BONUS - US Open 2026 Review

17 Sep 2026 · 1 h 29 min · 29 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

This bonus episode is a 2026 US Open review recorded shortly after the tournament, using multiple guest voice notes to discuss what changed about the event and why it felt different.

Guests and backgrounds

Simon Briggs (Telegraph journalist, UK media at the US Open); Matt Futterman (The Athletic, New Yorker tennis writer); Ava Wallace (The Athletic); Hannah Wilkes (writer who covered WTA business news); Pamela Howard Shriver (former player/TV/radio broadcaster; BBC Radio and Yonex/BBC work).

Key claims

The US Open’s “influencerfication” and media culture shift is part of wider FOMO and loss of monoculture, with legacy media reacting strongly (including a brief Naomi Osaka match interruption for lip-syncing). A separate issue is “VIP-ification” via expanded suites/renovations, creating sharper haves/have-nots and a more “airport”-like VIP experience. The tournament felt bloated and noisier, with late finishes pushing too far (e.g., matches ending around 3:33am). The WTA product is strong but the tour faces projected financial losses (reported $23m in 2026; bankruptcy risk in 2027), prompting concern despite reassurances tied to WTA Finals moving to Charlotte.

Notable examples

Ialyа Jovic vs Alex Eala (WTA match of the tournament); Noskova vs Sabalenka; Coco Goff; Taylor Townsend doubles final; Ben Shelton and Francis Tiafoe; Shelton vs Alcaraz (late-night crowd); Rybakina’s rise to No.1 and US Open title; Tiafoe vs Alex Mickelson BBC Radio quarterfinal; Naomi Osaka lip-syncing interruption; WTA “no serve bots” marketing discussion.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Post-Open Reflections

0:45 to 2:54

The hosts reflect on their recent experiences returning home after the US Open.

“So I've got a few days to sort that out but maybe it's related to the sleep because occasionally I have had to have a nap and I don't like naps so maybe my brain isn't working so that's how it's going.”

Simon Briggs' Experience

2:54 to 4:46

Simon Briggs shares his contrasting experience at the 2026 US Open.

“We're going to look back on the US Open with the help of some of our very favourite people and most esteemed contributors to this show.”

Cultural Commentary on Influencers

4:46 to 7:21

Discussion on the impact of influencers at the US Open and their media portrayal.

“Here is Simon Briggs telling us about his experience at the 2026 US Open, which was very different to ours.”

US Open's Changing Landscape

7:21 to 14:01

Exploration of the changes at the US Open and their effects on the tournament's environment.

“I think that would bring a lot of joy to all our lives.”

The Future of the US Open Experience

14:01 to 16:30

Discussion on the renovations and changes at the US Open and their impact on fans.

“You know, there's significant renovation being done.”

Matt Futterman's Take on the US Open

16:30 to 19:36

Matt Futterman shares his unique perspective on the chaotic experience at the US Open.

“So it's always particularly interesting, I think, to get his perspective on this event.”

Cultural Impact of the US Open

19:36 to 23:22

Exploration of how the US Open reflects broader cultural and societal themes in America.

“Open got me, because it always does, and it would get me again in the next couple of days.”

Reflections on a Changing Sport

23:22 to 28:00

Hosts reflect on tennis's evolution and the significance of diversity in players.

“made me feel good about being an American and about how black players have completely transformed elite American tennis.”

Balancing Atmosphere and Match Timing at the US Open

28:00 to 31:36

Learn about the challenges of maintaining the New York atmosphere while managing match timings at the US Open.

“And it's very hard to get that balance right.”

Ava's Insights on the U.S. Open Experience

31:36 to 34:28

Discover Ava Wallace's perspective on the atmosphere and memorable matches at the U.S. Open 2026.

“Even before the tournament started, there were more people, there was more noise, ticket prices were up, and so was discourse online.”
Show all 29 chapters

The Importance of Serving in Women's Tennis

34:28 to 39:46

Explore the crucial role of serving in women's tennis and how it impacts player performance.

“I absolutely love that turn of phrase and that idea of a match being frozen in time and it only have been possible in that moment, in that place with those players at the age they are.”

Concerns Over WTA's Financial Future

39:46 to 42:00

Hear about the alarming financial projections for the WTA and the implications for women's tennis.

“There's something always sort of a bit apologetic about WTA marketing.”

Exciting Highlights from Women's Tennis

42:00 to 43:52

A discussion on the thrilling matches of the women's draw at the US Open.

“From the first round up until the final, there was so much amazing tennis and really compelling entertainment being provided by the women's side of the draw.”

The Value of Women's Tennis

43:52 to 46:59

Exploring the disconnect between women's tennis quality and market valuation.

“I'm just very genuinely sort of confused by this.”

WTA's Financial Challenges and Future

46:59 to 51:32

An analysis of the WTA's financial situation and strategic plans for sustainability.

“Like, genuinely, what happens if the forecast scenario in Simon Briggs' piece comes to pass, David?”

Reflections on the US Open with Pam Shriver

51:32 to 55:04

Pam Shriver shares her experiences and reflections from the recent US Open.

“But, I mean, the reason the WTA went to Riyadh was for money.”

Dramatic Moments at the US Open

55:04 to 56:04

Pam recounts the thrilling quarterfinal match between Tiafoe and Mickelson.

“She'll explain to you in this voice note what she was doing over the course of this tournament.”

Reflecting on the U.S. Open Quarterfinals

56:04 to 1:01:15

Learn about the emotional moments and insights from a dramatic quarterfinal match.

“I have a lot of really strong memories from this U.S.”

Accomplishments and Insights from the Finals

1:01:15 to 1:08:29

Explore the achievements of Rybakina and Zverev during the finals and their personal journeys.

“Brilliant stuff from Pam there, as always, of course.”

Charlie Eccleshare's Unique U.S. Open Experience

1:08:29 to 1:10:01

Discover Charlie's reflections on watching the U.S. Open from home during paternity leave.

“He's on paternity leave, but he did pop up and couldn't resist writing a piece about single-handed backhands.”

Sharing Tennis with Family

1:10:01 to 1:12:04

The host reflects on sharing tennis moments with his children and the lessons learned.

“which was how I got into the sport when I was a child.”

The Impact of Communal Experiences

1:12:05 to 1:13:46

Discussion on how shared experiences in sports create lasting memories.

“to listen to Mary commentating on that Shelton Alcaraz match and then dive into the reactions on the pod and on The Athletic and from colleagues elsewhere.”

Reflections on Alcaraz and Parenting

1:13:47 to 1:15:56

The hosts discuss Carlos Alcaraz's influence and how sports figures can model good behavior.

“I think that's why Futterman was so into it.”

Speculations on Ferrero's Coaching

1:15:57 to 1:18:08

Discussion on Carlos Ferrero's potential return to coaching and its implications.

“He is an Art of Feast guy, though, right?”

Alcaraz's Comeback Performance

1:18:09 to 1:19:44

Analysis of Alcaraz's performance at the US Open and his potential future.

“Because there was the Tommy Paul match where I thought, OK, he's 100 % back.”

Looking Ahead to the ATP Finals

1:19:45 to 1:23:49

Speculation about the upcoming ATP Finals and the excitement surrounding player performances.

“So I think we come out of it feeling good about Carlos Alcarez's return.”

Anticipation for the Upcoming Tennis Season

1:24:00 to 1:24:20

The hosts discuss the excitement surrounding the upcoming tennis season.

“Who will we see on a nightmare tour this year?”

Introduction of Mary Carrillo

1:24:20 to 1:25:19

The hosts introduce Mary Carrillo and reflect on her contributions to tennis.

“Okay, folks, that is almost it for this US Open review show, except there is one very important bit of business to come.”

Life Lessons from the US Open

1:25:19 to 1:28:47

Mary Carrillo shares valuable life lessons learned from the US Open experience.

“I miss you, Charlie, and I've missed my three grandchildren by being here in New York.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:10Well, hello, friends, and welcome to the Tennis Podcast and our US Open review show for 2026. It is Thursday, the 17th of September. As we record this, we've all been back on home soil for 48 sweet hours. and here we are remembering how to podcast just as we've been remembering how to sleep. How has it been going, David? The sleep's been going better than the podcast setup because I still haven't made my camera work which makes it a relief that we are not requiring the camera today. So I've got a few days to sort that out but maybe it's related to the sleep because occasionally I have had to have a nap and I don't like naps so maybe my brain isn't working so that's how it's going.

0:59I don't like to hear you say that about naps David but I'll take that up with you later. I too am relieved that we don't have to use the cameras today but for other reasons non-tech reasons. Matt how are you doing? The beard is still a thing? It is yeah. Haven't figured out what to do with that yet but that can wait. The people of Instagram have got some suggestions and none of them involve shaving. Right. Okay. Well, we'll see. I can run a poll if you like. Oh, I actually think I might quite enjoy that.

1:43I'm not sure I will. Okay. We'll keep you posted on Matt's beard situation. You'll see it on Monday's show. We're back with another podcast on Monday. There is tennis happening this week in Guadalajara. There's Davis Cup tennis happening this weekend. Matt and I, I think we were at baggage claim at Heathrow. We saw that Amanda Inisimova was in Singapore. And apparently there's a WCA 500 there next week. And it's got a banging field, David. So we're already reeled back in. Have either of you switched Guadalajara on yet? I haven't, but I'm not ruling it out today. Have you? I've looked at some live scores.

2:30I saw that Sonmez and Jovic had a great battle. And I also saw that Taylor Townsend has had some sort of emergency surgery. Oh, gosh. But I haven't had the opportunity to look into it yet. So as you can tell, we're right across all things tennis right now. But it's fine because we're going to talk about the past. During this show, the very, very recent past. We're going to look back on the US Open with the help of some of our very favourite people and most esteemed contributors to this show. Let's start with one of our OG tennis podcast contributors. It is the Telegraph's Simon Briggs, who we actually barely saw throughout this US Open.

3:17We caught up with him a little bit over the final weekend, but we were like ships in the night. It's kind of crazy how much things differ for us behind the scenes from one slam to the other. Like at the French Open, we're seated, our assigned seats in the media centre are on the row with all the British journalists. So we feel like we're having a shared experience with them, even though our jobs are very different. Whereas here, we barely see them. It wasn't until the final weekend that I even caught sight of Tom Kershaw from The Times, for example. and I was literally sitting opposite him for two and a half weeks during the French Open.

3:55So, yeah, it's just sort of evidence of how different these slams are, both front of house and behind the scenes. We're with the Spanish media at the US Open. They've heard about my passport and they're sure, get them on the Spanish row. Sandwiched in between the Japanese media and the Spanish media. Which match was it? Did it involve Bookshire? Oh, you've got yourself down a rabbit hole here trying to remember this match. It was Bookshire against Sakatsume? Yes, it was. And it was a thriller. Seven, six and the third. We were the filling in a sandwich. Yeah. So where was I? I was introducing Simon Briggs.

4:47Here is Simon Briggs telling us about his experience at the 2026 US Open, which was very different to ours. Hi, Simon Briggs here. I'm going to do another movie comparison. So this slam was the Odyssey because I started it off feeling like I was sailing along with a nice following breeze and I finished it thinking I was half drowned, strapped to a piece of driftwood and might not actually survive. Maybe a bit overdramatic, but it is, as Matt explained on Sunday, it is kind of quite difficult when you're a British media person and you're waking up in the morning and your office have been awake for like six hours coming up with ideas of what they want you to do, which you're blearily trying to process over breakfast.

5:34And then when you go to bed, well, you don't get to go to bed sometimes because it's finishing at 3.33 in the morning. so you're kind of trapped between Scylla and Charybdis one might say the other point which might relate is the number of guests hanging around consuming all the food making a nuisance themselves and generally getting in the way you might have seen them in the Odyssey also spotted in the influencers attending the US Open I think it's quite funny what a massive amount of coverage we managed to make out of this given that it was actually only one brief interruption when Naomi Osaka's match had to be stopped for that lip-syncing exercise in a sponsor's box but I guess as legacy media we are somewhat sensitive about the rise of a new generation of people who look like they're going to send us into obsolescence which might be why we kind of stabbed them with the metaphorical spear or indeed a nasty comment piece or two so the influencers got it in the neck the ending was a little ambivalent in terms of being Ravatkaner and Zverev if we'd known that was going to be the case I don't know how many of us reporters would have come over from UK and started the mission in the first place and that don't actually spin the dial very much for us.

7:04But it was an interesting trip. We learned a lot along the way. And yeah, maybe someone can explain to me how I become a TikTok influencer. Answers on the postcard. Look, I don't know how to make it happen, but there is nothing my heart wants more than Simon Briggs to become a TikTok influencer. I think that would bring a lot of joy to all our lives. Incredible line. If we'd known that was going to happen, we wouldn't have bothered. I also like the fact that he wants to become a TikTok influencer and yet he wants answers on a postcard Right, yeah I think that was I'm hoping that was a sort of deliberate irony I'm giving Simon the credit of that being a deliberate irony And look, I think an important and very helpful admission there from Simon about one of the themes of this US Open, particularly week one, and the influencerfication or the supposed influencerfication of the media and of so many of those attending, which is that the so-called legacy media went particularly hard on this partly for reasons of their own agenda, albeit potentially a very legitimate agenda.

8:29But it again, Simon's admission there points to, and there was a brilliant Giri Nathan piece to this effect in Defecta throughout the course of the tournament. It's not about the US Open and their particular decisions about how many influences they accredited. It's about culture. This points to something, this is indicative of something that is happening in wider culture that is scary. Maybe not as scary as some people make it out to be, but definitely is scary and alarming and makes a lot of people feel very, very threatened.

9:17Yeah, the point Gary was making was that kind of the US Open has become this reflection of broader culture, I suppose. And I think in particular this feeling of people kind of wanting shared experiences and that almost being, I don't know, maybe harder to sort of come across now. and you and like FOMO is just driving so much of people's lives and they're seeing everything on Instagram and anything I need to be part of that I want to be part of that and and that is perhaps leading to more people going to the US Open as a thing to be at rather than a tennis event to to follow and I think the tournament has probably lent into that as well in terms of the pricing of its tickets and that being difficult now maybe for for just people who are just tennis fans feel like maybe they're priced out and I don't know all of this has come together to sort of change the feel of of the US Open potentially and and as we talked about during the during the during the tournament, I do think the influencers were getting a bit of a bad rap there.

10:44I don't think it's their fault that this is happening. I don't think it's a bad thing necessarily that the US Open is accrediting influencers. I think that's the right thing to be doing. And the ones that they were giving credentials to generally were tennis influencers. And I don't think they were the ones disrupting the matches or behaving in a bad way. I think it was I think it was some of the people in the in the suites who probably maybe think of themselves as influencers, but maybe aren't officially influencers. And as Simon said, it was, I think, blown out of proportion. people were looking for a kind of scapegoat i suppose as to why the u.s open felt different to how it used to feel um and of why the perhaps legacy media and traditional media are not being treated in in quite the same way as they used to be and but i think i don't think you're coming at the right people there if you're blaming the influences you know there's a there's a wider cultural thing at play there.

11:54It strikes me that there are two, there have been two very separate things going on that have been totally conflated. There's the wider cultural stuff that Gary wrote about, the loss of monoculture in our society and the rise of FOMO culture and the desperation for shared experience. and that leading to this so-called influenceification of the world and everything being about the post you put on Instagram. And then there's the quite separate, I mean, there is overlap in this Venn diagram, but as I see it, quite a separate thing of the US Open, and we're going to hear Matt Futterman talk about this in a moment, turning itself from a, look, there's always been suites, There have always been posh seats and hospitality seating, but then very much expanding that offering and creating a real feel of the haves and the have-nots at this tournament that are having two very separate experiences.

13:07is as Matt talked about on an appearance he did this week on the Pablo Torre Finds Out podcast that's been very widely clipped up and it's a fantastic interview. He talks about it being like an airport. You know, there is literally an arrivals lounge for VIPs at the US Open now and these changes that they've made to the Arthur Ashe Stadium are basically to create more suites and more posh seats And my feeling is that that is the thing that has most significantly altered the feel of the Arthur Ashe Stadium and not that more people are drinking honey juices and having their photo taken with their honey juice and putting it on Instagram.

13:52What do you think, David? Yeah, I think that's true. And it's not going to stop. You know, there's significant renovation being done. And it's all been done for that reason. And, yeah, I just hope that they recognize the importance of keeping the overall appeal of the tournament similar. You know, it's always struck me as a tournament that, you know, anybody can go to, you know, and a lot of people who are sort of more general sports fans and not just tennis fans go to. So I think there is room for all of it. I just hope they don't go too far the other way. Is there an argument that they have already?

14:44Yeah. But I think there is still space to bring it back. And I actually think the fan week, for instance, is an achievement. And I think that they need to extend a little bit more of that into week one. I think they need to be mindful of what they do with the grants passes in that regard. I agree. I just worry that what they've done with Fan Week is very explicitly so that they don't have to extend any of that into the actual tournament. It's we can maximise revenues from the tournament by creating this Fan Week, which is that's where the plebs can go and get their US Open experience. and, you know, any criticism that we get of this VIP-ification of the tournament, we can say, well, look at Fan Week.

15:38That's when anybody can go for free. And that is a brilliant, it's a brilliant thing. I just do worry it's a bit of a shield for something that is very much not a brilliant thing. The plebs can also go for the$24 Zverev-Hachinov semifinal. on the resale. If you just play the Ticketmaster game and hold out, there will be some cheap tickets going for you at the end of the tournament. Very good, very good point. Yeah, Math sent through a text to our group, didn't he, midway through that match saying, God, imagine if you'd paid$24 for this. You'd be furious. Right, let's hear from the aforementioned Matt Futterman.

16:29of The Athletic, who is a New Yorker. So it's always particularly interesting, I think, to get his perspective on this event. And here he is kind of setting the scene for us and telling us about his experience of this US Open. I never thought I would break news in one of these voice notes. But when you get a hot scoop, you want to get it out as quickly as possible. So here it goes. Matt Roberts is experimenting with a one-handed backhand. How about that shit? There we were, hitting on a glorious Monday morning in New York, on our first day of liberation, at the end of the U.S. Open. We were on the haven of the 119th Street Courts in Riverside Park, my home turf.

17:10He wanted backhand reps. I was giving them to him. It wasn't going great. There were inconsistency issues with the take-back and the footwork and some deceleration on the follow-through, too. And then, in the blink of an eye, he starts breaking out the one-hander. It wasn't perfect, but before long, he started roping some of them, and then some more. I don't know where this is all going. I don't know if it can hold up against a certain weight of shot. I'm pretty sure he can't take it down the line, but I feel like this is big, and it shows that both Matt and Coco treat everything that happens after the U.S.

17:46Open as preparation for the start of the next season. We all know what that means for Matt. The Australian Open media one-point slam. them. Now, as someone who may end up on the other side of the net from Matt in the most important tournament of the year, part of me sort of relishes the idea that my opponent may not be sure of which backhand to use when the ball comes at him at a moment when one point is the difference between tennis life and tennis death. See, Matt right now isn't just Coco. He's also Lorenzo Musetti, a player maybe with too many tools who has yet to figure out how to simplify his game.

18:24Now, am I the kind of person who, after the coin flip, would look across the net at Matt and ask, are you sure you've made the right decision about your backhand? I think I probably am, but I guess we'll just have to wait and see how this all turns out, won't we? Draws matter, after all. Now they're really going to. Anyway, I suppose I should talk about this little hot mess of a U.S. Open that just finished. It's always too expensive. It's always really noisy. It always has late nights. Seriously, though, I think back on the last three weeks, and this is just one blur of wildly expensive tickets and finishes at 2 and 3 and 4 a.m., and basically chaos everywhere you turned.

19:06I mean, there's this over-the-top renovation going on, largely aimed at making life even more luxurious for the luxury class, and the building was literally falling down on top of us at times. And yet, there I was at a quarter to three on a Wednesday morning, pumping my fist in the air to the bop-bop-ba of Sweet Caroline with maybe 10 ,000 other lunatics who were sticking around for the end of Shelton and Alcaraz. I was riding this only in New York high that I will remember for the rest of my life. Once again, the U.S. Open got me, because it always does, and it would get me again in the next couple of days.

19:42And it's always for the same reason. The U.S. Open is so different from the other Grand Slams. The Australian Open in Melbourne Park feel to me like the ultimate winter vacation at an awesome tennis resort. January in the Southern Hemisphere will do that to you. The French Open is all about beauty and elegance. These people built this jewel box tennis court in the middle of a greenhouse and garden, for Christ's sake. Wimbledon takes place at a wildly exclusive club with a royal box and the Princess of Wales as its main patron. For a guy like me, all that is just, I don't know, kind of different.

20:17Here's what I will say about the U.S. Open. About 50 years ago, the people running the USDA made a decision to take the sport's main event in the U.S. and move it out of a private club and into a public park in New York City. It was kind of a crazy decision. New York was essentially bankrupt and fading and dirty and filled with crime. Maybe go re-watch Martin Scorsese's Taxi Driver and you'll get a pretty good idea. They threw up some concrete stadiums, turned some swampland in what F. Scott Fitzgerald referred to as the Valley of the Ashes and the Great Gatsby, and that has been the American slam ever since.

20:53That decision sent a message. Tennis in America wasn't going to be a country club sport anymore exclusively. It was going to be a sport of the people, just like baseball and football and basketball and all the rest of the games we play. If you wanted to be a fan or play it, there was going to be a way to do that. There was a place for you. That was the message, and that's been the goal. So there I am, a day after the end of Shelton beating Alcaraz, and I settle in to watch Coco Goff play in the semifinals. She lost. She'll be back. The next day, I watched Taylor Townsend and Katerina Signiakova beat Robin Montgomery and Ashlyn Krueger in the doubles final.

21:29Later that night, Ben Shelton and Francis Tiafoe played the men's semifinal. If you don't know the backstories, they're worth knowing. Coco is the granddaughter of the woman who desegregated her school district in South Florida in the early 1960s. Taylor Townsend originally grew up and started playing tennis on the south side of Chicago, the same part of the city where the woman who gets the biggest roars at the U.S. Open these days, Michelle Obama, is from. Robin Montgomery grew up in a one-bedroom apartment in Washington, D.C. with her mother and grandmother. Francis Tiafoe is the son of immigrants from Sierra Leone, whose father was a maintenance worker at a local tennis academy for less advantaged children in Washington.

22:11Ben Shelton's grandfather enlisted in the Army when he was 18 years old, just after Harry Truman desegregated the military. He never had another employer. He and his wife, a homemaker, raised four children, mainly in Huntsville, Alabama. One of them, Brian, found a way to become the world number 55. In 2002, while he was coaching at Georgia Tech, he and his wife had their second child, Ben. From the looks of it, Ben could have played any sport. He chose tennis. Players that look like these players do, and from backgrounds like that, don't generally come from anywhere but the U.S. Not with any sort of critical mass.

22:49France, a little bit. But not many others. I don't think I'm old. I grew up playing tennis in the 1980s. That feels like yesterday. I didn't belong to a country club, but I played at some clubs that had signs hanging on the fence of the courts that said whites only. Supposedly it referred to the tennis attire. Someone would blink at you like it was a funny joke. Brian Shelton is my oldest brother's age. Imagine how he felt when he saw signs like that. Watching Coco and Taylor and Robin and Francis and Ben compete in the final rounds of this U.S. Open made me feel good about being an American and about how black players have completely transformed elite American tennis.

23:30I haven't had a lot of days the last couple of years when I have felt all that great about this country. We're picking fights with Canada right now. Who the fuck picks fights with Canadians? That's all another conversation that thankfully didn't invade the U.S. Open this year. I know compared to the other Grand Slams, the U.S. Open is a crazy hot mess, and it was messier and crazier this year than I think it's ever been. You know what? The city has been churning out crazy, messy shit for going on 400 years now. Some of it's been terrible and absurd, like tennis matches that finish at 3.33 in the morning.

24:07On the whole, I think we're all probably better for what New York has given the planet. Greatest city in the world, right? At least that's what we tell everybody. I don't expect it to stop anytime soon. First of all, Matt, let's address the bombshell dropped at the start of that voice note. You went into the US Open clean shaven with a double-handed backhand. Now the world is turned upside down. What is going on? Who even am I anymore? Yeah, that's the effect that the hot mess of the US Open has had on me. I had to text Teach Trez after I heard Futterman's voice note. I had to let him know from me firsthand that I'd been cheating on all the work that we've done with my double hander over the last 18 months.

25:01I didn't want him to find out via Futterman that I was flirting with the single hander. but I can assure everyone it was just a post-US Open fling in Riverside Park. I'm not planning on having a one-handed backhand. I am going to commit to the double-hander. But, you know, it's nice to know that I can hit a one-hander. It's quite a flex. Reasonably well. Yeah. it's got me very pumped for the media one point slam in Australia put it that way I definitely do have too many thoughts going on in my head when I'm on a tennis court and this is now another one and Matt Futterman I think it's all just mind games I think he's just trying to get in my head ahead of the one point slam successfully yeah absolutely David any serious reflections on Matt's voice note there yeah I really enjoyed listening to his sort of vantage point as a New Yorker and somebody who's got a sort of love and hate relationship with the US Open which I think applies to many many people um I think I think I feel the same it's the it's not the first tournament I ever saw but it's the one that made me fall in love with tennis and I still feel that you know there are nights at the US Open that I feel that and the 3.33 in the morning was that great kind of conflict of what on earth are we doing here but isn't it great um you know and and I think that that that sums it up beautifully and yeah it's got a lot of faults but in a way it's also got something that none of the others have and I want it to change and I don't want it to change so I'm as much of a part of the problem as it is yeah i think i think matt makes a great point in describing the different identities of of the various slams and like when we talk about the late finishes and we mention the curfew and we mention the way the other slams do it that that i'm not trying to say that i want the US Open to be Wimbledon you know like I don't want that I think it's very important that it still feels like it's happening in New York that's so important to the event and you know I want there to be more noise in New York I want I want it to go on later than 11pm because you saw how many people were still there at the start of Alcaraz Shelton You know, there's 25 ,000 people there in the Arthur Ashe Stadium.

27:52Like, that city can take it. It's got an all-night subway, for example, things like that. Like, I think we're not saying that we want to just make the US Open like Wimbledon. That has never been the point. I just think that 333 is too far. And it's very hard to get that balance right. It's very hard to schedule tennis. You don't know when a match is going to end. It could last two hours. It could last five hours. It's very, very hard. And structurally, the US Open's financial models are built on having these night sessions and not using Armstrong from the quarterfinals onwards. And, you know, so that would take a lot of untangling to change.

28:38So you want it to feel like New York. You just don't want it to overstep and go too far. And I'm not I'm not saying that's easy, but I'm just saying this year did feel like it went a bit too far. You know, like in terms of what we were talking about from Simon's voice in terms of people being there who maybe weren't really there for the tennis. Like you want the noise in the stadium, but you want it to be tennis noise, not just total background noise. And you want it to go on late and have the energy, but not go on to 3.30 in the morning. Like and striking that balance is really hard. It just feels like this year it tipped too much the wrong side to me personally.

29:24But there have been US Opens in the past where it's felt right and cool. And we've been finishing at, I don't know, 12.31, which you can kind of justify in New York. So, yeah, you want it to feel like New York, though. And I think Matt has made that point really well in that voice note. Can I just say something controversial that there's no way of proving? Please I love New York so much I don't think the number of people that stayed in the atmosphere that there still was at 3.30am I don't think that's unique to New York I think if that had been Melbourne, which is also prone to a late finish We were there in the stadium for Murray-Kokinakis It was a smaller stadium, it was a less big deal match but I think it would have been similar in Melbourne.

30:20I remember Djokovic Sinner happening very late in Melbourne. I can't exactly remember what time it was. One something I would say and there was still a big crowd in. And like that is just what happens. The later it gets, if you're someone that stays, like you're staying because you're so into it and there's nowhere else on the planet you'd rather be and fuck sleep, fuck, you know, the practicalities of getting home. Like you're in it and it's feverish and it's, you know, you're probably incredibly drunk by that point or some of them are, you know. Like that is, I don't think that's unique to New York.

31:00Maybe it's more, more of everything than it would be elsewhere in New York. But I do think it would have been that much at that time. I think it would have been quite similar in Australia, personally. Yeah, I don't disagree. I don't want to take that from New York, but yeah. Okay, should we move on to our next voice note? The wonderful voice, I love Ava's voice. This is Ava Wallace from The Athletic. The U.S. Open was a lot this year. Even before the tournament started, there were more people, there was more noise, ticket prices were up, and so was discourse online. Everyone was talking about how many more pre-tournament events there were than usual.

31:52I am hardly the first to say, but the tournament felt more bloated than ever before. There were also, thankfully, a lot of rich storylines. you don't usually equate volume with rarity but that's why my lasting memory and I think my favorite match of the U.S. Open maybe aside from Francis Tiafoe, Daniel Medvedev was Alex Yala and Iva Jovich's third round battle on Ash. The atmosphere was everything you'd want it was one of those great matches where Ash just turns into a cauldron of noise and excitement and buzzing and cheering. And it was all for the up and coming generation of WTA stars. Alex Yala has this massive following in a way that feels groundbreaking because she's from the Philippines, a non-traditional tennis power.

32:42So there's this rapturous pride and energy about the stadium, kind of wherever she plays. And then there's Evie Jovich, the fast rising American who the home crowd really got behind. She's sharp and assertive and a fantastic athlete. I spent a lot of time watching her matches this summer, and something I really love is you can really see everything she's thinking during a match right on her face. I think it is the writer Geary Nathan's hypothesis that tennis players are more fun to watch before they know how to serve, and this match absolutely bore that out. I'm not saying that Jovic and Iala don't know how to serve, obviously, but they're not serving consistently yet, and they're so clearly both works in progress for how good they already are.

33:29It's exciting to watch players with a floor that high. They weren't getting free points off their serves, and the tennis was marvelous. We got to watch them kind of work through how to outsmart each other on the ground and just see what they could come up with. It was athletic and sweaty and emotional and suspenseful, and probably some of the most creative tennis I watched throughout the U.S. Open. When Jovic won at the end, there was Iala having crossed the net waiting to give her friend a hug. I had never really known what to make of their friendship before, how real it was, how much they actually got to see her, but that moment really cemented it for me.

34:09It felt like a match that was frozen in time, that only could have happened between these players at this exact age at this tournament on Arthur Ashe Stadium, and it was dramatic and joyful. And in this supersized era of the US Open, it felt very special. I absolutely love that turn of phrase and that idea of a match being frozen in time and it only have been possible in that moment, in that place with those players at the age they are. That's such a perfect concept and obviously applies totally to Iyala Jovic. And it's got me thinking about, you know, other matches from history, but from this year that that applies to.

Read the full transcript

34:58I thought about Fonseca Djokovic at Roland Garros, you know, the age disparity where they both were in their careers. That one was kind of the first one that jumped to mind. But yeah, it's so perfect. And I think, obviously, Sholten Alcaraz is there looming. It's kind of an umbrella over all discussion of this US Open. But I do think Jovic-Iala, for me, was the match of the tournament. I loved it so much. Yeah, it was superb. And I think because they're still relatively new and because you've got an American in America against Iala and everything she brings. Yeah, it was perfect, really. I also thought Noschka vs.

35:48Sabalenka was right up there for one of the matches of the tournament. And on the subject of Frozen in Time, that's kind of how I think about Raducanu against Fernandes from the 2021 final. You know, these two newcomers, really, who've never been able to recreate that moment. Maybe they still will. I hope they can. But you never know when you've had your best moment. You only know when you've retired, I suppose, or when you finally admit defeat. So you never know can work both ways. Gosh, the dark side of you never know. You okay, David? Yep. Was the dentist that bad? It was pretty bad.

36:39and um yeah kind of when ava said frozen in time and when she was talking about you know tennis players are never more fun to watch than when they don't have a serve or don't know how to serve well yet it kind of made me think of like very early stage uh djokovic nadal matches as well there's there's one in miami that they played which was just like so explosive but every rally is having, every point is having to be a rally because they haven't got these serves, something that Djokovic would go on to have. I think that's a great rewatch and they're young, kind of like Iala and Jovic are. I think it's from about 2007.

37:22And specifically on the point of the serve, that was something that, again, Math said that kind of the WTA slogan should kind of be no serve bots here. And like, that is one of the great things about women's tennis in that the serve is less dominant and you do you do get more matches like that and matches where the rallies become so important and yet i do think still the serve is key to women's tennis like if you think about the players at the top rebecca has just become world number one what are we always talking about with her her serve is such a separator one of the players who has been dominant but is now struggling, Igor Sviontek if you had to point to the one area of her game that seems to have really declined in that time it is the serve Coco Goff has become a consistent force again over the last few months because her serve has got more consistent Sabalenka sorted out her serve after many years of having the yips and she became a dominant number one after sorting that out And as fun as Iala Injovic was and as brilliant as it was, I do think there is this ceiling on your game if you can't serve better.

38:40So I think that is going to be an interesting development for Iala Injovic. And whether that means their matchup becomes a little bit less compelling in the future if they're getting more free points, I don't know. but I think they can become better players if they improve their serve, particularly Iala, of course. But yeah, it was an amazing, amazing match, that one. It did make me think about what she said in her pre-tournament press conference at Iala about her serve, where she was very, in a very charming way, she was quite defensive about the shot, wasn't she, and the criticism she gets of it.

39:17She was like, I like my serve. Yeah, it was really endearing. But I do hope that behind the scenes, she is like, I need to improve myself because she needs to improve herself. And she's really smart and clearly has a great work ethic and is very ambitious. Like I think she does. It's just, yeah, I do hope she does improve herself because I want her to be successful. and yeah I was thinking about that what math said too about you know the the greatest marketing campaign that the WTA have never done which is you know not a serve bot in sight and that made me think about the WTA and generally how they have always approached marketing and how there's never been anything as edgy and cool as that.

40:17There's something always sort of a bit apologetic about WTA marketing. I don't quite know if that's the best way to put it, but let's hear from Hannah Wilkes, who talks some more about the WTA and a story actually that was broken by Simon Briggs over the course of the tournament about the WTA and its apparently impending bankruptcy unless there's a significant financial change, of course, something that, you know, we were aware of needing and wanting to cover, but they just didn't feel like there was oxygen for over the course of the tournament. So that is something that Hannah touches upon here, amongst other things.

41:01Here's Hannah Wilkes. so there was a piece of news that came out during this u.s open which i found really distressing but kind of also mainly just confusing um which was that the wta tour is apparently projected to lose 23 million dollars in 2026 and if that rate of depletion continues could be bankrupt in 2027 um and look i am a verified idiot when it comes to the business side of tennis and i'm fine with that but i just don't understand how this can be the case when this us open showcased once again the extraordinary strengths of the WTA Tour right now in terms of the product, in terms of the players, in terms of the matches.

42:04From the first round up until the final, there was so much amazing tennis and really compelling entertainment being provided by the women's side of the draw. I mean, Obviously, every single one of Xun Chen Wen's matches was absolute must watch, gripping from first ball to last. You know, that was a fantastic story. But it wasn't just that kind of fairytale factor. It was also the players at the top of the draw performing, not only kind of overwhelmingly like performing to their seedings, but competing so intensely against each other. I thought that Irina Sabalenka against Linda Noskova was one of the best matches I've seen this year.

42:58uh I am so wildly excited about the tennis that Noskova plays and just I mean just imagine if she brings that level to one tournament a year for the next decade that is going to be an extraordinary career right and Sabalenka as always I'm so compelled by her Grand Slam main character energy and Elena Rybakina, I really didn't, I know that every player kind of wants to be world number one. Of course, of course you do. But I didn't really think that given everything that kind of goes with that, I didn't think that she would kind of be the kind of person who would really reach for that with kind of a ferocious appetite.

43:46And she really did. And, you know, that was not a throne that Sabalenka vacated with England. and she's gonna want it back and I am just so compelled so captivated so gripped um and so delighted by women's tennis at the moment and it's not even just this season for the last few years really I think it's been extraordinary and how is it that this brilliant product can can somehow be losing money. I'm just very genuinely sort of confused by this. I mean, I've been following women's tennis seriously since about 2009, I would say. And in that time, I've heard over and over again that the product is the problem.

44:41You know, the problem is that women's tennis doesn't have the stars or it doesn't have the rivalries or, you know, the matches are too one-sided or there's too much parity and there aren't kind of dominant stars and I always thought that that argument was kind of bullshit but now I actually know for a fact that the product is not the problem because the product is so good so I don't know I'm left bewildered by this gap between the the kind of phenomenal entertainment that I'm seeing on the court and the way that it's the way that it's apparently valued by the market I don't know can somebody fix this can somebody sort this out that would be great would be great definitely would be great um I share a lot of Hannah's befuddlement at this story in the I mean sort of I do when I don't like obviously I totally agree with everything she said there about the product but I suppose it doesn't surprise me that the quality of the product doesn't have as much impact on the level of interest as it should because you know we still hear attitudes to women so there's still a lot of attitudes to women's sports out there that have absolutely nothing to do with the quality of the product quite the quite the opposite actually like that doesn't shock me at all and that's not to say that you know poor WTA marketing and management isn't partly to blame as well but I think what I'm most confused by about it is like what happens if the WCA goes bankrupt like there doesn't cease to be women's tennis there doesn't cease to be an arena Sabalenka and a Elena Rabachner like I know what happens if a normal commercial company goes bankrupt they cease to exist and the product they're selling comes off the market, what happens if a not-for-profit governing body goes bankrupt?

47:05Like, genuinely, what happens if the forecast scenario in Simon Briggs' piece comes to pass, David? Well, I mean, it's difficult to know exactly what would happen, but they are responsible for creating the sanctions that tournaments buy and staffing those tournaments with umpires and various other people. So you would lose your standard framework. You would lose a lot of the services that the WTA provide. But in any case, I mean, what's happened... But the WTA also provide the prize money, don't they? Are you saying the tournaments would continue to exist? No idea, Catherine, really. I mean, it's never happened since I've been following the sport, so exactly what would happen in the undoing of all that, I don't know.

48:04But in any case, I mean, since Simon's piece went out, and only yesterday the WTA announced their new WTA finals location in Charlotte, which is going to be a three-year-long commitment and that should help for a start. I mean, that is their flagship tournament. I've been in touch with the WTA about Simon's article, WTA Ventures in particular, who look after the sort of commercial side of the operation. And I was sent some words from Valerie Camillo, the uh the the ceo um at the charlotte announcement making this wta finals announcement um in regard to their finances and uh and they said that the wta is managing an important period of transition and strategic investment while taking the decisions necessary to build a stronger and more sustainable organization for the long term because obviously they've they've had this huge investment taken away from the venture capital firm that kind of came in to sort of prop them up really when they pulled out of China and when the whole China investment was removed following the WTA stand over Peng Shui's disappearance a few years ago.

49:36It goes on to say, our plan is clear, operate efficiently, align our cost base with sustainable revenues, invest where we can generate the greatest long-term value, and continue delivering for our players and tournaments. The 2026 financial position has been impacted by the deliberate decision to move the WTO finals. And just to say, you may remember that they were supposed to stay one more year in Riyadh than they've ended up doing. um it should not be extrapolated as the long-term trajectory of the organization so that's where they're differing with the idea that they're i.e if they carry on this path then yes they'd have a they'd have a problem they're saying that long term that isn't going to be the case um the fundamentals of women's tennis are strong and we have a clear pathway forwards with the move of the wta finals to charlotte a key part to that plan.

50:31And I asked for some confirmation that they remain on course for all of their equal prize money goals that they set out in June of 2023. They announced that by 2027, they wanted all the 1000s to be paying equal prize money. And I think it was 2033 that they wanted lower down tournaments that weren't combined uh to to achieve the same and uh and i was told that they remain on track for the 2027 goals they had to make some confirmation soon um but you know that at least is is something they expect to be happening and i believe my understanding is that that is where the majority of the venture capital investment went into the enterprise money into leveling up prize money um i do i do i mean that's generally encouraging that statement that i guess they're not disagreeing with the premise of the article they're just saying we're not going to stay on the the current course which would which would leave to lead to eventual bankruptcy there are you know material material course changes in the uh in the near future that's that's reassuring i do find the um the list of things that are going to change the the original list that you read out both vague and very wide-ranging like that is basically a list that says we're going to change everything about the way the way the business functions um so does feel like it feels like there's a lot going on there um and I guess we'll talk about the the Charlotte the year-end finals Charlotte deal on Monday's show there are there are positives and negatives to that for sure um and i guess we'll get into that on monday but yeah i mean just i don't know matt what do you think i don't really have much to add i would i would put myself in the idiot pile with hannah when it comes to when it comes to the finances of these things so i i thank david for for getting in touch with the WTA there and yeah like I mean I'm encouraged that they they think they're on a different path it just that always just seems to be another thing you know like over the last five years or you think okay they've they've solved this they've pledged this and then something comes along and suddenly you know alarm bells are ringing again so I definitely have quite a lot of concern um but i hope as hannah said i just hope they can figure it out because the one thing that always delivers is is the wta matches and players and tennis side of things it does baffle me that i mean look i assume and i hope that the the money involved the money being pledged as part of this Charlotte deal and the Indian Wells deal this year is obviously really significant.

53:54It has to be really significant, right? But, I mean, the reason the WTA went to Riyadh was for money. You know, okay, there was all sorts of waft about growing the game, whatever, that, you know, we all know that the reason sport is going to that part of the world is money. so if that if that hasn't helped then I don't know maybe Charlotte has more money going for it than Riyadh does or maybe the structure of the whole thing is different I know that in the wording of the press release about Charlotte there's some stuff about the WTA taking control of the whole thing in a way that it sounds like they didn't have in Riyadh that may all be very significant but it does I am left with the sort of feeling of gosh is this going to be that financially different to Saudi Arabia where they were just printing money?

54:51Yeah it worries me and the product deserves better and hopefully it's going to get better in the future.

55:04let's move on now to our next contributor your friend of mine it is Pamela Howard Shriver who we got to spend some wonderful time with particularly at the in the early stages of our New York and Newport trip Pam had a very different US Open this time her first time in a long time not working for ESPN. She'll explain to you in this voice note what she was doing over the course of this tournament. Here is Pam Shriver. Sitting out on my tennis court in Los Angeles, a court that I've loved for the 23 years that I've lived in this house. Got my golden retriever at my feet and just reflecting on the US Open.

55:53I got there the first day of qualifying playing stayed through Wednesday as we were heading towards the final weekend. I have a lot of really strong memories from this U.S. Open. One of the most impactful experiences was calling a men's three-out-of-five-set quarterfinal match on BBC Radio. It was between two Americans, Francis Tiafoe and Alex Mickelson. And obviously the drama that unfolded in the match as Tiafoe, from my home state of Maryland, came from two sets to Love Down and a breakdown, end up winning the match in that crazy day of where three of the four quarterfinals scheduled that day and night went to a match tiebreak.

56:45But to see Tiafoe be able to win that match, see the heartbreak of Mickelson, see the way they embraced and Mickelson cried on the shoulder of Tiafoe. It was just, I'll remember that match forever. I'm also going to remember it because BBC Radio had three women on the call. My colleagues on that match, Katie Smith, Abigail Johnson. And it was really fun. I was doing the analyzing in between. The work of a radio play-by-play person is quite unbelievable, the skill. total respect. But it served as a bit of a contrast to my workplace of 35 years ESPN, where I really felt such a ceiling and an inability to be able to work men's matches very much at all.

57:44It was something I really missed. I missed not really having any kind of an impactful part of the 20 years of the big three, you know, the Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, and, you know, throw in Murray, that whole, just as a female, I was shut out pretty much. So anyway, it's really fun being in a couple of workplaces as I've made a big jump this year and changed a few things up, and I feel very valued and respected in both the workplace of Yonex and the workplace of BBC Radio, and that's a good thing. I also want to reflect on a couple of more accomplishments that occurred during the U.S. Open. Elena Rybakina, wow, to get to number one for the first time with that quarterfinal win.

58:41And to then back it up with such an impressive semifinal win over Coco Gauff and then the way Rybakana performed in the finals against Sabalenka was something else. And, you know, I truly believe the serve is by far the most important shot in tennis. I think it really helps the mindset to know that your serve is firing on all cylinders. And I thought the way Reebok, and after some nervous double faults, right, in that game where she was serving for her first US Open, but the way she emphatically ended it with the ace up the T was something else. I also want to reflect on the men's final. I want to mention someone I competed with on a team tennis team back in the 90s, Brian Shelton.

59:37And to see how he has handled the double job of being a parent and the primary coach of his son, Ben, it's been incredible to watch and to hear his coaching nuggets, to see how he is a parent first and a coach second. Also, shout out to Ben's mom, Lisa, also such a great person. So while he came up one match short of ending the drought, I think much is to be expected. I do know, though, when you get to one singles final and people say, oh, well, bad luck, you didn't win at this time, but you'll be back many more times, you'll win one. From my case, I know it's not always, doesn't always happen.

1:00:28But in the case of Ben, a late blooming, great athlete, as long as he stays healthy and keeps developing his game, I can't wait for his future. And I just want to shout out to Sasha Zverev's mom, because I thought the tribute to her and what a parent goes through when they find out their child has a disorder like type 1 diabetes is it's something else I lived that in March of 2017 when my oldest son George was diagnosed with the same thing it's really hard so is playing the U.S. Open Brilliant stuff from Pam there, as always, of course. Just thinking about the two winners there, obviously, Rabakina and Zverev, and actually some commentary about Elena Rabakina and something that I observed as well, how happy she seemed winning this US Open title, how sort of much she seemed to be really experiencing it.

1:01:47We were recording during her press conference, weren't we? So we weren't in there, but I've seen clips of that. I've obviously seen all the footage of her photo shoot that she's done with the US Open trophy and the world number one trophy. And she just, I don't know, there does seem something a bit different about her. She seems to have a bit more sense of self, a bit more agency, dare I say. I don't know. There's something just slightly more reassuring about her demeanour winning this one than previous successes that she's had. I don't know. I could be projecting or imposing something that's not true, but certainly that's my impression from the outside.

1:02:36yeah i think so i think you know there was there seemed to be genuine joy that she was feeling and experiencing and as you said the press conference but also i saw one or two of the interviews with the broadcasters you know outside and the and the crowd was there and yeah she just seemed to be really relishing that moment which i which i loved for her and I don't know something that I feel like slightly connects Rabatkaner and Zverev is just how at the start of the tournament they felt like such unlikely winners and yet now sitting here it's kind of like yeah it makes sense that Rabatkaner and Zverev have won the US Open like so much can happen in the course of a two week Grand Slam they're really long tournaments And, you know, for Rabatkinner, it was obviously the huge injury concern that she had at the start.

1:03:35And I actually saw a clip of the player's box podcast with Pagula and Keyes. And they were talking about how maybe those injury concerns kind of helped Rabatkinner be a little bit free at the start of the tournament in terms of her mindset. Maybe she did have lower expectations. And we've seen her get tripped up early at slams in the past. but there was none of that this time. And once she got the world number one thing done as well, she then really knuckled down in those last two matches and played great players and stood up to them. And so that was really impressive. But now it feels like, well, yeah, like Rebecca kind of playing her best tennis, she could definitely win the US Open as she did.

1:04:19And then with Zverev, I think the thing is that he came in without much form and he played those two five setters right at the start of the tournament. late into the night and you kind of thought that is going to be so hard to then go on and win the title. He ended up being the first man to win a Grand Slam having two five-setters in his first two matches since Gaston Gaudio in 2004. It's a really hard thing to do. It's just that he's so good at managing his energy levels and tournaments generally and also there was that two or three day period wasn't there where the contenders in his half fell away you know when caballi lost and fritz lost and muzzetti lost like suddenly his door opened up and it was about well can he manage his energy levels and the and the lateness of it all and get through to the final when by then he's probably going to have found some form and and he did that really well so i i just think there's There's a lesson there in that a lot can happen, basically, in a Grand Slam.

1:05:24And what you think is going to happen at the start can suddenly change. And I think Robackina and Zverev are good examples of that, I think. David, how long ago does Zverev's son ago feel? A long, long time ago. That was an exhilarating match. Two points from defeat. i do remember david's a low-key sonico guy that i do like that's what yeah i do i think he's a great early rounds of slam guy to just guarantee you entertainment um and so i i did say i thought that could be good uh i didn't think it'd be as close as it was but the thing that i remember from it now in hindsight more than anything else is very of saying at the end this is what i needed you know and i thought he was saying that to kind of gloss over his lack of form i thought he was trying to protect himself and sort of almost convince himself that that's what he needed and then and then he goes into another fire setter against contan alice and you're thinking well surely this isn't what you needed you know two back-to-back four and a half hour matches finishing at two in the morning but he did play his way into some form in that tournament and i think he's one of the ones who's tough enough and durable enough to still have an energy when it goes later into the tournament after you've had that i think he did get lucky with the number of people that lost in his section of draw um but he can't control that you know he won those really durable exhausting matches and he did end up coming out better for it so you can see you can feel his experience by now and he also kind of managed that jet lag experience of being just on a different time zone to the rest of the tournament for for most of it you know the closest parallel we had to that was Medvedev at the 2024 Australian Open when he did reach the final but it caught up to him in the final and he went those two sets of love up and then it was just just as well not even that slow just kind of death by a thousand cuts watching him fade over the course of that and he said it himself it just all caught up to him um and Zverev was in that very very very similar situation potentially even more extreme um and fought his way out of it it was very impressive um and for more reflections on zverev and on a number of other features of this tournament we turn now to the athletics charlie eccleshare who wasn't in new york we missed him uh we really did miss charlie's company didn't we matt um and yeah we look forward to his uh valiant return in melbourne i'm not sure that's what his wife will be calling it but that's what we'll be calling it Charlie.

1:08:33He was on the same time zone as Vera. Yes, he was. Absolutely. We're going to hear about that now. And he did pop up. He's on paternity leave, but he did pop up and couldn't resist writing a piece about single-handed backhands. Little did he know, Matt, that you could have been included in that piece if it only waited a few more days. That was the rep. Here is The Athletic's Charlie Eccleshare. Hello everyone, it's Charlie Eccleshire here. Well this was a very different Grand Slam for me, because I was watching it at home in London, where I'm currently on paternity leave. But if there's a sequence that sums up my experience of this year's US Open, it's the few hours from just before 5am UK time to just after 8.30am last Wednesday morning.

1:09:18My routine at the moment is to be woken up by my wife at around 4 or 5am to have a few hours with my daughter while she sleeps on me. During the US Open, this worked out quite well at various points, and there were definitely days when I was more receptive to my early wake-up call. The previous night, as it became clear there was a decent chance of getting to watch some of the Ben Shelton-Carlos Alcaraz quarterfinal at this sort of time, I made it clear to my wife that she could basically get me up whenever. I was perhaps less effusive with that offer on some of the Alex Verov second-on-Ash nights.

1:09:45Anyway, when I got up, the first set was just finishing, and I then had a couple of hours watching just me and my daughter. Around 7am, my sons woke up and came down to watch with us. And this was one of the elements of the tournament that was very different from normal. It occurred to me that I never get to watch Grand Slam tennis with my family, which was how I got into the sport when I was a child. And so it was nice to share some of this with them. I felt a disproportionate amount of pride when they would pop up with a bit of tennis knowledge. Head of the final, for example, the older one commented that Zverev had won the first set of the Wimbledon final.

1:10:14The younger one, who's about to turn four, asked some pertinent questions. When we watched highlights of the Williams sisters and they were storming back into the match, she asked, why is the good team such a good team? There was a great New Yorker cartoon a few years ago with a woman saying to her friend, as a Father's Day gift, I'm going to let Dad explain a Bruce Springsteen song to me. I'm sure there was an element of that going on here with my kids. The boys indulged me as I talked about America's long wait for a male Grand Slam champion, and they learned the word VAMOS as we watched Alcaraz and Shelton heading towards a fifth set.

1:10:43I don't know how much they'll remember this, but as a parent with young kids, you constantly think about how you can model good behaviours and set a positive example. And so watching Alcaraz, I couldn't help but think, not so much for them, but for me, God, wouldn't it be great to be a bit more like that? I don't mean the talent. I feel that shit may just about have sailed, but the way he deals with setbacks and always tries to stay positive and upbeat. Now, obviously, it's a hell of a lot easier to be humble and gracious when you're incredibly good at something. A sort of virtuous cycle develops when you don't need to self-aggrandize because your gifts are so obvious.

1:11:12And as a result, you become even more likeable. And the same is true the other way. It's where if he may feel he kind of needs to advocate for himself in relation to Sina and Alcaraz, because realistically, no one else is going to. But even so, how tempting it must have been for Alcaraz to rail at how unfair it was that without his injury and absence from the tour, it could have been him in the semis, not Shelton. How tempting it must have been to make the world aware just how much he was being affected by his long layoff. To do none of that and be nothing but generous in defeat was the kind of example most of us try to set, but probably fail most of the time.

1:11:43the boys were too busy wrestling each other by this point to really notice any of this and the baby slept through the whole thing but i thought it was pretty cool and i'm looking forward to being able to see this kind of stuff firsthand again in melbourne and beyond i also had the thought while appreciating the rarity of watching grand slam tennis with family how lucky i am to have such a great crew to share it with when i am away that communal aspect really is such a big part of what makes sports so special and what got many of us into it in the first place i loved being able to listen to Mary commentating on that Shelton Alcaraz match and then dive into the reactions on the pod and on The Athletic and from colleagues elsewhere.

1:12:15I love being able to chat to you all and with family and friends about everything that was going on. The results of these events do really matter but for most of us so much of it comes down to the experience of sharing it with people close to us, whether that's on Ash in the media seats, via social media or on a sofa in Walthamstow with the sun coming up. that was so nice from charlie really really beautifully put in a great little window onto what his what his world's been like for the for the past two and a half weeks and um yeah we did miss charlie but um yeah we're looking forward to having him back yeah yeah we we really did miss charlie he's always he's always great company and we enjoy our chats with him so much he sees the sport I think like like we do and it's it's such a good point about how the people you experience these matches with for me they form some of the memories that last the longest in a way like Shelton Elkraz was absolutely thrilling and yet I can remember about I don't know four points from it but I can also remember Matt Futterman singing along to Sweet Caroline sitting next to me very very vividly and I can remember doing the pod with David at 5am very vividly it's it's it is those communal experiences that that you have that I think make the make the event feel bigger and more special in a way and yeah I think Charlie's put that really beautifully was it was Was it DJ Triz that night?

1:13:54I think it was. I think that's why Futterman was so into it. Matt Futterman is so into one of the DJs that they have in the rotation on Ash, and it is DJ Triz. I still haven't really figured out why he's so different to all the others. I don't think I would notice it without Matt pointing it out, but I do think his song choices are the best. Okay. Yeah, he gets vibe, Triz. Right. He's like Billie Jean. He knows what's required in the moment. And yeah, what Charlie was saying about Alcaraz and parenting and sort of modelling good behaviour, it made me think of that image of Carlos Alcaraz in the corridor coming off court at 3.35 in the morning, just grinning.

1:14:45grinning because he knew he was back and because he'd been a part of something that made him feel alive and what else is there that was such a powerful sporting image for me there were a lot of those in this tournament sort of snapshots there was Mickelson crying on TFO's shoulder that'll really really live with me there was just incandescent Sabalenka sat in her coaching box all of them afraid to talk to her or even to look at her and her shoving the camera away um but I think the single most powerful one for me is Alcaraz grinning his way down that corridor, David? Yeah, I mean, I share Charlie's thoughts on the parenting side of things.

1:15:40And, you know, I'm a lot further along with it. But I'm often using various sporting people that my son admires because of their incredible goals or shots or celebrations to also try to point out the good behavior or at least um admirable behavior of people who are good sports and you know fair and and all those sort of things you know look no further than carlos alcaraz but he's not an alcaraz guy david so what's gone what's gone wrong parenting wise there yeah i have to use somebody else as an example because if i I've pointed out that it's Carlos Alcaraz who's done something good. He'll be like, oh, I hate Alcaraz.

1:16:27He'll come around, David. He is an Art of Feast guy, though, right? Yeah, yeah. Yeah, he is. And Cabali? Yeah, he quite likes Cabali, yeah. Yeah. How does he feel about Hodder? Don't think he's into Hodder. Okay. Have you seen the one Carlos Ferraro interview that's doing the rounds? I heard that he wants to coach again. He's back. No, he said that he is coaching again. He said, I'm going to be back. It's all signed and sealed. Watch this space. And now everybody is speculating about who it's going to be with. And surely the most obvious answer is Khodar, right? Is that where your mind went, Matt?

1:17:16I've seen three names. I've seen Hodda, I've seen Fonseca and I've seen Sinner. Yeah, I've seen Sinner a lot too and I just, I can't. I know Ferreiro said he would be up for coaching Sinner, but I just, it would be too much drama and I just don't think Sinner's into drama, you know? But it does follow him around, doesn't it? Like drama. He's had a more dramatic career than him instigating it. I could see Fonseca, but I mean, Hodder just has his dad, right? And he has indicated that he will be looking to expand, but presumably his whole team. He needs an agent. He needs a fitness guy. He needs an everything.

1:18:06And obviously they're both Spanish. It seems like the most obvious one to me, but... as you said david van colos ferrero is a talker that was your best ever take

1:18:26even i've been taken a little bit of back by quite any further thoughts on this us open before we close out with you know who I think the only thing that comes to mind thinking about Alcaraz is what percent of back do we think we had Carlos Alcaraz there? Because there was the Tommy Paul match where I thought, OK, he's 100 % back. And then the Shelton match happened. And I think we saw what David had been forecasting, really, which was that, OK, he's back, but he hasn't felt pressure yet. And I think he felt that pressure from Shelton and there was a dip and he couldn't quite get over the line.

1:19:19And it felt like he had two sets off in that match, basically, and yet still managed to take it to 7-6 in the fifth and almost beat the guy who almost won the US Open. I just think it all bodes really well for Carlos Alcarez going forward. As soon as he experiences more of that pressure, he gets used to the tour again. It feels like we're going to be OK with Carlos Alcarez. And I think we went into this tournament a little bit worried about what the risk would look like and feel like. So I think we come out of it feeling good about Carlos Alcarez's return. Certainly I do. Massively. I mean, it wasn't that long ago that, David, you were, you know, quite rightly kind of the voice of caution and reason about Alcaraz, which was, you know, yes, it's exciting to see him back, but let's see what it is that we're seeing back.

1:20:14Like, he might never be able to play like he did before. Like, we just don't know until we see him. We shouldn't take for granted how positive a picture we're seeing of comeback Alcaraz. And I think the thing is he's more back now than we saw during that Shelton match because that Shelton match will have done in the world of good. There is stuff that you just can't replicate and it's the tension. You can play for five hours in practice and be fit enough to play for five hours but then introduce stress and tension into it and it's a completely different situation for your body and there's just no way of replicating that other than doing it.

1:20:58So I think the fact that he's done it will put him in a better situation now than he was then. There's obviously the question marks around the serve. I think the serve does need to improve. On the basis of how positive everything else is, I do think it will. I think it will come back. but that is that is the one area of unknown I would say yeah I those are the two things for me as well I think you've highlighted them perfectly I think where I come down on it is that I am far more reassured now than I was before this tournament because I didn't see any ill effects really of the injury I saw rust I saw a lack of stamina and uh and yeah maybe the only way I you could tell that maybe the wrist might still be an issue is with the serve maybe that maybe it is or maybe it's just being careful but he did look like Carlos Harker as again and very quickly so um so to me it was really a pretty enormous success as a comeback i know he didn't win the thing but i would have i i mean that's the one prediction in the entire fortnight that i got right it was that he wouldn't win the thing until i started to get carried away and think oh he's too good for everybody um but i do think when we get into next year as long as he doesn't suffer any setbacks I think he can be right back where he was and we're hearing that Anik Sinner's back in training uh returned to training on Monday I believe so nature is healing nature is healing yeah hopefully we're um we're in a good place for for the rest of the season and the potential for it to be I don't want to jinx it here but the only sustained portion of the season when we've had Sinner and Alcaraz playing together makes, I sometimes find this part of the season quite hard because the stakes feel low and because everything's happening in the morning UK time, which is when I'm at my least functional and my appetite for watching sport is the lowest.

1:23:17But yeah, the prospect of, oh, right, we get to see Sinner and Alcaraz playing in the same tournament potentially on a collision course in the final is an added dash of interest for sure yes i saw that alcaraz had qualified for the atp finals and i was thinking wow he's barely played but of course like he won the slam and that and that like protects you and virtually guarantees that you'll get in these days and yeah i agree i think that is a compelling storyline for the end of the season on the ATP side. And the WTA side, like the race for the finals is well and truly on. I think there's a lot to be gripped by.

1:24:01Who will we see? How many players are playing well? Who will we see on a nightmare tour this year? That is the exciting question that will be answered over the course of the next few weeks of tennis podcasts. Could be a few. Could be a few this time, I think. Buckle up, everyone. Okay, folks, that is almost it for this US Open review show, except there is one very important bit of business to come. It is the way we always like to play out these shows. The rule is nobody follows Mary Carrillo. It is as true now as it ever has been. we're not going to put ourselves in a Mirka and Roger Federer situation who both did a very good job I think of having to follow Mary Carrillo but why would we do that to ourselves absolutely Matt well said here is Mary and if you enjoyed a little glimpse into the Charlie Eccleshare family life this is almost kind of part two of the story that Charlie began thank you all for listening thank you all for being friends of the tennis podcast you are tremendously important to us this community is tremendously important to us and we love making these shows for you so without further ado here is the newest member of the international tennis hall of fame mary carillo charlie eccleshare sports writer for the athletic and friend of the pod had to skip this year's u.s open for the best of reasons he and his wife have co-authored another beautiful Eccleshire, baby Nora, to go along with Frankie and Zephy.

1:25:42I miss you, Charlie, and I've missed my three grandchildren by being here in New York. Although the four-year-old Neela said to me, I saw you on television, but I didn't listen to you. Yeah, she is the most unintentionally funny child I've ever known. Once when my daughter told Neela she had to snap out of a long slog of a bad mood that she was in. Neela replied, it's easier to stay mad. Amen, sister girl. She's a little like her grandfather, my former husband, who once explained to me, Mayor, I know you're funny. I just don't think you're funny. That's the funniest thing he ever said. I love Bill, and as always, we texted throughout the tournament.

1:26:23And as always, he knew just what he was looking at. As parents, and again now as grandparents, we've decided there's a lot to learn from the open about character, about stuff Neela is supposed to be learning in kindergarten. Like this, no throwing. Arena, stop breaking shit. All too often, you show such high self-regard and such low behavior. Elena Rabacchino was better than you were. Tennis isn't all about you. Smashing your racket, it's the act of an angry toddler. Next, no cursing. You chuckle fucks have got to stop that. Next, get enough sleep. This is a reminder to players, to fans, and especially the people running the tournament.

1:27:10Guys, take a nap, then figure this out. Stop advertising U.S. Open night matches that too often become morning matches. Enough with this breakfast tennis. We all need sleep. Next, be on time. Mr. Zverev, I'm looking right at you. Respect the clock, respect your opponents and the fans. Enough with the bouncing, enough with the overlong changeovers. Life is too short. Next, share with others, like Francis Tiafoe did, when after five long sets against Alex Mickelson, who really had his chances to win. Francis cut short his own happiness to wrap Alex in a fierce hug at the net. That's the most indelible image I'm going to carry away from the open.

1:28:00Francis knows how to share. Next, try as hard as you can. Time and again, we were shown comebacks come and big leads go. Breathtaking, heartbreaking, but they gave everything they had. And that's what counts. Kids, you should feel good knowing you tried so hard, even if you don't win. That's what Carlos Alcaraz knows better than anyone. There are so many more lessons, and I welcome you to add to this list. I look at these players, and more than ever, I realize it's a very lonely way to grow up, surrounded by so much pressure and so many grown-ups. Frankie and Zephy and baby Nora, you've got good grown-ups.

1:28:44Watch, and unlike Neela, listen to them. You'll be good kids, and you'll be good grown-ups.

From the publisher

Catherine, David and Matt have been home from New York for 48 hours meaning it's time to reflect some more on the 2026 US Open, with the help of voice notes from Simon Briggs, Matt Futterman, Ava Wallace, Hannah Wilks, Pam Shriver, Charlie Eccleshare and Mary Carillo.

There's chat about the "influencer-fication" of the tournament, the WTA's off court financial problems contrasting with its on court excellence, Elena Rybakina and Alexander Zverev's routes to becoming champions, the return of Carlos Alcaraz, and why this felt like a particularly chaotic edition of the US Open.

More from Friends of The Tennis Podcast

All 222 episodes
BONUS - US Open 2026 ReviewFriends of The Tennis Podcast · 1 h 29 min
Listen in VO