Amb. Mike Waltz, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Rep. Jason Crow

23:09Margaret Brennan:So no timeline beyond the four to six weeks has been briefed or shared with Congress at this point? No, no, we are not getting the information from this administration. They started this war without congressional authorization. There's no imminent threat. They actually have even stopped trying to pretend there was an imminent threat, which is what is necessary for the president to take action without congressional approval. So now here we are spending tens of billions of dollars of taxpayer money, losing American lives. Congress isn't involved. We've been stonewalled. The American people are not in the driver's seat here, right, because Congress has been sidelined in this.

23:48They are the ones that need to have the voice and whether or not they're going to send their sons and daughters to go fight this war, whether or not they're going to finance it. It's time for this to end.

23:57Margaret Brennan:Let's take a break. I have more to talk to you about on the other side of it. And we'll be right back with a lot more, including Democratic Congressman Jason Crow, head of the U.N. Nuclear Watchdog Agency, Rafael Grossi, and findings from our latest CBS News poll.

24:17Margaret Brennan:Welcome back to Face the Nation. We return now to our conversation with Colorado Congressman Jason Crow. Before we leave the topic of Iran, I do want to ask you, last Sunday on this program, The White House economic advisor, Kevin Hassett, said the war was ahead of schedule. And while it was up to the budget office, he didn't think the administration would need any kind of supplemental funding. But then days later, Secretary Hegseth seemed to confirm the Pentagon needed as much as$200 billion. As far as$200 billion, I think that number could move, obviously. It takes money to kill bad guys. So we're going back to Congress and our folks there to ensure that we're properly funded for what's been done, for what we may have to do in the future.

25:07Margaret Brennan:I know you're opposed to the war, but is there a way to structure this deal where you would be comfortable with additional funds? No, if they think I'm going to vote for hundreds of billions of dollars for an unauthorized war, a war they didn't come to Congress for, a war they haven't given an explanation to the American people for what we're doing and not doing, how it's going to end, how we're protecting our service members. And on top of that, the House Republicans gave DOD$150 billion slush fund last summer as part of Donald Trump's big, ugly bill. And on top of that, they say they're going to come and ask for a one and a half trillion dollar defense budget.

25:45And the Department of Defense to this day can't pass an audit. They can't tell us where all their stuff is, where they're spending all their money. So I'm not about to throw money at a DOD that can't pass an audit. It's sitting on money that they already haven't accounted for and haven't spent. and to perpetuate an unauthorized war that is not in America's interest.

26:03Margaret Brennan:I know you're a veteran, but you know that the accusation will be made that Democrats just don't support the troops. There is, of course, that's what they're going to say. But there is plenty of money within DOD for military families, for troops, for barracks. I have guaranteed that. I sit on the Armed Services Committee and I will continue to push forward and vote to make sure our troops, our military is taken care of, that we have the military that we need to protect America. What I'm not going to do is just throw money at the Iran war, which they're now admitting is a war. This cannot continue.

26:38We spent 20 years in Iraq and Afghanistan, trillions of dollars. It ends here. It must end here.

26:46Margaret Brennan:Tell me, though, as a Democrat, because Congress is scheduled to go on vacation soon, A lot of TSA agents aren't receiving paychecks because of this Democratic-led funding shutdown because of a demand to change immigration policy, something the White House has not made any concessions on that I know of to date. This is in the Senate. But as a Democrat, I mean, look at Denver Airport near your district. They're asking people to donate gift cards for TSA agents to make ends meet. The airport says, you know, this is a huge generator in terms of what the airport does for the region. This is hurting your community.

27:19Margaret Brennan:How do you continue to defend the shutdown? I'm going to be really clear that this is a Republican shutdown. Full stop. Republicans said that fund it all. Just yesterday, just yesterday, the U.S. Senate held a vote. And Senate Democrats put up an authorization to fund everything except for ICE and CBP. That's Coast Guard. That's TSA. That's cybersecurity. Every single Senate Republican voted against it. In the House, we actually have a bill, Rosa DeLauro and Hakeem Jeffries. We have a clean bill that would force a vote to open up everything, to fund everything except for ICE and CBP. Republicans are stopping it.

27:58They're not even allowing a vote on that bill. So we are ready to go. They are in control of every facet of government.

28:04Margaret Brennan:But in the meantime, these people are left stuck. We're about to be in spring break, heavy traffic season. That's the Republican. They are in control of every element of government. They're in control of what we vote for and don't vote for. We are saying, let's open it back up. Let's fund Coast Guard. Let's fund FEMA. Let's fund TSA. Let's fund cybersecurity, which, by the way, we need because we just started a war with Iran, which has a huge cyber capability. We want to fund it. We're ready to fund it. We will take the votes tomorrow. They're stopping that vote. They own this shutdown. Congressman Krupp, thank you very much for your time today.

28:39Margaret Brennan:We'll be right back. Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile with a message for everyone paying big wireless way too much. please for the love of everything good in this world stop with mint you can get premium wireless for just 15 a month of course if you enjoy overpaying no judgments but that's weird okay one judgment anyway give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch up front payment of 45 for three-month plan equivalent to 15 per month required intro rate first three months only then full price plan options available taxes and fees extra see full terms at mintmobile.com Have you ever felt like you were living just a B or B plus life?

29:16It's so dangerous to live that more dangerous than a B minus or a C plus life because when you're living a B or B plus life, you don't change it. You think it's good enough. Is it? I'm Susie Welch. I host a podcast called Becoming You. People think, okay, an A plus life is not available to me, but there is a way. We are all in the process of becoming ourselves. Listen to Becoming You wherever you get your podcasts.

29:43Margaret Brennan:The UN nuclear watchdog agency, the IAEA, says it has not detected any raised levels of radiation around nuclear sites that have been targeted by strikes in Israel and in Iran. On Thursday, we spoke with the head of that agency and began by asking him whether Iran's nuclear ambitions can be destroyed through military action? Well, of course, there has already been a lot of damage done. Last year, 12-day war was, in that sense, quite effective. This time around, I think the focus of the campaign does not seem to be specifically the nuclear facilities, although there have been some hits in Natanz and Isfahan, and also at another place near Parchin, which used to be a facility more related to the weaponization efforts, but back in the early 2000s.

30:42So there has been some, but I would say they have been relatively marginal when you consider the overall nature of the military campaign so far. So, going back to your question, there has been a lot of impact on the program. One cannot deny that this has really rolled back the program considerably. But my impression is that once the military effort comes to an end, we will still inherit a number of major issues that have been at the center of all of this. One, most notably, the inventory of enriched uranium at 60%, which is very close to the degree you need to make a bomb. That is going to still be where it is, largely.

31:42Margaret Brennan:Under the rubble. Under the rubble, and in some cases, no rubble, somewhere under. And also, importantly, some facilities, infrastructure, equipment, which have most probably survived some of the attacks. Even they could be damaged, seriously damaged. But that is something that we will only be able to ascertain once our inspectors go back. So let's talk about that. What I heard you say there is Iran had that nuclear weapons program that in 2003, according to U.S. intelligence, was halted. But as you know, there's this debate over whether Iran's nuclear program actually did have a weapons ambition.

32:35Margaret Brennan:You were never quite able to say yes or no. Well, because we are we are not analysts or people having opinions. We are the IAEA. So whenever we say something, it has to be based on actual inspection. And the thing is and continues to be one. Yes, like you say. Yes, we haven't seen a systematic program like the Ahmad plan with offices, people reporting to people and an array of places where you are doing stuff. But there were many, many concerning things, many unanswered questions. And especially since 2019, 2020, when I became more or less when I became director general, were, yes, in 2015, in 2016, when the JCPOA, the previous agreement, you remember.

33:28Margaret Brennan:The Obama era nuclear. Exactly. When that started to be applied, Iran was complying with a number of things. But we started seeing new stuff. We started seeing and getting new elements that gave rise to concerns. And we were talking about them with Iran. And then it came a point, very important point, when I said, you know, in view of this, I have to say that I'm no longer able, I'm no longer able to say that everything is in order. Because you were finding uranium in places it wasn't supposed to be because they weren't allowing you unfettered access. You couldn't say clearly one way or the other.

34:14Margaret Brennan:Exactly that. So let's come back to that. According to what you did know and were able to declare in these IAEA reports, Iran had uranium enriched up to 60 percent, weapons grade is 90, as I understand it. And if that material remains now in Iran after combat ends, will it still have nuclear capabilities, if it has the enriched material and the centrifuges? Well, you remember, and for this, I would quote or partially refer to things that have been said in Iran by Iranians. You remember very important officials saying, we have all the elements of the puzzle. So when this is said, we were telling them this is unhelpful, or at least you should explain what is meant by that.

35:08It's a vast program. All right. And so, albeit the physical distraction that has been operated, acted upon these facilities, there's a lot going on. And don't forget something, Margaret. When we talk about centrifuges, when we talk about these kind of facilities, this is an activity that can be relatively, I wouldn't say easily, but it is very possible to reconstruct this effort. It's mythology.

35:40Margaret Brennan:Yeah. It's a sophisticated washing machine. It's nothing. I mean, and you cannot unlearn what you've learned. Right. You can't bomb away the knowledge. So that capability will exist after combat. Exactly. And it was very sophisticated. Let's not forget, again, referring back to JCPOA. JCPOA was based or predicated upon a very primitive type of centrifuge. Now Iran has the most sophisticated, fast and efficient machine that exists. And they know how to make that. And on top of that, there may be places out there which are not nuclear places. This is why what I say is that we still need to find a framework, an agreed framework that is going to be providing us with the necessary previsibility and sense of a clear idea of where they are, where they want to go.

36:44Margaret Brennan:Because this war will not destroy Iran's nuclear ambitions and capabilities. Any war. I would say any war. Any war. Unless it was nuclear war and you go for destruction in an unfathomable way, which we hope, of course, will never be the case. Well, talk to me about the options that we know are being discussed by the United States right now, including President Trump and Israel have talked about the potential of sending special forces in to secure some of this enriched material. You have been to Isfahan. You have seen some of the underground facilities. Yes. How difficult would it be to move these cylinders that are there full of chemicals?

37:20We're talking about cylinders containing gas of highly contaminated uranium exofluoride at 60 percent. So it's very difficult to handle so much so that, for example, in terms of this negotiation, we might perhaps discuss that a little bit. That did not bear fruit. one of the things that we were discussing was downblending it because of its difficulty in terms of handling in the scenario, for example, of a ship out of the material, infiltrating the material. So it is very difficult. then, of course, I guess there will be a number of decoys, a number of distracting cylinders, materials over there, which would make it very difficult.

38:12I'm not saying it's impossible. I know that here there are incredible military capacities to do that. But it would be a very challenging operation for sure.

38:22Margaret Brennan:For military operation to be carried out. Let me just ask you about one other thing. You've said about half the nuclear material was around Isfahan. Well, it's a little bit more. There is, but the majority of the material is there. And this is not a secret because I've seen a lot of hype about it. This has been in our reports. The vast majority is there. There is some in Natanz as well and some other parts. There is focus on these other undeclared facilities President Trump has brought up. There's a facility called Pickaxe Mountain, for example, that comes up. Are you concerned about those other things?

39:00Well, we should visit those. They were not operational. So this is why we hadn't. You may remember that on the eve of the June 2025 campaign, Iran announced that they had a new enrichment facility in Isfahan.

39:18Margaret Brennan:Yes. On the same day, I issued a request for an urgent inspection, which was granted. And the inspectors were there in the morning or the late night when the attacks happened. So we never got to see the place. We will have to go there eventually. Final thought here. Do you think President Trump supports what I heard you say, which is that a military campaign cannot destroy Iran's nuclear program? and that the only way to understand what they're really doing is to be on the ground inspecting it. And that can't be done by the United States military fully either. Well, I think, I don't know whether he would endorse this or not, but he has said also that, of course, diplomacy is the preferred option.

40:10I think that is encouraging. and we have had a very constructive conversation in the past and now. Have you spoken to him? Not to the president, no. I haven't had the honor. But I was talking to people that I have been talking in the past and we continue. We continue this effort. I think the essence of this is that in the bleakest hour we should never lose hope.

40:39Margaret Brennan:You can see our extended conversations on our website, on our YouTube channel. We'll be back in a moment.

40:48Margaret Brennan:Rinse knows that greatness takes time, but so does laundry. So Rinse will take your laundry and hand deliver it to your door expertly cleaned. And you can take the time pursuing your passions. Time once spent sorting and waiting, folding and queuing, now spent challenging and innovating and pushing your way to greatness. So pick up the Irish flute or those calligraphy pens or that daunting beef Wellington recipe card and leave the laundry to us. Rinse. It's time to be great. We turn now to our new CBS poll with Executive Director of Elections and Surveys, Anthony Salvato. Anthony, good to have you here.

41:25Margaret Brennan:Good morning. So as we were discussing earlier with U.N. Ambassador Waltz, the American people, they're just not sold on this war. Their skepticism is growing. Why? So to evaluate a war, you need to know what the goals are, what you're comparing against. And the American people increasingly feel like they haven't gotten a clear explanation from the administration. So against that backdrop, I asked them, OK, what do you think it's important for the U.S. to be doing? The top answer was to have a quick and successful war. But beyond that, majorities say they want to see the nuclear program in Iran stopped permanently.

42:01They'd like to see the Iranian people be safe and free. and really importantly for a majority, it would not be acceptable for them to see the war end with the regime still in power. Now, all those things might be incompatible with a quick war and wouldn't be the first time the public asked for a wide range of things. There's still a collective uncertainty about whether or not the U.S. would need to have boots on the ground, sending ground troops. But this is important about duration of this. There's still a lot of people who think this may take months, may take years. And what that goes to is approval.

42:38The longer you think this will last, the more disapproving of it you are. That all ties up in the uncertainty, too.

42:45Margaret Brennan:That's the overseas picture. Here at home, the most measurable thing seems to be the price at the gas pump. How are people feeling about the economy? They have noticed the increase in gas prices. Of course. Big, big number. See, now they've gone up. But it's the impact more broadly on the economy. They think the war is having both a short term impact on gas prices and weakening the economy. But also I asked about the long term because you hear the argument out there. Well, it'll just take patience and let's ride this out. But even in the long term, folks are not convinced that there's going to be an improvement in the economy and also that larger increase in gas prices.

43:25The other part of this, too, is they see this as a war of choice as opposed to necessity. And what that does is it comes back to this. Are you willing to have patience right now, at least as far as gas prices are concerned? Most people say they don't think Americans should be willing to pay higher prices for it.

43:45Margaret Brennan:Anthony Salvante, thank you. Thanks. There are at least four Americans currently detained in Iran and two of them, Reza Valizadeh and Kamran Hakmati, have been designated by the U.S. government as wrongfully detained. Last week, we spoke with two men who have shared that experience of being held hostage in Iran, Siyamak Namazi and Imad Shargi. We also spoke with Netta Shargi, Imad's sister, who is now helping families of other wrongful detainees. Here's some of that conversation. For the American people, what do you want them to know, Netta, about both the Americans who were held and the Iranians and the Iranian Americans who are back in Tehran right now?

44:30Margaret Brennan:Well, you know, I'm not an analyst. I can give you a little bit about my own lived experience. You know, I was born in Iran and I left with my family during the revolution in 1979 with my parents and Ahmad. I am an American now, but, you know, my country of birth is still very much in my heart. And there are people in Iran who all they want is freedom and peace. And they, you know, it's tough because here I am trying to advocate for Americans there, but I want freedom for everyone. And I want people of Iran to find liberation just as much. I do want to say that sort of to Roger's point, what happens with our American hostages, whether they're in Iran or in Venezuela, is that they always become a hostage to other bigger, broader political issues.

45:28And I wish that, you know, Envoy Whitcoff had sort of, before he started engaging with the Iranians, had said, we will not talk to you until there's an unconditional release of our Americans. I'm not sure if that was asked or not, but here we are again. These Americans who are innocent are again tied to this issue that's out of their control. So I want Americans to know that Comran and Reza are just ordinary Americans who were there sort of to take care of family, and they've been caught in this big issue. And we need to convince our government to separate them from what's going on and find a creative solution, like we did to get Ahmad and CLMAC home.

46:20Find a creative solution to bring them home.

46:23Margaret Brennan:I wonder what you, but the two of you in particular, would say to President Trump at a moment like this. What I would tell the president is he has such a great record of getting Americans home from all over the world. I don't think any other president has managed to do what he has done in the first hundred days. And I'm confident that if he is aware that there are Americans sitting in prison, that he is going to instruct people around him to put that on the agenda. So I think it's important that he hears that, that there are innocent Americans being held, like we were, as political pawns. Siyamud?

47:16I completely agree with Ahmad, and I can't imagine if President Trump knew their names and knew these cases, they wouldn't be one of the priorities. I would say that it is unfortunate that they weren't, priority was not given to them before. But as I said, I personally think that there will be a time soon because all wars end with some form of diplomacy. So I would implore President Trump to make sure that part of those negotiations that will be coming up is bringing our people home.

47:53Margaret Brennan:That full conversation's on our website and YouTube page. And a quick note on the debate over DHS funding, the White House sent a letter to Congress last week outlining some concessions they are willing to make. Thanks for watching. I'm Margaret Brennan. Today's guest for U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Mike Waltz, NATO Secretary General Mark Ruta, Colorado Democratic Congressman Jason Crow, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafael Grossi, CBS News executive director of elections and surveys, Anthony Salvato, and a panel discussing the plight of U.S. hostages held in Iran.

48:30Margaret Brennan:The senior executive producer of Face the Nation is Mary Hager, and the executive producer is Anne Hsu. This broadcast was directed by Shelley Schwartz. Face the Nation originates from CBS News in Washington. For more, we're online at facethenation.com and on YouTube. We're also rebroadcast on our CBS News 24-7 streaming network at 1230 on Sundays. And we're available through our apps, CBS News and Paramount Plus. Mr. Beast launched a theme park and Alex Cooper has an energy drink. What does it take to reach that kind of scale? I'm Kai Urieff. And I'm Jasmine Enberg. We're the founders of Scalable, where we take you beyond the headlines and help you make sense of it all.

49:09Margaret Brennan:Every Thursday, we break down the biggest stories affecting the business of creators, brands, platforms, and the dollars behind them. If you're a marketer, founder, creator, or investor, you need to understand what it means for your business and where this industry is going next. Subscribe to the Scalable Podcast and our newsletter at scalablepod.com. Me and my brother, we grew up off the grid. A new Paramount Plus original documentary explores the wild true story of two brothers. They were dubbed the Wild Boys. There's no driving records, nothing tangible. What's their story? Who shook a small town after they emerged mysteriously from the Canadian wilderness.

49:47Margaret Brennan:Are they criminals? Maybe they're a cult. Who are these guys? Why are they here? It's not my job to tell you the truth. Wild Boys, Strangers in Town. Now streaming on Paramount+.