BONUS - May Q&A Show

6 May 2026 · 1 h 27 min · 28 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

May live Q&A for “The Tennis Podcast,” mixing tennis talk with personal “why we love tennis” reflections and forward-looking discussion about players and the tour.

Guests

No external guests. Hosts include Catherine (often addressed as “Catherine”), David, and Matt (plus occasional references to others in the chat).

Guest backgrounds (hosts’ relevant experience): Catherine and David are long-time tennis podcast hosts/media participants; Matt is a former competitive player who coaches/plays and has deep interest in tennis history and analysis.

Key claims

  • Tennis fandom is “inherited” for some (Wimbledon-era family viewing; later US Open discovery) and becomes identity through stories, technicalities, and one-on-one combat.
  • Jannik Sinner nearing a “Masters 1000 sweep” should be talked about more, but it’s under-discussed because it “crept up” and Masters 1000s feel secondary to Slams.
  • Amanda Anisimova’s 2025 breakthrough is not expected to mirror Jasmine Paolini’s 2024 path; Anisimova’s upside/ceiling and training changes suggest room for growth.
  • Movement/athleticism-dependent players may face career-length challenges, but adaptation (especially serve quality) is crucial.

Notable examples

  • Rome tournament atmosphere; Ostapenko vs Anisimova mentioned.
  • Djokovic’s Masters 1000 quest; Sinner potentially doing it on home soil in Rome.
  • Chang/Hewitt fading; Hingis overtaken by power.
  • Bianca Andreescu disappointment; Ash Barty surprise; Kyrgios “worsening” trajectory.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Excitement for Rome Tournament

0:45 to 2:19

Hosts share their excitement about the atmosphere at the Rome tournament.

“You know, the first day of Rome yesterday was so drab and the crowds were so small.”

Personal Connections to Tennis

2:19 to 4:25

Hosts discuss their personal journeys and connections to tennis.

“But I think, as David said, it improved and the matches got better throughout the day.”

Debating the Love for Tennis

4:25 to 9:24

A deep dive into why the hosts love tennis, exploring various aspects of the sport.

“very much part of my family DNA that I inherited.”

Individual Fandom Experiences

9:24 to 14:00

Hosts recount their unique experiences and memories related to tennis fandom.

“But like I in my sort of darker existential moments, I'm like, well, do I actually like tennis?”

Personal Reflections on Tennis

14:00 to 16:29

Explore how tennis has become a significant part of the speaker's life and identity.

“hours you have to spend and can spend following it researching it looking into the history How rewarded you are for those hours.”

Discussion on Sinner's Masters 1000 Pursuit

16:29 to 22:52

Analyze the implications and significance of Jannik Sinner nearing a Masters 1000 milestone.

“What a question to start the show, Rachel.”

Comparing Anisimova and Paolini

22:52 to 28:00

Evaluate the potential trajectories of Amanda Anisimova and Jasmine Paolini in tennis.

“Yeah, I don't have a lot to add, but I think the point you made at the start, Catherine, it's impressive.”

The Evolution of Amanda Anisimova's Game

28:00 to 29:52

Explore how Amanda Anisimova's training changes impact her performance.

“or maybe not anything close is an exaggeration.”

Comparing Careers: Anisimova vs. Paolini

29:52 to 32:45

Discuss the contrasting career trajectories and potentials of Anisimova and Paolini.

“I think there are going to be opportunities for players to win Wimbledon.”

Movement vs. Ball Striking in Player Longevity

32:45 to 36:48

Analyze whether players relying on movement will have shorter careers than those focused on ball striking.

“will have shorter careers at the top of the game?”
Show all 28 chapters

Adapting Playing Styles Over Time

36:48 to 40:14

Examine how top players adjust their playing styles to maintain success as they age.

“I mean, the foot speed is great, but it's the athleticism, isn't it?”

Grand Slam Venue Rotation Discussion

40:14 to 42:04

Debate the feasibility and implications of rotating Grand Slam tournament venues.

“I'm slightly distracted by the fact that I think we're finally getting the Greg Rosensky coaching debut.”

Discussing the Future of Grand Slams

42:04 to 47:12

Explore potential changes to Grand Slam hosting and the importance of venue identity.

“And I think, OK, maybe some federations or promoters would be incentivised to develop new venues.”

Player Disappointments and Surprises

47:12 to 52:43

Insights into players who have surprised or disappointed over the last five years.

“No no no I'm angry at mine Hang on, David, I was very clear that I'm not angry at Bianca.”

Behind the Scenes at Grand Slams

52:43 to 56:01

An overview of media seating arrangements and experiences at Grand Slam events.

“I just don't really know if I knew Paolini all that well in 2021.”

Media Access at Major Tournaments

56:01 to 58:29

Learn about how media access and seating works at various tennis tournaments.

“or is it a first-come, first-served situation?”

Challenges of Covering Wimbledon and the US Open

58:30 to 1:01:13

Explore the differences and challenges faced by media at Wimbledon and the US Open.

“We have one designated seat for the tennis podcast as an outlet.”

Press Room Experiences and Facilities

1:01:14 to 1:05:07

Discover the unique quirks and issues of the press room facilities at the US Open.

“And yet you still don't want people to recline their seats and you get to enjoy that.”

Navigating Burnout During Tournaments

1:05:08 to 1:10:01

Understand the experience of burnout during tennis tournaments and how to manage it.

“There's always far too many people in there and the gaps.”

Navigating Tennis Burnout

1:10:01 to 1:11:38

Explore the challenges of physical and mental burnout in tennis coverage.

“Like that is, I've got nothing to say to that.”

Behind the Scenes of Tennis Coverage

1:11:39 to 1:13:21

Hear about the intense schedule and teamwork behind producing tennis content.

“I would just, I would go to sleep on the laptop.”

Tennis Players on Reality Shows

1:13:22 to 1:16:53

Discuss which tennis players might excel on reality shows like Race Across the World.

“When those messages, when the WhatsApp would go, so I'll be dialing you up in five minutes, Catherine.”

Character Dynamics on Race Across the World

1:16:54 to 1:18:38

Analyze the dynamics of contestants on Race Across the World and their personalities.

“Married couples, David, aren't always...”

Imagining Tennis Players in Unique Scenarios

1:18:39 to 1:23:42

Speculate on how tennis players would navigate challenges in a reality show format.

“I would have smothered him in his sleep.”

Final Thoughts on Group Dynamics

1:23:43 to 1:24:00

Discuss the dynamics of team performance and individual roles in group settings.

“But that's where you don't both need to do the direction stuff.”

Navigating Life and Tennis

1:24:00 to 1:25:49

The hosts discuss experiences in Indian Wells and the fun of getting lost while driving.

“One of my favourite things was when we were in Indian Wells and David would drive every day and we'd get to the gate and every day, every day we had to go right.”

Audience Engagement and Questions

1:25:50 to 1:26:38

The hosts thank listeners for their questions and encourage ongoing engagement.

“folks what a show thank you so much for those questions well done Matt for picking those out a really a really lovely smattering of silly and existential and behind the scenes stuff and analytical stuff.”

Upcoming Content and Closing Remarks

1:26:39 to 1:27:18

The hosts share updates on future episodes and thank those involved with the show.

“No streaker has responded to my come and get me plea.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:11Hello friends and welcome to the tennis podcast and your May question and answer live pod for friends of the tennis podcast. You know that because if you're listening or if you're watching us live on YouTube right now, you're a friend of the pod and we're very pleased to have you. A special hello if you're with us live tonight and in the chat, which is already lively with enthusiasm about Yelena Ostopenko against Amanda Enesimova on Petrangeli tomorrow. David can't get the grin off his face and is wearing Seahawks merch, of course. All is right with the world. Yes, that's right. Yeah, it is. You know, the first day of Rome yesterday was so drab and the crowds were so small.

0:56I was really on a downer about it. Then suddenly today, it's like they just let all the schools out and everybody descended on the Foro Italico and made for a great atmosphere. I've been watching Carabelli with loads of Argentina fans going crazy in one corner. I've been watching Analdi in another. And now you start reading out that order of play for tomorrow. I'm really pumped. I got a very excitable text from David about Matteo Arnaldi Turn on Arnaldi! He's doing things! There was a brief moment in time where you were quite excited about Arnaldi I thought of him as a Matt Roberts guy but I haven't thought about him at all in about two years Yeah, I think I put him in my fantasy team last year I feel like coming off the end of 2024 going into 2025.

1:52I was on board. But no, he's really struggled, hasn't he? And been overtaken by other Italian men that keep appearing, I suppose. And now he's... Well, there's no shame in that. Now he's fighting back. Yeah, it was a strange start to the day in Rome. I saw three six-love sets, the first thing this morning. Ayala was six-love up on Freck. Ostapenko was six-love up on Stefanini. Our mate Dave. On Stefanini. The wrong girls. And Maria was 6 '0 up on Lynette. I was like, what is happening in Rome? This is chaotic. But I think, as David said, it improved and the matches got better throughout the day.

2:33And tomorrow is the first order of play where you're like, OK, this is proper now. Yeah, it's proper now. Oh, it's a tournament. Yeah. I mean, still none of the top seeds, obviously. Certainly not on the men's side anyway. Yeah, not on the men's side. Tomorrow we've got Sabalenka and Goff and a Samova all playing. So that's quite a lot, actually. That's pretty good. Get into that. And Andreescu. Oh, yeah. We'll come on to her later in the show. I've got her in mind for one of the questions. Excellent questions, as always. They are all cherry-picked from the barge, where we have a kind of repository of just excellent questions that are always there for either us or guest editors to choose from whenever we fancy.

3:23So thank you for everybody that contributes and continues to contribute to that repository. Without you, we would be nothing. And we, I think, have an excellent smorgasbord of questions tonight, a real selection box of different stuff, starting with what I think is one of the most difficult questions we've ever been asked. It's from Rachel Sayre. Hello, Rachel. One of our most joyful and enthusiastic and wonderful supporters of the pod. Rachel asks, why do you all like tennis so much? And Rachel, you sound like my therapist. that is such a different difficult question it's like asking why do you like chocolate ice cream so much more than vanilla like i just do i just like it that's who i am do you know and maybe that's because my sort of origin story with tennis is that it was very much part of my family DNA that I inherited.

4:38I wish I had that light bulb moment where I just discovered tennis and went, oh my God, what's this? I love it. It's for me. I have to know everything about it. But, you know, I can think of moments and matches that really hooked me in and elevated my levels of interest and made it feel like it was mine rather than my family's. that I was sort of tangentially a part of. But the fact is it was always just in me in various different ways. So maybe that's why I find it particularly hard to really answer this question. I feel like, David, you're probably going to do some really good pinpointing here.

5:27I feel like you're going to be able to put this into words pretty well. Maybe you'll be able to explain why you like whatever ice cream flavour you do.

5:37I do. I've become quite a chocolate ice cream guy. But it's taken a bit of time. I now like those magnums with the salted caramel inside and the chocolate ice cream as well. I really like those. Anyway. Matt likes a Maxibon. I do. I like the free ice cream at the Australian Open. I like the minis. I like the little ones that just make me feel like I'm getting a treat. Yeah, I'm getting a treat and I'm being a bit good so I can have two. I love a mini magnum. This isn't what Rachel wanted to know, is it? No. But I think it actually does go, similarly to you, I think it goes a little hand in hand with my love affair with tennis because I think that that also went in stages because I had my initial stage of discovering it through Wimbledon through the family household and i think it's probably a pretty typical story certainly in britain of certainly in the 80s when i when i've discovered it it was only on at wimbledon it was only on on the bbc you could not watch anything else so that is what i was exposed to and it was but it was all encompassing like everybody was watching it that was the beauty of only having at that stage three television channels that you could watch and two of them had Wimbledon on so that's what everybody watched and then everybody suddenly started going down the local park to to play tennis um and and so in 1981 that was my discovery of it and I and I didn't fall in love with it like I would come to love it but but I definitely I was totally won over by it and I I loved sitting there with my mum watching it.

7:29And then on finals day when my dad was off work, he'd be watching it too. And even my sister would be interested. Everybody would just drop everything. It was just a family event in everybody's family that I knew. And then it was another 10 years before I discovered it on my own terms because I discovered the US Open. And that was the whole Jimmy Connors run and his story and watching in the middle of the night. and me finding something that I loved that nobody else I knew loved because this wasn't Wimbledon, this was the US Open. And so those are my two stages of falling in love with the sport.

8:08It's quite interesting now because of us all working in it. I mean, we've basically all managed to manufacture a way to work as a full-time job in something we absolutely love. I mean, I feel incredibly fortunate. I always have done about that. But I've always wanted to sort of maintain my love for it. And it has changed a little as time's gone by. And I think now I love the stories. I love the conversation with you guys and what we have through this podcast. But I also really appreciate just the technicalities, the ball on strings, what spin does on different surfaces. I will sit there watching people hit balls and just be quite happy for ages just to sort of see what they can do and what happens when they impart what spin.

9:07I know, it's an intoxicating sport to me. and I love the I love the combat I love the person to person one on one I mean obviously there's doubles and there are team events but I do love the one on one nature of it and how what you do directly affects your opponent but there's no violence not physical violence there's violent intent but it's not hurting anybody typically at least you know certainly not but I just I love that element of it Yeah, what you've just described there, that really speaks to me, not to get too sort of too deep about it. But like I in my sort of darker existential moments, I'm like, well, do I actually like tennis?

9:55Or is it do I if I just assumed I like tennis, because that's because my family likes tennis, and I just inherited it, like, have I built a whole life and a whole career on something that I don't even know myself well enough to know that I actually like? And I like I really actually recently tried to be more intentional and conscious about figuring out what I like about tennis and that exactly what David's just described. There is one of those things. And I mean, as keen listeners to the pod will know, I like the drama and I think tennis reliably brings drama. And I think sort of narrowing that down even further, I think the scoring system, I think it is the best scoring system in sport.

10:44I think it is a thing of absolute genius and beauty, the scoring system. Matt, over to you. Yeah, I really enjoy thinking about this question and how to answer it. And like you, I struggle to pin it down to one particular thing. So I want to try and take you on a journey through my tennis fandom if I can. And going back to the start, the thing for me is that it started with playing the sport. You know, like my first introduction to it was actually through playing. And I always try and remember that. You know, I don't think I do play as much tennis as I would like to, even though I've done a better job in the last few years.

11:34But I remember finding it so, so fun to play and so much better than like football, which I was also playing because I wouldn't get the ball. Like, you know, when you're playing kids football, no one passes you the ball. And you spend a lot of the time just sort of standing. Who wasn't passing to Matt Roberts? You just sort of spend a lot of time standing around in a field getting cold. And I remember like finding that quite annoying. Whereas, you know, the thing and Billie Jean King always says this about tennis as well, like feeling the ball on the strings and just getting to hit shots over and over, I think is really satisfying.

12:14So that definitely drew me to the sport initially, the playing of it. And, you know, I had reasonable hand eye. I was OK at it, like to begin with. And that combination of moving and hitting, I just found really satisfying. And I had a really good first coach. Shout out Paul Ambrose, who was, you know, just made it fun. You know, kids, kids tennis. It was just fun. So I think he sort of hooked me on it. And then I discovered the professional game. And it was it was already pretty popular in my family, I would say. It was a way of especially connecting with my with my grandma who, you know, you'd go around to her house and the tennis would definitely be on.

12:53it was nadal or enin basically always uh and you know wimbledon was on our doorstep i was very lucky that i would go to wimbledon every year i first went when i was 10 and i've been every year since you know i'm very lucky in in in that sense um and you know i think i knew immediately that i'd come in and it was the federer and nadal era right and i think i knew that that was a big rivalry and it was a big moment in the sport and it was kind of special and I think those two definitely got me hooked on the professional side of the sport very quickly and I think now that I'm older and I take a step back from it I think one of the things I know about myself is that rather than necessarily having lots of interests in lots of things I tend to be the kind of character who has deep dive interest into something and no that right i'm glad that i'm right and like tennis tennis presents that opportunity i think to really go deep into the sport just the hours you have to spend and can spend following it researching it looking into the history How rewarded you are for those hours.

14:14Yeah. You never come back from the Wimbledon Library and are like, I didn't quite get what I was hoping for today. Never. So just like the sheer amount of time I've been able to just spend thinking and watching and researching tennis has just been incredibly satisfying to me. And I was talking the other month to Matt Futterman. I don't know why we're talking about this, we were talking about baseball and he said that baseball is kind of like the air it's just there and i was like that's how i feel about tennis you know like we complain about tennis being on all the time and the scheduling but i find it now just this constant comforting companion you know like honestly as a as a total reflex one of the first things i will do every morning is check an order of play or check the overnight scores i just like i need it i'm tethered to it and it's it's just become a sort of way of navigating myself through the world if you like like january is not january january is the australian open june july is not june july june july is french open Wimbledon you know that that is kind of my relationship now and I I think Pam talks about this as well in terms of like it being that thread running through her life and I feel like that and you know a lot of my friends have come about through watching you know at school I made friends through playing tennis same at university in in my adult life I've made I've made friends through tennis and you're talking about pam shriver matt totally and but also you guys and you know itamar and vicky and hannah i i consider all of you my friends and that tennis is sort of the thing that's that's brought us together and um equally if i want pleasure i might go and watch a tennis match or i might go and play tennis like it's it's just this constant stream and thread through my life and there's no real part of my life that it hasn't touched in some way I suppose so um yeah that that's that's a deep answer but I did I did really enjoy thinking about that and realizing that about myself and relationship with the sport and also that thing that David said in terms of like when he discovered it and it was like he discovered the US Open and you were like oh this is this is kind of mine now I kind of think a lot of people feel that with tennis because you I don't know like it was quite an individual thing for me watching tennis in a way like initially um like tennis Kathy exactly it's like that was my name at university becomes kind of your identity in a way yeah absolutely that's why I have existential school crises of like is this Is this actually who I am or is this just who I decided I was when I was a kid and you're just desperate for an identity and the goth look never felt like it was going to work for you?

17:28What a question to start the show, Rachel. Where do we go from here? Let's go to Matt Drake's question. Matt asks, do you think the fact of Sinner getting ever closer to having won every Masters 1000 tournament at least once isn't being talked about enough? He could do it on home soil in only a couple of weeks and would only be the second man after Novak Djokovic to complete it. And of course, he would be the youngest by quite some considerable distance. I'm a bit conflicted about this, Matt. I think you can very easily make a case for the answer being yes, it should be being talked about far more because it would be an unreal achievement.

18:18But he's also, there's kind of so many other unreal achievements he's going for at the moment that, you know, they all have to sort of divide up the Alexina oxygen in the room, I suppose. And I think the other thing maybe is that it would be a tremendous achievement, but it would never be something that, it's not something that kids dream of when they're young and say, I want to be a tennis player. It's just not, it just doesn't have that sheen to it as a line on the CV. But it would be an extraordinary achievement, of course. Yeah, I think the reason it probably hasn't been talked about all that much is because it's actually crept up on me that he's about to do it.

19:13I think the thing with Djokovic is that there was a chase. There was a quest to do it. Yeah, that's a great point. Cincinnati was his last one, wasn't it, that he needed. And he'd lost several Cincinnati finals. Federer was kind of the best in Cincinnati on those quick conditions. And he was, I think, 31, maybe even 32 when he finally did it, which obviously we now know that was nothing. And he would go on to play forever. But at the time it was like, oh, my God, if he doesn't do this now, he's going to be in the coffin. So I think it's almost like he's too good, Sina. Like for us to be talking about it and for it to have come on our radar.

19:57it's an unreal achievement if he does it at 24 because i agree with you obviously like it's not it's not going to be the headline of his career i don't think but it does require you know you to play well at so many different times of year to do this you know you've got to you've got to be able to play well in the in that sort of purgatory period that matt fustman was talking about the sunshine double you've got to be able to play well at the end of the season you've got to be played well on all the surfaces, indoors, outdoors. It is a real test of skill, I think. I do love a quest though, Matt.

20:33He's not going to have any quests left to have, is he? Well, he's going to have a chase, isn't he? He's going to have a chase in terms of trying to rack up numbers, right? You mean weeks at number one, year end number one, number of Grand Slam titles and all that kind of thing. I think that's going to be what he's going for I also think that this is also an indication of just how big the Grand Slams have become you know they're the pillars they're the things we think about I also think there's a slight point here to be made of what has happened to the Masters 1000 events in that they now massively feel like sort of secondary to the slams but just like almost not warm up events for the slams but I think what the ATP has done in terms of trying to elevate them and make them two weeks is they've just made them weaker versions of the slams I think they've slightly lost a little bit of their identity you know and 10-15 years ago I do think this sort of masters 1000s i remember the constant battles between the big three and the big four they really felt like they were different to the slams but mattered in their own regard now i think what's happened with the calendar there's always this feeling of yeah but let's wait until we get to the grand slam and that kind of thing and they just feel like smaller versions of the slam so they they perhaps have a little bit of a less of a significance in my mind than they maybe used to have that's not to take away the achievement because it's absolutely astonishing I'm just trying to get my head around why I agree with Matt like it hasn't been kind of talked about enough I think it's also something to do with people are just generally a little bit disparaging about the two-week Masters 1000 events at the moment I think rightly but we shouldn't let that take away from the achievements of Sinner and I think David I want to come to you on this I I think if he actually does it come a week Sunday, there will be a lot more talk about it.

22:45Especially because it's Rome, which is his last one. Right, exactly. Yeah, yeah. David? Yeah, I don't have a lot to add, but I think the point you made at the start, Catherine, it's impressive. It's incredibly impressive. I'm just not that into it because, you know, to me they're good tournaments, but I'm just not that they don't that doesn't matter to me that much I was I ended I've kind of in hindsight become very impressed with the fact with what Djokovic did because other players didn't do it you know in that same way um I mean I you came up with a stat in the newsletter today Matt that made me think that with this going on does this change Sinner's attitude towards the canada tournament that that he's now started missing you know or that or that you you wonder whether he'll ever play again and you think well yeah but what if it what if he wins this one now then then do you start to think that that's an important statistic to try to i don't think he would i think he i think he would still see the bigger picture of well hold on have i won wimbledon or have i reached the final wimbledon do i need a break yes probably therefore i won't play it but I think you did say that there's a three-week gap this time rather than a two-week one.

24:05I just still feel like it's not very much. How have they found that extra week? Where have they pulled the week from? I'm not entirely sure. They've done something, haven't they? Because last year, Cincinnati was all over the place, wasn't it? And Canada. Yeah, the dates were a little different. The dates were odd. Canada ended up finishing, I want to say, on like a Thursday or something. Like it had its final on an odd day of the week. And then the Cincinnati was on a Monday. This year it's back to normal, so to speak. Why didn't they just do this last year? There's the same number of weeks in a year.

24:42Wimbledon's at the same time. The US Open's at the same time. I don't understand. A vortex has happened that time of year. Okay, next question comes from Simon Robb. And Simon says, This might be a question that Matt wants to look away from, but Amanda Anisimova's 2025 seems quite reminiscent of Paolini's 2024 in terms of breakthrough and results, especially at the Grand Slams. How worried are all three of you that Anisimova's 2026-2027 will follow in Paolini's footsteps? What are the potential significant differences you could see happening to avoid it? Now, personally, I think it's really different.

25:32I see a lot of differences. Should we... David, do you want to weigh in on this as a slightly more impartial observer before we go to Matt? But am I? I'm the underestimating Jasmine Paolini guy, aren't I? The good draw guy. I mean, look, I do feel as much as I'm quite happy to wear the egg on the face that I warranted through all of that um I do think there's a huge difference in their respective upsides um I I still to this day don't really know how Pauline did what she did I think it's incredible I think it was one of one of the great sort of achievements of the last few years that that that was punching above your weight big time you know we got a question later on about about sort of how how your physicality can can versus your strokes can influence your your your results and that sort of thing and she managed to make everything work um i i don't feel like anissa movers had to do that she's had to put it together in another way but my word in terms of an artillery Anisimova has everything clearly the only thing she doesn't have is foot speed and that kind of thing but and I think sometimes she struggles to hold it together but I mean just game wise you feel like she can cut a swathe through a draw and it looks quite easy because if she's on she's just lethal and I don't think that that is Paolini.

27:10So yes, I can see that Anissa Merva may have dips, but I just think that's going to be form-based. I don't think it's a question of people figuring her out or anything like that. Anissa and Paolini may well have a bounce back. I don't want to write her off completely, but I've always thought that she has to work so incredibly hard and she has to be so on top of her form to do what she's doing. I don't think Anisimova has to do that. Yeah, I think Hannah's made a great point in the chat here. She says Anisimova can get better. And she said, I don't know how Paolini can get better game-wise. It feels like she maximised.

27:52I don't think even in the two Grand Slam final runs that we've seen that we've witnessed anything close to the peak of what Anisimova is capable of. or maybe not anything close is an exaggeration. But, you know, she only employed Shadi, her fitness trainer, who's Matt Futterman's done a big piece about her. We've talked about her a lot. Totally changed everything about the way Amanda Enesimova trains and does things and approaches the sport and just the very decision to employ her was a big signifier of a change in Amanda as well. She did that in April last year. Like that was two and a half months, 10 weeks before Wimbledon, before the Wimbledon run, maybe a bit less than that.

28:37Like it can take years for the full effects of a partnership like that to really come into force. Like she felt like a work in progress last year and those results felt ahead of the curve. And I don't think progress, well, progress is very rarely ever linear. and I don't think Amanda Nisimov is a person that, it makes sense to me that she's having ups and downs. I don't think she's going to be 100 % of the time locked in person but I don't think we've seen anything close to the max and I think what Paolini was doing was maxing in the most admirable way possible and that's not to minimise that as a skill.

29:24Like there's plenty of players that have never maxed and never even really put themselves out there enough to try to. And that's, you know, that's on them. And, you know, they don't have to answer to us. But that's a skill in itself, making the right decisions to max yourself out. And I think Amanda Anasimova is trying to do that. I think the decisions are there. She's just she's on a journey. We all are. Right. The theme of the show. yeah look I think you've both said it really well I wouldn't add too much I think that you know the obvious point but Anissimova is a lot younger in 2025 when she made those back-to-back slam finals than Paolini was when she did it in 2024 you know like I just see them at opposite opposite ends of their careers really in terms of in in in terms of age and yeah the potential upside and ceiling of anisimova's game is is higher i think and also like the thing about anisimova is that i know she's good on all surfaces but i do think her best surface is hard courts and yeah i think she's where she feels the most stable underfoot um and there's two majors on hard courts and she gets a home major you know I think that's kind of helpful as well in terms of trying to build on that Grand Slam success that she had and I do think Wimbledon I know Paolini obviously got to a Wimbledon final as well but the Anissimova game makes quite a lot of sense at Wimbledon in terms of the flat ground strokes and Wimbledon is the most open major you You know, no one has just grabbed hold of that on the women's side and said, this is my one.

31:16I think there are going to be opportunities for players to win Wimbledon. And Anisimova has kind of shown that her game can really, you know, cause a lot of damage there. You know, like she beat Sabalenka in a Wimbledon semifinal. You know, I don't always like like comparing runs and that sort of thing from players. Like you play who's in front of you in a Grand Slam. But I think the level that Anissimov had in that Wimbledon run to the final, obviously not in the final, but to the final, I think was perhaps like a higher level even than Paolini had on the grass the year before. Like it was a blooming hard Wimbledon to try and win in 2025 when you had Sabalenka-Sviontek back to back, you know.

32:01So, yeah, I agree with you that I do think the things are quite different. and I don't think I'll be worrying about it until we're maybe, you know, two or three years and we're not seeing anything like 2025 again. You know, I think those ups and downs are going to come and she's got time in a way that, this sounds morbid, in a way that Paolini doesn't. I didn't mean to end on such a bad note, but I have done. I've already put someone in a coffin, this show. Now Jasmine Paolini. Next excellent question comes from Peter. Peter Selves? Peter Selves. Could be either. Peter says, do you think players that rely on their movement and athleticism will have shorter careers at the top of the game?

32:52For example, players like Goff and Alcaraz rely so much on foot speed. When they eventually lose half a step through age, will they be overtaken by players that rely more on ball striking than movement, like Rabakina or Anisimova? even sinner to a lesser extent is there precedent for this in the past great question let's let's let's come to you david because you'll be able to give kind of the deepest historical perspective on this i think i think there's definitely precedent i would actually in the cases of those two certainly alcaraz i think that unless he's injured i think he's got the firepower as well so I don't I wouldn't necessarily use him as as an example in this and I also think I mean Goff hits a big serve and and she has but but that but certainly her athleticism is a major reason that she's what she what she is um but historically though I definitely think there are precedents um I think of Michael Chang um who was you know top two or three in the world for for a number of years and won a grand slam at the age of 17 and never won another one um and actually he got to his sort of late 20s and i was looking back over his rankings and between 98 and 2004 he was ranked outside the top world's the top 30 in the world for six years you know just sort of winding down his career trying to play playing 60 matches in a year but you know not not winning that many of them i remember being that coincided when i joined the tour as a communications person i'd see him around and to me he was just one of my gods you know of of my 90s and yet here i'm working with him and he's just fading and he's not part of the the sampras conversation anymore and he and the agassi conversation yet he used to be right there he just his game just started to lose its teeth um i think it happened to but he didn't have the weaponry and same with no no that's that's the point they totally relied on it didn't they yeah i i i mean they they they had they could hit hit a big ball but i mean mainly it was counter punching maybe mainly it was lobs and speed across the ground hewitt and and chang in particular and i mean hewitt was world number one but this is reductive because he's he's added so much to his firepower and i know matt's going to come at me from this but would alex de minore maybe be a closer comfort like i think he in terms of his reliance on the foot speed it's it's interesting because he's probably the top player that springs to mind the most he's got he's got a slightly he's got a different trajectory in as much as Chang and Hewitt were top players in the world, really young.

35:51And then they started to fade after a few years of being at the top. Dimonor has not got to their level. And I think maybe that tells you, maybe he's not as good as them, but I think he's not far off. I think it's really that the game has changed. Players used to come at Hewitt and Chang and they would counterpunch them. They would handle the serve and volley and turn it back on them in a way. people don't do that now so Dimonor's required to beat them from the baseline with this technology it's tough and he's what Chang and Hewitt tried to do is to develop with the game, they tried to add power they tried to add a punch the same way as Dimonor, I actually think Dimonor's doing a better job of that than those two did really and in the women's game I think of Hingis probably who was dominant and then And she started to get overtaken by the power hitters.

36:48Goff's an interesting one, isn't she? Because it's not just the speed. I mean, the foot speed is great, but it's the athleticism, isn't it? And the retrieval and the hustling. And I feel like you can maintain that pretty deep into your 30s if you do the right things and if you want to. So, yeah, I feel like it would be interesting to track with Goff, definitely. With the Alcaraz example, that made me think of Nadal. Like, I definitely remember that being said about Nadal. And, OK, you know, he ended up with a zombie foot and, you know, various other body parts falling apart. But the losing a step thing wasn't really much of a factor with him.

37:32Yeah, I think the key for all top players, no matter your game style, really, if you want to stay at the top, is you have to adjust. and you have to be constantly improving. And I think that's what Nadal was just so good at, you know, in terms of getting more out of his serve as his career went on and becoming, I think, even tactically smarter. You know, the way he won that Australian Open final in 2022, okay, there were a lot of Nadal traits there, heart and grit, but it was also like so tactically smart and he was playing a different way to how he was when he was dominating the sport in 2008, 2010, that sort of period.

38:19I have a theory that players' ball striking can actually get better as they age. I think we might have seen some of that with Djokovic the past few years. I think the way he strikes the forehand now when his timing is there, I think is maybe bigger than... That elastic forehand David Coulter. Yeah, I think it was bigger. I think he's also trying to go for it more, you know. But I think, you know, I think of like Agassi in 2005. I know Agassi was always an amazing ball striker. But how good did his ball striking have to be in 2005 to be able to like keep up with Federer in some of those matches that they had because he couldn't really move because of his bad back, you know.

39:05And like, I think even Federer himself, His ball striking in 2019 was unbelievable the way he was ripping the ball. And the thing that I keep coming back to for all of these greats who have played well in their 30s, Federer, Djokovic, Serena is the serve. I think if there's one thing you need to maintain a really high level and keep at the top, it's your serve. because it gets you free points and it sets up the rest of your game that you need to be playing on your terms if you have lost a little bit of movement or athleticism. And Serena's the best server ever. Federer, you could make a case that he's one of the best servers ever.

39:50And Djokovic has become like Federer with his serving in terms of hitting his spots and not having an attackable second serve. And I think that shot will help keep you at the top of the sport well into your 30s if you've been at the top of the sport already. Great answer. Next question from Claire Evans. I'm slightly distracted by the fact that I think we're finally getting the Greg Rosensky coaching debut. Is it happening, David? It is, yeah. Yeah. Jacob Fern, he seems to be able to return the Mpessi Pericard serve. Has he made a serve worse? Well, he seems to be having a saga every service game at the moment, which I don't think was the idea.

40:46But anyway, early days. I'm not going to be at all distracted by knowing that's going on. Not at all. Next question from Claire. Claire Evans. Claire says I know you're all big golf fans one interesting difference I find between the two is the way the golf tournaments including those beyond the majors move around and are not at the same venue which potentially offers different conditions and maybe opening it up to new fans would you like tennis to follow a similar structure so the Australian Open could rotate to Sydney or Brisbane or do you like that it revisits venues I mean my short answer pissing on the bonfire of this excellent question is it's just not possible because if the size and scale of venue and facilities required to host a Grand Slam there aren't two of those in Australia.

Read the full transcript

41:41I don't think there are two of those in any country really. Like there's nowhere else in the UK that could host Wimbledon. Maybe there's somewhere I suppose Indian Wells might just be able, just about, but not really. You know, it would be massively diminished. So, yeah, that's the very boring answer, I hope. And I think, OK, maybe some federations or promoters would be incentivised to develop new venues. with the incentive of becoming a Grand Slam host, but not if it was only a one-time Grand Slam host. You couldn't justify that investment in infrastructure, I don't think, if it was just to host a slam every few years.

42:37But do you like the concept, David? It's interesting that there was a period when the year-end event on the men's side, when it was rebranded the Tennis Masters Cup, the idea was that it would rotate annually. And that started in, I think, Sydney. I think it started in Sydney, and then the next year it went to Lisbon, and then the next year it went to Shanghai, and then it had a couple of years in Houston. And it was rotating, but they were finding it very difficult to make that work, because of the need to kind of build a market, you know, a lot of the time, like have a couple of years to get it embedded in the city and become something that people knew about.

43:25And I mean, look, frankly, taking it to Houston with Mattress Mac didn't really elevate it. God, I love a Mattress Mac mention. Yeah. My heart just fluttered a bit. So, I mean, and then, you know, look, it did that and then eventually settled in Shanghai and then it settled in London. And it had several years. But I do remember Novak Djokovic saying when it was in London, as much as he liked it there and it was a big success and he won it loads of times, he felt it needed to be going around the world. And I do think that that's probably the one in the... Those ones are the ones in the current structure that you could look at.

44:02I think the ones I miss in terms of movement is the team competitions. I miss... I don't feel now as I felt when the Davis Cup was initially changed. I thought that that was going to be good to have a sort of single venue. There are elements that are good, but honestly, seeing countries go into the lion's den of another country and it always being different year to year, that was cool. And I also think that one other big difference with golf is you know one one tennis court is pretty much like any other and golf courses have their unique character um and it you just don't get that in tennis i love that about golf it doesn't apply to tennis tennis has its own things and certainly the grand slams i think have their own prestige by being where they are really anything to add matt what do you think billy g just tend to be yeah i i get why golf does it as you say david because the course you know the course every course is different and it's a way of showing off those different courses but the thing is the one golf event i love the most is the one that doesn't move around and it's the masters because it's got an identity and you know i think that staying in the same location gives these events identity because you you remember the history you know why do i like the masters because if mackerel is hitting a shot i'm like oh i saw tiger hit that shot or i saw phil hit that shot and why and like i love the slams because i'm like wow alcaraz is trying to trying to do this where when the doll did this and they're all trying to do it where borg did it and where never rattle over you know like i think that that history that thread is just so important and gives these events such weight you know like i love the fact that we revisit those venues every year i i would i don't know what it was like when in those first few years when the australian open moved from from coo young and the u.s open moved from from forest hills i imagine that took a little while to to create that new sense of identity of the new venue like i would be devastated if we went to a if a grand slam moved i think it's like it's like i'd be devastated if fulham moved stadium you know like i i think there's i think it's important the place that you're in and it just provides such memories and i i think it's massive for tennis that it stays in those in those places and then we have the associations of the past god the thought of having to get to grips with a new airbnb market for every slam uh great question though next one from hannah martin in the last five years which player on tour has disappointed you the most and who has surprised you the most it's Bianca Andreescu Hannah is who has disappointed me the most and that doesn't mean I'm not disappointed in her I'm disappointed in her results and the outcome of her efforts, I'm not like oh Bianca I'm disappointed in you, you should have tried harder I'm just disappointed in her not being a relevant presence in tennis for the last five years that is a total bummer

47:46someone else go I went back and had a look at the world rankings on the 3rd of May 2021 Monday the 3rd of May five years ago top of the pile Ash Barty and look I'm thrilled for Ash that she's having a good life but I am disappointed that we haven't seen more Ash Barty That's it that's the answer Sorry David this is closed Bianca's gone

48:21I forget and then when I'm reminded I'm like God I think the difference in the way I looked at this moment because I totally I like both of your choices but I'm not angry at either of them Who are you angry at David? No no no I'm angry at mine Hang on, David, I was very clear that I'm not angry at Bianca. No, I know. I know, absolutely. But I am angry at mine. Oh. Okay. Nick Kyrgios. I'm not angry at it. Yeah, I do know. I wrote down Kyrgios as well. Do you know, I considered him. Yeah. I think it's very easy to forget how into Kyrgios we were. I think I maybe understand myself, though. You know, we were so...

49:07I know we had a WhatsApp group. We had a WhatsApp group with Catherine's brother. It makes me think that I... Curie optimists. But I think, I mean, I do think he, you know, has been on that worsening incel, toxic manosphere trajectory. I do think he's got worse. But I also think I was an idiot. Like, I was not seeing things that were... I mean, it's longer than five years, isn't it, really? I'm angrier at myself. Pre-pandemic, Catherine, I still remember sort of, you know, when you were doing the Amazon work, we'd sometimes finish your shifts and we'd record the podcast this was probably before Matt was with us and we'd go and watch his matches in bars and every move he made we couldn't get enough of because it was just watching him was so fun and we just wanted to see that come to fruition and I think of his matches with Federer in Indian Wales and Miami when he beat Djokovic and then played Federer And it was just, you just wanted him to become the guy or to see this brand of tennis and, and some of the, some, the good stuff become meaningful.

50:22And then the bad stuff just, I mean, which was always there in bits, but then it just started to overtake everything. and now I'm I can't even believe that I used to feel like that because I I find him so

50:39irritating and annoying and frustrating and and worse worse actually yeah gross yeah and and I and I just I mean I realized that you know he's he's probably got some problems in life in his in his head you know but i don't want to hear from him anymore i don't want to know about him and i think that's just you know that's just a terrible shame that he's that somebody that gifted was unable to make or unwilling to make a go of it um so yeah i find myself disappointed in yeah surprised do you know i tried to i tried to really take five years ago as my as my point for this see i see what you've done here yeah and i actually i'm gonna go sabalenka i would not have thought five years ago that Sabalenka would turn into the player she's become you know like a dominant world number one if you think five years ago she was really like struggling to actually bring her best stuff to majors and initially when she did start doing well at majors she had a real problem closing them but the and like also I thought she was one-dimensional as a player and I thought that will only get you so far and I think it's I think the gains she's made are some of the toughest to make in terms of being able to put the fine-tuning on your game and become like an absolute champion and kind of greater the sport really you know like that is such a hard improvement to make and she's made it um so for her consistency her improvements I do think if you told me five years ago that Sabalenka would be the player she is now I would not have believed you honestly I thought maybe she could nab a major you know that's not it's not preposterous to me but to be this dominant and this consistent and this like the bar in women's tennis I didn't see that coming five years ago David the two players I've got written down are Jasmine Paolini because I would never have imagined.

53:10I just don't really know if I knew Paolini all that well in 2021. Do you know what I mean? I commentated on her in about 2019, I think. But it was a very brief moment. And actually, I've got Sinner because I think, similarly to Sabalenka, I always thought this guy's got great talent, but then, you know, you would see him lose to Daniel Altmaier and get beaten heavily by Djokovic and, like, always get beaten by Daniel Medvedev. And I just, I wouldn't have thought that he would have gone on to do this, to not just be a really great talent, but to be dominant. I think it's amazing what he's done, the way he's elevated.

54:00Yeah. A few people in the chat saying Pagula as well, who's another one that... That's a very good show. Yeah, I underestimated her definitely for a few years. And I, yeah, a few years in the last five years. And I wouldn't have thought she'd have been a consistent mainstay, top 10, challenging for slams, reaching a slam final. I would not have thought that. Tell you what as well, if you told us in 2021, that Caspar Rood would reach three grandstand finals and be a match away from world number one, we would have been very surprised. I'm still a bit surprised.

54:48Next, we have two more questions, and one's a two-parter, OK? The two-parter is from Nicola Rose, who says, hi, I have two questions for you. First, a bit of a behind-the-scenes question. How do media seats work at the Grand Slams? I live in Melbourne and I'm an Australian open... Oh, what a stitch-up of a photo. Brilliant. That's Matt Roberts in the media seats at Wimbledon. I reckon that's taken by Vicky herself, right? It must be, yeah. Vicky snuck that in there. Love that. Oh, Matt looks so thrilled. He knows he's been caught. That is a great photo. That is moments before disaster, that photo.

55:31That is moments before Grigor Dimitrov retires. Oh dear. There's April Todd there in the background. Who else can I spot? No, I'm distracted. Nicola says, I live in Melbourne. I'm Australian Open regular. I'll admit I'm always a bit jealous hearing you talk about being able to pop in and out of matches so easily for the big matches? Do media organisations have specific allocated seating or is it a first-come, first-served situation? I remember you mentioning there were only two tickets between the three of you for Rafa's farewell. How is that decided? Melbourne's one of the easiest ones in terms of popping in and out.

56:16Certainly for the first 10 days of the tournament, all three of us are treated really well. We don't have allocated seats, but we have the graphic, the picture on our pass that means we can come and go into the media seats. And it's first come, first serve, but it's generally well catered in Australia. They look after the media well for what they call high profile matches, which it's always both finals. And it tends to be men's semifinals and not the women's. Then they will operate an allocation system where you have to get a secondary pass and register your interest in attending. But again, we are, as members of the International Tennis Writers Association and generally now, certainly by the Australian Open, I doubt Roland Garris would say the same, but a respected media outlet, they treat us really well and they make sure that we three are all on the priority list.

57:19and I think we've always got allocated passes for those high-profile matches, certainly since we've been in Itwa. The French Open is also really good in that they have a very large media seating area and Roland Garros. It's kind of incongruous with the tournament as a whole and sort of how much I feel they like the press. Like every year I get there and I worry... Yeah, I'm still waiting for that. for that press. He scaled this back. He would have cut in half, yeah. I mean, they reduced the seats on Longland, didn't they? But they are amazing seats. Yeah, they did. They are. So, yeah, I don't think we've ever...

58:02In fact, the Nadal event was the only time it's ever been allocated seats, sometimes with big matches, and again, more so men than women, sometimes we'll be like, we want to get there really early to make sure we get a seat because it's first come, first serve. and that's certainly the case for finals and so on. But generally, it's very well catered in Paris. Wimbledon is a lot different. They have a lot more limited seating on centre court. We have one designated seat for the tennis podcast as an outlet. So we share it between us, basically, which is still pretty good going for centre court. and Matt has connections at Wimbledon, having previously worked in the press room there.

58:52So they usually make sure, you know, certainly for the first week in the first 10 days, maybe the tournament, they usually, you know, if two of us want to be out there, maybe even three, that's usually possible at Wimbledon. Certainly two of us, you know, in the first week or so of the tournament. Wimbledon is the one where outside courts is quite hard and like Court 1 and Court 2. Court 2 is always a bit of a struggle at Wimbledon. Like it's just less easy to just pop over to like Court 18 and think I'll just catch a bit of that. That is one of the frustrations in Wimbledon. And then the US Open is an absolute shit show.

59:39I don't really understand how the US Open works all that well i mean there's so there's like court side neither does the us there's like there's like court side seating at the us open for media but there's probably i don't know how many seats would you say are in those court side ones for media 15 20 something like that yeah and for years for years i just thought i don't want to get involved in that i can't i can't face being turned away i don't really know what sort of pass i need i'll go to the seats higher up where There are quite a lot more seats up there. Yeah, they're in the top tier. So they're kind of at the bottom of the top tier.

1:00:19Yeah. But I think, I don't know, I feel like David's bolder. And David's like, go on, let's try for the courtside seats. So I think in the last few years, we have gotten those a little bit. The US Open's pretty good for the outside courts. Yeah, it is. It is. Like going to grandstand. I suppose when I'm saying outside courts, I mean non-main court, really. Okay. One of the things I love about the US Open, and this probably only applies to me, is how easy it is to just walk up to certain courts and just stand with everybody else, and I just look overheads, and I'm really close up. I would say, David, you're six foot seven.

1:01:08Yeah, I know. Yeah, you can do that. I don't have the same experience of that. I love all that. But, you know, and just in terms of... And yet you still don't want people to recline their seats and you get to enjoy that. That is correct, yeah. Demand that other people not recline their seats. Didn't need to bring that up, Catherine. We've been getting on so well. Anyway, the... It's been fomenting. in terms of asking it you know for stuff because in the start of the tournament i'm really i tipped her around and by the end of the tournament i've had enough of everybody and i just bulldozed in anywhere and just i just want the argument basically by then yeah i mean us open for the men's final last year obviously donald trump was there and it was just an absolutely bonkers, I mean the whole situation, the whole day was, it feels like it was a fever dream quite frankly but all of the press seats got taken over by either White House correspondents or members of the Secret Service or as rumoured members of the Saudi Secret Service because there was a Saudi prince in the Rolex box with the president.

1:02:29So that was, I mean it was just yeah utterly bizarre yeah the US Open's a bit of a bit of a law unto itself they treat TV incredibly well at the US Open but sort of print radio media what they would call old school media even though podcast is kind of as new school as it gets in terms of how they treat us we're lumped in with with the others they they would be quite happy if none of us came quite frankly is it's certainly the impression i i they give they are building a new space for media aren't they at the us open or certainly incorporating it into a new building that is that is being constructed this is going to be the last year in the current building but i've heard there's not going to be a radio room right and that is causing massive to-dos behind the scenes what i'm hoping is that there are more than two urinals in the entire press room i cannot go to the toilet in the US Open press room.

1:03:43It is so small. It is so close to Steve Flink's desk. The door is like always open. I just... There is no, folks, I know, look, I know we are so lucky to get to do this job. There aren't many genuine downsides, but there not being a door on the toilets in the US Open press room is a major downside it's a problem and also like it's all crossed a bear american cubicles have way too big gaps like there's like a gap in the door there's like a huge gap at the bottom that david can definitely see over the top like oh yeah yeah yeah honestly i have to duck it's So bad. If I don't duck, people know that I'm in there.

1:04:37Yeah. I go to the grandstand toilets. Just putting that out there. That is what I do at the US Open. Sometimes you catch someone's eye between the slats. Oh, God. Between them. It's so bad. In the gaps. I know, like, very often men are not the ones who have to queue for the toilet. very specifically in a sports journalist's press room, like for the fact that there's only two, like there's always a queue. There's always far too many people in there and the gaps. Oh, just awful. Absolutely awful. It's right next to the water fountain. Right next to the water fountain, right next to Steve Flink's desk.

1:05:23So bad.

1:05:29Yeah, get the violins out for us. There is a part two to Nicola's question. It also seems to have got better as well. This is the other thing. Before you were coming, it was worse, this place. And then you've got so much anxiety, you can't go to the loo. It's a disaster.

1:05:57Yeah. Have I left a pair of sunglasses in the loo last year? Anyway, a lot of lewd trauma. Second part of Nicola's question. Secondly, I did a solo day at the AO this year in the first week to sneak in lots of tennis without my less tennis obsessed friends getting annoyed with the lines and was there from 10 a.m. until the rain hit at 9 p.m. I actually spotted Matt and said a quick hello before the downpour. It was a great day, but I was so wrecked the next morning. I had to drag myself back to meet friends at the AO, which was again lovely. But after three tennis days in one week, I honestly couldn't think of anything better than watching from my couch and not going to Melbourne Park for the day.

1:06:40My question is, do you ever get tennis burnout during a slam? It has to be the best job in the world. Nicola wrote this question before she knew about the proximity of the toilets to Steve Link's desk. It has to be the best job in the world, but the schedule seems exhausting. do you ever just need a break mid-slam to replenish? Yes, a break would be lovely. But I also don't... I don't want to stop. Like, I don't know. It's... The one that always makes me laugh. It's our version of a marathon, isn't it? That, you know, there's the adrenaline and the achievement of getting through each day and yeah, I would never want a day just on the sofa because I'm so powered by FOMO, as we've established many a time, that I couldn't bear the feeling of missing out.

1:07:37I wouldn't mind the return of a middle Sunday and then an additional, you know, add it on to the end or something so we're not missing out on a day. But generally, I don't know. I mean, it is utterly exhausting. it is it's bonkers really what we do but i there's also different stages because then the there is the funny stage as well when we come out the press room and we we seek out the rolex clock with the 4am that's always quite funny but that's always in week two when we just get in a bit giddy uh from our silly at all it's um but the one that always does amuse me is Catherine you'll relate to this is just how hard Matt goes from draw day through to at least second Tuesday Matt is there for the first ball every single day and like pumped and he's finishing at 2am and he's like having his 5 hours sleep and he's up and he might have even played tennis and then he's still in for a missimov us next match and we've hit the wall at least three times by this by this point um and and see i would say that we do you know because i'm having to get used to covering it for the podcast in the in in the last couple of years rather than you know doing it alongside commentary in quite the same way which i'm loving it but i'm having to sort of learn to sort of pace myself and target things and and what what we're going to cover as a collective but i have started to realize oh some days you could go in a bit later and watch a match at home you know and it's really nice to sit on the sofa with you with whoever's there or or come back and watch a sort of evening session match you know but then there's one day when matt just hits the wall and the look on his face it's It's like he's a different man for a day.

1:09:35He regroups. He regroups, but there is always one day when Matt's ever so slightly scary. Do you want to go to lunch? No.

1:09:49No. And I always want lunch. Yeah.

1:09:58Yeah, look. Yeah. You're right. Like that is, I've got nothing to say to that. I love that first week so much, you know, like I do just look at every order of play and be like, you know, I want to be there for that. I want to be there for that. I want to be there for that. Like, yeah. And that's the thing, like kind of to Nicola's question, I definitely never get tennis burnout. You know, like I'm never burnt out by the tennis. You know, I'm always excited for the order of play and what's next and the stories and talking about it with you and everything like all of that. Love it always. But as we've established physical burnout, there's always a day where just hit the wall.

1:10:44And that is where I would want to shout out as well, Hannah and Vicky and Jiv now as well. Like there was a time and, you know, YouTube for longer than me. But when when we were doing everything and that meant staying up till three, four in the morning, even if the tennis had finished at a sensible time, because we've got to get the show up. We've got to edit the show. We've got to send it out. We've got to do the newsletter, all that kind of stuff. We have a we have a much bigger team of people now who are helping us. And that has really made a difference, actually, in the last year or so, just trying to sustain the energy levels.

1:11:23I can make it through to the second Tuesday now rather than maybe like the first Thursday before that crash comes. Wimbledon last year, the crash didn't come till Women's Finals Day. Yeah, that was unfortunate. But it came. It came and it came hard. I had to watch back that though I didn't have to I was trying to find something for Charlie Eccleshare who's doing a piece and I'd remembered something Matt Futterman had said on that the preview show we did for the women's final and I watched it back and I can't believe we made you do that I can't believe I'm so sorry Matt that we made you do that I mean I hope that we didn't totally make you but you shouldn't have you shouldn't have been having to be upright at that time with a with a bowl of jelly jelly beans under the under the desk it was so bad yeah I mean and that was before and it was some over lost love and love the the pod the night before so what would that have been after the men's you were six straight afterwards weren't you I was six straight yeah

1:12:41so bad just been sick yeah anyway so yeah it's tough but we love it and we do yeah we've put in more mechanisms to we've taken burnout more seriously you know at one stage I used to edit the podcast whilst Catherine was presenting live television. Yeah, that operation. I would just, I would go to sleep on the laptop. Yeah. What were we doing? Crazy stuff. Yeah. When those messages, when the WhatsApp would go, so I'll be dialing you up in five minutes, Catherine. Catherine? you're asleep aren't you Catherine

1:13:43that happened once but it was the night the Grigel Dimitrov beat Roger Federer yes and then David texted me are you awake Matt in London yeah Matt got a you up from David Law yeah I know you haven't watched this match Because you talked to me about it.

1:14:08Oh, that was even, that was before you were even in the caravan, Matt. Yeah. I was out of that US Open. I didn't do that US Open. Well, in terms of doing it for the pod anyway.

1:14:24David's left. Okay, well, we have one more question. I feel like David should be here for that question. He's here. David? Hello. He's back. Okay. You ready for one more question? Yes. Hannah says, Hannah May, this is. Hannah says, my family and I absolutely love Race Across the World, which we have clashed with tonight. So apologies for that. Oh, I've got two episodes to catch. It's on tomorrow. Is it? I'm sure it's Thursdays. Oh, yeah, maybe. Anyway. Well, I retract my apology then. But anyway, we all love Race Across the World. And Hannah asks, which tennis players do you think would be very good at Race Across the World or that you'd like to watch on Race Across the World?

1:15:15Criteria, they need to work well as a pair. They need to navigate the world with no phone and manage a very limited cash budget. Honestly, Hannah, I think all tennis players would be absolutely terrible at it. They are... I was going to say the opposite. Wow. They are totally unequipped to cope in the real world. I think lower-ranked players would be quite good at it. Oh, yeah, I suppose, yeah. Name me the world number 200 that I haven't heard of. I was going to say, I did actually write down the names Madison Inglis and Jason Kubler.

1:15:53They're rich now, David. Remember the Australian Open they had? Yeah, I've not heard of them since. David I love that God I just think they'd be terrible about they don't book their own flights they don't keep track of their own passports they'd be losing they'd be leaving the money wallet on the bus well yeah that's the division of like of the top and lower ranked players right because the lower ranked players do do that stuff yeah okay like I feel like this question is aimed at like sort of naming players in the top 100 though, isn't it? Yeah. Okay, like... I'm now in name of tennis player territory that I can't...

1:16:43I know what you mean. You get my drift. Yeah. What top players, other than Madison Inglis and Jason Kugler, do you think would be good? I like people... Married couples, David, aren't always...

1:16:59they look like they've lived

1:17:04do they

1:17:09I like people who take the race aspect of it seriously but not too seriously do you know what I mean there was that guy in the Canada series who just booked

1:17:27too quick David too good there was that guy in the Canada series of Race Across the World who just took taxis everywhere and I know the Canada series was a bit different but it was like it wasn't really in the spirit and there were those teachers I think I want to say in series one who just went a bit overboard of like just too desperate to race rather than live I like people who get that balance right but I think tennis players naturally would would be competitive so that so i think that side of it would sort of lend themselves to taking part i also think the thing that i like as well is people for whom it's really going out of their comfort zone and they're i sometimes think the best people on race across the world are the ones who are actually a little bit wary of getting to know other people you know and they're wary of the homestays, of the sharing.

1:18:21But actually, they benefit from that the most and they come out the other side of it, like, loving humanity more. I thought I felt that way too, Matt, until this series. And what's the name of the bloke that poor Margot is having to race across the world with? Mark? Yeah. I would have killed him by now. What's wrong with Mark? Drippy Mark? Good God. He is unbearable. I think you're being harsh. I think he's very different to Margot. I would have smothered him in his sleep. To be honest, I don't want to race across the world with Margot either. I think I'd rather race across the world with Mark.

1:19:06Margot's quite intense and full on. Yeah, no, no. But I think she's being... Her joy when he got ill and she got to spend the day alone. Judging by this conversation I want to see you two do it Look no Margot's not my people either but Mark my god he did take one for the team and eat that horse meat didn't he Yes Is that a spoiler? That was last week I think so yeah if you're a week behind I'm two weeks behind he ate some horse but you know it's my fault They have got language skills tennis players yes absolutely and that is helpful that is big so maybe I'd go I'd say players with lots of languages to their name which makes you think of Djokovic but I just don't think Djokovic should be good at it when was the last time Djokovic booked his own flight

1:20:10a very long time ago well he can't fly but yeah Yeah, he's never been on a coach. Or, you know, booked his own coach then. Yeah. I think Alexey Arla would be great. Got the language skills. I think she's quite sort of worldly. I've never known anyone react to Alexey Arla the way you've reacted to Mark. Everyone loves her. She's great. And I think she'd be good at the... I think she'd be good telly, you know? Like, she'd be good at the little insights. Such a buzzkill.

1:20:56Do I need to look at Mark with fresh eyes? Well, I just feel a bit sorry for him, you know? His wife's died. I'm not sure it would help. I feel sorry for him because he's on Race Across the World and he clearly shouldn't have applied to be on this show. I thought he was having a good enough time. I think he's having a good time. I haven't got to those episodes. In his own weird way. Okay. I don't find him an enjoyable screen presence. I think that much is clear.

1:21:30Any other submissions for this? Well, if the... It's resourceful. If the... I was thinking of the mixed... If the US Open mixed doubles told us anything, it's that you can actually sort of get some unexpected and random fun out of a pair that you wouldn't think would sort of go together do you remember Mazzetti and McNally remember the vibes were yes we're just really good yes like you could just put yeah I don't think you necessarily need to have like I love David's shout it's a very good point um Kubler in English I think that's hilarious but I think you could just put like two random people together and see if you know kind of I think that would be good telly as well, to sort of see if that works.

1:22:14I thought you were about to say, I've got to go with Arani, and she would terrify me. Draper and Pegula, I think they'd be dreadful. Oh, they'd be terrible, but you'd be good telly, though. Absolutely terrible. I was going to say, I quite enjoy the just them being mic'd up, having to have a conversation. Or as Draper would say, get a better chat going. What was it? dropped a little bit of chatting. Tried to edge you a little bit of chatting. What do you mean you talked to her? Is that what you mean?

1:22:55I think Jack would be the Mark and Jessica would be the Margo in that set-up. The stuff you've just said about Mark. Poor Jack. Look, I think if one of those two is knocking back shots of vodka on a Kazakh train at 9am, it's Jessica Bagula. While Jack Draper's at the other end of the car, rolling his eyes, chewing his lip. Tell me I'm wrong.

1:23:29Yeah, fair point. David's like, what did I miss in this, in last week's episode? Got to catch up, David. Do you think any of us would be good at it? I'd be a disaster. I would be terrible. I get lost going to the shops. Yeah, you do. You know what I'm like. I just let somebody else do the work. But that's where you don't both need to do the direction stuff. I can do the charming stuff. Because you're with somebody. You can do that. Yeah, you can do that stuff. I'll bowl in and go and get us a job. One of my favourite things was when we were in Indian Wells and David would drive every day and we'd get to the gate and every day, every day we had to go right.

1:24:15And every day it was like, which way?

1:24:22So great. David would keep spirits up though. Which is key. Yeah, I think in the right partnership, David, you would thrive.

1:24:35I think Matt, you'd be good. You're a linguist, Matt. well it would depend where we were well sure yeah I could give it a go I think you'd be good I think you'd get the balance right of race and yeah I would trust myself on that experience I think so yeah how many tennis players do you think can read a map

1:25:03most yeah they all like quit school at 11 or something you know that's what it you know that is what it takes to be a dance player yeah and you've just said you're absolutely crap at directions

1:25:23I think that's because I I'm not sure whether it's because I got thrown out of geography or I got thrown out of geography because I'm crap at directions we'll end on Hannah's excellent comment that Holger Rune can famously read a map because of course he posted a map to his court that he was scheduled on at the US Open when he was the fourth seed iconic behaviour folks what a show thank you so much for those questions well done Matt for picking those out a really a really lovely smattering of silly and existential and behind the scenes stuff and analytical stuff. I loved that so much. So thank you, everybody that submitted those questions, everybody that has submitted questions on the barge.

1:26:12Not all of these are submitted all that recently. Like we keep them in the repository and we will keep coming back to the repository. So do put questions as and when you think of them, pop them on the barge and do head to the barge generally for chitchat. It's a fun time. Thank you all for being friends of the Tennis Podcast. Matt is preparing our next edition of Tennis Relived. David's been doing interview after interview after interview. No streaker has responded to my come and get me plea. So Wimbledon Relived is on ice for the moment. I've forgotten her name, but 1996 Wimbledon Streaker. If you're listening, do get in touch.

1:26:56info at tennispodcast.net David

1:27:04That's extraordinary Melissa get in touch thank you Vicky for stage managing the show tonight thank you Hannah for being in the chat and for being our friends we are the Tennis Podcast thank you for being our friends and we will speak to you very soon indeed

From the publisher

For our May Q&A, Catherine, David and Matt were live on YouTube taking some excellent questions from The Barge:

- Why do we all like tennis so much?

- Are we not talking enough about Sinner potentially completing the set of Masters 1000 titles?

- Will Anisimova's career follow a similar trajectory to Paolini's after reaching back-to-back major finals?

- Do players who rely on movement and athleticism have shorter careers at the top?

- Should the Grand Slam locations move around?

- Which players have disappointed and surprised us most in the last 5 years?

- How do media seats work at slams?

- Do we ever suffer from tennis burnout?

- Which players would we like to see on Race Across The World?

More from Friends of The Tennis Podcast

All 222 episodes
BONUS - May Q&A ShowFriends of The Tennis Podcast · 1 h 27 min
Listen in VO