In short
Face the Nation covers (1) U.S.-Iran war and a proposed staged diplomacy framework to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, (2) midterm-election politics and concerns about election interference vs influence, and (3) U.S.-China/Taiwan tensions after Xi’s Washington visit.
Guests and backgrounds
- President Masoud Pezeshkian: Iranian president; negotiates Iran’s offer tied to a June Memorandum of Understanding.
- Sen. John Kennedy: Louisiana Republican; member of GOP leadership; focuses on sanctions/blockade and cost-of-living politics.
- Rep. Jim Himes: Connecticut Democrat; House Intelligence Committee member; released a statement after a classified briefing.
- Ambassador Alexander Yu: Taiwan representative to the U.S.; discusses deterrence, arms delivery, and Taiwan’s role in semiconductors.
Key claims + notable examples
- Pezeshkian says the U.S. blocked progress; Iran will allow IAEA inspections under NPT; blames U.S./Israel strikes on nuclear sites and cites 440 kg 60% enriched uranium; argues sanctions target civilians and calls Trump’s “annihilate” threat nonsensical.
- Kennedy says he hasn’t seen a “secret plan” but supports sanctions/blockade; warns the strait’s partial closure raises oil/gas prices; opposes sending troops.
- Himes distinguishes “interference” (vote machinery/tallies) from “influence” (ads/social media); says intelligence community assessed no adversary interference; argues Iran could affect elections via Strait of Hormuz disruptions (oil up, diesel up).
- Yu says Taiwan-US positions haven’t changed; urges faster delivery of a $14B weapons package; highlights Taiwan’s semiconductor centrality (90% of leading-edge chips) and AI supply chain.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOOverview of Current Political Climate
0:45 to 2:25
Discussion on President Trump's challenges ahead of midterm elections.
“Fastest based on analysis by Ooklo Speed Test Intelligence Data of National Speed Score results incorporating 5G download and upload speeds for the first half of 2026.”
Iran Conflict Discussion
2:25 to 3:45
Exploring the latest developments in the U.S.-Iran conflict.
“Good morning and welcome to Face the Nation.”
Interview with President Masoud Pezeshkian
3:45 to 9:01
Exclusive interview discussing Iran's proposals and U.S. relations.
“a rare network exclusive interview with the leader of a country at war with the United States.”
Senator John Kennedy's Perspective
9:01 to 14:01
Senator Kennedy shares insights on U.S. strategy towards Iran and domestic issues.
“Senator, the president seems to be dangling some interest in diplomacy.”
Wasteful Spending in Government
14:01 to 17:24
Discussing concerns over government spending, specifically on ads and aid.
“And then the money goes to the bureaucracy.”
Election Interference and Intelligence Briefings
17:25 to 23:58
Examining election interference theories and the role of U.S. intelligence.
“And we're back now with Connecticut Democratic Congressman Jim Himes.”
Sponsor: Dumb Blonde Podcast
23:59 to 24:34
Promotional segment for the Dumb Blonde podcast.
“Dumb Blonde is where we talk about all the things everybody else is thinking, but is too scared to say out loud.”
Iran's Diplomatic Stance and Nuclear Ambitions
24:35 to 28:00
Insights into Iran's political strategies and their position on nuclear weapons.
“Here's more of our conversation with the president of Iran, Masoud Pazeshkin.”
Iran's Nuclear Ambitions and US Relations
28:00 to 37:34
Discusses Iran's stance on nuclear weapons and the complexities of US-Iran relations.
“So are we at that point where those concessions need to be made?”
Taiwan's Position and US Relations
37:42 to 42:02
Examines the current state of Taiwan's relations with the US and China's influence.
“We're joined now by the Taiwan representative to the United States, Ambassador Alexander Yu.”
Show all 11 chapters
Taiwan's Role in Global Security and Technology
42:02 to 46:32
Learn about Taiwan's significance in U.S. defense and semiconductor industries.
“And the point you are making, as I understand it, is that the Chinese Communist Party was not running China during World War II.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Hey, our ride's almost here. Are you ready?
0:03Margaret Brennan:Just grabbing my shoes. That's what you said 10 minutes ago. I just dropped a video call, uploading this giant file on my tablet, looking at my watchgo bananas with the group chat, and of course, still lining up tonight's playlist on my phone. All at once? Yep, story of my life. That's why I switched to T-Mobile. They have the fastest 5G network. Okay, multitasker. I see you. Honestly, I never imagined I could do all this at once. It's awesome. Say no more, I'm totally switching. My post is taking way too long to upload. That's a sign. You've got to get T-Mobile. So many reasons to join T-Mobile.
0:43Find yours at T-Mobile.com.
0:49Fastest based on analysis by Ooklo Speed Test Intelligence Data of National Speed Score results incorporating 5G download and upload speeds for the first half of 2026.
1:00Margaret Brennan:I'm Margaret Brennan in Washington, and this week on Face the Nation, President Trump turns his focus to the midterm elections following a week of high-stakes summits with foreign allies and adversaries. The president spent much of last week striding the world stage without ever leaving the U.S., first delivering a stark warning to Iran in his speech to the United Nations General Assembly. Will a deal be made with Iran, or do I annihilate the Islamic Republic and do it quickly? So what is the status of that potential deal? In a network exclusive, we'll hear from Iranian President Masood Pazeshkin on his country's latest offer to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the conflict.
1:45Margaret Brennan:Then Chinese President Xi Jinping's state visit to Washington drew no shortage of pomp and circumstance. But behind it all, serious tensions remain. Chief among them, the status of Taiwan. We'll check in with the territory's representative to the U.S., Ambassador Alexander Yu. Plus, with midterm elections just weeks away, Republicans are scrambling to save their majority in both houses. We'll ask Louisiana Republican Senator John Kennedy about the outlook for the GOP and Connecticut Democratic Congressman Jim Himes on his party's plan to govern if it does take the majority. It's all just ahead on Face the Nation.
2:41Margaret Brennan:Good morning and welcome to Face the Nation. With just weeks to go before the midterm elections, President Trump is facing challenges on multiple fronts, persistent voter concerns about the economy, rising prices for consumers and growing questions about his strategy in the war with Iran. Adding to those pressures is an ongoing confrontation with the White House press corps. The major television networks resumed coverage of the president's daily activities after a federal judge ordered the White House to restore access to outlets that had been banned. That only after Chinese President Xi Jinping's state visit was already underway.
3:18Margaret Brennan:The administration continued to limit CNN's participation in the television pool yesterday. Regarding the war, President Trump told reporters yesterday he had rejected the latest offer to end it presented by Iranian officials during meetings in New York. But will he keep diplomacy alive or resume strikes. The Pentagon's public casualty count rose again last week, bringing the number of U.S. military deaths to 19. The Iran conflict is where we begin this morning, a rare network exclusive interview with the leader of a country at war with the United States. We sat down with President Masoud Pazeshkin in New York on Friday, and we began by asking him about Iran's latest proposal, built on what was outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding signed by both sides in June.
4:08Now, in fact, there is a framework along the same path with the same objectives that were established. Ultimately, the requests that were included in that memorandum and MOU have now been broken down into stages so that we can proceed according to those stages. If the United States agrees to proceed in that way, everything will return to the way it was before. because right now it's the United States that's blocked our way and naturally Iran has also blocked the way from its side. These are things that both sides need to open up first. Then we can sit down at the negotiating table and discuss other issues at hand.
4:51Margaret Brennan:If President Trump accepts this proposal, can you guarantee your military will abide by it? Obviously, we will abide by whatever we commit to. Well, President Trump said he was open to meeting with you. When you were here, that didn't happen. Would you be willing, if you want direct communication, would you be willing to speak directly to him, to meet with him? Now, the atmosphere of distrust that has developed between Iran and the United States is because we have had several rounds of talks with the United States. the cog of the weekend. Basically, we need to determine now what exactly we want to reach an understanding on.
5:34If we don't abide by what we have written down as necessary, can we really resolve it through dialogue? We wrote it down and signed it. It's clear. The first thing that needs to happen is that the distrust created by this war has to be overcome. We need to abide by what we have written down. The United States needs to show that it does not intend to overthrow our government or our administration. Put yourself in our position. Imagine someone came and martyred your supreme leader and then not abide by everything you had agreed upon. What would be your reaction? It's not something that can be resolved that simply.
6:11Margaret Brennan:So the offer that you are making for diplomacy, is it now to begin talks about putting limits on Iran's nuclear program, but not fully abandoning that program? Of course, we agree. We had already reached an understanding on this in our previous talks. They struck it down. We're not supposed to develop nuclear weapons. Within the framework of the NPT and the other existing frameworks, all of these issues are matters that can be agreed upon.
6:49Unfortunately, they are disregarding the rights that international law grants to all countries.
6:54Margaret Brennan:Under international law, including the non-proliferation treaty your country signed, though, inspectors would be allowed in from the UN. Will you allow them in now to settle those concerns? That is absolutely correct. According to those very international laws, when there are nuclear centres under the inspections and auspices of the IAEA, within the NPT framework, no country has the legal right to attack those nuclear centres and sites.
7:26But American Israel carried out the act of attacking them. Now the agency itself, rather than its strong condemnation, showed absolutely no reaction.
7:40Why is it that centres and sites that were completely under their unprecedented surveillance and inspections regime, perhaps they had the most surveillance on those centres? We had no deviation from that framework. Why did they attack it in the first place?
7:55Margaret Brennan:Well, the IAEA said they were not being given full access. UN inspectors weren't being allowed in. They said they couldn't guarantee the peaceful nature of your program. And say now you have 440 kilograms of 60 % enriched uranium. So they want to be able to verify that that won't be made into a weapon. Will your country allow in weapons inspectors now? That is absolutely correct. This occurred after America chose to tear up the JCPOA. Iran waited for one year in order for the European counterparts to live up to their commitments within the JCPOA. They failed to do so. Iran left the JCPOA and continued on the path that it saw fit.
8:43Now, if they want to come in and have inspections, we could reach accords and agreements vis-a-vis that specific topic within the negotiations. Not for them now to come and inspect those existing frameworks again.
8:57Margaret Brennan:And we'll hear more from President Pozeshkin later this hour, but we turn now to Republican Louisiana Senator John Kennedy. Good morning to you, Senator.
9:09Margaret Brennan:Senator, the president seems to be dangling some interest in diplomacy. The U.S. president also seems to be somewhat interested, but the Wall Street Journal is also reporting President Trump has a secret plan to restart the bombing campaign in Iran after the midterm elections. That's 37 days from now. Is that renewed bombing something you support?
9:36I don't know. I haven't seen the classified intelligence. Iran made an offer recently to the president. It was not a serious offer. The president's not Bambi's baby brother. He turned it down. We need to continue doing what we're doing, the sanctions, the blockade. The truth is, if you're fair-minded at all, Iran is a sucking chest wound, and the world is safer for it. It's public and private sectors held together with duct tape and spit. Now, there's just one problem. The strait is at least partially closed, and it's affected the price of oil. and oils in everything, including gasoline. And it's painful as hell.
10:33And we've got to either figure out a way to settle this thing, to get the straight open, or to escalate. I would not send in troops. We could send in troops and we could open the straight. But once you send them in, you've got to leave them there. And that creates a whole new host of problems.
10:56Margaret Brennan:Well, and the broader question of to what end, since the president has said, you know, Iran's about to capitulate any day now. But when we look at the politics of this out in Iowa and Michigan, we've seen Republican candidates who are going to be on the ballot in November call for an end to the Iran war. In the Senate, we've seen 14 votes to date objecting to it, two past. I mean, I know those are symbolic, but this is reflective of frustration within your own party here. Should the president be more aware of public opinion?
11:33Well, look, here's none of this is advanced calculus. Here's I've been to just about every battleground state helping my mates. Here's what I've learned. When moms and dads lie down to sleep at night and can't, they're not lying there worried about whether the football coaches are happy or whether the press is biased or the other things that we've been talking about. They're worried about the cost of living.
12:07Margaret Brennan:Yeah. And they're a little worried about Iran because they don't understand why, but they know the two are inextricably linked. and we've got to be straight up and address those things. Here's my prediction for the midterms, Margaret. The experts will be wrong. They almost always are. None of these guys have ever run a campaign in their natural lives. It's going to be close. It would help if the president would stay focused on cost of living and I would like to see him give a nationwide address or let Rubio and General Cain do it and explain why we went into Iran, why we're winning, and how we're going to get out.
12:51Margaret Brennan:Yep. You've been making that recommendation for some time. You did it last time you were with us over the summer. The White House has not to date. Well, the president doesn't take orders from me. He barely takes suggestions. But I'm pretty persistent, and I'm going to keep recommending it. I want to ask you about something else the executive branch just did without Congress. On Friday, the White House informed congressional leaders that he, the president, unilaterally canceled nearly a billion dollars in congressionally approved funds and did it without Congress's consent. You sit on appropriations.
13:27Margaret Brennan:The chair of that committee, Susan Collins, said this was the latest attempt to undermine Congress's constitutional power of the purse and that this is a clear violation of the law. She wants to take action against these illegal actions. Do you share her concern? Are you going to join her effort? I love Susan Lakotaka, but she's wrong. First, Congress didn't approve this stuff. When Congress appropriates money, we do it in broad categories. For example, I'm making this up. $250 million to improve relations with sub-Sahara Africa. And then the money goes to the bureaucracy. And a lot of times the bureaucracy wastes it.
14:14Spending porn is what I call it. That's how we ended up with millions of dollars for circumcisions in Zambia and electric buses in Rwanda. So you're okay with this? What the president, yeah, I'm fine with it. If you read what Russ Vogt wants to actually cut, What he wants to cut is aid to NGOs who support illegal immigration. And he also wants to cut some money that the bureaucracy has decided to give to help pay down not our debt, but foreign debt. This stuff's spending poor. Congress didn't approve it. Now, Susan is worried about them doing this to the NIH grants. I don't think they ought to do it to the NIH grants.
15:07But this is spending porn that they're cutting. And Congress ought to get up off its ice cold lazy butt and cut it itself. But since we're not, I'm glad that Russ Vogt's doing it.
15:22Margaret Brennan:You're talking about concern about wasteful spending. You were very sharp in your questioning of then-Secretary Kristi Noem in regard to some ads that DHS had been running using taxpayer money to bolster her public image. Our viewers are going to see a 30-second commercial on this program. It's on all major networks. It's on the cable networks as well. It prominently features President Trump. And there's a voice praising him as, quote, the toughest, most resilient person I ever met. And at the end, it says paid for by the U.S. government. Is that the best use of taxpayer money? Well, first is to Secretary Noem.
16:11What she did was masterclass dumb. She spent$220 million on commercials about her. And I called her out on it. This looks like a commercial about President Trump. I was just going to say, Margaret, I don't think any public official, including President Trump or Kristi Noem or John Kennedy, should spend public money on private ads for themselves. Now, the White House sees it differently, but I think there ought to be a rule that you can't, well, there probably is a rule. You can't spend public money to promote yourself. I may end up with a sombrero on my head, but I also think that we ought to have a rule that no politician can have a building named after him while he's alive.
17:12I think that would settle a lot of this controversy. We have that rule in Louisiana, and it works pretty well.
17:17Margaret Brennan:Well, we'll watch, Senator, if you introduce that. Thank you for your time this morning. Face Nation will be back in a minute. Stay with us. And we're back now with Connecticut Democratic Congressman Jim Himes. Congressman, you sit on the House Intelligence Committee. We are 37 days out from the midterm races. I know you received a classified briefing on foreign threats, and you released a statement saying that the U.S. intelligence community assessed no adversary had interfered or attempted to interfere with infrastructure or vote counting. Why did you think it was important to make that statement if nothing changed?
17:59Yeah, well, Margaret, we know that the president, as he careens on, and I overheard you talking about the Strait of Hormuz and gasoline prices and everything, as the president careens towards a very substantial loss in the election, we know that he's going to deny its legitimacy. And I say we know it because he always does that when an election goes against him. By the way, he does it when an election doesn't go against him. In 2016, of course, he famously claimed to have won the popular vote. So this is coming. This is coming. And the only question is, how prepared are we for it? And, you know, we could spend two hours on the various scenarios that Donald Trump is going to do to claim that the election is corrupted.
18:38You know, that he's going to say that there's illegal aliens voting in Michigan and Florida. My little piece of this is, and we saw a preview of this in his July speech to the nation, he is quite possibly going to claim that the Iranians have taken control of the voting machinery in Florida or in North Carolina or that the Russians or the Chinese. And as the guy who has access to that information, I'm making sure, to the extent that I can, that people understand what the history is and that in real time, I'll have some insight as to whether what the president says in that moment is true.
19:10Margaret Brennan:You have that assurance from U.S. officials that they will provide you that real-time intelligence? Well, the answer, of course, is yes, I've received that assurance. Do I believe it? You know, it was really interesting listening to you talk to Senator Kennedy, who in his very veiled and folksy way was was breaking with the president in pretty substantial ways. As he said, he may end up with a picture with a sombrero on his head. you know, look, it's one of the attributes of this administration in this second version of his presidency is that if you go against the president, you get fired. So yes, I have received those assurances.
19:48They only partly make me comfortable.
19:51Margaret Brennan:Well, we will watch for that. You said no interference. Influence campaigns, of course, are also something that I understand we'll have to be tracking. You heard from president. Influence is very different. It's important that people understand the distinction. You know, interference is messing around with the actual machinery or the vote tallies. Influence happens all the time. People buying, you know, Facebook pages, opposing some candidate. That happens. Yep. Understood. Thank you for making that distinction. You heard President Pazeshkin at the top of this program dangle this chance at diplomacy.
20:23Margaret Brennan:President Trump openly speculated at the United Nations that Iran's waiting on a deal until after the midterms. What do you think, if anything would change after November that could affect how the executive negotiates. Yeah. You know, it's funny. I read the transcript of your interview with the president of Iran, and it was a whole lot of words. There were some interesting nuggets in it about, you know, no, we're not. We're not inviting the president to Iran. And no, we're not. There was interesting stuff in there. But make no mistake, right? Two things are true. The president's threat to annihilate Iran is nonsensical.
21:01You know, he's been trying that for six months now, and he's not wrong. We sank their Navy. We destroyed a lot of their planes, but the Iranians have for six months sustained the very worst that we and the Israelis can throw at them. Unless the president wants to start sort of killing civilians in cities, we've shown what we can do, and the Iranians have shown that they can sustain that. More interestingly, and you ask about this in the context of the election, look, the Iranians now, in some sense, control what happens on election day. Why do I say that? Because if the Iranian regime, and this is why they're not negotiating before the election, if the Iranian regime wants to make sure that Mike Lawler loses in New York 17, or that Ashley Hinson is not a senator in the Midwest, they will call their friends the Houthis and say, fire five missiles at five ships, or they'll fire a couple of missiles or drones at ships in the Strait of Hormuz.
Read the full transcript
21:51Oil goes up to$120 a barrel. Diesel, already at record highs, goes to$8 a gallon. And guess what? Mike Lawler and Ashley Hinson lose their elections, right? And so the Iranians are not stupid people. They've been negotiating literally for thousands of years, and they understand that they now have a massive impact on what happens in November simply because they control the flow of oil and fertilizer and other stuff out of the strait. So do you think they're giving up that position before the election? Of course they're not.
22:21Margaret Brennan:Well, a lot of what they asked for, the president had already agreed to back in June in that MOU that failed. But I want to ask to be at another big meeting this week, and that was in Washington between she and Trump. The White House said afterwards that the countries would set up a bilateral communications channel for artificial intelligence incidents. Do you consider this in any way a step forward? Yeah, of course it's a step forward. I mean, it's not something that came out of the pageantry of the last five days, right? Scott Besson had set this up weeks before the actual visit of President Xi occurred.
22:59And look, we all know, because we can read and watch TV, that nothing significant came out of this. But look, when you have a situation as important as the relationships between Beijing and Washington, simply talking is a win in and of itself. So again, we all know that nothing terribly meaningful came out of this conversation. And look, Xi himself is waiting for 37 days when he will now face a president of the United States who has been rebuked by his own people, who will be in a much weaker position of political leadership than he is today. So, you know, President Xi wasn't going to make a commitment any more than the Iranian regime was.
23:40But like I said, let's not be too harsh. Anytime we're talking to the Chinese and stopping misunderstandings and making incremental progress on things like AI or not starting another trade war, you know, it's a valuable couple of days.
23:53Margaret Brennan:Congressman Himes, always good to have you with us. Thanks for your time today. Base Nation will be back in a moment. Stay with us. Dumb Blonde is where we talk about all the things everybody else is thinking, but is too scared to say out loud. I'm Bunny XO, and every week I'm sitting down for real unfiltered conversations with guests like Dolly Parton, Machine Gun Kelly, Denise Richards. Plus, you never know what's going to come out during Ask, Tell, Confess. We laugh, we overshare, and maybe heal a little along the way. Follow and listen to Dumb Blonde wherever you get podcasts.
24:34Margaret Brennan:Welcome back to Face the Nation. Here's more of our conversation with the president of Iran, Masoud Pazeshkin. There is now a new supreme leader. How often do you consult with him and what decisions has he made? You see, thus far I have met with a supreme leader on two occasions. We've had encounters. What did you ask him for? Did you ask his permission to come here to America? Well, see, coming to America doesn't necessarily require a permission, as you put it. We have informed them that we are coming. Our trips are at the volition of the government. You said you met twice with the Supreme Leader.
25:11Margaret Brennan:You're a doctor by training. You're a physician. What did you make of his recovery from the injuries he sustained in the US-Israeli strikes that killed his father and his family? No, there's no specific ongoing health issues or challenges.
25:31On the last occasion when we met for seven-plus hours, of course, we were not used to being in seated positions for those many hours.
25:40We changed angles and positions, we crossed our legs and so on. But of course, he was healthy enough to be able to withstand those hours of that situation. From a medical standpoint, he's completely healthy. Hear this from me as a physician and accept it. He has no issues. But the Supreme Leader, you said, was able to conduct this meeting.
26:00Margaret Brennan:He has his legs and his face recovered? Yes. He was able to sit on the ground? Did he advise you on this diplomacy? Does he want a deal with the United States? Everything that we spoke of and about and had discussions about was shaped through coordination.
26:27There is a team that has been put in place in Iran, consisting of six members of various organizations, security forces, parliamentary representatives, government agencies, and they sit and conduct talks, consultations about decision-making processes and reach any decisions through coordination. This has taken place quite comfortably in our country.
26:51Margaret Brennan:Your oil exports are blockaded. Your foreign accounts are frozen for Iran. Inflation has skyrocketed. Iran's economy is under so many sanctions. You ran on trying to improve the economy for everyday people. At what point does all of this financial pain become too much and you have to make concessions to the United States? With the imposed sanctions, if they block access to food and medication, who are they truly targeting?
27:27The sick, the elderly, the indignant, the downtrodden? They claim that they're proponents of human rights. They think about humanity. If they're at war with us or non-civilians, what business do these people have with civilians? What the US is committing is a war crime. What we do in our country we know. For the news that you're distributing and the reports that you share, it's not a true reflection of reality.
27:56Right now our people are living with dignity. They are enduring hardship.
28:01Margaret Brennan:But respectfully, the world powers, not just the United States, are saying they could lift some of those sanctions if only Iran chooses, your government chooses to go in a different direction and give up any ambition to have a nuclear weapon. That's the cost. So are we at that point where those concessions need to be made? where Iran says, I will not in the future pursue a weapon and allow an inspector and give up. Are you aware of the previous conversations that we've conducted? When did we ever say that we are seeking nuclear weapons? They have martyred a supreme leader that according to his clerical decree...
28:48Margaret Brennan:Iran has always said you're not seeking a nuclear weapon. Intelligent agencies. Developing nuclear weapons is haram. from a standpoint of belief, not from a legal perspective. Even if some individuals in Iran may have the incentive to develop nuclear weapons, religiously speaking, they are not allowed to pursue that path. America came and killed it. We were sitting and talking and we had reached an agreement. Why did they attack? America's intention is not to resolve the issue. America's intention is to overthrow our administration. Israel says it in their own speech. What they're doing is neutralising the government, not negotiating.
29:26Margaret Brennan:But your job is to improve the lives for the Iranian people. Yes, we are doing everything humanly possible, but not through bullying and coercion intended to force us into submission. We're already negotiating. Why are they concurrently attacking us? According to what logic do they have the right to do so? We're negotiating. Why did they attack us? What sin did we commit for them to attack us? The UN Human Rights Council says there are grounds to believe that US airstrikes were responsible for hitting that girls' school in Minab that killed some of the children that you have referred to here. That very same report, though, says Iran's guilty of crimes against humanity for violent crackdowns on your own people, on your own protesters.
30:13Margaret Brennan:Do you accept all of those findings? The speech given by Mr Trump, your own president, in which he admitted to arming instigators to take to the streets, have you heard of it or not heard of it? When they cause sanctions, when they cause social upheavals, problems and sanctions, poverty grows in one place. Then they hire these people and they have armed some of them. More than 500 security and military forces in a demonstration. Apparently they say it was a simple demonstration. In what demonstration 500 security and military forces get murdered?
30:56They were attempting a coup. When that coup attempt failed, they imposed the 40-day war. It's the same people who are in the streets. Those people who are in this way, if these people are really seeking human rights, in Gaza, with the support of the US, they have killed 70 ,000 people and displaced hundreds of thousands of people. They're doing this in Lebanon. Where is human rights? What is the awakened consciousness of the world doing?
31:27Margaret Brennan:You said publicly, you apologise. You said we are ashamed before the people. We are obligated to assist all of those who were harmed in those incidents. You saw what happened in your own country as wrong. That's the way that sounds. How those protesters were treated. The issue is how we should have dealt with this. if we had handled it correctly perhaps we would not have allowed those who had taken up arms to come to the streets
31:57because in the midst of all of this some innocent people were killed there were people who were genuinely protesting but those who were carrying weapons in the streets had mixed in with them and they started the fighting began destroying things and killed members of the military these were no longer ordinary people and it was in the course of all of this ultimately a problem occurred that should not have occurred
32:19Margaret Brennan:There are two Americans determined to be wrongfully detained in Iran. One of them is a journalist in Evin prison. His name is Reza Valizadeh. Why not release the Americans as a sign of goodwill towards the United States to rebuild the trust you say that is lost? Do you think by setting them free, we can rebuild trust? Do you think the United States of America is genuinely interested in solving problems with us? Why then does it bomb us in the middle of negotiations? Why does it come and kill our scientists, officials and people? Why not test it? Test it, we've done it. Make a gesture to President.
32:58We have done it. Before that, the United States had several of these prisoners and we released them. The understanding was that they would release our money. We did our part. Several of the people that they had asked for were released. The money came from South Korea and Qatar was supposed to transfer it to us. When we did our part, the United States did not follow through. We tested it, but it didn't work. The United States gets what it wants and then it doesn't honour its commitment. That's the situation we have today. In other words, we gave our money, we did what the United States asked us to do, but the United States did not do what it was supposed to do.
33:36Even now, we remain committed. We don't want to fight. But certainly, if they strike us, we will defend ourselves.
33:44Margaret Brennan:Mr. President, I'm told we are out of time. But just to ask you again, would you meet with President Trump? Would you take the extraordinary measure of inviting him to Iran? Something to bring this to a conclusion? Look, first of all, you know what the situation is like in Iran. What they have done to us, to our people, has made people extremely upset. Imagine if someone came into your country and assassinated your president. some of your top officials and your scientists. If you were in our position, what would you do? And yet, here we are. We're still talking, we're still engaging in dialogue and we're still making our demands within the framework of international law.
34:29We're not asking for anything more than that. We're not seeking war. War was imposed on us. They martyred some of the best people in our country. We have put things in writing. We've signed agreements. We've made commitments. Let them implement what they agreed to so that we can have confidence that this process can work. Let them abide by what was written. And then we can sit down closely and resume negotiations.
34:53Margaret Brennan:There are threats against President Trump and his family from Iran as well. But how do you move on? How do you get to a deal? Look, look, if in Iran, think if something happens to the family. We in the government do not want to dominate. If we intended to do so, we wouldn't be sitting at the negotiating table. We wouldn't have sat together. The fact that some people are saying these things is coming from indignation. They're deeply upset. The supreme leader is not simply a leader of the government, the president or a politician. There are tens of millions, perhaps hundreds of millions of people in the region who believe in and follow our leader.
35:36They martyred our leader. You saw what they did in Iraq and Pakistan. This is a matter of faith. So based on that faith, people can't accept what was done. Hypothetically speaking, let's say in Iran they want to assassinate. From the standpoint of the government, if that were what we intended to do, we would not be sitting at the negotiating table.
36:00Margaret Brennan:But you're saying it's too politically difficult to meet with the president now? Until trust is restored.
36:10As long as they don't cease doing what they're imposing on us every day, it's difficult to trust them. Every day they increase the sanctions against us. Every day they threaten us. Every day they strike us. And they don't honour what they've put in writing. So if they engage in talks, will they actually follow through? They don't honour what they've signed. How can we believe that if we talk, the problem would get resolved?
36:37Margaret Brennan:For the full interview and transcripts, you can find it on our website, facethenation.com, or watch it on our YouTube channel. We'll be right back. Matching outfits, extravagant birthdays, many nicknames, a few classic moves of a dog-obsessed parent. At Ollie, they're obsessed with how obsessed you are with your pup, which is why they obsess over giving your dog the best. Ollie's fresh, human-grade recipes are developed by real chefs and backed by vet nutritionists. The meals are perfectly portioned. And come with a pup-tainer and scoop for easy storing and mess-free serving, delivering the best experience for you and your pup.
37:15And through the Oli app, you can actually check in on your dog's health with real vets. By uploading a picture, their team can check your dog's weight, digestion, teeth, and coat. They'll then provide next steps on how to keep them thriving. And because they're just as obsessed as you are, there is zero judgment if you check in every day. You could say Ali feeds the obsession. Go to Ali.com slash FirstBox and use code FirstBox to get 70 % off your welcome kit. Ali, feed the obsession.
37:42Margaret Brennan:We're joined now by the Taiwan representative to the United States, Ambassador Alexander Yu. Good to have you back here. Thank you. Not too bad, Margaret. You were here in May after President Trump visited Beijing, and we discussed that the two leaders did at length discuss Taiwan, according to President Trump at that time. When it came to this meeting this past week, President Trump said Taiwan did come up with Xi, but, quote, we didn't spend a lot of time talking about Taiwan. Do you have any sense what context there was, how Taiwan was discussed? Have you been given any readout? Well, I mean, you've heard many people comment, including President Trump, comment on the question of Taiwan.
38:27He made it clear himself that it was mentioned, but it was not the main topic of discussion. As a matter of fact, during the release statements by both sides on the deliverables or the achievements, Taiwan does not figure in neither side of the papers.
38:49Margaret Brennan:China did say this issue was foundational. Well, it was foundational, but there was no reaction from the US side, which I think, again, during May, President or General Secretary Xi gave an earful of Taiwan to President Trump when he was in Beijing. But during this trip, I think the United States made it very clear that no change in position towards Taiwan. And I think they made it clear during and before and after the visit. Right before the visit, Secretary Rubio met with the foreign ministers of Japan and Korea in UNGA in New York. And they made it very clear that it supported peace, stability of the Taiwan Straits, no coercion, no status quo, and even supported Taiwan's meaningful participation in international organizations, as well as many other countries during UNGA.
39:44But so Taiwan is there's no change in Taiwan's position for the United States.
39:50Margaret Brennan:In May, President Trump said he wanted to speak with your president, President Lai. Did that call ever take place? Well, I'll say that the communications between the two sides, between Taiwan and the United States, is open, is regular and very, very close at different levels. And I'll just leave it at that. But not at the presidential level, which could be provocative. Well, I'll just say that our communications are quite regular and quite open. I want to ask you about the state of play with Taiwan and the tension with Beijing. The unclassified U.S. intelligence community assessment says Chinese leaders do not currently plan to execute an invasion of Taiwan in 2027.
40:31Margaret Brennan:But it also says Beijing will continue setting the conditions for eventual unification short of conflict. What do you need from the U.S. to deter Xi Jinping? Well, this comes back all the way to the mentions of United States President Donald Trump and the Secretary General of China, Xi Jinping, during their visits, during his visit, where both mentioned the historical factors between World War II or the war of Japanese invasion of China during the late 30s, which President Trump highlighted the historical actions, the heroic actions of United States Flying Tigers. But Secretary General Xi wanted to mention that it was, really made a reference that it was the Chinese Communist Party that fought World War II or fought the Japanese.
41:28Margaret Brennan:And that's not correct? That's not correct. Let me show you this. This is the Flying Tigers using our flag. This is our crest. This is the blood chip by which every American pilot, when they flew on missions on the Flying Tigers who wore on the back of their jacket to show if they're down, that Chinese people can help them. That's what those words say. If this pilot goes down, he is an American. This foreigner is here to help us in the war effort. Please help them. And the point you are making, as I understand it, is that the Chinese Communist Party was not running China during World War II. It was actually the very same party that eventually left the mainland and set up a government in Taiwan.
42:17The communist regime did not exist until 1949. During the war, they were guerrillas, barely having any skirmishes against Japanese, if any. And then after they became a people of Republic in 49, a few years afterwards, they were fighting and killing American soldiers in the Korean War. So let's put that into perspective.
42:40Margaret Brennan:Was that offensive to people in Taiwan when they heard the president of the United States It's not correct, Xi Jinping, but accept that claim? President Trump was correct in saying that the Chinese and the Americans fought valiantly in the war. But that was in the context that it was the Republic of China government fighting alongside Xi Jinping. But also the perspective that now because of that is making reference that China and the United States have to fight the new militarism, implying Japan and other countries, for example, the Philippines, or even Taiwan being aggressive, that therefore, that the United States shouldn't sell arms to Taiwan or other.
43:21Margaret Brennan:Exactly. And that's messing, again, twisting the facts, because it is the people of Republic of China who have been the aggressor. They are the ones who are creating all these tensions in the region, the first island chain in the Asia-Pacific. And now Japan is after, currently, they're not the aggressors. Right. And then PRC is trying to drive a wedge between United States and its partners in ALS, which is Japan and Taiwan. But to bring you back to where we started here, what does Taiwan need from the United States? Because one of the things that President Trump referred to as a bargaining chip was this$14 billion weapons package that still has not been delivered to your country despite initial indications it would.
44:04Well, it's just not this purchase or this sale. Actually, it's peace through strength is the best way to avoid any conflict. The notion that China will not attack Taiwan is on the basis that Taiwan is strong. Right. It's, you know, that we're well prepared to fence off against any Chinese aggression.
44:30Margaret Brennan:And there's more than a billion dollars in additional aid that we heard Republican senators, including Tillis, Murkowski, McConnell and Cornyn say. they want to know why the Trump administration is not delivering it. Exactly. Therefore, we want to share our burden of defense or share our burden of doing better at being a better defender of ourselves. And therefore, we need and we're increasing our defense budget and we need to procure arms as necessary. And the United States has been our main supplier of selling weapons to Taiwan. We hope that we can get that weapons as soon as possible. Taiwan is also a huge supplier of computer chips to the rest of the world, 90 percent of the highest level computer chips.
45:16Margaret Brennan:And Mike Gallagher, the former congressman who helped set up the select committee on the Chinese Communist Party, wrote an op ed in the journal arguing the biggest threat to humanity is not rogue A.I., but rather A.I. controlled by China. He refers to Taiwan as the single point of failure in the most important technology the Communist Party wants to dominate. How do you shore up defense of those critical industries? Well, that's why Taiwan matters to the United States and to the world. It's not just on the security side, which is part of the first island chain in Asia-Pacific, but also Taiwan has been the relevant partner in terms of technology, in terms of semiconductor especially.
45:58And the United States is creating this huge wave of artificial intelligence development, you know, now superintelligence, this huge wave. And Taiwan is the one making the surfboards, you know, the semiconductors, the AI stacks, the servers, that people will ride on this huge wave. So it's interdependency, symbiotic relationship between United States, Taiwan, and that makes Taiwan very relevant and why it should be protected.
46:32Margaret Brennan:Ambassador, thank you for coming on and explaining the centrality of Taiwan to all of this. We'll be back in a moment. Thank you very much. That's it for us today. Thank you all for watching. Until next week, for Face the Nation, I'm Margaret Brennan. The senior executive producer of Face the Nation is Mary Hager Laird. The executive producer is Ann Hsu. This broadcast was directed by Shelley Schwartz. Face the Nation originates from CBS News in Washington. For more Face the Nation, we're online at facethenation.com and on YouTube. Face the Nation is also rebroadcast on our CBS News 24-7 streaming network at 1230 on Sundays.
47:13Margaret Brennan:It's available through our Paramount Plus app. A lot of short daily news podcasts focus on just one story. But right now, you probably need more. On Up First from NPR, we bring you three of the world's top headlines every day in under 15 minutes. Because no one's story can capture all that's happening in this big, crazy world of ours on any given morning. Listen now to the Up First podcast from NPR.
From the publisher
This week on Face the Nation, President Trump turns his focus to the midterm elections, following a week of high-stakes summits with foreign allies and adversaries.
The president spent much last week striding the world stage without ever leaving the U.S., first delivering a stark warning to Iran in his speech to the United Nations General Assembly.
So what is the status of that potential deal? In a network exclusive, we'll hear from Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on his country's latest offer to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the conflict.
Then, Chinese President Xi Jinping's state visit to Washington drew no shortage of pomp and circumstance, but behind it all, serious tensions remain. Chief among them, the status of Taiwan. We'll check in with the territory's representative to the U.S., Ambassador Alexander Yui.
Plus, with midterm elections just weeks away, Republicans are scrambling to save their majority in both houses. We'll ask Louisiana Republican Senator John Kennedy about the outlook for the GOP and Connecticut Democratic Congressman Jim Himes on his party's plan to govern if it does take the majority.
It's all just ahead on Face the Nation.
