In short
Premier League relegation/title implications plus a deep dive into Arsenal vs West Ham VAR controversy and the broader problem of grappling at corners.
Guests (backgrounds)
- Mark Chapman (host; BBC Football Daily/Monday Night Club).
- Nadim Anua (football writer/pundit).
- Chris Sutton (former Premier League striker; pundit).
- Rory Smith (football journalist).
- Matt Upson (former defender; Tottenham match coverage).
- Roberto De Zerbi (Brighton manager; quoted via interview).
- John Southall (former Everton goalkeeper; De Zerbi interview partner).
- Jarrod Bowen (West Ham forward; quoted).
- Darren England (former/professional referee; VAR discussion).
- Steve Wilson (Match of the Day interviewer; Bowen interview).
Key claims
- Spurs’ 1-0 draw with Leeds is a “missed opportunity” given fixtures; pressure may decide the final day.
- Arsenal’s 1-0 VAR win vs West Ham was “a foul” on goalkeeper David Raya (Pablo’s arm/holding impeded him), and VAR’s decision was correct.
- The bigger issue is inconsistent enforcement of grappling/holding in the box; England argues 2024 guidance raised the threshold, creating a grey area.
- Notable examples cited: disallowed/allowed goals involving Saliba vs Man United; Gabriel vs Aston Villa; West Ham vs Everton (Pablo arm across Pickford); Thomas Suchek penalty appeal at Brentford.
- Notable example proposal: Darren England suggests attackers can’t enter the six-yard box until the corner is taken to reduce chaos and VAR reviews.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOSpurs' Missed Opportunity
1:48 to 3:06
Discussion on Spurs' recent draw and its implications for the team.
“Nadim Anua, Chris Sutton and Rory Smith are with us.”
Upcoming Fixtures and Rivalries
3:06 to 4:50
Analysis of Tottenham's upcoming match against Chelsea and its significance.
“Chelsea and Tottenham do not like each other.”
Pressure and Performance Insights
4:50 to 7:12
Exploration of the pressure faced by teams like Everton and their potential impact.
“Played really well, good decisions with the ball and made fantastic saves.”
VAR Controversy Overview
7:12 to 9:07
Reactions and opinions surrounding the West Ham goal disallowed by VAR.
“the pressure but the pressure is normal in this situation and fighting for the relegation is not like fighting for the qualifying Champions League because we are we are playing for something very important for us.”
Debate on VAR Decisions
9:07 to 14:00
In-depth discussion on the implications of VAR decisions in recent matches.
“I am looking at you first, not from a City perspective at all.”
The High Threshold for VAR Decisions
14:00 to 15:00
Explore the implications of the high threshold for VAR decisions in England.
“They haven't tweaked the guidance there.”
Player Reactions to VAR Decisions
15:01 to 16:40
Hear player perspectives on recent controversial VAR decisions affecting their games.
“But that's not what they were looking for.”
The Challenge of Consistency in VAR
16:41 to 19:10
Discuss the challenges of maintaining consistency in VAR decisions across different games.
“and if the legislation comes in which loosens the threshold in terms of it has to be a more significant contact, then that has to be viewed as where the situation is measured.”
Diverging Opinions on VAR Calls
19:11 to 20:50
Analyze differing opinions among commentators regarding VAR calls and their ramifications.
“West Ham fans would say, why haven't others been given then?”
The Grey Area of Referee Decisions
20:51 to 22:40
Understand the complexities and grey areas faced by referees when utilizing VAR.
“but in the cold light of day, everybody could see that Pablo had his hand on Reyes' arm.”
Show all 27 chapters
Missed Incidents and VAR Reviews
22:41 to 24:50
Delve into discussions about missed incidents during VAR reviews and their impact.
“But obviously in these kind of melees, there's that much, which really alluded to like three or four different incidents at the same time.”
Fan Reactions and VAR Controversies
24:51 to 27:00
Evaluate fan reactions to VAR decisions and the perceived fairness of these calls.
“And on that particular occasion on replay, you can see that Chris Gabbana doesn't actually have a clear view.”
Understanding Mutual Holding in VAR
27:01 to 28:00
Discuss the implications of mutual holding as per VAR guidelines and its interpretation.
“is that the officials are not spotting what has caused him to have his arm in that position.”
VAR Controversies and Mutual Holding
28:00 to 29:23
Discussion of VAR decisions related to holding and fouls in football.
“non-footballing actions, I believe that's all.”
The Spectacle of Grappling in Set Pieces
29:23 to 31:09
Analysis of how grappling in set pieces affects the quality of football.
“But that is the bigger problem, is that we are now in this situation of, well, if both sides are doing it or if everybody's doing it, then that's okay.”
Critique of Premier League Tactics
31:09 to 33:16
Critique of current tactics used in the Premier League and their impact on the game.
“In-swinging corners are up by 22 % from two seasons ago.”
Proposed Changes for Corner Kicks
33:16 to 35:44
Discussion of proposed rule changes for corner kicks to improve gameplay.
“and a Champions League we should all be praising Mikel Arteta to the hill, shouldn't we?”
VAR Review Process and Time Management
35:44 to 42:00
Explanation of the VAR review process and the time taken during checks.
VAR Decisions and Premier League Regulations
42:00 to 43:20
Understanding the complexities of VAR decisions and the regulatory authority in football.
“And I think given what was at stake, I think that's pretty acceptable.”
Arsenal's Performance and Season Challenges
43:20 to 45:00
Analyzing Arsenal's recent performance amidst pressure and expectations.
“And Sampo, before Sam go down, it's not all down to that decision.”
Referee Decisions and Arsenal's League Position
45:00 to 46:40
Discussion on referee decisions impacting Arsenal's standings and public perceptions.
“Yes, I just think we got to a stage of the season where a lot of people, because it's Arsenal, wanted Arsenal to fail.”
Scottish Premiership Title Race Insights
46:40 to 48:20
Exploring the dynamics and favorites in the Scottish Premiership title race.
“Do you think, Chris, if they'd allowed that goal to stood, he would have said the same thing?”
Hearts' Competitive Aspirations
48:20 to 51:40
Examining Hearts' ambitions and strategies to compete with Celtic and Rangers.
“I mean, that was a big performance at the right time.”
Long-term Vision for Hearts in Scottish Football
51:40 to 56:00
Insights on Hearts' strategy for future success and competitive sustainability.
“being a little bit stuck in their ways, a little bit traditionalist.”
Hearts' Performance and Team Dynamics
56:00 to 57:20
Discussing Hearts' consistency and the impact of coaching on their performance.
“And I think that's what the guys at heart will be saying now is, we have two games, the next game's fall, could get home, win that and then see what happens come the Celtic game.”
Pitching Players to Hearts
57:20 to 59:10
Exploring strategies for attracting players to Hearts and the allure of Edinburgh.
“I think Derek McInnes has to take a lot of the credit.”
Match Expectations and Rivalries
59:10 to 1:01:05
Anticipating the upcoming matches and discussing the rivalries involved.
“but obviously you needed to be able to pay them the right money and agree the transfer fee and things like that with the club.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.
0:30Make your travel dollars work harder. Follow Smart Travel on your favorite podcast app. Ever invest in something that seemed incredible at first, but didn't live up to the hype? Like those$5 roses at a gas station, or a second-hand piece of technology that breaks in the first 10 minutes? Marketers know that feeling. We optimize for the numbers that look great, impressions, reach, and reacts. But when they don't show revenue, well, that's a not-so-great conversation with the CFO. LinkedIn has a word for that. Bullspend. Now you can invest in what looks good to your CFO. LinkedIn ads generates the highest ROAS of all major ad networks.
1:11You'll reach the right buyers because you can target by company, industry, job title, and more. So cut the bullspend. Advertise on LinkedIn, the network that works for you. Spend$250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get a 250 credit for the next one. Just go to linkedin.com slash broadcast. That's linkedin.com slash broadcast. Terms and conditions apply.
1:42This is the Monday Night Club with Mark Chapman on the Football Daily Podcast.
1:47Chris Sutton:Hello, welcome to the Monday Night Club. Nadim Anua, Chris Sutton and Rory Smith are with us. We'll talk Arsenal's 1-0 win against West Ham and VAL shortly. But firstly, Spurs 1-0 draw with Leeds that has put them two points above West Ham and the relegation zone. Matt Upson joins us from the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium. Is there a sense there, Matt, that it's been a missed opportunity for Spurs? 100 % given the remaining fixtures, don't you think? If you're West Ham now, you're looking at it feeling a little bit better. Looking at their fixtures and what they've got to do and what Spurs have got to do, they're in touching distance of Tottenham still.
2:26and this was an opportunity for Spurs to take that out of their hands and they haven't this evening. But on reflection of this crazy end to the game, we'll probably come off the pitch feel blessed that they've got a point.
2:38Chris Sutton:Make any difference to you, Nadem, that West Ham go first in the next round of fixtures? I'm going to say no, because I get the feeling it's going down to the last day of the season anyway. So, yeah, when they all kick off at the same time, that's one we'll see. OK. I mean, the other factor in all of this, Chris, is that Tottenham's next game is away at Chelsea and good luck trying to predict what kind of Chelsea you're going to get at the moment. And that will be, what, three days after the Cup final? Yeah, but there's that, I mean, there's that needle with that game. Chelsea and Tottenham do not like each other.
3:11Chris Sutton:So, I mean, Chelsea would love to put a big dent into Spurs, wouldn't they? Well, yeah, they'd love to push them ever closer to relegation. You're looking ponderous, Rory. yeah I think it's what Chelsea turns up is the big question about that game but I think West Ham if you have to be in the situation they're in their next game is at Newcastle who are mid-table nothing to play for and then they're at home to Leeds again mid-table nothing to play for now that doesn't necessarily mean anything as Leeds have just proved but I'd probably rather that than having to go and face a team as Chris says that genuinely would take pleasure in relegating I don't know I'll go the other way with that because there's a game that you're absolutely 100 % up for you know because from a Spurs perspective like that is one of their biggest games in any season and obviously Chelsea will be motivated but this is a weakened Chelsea club you could say not even a side they might be coming off having won the FA Cup for example Mick Fallon and beating in it's Guardiola yeah that part isn't it isn't it which Chelsea rather than what Chelsea Rory language is about communication Chris it's either we all understood what he meant anyway it's a big game I'm sure they'll be ready for it and the other thing with all of that is Everton Naden could be back in the race for a European place for that final game of the season I know these are all ifs, buts and maybes here this is why we love it I know but they are and they could be in the race for a European place and David Moyes has made that a big thing for Everton yeah and I respect that completely and I think the added difficulty with playing Everton is Everton have been brilliant away from home this whole season so they will be more than ready to play spoiler especially if there's something on the line like that middle section is still so so tight and I think based on what happens on the games this weekend I wouldn't be surprised if half the league got something to play for How would you describe the body language Matt of those Spurs players as they leave the field?
5:09Well I could describe one of them and it's Kinski and I'll tell you what Chappers, he's 10 foot tall with his chest out and a smile on his face and rightly so, fair play to him because massive game from him for Tottenham this evening. Played really well, good decisions with the ball and made fantastic saves. But the rest of them, yeah, I get the same sense as the crowd. I think they're OK, but big missed opportunity here and it really does leave it in the balance big time.
5:38Chris Sutton:OK, let's get some reaction. Here's Roberto De Zerbi with John Southall. I think I'm positive, not because we have two points, but I'm positive because we played a good game, not a great game like in Villa Park, but we played a good game enough to win because we deserved to win. We could lose the game because Leeds, at the end of the game, they had a chance to go one goal up. But anyway, I saw the right spirit. I saw the right mentality. We didn't play a great game because I think we felt too much the pressure after the West Ham result yesterday, after the polemic, and maybe we suffered too much, like the referee, because the referee, I think, suffered too much pressure as well.
6:32I didn't see him calm, but it's normal. He's a human. He played a good game, not changed the result. But I felt maybe wrong, but I felt not to see the referee calm. Yesterday was a foul, clear, clear, clear foul. Was just the polemic for nothing because it was clear. And maybe, you know, it's a crucial part of the season for me, for the fans, for the club, for all teams. And it's normal, I suffer. I think we suffer my players suffer too much the pressure but the pressure is normal in this situation and fighting for the relegation is not like fighting for the qualifying Champions League because we are we are playing for something very important for us.
7:29Is that a concern that maybe they struggled with the pressure because two games to go the pressure is only going to get bigger isn't it greater? I don't know the pressure is for us it's for Arsenal it's for West Ham it's for Aston Villa they are fighting for the qualifying Champions League for everyone May April May there is pressure in football do you feel pressure now? Yeah sometimes Yes Have a look Just to clarify what you were saying before you were talking about the West Ham game yesterday and that maybe affected things today Yes I watch the television and I heard was not fouled it's finished football finished if we discuss if was fouled or not we have to go on holiday or on the park with the dog thank you okay
8:33Chris Sutton:New teams New rules A new era Formula One returns The engines are revving People are getting excited Hear every race live on BBC Sound
8:55On 5 Live Sports. This is the Monday Night Club with Mark Chapman. On the Football Daily Podcast.
9:06Chris Sutton:We have had so many emails about West Ham's disallowed goal at home to Arsenal yesterday. When it went to VAR... Gosh, you're looking at me first. I am looking at you first, not from a City perspective at all. just as a former footballer and football fan perspective, when you saw it go to the screen, what were your... Did your heart sink? I am neutral, Mark Chapman. Yeah, no, no, I just meant as a football fan. I'm a light blue neutral. Yeah, you are. As a football fan, obviously, that felt like a really significant moment. Say, you could say for West Ham, say the Premier League title race and so on but just coming back as an underdog to score in that manner so late in the game it's huge but I'm one of those people obviously we'll expand the conversation but I do see the foul you know what I mean?
10:00I do see it because there are two things in relation to Raya and obviously there are more things that are going on but the two things after I saw them on Raya I thought well I don't see how this is going to be allowed to go on and I know goalkeepers have had a fairly rough time over the last few years, you could say. But yeah, I was disappointed in some ways, but Chappers, you know.
10:21Chris Sutton:Did you see, you saw the foul. Did you see 20 fouls? I saw, I think it was Taddebo pulling his shirt and then I saw the Pablo one on his arm. Because that's what I was looking for. And then when I stopped looking for that and I watched it generally, I thought, oh, the Premier League's in a great spot, isn't it? You know, it's just the wrestling thing from set pieces now. And trying to manage that, referee that, is nigh on impossible. And the way that they sort of have to make decisions, no one's ever going to be happy. But I think overall, what I will say about that VAR decision, I think it just confirmed to me that people always perceive things according to their bias.
10:59Chris Sutton:Well, yes, 100%. What was the overall mood of callers to 606, Chris? Did it depend on their bias? Depends which team you support. Did you have any neutrals? Neutrals on 6.06, Mark? I mean, you're better than that, aren't you? I mean, that doesn't happen. No, not really because of the implications of that decision. And, you know, you could say it went for Arsenal. I thought it was the correct decision. And that's where, you know, no matter what stage of the season we're at, I just think you have to look at the situation in isolation. Was it a foul or wasn't it? And it was a foul. And I can understand how sore that would have felt for West Ham, the manager and the players.
11:53Chris Sutton:But then if you flipped it and it happened at the other end, they'd be screaming foul. There is a feeling, Rory, and we're going to hear from Jarrod Bowen in just a moment, and then Darren Kant, a former assistant referee in the Premier League, will join us. He was on Match of the Day last night, giving some very interesting opinions on everything that went on. There is a feeling, isn't there, that the Premier League and English football brought last night's situation on themselves? 100%, yeah. And I think I would agree with Chris and Nadam that it was a foul. It's just weird that that has been allowed for two years and has not been a foul in that period.
12:29I thought it was really interesting that within minutes last night, you had people who aren't necessarily neutral, but don't have an actual horse in this actual race or either of the actual races producing what I believe the young people now call receipts. There was the goal on the opening day of the season at Old Trafford that was given despite the fact that Saliba was pinning Altai Bayindir. There was the goal that Gabriel scored for Arsenal against Villa in December where he had his arm across Emi Martinez's chest. There was one, this is my favourite, for West Ham against Everton where Pablo had his arm across the goalkeeper, across Pickford, and Thomas Suchet scored, that was in April, and that goal stood.
13:12And I think as much as, to me, what... I think there's a separate conversation about how many fouls were going on in the box, because there were loads, and I've seen West Ham fans making the case that the reason Pablo stuck his arm out was because he was in the act of being fouled by Leandro Trossard. So Darren might be able to explain why some fouls are more important than others. but I think the big thing is that for certainly this season, I'd say probably two, since they tweaked the guidance in 2024, there has been a free-for-all in the box. The reason that has happened is because VAR exists.
13:46That is why the Premier League looks like it does. That is why it is a wrestling match. It's because of VAR and the way they have to referee to make VAR work.
13:55Chris Sutton:But it's not a free-for-all in La Liga or the Bundesliga or the Champions League. And VAR exists there. They haven't tweaked the guidance there. That's the difference. It's a conscious choice that seems to have been made in England. I spoke to a former referee today about it, just to check that my theory was correct. They tweaked the guidance in 2024 to introduce a high threshold for pushing and grappling offences. and the reason they have a high threshold for grappling offences is because you have to use evidence to summon the referee to the sideline. You have to basically prosecute a case and you can't do that with minor infractions.
14:32It has to be substantial offences, which has led to this kind of the raising of the bar, which means everything that doesn't meet that bar goes completely unpunished, which is why the Premier League has turned into what it's turned into, which some people will like and I don't. The controversy yesterday was that for the first time in nine months, somebody enforced the rules.
14:51Chris Sutton:okay well we'll bring Darren in in a moment let's hear from Jared Bowen first of all with Steve Wilson when you're looking at a screen for five minutes in the end you're going to find something that you've been sent over there to look at you know it's it's a lot of grappling there's a lot of holding in the box you know like I said if you look long enough I'm sure you'll find something that you know will give the goal against us but do I think it's the right decision no but you know we have to accept it the game's done now and we've lost I know you won't have seen it but I mean if If you'd have gone there looking for a foul on Mavropanos, you would have found one from Declan Rice, arguably a foul from Trossard on Pablo.
15:28But that's not what they were looking for. No, and I think that's the frustration. Where's the consistency? It's if no one wants, as a fan, as a viewer, you don't want to be celebrating the goal and then waiting eight minutes, whatever it was, and then have it taken off you. A corner is a physical. The Premier League is physical. It's probably the most physical league in the world. that's why everyone loves it they want to see the ball in play, they want to see action and at corners you have to expect contact, you know, and if you're going to give decisions like that you have to give all the holding calls in the world and that's not the way that people I'm sure want the game to go down but certainly if that's the bar that's been set, surely listen, I've just done an interview and said I don't want to sound bitter, I don't want to come out and sound just because we're on the receiving end of it but last week we had one with Thomas Suchek getting held at Brentford away that wasn't given us a penalty which is fine but then I don't think you can go and give a decision like that today.
16:21Chris Sutton:So that was Gerard Bowen talking to Steve Wilson on Match of the Day. Chris and Rory and Nader are here. Matt Upson is at Tottenham. Before I bring Darren in, what's your overriding view of it? Well, Chappers, I mean, I think Rory makes a point in that you have to enforce one way or the other and if the legislation comes in which loosens the threshold in terms of it has to be a more significant contact, then that has to be viewed as where the situation is measured. I think it's very, very difficult for the VAR to subjectively call things that are necessary, i.e. obvious and are not obvious. I think that's a huge grey area.
17:04So while it's impactful, is it obvious? And I think you then get into that territory where you've got to make those decisions under huge pressure to then decide to send the referee. and once the referee goes, as we know statistically, we know what that means. It's nailed on that it's going to be changed. So I don't have that much of a problem where they set the bar. So I'm not saying I dislike the contact or what have you. I think Jarrah Bowen's absolutely spot on that the Thomas Suchek one at Brent for the other week is a penalty. And I think, you know, on reflection, that would be a preferred penalty for sure.
17:39Whether or not it's near the ball or not near the ball, it's grappling to the ground. it needs to be penalised. So the levels have got to start being set in that sense. But, you know, if I say, do I agree with the decision that it was a foul? I think it is a foul. I think he impedes David Rea. But for me, the grey area is, how does the VAR decipher whether you send the referee to the screen as a subjective call to know whether it's obvious or not?
18:06Chris Sutton:And I wonder, Darren, whether that's the big issue at the moment. in that, and it's a bit of a weird one here, because I think the majority of people would say that's a foul, but quite a lot of that same number of people would then also say, but there have been, and Rory used a young person's phrase earlier, of receipts, but there have been other examples over the course of this season, and they haven't been given. Dale Johnson on the BBC website is writing that West Ham's is the only goal to be ruled out for jostling and pushing by VAR on review this season. I think Matt makes a very good point.
18:46It's very difficult sometimes to ascertain what is clear and obvious. And that is something I think that the Premier League will look at over the summer. As for yesterday, yes, it's very unfortunate. And you've got to feel for West Ham. but in the cold light of day, there is a clear foul on David Rea.
19:09Chris Sutton:But why haven't the other, Darren, why haven't the others been, West Ham fans would say, why haven't others been given then? Why is theirs, as Dale Johnson says, the only one? Well, I don't think any two incidents have been the same and of course, as we know, it is a contact sport. I think in particular this one impeded the goalkeeper so much when he went to catch the ball and his arm is being held, as opposed to sometimes a little bump on the goalkeeper or maybe an aerial challenge with the goalkeeper. And some of those are seen as footballing actions and are allowed to take place. You are allowed to challenge the goalkeeper.
19:55But I think on this occasion, it was a non-football action of a player just grabbing the goalkeeper's arm, which had a detrimental effect on him having the ability to catch the ball. And I think that's the difference with this one.
20:09Chris Sutton:It doesn't matter what's gone on before. I know it does. But what's gone on? Can you just say that line again? Because that was brilliant. Yeah, I know. But it's irrelevant because that's the past. And we're at this stage of the season. And most people looking at that would say it is a foul. So while we can go back and look at all the incidents that Rory's mentioned and have our own opinion on that, they still came to the right conclusion last night. It was a foul. It was obvious. So I do take Rory's point. I do take Jared Bowen's point very much so. but in the cold light of day, everybody could see that Pablo had his hand on Reyes' arm.
21:01Chris Sutton:So that was the foul, that was the right call. Yeah, Miguel Delaney has written in the Independent today that it ultimately isn't Chris Kavanagh's job to referee the rest of the season. He can't take that into account while he's making the decision, which is absolutely right. But I think for most people watching it, neutral or not, it's really hard to understand how you get that decision there I mean Darren says it's an obvious foul I'm not convinced it's to a layman, to a mere layman I'm not convinced it's any more obvious than quite a lot of the others to be honest I think it's a foul but there's loads of goals that have stood where you look at just the melee in the penalty area whether it's goalkeepers or not there are any number of fouls not being given all season and then it gets to probably the most consequential decision of the season in terms of the title race and possibly relegation and they decide, actually that's a foul.
21:55The decision is right, but it does make you think, well, hang on, all of those others, by those standards, literally all of those others have been wrong. And you can't square that circle. There is a point where, Darren, I take your point, and I say this with respect, that no two incidents are the same. That is absolutely true. But if you're getting into that kind of rugby union thing where the scrum's collapsing and literally nobody's got an idea why it's collapsed and you just all accept it and walk away. You've got a real problem because I don't know why that yesterday was a foul, but loads of other decisions are, well, that's fine, play on.
22:29Would it not be, what would really determine it? Would it not be that the VAR would bring something to the referee's attention that he obviously hasn't seen? Because I've got this thing about if the referee sees it on field and he's seen the whole picture, then make the call. But obviously in these kind of melees, there's that much, which really alluded to like three or four different incidents at the same time. So by sending him, is that not the VAR's way of saying, look, just make sure that you're sure you can look at it all again and be happy with your call? Because let's not forget, he can stick with his call.
23:02It's not, it's a possibility. That's right, yes. No, I agree, Matt. And Chris Cavanaugh is actually one of only three referees that have stuck on more than one occasion. so if he felt there was no foul I've seen him do it as I say on a couple of occasions and as you said it's usually quite rare for a referee to do that but he is certainly one referee who wouldn't hesitate if he didn't think it was a foul then he would stick with his original decision just to go back on the previous point I'm speaking now as a football fan not as a former official but I think generally speaking we're all a little fed up with the grappling with the wrestling, particularly at corner kicks.
23:45And this is why I proposed a law change, which I think would actually eradicate these problems.
23:52Chris Sutton:I'll come on to that with you in a second. What are you shaking your head at? It's just, unless I've misheard that from Matt, and I don't know if Darren really clocked that, it sounded like, Matt, you were saying that the fourth official, sorry, the video assistant referee has just asked the referee, just go and have another look at this, you know what I mean? As opposed to going towards a specific thing to look at. Is that what you meant, Matt? or were you being specific about, say, the foul on Raya? Yeah, well, what I'm saying is that situations like that, sometimes the referee is not going to see everything.
Read the full transcript
24:20So the reason why the AAR would send him is because, well, hold on a minute, there's stuff that's gone on here that I don't think you... In your comms between each other during the game, you haven't described this that's happened. So it's actually happened. You haven't described it. So I'm assuming you haven't seen it. So why don't you go and take a look? You're right. So just to clarify for our listeners, it's a clear and obvious error or a missed incident. So the VAR can send the referee over to the monitor if he feels that there's a missed incident. And on that particular occasion on replay, you can see that Chris Gabbana doesn't actually have a clear view.
24:58It's impossible for him to be able to see that David Reyes shirt is being pulled because there are players in the way. And also the fact that David Reyes arm is being held as well. But both it's impossible to see. So it's a missed incident. I do think it's a clear and obvious error as well. But again, you need the replay to see that. I don't blame the officials on the field because with 16 players in a very close proximity, it's impossible to keep your eye on everything. And there are just bodies in the way sometimes. So yes, Darren England on VAR was perfectly entitled to send him over. And I think he made the correct decision.
25:39Just to be crystal clear here, so there's no muddying of waters, I think, Darren, you're saying that you sent him over to look at the specific incident on Ryan, not everything else in the box. Because what it sounded like Matt was saying was that he was to go and look at everything on the side. That's what it sounded like. Yeah, so what would actually happen, Nadam, is that Darren England would recommend an on-field review for a possible foul on the goalkeeper. bearing in mind West Ham have been given the goal so they're not looking to see if there are any other incidents other than is there a reason to disallow the goal so on this occasion the video was looked at it was seen that there was in Darren England's opinion a foul on the goalkeeper so he recommended an onfield review
26:27Chris Sutton:but hang on Darren, sorry to interject but then what happens if he sees half the other things that are going on as well and just let me, well you know He can't do take your pick, can he? He can't just pick one. Chris, it's such a random enforcement of justice to say. Yeah, Glenn, let me read a couple of emails on this. No, it's not. Glenn says, As a lifelong West Ham fan, I wish to express my disappointment in yesterday's decision to allow the goal. I'm not disputing that, looking at the footage, Pablo has an arm across Raya, and if that was in isolation, I would agree with the foul being given.
27:00Chris Sutton:However, what I find more concerning is that the officials are not spotting what has caused him to have his arm in that position. If Trossard doesn't look to hold Pablo, or Gabriel not hold on to his shirt, then Pablo would jump. We all know that arms are used for leverage, but being unable to do so, I feel, results in his arm being at that height. Another one, Noel. Oh, no, sorry. Phil. Hang on, no, where's the other one gone? Hang on. There was one more. Hang on. Oh, I've lost it. Anyhow, go on, Rory. My sense would be, and Chris, I take your point, you can't be like, hang on, there was a lot going on there, let's just send the referee over.
27:33And I understand that the way that VAR works is they have to say there is an issue here with this bit. We need you to look at that because we think either you've made a mistake or you might not have seen it, as Darren says, for perfectly legitimate reasons. But at the same time, it strikes me as being fundamentally bizarre that the referee can say, well, I've seen a foul there, but all that fighting around him... And there were several Arsenal players who were, I mean, what looked to me like dragging people down,
28:01Chris Sutton:non-footballing actions, I believe that's all. I've found it. Damien, I should have scrolled up rather than scrolled down. Damien, we've been calling all season for holding and grappling to be dealt with in line with the law. Law 12 says it's an infringement to hold an opponent or impede an opponent. Before the ball reaches Raya, Trossard manhandles Pablo, Suchek is floored by Havertz, and as Pablo reaches Raya, Gabriel is crouched down pulling Pablo's shirt. So should the outcome of a VAR review have been a foul on the goalkeeper? He says the answer is no. Sheik Given said on Match of the Day last night, Gabriel is holding, Odegaard is holding, Trossard is holding before the foul even happens.
28:37Chris Sutton:When does the referee decide that that's the foul he wants to pick and not the previous foul? This is just a little interjection. One of the things in the guidance, which I think was tweaked in 2024 and possibly down in 2025, and suggests that PGMOL has a romantic streak, is that mutual holding is OK. And to an extent, seems to be actively encouraged. Mutual holding is the term that they use, and it's the official way of saying they're all at it. But I think the issue there is you're creating a grey area. You're saying, well, if you're both doing it, it's fine until the point where it's not. And that is where fans lose their sense of what makes any sense at all.
29:18Chris Sutton:And that's the bigger problem, isn't it, Nadem? And not if you're a West Ham fan, I appreciate that, or an Arsenal fan. But that is the bigger problem, is that we are now in this situation of, well, if both sides are doing it or if everybody's doing it, then that's okay. And it's not because it's dreadful. I mean, it's a dreadful spectacle. And to suggest that the Premier League is physical and that's why it happens is nonsense because the Premier League isn't physical anywhere else on the field because if it was, Joachim Andersen wouldn't have been sent off. That tackle would have been allowed.
29:52Yeah, I think you're making really good points. And for me, I think I've spoken about this on this show before and others, like a law tweak is something that is needed i think darren's got a good idea in terms of creating space because for the last couple of years in my opinion goalkeepers overall before the thing on sunday goalkeepers overall had become basically redundant from set pieces especially in swinging ones and the whole grappling side of things like realistically when a corner comes in in the past it'd be like try and find space try and get a block try and create this create that but when you've got essentially 15 to 20 players in a six yard box and the ball's coming into that area, all that people can do is grapple.
30:32Those defensively, those in attack, and realistically there, it's rubbish to watch. I'll call it what it is. It's rubbish to watch. Like, I like, and this is just me, I like a bit of creativity. Oh, that's a great ball in the box. That's a well-timed run. But some of these goals and some of these moments are coming from essentially playing percentages, which people are entitled to do. But as the guys have been saying, as everybody said, all of a sudden you're seeing the marking is literally like, well you're starting here, I'm standing here, the ball's coming in here, we're going to fight for the ball.
31:01And that fight regularly involves just using your arms. And until something changes, that's how it's going to be.
31:06Chris Sutton:The Athletic have done an article today. In-swinging corners are up by 22 % from two seasons ago. We are at the highest rate for in-swinging corners, 2 ,503 since 2018. Fouls on goalkeepers from those corners, 146. goals from corners 174 if you compare it to others in Europe Germany for the number of goals from in swinging corners 18 team league they've only had 133 120 in Serie A 111 in La Liga it is a Premier League problem Chris or issue depending on your opinion Well, it is, but teams are doing it for a reason. And just because life now is more difficult for goalkeepers, I don't see the issue with that.
32:08The issue with it, Chris, is that they're profiting because the rules aren't properly being enforced. It's really hard. Nedim's right. We've all kind of beaten around the bush with this for ages. The Premier League, the money in it, has so much money ever been spent for so little in terms of what we actually get to watch. You watch the Champions League semi-final, the first one between Bayern and PSG. Huge wages, nation-state on PSG, Bayern dominate a league that's been hollowed out to a hush by English money. But at least they're trying to attack, whereas people are paying 70, 80 quid to go to football matches in England to watch teams lump corners at each other.
32:44And it's dreadful to watch. It's terrible for the product. And the problem with it, Chris, is that they're doing it because the rules aren't being enforced.
32:50Chris Sutton:but in the end Arsenal have done something different and we should be applauding Arsenal because not everybody can keep up with the Manchester City Manchester City's in terms of playing the beautiful game the expansive game same as Bayern Munich same as PSG so other teams have adapted and we shouldn't be kicking them for that because in the end the end justifies the means if Arsenal go on and win a Premier League and a Champions League we should all be praising Mikel Arteta to the hill, shouldn't we? We should pray. It's genius for him. And just because he's doing things differently, we shouldn't be giving him a kicking for that.
33:30Chris Sutton:Arsenal have tried for years playing the beautiful game under Arsene Wenger and didn't win a Premier League. And Mikel Arteta, when he first went in, tried to play expansive football. And eventually he's changed. So it's not Arsenal's problem. It's not Mikel Arteta's problem. No, it's not. It's a Premier League problem. It's a Premier League problem, and it's a referee problem because they have to somehow try and resolve these issues. And it's not easy. VAR didn't give Arsenal the title because they ruled out the Callum-Wilson goal. Arsenal are top of the league because they've won the most games across the course of the season.
34:07It's just one incident. It's not Arsenal's fault what's happened. They have exploited it and should be credited with the ingenuity for exploiting it. But that doesn't mean it's a good thing. dressing it up as a good thing is sophistry it has ruined the spectacle are you saying it's damaging the premier league brand then rory would you go that far i think it's very odd that given the amount of the amount of time and money people spend about worrying about how to attract gen z to watch football that no one seems to have thought maybe we should stop them lobbing corners at each other yeah i don't mean what there's no point watching anything what's your
34:40Chris Sutton:alternative then so what is your alternative so so all of a sudden you know change i mean just totally change football? No, do what we did until two years ago, Chris, and accept that sometimes the goalies are getting fouled. That's all you need to do. They removed that bit. As Nadam said, they rendered goalkeepers redundant by creating this high threshold so that they could re-referee everything on video. All you need to do is enforce the rules as they used to be enforced. You weren't allowed to foul goalkeepers, Chris, when you were playing. You just weren't. But that was too far, Rory. No, has it not swung?
35:11Do you not think that was like an overprotected species at that point? any little touch on the goalkeeper and it was a senseless foul in the goalkeeper's favour so there is a balance to be had here I do agree but I think PJML probably looked at it similar to the handball rule where they've tried to apply a little bit of leeway in terms of right we don't want people to get punished for certain things that are not right and I think they've gone down that road maybe with this issue and I think it's a harder issue to place
35:41Chris Sutton:What's your idea then Darren? Well, my idea would be for attacking players not to be allowed in the six-yard box until the corner has been taken, thus creating space between the attackers and the defenders, so it would stop the grappling, and also it would stop the attacking team loading the six-yard box with six or eight players crowding around the goalkeeper, and it would make it much easier to officiate, it would be more attractive. it wouldn't detract from the goals I think because the attacking players would effectively get a run on the defenders if they're starting outside the six yard box so it would just mean that it's much easier and it would stop the referee having to go in before the corner is taken every time because we see that a lot where players are just pushing each other to the ground and of course as you'll know in law you can't give a penalty or a defensive free kick if the ball is not in play so going back to a couple of the emailers earlier and some of the sort of individual tussles if you like actually started before the ball was in play so they're inadmissible in law you can't give a penalty or a defensive free kick because it's happening before the ball is in so my idea would be like a penalty attackers have to stay outside the box until the penalty is taken like a goal kick attackers have to be outside the penalty area before a goal kick is taken and I think it's a simple tweak just to change the law to say that they're not allowed in the six yard blocks until the ball is in play you quite like that don't you?
37:19yeah I adore it I think that might have taken the idea away from me a few months ago to be honest that's been discussed on the airways before right okay no I don't mind it just because like firstly you know I'm with the guys I remember back in the day goalkeepers were overprotected but we knew that same way we feel about certain other laws whether the you know the handballer last player whatever tug of the shirt it's like an accepted standard you know and it was like yeah it's a bit soft but it's a bit too much but the corners thing I like it because you mentioned the inswingers but the nuance is there have been tons of inswingers in the past but maybe they go between the six yard box and the penalty spot but in this era it feels like a lot of just going into the six yard box and it's just pure chaos just wrestling people.
38:05And I think if Darren's idea was to come through, then it adds a bit more creativity, adds a bit more of a focus in terms of, say, the delivery. Because some of the delivery into the six-yard box, it doesn't have to be great. When I think of those deliveries, I maybe think at times of Declan Rice really flat one being driven in. But there are loads of games where I watch where it's literally just floated into that space. And you know that, say, the goalkeeper can't come out, there's no space to do anything. And I think that idea of allowing goalkeeper a split second to be able to make a better decision as opposed to having so many bodies around them from the get-go and also the players themselves trying to time their runs better.
38:40Would it be harder from a defender's point of view
38:42Chris Sutton:because the attackers would get a run on you? Well, then you can go back to times of my marketing and things like that, couldn't you? You could still have people set up in a zone like many people do around the six-yard box and maybe in some ways you could try and disrupt their runs by, say, blocking them off just as the ball's coming in. But it forces people to think in a different way instead of, like, as I say, people are perfectly entitled to do it and it's proven to be very good for lots of teams overall. But just 20 players standing in the six-yard box, you've got to ask yourself, is that what you want to see and is that the best version of the game?
39:12Can I workshop Darren's idea just a little bit? Is that all right? Well, you can as long as you don't use the word workshop.
39:17Chris Sutton:Come on, let's blue sky here, Chappers. We're not in W1A. Very often it feels like we are. Darren, I'm leaving that alone. Darren would, just to check, the defenders can still mark wherever they like so the defenders could be outside the six yard box Absolutely, there's no restriction on the defensive team but the attackers not being in the six yard box would just simply mean that the goalkeeper has clear space if you like because clearly it's a tactic to surround the goalkeeper to try and make him ineffective and this would eradicate that situation But there might be a hell of a lot of stopping Darren, at the point when the corner is taken attacking players, trying to time their run, and that may hold the game up even more.
40:06Chris Sutton:I mean, every corner of the game could get held up, couldn't it? Well, I think it does at the moment, Chris, to be honest. So I think by creating separation between attackers and defenders, and of course the defenders can mark outside the six-yard box, but I suspect they would be mostly zoned or across the edge of the six-yard box, and then some picking up. That's what we normally see. But the main thing is that we wouldn't have attacking teams placing eight players under the crossbar and the in-swinging going under the crossbar. And it's carnage. It's impossible to police. And that would therefore lead to fewer VAR interventions as well because there wouldn't be so many things to look at like there were yesterday.
40:51I just want to go back to one thing just to make clear. there was Declan Rice on Navrapanos as well that would have been looked at by the VAR as well that would have been considered that the foul on Davadreya took place before Declan Rice fouled Navrapanos so obviously that doesn't come into it because the foul happened first they would have also looked at Trossard Trossard possibly was engaged with Pablo as well so they're looking at every incident and that's why it takes a little bit longer because it wasn't just one incident to look at But what I would say, Chappers, is I've heard five minutes, I've heard eight minutes.
41:27Believe me, I've watched this 200 times today. Darren England took two minutes and 21 seconds from the time that he said, well, Chris Cavanaugh said that the goal has been given. And then he did the check for two minutes, 21, before recommending the on-field review. And of course, then we have time for the referee to go over to the screen and look at the screen. But two minutes 21, I think we ought to actually put that out into the audience so that they know actually it wasn't five minutes, it wasn't eight minutes, it's under two and a half minutes. And I think given what was at stake, I think that's pretty acceptable.
42:10Chris Sutton:Just a final one on your idea. That couldn't... If somebody from the Premier League was listening, they thought, oh, yeah, that would be quite interesting. we couldn't do it and the Bundesliga and La Liga not do it could we? that's correct Chappers yes sadly not all law changes are looked after by IFAB in conjunction with FIFA so it would have to go to them for them to actually ratify it and so yes unfortunately it's not something the Premier League can bring in so we would have to wait for IFAB to approve it how many times have you watched it again? about 200 this afternoon so I can tell you everything about it but we don't have time to go into it have you done anything else today?
43:02no, I've pretty much spent all my day looking at this preparing referees get a bad name that's dedication thank you very much Darren
43:12Chris Sutton:Collie on mnc at bbc.co.uk what is clear and obvious is that there's nothing clear and obvious about being clear and obvious and I hope that's clear, if not obvious. And Sampo, before Sam go down, it's not all down to that decision. They've had a terrible season as a whole. When you watched yesterday, Nadine, did Mikel Arteta come very close to blowing that? In what sense, sorry? In substitutions and certainly the second half of the first half. You could say that, yes, but then I think for me just the biggest thing is the fact that they managed to get the win and I think at this point in the season having seen you know teams like City in years gone by win the league in the way that they've done it's not been brilliant to look at at this stage it's just been enough just enough just enough just enough I think for Arteta to be able to do that is important and in some ways so having been somebody for example who's been in the bottom three playing against big sides especially at home that game to you is everything.
44:19To Arsenal, they kind of know it's everything, but the midweek game in the Champions League was objectively like everything to them. And that was such a high that the next game can't really be that high, in my opinion. Like, you can't continue to perform at that sort of level. So I think in some ways, it was the down that was probably expected after they made it to the Champions League final against a tough side who were desperate for the points. So I think West Ham played their part within that. But yeah, for Arsenal, like, you've just got to celebrate that. because the boost that they can get from a game, which was everyone was eyeing up as a letdown spot, I think I'm at peace with it.
44:54Chris Sutton:And I suppose, Chris, we've had so many discussions about Arsenal's squad over this season, at times when it was perceived to not have stood up to the rigours, the Southampton game in the FA Cup, for example, but actually the squad delivered yesterday, and in fact the squad has delivered since Manchester City away. Yes, I just think we got to a stage of the season where a lot of people, because it's Arsenal, wanted Arsenal to fail. I do feel that. It doesn't matter how they get over the line. This was such a big game against West Ham. They've got Burnley and Crystal Palace to come, but this was the game because of what was at stake for West Ham.
45:39Chris Sutton:It didn't matter how they did it. They did it and they are in the box seat. But I don't... I think so much has been made of this incident and Rory's sort of enraged about what happened. But essentially, Raya was fouled, the right conclusion was drawn and Arsenal won. And I don't understand why everybody's getting so angry because, you know, and going back on what has happened previously in the season and talking about inconsistencies. It was a nailed-on foul. They got it right. Arsenal have three points and they're now going to win the Premier League. Good on them. I like it when Chris pulls the...
46:23What are you all getting so worked up about? I think that's my favourite version of Chris.
46:27Chris Sutton:But what's gone on in the past has gone on in the past. And, you know, Nuno Espirito-Santo came out and, you know, he didn't nail that decision, really. He didn't speak about that specific incident. which most managers would have done because of the implications of West Ham most managers would have come out and said well that's a disgrace that's the worst decision of all time he didn't because he knew that they came to the right conclusion but to make the the point which he made about earlier inconsistencies I think everybody understands but in that moment it was the right call just on what managers say afterwards Mikel Arteta was full of praise for the officials afterwards and saying he then realised what a difficult job they have, the officials.
47:17Chris Sutton:Do you think, Chris, if they'd allowed that goal to stood, he would have said the same thing? No, he's got a bit of history of nailing referees, hasn't he? But no, definitely not. It's brilliant, you know. Obviously, we said at the start, your bias will sort of define how you see anything in particular. And I've got loads of Arsenal fans in my life that were drawing up this conspiracy list of all these decisions going against them. And then on the weekend, yeah, you see, this is correct now. This is correct. This is perfect. Everything is great with referees. You know, right decision, more power to them.
47:49Just like that.
47:58Chris Sutton:We'll switch to the Scottish Premiership title race. Who are the favourites for you now, Chris? I don't know.
48:08Chris Sutton:Right, have you had a bad day? What is wrong with you? No, I've had a good day. I don't know. But that tells you everything you need to know about the title race. Celtics win at the weekend. And probably more pertinently, the way that they played. I mean, that was a big performance at the right time. I mean, Celtic and Rangers always try and destroy each other. And of course, Rangers now are going to finish third. but that may give them real momentum going into the Motherwell game which is really difficult and of course the reason I don't know is if Celtic get something at Motherwell they go into the last game against Hearts I think Hearts will beat Falkirk although Hearts have key injuries now to two big players for them Craig Halkett and Leonard in the midfield who have been excellent you know Celtic at home against Hearts last day I would fancy Celtic to get over the line in that one so it's you know it's really difficult because Motherwell are one of those teams especially at home who you know have that have that ability where they can beat Celtic and you know I'm sure they can but it was more the performance than the result for Celtic where I think well hang on a minute you know maybe maybe just at the right time Celtic are getting going Alistair Johnson back into the Celtic team and right back the right back Canadian right back he has made such a huge difference Engels coming into form the midfielder I think Nottingham Forest wanted to buy him for 25 million uh you know he started to look like a uh a player so I mean you can say it was only Rangers but with what was at stake that was really impressive their performance the other thing in all of this is that hearts are still there and it is still in their hands which not not many people would have thought would be the case you know everybody was saying oh they won't last they won't last yeah i mean i suppose there was a there was a parallel with derrick mckinnis's season in 2014 at aberdeen where they won their first eight and then the the story of that campaign which obviously was without rangers in the top flight was basically Celtic chipping away at their lead and waiting for Aberdeen's fuel to run out, whether it's psychological or physical.
50:29And Hearts, although they've had setbacks in terms of the drop points that they will come to regret if they don't win the league, they have stayed top. And they've stayed top, and I think this is really impressive, they've stayed top just for a long time. So they've been a point ahead of Rangers, two points ahead of Celtic. There's been one game in it for most of the season, and Hearts have been able to sustain it. And given the pressure that that club must be under because they don't have that institutional kind of success and also, to be honest, the massive financial advantages that Celtic in particular have, that is an amazing achievement.
51:04And I think, to me, the message, if I was Celtic or Rangers, the thing I'd worry about much less, obviously this week I'd worry about will Hearts win the title, I think the really big worry would be Hearts probably aren't going anywhere. Hearts will be around next season as well because Tony Bloom isn't in it. Tony Bloom and James Anderson, who's put a lot of money in of his own as well to bring players in, the kind of, I think he's a biotech billionaire. They're not doing it for a season. You know, Tony Bloom thinks he can do in Scotland what he's done in Belgium or what Alex Musio has done in Belgium, who's a former employee colleague of his.
51:39They think there is a gap to exploit in the old firm being a little bit stuck in their ways, a little bit traditionalist. then the chances of them being around next season, especially with Champions League money, if they make it into the group stage, they suddenly become a long-term threat.
51:55Chris Sutton:Delighted to say that Joe Savage joins us, former sporting director at Hearts. Evening, Joe. Thank you very much for being with us. Hi, guys. How you doing? It's okay? Yeah, very good. Thank you. Before we come on to your time there and what you built there and what you left for them, just that final point from Rory is that maybe a lot of people are thinking, you know, This is a one-time shot for Hearts, given the position that they've put themselves in. Celtic can't be like this again next season. Rangers, would Rangers improve next season? Internally, they're not likely to be viewing it like that, are they Hearts?
52:29Chris Sutton:They're here for the long term themselves. That's their inner belief. Yeah, I think from speaking to the staff and the guys there, they're in this for the long haul. I think Tony, as you've obviously just picked up on, he thinks that he can deliver this within 10 years and they're obviously close to doing it after one year. So I don't think they're going anywhere. I think they're only going to get better. They're going to invest a lot of money again. They've invested a lot this year. Nothing in comparison to what Celtic and Rangers have done, but they've still invested good amounts. And as Rory's saying, they're near the top of the league and they've been there all season.
53:05So they'll be confident in going again next year and the years after that.
53:09Chris Sutton:You went in in January 2021. Give us an insight into what it is like to try and build a club to be in any way competitive with the old firm in the Scottish Premiership. Yeah, well, when I went in, we were in the championship in Scotland. And again, Chris can obviously testify. This Hearts are a big club in Scotland. They're massive. They've got a huge expectation as a fan base and what they want to do. And that was the excitement for me was the project. It was more or less a blank canvas for me to go in and really build from within. and it was only really when I went in and I seen how big the club was and where you could get to that that's what really excites you and that's what excited me was that challenge of trying to get closer to the old firm and in my time there we obviously finished third twice and then fourth but the seasons that we finished third we weren't far off Celtic Rangers we just lacked a wee bit of consistency but we beat Angie's Celtic side we beat Brendan Rodgers' Celtic side and we ran Rangers close a lot of the times and they obviously beat us in one of the cup finals.
54:19So we always knew that we had the capabilities and probably just lacked that consistency. And then you've obviously seen Tony Bloom's invested the money that he's invested. The analytics through Jamestown has allowed them to go into a market and sign players. And they're obviously spending a wee bit more money in terms of transfer fees and salaries to get these players. But there was always that belief within the club that we could be someone that could actually challenge them and get closer. and I remember doing an interview and I got slaughtered for it when somebody says, what's your ambition?
54:52And I said, well, my personal ambition is to win the league. I believe that we can do it. I believe that we can build to eventually achieve that. And all the Celtic fans, the Rangers fans, the Aberdeen fans, the Hibs fans, they absolutely battered me for it and slaughtered me for it. And it's only now, obviously, you can see I'm no longer at the club, but you can see that they are capable of doing that. And listen, long may it continue.
55:13Chris Sutton:I believe they have some irrational pundits north of the border as well, Joe, who may have weighed in as well. I don't know. Joe, could you explain to us then sort of the conditions whereby, say, a club like Hearts can say that in the next 10 years, they believe that they can be competing with Rangers and Celtic? Because, you know, for the dominance that they've had across decades now, is it more so about what you can achieve with Hearts or also a message about where Rangers and Celtic are, relatively speaking, compared to, say, recent history? Ah, good question. I think that the sky's the limit for Hearts because they've got a brilliant fan base, a brilliant training ground, brilliant stadium.
55:53They've now got the investment, which they probably were lacking for years when I was there. I know you mentioned James Anderson and James is brilliant for the club, but Tony's obviously come in and taken it to a new level and that was probably what they needed. the old firm I'm not massive on saying that they've not had that good a season this year, I just think Hearts have been brilliant I think they've been very very consistent and they've just kept pushing and pushing and pushing and winning the games that they needed to win when the pressure was on them and obviously the other night against Motherwell they were unfortunate not to win the game but they're still in a position where two games to go if you'd said that to me at any point during my career at Hearts that you'd be two games from winning the league, I would have absolutely bitten your hand off for it.
56:38And I think that's what the guys at heart will be saying now is, we have two games, the next game's fall, could get home, win that and then see what happens come the Celtic game. But the conditions for me are, they've just probably lacked a wee bit of belief in the years. And now that Tony's come in and now Tony's given them access to the analytics. But guys, everyone's got data in football. Don't think that this is just something new. We were signing players when I was at Hearts through our own data. It's just Tony Bloom's obviously got access to a higher level and got more money to spend on these players.
57:14Chris Sutton:Joe, how much is it, do you think, the Jamestown data? How much Derek McInnes? I think Derek McInnes has to take a lot of the credit. I think Derek's come in, he's got them really organised, he's got them playing in a style. I think that he has been absolutely a breath of fresh air for them, to be honest with you. I think Jamestown's good. Chris, don't get me wrong. I think it's very, very good. I think they can identify some good players from it. But the core group of that team was Lauren Shanklin, Cammie Devlin, Benny Beningamy, Craig Calkett, Stephen Kingsley, Blair Spattle. They were players that were signed under our watch that know the Scottish League, know what it takes to play in that environment and that culture.
57:58and then they've obviously dripped in some bits of quality in Claudio Braga and Kiziridis and things like that. But I think Derek McKinnis has to take a huge amount of credit for what he's done and how consistent the club has been. Joe, what was your pitch to players when you were signing the likes of Shandlin, Blaire Spitzel and Cammy Devlin? And how do you think your successors at Hearts will be pitching it this summer, regardless of whether they finish first or second? The pitch for Hearts was Show them Edinburgh Show them the city Show them the stadium Show them the training ground We obviously created a video To show them about the team And how we wanted to play And the manager would obviously Talk to him about his style And his ideas for the team But I think that Hearts kind of speaks Especially for the Scottish players A lot of the Scottish players Know and understand That Hearts are a big team And playing at Tyne Castle in front of the fans is a brilliant experience if you're winning.
58:56It can be tough if you're not winning, but it's harder for the opposition as well. So I never found it tough, Rory, to sign players for Harts. I really didn't, especially once you showed them everything that you needed to show them. We were just always confident that we could get them, but obviously you needed to be able to pay them the right money and agree the transfer fee and things like that with the club. But we were always in probably a really favourable position that we, again, Edinburgh is a beautiful city. I think a lot of people would say that. And the stadium, it speaks for itself. So it was always, it was a good challenge, but you could always convince them to come here once they had seen everything that was there.
59:36And the training ground, as much as it's on a university campus, it's still a brilliant training ground. There's still a lot to like about it. And the part of Edinburgh that it is, like trafficking that's not difficult to get to. so yeah I found it quite easy to be honest with you. Presumably if you can chuck it, I mean I love the idea that you're taking them down the Royal Mile and stuff the this is the zoo, it's really good That's what we've done, we took them for lunch, we would take them for lunch Not at the zoo Joe No not at the zoo Where would you take them for lunch? So overlooking the castle so we would ask them what sort of food they would prefer but whatever they would say maybe the Italian or whatever generally we'd want to go for an Italian or something like that you would always pick so they could see the castle and things like that and it would be maybe a lunch so 2-3 o 'clock you could just see it and see how busy it was and it was funny because you could picture them looking thinking I'm going to get that penthouse there I'm going to look at you not be what you're paying me at heart
1:00:40Chris Sutton:Not when I put this contract in front of you you are. Given your hearts connections, are you nervous before I let you go? Am I nervous? No, I think it will come down to Saturday. I think hearts win on Wednesday, I think Celtic win as well and then it's going to be a shootout on Saturday. I think, sorry Celtic have not beaten hearts this season yet so that's going to play in their minds I would imagine. I think Derek McInnes thrives in these sort of games so I think it's going to be a brilliant, brilliant spectacle. I appreciate you coming on, been really good to talk to you thank you Joe thanks guys thank you Joe Savage former sporting director at heart that's it thanks to Nadim Chris and Rory up next on the Football Daily Pod a 72 plus special looking at 40 years of the playoffs
1:01:315 Live Sports BBC Women's Football Weekly the latest news insights and analysis from across the women's game Dame Serena Vigman welcome to the are we including Dame in your title now. You know how much an honour that is. And it's remarkable team! And it's remarkable women! We want to play in a way that they can show their skills, so that's what we're trying to do. Win the World Cup. It's a dream. Listen. With the BBC Sounds app.
From the publisher
Mark Chapman is joined by Chris Sutton, Rory Smith and Nedum Onuoha on this week's Monday Night Club.
The team start with reaction to Spurs' 1-1 draw v Leeds United which leaves them 2 points clear of West Ham and the relegation zone. Former Arsenal and West Ham defender Matt Upson was at the match, and joins to reflect on the draw as well. Is it a missed opportunity for Tottenham, and could their fight for survival go down to the final day?
Then, the panel dissect Arsenal's 1-0 win over West Ham, and the massive call by VAR to disallow West Ham's late equaliser. Was David Raya fouled, should the rules surrounding corners be revamped and has the Premier League become bad to watch? Former assistant referee Darren Cann weighs in on VAR and the state of Premier League set-pieces.
And finally, former Hearts Sporting Director Joe Savage joins the pod to discuss the Scottish Premiership title race. How did Hearts recruit some of their top players, what will Champions League football do for the club and could they be caught be Celtic?
Timecodes: 00:29 Reaction to Spurs' 1-1 draw v Leeds 04:00 Roberto De Zerbi reflects on Spurs' point 07:25 Was David Raya fouled & did VAR get it right ? 13:15 Jarrod Bowen speaks about the disallowed goal 14:45 Matt Upson & former assistant referee Darren Cann on other fouls in the box 28:13 Is a rule change needed? Has the Premier League become bad to watch? 41:48 Did Arteta's substitutions almost blow it for Arsenal? 46:16 Who does Chris back for the Scottish Premiership? 50:13 Former Hearts Sporting Director Joe Savage joins the pod




