BONUS - Our final live Q&A of 2025!

16 Dec 2025 · 1 h 24 min · 27 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

A live end-of-2025 Tennis Podcast Q&A with rapid-fire, chat-driven questions spanning rival “villains,” WTA title predictions, dream tournaments, career Grand Slam odds for 2026, and an exhibition-team fantasy lineup.

Guests

No separate guests appear as interviewees; the “guest editor” is Etienne21 (Etienne21 in the chat), who selects most questions. The hosts are Catherine, Matt, and David (the episode is their live Q&A format).

Key claims and notable examples

  • “Pantomime villain” debate: some say a disliked rival enhances enjoyment; others argue media coverage should focus more on uplifting stories. Zverev is discussed as feeling “sinister” rather than fun; Medvedev at his best is compared to “beautiful” villainy.
  • WTA titles: Karolina Muchova is predicted to win a second WTA title in 2026 (health permitting). Emma Raducanu is also predicted to win a title in 2026. Muchova’s low title count is linked to injury/stress and late-tournament decline (e.g., semi-final/final record stats mentioned).
  • Dream tournaments: United Cup in Perth is a wish-list event (with crowd discussion and Perth’s vibe). Brisbane is also suggested as a practical one-week add-on.
  • 2026 career Grand Slam: prediction is that Alcaraz and Sinner will complete; Sabalenka likely won’t in 2026; Swiatek’s completion is debated but leaned toward by some.
  • Exhibition lineup: consensus-ish picks include ATP Corentin Moutet, Gael Monfils, Lorenzo Berrettini, and “Mahatch” (unnamed spelling in transcript); WTA includes Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova? (not), but the final women’s list settles on Ekaterina Kazakina, Aoi Ito, Conchita? (no), and Victoria Azarenka, plus Baptiste (spelled “Baptiste”).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Anticipation for the Q&A

0:45 to 2:14

Hosts express their enthusiasm for the live Q&A format and its unpredictability.

“But the thing is, because the questions always require some thoughts.”

The Role of Pantomime Villains in Tennis

2:14 to 3:37

Discussion on whether a pantomime villain enhances the enjoyment of tennis.

“Everybody in the chat say hello to Etienne because he's created a fabulous show for us today.”

Personal Perspectives on Rivalries

3:37 to 5:24

Hosts share their views on needing rivals or villains in sports and their personal experiences.

“While Zverev would so naturally fulfil this role in theory He is so terrible in practice But do I need to hate someone?”

Defining Pantomime and Its Cultural Impact

5:24 to 8:11

Exploration of what pantomimes are and how they relate to sports villains.

“Like obviously we've had some bad times watching him win, but we've had some good times watching him lose on centre court in the back of taxis.”

Childhood Memories of Pantomimes

8:11 to 12:00

Hosts share nostalgic stories related to pantomimes and their familial connections.

“The closest thing to it really is the wrestling heel, I think, in American wrestling or something like that.”

Humor in Pantomimes and Its Evolution

12:00 to 14:00

Discussion on the humor in pantomimes and its relevance to modern audiences.

“So did you sort of every Christmas, it's a...”

Pantomime Traditions and Personal Reflections

14:00 to 14:34

Explore the pantomime tradition and personal anecdotes from the hosts.

WTA Title Predictions for Mukova and Raducanu

14:34 to 16:47

Discussion on whether Karolina Mukova or Emma Raducanu will win a second WTA title first.

“I kind of don't want to move on, but there's so many other good questions, so I can't just talk about pantomimes for the next hour.”

Assessing Mukova's Career Challenges

16:47 to 19:11

Analysis of Mukova's struggles with injuries and her potential to win titles.

“But I do fall down on the same side as David, that if she keeps playing and keeps fit, I do think she'll pick off another title.”

Skepticism About Player Fitness

19:11 to 21:58

A deeper look into the concerns regarding player fitness and its impact on career success.

“which I think would be important for her.”
Show all 27 chapters

Fan Appreciation and Gift Sharing

21:58 to 23:20

Hosts express gratitude for thoughtful gifts received from fans during a recent event.

“So Catherine Whitaker is slightly less optimistic than David Law.”

Tournament Wish List: The United Cup

23:20 to 25:17

Discussion on tournaments the hosts wish to attend, focusing on the United Cup.

“The United Cup Is it because I talk about the hotel breakfast in Perth so much?”

Exploring Brisbane and Event Preferences

25:17 to 28:00

Hosts share their thoughts on Brisbane events and the appeal of mixed tournaments.

“Remind me, Catherine, what are the crowds like, you know, typically there in Perth?”

Exploring Favorite Tennis Events

28:00 to 30:00

The hosts discuss their favorite tennis events and locations, sharing personal anecdotes.

“I think a real sweet spot is one-week events.”

Challenges of Traveling for Tournaments

30:00 to 31:30

The conversation dives into the practical considerations of attending multiple tennis tournaments.

Predictions for Future Grand Slam Winners

31:30 to 33:10

The hosts predict which players will achieve career Grand Slams in the upcoming years.

“I was just imagining you two sitting next to one another at the Olympic tennis with about six devices on your laps between you with different sports.”

Historical Context of Career Slams

33:10 to 36:50

Discussion on the history of players completing career Grand Slams and potential future implications.

“I believe that Al Kraz and Svantec will complete at the Australian Open.”

Upcoming Exhibition Tournament Plans

36:50 to 39:50

The hosts brainstorm players for an exhibition tournament, focusing on entertainment and competitiveness.

“So like it's quite standard, I suppose, that we've got these many players all close to completing it.”

Player Preferences for Exhibition Matches

42:01 to 45:04

Discussion on the players preferred for exhibition matches and their characteristics.

“You two might want Sonigo, and we're trying to be collaborative.”

Choosing Women Players for Exhibitions

45:04 to 51:30

Identifying female players suitable for exhibition matches and debating their qualities.

“I think we get rid of Fils, actually, for Monfils.”

Podcast Preparation Insights

51:30 to 56:00

Hosts share their preparation styles and roles in creating the podcast.

“That wasn't random enough for you, Matt.”

Podcast Preparation and Team Dynamics

56:00 to 1:01:50

Learn how the hosts prepare for each episode and the dynamics of their teamwork.

“Sometimes I'll script a bit at the top, particularly if we've got something we need to promote or, you know, particular facts that we have to get straight.”

Analyzing the Top WTA Players

1:01:50 to 1:04:09

Explore the vulnerabilities of Sabalenka, Svantec, and Goff in their performances.

“My question, says Swarna, is about the three-year trend in the main vulnerability of each player.”

Svantec's Adaptability Under Pressure

1:04:09 to 1:10:02

Discuss the challenges Svantec faces when her game falters and how she adapts.

“For each of them, do you think the trend is getting better or worse?”

Evaluating Player Performance and Changes

1:10:02 to 1:17:16

Discussion on the performance trends and style changes of tennis players over the past few years.

Childhood Memories and Acting

1:17:16 to 1:21:12

Hosts share humorous anecdotes from their childhood related to acting and misunderstandings.

“I would have probably only been about 10.”

Festive Traditions and Humor

1:21:12 to 1:24:00

A light-hearted discussion about a Catalan holiday tradition involving humorous figurines.

“So I now have a pooing raffa on the doll.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:10Hello, friends, and welcome to the Tennis Podcast and our final live Q &A show of 2025. I love these shows. They are some of my very, very favourites. I really look forward to them. I look forward to seeing the vibes in the chat. I look forward to seeing your two faces. David, how are you doing? Yeah, I like them too. Because I always do just a little bit of prep for these. You know, some shows I don't do any prep for. So that's one of the questions answered. Start talking. But the thing is, because the questions always require some thoughts. And I like that. And they often get me just thinking about things in a different way.

1:00And then I often find out stuff about you two that I didn't know or the way you're looking at things. So, yeah, I enjoy these very much. Matt probably does less prep for these shows than he does for a regular show, I think, but still quite a lot of prep. Yes, as we'll talk about later, I like to be prepared always. but I very much enjoy these shows too Matt Futterman messaged me the other week saying that he really enjoys the Q &As as well they're some of his favourite because quote they're kind of random which yeah they are I thought yeah that is true we will go off in all sorts of directions and that's fun yeah and that's partly down to the guest editors that we have today's guest editor is Etienne who I think is, well, was hoping to join us live.

1:57I think might be in the chat. Haven't seen him yet, but I'm keeping my eye out. Hello to Etienne. And thank you for your brilliant guest editorship of today's show. We've got some questions from Etienne. I think one from Etienne and the rest that Etienne has selected. Yes, Etienne is here at Etienne21. Everybody in the chat say hello to Etienne because he's created a fabulous show for us today. One question of his own, which is brilliant. And then he selected a bunch of questions from the barge and they're all good 'uns and they are all really quite random. And that is the beauty of a Q &A show.

2:40Shall we get going? Let's do it. Don't all speak at once. Right. First question is selected by Etienne from Alex via The Barge. And it's excellent. What a starting point for a Q &A show this is. Alex asks, do you need a pantomime villain to get your blood flowing? Without wishing to reveal myself as a complete cliche, I always hated the disruptor that was Novak Djokovic. I loved Rafa, enjoyed Roger and loved to hate Novak. While I couldn't be more thrilled by the rise of S and A I'm going to assume that's Sena and Alcaraz Could be Shvantec and Anasimova I find myself worrying if I need that villain to really get my juices flowing Being happy when either wins just doesn't quite cut the mustard While Zverev would so naturally fulfil this role in theory He is so terrible in practice But do I need to hate someone?

3:46I love this question I, Alex and Matt and David I'm so intrigued about what your answers are going to be here I think it entirely depends on your personality type but I think I am like Alex or certain, oh Siri doesn't know I think I am similar to Alex in that I don't need a pantomime villain to get into tennis like I'm into Sinner and Alcaraz and Shvantech and Anasimova without a pantomime villain but I do think a pantomime villain would enhance my enjoyment of those dynamics definitely and I think I think there's something very human about that you know in some ways in quite a dark way like nothing unites people like a common enemy right the politics of fear is a powerful tool for a reason that's what the whole of Wicked is about great great films so I think it makes sense on a very very human level I wouldn't beat yourself up for being a cliche Alex but I think the extent to which you really really relish the pantomime villainy kind of depends on your your personality type and how much you like camp and nonsense um i quite like camp and nonsense and i also will say i think i can say this given this is a friend show some of our collective best tennis watching experiences have been watching alexander's Varev lose.

5:28Have they not? Yeah, absolutely. We have a great time. Like the stakes are never higher. Like obviously we've had some bad times watching him win, but we've had some good times watching him lose on centre court in the back of taxis. Doesn't really matter where we are. We're having a good time. Yeah, we took a selfie on centre court when he lost to Arthur Wynnecht.

6:03Just to mark that moment. Yeah, it's a great picture. I have to say, though, I do find Zverev a very different case here. Like, I don't think there's... I would not class him as a pantomime villain. And actually... No, it is the common enemy thing, but it's not it's not fun yeah and actually as a you know as someone covering the sport rather than just watching the sport purely as a fan I think I have come to want villains a bit less you know like I don't want to have to tell those stories I don't want them winning stuff you know we're not going to shy away from it um I'm going to highlight the bad stuff but I would rather that you know the true villains faded into obscurity and irrelevance and we could focus more on telling the uplifting stories and the good stories there's many out there but in terms of a pantomime villain like i do love those you know and i do think tennis tennis has them in in abundance and I think it's richer for it.

7:17Medvedev at his best. Exactly. There's a flip side that isn't pantomimey and is just dark. But when Medvedev's in that mode, that's true pantomime villainy and it's beautiful. Yeah. Ostapenko as well, obviously that's had a dark side this year as well. But she's had some pantomime villain moments. David, what do you think? It occurred to me when Vicky flashed up the message from Rachel about almost like defining what a pantomime is to people who aren't from the UK. But I think you're getting the gist of it. It's sort of slapstick almost villains, isn't it? I think pantomimes are impossible to explain.

8:07Yes, they are, aren't they? It's stage show. Because as soon as you start saying it, you're like, what am I talking about? And how do you get that across? How is that part of your culture? The closest thing to it really is the wrestling heel, I think, in American wrestling or something like that. When it's not real, you know, but they're cast as the bad guy. And I think you sum it up very well about Zverev, why he's different. is there's something really sinister about him for me, that his record, the experience of having him in the sport for several years has made me feel very uncomfortable on many occasions, and therefore I feel better about it when he's not in the tournament.

9:00And yet I am also somebody who watches every one of his matches. and I mean I think mainly because I'm sort of I'm looking to see who's going to beat him next because I think he's so beatable by so many different players and yet I also think he's capable of playing so much better than he is as well a lot of the time and I sometimes I think he's cracked it other things other times I don't just to get back to the question I don't think I need somebody to hate or dislike but i need somebody to root for i have to want one of the players to win i have to have a reason for that in my mind and and i'm like in every sport i'll find a way i'll find something that makes me want one to win over the other i can't just watch it as a sort of clash of tennis strokes or golf strokes or punches in boxing or whatever.

10:00I have to have a reason in my mind for why I want one of these two people to win, or teams, and I pretty much never fail to achieve that. And sometimes that can be wanting the other person to lose. Yes, absolutely. That's sort of the most negative version of rooting. Yeah, yeah. NFL, I want the Dallas Cowboys to lose in NFL every single time. Right. Man U. Yeah. Wolves. Brentford. Chelsea. Burnley. Burnley. Scott Parker. Yeah. Scott Parker. Wickham. Yeah. I mean, I grew up in a household where it was much more important that Wales lost the rugby than it was England won the rugby. Right. You know, so, you know, I'm a sort of hater at heart from my dad.

10:53Have either of you two ever been in a pantomime? Don't think so. No, but my aunt was an actor on stage and screen, and she was in many pantomimes when I was young. And we would go and watch her. And I remember when I was really young, she was Cinderella. And we met afterwards, we met, in inverted commas, the Ugly Sisters, who were very mean to her. In real life? No, just on the stage. And I just watched them do it. I thought you meant they were doing method acting. I met them in real life afterwards, and I couldn't handle it. And I tried to kick them. I tried to... Oh, my God. Yeah, yeah, I was trying to kick them in the ankles under the table and all sorts.

11:53I could not handle the fact that they were mean to my auntie. And I'd been watching this. It was awful. I'm so glad I asked. I think I had to be removed. So did you sort of every Christmas, it's a... For anybody that doesn't know, it's a holiday festive time tradition in the UK. So did you get to go and see your auntie starring in a pantomime every Christmas then? Absolutely. Wow. Yeah, it's pretty cool. And usually sort of very minor celebrities star in them. Yes. Like there are some tennis players that will have done. I bet you Pat Cash has been in a panto in the UK. I think Annabelle Croft will have been in a panto.

12:46Yeah. Tim Henman would never go near panto, but I bet you he's declined some offers. It's only a matter of time for Greg, I would say. Yeah. Greg might have been actually asking to be in. You ever been in a panto, Matt? No, I don't think I have. Or senior auntie star in one? No, we would always go to a panto at Christmas up until I was, I don't know. Oh, no, you didn't. Yeah, mid-teens probably. And then we started to go to sort of slightly more serious theatre. A mid-teenager going to a panto is right. Yeah, I think we sort of reached the point where it was time. Maybe I wasn't quite that old.

13:32There's different levels of humour. That's what I think is fun about a panto. Yeah. yeah well there's a lot of innuendo isn't there which you don't get when you're eight yeah yeah i wonder how much of panto is sort of works for 2025 because i remember i used to be in the the ice skate the pant my ice rink used to put on a pantomime every christmas and i used to be in that um and there was a a pantomime dame is a big big part of the pantomime tradition right and the joke there is just a man dressing up as a woman which obviously isn't funny anymore um anyway i'm now just riffing on riffing on on on the existential crisis of pantomimes anyway i've really enjoyed this it's been brilliantly random and i've learned a lot about david I kind of don't want to move on, but there's so many other good questions, so I can't just talk about pantomimes for the next hour.

14:40Next question comes from Arvind via The Barge. Arvind asks, will Karolina Mukova win a second WTA title? And if so, please tell me when. Alternatively, who wins a second WTA title first, Karolina Mukova or Emma Raducani? who would like to go first with this one? Well, I'm quite happy to answer both questions. Yes, Matt? I was going to say, I feel like you're very well placed to answer this. I think you had both of these players in your fantasy team last year. You're a real believer, both of these players. I love these two. I love watching them. and they are probably they're right up there in the players that I want to maximize their potential which I consider to be considerable um I I I don't think it's a question I think it's the bigger question is how many how many they win and how big they are I don't think it's I think you got anything to worry about often I think that you know I I know I know injuries are a concern but I believe that it is coming for them.

16:00I really think that they could win big. I mean, they're sort of slightly forgotten, and I realise why, because there's this incredible group that is ahead of them, and they don't get talked about that much. But I still think when you put them up against a lot of the top players, their games stand up. I mean, Karolina Mukova wasn't really fully fit against Naomi Osaka at the US Open, I don't think. And yet she gave her a heck of a run for her money. She very nearly beat Jessica Bagula in that semifinal a couple of years ago. So I think it's coming from Mukova. I mean, if she stays fit, it's a hell of a big if.

16:43I realise that. But I'm optimistic. I'm going to stay optimistic. I think that they will both win a title, Arvind, in 2026. David in optimism shocker Matt I think I can get on board with that I could see both of them winning a title in 2026 obviously health permitting and that's probably the biggest concern for Mukova she did play a full schedule I think from Roland Garros onwards pretty much we saw her all the big events but early stages she wasn't hitting the two-handed back cam was she but by the end of the year that was back um i just always carry a fear of injury like but also within a tournament like it's it is quite remarkable that she has only won one career title because we do think of mukova exactly as davis described there as someone who has the level you know and can push the top players and but something is going on in these tournaments like even when she's fit and playing she's not winning them and i think a lot of it is that she sort of gets hurt if not injured during a tournament and by the end of it she's accumulated so much like stress on her body that she's maybe not quite herself she's six and nine in semi-finals on tour she's one and five in finals you know like she's got an issue at the end of these tournaments and i think partly it can be about the level you know i think she's she's so good but there are players with bigger weapons who can kind of rip it from you more than she can but i also just worry a little bit about you know if she's played three or four matches already in a tournament likelihood is by the end but by that point she's carrying some kind of niggle or something and she's not quite 100 and i think that would go a long way to explaining why she's only got one title despite her excellent brilliant tennis generally.

18:50But I do fall down on the same side as David, that if she keeps playing and keeps fit, I do think she'll pick off another title. Because she is plenty good enough, and I think she could have a run where she doesn't get herself too involved in long matches and has a bit more in the tank at the end of a tournament, which I think would be important for her. So I'm predicting a title for Karolina Mukova next year, like David. Yeah, I can get on board with that. I think they will both win other titles. I don't think that's too bold a prediction. You know, look at some of the names names and ranks of players that win titles like they are both way better than sort of the low bar for for winning titles um so I'd say probably they both will in 2026 um I do just sort of generally on how I feel about both their careers I do I I kind of agree with all your points but I do I do have a I do have a bit of a sort of bugbear not bugbear but just sort of thing in my brain about sort of the sweeping statement of provided X player stays fit it's taking the example of Karolina Mukova who's 29 years old and has never been able to stay fit like that's like saying if they if they have a better serve or a better forehand or, you know, like that is who she is and she is unable to stay fit.

20:37Like her body kind of, like we've seen enough now, her body can't really cope with top-level tennis. So I think there's still, I think I have quite a lot of doubts still about Emirati Karno and whether her body can cope with the rigours of real consistent life on tour. But there's more time for Amarada Karnou to maybe change her trajectory on that front and change her body. But with Mukova at 29, I'm kind of assuming she's basically not going to be consistently fit. That would be surprising to me if she suddenly becomes a player that's consistently fit at 29 years of age. So I do unfortunately think that is going to continue to be a blight on her career and will hold her back from achieving her potential, which I don't think anybody would argue about.

21:36And that's sad. But I don't think it's going to be a tragedy. Like, I think she'll achieve more things. I do agree with you both on that front. It's just not what we all want her to do based on what a joy she is to watch. Yeah. So Catherine Whitaker is slightly less optimistic than David Law. Shock. There you go. A bit of a concern if it would be the other way around, wouldn't it? Next question is from Rachel Sayre via the barge. And just before we have Rachel's question, I would like to take this opportunity to thank Rachel for the absolutely joyful, not even gift, like package of gifts that she presented each of us with when we saw her at the history conference last week.

22:33Like so much thought and care and love had gone into each of them. And it really, they bowled us all over. And Billie Jean and Pippin will enjoy their dog champagne together on Christmas Day, Rachel. And photos of that will be appearing on social media. So thank you, Rachel. And also thank you to everybody else that gave us gifts. Kai gave me a lovely dog bauble for my tree. Vicky gave us gifts. I'm wearing one of them now it's a pin that says I'm too clumsy to be around fragile masculinity so thank you all you lovely lovely people yeah just so much loveliness thank you Rachel's question what's a tournament you haven't been to but is on your wish list I wonder if Rachel's wanting tips here because Rachel is a prolific traveller to tennis tournaments so maybe we need tips from you Rachel but David what's your answer to this?

23:40The United Cup Is it because I talk about the hotel breakfast in Perth so much? I mean and specifically Perth I hadn't thought of that but now that you'd mention it yes let's add that to the list I've never been to Perth I'd like to go you always seem really happy there when you go but I also, I mean look it's a little too long a trip for me to do that away from the family I'd like to go if my family could come and that sort of thing but also I love the concept of the event I think it's great that there is that event and I'm looking forward to watching it again this year it's selfishly it's also run by a great friend of mine in Stephen Farrow who I worked with for years at Queen's and I love watching him being a tournament director I just love the love that he has for his event and the pride he has in it and I want to see him doing his stuff in another event up close over there it's just like the perfect kind of setting for him that he he kind of came up with the idea of that thing in the first place.

25:02I mean, I know there's loads of people who've come up with the idea of a United Cup, maybe, but he got it off the ground. And I'd love to go and sort of, I'd love it to really grow and get good crowds. Remind me, Catherine, what are the crowds like, you know, typically there in Perth? Decent, decent. It really feels sort of a bummer. You're really sort of remarking on the crowds being bad. But look, some sessions are better than others and it does depend on who's playing. Like two years ago, Australia were in Perth and those sessions were sold out and it was absolutely rocking. China gets good crowds.

25:45I don't think they're in Perth this time either. but basically good I would say and it is one of those where Perth is a sufficiently kind of small city that it feels like the biggest thing that's happening when it is happening which is a cool thing. A whole answer David about how much you'd like to go to Perth without mentioning quokkas. I mean they'd be terrified of me wouldn't they if I turned up. I'd love to see you crouch down low enough to get a quokka selfie. I know, I'd ruin it for everybody else. Yeah, you'd need to oil your knees to get back up. I was going to say, you got quite a lot of scratches and stuff doing that, didn't you?

26:32Oh, I was scrabbling around in the earth. We only ever see the Instabush. Inside a bush. yeah but as hannah is pointing out here in the chat you do share a disposition with quokkas a shared sunny spirit maybe i'll just go there and people can have their photo taken with me i'm not gonna have to scrabble under the undergrowth in order to get that that does happen at tennis tournaments um lovely answer matt what's yours just gonna say while i was preparing the quiz I did I did have a question which was who did Catherine declare took the best ever quokka selfie I was I was listening back through some through some old shows and it's kind of surprised that you declared so confidently this was the best one ever but you did have you did have full reasoning for it is it Karen Hashanow no it was Elena Rabatkinner oh yeah it is fantastic yeah yeah which I had forgotten about but it was nice to be reminded of that yeah do you remember how many photos we got of Catherine McWalkers until a good one came out it was a fun day thanks Matt thanks for throwing me a bone um what's your i've got a i got i i got a quokka magnet on my fridge i bought my niece a quokka bedtime book i went all in on quokkas no regrets i had a similar answer in that i was also thinking about sort of extending the Australia trip.

28:30Brisbane, for me, was my answer. I think a real sweet spot is one-week events. I think a real sweet spot is men and women together, and there are not that many of those anymore. And Brisbane really ticks all the boxes. And as much as I love the United Cup, and I share everything you've just said, and yes, I would like to go to that event as well, nothing pleases me more than the first draw of the new season you know the fresh pdf we get the draw you want to go to the brisbane i do that's what i want the first draw of the season i love it it just it just makes me feel warm inside and um yeah i think that'd be a fun trip to do like to extend the australian swing and go to brisbane one year i i would i would love to do that and they always get great fields as well.

29:23I know the United Cup obviously get a lot of the top players now, but I feel like Brisbane's always strong.

29:32You just talked about a PDF in the same way you talked about Lorenzo Mazzetti's tunic.

29:40Your face when you said the word, the first PDF. I'm easily pleased, apparently.

29:54what's my answer to this there's quite a lot I always say Charleston because I really would like to go to Charleston but unfortunately a caveat to that is I don't really want to do the extraneous trips to America at the moment but I would like to go to Charleston there's quite a lot that I've sort of been to once and would like to go back to Eastbourne really love Eastbourne it's like a village fate but with top level tennis like it's so relaxed and accessible and stress free and just there's almost always good weather which like reliable good weather in the UK is pretty rare yeah Eastbourne's great I'd love to go back there yeah sorry it's not really answering the question Rachel but no but I but I was thinking about it similarly in that like part of the reason I wanted to go to like Brisbane is like it's very practical like it just extends that trip like there's a lot of there's a lot of places I'd like to go to but they are not that easy if you also want to go to the slams like Eastbourne like it's the week before Wimbledon you've kind of got to be at Wimbledon like you've got to be at the Wimbledon draw for example um Rome like I'd love to go to rome but then like you're going to rome are you then coming back before paris are you extending that like just just sort of practically i know that's a very get the violins out rome now lasts about three weeks matt you could go for the beginning of rome i suppose have a holiday in between that and the french open three days uncork yeah yeah i mean non-stop the other event i would love to experience is um tennis at the olympics i mean the olympics generally okay that's my answer you know I think I would potentially get a bit of FOMA about the other Olympic events going on like I enjoy watching the Olympics with you know iPlayer and being able to or it's not on iPlayer anymore is it Discovery Plus or whatever being able to dart between streams I find very helpful you know like the tennis is great but it's not always like the main event at the Olympics but I would love to feel the vibes I watched the Alcaraz Djokovic gold medal match on my iPad whilst commentating on Simone Biles in the gymnastics and that felt very Olympic.

32:20I was just imagining you two sitting next to one another at the Olympic tennis with about six devices on your laps between you with different sports. I think I could do that. Yeah. Staying at Pam's. I'm going to put my iPad and phone. Call it a plan. Next question comes from Etienne himself. Great question incoming, folks. Etienne asks, in 2026, Alcaraz, Sinna and Sviyontek are all one major away from completing the career Grand Slam. Sabalenka is two majors away. And I'm including her here as well, given her amazing consistency at majors and that she made three out of four major finals this year.

33:04Out of these four players, will all, some or none of them, complete the career Grand Slam in 2026? And why, David? I have three of the four completing. So all but Sabalenka? Yes. I believe that Al Kraz and Svantec will complete at the Australian Open. I believe that Yannick Sinner will complete at Roland Garros and Irina Sabalenka might add to her collection but she won't complete this year. And why? I'd say the boldest prediction there is confidently predicting Shontek to win Australia. Yeah, I understand. I mean, listen, there isn't evidence so far. She hasn't won it before. And she did come close in 25.

34:07I mean, let's remember how close she came against Keys and then who knows against Sabalenka in the final. But there's absolutely no reason why her game shouldn't work there, in my view. And I think that she's going to be coming off quite a... it feels like a longer off season in a way it feels like she's had enough time and I think she's going to come out firing and and I think that the Wimbledon win is going to have done her a lot of good in terms of breaking new ground um and and I see I see her getting the job done interesting I certainly could see her getting the job done in Australia it wouldn't surprise me but I don't think I would predict it she's not my favorite for the Australian Open at this stage I think I probably would just about edge Alcaraz to do it I think the one I feel most confident about is Sinner at the French and I agree with you David I could see Sabalenka getting a step closer and doing one of Wimbledon and the French and then mopping up the remaining one for the career slam at a later date but you know doing Wimbledon and the French is just a crazy achievement that it's kind of wild to predict anybody doing that obviously it can be done but to actually predict that it will happen would be madness I think so I think if I had to put money in places now I'd say two of the four and that would be Alcaraz and Sinner and if I had to place all my money on one it would be Sinner Matt Can I just give you a little potted history of the career slam being completed because I was very intrigued by this like has there ever been a year where more than one player has completed the career slam and the answer is no that's never happened so like we could well be on for a very very historic year next year because I imagine nobody's ever been this close multiple players it's interesting very often you do get groups of players who complete it around the same sort of time like 1930s you had fred perry and don budge who did it both like within a few years of each other 1950s you had maureen connolly doris hart shirley fry all do it 1953 1954 1957 in the 80s you had everton martina do it in back-to-back years and then you had stephie graf do it a few years later and then obviously like we had fedor nadal and djokovic all do it within i think it was seven years of each other so like it's not outlandish that we've got a group of players right now who are all very close to completing it in fact it's very much in line with what tends to happen throughout tennis history someone like agassi is actually more of an outlier you know he did it in the 90s no one on the men's side did it in the 70s the 80s you know like he was he was the the one in between Emerson and Federer, you know?

37:38So like it's quite standard, I suppose, that we've got these many players all close to completing it. But if they were all to do it in the same year or even several of them to do it in the same year, that would be a one-off. So that's pretty exciting, I think, that we're going into 2026 with that kind of history on the line. and it's so interesting isn't it because it's such a different task I think for Alcraz and Sinha than it is for Svantec in a way like for Alcraz and Sinha the task really is beating the other one like I know they've got to get to the final but they're I feel so confident sitting here in December 2025 that they will reach those finals that they need to reach but for Svantec I'm not sure she's got as single tough opponent as that but the draw generally is is tougher you know there's there's more threats along the way i think there's more people that could beat shion take out the australian open than there are people who could beat alcaraz for example um but i i think i'm going to lean two of them and I think it probably is Alcaraz and Sinner as well I would love two to do it at the same slam like if Alcaraz and Svante doing it imagine that weekend that would just be absolutely wild.

39:11That would be like the Barty plus Miracle in Melbourne weekend wouldn't it the sort of twin I suppose the French Open final weekend this year was was pretty great in terms of twin flame stories. But yeah, that would be good. And then I love the idea of Alcaraz doing it in Australia and then Sinner trying to... Yeah, respond. Match him and respond. And they responded to each other so well this year, right? Over the summer, that was the theme of it, really. So they've kind of already shown that they can do that. Oh, it's got me really hyped. for 2026. Yeah. Yeah. Thank you, Etienne, for getting us so hyped for 2026.

40:00Next question comes from James G via the barge. James G asks, Catherine, Matt and David are in charge of an end of season exhibition tournament despite protests for four WTA and four ATP players. Unfortunately, none of the top 30 players are interested so are having to look further down the ranking list for an exciting lineup who would the team pick as their four atp and four wta players that offer a nice balance of a high quality tennis b entertainment and showmanship and c aggro now i think we should all agree on this we should debate and agree on this amongst ourselves rather than each submitting our answers.

40:46Yeah, we need to come to a consensus, I think. Yeah, I think so. Now, what I would say, and David, I think you'll back me here, on the basis of our extensive Champions Tour experience, aggro in an exhibition scenario can be created by anyone out of nowhere. Yeah. That's the beauty of an exhibition. Stefan Edberg was on the end of it. Right. Exactly. OK. Would we like to submit? I would like to submit a name to start with that I think we will all agree on instantly. I give you Corentin Moutet. Of course. Yeah. I think ticks all the boxes. And like could also bring genuine aggro. Yeah. next submission Kasikina was on my long list she's top 30 no she's not is she outside the top 30 yeah oof she can do tweeners yes good too yeah Mahatch obviously on my list I think Mahatch actually might live perfect for this he might be the rare example of a player that I'd rather watch in an exhibition what was it Jack Draper said about mid-season UTS he plays all of them the air machete is that his name yeah

42:34David Artifice is ranked outside the world's top 30 he's on my list ok Okay.

42:44Lorenzo Sonigo? Wow, I'm surprised that from you. You're not a Sonigo person. Well, no, I'm trying to be inclusive. You two might want Sonigo, and we're trying to be collaborative. I don't want Sonigo. I've got one for you that I'm unsure about, because I've listed five women, so I've got nine players, right? So one's got to go, even if we had all of mine. Okay. and the one that's the outlier is Sigmund and I don't know how you feel about that no I'm not I thought you might not I forget everything I said about being collaborative that's not even a discussion no you could get to know her everybody would be so bored like exhibition matches are for the people in the stadium right like it's not about the television television experience generally speaking okay labour cup's a bit of an exception but like so when you're watching her live and you haven't got a director trying to spice things up for you and hold your attention by cutting to other shots and you're just watching her hold her service position on the baseline for an eternity every Every single time.

Read the full transcript

44:06Is it... Just... No. Everybody else wants her to be chosen now just so they can get your reaction.

44:18It's a hard no. OK, so who else have you got? Fine. Matt? Well, hang on. So men, are we agreed on Mahatch, Mute and Fees? Vachero?

44:34yeah Vashera could be fun no I think Berrettini I think you're going to have Vashera it'd be fun to have Rinder Kinesh but he's top 30 now right yeah Berrettini Berrettini I could get I can get on board with he'd sell tickets he'd sell tickets yeah

45:04um touch on the marine i think you're slightly look i was into vashiro but i think it was i don't know it was such a unique thing to that week one and done yeah for the moment for the moment like he might bring it again next year and you know that'd be great but I would I would put Berrettini ahead of Monfils a lot of people in the chat saying Monfils Monfils is a good shout Monfils is a good shout well hold on Matt you said you've never been into Monfils the other year but now it's just French players and and Mahatch maybe that's okay Bergs

45:49surely he's a bit more serious I'm into both we've got fees David yeah but he's broken back for the last six months got to ease him back in with a nice exhibition so we're holding this sort of now giving him a nice payday I mean Conchita Martinez seems to be in the Macau field so surely she's a team captain no it's not clear from the poster David David. Okay, so is Monfils in? I'd be happy to have Monfils in. I think we get rid of Fils, actually, for Monfils. I think we have Mouté, Monfils, Berrettini and Mahatch. Who's signing for that? Yeah, it's a great list. Fils is too serious, David. He's too serious.

46:39He's got his eyes on bigger things. Berrettini's hardly a song and dance man, is he? No, I mean like he's got two, his aspirations are too high. Oh, right. I get it. You know, he doesn't need to waste his time on an exhibition. The others might. Okay. Were we all signing for that? Yeah, I had Baptiste on my long list. Yeah. Ayala. Who else have we got? Yeah, fun. Baptiste, Ayala. Hang on, David's not convinced about Ayala. I'm just processing. Okay. Vondrosheva. She can be a bit of a vibe killer, can't she? Yeah. I don't know, like, she's amazing, Vondrosheva, but... She can be a vibe, she can be a vibe killer, you just don't know what you're going to get.

47:35Is Ayala exhibition material? real.

47:42She's fun. No. She's feisty. She's feisty. I feel like she'd be into it, you know. Baptiste is a shot maker. You know what I mean? She's going to show you shots that you've not seen. Yeah. Agreed. Yeah, no, we're all in on Baptiste, I think. Who have we got so far in the women? Baptiste, Kazekina are in, I think. Yeah. I'm scrolling through the rankings and realising that everybody now represents Uzbekistan on the WTA. Have you seen this? I've now said Tatiana Maria twice and not even acknowledged. I think I'll say that as a no.

48:30Yeah, it's a no. You were all into her in June, honestly. Couldn't get enough of that. And I loved it, but it doesn't feel like an exhibition-y vibe to me. Awi Ito is being put forward by multiple people in the chat, including my dad. Oh, that I can get on board with. Catherine will have forgotten all about cut me and I bleed caballi in January.

48:54That was a very momented time, wasn't it? No. I'm excited about being into Flavio Caballi. He's going to be in Perth for United Cup. Could be commentating on him. I mean, admittedly, I'm the bloke who once got into Maxine Cressy. Have we got Awe Ito? Yeah, I mean, I would vote for Ito. Okay, so it's Kazakina, Ito, Baptiste and one other. Ava Lees, I put forward. Ted Townsend. Which got nothing. Ava Lees. Why are we into Lees for an exhibition player? Lees is great. What about Victoria Azarenka? like she'd shift a few tickets wouldn't she like Lisa would be good on the mic if she had to you know sort of chat to the crowd at all Lisa would be somebody retired fill the gap I mean the other thing to say here is it does depend a bit what country this exhibition is happening in because it you know you do want a home a home player generally well France actually Catherine you mentioned Nazarenka there you mentioned Nazarenka and she was very good at that exhibition we had at Queen's that year.

50:13Right. She was fun. She put a policeman's helmet on her head and sat in the chair.

50:23Okay, we having Azarenka? Yeah. Sure. I briefly had a bit of a rap ball with her at that event. Oh, hang on, I've got a suggestion. What about Harriet Dart and Lois Boisson together?

50:37Okay. That's shifting tickets, isn't it? That feels like a... They feel like numbers five and six in a wrestling arena where one of them comes into the environment to sort of disrupt the match and then the other one comes in to go and take her out. That sounds great. Okay, should we go as a ranker? Sure. Yeah. I like it. Okay, so it's Kazakina, Baptiste, Azarenka and...

51:21Eala? I'm not sure that was agreed on. Taylor Townsend? Ito? No, it was Aoi Ito. It was Aoi Ito. Yes. Great. Okay. Boom. Random. That wasn't random enough for you, Matt.

51:41Okay, next question from Lauren H. Lauren H. via The Barge. And I feel like lots of things we've said over the course of this podcast have partially answered this question, but here goes. As someone who knows very little about how you coordinate a sports podcast, how do you, Catherine, Matt and David, prepare for each podcast? How much your roles and preparation differ? E.g. it sounds like Matt leads on research for Tennis Relived. Correct. Do you have different styles of preparation? And in terms of podcasting, what do you feel your different strengths are? Thank you. Well, Matt gives us credibility by doing lots of prep.

52:25And saying stuff with evidence. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I feel very, very anxious when I'm not prepared for something, you know, like just in life, just in life generally. Like, you know, if I'm even if I'm traveling somewhere, I don't know. I will always like look up, you know, what train I need to catch or what bus, you know, like I'm a planner. Probably to a fault. You're not a race across the world guy. No. Would you go on Race Across the World? Would I go on Race Across the World? Yeah. No, I don't. We could go on together. I don't think I would. Who's doing the podcast? Yeah, like I'd miss too much stuff.

53:20So not because of 17-hour bus rides, but because of tennis phone. They definitely make Race Across the World seem more doable than it is, I think. I just would not enjoy that amount of time on a coach. Yeah, it's the best journeys, isn't it? You're not allowed to have a phone, are you? No. No. If we put your phone in aeroplane mode for 10 minutes, Catherine, you kick off so there's no chance. Yeah, Catherine would be worse at that than me.

53:52yeah but i'd be having a spiritual experience and you know appreciating the new perspective on the world so maybe i wouldn't care about not having wi-fi for once that's the whole point of it isn't it yeah but i think i realized that even with something like live at wimbledon for example or the live shows when we do it you know to an audience it's not it's not a live thing that would make me anxious it would be not it would be not being prepared as long as I'm prepared I can do it and I so I take that approach always to kind of everything if I can um and yeah I do that for the pod I always you know I basically build the agenda through the week but then I will sort of build my own agenda you know there's the there's the there's the one for all of us and then I'll have my own where I'm writing down what I'm thinking or feeling about a match or stats that I've found and that kind of stuff.

54:45And, yeah, I love doing all that.

54:51I would say I do sort of a version of that, but far looser than Matt. Like I do, you know, I have a notes app throughout the week where I jot things down. But emphasis on looser than Matt, definitely. But I, you know, I do, I, I, obviously my role is slightly different and I really try and, I share your feelings about how, how much being prepared alleviates anxiety and, you know, that feeling of being in control and everything. But I also aspire to a very natural presenting style. I don't want things to sound really prepared and rehearsed and pre-formulated. And yet I want it obviously to be professional and to feel in control with which preparation helps.

55:50So that's kind of a balance that I try and tread. And obviously if we have a tricky or delicate topic that we're addressing in the show, I will do a lot more scripting for my presenting that I don't tend to do. Sometimes I'll script a bit at the top, particularly if we've got something we need to promote or, you know, particular facts that we have to get straight. But generally I'm kind of always trying to tread that line of trying to keep things sounding really natural and conversational whilst also being conscious that I'm, you know, steering a ship and the listener wants to feel confident that I'm in control.

56:39you know it's like you you don't you don't want your you don't want your airline pilot to have a quiver of anxiety in their voice do you or for them to sound a little bit chaotic or that they've forgotten their lines um but you also like it if they sound so relaxed that you know whatever no big deal done this a million times um so yeah that's my answer David has already told you what his attitude to preparation is. It's not always, though, David. Yeah, at the top of the show, you said, I do prep for these shows and I don't usually. Now, the truth is that I'm... There's not a day that goes by that.

57:26I don't think about the next podcast, really, that whether it's a story that comes up, a thought that goes through my head, somebody else... I mean, I suppose I'm the bloke with contacts who likes to talk to... I like to sort of just start messaging people I know within tennis and ask them what they think about something just to kind of inform where I'm going to come to with it. I mean, I bring age. Experience, let's call it politely. So I've got... No, accurately, David. Yeah, I've got that to draw on. silliness um i mean look you know some of the predictions i i there are sometimes i will i will say stuff because i think it's funny um even if it sounds absolutely ridiculous um but there we are um but i also i i am i i do i do genuinely think extraordinary things are possible in sports and I like to sort of explore that potential.

58:34But I mean, actually, one part of the question is the strengths of the other two. And I mean, I think the nice thing about our show is that although we're all great friends and we get along very well, we're all very different. We come from different sort of brackets of, certainly age brackets, you know, and we've got different approaches to things naturally and I love that. I love to hear what you two are going to say. I really enjoy that. I enjoy getting on the podcast. I enjoy it on WhatsApp, finding out what you're going to say about stuff. There's never a moment that goes by on the show that I don't learn.

59:18There's never a show that goes by that I don't learn something or think about something slightly differently because of something one of you two have said, which I really like. hmm yeah and and it's always interesting like i just a sort of example of a sort of difference that i think for example me and david would have is if i'm watching a match with david i can expect david to say who thinks going to win or you know what do you think sort of happening now like david's like david is always he's he obviously didn't like my my my take there he's left um for those not watching live um but like david will you're back david i thought i defended you well mic drop like i very much sort of come up with what i think about something after it's happened, I suppose.

1:00:18But I think, especially David, but I think maybe you as well, Catherine, like you're much more trying to think of takes in the moment, I think a little bit more. I think that is a kind of difference that we all slightly have. I'm not necessarily trying to, but I am against my will having takes. Yeah, whereas I often find myself thinking, oh that might change in a minute let's see how it plays out you know but I think also partly that comes maybe David from commentating for you like I think that is kind of how you have watched a lot of matches like needing to analyse them in the moment and get takes from pundits in the moment and it's also just your general excellent vibe like you you just you just feel things in the moment which I'm always a little bit I don't know who's going to win.

1:01:16Let's see. And then let's talk about it. Yeah, I never... Yeah, the who's going to win. I'm like, well, none of us know. Like, you know as much as I do. Going into a tie break, who's going to win? I might well look around myself. There's like six people in earshot and I'll have asked them all. Yeah. Yeah, and that's really fun.

1:01:43i can't help you i asked the barge i'm always asking people also just one other little point here that sort of uh came to me it's not it's not fully related to us but i was thinking about hannah's voice note the other day when she was talking about how this was the year where the tennis content was um let down by the tennis process right and if we if we apply that to the podcast the one thing i wanted to shout out is this has been the year of us with our best ever process i think and i think that's largely down to vicky and hannah and also just some like letting go of you know like I have finally let go of editing every single podcast at a grand slam for example and now we have the wonderful jib doing a lot of that work and it's like it always made sense for that to happen but like we need to get to a place where we knew jib well enough but also like it comes from within and being able to kind of let go of it and trust other people to do it and I think we've got really good at that this year in terms of getting our processes and our planning and our sort of behind the scenes stuff like just we're in a lot better place than we were before and i think yeah just shout out you would not believe how much matt gets into a workflow matt loves a workflow i do whenever we have a planning meeting matt's like should we do workflow or sometimes it'll be i've i've prepared a workflow yeah here's one i made earlier yeah guilty it's it's been a real revelation it's real yeah yeah hannah vicky jib matthew and matt's workflows we thank you uh we have one more question from swarner via the barge the question is Sabalenka, Svantec and Goff have been the year-end WTA top three for three consecutive years.

1:03:53My question, says Swarna, is about the three-year trend in the main vulnerability of each player. As Swarna sees it, it's Sabalenka's mindset in big finals. It's Svantec's adaptability when she starts missing her shots. And it's Goff's second serve problem. For each of them, do you think the trend is getting better or worse? Should we go one by one? Let's start with Sabalenka's mindset in big finals.

1:04:30First of all, I want to say good question, I think. Yeah, great question. And I've been thinking about it a lot. I don't think there's easy answers for any of them. I also think it might slightly depend on the time frame you're using. You know, like I think if we look back three years for Sabalenka, I feel reasonably confident to say things have improved for Sabalenka. You know, I think it's not been totally always upward. you know see this year's Roland Garros final for example but I think that was an important experience for her and will make her better in in the long run as well but you know if you go back three years Sabalenka had not won a major for example she's now won three of them she's reached a lot of big finals I I see Sabalenka now as a big big match player you know like she might not win them, but she's going to be there and her opponent is going to have to do something pretty impressive to beat her.

1:05:41You know, think Madison Keys, think Coco Goff and her scrambling and her defence. You know, I don't think Sabalenka loses those Grandstand Finals, were it not for also what her opponent was doing, you know? So I think Sabalenka's mindset, to me, over the last three years has improved a lot. Bumps along the way, doubts along the way. But yes, I feel confident that things have got better for Sabalenka in big moments over the last three years.

1:06:15Yeah, no notes. I agree with that. Sort of non-linear upward trend for Sabalenka. And I think he'll probably continue to be non-linear. Yeah. David, any notes on Sabalenka? Yeah, I'm not worried about her, actually, because I think the only one I really feel that about is that Goff one. I think you can be knocked off the court by Madison Keyes in the final throws. You can be beaten by Amanda Inissimova playing lights out. And then she won the other one. yeah the other two I have more concern over really okay well let's get into the second one Shontek's adaptability when she starts missing her shots this one I find the most interesting actually and it brings me to a conversation we all had after the Andy Murray interview when we there in the in the room in the immediate aftermath when Andy Murray had gone off to meet Stephen Hendry who was late and we were just reflecting on some of the you know just digesting and processing in the moment some of the some of the things that Andy had said in that interview and we were reflecting on the portion where he talked about the the big three Djokovic Federer Nadal and in particular his analysis of Nadal's game and how he talked about Nadal's prowess as a problem solver and how underrated and elite that was as a skill.

1:08:05And I think, Matt, it was you first that said it just made me think about Iga Shvantec and how she just doesn't really have that chip somehow. When things start going wrong for her, it's almost like the opposite of whatever happens to Nadal happens. And I'm not sure that is going better. I think, I don't want to piss on your lawn again, Matt, and maybe you've brought stats to this question, But didn't she suffer more, lose more six love sets this season than she ever has before? Like there were more, like it was still a great season for Ike Chante, but I feel like she suffered more sort of defeats by alarming scorelines or set defeats by alarming scorelines than we've ever seen before.

1:08:56Yeah, yeah, she definitely did. I think the thing that really jumped out to me from the Andy Murray interview that made me think of Sviontek was that thing about Nadal being a problem solver. And also the point that Sviontek is one of those players who does no tactical analysis herself. She says that, you know, she says that she relies on the team to give it to her. She's not a feel player in that way. You know, she kind of wants, she wants the instruction and she's been absolutely brilliant at executing it a lot. You know, that's why she's won so many majors and spent so long at world number one.

1:09:42You know, she's an incredible player. But I do think, I do think when things starts going wrong, she gets pretty stressed and her inclination, her sort of response to it is stress rather than figuring it out and adapting and changing um i think this year as well it's been combined with a slight change of style that she's tried to incorporate you know i think she has tried to go back a little bit more to the way she originally played but i think there have been moments where that's lapsed and she's she's lost she's lost her way a bit and poor bad habits have crept in and these sorts of things have happened overhitting and getting blown off the court and losing you know six love six one sets um but again if we take it over a three-year period you know i'm not i'm not sure things are as bad as they were for example like against corne at wimbledon a few years ago or even against Putin's savor at Wimbledon you know and I think I think the way this year that actually she had some of her best tennis on faster hard courts was was interesting you know Australia Cincinnati she played well Wimbledon a sort of low bouncing quick grass court these were not traditional Shviontek great points on the tour and I think they do indicate a sort of evolution of game style that she was going through and I do wonder whether next year is the year it all sort of Marries back up again and and we see we see a bit more the real Ligus Fiontech throughout the whole season in the biggest matches like that that would not shock me if we did get that Ligus Fiontech again so I agree with you that this is the one that I find the most interesting I think over a three-year period I would say just trending upwards but there were some there were some worrying moments this season but i do think it was quite a lot in conjunction with the game style changes that she was trying to incorporate and i hope next year she just feels a little bit more set with that you know like you know she made a pretty big coaching change you know going from someone who she'd had so much success with uh to someone else that it was it was a lot for her um and she still managed to win wimbledon in in that year so generally i feel positive but not as positive as I do about San Belenco in this sort of area I don't know what David thinks Yeah, David Similar, very similar and yeah and then with the final one Goff, I think she's the she's the one I'd be most concerned about because I just I don't know I just feel like it's such an Achilles heel the the serve and the forehand but certainly the serve there's no hide in place and we're still seeing matches where there are double digit double faults and more um and a look of total exasperation on her face and and some of some of it seems so mental as well when when she was at the u.s open and looked so anxious and was turning around and communicating with her box and they're trying to give her advice.

1:13:11I can't quite believe that the same player who won the French Open is having to try to patch this thing together a few months later.

1:13:25I largely share your concern. I would say she brought Gavin McMillan on the week, days before the US Open. And I think, you know, just sort of thinking back to Matt Futterman's voice note in our review show yesterday, by that point in the season, she was pretty cooked, really. You know, he's got a fantastic track record, Gavin McMillan. There's reason to have confidence in him, I think, and his ability to make something and make significant changes to her second serve. and I'm not sure we've yet seen the potential of what he can do with Coco Gauff. I think we'll potentially know quite quickly at the start of the 2026 season.

1:14:20But I do think there's still... That gives me a bit of hope, I suppose. I don't know. What do you think on the Gauff one, Matt? Yeah, I think she's, you know, out of all of these players listed and their vulnerabilities, you know, she's the one who has made the most obvious sort of step to deal with it, which seems like a good thing. but also it agree with David it's the biggest of the issues it it's it's it's holding her back in a way that you know she runs text adaptability when she starts missing her shots like sure like she'd be an she'd be even better were she to fix that but she's already like trending for like an all-time great career Sabalenka's okay mindset in big matches okay like she's still winning loads she's still the world number one i think for golf like obviously she's still doing incredible things but it feels like it's it's there almost in all of her matches you know like the serve is is an issue and i wouldn't say that about sabalenko and chvontek and those vulnerabilities lifted it's just it's just a very big thing for coco golf the serve and there's people much more qualified to talk about it than me in terms of how just how hard it is to change you know we've got the example of sabalenka you know who worked with gavin mcmillan as well and and has overcome it but i i don't think it's uh just because sabalenka did it it will mean it will work for coco goff too i'm not sure it's as simple as that i i really hope it does um but to me this is the biggest problem of of the three that there's no doubt that on yeah on three-year trend to take your sort of you know the time period thing on three year trend gough's gough's problem is worsened yeah worsened i think because like she's accumulated mental baggage on it like technically it's the same serve isn't it it's you know the the nuts and bolts of the problem remains the same but you know mental baggage is a very is a very powerful thing yeah um okay well that feels like a bit of a bummer of a note to end what's been a really fun show on.

1:16:45David, tell us another anecdote about pantomimes. Quick.

1:16:55Wasn't isolated, by the way. Wasn't isolated. You beat up the Ugly Sisters more than once. And also we had somebody once come into the school who was playing a part of like a pirate or something like that. And, you know, it was like drama. I would have probably only been about 10. I thought it was serious. So I was trying to beat him up.

1:17:28Did your parents not explain the concept of acting to you? Not really. Not effectively, anyway. A lot more violent in your youth than I was expecting. Me too. So hang on. Someone came to your school dressed as a pirate and you assaulted them. Kind of, yeah. Okay. It's supposed to be an uplifting note, David. Never forget this. I remember him sitting in the centre of the room and we were supposed to keep going and doing a circle round him. What was he doing? What was the point of his presence? I think we were probably prisoners or something and he's just sat there in charge of us as we were just circling the room around him.

1:18:16And when I ran around the blind side of him, I'd saw the chance to go and punch him in the back. What? I'll never forget it. I was only about nine. And I remember him turning around and looking at me like, yeah

1:18:37were there consequences? did anyone see you punch him in the back? no I mean maybe they did but I didn't there were any consequences I think maybe they thought I was being brave and protecting them it's just that it wasn't real wow

1:19:00I wouldn't do it now thanks don't worry when do you think you sort of got a handle on sort of the concept of acting yeah it took a while i mean i was still i was still into wwf when i was about 16 i still thought that was real did you did you think wwf or whatever it is did you think that was real way too long yeah yeah oh that is that's adorable though i was devastated very on brand I found out that it was a load of bottles. Do you remember how you found out? Yeah, well, I mean, I was starting to get a bit suspect because I kept thinking, why do they keep banging something every time they hit something to make a sound effect?

1:19:44They don't look like they're actually making contact. It's a bit like finding out that Santa's not real, isn't it? I was going to say, dare I ask how old you were when that crushing realisation hit you? These things, I took these things hard. Do you remember how you found out that Santa's not real? No. No? Okay. I know I was crushed. Do you remember how you found out, Matt? Let's end on a festive Santa reno. I was just thinking about that. I don't remember. You're not? No. Do you remember believing in Santa? Yes, absolutely. Okay. But you don't remember the crushing moment? No. I reckon my parents will remember, though.

1:20:35OK, well, can you ask them to let us know? I will. I have a fun Christmas note to end on. Yes, please. My present from Rachel. Yes. As CJ says in the chat, Catherine, you can't end with Santa's not real. Save me, Matt.

1:20:58for the benefit of those listening on the pod Matt is reaching behind him to a to a shelf he's holding something up to the screen it looks like it's a figurine it's a tennis player it's got a Nike headband on it's like a fat old Rafael Nadal yes it is it is rafael nadal but that is that is not all that it is there is a there is a catalan tradition a catalan nativity tradition uh of of figurines called caganers and these are figurines who are defecating correct you you heard that correct it is a tradition this is the festive note we're ending on it is a tradition in catalunya that you have figures who are sort of defecating in your nativity scene it's a sort of you know there's a whimsy element to it and and it's supposed to and it's nothing more whimsical than a turd and it's supposed to signify you know good luck and good soil for the new year kind of thing.

1:22:15So I now have a pooing raffa on the doll.

1:22:26For the benefit of those listening, Matt has turned the figurine 180 degrees to reveal a soiled pair of shorts pulled down to below the buttocks. Yep, with a turd at the bottom of the fig tree. Oh, right, OK. I thought it was a stain. No, it's an actual, it's like a Cumberland sausage. Yeah.

1:22:58So that now lives proudly on my shelf. OK, so rather than Santa's not real, we're ending on Nadal's doing a shit. Okay. Yeah. Happy holidays, everyone. That's what you've come to the tennis podcast for, isn't it? Etienne, thank you so much for creating. Billie Jean's getting in there. Thank you very much for being the godfather of the last hour and 25 minutes of fun. We are very grateful. Thank you to everybody's questions on the barge. Thank you to all of you for making the barge the wonderful place that it is. Rachel wrote some truly moving words in her card, her letter to each of us about what the barge means to her.

1:23:48And that means so much to us. So thank you, everybody on the barge, everybody submitting questions. Thank you to Etienne. Thank you to all of our friends of the tennis podcast. We love these Q &A shows. We'll be back for plenty more in 2026. Thank you and good night.

From the publisher

Catherine, David and Matt gathered on YouTube for our final live show of 2025 and this one was a wild ride. Thanks to guest editor Etienne for putting the show together. We were asked:

- Does tennis need pantomime villains?

- Will Muchova win another title?

- Which tournaments would we love to attend?

- How many of Alcaraz, Sinner, Swiatek and Sabalenka will complete the Career Grand Slam in 2026?

- Which players from outside of the Top 30 would we nominate to play the perfect exhibition?

- How do we prepare for podcasts?

- Are Swiatek, Sabalenka and Gauff overcoming their biggest vulnerabilities or not?

Come for all of that, stay for some tales from David's childhood and an introduction to the Catalan Christmas tradition of caganers.

More from Friends of The Tennis Podcast

All 222 episodes
BONUS - Our final live Q&A of 2025!Friends of The Tennis Podcast · 1 h 24 min
Listen in VO