In short
Face the Nation covers U.S.-Iran war tensions and a Capitol Hill clash between President Trump and Sen. Bill Cassidy; health policy and public health oversight; NATO/defense personnel shakeups; Democratic Party leftward shift; and Supreme Court immigration rulings.
Guests and backgrounds
Sen. Bill Cassidy (Louisiana Republican; retiring from Senate; chairs Senate HELP). Sen. Tim Kaine (Virginia Democrat; in Brussels with NATO-focused senator delegation). Jan Crawford (CBS Chief Legal Correspondent; Supreme Court legal analysis).
Key claims
Cassidy says Trump berated War Powers Act opponents, but Cassidy sought briefings because negotiations are “delicate”; he argues the Iran conflict is a “foreign policy blunder” and that an Iran deal would effectively be a treaty requiring Congress. He criticizes HHS Secretary Bobby Kennedy for broken promises and vaccine skepticism, citing Louisiana measles herd-immunity shortfalls. Kaine says Pentagon leadership changes risk pushing out “truth-tellers,” and he opposed a defense budget increase due to unclear funding and lack of guardrails. Crawford says Supreme Court rulings uphold ending TPS and border “metering,” emphasizing Congress can change the statutes.
Notable examples
Iran airstrikes and attacks on Bahrain/Kuwait; Cassidy’s proposed cash-based health affordability; measles outbreaks and MMR/Tylenol autism claims; General Chris Donahue being pushed out; TPS for Haitians/Syrians and “arrived in” asylum metering interpretation.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOTensions Over War with Iran
1:02 to 2:26
Discussion on the recent tensions involving President Trump and Senator Cassidy regarding the war with Iran.
“Good morning and welcome to Face the Nation.”
Cassidy's Meeting with Trump
2:26 to 4:04
Senator Cassidy shares insights from his heated meeting with President Trump and reflects on their exchange.
“And the president wasn't invited to dish out verbal abuse.”
Concerns About U.S. Foreign Policy
4:04 to 5:22
Cassidy discusses the implications of U.S. foreign policy decisions and the perceived failures involved.
“which is another way of saying that President Trump's threats to return to bombing are empty threats.”
The Role of Congress in Foreign Policy
5:22 to 6:50
Cassidy emphasizes the importance of Congressional oversight and accountability in foreign policy.
“So we didn't talk about that last night, but I think that's a fair statement.”
Health Care and Affordability Issues
6:50 to 8:45
Senator Cassidy discusses the current priorities in health care legislation and the importance of affordability.
“He canceled that event on the bipartisan housing bill, which had strong support from both sides of the aisle, was aimed at least at affordability.”
Concerns Over Intelligence Appointments
8:45 to 11:01
Discussion on the acting Director of National Intelligence and concerns over his qualifications and actions.
“Once under the rules, and we live by the rules, the president can make an interim appointment.”
Reflections on Leadership and Accountability
11:01 to 13:55
Cassidy reflects on the importance of accountability for leaders and his stance on President Trump's actions.
“My understanding is that it's continuing to be implemented.”
Senator Cassidy on Healthcare and Social Security
14:01 to 16:53
Senator Cassidy discusses the impending insolvency of Social Security and his plans for healthcare affordability.
“because I'm going to run through the tape.”
Introduction of Senator Tim Kaine
16:53 to 17:09
Margaret Brennan introduces Senator Tim Kaine and his current work in Europe.
“Face the Nation will be back in one minute.”
Concerns Over Military Leadership Changes
17:09 to 19:51
Senator Kaine expresses concerns about changes in military leadership and the implications for U.S. military advice.
“We know he was ordered by Secretary Hegseth to turn in his retirement papers.”
Show all 20 chapters
Discussion on Defense Spending
19:51 to 22:20
Senator Kaine talks about his objections to the defense spending increase and the implications of military operations.
“So it would be difficult to reduce the presence in Europe based upon some NDAA provisions that we have put in place that kind of set a floor in terms of U.S.”
Senator Kaine on Political Dynamics
22:31 to 26:54
Senator Kaine discusses the political landscape and the impact of progressive candidates on the Democratic Party.
“and we hope you'll join CBS for a special presentation of the festivities.”
Senator Cassidy on Public Health Risks
26:54 to 28:00
Senator Cassidy raises concerns about public health risks related to mass gatherings and vaccination importance.
“Senator King, thank you for joining us this morning.”
Public Health and Vaccination Importance
28:00 to 30:08
Discusses the significance of vaccinations in public health and combat readiness.
“is American public health up to dealing with this level of risk?”
Consequences of Vaccine Skepticism
30:08 to 31:52
Explores the fallout from vaccine skepticism and historical lessons on disease impact.
“And one is children dying from measles, as has occurred, and thousands getting sick with many in the hospital.”
Political Challenges in Public Health
31:52 to 34:08
Examines political dynamics affecting public health decisions and vaccine messaging.
“So if you've not been exposed to something, sometimes it's a little bit harder to imagine that it can occur to you.”
Trust Erosion in Health Leadership
34:08 to 36:28
Highlights the importance of trust in health leadership and the consequences of misinformation.
“By the way, let's give the secretary credit.”
Bobby Kennedy's Influence on Health Policy
36:28 to 38:10
Discusses the political implications of Bobby Kennedy's position on public health and vaccines.
“You've got to search for the truth and use the truth for your solutions.”
Reflections on Political Decisions
38:10 to 41:25
Reflects on the political decisions made regarding health policy and vaccine oversight.
“Bobby Kennedy was going to have the ear of the president.”
Supreme Court Analysis: Immigration Decisions
42:03 to 46:11
Explore the recent Supreme Court rulings on temporary protected status and immigration policy.
“The Supreme Court is on the verge of wrapping up this session for some analysis on last week's key decisions.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Margaret Brennan:I'm Margaret Brennan in Washington and this week on Face the Nation, the fragile detente between the U.S. and Iran is disrupted and tensions over the war with Iran explode between President Trump and the Republican senator that he worked to defeat. Following a Capitol Hill shouting match between President Trump and Louisiana Republican Bill Cassidy over the senator's vote against the war with Iran, we spoke exclusively with Cassidy about that exchange, his relationship with the president, and his thoughts on the administration's health policy agenda as Cassidy wraps up his Senate career. You said that Secretary Kennedy you broke promises to you?
0:43It's pretty clear.
0:44Margaret Brennan:Do you think you just made those promises to win your vote, that it was just political expediency? Easy as your schmize. We'll also speak to Virginia Senator Tim Kaine about the shift of the Democratic Party to the left and check in on all the other news of the week. It's all just ahead on Face the Nation.
1:18Margaret Brennan:Good morning and welcome to Face the Nation. Today marks exactly four months since the U.S. launched the war with Iran, and the agreed-to talks over Iran's nuclear program are in jeopardy following several new rounds of airstrikes. This weekend, Iran attacked U.S. Gulf allies in Bahrain and Kuwait, and the U.S. responded by striking Iranian missile sites and other targets. Last Wednesday, President Trump faced Republican senators on the Hill, four of whom, including Louisiana's Bill Cassidy, had just voted with Democrats against his launching the war without congressional approval. Following that heated meeting, Cassidy did receive a private White House Situation Room briefing with Vice President Vance and Special Envoy Steve Whitcoff.
2:06Margaret Brennan:Cassidy then voted in support of the president's war on a second measure. And after that, in our interview, Cassidy told CBS that he spoke to the president and that the conversation was, quote, positive and looking to build a working relationship. Here's what Cassidy told us about that meeting. The president was berating the four people that voted for the War Powers Act. Frankly, I'm not there to be berated. And the president wasn't invited to dish out verbal abuse. But that's what he did. I raised my hand. I said, Mr. President, do you just want, is that a rhetorical question that you're asking why do we vote for it or are you really interested?
2:44He goes, I'm really interested. I stood up and I said, this is why. And I listed those objectives that I did not see being achieved and how the kind of endpoint of the war kept stretching out longer and longer. He began to speak over me. Unfortunately, I raised my volume to match his and we spoke to each other like that. Or shall we say spoke at each other, not to each other. Now, I shouldn't have lost my temper, nor should he. But you know, my wife will tell you every now and then my Irish temper gets the best of me. But point being, I needed to know. I need to know to serve my people and my state and my country.
3:20As it turns out, I got a briefing afterwards. In one sense, I actually accomplished the mission of what I needed to do.
3:26Margaret Brennan:But you had also said the American people need that information. So the American people aren't getting those public hearings and briefings. When I asked about that in my briefing, they said right now the negotiations are delicate. And they could collapse if they're not nursed along in the appropriate way. I can accept that. Sometimes you have to have some space for people to come to an accommodation. That's the reason they said for their kind of lack of being forthcoming. I can accept that. Not only did you say this is the worst foreign policy blunder on record, Reagan be rolling in his grave, you said America lost the credible use, credible threat of force, which is another way of saying that President Trump's threats to return to bombing are empty threats.
4:15I don't know if they're empty threats because you can certainly return to bombing. But the fact is that a medium-sized power at this point is perceived to have fought a superpower to a draw, requiring some measure of accommodation of we, the superpower. And we spent$29 billion and we have 13 Americans dead. We hope to get back to status quo ante. I will say in the briefing last night, they would make the argument that we've actually made progress. If that's the case, we should all be thankful.
4:44Margaret Brennan:Would you call for a vote for some kind of congressional oversight if an actual agreement is reached? I think this would amount to a treaty. Congress has a... It does not? I'm saying it would. It would. And so, I mean, if it... I don't know the technical definition of a treaty. It seemed like a treaty to me. And so if it is, then Congress will be able to weigh in. Do you have that kind of commitment that when things aren't so delicate, Congress actually will be read in and perhaps put to a vote under Inara? I think I've shown, at least on my level, that I'm willing to make tough votes in order to get that briefing that I feel I need to have the truth to make a decision that's good for my country.
5:22So we didn't talk about that last night, but I think that's a fair statement.
5:26Margaret Brennan:Will anyone else hold the president accountable once Cornyn's gone and Tillis is gone and you're gone? The simple answer will be yes. The men and women who serve in Congress, by and large, love our country. I mean, they all love our country deeply. And by and large, they will do what is required. Now, when you're running for office, you have to be aware of what your voters are interested in. You have to talk about what your voters are interested in if you want to get reelected. But in the Senate, at least, there's that space of four years prior to that. And I think you see every, every, every period there's senators that step up and say, we need something different.
6:02We need more. The Senate is a separate body, separate from the presidency. I think we're seeing that.
6:08Margaret Brennan:Do you think the president understands that? I don't know if the president does. Sometimes he acts as if Congress is merely an appendage. And frankly, sometimes Congress acts like it's an appendage. But that said, I think you got the message yesterday. Congress wants to be read in and Congress has our rules and procedures that our founding fathers set up and they set it up precisely so that there would not be too powerful of an institution of a presidency designed to reflect all of the American people not just the will of one person. That's being tested right now. I suppose it's being tested but hopefully we pass the test.
6:44Margaret Brennan:Well the president seems to have some changing priorities himself when it comes to what he's asking you all to deliver on. He canceled that event on the bipartisan housing bill, which had strong support from both sides of the aisle, was aimed at least at affordability. He seemed to sabotage his own nominee to run the intelligence community, Jay Clayton. He told him, don't show up for the hearing that Senate Republicans had scheduled. And he's been talking about the ballroom legislation like the SAVE Act, which later Thunas said there are not the votes for it. What do you think his priorities are right now.
7:19Margaret, you're asking me to get inside the president's brain. I cannot get inside the president's brain.
7:23Margaret Brennan:You had lunch with him yesterday. I did, but it wasn't really, you know, sipping tea with a pinky finger out and saying, hey, how do you feel about life? But clearly he wants to say that passed. So you can say that that is a priority. What I think should be the priority is how do you make life more affordable for the American people? and and so that's why i'm asking the president regularly let's work on affordability of health care the president has made a strong push to make health care more affordable i want to make health care more affordable so i can't tell you what his priorities are beyond the save act i can tell you what i think they should be and how do we make life more affordable for the average american the save act he wants to put in place more restrictions around federal elections but it's already federal law that non-citizens can't vote.
8:10Yeah, but what he's asking is that people have to show an ID. Yeah. And showing an ID, I think, is a reasonable thing. We've done it in Louisiana. There's been no disenfranchisement at all. But we had a reputation for corrupt elections, and now everybody acknowledges our elections are pretty straightforward. But you agree with Leader Thun. There just aren't the votes. There are not the votes.
8:29Margaret Brennan:You have also made clear you think that the director of national intelligence, Bill Pulte, He's in the position in an acting role presently that he's not qualified. He has no national security experience, but he's in the job. And he can stay there for 210 days without Congress having a say here. Is Congress powerless to put a check? Once under the rules, and we live by the rules, the president can make an interim appointment. And indeed, he can stay there. Now, there may be other things we could do that the parliamentarian or someone can tell us. I'm not familiar with those. My objection to Bill is that he used personal information to target a political enemy of the president.
9:16Margaret Brennan:At the Federal Housing Administration. At the Federal Housing Administration. Using personal data. Now, if we have an inalienable right, I have, you have, The woman targeted has an inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I'm a conservative. You should not be using the force of government to crash upon somebody just because the person in charge does not like them or finds them inconvenient. The fact that Bill did that is disqualifying for someone to be the director of national intelligence. We should be about all people having access to that life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
9:56Not saying we're going to bring, boom, DOJ down on you because you have the nerve to disagree. And so that's the standard I hold him to. And as best I can tell, he does not meet that standard.
10:08Margaret Brennan:Are there any checks on the abuses that you say Pulte has carried out in his current position at federal housing? You can go to court. So we have three branches, and one is the court. Secondly, Democrats have said they will not approve FISA until we do something about that DNI director. And the president, of course, should be concerned about FISA. Is he? Again, you're asking me to get inside the president's head. But my point being that the president, as a responsible agent, as the responsible servant of the American people, should be concerned about making sure that we don't have a cyber attack or that we don't have a terrorist cell coming into our nation.
10:47And so the Democrats are, if you will, holding that hostage. I'm not saying I agree with it because I think we need FISA reauthorized. But point being, they're all points of leverage.
10:57Margaret Brennan:But in the meantime, there's a standoff. There's a little bit of a standoff. And that's authority is expired. Yes. My understanding is that it's continuing to be implemented. But nonetheless, there is a there is a standoff. You were one of seven Republicans who voted to convict President Trump for his actions on January 6th of 2021. After January, there'll be only one or two senators who remain here who took the stand you did. You've been fighting his attempts to create this$1.8 billion fund, compensation for those who felt they were wrongly prosecuted under the Biden administration, perhaps including some of these people who attacked the building we are sitting in right now.
11:41Margaret Brennan:Do you trust that the acting attorney general, Todd Blanche, that he won't move forward with the fund? I prefer to say I voted to uphold the Constitution. And my oath of office, which is to protect the Constitution against all enemies, domestic and foreign. So let me just frame what my vote was that day. Understood. You're asking about Attorney General Blanche. Right now, I am actively considering my vote for him. So I will reserve judgment. He has assured Congress that he will not use the weaponization fund. I will note that he's not given the same guarantee to the 7th District Court, if I have that right, down in Virginia, which has asked for a guarantee.
12:24He says, well, we don't think they have jurisdiction. But it doesn't seem hard to just write a letter saying we're not going to do it. But nonetheless, nonetheless, he has said that he is not going to. The president has sent conflicting signals. That's something that has to be sorted out before the vote.
12:40Margaret Brennan:Before you decide your vote, you actually wrote a memo because the DOJ had said this fund was going to be created. They also said the U.S. is forever barred from prosecuting any claims against President Trump, his family, his businesses, and all related or affiliated individuals. Do you still object to that? Do you need Blanche to say something more clearly on that point? I absolutely object to that, and I don't think that agreement should hold the force of law. Absolving somebody of any crime which they or their family may have objected to, may have committed, not just in terms of IRS audits, but like anything, seems a little bit far afield from the self-sacrifice that our founding fathers embraced.
13:25It seems more I'm above everybody else, and I should be held to a different standard. Leaders should be held to a higher standard, not a different standard. They should be more accountable. They should be pledging their life, their liberty, their sacred honor. I should, as a senator. Frankly, I think all Americans should, whatever their role. But point being, I would object to anything that goes against the kind of spirit of that. And making one person above the law is wrong.
13:54Margaret Brennan:We're four months until midterms. You've got six months left. is health care your top priority? I've got so many things because I'm going to run through the tape. But right now we're working on Social Security. Social Security is insolvent, going to go in insolvent. And when that happens, there'll be a cut of 22 to 25 % in someone's benefits if we follow the current law. I've been working on a plan for about six years. I am still working on that plan and I want to bring it to completion. How do you make health care more affordable? Second thing, in our help committee, of which I'm the chairman, we're working on price transparency.
14:28Wouldn't it be great if a mom, daughter has an earache, could say, hey, Siri, where is the most affordable urgent care center near me? Oh, this one's 50 and that one's$500. And so she goes to the one that's 50. Let's give her the tool of price transparency so that she can make the best decision for her family's health, but also for her pocketbook.
14:51Margaret Brennan:When you were on the Senate floor recently, you were banging your hands down. you were yelling that the president needs to get engaged. Mr. President, too many people have this debt,$10 ,000 on their credit card, related to paying in part for things such as medical expenses, and they are going down. That is something that we, Mr. President, you, the president, and we as Congress must engage upon. Your party controls the White House. Your party controls the Capitol. Why haven't they done anything to deal with what you are describing as really a health care crisis in terms of affordability? If you fully elaborate on what I said, Margaret, it's that we as Republicans and Democrats have to come together.
15:34Yes. You need 60 votes to get something done. But practically, you've got to be unified as a country. Well, first you've got to try.
15:42Margaret Brennan:You've got to try. The party hasn't put forward a plan. Well, I'm not going to blame that on the president. Congress has a role, and the president needs to collaborate, but Congress has a role. And by the way, that's what I'm attempting to do. And so everything's not Donald Trump's fault. But I do say that if the president gets engaged, it gives a real push. The plan I propose takes principles that the president has embraced and makes them and kind of puts them into practice, if you will. Giving cash. What's that? Giving cash to individuals rather than directly to insurance companies. Is that what you're talking about?
16:15Yes. If you take somebody, a family owner, get an insurance to their employer, and if you give them for a family of four up to$2 ,000 money in their pocket to pay that out of pocket, to pay that out of pocket actually benefits the family immediately. You can do that and we can have that set up in a relatively short period of time. That would help that family.
16:35Margaret Brennan:You have any pledge from leadership to move that forward? No, but partly you just got to make people aware of it. And partly the American people have to speak to our leadership. And that's what November's about? That's what November's about. In our next half hour, part two of our interview with Senator Cassidy. Face the Nation will be back in one minute. Stay with us. We turn now to Virginia Democratic Senator Tim Kaine, who joins us from Brussels. Good morning to you, Senator. Great to be with you, Margaret. Thanks. Because you are in Europe, I want to ask you about exactly what is going on with the U.S.
17:13Margaret Brennan:Army Europe General Chris Donahue. We know he was ordered by Secretary Hegseth to turn in his retirement papers. He's going to relinquish command July 2nd, relinquish NATO command July 9th. Do you have any indication why this very well-respected general is getting pushed out the door? Margaret, I am in Europe with a bipartisan delegation of senators visiting NATO allies and our troops, talking primarily about NATO, summit next week, and support for Ukraine. I will say on General Donoghue, a lot of questions and very few answers. He was very well regarded in the Armed Services Committee, where I sit, both sides of the aisle, thought really highly of him.
17:57And so the news that he was being ushered out caught us all by surprise. And we don't yet have good answers from the Pentagon.
18:05Margaret Brennan:Well, it's part of a bigger question as to the changes Secretary Hagstaff is making at the Pentagon. Retired Admiral Bill McRaven, people know him from commanding the raid to take out Osama bin Laden. He wrote a piece in The Atlantic raising concerns about the exit and the firing of at least 12 other high-ranking military officials. He explained officers need to be brutally candid in order to give good advice. He said these recent firings raise a real risk. Senior officers will be overly cautious about providing their best advice, and therefore the chance for military miscalculation will grow dramatically.
18:46Margaret Brennan:How concerned are you? Can Congress intervene and do anything here? Well, I don't think that concern is misplaced. We're worried about the same thing. Are you pushing out the truth-tellers to surround yourself by yes-men? And in particular, it looks like the Secretary is coming down hardest on the Army. He served in the Army. He felt like he wasn't treated well by the Army. That's a grudge he's carried that he's described publicly. And so when you see Army officers forced out, you've got to wonder, is this a personal thing or is it really what's best for the nation? So we are working on the defense bill right now.
19:27We've voted it out of the Senate Armed Services Committee. There's nothing in the bill at this point that would address this situation. But when we bring it up on the floor, I think by then we'll have some of our questions answered. And if we need to go farther to put some guardrails in place, you'll probably find bipartisan support to do that.
Read the full transcript
19:46Margaret Brennan:What are you hearing from your NATO partners there about the American plans to reduce the presence in Europe? So it would be difficult to reduce the presence in Europe based upon some NDAA provisions that we have put in place that kind of set a floor in terms of U.S. troop strength. And here's the good news, Margaret. both because of President Trump, but also, frankly, because of the actions of Vladimir Putin, European nations are really stepping up their investment in their collective defense. They see the need to do it, and they understand that the United States is right there with them. There's some political churn, no doubt about it.
20:28European nations are not only concerned about rhetoric coming out of the White House, they see a chaotic tariff policy as hurting their economies. But they I also see the U.S. continuing to make sizable investments in European defense, troop presence. The Senate version of the armed services bill that we just passed has sizable investments for the defense of Ukraine. And I think you're going to see some positives coming out of the NATO summit next week. That's my expectation.
20:55Margaret Brennan:So you just mentioned the defense bill that is so significant. And we looked and you said that for the first time in your 13 years on the committee, you voted against it. I understand you have objections to the Iran war, but given the significant military community you have in Virginia and the need the military says it has, how can you defend that? Margaret, it was one of the hardest votes I've cast in 13 years in the Senate. But here was the reason. President Trump is seeking at least a 40 percent increase in the defense budget in one year. He hasn't really told us where that money's coming out of.
21:38Is it coming out of education? Is it coming out of health care? And to vote for that kind of an increase without knowing where we're going to pull the money from in the middle of a war that I think is illegal, unnecessary and foolish. and also to support that kind of an increase without guardrails about how the money is spent. I just couldn't do it. Part of protecting our Virginia troops and going to bat for them is making sure that when we use troops, especially when we go to war, we do it the right way, not the wrong way. Our troops have deployed into the Middle East often over the last 25 years, and in an illegal war for kind of a suspect rationale, that's no way to treat our troops.
22:19Margaret Brennan:Well, I need to talk to you about more in regard to this, but I have to take a commercial break, so please stay with us if you would. Senator Cain there in Brussels. We'll be right back. In just under a week, America will be celebrating its 250th birthday, and we hope you'll join CBS for a special presentation of the festivities. The Great American Block Party airs at 8 p.m. Eastern on the CBS broadcast network, CBS 247, as well as Paramount+.
22:53Margaret Brennan:welcome back to face the nation we return to our conversation with virginia democratic senator tim kane uh senator i want to ask you a little bit about what's happening here at home um there were three far left candidates handpicked by new york city mayor mamdani who won last week over more centrist candidates some are looking at that and saying the reach of the left wing of your party seems to be expanding. And here is what President Trump said. Take a listen. It's becoming a communist party. These are not social Democrats. These are hardcore, godless communists. They're godless communists. All communists are godless.
23:34They don't believe in God. This is the most serious threat to our country since its existence.
23:42Margaret Brennan:What do you make of that attack here? And do you have concerns that the progressive platform of some members of the party will make it more difficult to win in other parts of the country headed into November? Margaret, what the president said is just goofy word salad. I'm not an expert on New York House races. I am an expert on Senate races. And we have got Senate candidates all over this country working to flip red seats blue by focusing on the president's mismanagement of the American economy. Families are suffering cost increases because of chaotic tariffs, illegal war, and focus on goofy things like ballrooms, arches, and the reflecting pool.
24:30And in Virginia, at the House races, I've got four Democratic challengers running to flip red seats blue who are focused on that same kind of cost and affordability agenda that led us to have a landslide win in state races last fall. So I can't really explain what's on the voters' minds in New York City congressional races, but I know it's on Virginians' minds, and I think I know what's on Americans' minds. Let's focus on the economy and bringing costs down, not foolish wars and chaos.
24:58Margaret Brennan:Well, Senator Alyssa Slotkin of Michigan said the party needs significant new leadership because the old models are not working. And she pointed a finger at leadership. Leader Jeffries, Leader Schumer said they need to make room for others who can adapt if they cannot. Do you agree with her assessment? Well, I don't know exactly the context in which she was making it. look, I do think some of these elections can show that there's a desire for new, and it's a tough environment for incumbents. And that, I think, works to the Democrats' advantage in November. Remember, primaries are interesting, but where you really make the difference is not trading out one Democrat for another or one Republican for another.
25:41Where you make the difference is flipping a seat from red to blue. And it is a challenging environment for incumbents, but that's going to work to Democrats' advantage in November.
25:49Margaret Brennan:So you will continue to support Chuck Schumer as leader? Yes, he was one of the best majority leaders we've had in a long time. And if he gets the chance, he's going to be a good majority leader going forward. Well, just to pick up on something Senator Cassidy said, he was talking about health care affordability. Is there any Democratic plan for health care or opportunity to work across the aisle? There is. And look, Bill has been a good chairman. I agree with him on a lot. We have some disagreements, but he's been a good chairman of the Health Committee. And we're working on some affordability issues.
26:25For example, we have a bipartisan bill that we've enacted some pieces of, but we could do more to rein in pharmaceutical costs by more effective regulation of the PBMs, the pharmacy benefit managers. On the Democratic side, we want to reverse some of the harmful Medicaid cuts that the Republicans put in place a year ago. And we've had some interest by some Republicans in that. But reversing those Medicaid cuts and the cuts to SNAP benefits is something that we feel very, very strongly about as Democrats.
26:54Margaret Brennan:Senator King, thank you for joining us this morning. We'll have to leave it there. Sometimes historic events suck. But what shouldn't suck is learning about history. I do that through storytelling. History That Doesn't Suck is a chart-topping history-telling podcast. chronicling the epic story of America decade by decade from the 18th century to the 20th. Original music and immersive sound design accompany us on our storytelling journey. Listen to and follow History That Doesn't Suck, an Odyssey podcast, available now on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. And we return now to our conversation with Republican Senator and Dr.
27:34Margaret Brennan:Bill Cassidy. Let me ask you about your role on this powerful committee overseeing health policy. You were recently raising concern that the World Cup and some of these other mass gatherings happening in the United States run the risk of transmission at mass scale of some of some of these diseases right now. Given the cuts to personnel, given the concern you have about what's happening inside these institutions, is American public health up to dealing with this level of risk? Well, we would, one, we don't know the complete effort that's being taken, okay? You don't. The Center for Disease Control, for example, has many things going on at any one moment that no one person knows unless you're directly involved in the agency.
28:22And so let me just say that. And I have no doubt that there's a commitment to making sure that there is not a widespread dissemination of disease at one of these massive events. I'll say that as well. We do see the consequences, though, of ignoring the benefits that things like vaccines brings for public health. And if you will, I think what you're going after is that this administration, parts of it, have tried to downplay the importance of immunization. The Secretary of War, Hegseth, recently did away with the flu mandate. And then there was a big outbreak of flu in one of their military outfits.
29:00Yes. If you ignore history, history doesn't necessarily repeat, but it has a rhythm. And we can look back in World War I, where the Spanish flu went through, decimating armies. But one of the reasons the Germans collapsed is because so many people died from Spanish flu that they had and didn't have manpower to fulfill that their lines began to collapse. Combat readiness means preventing disease. And if you want to be combat ready, you don't want everybody out with the flu.
29:30Margaret Brennan:But he was following the Secretary of Health and Human Services push for medical freedom. So if you see that, you can see we have a mutual obligation. When our founding fathers pledge their life, their fortune, and their sacred honor, there is a sense that we all have to, one, achieve, to achieve those inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. There has to be also a spirit of sacrifice among everyone else. And so, if we're speaking about how to protect others, obviously, more people being immunized makes it less likely that someone else gets ill. There is a consequence to not obeying the science of immunization.
30:12And one is children dying from measles, as has occurred, and thousands getting sick with many in the hospital. So I would argue, unfortunately, facts can be a tough, tough teacher. Protect yourself. Talk to your doctor. But society has a vested interest, as we all do, and we all be unprotected.
30:33Margaret Brennan:We now have a longtime vaccine skeptic who is running HHS. who in private practice sued vaccine makers. How much harm has he done? Or do you believe that he has restored trust in public health as you thought he might do? Well, he has not restored trust in public health. And you can see the administration, if you believe the press accounts, are trying to limit his range of activity. Polling shows that the American people understand that vaccines are important. And for someone to be out there saying that they're not goes against their experience. And again, if you look at the measles outbreak in which thousands of kids got measles with the consequences of that, clearly the American people understand immunization is important.
31:17So I think you can see the administration responding to the American people's awareness that folks should be vaccinated.
31:23Margaret Brennan:But we looked at the vaccination rates, which have plummeted. There is not a single county or parish in Louisiana where kindergarten rates meet herd immunity protection levels for measles, meaning it could still be transmitted. Why do you think that is happening, particularly in red states like yours? Well, as Kennedy says, it's not his fault this predated him, even though he had been working on the issue. Yeah. So so leaving that aside, we can look back two things. One, people have not seen that illness. They've not seen illnesses. So if you've not been exposed to something, sometimes it's a little bit harder to imagine that it can occur to you.
32:02If you've never had somebody who's had a child who's deeply mentally retarded because the mama was exposed to a disease while the child was in utero, you may not be able to relate to it. What we're going to find, though, is that people see these terrible events. When they see children die, a woman abort, perhaps a child unfortunately born mentally retarded, then they will have greater understanding. Facts can be a tough teacher, but they do teach.
32:32Margaret Brennan:Do you see Secretary Kennedy learning from those facts? Is he open to those facts? He and I have had multiple conversations, text messages going back and forth and emails, And he seems pretty dug in on his positions. And whatever you bring to the table, for some reason, is not adequate. So I don't see him changing his mind. Do you think he's going to still be here after you leave in January? He serves at the president's pleasure. And so I can't answer that. You've called forward some of these former CDC officials to share with you what's happening inside public health. Secretary of County went on television and made false claims about the MMR vaccine, even claiming there were fetal parts in it.
33:13Margaret Brennan:You had CDC officials saying the secretary is out there in the middle of a measles epidemic telling people false information. Why isn't that disqualifying for the job? Well, first, he's already in the job. And so, again, he serves as the president's pleasure. And you think the president is now aware that this is a problem? The polling, just what I read in the paper, the White House has seen polling that shows the American people rightly understand that immunization is important. And they see these measles outbreaks, and they understand that the American people, whoa, we're not getting immunized, and now we have children dying from measles.
33:55We have people in the hospital because of measles. We have schools that can't open because of measles. And so the administration clearly has gotten off the anti-vaccine message into something more positive. By the way, let's give the secretary credit. He is very much into ultra processed foods. If that's where he stayed, our country would be really much better off. But the concept that immunizations somehow are bad has been clearly disproven by life experience. Because what's happening is people getting sick, in some cases dying. And the administration clearly has moved away from that.
34:33Margaret Brennan:Well, there's no Senate confirmed Surgeon General, no Senate confirmed CDC director. There hasn't been for nine months now. No Senate confirmed FDA chief. 13 of the 27 NIH centers are currently run by acting directors. Is this a problem? Is this something you want to move through by the time you leave? Clearly, it is a problem, if you will, that will reflect a wider problem at HHS. That just goes without saying. Lack of stability is a problem. But there are people nominated for some of these positions. We will process them in this committee, the committee I'm chair of, the help committee. We're in the help committee room.
35:12As soon as we get their paperwork. That's something we just have to have. There's a process you go through. But I've met with the nominee for the Surgeon General. And I met with the nominee for CDC director. And very favorably impressed. And so I imagine they will, I can't speak for everybody, but I imagine they will be approved. And so progress is being made.
35:32Margaret Brennan:Well, I mean, the current CDC autism and vaccines page has a heading that says vaccines do not cause autism very clearly. But there's an asterisk next to it. And it says it's up there due to an agreement with you, the chair of the committee. Do you think there will be strong oversight after January? Do statements like that disappear? I cannot tell you that it's going to disappear. Excuse me. I can tell you that that broke an agreement that I had with the secretary, that that was not supposed to happen. So once you lose trust in somebody, you're not quite sure what to trust going forward. In fact, you don't trust anything.
36:11It should go away because the evidence is that that is not the case. That is a prejudice being brought. And by the way, if you build public health upon a foundation of lies, then you're going to have the absence of adequate public health. You need to build everything in life on truth. I go back to being a doctor. You've got to search for the truth and use the truth for your solutions. That sounds kind of, oh, my gosh. No, that's the only way you make the correct diagnosis and the correct, this is not truth. And there'll be a consequence of it. And that consequence, unfortunately, will be borne by those who actually are influenced by it.
36:52I will say, except for news anchors, very few people read the CDC website. And so I'm not sure how much influence that has, how much negative influence that has.
37:02Margaret Brennan:But the message is from the president of the United States' own social media account. Oh, I get that. He linked the MMR vaccine and Tylenol to autism. I totally get that. And that's wrong. Isn't there damage that's done? Well, again, people have sensory overload. So I'm not sure how much that does. But that's false. It is wrong. And if you build a position based upon lies, upon falsehoods, that position cannot stand. I am a doctor searching for truth, both for the diagnosis of the problem and how do you cure it. In this case, autism is, oh my gosh, doesn't our heart go out for those parents who have autism?
37:39But putting them on a guilt trip because they gave their child a Tylenol or they took Tylenol when they were pregnant is not the answer. You don't make that mom guilty. What you do is you invest those resources into finding the true answer.
37:52Margaret Brennan:You said that Secretary Kennedy broke promises to you. It's pretty clear. Do you think he just made those promises to win your vote, that it was just political expediency? Easy to surmise. You hate the question of whether you regret your vote. Can you explain why you said yes? Bobby Kennedy was going to have the ear of the president. The president seems to be fascinated with the Kennedys. So either he was going to be in a position where there are guardrails, and I did have commitments made as to kind of guardrails, or he was going to be appointed White House health czar, in which case he would have the president's ear without the guardrails.
38:37Now, I had to make a decision. He's going to have the president's ear. Is it going to be with some sort of guardrails where there'd be a commitment to meet on a quarterly basis in which there could be regular communication, in which there would be kind of an agreement that I would have, you know, obviously as a chair, I have some role in terms of the people who assist him, or would he be an unappointed, excuse me, a non-Senate confirmed health care czar? That's kind of my choice. And I chose, you can criticize it, but I chose to have the one with the guardrails.
39:06Margaret Brennan:Do you think you reined him in? The commitment. It would have been worse? I don't, well, that is something that you cannot know. We can't go back in time and say, White House are. But we do know the president is very influenced by Bobby Kennedy. But you don't think he should be in that job? At this point, the commitments that were made to me have been violated. When commitments are made, trust is destroyed. It's difficult to have effectiveness. By the way, I once read trust is the coin of the realm. If you lose trust, you lose everything here. And by the way, the ability to work with others is essential for our government to function.
39:48Essential.
39:48Margaret Brennan:The head of the political action group, Make America Healthy Again, or Maha, says they poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into your primary race. Do you think it made a discernible difference? To beat me, I had a governor, a state legislature, a president, cabinet officials, and members of Congress all coming at me. And they obviously succeeded. But we used to have an open primary in which 1.2 million people could vote for or against me, and they closed it to 400 ,000, trying to distill it down to those who are least likely to vote for me. And among those people, the critical issue is, who did the president endorse?
40:25He endorsed somebody different.
40:27Margaret Brennan:He openly encouraged a primary challenger. Absolutely. And we know why. I voted to uphold the Constitution. The president was offended by that. But that said, it took all that effort in order to beat me. So in one way, I'm complimented. Maha, they just supported my state's economy. Because the real issue is, who did the president endorse? The advocacy group Maha Action touted the win as the Maha movement's taking its first scalp by defeating you. Yeah, that's a press release they're going to put out to try and raise money. It was a president's endorsement period, end of story. Secretary Kennedy testified last year that he is complying with all the agreements he made with Senator Cassidy.
41:13Margaret Brennan:We did reach out to HHS to confirm that the secretary still believes that, but we did not hear back. We have requested an interview with the secretary for this broadcast, and we will continue to do so. Our full conversation with Senator Cassidy can be viewed on our website and our YouTube channel. We'll be right back.
41:35At DSW, we ask the important questions like, what shoes are you going to wear? Whether you're prepping for wedding season, festival season, or just planning the ultimate vacay, the right shoes can make or break an RSVP. So own the moment. You've got big plans and we've got just the shoes. At the perfect price, of course. Get ready to get ready with Designer Shoe Warehouse. Head to your DSW store or DSW.com today and let us surprise you.
42:03Margaret Brennan:The Supreme Court is on the verge of wrapping up this session for some analysis on last week's key decisions. And a look ahead to these last few cases, we turn to chief legal correspondent Jan Crawford. Jan, it's always the hardest ones at the end. We know the Supreme Court ruled the president or the DHS secretary can decide, the courts cannot, on the right to cancel temporary humanitarian protections or TPS designations for Haitians and Syrians. That was the decision, but it had bipartisan outcry because part of the impact on the economy. Should we expect everyone here on TPS to be expelled sometime soon?
42:42No. I mean, that will take some time. They're going to lose their legal status, work permits. But there will be some process as this kind of unfolds because they will now be subject to deportation. But advocates say that they could have other grounds for staying in this country, some of the people. And so it really will have to be done more on a case by case basis. Now, this was just one of two of the big immigration wins for the president last week. And in this case, it actually could go beyond the Haitians and the Syrians, some 350 ,000 who now are subject to deportation. President Trump is wanting to end or will be ending now 13 of the 17 countries that currently have temporary protected status for people from those countries.
43:26So we're talking upwards of 1.5 million people who now could be subject to deportation.
43:32Margaret Brennan:So on this particular ruling, the lawyers for the Haitian immigrants argued the administration's decision to revoke TPS. And specifically, the president's own language was racially based and therefore in violation of equal protection. I just want to read a few of the things he said. The president said Haitian immigration is like a death wish for the country. They probably have AIDS. He falsely claimed they're eating cats and dogs. You remember that from the presidential race. And he described Haiti with a word that I can't say on this network. Why did the court look at that and say this is not racial animus?
44:08Because of the sweep of the president's efforts to end these TPS designations for 13 of 17 countries. Right. And, you know, Trump wants to end almost all of them. So they're not just singling out Haiti. So they had a race neutral reason. And the court said that that was sufficient.
44:26Margaret Brennan:So among the other decisions, asylum, Stephen Miller, the architect of a lot of these policies, stood on the White House lawn and says America's doors are fully closed to asylum seekers. Yeah, I mean, no, not quite. I mean, it certainly could be severely restrictive. But this case was about a program that started under the Obama administration and President Trump expanded. It's not even an operation right now. It's called metering, and it allows agents when there's a lot of people trying to come into the country at one time, it's just overcrowded to stand at the border and turn people back. Well, that conflicts with federal immigration law.
45:02What does that mean for federal immigration law? Because you have to be physically present or have arrived in the country to apply for asylum or to seek admission. And so this case turned on what did the statute say? What does it mean to have arrived in the country? And the Supreme Court said arrived in means you're in the country on U.S. soil, not standing on the front yard, you know, front yard of the country. And I think if you look at both of these immigration cases, they both turn on what Congress said. Temporary protected status. Congress created that in 1990. And it says courts have no role in reviewing the president's determinations.
45:39So that's what the court ruled. But Congress can change these laws. And if you don't like it, they can change them. And that, I think, is a real theme that we're seeing from the Supreme Court. It's reinforcing the idea that elections have consequences. And who you vote for, whether in Congress or for the White House, that matters.
45:57Margaret Brennan:And if they can actually legislate very quick decisions, transgender, birthright, how are these going to go? Well, I think it's going to be a mixed bag for the president. He'll lose birthright, but he may get a win on another firing executive officers. All right. We'll be back in a moment. I'm Margaret Brennan and this has been Face the Nation. The senior executive producer of Face the Nation is Mary Hager Laird. The executive producer is Anne Hsu. This broadcast was directed by Shelley Schwartz. Face the Nation originates from CBS News in Washington. For more Face the Nation, we're online at facethenation.com and on YouTube.
46:35Margaret Brennan:Face the Nation is also rebroadcast on our CBS News 24-7 streaming network at 1230 on Sundays. It's available through our Paramount Plus app. There's a lot going on right now. Mounting economic inequality, threats to democracy, environmental disaster, the sour stench of chaos in the air. I'm Brooke Gladstone, host of WNYC's On the Media. want to understand the reasons and the meanings of the narratives that led us here, and maybe how to head them off at the pass? That's on the media's specialty. Take a listen wherever you get your podcasts.
From the publisher
This week on Face the Nation, the fragile detente between the US and Iran is disrupted and tensions over the war with Iran explode between President Trump and the Republican Senator he worked to defeat.
Following a Capitol Hill shouting match between President Trump and Louisiana Republican Bill Cassidy over the Senator's vote against the war with Iran, we spoke exclusively with Cassidy about that exchange, his relationship with the President and his thoughts on the administration's health policy agenda as Cassidy wraps up his Senate career.
We also speak to Virginia Senator Tim Kaine about the shift of the Democratic party to the left and check in on all the other news of the week.
Finally, the Supreme Court is on the verge of wrapping up this session, for some analysis on last week's key decisions and a look ahead to those last few cases, we turn to chief legal correspondent Jan Crawford.
