BONUS - Our first Q&A show of 2026!

25 Feb 2026 · 1 h 18 min · 22 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Live tennis podcast Q&A (first Q&A show of 2026) covering: whether women should play best-of-five sets at Grand Slams; player-controlled content (YouTube/TikTok/podcasts); ceilings for teen WTA players (Mirra Andreeva, Victoria Romboko/Victoria “Mboko”, Iva Jovic); Winter Olympics crossover picks (figure skaters and a curling rink); coaching/mental-coach speculation for Iga Swiatek; and how journalists’ treatment of podcasters has changed.

Guests/backgrounds

No guest athletes; it’s a host-led Q&A with Matt and David (co-hosts). “Catherine” is also referenced as a co-host/host voice. Questions come from listeners (e.g., Chris Chu, Claire Evans, Michelle B., Connie, Richard Brown, Tom Nicholas).

Key claims

Best-of-five for women would initially cause turbulence, likely widening the gap between top players and the rest; long-term, the best players would still win. Player content is often PR-glossy; “What the Vlog” style is preferred for authenticity. For teens: long-term ceiling debated between Andreeva and Romboko; Jovic seen as reliable but less proven. Figure-skating picks emphasize high-wire, high-risk execution. Swiatek’s team dynamics may be codependent; consider mental/coach changes if clay/Wimbledon don’t improve results.

Notable examples

Coco Gauff named as benefiting from best-of-five; Amanda Anisimova and Alexandrova/Taus-like players suggested as less suited. Content examples: Ben Shelton, Alex Diminor, Dario “What the Vlog” Kazakina. Teen examples: Andreeva forehand/composure issues; Romboko’s athletic “weapons” and fitness/forehand question; Jovic’s compact reliability. Figure skating: Carlos Alcaraz for men; Joanna Garland/Madison Keys/Amanda Anisimova for women; ice dance/pairs picks include Sarani and Jasmine Paolini; curling team discussion centers on Italian players like Jannik Sinner and Matteo Berrettini.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Welcome and Jokes

0:45 to 3:22

Casual banter among hosts about haircuts, dad jokes, and chat interactions.

“I mean, I don't know what you asked for, but it looks good, Matt.”

Transitioning to Tennis

3:22 to 3:54

Hosts discuss transitioning from casual talk to tennis-related topics and questions.

“Should we try not to be distracted by credible Arta Rinderkinesh, who's a breakup on Jack Draper in the third set in Dubai?”

Women Playing Five Sets

3:54 to 10:46

Discussion on the implications of women playing five-set matches and potential winners.

“Which athletes could benefit from an even more rigorous stamina contest?”

Player-Controlled Content

10:46 to 14:00

Hosts analyze the trend of tennis players creating content and its impact.

“which would lead to, well, we all know what it would lead to in terms of discourse.”

Player Vlogging Insights

14:00 to 14:37

Discussing the authenticity of player vlogs and their impact.

“But there aren't that many Dario Kazakina's.”

Exploring Player Personalities

14:37 to 18:15

Delving into the personal lives of players like Alexandra Ayala.

“Yeah, I mean, I think a lot of players just aren't prepared to risk anything with their, I don't know whether it's privacy or whether it's just brand, you know.”

Examining WTA's Rising Stars

18:15 to 22:21

Analyzing the potential of teen players in the WTA like Mira Andreeva.

“That very successful YouTube content he does.”

Comparing Young Talents

22:21 to 28:07

A detailed comparison of young players' potential and weaknesses.

“We are edging closer to the Winter Olympics section.”

Analyzing Emerging Tennis Talents

28:07 to 31:32

The hosts discuss the potential of rising tennis stars, focusing on Jovic, Mboko, and Andreeva.

“She was the only teen in the top 100 and she was in the top 10.”

Winter Olympics Nostalgia

31:33 to 36:15

The hosts share their feelings about the end of the Winter Olympics and engage in a fun crossover question about figure skating.

“Pick a man and a woman for single skating and a doubles slash mixed doubles team for pairs and ice dance each.”
Show all 22 chapters

Tennis Players as Figure Skaters

36:16 to 40:08

A deep dive into which tennis players would excel as figure skaters, focusing on their technical and artistic abilities.

“It was either going to be Joanna Garland or my other submissions are Madison Keys, because I think that's the way she won the Australian Open last year.”

Curling Team Composition

40:09 to 42:01

The hosts brainstorm which tennis players would make a successful curling team, discussing traits needed for the sport.

“So I'm going to give you two some parameters and you're going to come up with the names.”

Building an Italian Men's Curling Team

42:01 to 46:50

The hosts discuss potential players for an Italian men's curling team, evaluating their skills and team dynamics.

“I've put a lot of thought into my names.”

Debating Team Composition and Player Traits

46:51 to 48:38

A lively debate on the characteristics needed for a successful curling team, with comparisons to notable tennis players.

“I went for Coco Gauff, Jessica Bagula, Yannick Sinner and Karen Inamukova.”

Analyzing Iga Swiatek's Coaching Situation

48:39 to 56:01

The hosts analyze Iga Swiatek's coaching setup and potential changes to optimize her performance.

“I mean, I'm already a bit anxious about Yannick Sinner being in...”

Analyzing Shviontek's Performance Changes

56:01 to 57:38

Discussing the impact of player Shviontek's recent performance changes and strategies.

“to the setup because it does feel like she should be winning more than she is right now to me.”

Doubt and Pressure in Shviontek's Career

57:39 to 1:00:46

Exploring moments of doubt in Shviontek's career and their influence on her performance.

“He loves watching her play and analysing this development over the last year and a half.”

Evolution of Media Perception for Podcasters

1:00:47 to 1:06:48

Examining how the treatment and perception of podcasters in media environments has changed over time.

“Do you ever still feel looked down on by some old school journalists?”

Acceptance and Respect in the Media Room

1:06:49 to 1:10:03

Discussing the growing acceptance and respect for podcasters in traditional media settings.

The Evolution of Podcast Credibility

1:10:03 to 1:12:02

Learn how the podcast has established credibility within the tennis media landscape.

Notable Shifts in Media Careers

1:12:03 to 1:14:18

Discover how prominent media figures have transitioned to podcasting and what it signifies.

“I think you mean the creator lounge, Catherine.”

The Rise of Podcasting Since the Pandemic

1:14:19 to 1:16:18

Understand the significant change in public perception and acceptance of podcasts since COVID-19.

“on the podcast we listen to the news agents the way you've got these really recognized news journalists and political journalists john sobel louis goodall and emily matlis who basically you just gave up their TV careers.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:10Hello friends and welcome to the tennis podcast and our first live Q &A show of 2026. These are my favourite tennis podcast shows that we do. So I'm very excited to be returning with our first of the year. Matt has had a haircut in honour of the first Q &A show of the year. Hello, Matt. Hello. I have, yes, by a man named Casper, who I think I'm going to go back to. He was very nice and did a decent job, I think. He did. I mean, I don't know what you asked for, but it looks good, Matt. Well done, Casper. Was he well-mannered or was he rude? too good David too good that was awful David how can we mute David I'm back folks it's so good to be back I've so missed the Q &A shows I've so missed all this liveness and I'm going to come with all my dad jokes and be as cringe as possible well you've succeeded so far David we're all thrilled to be your outlet, they've got to go somewhere haven't they?

1:29Well I say that to my kids as well in the car just now on the way back from tennis and they didn't seem very happy with them so I thought I'd give you the rest So you're recycling the jokes that have already failed on your kids Are they getting a bit old for your dad jokes now David? No I mean some of them they don't understand and then the rest they think are rubbish so I'm trying to find that sweet spot and I've yet to find it. Okay, we'll let you know if you find it here. I'm having a whiskey, a very watered down whiskey from the whiskey that David got me for my birthday a couple of weeks ago.

2:07And that is a glass for anybody that can't see with a little sausage dog in the bottom. So lots of Catherine Whitaker coded things happening over here. And we've had some really excellent questions in on the barge which has been rocking recently uh the chat is rocking hannah's in the chat sophie smith loved your casparoo joke david thanks sophie i found my audience brilliant uh yeah we have some um we have some great questions we have a little winter olympics themed section which i am so thrilled and excited about um and uh yet to To people asking about the glass, there's lots of people in the chat asking about the...

2:55OK, there's one person in the chat asking about these glasses. They're an Icelandic brand, I think, and they have all sorts of fun glass animals in the bottom. I've got another one with a fun pink sheep in it. That is epic. I'll remember the name and I'll pop it in the chat for anybody. For anybody that's come here tonight for glassware recommendations, I know that's what everybody wants. Should we talk about tennis? Should we try not to be distracted by credible Arta Rinderkinesh, who's a breakup on Jack Draper in the third set in Dubai? Let's answer some questions, shall we? Starting with a question here, question number one from Chris Chu.

3:42Chris asks, with the renewed chatter about women playing five sets, How do you think that would hypothetically change the pool of Grand Slam winners among the current era, if at all? Which athletes could benefit from an even more rigorous stamina contest? It's a great question, Chris. And I think it's probably a two-step answer. I always think with the question of women playing best of five, I think there would be an initial period of tremendous turbulence if the change were made. And then things would just revert to a new normal. Women would start training differently. I think the gap between the very, very top and the rest would widen, as has generally been the case at the slams in men's tennis.

4:44But I guess if the question is kind of looking at the current crop of players and the sort of period of immediate turbulence, which I think would last for a few years. I mean, obviously it would taper, but it would be at its most extreme sort of in its initial impact. I think probably the player that springs most to my mind that would benefit is Coco Goff. I don't know where your minds went when you read this question. Matt, how about you? Yes, I had Coco Goff at the top of my list as well. Someone who combines great stamina and physical prowess on court with, I think, great mental strength as well.

5:29qualities that we talk about a lot in terms of best of five sets and and needing to manage that but also someone who has holes in her game and therefore would have more more time I suppose to sort of get matches back on track if if things went against her in a match potentially um I think my big my big picture answer is is kind of what you're saying there I actually not sure a huge amount would change long term i do think the best players tend to win over the longer formats and i also think best of three is a long enough format that you've figured out who the best players are over that format and i don't think there's a huge amount of difference you know if you look at the men's game in terms of who wins on on tour versus who wins at the slams there are certain players who who do a bit better at the slams or a bit worse but generally i don't feel like the best of five makes an enormous difference to the tour.

6:28I just generally think it would suit the best players, you know, like it would be harder to beat them. I do think there is a sort of category of WTA player that maybe exists a bit more in the WTA than the ATP, which is kind of like streaky, big hitters. I think it might not favour them quite so much would be my sense, you know, like I'm going to say it. Amanda Nissamova, I think, wouldn't benefit from best of five. I think maybe like a Alexandreva or a Taos, these sorts of players who are all about taking the racket out of your hand, hitting big, hitting flat. I think players with more time and probably with better movement and fitness could sort of maybe nullify some of those threats over best of five would be my overall take, I think.

7:18I suppose there could be an anomalous Rorinka type player that might emerge that we don't currently know about at the moment that would be this WTA diesel that is currently being constrained in ways they and we don't even realise by the format. but we don't know who that is and they don't know who that is right so but I think there is potential for that to be the case for somebody just to emerge that like wow uh but it's it's it's very difficult to predict who that might be and I think also that just to say that the fact that at the moment the chatter is only about bringing it in okay at one slam but certainly in the latter stages.

8:03So actually, I'm not sure there necessarily would be as much turbulence straight away because I think the fact that it would be best of three for the first four rounds or so, I think you would then end up probably still with the players you would normally end up with at the end of a slam, and those would be the top players. Do you know what I mean? I think if you put best of five in from the start straight away at the slams, that could cause a bit of chaos, a bit of disruption but i don't know i think the way they're talking about it i could see it sort of being eased in in in that sense i suppose david your thoughts uh well one of me that speaks to mine is that you say they're only talking about it for one tournament well you can make that two now can't you because the one who was suggesting it is running the other tournament now um in craig tiley uh there's one for for monday's show uh when we discuss the news But look, my feelings are very similar to yours.

9:02It will reduce the pool of players, I think, actually, who end up winning Grand Slams a little bit because I think the top players will become even more dominant. And actually, if we want specifics, I am not convinced that Madison Keys would win that Australian Open if those latter stages were best of five sets because I think eventually Iga Svantec and Irina Sabalenka would have got to her. I don't think Jelena Rostopenko would have won her French Open in the end. I think that Simona Halep would have probably found a way into that match and ended up winning it. I mean, obviously, I can't be sure of that, and people may say, don't agree.

9:44That's what comes to my mind. Yeah, I thought about Sabalenka as well, and I feel like it's, you know, there's that stat, isn't there, about how she hasn't lost in straight sets of a slam since the 2020 US Open. like she always gets into a match and I feel like it it's kind of taken like a kind of peaking Madison Keys for example or peaking Elena Rabatkin to just rip it from her at the Australian Open in the last couple of years I think that would be that'd be harder to do I think over over five sets

10:19yeah I mean I if it comes in just in the last three rounds of one slam I know I know you've got to start somewhere and I'm not suggesting suddenly bring it in across the board at all slams wouldn't be turbulent either but I just it would be so sort of incremental a change that I don't think I don't think players would specifically start training for it and you could end up with some I don't know I could just foresee it being quite a rough a rough transition which would lead to, well, we all know what it would lead to in terms of discourse. And I just feel like I would, you know, I would celebrate the change in one way, but I would also put my helmet on, you know, in anticipation of it sort of weaponising the worst of the sports commentators, I suppose.

11:20Yeah. I mean, I think I said that at the time, like I applaud the idea and the innovation. But I kind of always want the change to be happening on a sport wide level rather than, you know, rather than individuals, I suppose. Great question, though. Next question. Claire Evans asks, asks, we seem to be in a new era where tennis players are increasingly wanting to take control of their content, such as via podcasts or YouTube channels. I've seen Shelton, Diminor. Diminor's a TikToker now. Has everyone seen that? Yeah, he went a bit mad. He did lose his tiny mind a little bit and then lose to Patrick Kipson.

12:09Welfare check on Alex Diminor or someone. um he did a sort of q a but rather than just answering like a load of questions within one video he did about 10 10 different videos in in five minutes which is you know i don't think what the algorithm wants it was chaotic yeah that's a bit like what i'd do yeah it was giving like you know boomer dad takes over a tiktok account for the for the evening it was very funny Claire asks who would you like to see start a channel or what content would you enjoy I have to say I find most of them extremely dull and I think player controlled content like it's not you know it's extremely generally speaking it's extremely glossed isn't it they don't want you to see the real stuff and the hard stuff they want to give you just enough so you feel like you're seeing the real stuff and the hard stuff but it's basically just PR.

13:16And there's a market for that. Good luck to them. I don't have a problem with them doing it. It's just I don't feel like it's really for me. You know, Ben Shelton's YouTube channel, it's incredibly well produced and it's glossy and it looks great. I haven't, like, it bores me to tears. Like I haven't learned anything about him from it or about tennis or like it's just not it's not for me. I do like what the vlog. I like Dario Kazakina's what the vlog a lot because it's funny and irreverent. And you do genuinely get a bit of access that that you don't get elsewhere. And I would be up for more of that.

14:04But there aren't that many Dario Kazakina's. on tour. So yeah, like good luck to them. I totally understand why they want to do it. I don't feel like I'm the target market for a lot of this content, but good luck to them. But, you know, I would be up for more What The Vlogs, but I'm not sure how many candidates for making what the vlogs there are out there. David, what do you think? Yeah, I mean, I think a lot of players just aren't prepared to risk anything with their, I don't know whether it's privacy or whether it's just brand, you know. They've all got a lot, especially the top players, they've all got lots of sponsors and they've got a lot at stake and they've often got people in their ears saying, oh, you don't want to say that, you know.

15:02and I mean I think that's why you end up with what you do end up with most of the time in Shelton's I've only seen one of his I did find it I didn't know he was into old cars and stuff like that I mean I think my interest lasted about 15 seconds in that but I at least was curious to I'm good for him I didn't know he was into them so now I do know that's good now I don't really want to hear too much more about it you didn't see a slightly problematic post a while back about the wage inflation of mechanics then no I didn't see that he was complaining about the wage inflation of mechanics he was complaining about the cost of mechanic labour yeah a little while ago crikey yeah when tennis players talk about how much stuff costs I really do.

16:00I do wish they would shut up at that point, to be honest. But I thought one in the video sphere and one in the podcasting sphere, actually, of things that I would be interested in. And I would love if somebody could do a good job of, in a non-creepy way, following Alexandra Ayala around to just kind of get an insight into what her life is like. I would be very interested to see it because I just find the interest level she creates absolutely fascinating. you know and and i sort of i want to i kind of want to know what it's like to be her really you know in in those situations i have no idea how you document that um maybe you just give her a camera and just say off you go just just film stuff film out your window like like they do in the in the one direction video i once saw when it was absolute mayhem um and uh on a what i enjoyed the One Direction documentary what can I say and then and I saw a take that one recently as well that was quite good and that was quite similar anyway and then there's on a podcast angle I'd quite like to listen to a podcast with Miran Draver and Conchita Martinez just having a conversation because I think I could listen to them all the time really they're just so much fun to listen to they're slightly sarcastic and affectionate digs at one another I'd also like to know what Martinez has been saying to Andreva over the last year after some of these absolute heartbreakers because they're not only upsetting as in I've lost a tennis match but they've really been quite upsetting to watch for her, I've worried for Andreva and I'm curious how Martinez manages that I am too, I feel like that's a one off interview rather than a weekly appointment to spend an hour in both of their companies I have to come to Martinez at the outset of their relationship and I was already getting some fantastic eye rolls from her so maybe maybe need to revisit that yeah maybe Matt yeah I must say can you take us down as weird and wonderful on as weird and wonderful a journey as David just did with his answer can I mention One Direction

18:52I feel so many to you Catherine I think what the vlog I like because it's sort of so authentic it's felt like it's come from Kasachina herself whereas it feels to me like someone has told Ben Shelton and Alex Diminor and Art of Feast and Kasper Rood it'd be a good idea to to do some vlogging and set up a YouTube channel and be really great for your sponsors and you know and your brand has gone around definitely been mentioned and as soon as as soon as it feels like that I'm far less interested did um the guy who jumps out to me on the men's side because i first i think he's the first tennis player i learned about via social media is actually zizu bergs he used to always be making tiktok videos i knew i knew him from tiktok before i knew him from the tour and i think therefore it's sort of i think he has a genuine desire to sort of do it and he can be quite funny and i sort of i think azizu berg's what the vlog style thing would be quite would be quite amusing i think i think he's i think he's quite funny and he's quite smart um and i think i would like that insight to the atp tour that casacchina gives us into the into the wta tour side note by the way casacchina's ranking is 58 now i i noticed earlier when i was looking her up in in sort of prep for this um but actually i think my i think my biggest take on this is that like when i think of other sports Like I know that like Bryson DeChambeau's got that one, hasn't he?

20:26That very successful YouTube content he does. And Carlos Alcraz was on it very recently when he tries to break 50 and he gets a celebrity or a fellow sports person on. And that's sort of been a really big breakthrough content for him. But I think other sports, I always say this, I think that sort of other content that players produce is more beneficial because the best insight into a tennis player and their personality and what they're like is a tennis match. Like, I feel like we're so privileged as watchers of the sport that we do know our players because of the sport that they play. We spend three or four hours watching them and we see their facial expressions and we hear conversations they have with coaches and umpires and we get close-up replays and they don't have a helmet on or that you know nothing like that and i feel like a tennis match is the best way of showing off what a tennis player who they are and what they're good at and i i feel like it takes a very would take it it's not for everyone to be able to then produce like extra content that is genuinely interesting it's just not gonna be the case that all tennis players can can do that and they don't need to do that I don't think is it because we already know so much about them obviously extra stuff is great and I do applaud the general you know the sort of general drive there but there's not going to be many for me that can really make it make it brilliant and Casacchino is definitely one of them um but yeah like I feel like we know our tennis players pretty well in a way that we maybe don't know some other sports people all that well.

22:16That's such a good point. The way tennis reveals character like almost no other sport, I would say. Great question. These are all great questions. We are edging closer to the Winter Olympics section. I'm very excited. But first, we have a question from Michelle B. Michelle asks, After watching Victorian Bokobin today, I'm thinking again about the exciting teen players of the WTA. It wasn't long ago that Mira Andreeva was the only teen in the top 100. And now we have Mira, Vicky and Ivi Jovic in the top 20. Which of these players do you think has the highest short term and long term ceiling? What are the key improvements they each need to make to maximise their specific potential?

23:06should we go should we go player by player here or should I how do we want to do this you're in charge you can do it as you like David you show your hand first show us your workings we've been asked the question which of them and my my answer was very quick and emphatic that the one with the highest ceilings short term and long term is Victoria Romboko I just feel like she has an athleticism a wingspan, weapons that the other two don't and are not going to get I think that they've got things of their own but I think at this stage I don't see I've yet to come across real weaknesses is an Mboko's game and I'm sure they're coming you know I'm sure at some point when she because I mean she hasn't even done really a year of being on the tour where players and coaches are picking on your on your game and trying to figure out where the weak spots are and I feel like people have got to Andreva a little bit over the last year part of it is the forehand I didn't know in the first year of watching Andreeva that she had a forehand that needed work or needed sometimes to be covered up the way it does.

24:36Jovic, I don't see weaknesses either, but I also don't see the level of upside. I think she's going to be incredibly strong mentally and she's always going to be there. But I think looking at Mboko, she's just got it all. I know that there's a question mark over her forehand. I think that you've heard, Matt in the past um I'm not saying she she's perfect and she's not certainly not the finished article I think she's going to get better but I'm also interested to see what happens when she hits a rough spot you know we haven't really aside from injury maybe that's her maybe that's her weak area is just can she keep fit but to me she is she's just there already I mean it literally is taking Sabalenka for instance to to stop her um and I don't think I don't think I'd be expecting that necessarily from and we've we've seen Andreeva run into several different types of opponent the last year and also have incredible runs of success and being being a champion but yeah and Boko to me

25:47Matt yeah it's hard isn't it because although they are similar ages and drave has been around for longer and has been in our consciousness for longer and i think potentially has already been through or is currently experiencing that phase that david's talking about where people start to figure you out a bit and your weaknesses start to be shown so i feel like with andreva we've sort of got we've seen more success but we've also seen more of the vulnerabilities. So we've got a fuller picture for Andreva. And I think at the moment, we're seeing more of the vulnerabilities. I think that's maybe clouding my judgment a little bit.

26:29I would probably still go long-term Andreva. I agree with David in terms of like the weapons that Mboko has. And we are in an era of weapons winning the biggest tournaments, you know, Sabalenka, Rabakina, Keys, Sviontek. you know these recent winners of slams have got incredible weapons um and maybe that is slightly missing from andreva's game uh but i do think i do think some of the stuff we've seen her produce has made me think she's a slam winner in in the future you know her run in indian wells and dubai last year i think that was to me that was a higher level than what we've seen from mboko so far and I just think her her tactical nous is is extremely high and Drava but she needs to overcome this this issue she's got at the moment of composure and losing it in in big moments and I do tend to agree with David again that she needs one win like that you know and that and that could really unlock something and help her but it needs to come soon I think you don't you don't want to build up sort of too much baggage in that sense but I suppose at the moment I would still say sort of Andreva long term but short term the answer to me might be Mboko like if someone is gonna sort of explode and do something this year perhaps it could be an Mboko and sort of riding the wave that maybe andreva was on a year or 18 months ago uh jovic i just don't feel like i've seen enough of yet personally uh i think again i would have the question marks does she have the weapons but also not many weaknesses i just i haven't watched her as much as i've watched mboko and andreva and i'm not i'm not sure really what her upper upper potential is right now um But yes, it's a great point that Andreeva for so long was the only teen and she was so far ahead.

28:44She was the only teen in the top 100 and she was in the top 10. And now suddenly she's been caught up a little bit by Jovic and Mboko. And it's a really fun picture at the moment with those three.

28:57Yeah, I mean, I share pretty much all of your views. I mean, obviously right now the knee-jerk kind of recency bias thing to feel is Mboko, right? Like we've got so much recent evidence of Mboko knocking our socks off and showing maturity well beyond her years. But I'm still a really big believer in Andreeva. you know she does have this problem at the moment that she does need to sort out and I agree with you Matt I think the clock's ticking on sort of sorting it out because the longer you're not sorting it out the more scar tissue you're accumulating and that's that's quite significant but I do think she's got the right people around her to do the sorting out I do think she will she She is still so incredibly young and I really believe in that game.

29:56I think it's so versatile and she's got so many ways to win tennis matches and she has weaponry. Like her serve is incredibly good.

30:11So I'm tempted to go for Andreva long term as well, much as I'm a massive Mboko believer. but I think it's going to be close between those two and I think that's really, really exciting and Jovic, I just haven't seen enough to know what the ceiling is I think everything looks very compact and reliable and I think she's going to be there I don't think it'll be that long before we start seeing her in Grand Slam quarter-finals but what the peaks might be I don't feel qualified to say that yet but we'll keep an eye out Michelle I'm going to end up underestimating her I've got this feeling she's going to be my next power I think I might already be David but here we are she has already reached the Grand Slam quarterfinal right

31:12was it fourth round was it quarterfinal I think that was the quarterfinal I think Mboko was the fourth round, right? And then Jovic in the quarters. As I said, Matt, I think she's going to be reaching round-slam quarter finals. Yes, you were right. Catherine nails it. OK, we've arrived at the Winter Olympics section of today's pod. I'm not over it, folks. I really, really miss it. I've had such a... I've had post-Winter Olympics blues. it's been a tough week for me I had a wisdom tooth taken out the Winter Olympics ended yeah all the first world problems Connie asks for Catherine thank you Connie you've made my day as both a tennis fan and a figure skating fan I love when we get an odd figure skating reference from Catherine you're welcome a question to take crossover content to a new level in honour of the Winter Olympics which tennis players would make the best figure skaters?

32:16Pick a man and a woman for single skating and a doubles slash mixed doubles team for pairs and ice dance each. Please explain your reasoning, taking into account both technical and artistic elements of the sport. It's like an exam question. So curious to hear your thoughts. I know, but she's been so specific and I'm worried, rereading that, that I actually haven't followed Connie's guidelines nearly closely enough, but I have given this a lot of very pleasurable thought, Connie.

32:53I know you've urged me to go in a sort of technical and artistic direction, but I just, I was drilling down into that and I just found it quite, I found it quite boring because basically the answer is you need to be, you need to be tiny, right? To be a figure skater, not a dancer, to be able to do the jumps. There are no skaters. There's one female skater that's 5 '7", and it is remarked upon all the time how tall she is. Basically, 5 '2 is big for a figure skater. So I could just list all the small tennis players, but I don't think that's a particularly interesting answer to this question. So I've actually approached it from a not quite a mental point of view, but I was talking a lot throughout the Winter Olympics with your friend of mine, American Andrew, who got very into the Olympic figure skating.

33:59and I was trying to explain exactly how wild figure skating is from a sort of high wire act standpoint like every figure skating program at the Olympics particularly the free but you do a short program and a free program is like a one-point slam. It's like a one-point slam where you have to serve and you have to go for your shots. You can't play it safe and hope the other person missed. You have to go for a full-blooded Carlos Alcaraz rocket launcher forehand on every single shot and hope that it lands. You can't be Rafael Nadal hitting it harder in practice than you do on the match court you're going absolute full pelt the the max of what a human being can do technically on a pair of skates and you've got one chance you've got one fall one mistake and you are simply not making the podium like that's it you miss one forehand and it's done like it's an absolutely ridiculous sport yeah it is it is ridiculous you know amber glenn in the in the women's she doubled the jump in the short program rather than doing a triple didn't fall didn't like to to the to the eye it looked like perfection she nailed every single element in her free program and she she didn't get a medal because of that one that one error in the short program it is the demands of the sport are absolutely ludicrous like I couldn't handle it I mean you know I wasn't doing it at their level but um I loved figure skating possibly more than I've ever loved anything but I hated competing because it's just brutal just absolutely brutal so I've tried to think of players that I would back in that sort of one point slam scenario players that you can just say go out there pull the trigger on everything and let's hope it lands is your answer Joanna Garland my answer might be Joanna Garland but I It was going to be Joanna Garland, but is that silly?

36:36I don't know. Can it be Joanna Garland? It was either going to be Joanna Garland or my other submissions are Madison Keys, because I think that's the way she won the Australian Open last year. And my other submission is Amanda Enesimova, because she plays that kind of a way. But also there was a lot about Alyssa Liu's story at the Winter Olympics that reminded me of Amanda Inesimova. There's a lot of differences in it as well. But she was, Alyssa Liu was a teen, teen phenom that retired from the sport as a teenager. Nobody really thought she was coming back and she ended up missing it and coming back.

37:20but coming back entirely on her own terms as a grown-up and with a completely different attitude to the sport. And I'm not sure I've ever seen anything more joyful than her winning gold last week. And obviously the reasons for Amanda Renesimo overstepping away from the sport were incredibly tragic, but I do think there are similarities there in sort of reinventing herself as an adult in the room versus the teen phenom that she originally emerged as. So those are my three answers on the women's side. I think on the men's side, I have to go for Carlos Alcaraz because if you want someone performing a high-wire act that's prepared to go for everything and you back them to make it, I think you have to go Carlos Alcaraz, right?

38:22That's who I've got. And in the pairs and the dance, so the pairs is my least favourite format of the sport because basically the key to it is it's all about the lifts, right? You just have to have one really big man. The man needs to be big and strong and the woman needs to be small enough that he can lift her and fling her around. So I went through the US Open mixed doubles draw and I tried to choose the pair with the biggest sort of size differential. It's Arani, isn't it? It's Arani and Bavisori, isn't it? It's Arani and Bavisori, yeah.

39:03But then I've got Sarani for two of my answers because I think my ice dance answer. Now, ice dance is basically a different sport to the other three disciplines. It's ballroom dancing on ice. And I wanted to pick a same gender team rather than a mixed gender team, because I think there should be same gender teams allowed in ice dancing. That's something that Gabriella Papadakis is campaigning for. And she's amazing. We should all be listening to her. and so I and I think Ice Dance for me what I enjoy about Ice Dance is chemistry like yeah that's what I most look for in a partnership so chemistry good footwork I've gone for Sarah Rani and Jasmine Paolini for the vibes so there you go any notes on my answers?

40:03No wonderful very well reasoned I'm a bit anxious that I've completely Connie's been so specific with her guidelines for my answer and I've largely ignored them but I hope that Connie would agree that me just listing short tennis players wouldn't be fun or edifying for anybody involved so there you go the next question is Winter Olympics themed but we're going to make this a team effort folks, it's from Richard Brown Richard says, piggybacking a bit on Connie's question on figure skating which tennis players would you nominate for a four person curling rink which is the curling team as a reference point I asked chat GPT for the traits expected in an Olympic level curler which were technical intelligence and adaptability shot precision and consistency physical conditioning mastery of changeable ice ice conditions and mental resilience now I've watched a lot of curling over the last couple of weeks I shed a wee tear when when the Scottish lads didn't win gold on Saturday, watching at the pub.

41:23So I'm going to give you two some parameters and you're going to come up with the names. Is that OK? Sure. OK. I was using Richard's parameters. Well, no, but I've drilled down further within that. OK. Brilliant. Well, a curling team, they have to all be from the same nation. Oh. Well, hang on. That's tough. Well, they do. They do. So we're going Italy. We're going for a men's curling team from Italy. Can we get on board with this? Your faces are saying no. Guys, we're live. Yeah, but you've... I've put a lot of thought into my names. and now they're useless. Yeah, none of mine are Italian. Okay, but go with me here.

Read the full transcript

42:21Okay, sure. Go with me. Okay, they all have to be from the same nation. So we're going Italian men's tennis. Because there's enough of them. To get ourselves a big pool. Because it's a big pool, exactly. Okay, so there are different roles within a curling team. You've got your Bruce Mowat. He's your captain. he needs to be steady, he needs to be intelligent, he needs to be technically excellent but also tactically tactically astute and he needs to be extremely likeable and command the quiet authority of his teammates Pick an Italian man. Luciano Darder no, Yannick Sinner

43:13David you happy with the annexiner being your Bruce Mowat your captain I think he'd be alright ok now the other three one of them doesn't do much of the throwing they just do the sweeping very teeny and that guy can be a bit of a beefcake he's mostly just aggressively sweeping that guy can be, if you will, agricultural. Who are you having? Well, actually, you could have Luciano Darderi, but no, I think Berrettini. David? Isn't his nickname the hammer? And there's a hammer in curling, isn't there? Yes, very good, Matt. Yes, very good. Now, your other two, they need to be able to sweep, so they've got to have a bit of the agricultural about them, but they also need to be technically astute and be able to throw and also be just a good vibe in the team.

44:17Everybody needs to get on. So these guys need to be all-rounders in terms of ability and vibe. Caballi and Sonigo. It's a tough scene for Lorenzo Mazzetti, David. I would put Mazzetti ahead of Sonigo. No, you can't. People are going to fall out over him, aren't they? He's going to be getting all the bloody headlines and the pictures. You need a team. I think if there's anyone people are going to fall out with, it might be Yannick Sinner. I agree. I think there's an argument for Mazzetti being the captain, to be honest. Oh, no. No. Who are you having, Matt? He's too much of a loner, his old... Mazzetti.

45:12You think Mazzetti's a loner? A little bit, yeah. He's his own man, isn't he? I think everyone gets on with him. I know, but he's got his flamboyant background. Yeah, the problem is Sonogo. If he want to win a medal, Sonogo's not serious enough. Sonogo's off the podium. He'll fluff it. No, but it's a team game. but it's an individual role within a team game he's good for vibes he can be he can be on standby in case Berrettini or when Berrettini gets injured we can bring Sonico in yeah so you're having Caballi and Mazzetti yeah I think if you want if you want to throw is that the right word you know Mazzetti you have the touch?

46:03Yeah, touch is important with the throwing. Yeah. Lorenzo Sonogo is not coming anywhere near my curling team. He's not even on the bench. Darderi's on the bench. There must be Italians we've overlooked here. There's millions of them. That's what I mean. If David's not happy with Mazzetti, maybe there's someone else we could... Arnaldi? We could draft in. Yeah? No? Oh, he hasn't been around much lately, has he? Luke and Nardi, David, nurturing some young talent. No, come off it. He's a lucky loser, isn't he? Okay, I can tell you're annoyed that you've done research that's gone to waste, so speak now.

46:51I went for Coco Gauff, Jessica Bagula, Yannick Sinner and Karen Inamukova. you haven't watched enough curling david what's wrong with those four well the the mixed team is a two two person oh well i've got to have specifics have i i've got to have right i feel like this is this is slightly harsh coming from the person that ignored the parameters of the question directed at you and went off and did your own thing and suddenly David and I are being constrained yeah yeah look if it's not clear to everybody I took the Winter Olympics very seriously and I'm continuing to do so so seriously she ended up doing the opening ceremony although I'm not sure how seriously I took that um Matt what have you got well actually as it happened I did quite like your your breakdown of the of the Italian way of doing it and I'm quite happy with that team but based on Richard's observations of the skills required I mean that that to me read out as just a list of all of Novak Djokovic's best traits I think he would be excellent at curling He's not a team player, though.

48:19He's not a team player. I wouldn't have him in a team. He won the Olympics and he won the Davis Cup. Well, the Olympics wasn't a team thing. But yeah, take a point on the Davis Cup. But still, it's so collaborative curling. Yes, it is. It is. Yeah, but you can't... I don't even have one superstar like that. I don't... I mean, I'm already a bit anxious about Yannick Sinner being in... Okay. in the Italian team. I think it's dangerous for the equilibrium to have one standout star. I also thought Pagula. I think David had Pagula. Did you have Pagula? Yeah. Yeah, and I had Mukava. She's there for good harmony and always delivering.

49:08Mukava's there for the touch. So I had Alcaraz there for the touch and the same thing of just like you always want Alcaraz. He's good at everything. You could do a Spanish men's team, I think. There's enough of them. And an American women's team, a Czech women's team as well. I'm not having Pedro Martinez anywhere near it.

49:32Fair enough. Nor am I. In, Sonigo, out, Martinez. OK, that concludes our Winter Olympics section of the show. Two more questions. The first from Tom Nicholas. He asks, do you think it's time Eager pulled the fire alarm? If you had the opportunity for a heart-to-heart chat with Eager, would you recommend a change in primary coach, i.e. Wimfocet, or, and Tom says this is his thought, would a change in mental coach be a next step worth considering? Obviously she's worked with her mental coach, Daria Abramovich, for, well, her whole career, pretty much. She's been an ever-present and she's never seemed to waver in her loyalty to Daria Abramovich.

50:26I did think the vibes looked a bit tense a couple of weeks ago during her loss in Doha. And I know there's a lot of scrutiny on Daria and Daria's role within the team in the Polish press. I've been hearing about that recently. I mean, it's difficult because we're not inside it, right? But I like the sound. I like the stated aims of what Wimfocet is trying to do with Iga Shiontek's game. I do think those are the right things to try and do with her game. and I kind of think if she splits if she were to it's like with Brom isn't it David well if you ditch him then what if he's not the right person then who is the right person I do I do think there are signs of some codependence there with Daria and within the team and I just always, you know, I think there's a lot of that around in tennis, particularly in women's tennis, and I just kind of always think that is a worrying thing.

51:46That is always a red flag to me. So yes, personally, that is something I would look at, but I think precisely because of those red flags, it might be exactly the thing that she won't consider looking at, But I don't know because I genuinely don't, you know, I don't know the inner machinations of that team. That is an incredibly longstanding, I'm sure, very complicated relationship. But yeah, like I would look in that direction. Yeah, I would certainly consider looking in that direction. Whether Eager is considering that, I really, really don't know. and if she did ditch Wimfossett, and look, I think there are results-related arguments that she should, I would kind of think, well, then who?

52:41Because I do think the Wimfossett project is a good one. It's just not quite happening at the moment. So maybe the blockage is elsewhere. Matt, what do you think? Yeah, similar to you, really. I think the the sort of most information we've ever had in terms of like sort of coming out of the Shviontech camp in terms of what it's like in there was was when her old fitness trainer woman called Yolanta who was part of her team in the very formative years of Shviontech's career and actually left in 2019 she went and ended up working with Kostiuk she gave an interview last year saying that she thought that daria's presence in that team was a little overbearing and sometimes interfering with other people's specialisms um and you know sort of mentioning what what you're talking about there in terms of like i think you know that sort of codependence um now you could say that you know she on tech has enjoyed all of the all of the biggest successes in her in her career when when when daria has been a part of that team um and but i do think there have been some sort of alarm bells ringing like you said the tension in that sackory match the other week was was pretty evident um and i and you know from a from a purely sort of point of view of sort of mentally you know sviontek's game is not breaking down in the early rounds of tournaments it's not like she's got big issues with her game that are causing her to lose early it does appear to be more when she's under pressure against players now who are like fellow top five top ten players they can push her that's where we're seeing the struggles and it does seem it does seem quite mental so it does seem like maybe you could look at the sort of mental side of of her team and and her setup to make a change for what it's worth i would give it the clay court season like i do think when Fissette and that team would deserve another shot at a clay court season I think last year it was new and they were really trying to change things and okay it didn't go as well as it had done previously for her on the clay but I think give it the clay court season this year and I do think Svantec is quite close to Fissette he stood by her when the drugs positive test came out.

55:19And he will always be the coach who helped deliver a Wimbledon trophy, kind of the biggest dream of her career. And like you, I believe in the project. I believe in trying to become a little bit more of a counterpuncture and using the athleticism, getting more shape on the ball. And I think these are all good things. I think he has a good idea. Maybe it's the messaging or maybe it's something else in that team that is the blockage right now. So yeah, I would give it the clay, but I do think if the clay doesn't go well, if I was Fiontech, I'd probably be looking at making some kind of change to the setup because it does feel like she should be winning more than she is right now to me.

56:08Surely not time though between the clay court season and Wimbledon. No, I guess not. I guess you'd do it after Wimbledon. So I'd give it the year. I would give it a year personally. That was my instinct to it. With the whole team? Yeah, I mean, I can only really judge Fissett, I feel, on that level because I just don't know enough about, you know, I see moments of tension, certainly within the, you know, on court, like your reference with the Zachary. um situation but i i i look at it from from if i find the facet project as you call it very interesting just because here's a player who had such incredible success playing one way playing this dominant stand up and take you out kind of player over the last five or six years and i sort of wonder why on earth did she try and change that you know i know there was some things she didn't win and she wanted to win but actually are you ending up causing yourself like she's not winning as often as she was before she started all that um and actually what because i so i because i don't feel like i know i wasn't that convinced i've actually consulted two of our good friends from the athletic on this particular question um i asked charlie eckleshare and james james hansen the uh the senior editor of the athletics tennis coverage because he's i always think of him as a really seasoned sort of Svantec observer.

57:41He loves watching her play and analysing this development over the last year and a half. I mean, Charlie said because of the Wimbledon win, he looks at the progress that they've had as about par, because she's obviously not been as good in some areas of the game and some tournaments, but then she's got Wimbledon, and that just counts for so much. James' view, I mean, I think they end up coming out on the same the same conclusion of carry on and and which is pretty much what we've said and james said in terms of the game style changes he thinks he would persevere because they've made clear improvements when it comes to rally tolerance using the margin and it's going to take time for those things to bed in he he reckons the bigger question is whether facet can make serve motion more repeatable and reliable overhitting hasn't been an issue lately he says but it's not been getting free points on serve and therefore starting too many points from a point of neutral.

58:42And, you know, what do you do about that? If you can't get the serve to where you want it to be, do you have to almost bring in a consultant to work on the serve? I don't know. It's trying to work out the best things to tweak and the best things to just leave and accept and maybe concentrate on your strengths and so i i still not entirely sure that it was the right thing to do to change it all um you know that because she was winning that much but i'm also in i was also a little frustrated when i would watch those matches against corne and put it save at wimbledon and one or two others where suddenly she's just hitting 10 feet long every point and has no way of reading it in but was it worth an overhaul?

59:32Don't know.

59:36Really interesting. There was kind of a disconnect for a while wasn't there between Shviontek's tour results on a hard court for example and her slam results she went through that period where US Open she lost to Ostopenko and Pagula and Australian Open when she lost to Noskova. You know, there was a series of, like, hard-court majors there where you really felt like Shiontech probably should have won one of those, given how good she was on the tour. And, yeah, we did see a lot of the overhitting. I still think that the real moment of sort of doubt that came in Shiontech's career was the Olympics and that match against Jungxin Wen.

1:00:20And, okay, she did really well the next day or whatever it was to, you know, end up with a medal and I'm sure she looks I'm sure she's very pleased on an Olympic medal but you know an Olympics at Roland Garros where she was on an incredible run at the time at that venue I do think that just knocked her off track a little bit and maybe maybe did plant a bit more doubt in the mind than there needed to be and yeah like i mean such an interesting player over the last few years yeah she is yeah she really is okay final question from richard richard asks this is fascinating have has other journalists treatment of you at tournaments changed over time obviously there's always been a good relationship with simon and charlie and matt futterman too but as the pod has grown in status and visibility?

1:01:18Have you felt more respected? Do you ever still feel looked down on by some old school journalists?

1:01:29It's a fascinating question, this. I mean, the short answer is yes, absolutely. Our treatment has changed over time. And I think, yes, still do occasionally feel looked down on a little by some some of the elder statesmen um but way that's way less and less frequent than it than it ever has been before i would say that's the that's the very very short answer david i'm sure you will delight in giving a longer one yeah i mean it's well you're absolutely right i mean when we started honestly people would barely conceal their sneers uh i would say and you know that that happened for a long time um to a lesser or greater extent then when we we sort of started to go more full time with it and and get places in the media room i still think there was a kind of a little bit of a look of what are they doing here or or or kind of what what what but it's it was unusual you know we were the first there are more than there are other podcasters that come to some of the slams now um not not full-time like we do um but you know that it's it's becoming more and more accepted generally but and i think i think we're part of that um certainly within the tennis world where We were the ones that went for it, really, and took the...

1:03:08We have such respect for the medium. And I think respect for the medium has been part of the problem, really, that a lot of people I just don't think understood quite how powerful the medium was. And, you know, we would sometimes get sneery behaviour from people who didn't realise that our audience probably dwarfed theirs, you know, much bigger than theirs. but as it's gone along I think how seriously we've taken it has really caught on I think people have realised that we try to do it properly with real respect for journalism within the media rooms we've gone all in and invest in going on site we don't just do it from our homes and that's a big thing I feel and the fact that we've I think people are genuinely quite impressed that gee they've managed to make a living out of this you know it's it's it's it blows me away sometimes that the fact that we're able to go to these tournaments invest this much and sort of not do other things as a result yeah I think a number of things have changed or evolved post-Covid that have been quite significant in how we're perceived.

1:04:28And obviously part of that is, you know, we're all pretty much full time on it now. We are full time on it now. But I also think there's been such a huge trend of print journalists, print journalist publications cutting back on travel budgets for their reporters, particularly since Covid and for broadcasters as well. There's been a slight course correction there. You know, ESPN had a couple of Australian opens, didn't they, where they did it all remotely and now they have started going back. But, you know, a lot of production managers saw bottom lines during COVID where we had no choice but to cover tennis remotely and it's hard to express the value of being there numerically.

1:05:16It's impossible to express it numerically. We all know the value. That's why our single biggest expense as an organisation is travelling to the Grand Slam tournaments. But we believe in the value of that investment and more so with every slam, in my opinion. But for bean counters, when beans are getting sparser and sparser, particularly in the print journalism world, it's hard to quantify and justify that value and that expense and it's been so noticeable how many fewer people travel to tournaments even from big, big publications that you could never have imagined them not having somebody on site, David.

1:06:05And I think for that, you know, all of those, you know, the big institutions no longer take for granted that the reporters from those institutions no longer take for granted being there at events being sent to these events and I think they look around and they say they see three of us there from a podcast and they think wow like they know how much that costs and they know how much of a commitment and an investment that is in what we're doing and in the sport and in the medium and in covering the sport properly and i think they respect that a lot yeah yeah the other thing is i think because we go into press conferences and we really do contribute to the the discourse with players that everybody gets to use you know these aren't one-on-ones these are conversations that everybody gets asked us to you know sometimes it can be not very nice if you get clipped up because a player might not like a question or something and and and everybody's using it to laugh at you or poke fun at you but most of the time it's it's just gen hopefully genuinely useful stuff because we're doing a proper journalistic job and asking questions that and i think we get called on quite a lot by by um communication staff because they they trust that we will ask sensible stuff because we we we really do follow the sport and we we don't want awkwardness with players and you know sometimes it's going to happen but we try to ask really good questions i think you're right okay sometimes sometimes i have a carrots moment um i mean i think i think there are people in the media room there's quite a lot of people in the media room who will have a listen to the show uh because it's useful to them you know that we will have had i we're the three of us who gets to see three sets of things every day and and they may have missed something and and we can fill in some blanks and so i think yeah respect for it has grown i'm happy to say and uh and generally i don't know i mean i'm curious to hear what matt thinks as somebody who's who's really only worked for the podcast since we brought you on board like this it feels to me like the media room is actually a much happier place for us to be in now than it may have been a few years ago i feel like there's a lot of we've got a lot of good colleagues now not everybody but a lot of good ones and i'm curious to know what you how you feel matt yeah i think you've said it really well i think for i think for a long time we were other in the media room and that sort of instantly unfortunately just brings a sort of skepticism and you know the fact that we're not writers and we wanted to join the international Tennis Writers Association because that's just so what it was called when it was set up 20-25 years ago because that was the main the main medium back then and we did join that organization and within about a couple of weeks of joining there was a sneery email sent around calling out the fact that some podcasters had joined and we were the only ones who were podcasters who joined so it was clearly aimed at us.

1:09:30It was aimed at you and me. David's a legacy member. It was aimed at me and Matt. I had already previously been rejected by this organisation for, quote, doing too much TV work. Anyway. And look, I think at the start there probably was, you know, a sort of understandable scepticism. I understand that, you know, those writers, those journalists, they need to protect their space right and that that is important um and there was probably a skepticism about whether we needed the sort of access of the press room for example because we're not necessarily you you know we're not a show or a publication that lives or dies by quotes right you see a lot of the journalists there they need to speak to players because they need a quote for their story okay there's some who are writing columns or whatever who who might not but most people in that press room are getting quotes and speaking to players and putting them in their stories whereas we're we're not doing that but there has over time i think been a very clear acceptance that as david said we are still using the quotes but in our own way we're speaking to the players we're then talking about it you know on the show and we and we are contributing to the to the overall sort of media landscape we're not we're not influencers you know we're not we're not people who are just trying to get into the press room and make social media content and talk up how great the tournament is because we're taking some some dollar maybe from the tournament you know like we're we're doing this journalistically and i do think the the partnership with the athletic would would be a real shift moment again as well where i think a lot of people looked at that and thought wow okay that's that's that's serious these these these people are serious and it's a very respected publication the athletic the new york times and everyone knows they do such a good journalistic job and being aligned with them was was helpful i think and uh and the murray interview and the draper interview that you know thing things like that as well really helped give us give us that kind of credibility as well and yeah i just think over time the personnel as you say katherine who go to tournaments has changed a little bit over the last few years we're now regularly always there at the majors that people expect us to be there they accept us there and it's a it's generally a really good place to be generally like you know we we get on with a lot of them and we'll play tennis or have lunch or do the one point slam these are all sort of important things as well to sort of bring the journalists together a little bit more that i feel like it's just happening a little bit more and more and yeah i have far fewer conversations now where it's like oh so you do this full time what else do you do like that that happens that happens less and less now i think people people realize people realize a bit more just and part of it is us having been there now, us having done this like this for several years now and people just having witnessed it, like just people leaving after their own very long day and on their way out seeing us sat there in Garden Square or wherever it might be sitting down about to record a podcast.

1:12:58I think you mean the creator lounge, Catherine. Sorry. Maybe we are influencers. People notice that, you know. people clock it I think the what it what it is and what goes into it and I think you know there's been a sort of quiet subtle tip of the hat in toward towards that I think not from absolutely everybody and we've always benefited from like David's reputation right like if if we'd been trying to establish ourselves and get to this point without David and without everything, all the credibility that David just brings to the party by being David, we'd have been starting, you know, maybe we'd get to where we are now eventually but we'd have been starting from way further back than where we were starting from so yeah, that's helped but yeah, we're in a good place yeah just on that point actually i mean yes i mean i am the oldest i've been around the longest and done a lot of other things and now just doing this it's a little i look at the way on the podcast we listen to the news agents the way you've got these really recognized news journalists and political journalists john sobel louis goodall and emily matlis who basically you just gave up their TV careers.

1:14:36Now they do do still TV or whatever, but they gave up the BBC in order to do a podcast. And, you know, I do still do a bit of BBC radio, nowhere near as much as I used to. I don't TV commentate anymore. I don't run Queen's Media anymore. Catherine, you were literally fronting the UK coverage of tennis on television for five years. And now you do this. And I think the fact that we've done that, it's a big statement, really. And the fact that we brought Matt in and we were able to, thankfully, you know, thanks to Friends of the Podcast and everything else, Matt became a voice in his own right. And it's just quite a statement.

1:15:22Right. So that's for a podcast. Yes, because podcasts deserve that sort of attention and respect if they're done well. I'm such a believer in the medium and well thankfully so so a lot of listeners that's kind of the final final pillar of it as well sort of and and I would track this back to the pandemic as well just the general perception of the of the medium in general and awareness of the medium in general understanding of it it has really shifted I think you know pre-pandemic we we were still sometimes having to explain to people what a podcast is. Like that was the case for so long. Yeah, and now everybody not only knows what one is, but has one.

1:16:12Like everyone has a podcast now. And people respect the medium generally, I think, in a way that perhaps wasn't the case in 2019. But yeah, we're in a good place. we sure are and that's it for our first Q &A show of of 2026 unless anyone wants to throw some Winter Olympics questions at me in the chat I'm here all night it's been good I've loved it I love these shows so much I really love them yeah me too so thank you they're kind of random as Matt Futterman would say exactly yeah and who doesn't like random so thank you to everybody that submitted questions thank you to everybody on the barge for just barging it up thank you to everybody in the chat tonight, thank you for Hannah who of course has provided the words on which we have to end tonight's show of course those words are the podcast motherfuckers Thank you for being friends and we'll speak to you soon.

From the publisher

Catherine, David and Matt were live on YouTube for our first Q&A show of the year, tackling questions from The Barge.

We discussed which women would benefit from five sets, the rise of player-created content, the respective ceilings of Mirra Andreeva, Victoria Mboko and Iva Jovic, the tennis players which would make the best figure skaters and curlers at the Winter Olympics, whether Iga Swiatek needs to change up her coaching team, and how our relationship with other tennis journalists has changed over time.

More from Friends of The Tennis Podcast

All 222 episodes
BONUS - Our first Q&A show of 2026!Friends of The Tennis Podcast · 1 h 18 min
Listen in VO