In short
Part 2 of an investigation into Danny Bones, an AI-generated rapper promoted to far-right audiences via the Node project. The episode argues generative AI music is “creative theft” because models are trained on existing artists without consent or compensation, and that copyright enforcement and platform accountability are weak. It also covers platform responses, especially Spotify’s planned AI labeling and whether synthetic personas are still algorithmically boosted, plus the monetization of Danny Bones (merch, streaming presence) and the lack of tour dates.
Guests
Effie and Harriet Neffy, investigative journalists who previously reported on AI music and copyright issues (including UK copyright law) and who spoke with musicians and platforms.
Key claims
Danny Bones and Node use tools like Suno to generate tracks; the project’s creators are industry professionals; Spotify initially verified/boosted the persona; labeling may not prevent promotion; far-right content is amplified through mainstream platforms.
Notable examples
Suno “voices” (e.g., “Danny Toxic”); Amelia (a co-opted AI character) appearing as Danny Bones’s love interest and endorsing Advance UK via a tweet; references to hate-leaning lyrics (e.g., “Jews and Master Masons”); comparisons to other AI persona cases (Taylor Swift impersonation, deepfake personas).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Rise of AI-Generated Music
1:28 to 2:55
Explore the increasing prevalence of AI-generated music and its implications.
“I will see you at the end for a few more thoughts.”
Creative Theft and Consent Issues
2:55 to 4:28
Discuss the ethical concerns surrounding AI music and the lack of artist consent.
“And then, so it's the recordings, the actual recordings that someone's done, but then it's the structure of the songs, it's the arrangement of the songs, it's the lyrics, it's the way things are structured.”
Exploring AI Music Generators
4:28 to 6:28
Delve into the mechanics of AI music generation and its accessibility.
“And I think you've done some digging and you think you found the model that they're using to generate the music.”
Impacts on Artists and Copyright Laws
6:28 to 8:10
Examine the implications of AI on artists and the enforcement of copyright laws.
“Well, why are the government taking coffee breaks with AI companies?”
Spotify's Approach to AI Music
8:10 to 10:06
Analyze Spotify's handling of AI-generated content and its transparency issues.
“All the Danny Bones songs have remained on Spotify and as far as I'm aware, will do.”
The Illusion of Danny Bones
10:06 to 13:55
Investigate the manufactured persona of Danny Bones and its cultural implications.
“I think Danny Bones isn't quite in the AI slop category.”
The Reality Behind AI Personas
14:00 to 18:09
Explore the implications of AI-generated artists on real-world sentiment and the music industry.
“And I think the questions around what that then takes away from other artists.”
Responses from Artists and the Music Community
18:10 to 22:09
Discuss the reactions from musicians regarding AI-generated content and its impacts.
“Maybe someone that gets taken down when Spotify or if Spotify realise.”
Curiosity and Concerns About AI Music
22:55 to 28:00
Delve into the curiosity surrounding AI music and the fairness to traditional artists.
“And I guess like music fans in general are curious people.”
The Role of AI in Music Recommendations
28:00 to 29:48
Discusses how AI music is curated and its implications for consumers.
Show all 14 chapters
The Complexities Behind AI Personas
29:48 to 33:14
Explores the transparency and motivations behind AI personas like Danny Bones.
“But teaches other people how to get rich quick, essentially making this kind of slop that hits on the kind of themes that Danny Bones hits on to a lower quality, I suppose, but higher volume.”
Implications of AI-Generated Content
33:14 to 35:04
Analyzes the potential for individuals to create their own AI characters and the ramifications of that.
The Impact of Music Industry Practices
35:04 to 36:50
Examines the responsibilities of the music industry and artists regarding AI usage.
“But big companies have done deals with these organizations.”
Media Literacy and AI's Influence
36:50 to 39:54
Discusses the importance of media literacy in understanding AI-generated content.
“I think I feel like we've covered everything in a bit more.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Harriet Williamson:Who the hell is Danny Bones and why do people on the far right enjoy his AI generated rap music? These are maybe not questions we can answer without speaking to an investigative journalist, Effie and Harriet, who, if you listen to part one, have been investigating the phenomenon run by the Node project, which has had nearly 5 million streams on YouTube at the time of recording, about half a million or more on Spotify. And in this second part, we get into the theft of black music, some of the responses from musicians, the lack of consequences for breaking copyright law, which is a much, much bigger topic.
0:45Harriet Williamson:And if you didn't hear my episode with Tom Gray, the second part of that, we talked a little bit about what is happening with copyright law in the UK. We also get into how the platforms have responded. Spotify are about to introduce AI labelling. Will that have any impact on an artist like this? Will they still be boosted in the algorithm? Was he boosted in the algorithm? These are questions we don't necessarily know the answers to. And yeah, we'll get into accountability and what you as music fans can do. So this is part two of Drowning Sound's conversation with Harriet Neffy about Danny Bones.
1:19Harriet Williamson:This is Drowning Sound podcast brought to you in partnership with Kobuz. if you go to drowninsound.org forward slash playlists you can find the companion playlist for this two-part episode about british pride yes that is the theme of the playlist there are tunes on there from the clash and oasis and all sorts of other artists which effie and harriet chose so that's drowninsound.org forward slash playlists where you can also find yourself a 30 day free trial of the high quality more ethical music streaming platform let's get into part two to how we ended the previous episode because I thought Harriet's summary was so good that we should hear it again to get you warmed back up and back into this conversation.
2:02Harriet Williamson:I will see you at the end for a few more thoughts.
2:14Effie Webb:You know, going back to this issue of AI-generated music, it is becoming more and more common and Apple Music reckons that about a third of the songs on its platform are now 100 % AI generated, which is a vast amount. And that we know from research done by Ipso and by Deezer, which is another streaming platform, that people overwhelmingly want to have AI music clearly labeled so they know what they're listening to. People are generally quite open to listening to AI music, mostly out of curiosity, I think, but they want to know what it is they're actually consuming. They want it to be clearly marked.
2:49Effie Webb:And I think that that's that's really fair and i see generative ai within music as a form of quite serious creative theft because these models are entirely trained on um existing human artistry that the humans behind it were not consulted about they didn't give consent and they weren't compensated or remunerated in
3:09Harriet Williamson:any way for this use of their work that is the big story like we've covered a fair bit on the podcast and if people this is the first one people are listening to like my chat with tom gray from the ivus academy who was in gomez he talked a lot about just kind of like how it feels and why we've not had action like the government did a big survey and a lot of people a lot of big organizations for the music industry sent in like this is what our fears are with ai these are the existing copyright rules these is what it's in breach of because it's not just the sounds of the recordings that are being used like one of the voices in there sounds like well james blake voice and its production techniques, like in one of the Danny Bones tracks.
3:50Harriet Williamson:And then, so it's the recordings, the actual recordings that someone's done, but then it's the structure of the songs, it's the arrangement of the songs, it's the lyrics, it's the way things are structured. All of that stuff is being taken from people in different ways that they wouldn't know and don't understand how it's being taken from them.
4:08Effie Webb:Broken Britain
4:28Harriet Williamson:And I think you've done some digging and you think you found the model that they're using to generate the music.
4:34Effie Webb:Yeah, and this is kind of hot off the press because we didn't find so suno the ai music generator platform i don't know if that's the best way to describe it but um i remember downloading it when i did the first piece and just like whacking a few danny bones lyrics into suno and getting a decent decent track so i was like okay this is very accessible and seems like a yeah a very like easy easy way for them to pump up more content I suppose when I I suppose I was surprised when I when we did find the these two people were music industry professionals because they are you know together music producers sound engineers plus you know visual effects people why are they using AI if it if not like there's not a skill issue here it's like it is you know presumably the speed and the the cost etc plus the anonymity that AI affords to you.
5:32Effie Webb:But yeah, in terms of Suno itself, it's really interesting because you can see there's about 11 sort of voices, I think. One called Danny Angry, which I think, and it'll be interesting actually to match them up to the different songs and modes. But yeah, I think that Danny Angry, Danny Toxic, Danny, Danny 2. Danny Toxic is all of them. Yeah. and it's really interesting because i yeah i guess that stuff is public isn't it it's like
6:02Harriet Williamson:because the way the platforms operate like you can see the profile and the tools they're using
6:07Effie Webb:yeah and you can go on like anyone listening you can go on danny toxic and make your own song but i just it begs the question whose music and lyrics or sound or voice went into making danny toxic especially given their the fact that you know denver bamba did say in his um right reply yeah of course I've been influenced by my work in the music industry so and specifically with rap grime and drill artists who explicitly rap about things like racism deprivation you know social
6:43Harriet Williamson:injustice yeah um yeah I think that's the the elements of this story like there's there's obviously multi-tiered issues but i think the use of i don't know say someone took this podcast and edited danny bones into talking to me right now and changed what i said and make it sound like i'm endorsing him like that's the kind of thing these sorts of people can do and i can't like how am i meant to stop someone using my likeness like we did a episode of the podcast looking at taylor swift is trying to protect her entire persona and identity and like matthew mcconnelly or someone has already done it as well and like there's a lot of issues around these topics where we're not protected image and heap try to create a this is me and this is what this is who i am this is what i own and here is the proof that i'm a human being to have that like which you shouldn't need to do because we've already got existing copyrights and all these other things
7:42Effie Webb:Why aren't they being enforced?
7:44Harriet Williamson:Well, why are the government taking coffee breaks with AI companies? Why are they not taxing those huge corporations? And why are they not enforcing the existing laws? Those are the big questions really.
7:58Effie Webb:And why is creative work being poured into these large language models to train them with absolutely no consequences, remuneration, consent, anything like that?
8:10Harriet Williamson:Yeah.
8:10Effie Webb:I really do see this as a very conscious long-term project by big tech to stifle critical thinking and outsource human creativity, including things like our relationships with each other and all the good bits that make human life worth living and to give that to artificial intelligence. I find generative AI to be like deeply intellectually dishonest it's about allowing people who don't have skills to cosplay as having them while learning absolutely nothing it doesn't help you develop any any skills within yourself other than prompting yeah anyone can prompt I mean essentially an interviewer is a prompter right no I think it was interesting when I had an initial conversation on the phone with Spotify about their essentially saying, you know, we weren't necessarily taking issue with the Danny Bones lyrics themselves.
9:12Effie Webb:All the Danny Bones songs have remained on Spotify and as far as I'm aware, will do. Yeah, but there's still
9:20Harriet Williamson:a song on Spotify and Apple that's about killing Dua Lipa. It was number one in Israel.
9:26Effie Webb:This isn't me defending Spotify.
9:28Harriet Williamson:No, no, but there's stuff on the platforms that you'd be really surprised given if you read their terms and conditions.
9:34Effie Webb:Yeah, no, it doesn't. They're definitely not consistent. But I think what I found interesting from Spotify was, you know, and we were sort of going at it more from the AI disclosure label angle. And, you know, can you, you know, should a AI, a clearly synthetic artist have a, you know, have a, you know, back then it was verified artist, whatever it was. and Danny Bones did have that initially um one is that misleading is that seems pretty deceptive to me especially when you know if you come at it fresh and listen to it and I spoke to people at the rally who were Danny Bones fans and I like broke the sad news to them that Danny Bones is not a real person and they were like oh my god by the way yeah and I was like okay like there's there's another issue going on there but um but no I wouldn't I actually wouldn't blame people because it is, you know, I think there's a lot of slop on Spotify.
10:28Effie Webb:I think Danny Bones isn't quite in the AI slop category. Some would disagree with me. Me. Yeah, fair enough. I think, yeah, I mean, slopaganda, there's elements of slop. But Spotify were essentially saying, look, we can't sort of mark everything as AI generated because there is a spectrum of AI use, right? I'm sure you've discussed this before, but you know if they essentially said if we were to do it for every artist everyone would have a not everyone but almost everyone would have a an ai mark by their name which i don't know how true that is but i think i find that quite hard to believe to be honest i mean look at australia their top charts have just banned largely or wholly ai generated songs from appearing in them that means that you can tell there are ways to use ai tools that are assistive without making up
11:21Harriet Williamson:the entirety of the creative process i think the only argument that they have is the definition of what ai is can be a bit so like an auto-tune melodyne could be considered to be ai if it no if it's using data sets but it's not really it's an algorithm like there's there should be different lines like holly herndon has her own generative system based on her own voice that can she's created a deep fake of herself um and grimes did something similar where you can sing in grimes's voice but is that that different to a vocoder which is a microphone effect that you can sing through like it's is it any different to using a ar filter on um instagram where you can put someone else's face or makeup and all these other things like the layers of whereabouts ai is and where algorithms and because like i don't know to do the like fake makeup thing it needs to be trained on enough eyes to know where to put the eyeliner and it needs to be trained on enough cheeks to know where about to put the cheeks like that's not really artificial intelligence that's just something that's been trained on faces and i think when something's fully ai generated and I think the fact that the person present the face of it is also an AI and an AI persona I think they're bringing in in the next few weeks the kind of AI persona tag I think
12:47Effie Webb:I think you talked about that in your reporting yeah which is which is definitely a step in the right direction so like this is this this isn't really about like is this song AI or isn't it but like is this profile a real person and there'll be like not only just like a synthetic persona a badge of some sort but that will also mean they are um not amplified or boosted algorithmically one kind of question mark that spotify hasn't hasn't clarified yet but is because basically on on danny bones spotify you can buy his merch and i didn't quite realize how all not just spotify but on on instagram when they were still kind of active they'd all become shopping platforms for danny bones you could buy this shirt on his profile yeah and i yeah i would like to know from Spotify, will a synthetic persona still be allowed to flog match?
13:34Harriet Williamson:I mean, there's one obvious teller for an artist as AI. They don't have any tour dates. Unless they're going to start booking themselves fake shows in fake venues. Yeah. Like, it's pretty easy for, because pretty much every artist on Spotify that's trying to start a career, even if they're only playing a local pub, it will still be listed in the gig listings. So I don't know. I don't know why they're making it sound like it's so hard.
13:57Effie Webb:one of the most sort of meta parts of this story was when we saw that one of the early Danny Bones videos was like a making of one of his music videos it's like there are there are so many levels to this it's a it's a fake person pretending that they are filming an actual music none of this exists this is all not real but it drives real sentiment and it's consumed by real people who then spend their real money on it like yeah yeah I can't imagine who would buy the merch
14:25Harriet Williamson:and what they think they're representing by buying it. And I think the questions around what that then takes away from other artists.
14:36Effie Webb:Yeah, I think that's really important.
14:38Harriet Williamson:Because there might be some great far-right rappers out there who are not getting the same breaks. Why didn't they get booked for Unite the Kingdom?
14:46Effie Webb:I thought they were absolutely feeling. I do wonder, because we've talked about how the two men behind the Node project, they do have those industry skills, and they have successful industry careers, maybe they just couldn't find somebody who would sing and write lyrics and play the guitar as Danny Bones.
15:04Harriet Williamson:I mean, I'm sure Tommy Robinson is very talented. No comment.
15:08Effie Webb:No comment.
15:10Harriet Williamson:When you were digging into this story, did you find lots of other similar personas that were not as successful or other artists that were maybe in the same space? is this like a like scene or is this just one avatar that's managed to cut through
15:27Effie Webb:i mean i didn't find very many similar ones that what was coming up for me was part of the node project's extended universe so to speak which is the uh purple haired cute goth girl amelia who was created by the home office initially as a like an anti-radicalization drive for like i guess angry young men but then the online right were like she's hot we'll have her and she's been like totally co-opted wow she appears as danny bones as love interest in some of the content um yeah and is massively i mean she was a school girl in the kind of home office version they've then massively yeah sexualized her and she yeah she looks great she looks great she is out there Danny Bones, so the online right, aside from Danny Bones, co-opted her.
16:16Effie Webb:Danny Bones then co-opted her as part and has put Amelia under the management, i.e. like the sort of record label, I suppose, of the Node project, which is...
16:25Harriet Williamson:Is she like Dido to his stand?
Read the full transcript
16:27Effie Webb:Yeah, yeah. I think, I mean, Amelia's not been showing up as much these days. But she was very present around the Gorton and Denson by-election and she endorsed Advance UK's, endorsed, Advance UK's candidate. I have to keep reminding myself, none of these people exist. But actually, this was even wilder. She didn't endorse him. Nick Buckley, on his own volition, tweeted, oh my God, me and Amelia, Amelia just endorsed me. And it was him with Amelia, the AI. And I was like, this is another level of slop.
17:01Harriet Williamson:I wonder what goes through these people's heads. You're trying to be taken seriously to be elected for public office, to look after the people of an area yeah and you are hanging out with a fake ai yeah yeah
17:15Effie Webb:but no i think in terms of like is this you know is danny bones one of many not i mean i was expecting to you know once the algorithm got cooking to be fed more and more of these synthetic personas both maybe on spotify and and online but i really wasn't and you know there's there's plenty as we said like of low quality ai slop type music and there is an interesting sub sub genre of like and i don't know how connected these sort of users or accounts are of just like faceless very synthetic um probably just put through suno and then uploaded but like low effort high churn um artists who will in a similar way to danny bones reacting but will like pick up on a viral, slightly divisive news issue about channel crossings, etc.
18:05Effie Webb:And release a really offensive song, much more offensive than the Danny Bones stuff in most cases. And we'll just churn it out at volume. Maybe someone that gets taken down when Spotify or if Spotify realise. But, you know, it's a bit of a numbers game. But none of them had the same compelling kind of figurehead. They just sort of, yeah. you know why i think danny bones is quite compelling as this um figurehead to lead it it's because his whole look and aesthetic is stolen yeah and they might have tried 10 other versions and worked on which one worked like we don't know of how many failed attempts they've
18:43Harriet Williamson:had at this yeah that's so true they could have been two or three years than no project of trying to find the right character or like i mean they might not have done they might this might also just be beginner's luck um and they've just managed to ride the right wave like i think the ways in which artists careers start and the way in which because this is this is like not really a musician like i've never seen i mean we've seen some of those people that sing at tommy robinson rallies that often can't sing in tune um that have tried to start careers off the back of being kind of at those events and that's never seems to have jumped through like i don't think Nicki Minaj is selling more records because she's now more closer to the Trump regime or anything like that but I think she's selling less and I guess in terms of the reaction to this like you've spoken to some artists already and I've reached out to a few people and the general reaction of what they're using AI music which doesn't have copyright they're creating these videos they're like being on the platforms where it's hard enough to get cut through as a musician on Spotify already so taking up space and bandwidth which is also just like frustrating what are some of the responses that you've had from artists or in the replies to the posts that
20:00Effie Webb:you've had yeah I think both times we've we've published both back in March about the advanced links and then and then this sort of reveal of the two creators it has it has been the most visceral response has been from from from musicians basically pointing out either like this is this is crap this is like this is ai slot this is um this like the hypocrisy and the irony of what what is being um what is being said by danny bones versus the the genres being used is is is is very obvious um and now obviously the irony of the the career particularly of denver bamba as one of the two people behind the node project working with with lots and lots of black artists yeah and I spoke so I spoke to an artist this week who's actually met um and previously worked with Theo um who has sort of directed and been a visual artist on on various um music videos in that scene his main take was that like look if these if these people who claim that they are not hiding behind Danny Bones they stand by every lyric they are really proud of the art project they've created um and that they're also very proud of um british culture like why why not do like folk music why not why not go with what sticks what you know type thing or you know again like just the cognitive dissonance type thing of the of the rap that some of the diehard Danny Bones fans really don't like but it does there is a very visceral hate from a lot of artists in this space.
21:47Effie Webb:We haven't spoken to artists that Dan Bamber or Theo have directly worked with I would be really interested to hear from them in terms of the claims that the artists were aware or were made aware by Dan and Theo.
22:11Effie Webb:Hi there, it's Emma here. I'm gay crashing the podcast to quickly tell you about the Drowned in Sound newsletter. Every Wednesday, I invite myself into your inbox with permission, of course, to share opinion writing and resources, tell you about cool things that you should be involved in within the world of music, activism, etc. I also bring track of the week and a little bit of hopeful news for you because we all know that the news cycle can be grim at the best of times. Drowned in Sound newsletter every Wednesday in your inbox. Sign up now.
22:54Harriet Williamson:Kind of worry with an episode like this that people are going to go listen. And I guess like music fans in general are curious people. like and i think some of the music is not like it's not terrible like it's not it's you wouldn't you wouldn't be shocked if you got sent a pile of new music and it was one of the new releases by a bunch of music students or something like it's of a standard but then that's what ai has been trained on to make stuff sit within the confines like did you get many music fans in the responses to some of the videos you made first time around and yeah i think we did have a bit of a response from
23:31Effie Webb:music fans i mean aren't we all music fans even if it's like me within a very narrow confine of the like mid-2000s my chemical romance albums um yeah see our previous episode for thoughts on my chemical romance at wembley stadium oh my god i'm scared um yeah i think that people generally there is a sense of curiosity about the standard of ai music there is um a want and i think a need for transparency really and a sense that um the monetization is unfair to artists who are working hard like creating their own stuff and not just ripping off other people's aesthetics or using AI tools that are generative and amount essentially to creative theft within the industry.
24:26Harriet Williamson:So what can the platforms do? What can fans do? Are we just meant to accept until the government intervene that this is the new normal? Like, are we going to see, I don't know, the Green Party inventing a version of Billy Bragg because he can't appear at all events or a version of Plume of Faith that can appear at different rallies? like I can't imagine it happening on the left but I can imagine I don't know the AFD in Germany creating their own version or political parties in South America and like the chainsaw guy I can definitely imagine is going to have his own like AI persona favorite artists like I guess the platforms themselves like they the contents is like some of it is just on the line of hate speech which they would describe as free speech and they do that they tow that line very well
25:18Effie Webb:and that's why you know all of the platforms we've been speaking about today are mainstream social media platforms these aren't the like alternatives like rumble which you know a lot of cancelled youtubers um like russell brand or someone like that would have to retreat to rumble
25:32Harriet Williamson:a platform part owned by peter till and jd vance oh really i actually didn't know that but i'm not
25:39Effie Webb:They are in the mainstream. They say they're anti-establishment and the moment they're banned from Meta or TikTok, they're suddenly like, oh, I hate big tech.
25:48Harriet Williamson:But I guess the stuff that's not the music probably is the stuff that's got the contents in, which could be considered closer to hates. Because I think there's a lyric in there that they put a question mark on the end of.
25:59Effie Webb:The Jews and Master Masons one, yeah. Classic world control trope, but stick a question mark on the end of it and it's fine apparently.
26:16Harriet Williamson:I guess if you're using AI you can put in the terms and conditions and the rules on hate speech in different countries but I'd imagine in some countries they might be breaking different laws like there's different things you can and can't say in certain countries and obviously these platforms are global and they have to think about global
26:34Effie Webb:audiences as well yeah and there's no coordination between meta youtube tiktok etc so any any social media story or reporting is always like a bit bittersweet in terms of like okay there might be some really meaningful interesting and responsiveness from from one platform that just means they'll migrate very easily and quickly to another platform and slash or set up a second account where you know they you know people are savvy and people get around things like that and I think it's compounded in this case because it's not only your social media four or five platforms but it's the music streamers it's your Spotify's it's your Apple Music Amazon Music whoever else plus the payment processors you know across the board and I think you'll know more about this but the kind of distributors and you know it's a whole like infrastructure I suppose propping it up and they'll all have different
27:29Harriet Williamson:And I think as consumers or as fans, we have to decide, do we want to use those platforms? Like if you're an artist, do you want to use the same distributor that they're using? Like from what I can tell, it looks like it's a company in America called Two Lost. I've reached out to them to find out they're a massive platform. They're a big rival to the kind of major label owned distributors now because the majors own most of the kind of self-serve platforms. it's like as an artist you've got to choose which platform you're going to be on and what they think is acceptable and okay and like if your choice between using spotify which might be boosting this in its algorithm or other platforms which are not pushing ai music they've got like koboz who sponsor this they have human curators so it's very rare that an ai is going to be recommended because their human team is not going to go oh that that seems like something our audience would like um similarly like tidal like i don't think they necessarily have the same like autoplay of just random stuff that's ticked by the algorithm without any human beings really being involved i think apple don't really push at least to the fore of their home page and places ai music so i think that there's there's a lot that consumers and fans can do like should we be reporting AI personas that are popping up that don't have any logging on them because yeah you might be fine with it but if that's playing to you I don't know I always think of like people's like 14 year old cousin or something who's edgy and anti-establishment and like I was edgy and anti-establishment but I never found myself hating groups of people because of it it's like and I think I'm not suggesting that you're going to end up hating people off the back of this music but you're going to end up being part of a movement and if that movement leads you to a Tommy Robinson rally or like getting involved in supporting political parties then that is like Overton window shifts are one thing but actually becoming part of some of these things
29:32Effie Webb:is a bit more isn't it and that's why I think it was so important to find out who was behind the project right there has to be a level of transparency and accountability and I think that's what the whole i don't know i guess a bit of a victim mentality from the node project over this is about it's because they don't want any scrutiny of who they are and they did want to just let the danny bones persona speak for them because otherwise why not sit in front of a camera yourself why not put your name on it yeah and also we need to know
30:06Harriet Williamson:that it's not i don't know someone in moscow making it another fantastic tbij investigation
30:11Effie Webb:was about this stuff yeah i mean yeah we've sort of been yeah been like inadvertently just in the world of basically islamophobic ai slot which the face especially facebook the algorithm just laps up and two separate kind of operations um we were reporting on and my colleague neve kind of found And these weren't people with far-right ideologies sat behind a desk in the UK, but one in Sri Lanka running a pretty advanced, sophisticated, I suppose, content farm type thing where he was both and still is. And has cited our reporting as well. But teaches other people how to get rich quick, essentially making this kind of slop that hits on the kind of themes that Danny Bones hits on to a lower quality, I suppose, but higher volume.
31:05Effie Webb:And another, like, devout Muslim from Pakistan churning out the same Islamophobic stuff. So, again, that was, you know, there is no one kind of person that is making this content, and the incentives are very, very different. And I think in the case of the Node project and Danny Bones, I don't think it's as straight and narrow as just this is a lucrative operation. I don't get the sense that, although, you know, they're you know they've made a fair amount it's it's not the kind of thing you could quit your day job for necessarily so i think it's a slight if there's a slight in between there of like it being a creative endeavor as they as they say plus a bit of a side hustle and really actually believing in this messaging of christian nationalism that it's just totally divorced from any new testament teachings and anxiety about population replacement um and anger at a country that just doesn't seem to be working for anybody but a few elites which is a sentiment that I as someone on the left really it really resonates with me and I think yeah that's actually true I just come to a different conclusion.
32:13Harriet Williamson:You look at the number of billionaires since Covid and the number of millionaires like all of those graphs show a very distorted inequality in the country.
32:21Effie Webb:Right and that's why there are some issues here that are highlighted by the Danny Bones content that we could potentially find common ground with the fans of this project on but because the conclusion that they've come to is that it's because of muslims islam people on small boats immigration you know that's not something i subscribe to and i think that even if we did in this country get the furthest right most mass deportation doing government it's not going to make life better for most of us it is not going to solve those problems and yeah i hope we don't have to go down the road of actually finding out what that's going to be like and having families and communities completely torn apart to see that it was a fully failed
33:11Harriet Williamson:experiment what is stopping someone listening to this creating their own danny bones who's maybe more extreme or woke or anything that they might want to do with danny bones like could someone just go out and is it like an off the peg you can generate like could someone ruin danny bones's
33:30Effie Webb:reputation oh what literally copped yeah the danny bones avatar type thing yeah like again copyright law you're the expert but like as far as i'm not an expert in copyright law but i've had
33:42Harriet Williamson:but you know, disclaimer, disclaimer, I played one on TV.
33:47Effie Webb:Yeah. Um, I mean, no, I think if the left, if, you know, if the left wanted to use, um, the Danny bones carrot, and I'm not suggesting they do this, but if they wanted to, um, use Danny bones as likeness for, um, spreading a very different message, there would be nothing legally stopping them. I don't think the node project would have any like right to, like you know there wouldn't be a leg to stand on in terms of take down like take this down in terms of because i mean there is a sort of impersonation bit in various terms of service and social media platforms but you're if you're impersonating a ai character i don't think that
34:26Harriet Williamson:stands i was just thinking the i am spartacus kind of thing we could flood danny bones messaging and philly's instagram and his i guess his spotify account and all those things no one's done it yet yeah the um but i also like what we don't really want is people going out and doing like a rap
34:44Effie Webb:battle and making him more famous right exactly there's doing like a blur versus oasis with like ai slop yeah and one of the things that we sort of grapple with around this is the attention that our reporting has brought to his content um but if we are in a place where made up ai characters are intervening in important political moments i think that that was public interest justification enough into looking into danny bones and and who makes him well thank you both for your
35:16Harriet Williamson:time and for the brilliant work you've been doing on this i think it's really important in reporting i think it's there shouldn't it shouldn't be obvious that the changes that need to happen in this country need examples like this like people can pressure their mps and see there's different movements about stopping ai um i'll link to some in the show notes there's some quite good campaigns going on at the moment which um like the stop gbt movement has become huge very quickly it's not necessarily linked with this um i think there's a lot that music industry trade bodies should be doing and i know they're prioritizing ai like pretty much every head of a music industry body i've had on is wanted to talk about ai on the here um i think musicians need to be aware that their work and their likeness could be being used in this way and they need to speak to their copyright holders because often they don't own their own copyrights suno has done deal with different record companies i think artists have to opt in i don't think it's standard that like the entire Polydor records catalog is available for Suno or anything like that.
36:25Harriet Williamson:But big companies have done deals with these organizations. And I think as music fans, I think we need to just think about what are we signal boosting? What are we engaging with? How, if you're seeing stuff like this rise up, how do you support independent media, for instance, so that it can be reported on investigated properly? And there's lots of different things, I think, that music fans can be doing. Is there anything else we've not touched on that you guys wanted to talk about? I think I feel like we've covered everything in a bit more.
36:56Effie Webb:I think, yeah, just on that last point, like it does, I think the monetization thing, it sets for some like, you know, slightly entrepreneurial person who sees the rise of Danny Bones. and you know before we named the creators the lack of any accountability and the money that they were bringing in and the like clout they were getting I suppose that does massively just like throw all accountability out the window and you know I'm sure it is a you know there's more that goes into it than just typing give me a Danny Bones character like there maybe was some early iterations and decisions about how he looked and how to make him consistent across videos etc but people can the bar is getting lower and getting cheaper it looks like so I really don't want this to be a kind of like how to make your Danny Boons go viral thing and I think the platforms need to at the very least make sure that these accounts aren't monetised but also terms and conditions terms of service etc are actually being followed because it shouldn't take journalists having to become the sort of de facto regulators which is often the case in these kind of stories.
38:08Harriet Williamson:Yeah, regulators. Imagine if we actually had them and they operated.
38:11Effie Webb:Imagine. I kind of don't want to give the people behind the Node project an opportunity to say, oh, we've been cancelled by all these platforms. We were cancelled because of reporting. We've been silenced. We've been shut down. I want a human audience to reject Danny Bones as slop and to reject his lyrics as divisive and racist and Islamophobic, particularly the more extreme stuff that's come out in the Slopaganda album because that's like that doesn't give people anywhere to hide in terms of you know whether their ideas have been picked up within a wider sort of marketplace where everything is given a fair hearing that that's sort of what I'd like to see and I think that this is a story that makes things like media literacy so important people need to understand what they're seeing particularly if you're scrolling very quickly through short form videos i can see many many instances where people who are maybe time poor or less media literate might think that a danny bones video is real um i think that's perfectly possible um or at least a video game yeah it's got grand theft vibes hasn't it or at least a piece of art that is human made where the actual human beings involved were being like properly remunerated and you know when you're in a position where you're using a generative ai tool that's already out of the window and also they're talking about being
39:37Harriet Williamson:working class and things it's like well where why aren't you paying workers to make this why are you paying a generative ai model that's owned by billionaires and that is stolen from working
39:47Effie Webb:class artists yeah um yeah and yeah support independent media support independent journalism
39:54Harriet Williamson:made by human beings yeah so this podcast brought you in partnership with kobars we're going to make playlist did you guys have a think about what song you might add to our playlist of songs that give
40:05Effie Webb:you a little bit of pride in where we're from um absolutely um i'm a big fan of the clash it would have to be white man and hammersmith i don't know why it's come to mind but lily allen um london
40:16Harriet Williamson:not ldn we are in london um well thank you both for coming we can find this playlist at john and sound.org um forward slash playlists and if you think of other songs we can add them that playlist will be available alongside all the other episodes where we've made a playlist for different episodes
40:39Harriet Williamson:just quickly to add at the end of this episode one that conversation could have gone a lot of other directions I actually I don't know if you can tell was a little bit more cautious with my words considering the type of topic we were discussing and very, very aware that there are landmines that you can stumble onto when talking about topics like this, which, yeah, I tried. Hopefully, hopefully, um, is one of, I bet it felt like when we finished it, one of the better episodes. Um, and we are approaching a hundred episodes of this podcast. So we will soon be doing some special episodes, but we might take a little bit of a break to get our feet plunged on the ground and back on fire because as you might have noticed this summer this podcast has been a little bit all over the place as to what days the episodes are coming out.
41:31Harriet Williamson:I don't know if you pay attention we aim to release these episodes every Tuesday but yeah for the last few weeks I have been flying solo and kind of putting stuff out weekends when I've got time and stuff like that so we will get back into a much more regular back to work back to school kind of theme and um yeah look back across the hundred episodes as well because i think there are if you're a new listener there's a lot in the archive that's still very much evergreen to dig into and a lot of connected issues topics which might have changed a bit so yeah if you've got any thoughts questions things you'd like to know just drop an email to podcasts at dranninsound.org and um yeah we might do a little bit of a q a episode as well if you've got things to ask but if you listen to the end thank you so much please uh whatsapp this to a friend send a text to someone with a link to this podcast you think would enjoy it there's always one person in our head i think when we're listening to conversations who we think oh yeah this person is thinking about all these things or is completely unaware of all these things and this episode might be really of interest to them thank you for spreading the word i have been sean adams the host of the drowning sound podcast this episode was produced by george amuni our new producer and you have been you this podcast is brought to you in partnership with Cobuzz and you can go to drowningsound.org forward slash playlists to find our companion playlist for this episode and many others the companion playlist this time around is a british pride playlist which harriet and effie picked some great tracks for that's drowningsound.org forward slash playlists that's all for now see you next time bye
43:16To be continued...
From the publisher
In part two of our conversation with journalists Effie Webb and Harriet Williamson, we move beyond who created Danny Bones and ask what his existence means for music itself.
We discuss the irony of a far-right AI rapper borrowing from Black music, the response from musicians, and what happens when technology can imitate creative work at scale with little to no consequence.
We get into copyright, the devaluing of human creative labour, Spotify’s response to AI artists, whether Danny Bones is an outlier or an early sign of what’s coming, and finally, what music fans can do to help musicians, songwriters and artists to remain at the centre of music.
The Drowned in Sound podcast is presented in partnership with Qobuz, the pioneering high-quality music streaming and download platform for music enthusiasts and audiophiles.
Each week we curate playlists on Qobuz, featuring our favourite records, artists, and the themes we explore on the show. Visit drownedinsound.org/playlists to discover new music in rich Hi-Res lossless quality and start your 30-day free trial of Qobuz.
This week's playlist is songs that give you a bit of pride in where you are from. Amongst the picks, Harriet chose 'White Man in Hammersmith Palais' by The Clash and Effie chose 'LDN' by Lily Allen, two London songs, one of them about race and punk and reggae and the other about what the city actually looks like underneath, which is a fairly pointed answer to a record trading on national pride. What would you add? You can email us on podcasts@drownedinsound.org
Referenced In This Episode:
More than a third of new uploads to Apple Music are now AI-generated, reported by Music Ally: More than a third of Apple Music uploads are now AI music
Australia banning fully AI-generated songs from the ARIA charts, announced two days before we recorded: AI-generated music to be banned from the ARIA charts
Spotify’s AI persona labelling, announced this month: Spotify introduces an AI persona label and keeps AI-generated artists out of recommendations by default
‘Harbu Darbu’ by Ness and Stilla, the track mentioned in the episode, which calls for the deaths of Bella Hadid, Dua Lipa and Mia Khalifa and topped the Israeli streaming charts: Harbu Darbu
Effie Webb, Bureau of Investigative Journalism Effie Webb’s profile
Harriet Williamson, Novara Media Novara Media
Recorded at The Shure Experience Centre, London.
Sign up to the DiS newsletter: Drowned in Sound
Produced by Georgia Mooney.




