296. Ottoman Gaza: Gunpowder Conquests & Rising Nationalism (Part 6)

5 Oct 2025 · 57 min · 31 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Ottoman rule in Gaza (1516 onward) and how later Ottoman-era economic shifts and 19th-century nationalism set the stage for Zionism and emerging “Palestinian” identity.

Guest background

Eugene Rogan, professor of modern Middle Eastern history at Oxford; author of The Arabs (cited) and specialist on Christian minorities in Damascus and 1860s massacres.

Key claims

  • Gaza’s strategic crossroads role made it vulnerable during regime change; after a rumor-driven uprising against the Ottomans, the Ottomans used scorched-earth violence, leveling Gaza and reducing its population to about one-sixth.
  • Ottoman administration provincialized the region: “Palestine” wasn’t a single province; towns like Gaza, Jerusalem, Nablus were grouped under larger provinces (Sidon or Damascus).
  • Ottoman religious minorities were “protected” (dhimmi) and integrated economically, but were second-class and paid jizya.
  • In the 18th century, cotton wealth (Galilee/Tiberias) enabled local power (Zahir al-Omar; later Ahmed Pasha “al-Jazzar”), illustrating decentralization rather than simple “decline.”
  • Zionism’s rise: driven by European antisemitism and pogroms (notably 1881 Russia), plus pilgrimage “next year in Jerusalem,” supported by Jewish philanthropy and land-purchase efforts.

Notable examples

  • Selim I’s “gunpowder” shock-troop victories over the Mamluks at Marj Dabik (1516).
  • Evliya Celebi’s travel portrait of Palestine as a holy-land of multiple faiths (with exaggeration).
  • Napoleon’s 1798 march through Gaza; expanding European consuls and tourism (Thomas Cook, 1860s).
  • Herzl’s diary (1895) advocating “gentle” expropriation and discreet removal of the poor; 1897 First Zionist Congress; 1904 founding of Tel Aviv; 1908 Jaffa riots.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

The Mamluk Empire's Golden Age

0:19 to 0:44

Explore the Mamluks' rule and Gaza's significance in the 1300s.

“Have you ever had so many tabs open that your computer starts slowing down?”

The Mamluk Empire's Golden Age

2:25 to 3:49

Explore the Mamluks' rule and Gaza's significance in the 1300s.

“The hot summer sun beat down upon al-Ashraf Khansu al-Gawri, 49th sultan of the Mamluk dynasty, as he reviewed his troops for battle.”

Transition to Ottoman Rule

3:50 to 5:18

Understand the transition from Mamluk to Ottoman control in Gaza.

“The Mamluks, slave soldiers who became the sultans of Egypt, had conquered Gaza from the Mongols.”

Selim I and Ottoman Conquests

5:19 to 7:17

Learn about Selim I's military strategies and the Ottoman conquests.

“And I feel we need to go over his CV again in this episode.”

Cultural Clash in Warfare

7:18 to 9:47

Examine the differing philosophies of warfare between Mamluks and Ottomans.

“mature Mamluk empire before trying to take on the still virile and dangerous Suffolans.”

Fall of Gaza to the Ottomans

9:48 to 12:11

Discover Gaza's uprising and subsequent defeat by the Ottomans.

“You have a wonderful quote from Kansu or a story about Kansu in your book.”

Aftermath of Ottoman Conquest

12:12 to 14:00

Understand the impact of Ottoman rule on Gaza's population and governance.

“Because now you've got defeat in Gaza, the Ottomans are in charge.”

Demographics and Diversity in Ottoman Palestine

14:00 to 18:07

Learn about the diverse religious communities in Ottoman Palestine and their social dynamics.

“Gaza, Palestine more broadly, tended to be passed between a province based in Sidon on the eastern Mediterranean or Damascus.”

Governance and Local Power Structures

18:07 to 21:10

Explore the relationship between local notables and the central Ottoman authority in governing Palestine.

“If you like, that's what's going on at the highest echelons.”

The Rise of Local Leaders in the 18th Century

21:10 to 23:10

Understand the emergence of local leaders in Palestine and their economic impact due to cotton trade.

“But in the 1700s, just tell me a little bit about the local leaders in places like Gaza and the surrounding areas.”
Show all 31 chapters

The Contradiction of Decline and Prosperity

23:10 to 26:25

Examine the debate over Ottoman Palestine's decline versus its economic developments in the 18th century.

“I'm quite transfixed with this idea of white gold coming from this region.”

Impact of European Interests in the 19th Century

26:25 to 28:01

Discover how European powers influenced the region economically and politically during the 19th century.

“The other thing that gets going at this period is Jaffa oranges, isn't it?”

European Colonial Interests in the Eastern Mediterranean

28:01 to 29:12

Learn about the changing dynamics of European colonialism and interest in the Eastern Mediterranean during the 19th century.

“It's also going to be a time in which the European powers begin to play their imperial politics.”

Diplomatic Relations and Identity in the 19th Century

29:12 to 33:54

Explore how European powers established diplomatic connections in the Ottoman region and how regional identities began to shift towards nationalism.

“efforts, material links and having industrial relations.”

Emerging Focus on Jewish Identity and Zionism

33:54 to 34:37

Understand the growing attention to Jewish identity in the Holy Land and the rise of the Zionist movement in the late 19th century.

“When does the Palestinian identity emerge?”

Emerging Focus on Jewish Identity and Zionism

34:44 to 35:36

Understand the growing attention to Jewish identity in the Holy Land and the rise of the Zionist movement in the late 19th century.

“And it's this art of the deep dive that the London Review of Books champions.”

The Jewish Community and Migration to Palestine

35:37 to 36:30

Delve into the history and experiences of the Jewish community in Palestine and the socio-political factors driving migration.

“Let's talk about a condition many people haven't heard of.”

The Jewish Community and Migration to Palestine

37:04 to 42:00

Delve into the history and experiences of the Jewish community in Palestine and the socio-political factors driving migration.

“Now, we're going to deal in this half with the rise of political Zionism in the late 19th century.”

Influential Voices in Early Zionism

42:00 to 42:44

Learn about the key figures influencing French thought on Jewish nationalism.

“In the early 1800s, you have someone called François-René de Chateaubriand who is a writer, a politician, somebody who has the ear of Napoleon Bonaparte through his writings.”

The Tension of Zionism and Nationalism

42:44 to 43:30

Explore the contrast between Zionism's aspirations and realistic nationalism.

“And Zionism is trying to unite the Jewish people who are in diaspora, spread across four continents.”

Theodor Herzl: Architect of Zionism

43:30 to 44:12

Understand Herzl's role in shaping the political agenda for a Jewish state.

“Herzl is, in a sense, the first intellectual to harness the push and pull factors that we have been describing into a distinct political agenda to create a Jewish land in Palestine.”

Impact of the Dreyfus Affair on Herzl

44:12 to 45:21

Discover how the Dreyfus case influenced Herzl's vision for Jewish nationalism.

“For those who don't know what the Dreyfus there was about, just give us a little thumbnail, would you?”

The First Zionist Congress

45:21 to 46:05

Learn about the significance of the 1897 Zionist Congress and its goals.

“Well, here again, we see the organizational ability of the journalist to be able to rally a group of fellow believers to debate the issues of Jewish nationalism.”

Herzl's Views on Palestinians

46:05 to 46:55

Examine Herzl's perspective on the Arab population in Palestine and his intentions.

“To then turn around and say, actually, we as Jews are a separate nation, seemed to be going with the arguments of the anti-Semites.”

Herzl's Written Thoughts on Land Expropriation

46:55 to 48:29

Analyze Herzl's private journal entries on land acquisition and population displacement.

“Well, Herzl's quite aware that there is already a population in Palestine.”

The Founding of Tel Aviv

48:29 to 49:25

Explore the implications of establishing Tel Aviv as a Jewish city in 1904.

“And remember, at this point, the Zionist organization is reaching out to the Ottoman an empire to try and petition for the creation of Jewish colonies.”

Tensions Between Jewish Settlers and Arabs

49:25 to 51:11

Understand the Jaffa riots and rising tensions between Jewish settlers and local Arabs.

“I find this astonishing, actually, that he was only 44 when he died.”

Indigenous vs. Immigrant Jewish Relations

51:11 to 52:58

Learn about the dynamics between indigenous Jews and European immigrant settlers in Palestine.

“the growing tension between the local Palestinian Arab population and the Jewish immigrants, who, by the beginning of the 20th century, are already politically motivated.”

Emergence of Palestinian Identity

52:58 to 54:08

Discover the significance of the newspaper 'Philistine' and its role in Palestinian identity.

“And they saw their place in local societies having been long established by the norms governing relations between Muslim, Christians, and Jews in the Ottoman Empire.”

Palestinian Nationalism and the Zionist Movement

54:08 to 56:00

Examine the challenges of Palestinian nationalism in response to Zionism before WWI.

“in an earlier age, perhaps a town identity would have been the most that one might have recognized.”

Palestinian Nationalism vs. Zionism

56:00 to 58:05

Explore the dynamics and tensions between Palestinian nationalism and Zionism during the Ottoman era.

“In a sense, Palestinian nationalism was disadvantaged in the face of Zionism, in that Zionism was a well-articulated ideology.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Anita Anand:If you want access to bonus episodes, reading lists for every series of Empire, a chat community, discounts for all the books mentioned in the week's podcast, add free listening and a weekly newsletter, sign up to Empire Club at www.empirepoduk .com. A BetterHelp ad. Have you ever had so many tabs open that your computer starts slowing down? Life can feel like that too. BetterHelp's 2026 State of Stigma report found that 74 % of Americans believe society still discourages asking for help. Therapy can help you sort through what's taking up space and quietly affecting you. With BetterHelp, connect with a licensed therapist online and switch anytime.

0:42Maybe it's time to close a few tabs. Visit BetterHelp.com slash Empire to get started. For adults with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis symptoms, every choice matters. Tremphaya offers self-injection or intravenous infusion from the start. Tremphaya is administered as injections under the skin or infusions through a vein every four weeks, followed by injections under the skin every four or eight weeks. If your doctor decides that you can self-inject Tremphaya, proper training is required. Tremphaya is a prescription medicine used to treat adults with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease and adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.

1:23serious allergic reactions, increased risk of infections or lower ability to fight them, and liver problems may occur. Before treatment, get checked for infections and tuberculosis. Tell your doctor if you have an infection, flu-like symptoms, or need a vaccine. Explore what's possible. Ask your doctor about Trimphia today. Call 1-800-526-7736 to learn more or visit trimphiaradio.com.

1:49William Dalrymple:Hey parents, how do you make smarter choices for your kids' college today? That's where Sally can help. With Sally, you can find scholarships, funding options, tools, and guidance all in one place. And if you need a loan, Sally has options for different families and different situations. College is only worth it if you do it right. So don't just help your kid go. Help them go smarter. sally.com slash go parents.

2:27Anita Anand:The hot summer sun beat down upon al-Ashraf Khansu al-Gawri, 49th sultan of the Mamluk dynasty, as he reviewed his troops for battle. Since the founding of the dynasty in 1250, the Mamluks had ruled over the oldest and most powerful Islamic state of its day, The Cairo-based empire spanned Egypt, Syria and Arabia. Khansu, a man in his 70s, had ruled the empire for 15 years. He was now in Marj Dabik, a field outside the Syrian city of Aleppo, at the northernmost point of his empire, to confront the greatest danger the Mamluks had ever faced. He would fail, and his failure would set in motion the demise of his empire, paving the way for the conquest of the Arab lands by the Ottoman Turks.

3:21Anita Anand:The date was August the 24th, 1516.

3:26William Dalrymple:Hello, and welcome to Empire. And that was a reading from the opening passages of The Arabs by Eugene Rogan, a very good friend of this show and professor of modern Middle Eastern history at the University of Oxford. Welcome to you, Eugene, and thanks for coming back. Thanks, Anita. It's great to be with you. What we're going to concentrate on in this episode is the Ottoman era in Gaza. And just to sort of place you and let you know where we are at in the series, in the last episode, we were very much rooted in the 1300s. The Mamluks, slave soldiers who became the sultans of Egypt, had conquered Gaza from the Mongols.

4:04William Dalrymple:It had then experienced what I think it's true to say a golden age of trade, urbanization, wealth. But if you have wealth and you have success, you catch attention. And there is a new empire on the horizon and it is the Ottoman Empire. So just sort of take us forward from that because that was the 1300s. In the 1500s, which is where we are now at, this is the same time that Henry VIII is on the throne in England. What is going on in Gaza and in that region? So Gaza is, as your previous episodes will have highlighted, a crossroads between Egypt and the Syrian lands. It's a small port. There are bigger ports in the eastern Mediterranean.

4:48It's also a major land crossing point. And that is an advantage for Gaza in terms of trade and administration. It's on a vital road linking key territories. But it's also a danger because when territories change hands, those cities at the crossroads really get devastated. And I think Gaza's experience of transition from Mamluk to Ottoman rule would just bear that point out.

5:14William Dalrymple:Running the Ottoman show, if you like, as a man that we've met before in our Ottoman series. But we talked about Selim I, also known as Selim the Grim. And I feel we need to go over his CV again in this episode. Just remind us who he was and what he was like. So Selim was one of the more successful conquerors of the early Ottoman Empire. The history of the Ottoman Empire is usually told as empires spanning three continents built in the reigns of 10 great sultans. And Selim is right in the middle of those. But his methods of conquest were those that relied on great violence to stun his enemies into submission.

5:52and hence the sobriquet, the Grim. This was certainly to be the case when the Ottomans decide to divert a campaign that initially was heading towards Persia. But knowing that in going towards Persia, they would have on the right flank the Mamluk Empire, and the Mamluks had been making noises about allying with the Persian Empire against the Ottomans, Selim decided it was unwise to leave his flank exposed to the Mamluks if he was going to attack the Safavids, and instead decided to turn on the Babluks. And he brought the full power and force of his very successful shock troops against the chivalric, basically knights more in line with the court of Arthur than let's say that of Henry VIII, and was to bring a gunpowder army to bear against men carrying swords.

6:42The result was overwhelmingly Ottoman victory.

6:46Anita Anand:And this was in a sense the same strategy that Alexander the Great had to attack Persia. He decided not to leave his right flank exposed. Exactly the same strategy. You know, very wise position in war not to extend your lines beyond what you can secure. And so it made perfect sense. And don't forget, in conquering the Mamluk territories, the Ottomans were adding to their empire, wealthy provinces, the eastern Mediterranean, the bridge to the Indian Ocean through Hejaz and Egypt. They knew what they were doing. They stood to gain far more out of conquering the elderly, mature Mamluk empire before trying to take on the still virile and dangerous Suffolans.

7:27William Dalrymple:And when you talk about sort of this mismatch of power, sure, the Ottomans had the bigger guns, if you like, but you were talking about the chivalric thing that was in the Mamluk's heads. And that very much, I mean, if you were to picture the OK Corral as the single gunfighter who comes out into the middle and calls out their biggest champion to face one-on-one. That's what the Mamluks thought battle was about, that you face somebody head on and you take honor in defeating them. Whereas the Ottomans not just outgunned the Mamluks, but they have a very different philosophy of fighting. So with the Mamluks, it is mano a mano, you fight for your honor, you are the champion, you challenge their greatest champion and you win.

8:07William Dalrymple:It's like that, a very old-fashioned way of fighting. But the Ottomans are not interested in that. They are interested, down, dirty, quick defeat? Basically, the Ottomans wanted to use whatever weapons of war would give them the best result. And it was a real clash of cultures. You're absolutely right. For the Mamluks, there was this notion that there was honor in warfare. They dressed to the nines to go to war. They wore their finest silks. Their arms were jeweled. It never crossed their minds that they would lose a war. They spent all their days training in martial exercises, and they terrified people by the very confidence with which they went to war.

8:44Anita Anand:These, we should perhaps remind people, were the only people, I think, ever to defeat the Mongols, weren't they? The Mamluks famously see off the Mongols in a way that no other army does at that period. The Mamluks had an impeccable track record and they had beaten virtually every adversary they came up against in the field. They did so because they just were dedicated to their warfare. They had no other interests. They weren't merchants, They weren't administrators. They were military men who trained day and night to be the most powerful, successful swordsmen in the world. And in fact, they had proven themselves in the Middle Ages to be the greatest single army of force.

9:23Anita Anand:But this was now the age of gunpowder. Had they failed to modernize in the way the Ottomans had? For the Mamluk, the idea of putting down their swords to pick up guns was cowardly. Real men fought face to face in battle with swords, and the really proud ones dressed up for it because they knew that there was no risk of them losing. They wouldn't stain their clothes. And so this was really part of the ethos of the Mamluks. And it was that ethos which undermined their position in battle in Marshdabic in 1516.

9:53William Dalrymple:You have a wonderful quote from Kansu or a story about Kansu in your book. And that's the same Kansu that William was talking about at the top of the episode. It goes a little, our master, the sultan, the Ottomans have defeated us. Save yourself. Take refuge in Aleppo, says a fleeing bannerman. And as soon as he says these words, the sultan suffers a massive stroke. You know, he tries to mount his horse. He falls off the horse and he dies on the spot. Is that pretty much sort of the end of the Mamluks? And, you know, they've got their leader, their great leader, their idea of chivalry trodden into the dirt, and he falls off his horse.

10:31William Dalrymple:Is that it? Well, the Mamluks will have one last stand in Cairo, their capital, and the Ottomans will work their way through the Syrian lands, conquering towns and cities, Gaza among them. They'll go down towards the Hejaz and take Mecca and Medina, which will allow the Ottoman sultans henceforth to claim the dignity of being caliphs of Islam. and then they come north to take on Cairo and to defeat the Mamluks in their capital city. And it's there where the Ottoman conquest is completed and the destruction of the Mamluk empire is finished.

11:05Anita Anand:Now, while they are busy in Cairo, a rumor spreads to Gaza, doesn't it, that they've been defeated, which is wrong, that the Ottomans have been defeated by the Mamluks. and Gaza rises up against the Ottomans. This turns out to be a bad mistake, Eugene, doesn't it? You have to understand that for the notables of a town like Gaza, the Mamluks have been the only state power they've ever known, and they've been in place for centuries. And so your interests are tied up with the Mamluks, and you have a hard time imagining a new power defeating them. So it was quite easy to be taken in by rumors that the Ottomans had gotten overextended and defeat it.

11:41This happened in other towns as well, where you had local uprisings of the old vested interests in the Mamluk order trying to reassert their privileges against these new Ottoman invaders. But they underestimate the Ottomans. They're extremely dangerous, extremely well-armed. And so they come back with scorched earth tactics to put down any town that dared to rise up in rebellion against them. Gaza, unfortunately, fell victim to their scorched earth tactics.

12:10William Dalrymple:So then what follows? Because now you've got defeat in Gaza, the Ottomans are in charge. What do they decide to do with the place? Well, basically, the Ottomans lay siege to insurgent Gaza, and they level the town. And they reduced the population to about one-sixth its size. So Gaza was to suffer the consequences of its uprising, and it would take years for it to recover from the damage inflicted. not so much by the first Ottoman conquest, the town more or less surrendered and let the Ottomans pass through. But in rising up, the Ottomans were to put down Gaza in a very violent way. And yeah, the damage to the city was intense.

12:53William Dalrymple:When you say put them down, I mean, we're not talking about in battle then. We must be talking about the kind of red mist that follows conquest that we've talked about before in other imperial scenarios. Do they just go around massacring men, women and children? Basically, it is unleashing the army on the town, and then men, women and children are massacred. So yes, there's superior fire powers brought against the civilian population that rebelled against them. And in this way, those who resisted are killed, and the town is brought back under order.

13:22Anita Anand:A very crucial point is that in the new Ottoman system, there is no province of Palestine, is there? It's just now part of Syria. Is there a sense in which it has become provincialized, that while it was very important for the Mamluks, it's less important for the Ottomans or not? It's not that Gaza or the other towns of Palestine were not important to the Ottomans. It's just that they were trying to put in place a new administrative order that reflected Ottoman methods, which were different from Mamluks. They had their own system of government. Their empire was based in Istanbul, not in Cairo.

13:56And so they put in place provincial administrators and they created a provincial system of which towns like Gaza, Jerusalem, Nablus were part. They came under bigger provinces. Gaza, Palestine more broadly, tended to be passed between a province based in Sidon on the eastern Mediterranean or Damascus. And for much of the Ottoman centuries, there was no Palestine so much as there were counties led by market towns like Hebron, Nablus, Jerusalem, Gaza.

14:30Anita Anand:Give us a portrait of the kind of people who are living in these towns. We saw in our episode about the Crusades that it was only then that Palestine had become majority Muslim, that there'd been this very strong Christian minority, and there were also Jewish communities in the land. What is the kind of makeup of Gaza and the Palestinian countryside at this point? I couldn't give you precise figures only because we don't really have reliable census figures for the 16th century. But from what we have from Ottoman sources, it's very clear that you had a Muslim majority population across greater Syria with large Jewish and Christian communities.

15:08and the Ottomans were very keen to get the cooperation of all these communities and so you wouldn't talk about as it were a discrimination or persecution of minorities so much as allowing minorities a certain degree of autonomy within the Ottoman system to apply their own personal status laws so you'd get married you'd do business and get buried according to the rules of your own church or denomination but your church would be responsible for collecting your taxes and making you live by Ottoman law.

15:39Anita Anand:There's some talk in some quarters of dimitude, the idea that Christians and the Jews under Ottoman rule are oppressed, that they have to pay jizya tax, that there's various other discriminations against them. I mean, this is your specialist subject. Your last wonderful book was about particularly the Christian minorities in Damascus and the massacres that take place in the 1860s. Do you see the Ottoman system as fundamentally discriminatory against religious minorities or really not? It's really interesting because, again, we have to compare the Ottoman world with the rest of the world of its own time.

16:14And so if you look at the persecution of Huguenots in France, we can see what discrimination really looks like. This was not the case with the minorities in the Ottoman Empire. Yes, they were branded as dhimnis, meant that they were protected communities. They did have to pay the jizya tax, but that was in compensation for the fact they were spared military service. And I would describe the Christians and Jews of the Ottoman Empire as respected. They had an integral part in society and economy. They were protected. You could not take arbitrary action against minorities, but they were distinctly second-class citizens.

16:53They did not enjoy the same full rights that Sunni Muslims enjoyed in what was a Sunni Muslim majority empire. But it would be wrong to confuse, let us say, the status of Christians and Jews in the 16th and 17th century with what will happen in the 19th century when a new idea of citizenship is beginning to compete with that of subjecthood.

17:14Anita Anand:Is there a sense in which the local population, particularly the Sunni population, can get on the rungs of the Ottoman system, that they can send their sons to Istanbul and become governors and so on? Or do you get the impression that the grandfamilies of Jerusalem and Akar and Nabulus are being ruled by Turkish-speaking foreigners from Istanbul? It really is centralized rule from Istanbul in which local notables will have authority locally, but you had him play what was termed by Albuquerani a politics of notables. And this meant that provincial governors sent by Istanbul had to work with local notables in councils to strike a balance in how to rule the territory with the cooperation and acceptance of the local people.

18:03So they had influence, but they were not the government officials. Those officials came from Istanbul.

18:08William Dalrymple:If you like, that's what's going on at the highest echelons. But just among people, what is the attitude of Ottomans who are Turks, not towards different religions, but fellow Muslims, if you like, but Arab Muslims? Is there a sense that Arab Muslims somehow are not as good? I mean, what is the kind of tension or is there a complete lack of tension among if you are an Arab Muslim or you're a Turkish Muslim? It's, again, very interesting to look at how national identities played in this early modern period. I would say they really didn't play a major role. That if people had markers of identity, yes, religion was a very important one, but that bound Kurd, Turk, and Arab to a same Sunni faith that meant that dividing the Islamic Ummah by language groups, essentially, was in some way impious.

18:59It was the wrong thing to do. So I don't see much evidence of discrimination. I think that the Ottomans saw their empire as a very cosmopolitan one. You have to remember many of the ruling elites of the Ottomans were actually recruited from Balkan Christian communities, brought to Istanbul, converted to Islam. They were hardly themselves, you know, Turkish Muslims in, let us say, the Kemalist vision of that word, go back to the 17th century, the 16th century, you're dealing with a world in which your religious affiliation is probably your single most important marker and where people were moved around the map with a kind of cosmopolitanism that really defies what, say, the small city-states of Europe would have been used to.

19:43Anita Anand:Eugene, in our Ottoman series, which you so kindly came on and helped us with, we met this Turkish traveller, Evliya Celebi, who's the beginning of the 17th century and who travels around the Ottoman world. And one of the places he goes to is Palestine. He's fascinated by the amount of Sufi shrines and the amount of Islamic holy places that he comes across in this region. Tell us a little bit about his portrait of Palestine. So Evliya Celebi captured the Ottoman world writ large, and he becomes sort of the most famous travel writer of his day. When it comes to Palestine, as he tries to distinguish what makes it special and exceptional, he falls into a pattern that's common to Western observers as well.

20:25It is the Holy Land. It's a place of mosques and shrines, but for him, it's those associated with the First Community of Islam, the territory covered by the Prophet Muhammad, and the early Islamic conquests.

20:37William Dalrymple:But does he talk specifically about synagogues and churches too? And what does he have to say about those? Actually, Evliya Celebi was as interested in synagogues and churches as he was in the religious shrines of the Sunni Muslim community. He really saw all faith communities as part of that Ottoman world and of interest to Ottoman readers. But the other cautionary note is Evliya was a great exaggerator. And so modern readers are very well aware that he was more interested in spinning a good yarn. We're going to hop, skip and jump a little bit around in this episode, because from what you're saying, there's huge chunks of stability where things remain the same.

21:13William Dalrymple:there's a stasis. But in the 1700s, just tell me a little bit about the local leaders in places like Gaza and the surrounding areas. Well, it's really interesting, Anita, because in the 18th century, you're going to see for the first time Palestine emerging as a sort of separate part of greater Syria. And it happens under the rule of two local leaders who base their power on the resources of Palestine, specifically cotton. And cotton finds huge markets in Europe, particularly from the Eastern Mediterranean in France. And for parts of the 18th century, these local leaders were really able to set the price of their cotton exports, and it made them immensely wealthy.

21:59And with that wealth came power. And the power stayed local in Palestine. It didn't go to Istanbul.

22:04William Dalrymple:Where does the cotton come from? Just tell us a little bit about the cotton trade, because in our heads, you know, we've got Cottonopolis in Manchester, and we've got the whole India cycle, but where are they getting the cotton from so that they can set the price and make their money? So the cotton has grown in northeastern Palestine, and it's really in the area around Tiberias and the Galilee that you'll have the cotton cultivation that will be the kind of white gold of the 18th century. And the first person to really harness this power is a local tax farmer. His name is Zahir al-Omar, and he was very much a native Arab of northeastern Palestine.

Read the full transcript

22:39But he was able, through his access to the cotton of the Galilee, to amass tremendous wealth. And with that wealth, he extended his power over more and more territory. He makes the port city of Acre his outlet to the Mediterranean world. And from there, he is able to build a mini empire around much of that southwestern part of Syria that would come to be called Palestine. First time we really see it separate out under a leadership, he will ultimately fall and be overtaken by a mamluk whose name was Ahmed Pasha, nicknamed Al-Jazar the Butcher, because he very much in the line of tyrants of the 20th century, like Saddam Hussein, relied on massive violence to generate total submission through fear.

23:31And Ahmed Pasha Al-Jazar was to rule in the last quarter of the 18th century on the back of what Zahir al-Omar had created and would die peacefully in his bed, having massacred his way into a position of power and really separating Palestine out.

23:48William Dalrymple:I'm quite transfixed with this idea of white gold coming from this region. But are we then also talking about a select cadre of incredibly wealthy people and then an enormous peasant class? I'm just trying to get an image of what people experienced. You're right to point out that most producers living through this time just worked to the bone and enjoyed very little benefit from it. The benefit went to a very small group who established themselves as the rulers and then had a court around them whose members would be made wealthy and then broken by the powers that be. Both Zahar el-Omar and Jazar Pasha allowed their retinue to get rich, but then basically shook them down when it served their interest and demonstrated that no one was powerful except for the tyrant.

24:43Anita Anand:Now, this, of course, is a very important and controversial period, because in some accounts, we have this idea that Ottoman Palestine is in decline. It's sort of ruination. And you get that in some travelers accounts. People like Mark Twain paint a picture of this sort of ancient landscape of crumbling ruins. And that's very much there also in the tone mood in those famous David Roberts prints that you see all over hotels in the Middle East of, you know, a couple of Bedouin in front of an old Roman ruin with palm trees and the whole thing looking very rural and crumbly. The picture you're painting of this sort of nascent capitalist economy with export of cotton and people at the top certainly making money seems to be a bit at odds with that.

25:25There is a tendency to talk about Ottoman decline. And of course, historians hate it because it reduces history to this sort of rollercoaster ride of ups and downs, when really what makes history interesting to us all are the evolutions that are taking place. And so what I would say is happening in Palestine in the 18th century is that you have a phenomenon of peripheral regions of the Ottoman Empire gaining power at the expense of the capital, Istanbul. And so it's what some refer to as a period of decentralization. The Ottoman center is losing control over provincial territories. It's not just Palestine.

26:01Damascus is going through this. Mosul and Iraq is going through this. In eastern Anatolia, the Kurdish Derabays. So it is a phenomenon of the 18th century and maybe a reflection of the weakening power of the mature Ottoman Empire to control all of its provinces. But the dynamism of the history of these regions is, in defiance of all claims, of decline.

26:24Anita Anand:And we talked about cotton. The other thing that gets going at this period is Jaffa oranges, isn't it? This is the time when Jaffa oranges are being planted and being exported. Well, presumably they were being planted at this time, but they really only come onto my historic map in the 19th century as a real commodity of the Mediterranean trade. And an orange is only so marketable as it can be taken from the tree to the market. The local markets can only eat so many oranges. So you really want to know when they're able to create and ship oranges to Europe. And that's going to be in the age of steamshipping in the 19th century.

26:59William Dalrymple:I'm really interested in how as this region starts to have autonomy and wealth, and albeit it's not the trickle down theory ain't trickling so much, but it's there. The wealth is there in this region. But how are other countries around the world reacting? So, I mean, in the 19th century, you've got the Crimean War, you've got Europe trying to make friends wherever it can, different opposing groups trying to get their fingers in different pies. Is this place on the map? Even though the Ottomans supposedly are ruining everything, are people trying to make deals with the local leaders here? Well, definitely as we move from the 18th century cotton trade into the 19th century, you're going to see not just Palestine, but the whole of the Eastern Mediterranean drawn into massive economic and social change.

27:46One is going to be just in trade as industrial Europe is producing far more than its own markets can consume and is looking for exterior markets and the Eastern Mediterranean is right there. So the dumping of industrial goods is changing the nature of trade and commerce in the Eastern Mediterranean. It's also going to be a time in which the European powers begin to play their imperial politics. Napoleon's going to invade Egypt and march through Gaza in 1798 to 1801. In the aftermath of that, you have more and more European diplomatic and consular attention to the region. You have the beginning of European missionaries coming to the region.

28:31Through faster transport, more and more pilgrims coming to the region. The Holy Lands really begins to attract growing interest from common people. And that is going to be accelerated by the work of a good Briton named Thomas Cook, who in the 1860s is going to take advantage of steamshipping to extend the privilege of the Grand Tour, formerly just the bastion of the aristocracy to any middle class tourist who wants to go across the classical world into the Eastern Mediterranean.

29:01William Dalrymple:Yeah. And if those of you are scratching your head listening to this going, oh, I wonder if that's that Thomas Cook, the one that does the high street, yes, that Thomas Cook. This is the whole origin story of the Thomas Cook story. But being somebody who's very interested in politics, I'm most interested in diplomatic efforts, material links and having industrial relations. That's one thing that happens behind closed doors. What with diplomatic missions? Would European nations have sent a diplomat to a city saying, this is somebody who's going to contact Palestine? How did the rest of Europe view this region, which involved the cities that you've talked to, Jaffa, Jerusalem, Haifa, Gaza, Would they have seen it as one contiguous power that they would have to send one person to who would umbrella the whole region?

29:50William Dalrymple:Or how did it work? So diplomatic relations with the provinces of the Ottoman Empire evolved over the 19th century, and European powers got a more extensive presence in the major towns and cities of the Ottoman East. So in the course of the 19th century, you'll see consuls going from Cairo, Istanbul, maybe Izmir, to begin to dot the map of the eastern Mediterranean, Beirut, Jerusalem, later in Damascus. What's driving the extension of the European diplomatic presence is going to be either trade or else it's going to be pilgrims and tourists. I mean, basically, countries only send diplomats to places where they have interests, and that's the nature of their interests in the Eastern Mediterranean.

30:35But it just grows so much in the course of the 19th century, and so too does the diplomatic footprint as not just Britain and France, but Prussia, Genoa, Venice, Russia, Greece, they're all there. Even the little United States will begin entering the game sort of in the 1840s as American missionaries begin to flood into Lebanon and Syria. So this will be the driver of the foreign interventions in this region. But at base, it always harkens back to the holy places, the crusades, that legacy, they're very conscious of all of that.

31:10William Dalrymple:But Eugene, I'm just really fascinated. Just say on Napoleon's desk, there is a map unrolled and all the European powers are deciding where to send our man in Haifa or whatever. Are they looking at a region that is marked Palestine or Philistina? What is this place that they are sending their diplomatic representatives to? I think you would find that most 18th, 19th century maps would have Palestine marked on the Eastern Mediterranean in big, bold letters spanning an undefined territory, but with Jerusalem sort of in its middle, maybe where the E of Palestine goes or something, the same way that you'd have Syria written across parts to the north of there.

31:55These were Roman toponyms. They were the ways in which Europeans conceived of the Eastern Mediterranean. And in a way, those Roman toponyms were also absorbed into Arabic. So the word Palestina from the Latin becomes Philistine in Arabic, and will be reintegrated into European usage as Palestine. And that toponym definitely features on modern maps from the early modern period.

32:23Anita Anand:Obviously, it's a highly contentious, but how much are the people who are living in Gaza, or in Jerusalem or in Nablus, are they thinking of themselves as Nablusi and just inhabitants of their town? Or would you have found people in the 19th century who described themselves as Philistine, as Palestinian? So the 19th century is key to this question. I would say before the 19th century, you were in a pre-nation state world where people simply did not go around describing themselves as national figures. They would not be, you know, Italians in 1710, right? They would be Florentines or Venetians.

33:01William Dalrymple:Or Genoans, yeah. Or Genoans. And the same applied to the Eastern Mediterranean. If you were to identify, it would be to a town, or if you were from a big city like Damascus, to a quarter. Or it might be a tribe if you were from a rural community or a village, but not a national unit. But that nation state idea and the whole political ideology of nationalism catches on like a contagion in the course of the 19th century. And by the time you get to the end of the 19th century, when people in the southern Syrian regions that come to be known as Palestine describe themselves, they will begin using the word Filestini, Palestinian.

33:40It is the beginning of an awareness of a separate identity, which is still proto-national. But I think for 20th century Palestinians, it demonstrates the deep root of their national identity. And so it becomes quite a contentious thing. When does the Palestinian identity emerge? I would say that that would be something that's happening in the course of the 19th century. And not until the end of the 19th century could we really see people using the place named Palestine as a personal identity marker.

34:08Anita Anand:We're going to take a break in a minute. And when we come back, we're going to talk about how, as well as the European consuls who are now looking at the holy places with Christian eyes, There is increasing attention on the whole Jewish identity of the Holy Land, and East European Jews in particular are beginning now to emigrate and the birth of the Zionist movement. That's all after the break.

34:37Anita Anand:this episode is brought to you by my favorite london review of books in our journey to unpick the complexities of the past it's clear that history is not a straight line it's a vast intricate and complex tapestry to truly understand a political revolution or the fall of a dynasty you have to build up the picture piece by piece you need diary entries and poetry that capture the scale of emotions the secret correspondence of a diplomat and the sharp discerning insights of the era's great thinkers. And it's this art of the deep dive that the London Review of Books champions. They bring together the world's leading thinkers and interrogate a rich range of topics through long form essays.

35:16Anita Anand:Try three months of the LRB completely free when you sign up today. Subscribe at lrb.me forward slash trial. That is lrb.me forward slash trial to try three months of the London Review of Books for free. Just do it. It's the most wonderful journal in the country and you will never regret it. Let's talk about a condition many people haven't heard of. And it turns out it's more common than you'd think. Peyronie's disease or PD for short. PD can happen when scar tissue builds up under the skin of the penis. This can cause a curve or the bump during an erection and for some men lead to pain during intimacy and may impact mental health.

35:56Anita Anand:It may also lead to anger and frustration, depression, lower self-esteem, and even withdrawal from sexual activity and physical intimacy. Because of this, some men could feel embarrassed or reluctant to talk about PD. The actual cause of PD isn't always known. In some cases, it may be linked to a minor injury or repeated injuries during sex or other physical activity. The good news is, PD is treatable. If you notice a curve with a bump, a trusted urology specialist can help diagnose it and walk you through your options, including non-surgical treatment. To learn more about Peyronie's disease, visit talkaboutpd.com.

36:35Anita Anand:Let's talk about Peyronie's disease, or PD. It's not widely talked about, and some men may feel reluctant to bring it up, but it's more common than you'd think. PD can happen when scar tissue builds up under the skin of the penis, causing a curve or the bump during an erection that for some men may lead to pain during intimacy and impact mental health. A trusted urology specialist can help diagnose PD and walk you through your options, including non-surgical treatment. Visit talkaboutpd.com.

37:09Anita Anand:Welcome back. Now, we're going to deal in this half with the rise of political Zionism in the late 19th century. But before we go into that political movement, Eugene, will you paint us a picture of the Jewish community in Palestine? They're well integrated. They've been there for centuries. They share many village shrines with their Muslim and Christian neighbors. But the numbers are not huge, are they? Was it 5 % to 10 % at this period? That's right, Willie. And it's really important to remember that there was an indigenous Jewish community in Palestine before Zionism. And they were concentrated in the cities of rabbinic learning, such as Safad, Tiberias, Jerusalem, Hebron.

37:48and while these communities were old and deep-rooted, they really didn't extend much further. I think there might have been a synagogue in Gaza, but there really wasn't a Jewish population of any significance in Gaza itself, unlike the cities to the north.

38:03Anita Anand:So take us through the beginnings of the Zionist movement. Where does it begin? What's inspiring it? And give us a picture of the pogroms and the anti-Semitism which are driving it in Europe. Well, Zionism is really a creation of the push and pull factors of the 19th century. And I mean, I think many people have been pulled to the Holy Land. You had Jewish pilgrims coming for religious pilgrimage, many of them to die in the Holy Land. This is part of the Russian diplomatic presence in Jerusalem dating back to the early 19th century. Then you had, from the same Russian Empire, the horrors of pogroms in 1881, in which the Jewish communities of the Russian Empire were subjected to brutal and terrible violence.

38:49And this drove many to seek to flee the Russian Empire. And this increased those who were taking the path to the Holy Land for religious purposes.

38:59William Dalrymple:And is it some kind of religious mandate? You mentioned sort of to die in the Holy Land. Is that a religious mandate? Where does that come from? My understanding is that for many observant Jews, the annual plea that next year in Jerusalem settled every Passover was realized by pilgrimage. And so this goal that next year they would celebrate Passover in Jerusalem has driven observant Jews to seek a chance before they died to go to Palestine. But with the turn of antisemitism in the Russian Empire, I think it drove a larger and larger number of Russian Jews to make the move, and they found that there was a support infrastructure among Jewish philanthropy in Western Europe.

39:42Certainly, the Montefiore efforts around the Alliance Israelite Universelle and the schools that they created across the Eastern Mediterranean for Jewish communities to have access to a modern education. And indeed, the Rothschilds with the Palestine Jewish Colonization Association were there to support the acquisition of land and to help the colonization of Jews in what were then the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire. In the 1880s, even before you had the emergence of political Zionism, you had an infrastructure, you had push and pull factors that were leading to a rise in Russian and European Jews choosing to migrate to Palestine.

40:23Anita Anand:You also have Western politicians like Lord Palmerston, who are advocates of the Jews returning to Palestine for political reasons. Palmerston writes that the Jews could be useful in buttressing the collapsing Ottoman Empire, thus helping to accomplish the key object of British foreign policy in the area. What's going on there? Well, I mean, I'm going to argue it's the same motive that lies behind the Balfour Declaration when we get to that, this notion that one might be able to benefit from a Jewish community in Palestine to advance distinctly national or imperial interests is something that links Palmerston to Balfour.

40:59But more than that, I think that the anti-Semitism of Western Europe, enshrined around the Jewish question, had many in European countries looking to Palestine as a place in which perhaps they could encourage the migration of their own Jewish communities as a way of solving their own anti-Semitic problems. This will, I think, re-emerge as one of the drivers around the time of the Dreyfus Affair in France. And I think it's one of the push factors that made many politically engaged Jews who began to take from the Jewish question and its underlying anti-Semitism, the idea that they were a distinct nation who would never really be accepted and assimilated into Europe and to seek, through a national movement, national revival in their biblical homeland, Palestine.

41:51That's, I think, the background to the emergence of a political movement known as Zionism.

41:55William Dalrymple:We have talked about the Bar for Declaration on this podcast before. What we haven't looked at is actually other countries and what is going on there. In the early 1800s, you have someone called François-René de Chateaubriand who is a writer, a politician, somebody who has the ear of Napoleon Bonaparte through his writings. But he says something where he says, look, we got to help the Jews and he calls them, I mean, this is a direct quote, I believe from him, the legitimate masters of Judea. So how much does that influence the thinking of France? We've talked a lot about the thinking of Great Britain and we'll come back to that.

42:32William Dalrymple:But what about France? What is going on there? Again, I think you'll find that you had many influential people spouting on the subject without necessarily taking significant political action. So there is this contrast in the emergence of, let us say, political Zionism between what are realistic nationalisms, where a people is on a land and seeks to have their own self-determination and sovereignty, which is going to be nationalism in Germany or Italy. And Zionism is trying to unite the Jewish people who are in diaspora, spread across four continents. The dream of Zionism versus the reality of nationalism will always be a tension.

43:12And people like Chateaubriand, Palmerston, Disraeli, were all spouting ideas without them having any realistic political outcomes.

43:22Anita Anand:Take us now to the early Zionist organizations and to Theodore Herzl. Who is he and what is his ideas? Herzl is, in a sense, the first intellectual to harness the push and pull factors that we have been describing into a distinct political agenda to create a Jewish land in Palestine. Born in 1860, he's going to write influential tracts, der Judenstaat, or the Jewish state, which will set out this agenda. And then as a journalist, he's driven to see the need for a Jewish nation state by his own realization that there is no solution to European antisemitism. And for him, I think it was the Dreyfus case, a case in the aftermath of the 1870 war.

44:11William Dalrymple:Yeah, let's talk about that. For those who don't know what the Dreyfus there was about, just give us a little thumbnail, would you? Alfred Dreyfus was an officer in the French army who was scapegoated for the defeat in the Franco-Prussian War, as though Jews had been in some way responsible for a French defeat that was a national humiliation. And in his trial, which was, by all measures of justice, unjust, this was a story that was covered by Herzl as a journalist, it was the moment of awakening for Theodor Herzl that there was no future for Jews in Europe, even in post-revolutionary France, Republican France, with its philosophy, its ideologies of equality.

44:53William Dalrymple:Herzl writes in his journalism, as you say, about what he saw with his own eyes there around the court as the Dreyfus Favre was being tried. And he writes about sort of mobs sort of shouting death to the Jew. And that certainly has an enormous impact on him and what he thinks the future of European Jewry will be. And for him, the future of European Jewry was only secure in a Jewish state. And the natural place for that Jewish state was in the biblical homeland of the Jewish people, Palestine.

45:20Anita Anand:He's responsible for the first Zionist Congress in 1897. Tell us about that, Eugene. Well, here again, we see the organizational ability of the journalist to be able to rally a group of fellow believers to debate the issues of Jewish nationalism. And it was a major turning point. In a sense, Jews in Europe had been struggling to assimilate and be accepted as British, as German, as French. The idea of claiming a separate Jewish national identity was going in the face of all those efforts epitomized by Benjamin Disraeli, who was the first Jewish prime minister of Britain, who saw in his arrival both as a member of parliament and later as prime minister, the possibility for assimilation and integration.

46:09To then turn around and say, actually, we as Jews are a separate nation, seemed to be going with the arguments of the anti-Semites. And it was a very difficult challenge for the Zionist movement to try and gain powerful and influential people to support their political agenda of trying to create a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine. And that's what the first World Zionist Congress held in 1897 seeks to do. And it will be the beginning of political Zionism and its efforts to secure a broad base of support in the capitals of Europe.

46:43Anita Anand:Now, what does Herzl think about the Arabs already living in Palestine? Is he aware that they are 80 % or 90 % of the population? Does he think they're going to live together alongside each other? What's his vision for this? Well, Herzl's quite aware that there is already a population in Palestine. There was a delegation that was sent to Palestine by the early Zionist organizations, and they reported back that the bride, meaning Palestine, is beautiful, but married to another man, meaning inhabited by another people. So they were well aware. And I think Herzl's solution was, go gently, give push to the local populations to clear the land to enable the space for Jewish colonization, and that this needed to be done with the cooperation rather than coercion, buy up the land and then push the people off it.

47:34But he was clearly looking for an incremental driving of the local population out to make space for a Jewish national home.

47:41Anita Anand:There's an entry in his diary, which is often quoted in the history books, and it's Herzl's diary from the 12th of June, 1895. This is just his own thoughts written into his own journal. This is not something that's published. He writes, we must expropriate gently the private property on the estates assigned to us. We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries while denying it employment in our own country. The property owners will come over to our side, but the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly.

48:18Anita Anand:Is there much of that sort of thing said publicly, or is that just private thoughts? I believe that Herzl's thoughts were still at this point kept private. I don't think that talk of the expulsion of the local population would have earned the Zionist movement much support. And remember, at this point, the Zionist organization is reaching out to the Ottoman an empire to try and petition for the creation of Jewish colonies. Without official permission, you have the Rothschild-supported PICA organization funding the purchase of lands for the creation of colonization. Since 1882, you've had an uptick in the number of Jewish immigrants to Palestine, creating towns and farming communities in land supported by Jewish philanthropy.

49:04So there is this notion that you can ask for permission, but then you run the risk of being denied, or you can simply go about buying land and encouraging settlement and building up a Jewish presence in Palestine. That would be the basis for a claim to a state. I think that that is the route that Herzl, until his death in 1904, was to pursue.

49:25William Dalrymple:And Herzl dies at a very young age. I find this astonishing, actually, that he was only 44 when he died. He died of heart problems, a heart attack, potentially. Many around him said, this is a man who worked himself to death, but his death didn't mean the end of his ideas. Let's go to 1904 and the founding of Tel Aviv. I know this is a series about Gaza, but this is an interesting step on the way to telling the story of Gaza too. What happens in 1904 and why is it so seismic in the region? Well, in a sense, Tel Aviv is going to stand out as the first genuinely Jewish city to be built in the land of Palestine.

50:05Until this point, you could talk about settlements that would become the kibbutzes of popular imagination. But the idea of a modern Jewish city where there had been no previous Palestinian town, this is to the north of Jaffa. It was on beach land. It was laid down with broad avenues. It's called the White City for its Bauhaus architecture. It was a distinctly Jewish articulation of urban space. And in that stood out from everything surrounding it in Palestine. This was perhaps the boldest cultural claim of a Jewish presence in Palestine yet undertaken. And that's still at a time where the presence of Jews in Palestine was a distinct minority and with no official support from any power, least of all the Ottoman Empire.

50:54Anita Anand:1904, you have the founding of Tel Aviv. Now, in 1908, you get an incident of serious violence breaking out now between the new Zionist settlers and the inhabitants of Jaffa, the Jaffa riots of 1908. What's going on there, Eugene? Again, relatively speaking, a small scuffle, but it does lead to fatalities, and it demonstrates the growing tension between the local Palestinian Arab population and the Jewish immigrants, who, by the beginning of the 20th century, are already politically motivated. They're there with an ideology. They are seen by the Palestinian Arab community as a threat. So members of the Ottoman parliament from Palestinian jurisdictions have tried to raise the issue of Jewish immigration in the Ottoman parliament to try and get the government to stop allowing the flow of migrants.

51:49They're increasingly seen as a threat to the status quo. And with such intense tensions, it was unsurprising that you would have the outbreak of street fighting and riots that would lead to violence.

52:04William Dalrymple:I mean, just sort of highlighting what the violence is, you've got Jews attacked during the Purim celebrations. You have one Arab who's then stabbed to death. Then barely months later, you have four Jews who were killed by locals for what they describe as nationalist motives, the spiral starts small, but then starts getting rapidly larger and larger. You said just a moment ago what the reaction was of Palestinian Muslims. Do we have any record of Palestinian Jews who've lived there, as you say, for centuries? What they are thinking about what's going on here? Well, the relationship between the indigenous Jewish community of Palestine and the new immigrants is quite an interesting one because the local community was not itself ideologically motivated.

52:50Their presence in Palestine dated back generations, and they were not politically so much as religiously motivated in most cases. And they saw their place in local societies having been long established by the norms governing relations between Muslim, Christians, and Jews in the Ottoman Empire. The European immigrants were much more assertive. They were much more politically engaged. And so there's a tension between the local and immigrant Jewish populations of Palestine that meant that they weren't all working towards the same goals. And I don't think that the indigenous Jewish population was really drawn into the activism of the new immigrants.

53:32Anita Anand:So we now have, at this point, just after the the founding of Tel Aviv, and the Jaffa riots, we have a newspaper founded in Jaffa in 1911 from a pair of Christians called Isa el-Isa, who's joined by his paternal cousin Yusuf el-Isa. And this newspaper is called, significantly enough, Philistine. Is that something that is significant in itself, Eugene, the title? Here again, it's the beginning of people beginning to identify a distinct geographic place with a political identity. And as we said before, in an earlier age, perhaps a town identity would have been the most that one might have recognized.

54:15But seeing Philistine, Palestine, as a common territory of the readership of that newspaper, which was not confined to Jaffa, which would have been sold in Jerusalem and in Haifa and down in Gaza. And in a sense, it's part of the awakening of a distinct notion of a Palestinian identity. But remember, still within an Ottoman context, where independence from the Ottoman Empire would have been beyond the imaginings of your average Arab citizen. They claimed a distinct place identity, but it wasn't yet, let us say, a nationalist identity. But certainly, a step in that proto-nationalism that would emerge after the creation of a mandate after the First World War.

55:01So in 1914, now this is just on the eve of the First World War breaking out, which is what

55:09Anita Anand:we're going to be discussing, and the siege of Gaza, which is going to be dominating our next episode. Just before that, Philistine discusses this issue that we were just talking about. And And this is a quote from the newspaper in 1914. Ten years ago, the Jews were living as Ottoman brothers, loved by all the Ottoman races, living in the same quarters, their children going to the same schools. The Zionists put an end to all that and prevented any intermingling with indigenous population. They boycotted the Arabic language and the Arab merchants and declared their intention of taking over the country from its inhabitants.

55:42Anita Anand:On the eve of the First World War, Eugene, is that now something that people are really beginning to talk about across Palestine, or is it just a small group of intellectuals in Jaffa?

55:52William Dalrymple:And is it true? I mean, what is the veracity of it? You say, you know, this is the start of a nationalism movement. Is it based in truth or something else? In a sense, Palestinian nationalism was disadvantaged in the face of Zionism, in that Zionism was a well-articulated ideology. And the people who subscribed to Zionism knew what their program was. Palestinians living under Ottoman rule in 1914, on the eve of the First World War, were not allowed to have a separatist nationalist ideology. The Ottoman states clamped down on any expression of separatism. They didn't want to see the balkanization of the Arab world as they'd witnessed in their European provinces.

56:32Anita Anand:In Bulgaria and in Greece, which by this stage have just broken off because of nationalist movements. So Greece was the first one to go. Greece went already in 1820, and the progressive breakaway of all the Ottoman provinces in the Balkans was exactly what they're trying to avoid in Palestine, and why the Ottomans were actually so hostile to Zionism, because they saw Zionism as a movement that was trying to separate a territory from Ottoman rule. So in a sense, Zionism, fully-fleshed nationalist ideology, Palestinians have no scope to create a nationalist movement in their own right. They're part of the Ottoman Empire, but they feel under threat.

57:13And they see the Zionists coming in growing numbers. They are assertive. They have the support of European philanthropy to help them buy land, to build towns and villages, and to create a bridgehead for more Jews to follow. And all I would say is at this point, you're still dealing with a Jewish community in Palestine. That is absolutely tiny. You're still 4 % to 5 % of the total population. So it's not as though the numbers are the threat, but it is the political agenda and the increasing power of land purchase that they were mobilizing that is going to go a long way to creating tensions between the communities of Palestine.

57:53William Dalrymple:So here we are, simmering tensions on the eve of World War I. Join us in the next episode when we see what that cataclysm of international warfare will visit on this region. And if you want to listen to that Empire episode with Eugene right now, just head to empirepoduk.com. That's empirepoduk.com to sign up to our membership, really for the price of a fancy coffee a month. So that's empirepoduk.com. You get early access, bonus episodes and a weekly newsletter. For now, though, it's goodbye from me, Anita Arnand.

58:26Anita Anand:Goodbye from me, William Durimple.

From the publisher

In 1516, the Ottomans defeated the mighty Mamluk Empire in the Middle East, taking control of Gaza. How did Ottoman forces roll out scorched-earth tactics on Gaza City to punish those who had rebelled against them? How did the citrus and cotton industries develop in Ottoman Palestine? What did the rise of nationalism at the turn of the twentieth century mean for Gaza and the surrounding region?

Anita Anand and William Dalrymple are joined by Eugene Rogan, author of The Fall of The Ottomans, and Professor of Modern Middle Eastern History at The University of Oxford, to discuss Ottoman rule in Gaza, from the 1500s to the early 20th century. 

Join the Empire Club: Unlock the full Empire experience – with bonus episodes, ad-free listening, early access to miniseries and live show tickets, exclusive book discounts, a members-only newsletter, and access to our private Discord chatroom. Sign up directly at empirepoduk.com 

For more Goalhanger Podcasts, head to www.goalhanger.com.

Email: empire@goalhanger.com

Instagram: @empirepoduk

Blue Sky: @empirepoduk

X: @empirepoduk

Assistant Producer: Becki Hills

Producer: Anouska Lewis

Executive Producer: Neil Fearn

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Empire: World History

All 218 episodes
296. Ottoman Gaza: Gunpowder Conquests & Rising Nationalism (Part 6)Empire: World History · 57 min
Listen in VO