In short
The U.S. conducts a major air/military operation in Venezuela to capture Nicolas Maduro, then debates what comes next—whether the U.S. is “running” Venezuela, how sanctions/oil “quarantine” will be used, and the legality/war-powers implications. Rubio and Cotton emphasize leverage via sanctioned oil shipments and stopping drug trafficking, weapons trafficking, and Iran/Hezbollah/Cuba influence. Democrats Himes and Van Hollen argue it’s illegal under international law and the Constitution, warn it resembles regime-change for oil/company benefit, and press for congressional oversight.
Guests (backgrounds)
- Marco Rubio: U.S. Secretary of State.
- Tom Cotton: U.S. Senator; chairs Senate Intelligence Committee.
- Jim Himes: U.S. Representative; top Democrat on House Intelligence Committee.
- Chris Van Hollen: U.S. Senator (Maryland).
Key claims
- Rubio: No U.S. occupation plan; “oil quarantine” provides leverage; Maduro’s regime steals oil revenue; Maduro and wife arrested and face U.S. court justice.
- Cotton: CIA/intelligence enabled the operation; other indicted/sanctioned officials may be given a chance to “turn the page”; free/fair elections should follow.
- Himes: No coherent plan; Republicans are sidelining oversight; operation is illegal; compares to Iraq/Afghanistan/Libya.
- Van Hollen: Administration is lying to the public; focus is oil/resources; pushes war-powers resolutions and taxpayer funding limits.
Notable examples
- Cotton cites past “turning the corner” cases (Syria’s Ahmed al-Shahrer; Libya’s Gaddafi).
- Himes compares to Noriega/Panama precedent and warns it could greenlight similar “snatch and grab” actions by China/Russia.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOU.S. Military Operation in Venezuela
3:12 to 4:47
Discussion on the U.S. capturing Nicolas Maduro and its implications.
“Good morning and welcome to Face the Nation.”
Running Venezuela Post-Capture
4:47 to 7:43
Secretary of State Marco Rubio discusses plans for Venezuela's future.
“There's a quarantine right now in which sanctioned oil shipments, there's a boat and that boat is under U.S.”
Operation Complexity and Priorities
7:43 to 8:27
Rubio explains the challenges and priorities of the military operation.
“You're going to go in and suck up five people.”
Transition to Democracy in Venezuela
8:27 to 14:02
A deep dive into the potential for democratic transition in Venezuela.
“And you're asking me, why didn't we do that in five other places at the same time?”
Venezuela's Political Landscape
14:02 to 16:50
Discussion on the legitimacy of Maduro's presidency and the prospects for democracy in Venezuela.
“It was an illegitimate election, and that's why he's not a legitimate president.”
U.S. Military and Intelligence Operations
16:50 to 17:50
Exploration of U.S. military involvement in Venezuela and the role of intelligence agencies.
“Marco Rubio, secretary of state, would love to keep talking to you, but I'm told you are out of time.”
Assessing the Venezuelan Regime
18:22 to 23:22
Senator Cotton's insights on the Venezuelan regime's ties to global powers and potential U.S. responses.
“You have oversight of the intelligence community, which was deeply involved in this operation to go into Venezuela militarily and extract Nicolas Maduro and his wife.”
Future of U.S.-Venezuelan Relations
23:22 to 28:00
Discussion on the potential for a free Venezuela and U.S. military oversight in the region.
“But the person running the country, Delcey Rodriguez, spoke yesterday with Russia's top diplomat.”
Venezuela's Oil Trade and U.S. Interests
28:00 to 30:22
Discussion on Venezuela's oil trade, drug trafficking, and U.S. foreign policy implications.
“to quarantine the oil trade that Venezuela was sending to Cuba or sending to our adversaries around the world.”
Congressional Oversight and Military Options
30:22 to 33:58
Analysis of Congress's role in military decisions and the implications of U.S. actions in Venezuela.
“Fox News is now streaming live on Fox One.”
Show all 18 chapters
Euphoria Phase in U.S. Military Actions
33:58 to 36:05
Congressman Himes draws parallels between past military interventions and current U.S. actions in Venezuela.
“That was Dick Cheney in the conference yesterday, you know, deciding that the United States was going to, you know, militarily change regimes and threaten other ones just because we don't like them.”
Oil and Natural Resources in Venezuela
36:05 to 39:34
Discussion on the motivations behind U.S. actions in Venezuela focusing on oil and natural resources.
“He says that no information was being shared with the top people who have oversight, like himself.”
Legal Authority and War Powers
39:34 to 42:03
Exploration of legal authority regarding military actions in Venezuela and implications for American foreign policy.
“So Chevron, an American oil company, has been operating in Venezuela throughout.”
U.S. Military Intervention in Venezuela: Legal and Ethical Concerns
42:03 to 42:44
Discussion on the implications of U.S. military actions in Venezuela and their motivations.
“Well, I don't think we should be putting American men and women at risk in a situation like this.”
War Powers and Congressional Responsibility
42:44 to 43:44
Exploration of the legal authority of the president regarding military intervention and congressional oversight.
“But clearly on the question of war powers, does the president have the legal authority to do what he's doing?”
International Law and Military Precedents
43:44 to 45:34
Analysis of the legality of military operations under international law and historical precedents.
“Thank you very much for joining us here today.”
Implications of U.S. Actions for Global Powers
45:34 to 46:54
Discussion on how U.S. military actions influence the behavior of countries like China and Russia.
“So what China and Russia just learned is that the beacon of liberty and rule of law in the world has now greenlighted snatch and grab operations in Estonia, in Taiwan, wherever Xi and Putin decide they want to go next.”
Legal Challenges of 'Snatch and Grab' Operations
46:54 to 47:21
Insight into the legal ramifications of extraordinary renditions and military captures like that of Maduro.
“Yeah, as we understand it, because we looked this up, Noriega claimed head of state immunity, and the court said that that immunity was meant to protect official state functions and private profiting off the drug trade.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Margaret Brennan:Spring is when plans start becoming real. Trips get booked. Calendars fill up. And if learning a new language has been on your list, starting now means that, by summer, you'll already feel more confident speaking and understanding it. That's where Rosetta Stone comes in. For over 30 years, they've been a trusted leader in language learning. Their immersive, intuitive method helps you naturally absorb your new language. No memorizing random vocabulary lists and no relying on translations. Instead, you learn by connecting words, visuals, and meaning in context, the way language is meant to be learned.
0:36Margaret Brennan:With 25 languages to choose from, including Spanish, French, German, and Japanese, and millions of users worldwide, Rosetta Stone is the go-to tool for real language growth. Plus, lessons are simple and easy to fit into your day, whether you have 5 minutes in the morning or a quick break in the afternoon. Ready to start learning a new language this spring? Visit rosettastone.com slash rs10 today to explore Rosetta Stone and choose the language that's right for you. Go to rosettastone.com slash rs10 now and begin your language learning journey. Have you got Groom's? The mega vitamin, mineral, nutrient daily pack of gummies ready to give you the boost to take on the world.
1:17Margaret Brennan:Generic brands only contain seven to nine vitamins in one pill. Grun's Daily Pack gives you more than 20 vitamins in nutrient-dense gummies full of flavor, along with 6 grams of prebiotic fiber, to support immunity, brain development, and developmental growth with ingredients backed by more than 35 ,000 research publications. Save up to 52 % off with code FOTW at GRUNS.CO. I'm Margaret Brennan, and this week on Face the Nation, the Trump administration stages a dramatic, top-secret mission in Venezuela and captures its leader, dictator Nicolas Maduro. But what's the U.S. role going forward? We'll talk to Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
2:00Margaret Brennan:Nicolas Maduro is now in a Brooklyn jail facing drug trafficking charges after being captured by the Army's elite U.S. Delta Force as part of a massive U.S. military operation early Saturday that reportedly killed at least 40 Venezuelans. And it was an assault like people have not seen since World War II. No nation in the world could achieve what America achieved yesterday or frankly in just a short period of time. The mission was months in the planning, but executed in just under three hours. What's next will take much longer as questions about the legality and justification of the strikes continue, as well as how and who will rule Venezuela going forward.
2:48We're going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition.
2:56Margaret Brennan:In addition to Secretary of State Rubio, we'll also hear from Senate Intelligence Committee chair Tom Cotton and the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Congressman Jim Himes. Plus, Maryland Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen will also be here. It's all just ahead on Face the Nation.
3:29Margaret Brennan:Good morning and welcome to Face the Nation. Americans woke up yesterday to the shocking news that the U.S. had staged a massive air attack on the capital of Venezuela and captured Nicolas Maduro. Today, we'll explore questions about what it means for the U.S. and why it's such a seismic development. We begin today with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who joins us this morning from Miami. Good morning to you, Mr. Secretary. Good morning. Good morning. President Trump said that the United States will run the country and that Venezuela will be largely run by, he pointed to you and some of the other cabinet members when he spoke to the public yesterday.
4:13Margaret Brennan:He said the U.S. retains all military options, including boots on the ground, until U.S. demands have been fully met. How do you plan to run the country? Well, first of all, I think the important thing to point out is that the key to what that regime relies on is their economy fueled by oil. And right now it is an oil industry that is backwards and really needs a lot of help and work in terms of it. Not only that, but it doesn't help the people. None of the money from the oil gets to the people. It's all stolen by the people that are on the top there. And so that's why we have a quarantine. There's a quarantine right now in which sanctioned oil shipments, there's a boat and that boat is under U.S.
4:54sanctions. We go get a court order, we will seize it. That remains in place. And that's a tremendous amount of leverage that will continue to be in place until we see changes, not just further the national interest to the United States, which is number one, but also that lead to a better future for the people of Venezuela. And so that's the sort of control the president is pointing to when he says that. We continue with that quarantine and we expect to see that there will be changes, not just in the way the oil industry is run for the benefit of the people, but also so that they stop the drug trafficking, so that we no longer have these gang problems, so that they kick the FARC and the ELN out, and that they no longer cozy up to Hezbollah and Iran in our own hemisphere.
5:32Margaret Brennan:What you are talking about is more of a sanctions pressure, not boots on the ground. So just to be clear, there is no plan for U.S. occupation of this country of nearly 30 million people. Well, I think, first of all, the president always retains optionality on anything and on all of these matters. He certainly has the ability and the right under the Constitution of the United States to act against imminent and urgent threats against the country. That said, and all of that said, right now, I think what you see is a force posture. It's one of the largest naval deployments in modern history, certainly in the Western Hemisphere.
6:08And it is capable of stopping not just drug boats, but stopping any of these sanctioned boats that come in and out and really paralyzing that portion of how the regime generates revenue. So that will continue to be in place. What the president has said, obviously, is, you know, and I think what he's pointing to is that this obsession people have about boots and this or that. He does not feel like he is going to publicly, you know, rule out options that are available for the United States, even though that's not what you're seeing right now. What you're seeing right now is an oil quarantine that allows us to exert tremendous leverage over what happens next.
6:44Margaret Brennan:Well, he also said the U.S. is ready to stage a second and much larger attack if we need to do so. But I'm curious because you just described the regime as still in place, essentially. I mean, I'm curious why the Trump administration decided to leave it intact and only arrest Nicolas Maduro and his wife, the person who controls the police, the chief thug, Diaz de Cabello. He's the interior minister. He's been indicted by the United States. He was in that indictment the administration released. He's a narco-terrorist. There's a$25 million price on his head. He's still in place. The defense minister, who has deep ties to Russia,$15 million price on his head.
7:26Margaret Brennan:He is still in place. I'm confused. Are they still wanted by the United States? Why didn't you arrest them if you are taking out the narco-terrorist regime? You're confused? I don't know why that's confusing to you. They're still in power. I mean, it's very simple. You're not going to go in and wrap up. You're going to go in and suck up five people. They're already complaining about this one operation. Imagine the howls we would have from everybody else if we actually had to go and stay there four days to capture four other people. We got the top priority. The number one person on the list was the guy who claimed to be the president of the country that he was not.
8:04And he was arrested along with his wife who was also indicted. And that was a pretty sophisticated and frankly complicated operation. It was. It is not easy to land helicopters in the middle of the largest military base in the country. The guy lived on a military base. Land within three minutes, kick down his door, grab him, put him in handcuffs, read him his rights, put him in a helicopter and leave the country without losing any American or any American assets. That's not an easy mission. And you're asking me, why didn't we do that in five other places at the same time? I mean, that's absurd.
8:34I do think this is one of the most, you know, daring, you know, complicated, sophisticated missions this country has carried out in a very long time. Tremendous credit to the U.S. military personnel who did it. It was unbelievable and tremendous success. And today, an indicted drug trafficker who was not the legitimate president of Venezuela, who we don't recognize, the Biden administration didn't recognize, 60-something countries don't recognize, the European Union doesn't recognize, and many countries in Latin America don't recognize. He was a convicted, he was a indicted drug trafficker. He was arrested.
9:07His wife was arrested also indictment, and they are now facing justice in the American system of courts.
9:12Margaret Brennan:The others who are also indicted are still in place, so that's the point of my questioning there. But you talked about not being the legitimate president. So you wanted us to land in five other military bases? No, I'm asking why you chose that this was the limit of the military operation. But to your point that you just made, that Maduro was not the legitimate president. He was the guy who was claiming to be the president. Right. Well, the opposition... He was the top target. OK. The opposition leader, Maria Karina Machado and Mundo Gonzalez, won that 2024 election by your own account. They were some of the first people you called when you were secretary of state.
9:49Margaret Brennan:You said Mundo Gonzalez is the rightful president of Venezuela. Is that still the U.S. policy? And if so, are you working on a transition to have those elected leaders run the country? Well, I think a couple of things. I have tremendous admiration for Maria Corina Machado. I have admiration for Edmundo. We have all those views about the election that happened the last time, and not only us, but many other countries around the world. There's that. But there's the mission we are on right now. We have been very clear from the beginning, because I still think that a lot of people analyze everything that happens in foreign policy through the lens of what happened from 2001 to 2015 or 2016.
10:30The whole foreign policy apparatus thinks everything is Libya, everything is Iraq, everything is Afghanistan. This is not the Middle East. And our mission here is very different. This is the Western Hemisphere. Within the Western Hemisphere, we have a country, potentially a very rich country, that has cozied itself up under the control of this regime, has cozied up to Iran, has cozied up to Hezbollah, has allowed narco-trafficking gangs to operate with impunity from their own territory, allows boats with drugs to traffic from their territory. And we are addressing that. And And by the way, eight, nine million people in the largest mass migration event in modern history have left that country since 2014.
11:07But that regime is still in place. Also having an impact on us. That is what we are addressing now.
11:11Margaret Brennan:When you spoke yesterday. We're not just addressing the regime. We are addressing the factors that are a threat to the national interest of the United States. Understood. You spoke with Delce Rodriguez, who is now, according to President Trump, sworn in as the president, as the leader of Venezuela. did she promise you that she is expelling all those american adversaries from venezuelan territory what exactly did she agree to do when she spoke to you we we are going to our objectives when it comes to how venezuela impacts the national interest of the united states have not changed and we want those addressed we want drug trafficking to stop we want no more gang members to come our way we don't want to see the iranian and by the way cuban presence in the past we want the oil industry in that country not to go to the benefit of pirates and adversaries of the United States, but for the benefit of the people.
12:01We want to see all of that happen. We insist on seeing that happen. And we are going to work to continue to see that happen. Well, right now, we are going to see what happens moving forward. Let me just say that. I'm not obviously going to have these conversations in the media. These are delicate and complicated things that require mature statesmanship, and that's what we intend to do. But our goals remain the same. The difference is that the person who was in charge, even though not legitimately, in the past was someone you could not work with. We just could not work with him. He is not a person that had ever kept any of the deals he made, broke every deal he ever made, made a fool out of the Biden administration on the deal they made with him.
12:39And we offered him on multiple occasions an opportunity to remove himself from the scene in a positive way. He chose not to do so. But his number two is now running the country.
12:48Margaret Brennan:His number two is someone you can work with. And is that what you're implying here? And did she tell you that she will transition to democracy? And the woman who won the election, along with her partner there, Maria Karina Machado. We are going to make our assessments of people. You're asking me to make an assessment. We're going to make an assessment on the basis of what they do. Not what they say publicly in the interim, not what they've done in the past in many cases, but what they do moving forward. So we're going to find out. You're asking me, do I know what decisions people are going to make?
13:24I don't. I do know this, that if they don't make the right decisions, the United States will retain multiple levers of leverage to ensure that our interests are protected. And that includes the oil quarantine that's in place, among other things. But we are going to judge moving forward. We're going to judge everything by what they do. And we're going to see what they do.
13:43Margaret Brennan:Okay, because yesterday President Trump said Maria Karina Machado doesn't have the support or respect within the country, and by your own admission, she walloped Nicolas Maduro in the last election. So it does sound like a decision was made. She wasn't on the ballot in the last election. No, but her party was. Edmundo was. Yes. Correct. It was an illegitimate election, and that's why he's not a legitimate president. Right, but is there an agreement to transition to democracy? I think what the president pointed out is the obvious. Well, I think with the point, but there's have to be a little realism here, okay?
14:17A transition to the market. They've had this regime. They've had this system of Chavismo in place for 15 or 16 years. And everyone's asking why 24 hours after Nicolas Maduro was arrested, there isn't an election scheduled for tomorrow? No, no, I'm asking what you talked about with her. These things take time. There's a process.
14:33Margaret Brennan:Right. And you are - I'm not going to publicly get into details about any of those things other than to tell you that our expectations remain the same. And we are going to judge whoever we're interacting with moving forward by whether or not those conditions are met. We want, of course, we want to see Venezuela transition to be a place completely different than what it looks like today. But obviously, we don't have the expectation that's going to happen in the next 15 hours. What we do have an expectation is that it move in that direction. We think it's in our national interest and, frankly, in the interest of people of Venezuela.
15:03Margaret Brennan:The president used the word oil 20 times in his press conference. You talked about these tremendous oil assets that Venezuela has. But the president's last envoy to Venezuela, Elliott Abrams, is publicly arguing that you know better than the policy you're backing. He said, quote, Venezuelan plutocrats or U.S. oil executives seem to be coming to Mar-a-Lago and whispering about how easy life would be if we just made a deal with the regime once Maduro was gone. Is that what happened here?
15:38No. That's not what happened here. What happened here is that we arrested a narco-trafficker who's now going to stand trial in the United States for the crimes he's committed against our people for 15 years. And the person who helped him, of course, his wife, who was co-located with him, so she was arrested as well. That's what happened here. As far as oil, look, oil is critical not just to fueling economies all over the world. It's critical to Venezuela's future. Their oil industry is completely destroyed. It's destroyed all those oil fields that used to produce a lot and wealth for their country and their people.
16:07Those things are decrepit. They're bankrupt. They need to be reinvested in. It's obvious. They do not have the capability to bring up that industry. Again, they need investment from private companies who are only going to invest under certain guarantees and conditions. That has to go to the benefit of the Venezuelan people. Right now, all of that wealth is stolen. It's stolen and it goes into the hands of oligarchs around the world and the oligarchs inside of Venezuela. A handful of people benefit from it. The people don't benefit from it. On top of that, it's very simple. OK, in the 21st century under the Trump administration, we are not going to have a country like Venezuela in our own hemisphere in the sphere of control and the crossroads for Hezbollah, for Iran and for every other malign influence in the in the world.
16:50That's just not going to exist.
16:51Margaret Brennan:Marco Rubio, secretary of state, would love to keep talking to you, but I'm told you are out of time. I have to leave it there. Thank you. Late yesterday, CBS Evening News anchor Tony DeCoppo talked exclusively with Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and asked what the president's comments about the U.S. running Venezuela meant and asked if the secretary was prepared to have troops on the ground there. Well, it means we set the terms. President Trump sets the terms. And ultimately, he'll decide what the iterations are of that. But it means the drugs stop flowing. It means the oil that was taken from us is returned ultimately and that criminals are not sent to the United States.
17:32It means that foreign countries don't have a lodgment inside our hemisphere. So ultimately, we're going to control what happens next because of this brave decision. President Trump has shown American leadership and he'll be able to dictate where we go next.
17:47Margaret Brennan:Face the Nation will be back in one minute. Stay with us. Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile with a message for everyone paying big wireless way too much please for the love of everything good in this world stop with Mint you can get premium wireless for just$15 a month of course if you enjoy overpaying no judgments but that's weird okay one judgment anyway give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch upfront payment of$45 for three month plan equivalent to$15 per month required intro rate first three months only then full price plan options available taxes and fees extra See full terms at MintMobile.com.
18:21Margaret Brennan:We're joined now by the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Arkansas Republican Tom Cotton. Good to have you here, Senator. Thanks, Margaret. You have oversight of the intelligence community, which was deeply involved in this operation to go into Venezuela militarily and extract Nicolas Maduro and his wife. does the U.S. still assess that the regime in Venezuela is made up of narco-terrorists with ties to Iran, Russia, China, and Cuba? Well, first off, let me commend not only our military, as President Trump said, this was an excellent operation. Only the United States military could have pulled it off, but they couldn't have pulled it off without the support of the professionals in the intelligence community, especially at the Central Intelligence Agency.
19:05And I'm glad that we have a director, John Ratcliffe that has restored confidence in the CIA and the president has. I think the president respects the CIA as much as he ever has. It's a great day, not just for our military, for our CIA. There's no question that the people in Venezuela who are still in charge of the apparatus of the government are sanctioned and indicted officials. And they've been in league with Nicolas Maduro until just yesterday. I think President Trump wants to give them a chance to turn a new page. Now, that's happened in the past. If you look at what's happened in Syria, as you know, Ahmed al-Shahrer used to be an Islamic terrorist.
19:42He's now effectively a pro-American leader of Syria. Muammar Gaddafi, the same way, had much blood on his hands after the Iraq war. He turned over a new page and came out of the cold. Now, the difference in those two cases is they made concrete concessions to the United States and our policy goals and interests, or they had a longer history of turning the corner like Ahmed al-Shahrer has. Or it's an entirely new government. We've got to make sure that the people who are now in charge of the apparatus of the Venezuelan government are not going to continue Nicolas Maduro's ways. And I think that's what the president made clear yesterday.
20:13But it sounds
20:14Margaret Brennan:like you think that's actually possible for these individuals to cut all ties to the cartels? The president wants to give them a chance to turn the page in Venezuela and to help America achieve our policy goals there. How much time would you allow for that? I wouldn't allow much personally, but I know those conversations are ongoing. As Secretary Rubio said earlier on the show in your interview, we want them to stop the drug and the weapons trafficking. We want them to take the refugees back. We want them to kick out the Iranians, the Cubans, the Islamic radicals like Hezbollah, and just return to being a normal nation that will help build stability, order, and prosperity, not just in Venezuela, but in our backyard.
Read the full transcript
20:51Margaret Brennan:Should a free and democratic Venezuela still be a goal of the United States of America? And if so, do you hear from the administration a plan to transition to that? I think it should. Secretary Rubio wasn't. I think it should be a goal. The opposition leaders, Ms. Machado, Mr. Gonzalez, have said they think there need to be new elections. I hope the government that's right now in place in Venezuela will allow them to return along with many other exiles who have left, political exiles who have left Venezuela, and that in some period of time, it probably is not going to be days or weeks, maybe a number of months, you can have new elections in Venezuela that are free and fair.
21:26The Venezuelan people have made clear now under Nicolas Maduro that they do not want a Chavista regime governing them. They want to say in their own future, Venezuela has a long history of stable, orderly government that was friendly to the United States. We are their number one customer for oil, and we work together to help build prosperity and stability in our own backyard. I hope that we can do that again with a future government in Venezuela.
21:51Margaret Brennan:CBS is reporting that the CIA source inside the Venezuelan government helped the U.S. track Maduro's location leading up to this capture by the Army's Delta Force. The president said yesterday the U.S. should not pay out that$50 million bounty that was on the head of Maduro. Does that mean that the CIA asset inside still works for us? Well, I have no comment on CIA sources or methods in Venezuela or elsewhere. But they won't be receiving the$50 million reward? I'll simply say that the CIA's amazing work here that has instilled such confidence in the president is a reminder, not just to Nicolas Maduro's cronies in Venezuela, but other bad guys all around the world, that we have very good insights into what they're doing and what they're up to.
22:37Margaret Brennan:So when the president says we will run Venezuela, you are confident that there are actual American assets helping to do that? Is that how I should interpret that? We have very good insight into Venezuela and other adversaries, foreign nations and terrorist groups around the world. Why was China there? That's why the president has such confidence in John Ratcliffe and the CIA. Well, China was trying to provide support to Venezuela during a U.S. pressure campaign. But where were they when Delta Force went in and got Nicolas Maduro? They were nowhere to be found. And frankly, that's the same thing you saw in June with China and Russia in Iran.
23:14We struck Iran. China and Russia did nothing. They stood idly by. That's a reminder that the United States is still the world's dominant superpower. Our friends are very happy today. Our enemies are very worried.
23:25Margaret Brennan:But the person running the country, Delcey Rodriguez, spoke yesterday with Russia's top diplomat. They are in contact with Russia. The defense minister has deep, deep ties to Russia. Is there a U.S.-Russia agreement here? Because there has been speculation based on testimony to Congress back in 2019 by one of Trump's top Russia advisors, Fiona Hill, that Russia has been floating a Venezuela for Ukraine deal here for some time. Is there any such deal? No, this was a U.S. operation that was designed to remove Nicolas Maduro because he was a U.S. indicted drug trafficker. And you don't get immunity from American justice when you're indicted by our courts just because you're the illegitimate communist dictator of another country.
24:09Margaret Brennan:But to be clear, that's not what I'm saying here. Is there an implication that if Russia doesn't meddle in America's backyard, South America, the United States will do something less in Ukraine, which Russia calls its backyard. No, there's no such implication. And obviously Russia doesn't need any kind of pretext to do so. It's invaded Ukraine twice over the last 11 years. There's no such implication here at all. And this is an operation the United States conducted on our own without any coordination or cooperation from other countries to advance our national interest, which is to stop the drug trafficking and stop Venezuela from cooperating with countries like Russia and China and Cuba and Iran.
24:48Okay.
24:49Margaret Brennan:I want to ask you about authorities here on the other side of the commercial break that we are going to take. So let me do that and come back. All right. Stay with us, Senator Tom Cotton. We'll be right back with more from Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton, plus the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Jim Himes, and Maryland Senator Chris and Holly.
25:17Margaret Brennan:We return now to our conversation with Senate Intelligence Chairman Tom Cotton, Senator Cotton. The president said Saturday that a second wave military attack had been planned. It wasn't necessary, but it could still be carried out. What would necessitate it and what would you support? Well, what I took the president to mean is that what we just did with Nicolas Maduro could be done again to other Venezuelan leaders. Several of them are indicted in U.S. courts. They're sanctioned by the United States and Canada and European Union and other nations. And if they continue down the path that Maduro took the took the nation of Venezuela, then we could conduct the same kind of operation as him.
25:56I took that as the president, urging them to change their ways or face the same consequences.
26:01Margaret Brennan:And would you support a stabilization force? What U.S. boots on the ground? As the president said, he wouldn't rule out. We already had boots on the ground as Nicolas Maduro learned the hard way. It's always the president's option to use the American military to protect American citizens and interests. And obviously we have many American citizens inside of Venezuela and we have many interests and property as well. But you know, combat and stabilization forces are there. But I don't think he plans to do that. And I think we've seen too, the president's way of war over the last, or over five years in office, if you look at four major operations, the killing of the ISIS leader in Syria, the drone strike against the Iranian terrorist mastermind in Iraq, the strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, and now this capture of Nicolas Maduro.
26:48When our vital national interests are implicated, the president takes bold, audacious, direct action. He accomplishes the mission, and then the mission is over. In some ways, this is the greatest mission of them all. I mean, as impressive as our military was in Iran in June or in its first term in Iraq and Syria against those terrorist masterminds, it's probably harder to capture someone and get out with no American loss of life than it is to kill a target or to blow up nuclear facilities.
27:17Margaret Brennan:So you are drawing a distinction there in terms of authorities and use of the military. The War Powers Act requires the president to notify Congress of the reason for committing troops within 48 hours of their deployment and requires they be removed within 60 to 90 days unless Congress authorizes it. You OK with this open ended commitment to keep forces as they are? Well, I think he has removed the troops. They were only there for a couple of hours to nab Nicholas. You're talking about the Delta Force operators who are on the ground. But there is a significant military buildup all around South America right now.
27:51Yes.
27:51Margaret Brennan:You're comfortable with that? Does Congress need any authority? I strongly support it. I mean, part of that deployment was to collect intelligence, to conduct this operation, to quarantine the oil trade that Venezuela was sending to Cuba or sending to our adversaries around the world. But it's not mission accomplished. We won't have accomplished our mission until Venezuela starts acting like a normal nation. It stops the drug trafficking and human trafficking. It kicks out Islamic radicals and Iranians and Cubans and helps the United States build a more stable, prosperous Western hemisphere. That's the ultimate goal, and that's what President Trump laid out yesterday.
28:26Margaret Brennan:So last month, the chief of staff to the president, Susie Wiles, told Vanity Fair that attacking targets on Venezuela's mainland sovereign territory would force Trump to get congressional approval. Quote, if he were to authorize some activity on land, then it's war. Then we'd need Congress. You are a co-equal branch of government. Why doesn't the president need you or your authority or your consultation? Well, I consult routinely with the president and his senior advisors. You personally? Sure. Well, as the chairman of the intelligence committee, they keep me apprised of what their plans are and what's going on.
29:02I mean, I spoke in the last 24 hours, not just with the president, but with his senior team. Every man that was on that stage with him yesterday, Marco Rubio, John Ratcliffe, Pete Hexeth, Dan Cain, Stephen Miller, the core architect of the president's policy here. I've spoken with every single one of them in the last 24 hours. Congress has acted to provide the president the resources and authority that he needs to protect the vital interests of the United States, whether it's taking out this drug trafficker, Nicolas Maduro, who had contributed to the deaths of hundreds of Arkansans and hundreds of thousands of Americans or striking Iran's nuclear facilities.
29:36He has the inherent authority under our constitution to protect these American national interests. and as the chief law enforcement officer to make sure that indicted drug traffickers face justice, whether they're indicted in Venezuela or indicted in the United States.
29:48Margaret Brennan:But by his own admission, the DEA administrator said that cocaine prices have gone up nearly 45 percent. Drug traffickers have only changed routes. Venezuela is not a fentanyl producer, not a cocaine producer. Do you really think that this has ended the drug problem? Venezuela is unique in Latin America, though, because the Maduro regime is itself in league with the drug trafficking cartels. It doesn't just tolerate them or it doesn't just fail to control its territory. It is in league and profits from drug trafficking cartels. That's the distinction between Venezuela and other nations. Senator Cotton, thank you for your time today.
30:23Thank you, Margaret.
30:23Margaret Brennan:We'll be right back. Fox News is now streaming live on Fox One. When it matters most, turn to the voices you trust. We go beyond the headlines, bringing you the stories you won't hear anywhere else. Live coverage, sharp analysis, real perspective. At home or on the go, stay connected when it counts. Stream Fox News on Fox One. Download today.
30:55Margaret Brennan:We turn now to Connecticut. Congressman Jim Himes, he is the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, and he joins us this morning from Greenwich. Congressman Himes, you are part of that gang of eight, which means that information about these secret operations is statutorily intended to be shared with you as part of this very small group. Given that and what you should know, can you clearly explain what the United States is doing?
31:26Yeah, by the way, I was delighted to hear that Tom Cotton, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has been in regular contact with the administration. I've had zero outreach and no Democrat that I'm aware of has had any outreach whatsoever. So apparently we're now in a world where the legal obligation to keep the Congress informed only applies to to your party, which is really something. But yeah, no, look, I know exactly where we are, Margaret. We're in the euphoria period of acknowledging across the board that Maduro was a bad guy and that our military is absolutely incredible. This is exactly the euphoria we felt in 2002 when our military took down the Taliban in Afghanistan in 2003, when our military took out Saddam Hussein.
32:03And in 2011, when we helped remove Muammar Gaddafi from power in Libya, these were very, very bad people. By the way, much, much worse than Maduro in Venezuela, which was never a significant national security threat to the United States. But we're in that euphoria phase. And what we learned the day after the euphoria phase is that it's an awful lot easier to break a country than it is to actually do what the president promised to do, which is to run it. And so, again, let's let let's let my Republican colleagues enjoy their day of euphoria. But they're going to wake up tomorrow morning knowing, my God, there is no plan here any more than there was in Afghanistan, Iraq or in Libya.
32:40Margaret Brennan:Well, you heard the secretary of state say, well, this is not the Middle East. There are conflicting statements from cabinet members. Hegseth told CBS, you know, the president of the United States will absolutely be in charge here and leaned into the idea of military options. President Trump said there will be an option of boots on the ground. Secretary Rubio, though, really just leaned into an oil quarantine here. What what exactly is the point of leverage here? When do you expect to get answers? Do your Republican colleagues promise you that they will get some of these answers to the questions you have?
33:21Of course not, Margaret. I mean, look, you're seeing it on television today, right? two thirds of my Republicans pick up every single morning. And the only question they have is, what can I do to prove my loyalty to the president today? And we see this because the president has completely shifted who he was. I mean, as I watched that news conference yesterday, I thought, oh my God, this is Dick Cheney and the neocons. Not only are they taking out a, they're doing a regime change in a country, by the way, not a tier one threat to the United States, but that they just don't like, they're warning the other dictators.
33:53This is Dick Cheney in 2002 saying, we're taking down Saddam Hussein. And by the way, Syria and Iran better watch out. And the fascinating thing about that and why it's really hard to answer the question of where the hell they're going to go from here is that the president won by promising MAGA and his own people that this kind of stuff was done, that the neocons were over. And here we are. That was Dick Cheney in the conference yesterday, you know, deciding that the United States was going to, you know, militarily change regimes and threaten other ones just because we don't like them.
34:23Margaret Brennan:Well, but then the secretary of state was talking about working with the regime and working with Maduro's number two, who's now running the place and other indicted criminals, according to the Southern District of New York, who are continuing to run Venezuela. So can you really say that's regime change if they're working with the regime? As you pointed out, it's not much, right? And, you know, a loss to explain any consistency here. I mean, as you pointed out, it was a very bad guy in an indicted drug traffic. Five weeks ago, the pardoned bad and indicted drug traffic. These guys get a part. Some of them get the full fucking milk.
35:09They'll take them to New York. I can't explain that. There is no law. Maybe, maybe he believes that he can work with the, but I mean, look, again, go back to it.
35:23Margaret Brennan:Congressman Himes, I'm sorry to cut you off here. I'm having a terrible time audio wise. I'm going to take a break because hopefully our technicians can fix it in those two minutes. So please stay with us. We'll be right back. Welcome back to Face the Nation. Just want to apologize to our viewers there. Congressman Himes did not have a bad case of the hiccups. We have technical problems. That's why he was getting interrupted there. It's called Live View. That's the technology being used and it wasn't working. So apologies for cutting that short. You're back with me now in studio. And we're going to talk to Maryland Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen, who is here in person.
35:59Good to be with you, Margaret.
36:01Margaret Brennan:We'll not have those problems, we hope. But let's pick up on that very same point that we were discussing with Congressman Himes there. He says that no information was being shared with the top people who have oversight, like himself. What leverage do Democrats have to force the administration to treat Congress as a co-equal branch of government? Well, Margaret, it's hard when the Republicans in Congress are totally AWOL, right, when they want to give Donald Trump essentially a blank check because they continue to have majorities, of course, in the House and the Senate. Obviously, in 2026, if Democrats regain control of either House, we will have the gavel.
36:46But in the meantime, we need to go directly to the American people and just make it very clear that in this case, it's my view that the Trump administration has been lying to the American people. This has never been about stopping drugs from coming to the United States. We all support stopping drugs. This from the beginning has been about getting rid of Maduro, grabbing Venezuela's oil for American oil companies and Trump's billionaire buddies. That's what this is about. That's why Donald Trump spent so much time yesterday talking about oil.
37:18Margaret Brennan:Twenty times the word oil was used in those remarks. The defense secretary spoke to my colleague, Tony DeCopal, and used the word oil about six times. There is a lot of focus on those natural resources. But arguably, isn't that what China, Russia, Iran, others are also trying to do, which is to extract their own benefit from this country? You know, what is the counter to that point that the administration would argue? Well, the counter is you don't invade a country to grab their natural resources, right? Do you consider this an invasion even though, although it's unclear because Senator Cotton both said there were boots on the ground and that there aren't.
37:57Well, they took, they had boots on the ground, right? They took out the leader and now they're demanding access to Venezuela's oil. That's what this has been about. I mean, Donald Trump, you know, claimed that he'd been against the war in Iraq from the beginning. That wasn't true. But what we do know is he said, well, having gone into Iraq, we should have gotten their oil. This is what drives Donald Trump. And our servicemen and women perform magnificently. But I think it's outrageous that the president of the United States puts American lives at risk. So big American oil companies and his billionaire buddies can profit.
38:35Margaret Brennan:But arguably, there are also critical minerals there. There are all sorts of natural resources in Venezuela that the drug cartels even were getting in the business of that the Chinese were there trying to get. How do you do both things, both corner the market on things that are of vital national security interest, those kind of minerals, and still actually maintain the principles that you're arguing should be upheld? Well, the United States is working and under the previous administration also worked to secure critical mineral supply chains. Unfortunately, in many of these areas, the Trump administration actually has surrendered to China.
39:15I mean, if you look at, for example, clean energy and all those issues and batteries, we've essentially surrendered that market to China. What you don't do, Margaret, is you don't put American lives at risk to go in and grab oil resources to benefit the billionaires that support Donald Trump.
39:35Margaret Brennan:So Chevron, an American oil company, has been operating in Venezuela throughout. And they told CBS yesterday that they continue to work there. My understanding is there are hundreds of Americans working and living in Venezuela still. Reportedly, there are at least four who have been detained by the regime, the regime that remains in power here. You are on Senate Foreign Relations. What do you know about the detained Americans? What can you find out about how they're doing? I've not gotten an update from the administration on those detained Americans. Months ago, I did work to secure the release of an American, a Marylander, who we now have back in Baltimore, Maryland.
40:17I think the administration is looking at those detentions currently ongoing in Venezuela and determining how many of them are wrongful detentions, how many that they don't think are wrongful detentions. But certainly my view is we should work to bring back every American who is wrongfully detained overseas. I think this is going to complicate that effort, what the Trump administration just did.
40:41Margaret Brennan:Because they could designate Venezuela as a state sponsor of hostage shaking now? Is that where you're going with that? No. My view is that the administration should designate as wrongfully detained any Americans that the Venezuelan government has seized wrongfully. And then there are ways to continue to put pressure on. Now, normally that pressure would be through sanctions. Here, the administration obviously has taken military action. As you've been pointing out, we're still left with the regime. I mean, the vice president is part of the regime. Donald Trump says he's running Venezuela. This is not going to end well.
41:21Iraq did not end well. Other efforts to try to get rid of bad people and we're glad to get rid of Maduro. I'd like to get rid of leaders in other countries, but you don't do it through force. That just doesn't work out well in our experience.
41:36Margaret Brennan:Right. And even on that point, the Secretary of State Rubio challenged me and saying, oh, we couldn't grab all those people at once. But former Attorney General Bill Barr was on Fox News this morning, the man who put together that first indictment of Maduro. And he said the intention was to clean the place out of this criminal organization so there's going to have to be follow-up action. To be clear, do you oppose all snatch and grab operations of indicted people? Well, I don't think we should be putting American men and women at risk in a situation like this. I mean, I'd have to look at every situation.
42:11But again, the motivation here is about grabbing Venezuela's oil for American oil companies. You already see folks on Wall Street lining up. So let's just be real as to what is really behind this operation. I mean, Donald Trump said he was going to focus on the United States. We have people's health care costs going through the roof because they refuse to extend the affordable care tax credits. Meanwhile, he bails out Argentina and wants to run Venezuela for the benefit of American oil companies.
42:43Margaret Brennan:We're going to have to talk about all the things you just raised in a future episode of Face the Nation. But clearly on the question of war powers, does the president have the legal authority to do what he's doing? No, he does not. You're on the Appropriations Committee. You've got power. What can you do about it? Well, I worked with Senator Merkley already to offer a resolution in the United States Senate to cut off any U.S. taxpayer dollars to fund an attack against Venezuela. Republicans blocked us from doing it. So, yes, we will continue to push. In fact, I'm sure we're going to have a vote on a war powers resolution probably as early as this week, if not next.
43:23Last time we offered those, Margaret, Republicans voted no, all but one or two. Senator Paul voted with us, maybe one other. But for the most part, Republicans are happy to give Donald Trump a blank check and surrender their constitutional responsibilities to Donald Trump.
43:41Margaret Brennan:Senator Van Hollen, a lot more to talk to you about. Thank you very much for joining us here today. Thank you. To leave it there. We turn now back to our conversation with Connecticut Democratic Congressman Jim Himes, who I think can be heard now. Congressman. I'm glad we got the link back up for those viewers who lost you there. Can you explain to us, the administration is arguing that what they did is legal and that the snatch and grab operation of taking an indicted criminal, Nicolas Maduro, to the United States through military force has precedent. And they point back to what happened in the late 80s when Noriega and Panama.
44:27Margaret Brennan:What's your challenge to that? Yeah, well, first, it's clearly illegal under international law, right? No full stop. UN charter. No question there. Now, you may not care about international law, but if you don't care about international law, remember, you're going to be making an appeal to international law to try to get restitution for the seizure of Chevron's oil stuff. So maybe you want to rethink how much disdain you show for international law. Clearly not legal under the Constitution because though presidents of both parties have argued against this, the Constitution is really pretty clear that the representatives of the people get to be consulted and ultimately approve military activity.
45:06That has not happened here at all. And so, again, there's nothing legal about this. And more to the point, again, under the international law point, think of what Russia and China just learned. Russia and China just learned that all you need to do if you want to go into Estonia is to say that the leader of Estonia is a bad person. You don't even need to make a particularly good case. Look, there's no national security expert saying that Venezuela was a mortal threat to the United States three weeks ago. So what China and Russia just learned is that the beacon of liberty and rule of law in the world has now greenlighted snatch and grab operations in Estonia, in Taiwan, wherever Xi and Putin decide they want to go next.
45:47Margaret Brennan:So I take your point on the precedent there. Do you think that China or Russia would have the ability to carry out that kind of lightning operation the United States did? well um no uh but that doesn't mean well china yes china yes china very soon and you know their leader has said we will develop this capability we know that their intent is to do precisely this in taiwan russia is a more complicated case it's you know russia loses 10 000 people to get in you know three acres of land in eastern ukraine but that may not be true five years from now and by the way back to the noriega case because you do ask a good question there panama is a terrible precedent.
46:29Why do I say that? Because when we went into Panama, the Panamanian Congress had declared war on the United States of America, right? They had killed a United States Marine and wounded two others. And the Congress had been consultant. The Congress in the Noriega mission had authorized regime change. So it's a terrible precedent that the administration is using to say that this is legal.
46:56Margaret Brennan:Yeah, as we understand it, because we looked this up, Noriega claimed head of state immunity, and the court said that that immunity was meant to protect official state functions and private profiting off the drug trade. Basically, the courts ruled on his actions as a leader and not on the legality of the snatch and grab operation itself. So we're going to continue to track all of this. Thank you, Congressman Himes. Thank you, Senator Van Hollen. That's it for us today. and there has been a lot of breaking news. Thank you for watching. Be sure to tune in Monday night and every weekday night for the CBS Evening News as Tony DeCoppo begins a new generation here at CBS News.
47:37Margaret Brennan:Until next week. I'm Margaret Brennan and this has been Face the Nation. Today's guests were Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Arkansas Republican Senator Tom Cotton, Connecticut Democratic Representative Jim Himes and Maryland Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen. The senior executive producer of Face the Nation is Mary Hager, and the executive producer is Ann Hsu. This broadcast was directed by Shelley Schwartz. Face the Nation originates from CBS News in Washington. For more, we're online at facethenation.com and on YouTube. We're also rebroadcast on our CBS News 24-7 streaming network at 1230 on Sundays, and we're available through our apps, CBS News and Paramount Plus.
48:19How many discounts does USAA Auto Insurance offer? Too many to say here. Multi-vehicle discount, safe driver discount, new vehicle discount, storage discount.
48:28Margaret Brennan:How many discounts will you stack up? Tap the banner or visit usaa.com slash auto discounts. Restrictions apply. This Women's History Month, Paramount Plus celebrates with the Women Who Move Mountains collection. Let it ride. For the women who take control and push boundaries in Landman. Underestimating me is how I buy you out. who forge their own paths and stay true to themselves in the Madison. This is the most love I have ever shown you. And who act as guides and explorers in Star Trek Starfleet Academy. Boldly go where no one has gone before. Explore the Women Who Move Mountains collection on Paramount+.
49:03Margaret Brennan:Stream now.
From the publisher
The Trump administration stages a dramatic, top-secret mission in Venezuela and captures its leader, dictator Nicolas Maduro, but what's the U.S. role going forward? We'll talk to Secretary of State Marco Rubio. We'll also hear from Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Tom Cotton and the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Congressman Jim Himes. Plus, Maryland Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen will also join us.
To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices
