In short
The episode centers on a Hollywood “can’t-lose” test for whether a movie is good or bad: Harry Cohn’s claim that if “my fanny squirms, it’s bad; if my fanny doesn’t squirm, it’s good.” Dana Stevens and host Michael Phillips discuss whether physical reactions (fidgeting, sighs, checking a watch, gasps, tears, laughs) can be trusted as indicators of a film’s success—especially in modern viewing conditions shaped by streaming and distractions.
Guest backgrounds
Dana Stevens is a film critic for Slate (and previously a long-time anchor on Slate’s Culture Gabfest). She’s known for close attention to film craft and audience experience.
Key claims
Cohn’s dictum is “primal” but not definitive; squirming can reflect pacing, personal state, or psychological disengagement. Streaming changes the “contract” between creators and viewers by rewarding continued consumption, not finishing.
Notable examples
Stevens cites her reactions to Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer (squirming tied to pacing) versus The Odyssey (feeling “nailed to my seat”); she also discusses audience payoff at The Odyssey’s ending (suitors’ murders) and her trust in laughs/gasps over tears.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Movie Mogul Posterior Test
0:45 to 0:58
Discussion about the anecdote from Harry Cohn and its implications.
“When a brand is willing to show you exactly how your dog's food is made, it says a lot about the care, quality, and standards behind every meal they produce.”
The Movie Mogul Posterior Test
1:04 to 2:29
Discussion about the anecdote from Harry Cohn and its implications.
“Amazon Health AI presents Painful Thoughts.”
The Movie Mogul Posterior Test
3:25 to 6:22
Discussion about the anecdote from Harry Cohn and its implications.
“Each week on The Movie Racket, we take a little nugget of Hollywood or filmmaking wisdom, whether it's actually wise or not.”
Physical Reactions to Movies
6:22 to 10:42
Exploring how physical reactions influence our perception of films.
“Well, we'll get to that and we'll get to what Dana and I learned about each other's physical responses to movies that may or may not be working for us.”
The Balance of Engagement and Distraction
10:42 to 14:00
Debate on how modern distractions affect movie watching experiences.
“Would Harry Cohn even remotely recognize the lurches we've been through lately as audience members just in terms of what distracts us, what's probably still in our hands on or off as we watch something at home for sure?”
The Physical Symptoms of Movie Engagement
14:00 to 16:50
Explore how physical responses reflect engagement levels during films.
“and screaming out of the theaters and maybe for a certain kind of viewer that that's true.”
Psychological Responses to Dull Films
16:50 to 19:12
Discuss the mental processes triggered by movies that fail to engage.
“And I think we can, I don't know if Harry Cohn would agree with this because he just had his one way of determining the success of a film.”
Critics vs. Spectators: Different Perspectives
19:12 to 21:18
Examine the contrasting mindsets of critics and average viewers in film experiences.
“Do you make an alternate movie in your mind?”
Critics vs. Spectators: Different Perspectives
21:23 to 22:49
Examine the contrasting mindsets of critics and average viewers in film experiences.
“Yeah, but I'm not itching to go downtown and tell a receptionist I'm here to talk about my downtown.”
Critics vs. Spectators: Different Perspectives
22:53 to 23:40
Examine the contrasting mindsets of critics and average viewers in film experiences.
“What you said earlier made me think of what Jean Kerr, the wife of Walter Kerr, the New York Times critic, a long time.”
Show all 20 chapters
The Changing Landscape of Film and TV
25:48 to 28:00
Analyze how streaming services influence audience engagement and content consumption.
“So again, there's just, there's something going on.”
The Legacy of B-Pictures and Studio Strategies
28:00 to 29:30
Explore the evolution of film studios and the significance of medium-budget films.
“people want, and whether it's simply just the size of some of the images or sequences.”
Audience Reactions and Critical Perspectives
29:30 to 31:04
Discuss the importance of audience reactions when viewing films and the role of critics.
“You know, I once knew a man who kept his hat on until he was completely undressed.”
The Impact of Physical Reactions to Movies
31:04 to 33:31
Examining how physical reactions influence film perception and critical reviews.
“And the big action adventure and the stuff that people come to far less prestigious movies to see.”
Trusting Emotional Responses to Film
33:31 to 35:36
A conversation on the reliability of emotional responses to films, particularly laughter and tears.
“and have thoughts about it, who can just physiologically respond to the movie in real time.”
The Ritual of Preparing for a Screening
35:36 to 37:55
Insights into personal rituals film critics use to prepare for screenings and engage with films.
“dog is a little bit of an exception, because that's so surefire, right?”
Harry Cohn's Influence on Hollywood
37:55 to 41:22
Exploring Harry Cohn's notorious legacy and his impact on Hollywood filmmaking practices.
“I'm going to enter into this common shared psychic space with this work of art and try to engage on its own terms.”
Fun Facts About Film History
41:22 to 42:00
Interesting anecdotes about Harry Cohn and Herman Mankiewicz's contributions to cinema.
“Somehow I'm glad that Harry Cohn's keister is kind of part of Hollywood lore and is kind of in the Hollywood, you know, unofficial rules for Hollywood success.”
Exploring the Legacy of Mankiewicz and The Wizard of Oz
42:00 to 45:58
Learn about the contributions of Herman Mankiewicz to 'The Wizard of Oz' and the impact of classic films.
“He never asked a second favor when he's been refused the first.”
Dana Stevens on Film Criticism and Buster Keaton
45:58 to 49:41
Dana reflects on her experience with the Slate Culture Gab Fest and her ongoing passion for film.
“The heavenly blisses of his kisses fill me with ecstasy.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Michael Phillips:This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human. Think about it. When it comes to your own food, you can walk into a restaurant, see what's being made, and know exactly what you're getting. But with dog food, most brands keep that completely hidden. Just Food for Dogs does the opposite. They've built their entire brand around open kitchens. You can actually walk in and watch them prepare your dog's meals with real human-grade ingredients like chicken, beef, carrots, and peas. cooked right there in front of you. No mystery, no behind-the-scenes you're not allowed to see. That kind of transparency is rare in the pet food world, and it's a big reason they've become the number one vet-recommended fresh dog food, earning trust from pet parents who want to feel confident in what they're feeding.
0:47Michael Phillips:When a brand is willing to show you exactly how your dog's food is made, it says a lot about the care, quality, and standards behind every meal they produce. Nothing to hide, everything to love. Go to JustFoodForDogs.com and get 50 % off your first order.
1:28to start planning your next vacation. That's visitusvi.com. USVI, naturally in rhythm.
1:35Michael Phillips:Amazon Health AI presents Painful Thoughts. Why did I search the internet for answers to my cold sore problem? Now I'm stuck down a rabbit hole filled with images of alarmingly graphic sores in various stages of ooze. I can clear my search history, but I can never unsee that. Don't go down the rabbit hole. Amazon Health AI gets you the right care fast. Health care just got less painful. Some people like working twice as hard just to stay right where they are. And in Ohio, we really don't get it. Because to us, owning a home in your 30s, working in tech without the traffic, and still being able to make it to your kid's soccer game sounds pretty good.
2:23Michael Phillips:In fact, Ohio is the second most affordable state to buy a home. Your move. Learn more at yourmoveohio.com. Film Spotting is presented by Regal Unlimited, the all-you-can-watch movie subscription pass that pays for itself in just two visits. See any standard 2D movie anytime with no blackout dates or restrictions. Sign up now on the Regal app or at the link in our description and use code FILMSPOT26 to receive 15 % off.
3:00Michael Phillips:A star is born tonight, and with it comes a new love. I'm going Hollywood. This is The Movie Racket. I'm Michael Phillips, and this week's guest, Dana Stevens of Slate, a tremendously good critic who has graced many a film spotting episode and the occasional live film spotting show. Each week on The Movie Racket, we take a little nugget of Hollywood or filmmaking wisdom, whether it's actually wise or not. It's an unofficial movie law, somebody's rule of successful creative endeavor, somebody's credo or a secret of filmmaking success. and we dig in and find what we can find. This week, it's the movie mogul posterior test.
3:49Michael Phillips:This episode's can't lose law of motion pictures comes from a real life paragon of old Hollywood nastiness. And the movies have come up with plenty of fictional variations on that very same character type. What did they have to go and make pictures talk for? Things were going along fine. You couldn't stop making money. even if you turned out a good picture you made man i built the studio i i with my brain and my hand i ripped it out of the world with my brains and my hands and who are you i could take you through it step by step explain why your story stinks but i won't insult your intelligence well all right first of all this is a wrestling picture the audience wants to see action adventure wrestling and plenty of it.
4:39Michael Phillips:They don't want to see a guy wrestling with his soul. Well, all right, a little bit for the critics. But you make it the carrot that wags the dog. Too much of it they head for the exits. I don't blame them. There's plenty of poetry right inside that ring, think. Look at hell ten feet square. Blood, sweat, and canvas. Blood, sweat, and canvas. These are big movies, think, about big men. In tights! Three fictional heads of movie studios there. Gregory Ratoff from the 1932 comedy Once in a Lifetime, Rod Steiger in the 1955 drama The Big Knife, and Michael Lerner as Jack Lipnick, head of Capital Pictures in the 1991 Coen Brothers film Barton Fink.
5:16Michael Phillips:Now, back to reality. One day, sometime in the late 1930s, in the executive lunchroom at Columbia Pictures, the head of the studio, Harry Cohn, declared his own surefire way to distinguish a hit from a flop. Luckily, somebody was seated at the table who shouldn't have been there. In fact, was forbidden from joining anyone in the executive commissary, especially Harry Cohn. But there he was, the legendary screenwriter Herman J. Mankiewicz, later of Citizen Kane fame. He had recently been hired on as a Columbia Pictures studio writer. Somebody else at that table brought up a movie that apparently played like gangbusters with a paying audience the other night.
6:00Michael Phillips:And this news set Cohn off. He hated that picture. Not a Columbia release. He just hated it. He had seen it alone in his screening room. And then he settled the matter by saying this, according to Mankiewicz. I have a foolproof device for judging whether a picture is good or bad, Cohen said. If my fanny squirms, it's bad. If my fanny doesn't squirm, it's good. What did Mankiewicz say in reply? Well, we'll get to that and we'll get to what Dana and I learned about each other's physical responses to movies that may or may not be working for us. You probably have your own. We all do, whether it's a case of restless fanny syndrome or some other indicator.
6:43Michael Phillips:So welcome to the Movie Racket. Let's go.
6:53Michael Phillips:Dana, thanks for coming along today. It's such a pleasure. Can I just say I love the premise of the show? And now whenever I read anything about film history, I'm going to be looking for quotes for you to base a future movie bracket on. Or any sort of like imperious, idealistic, or completely arrogant filmmaking principle or belief or anything, send it my way. Yes, cryptic statements like the one that we'll be dealing with today. So by the time Herman J. Mankiewicz was in the employ of Harry Cohn at Columbia Pictures, Mankiewicz had already developed this reputation, obviously, as a very difficult alcoholic employee in many other studios.
7:34Michael Phillips:And they knew it was going to be trouble, but they also knew he was a big talent. So Harry Cohen and Columbia hires Mankiewicz. And one of the executives under Cohen, William Pearlberg, thought, well, the least we should do is ban Mankiewicz from the executive dining room so we can kind of avoid some of the trouble we might be having if he has too many at lunch. Okay, so one day Mankiewicz gets into the dining room sort of, I don't know, by accident or sort of does a end run around the people, you know, trying to keep him out. And he ends up sitting at a table with Cohen and Cohen starts the conversation with, you know, last night I saw the lousiest picture I've seen in years.
8:16Michael Phillips:And after mentioning the title, This is according to a report I read on, I think, IMDb, so grain of salt. But he mentions the title, and one producer says, you know, I saw that film with an audience, and they loved it. And then he says, maybe, Perry, you should see it with an audience. You might have a different reaction. Cohen says, that doesn't make any difference. When I'm alone in a projection room, I have a foolproof device for judging whether or not a picture is good or bad. If my fanny squirms, it's bad. If my fanny doesn't squirm, it's good. It's as simple as that. And then there's this sort of like pause because nobody really knows what to say about that.
8:55Michael Phillips:And then Mankiewicz sort of busts in and says, you know, imagine the whole world wired to Harry Cohn's ass. And then, you know, the anecdote was born and Hollywood law was unofficial. Hollywood rule for success was born and Mankiewicz was out of a job and apparently in about 10 minutes. I mean, he got fired almost instantly by Cohn. Now, is that anecdote, Dana, do you think there's anything other than just sort of an amusing example of one mogul's bedrock belief in his own hiney telling him what's going to work and what isn't? Or is there some truth in sort of this idea like a physical reaction telling you what you're thinking maybe even before you're thinking it?
9:38Well, I think your answer is in the fact that I chose this anecdote out of a menu of three that you offered me to talk about in our conversation. That's right. Because I thought it was the richest of the three of them, and they were all good. So yeah, I think what's going on here, both in Cone's statement, his epigram, and in Mankiewicz's response, is something that continues to be a lively question for movie viewers. I mean, I think this is such an illustrative anecdote, not just because of what Harry Cone says, but because of Mankiewicz's response to it. You know, I feel like the whole question is in that dialectic, right?
10:10Like, is the world wired to Harry Cone's ass or whatever the 21st century equivalent is? and we should get into that? Or is that statement something to be punctured and made fun of? And it almost seems like what makes for a successful film is like the balance in between those two things, right? I mean, Harry Cohn, without question, had a very visceral sense of what audiences would respond to, right? But it's also the case that if that isn't constantly being reinvented and questioned and poked fun at by a mind like Mankiewicz's, then nobody's ass is staying in the seats because movies aren't changing and growing.
10:43Michael Phillips:Would Harry Cohn even remotely recognize the lurches we've been through lately as audience members just in terms of what distracts us, what's probably still in our hands on or off as we watch something at home for sure? And at the movies, half the time, we're surrounded by people who are digitally and neurologically distracted by looking at a different screen. if there's a scene in a movie that throws them out of it. Yeah, I don't know if we can even trust our physical reactions, our fidgetiness anymore, because aren't we in sort of a constant state of potential fidgetiness just with what's coming at us?
11:21Michael Phillips:I don't know. Yeah, that's a huge question. What is the modern day fanny squirm, right? I mean, they're still just good old fashioned, I can't sit still anymore. But like you say, it's accompanied by all of these potential digital distractions, the fact that other people are distracting us with their glowing screens within the theater, at least when Harry Cohn's ass squirmed, nobody had to know about it except Harry Cohn, right? But I have to say that it is just so personal. I mean, I squirmed like crazy through Oppenheimer. I found that movie to be so oddly paced, beautiful in stretches, you know, full of kind of bravura filmmaking moments.
11:55But I did not understand why the entire black and white section about Robert Downey Jr., you know, decades after the initial action was sort of tacked on in the way it was. It felt to me like a two-hour movie that had another 45-minute movie stuck at the end of it. And there was a great deal of squirming that I pinned not on the length of the movie, but on its pacing. Whereas The Odyssey, for whatever reason, it may partly be my attachment to the source material in a sense that I knew where the story was going because of knowing that poem, I definitely felt nailed to my seat. Even at moments when, you know, the dialogue could be clunky in a very Nolan-esque way or whatever.
12:30I mean, there I felt a flow and the feeling that I wanted to continue being in the theater. And for whatever reason in Oppenheimer, there wasn't that sense. So I just don't think there is a wisdom. There's a kind of primal Yoda-like wisdom to Harry Cohn's dictum, but I don't think it can be connected to any external factors about the movie. Like, is it long or short? Is it suspenseful or not suspenseful? I mean, think of all the art films that try to make you squirm. You know, movies that are about duration in some way and that are testing the audience's patience and attention.
13:04Michael Phillips:This is like the slow cinema genre, as it's been described, you know, the Bella Tars work like Satan Tango or things like that. Right. I'm thinking of that or even of Chantal Ackerman's 1800K Bruxelles. I can never remember the whole title of it, but the, you know, the Chantal Ackerman masterpiece that hit the top of the BFI Sight and Sound best list of movies of all time, right? On the last list. This is Jean Dielman, yeah, yeah.
13:35Jean Dielman, that's right. I never know whether the address or the woman's name comes first. I just think of her peeling potatoes. That's my image for the movie. Anyway, that is obviously a movie that is deliberately testing the audience's patience and what's going to happen next is less about what's on screen than what's within us, right? Like, what are you going to do next? It's almost calling out the audience's attention span, which is the kind of thing that in Harry Cohn language would send people running and screaming out of the theaters and maybe for a certain kind of viewer that that's true.
14:09But obviously, there are also watchers who very highly valorize that quality in a film, right? And that value having that as a kind of counterpoint to all the movies that are trying to excite us and keep us in our seats via suspense, which I'm sure as a longtime veteran of watching blockbusters, you agree with me. I mean, a movie can be packed with, quote, suspenseful action from beginning to end and still be utterly boring and have you squirming like crazy.
14:33Michael Phillips:In the spirit of Harry Cohn, when you are not engaged, do you have a physical symptom or do you get what? Well, what happens with you in a seat if you feel like I'm in for it here? Oh, man. I mean, part of this could depend on whether I'm writing on the movie or not, because if the movie is something that I'm going to review, I'm certainly not going to get up or walk around or leave. I'm always too afraid of missing even a minute of a movie, right? What if that's the funniest joke in a comedy or the turning point of a mystery or something like that? So at the most, it's going to be in-seat activity.
15:07I guess probably checking my watch. I'm actually wearing it today, but I have a special watch for movie screenings that has that Indiglo feature. It's a Timex, and if you press a button, the whole watch screen lights up. Hold on. Let me see it.
15:19Michael Phillips:Let me see it. Let me see it. I mean, you can't really see the lighting thing right now because I'm in daylight, but you've seen that feature before. Super cool watch, though. Super cool watch. Well, I mean, it works really well for movie screenings because I will check my watch and I will give myself the excuse that it's a professional watch checking and that I'm not just thinking about how long until I could go get dinner, but actually thinking about the pacing of the movie. And that is, in fact, why I wear it into screenings most of the time, so that you can make note of sort of unusual pacing in a movie.
15:47Let's say the protagonist of a movie doesn't enter until about half an hour in, as is the case with Nolan's The Odyssey, right? Except in flashbacks, you don't see Odysseus until well into the movie. And that struck me as unusual. So I checked my watch, you know, not out of boredom, but to sort of be able to clock how long he took to introduce that protagonist. But yeah, in terms of physical tells, I'm probably trying to do like little isometric stretches in my seat that won't be seen so that at least I can get some benefit of muscle toning out of the long, pointless experience.
16:18Michael Phillips:I think when I'm not as engaged by a film as I'd like to be, that's when I start noticing in a press room, in a press screening situation, that's when I start to notice things like the performative heavy sigh of the reviewer who really wants more than just his neighbor to know that it's not working for him. Don't love that. Don't love pen lights and notebooks. I don't love the pen light. I don't like that. Agree. Those are forms of pollution, visual and auditory pollution of the screening room. And I think we can, I don't know if Harry Cohn would agree with this because he just had his one way of determining the success of a film.
16:59Michael Phillips:Is my fanny squirming bad film or am I sitting still without any movement in the butox? Then it's working. My latest Columbia Pictures film is working. But I think you can break it down between the physical realm of how you're feeling about something not working or working and the psychological one. And there is something that happens to me that goes way back to my theater days, where if something is not working in a way that's a little worse and more pronounced than usual, even if you like the people on the screen or you love that material or something is off with theater, I used to, in small spaces, especially if it was working in a way that was actually getting a little feeling, not just empathy for the actors, but like sort of a deeper kind of embarrassment and like pain, right as an audience member there was a space between the actors heads where I would sometimes find myself focusing in kind of a wormhole way where you're just trying to slip out of the thing for a while and that's when you start thinking about why you know why is this driving me nuts and why why am I not engaged it's not it's not enough to kind of just have the feeling right and I guess that's not my physical reaction but it's sort of like my yearning for some sort of understanding of what put me in this state.
18:19Michael Phillips:That's where I go in terms of the psychological realm. I don't know if you ever start thinking about life choices or anything during a routine mediocre film or not. Like what have I done that I'm spending my Monday night watching this horrible movie? I mean, with theater, there's something interesting about the fact that when you're feeling that personal cringe for the actors who are living in front of you, the awfulness of the play not working is obviously completely different, right? I mean, even if a movie is awful, you're not going to feel that same kind of live embarrassment for the performers that you would in a play.
18:54So you don't have to create that space, as you say, of looking in between their faces so that you don't have to sort of encounter them. But yeah, that's a great question. Where does your brain go? Where does your consciousness go when you're in a movie that isn't doing it for you that you're either spacing out on or you are somewhat embarrassed for the people making it? That's a good question. Do you just dissociate? Do you make an alternate movie in your mind? I mean, I think a lot of times I try not to do this in my criticism, because I think it's not a mark of great criticism, right? To essentially give studio notes on a movie as if you were looking at a draft of a script rather than a finished film.
19:28Michael Phillips:Right, the kind of movie it should have been. Yeah. But sure, I think in my mind during it, I'll think something like that. Like, why did they cast this guy? They should have switched these two roles. You know, I'll often think that. Like, they should have put this actor in this role and this one in this one. And you kind of want to go back to the drawing board and give studio notes. But I think that's not a sign of a great movie. I mean, if your mind has the time to go to that space, right, then the movie isn't doing something for you. I do still contest, though, the basic Cohen formula that, I mean, it's a very simple belief in what entertainment is, right?
20:01Be it movies or plays or at the concert or whatever. The idea that the ideal experience is one of just pure passive involvement of the spectator, right? That the time should just vanish and you should be utterly sucked up into this entertainment. Sure, that happens sometimes. you know there's some movies oh citizen kane is actually an example speaking of mankowitz right that sort of no matter where you fall into that movie right say you turned on the tv and it was halfway through citizen kane i mean how could you not sit through the rest of it right the way it really does sort of just compress time down to this this single experience
20:37Michael Phillips:Hello, Jedediah. Hello, Charlie. I didn't know we were speaking. Sure we're speaking, Jedediah. You're fired. Most dog food brands don't really want you seeing how their food is made. Just food for dogs is the opposite. They actually invite you in. You can walk into any of their kitchens and see real human-grade ingredients like chicken, beef, carrots, and peas being prepared right in front of you. It's real food made in real kitchens. Nothing is hidden behind labels. And that kind of transparency says a lot. Nothing to hide. Everything to love. Go to justfoodfordogs.com and get 50 % off your first order.
21:22Michael Phillips:Amazon Health AI presents Painful Thoughts. I can't stop scratching my downtown. Yeah, but I'm not itching to go downtown and tell a receptionist I'm here to talk about my downtown. Some things you'd rather type than say out loud. There's no question too embarrassing for Amazon Health AI. Chat your symptoms and get virtual care 24-7. Healthcare just got less painful. some people like working twice as hard just to stay right where they are and in ohio we really don't get it because to us owning a home in your 30s working in tech without the traffic and still being able to make it to your kids soccer game sounds pretty good in fact ohio is the second most affordable state to buy a home your move learn more at your move ohio.com
22:23Health care can feel complicated. That's why Optum uses technology to connect the people and processes that make health care easier, more affordable, and more effective. We're making it clearer for you to know exactly what your benefits cover. And to help you better manage your health, we're coordinating care between your doctors and your technology. We believe better, simpler health care is always possible. That's healthy optimism. That's Optum. Visit Optum.com to learn more.
22:54Michael Phillips:What you said earlier made me think of what Jean Kerr, the wife of Walter Kerr, the New York Times critic, a long time. Jean Kerr wrote Please Don't Need it today as the wife of a theater critic. She used to go to 18 years of opening nights. And she said, you know, there's a big difference between a critic and how they're watching and sort of engaging and just physically sort of dealing with a play. And I think a movie, too, by extension. And how the average person is. She said, the critic says, sitting there, when a play's not working, this is an extremely bad play. Now, why is that? And the spectator says, you know, this is an extremely bad play.
23:31Michael Phillips:Why was I born? So, you know, it's a different kind, it's a different reaction, you know. I mean, I don't know. Do you feel differently when you're holding the notebook? Do you react, you know, differently than when you're not? When you mentioned, yeah, when you mentioned Gene and Walter Kerr, and I was thinking about going with a non-critic to watch a movie as a critic, which I think both of us, I'm sure, have done many times, right? Bringing a date, bringing a friend. That's a difference in engagement right there. No matter how good or bad the movie is, you are actively engaging with it because you've got a notebook and a pen and you're trying to at least grab onto one fleeting scrap of dialogue or something you might use later in writing on it.
24:08Michael Phillips:Right. And maybe that does keep you from the existential despair of why was I born? Because you don't have to deal with that question the way that your date does. In regards to passivity and squirming and being able to sit through something, I was also thinking that obviously TV and streaming has completely changed that landscape. And as you say, the movies are still struggling with what to do with that, with the fact that people can now have these experiences at home where it doesn't matter how squirmy they get or even whether they finish a series, right? Right. Netflix doesn't care whether you finish the series.
Read the full transcript
24:39They just want you to stay on Netflix. It's essentially, you know, that's the passivity is that you're continuing to consume something on that platform, whether or not you remain nailed to whatever mediocre streaming series you first sat down to watch. So the industry now has a completely different relationship to capturing viewers attention. I mean, in large part because of just the monopolization of these huge companies, right, is that all they want you to do is turn on their platform and keep it on, which is a really depressing way to think about content consumption, as we now call it, because it's actually good for these series, these streaming series to be really padded out.
25:16You know, this was something that on my podcast, The Dearly Departed Slate Culture Gap Fest, we would talk about all the time when it came to TV to the point that I just got tired of making this point. But it was so frequently true, which was, why does this need to be this long? Oh, my God. The Netflix documentary, right? That's for some reason four hours long, although it could easily be a 90-minute, very good, you know, movie-length documentary. But in order for it to, you know, gather more eyeballs and have more viewing time and just sort of seem more like a full Netflix documentary, whatever that means, it needs to be padded out to four-hour length, right?
25:51So again, there's just, there's something going on. I mean, as William Goldman, the screenwriter, famously said, and maybe this could be a movie racket quote sometime nobody knows anything we're working on nobody knows anything yeah and nobody knows what audiences want and everything is a constant and always has been i would add i'm sure throughout the history of the medium everything has been this juggling of different things to try to figure out what audiences want um but i feel like we're at an unhealthy moment in that relationship between the creators you know the studios and the people that are consuming it because it doesn't seem like the same contract has to be signed, the same unwritten contract that, okay, I will pay you$20 and sit in a dark room and in exchange, you need to give me roughly two hours of something entertaining that makes it worth my time and worth my$20.
26:38Instead, it's all, not all, but to a large extent, been offloaded to this home space where you pay per month, not per experience, and all that company wants is to keep you paying per month. right so if all you do is watch half of an episode of a mediocre series that you're never going to finish but you don't cancel your netflix then in their mind you know they've succeeded at fulfilling their part of the contract so that does not seem like a recipe for creative work to
27:06Michael Phillips:continue to get no no yeah it's wild to me that if you just not the hammer on the odyssey over and over but the film everybody seems to be watching and writing about and arguing about which classicist or academic is more correct than either loving it or hating it right now. But Christopher Nolan is doing exactly what the industry as a whole thought they had to do in response to the threat of television in the early 50s. You know, go big, cinema scope, 3D gimmicks and an enormous screen, you know, in a wider, bigger process. And that's the only way to compete is that way. And Nolan, with a very, to me, an endlessly fascinating mixture of kind of a cool, thoughtful temperament married to P.T.
27:52Michael Phillips:Barnum squared, he's sort of figured it out. He's figured out how to make a three-hour movie that has a prestige epic, that has everything people want, and whether it's simply just the size of some of the images or sequences. And I do take heart from that you know I mean just like you know a lot of the movies that came out from the studio machines in the 50s were junky and not very good but then now and then you get a director who knew how to use the screen properly this bigger wider screen and I just hope some of it trickles down to like a more of a you know we've hammered I've hammered on this forever I know everybody has where did the medium budget picture go and you know the kind of medium modest whatever you know the kind that harry cohn would have put out i mean his dictum and when he was running columbia was i just need one good picture a year to kind of just for my reputation which he loved that he was known as kind of like the meanest crudest guy in hollywood but you know he loved the prestige too but he says look if i gotta play and he used the examples of like what i make the money on is the bread and butter stuff, Blondie.
29:05Michael Phillips:You know, Blondie Boston, Blackie. Yeah, B-pictures, right? B-pictures. I mean, that's how he came up, and that's where he made it. And then suddenly, in 1934, you got a B-picture that Clark Gable was loaned out, you know, sort of spitefully didn't want to do, and Claudette Colbert, whatever, that happened one night. Perhaps you're interested in how a man undresses. You know, there's a funny thing about that. Quite a study in psychology. No two men do it alike. You know, I once knew a man who kept his hat on until he was completely undressed. Yeah, now he made a picture. Years later, his sequel came out.
29:40Michael Phillips:He wore a toupee. Won every Oscar, huge success, almost an accidental bit of class right in his lap. Great. It's a lot of things we're talking about here, but I love what the Odyssey's doing for just getting people in. and I was paying attention to the audience more than I ever have at a film lately. I wasn't reviewing it. But I thought, it's working for this crowd. Now, why is that? Harry Cohn is basically, in that anecdote, was like blowing off what somebody told him about, hey, the audience loved it the other night. I hate it. And Cohn hated it. And he said, well, I don't need an audience to tell me what I like or I don't like.
30:20That's true. And another part of that anecdote is that Harry Cohn says, when I'm alone in the screening room, and then goes on to talk about squirming, right? But of course, I'm glad we got to this, because I think this is a huge question. How important is it to see something with an audience? To what degree is a critic when you can't see something with a big packed house as you ideally would want to? Can you project what that would be? I did see The Odyssey with a big audience, but it was largely an audience of critics. And I still have yet to see it a second time, which I really want to do for the movie itself, because it's so big and so much to take in.
30:50But also because I really want to see it with a bunch of paying customers. I mean, there was a fair amount of hooting and hollering and audible enjoyment even in the mainly press screening that I saw it in. But I really want to hear what that movie does to audiences because it's really got the body horror, right? And the big action adventure and the stuff that people come to far less prestigious movies to see. And I'm just very curious to hear how they react to that. For example, when the suitors get murdered at the end. Did you have a lot of hooping going on in your screening?
31:22Michael Phillips:Yeah. Yeah. Although I have to say that's when I could not, did not want to. I can't really learn how to turn the critical response off in my head. I thought that that to me was the inevitable cheapening of the myth itself because it's shot like Christopher Nolan suddenly discovered gaming. And I just don't like that. I I think that scene's satisfying on a level that I think helps people get through a three-hour movie because they know, they've been shown in the trailers and everything else, they know it's going to end with a triumphant bloodbath. And we're going to see exactly why Matt Damon makes a little sense in this part for once.
32:04Michael Phillips:To me, it was a little bit of a struggle for him with me just because there's so little. I mean, he's not going for rhetorical heights of flourish or anything in that performance, and it's all very naturalistic and under, because I don't know if Damon can do the other thing and that's not the movie for it. But at the end, he makes sense, you know, because he's a good physical presence on the screen. I don't know, did that scene work for you? I mean, it's funny. I saw the movie with my editor by my side, who I always love seeing movies with because, you know, he's one of the few people that I'll actually bounce ideas off afterward.
32:35If I'm with another critic, we're almost never, right? It's sort of the unwritten code that you don't really share too much because you're getting your thoughts together and you sort of want to save it for the page, right? Right. But my editor is going to be looking at that page. So we often walk out kind of breaking down what worked and what didn't. And one thing I said to him is that I thought the very ending, the last third of the movie or so, was the weakest part. But both of us agreed that the audience absolutely disagreed with that. And I think, in fact, the moment we were on the escalator leaving the multiplex, and I think the very moment after I said, yeah, you know, I really loved the first two thirds, but I thought the last act was a little predictable, the action was a little muddy, and the people in front of us who were not listening to us at all were saying, that ending was so awesome when he shot the dude through the neck.
33:19And I realized whatever my critical finicky feelings may be about The Last Third, that is the part that to the audience feels like a huge payoff. And that's part of why I do want to see it with people who don't have to put pen to paper and have thoughts about it, who can just physiologically respond to the movie in real time. Yeah.
33:37Michael Phillips:I kind of want to talk about things like physical reactions we all have to films. Not so much itchiness when we're bored or a lack of it when we're really engaged, but like what physical reaction can we actually trust when we're having it watching a film? Like, I don't know for myself, a laugh can be many things. If it actually gets a laugh out of you, to me, it's something that's actually harder to argue with. Like, yes, yes, you know, because it got that going from you. Tears work differently for me. I mean, things that make me cry are often in some of the worst films, you know? I mean, but it just hits certain things, you know?
34:20Michael Phillips:And I don't feel the same way about laughs. and they're both physical reactions, you know what I mean? I see. You mean you trust your laughs more than your tears? I trust my laughs more than my tears. And I mean, when Argos, the dog in the Odyssey, it's the one emotional moment that everybody can seem to agree on that didn't, that everybody sort of had that moment because it's actually remarkably restrained and quick, which I appreciate. And you don't need much when you have a dog that waited 20 years for your master to get home and then say sayonara. You know, I mean, that was actually very good.
34:54Michael Phillips:And I did feel like, wow. And then it's like, is that a good sign that it's the dog that always gets the tears? And were any of the human interactions tend not to in this film, for me anyway? A laugh is different for me. Do you trust one more than the other or what? Ah, I never thought of that. I mean, I will say, now I will pay attention to which one I trust more, but I think it's easier to get the tears, which is why maybe you feel that they're less trustworthy. right? Because it can happen, I mean, as everyone always says in an AT &T commercial, right? Or it could be something related to your life that has nothing to do with the movie.
35:27You know, maybe you recently lost your own dog. And so that moment completely gets you. But maybe it was, you know, way too rushed through for somebody who is just trying to depend on the story. I mean, I think a dog is a little bit of an exception, because that's so surefire, right? Basically, almost every viewer is going to have some sentimental association with a dog. But then there's other reactions, like I'm a big gasper in movies, which is somewhat embarrassing. If you're in a somewhat empty screening.
35:52Michael Phillips:I think it's asleep. Like with jump scares, right? Or with some, especially certain kinds of violence, like blunt force trauma. You know what I mean? Somebody falling out of a building or something. Anything, any kind of splat related, you know, body horror. So splurge as well as splat. Yeah, just those kind of like George Romero grows out effects, you know?
36:19those will get a gasp out of me that's almost a physiological response. I might even be cynical mentally and, you know, be thinking, well, that's that moment was so predictable or, you know, these special effects are terrible or whatever, but still the sound of the crunching bone in the, you know, karate movie or whatever is going to get me gasping. So, I mean, I think some of those things you can't really blame the movie for. You know what I mean? It might happen if you were watching a TikTok video of something happening that would make you gasp. I mean, it might be such an inwardly wired response that the filmmaker's sophistication or skill has nothing to do with it.
36:53I have a whole tradition. I've written about this before, where before I sit down for a screening that I am going to write about the movie, I do almost a little, it's not a prayer, but it's almost like a little ritual, you know, to try to focus my mind. I'll sort of get my pen and paper that I have ready and like touch my pen to my forehead and kind of think for a second, like, Let me just clear my mind and watch this movie as attentively as I can and not think about how I only have 24 hours to write something about it. How, you know, I've already seen another movie today and I would love to go home.
37:22And also even not bring in the baggage of, well, I've never liked a movie by this director or, you know, this is really not my favorite leading man or whatever. You know, to just try to watch it as a blank slate to whatever degree possible. Yeah. And I do think that, again, was not what Harry Cohn was suggesting. suggesting, but in the sense that he was talking about a successful movie keeping you locked in, you know, that is kind of what I aim for. And I feel like we all need to have our own version of that sort of ritual, whether you're sitting down to a movie or a play or even a TV series, you know, to have a moment of just sort of saying, right now my body and how it feels and how it responds is not the most important thing.
38:01I'm going to enter into this common shared psychic space with this work of art and try to engage on its own terms.
38:07Michael Phillips:Yeah, that's a good reminder. And it always kind of really ticks me off when I see someone reviewing for whatever it is, you know, for on assignment or just for their own sub stack or whatever, posting things on Blue Sky or Instagram or whatever, just sort of actually pre-announcing their loathing of the filmmaker, like, ugh, good luck, you know, and just sort of like trying to get a laugh out of it. It's like, it's five minutes to seven. You don't do that. You know, I mean, there are. Oh, you mean from the screening room, the person is posting? Yeah, that's bad form, bad form. Terrible form. And this is a minor issue, but it's like you have to meet these things halfway.
38:44Michael Phillips:You have to. And I always take heart what someone like, it's hard enough to kind of see past whatever is going on in your own life and just sort of park it, you know, park it outside and give it that minute or two. And that's why I, in a way, I just, I don't really like to talk much before the screening, you know, even if it's surrounded by friends. I just kind of want to just sort of see what's up. And now every three times a year, you are going to be surprised, three out of 150 or whatever it was at the peak viewing, where a director whose previous work maybe did not click for you, something is different with this one.
39:21Michael Phillips:It doesn't happen often. But you have to be in the state of readiness for it. And I take heart from when I hear those at Scorsese when he was president of the jury at Cannes. And he just said, you know, I mean, between the jet lag and five days in, I didn't know if I was looking at a masterpiece or a piece of shit. He actually said that. And, you know, if a guy like that is acknowledging that, you know, your physical state can change like that, depending on where you, you know, how much sleep you've had. if you just had too heavy a meal, all of it. You have to kind of, it's all part of this sort of physical reaction thing that I do find, you know, that's why I tell people with certain films that work on a certain rhythm that I really love, please, you know, yeah, if you have any interest in it, please see it.
40:06Michael Phillips:Don't watch it at 9 o 'clock after two glasses of wine. Don't. I mean, I just think that you're just asking for trouble, you know. It doesn't mean get all jacked up on espresso at 9.30 in the evening, but try to help the movie out just by helping your own state of mind out. And then you make your call in an honest way. So I don't know. Right. And that way, if you do squirm, you can't blame it on the movie. You have to remember that you yourself are bringing a particular state of mind to the experience. I know. I'd love to interview at least the ancestor of one of Harry Cohn's doctors just to see what kind of physical shape he was in when he said that.
40:41Michael Phillips:He's a guy that just had a basically squirmy ass or was he squirming constantly or What actually made him calm down? He died of a heart attack fairly young. 66. Yeah, well, I mean, I'm old enough now that that doesn't feel so very old. And yeah, he kind of drove himself. I think he definitely was a dude who drove himself very hard. Yeah, yeah. Well, you know, I don't want to say it's great to have paid tribute to Harry Cohn and his utter venality as a human being, it sounds like. But I like that this anecdote and this crazy incidence, you know, that is sort of secondhand reporting that somebody said, well, according to Herman Rehnquist, this is how it went down.
41:22Michael Phillips:Somehow I'm glad that Harry Cohn's keister is kind of part of Hollywood lore and is kind of in the Hollywood, you know, unofficial rules for Hollywood success. Yeah, his ass has gone down in history. I have two little factoids about each of them that I learned from just doing a brief bit of research before our conversation. So my Harry Cohn factoid that I didn't know is just that the Hollywood mogul character in The Godfather is based on Harry Cohn, which I did not realize, but very much kind of goes to the coarse cigar chomping vision that comes through from this anecdote we're talking about.
41:55Michael Phillips:Right. Just tell him he should ask me anything else. But this is one favor I can't give him. He never asked a second favor when he's been refused the first. Understood? You don't understand. Johnny Fontaine never gets that movie. that part is perfect for him it'll make him a big star i'm gonna run him out of the business and then my little mank tidbit which comes from al jean harmitz's great book uh the making of the wizard of oz one of my favorite books about the making of an individual movie is that well i mean as i'm sure you know the wizard of oz had countless passes from scripts from different people and one of those people was herman mankiewicz and it was mankiewicz's idea according to al jean harmitz to have the black and white in the kansas scenes and make the switch to color in the wizard of oz which is essentially the sort of spiritual core of The Wizard of Oz.
42:40And it's hard to imagine the movie without it. And apparently it was Mank's idea.
42:45Michael Phillips:I did not know that. It seems like such a crazy mismatch of temperament to have Herman Mankiewicz taking a pass at a screenplay adaptation of The Wizard of Oz. I think it's very likely that not very much of his dialogue made it in, right? It doesn't sound like Mankiewicz's dialogue and it's not really his style. but even if he just had the vision for that one switch, it's an absolutely brilliant contribution to the script. It could be apocryphal, but if it's in her book, I tend to believe it. Toto, I have a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore. Dana, for 18 years, you were an anchor, just a great, great, steady, vibrant voice of the Slate Culture Gab Fest.
43:27Michael Phillips:18 years. I'm so sorry that has gone away. I mean, I'm really bummed about that. Yeah, me too. I really, really miss the show. I still haven't even absorbed that we're done with it. It's only, I guess, a month since our last episode was released, but we've gotten such great listener response on it. And it makes me feel like, yeah, I mean, maybe it will be one of those one door opens and then another window, whatever that expression is, that something else professional will be coming along to take its place. But for the moment, yeah, that's a big hole in my life too. So thank you. But on a better note, did I just read that you had how many?
43:59Michael Phillips:1 ,400 people at a screening of Buster Keaton's The General tied into your excellent, excellent book on Buster Keaton. And that was out in Seattle, right? There was a screening of The General that just killed. Yeah, that was a nice surprise. It's four years now since my book, Cameraman, it's a book about Buster Keaton and his lifespan came out. And this wonderful theater, the Paramount Theater in Seattle, which is an old picture palace. It was built in 1928. You cannot imagine the level of just ornate, you know, little naked golden babies in the ceiling and red velvet curtains and the whole deal.
44:31They had had me out back when the book came out to host a Keaton screening. And I had such a good experience that I told them, if you ever want me to come back again, and it so happens that they have a summer silent movie series, or I guess a seasonal silent movie series. Every season they show a series of silent movies. And so they had me out for their summer season to introduce The General, which is always a fun Keaton movie to show, probably the most screened of his movies, but always, always kills. And they actually sold, I'm just so moved by this, 1 ,400 tickets on a weeknight for people to go and see a 100-year-old movie.
45:02So it was a very heartening evening as to the state of rep cinema around the country.
45:08Michael Phillips:I mean, not just a weeknight, but a Monday, which is like the weakest of all weeknights, you know, by most measurements. Fantastic. Yeah, it was glorious. There was a live organist. There was a live Foley artist who was doing things like, you know, shaking a box of Tic Tacs to get the sound of the train wheels. It was so, so fun, Michael. I love it. If the Paramount ever invites you to do anything, say yes right away. But you're continuing as Slate's film critic, as you should be. Yeah. People who miss the Gab Fest can still find me writing on film at Slate. And I'm cooking up an idea for a future book.
45:36So if that becomes anything, I'll be trumpeting it far and wide. But yeah, for now, I'm just a week to week movie critic as I have been for 20 years now. So still churning out the review minds.
45:48Michael Phillips:And I mean, one of the very best of the very best. So thank you for It's just giving us so much good stuff to read and to listen to, including, I hope, the last, you know, 45 minutes or so on this thing. So thanks. Thanks again for coming on. It was a pleasure. Oh, I'm just wild about Harry. And he's just wild about me. The heavenly blisses of his kisses fill me with ecstasy. After Dana and I talked, I realized that everything I love about her effortless seeming writing on film is inseparable from her conversational voice and actual conversation. What stuck with me and what Dana wrote about for Slate back in 2017 was her routine of settling into a screening, getting things in order internally before the film actually starts.
46:38Michael Phillips:This is what she wrote for Slate. When I get to a screening with a few minutes to spare before the film starts, I'll sometimes close my eyes, take a deep breath or two, and in some pre-verbal and staunchly atheistic form of prayer, ask for the blessing of the movie Gods, that is, of whoever or whatever it is that allows a group of strangers in a darkened room to collectively embark on the common dream that is a theatrically projected movie. That's what I wish, she wrote, for us all as viewers and reviewers this year, that we enter into each movie with a kind of renewed innocence, so that without abandoning our critical faculties, we leave a part of ourselves open to chance, fate, seduction, and surprise.
47:25Michael Phillips:I love that. As for Harry Cohn's ass, well, I mean, humans are humans. We all have our little tells. Cohn certainly did, and his came from a man who once said, I don't get ulcers, I give them. His came from a man who redecorated his office, just like Mussolini's, which he marveled at in person when Cohn graciously accepted an invitation from Mussolini to hang out in Rome in 1933. This was shortly after Il Duce saw and loved the pro-fascist Cohn-produced documentary, Mussolini Speaks. We don't all run movie studios, but we do all have are physical indicators when we're losing patience with a movie or just bored.
48:09Michael Phillips:On the other hand, my conversation with Dana reminded me of something a friend once told me about the best teacher she ever had. In class one day, everybody was discussing a play or a film or a book. I don't remember the particulars, but one student in this class just said, ah, it's boring, slow, dull. And there were nods of agreement in the room. And then the professor said, watch out for words like that, words like boring. Boring might just be a code word for a much more interesting reaction you're experiencing. You're responding to something that makes you bored, okay, or restless, yes. But maybe there's anger or serious frustration you're feeling, and that is worth looking into.
48:54Michael Phillips:You have to follow that to get to the real reasons why you're thinking and feeling what you're thinking and feeling. Or you can just follow Harry Cohn's method and listen to your glutes.
49:12Michael Phillips:The Movie Racket is produced by me, but mainly by Joe Dessau. Adam Kempinar and Sam Van Haugren executively produced The Movie Racket. Special thanks to Dana Stevens, who's writing on film you can find on slate.com, and whose Buster Keaton book, Cameraman, is widely available and just terrific, that's all. I dare you to email me at movieracket at filmspotting.net with your thoughts and whatever else you got. Thanks for listening. I'm Michael Phillips. This is a Film Spotting production.
49:55Michael Phillips:Think about it. When it comes to your own food, you can walk into a restaurant, see what's being made, and know exactly what you're getting. But with dog food, most brands keep that completely hidden. Just Food for Dogs does the opposite. They've built their entire brand around open kitchens. You can actually walk in and watch them prepare your dog's meals with real human-grade ingredients like chicken, beef, carrots, and peas cooked right there in front of you. No mystery, no behind-the-scenes you're not allowed to see. That kind of transparency is rare in the pet food world. And it's a big reason they've become the number one vet-recommended fresh dog food, earning trust from pet parents who want to feel confident in what they're feeding.
50:38Michael Phillips:When a brand is willing to show you exactly how your dog's food is made, it says a lot about the care, quality, and standards behind every meal they produce. Nothing to hide, everything to love. Go to JustFoodForDogs.com and get 50 % off your first order.
51:19to start planning your next vacation. That's visitusvi.com. USVI, naturally in rhythm.
51:26Michael Phillips:Some people use ChatGPT to answer questions. Others use it to get real work done. With ChatGPT work, you bring the goal, plus real inputs like briefs, notes, files, feedback, data, and project plans. It can help turn them into an analysis, tracker, deck outline, prototype, or workflow you can review and keep shaping. You stay in control, giving direction and choosing the final output. Put ChatGPT to work on your most ambitious ideas and projects. Get started at ChatGPT.com by selecting Work Mode. Available on Plus and Pro plans. There are exciting things happening at your local CVS. Shop new extra big deals with ExtraCare every two weeks.
52:05No coupon needed. Plus, get access to exclusive sale prices, personalized deals, and more as a member. ExtraCare is the way to save at CVS. Join for free, online, or in-store and start saving. Visit your local CVS store or cvs.com slash extra big deals for this week's deals.
From the publisher
What can your body tell you about a movie? According to legendary Columbia Pictures chief Harry Cohn, everything.
This week's Movie Racket explores Cohn's infamous rule for separating hits from flops. Joining Michael Phillips is Slate film critic Dana Stevens (Cameraman), who helps unpack what that deceptively simple dictum reveals about audiences, critics, attention spans, and streaming culture. Along the way, they cover The Odyssey, Jeanne Dielman, Citizen Kane, and whether laughter, tears, gasps, or simple restlessness can ever be trusted as measures of a film's success.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.




