CEO Brian Moynihan, CBS News Washington Correspondents Panel

28 Dec 2025 · 51 min · 20 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

A year-end “Face the Nation” look ahead to 2026, covering the U.S. economy (consumer spending, wages, unemployment, housing), national security and homeland security (AI-driven cyber/identity threats, mass gatherings, political violence, immigration and labor impacts), and Washington politics (tariffs, Fed leadership, DOJ/justice changes, Supreme Court fights, election risks).

Guests (backgrounds)

  • Brian Moynihan: CEO and chairman of Bank of America.
  • Chris Krebs: former Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).
  • Sam Vinograd: former counterterrorism official at the Department of Homeland Security.
  • CBS correspondents roundtable: Major Garrett, Robert Costa, Scott McFarlane, Jan Crawford, Jennifer Jacobs.

Key claims + examples

  • Moynihan: spending is “solid” into year-end (Black Friday/Cyber Monday/November/early December up ~4.25–4.5%); unemployment ~4.6% is low; housing weakness is driven by higher mortgage rates and a nationwide permitting-driven housing shortage; Fannie/Freddie guarantees are essential for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages.
  • Krebs/Vinograd: AI is a global “value chain” (chips, software, data centers, water/thermal management, workforce) and increases anonymous impersonation and automated cyber threats; example cited: a reported automated breach attempt involving an AI chatbot (Claude) used by suspected Chinese hackers against ~30 organizations; mass gatherings face heightened structural vulnerability; political violence is rising with online access to tactics and targets.
  • Roundtable: Trump’s team expects tariffs to hold; housing costs are a top political battleground; DOJ investigations and staffing changes may intensify; AI/data centers could become a wedge issue in 2026.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Economic Outlook for 2026

0:54 to 2:44

Discussion on the economic forecast as we approach 2026 and consumer spending trends.

“Good morning and welcome to Face the Nation.”

Income Disparities and Spending Trends

2:44 to 5:23

Exploration of spending patterns across different income levels and economic sentiment.

“And we can see wages growing as people's paychecks come in at a 3 % clip.”

Impact of Trade Policies on Small Businesses

5:23 to 8:13

Analysis of how current trade policies and tariffs affect small businesses and their operations.

“And so the question when I talk to foreign governments and they ask you the question about what's this all mean, are foreign CEOs, you say, look, you got a choice.”

Housing Market Challenges

8:13 to 10:45

Insights into the challenges facing the housing market, including interest rates and supply issues.

“Moving mortgage rates 50 basis points will not be a huge change.”

The Role of the Federal Reserve

10:45 to 12:21

Discussion on the significance of the Federal Reserve and its influence on consumers and the economy.

“So I think they're very mindful of all that.”

Navigating Banking Policies and Practices

13:00 to 14:05

Discussion on recent changes in banking practices and their impact on customers and community trust.

“And we're back with more of our interview with the chairman and CEO of Bank of America, Brian Moynihan.”

Bank of America's Reputation and Regulatory Challenges

14:05 to 16:40

Explore the reasons behind Bank of America's account closures and the impact of reputational risk and regulations.

“understand, we've looked at that probably.”

Transition to National Security Threats Discussion

16:40 to 17:04

Introduction of CBS contributors discussing national security threats and AI.

“And we'll be right back with a lot more.”

AI's Complex Impact on Business and Government

17:04 to 18:28

Learn how AI is reshaping business operations and government functions across various sectors.

“We've heard so much in the past year about AI, artificial intelligence, in virtually every sector of the business world, in national security.”

AI's Role in National Security and New Threats

18:28 to 20:58

Discuss the implications of AI on national security, including threats and challenges it introduces.

“Are they happy with the results that they're seeing right now?”
Show all 20 chapters

Future Security Concerns for Large Gatherings

20:58 to 23:01

Examine the potential vulnerabilities and threat landscape for mass gatherings in 2026.

“So whose job is it to protect against it?”

Impact of Immigration Policy Changes on Security

23:12 to 27:29

Analyze the implications of recent immigration policy changes on national security and the economy.

“I'm a voracious consumer of information, and I'm impatient.”

Political Violence and Upcoming Election Concerns

27:29 to 28:00

Discuss the rising fears surrounding political violence as the midterm elections approach.

“Sam, I want to ask you about another big event that's coming, the midterm races.”

Threat of Politically Motivated Violence

28:00 to 30:20

Explore the rising concerns about politically motivated violence and the necessary protective measures.

“Politically motivated violence is probably the threat that keeps me up the most at night, particularly as we look at the year ahead.”

2026 Predictions: Political Landscape

30:20 to 39:07

Insights from Washington correspondents about the upcoming political challenges and predictions for 2026.

“You know, we've got to keep the energy going.”

2026 Predictions and Issues

40:02 to 42:01

Discussion on critical issues affecting Americans and political predictions as the 2026 elections approach.

“Venmo stash terms and exclusions apply at Venmo dot me slash stash terms.”

AI Regulation as a Political Issue

42:01 to 43:09

Explore how AI and data centers are emerging as key political issues leading into 2026.

“I think you're going to see this administration really dig in deeper to try to find evidence that proves fraud in various government programs.”

Government Workforce Changes

43:11 to 44:10

Discuss the impact of federal workforce reductions and where those workers are going.

“What did you want to report that you couldn't?”

Supreme Court's Role in Democracy

44:17 to 45:51

Examine the Supreme Court's actions and their implications for democracy and public trust.

“Is the next person going to bring it back to what we've enjoyed over the past couple centuries, the traditional controversies around pardons?”

Electoral Success of Young Democrats

45:53 to 47:14

Analyze the surprising electoral success of Zoran Mamdani and the support from Bernie Sanders.

“That's a big statement, Jan, if we hope to keep democracy intact.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Margaret Brennan:I'm Margaret Brennan in Washington and this week on Face the Nation. As 2025 comes to an end, we'll look ahead to 2026 and what's on the horizon for the economy, national security and more. 2025 is almost behind us. It's been a year filled with change that's turned Washington norms upside down and a year filled with news of great tragedy, but also moments of true triumph. What's ahead for Americans in 2026 when it comes to the economy? We'll turn to Wall Street and the chairman and CEO Bank of America, Brian Moynihan, for the industry's economic forecast. We'll look at national security threats and challenges from the increasing use of artificial intelligence with CBS News contributors Sam Vinograd and Chris Krebs.

0:47Margaret Brennan:And we'll wrap up and look to the new year with our CBS News Washington correspondents in our annual roundtable. It's all just ahead on Face the Nation.

1:09Margaret Brennan:Good morning and welcome to Face the Nation. We begin again with the top issue this year for Americans, the economy. Earlier this month, we spoke with the head of Bank of America, Brian Moynihan, about the state of the economy as we head into 2026. Our CBS polling is showing that the most Americans asked this question say their holiday items are hard to afford. They're pulling back because incomes are not keeping up with inflation. But it's a very different story when you look at the upper income brackets. I know you see data of actual transactions. Are people doing what they tell us they're doing?

1:49We not only see it in the aggregate, we also see it in pieces. And so if you look in the aggregate, the amount spent through the Thanksgiving weekend on Black Friday, Cyber Monday, through all the month of November, and the first part of December, it's up 4.25%, 4.5 % versus last year's November. And so it's growing. And then if you look by terse isles, three buckets of income levels, it's clear that people in the bottom income level and the lower income levels are spending a little faster growth rate, but still growing, and then the middle and upper faster. So, what they're telling you is what they feel.

2:23What they're actually seeing is spending is a reasonable solid heading into the end of the year. And it's been going along like that all summer. Now, wages have grown, but inflation bothers people. So jobs are, you know, the unemployment rate is very low, but it's been rising. So there's a lot of discussion in there. At the end of the day, people are spending. They have good credit quality. They are employed. And we can see wages growing as people's paychecks come in at a 3 % clip. So it's pretty solid right now.

2:53Margaret Brennan:Is that still, though, stilted towards the upper income brackets? Is it that K-shaped economy some people talk about? Our team looks at this. yes, the growth rate difference is higher, but all the third, a third, a third, all three-thirds are growing. And so - You think that'll continue? Yeah. And that's been continuous. And so that's the question. They grow at different rates, but they're all growing, which all means they're putting more money in the economy than they did this time last year. Why do you think people have sentiment that's low, but spending that's higher? It's, you know, you hear about it, You've talked about it.

3:31It's this question of affordability and prices and trying to figure out how that because we had a very, a very strange process from 20 through now. We had COVID lockdown. Then we had all the stimulus and we had high inflation and then we had wages caught up to it. If you draw a line and say, here's wages and here's spending and here's price growth, they stay in sync across a long period of time, but they went at different times. And so, they saw the inflation in 2023 and 2024 that was on their minds, and they want to see it subsist. And it'll take a little while to subsist. But as you go into 26, having come through 25, the incremental hit of that would be lower.

4:10And even when the Fed looks at it, they think inflation keeps working its way down. But it's what people feel. And you can't discount that. And it's also, at certain job categories and stuff, there's been more dislocation. And that's due to some of the government downsizing and some of the other things going on. But it's not widespread. At 4.6 % of unemployment is in the last number they published. That's still in our business careers is actually a very low unemployment rate, frankly.

4:39Margaret Brennan:So in the past year, trade and tariffs, there were a lot of shocks to the system. It was a big concern. But Bank of America now projects President Trump's strategy is one of de-escalation, not escalation. Does that mean you see this trade war with China cooling off? Well, I think if you go back to where we were in April, there was a lot of lack of understanding about where this would end up. And that affected small businesses. There was a shock. There was a shock. The sheer size, the volume, the dollars across the board, et cetera. What you say now as time has moved on, it's sort of a 15 % on one side and then a higher number based on people who won't commit to purchase from the US or won't commit to lowering their non-tariff barriers and things like that.

5:23And so the question when I talk to foreign governments and they ask you the question about what's this all mean, are foreign CEOs, you say, look, you got a choice. You could be here or be here. You just have to make the choice. You're going to drive more towards America and you will come down to 15%. To go from a 10 % across the board to 15 % for the broad base of countries, not a huge impact. And that's where our team says it's starting to deescalate and that you're starting to see the resolution of the discussions in the 15 % here 17 different numbers when you put China China's a different question because the national security interests the rare earth minerals about magnets batteries Just did AI all that stuff.

6:00It's a very different case and I think also between Mexico and China the US MCA which has to be redone is also different case, but the broadly in the world You could see sort of the end point here and now they've just got to with it's got to work through the system

6:14Margaret Brennan:How much of a toll has that taken on small businesses? I understand B of A is the largest small business lender So we're the largest small business lender and if we were sitting here in the second quarter You have of this year. It was a big toll They were very because rates have gone up and that costs them more money because they borrow revolving lines of credit In other words a bar floating rate And then the tariffs came in and caused them. I'm not sure I can get the goods at what price and how can I commit? But as you went through the year, rates came down a little bit. So their issue right now is, can I get the labor I need to bid the contracts to do the work I'm doing?

6:47Because the immigration policies haven't settled in yet, and that's causing people concern. It's not that they agree with or disagree, and they just need to have the answer. And that's what they're looking for. So if you think across four policy regimes, tax, trade tariff, immigration, and then ultimately deregulation, you've seen a resolution of a lot of them. But I think the next one for a small business, what they tell us is labor availability. How they get there is I need people to do this work, and I need to be dependable. They're here. So give me a set of rules, and I'll go play with them.

7:14But I need to be clarified what the rules are.

7:17Margaret Brennan:The Fed says activity in the housing sector is weak. What do you see as behind that hesitation? There are two parts to it. One is the rate structure is higher. So it's just slowed down the activity. So if people are going to sell a house to move up to a bigger house or something, the cost of debt is going to go up. So that's slowing down that activity. The second is building. And there's housing volume shortage all over the country. You could have single-family, small multi-four units, things like that, or even more bigger multifamily major cities. But there's a universal housing shortage because for so many years, it's been hard to get housing permitted.

7:52And so the advice I give to anybody is you're probably not going to see the 10-year rates go down. Our teammates think the Fed funds rate gets to low of 3, but the 10-year rate stays between 4 and 4.5, which means the mortgage rate won't be a lot different than it is today. But if you increase supply, you'll keep prices flat and wages will grow through it and you're starting to see Prices have flattened out in many places So you got to build supply and you got to get permitting done and you got to do that is probably the solution Moving mortgage rates 50 basis points will not be a huge change.

8:21We have a bunch of people 3 % mortgage rates That's not gonna be change and by the way for the American economy. We do not want To have an economy that has to have that low rate structure again because that means we're not growing And we're not successful and we're probably offsetting a recession. So we shouldn't be cheering for 3 % mortgage rates. It was an anomaly that happened. And now we got to get back to normal.

8:44Margaret Brennan:Well, you do hear the administration talk about rates coming down is a good thing. You're just saying it's not a simple quick fix. Well, for the housing market, because there's 130 odd million households in America, half of them don't have a mortgage. This whole lock in question is not even a relevant question. They rent. And so you got to bring rental affordability is a question. And are they own outright? And that's a different question. They inherit a house, third generation or something like that. So it's a very complex thing. But simplistically, if mortgage rates come down, people can pay more.

9:14The reality is if prices come down, people have more affordability on that side. So I think it works itself through.

9:20Margaret Brennan:So let me ask you about Fannie and Freddie. Taxpayers took a stake during the financial crisis in these mortgage lenders. The Treasury Secretary said that they are expected to return to the public market in the next year with the government selling a portion of that stake Does Bank of America have a role in that transaction, but but for consumers is that actually going to push up the cost of owning the home? I don't talk about client relationships, but look It won't if they keep the guarantee And and and the administration knows that and Secretary of Dissent knows it, that guarantee helps keep that mortgage rate down, but also provides a 30-year mortgage.

10:01Because now, when you make a mortgage loan without a government guarantee for a borrower, maybe on the qualification levels there are more advantageous to borrow, you're making a decision for the next 30 years that the borrower is going to be okay, or a lot of years. So, that guarantee is critical to the US getting fixed rate mortgages and having a lot of mortgage availability. And then they've run the thing that's pretty responsible since financial crisis and the down payments have stayed substantial. So the credit quality current portfolios is pretty good. And they can't lose that because that was the reason, one of the reasons why we had the financial crisis was the low down payments and lots of mortgage loans with zero equity in them.

10:40And as soon as prices on houses came down, the whole thing exploded and all America was affected. So I think they're very mindful of all that. And I think they're critical of the US housing system. They always have been. They're a great company or iconic company for the US frankly now that they put them together in a running ball

10:56Margaret Brennan:So the president has announced that he wants all these sweeping changes to the Federal Reserve chair Powell is set to retire from the job in May How much does that job? Matter to the consumer. How do you explain that? Well, it's one of the interesting things so the president's gonna appoint a new Chair of the Federal Reserve. He's got great candidates. He'll appoint somebody and and we'll help that candidate get the information, be successful. And so, we'll see what he does. But that's his prerogative, he should do it. There's my mind, there's too much fascination with the Fed. We're a country that's driven by the private sector, by what people do, and the businesses, and the companies, small companies, and large companies, medium sized companies, and entrepreneurs, and doctors, and lawyers, all these people drive our economy.

11:44The idea that we are hanging on the thread by the Fed moving rates 25 basis points, it It seems to me we've gotten out of whack. And so we got to get, since the financial crisis, the Fed had a big role in stabilizing the economy. That's what they're supposed to do. That went away a number of years ago. It came back a little bit in COVID. They're a lender of last resort. They're there to stabilize markets and price. But other than that, you shouldn't know they exist, quite frankly. ED HARRISON So you don't worry about all this hand-wringing of political interference

12:12Margaret Brennan:with the Fed once that new position is - will punish people if we don't have an independent Fed, and everybody knows that. CBS News and the Free Press have secured a partnership with Bank of America for Things That Matter, a series of town halls and debates designed to revive conversation on topics that matter the most. We'll be back in one minute with more of our interview. Springfest is happening now at Lowe's. Keep the spotlight on your yard with Stay Green premium two cubic foot mulch, five bags for$10. Plus, when you want more help indoors, get up to 40 % off select major appliances that help you supercharge your chores.

12:54Our best lineup is here at Lowe's. Vala to 422, while supplies last. Selection varies by location. See Lowe's.com for details. Mulch offer exclusive, Laskan Hawaii.

13:05Margaret Brennan:And we're back with more of our interview with the chairman and CEO of Bank of America, Brian Moynihan. So back in August when we spoke, you talked about these allegations of banks playing politics and discriminating against conservatives. You pushed back pretty hard in that moment. But earlier this month, the Trump administration released preliminary findings about banks, including Bank of America. It's a six-page report. There's reference to your environmental and sustainability-related decisions that were made during the Biden administration. Do you feel you Do you have to undo these? Have you undone them?

13:41A lot of them have been undone or made more precise because the interpretation wasn't actually what went on. If you read the website, you could say, oh, they're doing this, and the reality was that's not what was going, never as intended. We don't debank anybody for religious or political reasons. We made the policies clear so people could see it. We welcome all the input from the banking regulators and others, and we'll look at anybody who feels, believe me, people who thought they were closed for reasons that they couldn't understand, we've looked at that probably. Because customers can come to our company and say, you closed my account, why?

14:17And we can tell them. But I think people are forgetting the reason why a lot of this went on was reputational risk was an assessment process that went on and it was real. And believe me, people would read the paper and said, Jane Smith, John Smith, you're doing business with them. They did something wrong. You must be a fail as a company. And therefore, we're going to Right, yeah.

14:35Margaret Brennan:That was during the Biden administration, that kind of social pressure. 20 years ago. 20 years ago. It's been going on for a long time. It just kept building up. And then the second thing is that for AML and KYC issues, we had to close accounts. And so the level of a transaction was set in 1972 at$10 ,000. And you have two things. If it goes above that, you have to report on it. If it goes multiple ones close to that, that hasn't been changed since 1972. That number would be$80 ,000 a day. So what we thought was material then. In terms of like suspicious transactions. Yeah, and so there's a lot of overwork here that we're trying to, if they get those regulations right, that will be very helpful.

15:09So there's sort of the ESG side of it. Those things I think a lot of us fixed and made sure they're based on risk and real facts and stuff, because this was going on far before the new administration came in, frankly, in states and other places. There is the question of getting the AML KYC letter and then the reputation risk, which to the credit of the current federal bankers, they've taken that off the table.

15:31Margaret Brennan:Because there really aren't that many points agreement these days between Wall Street and the White House. But this issue, the president himself really dug into, and he said that Bank of America declined to open new accounts for him and his family after his first term in office. Do you think you've patched things up? I mean, do you know what he's talking about? I wouldn't talk about client relationships with anybody, but we bank everybody. He's sitting on television about you. I know that. But if I had a nickel for everything everybody said about me on television, I'd be rich. So at the end of the day, we bank everybody.

16:04We have 125 ,000 religious organizations. We have 70 million consumers. We have tens of thousands. We have the biggest small business lender in the country, period, and stop. And so the idea that we toss people out, it's just not true. So I won't get into an individual customer and their points of view. But look, some of these policies, we were pushed to places that we've been able to bring back to the center. And America ought to feel good about that. And you think the things are copacetic now?

16:32Margaret Brennan:You put this behind you with the White House? Yes. Our full interview is available on our YouTube channel, our website, and our podcast. And we'll be right back with a lot more. Face the Nation, stay with us. For a look ahead to the top national security threats in 2026, we're joined now by two CBS contributors. Chris Krabs was director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency during the first Trump administration. And Sam Vinograd, a former counterterrorism official at the Department of Homeland Security during the Biden administration. It's good to have you both here. Good to be here.

17:05We've heard so much in the past year about AI, artificial intelligence, in virtually every sector of the business world, in national security.

17:16Margaret Brennan:You said AI, it's not just an app on your phone. It's not just a computer chip. It's energy. It's data centers. There are some really complex challenges here. What are you looking at in the year ahead? Well, starting exactly there, just the diversity of sectors that are impacted by AI. It is an incredibly complex global value chain. It's chips. We've heard a lot about the NVIDIA H200 chips and then competing against Huawei and China. It is software. Right. And there's a significant tension in the national security space on should we give China chips or should we deprive them of chips? And it seems for now that the side that wants to give China chips and then extract value and revenue from it, that team is one for now.

18:05But broader than that, there's software, there's infrastructure, there's data centers, there's water, there's thermal management, there is training, there's workforce. So it is not just about the app that manifests on your phone. It's the entirety of the economy.

18:21Margaret Brennan:Because it's reshaping so many sectors. It's reshaping the way virtually every business operates. If you go talk to CEOs, they're talking about how they can be an AI-first company. Are they happy with the results that they're seeing right now? Absolutely not. But they know two years, we're going to face this equivalent of a Cambrian explosion of AI capabilities across the economy. And Margaret, if I can just add, it's not just reshaping how businesses operate. It's also reshaping how governments operate. If you look at AI, nothing is zero-sum in national security. It's not a net positive or a net negative.

18:55AI, and I've seen this firsthand, is changing the way that investigations are performed. It allows law enforcement officials to comb through so much data and to do investigations more efficiently. It is allowing the U.S. military to use certain autonomous vehicles and weapons that can reduce civilian risk if managed appropriately and more effectively engage in warfighting. It's changing the way the intelligence community is able to both collect and review data. At the same time, it is opening up a whole new host of threats. AI doesn't just level the playing field for certain actors. It actually brings new players onto the pitch because individuals, non-state actors, have access to relatively low-cost technology that makes different kinds of threats more credible and more effective.

19:45Margaret Brennan:You said something that was a little frightening to me. You said as technology gets more advanced, the ability to anonymously hurt people exponentially increases. What does that mean on the Homeland Security front? AI gives actors, not just in the homeland, but literally all around the world, to very credibly pretend to be somebody else. It is upending the whole notion of what identity is in today's day and age. AI is allowing bad actors to very authentically and credibly pretend to be someone else, both with their voices, with their faces, and then to deliver threats in a way that actually resonates.

Read the full transcript

20:24So it's impersonating someone, but then also using AI to figure out where vulnerabilities are in a system and what a target audience or a target entity is going to respond to.

20:36Margaret Brennan:So I want both of you to weigh in on this. But, Chris, we heard just last month the first documented case of a fully automated cyber attack by a foreign government. This was the AI chatbot Claude. They said the suspected Chinese hackers had used their AI to breach about 30 global organizations, just to do it really quickly and efficiently, as I understand it. So whose job is it to protect against it? Is it the government's job or is it a private corporation to figure out how to protect against all these risks you laid out? Well, I think there are two things in play right now. One is what's the regulatory environment look like that requires the safe use of these platforms?

21:16And we've seen a pullback on the regulatory front from this administration. The Biden administration had an AI executive order that required certain notifications and safety testings. That's been pulled back. Instead, we're in this innovation first model. And so late touch.

21:31Margaret Brennan:This is even this is no touch. This is yes. Again, this is really putting the the full weight of the government behind the U.S. technology industry winning the global AI race. That is the top priority. And so what's happening in the meantime is you'd normally say, OK, the states are going to regulate. But now you have the White House weighing in saying states cannot regulate in the AI space. And again, CEOs want some guidance. They want governance. So they have to do it themselves. So switching gears for a moment here, we're looking at 2026, a huge number of mass gatherings in the United States.

22:11Margaret Brennan:You've got FIFA, World Cup, the Super Bowl, the nation's 250th anniversary. Are you concerned about homeland security in the new year? There are always a lot of threats facing the homeland. What is materially different in the coming year, in 2026, is that there are structural issues that I fear make us more vulnerable to successful attack. That includes the fact that the United States, probably for the first time in our history, is no longer viewed globally as the leader and poster child for rules-based international order. Other actors feel like they don't have to follow the rules if we're not going to.

22:47That could introduce new threats. At the same time, there has been a degradation in the systems of government that do identify threats and then work to prevent them, not just today, but over the medium and longer term. We're going to take a quick break here, come back on the other side of it.

23:03Margaret Brennan:more things to worry about in the new year in just a minute. Stay with us. Why doesn't he tell Republicans, come into my office, let's hammer this thing out? Margaret, it's a totally fair question. Politics isn't a game. Why are you opposed to this deployment? It's unconstitutional. Politics is about policy. I'm a voracious consumer of information, and I'm impatient. I don't like to be spun. To be moderator of Face the Nation means bringing the most powerful stakeholders to the table to become better informed.

23:39Margaret Brennan:Coming up in our next half hour, more of our conversation on national security, plus our annual CBS News Correspondence Roundtable. Stay with us. It is not hard to destroy a college. Last season, the podcast Campus Files brought you stories of fraternity drug rings, stolen body parts, campus cults, and more. And now Campus Files is back for another season. There's a guy screaming into his phone. He's like, I just saw Charlie Kirk get assassinated right in front of me. Every week is a new episode and a new story. It was so chaotic. It's almost like a university on a siege. Listen to and follow Campus Files, available now wherever you get your podcasts.

24:19Margaret Brennan:And we're back with Samantha Vinograd and Chris Krebs, both our CBS contributors. Sam, you worked in Homeland Security under the Biden administration, and we heard at that time that the administration was just hamstrung unless Congress did something on the immigration front. This administration is taking a completely different approach. I mean, let's just look at what they did this year. Mass deportation campaigns, significant changes to legal immigration. Border crossings are now at the lowest level in decades, secured major funding for ICE and CBP, half a million arrests conducted. They repealed protected status for many immigrants.

24:56Margaret Brennan:And now there's a travel ban or restrictions on about 39 countries total. What is the longer term impact of these kind of really massive changes? Well, to be clear, the Biden administration did take action in July of 2024 to try to curtail unlawful immigration. December 2023, we saw almost 250 ,000 individuals unlawfully crossing our border. by January of 2025, that was down about 85 percent before Biden left office as a result of his executive order. We are seeing and will likely continue to see a systemic dismemberment of lawful immigration pathways to the United States. And the administration has shared a variety of reasons for that.

25:38Failure for refugees, for example, to assimilate into the United States, security concerns, and other matters. But if you just look at the numbers, Immigrants today account for over 15 percent of the U.S. labor force. Millions of people in this country are immigrants. And if we look at the economic impact of removing that talent, removing those people from this country, there will certainly be an economic impact as well as, I do believe, a technological and innovative impact. As we look at the individuals coming here on student visas, on H-1B visas and more, They are direct contributors to innovation in this country.

26:19And I fear that we risk losing out on that and getting the balance wrong between security, economic growth, and innovation.

26:26Margaret Brennan:But on that point, Chris, the administration says you can financially sort of arrange for more H-1B visas. These are the highly skilled workers. Are we losing a competitive edge because of these restrictions? I think this has been in play for several years, in fact, and going back even several administrations. administrations. What the Chinese, for instance, have figured out is that if they put their own capital into their Silicon Valley equivalent, they can retain high Chinese talent that has typically gone to the U.S., gone to university in the U.S. and then stayed here because our venture capital space is booming.

27:01The Chinese have figured it out. And what we're seeing now, back to the risks piece, is that the Chinese are using their financial resources to pull highly advanced, highly capable engineers out of the U.S. and European workforce, bring them back and then copy much of the technology that's giving us the edge.

27:24Margaret Brennan:So there is a connection here back to immigration policy changes, too. Absolutely. Sam, I want to ask you about another big event that's coming, the midterm races. We have seen a lot of political violence or concern about political violence in months past. The assassination of Charlie Kirk, the murder of a Minnesota lawmaker and her husband. We saw Governor Shapiro's Pennsylvania residence burnt. These are just some of the high profile things. There's more that's happened. What do you anticipate? Should we be fearful of a political environment and elections? Politically motivated violence is probably the threat that keeps me up the most at night, particularly as we look at the year ahead.

28:08Undoubtedly, the United States is viewed as one of the largest sources of conflict and homes of conflict in the world today, which is a seismic change, if you think about it. Heading into the midterms and, of course, looking ahead to the presidential, we have already seen terrorism becoming a tool of choice in the homeland to settle both personal grievances and political vendettas. The reasons for that are, of course, enhanced rhetoric, but also, frankly, enhanced access to like-minded individuals, enhanced access to tactics and techniques online, the ability to find out where your target is going to be and when, and more.

28:46the rhetoric needs to be calmed down, but there also needs to be the right investments in critical infrastructure protection and in appropriately identifying foreign influence to try to stoke up political violence and other threats.

29:03Margaret Brennan:And there have been actual cutbacks in the things you just laid out as necessary tools in terms of the FBI, their task force on foreign influence operations. Chris, the agency you used to work for, CISA. it's seen not just budget cuts, but just open jobs here. What is going on? Why not build up protection going into an environment like this? It's just not a priority right now for this administration. I think they believe that there were missteps in the past on what the Biden administration, even the first Trump administration did on identifying and countering information operations, particularly as they relate to elections.

29:40But we know that these threats are real. We know these risks are real. And we also know that they're multiplying. Sam talked earlier about the exponential explosion of capabilities in the hands of bad actors and the explosion of bad actors themselves because of tools like AI. When I think about the 26 midterms, we are going to be two to three generations beyond what the current AI model capabilities are. So they're only going to be more sophisticated, more advanced, more capabilities in the hands of those foreign and domestic that want to disrupt our ability to choose who represents us in Congress.

30:15Margaret Brennan:Thank you very much both for sharing your expertise with us. Thank you. Thank you. We'll be right back. What's ahead in 2026? It's time to check in with some of our exhausted Washington Beat reporters, including Chief Washington Correspondent Major Garrett, who also hosts The Takeout on our 24-7 digital network, Chief Washington Analyst Robert Costa, Justice Correspondent Scott McFarlane, Chief Legal Correspondent Jan Crawford, and Senior White House Reporter Jennifer Jacobs. It's great to have you all here. Exhaustible also energized. You know, we've got to keep the energy going. Keep the coffee coming, Major.

30:50Margaret Brennan:We're going to need it for the year ahead. But we looked at the polling, Costa. I want to get your take on this because a majority of Americans disapprove of the president's signature policy issue, immigration, came in at 54%. His approval of his handling of the economy, which is his other signature issue he was elected on, is now at 37%, according to our latest CBS poll. Is the president frustrated with the perception of his first year? Margaret, the Democrats are looking at those numbers, and that's why they're making their whole argument to the country. Affordability. They see real vulnerability for this administration on the economy.

31:25But inside the White House, I would say the phrase is not affordability. It's self-confidence. This president behind the scenes is telling his advisers to stay steady, to not have alarm. There is frustration about press coverage. There's frustration about how Republicans in Congress seem to be so worried ahead of the midterm, some heading for the exits with retirement. The president again and again in private conversations with his top officials is insistent that the trade policy is working. He's not going to pull off, pull back on tariffs at all. He believes he can have a new start with the new Fed chairman coming in in 2026.

31:58And so it's President Trump at the center driving this conversation and staving off any concern.

32:04Margaret Brennan:Jennifer, what do your sources tell you about how the president's going to tackle specifically some of these economic issues? Housing costs are really eating into wages. And the president has been shown polling that showed this is a really hot issue for both Democratic voters and Republican voters alike. The president has about a dozen proposals before him that have all sorts of ideas for how to lower mortgage costs, decrease rental costs. They're thinking about creating a new savings account that would be similar to the 529 college savings account, but this would be for first-time homebuyers.

32:40They're talking about federal lands, opening up federal lands for new housing construction. He has scheduled meetings down in Florida while he's there for Christmas break to talk to his advisors about this. I'm told that the president wants the housing cost issue to be the very first big policy decision that he launches in the new year sometime January or February.

33:00Margaret Brennan:Focusing in on that biggest contributor to inflation, shelter costs. Jan, tariffs are at the very heart of the president's agenda. And we know the court is expected to decide soon on the legality on a certain set of the president's tariffs that he justified by citing fentanyl. Should the White House be so confident that they're going to win? I certainly didn't get that impression from the argument. I mean, the chief justice, Justice Gorsuch, solid conservatives were asking questions really skeptical of the administration's arguments on tariffs. It was kind of a tale of two arguments, though, because it's that case kind of progressed.

33:36Margaret Brennan:Then they started asking questions skeptical of the other side. So, I mean, I think that anyone that comes out and confidently predicts how the court's going to rule in this case is just wishful thinking. I mean, it could be very close. I could see a 5-4 ruling, Trump losing. I could see a 6-3 decision. Perhaps Trump wins. Scott, on the legal front, the president has gone after some perceived enemies in things like executive orders, announced, you know, stripping away of security clearances, even of people who don't even currently have one. But he's made his point. But his attempt to prosecute opponents hasn't been quite as simple.

34:14Margaret Brennan:What are you saying? He campaigned a year ago arguing he'd end the weaponization of the Department of Justice against political enemies. And what do we see in 2025? An awful lot of investigations and criminal cases against his political critics. We saw these flailing attempts to charge James Comey and Letitia James, the New York attorney general. Those cases were dismissed. And twice in the past few weeks, grand juries have said no to efforts to try to resuscitate the case against Letitia James. grand juries rarely say no to prosecutors. That was a profound thing. And I think more fundamentally, Margaret, it's not just the cases or the investigations or the calls.

34:51It's the changes inside the Department of Justice. They have purged out prosecutors who handle cases Trump doesn't like, bringing in potentially new voices that critics would say are poised to weaponize against critics. And a tacit admission from the White House chief of staff that there is a retribution campaign in the article written by Vanity Fair, Chris Whipple. Susie Wiles said, yes, she was going to try to put a time limit on that unsuccessfully. But acknowledging what Scott just said is a real thing.

35:20Margaret Brennan:Well, on this question, though, of limits to authority, Major, we've seen some limits to congressional power or at least willingness to exert its authority. Do you think that's going to change this year? The political contours of the Congress going into 2026 are going to really flow through how anxious are Republicans about their own ability to obtain reelection? And do they have to create some noticeable difference between themselves and the president and the Trump administration? So all 2025, the answer that was no, we're good. We're staying in with Trump. But if the atmosphere, which currently exists, leading to some retirements, continues to worsen, you will see more congressional pushback.

35:59Does it manifold in a way that stops Trump and the administration cold? No, but it complicates things. And if anyone leaves the cabinet, the idea of who the nominee is and what their Senate confirmation prospects are will be filtered through this.

36:12Margaret Brennan:Costa, on that point, do you see departures from the cabinet happening? It's very possible, though. President Trump is not one to just make a move immediately because there's a flurry of news, negative news about one of his cabinet members. We see he often takes his time to make some of these decisions. And he doesn't like to be pressured to get rid of anybody. But there are so many people in the so-called MAGA universe who want these slots, and they are able to get access to this president. A lot of these cabinet officials I've spoken to privately and their top aides say they're going to try to make it through the midterm elections and then leave.

36:52But if the president is feeling pressure to make some kind of significant change ahead of the midterms, I wouldn't rule anything out based on my reporting. I can tell you, Margaret, this is not cabinet members, but this is in the West Wing. That main pack of inner circle advisers is going to stay intact. And that includes Susie Wiles and Stephen Miller and Caroline Levitt on the way down that core group of people. They're not going anywhere. I think we will see some senior advisers in the West Wing leave. Just keep in mind that there are some advisers that have young children, so they might be leaving for family reasons.

37:22Margaret Brennan:Jen, there is a perception that the Supreme Court has shown limited resistance to the president's efforts to expand the powers of the executive. Do you think that's fair? And do you think on that big case that's coming with birthright citizenship that they will find in his favor? I think there is a perception because of the way the court has handled some of these emergency requests from the Trump administration to step in to these cases and put lower court rulings on hold while the litigation plays out. So that would let the policies take effect. And the Trump administration has had tremendous success.

37:58Margaret Brennan:I mean, well over 20 such requests have been granted to let some of these policies go into effect, whether it's on deportations, on immigration stops. mass firings, but those are temporary interim orders. And the administration has been very strategic and only appealing these adverse rulings from courts below that it thinks it can win. Again, these are just interim orders. Once we do get to the merits, I don't think Trump's gonna win all these cases. And I certainly don't think he's gonna win the birthright citizenship case. You don't? No, absolutely not. He may not win the tariffs case. Right now it's looking great for Trump and the Supreme Court, but it may look very different come June when we've kind of gotten through some of these big landmark rulings.

38:41And Jan's Beat is going to be at the center of the 2026 politics. Tariffs, Voting Rights Act, and Birthright Citizenship all will have massive political consequences.

38:50Margaret Brennan:Oh, and so many social issue cases as well. Transgender participation in girls' sports. We've got two huge gun rights cases. This is a highly consequential term for the court. And, you know, it's going to be in conflict, I think, with President Trump by the end of the term because he's not going to like all these rulings. And we'll be right back with more from our panel. Starting a business can seem like a daunting task, unless you have a partner like Shopify. They have the tools you need to start and grow your business. From designing a website, to marketing, to selling and beyond, Shopify can help with everything you need.

39:23Margaret Brennan:There's a reason millions of companies like Mattel, Heinz, and Allbirds continue to trust and use them. With Shopify on your side, turn your big business idea into... Sign up for your$1 per month trial at shopify.com slash special offer. Get in the game with the college branded Venmo debit card. Wreck your team with every tap and earn up to 5 % cash back with Venmo Stash, a new rewards program from Venmo. No monthly fee, no minimum balance, just school pride and spending power. Get in the game and sign up for the Venmo debit card at Venmo.com slash college card. The Venmo MasterCard is issued by the Bancorp Bank N.A.

40:01Select schools available. Venmo stash terms and exclusions apply at Venmo dot me slash stash terms.

40:05Margaret Brennan:Max$100 cash back per month. And we're back with our panel predictions for 2026. Robert Costa. My motto as a reporter is assume nothing. And we're very early in the 2028 presidential cycle and discussion. Governor Gavin Newsom of California, Governor Shapiro of Pennsylvania, Governor Pritzker of Illinois. The list goes on. But my prediction is in 2026, we're going to see some names we're not discussing at all start to emerge as possible contenders for the Democrats in 2028. Some celebrities might come into the mix. And one name I would venture based on some recent reporting. Stephen A. Smith, the sports personality, is talking to people in the Democratic Party about whether he has a future, whether he runs or not.

40:49TBD. But something to watch celebrity politics in the age of Trump on both sides.

40:56Margaret Brennan:Jan Crawford. I'm going to revisit a prediction I made last year when I kind of confidently said that Justice Alito was probably going to retire and give President Trump his fourth nomination to the Supreme Court. Sources close to Justice Alito say he has not made up his mind. He in many ways is too young to retire. He's 75 years old. But then there's the concern that he's too old not to, because if he cares about his legacy and he is that intellectual leader of the conservative wing, if he cares about his legacy with a Republican in the White House or Republican controlled Senate, this year would be the best time for him to retire.

41:35Margaret Brennan:Scott? I think Americans will begin or increasingly feel the effects of doge. There's an awful lot of people lost their jobs in the last 12 months. A lot of longtime career civil servants who were good at delivering products for the American citizens. In my world, the Department of Justice got rid of 5 ,000 people. that can't help but slow down prosecutions, investigations and doing right by American people. And that's true across the board in Washington. Jennifer, fraud investigations. I think you're going to see this administration really dig in deeper to try to find evidence that proves fraud in various government programs.

42:12People cheating the system, trying to fleece taxpayers. Major. So I'm going to be the glue for this process because we have predictions and underreported. Mine merged together. So prediction is data centers and AI expansion will be a underappreciated but potent political issue in 2026. Eight executive orders signed by President Trump related to artificial intelligence just behind tariffs and immigration. He has made himself the AI president. Yet let me give you some names of states, Indiana, Arizona, Missouri, Texas, all in one way or another on the Republican side aren't up in arms about either AI regulation, lack thereof, or data centers and their implications.

42:5060 % in our most recent poll, nearly 60 % of Americans believe artificial intelligence will not increase jobs but take jobs away. And 44 % in our most recent poll want more regulation of AI than less. This is a wedge issue that Democrats have identified because it is not cohered on the MAGA side. The president has already put down his chips on it.

43:11Margaret Brennan:Okay. Underreported. What did you want to report that you couldn't? To Scott's point, I'm going to build on it. Elon Musk and the Doge team, they promised to cut the federal workforce. We're at the end of the year. So what is the tally for the year? It is 271 ,000 workers. That's according to the latest jobs report that showed how many workers the federal government shed. So just to put that into perspective, that's roughly the population of Madison, Wisconsin. So imagine if every single person in Madison, Wisconsin were to lose their job, either ousted or they leave their job. So the bottom line on Doge is that they did not succeed in cutting overall government spending, but they did fulfill their mission to trim the federal headcount by roughly about 10 percent.

44:00And I think it's going to be important to track those workers and to see where they end up, what their fates are, because they are not being scooped up in the private sector, at least not yet. There was some attention, but not the requisite attention to the thermonuclear use of pardons in 2025. Blanket pardons, family pardons, preemptive pardons. Is the next person going to bring it back to what we've enjoyed over the past couple centuries, the traditional controversies around pardons?

44:28Margaret Brennan:Jan, underreported? You know, there is a narrative that the Supreme Court is corrupt. I mean, we saw that emerge in the wake of the Dobbs decision that overturned Roe versus Wade. And now we see it that they're in the tank for Trump. Not only is that narrative overreported, it is patently false and it is dangerous for the institution and the public's faith and confidence in the rule of law. This is a conservative Supreme Court. It has been a conservative Supreme Court for 20 years. People can disagree and do disagree with their opinions, but it's profoundly wrong to call it or say corruption where there, in fact, is none.

45:07Margaret Brennan:What's underreported is any understanding of what this court's been doing for the past 20 years, its views of its role vis-a-vis the other branches, how it sees the law, how it's trying in its focus to restore some kind of accountability in our constitutional structure. Again, this is a court that is functional. It is consistent. They are nine justices. They don't necessarily see the Constitution the same way by any means or how to interpret federal law. They're in a struggle over the proper way to interpret the Constitution, but that is as it should be. And I think as we approach our 250th anniversary of this country, it's important to think about the court and the rule of law as the justices are doing, especially if we hope to keep democracy intact.

45:53Margaret Brennan:That's a big statement, Jan, if we hope to keep democracy intact. If the public lose confidence in the rule of law, I don't know what that means for democracy. Yeah. And that's why I think some of the rhetoric about corruption is so, so profoundly irresponsible. And it causes threats. Oh, yes. Which, again, I mean, the justices are under tremendous, and federal judges as well. Well, it's all institutions, including the fourth estate. Bob Costa, you're underreported. Just briefly, one of the most striking stories of the year politically, Zoran Mamdani, young. He's underreported? No, no. Let me make my point.

46:35One of the most striking stories was Mamdani's victory. The big question a lot of people have is, well, how does this happen? How does this young Democratic Socialist win in New York City? In my view, the most underreported story of the year is how someone laid the foundation for Zoran Mamdani, someone nearly 50 years older. Senator Bernie Sanders, independent Democratic Socialist of Vermont, had what's called a fight oligarchy tour earlier in 2025, drawing thousands of people in red states and blue states. Sanders enabled Mamdani and others like him to start to gain traction for Democratic Socialism inside of the Democratic construct in this country in 2025.

47:12Margaret Brennan:Interesting indeed. Thanks to all of you. Thank you. And good luck to us all in 2026. Thanks for watching. We want to wish all our viewers a very happy new year. For Face the Nation, I'm Margaret Brannon. We'll see you in 2026. Today's guests were Bank of America's CEO and Chairman Brian Moynihan, the former Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, Chris Krebs, former Senior Counterterrorism Official at the Department of Homeland Security, Samantha Vinograd, and our CBS News Correspondents Roundtable, featuring our chief legal correspondent, Jan Crawford, chief Washington analyst, Robert Costa, chief Washington correspondent, Major Garrett, justice correspondent, Scott McFarlane and senior White House reporter, Jennifer Jacobs.

47:58Margaret Brennan:The senior executive producer of Face the Nation is Mary Hager, and the executive producer is Anne Hsu. This broadcast was directed by Shelley Schwartz. Face the Nation originates from CBS News in Washington. For more, we're online at facethenation.com and on YouTube. We're also rebroadcast on our CBS News 24-7 streaming network at 1230 on Sundays. And we're available through our apps, CBS News and Paramount+. There's a lot going on right now. Mounting economic inequality, threats to democracy, environmental disaster, the sour stench of chaos in the air. I'm Brooke Gladstone, host of WNYC's On the Media.

48:39Want to understand the reasons and the meanings of the narratives that led us here? And maybe how to head them off at the pass?

48:48Margaret Brennan:That's On the Media's specialty. Take a listen wherever you get your podcasts. It is my great honor to welcome you all to Starfleet Academy. There's never been a better time to enroll in Star Trek. It's our job to prepare you for the unimaginable. Till the night, cadet! In high-pressure situations, positive reinforcement is crucial to one's success. You're doing a great job. This is what we train for. These friends of mine, they all live for something bigger than themselves. And that's Starfleet. Starfleet Academy. New series now streaming on Paramount+.

From the publisher

This week on Face the Nation, as 2025 comes to an end, we'll look ahead to what's on the horizon for 2026 and more. We'll turn to Wall Street and the Chairman and CEO of Bank of America Brian Moynihan for the industry's economic forecast.  We'll discuss national security threats and challenges from the increasing use of artificial intelligence with CBS News contributors Sam Vinograd and Chris Krebs.  And we'll wrap up and look to the new year with our CBS News Washington correspondents in our annual roundtable.  

To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan

All 87 episodes
CEO Brian Moynihan, CBS News Washington Correspondents PanelFace the Nation with Margaret Brennan · 51 min
Listen in VO