um it's very different from what coaching is offering people because it's those things are usually organized around specific states or goals that people are trying to get i want to feel this way now i want to right yeah where where where we of course we are bumping up against at least some religions i mean this sounds a lot like daoism in a lot of ways and important aspects of zen um uh but it's it's it's it's in that blurry line between philosophy and religion and i i kind of like being there.

1:01:11I think that's a good place to be right now. And so I just, I'm really appreciating this notion of, right, that what we're really trying to do is get people to seriously play so they can properly proportion how they experience reality so that they can make, they can stay connected to a dynamic complex reality that always exceeds whatever grasp we have on it and that's why we always have to have a playful attitude is is that right yeah and the way that we deal with the ill-defined problem of ultimate reality is we create a model of it and then we play within that model right yeah so this is why tmx comes from actor training which is where i've for bloody 35 years because it involves all of the self.

1:02:10Like all the internal faculties, your view, what you have to care about, every single action that you do and then you take a world and then you build a small world of Denmark, right? In the public theater, right? Whatever it is. And you play in that because hopefully, right? We don't experience, you know, seeing our father's goals walk down the corridor and contemplate our humanity in our life, but it allows us to do that. Which is not saying that people will come to TMA, you will become career actors. No, I'm trying to move forward the idea that there is a ritual importance here that what I think we found is across time, across history is the fully play way, the way to play most fully is with every faculty of your being.

1:03:03and that's an amazing opportunity it's an amazing opportunity that we have the facility to do that at all we are so complex that we can literally change our worlds that's awesome even if it's just for like five minutes and that helps us to understand the different facet of reality and that's play that's the kind of play i'm talking about i'm not talking about poking somebody and then going like, oh look, I'm tickling you. I'm talking about a real wrestling with stuff that matters.

1:03:42I don't know why, but there's a part of me that actually feels deeply angry that I have to say any of this at all. I find it necessary to articulate at all. And a part of me I think wishes that I didn't have to talk about this as passionately, that It wasn't as necessary to talk about it. I'm with you. And of course, you know, I had that experience that I was never looking for this work because I didn't know it was possible. I was living a life of contentment based on what was modeled for me and my family. It was like, oh, okay, well, yeah, we argue all the time. But my father and, you know, his wife argued all the time.

1:04:19So that was what was normal. I didn't know. It was only until I got into this other relationship with my now wife and started the journey through authentic relating and that where it was like, I had no idea what an experience of life was possible. I had no clue. I was completely existentially ignorant to it. I had no idea. I didn't even know to go looking for it. But it just, you know, in many ways, it happened by accident, you know, just through, you know, a willingness to stay open to new experiences rather than rehash the way I was in my previous relationship. So I'm with you in the like the challenge of trying to articulate the relevance of what we do for everyone without trying to overly dilute it.

1:05:03So there's always that frustration of like, this is for everyone. But as soon as we start talking about it being for everyone, it starts to lose the perception of a potency. So I'm with you in that struggle of like, you know, I think somebody asked a question last week about, you know, towards a deliberately developmental civilization and sort of the wholeness part, right? And there's like negative connotations around wholeness, but talking about that full expression of one's being, you know, that thing that you're sort of pointing to or adjusting to that's available, you know, and in fact, involving over the whole self, you know, to be an actor, to deeply use those imaginal muscles and to enter into, you know, another sort of way of being.

1:05:54And even through that process, learning actually something about yourself by deeply embodying something that's different from yourself. What a vehicle of transformation. I totally get the motion and the movement towards what you've developed based on what you've experienced through that whole journey. Some people, they're just a bit contracted and they never get it. They're not great actors, but then there's the actors who can just put themselves aside and go into that imaginal thing right to take in the world um for the role or or for you know however it's set up and they just they are from that place because they are just being they are just more real if this bloody word it's turning into a knot but but but you know but what i mean is like so you know to me this goes back you know it's like tangent i know we're at kind, but this goes back to the articulation from your voice coach, right?

1:06:54And that thing about real. And, you know, of course I wasn't there and I hear a part of it and I'm sort of like, yeah, screw that. But there's also that part of like the unencumbered being, right? And somehow, you know, and we're talking about remembering too, right? Of remembering something that was lost and, you know, and, you know, and the loss of it creates a certain degree of contraction, right? So if you can release that, we can remember something. But to me, when I'm talking about real here and I'm talking about like the full expression of being. That's what I'm talking about, about real.

1:07:24Anything else is a partiality of the real. I think even that full expression will never be full, full. I mean, I don't think we'll ever, we don't live long enough to probably ever quite get there. Um, anyhow, I just, I just wanted to sort of throw that out and, uh, and, uh, I'm going to shut up now and see what John might have. I mean, I know we're closer to time, so I don't, I don't, well, pick this up if you want or put it down if you want. I agree with everything Taylor said is that's one aspect of the anger. For me, when I get angry, and I don't know if this is also there, I get angry because of all of the unnecessary suffering.

1:08:07Right. And it's a weird anger because it's a sad anger thing mixed together.

1:08:19So, Taylor, I totally agree with the frustration about, you know, we're diminishing something here because we're trying to share about it and diluting. And that's there. I'm not denying that. I'm just wondering if this other thing, the sad anger about all the unnecessary suffering. it's more it's more this sad anger like underneath i don't i don't hold it so tightly that like oh i'm pissed i'm pissed all the time about something but the it's it's more the sadness and the hurt because i feel that viscerally um when like you know sometimes i hear someone say oh actually i don't matter yeah when someone says that to me wow i feel it bro like it drops like like there's a I only want to cry when I hear somebody say, especially if there's somebody that I really care about.

1:09:10Come on, dude. You know, and it's almost that piece, like, why do I have to tell you? Why do I have to tell you that you matter? Why do I have to tell you that you're real? How come you don't know that? What the fuck happened to you that you walked through thinking you're not real? You know, and talk about this, like this phone, I had a conversation with Randstor about this fullness of experience thing. It's like, I take it that even when someone is repressed, and they're struggling or they're contracted, that's pretty much as full as you can be right now. That's cool, man. Like, your repression is real.

1:09:51Your contraction is real, right? The garden-ness is real. That's cool. I try not to... I don't know. Maybe this is idiosyncratic to me. imagine taylor you have a different take on it me holy shit um it's kind of this thing of like i don't want to hold the implicit expectation that whatever is beneath or behind how someone is showing up right now right is it is more valuable than whatever is available right i try and hold the the suchness of that and what that does if i hold that pole right if i just if i take it and go okay okay this is where we're at right now then I stay I stay in relationship with the other person such that more is revealed to me I because I know I have a particular tendency that once I form an idea of a person I can just drop it and go because I'm naturally quite a highly suspicious person so all of the past few years of my life really in part of the work that we do has been affording that in a big way is to actually just be with what is with myself with the other person and trust that I'm going to see you again.

1:11:04And next time I see you, there'll be more to know. As we develop a relationship, it goes further and further. And that's the joy. To me, that's joy. Yeah. Well, I think ending on joy is a good place to end because we do want to move to practice. Will somebody put the Zoom room link? I'm doing that.

1:11:34So yeah, you should copy paste that because once we shut this off, you'll lose the chat. So just put it into a notepad or something like that. Get it somewhere to the side and we'll be there in a couple minutes as we have to logistically leave this open for a moment to finish uploading.

1:11:59But yeah, in that inviting others, Ethan's going to lead us in some practice over on the Zoom room that was placed there. We ask that if you're going to come and participate, that you have your camera on and a working microphone. And yeah, anything you want to say to close us out of the talk here, John? Nope. Okay. It was great. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, thanks, Ethan. I'm still, I'm still like, I still have so much more I want to say and we'll just have to leave it here for now. Yeah. Yeah. Same boy. Yeah. All right, see you all. Hope to see you all in the practice.

1:12:56Soldiers of Stability

From the publisher

What does it mean to say the world is fundamentally open for play - and why does it take something to even have to say it at all?

In this episode - the third and final in a live-recorded three-part series with Ethan Hsieh, Taylor Barratt, and John Vervaeke - the conversation centers on Ethan as he unpacks the distinction between teaching and facilitation, the purpose of TIAMAT, and the deep personal why that drives his work. John maps the teacher/facilitator divide onto Aristotle's sophia and phronesis, while the group works through how theory and practice function as mutual correctives - each able to expose the other's blind spots. They examine phenomenological adequacy (how a theory can be causally sound yet fail to account for what's actually showing up in lived practice), the necessity of an ecology of practices over any single panacea, and why no closed overarching theory can substitute for genuine interdisciplinary dialogue. Ethan unpacks TIAMAT's purpose as psycho-education toward a good life - affording self-knowledge and heightened religiosity (bindedness to self, other, and world) without becoming a religion - and walks through the SPIRE framework (Service, Pilgrimage, Inquiry, Ritual, Enlightenment). The conversation deepens into the primordial nature of relationality, the actor training roots of TIAMAT, and Ethan's core conviction: that serious play - wrestling fully with what matters, using every faculty of one's being - is the most human way to stay genuinely coupled to a reality that always exceeds our grasp. The episode closes on joy: not pleasure, not comfort, but contact.

Ethan Hsieh is the Director of Community Development and Partnerships at the Vervaeke Foundation. He comes from an acting background focused on character development. LinkedIn

Taylor Barratt is the Director of Practice and Education at the Vervaeke Foundation. He has over a decade of experience in relational leadership through Authentic Relating Toronto. LinkedIn X

00:00 Welcome to the Lectern 01:30 Introducing Ethan - the third and final session 03:00 Teaching vs. facilitation - the core distinction 04:20 The knowing-doing and being-becoming questions 06:30 What truly distinguishes a teacher from a facilitator? 08:00 Responsibility, longitudinal tracking, and development 09:00 Training containers vs. drop-in practice 11:10 Sophia and phronesis - Aristotle on wisdom 12:30 Self-correction and attachment to theory or practice 14:10 Adaptive fit vs. adaptive transfer 17:30 When to bring theory in as a leader 20:00 Theory as legitimation of practice 22:00 Does practice challenge theory? Practice as research 24:00 Phenomenological adequacy - what theory can miss 26:00 Being too precious about theory or practice 27:00 Voice work and the emotional dimension as data 28:30 Deficit, excess, and the normativity of practice 30:30 Ecology of practices as pedagogical design 32:20 Why there's no closed theoretical system 33:00 Why there's no panacea discipline 35:00 TIAMAT as a living, evolving system 35:50 Predictive processing, CBT, and Jungian thought 36:30 Propositional knowledge must afford participation 38:10 What's ours to do? Defining scope of practice 41:20 What is TIAMAT actually for? 43:00 Pathological vs. positive psychology 46:10 TIAMAT: psycho-education for a good life 47:00 Religiosity without religion 48:30 SPIRE - Service, Pilgrimage, Inquiry, Ritual, Enlightenment 49:30 Enriching religio and relationship 50:20 Relationality is primordial - all of it is real 52:00 Depersonalization and the world-as-instrument trap 54:00 Why Taylor does this work 56:40 "The world is open for play" 58:00 Joy as good 59:00 Serious play as anamnesis - recovering what was forgotten 01:00:00 Joy vs. pleasure - genuine coupling to reality 01:01:00 Daoism, Zen, and the blurry line with philosophy 01:02:00 Actor training as the origin of TIAMAT 01:03:30 Anger and sadness at unnecessary suffering 01:08:30 "Why do I have to tell you that you matter?" 01:10:00 Holding the suchness of where someone is 01:11:10 Joy as developing relationship - closing thoughts

The Vervaeke Foundation is committed to advancing the scientific pursuit of wisdom and creating a significant impact on the world. Become a part of our mission.

Join Awaken to Meaning to explore practices that enhance your virtues and foster deeper connections with reality and relationships.

Follow John Vervaeke: Website | Twitter | YouTube | Patreon

Thank you for listening!

More from Dr. John Vervaeke

All 50 episodes
Who is Ethan Hsieh?Dr. John Vervaeke · 1 h 13 min
Listen in VO