The Vanishing Mr. Feynman (Update)

16:02Charles Mann:What I remember that I thought was quite significant was when Richard was getting off on LSD for the first time, we were watching the water and the water was moving. And he started saying, we've got to draw the line somewhere. We've got to draw the line somewhere. And I always remembered that because to me, it meant that once one started entering that unitive state where everything becomes interactive and commingled, there's an arbitrary line that is drawn, that is consensually agreed upon to be the nature of reality. And I thought it was a very significant thing for him to be saying at that time.

16:48Debby Harlow:You know, not everything that happened with him was about psychedelics. I mean, we developed a much broader relationship with him. But I remember the LSD session. I thought it was so funny. He stared. He was lying on the same couch staring at a banana for three hours, quiet as could be. Debbie had trained him well. He would just turn it once in a while. And afterwards, I asked him what was happening. He said, very sincerely said, I don't know. I was just looking at the banana.

17:19Ralph Leighton:Sometimes a banana is just a banana.

17:23Barbara Berg:He talked a lot about Arlene. I think how it came up, I asked him, I said, I know a lot of scientists, and I have to say, you're one of the most well-rounded I've ever met. And he said, well, that may be true, but if it is, it's all due to Arlene. And he said that I would have been a very narrow, you know, computational kind of physics guy, but I knew her in high school and she introduced me to art, to philosophy, to all the humanities. She opened up my heart. She was bright as could be. She was my peer, but knowing other things, he said, that's what did it. And he deeply loved her. And then he told me, of course, a tragic story.

18:07Charles Mann:He said he met her when she was 16. She was shortly diagnosed with TB. They got married anyway. And he said, we grew up together. He said, now people have this idea that you have to grow up before you get married. But we got married and we grew up together. One thing that I will say about him is that he did not believe in an afterlife. And when Arlene died and she would come to him in dreams, he would tell her, go away, go away. And another friend of ours who was there for the LSD time, she felt so sad that he felt that way. And Richard wrote me a letter afterwards saying he's so sorry that he made my friend cry because she felt so sad that he did not believe in any kind of ongoing spirituality or any kind of ongoing life with Arlene, even though she had left her body.

19:07Debby Harlow:I think one reason that he enjoyed being with us is because we were psychological, and I don't mean clinical or analytical, but because we were insight-oriented. And I think that moved him, especially with regard to things like being able to talk about his grief with Arlene.

19:22Charles Mann:We went down to visit him just before his second surgery.

19:27Debby Harlow:It was simply that he wasn't feeling well, so we thought, you know, bring the mountain to Muhammad.

19:32Charles Mann:In fact, we stopped along the way and we cut fronds from the palm trees growing along the highway for which the police stopped us, but we ended up being able to make off with the prawns.

19:44Debby Harlow:I remember standing in the elevator, just keeping a really straight face

19:48Charles Mann:while we're in this elevator full of people. And so we were sitting on either side of his bed, fanning him, and the nurse walked in and said, oh my goodness, you look like a god with your goddesses. And he enjoyed that. We met his daughter Michelle and his wife, and they were interacting with him before he went into surgery. And it was interesting because there was a marked contrast between the way Barb and I were relating to him, which was very playful and very entertaining and lighthearted.

20:24Debby Harlow:They seemed a little more reserved than we were, but I think they had known him for enough years. They just sort of took it in stride. They weren't horrified. They were worried about him. I think they were respectful that we'd come and really cared. then they knew there was a caring relationship.

20:38Charles Mann:I really appreciate the sense of respect that he showed to me and to us. I mean, he never came on to us sexually. I really trusted his character, his intention, and his integrity. And I thought that was a really beautiful thing.

20:56Barbara Berg:Dick showed such deep respect for each of us had a personal relationship with him. he got me at very deep levels. I would say if anything, he maybe was a little bit paternal. He is quite protective. He cared about me as an individual. We talked about my career. We talked about what my goals were, what drove me. I would say that he wasn't a taker. He was a person who gave deeply of himself, shared what wisdom he had. He shared his levity.

21:26Debby Harlow:I would have to agree. We were walking on the property and he was talking about his philosophy of art. I thought he was rather self-indulgent. He said something about art, and I said something about farce. And he shot me a very dirty look, and I shot him a big-hearted smile. And that's the moment that we bonded. And so I think we were not groupies. I think we gave him some emotional educational training.

21:54Charles Mann:I lived in California. I went to New York to visit a friend, and I had just arrived. My friend was in the bathroom. The phone rang and I picked it up and it was Richard Feynman. He was going on this journey where they were going to investigate what happened to the Challenger. He did share in great detail with me how step by step he investigated the process that came up with that little cheap O-ring that ended up not being replaced when it should have and was responsible for blowing up the Challenger.

22:26Debby Harlow:He was calling to talk about what it was like. And as everybody knows at this point, I mean, everyone on that commission for three months, they all said, we want to go home, sign off on our paper. And here he says, I won't leave until you all sign my report. And told a wonderful story. I don't know if it's a publicly told story or not, that Rogers really didn't like him and was mutual. And that Rogers would send cars to pick him up, take him to meetings, but they'd send him to the wrong place. They'd give the limousine driver the wrong information. So he'd be late for meetings, miss meetings. and he was really sabotaged and thrown under the bush.

22:59Charles Mann:He was surprised that there was so much resistance. However, he was vindicated in the end because he did discover the reason and he even went before Congress and demonstrated why it was the case that that little O-ring was responsible for the whole explosion. It was also amazing that we got to watch on television together because I just happened to be down here at that time and everything was live on television when he dropped the O-ring in front of Congress into the glass of water.

23:31Debby Harlow:I've got a kick out of opening the New York Times all the time. There's Feynman on the front page again.

23:36Ralph Leighton:We heard all about Feynman's work on that presidential commission in the first episode of this series. On live TV, Feynman demonstrated how the failure of those O-rings was the likely cause of the Challenger disaster. To all those who watched, his testimony was an act of courage in the face of a government whitewash. To the government, his testimony was more like an act of sabotage. And to Feynman, he was just doing science, using every fold of his brain to try to find evidence for or against the proposition that X indeed caused Y, and if not, what did. Looking back, this may have been a high point for the public opinion of science and scientists, which is a little bit weird since Feynman was using science to explain a scientific failure rather than to celebrate a triumph.

24:30Ralph Leighton:Still, people believed this scientist on TV and they trusted him. And how about today?

24:36Barbara Berg:I think the question really isn't about trust in science. It's trust in the people who do science.

24:40Ralph Leighton:That's coming up after the break. I'm Stephen Dubner and this is Freakonomics Radio.

24:53Ralph Leighton:Freakonomics Radio is sponsored by LinkedIn ads. Ever invested in something that didn't live up to the hype? Marketers know that feeling. They optimize for the numbers that look great, like impressions, but then they don't see revenue. LinkedIn has a word for that. Bullspend. Instead, you can get the highest ROAS of major ad networks with LinkedIn. Cut the bullspend. Advertise on LinkedIn. Spend$250 and get a$250 credit. Go to linkedin.com slash Freakonomics. Terms apply.

25:48Michelle Feynman:Think about remodeling. Schedule your free quote on windows, siding, roofing, and doors at powerhomeremodeling.com. Power. Our work shows.

25:56Debby Harlow:Spring nights can't decide if they're hot or cold, and neither can you two. The Pod by 8 Sleep is a smart mattress cover with dual temperature zones, so one side of the bed stays cool while the other stays warm. Autopilot adjusts automatically as you sleep, And it's clinically proven to boost deep sleep by 27%. Better sleep for both of you. No compromise even. Try the pod by 8sleep at 8sleep.com.

26:32Ralph Leighton:Chapter 8. Do we still live in a scientific culture? Stephen Wolfram, a computational scientist and entrepreneur, studied physics at Caltech and stayed friendly with Richard Feynman until Feynman's death.

26:47Michelle Feynman:Near the end of his life, he was like, well, now I'm going to experiment with all kinds of drugs because I'm dying anyway, more or less. I think he was a little embarrassed about that. In the environment at the time, these were illegal drugs and so on. I think he viewed himself as a think-for-yourself-but-nevertheless-law-abiding citizen. I don't think he felt that he was having brilliant insights rushing in because he was in some altered state. One of the things he said to me was, if you want to do creative science, peace of mind is an essential feature.

27:21Ralph Leighton:Feynman visited Esalen several times toward the end of his life. People always wanted to know what he was working on, what he was thinking about. So sometimes he would give a talk, less formal than a classroom lecture, but scientific in nature. One of these talks he called Tiny Machines.

27:37Michelle Feynman:I heard people around in the bath saying, tiny machines. What is he talking about, tiny machines? And I said to him, you know, very small machines. And it doesn't work. I am talking about very small machines, OK? There wasn't a field called nanotechnology when Dick Feynman was thinking about nanotechnology. Nanotechnology was something nobody talked about. He just was thinking about it and he thought it was interesting. and he tried to think through what the implications of that would be.

28:05Helen Czerski:It was very much the beginning of nanotechnology.

28:09Ralph Leighton:That is John Preskill, the Richard Feynman Professor of Theoretical Physics at Caltech.

28:14Helen Czerski:He gave a talk in 1959 at Caltech, which was called There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom. And what he meant by that is that there was an opportunity by making our technologies smaller and by making smaller devices to take advantage of the potential to put a lot more devices in a small volume of space. And he recognized that that would be important for computing. He even suggested that we should eventually be able to manipulate atoms one at a time, grab a hold of a single atom, do what we want with it.

28:55Michelle Feynman:I think some of his best work was actually done in these corners where nobody else had gone and where he just said, well, I wonder how that works.

29:06Ralph Leighton:This idea of a scientist who looks for new corners, who follows his curiosity wherever it leads, who isn't afraid to spend time at a hippie retreat exploring the layers of consciousness. That is another aspect of the Feynman archetype that you don't see much of anymore. science has become more corporate and institutional. It's also an expensive enterprise and competitive. With so much at stake, it can be hard for a scientist to spend time on an intellectual query that might not bear fruit. Along with this decline in pure scientific inquiry, the last several years have also seen a decline in the public's opinion of science.

29:49Ralph Leighton:Maybe that's not a coincidence. Here is John Preskill.

29:53Helen Czerski:I think there has been a surge in skepticism about science and about scientists and their motivation. I don't think scientists should expect people to just believe what they say on the basis of authority. But I think there is an unhealthy level of skepticism about the motives of scientists. A lot of people go into science, and it's not because it's the most lucrative career they could have. They go into it because they want to discover things and they want to share that knowledge with colleagues and with students and with the world. And I think that's a very admirable motivation. And if we were interested in our own glorification or in pursuing a task because it was lucrative, there are other things we could do.

30:43Barbara Berg:I think what's interesting about that is that even the people who say they don't trust some science, they still want science on their side, right? They don't say, here's my alternative system. They say, here's this other piece of science. I'm Dr. Helen Cheresky, and I'm a physicist at University College London. So it's interesting because the authority of science actually isn't questioned. There's no one who's, well, as far as I know, there are not very many people who are saying, actually, the world is run by a load of wizards who just wave magic wands and things happen, right? There is a sort of collective agreement that there is a form of reality that we can understand systematically.

31:19Barbara Berg:I think the question really isn't about trust in science, it's trust in the people who do science.

31:24Debby Harlow:I mean, I think we're doing everything we can to dismantle the structures that allow science. Lisa Randall, and I'm a physicist professor at Harvard, you can't have these executive committees or congressional committees that really understand things. I mean, some things are difficult to understand, and not everyone will understand them. And it's really important for a scientist to be able to at least get the information out there and have that taken into account. There's also an idea that, you know, when people talk about science, they're being elitist. That's not what it's about. It's about understanding the world.

32:00Debby Harlow:It's something that we want to share. I mean, there's a wonderful universe out there, yet we're so short-sighted and we really don't think about the long-term consequences of what we're doing and what it does to our lives and what it does to animal lives or plant life.

32:15Helen Czerski:Feynman would often say the number one rule is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool.

32:25Michelle Feynman:If you expected science to give all the answers to the wonderful questions about what we are, where we're going, what the meaning of the universe is, and so on, then I think you could easily become disillusioned and then look for some mystic answer to these problems.

32:40Ralph Leighton:In 1964, at the Galileo Symposium in Florence, Feynman gave a talk he called What Is and What Should Be the Role of Scientific Culture in Modern Society. Here's Ralph Leighton.

32:52Cheryl Haley:So he says, people, I mean the average person, the great majority of people, are woefully, pitifully, absolutely ignorant of the science of the world that they live in. And an interesting question of the relation of science to modern society is just that. Why is it possible for people to stay so woefully ignorant and yet reasonably happy in modern society? And then he says, I believe that science has remained irrelevant because we wait until somebody asks us questions or until we are invited to give a speech on Einstein's theory to people who don't understand Newtonian mechanics. But we never are invited to give an attack on faith healing or on astrology.

33:40Cheryl Haley:I suggest, maybe incorrectly and perhaps wrongly, that we are too polite. So Feynman was interested in the role of science in society for a number of years, especially after the war, when science was used to create the atomic bomb. And so he gave various lectures. One of them, it's called The Value of Science. He says it's a duty of us scientists to create a philosophy of ignorance and doubt, meaning admit that you don't know something. Don't just fake it and make it up. When you don't know something, say you don't know it. I know that some people, Alan Alda comes to mind, have set up like a center for the communication of science.

34:36Cheryl Haley:And so Feynman, I'm sure, would happily give a guest talk at Alan Alda's Center for the Communication of Science. But he would start off by saying, now, you know, I don't know anything about really how to communicate science. So I'm just going to tell you something really interesting that I found out about the other day. And then by example, he would show you great communication of science.

35:03Helen Czerski:My name is Alan Alda, and I act, I write. You don't need to know more.

35:08Ralph Leighton:Well, let's say a little bit more. Alan Alda has played many roles on TV, film, and stage. He's probably still best known for starring as Hawkeye Pierce in the TV series MASH.

35:20Helen Czerski:When I was born, my father was in burlesque. So from the earliest times I can remember, when I was two or two and a half years old, I was standing in the wings watching burlesque shows, watching comics and straight men, chorus girls and strippers. And I learned a lot. And the thing that I identified with was the performing, I guess you could say the performing instinct, to communicating with the audience without necessarily acknowledging that they were there. Feynman was a performer on his own. If you look at his lectures, you see the jokes he does that Ralph Layton said were carefully constructed and paced.

36:06Helen Czerski:And he always was aware of where he wanted something funny to happen.

36:11Ralph Leighton:The Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science was established at Stony Brook University in 2009. About a decade earlier, Alda had fallen so in love with how Richard Feynman communicated science that Alda commissioned a play about him called QED. Alda played Feynman on stage in both Los Angeles and New York.

36:32Helen Czerski:I think Feynman had a good policy about how he taught physics. He didn't tell you everything at once, but he let you know that there's more to know about it. So the first dose might be general and get you connected to the big idea. And then when you were ready, he'd get into more detail. But it's not a good idea to go into the weeds first. I think I learned a lot from that aspect of his teaching. A couple of reasons why I think science should be communicated as well as possible. One is, it's beautiful. If we said we're going to eliminate music and poetry and you'll get by on the train schedule, that's all you really need.

37:20Helen Czerski:It'd be a big loss. We wouldn't stand for it. And yet we tolerate not learning more about science in a way that's meaningful to us. We read headlines and the question is, is it a breakthrough that's going to end cancer or not? Don't bother me if you haven't got that. I think we're going through a period where there's less trust placed in people who are experts at anything, not just science. There are a lot of us who seem to feel, if you claim to know so much, you're setting yourself up as better than me. Rather than saying, let me hear what you have to say and see if I can learn from you, it's don't tell me what to do.

38:05Helen Czerski:I'm free to believe anything I want.

38:09Ralph Leighton:So, what would Richard Feynman make of how science is practiced and communicated today?

38:15Helen Czerski:Yeah, I think that he would have wanted to have scientists speak out about things that they actually know about. And, you know, his classic example, kind of an exemplar for so many people, was when he participated in the board that was investigating the Challenger disaster.

38:34Ralph Leighton:That is Charles C. Mann, a science historian who interviewed and wrote about Feynman.

38:40Helen Czerski:He did this publicly because he had immediately gone down and reduced it to, you know, what is going on? This thing gets cold. It breaks. And that was pretty much it for the whole thing. And there's an example of a scientist really being helpful on an issue of public policy and understanding. And you find constantly pundits and political figures speaking in loud, confident voices about subjects which they know absolutely nothing about. And it kind of drives me crazy because I do have in my heart this example of Feynman, who is this enormously smart, inquisitive, knowledgeable guy who is exactly the opposite.

39:20Helen Czerski:You know, contrast that to Feynman's insistence on the limitations of our knowledge. I can live with doubt and uncertainty and not knowing. I think it's much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong.

39:38Michelle Feynman:I have approximate answers and possible beliefs and different degrees of certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure of anything. I don't feel frightened by not knowing things, by being lost in the mysterious universe without having any purpose, which is the way it really is as far as I can tell possibly.

39:57Cheryl Haley:It doesn't frighten me. It's a strange feeling that nothing is fixed. I know that makes some people uncomfortable. It's like, no, give me the answer now. I want to know the formula. Give me the formula. Well, if you can get the attitude that it's okay that things are not fixed and it's fun to discover new material, the world's more interesting than you thought.

40:24Ralph Leighton:Coming up after the break, the final adventure in the life of the curious, brilliant, vanishing Mr. Feynman. I'm Stephen Dubner. This is Freakonomics Radio.

40:38Michelle Feynman:Exterior Remodels, Inner Monologues, brought to you by Power. The house looks good. Like, really good. That siding? Stunning. The roof? Elevated. Windows? I mean, wow. The process? Smooth? The neighbors? Jealous? Choose Power Home Remodeling and remodel how you think about remodeling. Schedule your free quote on windows, siding, roofing, and doors at powerhomeremodeling.com. Power. Our work shows. An undisturbed sleep is a beautiful thing. That's why a Beautyrest mattress is designed to give you unparalleled motion separation. Isolating movement with our pocketed coil technology to help you sleep soundly no matter what's moving on the other side of the bed while providing individualized support for every sleeping position.

41:33Michelle Feynman:People at their best get their beauty rest for 100 years.

41:39Debby Harlow:Breathe in. Feel the sense of calm that comes from having up to$300 in overdraft protection with GoToBank. Now, did you say$300? Yes. Now, back to our breathing. So if I overspend my balance, GoToBank has my back up to$300. Yes. Can we breathe out now? Less worries, more zen. With over$300 in overdraft protection. Tap to open an account today. Eligible direct deposits and opt-in required for overdraft protection. Fees, terms, and conditions apply.

42:14Ralph Leighton:Chapter 9. Whatever happened to Tanu Tuva? Toward the end of his life, Richard Feynman was no longer on the cutting edge of physics research. The field was changing, as science does. Computer science was coming on strong, and Feynman did have a significant interest in that, but he wasn't a computer scientist. He was, however, perhaps the most famous living scientist at this time in the late 1980s. His book, Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman, a memoirish catalog of his adventures and misadventures, had been a bestseller. His participation in the Challenger space shuttle investigation a year later had shown the public how a scientist tries to solve a problem and how very different that is from how politicians try to solve a problem.

43:01Ralph Leighton:The scientist was all about inquiry, however uncomfortable that may be. He asked direct questions, however uncomfortable they may be. He was all about truth-seeking, even while acknowledging that the full truth is often unknowable. He also believed that it was simply wrong to pretend to know more than you do. A lot of what we know about Feynman today comes from some documentary films made toward the end of his life. Here's Ralph Layton.

43:32Cheryl Haley:For many years, Feynman would go over to England with his family in the summer because his wife, Gwyneth, was from Yorkshire. And one of those summers, a BBC documentary filmmaker named Christopher Sykes interviewed Feynman at length, sitting in a living room with a beautiful garden outside, and apparently violating all of the rules at the time of what you do for a documentary. because here was a headshot of Feynman speaking and gesticulating, but no cutaways, no fancy stuff, just a guy talking.

44:14Ralph Leighton:Christopher Sykes had first traveled to Caltech to persuade Feynman that this was something worth doing.

44:20Alan Alda:I have to say, he was quite intimidating. He looked me in the eye. He didn't smile or anything. He said, yes, sir. And I introduced myself and we went off to his office and he sat down and said, well, go ahead. So I tried to tell him a bit about, you know, I could feel perspiration under my arms as he just looked at me, didn't say a thing where I blathered on a bit about what we might try and do. And he said, well, I just think this is a dumb idea. He said, but tell you what, do you want to come down to the greasy spoon and we'll have some lunch? So we went off and we ordered soup and we talked about this and we talked about that.

45:00Alan Alda:He asked me, you know, what I was interested in, and I told him I'd studied literature, and he said rather impatiently, you know, well, all this is just a complete waste of time. I mean, you know, the only way to look at things is science, and that's the only thing that's interesting. And I thought, well, I've got nothing to lose here. And I think rather rudely, I said to him, well, I just think you've got absolutely no business having such a blinkered view of things. It's just such a narrow way of looking. And then he looked at me, and this was the great thing. he winked and he said I'll tell you what he said I did read a novel once it was called Madame Bovary and it was kind of nifty then he said I'll tell you what if you want to do something you go away think about what you want to do and tell me what it is and I'll say yes or no so off I went and I thought well what's he really good at that I can get my mind around well he's really good at talking So I suggested to him that what we should do is we'll start by doing a long interview.

46:00Alan Alda:I would ask him questions about his life and work. We'd go through in a chronological way from childhood onwards and then see what we got. And he said, OK, he'd do that. The film has gone on to become a bit of a cult film in a way. And I think it's just because of his ability to make people feel that even if they don't understand science or it would be much too difficult for them to, even if they tried. He makes everybody realise this must be a wonderful way to spend your time. You know, exploration of the world and trying to uncover the secrets of nature is just the most wonderful endeavour. I have to say, ever since I got involved with him, I realise, I go through life thinking, I wonder what Feynman would say about that.

46:47Alan Alda:What would Feynman think about this? It would have been fascinating. All this was before the internet. effectively. You know, what would Feynman have made of the internet and the World Wide Web and things like that? He would very often say, I don't know, that would be very interesting to find out about. Because that's the other thing, he detested any pretense at knowledge. You know, he hated fakery. As he says, it's much more interesting to live not knowing the answers to things than having answers that might be wrong. The great thing is to be endlessly curious and want to find out, but if you can't find out, we'll live with the doubt.

47:25Cheryl Haley:In January of 1988, I told Sykes, you better hurry up and get out here because I think Feynman is not doing well. And so Sykes came out in January of 1988, and you can tell from how Feynman looks in that documentary versus the others how much he had changed in his physical appearance from those

47:54Alan Alda:surgeries ralph leighton got in touch with me and said look he's really ill now people think he's really not going to last much longer by then there'd also been conversations between ralph and Feynman and me about this fascination they had with this country called Tanyu Tuva.

48:17Charles Mann:He was interested in visiting a far-off land called Tuva. My name's Michelle Feynman. I'm Richard Feynman's daughter. He had collected stamps when he was a boy, and they had the most interesting shapes, you know, diamond and triangular, and the images on the stamps were like nothing he had seen, right? So this boy in New York is seeing yaks or whatever else was on these stamps. And it just painted a picture of an entirely different world. So that sort of stuck in his head. And then many, many years later, he was at our dinner table with Ralph Layton. And they were playing a geography game to sort of entertain and educate themselves or the children or something.

49:04I was at one of my weekly dinners at the Feynman's, and I told him how I was going to get a geography class to teach.

49:13Cheryl Haley:I usually would teach math because that's where the demand is, but they let me teach a geography class. And so Feynman says, oh, yeah? What do you know about geography? And I said, oh, I know every country in the world. I listen to the shortwave radio. I can tell you. Oh, yeah? You know every country in the world. Whatever happened to Tanu Tuva? Now, to me, Tanu Tuva sounded a little too made up, and I almost was tempted to say to him, surely you're joking, Mr. Feynman. I was very skeptical, but we went to his Encyclopedia Britannica, which he loved and could recite for you the jacket categories, almost like a wrapper.

49:57Cheryl Haley:And in the back was an atlas, and there we saw the Tuva or Tuvinskaya Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. Tuva A-S-S-R, whose capital was K-Z-Y-L, K-Y-Z-Y-L, and that did it. As he said, any place that's got a capital spelled K-Y-Z-Y-L has just got to be interesting. And at the time, we had no idea how interesting it would be. The stamps were great. We wanted to know, can you still see scenes like on those stamps today? And we had no idea about this throat singing that they did. Only when we got into our research, driving around Southern California and going to university libraries, we came across a book that said that in Tuva, they have a method of singing in which a single voice can produce two notes simultaneously.

50:58Cheryl Haley:And we go, whoa. Little did we know that it was physics. It was harmonics.

51:11Alan Alda:They wanted to find out absolutely everything they could about this remote country in the middle of Asia. They even found a phrase book that they could somehow write to get in touch with people in Cuba, and they did. meanwhile the whole problem was how could they get there typical of Feynman he was offered the opportunity to go there the Soviet Academy of Sciences said look we'll arrange for you to go to Tanu Tuva if you'll agree to come and give some lectures in Moscow physics lectures which everybody obviously would want to hear and Feynman refused to do this for two reasons one is he didn't want to as he called it cheat by using ways of getting to this place that ordinary people couldn't do.

51:51Alan Alda:He didn't want to do it in what he saw as a cheating, privileged way just because he was famous and so on. And also he felt so strongly about human rights issues in Russia that he declined this idea of doing the lectures. Anyway, they kept trying to find out a way to go. And the idea was we were all going to go together. And I think probably we would have made a film or something if we had. So it was when Ralph gave me the wake up call and said, look, if we're ever going to do anything about Tuva, we must do it soon because Feynman's not going to live much longer. So I went to LA and my wife and I shot this long interview with Feynman about Tuva on a home video camera.

52:29Alan Alda:He could only manage about an hour at a time. He got so tired. When my wife Lottie and I were doing the video recording, one morning we turned up at Richard's house and he was still in bed Gwyneth his wife said yeah Richard's still in bed but he knows you're here and he's going to get up and so on and I'd said you know there's a thing here that we're going to have to worry about which is if Feynman really is dying and it seemed pretty clear he was the question is should I ask him to talk about death and his impending death and we decided well maybe the best thing is just to ask him so I went upstairs and he was getting up and getting dressed.

53:09Alan Alda:And I said, look, there's something I need to ask. He said, well, shoot. You know, he always said, shoot. I said, well, I wonder whether you think I should ask you what you think about the fact that you're dying. And he said, hmm, he said, look, I'll tell you what, I'll just get back into bed and let's just think about this and talk it out aloud. And he started talking about the conversations that he had had with Arlene. I hadn't heard about Arlene until this point. For the first time I heard the story of this love affair with Arlene when they were very, very young and she had tuberculosis, she was going to die, they knew she was going to die and they discussed this.

53:52Alan Alda:In the course of Feynman talking about his discussions with Arlene about death and what it all means, he got to the end and then he said, you know, I realise talking about this, about death, it just makes me very depressed and very unhappy so I think the answer is if you don't mind don't ask me about it. It was really interesting the way he thought took it seriously you know you ask and then he sets about working it out for himself and then coming to a conclusion and telling you what he thinks the correct answer is. You know if you watch the film which we called The Quest for Tanjotiva it's amazing to think that This guy, just a few weeks before he died, was able to talk in such a completely mesmerising and vivid and entertaining way about something he was passionate about.

54:41Alan Alda:That's when he and Ralph memorably played the bongos and Feynman sang this song he liked singing about, oh, I've got to have some orange juice. Feynman, two or three weeks later, I think, went into hospital and didn't come back out again.

55:07Cheryl Haley:As I later learned, for him, the journey was the destination, as the saying goes. I thought we were going to try to plant the flag of some crazy Californians at the Center of Asia Monument in Kazil, and that's what constituted success. But actually, along the way, trying to get there, we succeeded in bringing the largest archaeological and ethnographic exposition that ever came out of the Soviet Union to the United States. That's not bad, even if you don't get to Tuva. You know, trying to get to Tuva, to this far-off magical land, and you got cancer eating away at you, you know, it's a diversion.

56:05Cheryl Haley:You know, you're having fun with your friends, but I now kind of wonder whether for him, it didn't make any difference if he got there or something else to think about, something fun to do while you have cancer.

56:19Ralph Leighton:Two weeks after Feynman died, he and Ralph Layton finally received approval from the Soviet government to visit Tanu Tuva.

56:29Charles Mann:My dad just ran out of runway, I guess. You know, he didn't have enough time to see that plan come to life.

56:38Ralph Leighton:Eventually, Michelle Feynman and Ralph Layton did make the trip.

56:43Charles Mann:So it was honestly, and maybe I'll put some of it on jet lag, but I was so emotional on this trip. Like, I couldn't get through anything without crying.

56:54Ralph Leighton:The Feynman contingent was warmly received in Tanu Tuva, and his legacy there lives on. Just a few years ago, on the 100th anniversary of Feynman's birth, the mayor of Kazil declared a Richard Feynman Day. The celebration included Tuvan throat singing, and a Feynman diagram was carved into a rock face near a sacred place known as the Valley of the Kings. If you are an admirer of Richard Feynman, as I am, plainly, and as you may be by now, there is, of course, a disappointment that Feynman never made it to Tanu Tuva himself. On the other hand, it's fitting. His curiosity outstripped even his achievement.

57:40Ralph Leighton:I read something not long ago that made me think of Feynman. It was from a book by Carl Sagan, another great science communicator. Sagan was writing about what he called the dumbing down of America. I have a foreboding of an America, he wrote, when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to knowledgeably question those in authority, our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness.

58:23Ralph Leighton:Have we slid back into an era of superstition and darkness? I'd like to think that we haven't yet, at least not too much. And the human animal does continue to accomplish wonderful things, but we also routinely exercise stupidity and cruelty. When I look back at the life of Richard Feynman, what I most admire him for are simply the things he stood for and what he stood against. He stood for the indelible power of curiosity. He stood for the need to work very hard to distinguish between truth and hunch. And maybe because of what he learned from his father, the uniform salesman, he stood for ignoring the uniform, the epaulets, the titles.

59:09Ralph Leighton:What mattered to him were first principles, not status. And what did Feynman stand against? He stood against people bowing to experts without reason. He stood against people positioning themselves as experts without justification. His biggest fear may have been authoritarianism. An authoritarian represents everything Feynman disdained, and he has the power to stamp out everything Feynman loved. And what he loved most of all, I believe, is that every one of us is given the opportunity to try to understand the natural world and ourselves on a deep level if we are so inclined. That was his thrill.

59:54Ralph Leighton:That was his gift. And for me, that's his legacy. I don't think I would have ever thought of starting a show like Freakonomics Radio more than a decade ago if it weren't for Richard Feynman. So for that, I thank him. And I thank you for listening.

1:00:19Ralph Leighton:On the day we visited the Esalen Institute with Ralph Leighton and the Three Graces, we were pulling out of the parking lot at the end of the day when Ralph Leighton came running after us, waving his phone. He wanted to send us one more recording.

1:00:35Cheryl Haley:This is Ralph Leighton. I'm at Esalen on September 26, 2023 with the Freakonomics radio crew. I'm out here at the edge of the world, and it makes me think of Richard Feynman being here, looking out on the ocean. And I'd like to read a poem that he wrote about that. He says, for instance, I stand at the seashore alone and start to think. There are rushing waves, mountains of molecules, each minding its own business, trillions apart, yet forming white surf in unison. Ages on ages, before any eyes could see, year after year, thunderously pounding the shore as now. For whom? For what? On a dead planet with no life to entertain.

1:01:43Cheryl Haley:Out of the cradle, onto dry land, here it is, standing. Atoms with consciousness, matter with curiosity. stands at the sea, wonders at wondering, I, a universe of atoms, an atom in the universe.

1:02:19Ralph Leighton:And thus concludes our series, The Curious, Brilliant, Vanishing Mr. Feynman. I hope you enjoyed it. Please spread the word about Freakonomics Radio. That's the single best way to support a podcast you like. One other thing to note, as part of this series, we released a bonus episode featuring our full interview with Debbie Harlow, Cheryl Haley, and Barbara Berg, The Three Graces. That episode is called Mr. Feynman Takes a Trip But Doesn't Fall. You can find it at Freakonomics.com or wherever you get your podcasts. Freakonomics Radio is produced by Renbud Radio. this series was produced by Zach Lipinski.

1:02:56Ralph Leighton:It was edited by Gabriel Roth and mixed by Greg Rippon and Eleanor Osborne. I'd also like to thank everyone who sat for interviews, and especially Michelle Feynman and Ralph Leighton for taking our interests seriously, and then some. I'd also like to thank Luis Guerra, who writes and records the music for our show. He took on this special series with an enthusiasm that makes me so grateful to have a collaborator like him, And I think his Feynman music is sublime. If you'd like to hear this soundtrack music unencumbered by my talking, go to Spotify and search for The Curious, Brilliant, Vanishing Mr.

1:03:35Ralph Leighton:Feynman. That's F-E-Y-N-M-A-N. We had a lot of other help making this Richard Feynman series. I'd like to thank Richard Tai and Elisa Piccio, who led us into the Caltech archives, Nicholas Osorio and Music Mind in Pasadena, and Mike Buffo at House of Eight Media in Big Sur, who helped with the field recording, and to Rich Garcia at SiriusXM in Los Angeles for opening up the studio early on a Sunday morning. Thanks also to everyone at the Esalen Institute, especially Sam Stern and Shira Levine. Thanks also to Christopher Sykes and the BBC for the audio from their Feynman documentaries. to ITV for the audio from The World from Another Point of View, and the Library and University Archives at the University of California, Santa Barbara, for their recording of Feynman's Los Alamos From Below lecture.

1:04:23Ralph Leighton:The Freakonomics Radio Network staff also includes Augusta Chapman, Delvin Abouaji, Ellen Frankman, Elsa Hernandez, Ilaria Montenacourt, Jake Loomis, Jeremy Johnston, Mandy Gorenstein, Peter Madden, and Tao Jacobs. As always, thanks for listening.

1:04:45Ralph Leighton:Man, Ralph, that was amazing.

1:04:47Cheryl Haley:Was that a good rant?

1:04:55Debby Harlow:The Freakonomics Radio Network. The hidden side of everything.

1:05:03Debby Harlow:Breathe in. Feel the sense of calm that comes from having up to$300 in overdraft protection with GoToBank. Now... Did you say$300? Yes. Now, back to our breathing. So if I overspend my balance, GoToBank has my back up to$300. Yes. Can we breathe out now? Less worries, more zen. With over$300 in overdraft protection. Tap to open an account today. Eligible direct deposits and opt-in required for overdraft protection. Fees, terms, and conditions apply.

1:05:32Michelle Feynman:Close your eyes. Focus. Listen to work getting done with Monday.com. Relax, as AI does the manual work. while your teams are aligned on a single source of truth. Feel the sensation of an AI work platform, so flexible and intuitive, it feels like it was built just for you. Notice, you're limitless. Now open your eyes, go to monday.com, start for free, and finally, breathe.

1:06:02Ralph Leighton:Tyler Reddick and Chumba Casino, a winning combination. Another checkered flag for Tyler Reddick in 2311 Racing, This time at Coda in the Chumba Casino Toyota Camry. That's three wins this season. Talk about a lucky streak. Chumba Casino, proud partner of Tyler Reddick and 2311 Racing. Play for free at ChumbaCasino.com.

1:06:23Michelle Feynman:Let's Chumba!

1:06:24Ralph Leighton:No purchase necessary. VGW Group Voidware prohibited by law. See TNC's 21 Plus sponsored by Chumba Casino.