In short
This BONUS episode reviews the US Open 2025 and focuses on “change and evolution” in tennis, plus how tennis is (and isn’t) modernizing its TV data and coverage. Hosts Matt Roberts and “brunette” Matt discuss Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominance, women’s unpredictability, and the tournament’s overall feel (including New York weather).
Guests/contributors
Charlie Eccleshare (The Athletic) argues top players evolve despite narratives that they’re “erratic” or “robotic,” citing Alcaraz’s turnaround into efficiency (8 straight finals, 6 titles, 46 wins in 48 matches) and Sabalenka’s ability to win tight matches after earlier criticism. Pam Shriver (ESPN) reflects on Cliff Drysdale’s transition from player to broadcaster and praises the US Open’s weather; she also looks ahead to the “new two” at the top of men’s tennis. Simon Briggs (The Telegraph) says tennis TV underuses analytics compared with cricket/golf, arguing tennis has Hawkeye data but lacks “wow factor” stats and often presents them opaquely. Hannah Wilkes highlights wheelchair tennis, especially Takato Oda saving four championship points in the men’s wheelchair singles tiebreak vs Gustavo Fernandez, and calls for better scheduling/venue for wheelchair finals. Matt Futterman (The Athletic) remembers Alcaraz’s “impossible” quarterfinal shot, celebrates Amanda Anisimova’s resilience after Wimbledon, and condemns racism-related comments by Yelena Ostapenko toward Taylor Townsend, then notes Ostapenko’s later on-court fight in a match vs Barbora Krejcikova where Krejcikova saved eight match points.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOReflecting on US Open Experiences
0:45 to 2:51
Hosts discuss their experiences and insights post-US Open 2025.
“but he has stolen my bit, got in there first, and I remain a brunette at least until the Australian Open final of January.”
Charlie's Take on Change and Evolution
2:51 to 9:21
Charlie Eccleshare shares insights on change and evolution in tennis players.
“Let's get the thoughts on this year's US Open from The Athletics' Charlie Eccleshare.”
Analyzing Narratives and Rivalries
9:21 to 14:00
Hosts analyze the narratives of players and the impact of rivalries in tennis.
“Whereas obviously the players themselves are doing it in real time.”
The Mental Struggles of Today's Tennis Players
14:00 to 17:46
Explores the psychological challenges faced by current male tennis players in light of dominant rivals.
“I don't think there's any amount of delusion that can really convince you if you're Taylor Fritz or Felix Orgelia Seem or Kaspar Rude or, you know, name a male tennis player that's not Sinner or Alcaraz.”
Pam Shriver's Tribute to Cliff Drysdale
17:46 to 21:35
Pam Shriver reflects on Cliff Drysdale's career and legacy in tennis broadcasting.
“Actually, when he got to the finals, it was just the U.S.”
Weather and Experience at the US Open
21:35 to 24:07
Discussion about the favorable weather conditions during the US Open and its impact on experiences.
“Matt, can we just have a quick conflab about how we feel about the new two.”
Simon Briggs' Unique Perspective on the US Open
24:07 to 27:46
Simon Briggs shares his experiences of missing the US Open and discusses the need for data in tennis broadcasting.
“She was just part of the furniture, wasn't she?”
Exploring Data's Role in Tennis
27:46 to 28:00
Discussion on the potential of data analytics in enhancing tennis broadcasting and viewer understanding.
The State of Tennis Data Analytics
28:00 to 38:20
Explore the insights and challenges of tennis data analytics compared to other sports.
“my brother who's a huge tennis fan and player but also a PhD in data science and statistics and dabbles a bit in tennis data on the side.”
Highlighting Taquito Oda's Performance
38:20 to 42:06
An emotional reflection on Taquito Oda's remarkable performance at the US Open.
“Let's move on to hear from our very own, our captain of the barge, our resident writer, the wonderful Hannah Wilkes, who always brings a unique perspective when looking back on any tennis tournament?”
Show all 26 chapters
Emotional Connection with Takedo Oda
42:06 to 44:01
Explore the emotional impact of watching Takedo Oda play and the significance of his journey.
“I know that there was some frustration that this final I think took place on court 11 and it was scheduled at a time when there were loads of other finals on as well and it was quite hard to sort of focus on one.”
Scheduling Challenges at the US Open
44:01 to 45:50
Discuss the challenges of scheduling wheelchair tennis finals and potential improvements.
“But even so, I do think sort of the next big step for the US Open in terms of showcasing its wheelchair tennis is to, you know, put the final on one of the courts with a roof at a better time.”
The Future of Wheelchair Tennis Rivals
45:50 to 47:21
Analyze the current state of wheelchair tennis and the need for rivals to Takedo Oda.
“It's not like there's nobody that can get anywhere near him.”
Reflections on the Men's Tournament
47:21 to 49:44
Reflect on the highlights and disappointments of the men's tournament at the US Open.
“because you've got Didi de Rout on the combat trail Basically, she had surgery, didn't she, at the end of last year?”
Memorable Moments from the Women's Tournament
49:44 to 53:58
Highlight the standout performances and emotional journeys of women players during the tournament.
“Look, Shaggy left and Bruce has switched to sitting on the other side of his daughter, Jessica, so he could sit next to Sting.”
Amanda Anisimova's Inspirational Comeback
53:58 to 56:00
Delve into Amanda Anisimova's resilience and growth throughout the tournament.
“And then there she was again, in front of the microphone, manifesting a morsel of joy amid the heartbreak and vowing to fight on, because that's what the best ones do.”
Connecting with Players: A Personal Reflection
56:00 to 58:09
Discussion on the emotional connection with players and their journey in tennis.
“and with this kind of clear love for the sport.”
Ostapenko's Impact: Fun vs Seriousness
58:10 to 1:00:04
Exploring the shift in perception of Yelena Ostapenko after recent events.
“Will she go on to win a Grand Slam title?”
Men's Tournament Issues: A Statistical Look
1:00:05 to 1:05:20
Analyzing the lack of competitiveness and excitement in recent men's tournaments.
“And that is a, it's a blow because, you know, the head to head with Svantec and the faces on court.”
Reflections on the Final Day of the Tournament
1:05:21 to 1:08:22
Personal reflections on the emotional experience of watching the final day.
“that take up a lot of space on the schedule because they're best of five relative to women's matches.”
Distractions During the Final: Celebrity Presence
1:08:23 to 1:10:00
Discussing the distractions caused by celebrities during the final match.
“I felt like I was in a dream the whole day.”
Distraction at the US Open
1:10:00 to 1:10:51
The hosts discuss their distractions during the US Open, notably celebrity sightings.
“And on earth he and Shaggy might be saying to one another, have Bruce Springsteen and Shaggy met before?”
Reflections on America
1:10:52 to 1:13:40
Exploring the emotional impact of being in America during turbulent times.
“And I feel very sad about saying that because I, you know, I memorized all the presidents of the United States as a teenager.”
The Anxiety of the Ceremony
1:13:41 to 1:14:44
Tension surrounding the trophy ceremony and its relation to current events.
“you know, because what turned out to be the fake trophy was sitting there the whole time looming over the court.”
Thanking Contributors and Upcoming Shows
1:14:45 to 1:15:56
Hosts express gratitude to contributors and announce future shows.
“So sorry to kind of leave on a sad note.”
Mary Carrillo's Unique Perspective on Tennis Fans
1:16:04 to 1:18:41
Mary Carrillo shares her insights on the distinct experiences of tennis fans.
“You think a lot of rugby fans play rugby?”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:10Hello friends and welcome to the Tennis Podcast, our US Open 2025 review show where we give you the benefit of our not so hot takes. our takes with the benefit of just a little bit of reflection and introspection and the benefit of listening to the views of our incredible contributors that we'll be hearing from over the course of this show. Matt Roberts is here and brunette. Hello, Matt. Yes, it's a shame, isn't it? It would be fun if I was blonde right now, like Carlos Alcaraz. but he has stolen my bit, got in there first, and I remain a brunette at least until the Australian Open final of January.
0:57I'll be definitely describing the hue of Carlos Alcaraz's hair as blonde, because as a blonde person myself, I feel like I'm allowed to be a gatekeeper for my people. And I'm not sure that's blonde, you know. I think that might be silver or white, even. Platinum blonde, is that what they call it? Maybe, but even then, I'm not so sure. What I envisage for you, Matt, is a more sort of classic Euro blonde. Me too. Okay, okay, the bit lives on. No David on today's show, folks. He needs a bit more time to recover from the old US Open and the old jet lag, or maybe Disco David came out for his birthday on Sunday.
1:51What a terrible miss that we weren't all invited to the Carlos Alcaraz after party, but with it being David's birthday. I know. David was only saying recently how desperate he is to go to a club for some reason.
2:08What an opportunity missed. David too could have been linked to Brooke Snader. there is nobody in tennis that she won't link herself to Matt Roberts watch out you're next
2:23if you don't understand that joke then you're not as chronically online as we are and well done you keep it that way yeah exactly there's no need to understand it folks we're going to be hearing from some of our very favourite people over the course of this show we're going to hear from Charlie Eccleshare from Pam Shriver, from Simon Briggs, from Hannah Wilkes, from Matt Futterman, and of course, from Mary Carrillo. Let's start with the first of those. Let's get the thoughts on this year's US Open from The Athletics' Charlie Eccleshare. Hi, everyone. It's Charlie Eccleshare here. And thinking about this US Open, the kind of abiding theme for me is one of change and evolution.
3:13and I think it's a really interesting one because we're often programmed to kind of think of change in people whether that's athletes or anyone else as a kind of I don't know I think people are often quite resistant to it and there's a feeling that maybe there's like an insincerity that comes with it and you know people like people to kind of stay as they are we like to pigeonhole people and to kind of bracket them and you see this all the time you know from when you're young and someone will say something like oh you don't like that or you don't watch that or you don't eat that and you're kind of like well yeah you know maybe I didn't used to but it's kind of okay to change um and you know in like high school American films it's all about being true to yourself and kind of the moral is don't change just you know be who you are and that's kind of the path to success and happiness um and I think actually it's kind of okay to change and in fact it's often good to change and you know maybe we're sometimes resistant to that or we're reluctant to spot it there's kind of a lag when people are changing and evolving but we're kind of stuck in the past a little bit and you know you look at the two men's finalists and what a change and evolution we saw from Carlos Alcaraz you know and still there's been a bit of a lag there you know wrote about this in the tournament that he's kind of viewed as kind of erratic kind of up and down inconsistent player which you know can be true within matches although increasingly less so but you know even but you kind of zoom out and you know he's now reached eight consecutive tournament finals he's won six of them he's won 46 of his past 48 matches like he's really evolved into something a lot more efficient and you know kind of more like Yannick Sinner his main rival meanwhile Yannick Sinner is talking about wanting to change and evolve himself and you know again we like to pigeonhole him as the kind of metronome as this almost like robotic character and you know I think he doesn't want to be that and I think that's great that's what's going to keep this rivalry really interesting and that's important you know a time where men's tennis kind of is this rivalry um and you know how good a thing that is is a whole other voice note and i touched upon that after wimbledon you know kind of asking how healthy the situation was um and at that point you know it was maybe on the cusp uh that we were starting to think about this at grand slam on and I think, you know, most people who follow tennis closely kind of agreed this isn't a massively healthy situation.
6:03But yeah, just continuing that this kind of change evolution theme, I think over on the women's side as well. Irina Sabalenka is such an interesting one because, again, we kind of tend to think that once you win a Grand Slam, once you become the world number one, then you've kind of cracked it, you know. And the book on her previously, before she won that first Grand Slam, was the kind of she's too erratic and wild and gets too frazzled in tight situations. Then she wins one. And the following year, she wins two and becomes world number one. And it's kind of like, oh, she's done it now. She's sorted that out.
6:36She's just going to win loads. And then this year, you know, the first two Grand Slams, the finals, then losing a tight one at Wimbledon as well. And it was kind of like, oh, no, the narrative with her is she doesn't win tight matches. and then she goes and wins the US Open in incredibly difficult circumstances, I thought, given all of those tight losses, having surfed the match, missed the smash that would have given her match point, I thought she did incredibly well. And then I thought she was really interesting talking about the way that she had kind of had to rethink her approach, really, which given how successful her original approach had been for her, it would be very easy to be resistant to that.
7:22And I think that's what's so impressive about these top players is that they are constantly evolving and changing. And, you know, you think of the big three, they did so much of that throughout their career and, you know, broaden that out to other sports or other walks of life. And, you know, you look at the best football managers, Sir Alex Ferguson, Pep Guardiola, they constantly are constantly changing and evolving. um whereas someone like wenger marino were incredibly successful for a time um but then kind of just thought well that way of doing things was work really well for me why would it not work now um you know broaden it out i'm reading a book currently on the beatles amazing book and you know they were amazing both at the beginning and at the end and kind of every stage in between but sort of evolved and changed beyond all recognition um thanks in part should be said some mind expanding drugs which i generally wouldn't recommend for tennis players but you know you get the you get the idea um and then you know within tennis there are a lot of players who just kind of haven't changed and evolved particularly you know especially the many struggling players on the men's side um and then you know another example from this us open you had Coco Goff in the first week and desperately trying to make these changes to her game and we were seeing that playing out in real time like these things aren't easy to do um but yeah I guess just kind of in awe again of these top guys being able to do that both on the men's and the women's side um and yeah that's kind of something that really stuck out to me from this year's tournament but yeah thank you to you three very much for making it again just adding so much to the Grand Sam experience and to everyone for listening and supporting this great podcast and I'll speak to you all soon cheers bye here Charlie and thank you very much for that voice note about change and evolution which is an interesting one isn't it Matt because we definitely do we have stories and narratives about people in our mind don't we and we imprint whatever's happening at at any one given tournament or at any one snapshot in time we kind of overlay it onto the narrative and the story we we have about them and obviously we can change that story but But I do think there's quite often a lag in changing that story.
10:05Whereas obviously the players themselves are doing it in real time. And I don't know, maybe we are too rigid in how we think about tennis players and what their story is. I think also when a top player starts changing something there can sometimes be a bit of a reaction from us to think oh why are they doing that is this going to work and all that kind of thing I think back to some of the big examples we've seen this year in terms of Alcarez and Svjantek changing their serve and okay it maybe didn't work straight away but Iguaz Fiontek winning Wimbledon and Alcarez winning the US Open only losing serve three times.
10:56I think now at this point in the season, looking at it at its whole, we'd have to say absolutely these were good changes that they made and have paid off. And I think Charlie's made a great point there in that change is an absolutely fundamental element. let's just stick to tennis for top tennis players you know when you when you think of the era we've just been through Djokovic the changes he's had with his diet and his serve and his game Nadal with his serve Murray becoming a lot more aggressive I feel like we're seeing that in real time right now with this generation you know doing that doing that tinkering Alcaraz with his serve Sinner with that press conference he just gave okay I still think wholesale changes might be the wrong approach for Yannick Sinner but like subtle changes he's already added little layers to his game over the past couple of years Sabalenka is a completely different player to the one who came on the scene seven or eight years ago Coco Goff trying to change her technique during a grand slam these these feel like big moves these feel like oh should they be doing that but actually i think absolutely what what recent history anyway has told us is that even if you're at the top you've got to be changing and looking for a little edge and you know some of the players that we always talk about in terms of maybe not made the breakthrough that we thought they might several reasons for that but if you just look at the game i'm sorry to name names but is Denis Shapovalov that different a tennis player to the one who burst onto the scene in 2017-18?
12:44Same with Stefanos Tsitsipas. I think the likes of Grigor Dimitrov and Gael Monfils have maybe got there a bit late, you know, like maybe in their prime, they weren't quite as willing or able to change. Maybe Dimitrov did briefly. But I think it's vital for these players to constantly be evolving. And that's the beauty of rivalries. You know, Alcaraz and Sin are literally saying in their press conferences afterwards that they're doing it because of the other one. And, OK, I don't think Svjantek and Sabalenka and Goff have been quite so explicit, but it all feels like they're pushing each other.
13:24And that is, I think, such a healthy place for the sport to be in, in that sense, with these rivalries causing change and therefore causing them to, in time overall, get better, even if it's a difficult process in the moment, as kind of Coco Gough is finding out. That's such a good point about rivalries prompting change. And I often think about how just utterly demoralising it must be for the rest of men's tennis. to watch these finals. And no matter how much delusion you have going on, no matter how much Taylor Fritz delusion you have, and you have to have a big old dollop of it to get out of bed every morning, I think, as a tennis player, given the losses and the beatdowns that they have to cope with.
14:25I don't think there's any amount of delusion that can really convince you if you're Taylor Fritz or Felix Orgelia Seem or Kaspar Rude or, you know, name a male tennis player that's not Sinner or Alcaraz. Even Novak Djokovic, like, there is no level of delusion that can convince you you're anywhere close. Anywhere close or really can get anywhere close. Like, maybe some of the younger ones that still have upside to come in their game, maybe they can convince themselves that they can get there. But can Taylor Fritz convince himself he's got that much more to max out in his game? Can Tommy Paul? Like, they can't really.
15:13They must know deep down. And I sympathise with that. Like, it must be tremendously demoralising. And yet that delusion or stubbornness or belief in yourself has been such a fundamental element to be able to get them to where they are. And now it's kind of at the point where that's running up against Alcaraz and Sinner. Reality. Reality. And that must be a really, really tough thing for them because you can still have a lot of success on the tour and you still earn a lot of money and you can still do things for the first time in your career and win events and there's definitely still like good times ahead for these people but the grand slams are what they're really playing for you know they would trade you know several tour titles for a grand slam and it feels suddenly like they're further away than they were even a year ago.
16:30I think the grip that Alcaraz and Sinner have put on the sport on the men's side this year, even I didn't really see that coming, I must say. I thought they were the two. I thought they would dominate. But for them to win all the slams again, a second year in a row, there was a little window. So, you know, your team time, your Medvedev time, even when Alcaraz was just starting out. It was a long time ago, doesn't it? But it suddenly feels like, oh, good luck. Different age. Let's hear from our next contributor, one of our favourites. They're all our favourites, but we have a special place in our hearts for this one.
17:19It is, of course, the wonderful Pam Shriver. Well, of course, after a major, you always want to pay tribute to the two champions. So to Arena Sabalenka and Carlos Alcaraz. Amazing play. Under pressure. Way to finish the last one standing of 128. Well done. For me, though, I am going to reflect on someone that I have worked with at ESPN for 35 years, Cliff Drysdale, former U.S. Open finalist. Actually, when he got to the finals, it was just the U.S. championship. Won a U.S. championship in doubles. and Cliff decided after making his debut the same month ESPN made its debut, September 1979. While Cliffy was actually still on tour, he was just kind of wrapping up his playing career.
18:23He shifted to broadcasting, was really first of, set a great example actually of how to transition from one career as a player into broadcasting. podcasting. And we at ESPN, the team kind of documented behind the scenes. We had a group text that we started, I don't know, three, four years ago, dropped a lot of photos. And, you know, I felt like it was a really great send off. I felt very fortunate. I worked a quarterfinal match and a semifinal match with, it was Mary Jo Fernandez in the booth with Cliffy and I was courtside. And the three of us, really since 1999, when Mary Jo joined ESPN's team, the three of us have been at so many events together and have a lot of fun memories.
19:17So it was cool to share Cliffy's last couple of matches. Earlier in the tournament, I also worked with Cliff on the first round of Venus Williams and Leila Fernandez's lovely run through to the quarterfinals in the ladies' doubles. And that was another fun match. I worked in the booth with Cliff. So, yeah, it's incredible to see somebody able to work really well as a broadcaster into their 80s. And, you know, Cliffy in his last couple of broadcasts, He broke down some shots side by side, broke them down, asked for freezes from the production truck. Kind of like vintage Cliffy stuff. So I think that's what we all want.
20:06Maybe you don't go out on top, whether you're a player and you've played for however many years. You're not quite, but you want to go out in a respectable way, a great way, and that's what Cliffy did. So anyway, I think U.S. Open 2025, 25, on a personal note, that's what I'll reflect on the most. I also want to say, New York City, you brought out the best weather. And it really helped make, I feel like the U.S. Open much more enjoyable, that we weren't struggling in the heat and humidity. I know Some of the long days I had working, I felt that had it been hot and humid and muggy and miserable, that I don't know, I wouldn't have felt as solid as I did at the end of some long days.
20:58So anyway, awesome finish the major season. Women's tennis, as I wrap this up, let me just say, I feel like women's tennis is poised to have another moment. I feel like the storylines are quite unbelievable. the unpredictability. And at this point, I feel like we go into 2026, quick look ahead, where I can't see anybody crashing the party of the new two up at the top of men's tennis. Sinner Alcaraz look quite spectacular to continue their dominance. But in the women's game, who knows? Thank you, Pam. Matt, can we just have a quick conflab about how we feel about the new two. A lot of people trying to make new two happen.
21:50Apparently, Pam is one of them. Yeah, Jim Currier is another, I believe. It's got big backing, the new two. I'm not sure about it. The problem is it's going to go out of date. Yeah, they're just the two. Very quickly. In fact, they might already be the two. Between them, they've won the last eight slams. Yeah. Yeah, I'm not sure about it either. But if Pam says it. Yeah. That's it. You can't go against Pam. I totally agree about the weather. I know this is such a, like, get the violins out for us lucky people. they get to go to New York for three weeks every summer and talk about the US Open. But it was an absolute delight, the weather.
22:43And it isn't always. I am quite often quite sticky and grumpy during the US Open. And I was sticky and grumpy. Well, certainly grumpy, but it was rarely to do with the weather. You even upped your fan game. I'm not even sure you needed it all that often, did you? I was over-provisioned on fans, Matt. Like quite significantly over-provisioned. I needn't have packed three fans. And we bought a big fan for the apartment on day one. Because the hottest day was the day we arrived. Yeah. And I had a big panic about the flat being hot and sweaty. I was like, well, I'm going to be in a grump for three weeks if it's like this.
23:27Didn't turn the fan on. Did not turn the fan on once. Well, that flat's now got a lovely new fan. So good luck to them. Quite an industry. It was more industrial than I was expecting when I ordered it online. But anyways, prepare, fail to prepare and prepare to fail. And there we go. I reckon you'll be able to use your new fan quite likely at the next Grand Slam. I think so, too. on Cliff Drysdale who Pam wanted to pay a lovely tribute to there obviously I mean people listening in the US will be will be very very familiar with him and he's a very sort of a long-standing sort of comforting voice I think isn't he there's probably parallels with when Sue Barker stepped down from her role with the BBC here in the UK.
24:27She was just part of the furniture, wasn't she? And there's something that kind of shakes your foundations when these people are no longer there, even if you didn't think you had opinions about them. Just the very fact of them being there was comforting in ways you perhaps didn't realise. So yeah, very, very happy retirement to Cliff Cliff Drysdale and I know he'll be missed by lots of US tennis watchers. Just while we're on the subject of TV coverage of the US Open and of tennis, that kind of leads us on very nicely to Simon Briggs' voice note. Now, Simon, as you will hear, had a rather different US Open.
25:11Here is The Telegraph's Simon Briggs. Hi, it's Simon Briggs here. I feel a little bit of a fraud talking about the US Open since I didn't actually make it to New York at all this year. Two days before my flight was due to take off, I was in an ambulance on the way to hospital and on the eve of my departure, I was in the theatre having my appendix out. So I watched the whole thing on the sofa. I certainly had a bit of FOMO because on those nights when we get out of the stadium before 1am, we would certainly be going out in Manhattan and it's a spectacular place to be. Having said that, US Open is definitely the most stressful tournament of the year because of the time difference.
25:51You know, as a British newspaper reporter, you're waking up at 9am, you've been there late the night before, but your editors have been in the office for hours. It's two o 'clock in the afternoon in the UK. They've been talking about their tennis coverage and just as you're groggily trying to get some breakfast down, they're wondering where your copy is. You always feel like you're walking up the down escalator and life comes at you incredibly fast. I don't have an awful lot to add on the tennis itself, not having been up close. I suppose I might just have more to say about the TV coverage because I don't normally get to watch that.
26:27We have Sky Sports in the UK. It was a very good and professional production. I just think across the board, is tennis doing enough to really bring that data revolution to its audience? You know, the coaches have their tablets with all the Hawkeye information on it. But you don't see much of that on the TV, no matter which network you're watching. I just think, you know, in cricket, the sport I used to cover, Sky would put a commentator in an analytics booth with a specific duty of bringing technical points to the audience's attention. And if you did that in tennis, I think it would definitely lift the coverage, improve all our understanding and maybe sort of drive a little bit of a modernization of the whole scene.
27:09Paul Briggs it was a it was a tough lead-up week to the US Open for him a very dramatic one we were kind of hearing about it remotely through whatsapp so we're very worried about him he's he is recovering he'll be making his comeback in in Melbourne but it was yeah rough time for for Simon Briggs and we've been thinking of him and we wish him very well and you were missed Simon you were missed during this US Open but you make a very very interesting point about the data revolution and tennis's attitude to and embracing of and sort of trying attempts to process data or rather tennis broadcastings attempt to do that and I actually sought some consultancy on this from my brother who's a huge tennis fan and player but also a PhD in data science and statistics and dabbles a bit in tennis data on the side.
28:14So I wanted to get his view on this and he also just like Simon watches a lot of cricket. He claims to be you know busy raising two children under two and working for a living but he watches all the cricket and all the tennis. so maybe he just doesn't sleep. But he had some very, very interesting things to share which I in turn will now share with you. I kind of put two points to him. The first one was I wanted to ask whether tennis has the data, whether it has the same data that cricket has on the sport and whether there's any block or impediment there to what tennis is able to do. And in response to that He said there is no lack of data.
28:58He said there's Hawkeye data going back more than 10 years for almost all top level matches. So that's the position, speed, spin and bounce of every ball in professional tennis, plus all the conventional rally outcome stats are recorded as well. And he says, look, there are people out there doing interesting stuff with that data. He says tennis viz's shot quality and other metrics look pretty good to me, he says. and that is you do occasionally now see shot quality stats flash up and he says they do make the occasional appearances on broadcast but and this was an interesting point I hadn't thought about before he says they're largely opaque possibly because the methods are proprietary and tennis fees are selling the data to gambling syndicates or bookies so without the explanation of what these metrics mean I feel they come across as gimmicky.
29:55Those are my brother Math's words. And that tapped into something I hadn't really processed myself, which is that when that, for example, that shot quality statistic does flash up, which I have noticed that it does, and the commentators quite often reference it, I think my default position is to kind of dismiss it because they never explain the methodology behind it. And I have so little faith in tennis data generally, I kind of just assume it's something gimmicky rather than something really solid and that can be can be trusted um and obviously the the the proprietary nature of the the methodology is why they're keeping that deliberately opaque um so so that's an interesting one um but he says even if the those stats were fully explained they lack the immediate lights on factor of something like strokes gained in golf or false shot percentage in cricket.
30:55These are quote-unquote new stats that have been enabled by ball tracking technology in those sports which immediately tell the viewer something really insightful about the game playing. Tennis's shot quality metrics just don't quite have that wow factor, not least because you need to know several of them to get a full picture. This isn't to say there aren't loads of useful stats out there in tennis that we could be seeing And I think and hope that we will gradually see more of them, especially as broadcast mediums evolve. But I do think that this lack of new knockout stat might contribute to the lack of big bang in the use of stats in tennis broadcasts.
31:31And that's an interesting point, isn't it? If you think about, Matt, how much the ball tracker has totally transformed golf broadcasting. broadcasting. Like it's wild to me that people watched golf before the ball tracker existed because I just cannot pick out the ball on the screen without it. So I'm just watching a nonsense really. Tennis is yet to identify that knockout thing that suddenly makes everyone go, oh my goodness, how was I watching and understanding the sport without this? Yeah, because when I listen to podcasts on football or on golf which i do they're sort of probably the two other sports that i follow most closely i would say in football they're constantly talking now about expected goals you know that is a that is a metric that is a stat that has come in to the sport i'm sure had a lot of resistance to begin with you know people people thinking it's too woke and not you know probably not really understanding what it means and it does take a little...
32:38Matt loves snickering and telling me how low Burnley's XG is in any given game. Always 0.01. But, you know, once you take the time to understand that, it's a really useful metric. It's not the be-all and end-all. It doesn't like explain football necessarily, but it just allows you to understand it in that way. And same with strokes gained in golf, you know. No laying up, always talking about strokes gained. And that's a really useful metric in terms of relative to the rest of the field, how you're performing. And, you know, in the various different shots, you know, the strokes gained on putting and driving and iron play and all this kind of thing.
33:19And I think about tennis and I think, well, we're still talking about winners and unforced errors. and we're still talking about first serve percentage and, you know, all these kind of stats, which we've had for years, you know, go back and watch very old broadcasts of tennis and it's pretty much the same set of stats that are appearing. And as you say, and as Matt says, and as Simon says, like, there definitely is more out there because coaches are using it. But it hasn't yet transferred to TV. And I think there's a balance. Like I think you don't want to put people off with loads and loads of data.
34:11But I am a big, big supporter of data done well can be incredibly, incredibly insightful. You know, even the very little bits that we do see, you know, like even if it's not data, of a sort of technical analysis, like when Jim Currier explained the Andre Rublev second serve and when we saw the speed of Amanda Nisimova's shot relative to the men, you know, these little things are quite basic, but are useful and help provide an insight. And I've no doubt that we can go a lot deeper than that and provide a picture for fans to be better informed, which is ultimately, you know, what we want. and if the data is presented well and presented by the right people and done in the right way with kind of a soft touch I think on the broadcast then I would absolutely be before that revolution coming to the TV.
35:10And that sort of second point you make there about the presentation of the data is the other point that Math makes here. He says good data analysis is a really specialist skill. He says tennis broadcasting still seems to be wedded to the model of having two or three ex-players commentating on matches and nothing else. There is no reason to expect ex-tennis players to have any skill with data. You need specialists. Test match special, which is for anyone outside of tennis nations, it's an institution. It's radio coverage. It's BBC radio coverage. of cricket in the UK, which is a national institution going back decades and decades and decades, seriously high quality broadcasting.
35:58And it sort of marries this legacy and tradition with actually, I think they have done quite a lot of modernisation and moved with the times in terms of how they cover the sport. He says Test Match Special have a statistician in the booth with them for cricket broadcasts. and I think the Sky cricket team have at least one dedicated analyst supporting the TV commentary team. The Channel 4 cricket team used to cut to the analyst at the end of a session for a pre-packaged deep-dive technical analysis of the play. It's really, really hard to take a massive stream of data and distill a few key nuggets from it that illustrate a narrative.
36:34You need to understand the data and the sport and how to tell a story. It's telling that tennis commentators sometimes reference analysis done by Jeff Sackman. These commentators have exclusive access to the biggest, richest tennis data set in the world. And they're referencing homebrewed analysis done on public domain data by a Norwegian software engineer. He says no shade on Sackman. His analysis is very good. And then he references the ATP data that we're so often presented with, you know, at the end of the sets and the end of the matches in graphics. math going nuclear on all the ways in which that data is is terribly presented is um is quite a frequent feature in my life that i always enjoy says i won't rehash the ways in which these graphics are criminal but they are telling about the decisions being made the person who created them can't have been a data visualization specialist and the person who signed off on them can't have asked themselves do these actually help understand the story of this match.
Read the full transcript
37:39It looks like they just wanted something cool and datery looking. So you end up with a placebo data viz. It looks fancy, but isn't helpful. For good data storytelling, you need experts all the way down, making good decisions about what statistics to derive, what to present and when. And the when is extra difficult in tennis when you have inconsistent time gaps between points and sets, only two minutes between games and sometimes adverts to cram in as well. So there you go. No notes. No notes and very interesting stuff. Let's move on to hear from our very own, our captain of the barge, our resident writer, the wonderful Hannah Wilkes, who always brings a unique perspective when looking back on any tennis tournament?
38:36And here is hers reflecting on the US Open 2025. If you asked most people who played the best tennis at the US Open when they were down match points, I think most people would point to Barbara Krejcikova against Taylor Townsend. But if we apply Matt's principle that what we want to see more than anything is the best tennis played at the biggest moments, I think you have to look at Taquito Oda and the four championship points he saved in the deciding tie-break of the men's wheelchair singles final against Gustavo Fernandez. When I'm talking about Oda and I'm trying to find words for his tennis and the impact that he has, I find myself constantly reaching for comparisons from the standing game.
39:33And I think that's about more than the poverty of my tennis vocabulary. Stefan Uday said recently that Oda was like a standing player who happens to play sitting down. I don't know if that's true, but I can only compare the way that I feel watching Oda to the way that I feel watching Carlos Alcaraz hit a winner from an impossible position. Or, you know, watching the kind of sheer velocity coming off Amanda Anastasia Mova's backhand wing. It's just gobsmacked and marvelling and slightly indignant, you know, like, I'm sorry. I thought we had to obey the laws of physics. Like, who told you that you were allowed to just reconfigure space and time, you know?
40:26Are we allowed to do that? There's a forehand that Oda hit on the second of the four championship points he faced in that tiebreak, which I genuinely can only describe as Nadal-esque, you know? like that infuriating kind of swerving lefty forehand down the line that's definitely going wide it's definitely going wide oh it's dropped right in the corner like it's on youtube and the highlights that are available of that match but what the highlights won't show you is the shot he hit on the previous point which was also championship point against him which was an absolute laser of a backhand cleaning the line just another paradigm shifting a winner just hit off the opposite wing I don't think Gustavo Fernandez he was also playing for a career slam by the way can play better than he did but it's that capacity to just kind of break the game to do something like nobody knew anybody was capable of doing when it matters most and this clearly mattered tremendously to Takeda Oda.
41:41I mean, it was to complete the career golden slam at the age of 19. So, you know, fair enough. But there was a moment, quite a long moment, actually, during the trophy ceremony when he was addressing his coach who had also come out onto the court. his coach was getting you know getting an award recognizing recognizing his achievement in coaching Tukita Oda and Oda was speaking in Japanese to his coach and he was crying and his coach was crying and honestly I was crying even though I didn't understand what was being said and I think that's a pretty solid metaphor for the experience of watching this player you may not understand exactly how he's doing what he's doing and you may may not even have the technical technical tennis vocabulary to appreciate it but you can't deny the way that it makes you feel we were hoping that weren't we when we sent the requests out for voice notes that hannah would would talk about taquito odor and she did not disappoint yeah hannah talking about odour has become one of my favorite things really i think it i think watching him has become such an important part of hannah's second week grand slam experience you know where the number of matches suddenly whittles down in the singles and there are just gaps in in the day or parts of the day where you don't necessarily want to be watching the singles match that's on so so hannah has turned to Oda in those times and I think she really captures what is special about him there.
43:32I know that there was some frustration that this final I think took place on court 11 and it was scheduled at a time when there were loads of other finals on as well and it was quite hard to sort of focus on one. I believe that the reason that happened is because of the expected bad weather that did end up coming on the Saturday. I think that was why they ended up scheduling all the finals at 11 a.m. But even so, I do think sort of the next big step for the US Open in terms of showcasing its wheelchair tennis is to, you know, put the final on one of the courts with a roof at a better time. really um we ended up missing it you know as we were we were getting ready for the for the women's final it was just at a time when we couldn't be on site um but you know they do a lot of good things us open they've got the junior wheelchair events they had a para standing event this year as well and like absolutely odour is one of the one of the main characters of these Grand Slam second weeks now his his encore magnetism both with his personality and his shot making is extraordinary and yeah just want that to be as as showcased as it can be and that we can do more it's great that we've got got Hannah to to really help with our our coverage of Oda but I also think that you know we can do more and the and and and the tournaments as well.
45:11The other thing is that Saturday had all of those finals scheduled and okay, they didn't originally intend for them all to be scheduled at the same time and at 11am that was due to weather. But Sunday was always going to be just the men's singles final. Like the men's singles final gets Sunday all to itself. Whereas Saturday has all this other stuff going on. And now they've cleared out the mixed doubles at the US Open. Right. There should have been even more time, you would have thought. I mean, he could do with a consistent rival, Takedo Oda, in the coming years, couldn't he? Because he's separating himself.
45:50OK, look, this final was close. It's not like there's nobody that can get anywhere near him. Alfie Hewitt is constantly pushing himself to the absolute brink just to try and be competitive against him and give himself a shot in these matches. But Takedo Odo is 19 and he's getting better and better and better. And he's winning pretty much everything. And a rival would be welcome, I think. I'm sure for him as well. There's plenty of examples of rivals making one another better. Yeah, I think that's one of the things at the moment that makes him so extraordinary. The fact that he constantly wins big matches.
46:32you know he he doesn't need a David Law pep talk why do I lose all the close matches he he's he's winning all the close matches and coming up with extraordinary shots you know as as Hannah's described there but you do feel like in in the next few years he'll probably separate himself from from the field and and he'll he'll he'll remain remarkable but you want the matches to remain as thrilling as they are. And whether that's the likes of Fernandes and Hewitt catching up to him seems tough for them or whether it's someone new coming along, it's certainly going to be interesting to follow that. Yeah, and the women's wheelchair game is in a really interesting place at the moment as well because you've got Didi de Rout on the combat trail Basically, she had surgery, didn't she, at the end of last year?
47:31And she's come back, but she's not quite come all the way back yet to be dominant like she was before. And obviously, we've had Yui Kimiji being the one to take most advantage of this sort of gap in what everyone's assumed would be a gap in Didi de Hout dominance, and it'll only be a matter of time before she gets back to where she was. But nothing's a given, and it's going to be very, very interesting to watch that closely. So thank you, Hannah, for that. And thank you for everything that you do. Let's hear now from Matt Futterman, our host for bagels and dog cuddles on Saturday morning. It was a lovely day, wasn't it?
48:17I can't believe that was only six days ago. Matt Futterman of The Athletic. Here are his reflections on the 2025 US Open. I thought a lot during the last few days of this U.S. Open about what I might remember from this tournament, what matches and moments I might recall in 10 or 20 years. I don't know that I'll remember much from the men's tournament. I will remember that Sinner and Alcaraz played one of their 67 finals or whatever it ends up being. I might remember that Alcaraz won. I will definitely remember his dancing backwards, inside and forehand tearing through the court. Matt Roberts was sitting next to me in a relatively empty stadium by Ash standards when it happened in the quarterfinals.
49:02We both let out this visceral moan. He's made flashier shots than that one, but it might be my favorite because the physics seemed so impossible and he made it look completely effortless and normal. And it was the opposite of that. What else from the men? Not too much. I found the final kind of ropey and unsuspenseful. There weren't many stretches when both players were playing great at the same time. I won't remember the score or any particular turning point. I spent a lot of time staring at Bruce Springsteen, who was sitting about 20 yards from me. Hmm, Bruce just turned down a cocktail and opted for a bottle of Evian instead.
49:42Very interesting, I thought. I nudged Charlie Eccleshire at one point in the fourth set. Look, Shaggy left and Bruce has switched to sitting on the other side of his daughter, Jessica, so he could sit next to Sting. That's big, I told him. Then I thought long and hard about whether I would have preferred to sit in the musical icon box with Bruce and Sting and Shaggy and Pink or in the funny box behind them with Mindy Kalin, BJ Novak, and Ben Stiller. I think I'm going with the funny box. They seem a little more approachable. As you might have guessed, I'm struggling a bit with men's tennis these days.
50:17The whole tournament until the final matches feels like a form of foreplay, though that might be too generous a term. Then it's Sinner and Alcaraz. They're completely amazing, jaw-dropping at times even. I also sometimes feel like they're this flying trapeze act at the circus. Utterly otherworldly and outrageous, but a little numbing after a while. Men's tennis desperately needs a third man, and probably a fourth. I comfort myself by remembering that Ndalen Federer had a few years of near-total domination before Murray and Djokovic evolved into legitimate threats. Someone will come along. I just hope it happens sooner rather than later.
50:55The women, though, gave me two things I will never forget. I will start with Anissa Mova. I'd been with her in Cincinnati, first in a gaggle with a few other reporters, and then in a one-on-one interview. During the gaggle, she suddenly got teary when talking about something just distantly related to the Wimbledon final. When we were alone later, she seemed kind of wistful and pensive, totally understandable. but a little bit damaged, I thought. Again, completely understandable. And then two weeks later, she's grinding her way through the draw. She's blasting Sviantec off the court. She's coming back and plowing through Osaka in the middle of the night and then making Sabalenka's life really difficult late in the final.
51:41I don't know that I've ever seen resilience of that magnitude. It may be long for a time when America welcomed immigrants and also so thankful that the Constitution gives citizenship to anyone who is born here, as Anissa Mova was, and that the USTA connected her with a coach when she was eight years old who still texts her after every match with words of encouragement. She's needed it. She's come back from about the hardest thing any teenager could go through. I suppose after losing your father suddenly at 19, it's a little easier to classify a 6-0-6-0 defeat in the Wimbledon final as a bad day at the office.
52:18But still. I passed her in a hallway last Friday, the same day she had beaten Osaka in the small hours of the morning. She stopped to say hello as I congratulated her. I asked if she'd gotten any sleep. She did, she said, a few hours. What about you, she asked. I think Anisimova is going to be just fine. I don't believe in God, but if there is one, she has a hell of a plan for Amanda. There's no clean way to transition from there to Taylor Townsend. The other part of this U.S. Open that I think I will always remember. I don't have a lot of hate in my body, but my hatred of racism and anything that even reeks mildly of it takes up a lot of the reservoir.
52:59I know I'll never forget what Yelena Astepenko said to Townsend after their match. It'll be on my mind every time I see Astepenko now, because she quadrupled down on what she had said before someone finally got to her and made her stop, probably. there's that old saying about sports and war revealing the best and worst in people Ostapenko represented one half of that statement Townsend represented the other imagine the rage she must have been feeling inside as she sat at that microphone and showed that she is the true essence of class and education and intelligence and so much else I loved it and it also broke my heart because I felt like she knew the sad truth that women in general and black women specifically, aren't really allowed to get angry in public, and that really sucks.
53:45But then, under the most intense microscope of her career, she tore through Mira Andreeva on Ash and played the match of the tournament against Barbara Kirchikova on Labor Day weekend in a packed Armstrong. Kirchikova saved eight match points, one by a few millimeters. And then there she was again, in front of the microphone, manifesting a morsel of joy amid the heartbreak and vowing to fight on, because that's what the best ones do. They know the secret to tennis and life. The only thing that matters is what you do next. Great to share some tennis and bagels with you all. See you again somewhere, sometime.
54:22On to what's next. An all-timer there, I think, from Matt Futterman. He's done us incredibly proud. And he's kind of touched upon, really, all the things that I think I will take with me from this US Open. And they're not all positive things in terms of what will... I've got lots of really happy memories from it, but in terms of what will really leave a mark, a couple of the things aren't so positive, but the most positive one is the resilience of Amanda Anisimova. I didn't know that about her. It is a total revelation to me that she is this person. And it's a wonderful revelation. I'm really in awe of her and what she did this fortnight.
55:17I kind of said it all on the main podcast. I had my doubts after Wimbledon whether she would be back in that position again. And I would have been jaw on the floor astonished if you told me you should have been back in that position again at the very next slam, beating Igor Shvantec along the way and then backing up that victory over Igor Shvantec by beating Naomi Osaka. I think she's now an incredibly intriguing character to me as well as being obviously an astonishing tennis player. I've always understood the tennis. I really have. I've got what you've seen. But I've just never really thought of her as somebody with this kind of grit on the court and with this kind of clear love for the sport.
56:13And maybe it hasn't always been there or maybe she's not always been able to show it. But I've connected with her in a way that I really didn't see coming. and it's been such a happy revelation over these past few weeks for me. Yeah, and I think she is someone who you have to watch quite a lot to get that from because she does put a bit of a guard up in interviews, for example. She's spoken really well, I think, in lots of press conferences this year and she was actually really open in her final press conference, having lost to Sabalenka. She really did let us in in kind of how she was feeling there.
57:03But obviously, I agree with you. I'm just so pleased that we're seeing that tennis in the latter stages of the biggest tournaments now. I feel like part of my job on the podcast is, you know call out stuff we don't like about the sport and part of it is celebrate stuff that we do and lift up stuff that we do like and i i get such a buzz out of the amount of people on like the barge now and on on our instagram who are rooting for amanda and the simova like it just fills me with so much joy i'm like my job is done like people are people and i'm not saying they're just doing that because of me but people are appreciating her tennis in a way that i think they haven't done because we're seeing it in the latter stages of major tournaments that is the best way to get through to people whether it be your tennis or whether it be your personality that you're kind of talking about there we're seeing it and that's all i've really ever wanted you know Will she go on to win a Grand Slam title?
58:17I sure hope so. But I don't know. You can never know. There are so many good players still. There's still bits of her game that I still think she's got to improve. But she's relevant now. Totally. She's a relevant force. And you feel like with everything that's in place for her now, she can keep being relevant. Let's hope there's no big injury or something like that. But you think she can keep being relevant for quite a few more years. She's still pretty young and I find that exciting. And yeah, let's bring on the Australian Open. Do you share Matt's position on Yelena Ostopenko in terms of kind of not being able to view her in quite the same way from now on?
59:06Not sort of being able to have quite the same fun and silliness with her that we've always been able to have. Yes, I think Matt said it well. Like, we're always going to think about this now with Ostapenko. Unless, you know, I don't want to completely write someone off. Like, unless she does the work and properly fronts up and apologises and owns what she said and at least understands why it was wrong for her to say what she said i don't i still don't think we're there with her given the quote-unquote apologies that we that we did see on her social media so as long as that's hanging over her and she hasn't properly addressed it yes i do think i do think sadly ostapenko became a lot less fun this tournament And that is a, it's a blow because, you know, the head to head with Svantec and the faces on court.
1:00:15We've had a lot of fun with that. But this is a lot more important.
1:00:25Before we move on to our final voice note and just a few reflections on the men's final and the final day generally of the tournament. Anything else you want to touch upon? Well, I've come up with a stat, which I think you'll like. It goes off what Matt was saying there about, you know, the men's tournament being a bit of a drag until you get to the Sino Alcaraz of it all. And I think now there's such a pressure on Sino and Alcaraz to deliver. Like, I think that was quite a good final. but I think because of the paucity of good matches that have preceded it and because we kind of need it to be good we're maybe judging it a little bit harshly like I think if the rest of the men's event had been really good and we'd got that final we'd have been pretty satisfied with that final but because of Roland Garros that was so good and because of such a pressure on them to deliver for us now.
1:01:29I think we're being a bit harsh on it. I absolutely take the point. They didn't necessarily play all that well at the same time, which would make it a great match. But they've actually put the full replay on the US Open YouTube. It's great. They've cut all the faff. It's got Mary Crullo's commentary and it's just a really nice two-hour watch and I have watched it back and it's good. It's a high-level match, I would say, especially from Al Karaz. Anyway, that's all padding for my stat. This year at the majors, there's only been two five-set matches from the round of 16 onwards. So out of a possible 32, you've got eight round of 16 matches at the four majors.
1:02:22There's only been two. little quiz obviously the world on Garros final is one of them that's one that's one of them can you remember the other one I don't think was it a round of 16 match it was a round of 16 match and it was at Wimbledon because if it wasn't you'd have made it a quarter finals onwards stats so I'm getting this not from my tremendous memory of tennis I'm getting it from my knowledge of Matt Roberts' mind palace Wimbledon round of 16 matches oh my goodness
1:03:01think of a pod bit was Grigor Dimitrov involved? was it Nicholas Jarry? Nicholas Jarry against Cameron Norrie oh we can understand why I've forgotten that absolutely so Nicholas Jarry against Cameron Norrie and the French Open final, like one of the best matches of all time. Wow. Those are our two five-set matches from the round of 16 onwards. And look, obviously, not every match has to go to five sets to be a good match. You know, I'm sure there've been plenty of good four-set matches and, you know, even some interesting... Bad five-set matches. Right. But it is at least a marker of competitiveness, you know are we making that deciding set and truthfully i haven't done the stats on this but this year there was a lot of blowouts at the us open in the in the round of 16 and quarterfinals and the australian open i remember there being quite a lot of like retirements around that stage yeah and there were retirements in the us as well and that it hannah made this point in her in her second column from the us open which is uh which is available um right now um that, look, the early rounds are fine for men's tennis.
1:04:24You can get away with it because you've got sort of B plots, haven't you? Plots that aren't necessarily relevant to the wider tournament but are fun. And you are getting the good matches. There's always great matches somewhere. Yeah. Right. There's enough going on that there are good matches somewhere. You know, you've got Holger Runa losing to Jananad Struth and you've got Coleman Wong breaking through and being a fun story. I had a great time watching Kabali Brooksby. Right, there's stuff. There's fun stuff. And we've obviously got these Cineron Crest finals that provided we get them, they are usually pretty great.
1:05:01Like different levels are great. They're not always going to be the Roland Garros final. But I agree with you, like this final was pretty good. It's just we're judging everything by the yardstick of Roland Garros now. It is rounds 16 to semis that there is a real problem with men's tennis. That's when you feel it. That's when you've got matches that feel inconsequential, that take up a lot of space on the schedule because they're best of five relative to women's matches. And that there's so much less going on. you're kind of forced to pay attention to them, even if they aren't necessarily deserving of that attention.
1:05:44I know that sounds harsh, like everyone's trying their hearts out. It's not their fault. But in terms of entertainment and interest and stakes, like stakes for me are absolutely crucial in how much I care. It's suffering. Those rounds are really suffering. And I do think we've particularly felt it, well, at this year's US Open, but also at Wimbledon as well, where, you know, Draper's not been able to sort of build on what he showed in the spring. And, you know, he's now injured and out for the rest of the season. Feast as well is missing. and hear Ben Shelton. I remember thinking the moment Shelton did his shoulder, I thought, oh, we just lost some fun for the next few days.
1:06:37Like Adrian Manorino is quite fun, but he's not Ben Shelton fun in terms of quarterfinal, semifinal. Your dad's coming for me right now. On Tuesday when he picked us up from the airport, I would rather go and watch Adrian Manorino than Carlos Alcaraz. And he means it. He does. He's not just trying to be controversial. He really would choose Manorino over Alcaraz. But I do think if I had to pick out three players who I'm excited about in terms of, I don't think reaching Alcaraz-Sinna levels, but maybe once or twice or pushing them, it probably would be those three. As we were talking about earlier, that have enough upside still left.
1:07:26Yes. You wonder like, oh, maybe. Yeah. Like you're not thinking, oh, maybe about Taylor Fritz and Tommy Paul, are you? Really? We know Taylor Fritz and Tommy Paul. They are doing their damnedest. But we know. Yeah. Whereas we haven't quite seen the upper limits of Jack Draper and Ben Shelton. Yeah. And I'd probably add Fonseca into that as well. And Art of Feast. Yeah. Yeah. Those four. Or certainly a fit Fonseca, Feast, Shelton, Draper. Right. But then look at what they're having to do to themselves physically to even try and be competitive. You know, Shelton's shoulder's falling off. Jack Draper's serving arm is in a bad way.
1:08:09Yeah. Art of Feast has broken his back. This is not a good state of affairs. It's a worry. Yeah, it is.
1:08:22we should probably have a few reflections of our own on the final day um because unfortunately that is one of the that is the thing that will leave the biggest mark on me and not the final which I I have watched back and really enjoyed and it was a it was a very important thing for me watching that back because I barely felt like I was watching a tennis match on Sunday I struggled with Sunday a lot. I felt like I was in a dream the whole day. And I know it was a lot, depending on how and where you watched that final, you'd have been varying degrees aware of everything that was going on around it.
1:09:06And I'm envious of you if you were able to just watch that as a tennis match and enjoy that perfect performance, as he described it from Carlos Alcaraz. But I had a completely opposite experience of that day and the heaviness and the sadness of it with Donald Trump being there and everything that came with that is still weighing on me really. I still really, really feel it in my bones. we shared a media seat in the lower bit of the top tier and there I am sitting watching Yannick Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz and I was just drawn to him the whole time he was opposite us, he had the shiny fake trophy in front of him I was sort of intermittently looking between Donald Trump and Bruce Springsteen and sort of having to remind myself no there's a tennis match going on that you need to be watching I too was distracted by who Bruce Springsteen was talking to and what his seating configuration was.
1:10:15And on earth he and Shaggy might be saying to one another, have Bruce Springsteen and Shaggy met before? I'm dying to know. Is he talking with Sting about the fact that the rest of the police are suing him? Is he giving him the tea on that? Tell me everything. So, yeah, I obviously enjoyed getting preoccupied with the presence of Bruce Springsteen, which was iconic and the moment that Matt and I discovered that Bruce was going to be there was a high point in what was an incredibly, honestly, an incredibly low day. It felt doomful to me. And I feel very sad about saying that because I, you know, I memorized all the presidents of the United States as a teenager.
1:11:04I memorized all the states and their capitals. Like I was Americana obsessed. I loved America. Like I love America. I love going there. Like New York is one of my favorite places in the world. And I sort of tried to think of it this year is, you know, I'm not going to Trump's America. I'm going to New York. And that's that's different. And it is different to an extent, but there were a couple of very confronting moments where it really didn't feel different and where the state of the world and the state of the country were very much brought home. The other one being my argument with the climate denier at one o 'clock in the morning while trying to get on a bus desperately.
1:11:48And both were chilling, absolutely chilling. And I'm afraid that is that is what will stay with me. Yeah, same, really. and speaking to some American friends, they've kind of been like that final day of the US Open, kind of a perfect metaphor for life in America right now, where he's just there and just in the way and blocking your enjoyment of something. And, you know, you can't stop thinking about him. It's hard to put him out of your mind. And he does have this adverse effect on what you're experiencing. And yeah, I felt all of those things. I felt relieved that I was able to leave. You know, like I felt ready to leave America and leave New York.
1:12:49It felt like the end of Argo when the plane takes off. You haven't seen Argo, have you? But I think you might have referenced that before. I think you would like it. And I think you would relate to that final scene. Yeah. And it just, you know, when obviously when doomful things are happening in the world, obviously this is not unique to the US. We've got our own problems here and in a lot of places in the world. But you want to be able to like ring fence some things and keep them precious and safe from the stain of what's going on elsewhere. And it just felt like... Carlos Alcares is pretty much at the top of that list.
1:13:38Right. Like the anxiety, the whole time I was worried about, you know, because what turned out to be the fake trophy was sitting there the whole time looming over the court. And the whole time I was thinking, is he going to be involved in the ceremony? Are they going to have to go up to the Rolex suite for the ceremony? are they gonna feel like they have to reference him in their speeches the moment of the relief i felt when we got through the speeches and neither of them had mentioned the president being there that felt like the end of argo as well it's like okay nobody none of the things i love have been permanently tainted here this experience in this day have been tainted but hopefully in time we can just move on from today and enjoy enjoy something precious again we don't have to cancel carlos alcaraz few but yeah unfortunately that was um that was a huge part of the experience and it wouldn't be, I don't think it would be right for one of these shows to not talk about that.
1:14:49So sorry to kind of leave on a sad note. Although this isn't the final note, we do of course have one more contributor to hear from, somebody who also struggled a lot with what happened at the Billie Jean King National Tennis Centre on Sunday. It is of course the person with whom we end all of these shows because nobody should have to follow her uh thank you matt for this show thank you to all of our friends for for listening for supporting for making these shows possible uh thank you to david for well just being david yeah thank you to david for being david uh we'll be back with david very soon don't worry our next live show um or our next our next show which also happens to be live, is Monday at 8pm UK time.
1:15:46We'll be talking about the Billie Jean King Cup finals in Shenzhen, 8pm UK time on YouTube, also available as a podcast as well. Thank you for listening. Here is the wonderful, the incredible Mary Carrillo with her reflections on this US Open. So here's the difference between tennis fans and fans from most other sports. A lot of tennis fans play tennis. You think a lot of rugby fans play rugby? The football fans, your version, or the crazy-ass violence-soaked American kind. You think football fans head out to the soccer pitch or the gridiron with their cleats and their helmets a few times a week and beat the shit out of each other?
1:16:28All right, I know. You're thinking golf. A lot of golf fans play golf. And like fans do in our sport, they dress like golfers when they go watch golf. And please stop doing that. But you can't get 24 ,000 golf fans in one place to cheer over a 300-yard drive or sink a 40-foot putt or do other golfy things that are amazing. Golf is hard. And amateur golfers know how hard it is because they keep hitting their shots into lakes or off of alligators. I don't know. I don't play golf. Tennis-playing fans know how hard it is to hit a ball like Irina Sabalenka, or have to fight through emotions like Coco Gauff, or get too old like Novak Djokovic.
1:17:12They know what it's like to be so damn close to a win like Taylor Townsend and not win. Even famous tennis-playing fans, the actors and singers and athletes, the muckety-mucks and Rolex folk, whose motto is winding fans up by the thousands, These people, not the Rolex folk, they're used to expressing themselves eloquently, athletically, creatively. On Sunday, they were cheering and hollering and gasping at Alcaraz's tennis. They couldn't even speak about how Carlos made them feel because what's the use of words when you know in your bones how hard it is to play like that? So they shook their heads and they laughed and they banged each other on the shoulder because Alcaraz can do anything.
1:18:00everything, more than everything. They've never imagined what Alcaraz imagines because no one ever has. No one's ever been that quick, that instinctive, that playful and joyous and happy to be alive on a tennis court. Look, I've played tennis since I was eight years old, and I've called tennis matches for 45 years. I've been blessed to witness the greatest in my lifetime. Chrissy and Martina and and McEnroe, and Sampras, and Groff, and Serena, and Roger, and Rafa, and Novak. They put my kids through college. But there are no words I know that describe how Carlos Alcaraz makes me feel. I've run out of him.
1:18:40So thank God this U.S. Open is finally over, because I've got no more words.
1:18:55I'll see you next time.
From the publisher
Catherine and Matt are back in London and the help of voice notes from Charlie Eccleshare, Pam Shriver, Simon Briggs, Hannah Wilks, Matt Futterman and Mary Carillo, it's time to look back on the 2025 US Open.
We cover the evolving games of the top players, the way the data revolution in the sport has yet to reach TV coverage, Tokito Oda completing the Golden Career Slam, Amanda Anisimova's resilience, the pressure on Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner to deliver for men's tennis right now, and how the presence of Donald Trump clouded the final day.
