In short
Podcast Notes: Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan
Episode Title
Secretary Marco Rubio, Speaker Mike Johnson, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer
Air Date
[Insert Date] Episode Summary In this episode of *Face the Nation*, host Margaret Brennan discusses significant issues facing the U.S. and the world, including the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, the impact of the government shutdown, and new military rules under the Trump administration. Featured guests include Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Senator Tammy Duckworth, and retired Lieutenant General Ben Hodges.
---
Key Topics Discussed
- Israel-Hamas Conflict
- Context: Nearly two years after the October 7 massacre, discussions regarding a potential ceasefire and hostage release in Gaza are heating up.
- Guests: Secretary of State Marco Rubio provides insights into the ongoing negotiations.
- Key Points from Secretary Rubio:
- Hamas has tentatively agreed to a 20-point plan for hostage release and a ceasefire.
- Current focus is on logistical arrangements for the release of hostages.
- A warning about the need for disarmament of Hamas to ensure long-term peace.
- Importance of regional support from nations like the UAE, Qatar, and Egypt to pressure Hamas.
- Government Shutdown
- Current Situation: As of the episode, the U.S. government is in a shutdown, affecting federal workers and services.
- Guests:
- Speaker Mike Johnson discusses the impasse in Congress and criticizes Chuck Schumer for not cooperating on a continuing resolution.
- Johnson asserts that Republicans have done their part by passing a clean resolution to fund the government.
- Senator Chuck Schumer counters, stating Republicans are refusing to negotiate and are using the shutdown for political maneuvering.
- Polling Insight: Recent CBS polls indicate that neither party is getting positive feedback regarding the shutdown.
- Military Rules Changes
- Guest: Senator Tammy Duckworth discusses new military regulations proposed by Secretary of Defense Hegseth.
- Key Points:
- Hegseth's insistence on a return to "gender-neutral" standards for military fitness tests.
- Duckworth criticizes this as unnecessary and potentially damaging to the inclusion of women in the military.
- Insights from Retired Lieutenant General Ben Hodges
- Hodges comments on the military's approach to engagement and the importance of adhering to the Geneva Conventions.
- He emphasizes that effective military strategy is based on winning hearts and minds, not just sheer lethality.
---
Takeaways
- Middle East: The situation continues to evolve, with significant implications for Israeli security and Palestinian governance, emphasizing the need for a stable leadership structure in Gaza devoid of terrorism.
- Domestic Politics: The government shutdown reflects deeper partisan divides, with essential services and federal workers caught in the crossfire.
- Military Reform: Changes in military standards could impact the effectiveness and inclusiveness of U.S. armed forces, raising questions about the balance between physical standards and operational requirements.
---
Conclusion This episode of *Face the Nation* highlights pressing geopolitical issues and domestic political challenges, providing insights from key leaders and experts on the current state of affairs in the U.S. and around the world. The discussions emphasize the intricate balance of power and the need for effective leadership in both foreign and domestic arenas.
---
Additional Information For more details, visit the official [Face the Nation website](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/facenation) or follow on CBS News Streaming Network.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00I'm Margaret Brennan in Washington and this week on face the nation is is is Israel's war with Hamas finally coming to an end. Meanwhile, the government shutdown continues with no end in sight. Two years after the October 7th massacre that killed more than 1200 Israelis, is a serious plan for a full hostage release and ceasefire in Gaza finally materializing? Secretary of State Marco Rubio will tell us where that deal stands and what's ahead for Gaza, where more than 67 ,000 have been killed in the war's destruction. Plus, the Trump administration continues to ramp up its federal presence in blue cities.
0:41We're going to straighten them out one by one. It's the enemy from within, and we have to handle it before it gets out of control. And we'll take a closer look at the Trump Department of War's new rules for the military. Illinois Democratic Senator Tammy Duckworth will join us, as well as retired Army Lieutenant General Ben Hodges. Finally, as Congress continues their standoff on government funding, we'll talk with House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer about why Americans say the shutdown is hurting both political parties. It's all just ahead on Face the Nation.
1:34Good morning and welcome to Face the Nation. When word came late Friday that Hamas was open to the 20-point plan devised by President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to return the hostages and stop the war in Gaza, Mr. Trump took to social media. This is a big day. We'll see how it all turns out. We have to get the final word down in concrete. Negotiators for all sides will begin meetings in Cairo tomorrow with that exact goal in mind. Special envoy to the Mideast, Steve Wyckoff, and the president's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, will represent the U.S. We'll talk with the president's top diplomat and national security advisor, Marco Rubio, in a moment.
2:15But first, our Deborah Pata reports from Israel. Suspended between hope and dread. Families and friends of hostages who have waited nearly two years for their loved ones to come home are not celebrating yet. We have lived through Hamas lives before. We cannot let another deal collapse. Many Israelis worry the danger lies within. Right-wing members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's ruling coalition, Ben Gafir and Bezal El Smotrich, have threatened to collapse his government if Hamas still exists after the hostages are released and we know that the closer we get the more bentville smotrich and netanyahu will do everything to sabotage our chance to embrace our loved ones the terms of the proposed deal take the right-wing dream of annexing gaza off the table and demand a staged israeli withdrawal from the territory hamas has agreed to release all the hostages in exchange for prisoners and surrender governing power in Gaza.
3:27But it is the things left unsaid that could upend a deal. Hamas has made no mention of disarmament, a key Israeli demand. Palestinians are just as desperate for a ceasefire. President Trump had ordered Israel to stop bombing Gaza after Hamas' response. But not all the guns went silent. Azmi Hamdan's 12-year-old granddaughter was killed in an Israeli strike yesterday. What was her crime? He sobbed. Shrapnel pierced her chest and she died. This is two years of a relentless attack on everything they hold dear. We spoke to UNICEF's James Elder in Gaza. How important is it right now for the children of Gaza?
4:13Oh, it's everything. It's everything. They're holding on. They really are. It's day by day. And there'll be a lot of pressure on both Israel and Hamas when negotiations around logistics for a hostage prisoner swap begin in Cairo tomorrow. We turn now to Secretary of State and National Security Advisor Marco Rubio. Good morning to you, Mr. Secretary. Good morning. It would be extraordinary to end what has been one of Israel's longest and bloodiest wars. The prime minister said he's only allowing these talks that will be underway in Egypt to go for a few days. What exactly is the deadline for Hamas and the terror groups who are holding hostages?
4:56When do they need to release them? Well, yeah, so a couple of points. Hamas has obviously, look, we're dealing with Hamas. OK, so let's take that with it for what it is. But they have said that they agree with the president's framework for the release of the hostages. So what those talks should be about and some of that conversation is already happening now. It's not waiting until Monday in Cairo is the logistics behind the release of these hostages. How do you stop the fighting? Who's going to go in and get them? You know, when are they going to be released? Where are they picked up? What are the processes for this?
5:25That's what should be. That's what this conversation should be about at this point, because they've agreed to the framework of it. Then there's second beyond that is what happens after that. And that is, how do we ensure that we can create and help build a Gaza free of terrorism, free of Hamas, free of anything like Hamas? And that's going to take work and some time, not just to agree on, but to implement. But that's important because that's what's going to bring a permanent end to these hostilities in the long term. And so those are the two phases here. But right now, the most emergent and immediate phase is the one that Hamas claims to have agreed to already.
5:58And that is, they are prepared to release the hostages. Let's discuss through the mediators the logistics and the mechanics behind how that happens. And that has to happen very quickly. That cannot drag on. So my sources have indicated to me that because the upper echelon of Hamas fighters has been so decimated, communication is difficult. The other terror groups who also hold hostages in Gaza aren't necessarily easily controlled by them. How do you manage around this reality? And is a full release by October 7th the demand? Well, I don't know about the date. I'd be great if it was before October.
6:34So we wish it would happen yesterday. But there are realities here. And then there are things people do to impede progress. Reality is this is a war zone. I mean, this is a place that suffered a tremendous amount of destruction. That fighting needs to stop. You can't release hostages while there's still bombardments going on. But at the same time, that can't, you know, so that has to end. But that has to stop. But you also have to work through the other logistics. Who's going to go pick them up? We saw how this happened in the past. You know, the Red Cross would go in. that would be handed over through this process, etc.
7:02And so all of that's what has to be worked on and is being worked on as we speak. So I'm not telling you there aren't some logistical hurdles here, but I am saying that the expectation is that this happens quickly. And I would also say that while we want all the hostages to be released, if there are five that are ready to go right now, they should be released right now. If another 10 are ready to go in 12 hours after that, the next group should come out. But ultimately, they should all come out. And I think what you're hearing from people is, yes, There has to be some logistics that have to be worked through.
7:29But what you can't have and what we can't see and what we hope we will not see is that we get into these talks and these talks are then delayed and it looks like they're unnecessarily delaying it. That would be a very bad sign. Let's hope that's not what happens. And it's going to be very important for our partners in the region who signed on to this deal, the UAE, Qatar, Turkey, Jordan, Egypt, etc., for them to be putting a lot of pressure on Hamas to make sure this happens as quickly as possible. But you pointed out that releases can't happen when bombardments are underway. Our CBS team in Gaza tells us that there are Israeli bombardments underway.
8:02There were strikes Saturday. Tens killed, more injures, bombings continuing. One incident included 10 people killed when they tried to check in on their homes in areas where there are also military sites. Is that acceptable? Well, I think ultimately what you're going to see here is that when an agreement is reached on, these are logistics behind when the release is going to happen, then I think you'll see those bombardments stop. And I think some of that activity has already decreased somewhat. So there's a framework here. And the framework is simple. Once you agree on the logistics of how this is going to happen, I think the Israelis and everyone acknowledge you can't release hostages in the middle of strikes.
8:35So the strikes will have to stop. And as you saw, the president state that very clearly on Friday, where he asked the Israelis to begin to pull back to create the conditions for these releases. So this is not a violation of that. There's going to be a lot of complexities. Well, we're trying to get the hostages out. That's the bottom line. We want to get the hostages out as soon as possible for that to happen. There can't be a war going on in the middle of it. And Hamas has to agree to turn them over. We have to have the right people go in and get them. That's what we're going to focus on right now.
9:03And that's what we're going to that's what we've been focused on. And that's what the talks are going to be about today on Monday on Tuesday to get this done as soon as possible. I hear you. There are two phases here with the Hamas releasing the hostages is the one you're most focused on. But big picture, does the United States assess that Israel has so reduced the threat posed by Hamas that it can end combat and transition to the kind of lower tempo counterterrorism campaign that, say, the United States carries out against terrorist threats to this country? Well, look, I mean, the ideal outcome here is you don't have to carry out any counterterrorism missions because there are no terrorists in Gaza.
9:41But can they take the win? Can Netanyahu say he won this war? Well, first of all, creating a Gaza or setting up a Gaza that is governed by Palestinian technocrats that are not terrorists and are not sponsoring terrorism, that's not going to happen in 72 hours. That's going to take some time to build up and it's going to require a lot of work and a lot of international support. And that's the end goal here of this entire endeavor after you get the hostages out. By the way, if you can't get the hostages out, you have no hope of getting that done. So that's why I say, you know, that these two steps need to happen.
10:13But it's going to take a lot of hard work and time. You know, you're trying to build something that doesn't exist right now, which is a sort of civilian Palestinian leadership that's not tied to terrorism. That doesn't exist right now. It's going to take a lot of help from international partners. That's why having the countries in the region and the Europeans and all others involved in this in both money and resources. That's why building that coalition is so critical and then implementing it is not going to be easy. It's going to take some time here. But I think certainly for the first time in a long time, you see the framework and the outlines of something that could work.
10:44But combat operations can end. Well, that's the goal here. You wouldn't need combat operations if there weren't terrorists there. But by the same token, I would remind everybody, if in fact at the end of all this, terrorism and a terrorist group remains active inside of Gaza, you're not going to have peace. That's the fundamental truth here that everyone needs to accept. You're never going to have peace in Gaza as long as there are terrorists operating from that territory, threatening the security of Israel. But in terms of occupation and combat operations, that's different than a counterterrorism campaign.
11:15But let me ask you specifically what President Trump said. He told Barack Ravid of Axios that Prime Minister Netanyahu, quote, took it very far and Israel lost a lot of support in the world. Now I'm going to get all that support back. At what point did President Trump decide that Netanyahu took this fight in Gaza or his operations throughout the Middle East? When did he take it too far? No, I think the president's observation basically is that because of the length of this war and how it's gone, we've all seen the international narrative. We've all seen it. Whether we agree with it or not, we have seen countries like the UK, Australia, Canada and others come out and sort of signal support or announce support for a Palestinian state.
11:56We have seen, even in our own domestic politics, some of the attacks on Israel. We don't forget what happened on October 7th. That's the other thing the president repeatedly points to is remember October 7th. But whether we agree with it or not, we have seen the impact that this has had on Israel's global standing. And I think that's the point the president is making here, is that whether you believe it was justified or not, right or not, that you cannot ignore the impact that this has had on Israel's global standing. That said, if we never want to see this happen again, meaning a war like this, you can never have another October 7th or anything like it ever happen again.
12:30And that's the thing the president has reiterated and repeatedly made clear to our partners in the region. And that is if you truly want peace and stability and a better future for the Palestinian people, then there has to be a Gaza that is not governed or controlled in any way, shape or form by Hamas or anything that looks like Hamas. Does the United States support a Palestinian state? Because point 19 in your White House plan talks about a credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood. Well, we've always said, I mean, this has been a consistent position throughout, that the only way you're ever going to have anything that looks like statehood is in a negotiated deal with the Israelis.
13:08We are so far from that right now. Prime Minister Netanyahu opposes a Palestinian state and thanked President Trump for speaking against recognition of one. That's why I'm asking you to clarify. Well, we haven't recognized a Palestinian state. The United States has not. And right now there's no point in doing that because it's not even possible. That's not even a realistic thing right now because who would govern that Palestinian state? Well, it's.19 in your plan. Who would govern it? I thought. Well, but that's talking about a pathway long term and in the future. Right. But before you can even get there, okay, that's, you know, before you can even get there, you have to have someone to turn that land.
13:40Israel's made clear they have no interest in governing Gaza. They have no interest in occupying Gaza long term and being the government of Gaza. I think Israel, I can't speak for Israel, but I think Israel would tell you they would love to turn over Gaza to a Palestinian organization that isn't terroristic. They would love to do that, but that doesn't exist right now. That has to be built, and that's going to take time. You're not going to build that in 72 hours. You're not going to build that in 72 weeks. I mean, it's going to take some time to get to that point. So that's the pathway this discusses.
14:08And I think that if you look forward into the future, where there is suddenly a Palestinian government-like organization that can govern territory, then there's a lot of possibilities. But that has to be negotiated and agreed to by Israel. In the end, it's very simple. There can be peace in Gaza. There can be Palestinian governance in Gaza, whether you call it statehood or something else, as long as it is not terrorists that are in charge of that territory. That's what Israel agreed to when they turned over Gaza in the first place. And then Hamas took over Gaza and turned it into a terrorist camp.
14:37And that's what's led us to the point that we are at today. So we can get off that road and onto a different road. There are a lot of possibilities long term and in the future. But right now, maybe we are far from that right now. We need to get these hostages out and we just need technocrats that are not terrorists to be able to begin the basic reconstruction of Gaza. That interview was taped earlier today. With the camera off, Secretary Rubio clarified that President Trump still opposes Israeli annexation of the West Bank, though there is no mention of the occupied territory in the 20-point White House peace plan.
15:10Face the Nation will be back in one minute. Stay with us. We always recommend Shopify. It took us from an idea to a real business. We got set up, I think, in less than a day with very little effort. We could just focus on the supply chains and the product development. Shopify gives us the ability to customize without the complexity. We can change something without introducing fragility or having to pay a developer. We're Thirsty Turtle, and we leveled up our business with Shopify. Start your free trial at shopify.com slash au. We turn now to the government shutdown, now in its fifth day. House Speaker Mike Johnson joins us from Capitol Hill.
15:51Good morning to you, Speaker. Anyone up there to negotiate with? Yeah, there's not, Margaret. Good morning. Good to hear your voice. It's kind of quiet around here. It has been for the last several days, and it's very unfortunate because as we're talking, real people are being adversely affected around the country in some and in very substantial ways. I pray that more Democrats in the Senate will come to their senses and do the right thing. And when they have the next opportunity on Monday to vote to open the government, I surely hope that they will. Well, you did send your lawmakers home to their districts, which suggests we've got probably another week ahead of us of this shutdown.
16:26You mentioned the real world impact. Federal workers, including our military, would miss their first paychecks October 15th or 16th. How long should workers plan to be without that income? Well, the only person who can answer that question is your next guest, and that's Chuck Schumer, because the House did its job. The reason that House Republicans are home working in their districts, and I suspect House Democrats should be as well, because we did that. We passed a bipartisan, very clean, continuing resolution a couple of weeks back now and sent it to the Senate. It's very important to note what was in that.
17:00It was only 24 pages in length, Margaret. It was a good faith effort to keep the government open for seven more weeks so that Republicans and Democrats in a bipartisan fashion could work together to fund the government with the appropriations process. Chuck Schumer always voted for those in the past. In fact, he did it 13 times during the four years of the Biden administration. But now suddenly he's commanding his Democrats in the Senate not to do it. And there's one simple reason why. They need political cover from the far left corner of the base. He's afraid Chuck Schumer individually asked him about it.
17:30He's afraid he's going to get a challenge from the Marxist left in his party because that's the new wave in New York. That's what this is about. Chuck Schumer is trying to show a fight against the president and Republicans. And real Americans are being harmed in the process of this political game. OK, well, Democrats, as you know, want to have another conversation in regard to extending some tax subsidies that lower the cost of some health care that's purchased through the Obamacare market. To that point, though, you're talking about the politics of this. Our CBS polling that we released today shows neither party's stance is viewed as worth shutting down this government.
18:05The Democrats want to talk about the tax credits. You know premium pricing is already being set now, even if this doesn't expire until end of the year. Your fellow Republican Jen Kagan said raising costs for families, little notice and potentially stripping them of access to care is simply unacceptable. Doesn't she have a point here? There's a lot of points to be made on that. And we're ready to talk about, negotiate and do all of that. But they're trying to create that as a red herring here right now. Margaret, this is a funding bootstrap measure, a very simple, very conventional thing that's been done here all the time.
18:40This is the way it works now. We need a little more time on the clock to finish the appropriations process. We have plenty of time to debate that very complicated issue. It's not a simple one. There has to be reforms to that subsidy because there's a lot of fraud, waste, and abuse involved in it. There's 535 members of Congress in the House and Senate. There's probably 400 different ideas on how to fix that. But we need a little time to do it. We're not saying that we won't negotiate it. We're saying turn the lights back on in Congress. Get troops paid, TSA agents and Border Patrol agents paid who are trying to protect us.
19:12Restore the health care programs that are being stalled for veterans and Medicare recipients who are getting home health. It's all stalled now. Restore FEMA flood insurance programs in the middle of a hurricane program. And WIC programs for young women. We've got to get this fixed now. But just to clarify what you were just saying, do I hear you correctly? that you, as Speaker of the House, want to see the tax credit extended at a future date. Is that what you are saying? No, I haven't staked out any position on it yet because that's not how this process works. We're in a deliberative body. Right, I'm asking your position because you said you would be willing to talk about it.
19:48I'm telling you my position. I'm the Speaker of the House. What I have to do is draw consensus among 435 members of my body. I don't get out and project what the final conclusion is going to be. And I've told Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries most recently in the Oval Office with the president just five, six days ago, keep the government open so that we can do that job. We were always planning to do that. Again, the funding runs out December 31st. The month of October is a critical time for us to get to this. But we can't when Chuck Schumer keeps voting to shut the government down for political reasons.
20:21That's purely and simply what's happening here. You believe you have time here, but our partner at health policy think tank KFF reported 80 percent of all premium tax credits went to Obamacare enrollees in Trump one states, red states. Do you really do you worry at all that this stance could backfire that waiting to talk about the tax credit could hurt you? No, it could hurt your voters. No, no, no, because we have time to do it again. The funding does it right on into December 31st. We're talking about a September 30th deadline that's now passed to keep the government open so that Republicans and Democrats can have that very debate.
21:00Chuck Schumer has shut it off because he needs a political argument right now. 100 percent, Margaret, that's what this is about. Play the tape. Play the tape of Chuck Schumer saying consistently for the last 30 years that CRs are dangerous, destructive and selfish. He is now the captain of it. And it's on him. Republicans in the House, Senate and the White House want to keep the government open. We have voted to do so. But you are committing to have that conversation about health care is what I understand you saying. It was always going to continue. They're making this up. That is a red herring.
21:31They're trying to say that this fight right now is about that. That wasn't even a fight. It's a joke. Call them on it. Well, the director of the Economic Council, Kevin Hassett, was on another network this morning and said it is up to the president of the United States to decide when the mass layoffs will begin. He seems to be indicating the president is using those rifts, those reduction in force threats as leverage here. Do you know how quickly those layoffs will start? I don't know. I anticipate it will have to be soon because Chuck Schumer turned off the funding sources and whomever is the chair of the office.
22:03Do you want that as leverage? No, neither does the president. No, the president wants the government open. He's pleaded with Schumer and Hakeem in person in his office to do that. And they said no because they want to do this. You know what they counter propose? They want to spend one point five trillion dollars and they want to return hardworking taxpayer dollars to fund health care for illegal aliens. It is in their bill. Go to speaker.gov and see it for yourself. Page 57, section 2141. They're using this for political games and it is shameful and real people are getting hurt. Well, that I have looked at that text.
22:38It doesn't explicitly say what you are indicating. But unauthorized immigrants are eligible for ACA benefits. It does. It says very simply they want to repeal the changes that we made in the working families tax cut, the one big beautiful bill. And what those changes were is it removed health care going to illegal aliens. It removed all the fraud, waste and abuse. And the Congressional Budget Office, CBO, said it achieved the desired result. They project it will save almost$200 billion. Chuck Schumer's proposal on page 57 wants to return that$200 billion of taxpayer funds to pay for illegal aliens and other non-citizens.
23:13That is a fact. And you can check it out on my website, speaker.gov. Don't trust me. Look at Chuck Schumer's own paperwork. Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, thank you for your time this morning. Coming up next, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. Stay with us to hear what Democrats have to say about the impasse when we come back. Hey, this is Richard Deitch, the host of the Sports Media Podcast. If you're interested in what's happening with all the places where you consume sports, the Sports Media Podcast has you covered. I've been turning down interviews all week. Hoda Copy reached out, Oprah, George Stephanopoulos.
Read the full transcript
23:51So I said, no, I was booked on the Deitch podcast before the Taylor Swift phenomenon. I must live up to my responsibility. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.
24:11Welcome back to Face the Nation. Senator Chuck Schumer is the top Democrat on the other side of the Capitol, and he joins us now from New York City. Good morning to you, Leader. I want to pick up on something the Speaker of the House was pointing to. He wants this fight to be about illegals, as he said. And I want to be specific here because we know from our research that there is no federal money that goes towards health care tax credits for undocumented immigrants in this country. The federal government doesn't fund health insurance for the undocumented. But it is also true that states like yours, New York, does provide health care for people who are in this country illegally.
24:53And their argument seems to be the money here is fungible. And bottom line is it comes out of the federal pocket. Do you want to respond to that?
25:03You know, they don't want to—Johnson doesn't want to discuss the real issue, the health care crisis facing the American people. So he puts up all these fake lies to try and divert attention. It's his standard operation. He just is concerned with the politics. Every independent agency that looks at this says Johnson's claim is false. And just as you said, Margaret, no zero federal dollars can go to undocumented immigrants through Medicare, through Medicaid, through ACA. And so we ought to be talking about the real issue here, which is that we have a health care crisis in America caused by the Republicans.
25:41They've barreled us towards a shutdown because they don't want to deal with that crisis, plain and simple. Well, let's talk about the shutdown in a moment. In terms of health care, where you've taken us in terms of the messaging, Democrats, as I understand it, are looking for an extension of those Obamacare tax credit. I believe you'd like them permanently. You heard the speaker say we can talk about that after the government is reopened, perhaps not permanently. But do you hear any kind of opening here for a negotiation whatsoever? Well, right now, not. Look, Johnson's not serious about this.
26:18He sent all his congressmen home last week and home this week. How are you going to negotiate when they're all mayor? Well, he says the job is in the Senate with you and Leader Thune. Well, no, you need—no, you actually need Johnson if you're going to negotiate any agreement. You need Johnson, Thune, Trump, Schumer, and Jeffries. And the reason he sent them home is because he's more interested in protecting the Epstein files than protecting the American people from the health care crisis. We've been trying for months and months to sit down with them and have a serious conversation addressing America's health care needs.
26:54And they've refused and refused and refused. And just on your show and on other shows, when they ask him, well, will you do it in January? He says it's starting in January. He says, no, we'll have a conversation. Well, you know what? Later means never. And we've tried 45 days and 45 days and 45 days from March on. We asked them to vote on it three times. The Republicans in the Senate, they voted no three times. That was a permanent extension. So we need to solve this crisis. The bill that I think you're referring to is Senator Shaheen. It was a permanent extension. It wasn't the, you know, compromise that some Republicans have proposed.
27:30Margaret Johnson has not committed to any extension, and he won't until the American people force him to. And it doesn't. And by the way, the crisis doesn't start in January. Two days ago, starting October 1st, millions of Americans are getting notices that their health care premiums are dramatically increasing. If you're a 55-year-old couple and you make$80 ,000, you know how much your premiums will go up if we don't extend it? It'll go up something like$25 ,000. The average American will pay$900 more. How do Americans who are struggling, sitting at the table Friday night figuring out how to pay the bills, how the heck can they get such an increase?
28:13Democrats are simple. We want to extend it. And so they won't have to pay that increase. And Johnson does not want to do it. He's just not serious about it. As exemplified by him sending the house home for two weeks. You need to be here to negotiate. All right. You're using word extend versus making permanent, just making clear there. And then the number we see is the average increase of about a thousand dollars in premium payments for most households that will go into effect. But yeah, and it's horrible. And on the reopening everything conversation, sir, though, I mean, do you trust Leader Thune?
28:49And when you look at just your numbers here, three senators already crossed over to vote with Republicans on the short term funding deal. Are you concerned about more defections? Look, it's a Republican shutdown because they've refused to talk with us. Johnson, I saw him mentioned that we did it 13 times when I was majority leader. That's true. You know why? In every case, we sat down and talked with the Republicans, and there was a give and take, and then both sides didn't get everything they wanted, but we got it done. They have refused to talk to us even once. And Jeffries and I have been trying to get them to talk to us.
29:26They've tried to get us to talk to them for—we've tried to talk to them for months and months and months, and they said no. The American people know that they're in charge, Republican president, Republican Senate, Republican House, that they have a responsibility to govern, which means sit down and talk with us so we can address these needs. But back to the question of defections. Leader Thun was on another network on Fox, and he said that there are conversations with Democrats who want to find an off ramp here. Is he having conversations with Democrats other than you? Are you sure you can't? I've encouraged my.
30:01Yeah, Margaret, I've encouraged my Democratic members to sit and talk to Republicans. It's always good when Democrats and Republicans talk to each other. But two points. First, in those conversations, the Republicans offered nothing. But second, the only way this will ultimately be solved is if five people sit together in a room and solve it. And they are the president, who also doesn't seem serious about this. You know, he's putting out his memes and his things with the Grim Reaper and all of that stuff. He's playing golf. Johnson's not serious. And so we've got to sit down. For the five of us, that's the way to solve this problem.
30:40But when Democrats talk to Republicans, it's a good thing. And I've encouraged my Democrats to do it. But they've offered us nothing, no change. Have you tried calling President Trump? He seems to take phone calls directly. Well, you know, we tried to get President Trump to sit down with us weeks ago, long before the shutdown date started. He said yes. He said no. Johnson told him to say no. We sat down, you know, the day before. And he wasn't serious. He put these red hats on the table, and he's joking around. And honestly, in the meeting, Margaret, I got the feeling he didn't even know what was happening, that the crisis was impending, that people would pay such a—he once said, they're going to pay all that.
31:21That would be bad for me. And so the court here is the American people. The American people are hearing what's happening, and they are demanding that we address this crisis. They are demanding we sit down together and do it. It's just logical. They say that, you know, in your survey that you put out, they say that 75 percent people feel Trump isn't doing enough. Another survey by The Washington Post showed that not only do 80 percent of the American people want us to extend these credits, but 55 percent of Trump voters. The American people are right now talking to their senators, you know, talking to their congressmen.
31:57They're telling them, get this done. We want to get our polling also shows that neither side is getting good grades on any of this leader. We're going to have to leave that here for this moment. And we're now joined by Illinois Democratic Senator Tammy Duckworth. Good morning and good to have you here in person. So I have to ask you about what the president announced yesterday in regard to federalizing 300 National Guardsmen out in the state of Illinois. We've heard this threat going back all the way to August. The governor says these are not needed. Do you have any idea when they'll arrive? Well, I believe they're going to be Illinois National Guardsmen, so they're not going to be coming from other state.
32:34I spoke with our governor yesterday, and it looks like it's going to be about 300 Illinois Guardsmen who will be activated against the governor's wishes. So they'll be homegrown Illinoisans, and they're our brothers and sisters, our neighbors. I probably served with quite a number of them, certainly the leadership. And, you know, they'll be home. We'll welcome them. It's a misuse of the National Guard. They're not needed in this particular role. if President Trump really wanted to fight crime, then maybe he should stop defunding the police. He, you know, he diverted$800 million in crime prevention efforts away from, that was appropriated away from funding for our police officers.
33:10So, you know, they're not needed, but we're going to welcome them because they're our brothers and sisters and we're proud of our National Guard. He has surged, or the federal government has surged agents from different groups. The FBI said yesterday they're sending folks in. Tell me about these protests because Because the images look pretty intense of what has happened between people on the streets of Chicago. We're showing some of that video now around immigration issues. As I understand, yesterday ICE authorities shot a Chicago woman in the Brighton Park area. Secretary Noem claimed ICE fired defensive shots at this woman who was armed, who had appeared in a Border Patrol intelligence bulletin previously.
33:52She claims that federal agents were surrounded and were threatened. What are local authorities telling you about what they think happened here? Well, they lie, right? The Trump administration lies. We have a president who's a known liar. And they have been lying about the situation all along. And in fact, they even shot tear grenades, tear crash grenades, I think, at a reporter who was simply driving by with her window open. And so we're urging people, we're urging our protesters, remain calm, peaceful protests, exercise your First Amendment rights, but videotape everything. Everybody has a phone, tape everything so that we actually have real evidence of what is happening.
34:33We know the Trump administration lies consistently. And what I am hearing is that for the large part, people are being very respectful, but ICE is being very aggressive. Remember that they are zip-tying children. They are raiding apartment blocks in the middle of the night, separating children from their families, pulling people out onto the streets naked. They are using Gestapo tactics in Chicago. And this is what Trump wants to do. He wants to intimidate the people of Chicago. That's not going to happen. And we're going to document everything and make sure, just as the judge in Portland said, that these these requirements, these orders from the Trump administration are not actually tied to reality.
35:14You're talking about President Trump's directive to send Oregon National Guard troops into Portland, and the judge said that untethered to the facts. But in this case, I mean, the Homeland Security Advisor says there's a large and growing movement of left-wing terrorism organized and funded. They're posting on Homeland Security images of snipers. So we're not talking troops. We're talking about federal agents that are carrying out some of this right now. Have you seen any evidence of of what Stephen Miller is describing here in terms of organization and targeting of federal agents? No, not at all.
35:48This is it's simply not happening. They are lying. And so if anybody is targeting anyone, it is auto control ICE agents targeting, again, zip tying children, throwing reporters onto the ground, separating children from their mothers, trying to convince schools to turn over kids from public schools. They are ranging through the streets of Chicago trying to intimidate everyday ordinary citizens or just trying to go to school and go to work. That's not what America is about. And it is shameful that the president of the United States has instigated this on one of its greatest cities. He should be defending the city.
36:23He should be protecting the city. Send us the federal dollars that were appropriated in a bipartisan way to support law enforcement. They took money away from law enforcement officers, child prevention effort, violence against children prevention efforts, they've literally, this president has defunded the police. Well, that is counter their messaging at least, but on the messaging around the military, I want to ask you about what happened at Quantico. And just so our viewers are clear, you serve on armed services, but you retired from National Guard. You were a Lieutenant Colonel. 23 years, proud of it.
36:56Black Hawk helicopter pilot in Iraq. You served in combat. Secretary Hanks has told senior military leaders just a few days ago he doesn't want to prevent women from serving, but he's now going to require everyone meet the male standard. Let's listen to that. When it comes to any job that requires physical power to perform in combat, those physical standards must be high and gender neutral. If women can make it, excellent. If not, It is what it is. If that means no women qualify for some combat jobs, so be it. That is not the intent, but it could be the result. How did you hear those remarks, and how do you think female service people heard them?
37:42Well, this is the least qualified Secretary of Defense in our nation's history, and he's questioning the ability of the women who actually qualify to do their jobs. The female rangers, the female that graduated from SEAL school have met those highest standards. And by the way, he is obfuscating a little bit because there are different male standards. The standard for a 45-year-old man is not the same as an 18-year-old man. So he doesn't actually talk about that. He has long sought to push women out of the military. And frankly, our military could not do its job of protecting America and keeping us safe without the women who serve in the military.
38:15If you look at some lessons we learned in Afghanistan, for example, the lionesses, the Marine Corps, a group of women who actually went on patrol off female units that actually was able to get intelligence from women, Afghani women, to get information on the enemy. Frankly, you've got a least qualified Secretary of Defense in the nation's history who wastes taxpayer dollars on a regular basis doing things like bringing in general and flag officers to be an audience for his dog and pony show, using them as little toy soldiers when they should be out there at their units in command doing their jobs.
38:47Senator, thank you for your time and for your insight. We'll be back in a moment.
39:15It doesn't feel like paying. Paying paid? Safe. With Visu-Steuer. Now test it. At Amazon get every year 4.500€ for professional training. I started in the logistics center and knew I could be training. For example in robotics. So my job is a career. Amazon opens doors with up to 4.500€ per year for professional training. The participation is required. We turn now to the former commanding general of the U.S. Army in Europe, retired Lieutenant General Ben Hodges, and he joins us from Germany. Welcome to Face the Nation. Thank you very much, Margaret. I want to pick up where we left off with Senator Duckworth, who is a Purple Heart recipient for her time serving this country in combat.
40:08Men and women have different basic fitness standards. The secretary, in his remarks at Quantico, said women or he suggested women were being given a pass or were held to lower standards for fitness requirements. Do you think his change to the quote unquote male standard is necessary? I think this is completely unnecessary. I have 38 years in the Army and we've served with women in all sorts of different environments and deployments. and I never had a case where a female soldier was not able to do what she had to do. So this is a seems to me an unnecessary, almost a medieval approach that doesn't reflect the requirements that we have for women and men who are intelligent, able to operate in a modern battlefield environment.
41:02The defense secretary made these remarks at Quantico last week, as you well know, ordered in our most senior military officers to hear him lay out what he talked about in terms of changing rules of engagement. Those are, you know, codes of conduct and standards to make war less brutal. The secretary said this. We also don't fight with stupid rules of engagement. We untie the hands of our war fighters, to intimidate, demoralize, hunt, and kill the enemies of our country. No more politically correct and overbearing rules of engagement. Just common sense, maximum lethality, and authority for war fighters.
41:48What do you make of those directives to officers? Well, that's not going to help anybody accomplish their mission. I mean, when you think about the missions that we had in Afghanistan, for example, and I think that's where some of his experience comes from, it was to protect Afghan civilians so that they could reestablish government and secure themselves. And so it was not about how many Taliban could you kill. We had already tried that and that didn't work. So the rules of engagement are not politically correct. They're not intended to make it harder for soldiers or units to do their job. They actually are part of the mission.
42:31Why are we there? And so I don't have any experience where killing a lot of innocent people or violating the Geneva Convention is going to help accomplish the mission. I think that the idea that somehow it's going to make us better and more effective by people not having to worry about the law is going to be bad for us in the long term as well, both psychologically for soldiers, but also the trust of the American people and of our allies in American forces, where we have always lived up to international law. And that is where a lot of the respect came from. We do not want to be like the Russian army, and they certainly don't worry about rules of engagement.
43:16And the Geneva Conventions are something that the secretary is a private citizen wrote about in his book and questioned whether they should be followed at all. He said, what if we treated the enemy the way they treated us? And I mean, he talked about Al Qaeda and using some of their tactics, rip their arms off, feed them to the hogs. I mean, this sounds tough, but in terms of practice, does it risk the lives of those who are the trigger pullers, those who are on the ground, to have this message delivered from the highest levels? Well, first of all, the Geneva Conventions were constructed starting in 1949 after the Second World War.
44:00And they were intended to protect innocent people, helpless people, noncombatants from the ravages of war, as it did happen in the Second World War. And I don't think anybody would say that Dwight Eisenhower was woke. And here he was. He was chief of staff of the Army and then supreme allied commander and then president. So this was during his time that the United States helped create and sign the Geneva Convention. So here's a guy with more combat experience and wartime experience than almost anybody. Now, when you think about modern warfare, especially when you're counterterrorism, just as Secretary Rubio was describing earlier on your program, The people, how you deal with enemy and how you deal with populations is how you defeat an insurgency.
44:50And killing everybody in sight is not how you defeat an insurgency. As defense secretary, Hegseth fired the top military lawyers who advise on lethality. Here's some of the advice he gave to senior leaders this week. You kill people and break things for a living. In this profession, you feel comfortable inside the violence so that our citizens can live peacefully. Lethality is our calling card and victory, our only acceptable end state. What do you think that means?
45:29Well, first of all, it's not connected to the reality of how these things happen, how wars are won. First of all, the political leadership has to describe the end state. What is it we're going to do? Why are we sending troops somewhere? What are they supposed to accomplish? And usually it's not going to be by killing everybody in sight. So I think there's a disconnect between this idea that it's all about lethality and that we kill people and break things. That's not the mantra of any Army unit I was ever in in 38 years. It was always about accomplish the mission that was assigned to us, carry out every lawful order, and do it in such a way that protects civilians and ensures that all of our soldiers are protected and come back home safe.
46:16This idea of break things and kill people, you know, that's what the Russians did in Buccia and Mariupol. That's not who we are. We're the soldiers of a free, democratic country. The president also spoke at that gathering. He referred to the enemy within. Then he also spoke about using U.S. cities like Chicago as training grounds. Are you comfortable with people thinking that? Well, look, I think, first of all, U.S. military, our fellow citizens should be confident that U.S. military will always carry out lawful orders. And so it's alarming when all of the judge advocates general or the Army or the military lawyers are sacked or sent away because commanders do need to have legal counsel as they receive orders and they look at these complex situations.
47:04But our troops will carry out lawful orders. Thank you. I guarantee you that no soldier wants to have to use force against American people. Lieutenant General, thank you for your insights. We have to leave it there. I'm Margaret Brennan, and this has been Face the Nation. Today's guests were Secretary of State and National Security Advisor Marco Rubio, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, Illinois Democratic Senator Tammy Duckworth, and retired Lieutenant General Ben Hodges. The senior executive producer of Face the Nation is Mary Hager, and the executive producer is Ann Hsu.
47:40This broadcast was directed by Shelley Schwartz. Face the Nation originates from CBS News in Washington. For more, we're online at facethenation.com and on YouTube. We're also rebroadcast on our CBS News 24-7 streaming network at 1230 on Sundays. And we're available through our apps, CBS News and Paramount Plus. I want to know what's going on in the world. You can't do that if you're just sitting in a chair reading about what other people have found. You have to get out there and listen. By telling people about each other, you actually bring this country together. There are big questions that all of us are asking.
48:20I want to get you the answers. I'm Tony DeCoppo. Join me on the CBS Evening News.
From the publisher
This week on Face the Nation, nearly two years after the October 7 massacre, is a serious plan for a full hostage release and cease-fire in Gaza finally materializing? Secretary of State Marco Rubio tells us where that deal stands, and what's ahead for the region. Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill, the government shutdown continues, with no end in sight. We talk with Republican Speaker of the House Mike Johnson and Democrat Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer about whether either party can break through the gridlock. We also take a closer look at the Trump Department of War's new rules for the military. Illinois Democrat Senator Tammy Duckworth joins us, as well as retired Army Lieutenant General Ben Hodges, to discuss the changes and what comes next for the Pentagon.
To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices
