1. Podcasts
  2. Fintech Stacks
  3. 🏆 Circle Goes to Washington and Wins. SoFi Puts a Ring on Kraken. Revolut Inches Toward a US Bank Badge.
Fintech Stacks

4 Sep 2026 · 21m · 7 chapters

Episode artwork

🏆 Circle Goes to Washington and Wins. SoFi Puts a Ring on Kraken. Revolut Inches Toward a US Bank Badge.

In short

A “turf war” over who controls the financial system’s underlying infrastructure—bank charters, payment rails, and stablecoin regulation—using Revolut, SoFi/Kraken, and Circle as case studies.

Guests

No specific guests are named in the transcript; it’s presented as a host plus a co-host/interviewer.

Guest backgrounds

Not applicable (no guest identities provided).

Key claims

Revolut is seeking a U.S. national bank charter (OCC conditional approval) to stop relying on partner banks; SoFi is integrating with Kraken via the SoFi Exchange Network to enable near-instant dollar settlement and to list SoFiUSD; Circle is pushing Congress to implement the “Genius Act” for stablecoins, but faces a 2027 threat from a Goldman-led consortium of 21 legacy banks building a competing dollar stablecoin.

Notable examples

Revolut Bank US; Kraken Prime liquidity; $247 settlement; USDC ~73.7B tokens; Circle testimony urging Genius Act implementation by Jan 2027; Goldman consortium “clone” stablecoin.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes.

Chapters

0:45

Revolut's Regulatory Journey

Discussion on Revolut's strategy and its efforts to secure a U.S. banking charter.

“And our mission today is to decode how these three distinct players are all basically racing toward the exact same finish line.”
3:28

The Conditional Approval Challenge

Exploring the implications of Revolut's conditional approval and the hurdles ahead.

“And we are actually seeing a parallel push from Klauna right now, too, with their application for a Utah industrial bank charter.”
6:19

SoFi's Integration with Crypto

Analyzing SoFi's banking foundation and its integration with Kraken for crypto transactions.

“And passing those inspections in American banking requires demonstrating that your internal risk management, your anti-money laundering protocols, and your capital reserves are absolutely bulletproof.”
12:07

Circle's Legislative Influence

Examining Circle's role in shaping federal law for stablecoins and its recent testimony.

“So we have a neobank trying to become a traditional bank and a traditional bank trying to build a bridge to the blockchain.”
14:00

The Geopolitical Stakes of Stablecoins

Learn about the implications of Circle's lobbying efforts for stablecoin regulation.

“He said Congress cannot determine which technologies will succeed.”
16:44

The Battle for Digital Currency Control

Explore the competing strategies of Circle, SoFi, and Revolut in the digital banking landscape.

“And you have to understand why the legacy banks won in so badly.”
18:37

The Psychological Impact of 24/7 Financial Systems

Consider the effects of continuous trading on market stability and human behavior.

“It fundamentally alters the human relationship with capital, which actually brings me to a final concept I really want to leave you with today.”
A man walking through an airport, asking his phone a question

Ask about this episode

Get the gist, explore an idea or ask about something said.

Claude

On Fintech Stacks, what are the key points of this episode?

Searching your listening

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Right now there are three companies basically trying to take over your wallet. Like one is a London app begging the U.S. government for permission just to exist on American soil. Right. Then you have a consumer bank that's, you know, secretly wiring its core infrastructure into a crypto casino. Which is wild. And the third is practically writing federal law right from the floor of Congress. So welcome to this deep dive into the invisible turf war for the global financial stack. It really is a turf war. It totally is. And we're looking at a massive stack of incredibly detailed industry analysis today, mainly from a recent fintech newsletter covering Revolut, SoFi and Circle.

0:43Three very different companies. Exactly. And our mission today is to decode how these three distinct players are all basically racing toward the exact same finish line. Yeah. They want to evolve from just being, you know, cool front end consumer apps into becoming the actual structural landlords of the financial system. Right. They want to own the plumbing. Okay, let's unpack this, starting with Revolut, because their strategy takes us to the absolute bedrock of traditional finance. It really does. Because, I mean, before you can rewrite the rules of money, you need a literal seat at the table.

1:14Right. And getting that seat in the United States is, well, it's arguably the hardest regulatory hurdle in global finance. I can imagine. Yeah. Just look at Revolut's trajectory. They were founded in London back in 2015, and they have grown into this absolute neobank behemoth practically everywhere in the world. Everywhere except the U.S. Exactly, except the U.S. And the U.S. is the singular market that dictates true global scale. So how have they been operating over here so far? Well, for years, fintechs like Revolut have operated under what is known as a banking as a service or boss model. model which essentially means like renting someone else's regulatory license correct precisely yeah yeah the boss set up the fintech app provides the slick user interface the marketing the customer acquisition stuff the user actually sees right but behind the scenes a traditional often super obscure regional bank is actually holding the deposits oh interesting yeah they're the ones running the compliance checks and interfacing with the federal reserve okay So every time you swipe your neon fintech debit card, this complex chain of API calls fires off to that partner bank just to approve the transaction.

2:26Which has to cause like major latency issues. Oh, absolutely. It introduces latency. It means you're splitting the revenue on swipe fees. And most importantly, it severely limits what the fintech can actually build. Because they're basically stuck playing by the partner bank's rule. Exactly. If your partner bank isn't comfortable with, say, offering personal loans or crypto trading, you simply cannot offer those products. You are entirely beholden to their risk appetite. Which makes sense. I mean, that structural ceiling is exactly why the recent news out of Washington is such a massive pivot point.

2:59It's huge. Yeah. So Revolut just secured conditional approval from the OCC, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, for a U.S. national bank charter. Which is no small feat. Right. And it makes it an early move toward launching what they're calling Revolut Bank US. Yeah. And their CEO, Nick Staronsky, is calling this an important first step. I mean, they're trying to cut out the middleman entirely, hold deposits directly and lend right off their own balance sheet. It is the ultimate structural upgrade. Yeah. And we are actually seeing a parallel push from Klauna right now, too, with their application for a Utah industrial bank charter.

3:38Wait, let's pause on that for a second because I've seen that mentioned before. And the Utah Industrial Bank Charter is this fascinating piece of financial engineering. It really is. Like, why are all these tech companies specifically flocking to Utah for this? Well, the Utah Industrial Loan Company, or ILC Charter, is essentially a regulatory cheat code for nontraditional financial firms. A cheat code? How so? So in the United States, if a regular corporation buys or owns a standard commercial bank, the parent company becomes a bank holding company. And that means the entire corporate entity falls under the intense scrutiny and capital requirements of the Federal Reserve.

4:14Which a tech company definitely does not want. Exactly. A tech company does not want the Fed rummaging through its core engineering budgets or its marketing spend. Right. So the ILC charter allows a commercial firm to own a bank and offer FDIC-insured deposits without the parent company being subjected to that suffocating Fed oversight. Oh, wow. So it basically isolates the banking activity from the rest of the tech business. Exactly. So whether it is an ILC charter like Klarna is going for or a direct OCC charter like Revolut is chasing, the core motivation is identical. They want that vertical integration.

4:53Bingo. You know, the way I visualize this whole dynamic, it's like imagine a Michelin starred chef who has spent a decade forced to rent out other people's ghost kitchens just to cook their food. I like that. Right. Like they have the loyal customers, they have this brilliant menu, but they constantly have to negotiate with the landlord over, you know, what time they can use the ovens or how much fridge space they're allowed to have. Yeah, that's exactly what B's is like. So getting this OCC approval, it's like they finally secured the city permits to break ground on their own custom flagship restaurant.

5:26They get to design the kitchen from the floorboards up, set their own hours and serve you, the customer, directly without some middleman taking a cut of the check. That is an excellent visualization. But and this is a big but we need to look incredibly closely at those permits. Right. What's fascinating here is that the word conditional carries immense regulatory weight. It's not a done deal. Not at all. Conditional approval is a milestone, sure, but it is a far cry from a full green light. In the American system, an OCC charter is really only one piece of the puzzle. So what else do they need?

6:00Well, Revolut still requires formal sign-offs from the FDIC to actually insure those deposits, and they need the Federal Reserve to grant them access to the central payment rails. So keeping with the restaurant analogy, they secured the zoning permit to build the place, but they still have to pass the fire inspection, the plumbing check, and the health code audit before they can legally turn on the stoves. Exactly. And passing those inspections in American banking requires demonstrating that your internal risk management, your anti-money laundering protocols, and your capital reserves are absolutely bulletproof.

6:34Right. They don't mess around with that stuff. They really don't. The U.S. regulatory apparatus is highly fragmented and, honestly, notoriously suspicious of foreign tech companies whose whole ethos is to move fast and break things. Yeah, you can't exactly move fast and break a national banking system. Right. So while this conditional approval definitely puts Revolut closer to operating as a sovereign entity in the U.S. financial system, they are still just standing on the porch trying to prove they are responsible enough to hold the keys to the vault. It is just a brutal process trying to get inside that traditional banking club.

7:06But, you know, it makes you wonder what kind of power do you wield if you are already on the inside? That's the million dollar question. And that is the exact question SoFi is answering right now. Because if Revolut is knocking on the door, SoFi is demonstrating how you can weaponize a fully established banking foundation to build a bridge directly into crypto. Yeah, the structural dynamics here shift from traditional banking into something entirely unprecedented. For sure. I mean, SoFi, led by CEO Anthony Noto, already boasts nearly 15.8 million members, right? And they have that full banking charter.

7:42And they just formalized this major integration with PayWord, which is the parent company of the global crypto exchange Kraken. Yeah. And we need to break down the mechanics of this integration because it goes way, way beyond just adding some generic buy Bitcoin button on an app. Definitely. So PayWord is plugging into the SoFi Exchange Network or the SEN. For the uninitiated listener, what does that actually unlock for an institutional crypto player like Kraken? It unlocks the absolute holy grail of liquidity, which is$247 settlement. Wow. Okay. To understand why this is so revolutionary, you kind of have to understand the inherent friction in our legacy financial plumbing.

8:21The banker's hours problem. Exactly. Our traditional wire systems, like Fedwire, operate strictly on banker's hours. They close on evenings, they close on weekends, and they shut down for federal holidays. So if a hedge fund needs to move$50 million to meet a margin call on a Saturday night, they are structurally trapped until the Federal Reserve opens its doors on Monday morning. But crypto markets never close. Right. They trade continuously. So this creates a terrifying liquidity mismatch for institutional traders. So basically, the market is moving at the speed of light, but the actual dollars backing those trades are stuck in like a 1970s batch processing queue.

8:59Precisely. It's totally disjointed. But by joining the SoFi Exchange Network, Kraken's institutional clients can now settle massive dollar transactions instantly at, you know, two in the morning on a Sunday. Because they aren't using the Fed anymore. Exactly. Because both the sender and the receiver hold accounts within SoFi's internal ecosystem, the transfer isn't waiting on a centralized federal wire system. It's just internal math. Yeah. It is simply an API updating a ledger within SoFi's own database. It is instantaneous. And the value exchange here is totally symmetrical, right? Because by providing those always on banking rails, SoFi suddenly gets to tap into Kraken Prime as this deep liquidity engine for all the retail crypto trades happening inside the SoFi app.

9:45It's a massive win-win for them. Plus, on top of that, Kraken is going to list SoFiUSD, which is SoFi's newly minted bank-issued stablecoin. Right. There was this quote in the press release from Anthony Noto where he stated, the financial system should not shut down when markets stay open. Which is such a bold statement. It really is. It sounds like a brutal subtweet at every legacy bank that shuts off its servers every Friday at 5 p.m. Well, it is a deliberate ideological stance. It aligns perfectly with SoFi's whole thesis of becoming the everything app for finance. Right. They rolled out big business banking back in April.

10:22They launched their own stablecoin this year, and now they are literally hot wiring their regulated infrastructure directly into an offshore crypto exchange. OK, I do have to push back on the fundamental logic of this from the crypto side, though. OK, let's hear it. Wasn't the entire white paper ethos of Bitcoin and decentralized finance in general to render traditional banks obsolete? That was the original dream, yeah. Right. The whole narrative was about destroying the need for legacy intermediaries. So why is one of the biggest, most monolithic crypto exchanges out there willingly wiring itself into the core of a regulated consumer bank?

10:59Aren't they basically surrendering to the very system they swore to replace? If we connect this to the bigger picture, it highlights the ultimate contradiction of the crypto revolution. Which is? Digital assets just cannot survive in a vacuum. I mean, you can accumulate infinite wealth on a blockchain, but eventually corporations have to pay their employees, individuals have to buy real estate, and businesses have to pay taxes. Right. The real world still runs on dollars. Exactly. You always need a bridge back to fiat currency. The off-ramp. The off-ramp and the on-ramp, yeah. And historically, crypto companies have really struggled to maintain reliable banking partners because regulators view digital assets as a huge contagion risk.

11:38So they get debanked all the time. All the time. So by integrating directly with SoFi, Kraken is securing institutional grade, highly reliable plumbing. And SoFi is essentially leveraging its regulatory blessing to say, hey, we will handle the compliance of moving dollars so your continuous trading engines never stall. Wow. It legitimizes the space in a way that crypto purists might resent, but that institutional capital absolutely demands. That makes total sense. So we have a neobank trying to become a traditional bank and a traditional bank trying to build a bridge to the blockchain. Right. Now, we arrive at a company that already operates natively on that blockchain and is honestly playing the final boss level of this entire game, Circle.

12:22Oh, Circle is fascinating right now. Because Circle already holds the federal trust charter that Revolut is desperately chasing. They already issue a stablecoin that completely dwarfs what SoFi is attempting. And they are currently taking this turf war straight to the halls of Congress. Yeah. Circle is operating on an entirely different plane of influence. I mean, they were founded back in 2013 and they are the architectural force behind USDC, which is a stable coin with roughly 73.7 billion tokens in circulation. That is just a massive number. It's huge. That level of market penetration elevates them from just being a technology company to being a systemic pillar of global financial infrastructure.

13:01Yeah. And they're actively wielding that incredible scale to shape federal law. And we just saw a masterclass in how that influence is actually deployed. Circle's president, Heath Tarbert, recently testified before the House Financial Services Committee. He did. And his mission was basically to pressure lawmakers into fully implementing the Genius Act before its deadline, which is no later than January 2027. Right. And for you listening, the Genius Act is a piece of proposed legislation designed to finally establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for payment stable coins in the U.S. Which we desperately need.

13:34We do. It dictates the reserve requirements, meaning what actual physical assets can back a digital dollar. And it establishes clear oversight pathways at both the state and federal levels. And Tarbert's rhetorical strategy during this testimony was honestly brilliant. He didn't plead for leniency. He didn't ask them to go easy on crypto. No, not at all. He appealed directly to American economic supremacy. He basically warned Congress like if you fail to provide clear rules for dollar backed stable coins, the future architecture of global digital money will simply be built overseas. Right. He said Congress cannot determine which technologies will succeed.

14:14It can determine whether American law, American institutions and the dollar will remain embedded in the systems that do. It's a powerful argument. It basically says if we don't regulate this, it will be built using foreign currencies and governed by foreign jurisdictions. which directly threatens the geopolitical dominance of the U.S. dollar. It's the ultimate regulate us hard, just regulate us here pitch. And the market just devoured that narrative. Circle's stock jumped 14 % following the testimony, closing at$100.63 a share. Massive jump. And Coinbase, which serves as the primary distribution partner for USDC, they caught the exact same updraft.

14:53Their stock surged 10 % to$191.98. sense. Wall Street looked at this testimony and basically concluded that Circle is literally writing the rulebook for the next century of finance. Yep, they're cheering for the regulation. But here's where it gets really interesting, though. There's a massive plot twist looming on the horizon for Circle. Ah, yes, the 2027 paradox. Yes. So Goldman Sachs is quietly assembling this consortium of legacy banks to build a competing dollar stablecoin, specifically targeting that exact same 2027 regulatory window that the Genius Act would open. Right. When this idea first surfaced late last year, I think there were 10 banks involved.

15:31Today, that consortium has swelled to 21 massive financial institutions. Goldman Sachs, alongside 20 of its legacy peers, is pooling capital to build a direct clone of Circle's infrastructure. This raises an important question about the mechanics of regulatory capture. Who actually benefits when an emerging technology is finally brought under federal law? Right. The dynamic in Washington right now is like watching different syndicates bet on the exact same horse. Circle, Coinbase, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan. They all want the Genius Act to pass. They all desperately want the federal government to legitimize stable coins and define the rules and engagement.

16:10But they want entirely different empires to control the market once the ink is dry. Exactly. To go back to our analogies, it is as if Circle has spent a decade braving the wilderness to lay down thousands of miles of pristine copper wire, right? And they're lobbying the government to finally connect it to the national power grid. But the absolute second the government flips the switch and declares the grid legal, Goldman Sachs steps in as the legacy utility monopoly to just buy up or crush the entire network. Circle is aggressively lobbying for the exact legislation that will legally permit their most lethal competitors to enter the arena.

16:44And you have to understand why the legacy banks won in so badly. stable coins are incredibly lucrative how does the business model actually work well a stable coin issuer essentially runs an unregulated money market fund okay you take in billions of dollars in customer deposits but you pay zero percent interest to the users holding those digital tokens because a usdc token just stays at one dollar exactly no yield for the user yeah but then the issuer takes those real dollars parks them in short-term u.s treasury bills yielding say 5 % and they just pocket the entire spread. Wow. So they just collect pure yield on billions of dollars.

17:23Exactly. So the traditional banking sector is looking at Circle generating billions in risk-free yield and deciding they will not allow a tech company to monopolize the digital dollar. Of course not. Circle believes their technological dominance and that$73.7 billion head start makes them untouchable. But the legacy banks believe that once the regulatory risk is officially removed in 2027, they can simply leverage their century-old institutional relationships to absorb the entire sector. It is going to be a bloodbath. So what does this all mean for you? We've analyzed three divergent strategies today.

17:58Revolut is enduring the grueling OCC gauntlet to try and become a chartered bank. Right. SoFi is circumventing the legacy wire system by hot wiring its banking core directly to a crypto exchange. Yep. And Circle is utilizing its massive scale to basically write federal legislation while simultaneously bracing for a collision with a 21 bank legacy consortium. It's a lot of moving parts. It is. But despite operating in completely different verticals, their objective is identical owning the underlying plumbing of how value moves across the globe. And the outcome of this turf war will dictate the parameters of your economic reality.

18:36Exactly. Whether you are funding a brokerage account, securing a mortgage, or simply transferring funds internationally to family, the victors of these infrastructure battles will determine the speed, the friction, and the fees associated with every single transaction you make for the next 50 years. That's a huge deal. It is. If these networks succeed in standardizing continuous 2004-7 settlement, the legacy friction we endure today, the multi-day waiting periods for funds to clear, the exorbitant wire fees, the structural weekend blackout periods, all of that will evaporate. It fundamentally alters the human relationship with capital, which actually brings me to a final concept I really want to leave you with today.

19:15Oh. Well, we have dissected the mechanical advantages of 24-7 settlement, right? We've explored how SoFi and Kraken are engineering systems to eradicate bankers' hours so that liquidity never stalls. Right. And on a technical level, a frictionless, always-on financial grid is a masterpiece of efficiency. But consider the psychological implications, what actually happens to global stability when money literally never sleeps. Ah, you remove the natural circuit breakers. Exactly. For over a century, the friction of the legacy system has actually served a dual purpose. The T plus two settlement delays, the 5 p.m.

19:51closing bell on Wall Street, the weekend banking blackouts. These inefficiencies act as forced psychological pauses. That's a really good point. Right. When a geopolitical crisis or a massive market shock hits on a Friday afternoon, the plumbing shuts down. Traders cannot easily move massive amounts of fiat. Retail investors cannot just panic sell and instantly wire their funds to another institution. humans are essentially forced to walk away from the screens. They have to go be people for a couple of days. Exactly. They have to spend the weekend mowing the lawn, talking to their families, and just sleeping on their anxiety.

20:24And by Monday morning, cooler heads often prevail because the system forced a timeout. But if this new infrastructure succeeds... Exactly. If markets and bank settlements are permanently open 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, we strip away the only circuit breakers we have. Yeah. When the plumbing offers zero friction, does a minor algorithmic sell-off at 2 in the morning on a Sunday rapidly cascade into a global liquidity crisis by breakfast simply because human panic no longer has to wait in line? Upgrading the pipes accelerates the flow of capital, but it also accelerates the velocity of fear.

21:01The technology evolves, but the human psychology driving the decisions remains completely identical to what it was a century ago. The friction in the pipes might be the only thing keeping the system sane. It is a profound dynamic to consider the next time you tap your phone to authorize a payment. Keep exploring, keep interrogating the infrastructure beneath the surface, and we will see you next time as we continue to plunge into the sources that matter.

From the publisher

Circle turned a Congressional hearing into a 14% stock pop, SoFi just wired its bank straight into Kraken's liquidity, and Revolut inched one signature closer to becoming an actual U.S. bank. We break down why all three moves are really about the same thing: owning more of the financial stack before regulators finish writing the rules.


More from Fintech Stacks

All episodes